1
|
Warren TL, Tubbs JD, Lesh TA, Corona MB, Pakzad SS, Albuquerque MD, Singh P, Zarubin V, Morse SJ, Sham PC, Carter CS, Nord AS. Association of neurotransmitter pathway polygenic risk with specific symptom profiles in psychosis. Mol Psychiatry 2024; 29:2389-2398. [PMID: 38491343 PMCID: PMC11412910 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02457-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
A primary goal of psychiatry is to better understand the pathways that link genetic risk to psychiatric symptoms. Here, we tested association of diagnosis and endophenotypes with overall and neurotransmitter pathway-specific polygenic risk in patients with early-stage psychosis. Subjects included 205 demographically diverse cases with a psychotic disorder who underwent comprehensive psychiatric and neurological phenotyping and 115 matched controls. Following genotyping, we calculated polygenic scores (PGSs) for schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BP) using Psychiatric Genomics Consortium GWAS summary statistics. To test if overall genetic risk can be partitioned into affected neurotransmitter pathways, we calculated pathway PGSs (pPGSs) for SZ risk affecting each of four major neurotransmitter systems: glutamate, GABA, dopamine, and serotonin. Psychosis subjects had elevated SZ PGS versus controls; cases with SZ or BP diagnoses had stronger SZ or BP risk, respectively. There was no significant association within psychosis cases between individual symptom measures and overall PGS. However, neurotransmitter-specific pPGSs were moderately associated with specific endophenotypes; notably, glutamate was associated with SZ diagnosis and with deficits in cognitive control during task-based fMRI, while dopamine was associated with global functioning. Finally, unbiased endophenotype-driven clustering identified three diagnostically mixed case groups that separated on primary deficits of positive symptoms, negative symptoms, global functioning, and cognitive control. All clusters showed strong genome-wide risk. Cluster 2, characterized by deficits in cognitive control and negative symptoms, additionally showed specific risk concentrated in glutamatergic and GABAergic pathways. Due to the intensive characterization of our subjects, the present study was limited to a relatively small cohort. As such, results should be followed up with additional research at the population and mechanism level. Our study suggests pathway-based PGS analysis may be a powerful path forward to study genetic mechanisms driving psychiatric endophenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy L Warren
- Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Justin D Tubbs
- Department of Psychiatry, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Tyler A Lesh
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Mylena B Corona
- Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Sarvenaz S Pakzad
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Marina D Albuquerque
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Praveena Singh
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Vanessa Zarubin
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Sarah J Morse
- Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Pak Chung Sham
- Department of Psychiatry, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR.
- Centre for PanorOmic Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR.
- State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR.
| | - Cameron S Carter
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
| | - Alex S Nord
- Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tota M, Karska J, Kowalski S, Piątek N, Pszczołowska M, Mazur K, Piotrowski P. Environmental pollution and extreme weather conditions: insights into the effect on mental health. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1389051. [PMID: 38863619 PMCID: PMC11165707 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1389051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Environmental pollution exposures, including air, soil, water, light, and noise pollution, are critical issues that may implicate adverse mental health outcomes. Extreme weather conditions, such as hurricanes, floods, wildfires, and droughts, may also cause long-term severe concerns. However, the knowledge about possible psychiatric disorders associated with these exposures is currently not well disseminated. In this review, we aim to summarize the current knowledge on the impact of environmental pollution and extreme weather conditions on mental health, focusing on anxiety spectrum disorders, autism spectrum disorders, schizophrenia, and depression. In air pollution studies, increased concentrations of PM2.5, NO2, and SO2 were the most strongly associated with the exacerbation of anxiety, schizophrenia, and depression symptoms. We provide an overview of the suggested underlying pathomechanisms involved. We highlight that the pathogenesis of environmental pollution-related diseases is multifactorial, including increased oxidative stress, systematic inflammation, disruption of the blood-brain barrier, and epigenetic dysregulation. Light pollution and noise pollution were correlated with an increased risk of neurodegenerative disorders, particularly Alzheimer's disease. Moreover, the impact of soil and water pollution is discussed. Such compounds as crude oil, heavy metals, natural gas, agro-chemicals (pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers), polycyclic or polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), solvents, lead (Pb), and asbestos were associated with detrimental impact on mental health. Extreme weather conditions were linked to depression and anxiety spectrum disorders, namely PTSD. Several policy recommendations and awareness campaigns should be implemented, advocating for the advancement of high-quality urbanization, the mitigation of environmental pollution, and, consequently, the enhancement of residents' mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Tota
- Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Julia Karska
- Department of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Szymon Kowalski
- Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Natalia Piątek
- Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | - Katarzyna Mazur
- Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Patryk Piotrowski
- Department of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Warren TL, Tubbs JD, Lesh TA, Corona MB, Pakzad S, Albuquerque M, Singh P, Zarubin V, Morse S, Sham PC, Carter CS, Nord AS. Association of neurotransmitter pathway polygenic risk with specific symptom profiles in psychosis. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.05.24.23290465. [PMID: 37292649 PMCID: PMC10246134 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.24.23290465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
A primary goal of psychiatry is to better understand the pathways that link genetic risk to psychiatric symptoms. Here, we tested association of diagnosis and endophenotypes with overall and neurotransmitter pathway-specific polygenic risk in patients with early-stage psychosis. Subjects included 206 demographically diverse cases with a psychotic disorder who underwent comprehensive psychiatric and neurological phenotyping and 115 matched controls. Following genotyping, we calculated polygenic scores (PGSs) for schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BP) using Psychiatric Genomics Consortium GWAS summary statistics. To test if overall genetic risk can be partitioned into affected neurotransmitter pathways, we calculated pathway PGSs (pPGSs) for SZ risk affecting each of four major neurotransmitter systems: glutamate, GABA, dopamine, and serotonin. Psychosis subjects had elevated SZ PGS versus controls; cases with SZ or BP diagnoses had stronger SZ or BP risk, respectively. There was no significant association within psychosis cases between individual symptom measures and overall PGS. However, neurotransmitter-specific pPGSs were moderately associated with specific endophenotypes; notably, glutamate was associated with SZ diagnosis and with deficits in cognitive control during task-based fMRI, while dopamine was associated with global functioning. Finally, unbiased endophenotype-driven clustering identified three diagnostically mixed case groups that separated on primary deficits of positive symptoms, negative symptoms, global functioning, and cognitive control. All clusters showed strong genome-wide risk. Cluster 2, characterized by deficits in cognitive control and negative symptoms, additionally showed specific risk concentrated in glutamatergic and GABAergic pathways. Due to the intensive characterization of our subjects, the present study was limited to a relatively small cohort. As such, results should be followed up with additional research at the population and mechanism level. Our study suggests pathway-based PGS analysis may be a powerful path forward to study genetic mechanisms driving psychiatric endophenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Justin D. Tubbs
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Pak Chung Sham
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong
- Centre for PanorOmic Sciences, The University of Hong Kong
- State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Georgiades A, Almuqrin A, Rubinic P, Mouhitzadeh K, Tognin S, Mechelli A. Psychosocial stress, interpersonal sensitivity, and social withdrawal in clinical high risk for psychosis: a systematic review. SCHIZOPHRENIA (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 9:38. [PMID: 37330526 DOI: 10.1038/s41537-023-00362-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Stress has repeatedly been implicated in the onset and exacerbation of positive symptoms of psychosis. Increasing interest is growing for the role of psychosocial stress in the development of psychosis symptoms in individuals at Clinical High Risk (CHR) for psychosis. A systematic review was therefore conducted to summarize the existing evidence base regarding psychosocial stress, interpersonal sensitivity, and social withdrawal in individuals at CHR for psychosis. An electronic search of Ovid (PsychINFO, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and GLOBAL HEALTH) was conducted until February 2022. Studies that examined psychosocial stress in CHR were included. Twenty-nine studies were eligible for inclusion. Psychosocial stress, interpersonal sensitivity, and social withdrawal were higher in CHR individuals compared to healthy controls and there was some evidence of their association with positive symptoms of psychosis. Two types of psychosocial stressors were found to occur more frequently with CHR status, namely daily stressors, and early and recent trauma, while significant life events did not appear to be significant. Greater exposure to psychosocial stress, emotional abuse, and perceived discrimination significantly increased risk of transition to psychosis in CHR. No studies examined the role of interpersonal sensitivity on transition to psychosis in CHR. This systematic review provides evidence for the association of trauma, daily stressors, social withdrawal, and interpersonal sensitivity with CHR status. Further studies investigating the impact of psychosocial stress on psychosis symptom expression in individuals at CHR and its effects on transition to psychosis are therefore warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Georgiades
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
- Brent Early Intervention Service, CNWL, NHS Foundation Trust, 27-29 Fairlight Avenue, London, NW10 8AL, UK.
| | - A Almuqrin
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK
| | - P Rubinic
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK
| | - K Mouhitzadeh
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK
| | - S Tognin
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK
| | - A Mechelli
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Riley M. Critical review of the evidence base regarding theories conceptualising the aetiology of psychosis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 29:1030-1037. [PMID: 32972234 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.17.1030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
A critical review of literature related to the aetiology of psychosis was conducted with specific emphasis on genetics. It was found that, although many published articles were retrieved via database searches, the format of the information was disparate in presentation leading to unnecessary inconsistences. This suggests the need for insightful collaboration by authors and standardisation of published articles to prevent academic and specialism barriers remaining as a discouragement to non-specialists wishing to access this information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miv Riley
- Senior Care Co-ordinator, Early Intervention Service (Psychosis), Lancashire Care Foundation Trust and Manchester University
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mittal VA, Ellman LM, Strauss GP, Walker EF, Corlett PR, Schiffman J, Woods SW, Powers AR, Silverstein SM, Waltz JA, Zinbarg R, Chen S, Williams T, Kenney J, Gold JM. Computerized Assessment of Psychosis Risk. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BRAIN SCIENCE 2021; 6:e210011. [PMID: 34307899 PMCID: PMC8302046 DOI: 10.20900/jpbs.20210011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Early detection and intervention with young people at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis is critical for prevention efforts focused on altering the trajectory of psychosis. Early CHR research largely focused on validating clinical interviews for detecting at-risk individuals; however, this approach has limitations related to: (1) specificity (i.e., only 20% of CHR individuals convert to psychosis) and (2) the expertise and training needed to administer these interviews is limited. The purpose of our study is to develop the computerized assessment of psychosis risk (CAPR) battery, consisting of behavioral tasks that require minimal training to administer, can be administered online, and are tied to the neurobiological systems and computational mechanisms implicated in psychosis. The aims of our study are as follows: (1A) to develop a psychosis-risk calculator through the application of machine learning (ML) methods to the measures from the CAPR battery, (1B) evaluate group differences on the risk calculator score and test the hypothesis that the risk calculator score of the CHR group will differ from help-seeking and healthy controls, (1C) evaluate how baseline CAPR battery performance relates to symptomatic outcome two years later (i.e., conversion and symptomatic worsening). These aims will be explored in 500 CHR participants, 500 help-seeking individuals, and 500 healthy controls across the study sites. This project will provide a next-generation CHR battery, tied to illness mechanisms and powered by cutting-edge computational methods that can be used to facilitate the earliest possible detection of psychosis risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay A. Mittal
- Institutes for Policy Research (IPR) and Innovations in Developmental Sciences (DevSci), Departments of Psychology, Psychiatry, Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
| | - Lauren M. Ellman
- Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
| | - Gregory P. Strauss
- Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - Elaine F. Walker
- Department of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | | | - Jason Schiffman
- Department of Psychological Science, 4201 Social and Behavioral Sciences Gateway, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
| | - Scott W. Woods
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06519, USA
| | - Albert R. Powers
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06519, USA
| | - Steven M. Silverstein
- Center for Visual Science, Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience and Ophthalmology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
| | - James A. Waltz
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21228, USA
| | - Richard Zinbarg
- Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
- The Family Institute at Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
| | - Shuo Chen
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21228, USA
| | - Trevor Williams
- Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
| | - Joshua Kenney
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06519, USA
| | - James M. Gold
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21228, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu W, Zhang X, Qiao Y, Cai Y, Yin H, Zheng M, Zhu Y, Wang H. Functional Connectivity Combined With a Machine Learning Algorithm Can Classify High-Risk First-Degree Relatives of Patients With Schizophrenia and Identify Correlates of Cognitive Impairments. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:577568. [PMID: 33324147 PMCID: PMC7725002 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.577568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Schizophrenia (SCZ) is an inherited disease, with the familial risk being among the most important factors when evaluating an individual's risk for SCZ. However, robust imaging biomarkers for the disease that can be used for diagnosis and determination of the prognosis are lacking. Here, we explore the potential of functional connectivity (FC) for use as a biomarker for the early detection of high-risk first-degree relatives (FDRs). Thirty-eight first-episode SCZ patients, 38 healthy controls (HCs), and 33 FDRs were scanned using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. The subjects' brains were parcellated into 200 regions using the Craddock atlas, and the FC between each pair of regions was used as a classification feature. Multivariate pattern analysis using leave-one-out cross-validation achieved a correct classification rate of 88.15% [sensitivity 84.06%, specificity 92.18%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.93] for differentiating SCZ patients from HCs. FC located within the default mode, frontal-parietal, auditory, and sensorimotor networks contributed mostly to the accurate classification. The FC patterns of each FDR were input into each classification model as test data to obtain a corresponding prediction label (a total of 76 individual classification scores), and the averaged individual classification score was then used as a robust measure to characterize whether each FDR showed an SCZ-type or HC-type FC pattern. A significant negative correlation was found between the average classification scores of the FDRs and their semantic fluency scores. These findings suggest that FC combined with a machine learning algorithm could help to predict whether FDRs are likely to show an SCZ-specific or HC-specific FC pattern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenming Liu
- Department of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Xiao Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Yuting Qiao
- Department of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Yanhui Cai
- Department of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Hong Yin
- Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Minwen Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Yuanqiang Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Huaning Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bigdeli TB, Fanous AH, Li Y, Rajeevan N, Sayward F, Genovese G, Gupta R, Radhakrishnan K, Malhotra AK, Sun N, Lu Q, Hu Y, Li B, Chen Q, Mane S, Miller P, Cheung KH, Gur RE, Greenwood TA, Braff DL, Achtyes ED, Buckley PF, Escamilla MA, Lehrer D, Malaspina DP, McCarroll SA, Rapaport MH, Vawter MP, Pato MT, Pato CN, Zhao H, Kosten TR, Brophy M, Pyarajan S, Shi Y, O’Leary TJ, Gleason T, Przygodzki R, Muralidhar S, Gaziano JM, Huang GD, Concato J, Siever LJ, Aslan M, Harvey PD. Genome-Wide Association Studies of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder in a Diverse Cohort of US Veterans. Schizophr Bull 2020; 47:517-529. [PMID: 33169155 PMCID: PMC7965063 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Schizophrenia (SCZ) and bipolar disorder (BIP) are debilitating neuropsychiatric disorders, collectively affecting 2% of the world's population. Recognizing the major impact of these psychiatric disorders on the psychosocial function of more than 200 000 US Veterans, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) recently completed genotyping of more than 8000 veterans with SCZ and BIP in the Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) #572. METHODS We performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in CSP #572 and benchmarked the predictive value of polygenic risk scores (PRS) constructed from published findings. We combined our results with available summary statistics from several recent GWAS, realizing the largest and most diverse studies of these disorders to date. RESULTS Our primary GWAS uncovered new associations between CHD7 variants and SCZ, and novel BIP associations with variants in Sortilin Related VPS10 Domain Containing Receptor 3 (SORCS3) and downstream of PCDH11X. Combining our results with published summary statistics for SCZ yielded 39 novel susceptibility loci including CRHR1, and we identified 10 additional findings for BIP (28 326 cases and 90 570 controls). PRS trained on published GWAS were significantly associated with case-control status among European American (P < 10-30) and African American (P < .0005) participants in CSP #572. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated that published findings for SCZ and BIP are robustly generalizable to a diverse cohort of US veterans. Leveraging available summary statistics from GWAS of global populations, we report 52 new susceptibility loci and improved fine-mapping resolution for dozens of previously reported associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim B Bigdeli
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Ayman H Fanous
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Yuli Li
- Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Epidemiology Research Center (CSP-CERC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT,Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Nallakkandi Rajeevan
- Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Epidemiology Research Center (CSP-CERC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT,Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Frederick Sayward
- Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Epidemiology Research Center (CSP-CERC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT,Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Giulio Genovese
- Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA,Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rishab Gupta
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Krishnan Radhakrishnan
- Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Epidemiology Research Center (CSP-CERC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT,College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - Anil K Malhotra
- Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY,Division of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY,Department of Psychiatry, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY
| | - Ning Sun
- Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Epidemiology Research Center (CSP-CERC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT,Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Qiongshi Lu
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT,Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Yiming Hu
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Boyang Li
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Quan Chen
- Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Epidemiology Research Center (CSP-CERC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT,Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Shrikant Mane
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Perry Miller
- Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Epidemiology Research Center (CSP-CERC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT,Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Kei-Hoi Cheung
- Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Epidemiology Research Center (CSP-CERC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT,Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Raquel E Gur
- Departments of Psychiatry and Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Lifespan Brain Institute, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - David L Braff
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA,VISN-22 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Eric D Achtyes
- Cherry Health and Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - Peter F Buckley
- School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Michael A Escamilla
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Harlingen, TX
| | - Douglas Lehrer
- Department of Psychiatry, Wright State University, Dayton, OH
| | - Dolores P Malaspina
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Steven A McCarroll
- Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA,Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mark H Rapaport
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Marquis P Vawter
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA
| | - Michele T Pato
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Carlos N Pato
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
| | | | - Hongyu Zhao
- Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Epidemiology Research Center (CSP-CERC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT,Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Thomas R Kosten
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, Pharmacology, and Immunology and Rheumatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Mary Brophy
- Massachusetts Area Veterans Epidemiology, Research, and Information Center (MAVERIC), Jamaica Plain, MA,Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Saiju Pyarajan
- Massachusetts Area Veterans Epidemiology, Research, and Information Center (MAVERIC), Jamaica Plain, MA
| | - Yunling Shi
- Massachusetts Area Veterans Epidemiology, Research, and Information Center (MAVERIC), Jamaica Plain, MA
| | - Timothy J O’Leary
- Office of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - Theresa Gleason
- Office of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - Ronald Przygodzki
- Office of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - Sumitra Muralidhar
- Office of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - J Michael Gaziano
- Massachusetts Area Veterans Epidemiology, Research, and Information Center (MAVERIC), Jamaica Plain, MA,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Grant D Huang
- Office of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - John Concato
- Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Epidemiology Research Center (CSP-CERC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT,Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Larry J Siever
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY,University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Mihaela Aslan
- Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Epidemiology Research Center (CSP-CERC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT,Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Philip D Harvey
- Research Service Bruce W. Carter VA Medical Center, Miami, FL,Department of Psychiatry, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL,To whom correspondence should be addressed; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Suite 1450 Miami, FL 33136, USA; tel: (305)-243-4094, fax: (305)-243-1619, e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gold JM, Corlett PR, Strauss GP, Schiffman J, Ellman LM, Walker EF, Powers AR, Woods SW, Waltz JA, Silverstein SM, Mittal VA. Enhancing Psychosis Risk Prediction Through Computational Cognitive Neuroscience. Schizophr Bull 2020; 46:1346-1352. [PMID: 32648913 PMCID: PMC7707066 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Research suggests that early identification and intervention with individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis may be able to improve the course of illness. The first generation of studies suggested that the identification of CHR through the use of specialized interviews evaluating attenuated psychosis symptoms is a promising strategy for exploring mechanisms associated with illness progression, etiology, and identifying new treatment targets. The next generation of research on psychosis risk must address two major limitations: (1) interview methods have limited specificity, as recent estimates indicate that only 15%-30% of individuals identified as CHR convert to psychosis and (2) the expertise needed to make CHR diagnosis is only accessible in a handful of academic centers. Here, we introduce a new approach to CHR assessment that has the potential to increase accessibility and positive predictive value. Recent advances in clinical and computational cognitive neuroscience have generated new behavioral measures that assay the cognitive mechanisms and neural systems that underlie the positive, negative, and disorganization symptoms that are characteristic of psychotic disorders. We hypothesize that measures tied to symptom generation will lead to enhanced sensitivity and specificity relative to interview methods and the cognitive intermediate phenotype measures that have been studied to date that are typically indicators of trait vulnerability and, therefore, have a high false positive rate for conversion to psychosis. These new behavioral measures have the potential to be implemented on the internet and at minimal expense, thereby increasing accessibility of assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Gold
- Department of Psychiatry and Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,To whom correspondence should be addressed; Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, PO Box 21247, Baltimore, MD 21228; tel: +1-410-402-7871, fax: +1-410-401-7198, e-mail:
| | - Philip R Corlett
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | - Lauren M Ellman
- Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Albert R Powers
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Scott W Woods
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - James A Waltz
- Department of Psychiatry and Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Steven M Silverstein
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, and Ophthalmology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Vijay A Mittal
- Departments of Psychology, Psychiatry, Medical Social Sciences, Institutes for Policy Research (IPR) and Innovations in Developmental Sciences (DevSci), Evanston and Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu L, Wen Y, Ning Y, Li P, Cheng B, Cheng S, Zhang L, Ma M, Qi X, Liang C, Yang T, Chen X, Tan L, Shen H, Tian Q, Deng HW, Ma X, Zhang F, Zhu F. A trans-ethnic two-stage polygenetic scoring analysis detects genetic correlation between osteoporosis and schizophrenia. Clin Transl Med 2020; 9:21. [PMID: 32107650 PMCID: PMC7046891 DOI: 10.1186/s40169-020-00272-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS To explore the genetic correlation between schizophrenia (SCZ) and osteoporosis (OP). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, MEASUREMENTS We conducted a trans-ethnic two-stage genetic correlation analysis of OP and SCZ, totally invoking 2286 Caucasia subjects in discovery stage and 4124 Chinese subjects in replication stage. The bone mineral density (BMD) and bone area values of ulna & radius, hip and spine were measured using Hologic 4500W dual energy X-ray absorptiometry machine. SCZ was diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria. For the genome-wide association study (GWAS) of Caucasian OP, Chinese OP and Chinese SCZ, SNP genotyping was performed using Affymetrix SNP 6.0 array. For the GWAS of Caucasian SCZ, SNP genotyping was conducted using the Affymetrix 5.0 array, Affymetrix 6.0 array and Illumina 550 K array. Polygenetic risk scoring (PRS) analysis was conducted by PRSice software. Also, Linkage disequilibrium score regression (LD Score regression) analysis was performed to evaluate the genetic correlation between OP and SCZ. Multi-trait analysis of GWAS (MTAG) was performed to detect novel candidate genes for osteoporosis and SCZ. RESULTS In the Caucasia discovery samples, significant genetic correlations were observed for ulna & radius BMD vs. SCZ (P value = 0.010), ulna & radius area vs. SCZ (P value = 0.031). In the Chinese replication samples, we observed significant correlation for ulna & radius area vs. SCZ (P value = 0.019). In addition, LD Score regression also identified significant genetic correlations between SCZ and bone phenotypes in Caucasian and Chinese sample respectively. MTAG analysis identified several novel candidate genes, such as CTNNA2 (MTAG P value = 2.24 × 10-6) for SCZ and FADS2 (MTAG P value = 2.66 × 10-7) for osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS Our study results support the overlapped genetic basis for osteoporosis and SCZ, and provide novel clues for elucidating the biological mechanism of increased osteoporosis risk in SCZ patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Liu
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Yanta West Road 76, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Wen
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Yanta West Road 76, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China
| | - Yujie Ning
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Yanta West Road 76, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China
| | - Ping Li
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Yanta West Road 76, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China
| | - Bolun Cheng
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Yanta West Road 76, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China
| | - Shiqiang Cheng
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Yanta West Road 76, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China
| | - Lu Zhang
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Yanta West Road 76, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China
| | - Mei Ma
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Yanta West Road 76, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Qi
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Yanta West Road 76, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China
| | - Chujun Liang
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Yanta West Road 76, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China
| | - Tielin Yang
- Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiangding Chen
- Laboratory of Molecular and Statistical Genetics, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Lijun Tan
- Laboratory of Molecular and Statistical Genetics, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Shen
- Center for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Department of Global Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Qing Tian
- Center for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Department of Global Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Hong-Wen Deng
- Center for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Department of Global Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Xiancang Ma
- Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China
| | - Feng Zhang
- School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Yanta West Road 76, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China.
| | - Feng Zhu
- Center for Translational Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Richards AL, Pardiñas AF, Frizzati A, Tansey KE, Lynham AJ, Holmans P, Legge SE, Savage JE, Agartz I, Andreassen OA, Blokland GAM, Corvin A, Cosgrove D, Degenhardt F, Djurovic S, Espeseth T, Ferraro L, Gayer-Anderson C, Giegling I, van Haren NE, Hartmann AM, Hubert JJ, Jönsson EG, Konte B, Lennertz L, Olde Loohuis LM, Melle I, Morgan C, Morris DW, Murray RM, Nyman H, Ophoff RA, van Os J, Petryshen TL, Quattrone D, Rietschel M, Rujescu D, Rutten BPF, Streit F, Strohmaier J, Sullivan PF, Sundet K, Wagner M, Escott-Price V, Owen MJ, Donohoe G, O’Donovan MC, Walters JTR. The Relationship Between Polygenic Risk Scores and Cognition in Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2020; 46:336-344. [PMID: 31206164 PMCID: PMC7442352 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbz061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive impairment is a clinically important feature of schizophrenia. Polygenic risk score (PRS) methods have demonstrated genetic overlap between schizophrenia, bipolar disorder (BD), major depressive disorder (MDD), educational attainment (EA), and IQ, but very few studies have examined associations between these PRS and cognitive phenotypes within schizophrenia cases. METHODS We combined genetic and cognitive data in 3034 schizophrenia cases from 11 samples using the general intelligence factor g as the primary measure of cognition. We used linear regression to examine the association between cognition and PRS for EA, IQ, schizophrenia, BD, and MDD. The results were then meta-analyzed across all samples. A genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of cognition was conducted in schizophrenia cases. RESULTS PRS for both population IQ (P = 4.39 × 10-28) and EA (P = 1.27 × 10-26) were positively correlated with cognition in those with schizophrenia. In contrast, there was no association between cognition in schizophrenia cases and PRS for schizophrenia (P = .39), BD (P = .51), or MDD (P = .49). No individual variant approached genome-wide significance in the GWAS. CONCLUSIONS Cognition in schizophrenia cases is more strongly associated with PRS that index cognitive traits in the general population than PRS for neuropsychiatric disorders. This suggests the mechanisms of cognitive variation within schizophrenia are at least partly independent from those that predispose to schizophrenia diagnosis itself. Our findings indicate that this cognitive variation arises at least in part due to genetic factors shared with cognitive performance in populations and is not solely due to illness or treatment-related factors, although our findings are consistent with important contributions from these factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander L Richards
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Antonio F Pardiñas
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Aura Frizzati
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Katherine E Tansey
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Amy J Lynham
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Peter Holmans
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Sophie E Legge
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jeanne E Savage
- Complex Trait Genetics Lab, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid Agartz
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Department of Psychiatric Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway,Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ole A Andreassen
- CoE NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gabriella A M Blokland
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA,Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Aiden Corvin
- Neuropsychiatric Genetics Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Donna Cosgrove
- Cognitive Genetics and Cognitive Therapy Group, Neuroimaging and Cognitive Genomics Center, School of Psychology and Discipline of Biochemistry, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Franziska Degenhardt
- Department of Genomics, Life and Brain Center, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany,Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Srdjan Djurovic
- CoE NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas Espeseth
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Laura Ferraro
- Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Charlotte Gayer-Anderson
- Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Ina Giegling
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Neeltje E van Haren
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Sophia Children’s Hospital, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annette M Hartmann
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - John J Hubert
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Erik G Jönsson
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden,CoE NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bettina Konte
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Leonhard Lennertz
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Loes M Olde Loohuis
- Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ingrid Melle
- CoE NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Craig Morgan
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College, London, UK
| | - Derek W Morris
- Centre for Neuroimaging and Cognitive Genomics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Robin M Murray
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Håkan Nyman
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Roel A Ophoff
- Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA,Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Jim van Os
- Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of Psychiatry, Utrecht University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands,King’s Health Partners Department of Psychosis Studies, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
| | | | | | - Tracey L Petryshen
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA,Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Diego Quattrone
- Social, Genetics and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Marcella Rietschel
- Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Dan Rujescu
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Bart P F Rutten
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Fabian Streit
- Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jana Strohmaier
- Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Patrick F Sullivan
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kjetil Sundet
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michael Wagner
- Department for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Valentina Escott-Price
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Michael J Owen
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Gary Donohoe
- Centre for Neuroimaging and Cognitive Genomics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Michael C O’Donovan
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - James T R Walters
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK,To whom correspondence should be addressed; tel: 44 (0)29-20688-434, fax: 44 (0)29-20687-068, e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ashbrook DG, Cahill S, Hager R. A Cross-Species Systems Genetics Analysis Links APBB1IP as a Candidate for Schizophrenia and Prepulse Inhibition. Front Behav Neurosci 2019; 13:266. [PMID: 31920576 PMCID: PMC6914690 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response is a highly conserved form of sensorimotor gating, disruption of which is found in schizophrenia patients and their unaffected first-degree relatives. PPI can be measured in many species, and shows considerable phenotypic variation between and within rodent models. This makes PPI a useful endophenotype. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been carried out to identify genetic variants underlying schizophrenia, and these suggest that schizophrenia is highly polygenic. GWAS have been unable to account for the high heritability of schizophrenia seen in family studies, partly because of the low power of GWAS due to multiple comparisons. By contrast, complementary mouse model linkage studies often have high statistical power to detect variants for behavioral traits but lower resolution, producing loci that include tens or hundreds of genes. To capitalize on the advantages of both GWAS and genetic mouse models, our study uses a cross-species approach to identify novel genes associated with PPI regulation, which thus may contribute to the PPI deficits seen in schizophrenia. Results: Using experimental data from the recombinant inbred (RI) mouse panel BXD, we identified two significant loci affecting PPI. These genomic regions contain genetic variants which influence PPI in mice and are therefore candidates that may be influencing aspects of schizophrenia in humans. We next investigated these regions in whole-genome data from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) schizophrenia GWAS and identify one novel candidate gene (ABPP1IP) that was significantly associated with PPI in mice and risk of schizophrenia in humans. A systems genetics approach demonstrates that APBB1IP coexpresses with several other genes related to schizophrenia in several brain regions. Gene coexpression and enrichment analysis shows clear links between APBB1IP and the immune system. Conclusion: The combination of human GWAS and mouse quantitative trait loci (QTL) from some of the largest study systems available has enabled us to identify a novel gene, APBB1IP, which influences schizophrenia in humans and PPI in mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G Ashbrook
- Department of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Stephanie Cahill
- Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Reinmar Hager
- Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Morgan VA, Di Prinzio P, Valuri G, Croft M, McNeil T, Jablensky A. Are familial liability for schizophrenia and obstetric complications independently associated with risk of psychotic illness, after adjusting for other environmental stressors in childhood? Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2019; 53:1105-1115. [PMID: 31339337 DOI: 10.1177/0004867419864427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The interplay between genetic and environmental factors on risk for psychotic illness remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to estimate independent and combined effects of familial liability for schizophrenia and exposure to obstetric complications on risk for developing psychotic illness, covarying with exposure to other environmental stressors. METHODS This whole-population birth cohort study used record linkage across Western Australian statewide data collections (midwives, psychiatric, hospital admissions, child protection, mortality) to identify liveborn offspring (n = 1046) born 1980-1995 to mothers with schizophrenia, comparing them to offspring of mothers with no recorded psychiatric history (n = 298,370). RESULTS Both maternal schizophrenia and pregnancy complications were each significantly associated with psychotic illness in offspring, with no interaction. Non-obstetric environmental stressors significantly associated with psychotic illness in offspring included the following: being Indigenous; having a mother who was not in a partnered relationship; episodes of disrupted parenting due to hospitalisation of mother, father or child; abuse in childhood; and living in areas of greatest socioeconomic disadvantage and with elevated rates of violent crime. Adjustment for these other environmental stressors reduced the hazard ratio for maternal schizophrenia substantially (from hazard ratio: 5.7, confidence interval: 4.5-7.2 to hazard ratio: 3.5, confidence interval: 2.8-4.4), but not the estimate for pregnancy complications (hazard ratio: 1.1, confidence interval: 1.0-1.2). The population attributable fraction for maternal schizophrenia was 1.4 and for pregnancy complications was 2.1. CONCLUSION Our finding of a substantial decrease in risk of psychotic illness associated with familial liability for psychosis following adjustment for other environmental stressors highlights potentially modifiable risk factors on the trajectory to psychotic illness and suggests that interventions that reduce or manage exposure to these risks may be protective, despite a genetic liability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera A Morgan
- Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Patsy Di Prinzio
- Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Giulietta Valuri
- Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Maxine Croft
- Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Thomas McNeil
- Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Assen Jablensky
- Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Khan A, Powell SB. Sensorimotor gating deficits in "two-hit" models of schizophrenia risk factors. Schizophr Res 2018; 198:68-83. [PMID: 29070440 PMCID: PMC5911431 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Revised: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/06/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Genetic and environmental models of neuropsychiatric disease have grown exponentially over the last 20years. One measure that is often used to evaluate the translational relevance of these models to human neuropsychiatric disease is prepulse inhibition of startle (PPI), an operational measure of sensorimotor gating. Deficient PPI characterizes several neuropsychiatric disorders but has been most extensively studied in schizophrenia. It has become a useful tool in translational neuropharmacological and molecular genetics studies because it can be measured across species using almost the same experimental parameters. Although initial studies of PPI in rodents were pharmacological because of the robust predictive validity of PPI for antipsychotic efficacy, more recently, PPI has become standard common behavioral measures used in genetic and neurodevelopmental models of schizophrenia. Here we review "two hit" models of schizophrenia and discuss the utility of PPI as a tool in phenotyping these models of relevant risk factors. In the review, we consider approaches to rodent models of genetic and neurodevelopmental risk factors and selectively review "two hit" models of gene×environment and environment×environment interactions in which PPI has been measured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asma Khan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093, United States; Research Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Susan B Powell
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093, United States; Research Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Avramopoulos D. Recent Advances in the Genetics of Schizophrenia. MOLECULAR NEUROPSYCHIATRY 2018; 4:35-51. [PMID: 29998117 PMCID: PMC6032037 DOI: 10.1159/000488679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The last decade brought tremendous progress in the field of schizophrenia genetics. As a result of extensive collaborations and multiple technological advances, we now recognize many types of genetic variants that increase the risk. These include large copy number variants, rare coding inherited and de novο variants, and over 100 loci harboring common risk variants. While the type and contribution to the risk vary among genetic variants, there is concordance in the functions of genes they implicate, such as those whose RNA binds the fragile X-related protein FMRP and members of the activity-regulated cytoskeletal complex involved in learning and memory. Gene expression studies add important information on the biology of the disease and recapitulate the same functional gene groups. Studies of alternative phenotypes help us widen our understanding of the genetic architecture of mental function and dysfunction, how diseases overlap not only with each other but also with non-disease phenotypes. The challenge is to apply this new knowledge to prevention and treatment and help patients. The data generated so far and emerging technologies, including new methods in cell engineering, offer significant promise that in the next decade we will unlock the translational potential of these significant discoveries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Avramopoulos
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rebouças DB, Rabelo-da-Ponte FD, Massuda R, Czepielewski LS, Gama CS. The Relationship between Cytokines and Verbal Memory in Individuals with Schizophrenia and Their Unaffected Siblings. Neuroimmunomodulation 2018; 25:334-339. [PMID: 30248668 DOI: 10.1159/000492716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Verbal memory impairment may be considered an endophenotype in schizophrenia (SZ), also affecting the siblings of SZ subjects. Furthermore, the immune-inflammatory system response has an important modulatory effect on brain processes, especially on memory circuits. OBJECTIVE Investigating the relationship between TNF-α and IL-6 and memory performance in patients with SZ, their unaffected siblings (SB) and healthy controls (HC). METHODS 35 subjects with SZ, 36 SB, and 47 HC underwent a neurocognitive assessment for verbal memory by means of the revised Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT-R) in addition to serum cytokines analyses. RESULTS SZ patients performed worse in HVLT-R than SB and HC, but SB and HC were not different. Regarding the biomarker levels, we found significant results of TNF-α for both groups. However, we did not find differences between groups after multiple-comparisons analysis. There were no significant correlations between episodic verbal memory, TNF-α, and IL-6. CONCLUSION The results are compatible with the hypothesis that deficits in verbal memory of individuals with SZ could be secondary to inadequate functioning of cognitive processing areas, such as proactive cognitive control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego B Rebouças
- Laboratório de Psiquiatria Molecular, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psiquiatria e Ciências do Comportamento, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Francisco Diego Rabelo-da-Ponte
- Laboratório de Psiquiatria Molecular, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psiquiatria e Ciências do Comportamento, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Rafael Massuda
- Laboratório de Psiquiatria Molecular, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Departamento de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Leticia S Czepielewski
- Laboratório de Psiquiatria Molecular, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psiquiatria e Ciências do Comportamento, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Clarissa S Gama
- Laboratório de Psiquiatria Molecular, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre,
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psiquiatria e Ciências do Comportamento, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre,
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Clark LA, Cuthbert B, Lewis-Fernández R, Narrow WE, Reed GM. Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). Psychol Sci Public Interest 2017; 18:72-145. [DOI: 10.1177/1529100617727266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 333] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The diagnosis of mental disorder initially appears relatively straightforward: Patients present with symptoms or visible signs of illness; health professionals make diagnoses based primarily on these symptoms and signs; and they prescribe medication, psychotherapy, or both, accordingly. However, despite a dramatic expansion of knowledge about mental disorders during the past half century, understanding of their components and processes remains rudimentary. We provide histories and descriptions of three systems with different purposes relevant to understanding and classifying mental disorder. Two major diagnostic manuals—the International Classification of Diseases and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—provide classification systems relevant to public health, clinical diagnosis, service provision, and specific research applications, the former internationally and the latter primarily for the United States. In contrast, the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria provides a framework that emphasizes integration of basic behavioral and neuroscience research to deepen the understanding of mental disorder. We identify four key issues that present challenges to understanding and classifying mental disorder: etiology, including the multiple causality of mental disorder; whether the relevant phenomena are discrete categories or dimensions; thresholds, which set the boundaries between disorder and nondisorder; and comorbidity, the fact that individuals with mental illness often meet diagnostic requirements for multiple conditions. We discuss how the three systems’ approaches to these key issues correspond or diverge as a result of their different histories, purposes, and constituencies. Although the systems have varying degrees of overlap and distinguishing features, they share the goal of reducing the burden of suffering due to mental disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bruce Cuthbert
- Research Domain Criteria Unit, National Institute of Mental Health
| | | | - William E. Narrow
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico School of Medicine
| | - Geoffrey M. Reed
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization
- Global Mental Health Program, Columbia University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Raghavan V, Bhomia M, Torres I, Jain S, Wang KK. Hypothesis: Exosomal microRNAs as potential biomarkers for schizophrenia. Med Hypotheses 2017; 103:21-25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2017.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
19
|
Prioritizing schizophrenia endophenotypes for future genetic studies: An example using data from the COGS-1 family study. Schizophr Res 2016; 174:1-9. [PMID: 27132484 PMCID: PMC4912929 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Revised: 04/06/2016] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Past studies describe numerous endophenotypes associated with schizophrenia (SZ), but many endophenotypes may overlap in information they provide, and few studies have investigated the utility of a multivariate index to improve discrimination between SZ and healthy community comparison subjects (CCS). We investigated 16 endophenotypes from the first phase of the Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia, a large, multi-site family study, to determine whether a subset could distinguish SZ probands and CCS just as well as using all 16. Participants included 345 SZ probands and 517 CCS with a valid measure for at least one endophenotype. We used both logistic regression and random forest models to choose a subset of endophenotypes, adjusting for age, gender, smoking status, site, parent education, and the reading subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test. As a sensitivity analysis, we re-fit models using multiple imputations to determine the effect of missing values. We identified four important endophenotypes: antisaccade, Continuous Performance Test-Identical Pairs 3-digit version, California Verbal Learning Test, and emotion identification. The logistic regression model that used just these four endophenotypes produced essentially the same results as the model that used all 16 (84% vs. 85% accuracy). While a subset of endophenotypes cannot replace clinical diagnosis nor encompass the complexity of the disease, it can aid in the design of future endophenotypic and genetic studies by reducing study cost and subject burden, simplifying sample enrichment, and improving the statistical power of locating those genetic regions associated with schizophrenia that may be the easiest to identify initially.
Collapse
|
20
|
Georgiades A, Rijsdijk F, Kane F, Rebollo-Mesa I, Kalidindi S, Schulze KK, Stahl D, Walshe M, Sahakian BJ, McDonald C, Hall MH, Murray RM, Kravariti E. New insights into the endophenotypic status of cognition in bipolar disorder: genetic modelling study of twins and siblings. Br J Psychiatry 2016; 208:539-47. [PMID: 26989096 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.167239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2015] [Accepted: 09/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Twin studies have lacked statistical power to apply advanced genetic modelling techniques to the search for cognitive endophenotypes for bipolar disorder. AIMS To quantify the shared genetic variability between bipolar disorder and cognitive measures. METHOD Structural equation modelling was performed on cognitive data collected from 331 twins/siblings of varying genetic relatedness, disease status and concordance for bipolar disorder. RESULTS Using a parsimonious AE model, verbal episodic and spatial working memory showed statistically significant genetic correlations with bipolar disorder (rg = |0.23|-|0.27|), which lost statistical significance after covarying for affective symptoms. Using an ACE model, IQ and visual-spatial learning showed statistically significant genetic correlations with bipolar disorder (rg = |0.51|-|1.00|), which remained significant after covarying for affective symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Verbal episodic and spatial working memory capture a modest fraction of the bipolar diathesis. IQ and visual-spatial learning may tap into genetic substrates of non-affective symptomatology in bipolar disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Georgiades
- Anna Georgiades, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fruhling Rijsdijk, PhD, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fergus Kane, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Irene Rebollo-Mesa, PhD, Departments of Psychosis Studies and Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Sridevi Kalidindi, MBBS, MRCPsych, Katja K. Schulze, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Daniel Stahl, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Muriel Walshe, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Barbara J. Sahakian, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Colm McDonald, MRCPsych, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, S
| | - Fruhling Rijsdijk
- Anna Georgiades, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fruhling Rijsdijk, PhD, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fergus Kane, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Irene Rebollo-Mesa, PhD, Departments of Psychosis Studies and Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Sridevi Kalidindi, MBBS, MRCPsych, Katja K. Schulze, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Daniel Stahl, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Muriel Walshe, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Barbara J. Sahakian, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Colm McDonald, MRCPsych, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, S
| | - Fergus Kane
- Anna Georgiades, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fruhling Rijsdijk, PhD, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fergus Kane, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Irene Rebollo-Mesa, PhD, Departments of Psychosis Studies and Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Sridevi Kalidindi, MBBS, MRCPsych, Katja K. Schulze, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Daniel Stahl, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Muriel Walshe, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Barbara J. Sahakian, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Colm McDonald, MRCPsych, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, S
| | - Irene Rebollo-Mesa
- Anna Georgiades, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fruhling Rijsdijk, PhD, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fergus Kane, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Irene Rebollo-Mesa, PhD, Departments of Psychosis Studies and Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Sridevi Kalidindi, MBBS, MRCPsych, Katja K. Schulze, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Daniel Stahl, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Muriel Walshe, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Barbara J. Sahakian, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Colm McDonald, MRCPsych, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, S
| | - Sridevi Kalidindi
- Anna Georgiades, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fruhling Rijsdijk, PhD, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fergus Kane, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Irene Rebollo-Mesa, PhD, Departments of Psychosis Studies and Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Sridevi Kalidindi, MBBS, MRCPsych, Katja K. Schulze, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Daniel Stahl, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Muriel Walshe, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Barbara J. Sahakian, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Colm McDonald, MRCPsych, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, S
| | - Katja K Schulze
- Anna Georgiades, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fruhling Rijsdijk, PhD, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fergus Kane, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Irene Rebollo-Mesa, PhD, Departments of Psychosis Studies and Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Sridevi Kalidindi, MBBS, MRCPsych, Katja K. Schulze, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Daniel Stahl, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Muriel Walshe, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Barbara J. Sahakian, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Colm McDonald, MRCPsych, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, S
| | - Daniel Stahl
- Anna Georgiades, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fruhling Rijsdijk, PhD, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fergus Kane, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Irene Rebollo-Mesa, PhD, Departments of Psychosis Studies and Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Sridevi Kalidindi, MBBS, MRCPsych, Katja K. Schulze, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Daniel Stahl, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Muriel Walshe, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Barbara J. Sahakian, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Colm McDonald, MRCPsych, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, S
| | - Muriel Walshe
- Anna Georgiades, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fruhling Rijsdijk, PhD, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fergus Kane, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Irene Rebollo-Mesa, PhD, Departments of Psychosis Studies and Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Sridevi Kalidindi, MBBS, MRCPsych, Katja K. Schulze, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Daniel Stahl, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Muriel Walshe, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Barbara J. Sahakian, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Colm McDonald, MRCPsych, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, S
| | - Barbara J Sahakian
- Anna Georgiades, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fruhling Rijsdijk, PhD, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fergus Kane, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Irene Rebollo-Mesa, PhD, Departments of Psychosis Studies and Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Sridevi Kalidindi, MBBS, MRCPsych, Katja K. Schulze, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Daniel Stahl, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Muriel Walshe, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Barbara J. Sahakian, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Colm McDonald, MRCPsych, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, S
| | - Colm McDonald
- Anna Georgiades, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fruhling Rijsdijk, PhD, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fergus Kane, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Irene Rebollo-Mesa, PhD, Departments of Psychosis Studies and Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Sridevi Kalidindi, MBBS, MRCPsych, Katja K. Schulze, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Daniel Stahl, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Muriel Walshe, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Barbara J. Sahakian, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Colm McDonald, MRCPsych, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, S
| | - Mei-Hua Hall
- Anna Georgiades, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fruhling Rijsdijk, PhD, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fergus Kane, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Irene Rebollo-Mesa, PhD, Departments of Psychosis Studies and Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Sridevi Kalidindi, MBBS, MRCPsych, Katja K. Schulze, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Daniel Stahl, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Muriel Walshe, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Barbara J. Sahakian, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Colm McDonald, MRCPsych, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, S
| | - Robin M Murray
- Anna Georgiades, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fruhling Rijsdijk, PhD, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fergus Kane, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Irene Rebollo-Mesa, PhD, Departments of Psychosis Studies and Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Sridevi Kalidindi, MBBS, MRCPsych, Katja K. Schulze, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Daniel Stahl, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Muriel Walshe, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Barbara J. Sahakian, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Colm McDonald, MRCPsych, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, S
| | - Eugenia Kravariti
- Anna Georgiades, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fruhling Rijsdijk, PhD, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Fergus Kane, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Irene Rebollo-Mesa, PhD, Departments of Psychosis Studies and Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Sridevi Kalidindi, MBBS, MRCPsych, Katja K. Schulze, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Daniel Stahl, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Muriel Walshe, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Barbara J. Sahakian, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Colm McDonald, MRCPsych, PhD, Department of Psychosis Studies, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, S
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cariaga-Martinez A, Saiz-Ruiz J, Alelú-Paz R. From Linkage Studies to Epigenetics: What We Know and What We Need to Know in the Neurobiology of Schizophrenia. Front Neurosci 2016; 10:202. [PMID: 27242407 PMCID: PMC4862989 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2016] [Accepted: 04/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Schizophrenia is a complex psychiatric disorder characterized by the presence of positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms that lacks a unifying neuropathology. In the present paper, we will review the current understanding of molecular dysregulation in schizophrenia, including genetic and epigenetic studies. In relation to the latter, basic research suggests that normal cognition is regulated by epigenetic mechanisms and its dysfunction occurs upon epigenetic misregulation, providing new insights into missing heritability of complex psychiatric diseases, referring to the discrepancy between epidemiological heritability and the proportion of phenotypic variation explained by DNA sequence difference. In schizophrenia the absence of consistently replicated genetic effects together with evidence for lasting changes in gene expression after environmental exposures suggest a role of epigenetic mechanisms. In this review we will focus on epigenetic modifications as a key mechanism through which environmental factors interact with individual's genetic constitution to affect risk of psychotic conditions throughout life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel Cariaga-Martinez
- Laboratory for Neuroscience of Mental Disorders Elena Pessino, Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, Alcalá University Madrid, Spain
| | - Jerónimo Saiz-Ruiz
- Department of Psychiatry, Ramón y Cajal Hospital, IRYCISMadrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)Madrid, Spain
| | - Raúl Alelú-Paz
- Laboratory for Neuroscience of Mental Disorders Elena Pessino, Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, Alcalá UniversityMadrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Ramón y Cajal Hospital, IRYCISMadrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shevlin M, McElroy E, Christoffersen MN, Elklit A, Hyland P, Murphy J. Social, familial and psychological risk factors for psychosis: A birth cohort study using the Danish Registry System. PSYCHOSIS 2016. [DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2015.1113306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
23
|
Greenwood TA, Light GA, Swerdlow NR, Calkins ME, Green MF, Gur RE, Gur RC, Lazzeroni LC, Nuechterlein KH, Olincy A, Radant AD, Seidman LJ, Siever LJ, Silverman JM, Stone WS, Sugar CA, Tsuang DW, Tsuang MT, Turetsky BI, Freedman R, Braff DL. Gating Deficit Heritability and Correlation With Increased Clinical Severity in Schizophrenia Patients With Positive Family History. Am J Psychiatry 2016; 173:385-91. [PMID: 26441157 PMCID: PMC4933520 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15050605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia Family Study evaluated 12 primary and other supplementary neurocognitive and neurophysiological endophenotypes in schizophrenia probands and their families. Previous analyses of prepulse inhibition (PPI) and P50 gating measures in this sample revealed heritability estimates that were lower than expected based on earlier family studies. Here the authors investigated whether gating measures were more heritable in multiply affected families with a positive family history compared with families with only a single affected proband (singleton). METHOD A total of 296 nuclear families consisting of a schizophrenia proband, at least one unaffected sibling, and both parents underwent a comprehensive endophenotype and clinical characterization. The Family Interview for Genetic Studies was administered to all participants and used to obtain convergent psychiatric symptom information for additional first-degree relatives. Among the families, 97 were multiply affected, and 96 were singletons. RESULTS Both PPI and P50 gating displayed substantially increased heritability in the 97 multiply affected families (47% and 36%, respectively) compared with estimates derived from the entire sample of 296 families (29% and 20%, respectively). However, no evidence for heritability was observed for either measure in the 96 singleton families. Schizophrenia probands derived from the multiply affected families also displayed a significantly increased severity of clinical symptoms compared with those from singleton families. CONCLUSIONS PPI and P50 gating measures demonstrate substantially increased heritability in schizophrenia families with a higher genetic vulnerability for illness, providing further support for the commonality of genes underlying both schizophrenia and gating measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gregory A. Light
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,VISN-22 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA San Diego Healthcare System
| | - Neal R. Swerdlow
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Monica E. Calkins
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael F. Green
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA,VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Raquel E. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ruben C. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Laura C. Lazzeroni
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Keith H. Nuechterlein
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ann Olincy
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO
| | - Allen D. Radant
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA,VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - Larry J. Seidman
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Massachusetts Mental Health Center Public Psychiatry Division of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Larry J. Siever
- Department of Psychiatry, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY,James J. Peters VA Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Jeremy M. Silverman
- Department of Psychiatry, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY,James J. Peters VA Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - William S. Stone
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Massachusetts Mental Health Center Public Psychiatry Division of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Catherine A. Sugar
- Department of Biostatistics, University of California Los Angeles School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Debby W. Tsuang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA,VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - Ming T. Tsuang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,Center for Behavioral Genomics, and Institute for Genomic Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,Harvard Institute of Psychiatric Epidemiology and Genetics, Boston, MA
| | - Bruce I. Turetsky
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Robert Freedman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO
| | - David L. Braff
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,VISN-22 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA San Diego Healthcare System
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Greenwood TA, Lazzeroni LC, Calkins ME, Freedman R, Green MF, Gur RE, Gur RC, Light GA, Nuechterlein KH, Olincy A, Radant AD, Seidman LJ, Siever LJ, Silverman JM, Stone WS, Sugar CA, Swerdlow NR, Tsuang DW, Tsuang MT, Turetsky BI, Braff DL. Genetic assessment of additional endophenotypes from the Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia Family Study. Schizophr Res 2016; 170:30-40. [PMID: 26597662 PMCID: PMC4707095 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2015] [Revised: 11/06/2015] [Accepted: 11/10/2015] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
The Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia Family Study (COGS-1) has previously reported our efforts to characterize the genetic architecture of 12 primary endophenotypes for schizophrenia. We now report the characterization of 13 additional measures derived from the same endophenotype test paradigms in the COGS-1 families. Nine of the measures were found to discriminate between schizophrenia patients and controls, were significantly heritable (31 to 62%), and were sufficiently independent of previously assessed endophenotypes, demonstrating utility as additional endophenotypes. Genotyping via a custom array of 1536 SNPs from 94 candidate genes identified associations for CTNNA2, ERBB4, GRID1, GRID2, GRIK3, GRIK4, GRIN2B, NOS1AP, NRG1, and RELN across multiple endophenotypes. An experiment-wide p value of 0.003 suggested that the associations across all SNPs and endophenotypes collectively exceeded chance. Linkage analyses performed using a genome-wide SNP array further identified significant or suggestive linkage for six of the candidate endophenotypes, with several genes of interest located beneath the linkage peaks (e.g., CSMD1, DISC1, DLGAP2, GRIK2, GRIN3A, and SLC6A3). While the partial convergence of the association and linkage likely reflects differences in density of gene coverage provided by the distinct genotyping platforms, it is also likely an indication of the differential contribution of rare and common variants for some genes and methodological differences in detection ability. Still, many of the genes implicated by COGS through endophenotypes have been identified by independent studies of common, rare, and de novo variation in schizophrenia, all converging on a functional genetic network related to glutamatergic neurotransmission that warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany A Greenwood
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
| | - Laura C Lazzeroni
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Monica E Calkins
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Robert Freedman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Michael F Green
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Raquel E Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Ruben C Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Gregory A Light
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States; VISN-22 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA San Diego Healthcare System, United States
| | - Keith H Nuechterlein
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Ann Olincy
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Allen D Radant
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Larry J Seidman
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Massachusetts Mental Health Center Public Psychiatry Division of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Larry J Siever
- Department of Psychiatry, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; James J. Peters VA Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jeremy M Silverman
- Department of Psychiatry, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; James J. Peters VA Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - William S Stone
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Massachusetts Mental Health Center Public Psychiatry Division of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Catherine A Sugar
- Department of Biostatistics, University of California Los Angeles School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Neal R Swerdlow
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Debby W Tsuang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Ming T Tsuang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States; Center for Behavioral Genomics, Institute for Genomic Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States; Harvard Institute of Psychiatric Epidemiology and Genetics, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Bruce I Turetsky
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - David L Braff
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States; VISN-22 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA San Diego Healthcare System, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ocklenburg S, Güntürkün O, Hugdahl K, Hirnstein M. Laterality and mental disorders in the postgenomic age – A closer look at schizophrenia and language lateralization. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2015; 59:100-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2015] [Revised: 07/08/2015] [Accepted: 08/31/2015] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
26
|
Re-visiting the nature and relationships between neurological signs and neurocognitive functions in first-episode schizophrenia: An invariance model across time. Sci Rep 2015; 5:11850. [PMID: 26136150 PMCID: PMC4650684 DOI: 10.1038/srep11850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2014] [Accepted: 04/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study examined different types of neurological signs in patients with first-episode schizophrenia and their relationships with neurocognitive functions. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal designs were adopted with the use of the abridged Cambridge Neurological Inventory which comprises items capturing motor coordination, sensory integration and disinhibition. A total of 157 patients with first-episode schizophrenia were assessed at baseline and 101 of them were re-assessed at six-month interval. A structural equation model (SEM) with invariance model across time was used for data analysis. The model fitted well with the data at baseline assessment, X^2(21) = 21.78, p = 0.413, NFI = 0.95, NNFI = 1.00, CFI = 1.00, IFI = 1.00, RMSEA = 0.015. Subsequent SEM analysis with invariance model at six-month interval also demonstrated the same stable pattern across time and showed strong measurement invariance and structure invariance across time. Our findings suggest that neurological signs capture more or less the same construct captured by conventional neurocognitive tests in patients with schizophrenia. The measurement and structure of these relationships appear to be stable over time.
Collapse
|
27
|
Swerdlow NR, Gur RE, Braff DL. Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia (COGS) assessment of endophenotypes for schizophrenia: an introduction to this Special Issue of Schizophrenia Research. Schizophr Res 2015; 163:9-16. [PMID: 25454799 PMCID: PMC4382419 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.09.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2014] [Accepted: 09/26/2014] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COGS is a multi-site NIMH-sponsored investigation of the genetic basis of 12 primary and multiple secondary quantitative endophenotypes in schizophrenia. METHODS Since 2003, COGS has completed studies using a family-based ascertainment strategy (COGS-1), and a case-control ascertainment strategy (COGS-2) (cumulative "n">4000). RESULTS COGS-1 family study confirmed robust deficits in, and heritability of, these endophenotypes in schizophrenia, and provided evidence for a coherent genetic architecture underlying the risk for neurocognitive and neurophysiological deficits in this disorder. COGS-2 case-control findings, many reported herein, establish a foundation for fine genomic mapping and other analyses of these endophenotypes and risk genes for SZ. Several reports in this Special Issue compare findings of endophenotype deficits generated by fundamentally different COGS-1 vs. COGS-2 ascertainment strategies. Despite the expectation that family-based and case-control designs would establish demographically and potentially biologically distinct patient cohorts, findings generally revealed comparable patterns of endophenotype deficits across studies. The COGS-2 case-control design facilitated the accrual of a larger "n", permitting detailed analyses of factors moderating endophenotype performance. Some COGS-2 endophenotypes not assessed in COGS-1 are also reported, as is a new factor analytic strategy for identifying shared vs. unique factors among the COGS endophenotypes which can be used to develop composite variables with distinct genetic signatures. DISCUSSION The path to date of COGS-1 endophenotype and genetic findings, followed by replication and extension in COGS-2, establishes benchmarks for endophenotype deficits in SZ and their moderation by specific factors, and clear expectations for informative findings from upcoming COGS-2 genetic analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal R. Swerdlow
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0804, USA, Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 619 543 6270; fax: +1 619 543 2493. (N.R. Swerdlow)
| | - Raquel E. Gur
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology & Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 10th Floor Gates Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - David L. Braff
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0804, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
The importance of endophenotypes in schizophrenia research. Schizophr Res 2015; 163:1-8. [PMID: 25795083 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2014] [Revised: 02/06/2015] [Accepted: 02/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Endophenotypes provide a powerful neurobiological platform from which we can understand the genomic and neural substrates of schizophrenia and other common complex neuropsychiatric disorders. The Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia (COGS) has conducted multisite studies on carefully selected key neurocognitive and neurophysiological endophenotypes in 300 families (COGS-1) and then in a follow up multisite case-control study of 2471 subjects (COGS-2). Endophenotypes are neurobiologically informed quantitative measures that show deficits in probands and their first degree relatives. They are more amenable to statistical analysis than are "fuzzy" qualitative clinical traits or confoundingly heterogeneous diagnostic categories. Endophenotypes are also viewed as uniquely informative in traditional diagnosis-based as well as emerging NIMH Research Domain (RDoC) contexts, offering a bridge between the two approaches to psychopathology classification and research. Endo- or intermediate phenotypes are heritable, and in the COGS-1 cohort their level of heritability is in the same range as is the heritability of schizophrenia itself, using the same statistical methods and subjects to assess both. Because we can demonstrate endophenotypes link to both gene networks and neural circuits on the one hand and also to real-life function, endophenotypes provide a critically important bridge for "connecting the dots" between genes, cells, circuits, information processing, neurocognition and functional impairment and personalized treatment selection in schizophrenia patients. By connecting schizophrenia risk genes with neurobiologically informed endophenotypes, and via the use of association, linkage, sequencing, stem cell and other strategies, we can provide our field with new neurobiologically informed information in our efforts to understand and treat schizophrenia. Evolving views, data and new analytic strategies about schizophrenia risk, pathology and treatment are described in this Viewpoint and in the accompanying Special Issue reports.
Collapse
|
29
|
Light GA, Swerdlow NR, Thomas ML, Calkins ME, Green MF, Greenwood TA, Gur RE, Gur RC, Lazzeroni LC, Nuechterlein KH, Pela M, Radant AD, Seidman LJ, Sharp RF, Siever LJ, Silverman JM, Sprock J, Stone WS, Sugar CA, Tsuang DW, Tsuang MT, Braff DL, Turetsky BI. Validation of mismatch negativity and P3a for use in multi-site studies of schizophrenia: characterization of demographic, clinical, cognitive, and functional correlates in COGS-2. Schizophr Res 2015; 163:63-72. [PMID: 25449710 PMCID: PMC4382452 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2014] [Revised: 09/16/2014] [Accepted: 09/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a are auditory event-related potential (ERP) components that show robust deficits in schizophrenia (SZ) patients and exhibit qualities of endophenotypes, including substantial heritability, test-retest reliability, and trait-like stability. These measures also fulfill criteria for use as cognition and function-linked biomarkers in outcome studies, but have not yet been validated for use in large-scale multi-site clinical studies. This study tested the feasibility of adding MMN and P3a to the ongoing Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia (COGS) study. The extent to which demographic, clinical, cognitive, and functional characteristics contribute to variability in MMN and P3a amplitudes was also examined. Participants (HCS n=824, SZ n=966) underwent testing at 5 geographically distributed COGS laboratories. Valid ERP recordings were obtained from 91% of HCS and 91% of SZ patients. Highly significant MMN (d=0.96) and P3a (d=0.93) amplitude reductions were observed in SZ patients, comparable in magnitude to those observed in single-lab studies with no appreciable differences across laboratories. Demographic characteristics accounted for 26% and 18% of the variance in MMN and P3a amplitudes, respectively. Significant relationships were observed among demographically-adjusted MMN and P3a measures and medication status as well as several clinical, cognitive, and functional characteristics of the SZ patients. This study demonstrates that MMN and P3a ERP biomarkers can be feasibly used in multi-site clinical studies. As with many clinical tests of brain function, demographic factors contribute to MMN and P3a amplitudes and should be carefully considered in future biomarker-informed clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory A. Light
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,VISN-22 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA San Diego Healthcare System
| | - Neal R. Swerdlow
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Michael L. Thomas
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Monica E. Calkins
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael F. Green
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA,VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Raquel E. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ruben C. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Laura C. Lazzeroni
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Keith H. Nuechterlein
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Marlena Pela
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Allen D. Radant
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA,VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - Larry J. Seidman
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Massachusetts Mental Health Center Public Psychiatry Division of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Richard F. Sharp
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Larry J. Siever
- Department of Psychiatry, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY,James J. Peters VA Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Jeremy M. Silverman
- Department of Psychiatry, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY,James J. Peters VA Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Joyce Sprock
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - William S. Stone
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Massachusetts Mental Health Center Public Psychiatry Division of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Catherine A. Sugar
- Department of Biostatistics, University of California Los Angeles School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Debby W. Tsuang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA,VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - Ming T. Tsuang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,Center for Behavioral Genomics, and Institute for Genomic Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,Harvard Institute of Psychiatric Epidemiology and Genetics, Boston, MA
| | - David L. Braff
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Bruce I. Turetsky
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Factor structure and heritability of endophenotypes in schizophrenia: findings from the Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia (COGS-1). Schizophr Res 2015; 163:73-9. [PMID: 25682549 PMCID: PMC5944296 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2014] [Revised: 01/14/2015] [Accepted: 01/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although many endophenotypes for schizophrenia have been studied individually, few studies have examined the extent to which common neurocognitive and neurophysiological measures reflect shared versus unique endophenotypic factors. It may be possible to distill individual endophenotypes into composite measures that reflect dissociable, genetically informative elements. METHODS The first phase of the Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia (COGS-1) is a multisite family study that collected neurocognitive and neurophysiological data between 2003 and 2008. For these analyses, participants included schizophrenia probands (n=83), their nonpsychotic siblings (n=151), and community comparison subjects (n=209) with complete data on a battery of 12 neurocognitive tests (assessing domains of working memory, declarative memory, vigilance, spatial ability, abstract reasoning, facial emotion processing, and motor speed) and 3 neurophysiological tasks reflecting inhibitory processing (P50 gating, prepulse inhibition and antisaccade tasks). Factor analyses were conducted on the measures for each subject group and across the entire sample. Heritability analyses of factors were performed using SOLAR. RESULTS Analyses yielded 5 distinct factors: 1) Episodic Memory, 2) Working Memory, 3) Perceptual Vigilance, 4) Visual Abstraction, and 5) Inhibitory Processing. Neurophysiological measures had low associations with these factors. The factor structure of endophenotypes was largely comparable across probands, siblings and controls. Significant heritability estimates for the factors ranged from 22% (Episodic Memory) to 39% (Visual Abstraction). CONCLUSIONS Neurocognitive measures reflect a meaningful amount of shared variance whereas the neurophysiological measures reflect largely unique contributions as endophenotypes for schizophrenia. Composite endophenotype measures may inform our neurobiological and genetic understanding of schizophrenia.
Collapse
|
31
|
Gur RC, Braff DL, Calkins ME, Dobie DJ, Freedman R, Green MF, Greenwood TA, Lazzeroni LC, Light GA, Nuechterlein KH, Olincy A, Radant AD, Seidman LJ, Siever LJ, Silverman JM, Sprock J, Stone WS, Sugar CA, Swerdlow NR, Tsuang DW, Tsuang MT, Turetsky BI, Gur RE. Neurocognitive performance in family-based and case-control studies of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2015; 163:17-23. [PMID: 25432636 PMCID: PMC4441547 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.10.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2014] [Revised: 10/19/2014] [Accepted: 10/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia (SZ) are established and the Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia (COGS) investigated such measures as endophenotypes in family-based (COGS-1) and case-control (COGS-2) studies. By requiring family participation, family-based sampling may result in samples that vary demographically and perform better on neurocognitive measures. METHODS The Penn computerized neurocognitive battery (CNB) evaluates accuracy and speed of performance for several domains and was administered across sites in COGS-1 and COGS-2. Most tests were included in both studies. COGS-1 included 328 patients with SZ and 497 healthy comparison subjects (HCS) and COGS-2 included 1195 patients and 1009 HCS. RESULTS Demographically, COGS-1 participants were younger, more educated, with more educated parents and higher estimated IQ compared to COGS-2 participants. After controlling for demographics, the two samples produced very similar performance profiles compared to their respective controls. As expected, performance was better and with smaller effect sizes compared to controls in COGS-1 relative to COGS-2. Better performance was most pronounced for spatial processing while emotion identification had large effect sizes for both accuracy and speed in both samples. Performance was positively correlated with functioning and negatively with negative and positive symptoms in both samples, but correlations were attenuated in COGS-2, especially with positive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Patients ascertained through family-based design have more favorable demographics and better performance on some neurocognitive domains. Thus, studies that use case-control ascertainment may tap into populations with more severe forms of illness that are exposed to less favorable factors compared to those ascertained with family-based designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben C. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA
| | - David L. Braff
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San
Diego, La Jolla, CA; VISN-22 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center
(MIRECC), VA San Diego Healthcare System
| | - Monica E. Calkins
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA
| | - Dorcas J. Dobie
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,
University of Washington, Seattle, WA; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle,
WA
| | - Robert Freedman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver,
Aurora, CO
| | - Michael F. Green
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Geffen
School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; VA
Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Tiffany A. Greenwood
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San
Diego, La Jolla, CA; VISN-22 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center
(MIRECC), VA San Diego Healthcare System
| | | | - Gregory A. Light
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San
Diego, La Jolla, CA; VISN-22 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center
(MIRECC), VA San Diego Healthcare System
| | - Keith H. Nuechterlein
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Geffen
School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; VA
Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ann Olincy
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver,
Aurora, CO
| | - Allen D. Radant
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,
University of Washington, Seattle, WA; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle,
WA
| | - Larry J. Seidman
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
MA; Massachusetts Mental Health Center Public Psychiatry Division of the Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Larry J. Siever
- Department of Psychiatry, The Mount Sinai School of
Medicine, New York, NY; 13James J. Peters VA Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Jeremy M. Silverman
- Department of Psychiatry, The Mount Sinai School of
Medicine, New York, NY; 13James J. Peters VA Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Joyce Sprock
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San
Diego, La Jolla, CA; VISN-22 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center
(MIRECC), VA San Diego Healthcare System
| | - William S. Stone
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
MA; Massachusetts Mental Health Center Public Psychiatry Division of the Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Catherine A. Sugar
- Department of Biostatistics, University of California Los
Angeles School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Neal R. Swerdlow
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San
Diego, La Jolla, CA; VISN-22 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center
(MIRECC), VA San Diego Healthcare System
| | - Debby W. Tsuang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,
University of Washington, Seattle, WA; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle,
WA
| | - Ming T. Tsuang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San
Diego, La Jolla, CA; VISN-22 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center
(MIRECC), VA San Diego Healthcare System
| | - Bruce I. Turetsky
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA
| | - Raquel E. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Soh P, Narayanan B, Khadka S, Calhoun VD, Keshavan MS, Tamminga CA, Sweeney JA, Clementz BA, Pearlson GD. Joint Coupling of Awake EEG Frequency Activity and MRI Gray Matter Volumes in the Psychosis Dimension: A BSNIP Study. Front Psychiatry 2015; 6:162. [PMID: 26617533 PMCID: PMC4637406 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2015] [Accepted: 10/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many studies have examined either electroencephalogram (EEG) frequency activity or gray matter volumes (GMV) in various psychoses [including schizophrenia (SZ), schizoaffective (SZA), and psychotic bipolar disorder (PBP)]. Prior work demonstrated similar EEG and gray matter abnormalities in both SZ and PBP. Integrating EEG and GMV and jointly analyzing the combined data fully elucidates the linkage between the two and may provide better biomarker- or endophenotype-specificity for a particular illness. Joint exploratory investigations of EEG and GMV are scarce in the literature and the relationship between the two in psychosis is even less explored. We investigated a joint multivariate model to test whether the linear relationship or linkage between awake EEG (AEEG) frequency activity and GMV is abnormal across the psychosis dimension and if such effects are also present in first-degree relatives. METHODS We assessed 607 subjects comprising 264 probands [105 SZ, 72 SZA, and 87 PBP], 233 of their first degree relatives [82 SZ relatives (SZR), 71 SZA relatives (SZAR), and 80 PBP relatives (PBPR)], and 110 healthy comparison subjects (HC). All subjects underwent structural MRI (sMRI) and EEG scans. Frequency activity and voxel-based morphometric GMV were derived from EEG and sMRI data, respectively. Seven AEEG frequency and gray matter components were extracted using Joint independent component analysis (jICA). The loading coefficients (LC) were examined for group differences using analysis of covariance. Further, the LCs were correlated with psychopathology scores to identify relationship with clinical symptoms. RESULTS Joint ICA revealed a single component differentiating SZ from HC (p < 0.006), comprising increased posterior alpha activity associated with decreased volume in inferior parietal lobe, supramarginal, parahippocampal gyrus, middle frontal, inferior temporal gyri, and increased volume of uncus and culmen. No components were aberrant in either PBP or SZA or any relative group. No significant association was identified with clinical symptom measures. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that a joint EEG and GMV model yielded a biomarker specific to SZ, not abnormal in PBP or SZA. Alpha activity was related to both increased and decreased volume in different cortical structures. Additionally, the joint model failed to identify endophenotypes across psychotic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Soh
- Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living , Hartford, CT , USA
| | - Balaji Narayanan
- Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living , Hartford, CT , USA
| | - Sabin Khadka
- Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living , Hartford, CT , USA
| | - Vince D Calhoun
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico , Albuquerque, NM , USA ; The Mind Research Network , Albuquerque, NM , USA ; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven, CT , USA
| | - Matcheri S Keshavan
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | - Carol A Tamminga
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas, TX , USA
| | - John A Sweeney
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas, TX , USA
| | - Brett A Clementz
- Department of Psychology, University of Georgia , Athens, GA , USA
| | - Godfrey D Pearlson
- Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living , Hartford, CT , USA ; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven, CT , USA ; Department of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven, CT , USA
| |
Collapse
|