1
|
Suzumura EA, de Oliveira Ascef B, Maia FHDA, Bortoluzzi AFR, Domingues SM, Farias NS, Gabriel FC, Jahn B, Siebert U, de Soarez PC. Methodological guidelines and publications of benefit-risk assessment for health technology assessment: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e086603. [PMID: 38851235 PMCID: PMC11163601 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To map the available methodological guidelines and documents for conducting and reporting benefit-risk assessment (BRA) during health technologies' life cycle; and to identify methodological guidelines for BRA that could serve as the basis for the development of a BRA guideline for the context of health technology assessment (HTA) in Brazil. DESIGN Scoping review. METHODS Searches were conducted in three main sources up to March 2023: (1) electronic databases; (2) grey literature (48 HTA and regulatory organisations) and (3) manual search and contacting experts. We included methodological guidelines or publications presenting methods for conducting or reporting BRA of any type of health technologies in any context of the technology's life cycle. Selection process and data charting were conducted by independent reviewers. We provided a structured narrative synthesis of the findings. RESULTS From the 83 eligible documents, six were produced in the HTA context, 30 in the regulatory and 35 involved guidance for BRA throughout the technology's life cycle. We identified 129 methodological approaches for BRA in the documents. The most commonly referred to descriptive frameworks were the Problem, Objectives, Alternatives, Consequences, Trade-offs, Uncertainty, Risk and Linked decisions and the Benefit-Risk Action Team. Multicriteria decision analysis was the most commonly cited quantitative framework. We also identified the most cited metric indices, estimation and utility survey techniques that could be used for BRA. CONCLUSIONS Methods for BRA in HTA are less established. The findings of this review, however, will support and inform the elaboration of the Brazilian methodological guideline on BRA for HTA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/69T3V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Aranha Suzumura
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina - FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT TIROL - University for Health Sciences and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Bruna de Oliveira Ascef
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina - FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | - Sidney Marcel Domingues
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina - FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Natalia Santos Farias
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina - FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Beate Jahn
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT TIROL - University for Health Sciences and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT TIROL - University for Health Sciences and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Division of Health Technology Assessment, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
- Center for Health Decision Science, Departments of Epidemiology and Health Policy & Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Program on Cardiovascular Research, Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patricia Coelho de Soarez
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina - FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Raben TG, Lello L, Widen E, Hsu SDH. Biobank-scale methods and projections for sparse polygenic prediction from machine learning. Sci Rep 2023; 13:11662. [PMID: 37468507 PMCID: PMC10356957 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37580-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
In this paper we characterize the performance of linear models trained via widely-used sparse machine learning algorithms. We build polygenic scores and examine performance as a function of training set size, genetic ancestral background, and training method. We show that predictor performance is most strongly dependent on size of training data, with smaller gains from algorithmic improvements. We find that LASSO generally performs as well as the best methods, judged by a variety of metrics. We also investigate performance characteristics of predictors trained on one genetic ancestry group when applied to another. Using LASSO, we develop a novel method for projecting AUC and correlation as a function of data size (i.e., for new biobanks) and characterize the asymptotic limit of performance. Additionally, for LASSO (compressed sensing) we show that performance metrics and predictor sparsity are in agreement with theoretical predictions from the Donoho-Tanner phase transition. Specifically, a future predictor trained in the Taiwan Precision Medicine Initiative for asthma can achieve an AUC of [Formula: see text] and for height a correlation of [Formula: see text] for a Taiwanese population. This is above the measured values of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively, for UK Biobank trained predictors applied to a European population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy G Raben
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, Michigan, USA.
| | - Louis Lello
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, Michigan, USA
- Genomic Prediction, Inc., North Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Erik Widen
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, Michigan, USA
- Genomic Prediction, Inc., North Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Stephen D H Hsu
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, Michigan, USA
- Genomic Prediction, Inc., North Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Widen E, Lello L, Raben TG, Tellier LCAM, Hsu SDH. Polygenic Health Index, General Health, and Pleiotropy: Sibling Analysis and Disease Risk Reduction. Sci Rep 2022; 12:18173. [PMID: 36307513 PMCID: PMC9616929 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22637-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
We construct a polygenic health index as a weighted sum of polygenic risk scores for 20 major disease conditions, including, e.g., coronary artery disease, type 1 and 2 diabetes, schizophrenia, etc. Individual weights are determined by population-level estimates of impact on life expectancy. We validate this index in odds ratios and selection experiments using unrelated individuals and siblings (pairs and trios) from the UK Biobank. Individuals with higher index scores have decreased disease risk across almost all 20 diseases (no significant risk increases), and longer calculated life expectancy. When estimated Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) are used as the performance metric, the gain from selection among ten individuals (highest index score vs average) is found to be roughly 4 DALYs. We find no statistical evidence for antagonistic trade-offs in risk reduction across these diseases. Correlations between genetic disease risks are found to be mostly positive and generally mild. These results have important implications for public health and also for fundamental issues such as pleiotropy and genetic architecture of human disease conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Widen
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, 567 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. .,Genomic Prediction, Inc., 671 US Highway One, North Brunswick, NJ, 08902, USA.
| | - Louis Lello
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, 567 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. .,Genomic Prediction, Inc., 671 US Highway One, North Brunswick, NJ, 08902, USA.
| | - Timothy G Raben
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, 567 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| | - Laurent C A M Tellier
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, 567 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.,Genomic Prediction, Inc., 671 US Highway One, North Brunswick, NJ, 08902, USA
| | - Stephen D H Hsu
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, 567 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.,Genomic Prediction, Inc., 671 US Highway One, North Brunswick, NJ, 08902, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brown HL, Sherburn IA, Gaff C, Taylor N, Best S. Structured approaches to implementation of clinical genomics: A scoping review. Genet Med 2022; 24:1415-1424. [PMID: 35442192 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the extent to which structured approaches to implementation of clinical genomics, proposed or adapted, are informed by evidence. METHODS A systematic approach was used to identify peer-reviewed articles and gray literature to report on 4 research questions: 1. What structured approaches have been proposed to support implementation? 2. To what extent are the structured approaches informed by evidence? 3. How have structured approaches been deployed in the genomic setting? 4. What are the intended outcomes of the structured approaches? RESULTS A total of 30 unique structured approaches to implementation were reported across 23 peer-reviewed publications and 11 gray literature articles. Most approaches were process models, applied in the preadoption implementation phase, focusing on a "service" outcome. Key findings included a lack of implementation science theory informing the development/implementation of newly designed structured approaches in the genomic setting and a lack of measures to assess implementation effectiveness. CONCLUSION This scoping review identified a significant number of structured approaches developed to inform the implementation of genomic medicine into clinical practice, with limited use of implementation science to support the process. We recommend the use of existing implementation science theory and the expertise of implementation scientists to inform the design of genomic programs being implemented into clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen L Brown
- Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Isabella A Sherburn
- Australian Genomics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Australian Genomics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Understanding innovation of health technology assessment methods: the IHTAM framework. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2022; 38:e16. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462322000010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Adequate methods are urgently needed to guarantee the good practice of health technology assessment (HTA) for technologies with novel properties. The aim of the study was to construct a conceptual framework to help understand the innovation of HTA methods (IHTAM). The construction of the IHTAM framework was based on two scoping reviews, one on the current practice of innovating methods, that is existing HTA frameworks, and one on theoretical foundations for innovating methods outside the HTA discipline. Both aimed to identify and synthesize concepts of innovation (i.e., innovation processes and roles of stakeholders in innovation). Using these concepts, the framework was developed in iterative brainstorming sessions and subsequent discussions with representatives from various stakeholder groups. The framework was constructed based on twenty documents on innovating HTA frameworks and fourteen guidelines from three scientific disciplines. It includes a generic innovation process consisting of three phases (“Identification,” “Development,” and “Implementation”) and nine subphases. In the framework, three roles that HTA stakeholders can play in innovation (“Developers,” “Practitioners,” and “Beneficiaries”) are defined, and a process on how the stakeholders innovate HTA methods is included. The IHTAM framework visualizes systematically which elements and stakeholders are important to the development and implementation of novel HTA methods. The framework could be used by all stakeholders involved in HTA innovation to learn how to engage dynamically and collaborate effectively throughout the innovation process. HTA stakeholders in practice have welcomed the framework, though additional testing of its applicability and acceptance is essential.
Collapse
|
6
|
Raben TG, Lello L, Widen E, Hsu SDH. From Genotype to Phenotype: Polygenic Prediction of Complex Human Traits. Methods Mol Biol 2022; 2467:421-446. [PMID: 35451785 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2205-6_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Decoding the genome confers the capability to predict characteristics of the organism (phenotype) from DNA (genotype). We describe the present status and future prospects of genomic prediction of complex traits in humans. Some highly heritable complex phenotypes such as height and other quantitative traits can already be predicted with reasonable accuracy from DNA alone. For many diseases, including important common conditions such as coronary artery disease, breast cancer, type I and II diabetes, individuals with outlier polygenic scores (e.g., top few percent) have been shown to have 5 or even 10 times higher risk than average. Several psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia and autism also fall into this category. We discuss related topics such as the genetic architecture of complex traits, sibling validation of polygenic scores, and applications to adult health, in vitro fertilization (embryo selection), and genetic engineering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Louis Lello
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
- Genomic Prediction, North Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Erik Widen
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Stephen D H Hsu
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
- Genomic Prediction, North Brunswick, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Engel L, Bryan S, Whitehurst DGT. Conceptualising 'Benefits Beyond Health' in the Context of the Quality-Adjusted Life-Year: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2021; 39:1383-1395. [PMID: 34423386 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01074-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
There is growing interest in extending the evaluative space of the quality-adjusted life-year framework beyond health. Using a critical interpretive synthesis approach, the objective was to review peer-reviewed literature that has discussed non-health outcomes within the context of quality-adjusted life-years and synthesise information into a thematic framework. Papers were identified through searches conducted in Web of Science, using forward citation searching. A critical interpretive synthesis allows for the development of interpretations (synthetic constructs) that go beyond those offered in the original sources. The final output of a critical interpretive synthesis is the synthesising argument, which integrates evidence from across studies into a coherent thematic framework. A concept map was developed to show the relationships between different types of non-health benefits. The critical interpretive synthesis was based on 99 papers. The thematic framework was constructed around four themes: (1) benefits affecting well-being (subjective well-being, psychological well-being, capability and empowerment); (2) benefits derived from the process of healthcare delivery; (3) benefits beyond the recipient of care (spillover effects, externalities, option value and distributional benefits); and (4) benefits beyond the healthcare sector. There is a wealth of research concerning non-health benefits and the evaluative space of the quality-adjusted life-year. Further dialogue and debate are necessary to address conceptual and normative challenges, to explore the societal willingness to sacrifice health for benefits beyond health and to consider the equity implications of different courses of action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Engel
- Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
| | - Stirling Bryan
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David G T Whitehurst
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Prior to integration into clinical care, a novel medical innovation is typically assessed in terms of its balance of benefits and risks, often referred to as utility. Members of multidisciplinary research teams may conceptualize and assess utility in different ways, which has implications within the translational genomics community and for the evidence base upon which clinical guidelines groups and healthcare payers make decisions. Ambiguity in the conceptualization of utility in translational genomics research can lead to communication challenges within research teams and to study designs that do not meet stakeholder needs. We seek to address the ambiguity challenge by describing the conceptual understanding of utility and use of the term by scholars in the fields of philosophy, medicine, and the social sciences of decision psychology and health economics. We illustrate applications of each field's orientation to translational genomics research by using examples from the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium, and we provide recommendations for increasing clarity and cohesion in future research. Given that different understandings of utility will align to a greater or lesser degree with important stakeholders' views, more precise use of the term can help researchers to better integrate multidisciplinary investigations and communicate with stakeholders.
Collapse
|
9
|
Tellier LCAM, Eccles J, Treff NR, Lello L, Fishel S, Hsu S. Embryo Screening for Polygenic Disease Risk: Recent Advances and Ethical Considerations. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:1105. [PMID: 34440279 PMCID: PMC8393569 DOI: 10.3390/genes12081105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Machine learning methods applied to large genomic datasets (such as those used in GWAS) have led to the creation of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) that can be used identify individuals who are at highly elevated risk for important disease conditions, such as coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes, hypertension, breast cancer, and many more. PRSs have been validated in large population groups across multiple continents and are under evaluation for widespread clinical use in adult health. It has been shown that PRSs can be used to identify which of two individuals is at a lower disease risk, even when these two individuals are siblings from a shared family environment. The relative risk reduction (RRR) from choosing an embryo with a lower PRS (with respect to one chosen at random) can be quantified by using these sibling results. New technology for precise embryo genotyping allows more sophisticated preimplantation ranking with better results than the current method of selection that is based on morphology. We review the advances described above and discuss related ethical considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent C. A. M. Tellier
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; (L.C.A.M.T.); (S.H.)
- Genomic Prediction, Inc., North Brunswick, NJ 08902, USA; (J.E.); (N.R.T.)
| | - Jennifer Eccles
- Genomic Prediction, Inc., North Brunswick, NJ 08902, USA; (J.E.); (N.R.T.)
| | - Nathan R. Treff
- Genomic Prediction, Inc., North Brunswick, NJ 08902, USA; (J.E.); (N.R.T.)
| | - Louis Lello
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; (L.C.A.M.T.); (S.H.)
- Genomic Prediction, Inc., North Brunswick, NJ 08902, USA; (J.E.); (N.R.T.)
| | - Simon Fishel
- CARE Fertility Group, Nottingham NG8 6PZ, UK;
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L2 2QP, UK
| | - Stephen Hsu
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; (L.C.A.M.T.); (S.H.)
- Genomic Prediction, Inc., North Brunswick, NJ 08902, USA; (J.E.); (N.R.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Widen E, Raben TG, Lello L, Hsu SDH. Machine Learning Prediction of Biomarkers from SNPs and of Disease Risk from Biomarkers in the UK Biobank. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:991. [PMID: 34209487 PMCID: PMC8308062 DOI: 10.3390/genes12070991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
We use UK Biobank data to train predictors for 65 blood and urine markers such as HDL, LDL, lipoprotein A, glycated haemoglobin, etc. from SNP genotype. For example, our Polygenic Score (PGS) predictor correlates ∼0.76 with lipoprotein A level, which is highly heritable and an independent risk factor for heart disease. This may be the most accurate genomic prediction of a quantitative trait that has yet been produced (specifically, for European ancestry groups). We also train predictors of common disease risk using blood and urine biomarkers alone (no DNA information); we call these predictors biomarker risk scores, BMRS. Individuals who are at high risk (e.g., odds ratio of >5× population average) can be identified for conditions such as coronary artery disease (AUC∼0.75), diabetes (AUC∼0.95), hypertension, liver and kidney problems, and cancer using biomarkers alone. Our atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) predictor uses ∼10 biomarkers and performs in UKB evaluation as well as or better than the American College of Cardiology ASCVD Risk Estimator, which uses quite different inputs (age, diagnostic history, BMI, smoking status, statin usage, etc.). We compare polygenic risk scores (risk conditional on genotype: PRS) for common diseases to the risk predictors which result from the concatenation of learned functions BMRS and PGS, i.e., applying the BMRS predictors to the PGS output.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Widen
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, 567 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; (T.G.R.); (S.D.H.H.)
| | - Timothy G. Raben
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, 567 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; (T.G.R.); (S.D.H.H.)
| | - Louis Lello
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, 567 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; (T.G.R.); (S.D.H.H.)
- Genomic Prediction, Inc., 675 US Highway One, North Brunswick, NJ 08902, USA
| | - Stephen D. H. Hsu
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, 567 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; (T.G.R.); (S.D.H.H.)
- Genomic Prediction, Inc., 675 US Highway One, North Brunswick, NJ 08902, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Genomic information is poised to play an increasing role in clinical care, extending beyond highly penetrant genetic conditions to less penetrant genotypes and common disorders. But with this shift, the question of clinical utility becomes a major challenge. A collaborative effort is necessary to determine the information needed to evaluate different uses of genomic information and then acquire that information. Another challenge must also be addressed if that process is to provide equitable benefits: the lack of diversity of genomic data. Current genomic knowledge comes primarily from populations of European descent, which poses the risk that most of the human population will be shortchanged when health benefits of genomics emerge. These two challenges have defined my career as a geneticist and have taught me that solutions must start with dialogue across disciplinary and social divides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wylie Burke
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hoxhaj I, Govaerts L, Simoens S, Van Dyck W, Huys I, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I, Boccia S. A Systematic Review of the Value Assessment Frameworks Used within Health Technology Assessment of Omics Technologies and Their Actual Adoption from HTA Agencies. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E8001. [PMID: 33143182 PMCID: PMC7663163 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17218001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Omics technologies, enabling the measurements of genes (genomics), mRNA (transcriptomics), proteins (proteomics) and metabolites (metabolomics), are valuable tools for personalized decision-making. We aimed to identify the existing value assessment frameworks used by health technology assessment (HTA) doers for the evaluation of omics technologies through a systematic review. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched to retrieve potential eligible articles published until 31 May 2020 in English. Additionally, through a desk research in HTA agencies' repositories, we retrieved the published reports on the practical use of these frameworks. RESULTS Twenty-three articles were included in the systematic review. Twenty-two frameworks, which addressed genetic and/or genomic technologies, were described. Most of them derived from the ACCE framework and evaluated the domains of analytical validity, clinical validity and clinical utility. We retrieved forty-five reports, which mainly addressed the commercial transcriptomic prognostics and next generation sequencing, and evaluated clinical effectiveness, economic aspects, and description and technical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS A value assessment framework for the HTA evaluation of omics technologies is not standardized and accepted, yet. Our work reports that the most evaluated domains are analytical validity, clinical validity and clinical utility and economic aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilda Hoxhaj
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (I.H.); (S.B.)
| | - Laurenz Govaerts
- Healthcare Management Centre, Vlerick Business School, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Catholic University of Leuven-KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (S.S.); (I.H.)
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Catholic University of Leuven-KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (S.S.); (I.H.)
| | - Walter Van Dyck
- Healthcare Management Centre, Vlerick Business School, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Catholic University of Leuven-KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (S.S.); (I.H.)
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Catholic University of Leuven-KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (S.S.); (I.H.)
| | | | - Stefania Boccia
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (I.H.); (S.B.)
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health-Public Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sibling validation of polygenic risk scores and complex trait prediction. Sci Rep 2020; 10:13190. [PMID: 32764582 PMCID: PMC7411027 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69927-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
We test 26 polygenic predictors using tens of thousands of genetic siblings from the UK Biobank (UKB), for whom we have SNP genotypes, health status, and phenotype information in late adulthood. Siblings have typically experienced similar environments during childhood, and exhibit negligible population stratification relative to each other. Therefore, the ability to predict differences in disease risk or complex trait values between siblings is a strong test of genomic prediction in humans. We compare validation results obtained using non-sibling subjects to those obtained among siblings and find that typically most of the predictive power persists in between-sibling designs. In the case of disease risk we test the extent to which higher polygenic risk score (PRS) identifies the affected sibling, and also compute Relative Risk Reduction as a function of risk score threshold. For quantitative traits we examine between-sibling differences in trait values as a function of predicted differences, and compare to performance in non-sibling pairs. Example results: Given 1 sibling with normal-range PRS score (< 84 percentile, < + 1 SD) and 1 sibling with high PRS score (top few percentiles, i.e. > + 2 SD), the predictors identify the affected sibling about 70–90% of the time across a variety of disease conditions, including Breast Cancer, Heart Attack, Diabetes, etc. 55–65% of the time the higher PRS sibling is the case. For quantitative traits such as height, the predictor correctly identifies the taller sibling roughly 80 percent of the time when the (male) height difference is 2 inches or more.
Collapse
|
14
|
Yong SY, Raben TG, Lello L, Hsu SDH. Genetic architecture of complex traits and disease risk predictors. Sci Rep 2020; 10:12055. [PMID: 32694572 PMCID: PMC7374622 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68881-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic prediction of complex human traits (e.g., height, cognitive ability, bone density) and disease risks (e.g., breast cancer, diabetes, heart disease, atrial fibrillation) has advanced considerably in recent years. Using data from the UK Biobank, predictors have been constructed using penalized algorithms that favor sparsity: i.e., which use as few genetic variants as possible. We analyze the specific genetic variants (SNPs) utilized in these predictors, which can vary from dozens to as many as thirty thousand. We find that the fraction of SNPs in or near genic regions varies widely by phenotype. For the majority of disease conditions studied, a large amount of the variance is accounted for by SNPs outside of coding regions. The state of these SNPs cannot be determined from exome-sequencing data. This suggests that exome data alone will miss much of the heritability for these traits-i.e., existing PRS cannot be computed from exome data alone. We also study the fraction of SNPs and of variance that is in common between pairs of predictors. The DNA regions used in disease risk predictors so far constructed seem to be largely disjoint (with a few interesting exceptions), suggesting that individual genetic disease risks are largely uncorrelated. It seems possible in theory for an individual to be a low-risk outlier in all conditions simultaneously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soke Yuen Yong
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
| | - Timothy G Raben
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
| | - Louis Lello
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.,Genomic Prediction, North Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Stephen D H Hsu
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.,Genomic Prediction, North Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Trifonova OP, Balashova EE, Maslov DL, Grigoriev AI, Lisitsa AV, Ponomarenko EA, Archakov AI. [Blood metabolome analysis for creating a digital image of a healthy person]. BIOMEDITSINSKAIA KHIMIIA 2020; 66:216-223. [PMID: 32588827 DOI: 10.18097/pbmc20206603216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
In the frame of the work, data on the implementation of metabolomics tests in medicine have been systematized. Based on the obtained data, a set of protocols was proposed, the sequential realization of which makes it possible to conduct a blood metabolome analysis for medical purposes. Using this analysis and the number of blood samples from healthy volunteers, a prototype of a healthy person's metabolomic image has been developed; it allows visually and digitally to assess the compliance of the human blood metabolome with the norm. At the same time, 99% of the metabolic processes reflected in the blood plasma are estimated. If abnormalities are detected, the metabolomic image allows to get the value of these deviations of metabolic processes in digital terms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - D L Maslov
- Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia
| | - A I Grigoriev
- Institute of Biomedical Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Lisitsa
- Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - A I Archakov
- Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rost C, Dent KM, Botkin J, Rothwell E. Experiences and lessons learned by genetic counselors in returning secondary genetic findings to patients. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:1234-1244. [PMID: 32453499 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Revised: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Few studies have explored the real-world experiences and strategies of genetic counselors involved in the process of returning secondary findings (SFs). This study aimed to describe and categorize the experiences for the return of SFs from clinical sequencing. Semi-structured telephone interviews with 21 genetic counselors representing 56 incidences were conducted. A content analysis was conducted on the transcripts through an iterative, team-based approach. Four common categories emerged across all interviews. These included (a) the importance of pretest counseling for the return of SFs, (b) how primary test results influenced the level of importance placed on the SFs, (c) patients' emotional reactions from receiving SF results, and (d) how returning SFs changed future pretest counseling and consent. This study identified experiences and common practices by genetic counselors who returned SFs. More research is needed to assess how genetic counselors' specific strategies improve patient comprehension and medical actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly Rost
- University of Utah Graduate Program in Genetic Counseling, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Karin M Dent
- University of Utah Graduate Program in Genetic Counseling, Salt Lake City, Utah.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Jeffrey Botkin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Erin Rothwell
- Department of OB/GYN, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Veenstra DL, Mandelblatt J, Neumann P, Basu A, Peterson JF, Ramsey SD. Health Economics Tools and Precision Medicine: Opportunities and Challenges. Forum Health Econ Policy 2020; 23:fhep-2019-0013. [PMID: 32134729 DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2019-0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Precision medicine - individualizing care for patients and addressing variations in treatment response - is likely to be important in improving the nation's health in a cost-effective manner. Despite this promise, widespread use of precision medicine, specifically genomic markers, in clinical care has been limited in practice to date. Lack of evidence, clear evidence thresholds, and reimbursement have been cited as major barriers. Health economics frameworks and tools can elucidate the effects of legal, regulatory, and reimbursement policies on the use of precision medicine while guiding research investments to enhance the appropriate use of precision medicine. Despite the capacity of economics to enhance the clinical and human impact of precision medicine, application of health economics to precision medicine has been limited - in part because precision medicine is a relatively new field - but also because precision medicine is complex, both in terms of its applications and implications throughout medicine and the healthcare system. The goals of this review are several-fold: (1) provide an overview of precision medicine and key policy challenges for the field; (2) explain the potential utility of economics methods in addressing these challenges; (3) describe recent research activities; and (4) summarize opportunities for cross-disciplinary research.
Collapse
|
18
|
Taylor-Robinson D, Kee F. Precision public health-the Emperor's new clothes. Int J Epidemiol 2020; 48:1-6. [PMID: 30212875 PMCID: PMC6380317 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyy184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David Taylor-Robinson
- Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, The Farr Institute@HeRC, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Frank Kee
- UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research, Centre for Public Health, Queens University of Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lello L, Raben TG, Yong SY, Tellier LCAM, Hsu SDH. Genomic Prediction of 16 Complex Disease Risks Including Heart Attack, Diabetes, Breast and Prostate Cancer. Sci Rep 2019; 9:15286. [PMID: 31653892 PMCID: PMC6814833 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51258-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
We construct risk predictors using polygenic scores (PGS) computed from common Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) for a number of complex disease conditions, using L1-penalized regression (also known as LASSO) on case-control data from UK Biobank. Among the disease conditions studied are Hypothyroidism, (Resistant) Hypertension, Type 1 and 2 Diabetes, Breast Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Testicular Cancer, Gallstones, Glaucoma, Gout, Atrial Fibrillation, High Cholesterol, Asthma, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Malignant Melanoma, and Heart Attack. We obtain values for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) in the range ~0.58-0.71 using SNP data alone. Substantially higher predictor AUCs are obtained when incorporating additional variables such as age and sex. Some SNP predictors alone are sufficient to identify outliers (e.g., in the 99th percentile of polygenic score, or PGS) with 3-8 times higher risk than typical individuals. We validate predictors out-of-sample using the eMERGE dataset, and also with different ancestry subgroups within the UK Biobank population. Our results indicate that substantial improvements in predictive power are attainable using training sets with larger case populations. We anticipate rapid improvement in genomic prediction as more case-control data become available for analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Lello
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
| | - Timothy G Raben
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
| | - Soke Yuen Yong
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
| | - Laurent C A M Tellier
- Genomic Prediction, North Brunswick, NJ, USA.
- Cognitive Genomics Laboratory, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Neurogenomics, China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
| | - Stephen D H Hsu
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
- Genomic Prediction, North Brunswick, NJ, USA.
- Cognitive Genomics Laboratory, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Neurogenomics, China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Snyder SR, Hao J, Cavallari LH, Geng Z, Elsey A, Johnson JA, Mohamed Z, Chaiyakunapruk N, Chong HY, Dahlui M, Shabaruddin FH, Patrinos GP, Mitropoulou C, Williams MS. Generic Cost-Effectiveness Models: A Proof of Concept of a Tool for Informed Decision-Making for Public Health Precision Medicine. Public Health Genomics 2019; 21:217-227. [PMID: 31189173 DOI: 10.1159/000500725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Economic evaluation is integral to informed public health decision-making in the rapidly growing field of precision and personalized medicine (PM); however, this research requires specialized expertise and significant resources. Generic models are a novel innovation to efficiently address a critical PM evidence shortage and implementation barrier by enabling use of population-specific input values. This is a generic PM economic evaluation model proof-of-concept study for a pharmacogenomic use case. METHODS An 8-step generic economic model development process was applied to the use case of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B*15:02genotyping for prediction of carbamazepine-induced cutaneous reactions, with a user-friendly decision-making tool relying on user-provided input values. This generic model was transparently documented and validated, including cross-validation comparing cost-effectiveness results with 3 country-specific models. RESULTS A generic pharmacogenomic use case cost-effectiveness model with decision-making tool was successfully developed and cross-validated using input values for 6 populations which produced consistent results for HLA-B*15:02 screening at country-specific cost-effectiveness threshold values. Differences between the generic and country-specific model results were largely due to differences in model structure and assumptions. CONCLUSION This proof on concept demonstrates the feasibility of generic models to provide useful PM economic evidence, supporting their use as a pragmatic and timely approach to address a growing need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan R Snyder
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA,
| | - Jing Hao
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Larisa H Cavallari
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Zhi Geng
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amanda Elsey
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Julie A Johnson
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Zahurin Mohamed
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Sunway Campus, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.,Center of Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research (CPOR), Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.,School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Asian Centre for Evidence Synthesis in Population, Implementation and Clinical Outcomes (PICO), Global Asia in the 21st Century (GA21) Platform, Monash University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.,Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Huey Yi Chong
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Sunway Campus, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Maznah Dahlui
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Julius Centre, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - George P Patrinos
- University of Patras School of Health Sciences Department of Pharmacy, Patras, Greece.,United Arab Emirates University, College of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Marc S Williams
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Burns BL, Bilkey GA, Coles EP, Bowman FL, Beilby JP, Pachter NS, Baynam G, Dawkins HJS, Weeramanthri TS, Nowak KJ. Healthcare System Priorities for Successful Integration of Genomics: An Australian Focus. Front Public Health 2019; 7:41. [PMID: 30915324 PMCID: PMC6421399 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper examines key considerations for the successful integration of genomic technologies into healthcare systems. All healthcare systems strive to introduce new technologies that are effective and affordable, but genomics offers particular challenges, given the rapid evolution of the technology. In this context we frame internationally relevant discussion points relating to effective and sustainable implementation of genomic testing within the strategic priority areas of the recently endorsed Australian National Health Genomics Policy Framework. The priority areas are services, data, workforce, finances, and person-centred care. In addition, we outline recommendations from a government perspective through the lens of the Australian health system, and argue that resources should be allocated not to just genomic testing alone, but across the five strategic priority areas for full effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda L. Burns
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Gemma A. Bilkey
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- Office of the Chief Health Officer, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Emily P. Coles
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Faye L. Bowman
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - John P. Beilby
- PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Nicholas S. Pachter
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Subiaco, WA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Gareth Baynam
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Subiaco, WA, Australia
- Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies, Department of Health, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Government of Western Australia, Subiaco, WA, Australia
| | - Hugh J. S. Dawkins
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Sir Walter Murdoch School of Policy and International Affairs, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia
- School of Public Health, Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, WA, Australia
| | - Tarun S. Weeramanthri
- Office of the Chief Health Officer, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Kristen J. Nowak
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Roberts MC, Dotson WD, DeVore CS, Bednar EM, Bowen DJ, Ganiats TG, Green RF, Hurst GM, Philp AR, Ricker CN, Sturm AC, Trepanier AM, Williams JL, Zierhut HA, Wilemon KA, Hampel H. Delivery Of Cascade Screening For Hereditary Conditions: A Scoping Review Of The Literature. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018; 37:801-808. [PMID: 29733730 PMCID: PMC11022644 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Cascade screening is the process of contacting relatives of people who have been diagnosed with certain hereditary conditions. Its purpose is to identify, inform, and manage those who are also at risk. We conducted a scoping review to obtain a broad overview of cascade screening interventions, facilitators and barriers to their use, relevant policy considerations, and future research needs. We searched for relevant peer-reviewed literature in the period 1990-2017 and reviewed 122 studies. Finally, we described 45 statutes and regulations related to the use and release of genetic information across the fifty states. We sought standardized best practices for optimizing cascade screening across various geographic and policy contexts, but we found none. Studies in which trained providers contacted relatives directly, rather than through probands (index patients), showed greater cascade screening uptake; however, policies in some states might limit this approach. Major barriers to cascade screening delivery include suboptimal communication between the proband and family and geographic barriers to obtaining genetic services. Few US studies examined interventions for cascade screening or used rigorous study designs such as randomized controlled trials. Moving forward, there remains an urgent need to conduct rigorous intervention studies on cascade screening in diverse US populations, while accounting for state policy considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan C Roberts
- Megan C. Roberts is a Cancer Prevention Fellow in the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, in Rockville, Maryland
| | - W David Dotson
- W. David Dotson is a senior coordinating scientist in the Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Christopher S DeVore
- Christopher S. DeVore is a Public Health Fellow in the Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, CDC, and a master of public health candidate at the Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, in Atlanta
| | - Erica M Bednar
- Erica M. Bednar is a genetic counselor in the Department of Clinical Cancer Genetics and the Cancer Prevention and Control Platform at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, in Houston, Texas
| | - Deborah J Bowen
- Deborah J. Bowen is a professor of bioethics and humanities at the University of Washington, in Seattle
| | - Theodore G Ganiats
- Theodore G. Ganiats is director of the National Center for Excellence in Primary Care Research, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, in Rockville, Maryland
| | - Ridgely Fisk Green
- Ridgely Fisk Green is a Carter Consulting, Inc., contractor in the Office of Public Health Genomics, CDC, and at Carter Consulting, in Atlanta
| | - Georgia M Hurst
- Georgia M. Hurst is the director of ihavelynchsyndrome.org, in Evanston, Illinois
| | - Alisdair R Philp
- Alisdair R. Philp is a genetic counselor and a clinical assistant professor at the University of Kansas Hospitals and Clinics, in Westwood
| | - Charité N Ricker
- Charité N. Ricker is a genetic counselor and clinical instructor at the University of Southern California, in Los Angeles
| | - Amy C Sturm
- Amy C. Sturm is a professor at the Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, in Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Angela M Trepanier
- Angela M. Trepanier is an associate professor (clinician educator) at the Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University, in Detroit, Michigan
| | - Janet L Williams
- Janet L. Williams is director, Research Genetic Counselors, at the Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, in Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Heather A Zierhut
- Heather A. Zierhut is an assistant professor in genetics, cell biology, and development at the College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, in Minneapolis
| | - Katherine A Wilemon
- Katherine A. Wilemon is CEO of the Familial Hypercholesterolemia Foundation, in Pasadena, California
| | - Heather Hampel
- Heather Hampel is associate director of the Division of Human Genetics and of biospecimen research, and a professor of internal medicine, all at the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, in Columbus
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Eftekhari S, Yaraghi N, Singh R, Gopal RD, Ramesh R. Do Health Information Exchanges Deter Repetition of Medical Services? ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2017. [DOI: 10.1145/3057272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Repetition of medical services by providers is one of the major sources of healthcare costs. The lack of access to previous medical information on a patient at the point of care often leads a physician to perform medical procedures that have already been done. Multiple healthcare initiatives and legislation at both the federal and state levels have mandated Health Information Exchange (HIE) systems to address this problem. This study aims to assess the extent to which HIE could reduce these repetitions, using data from Centers for Medicare 8 Medicaid Services and a regional HIE organization. A 2-Stage Least Square model is developed to predict the impact of HIE on repetitions of two classes of procedures: diagnostic and therapeutic. The first stage is a predictive analytic model that estimates the duration of tenure of each HIE member-practice. Based on these estimates, the second stage predicts the effect of providers’ HIE tenure on their repetition of medical services. The model incorporates moderating effects of a federal quality assurance program and the complexity of medical procedures with a set of control variables. Our analyses show that a practice's tenure with HIE significantly lowers the repetition of therapeutic medical procedures, while diagnostic procedures are not impacted. The medical reasons for the effects observed in each class of procedures are discussed. The results will inform healthcare policymakers and provide insights on the business models of HIE platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ranjit Singh
- State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
| | | | - R. Ramesh
- State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kohler JN, Turbitt E, Lewis KL, Wilfond BS, Jamal L, Peay HL, Biesecker LG, Biesecker BB. Defining personal utility in genomics: A Delphi study. Clin Genet 2017; 92:290-297. [PMID: 28218387 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2016] [Revised: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 02/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individual genome sequencing results are valued by patients in ways distinct from clinical utility. Such outcomes have been described as components of "personal utility," a concept that broadly encompasses patient-endorsed benefits, that is operationally defined as non-clinical outcomes. No empirical delineation of these outcomes has been reported. AIM To address this gap, we administered a Delphi survey to adult participants in a National Institute of Health (NIH) clinical exome study to extract the most highly endorsed outcomes constituting personal utility. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty research participants responded to a Delphi survey to rate 35 items identified by a systematic literature review of personal utility. RESULTS Two rounds of ranking resulted in 24 items that represented 14 distinct elements of personal utility. Elements most highly endorsed by participants were: increased self-knowledge, knowledge of "the condition," altruism, and anticipated coping. DISCUSSION Our findings represent the first systematic effort to delineate elements of personal utility that may be used to anticipate participant expectation and inform genetic counseling prior to sequencing. The 24 items reported need to be studied further in additional clinical genome sequencing studies to assess generalizability in other populations. Further research will help to understand motivations and to predict the meaning and use of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J N Kohler
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - E Turbitt
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - K L Lewis
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - B S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - L Jamal
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - H L Peay
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina
| | - L G Biesecker
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - B B Biesecker
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kohler JN, Turbitt E, Biesecker BB. Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review. Eur J Hum Genet 2017; 25:662-668. [PMID: 28295040 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2016] [Revised: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Researchers and clinicians refer to outcomes of genomic testing that extend beyond clinical utility as 'personal utility'. No systematic delineation of personal utility exists, making it challenging to appreciate its scope. Identifying empirical elements of personal utility reported in the literature offers an inventory that can be subsequently ranked for its relative value by those who have undergone genomic testing. A systematic review was conducted of the peer-reviewed literature reporting non-health-related outcomes of genomic testing from 1 January 2003 to 5 August 2016. Inclusion criteria specified English language, date of publication, and presence of empirical evidence. Identified outcomes were iteratively coded into unique domains. The search returned 551 abstracts from which 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. Study populations and type of genomic testing varied. Coding resulted in 15 distinct elements of personal utility, organized into three domains related to personal outcomes: affective, cognitive, and behavioral; and one domain related to social outcomes. The domains of personal utility may inform pre-test counseling by helping patients anticipate potential value of test results beyond clinical utility. Identified elements may also inform investigations into the prevalence and importance of personal utility to future test users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennefer N Kohler
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Erin Turbitt
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Barbara B Biesecker
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Singh DB. Pharmacogenomics: Clinical Perspective, Strategies, and Challenges. TRANSLATIONAL BIOINFORMATICS AND ITS APPLICATION 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-1045-7_13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
27
|
Hall JL, Ryan JJ, Bray BE, Brown C, Lanfear D, Newby LK, Relling MV, Risch NJ, Roden DM, Shaw SY, Tcheng JE, Tenenbaum J, Wang TN, Weintraub WS. Merging Electronic Health Record Data and Genomics for Cardiovascular Research: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 9:193-202. [PMID: 26976545 DOI: 10.1161/hcg.0000000000000029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The process of scientific discovery is rapidly evolving. The funding climate has influenced a favorable shift in scientific discovery toward the use of existing resources such as the electronic health record. The electronic health record enables long-term outlooks on human health and disease, in conjunction with multidimensional phenotypes that include laboratory data, images, vital signs, and other clinical information. Initial work has confirmed the utility of the electronic health record for understanding mechanisms and patterns of variability in disease susceptibility, disease evolution, and drug responses. The addition of biobanks and genomic data to the information contained in the electronic health record has been demonstrated. The purpose of this statement is to discuss the current challenges in and the potential for merging electronic health record data and genomics for cardiovascular research.
Collapse
|
28
|
Brown SA, Sandhu N, Herrmann J. Systems biology approaches to adverse drug effects: the example of cardio-oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2015; 12:718-31. [PMID: 26462128 DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Increased awareness of the cardiovascular toxic effects of chemotherapy has led to the emergence of cardio-oncology (or onco-cardiology), which focuses on screening, monitoring and treatment of patients with cardiovascular dysfunctions resulting from chemotherapy. Anthracyclines, such as doxorubicin, and HER2 inhibitors, such as trastuzumab, both have cardiotoxic effects. The biological rationale, mechanisms of action and cardiotoxicity profiles of these two classes of drugs, however, are completely different, suggesting that cardiotoxic effects can occur in a range of different ways. Advances in genomics and proteomics have implicated several genomic variants and biological pathways that can influence the susceptibility to cardiotoxicity from these, and other drugs. Established pathways include multidrug resistance proteins, energy utilization pathways, oxidative stress, cytoskeletal regulation and apoptosis. Gene-expression profiles that have revealed perturbed pathways have vastly increased our knowledge of the complex processes involved in crosstalk between tumours and cardiac function. Utilization of mathematical and computational modelling can complement pharmacogenomics and improve individual patient outcomes. Such endeavours should enable identification of variations in cardiotoxicity, particularly in those patients who are at risk of not recovering, even with the institution of cardioprotective therapy. The application of systems biology holds substantial potential to advance our understanding of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherry-Ann Brown
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Nicole Sandhu
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Joerg Herrmann
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wilson BJ, Nicholls SG. The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2015; 8:9-20. [PMID: 25733939 PMCID: PMC4337712 DOI: 10.2147/rmhp.s58728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The language of “personalized medicine” and “personal genomics” has now entered the common lexicon. The idea of personalized medicine is the integration of genomic risk assessment alongside other clinical investigations. Consistent with this approach, testing is delivered by health care professionals who are not medical geneticists, and where results represent risks, as opposed to clinical diagnosis of disease, to be interpreted alongside the entirety of a patient’s health and medical data. In this review we consider the evidence concerning the application of such personalized genomics within the context of population screening, and potential implications that arise from this. We highlight two general approaches which illustrate potential uses of genomic information in screening. The first is a narrowly targeted approach in which genetic profiling is linked with standard population-based screening for diseases; the second is a broader targeting of variants associated with multiple single gene disorders, performed opportunistically on patients being investigated for unrelated conditions. In doing so we consider the organization and evaluation of tests and services, the challenge of interpretation with less targeted testing, professional confidence, barriers in practice, and education needs. We conclude by discussing several issues pertinent to health policy, namely: avoiding the conflation of genetics with biological determinism, resisting the “technological imperative”, due consideration of the organization of screening services, the need for professional education, as well as informed decision making and public understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda J Wilson
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Stuart G Nicholls
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Personalized medicine involves the selection of the safest and most effective pharmacological treatment based on the molecular characteristics of the patient. In the case of anticancer drugs, tumour cell alterations can have a great impact on drug activity and, in fact, most biomarkers predicting response originate from these cells. On the other hand, the risk of developing severe toxicity may be related to the genetic background of the patient. Thus, understanding the molecular characteristics of both the tumour and the patient, and establishing their relation with drug outcomes will be critical for the identification of predictive biomarkers and to provide the basis for individualized treatments. This is a complex scenario where multiple genes as well as pathophysiological and environmental factors are important; in addition, tumours exhibit large inter- and intraindividual variability in space and time. Against this background, the huge amounts of biological and genetic data generated by the high-throughput technologies will facilitate pharmacogenomic progress, suggest novel druggable molecules and support the design of future strategies aimed at disease control. Here, we will review the current challenges and opportunities for pharmacogenomic studies in oncology, as well as the clinically established biomarkers. Lung and renal cancer, two areas in which huge progress has been made in the last decade, will be used to illustrate advances in personalized cancer treatment; we will review EGFR mutation as the paradigm of targeted therapies in lung cancer, and discuss the dissection of lung cancer into clinically relevant molecular subsets and novel advances that suggest an important role of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the response to antiangiogenic agents, as well as the challenges that remain in these fields. Finally, we will present new approaches and future prospects for personalizing medicine in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Rodríguez-Antona
- Hereditary Endocrine Cancer Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.,ISCIII Center for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - M Taron
- Medical Oncology Service and Laboratory, Pangaea Biotech SL, Quiron Dexeus Universitary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Doble B, Lorgelly P. Clinical players and healthcare payers: aligning perspectives on the cost–effectiveness of next-generation sequencing in oncology. Per Med 2015; 12:9-12. [DOI: 10.2217/pme.14.81] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Brett Doble
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paula Lorgelly
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hayeems RZ, Hoang N, Chenier S, Stavropoulos DJ, Pu S, Weksberg R, Shuman C. Capturing the clinical utility of genomic testing: medical recommendations following pediatric microarray. Eur J Hum Genet 2014; 23:1135-41. [PMID: 25491637 PMCID: PMC4538218 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2014] [Revised: 10/01/2014] [Accepted: 10/21/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Interpretation of pediatric chromosome microarray (CMA) results presents diagnostic and medical management challenges. Understanding management practices triggered by CMA will inform clinical utility and resource planning. Using a retrospective cohort design, we extracted clinical and management-related data from the records of 752 children with congenital anomalies and/or developmental delay who underwent CMA in an academic pediatric genetics clinic (2009–2011). Frequency distributions and relative rates (RR) of post-CMA medical recommendations in children with reportable and benign CMA results were calculated. Medical recommendations were provided for 79.6% of children with reportable results and 62.0% of children with benign results. Overall, recommendations included specialist consultation (40.8%), imaging (32.5%), laboratory investigations (17.2%), surveillance (4.6%), and family investigations (4.9%). Clinically significant variants and variants of uncertain clinical significance were associated with higher and slightly higher rates of management recommendations, respectively, compared with benign/no variants (RR=1.34; 95% CI (1.22–1.47); RR=1.23; 95% CI (1.09–1.38)). Recommendation rates for clinically significant versus uncertain results depended upon how uncertainty was classified (RRbroad=1.09; 95% CI (0.99–1.2); RRnarrow=1.12; 95% CI (1.02–1.24)). Recommendation rates also varied by the child's age and provider type. In conclusion, medical recommendations follow CMA for the majority of children. Compared with benign CMA results, clinically significant CMA variants are a significant driver of pediatric medical recommendations. Variants of uncertain clinical significance drive recommendations, but to a lesser extent. As a broadening range of specialists will need to respond to CMA results, targeted capacity building is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Z Hayeems
- 1] Program in Child Health Evaluative, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada [2] Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ny Hoang
- 1] Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada [2] Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sebastien Chenier
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Dimitri J Stavropoulos
- Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children and The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shuye Pu
- Terrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rosanna Weksberg
- 1] Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada [2] Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada [3] Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada [4] Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Cheryl Shuman
- 1] Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada [2] Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada [3] Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dunnenberger HM, Crews KR, Hoffman JM, Caudle KE, Broeckel U, Howard SC, Hunkler RJ, Klein TE, Evans WE, Relling MV. Preemptive clinical pharmacogenetics implementation: current programs in five US medical centers. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2014; 55:89-106. [PMID: 25292429 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010814-124835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 331] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Although the field of pharmacogenetics has existed for decades, practioners have been slow to implement pharmacogenetic testing in clinical care. Numerous publications describe the barriers to clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics. Recently, several freely available resources have been developed to help address these barriers. In this review, we discuss current programs that use preemptive genotyping to optimize the pharmacotherapy of patients. Array-based preemptive testing includes a large number of relevant pharmacogenes that impact multiple high-risk drugs. Using a preemptive approach allows genotyping results to be available prior to any prescribing decision so that genomic variation may be considered as an inherent patient characteristic in the planning of therapy. This review describes the common elements among programs that have implemented preemptive genotyping and highlights key processes for implementation, including clinical decision support.
Collapse
|
34
|
Snyder SR, Mitropoulou C, Patrinos GP, Williams MS. Economic Evaluation of Pharmacogenomics: A Value-Based Approach to Pragmatic Decision Making in the Face of Complexity. Public Health Genomics 2014; 17:256-64. [DOI: 10.1159/000366177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
35
|
Hendershot CS. Pharmacogenetic approaches in the treatment of alcohol use disorders: addressing clinical utility and implementation thresholds. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2014; 9:20. [PMID: 25217046 PMCID: PMC4165632 DOI: 10.1186/1940-0640-9-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2014] [Accepted: 09/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite advances in characterizing genetic influences on addiction liability and treatment response, clinical applications of these efforts have been slow to evolve. Although challenges to clinical translation remain, stakeholders already face decisions about evidentiary thresholds for the uptake of pharmacogenetic tests in practice. There is optimism about potential pharmacogenetic applications for the treatment of alcohol use disorders, with particular interest in the OPRM1 A118G polymorphism as a moderator of naltrexone response. Findings from human and animal studies suggest preliminary evidence for the clinical validity of this association; on this basis, arguments for clinical implementation can be made in accordance with existing frameworks for the uptake of genomic applications. However, generating evidence-based guidelines requires evaluating the clinical utility of pharmacogenetic tests. This goal will remain challenging, largely due to minimal data to inform clinical utility estimates. The pace of genomic discovery highlights the need for clinical utility and implementation research to inform future translation efforts. Near-term implementation of promising pharmacogenetic tests can help expedite this goal, generating an evidence base to enable efficient translation as additional gene-drug associations are discovered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian S Hendershot
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Doble B, Tan M, Harris A, Lorgelly P. Modeling companion diagnostics in economic evaluations of targeted oncology therapies: systematic review and methodological checklist. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2014; 15:235-54. [DOI: 10.1586/14737159.2014.929499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
37
|
McEwen JE, Boyer JT, Sun KY, Rothenberg KH, Lockhart NC, Guyer MS. The Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute: reflections on an ongoing experiment. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2014; 15:481-505. [PMID: 24773317 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090413-025327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
For more than 20 years, the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute has supported empirical and conceptual research to anticipate and address the ethical, legal, and social implications of genomics. As a component of the agency that funds much of the underlying science, the program has always been an experiment. The ever-expanding number of issues the program addresses and the relatively low level of commitment on the part of other funding agencies to support such research make setting priorities especially challenging. Program-supported studies have had a significant impact on the conduct of genomics research, the implementation of genomic medicine, and broader public policies. The program's influence is likely to grow as ELSI research, genomics research, and policy development activities become increasingly integrated. Achieving the benefits of increased integration while preserving the autonomy, objectivity, and intellectual independence of ELSI investigators presents ongoing challenges and new opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean E McEwen
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4076; , , , , ,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dotson WD, Douglas MP, Kolor K, Stewart AC, Bowen MS, Gwinn M, Wulf A, Anders HM, Chang CQ, Clyne M, Lam TK, Schully SD, Marrone M, Feero WG, Khoury MJ. Prioritizing genomic applications for action by level of evidence: a horizon-scanning method. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2014; 95:394-402. [PMID: 24398597 PMCID: PMC4689130 DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2013.226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2013] [Accepted: 11/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
As evidence accumulates on the use of genomic tests and other health-related applications of genomic technologies, decision makers may increasingly seek support in identifying which applications have sufficiently robust evidence to suggest they might be considered for action. As an interim working process to provide such support, we developed a horizon-scanning method that assigns genomic applications to tiers defined by availability of synthesized evidence. We illustrate an application of the method to pharmacogenomics tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- WD Dotson
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - MP Douglas
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- McKing Consulting Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - K Kolor
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - AC Stewart
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- McKing Consulting Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - MS Bowen
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - M Gwinn
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- McKing Consulting Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - A Wulf
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Cadence Group, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - HM Anders
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- McKing Consulting Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - CQ Chang
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - M Clyne
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Kelly Services, Troy, Michigan, USA
| | - TK Lam
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - SD Schully
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - M Marrone
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - WG Feero
- Maine Dartmouth Family Medicine Residency Program, Augusta, Maine, USA
| | - MJ Khoury
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Johnson JA. Pharmacogenetics in clinical practice: how far have we come and where are we going? Pharmacogenomics 2014; 14:835-43. [PMID: 23651030 DOI: 10.2217/pgs.13.52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent years have seen great advances in our understanding of genetic contributors to drug response. Drug discovery and development around targeted genetic (somatic) mutations has led to a number of new drugs with genetic indications, particularly for the treatment of cancers. Our knowledge of genetic contributors to variable drug response for existing drugs has also expanded dramatically, such that the evidence now supports clinical use of genetic data to guide treatment in some situations, and across a variety of therapeutic areas. Clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics has seen substantial growth in recent years and groups are working to identify the barriers and best practices for pharmacogenetic-guided treatment. The advances and challenges in these areas are described and predictions about future use of genetics in drug therapy are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie A Johnson
- Department of Pharmacotherapy & Translational Research & Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Florida, PO Box 100486, Gainesville, FL 32610-0486, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hoffman JM, Haidar CE, Wilkinson MR, Crews KR, Baker DK, Kornegay NM, Yang W, Pui CH, Reiss UM, Gaur AH, Howard SC, Evans WE, Broeckel U, Relling MV. PG4KDS: a model for the clinical implementation of pre-emptive pharmacogenetics. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS 2014; 166C:45-55. [PMID: 24619595 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 192] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Pharmacogenetics is frequently cited as an area for initial focus of the clinical implementation of genomics. Through the PG4KDS protocol, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital pre-emptively genotypes patients for 230 genes using the Affymetrix Drug Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters (DMET) Plus array supplemented with a CYP2D6 copy number assay. The PG4KDS protocol provides a rational, stepwise process for implementing gene/drug pairs, organizing data, and obtaining consent from patients and families. Through August 2013, 1,559 patients have been enrolled, and four gene tests have been released into the electronic health record (EHR) for clinical implementation: TPMT, CYP2D6, SLCO1B1, and CYP2C19. These genes are coupled to 12 high-risk drugs. Of the 1,016 patients with genotype test results available, 78% of them had at least one high-risk (i.e., actionable) genotype result placed in their EHR. Each diplotype result released to the EHR is coupled with an interpretive consult that is created in a concise, standardized format. To support-gene based prescribing at the point of care, 55 interruptive clinical decision support (CDS) alerts were developed. Patients are informed of their genotyping result and its relevance to their medication use through a letter. Key elements necessary for our successful implementation have included strong institutional support, a knowledgeable clinical laboratory, a process to manage any incidental findings, a strategy to educate clinicians and patients, a process to return results, and extensive use of informatics, especially CDS. Our approach to pre-emptive clinical pharmacogenetics has proven feasible, clinically useful, and scalable.
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
The number and use of pharmacogenetic tests to assess a patient's likelihood of response or risk of an adverse event is expanding across medical specialties and becoming more prevalent. During this period of development and translation, different approaches are being investigated to optimize delivery of pharmacogenetic services. In this paper, we review pre-emptive and point-of-care delivery approaches currently implemented or being investigated and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. The continued growth in knowledge about the genetic basis of drug response combined with development of new and less expensive testing technologies and electronic medical records will impact future delivery systems. Regardless of delivery approach, the currently limited knowledge of health professionals about genetics generally or PGx specifically will remain a major obstacle to utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne B. Haga
- Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, 304 Research Drive, Box 90141, Durham, NC 27708, Tel: 919.684.0325, Fax: 919.613.6448
| | - Jivan Moaddeb
- Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, 304 Research Drive, Box 90141, Durham, NC 27708, Tel: 919.684.0325, Fax: 919.613.6448
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ioannidis JPA, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher D, Schulz KF, Tibshirani R. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet 2014; 383:166-75. [PMID: 24411645 PMCID: PMC4697939 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62227-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 937] [Impact Index Per Article: 93.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Correctable weaknesses in the design, conduct, and analysis of biomedical and public health research studies can produce misleading results and waste valuable resources. Small effects can be difficult to distinguish from bias introduced by study design and analyses. An absence of detailed written protocols and poor documentation of research is common. Information obtained might not be useful or important, and statistical precision or power is often too low or used in a misleading way. Insufficient consideration might be given to both previous and continuing studies. Arbitrary choice of analyses and an overemphasis on random extremes might affect the reported findings. Several problems relate to the research workforce, including failure to involve experienced statisticians and methodologists, failure to train clinical researchers and laboratory scientists in research methods and design, and the involvement of stakeholders with conflicts of interest. Inadequate emphasis is placed on recording of research decisions and on reproducibility of research. Finally, reward systems incentivise quantity more than quality, and novelty more than reliability. We propose potential solutions for these problems, including improvements in protocols and documentation, consideration of evidence from studies in progress, standardisation of research efforts, optimisation and training of an experienced and non-conflicted scientific workforce, and reconsideration of scientific reward systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P A Ioannidis
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Division of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Statistics, School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Sander Greenland
- Department of Epidemiology and Department of Statistics, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mark A Hlatky
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Division of Health Services Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Muin J Khoury
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Malcolm R Macleod
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh School of Medicine, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David Moher
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kenneth F Schulz
- FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Robert Tibshirani
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Statistics, School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Karnes JH, Van Driest S, Bowton EA, Weeke PE, Mosley JD, Peterson JF, Denny JC, Roden DM. Using systems approaches to address challenges for clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-SYSTEMS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2013; 6:125-35. [PMID: 24319008 DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2013] [Revised: 10/17/2013] [Accepted: 11/04/2013] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Many genetic variants have been shown to affect drug response through changes in drug efficacy and likelihood of adverse effects. Much of pharmacogenomic science has focused on discovering and clinically implementing single gene variants with large effect sizes. Given the increasing complexities of drug responses and their variability, a systems approach may be enabling for discovery of new biology in this area. Further, systems approaches may be useful in addressing challenges in moving these data to clinical implementation, including creation of predictive models of drug response phenotypes, improved clinical decision-making through complex biological models, improving strategies for integrating genomics into clinical practice, and evaluating the impact of implementation programs on public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason H Karnes
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Economic analyses of genetic tests in personalized medicine: clinical utility first, then cost utility. Genet Med 2013; 16:225-7. [PMID: 24232411 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2013] [Accepted: 09/04/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
45
|
Aiyar L, Shuman C, Hayeems R, Dupuis A, Pu S, Wodak S, Chitayat D, Velsher L, Davies J. Risk estimates for complex disorders: comparing personal genome testing and family history. Genet Med 2013; 16:231-7. [DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2013] [Accepted: 06/24/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
46
|
Vohra P, Blakely GW. Easing the global burden of diarrhoeal disease: can synthetic biology help? SYSTEMS AND SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY 2013; 7:73-8. [PMID: 24432144 PMCID: PMC3740103 DOI: 10.1007/s11693-013-9114-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2012] [Revised: 05/13/2013] [Accepted: 07/09/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The Millennium Declaration committed the 193 member states of the United Nations to end poverty by 2015. Despite the efforts of the UN and World Health Organisation, and the G8 commitment to spend a fixed proportion of gross national income on overseas aid, more than 2.6 billion people still lack access to proper sanitation. The absence of effective public health strategies in developing countries results in significant health burdens following gastrointestinal infections. Diarrhoea associated with infections resulting from oral-faecal contamination is the second leading cause of death in children under 5 years of age, primarily in Africa and South Asia. Currently there are no appropriate vaccines that could be easily administered on a global scale to prevent these infections. Synthetic biology has the potential to contribute to development of such vaccines. Our work is directed at developing a range of multivalent oral vaccines against the most common diarrhoea-causing bacteria, e.g., Escherichia coli, Shigella and Salmonella. If synthetic biology is to avoid the suspicion and possible revulsion of the public, scientists need to demonstrate that this new field has something real to offer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prerna Vohra
- Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Darwin Building, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JR UK
| | - Garry W. Blakely
- Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Darwin Building, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JR UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Godman B, Finlayson AE, Cheema PK, Zebedin-Brandl E, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I, Jones J, Malmström RE, Asola E, Baumgärtel C, Bennie M, Bishop I, Bucsics A, Campbell S, Diogene E, Ferrario A, Fürst J, Garuoliene K, Gomes M, Harris K, Haycox A, Herholz H, Hviding K, Jan S, Kalaba M, Kvalheim C, Laius O, Lööv SA, Malinowska K, Martin A, McCullagh L, Nilsson F, Paterson K, Schwabe U, Selke G, Sermet C, Simoens S, Tomek D, Vlahovic-Palcevski V, Voncina L, Wladysiuk M, van Woerkom M, Wong-Rieger D, Zara C, Ali R, Gustafsson LL. Personalizing health care: feasibility and future implications. BMC Med 2013; 11:179. [PMID: 23941275 PMCID: PMC3750765 DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2013] [Accepted: 07/09/2013] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Considerable variety in how patients respond to treatments, driven by differences in their geno- and/ or phenotypes, calls for a more tailored approach. This is already happening, and will accelerate with developments in personalized medicine. However, its promise has not always translated into improvements in patient care due to the complexities involved. There are also concerns that advice for tests has been reversed, current tests can be costly, there is fragmentation of funding of care, and companies may seek high prices for new targeted drugs. There is a need to integrate current knowledge from a payer's perspective to provide future guidance. Multiple findings including general considerations; influence of pharmacogenomics on response and toxicity of drug therapies; value of biomarker tests; limitations and costs of tests; and potentially high acquisition costs of new targeted therapies help to give guidance on potential ways forward for all stakeholder groups. Overall, personalized medicine has the potential to revolutionize care. However, current challenges and concerns need to be addressed to enhance its uptake and funding to benefit patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Godman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, SE-141 86, Stockholm, Sweden
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
- National Institute for Science and Technology on Innovation on Neglected Diseases, Centre for Technological Development in Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Alexander E Finlayson
- King’s Centre for Global Health, Global Health Offices, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, UK
| | - Parneet K Cheema
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eva Zebedin-Brandl
- Hauptverband der Österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger, 21 Kundmanngasse, AT-1031, Wien, Austria
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department for Biomedical Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Inaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea
- Osteba Basque Office for HTA, Ministry of Health of the Basque Country, Donostia-San Sebastian 1, 01010, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain
| | - Jan Jones
- NHS Tayside, Kings Cross, Dundee DD3 8EA, UK
| | - Rickard E Malmström
- Department of Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, SE-17176, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elina Asola
- Pharmaceutical Pricing Board, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, PO Box 33, FI-00023 Government, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Marion Bennie
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
- Public Health & Intelligence Strategic Business Unit, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, UK
| | - Iain Bishop
- Public Health & Intelligence Strategic Business Unit, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, UK
| | - Anna Bucsics
- Hauptverband der Österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger, 21 Kundmanngasse, AT-1031, Wien, Austria
| | - Stephen Campbell
- Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Eduardo Diogene
- Unitat de Coordinació i Estratègia del Medicament, Direcció Adjunta d'Afers Assistencials, Catalan Institute of Health, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alessandra Ferrario
- London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Health, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK
| | - Jurij Fürst
- Health Insurance Institute, Miklosiceva 24, SI-1507, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Kristina Garuoliene
- Medicines Reimbursement Department, National Health Insurance Fund, Europas a. 1, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Miguel Gomes
- INFARMED, Parque da Saúde de Lisboa, Avenida do Brasil 53, 1749-004, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Katharine Harris
- King’s Centre for Global Health, Global Health Offices, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, UK
| | - Alan Haycox
- Liverpool Health Economics Centre, University of Liverpool, Chatham Street, Liverpool L69 7ZH, UK
| | - Harald Herholz
- Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Hessen, 15 Georg Voigt Strasse, DE-60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Krystyna Hviding
- Norwegian Medicines Agency, Sven Oftedals vei 8, 0950, Oslo, Norway
| | - Saira Jan
- Clinical Programs, Pharmacy Management, Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, Newark, USA
| | - Marija Kalaba
- Republic Institute for Health Insurance, Jovana Marinovica 2, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Ott Laius
- State Agency of Medicines, Nooruse 1, 50411, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Sven-Ake Lööv
- Department of Healthcare Development, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kamila Malinowska
- HTA Consulting, Starowiślna Street, 17/3, 31-038, Cracow, Poland
- Public Health School, The Medical Centre of Postgraduate Education, Kleczewska Street, 61/63, 01-813, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Andrew Martin
- NHS Greater Manchester Commissioning Support Unit, Salford, Manchester, UK
| | - Laura McCullagh
- National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Fredrik Nilsson
- Dental and Pharmaceuticals Benefits Agency (TLV), PO Box 22520 Flemingatan 7, SE-104, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Ulrich Schwabe
- University of Heidelberg, Institute of Pharmacology, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gisbert Selke
- Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WIDO), Rosenthaler Straße 31, 10178, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Steven Simoens
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dominik Tomek
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University and Faculty of Medicine, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Vera Vlahovic-Palcevski
- Unit for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Rijeka, Krešimirova 42, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Luka Voncina
- Ministry of Health, Republic of Croatia, Ksaver 200a, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Menno van Woerkom
- Dutch Institute for Rational Use of Medicines, 3527 GV, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Durhane Wong-Rieger
- Institute for Optimizing Health Outcomes, 151 Bloor Street West, Suite 600, Toronto, ON M5S 1S4, Canada
| | - Corrine Zara
- Barcelona Health Region, Catalan Health Service, Esteve Terrades 30, 08023, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Raghib Ali
- INDOX Cancer Research Network, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lars L Gustafsson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, SE-141 86, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Fleeman N, Payne K, Newman WG, Howell SJ, Boland A, Oyee J, Saborido CM, Santander AF, Dickson R. Are health technology assessments of pharmacogenetic tests feasible? A case study of CYP2D6 testing in the treatment of breast cancer with tamoxifen. Per Med 2013; 10:601-611. [DOI: 10.2217/pme.13.60] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
This paper reports the process and experience of the design and conduct of a UK-based health technology assessment (HTA) of CYP2D6 pharmacogenetic testing to inform the targeted use of tamoxifen for the treatment of breast cancer. Examples of particular challenges for conducting a HTA are highlighted. It is clear from the HTA process described here that a common finding of similar future HTAs will have gaps in the evidence base, particularly in relation to evidence to inform cost–effectiveness. The lack of evidence is likely to be sufficiently large to result in extreme uncertainty and possibly decisions not to recommend a pharmacogenetic test for use in clinical practice. This has clear negative implications, which may hamper moving pharmacogenetic tests from the research environment into clinical practice and requires attention from both manufacturers of pharmacogenetic tests and key decision-makers responsible for market authorization and reimbursement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nigel Fleeman
- Liverpool Reviews & Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Room 2.10, Whelan Building, The Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - William G Newman
- Centre for Genetic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, The University of Manchester, St Mary’s Hospital, Hathersage Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Sacha J Howell
- Institute of Cancer Studies, The University of Manchester, Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Angela Boland
- Liverpool Reviews & Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Room 2.10, Whelan Building, The Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK
| | - James Oyee
- Covance, Osprey House, Maidenhead Office Park, Westacott Way, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 3QH, UK
| | - Carlos Martin Saborido
- School of Nursing & Physiotherapy, Comillas Pontifical University, Ciempozuelos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Fernández Santander
- Biomedical Science Department, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rumona Dickson
- Liverpool Reviews & Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Room 2.10, Whelan Building, The Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hasanaj Q, Wilson BJ, Little J, Montazeri Z, Carroll JC. Family history: impact on coronary heart disease risk assessment beyond guideline-defined factors. Public Health Genomics 2013; 16:208-14. [PMID: 23886802 DOI: 10.1159/000353460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2013] [Accepted: 06/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Family history (FH) provides insights into the effects of shared genomic susceptibilities, environments and behaviors, making it a potentially valuable risk assessment tool for chronic diseases. We assessed whether coronary heart disease (CHD) risk assessment is improved when FH information is added to other clinical information recommended in guidelines. METHODS We applied logistic regression analyses to cross-sectional data originally obtained from a UK study of women who delivered a live-born infant between 1951 and 1970. We developed 3 models: Model 1 included only the covariates in a guideline applicable to the population, Model 2 added FH to Model 1, and Model 3 included a fuller range of risk factors. For each model, its ability to discriminate between study subjects with and those without CHD was evaluated and its impact on risk classification examined using the net reclassification index. RESULTS FH was an independent risk factor for CHD (odds ratio = 1.7, 95% confidence interval = 1.26-2.47) and improved discrimination beyond guideline-defined clinical factors (p < 0.0006). However, the difference in the area under the curve of 2.8% and the extent of patient reclassification resulting from the inclusion of FH were small (p = 0.11). CONCLUSION While FH were a significant independent risk factor for CHD, it added little to risk factors typically included in guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Q Hasanaj
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont., Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Leunis A, Redekop WK, van Montfort KAGM, Löwenberg B, Uyl-de Groot CA. The development and validation of a decision-analytic model representing the full disease course of acute myeloid leukemia. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2013; 31:605-621. [PMID: 23640102 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-013-0058-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is moving towards personalized medicine. However, due to the low incidence of AML, it is not always feasible to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of personalized medicine using clinical trials. Decision analytic models provide an alternative data source. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to develop and validate a decision analytic model that represents the full disease course of AML. METHODS We used a micro simulation with discrete event components to incorporate both patient and disease heterogeneity. Input parameters were calculated from patient-level data. Two hematologists critically evaluated the model to ensure face validity. Internal and external validity was tested by comparing complete remission (CR) rates and survival outcomes of the model with original data, other clinical trials and a population-based study. RESULTS No significant differences in patient and treatment characteristics, CR rate, 5-year overall and disease-free survival were found between the simulated and original data. External validation showed no significant differences in survival between simulated data and other clinical trials. However, differences existed between the simulated data and a population-based study. CONCLUSIONS The model developed in this study is proved to be valid for analysis of an AML population participating in a clinical trial. The generalizability of the model to a broader patient population has not been proven yet. Further research is needed to identify differences between the clinical trial population and other AML patients and to incorporate these differences in the model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemieke Leunis
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment/Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|