TREAT-AND-EXTEND REGIMENS WITH ANTI-VEGF AGENTS IN RETINAL DISEASES: A Literature Review and Consensus Recommendations

Subretinal fibrosis occurrence according to macular neovascularisation subtypes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To assess subretinal fibrosis (SF) occurrence in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), according to macular neovascularisation (MNV) subtypes.

METHODS

A Retrospective national multi centre cohort study included eyes with naive nAMD. Main outcome measures were, according to MNV subtypes, cumulative incidence for SF, risk factors, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for 36 months.

RESULTS

Four hundred and twenty eyes were included. Cumulative incidence of SF was 34.3% at 1 year, 39.0% at 2 years and 50.6% at 3 years. In multivariable analysis, Type 2 and mixed type 1 and 2 MNV were associated (p < 0.001) with a more frequent and rapid development of SF (respectively 85.5% and 81.0% at 1 year, then 95.8% and 93.1% at 3 years) than Types 1 and 3 (respectively 11.3% and 3.6% at 1 year, then 22.9% and 12.7% at 3 years). In Type 2 and mixed type 1 and 2 MNV combined, at baseline a worse BCVA (p = 0.02) and a higher maximal subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM) thickness (p = 0.005) were associated with SF development at 3 years. In Type 1 MNV, the presence at baseline of intraretinal fluid (IRF) (p = 0.007) or SHRM (p < 0.001) and a higher percentage of visits with IRF (p < 0.001) or with SHRM (p < 0.001) were associated with SF occurrence. For Type 3 MNV, only a higher percentage of visits with SHRM (p = 0.001) was associated with SF. Including all MNV subtypes, eyes with a worse BCVA at baseline were associated with SF development (p < 0.001). Conversely, presence of SF at 3 years was associated with a worse baseline BCVA (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Occurrence of SF differs when considering apart MNV subtypes.

Impact of residual retinal fluid on treatment outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Treatment decisions for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the setting of individualised treatment regimens are adapted to disease activity. The main marker of disease activity and trigger for re-treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents is the presence of retinal fluid on optical coherence tomography (OCT). Recently, attention has focused on the impact of residual retinal fluid on nAMD management. Based on a literature review and the combined clinical experience of an international group of retinal specialists, this manuscript provides expert guidance on the treatment of nAMD according to fluid status and proposes an algorithm for determining when to administer anti-VEGF treatment according to residual fluid status. We explore the role of residual fluid in treatment decisions and outcomes in nAMD, taking into consideration fluid evaluation and, in particular, distinguishing between fluid in different anatomic compartments and at different stages during the treatment course. Current limitations to identifying and interpreting fluid on OCT, and the assumption that any residual retinal fluid reflects ongoing VEGF activity, are discussed.

Efficacy and safety of brolucizumab every 6 weeks induction therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

This retrospective study aims to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of brolucizumab every 6 weeks induction therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) cases. This study included 140 eyes from 140 patients (101 males and 39 females, with a mean age of 77.7 ± 8.7 years) with nAMD who received brolucizumab injections every 6 weeks as part of induction therapy across four participating centers between June 2020 and March 2024. Follow-up lasted for at least 20-24 weeks. Data collected included age, sex, history of nAMD treatment, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), presence or absence of exudation, and occurrence of intraocular inflammation (IOI). Sixty-one eyes had prior nAMD treatment. Mean BCVA (logMAR) was 0.40 ± 0.43 before brolucizumab therapy, improving to 0.38 ± 0.42, 0.33 ± 0.41, and 0.34 ± 0.44 after the first, second, and third injections, respectively. Significant improvements in BCVA were observed from the second injection onward (p < 0.05). CRT decreased significantly from baseline of 341.6 ± 151.0 to 219.1 ± 119.8, 204.0 ± 112.9, and 200.8 ± 96.0 after the first, second, and third injections, respectively (p < 1.0 × 10-20). Exudative findings, present in all cases before treatment, resolved in 64.3%, 82.1%, and 79.3% of cases after the first, second, and third injections, respectively. IOI was observed in five, three, and four eyes after the first, second, and third injections, respectively, accounting for 8.6% of all cases. No cases had retinal vasculitis or occlusion. In conclusion, brolucizumab administered every 6 weeks as induction therapy for nAMD showed favorable efficacy and safety outcomes during a 6-month follow-up.

Practice patterns and preferences in the management of age-related macular degeneration among vitreoretinal surgeons in the Philippines

PURPOSE

To determine the practice patterns and preferences in the management of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) among vitreoretinal surgeons in the Philippines.

METHODS

This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. A validated online survey regarding practices in AMD management was sent to the members of the Vitreo-Retina Society of the Philippines (VRSP). Data were analyzed using frequency and percent distributions.

RESULTS

A total of 114 vitreoretinal surgeons participated in the study. Majority (97.4%) inquired about patients' smoking habits and advised cessation (99.1%). Dietary advice (94.7%) focused on omega-3-rich foods and green, leafy vegetables. Oral antioxidant supplements were prescribed for unilateral intermediate AMD (83.3%), with the age-related eye disease studies formula most commonly used (25.7%). Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) was preferred for subfoveal (99.1%), juxtafoveal (94.7%), and extrafoveal (73.5%) choroidal neovascularization, with bevacizumab being the most frequently administered agent (72.6%) and aflibercept (83.2%) the most preferred due to cost considerations. The treat-and-extend protocol was followed by 58.4%, while 38.9% used a pro re nata approach. Treatment response was primarily evaluated by fluid reduction on optical coherence tomography, with intraretinal fluid being the most critical (48.7%). Most surgeons (86.7%) switched anti-VEGF agents for poor response, and 80.5% did so when no response was seen. Referral to low vision specialists was most often based on difficulty performing daily activities regardless of visual acuity.

CONCLUSION

Real-world practice patterns and preferences of the members of the VRSP generally align with globally recognized management standards for AMD. They displayed remarkable knowledge and attitudes with regards to smoking, diet, and nutrition in relation to AMD care. Anti-VEGF drugs have been used widely for neovascular AMD in accordance with international guidelines. A significant proportion acknowledge the advantages of referral to a low vision specialist.

FLUID RESOLUTION WITHOUT SHORTENING INJECTION INTERVAL DURING SUBRETINAL FLUID-TOLERATING TREATMENT IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence and factors associated with subretinal fluid (SRF) resolution during SRF-tolerating treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who exhibited fovea-involving residual SRF persisting for at least 6 months during aflibercept treatment. Patients who showed SRF resolution despite maintaining the injection intervals were included in the resolution group, while those who exhibited persisting SRF throughout the study period were included in the nonresolution group. The incidence and associated factors of SRF resolution without reducing the injection interval were evaluated. Furthermore, the frequency of successfully extending the injection intervals while maintaining SRF resolution was identified.

RESULTS

In total, 65 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration were included (32 and 33 in the resolution and nonresolution groups, respectively). When compared with the nonresolution group, the resolution group showed a lower mean height of SRF (67.7 ± 33.4 vs. 109.9 ± 44.9 µ m, P < 0.001) and a lower maximum height of SRF (138.3 ± 88.6 vs. 176.2 ± 76.9 µ m, P = 0.034). In multivariate analysis, the mean SRF height ( P = 0.001), maximum SRF height ( P = 0.006), and interval of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections ( P = 0.023) were significantly associated with the resolution of SRF. In the resolution group, 14 patients (43.8%) successfully expanded the injection interval.

CONCLUSION

During SRF-tolerating treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, a substantial proportion of patients exhibited resolution of fluid without shortening the injection interval. Patients with lesser residual SRF during treatment were more likely to achieve fluid resolution. After SRF resolution, injection intervals can be extended in more than 40% of patients.

Macular Atrophy in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

TOPIC

Macular atrophy incidence in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Macular atrophy is a significant event that may occur in eyes with neovascular AMD treated with anti-VEGF therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO, CRD42024474924). A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science was performed up to November 1, 2023. Randomized and non-randomized studies of treatment-naïve neovascular AMD patients reporting macular atrophy incidence at 24±3 months after anti-VEGF therapy were eligible for inclusion in this review. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. For randomized controlled trials, the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was employed, while non-randomized studies were evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. Random-effects meta-analysis models were used for quantitative synthesis, accounting for study variability. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic, and publication bias by funnel plots and Egger's test. The primary outcome was the incidence of new macular atrophy at 24 months post-anti-VEGF therapy, with secondary outcomes at 12 months. Atrophy was diagnosed using color fundus photograph (CFP), fluorescein angiography (FA), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), optical coherence tomography (OCT), or multimodal imaging.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis, with 11 included in the meta-analysis (N=3,013 eyes). The pooled 24-month incidence of macular atrophy was 29% (95% confidence interval [CI]:20%-38%,I2=93%). Subgroup analysis revealed incidence rates of 26% (95% CI:15%-37%,I2=88%) for 814 eyes with Type 1/2 macular neovascularization (MNV), 49% (95% CI:18%-80%,I2=92%) for Type 3 MNV (N=230 eyes), and 29% (95% CI:18%-40%,I2=96%) for all MNV types (N=2,131 eyes). The pooled 12-month incidence among 2,214 eyes was 11% (95% CI:4%-18%,I2=93%). The certainty of evidence regarding the incidence of macular atrophy after anti-VEGF treatment, as assessed by GRADE, was low.

CONCLUSIONS

While this meta-analysis has limitations, including a moderate risk of bias in non-randomized studies, inconsistencies in the results indicated by high heterogeneity, and imprecision due to the different imaging modalities used to diagnose macular atrophy, our results suggest that macular atrophy could be a common complication in neovascular AMD patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy.

Prediction of OCT contours of short-term response to anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic macular edema using generative adversarial networks

Diabetic macular edema (DME) stands as a leading cause for vision loss among the working-age population. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are currently recognized as the first-line treatment. However, a significant portion of patients remain insensitive to anti-VEGF, resulting in sustained visual impairment. Therefore, it's imperative to predict prognosis and formulate personalized therapeutic regimens. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have demonstrated remarkably in forecasting prognosis of diseases, yet their performance is still constrained by the limited availability of real-world data and suboptimal image quality, which subsequently impacts the model's outputs. We endeavor to employ preoperative images along with postoperative OCT contours annotated and extracted via LabelMe and OpenCV to train the model in generating postoperative contours of critical OCT structures instead of previous whole retinal morphology, considerably alleviating the difficulty of output phase and diminishing the requisite quantity of training datasets. Our study reveals that the GAN could serve as an auxiliary instrument for ophthalmologists in determining the prognosis of individuals and screening patients with poor responses to anti-VEGF therapy.

Outcomes and predictive factors for fluid resolution following three loading injections of faricimab for treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration

To evaluate the outcomes and predictive factors for fluid resolution following three loading injections of faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration(AMD). This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with treatment-naïve neovascular AMD who received three monthly injections of faricimab. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA) and central retinal thickness(CRT) following treatment were evaluated. The resolution of subretinal fluid(SRF), intraretinal fluid(IRF), and serous pigment epithelial detachment(PED) was also assessed. In addition, factors associated with complete resolution of SRF and IRF were investigated. A total of 69 patients were included in this study. BCVA significantly improved from a mean logarithm of minimal angle of resolution of 0.64 ± 0.41 at baseline to 0.47 ± 0.39 at 3 months (P < 0.001). CRT significantly decreased from 424.1 ± 155.5 μm at baseline to 266.3 ± 71.7 μm at 3 months (P < 0.001). At baseline, SRF was observed in 55 eyes (79.7%), IRF in 39 eyes(56.5%), and serous PED in 57 eyes(82.6%). By 3 months, the number of eyes showing these findings had decreased to 11 eyes(15.9%) for SRF, 6 eyes(8.7%) for IRF, and 10 eyes(14.5%) for serous PED. The presence of type 2 (88.2%) and type 3 (94.7%) macular neovascularization(MNV) was associated with a high incidence of complete resolution of SRF and IRF after treatment. Three loading injections of faricimab resulted in significant functional and anatomical improvements in treatment-naïve neovascular AMD, with a high rate of resolution of SRF, IRF, and serous PED. The anatomical effects were especially pronounced in cases of type 2 and type 3 MNV.

Emerging clinical evidence of a dual role for Ang-2 and VEGF-A blockade with faricimab in retinal diseases

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies have transformed the treatment of retinal diseases. However, VEGF signaling is only one component of the complex, multifactorial pathophysiology of retinal diseases, and many patients have residual disease activity despite ongoing anti-VEGF treatment. The angiopoietin/tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin and epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (Ang/Tie2) signaling pathway is critical to endothelial cell homeostasis, survival, integrity, and vascular stability. Ang-2 can interfere with Ang-1/Tie2 signaling and is increased in several retinal diseases. Lack of Tie2 signaling due to elevated Ang-2 levels drives vascular instability through pericyte dropout, neovascularization, vascular leakage, inflammation, and fibrosis. Although Ang-2 and VEGF can synergistically promote vascular instability and neovascularization, Ang-2 may also mediate vascular instability independently of VEGF. Faricimab is a bispecific antibody designed for intraocular use that inhibits two distinct pathways via Ang-2 and VEGF-A blockade. Clinical biomarkers of vascular instability are important for evaluating disease control and subsequent treatment decisions. These biomarkers include measurement/evaluation with optical coherence tomography (OCT) of intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid, central subfield thickness, and pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs), and fluorescein angiography imaging of macular leakage and PEDs. Hyperreflective foci (HRF), thought to be representative of activated microglia, indicating an inflammatory microenvironment, and epiretinal membranes (ERMs), a marker for retinal fibrotic proliferation in diabetic macular edema (DME), are both also identified using OCT. Here we summarize data (secondary endpoint and prespecified exploratory analyses as well as post hoc analyses) from six Phase III trials suggest that dual therapy Ang-2/VEGF-A inhibition with faricimab (6 mg) has a greater effect on reducing/resolving biomarkers of vascular instability than aflibercept (2 mg), by both controlling neovascularization and vascular leakage (with resultant resolution of exudation associated with DME, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, and retinal vein occlusion), as well as by targeting inflammation (reduction of HRF in DME) and retinal fibrotic proliferation (reducing the risk of ERMs in eyes with DME). Modulation of both the Ang-2 and VEGF-A pathways with faricimab may therefore provide greater disease control than anti-VEGF monotherapy, potentially leading to extended treatment durability and improved long-term outcomes.

Intravitreal therapy for the management of diabetic retinopathy: A concise review

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a serious microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus and may result in irreversible visual loss. Laser treatment has been the gold standard treatment for diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy for many years. Of late, intravitreal therapy has emerged as a cornerstone in the management of DR. Among the diverse pharmacotherapeutic options, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents have demonstrated remarkable efficacy by attenuating neovascularization and reducing macular edema, thus preserving visual acuity in DR patients.

Real-World Outcomes After Switch From Aflibercept to Faricimab in Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

To assess the anatomic and functional outcomes in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) switched from intravitreal aflibercept to faricimab in a real-world setting.

Methods

Retrospective, interventional consecutive case series. Patients with DME were switched from aflibercept to faricimab and categorized based on central subfield thickness (CST) 4 weeks after last aflibercept injection into responding DME (rDME, CST reduction >20% or CST ≤ 250 µm) and nonresponding DME (nrDME, CST unchanged or increased). Patients received a loading dose of two monthly faricimab injections followed by a treat-and-extend regimen. Differences in response between rDME and nrDME were analyzed based on injection interval, change in CST, and visual acuity (VA) 12 weeks postswitch.

Results

Fifty-two eyes of 40 patients met inclusion criteria (rDME: n = 26, nrDME: n = 26). Baseline and week 12: VA (logMAR) rDME 0.29 ± 0.23 and 0.22 ± 0.28, nrDME 0.42 ± 0.32 and 0.36 ± 0.29; CST (µm) rDME 370 ± 99 and 288 ± 80, nrDME 384 ± 85 and 380 ± 129. After 12 weeks, 54% rDME and 25% nrDME eyes showed a CST decrease of >20% or CST ≤ 250 µm. Forty-six percent rDME and 50% nrDME eyes had a ±20% CST change, 25% of nrDME eyes had a >20% CST increase, and 73% of rDME eyes and 47% of nrDME eyes reached an extended interval of 8 weeks or longer after 12 weeks.

Conclusions

Most DME eyes previously responding or not responding to aflibercept experienced a reduction or stabilization of DME after 12 weeks of faricimab treatment. rDME showed a better anatomic response, and treatment intervals could be extended earlier and longer than nrDME.

OUTCOMES OF PRO RE NATA VERSUS TREAT-AND-EXTEND ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR INJECTIONS FOR MYOPIC MACULAR NEOVASCULARIZATION IN MULTIETHNIC PATIENTS IN THE UNITED STATES

PURPOSE

To compare visual outcomes and recurrence rates between pro re nata (PRN), treat-and-extend and stop (TES), and treat-and-extend with chronic maintenance dosing (TEM) regimens of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (vascular endothelial growth factor) injections for myopic macular neovascularization (MNV) in multiethnic patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients treated with PRN, TES, or TEM for myopic MNV using intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab. The primary outcome measure was visual improvement at 12 months.

RESULTS

Overall, 127 eyes of 117 patients (75 women and 42 men) were included. The mean follow-up duration was 37.9 months. The outcomes of PRN (47 eyes [37%]), TES (52 eyes [41%]), and TEM (28 eyes [22%]) were compared. All groups showed significant visual improvement at 12 months and at the final follow-up (all P < 0.05). Visual outcomes did not differ significantly between the three groups at 12 months and the final follow-up (all P > 0.05). However, the number of eyes with recurrences was significantly higher in the PRN group and significantly lower in the TEM group during the follow-up (38%, 21%, and 11% in the PRN, TES, and TEM groups, respectively; P = 0.020). The PRN group received the fewest injections during follow-up (5.3, 10.9, and 19.9 injections in the PRN, TES, and TEM groups, respectively; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Comparing myopic MNV treatment regimens, anti-VEGF injections with PRN, TES, or TEM are effective for myopic MNV and have comparable visual outcomes. Because PRN provides favorable outcomes with fewer injections, it should be the first-line approach. However, a treat-and-extend approach with TES and TEM may be an option given individual patient factors.

Effect of baseline fluid localization on visual acuity and prognosis in type 1 macular neovascularization treated with anti-VEGF

PURPOSE

To assess the prognostic value of subretinal (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF) localizations in type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

SUBJECTS

Eyes were prospectively treated with anti-vascular epithelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intravitreal injections (IVT) according to a Pro-Re-Nata (PRN) or Treat and Extend (TAE) regimen during 24 months. A total of 211 eyes with treatment-naïve type 1 MNV secondary to AMD were consecutively included. Eyes were divided between 2 groups according to the fluid localization: presence of SRF alone (SRF group), or presence of IRF associated or not with SRF (IRF ± SRF group).

RESULTS

At baseline the mean BCVA was 66.2 letters. SRF was present in 94.8% of eyes, IRF in 30.8%, and both in 25.6%. Data were available for 201 eyes at 12 months, and 157 eyes at 24 months. The presence of IRF at baseline was associated with lower baseline BCVA and significantly lower BCVA at 12 months (p < 0.001) and 24 months (p < 0.001). Eyes with SRF alone displayed better visual outcomes (BCVA at month 12, SRF = 74.3 letters, IRF ± SRF = 56.9 letters). In the presence of baseline IRF, fibrosis (p = 0.03) and atrophy (p < 0.001) were more frequently found at 24 months. In a multivariate model, the presence of baseline IRF was significantly associated with lower BCVA at month 12 but not at month 24.

CONCLUSION

In type 1 MNV, the presence of baseline IRF was associated with worse visual outcomes compared to SRF alone, and more frequent atrophy and fibrosis.

Injection burden and treatment intervals of aflibercept in observe-and-plan regimen for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

The Observe-and-Plan (O&P) regimen allows for individualised treatment. In this study, we evaluated injection burden and intervals using aflibercept in an O&P regimen for eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS

This was a retrospective registry-based study of treatment-naïve eyes with neovascular AMD. Treatment data were compiled for 3 years after commencement of intravitreal aflibercept therapy. We evaluated clinical consequences at the first follow-up after loading dose, the proportion of patients who obtained and kept dry macula after loading dose, number of injections and intervals between injections.

RESULTS

Data were obtained for 1103 eyes. After loading dose, 0.4% were lost to follow-up, 7.5% discontinued, 50.9% booked for further injections and 41.3% booked for monthly observations. After loading dose, the macula remained dry in 49.2% at 3 months, 34.0% at 6 months, 23.7% at 12 months and 15.2% at 24 months. For the entire population, median cumulative total number of injections was 7, 12 and 15, after 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. After the 3rd year, the proportion of eyes in the short 4-6 weeks treatment interval was 51.1%, 8 weeks interval was kept in 14.4% and the extended treatment intervals of 10 and 12 weeks was possible in 34.4%.

CONCLUSION

After loading dose, one in two eyes required further injections. A large proportion required therapy with shorter intervals than the label-recommended 8 weeks. The large majority of those who obtained a dry macula after loading dose turned exudative again, mostly within the first 3 months.

Treat-and-Extend Versus Pro re nata Regimens of Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparative Study from Routine Clinical Practice

INTRODUCTION

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is generally given using pro re nata or "treat-and-extend" (T&E) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Randomized clinical trials have reported that T&E is superior to Pro re nata (PRN), but results from clinical trials may not always be replicated in clinical practice. Real-world data comparing T&E and PRN regimens for nAMD are limited. The objective of this work was to report 24-month outcomes of PRN versus T&E regimens for ranibizumab and aflibercept to treat nAMD in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a prospectively designed observational outcomes registry, the Fight Retinal Blindness! Project (FRB). Treatment-naïve eyes starting nAMD treatment with at least three injections using a T&E or PRN regimen were tracked by using the FRB. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity (VA) measured by the number of letters read on a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart at 2 years versus baseline. The secondary outcome was the number of injections at 2 years.

RESULTS

From January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2019, 3313 eyes from 2948 patients with nAMD were included: 1243 eyes from 1065 patients were classified as PRN and 2070 eyes from 1935 patients started a T&E regimen. At 24 months, patients on the T&E regimen experienced significantly greater mean (95% confidence interval) improvement in VA than those on PRN (+ 4.2 [3.1, 5.2] vs. + 1.3 [0.1, 2.6] letters; p < 0.001), with more injections (14.9 standard deviation(SD) 4.3) vs. 9.8(SD 4.3); p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes treated with a T&E regimen had better VA outcomes from VEGF inhibitors than eyes treated PRN. This large real-world data assessment supports previous data from randomized clinical trials that the T&E regimen delivers better outcomes than PRN.

Predictors of 24-month onset of macular fibrosis in type 3 macular neovascularisation

AIMS

To explore prognostic multimarker models for progression to macular fibrosis (MF) over 24 months specific to type 3 macular neovascularisation (T3 MNV).

METHODS

This retrospective, exploratory, single-centre, cohort study comprised 65 eyes of 43 Caucasian patients with treatment naive T3 MNV, all with a 24-month follow-up post anti-VEGF therapy using a strict pro-re-nata (PRN) regimen. Data on demographic features, clinical findings, frequency of intravitreal treatments and optical coherence tomography biomarkers were collected at baseline and after 12 and 24 months of follow-up. Logistic regression models (LRM) and receiver-operating curve (C-index) analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic ability of the studied biomarkers in discriminating between MF affected and unaffected patients.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, MF was present in 46.2% of eyes. Subretinal hyper-reflective material (SHRM) and subretinal pigment epithelium multilaminar hyper-reflectivity (multilaminae) emerged as significant predictors for MF, with adjusted odds ratios (OR) of 18.0 (95% CL 13.4 to 24.1) and 11.8 (95% CL 8.66 to 16.0), respectively. Additionally, the presence of multifocal lesions (OR 0.04, 95% CL 0.01 to 0.30) appeared to decrease the likelihood of MF. C-indexes for the selected LRMs ranged between 0.92 and 0.88, indicating a comparably high discriminant ability. Despite consistent treatment schedules between the two groups (MF: median intravitreal treatment (IVT) number=10.5, IQR=7; non-MF: median IVT=10, IQR=6), a decline in best-corrected visual acuity was noted in the group with MF onset over the 24-month follow-up (-13.0 ETDRS letters; 95% CL -22.1 to -3.9; p=0.006).

CONCLUSION

Our study identifies SHRM and multilaminae as relevant predictors of 24-month onset of MF in patients with T3 MNV. These findings enrich our understanding of the development of MF in T3 MNV and can guide improved risk prognostication. Future research should consider larger samples and prospective designs to validate these predictors.

Switching to Intravitreal Brolucizumab after Ranibizumab or Aflibercept Using Treat and Extend Regimen for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Japanese Patients: 1-Year Results and Factors Associated with Treatment Responsiveness

Objective: To purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the 1-year outcomes and factors associated with the treatment responsiveness of switching to intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBR) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in Japanese patients refractory to ranibizumab or aflibercept using a treat and extend (TAE) regimen. Methods: A total of 48 eyes of 47 nAMD patients were switched to IVBR, and 36 eyes of 35 patients (27 males and 8 females) underwent 1-year treatment after the switch. Results: The rate of dry macula was significantly higher 12 months after the switch to IVBR (p < 0.001), with a significant decrease in the mean central macular thickness (CMT) and the mean central choroidal thickness (CCT) (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). The injection interval was significantly extended from 7.0 ± 1.7 weeks to 10.3 ± 2.5 weeks 12 months after the switch (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, a smaller number of prior anti-VEGF injections (p = 0.025; odds ratio: 0.947; 95% confidence interval: 0.903-0.994) and a pre-switching CCT of less than 250 µm (p = 0.023; odds ratio: 0.099; 95% confidence interval: 0.013-0.731) were associated with the good response group. Conclusions: These results suggest that IVBR may suppress disease activity and prolong the injection interval by switching for AMD patients with an insufficient response to treatment with ranibizumab and aflibercept.

The Association between Retinal Thickness Fluctuations and Visual Outcomes under Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to examine the association between retinal thickness (RT) fluctuations and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in eyes with neovascular AMD, macular edema secondary to RVO, and DME treated with anti-VEGF therapy.

METHODS

A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed from January 2006 to March 2024. Studies comparing visual or anatomic outcomes of patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy, stratified by magnitudes of RT fluctuation, were included. ROBINS-I and Cochrane RoB 2 tools were used to assess risk of bias, and certainty of evidence was evaluated with GRADE criteria. Meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model. Primary outcomes were final BCVA and change in BCVA relative to baseline.

RESULTS

15,725 articles were screened; 15 studies were identified in the systematic review and 5 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Final ETDRS VA was significantly worse in eyes with the highest level of RT fluctuation (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 7.86 letters; 95% CI, 4.97, 10.74; p < 0.00001; I2 = 81%; 3,136 eyes). RT at last observation was significantly greater in eyes with high RT fluctuations (WMD = -27.35 μm; 95% CI, -0.04, 54.75; p = 0.05; I2 = 88%; 962 eyes).

CONCLUSIONS

Final visual outcome is associated with magnitude of RT fluctuation over the course of therapy. It is unclear whether minimizing RT fluctuations would help optimize visual outcomes in patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy. These findings are limited by a small set of studies, risk of bias, and considerable heterogeneity.

Dynamics and patterns of recurrence in neovascular AMD during real-world management using automated fluid monitoring

In this retrospective longitudinal observational study, data from one site of the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry (University of Zurich, Switzerland) was used to investigate the quantity and distribution of recurrent fluid in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Study eye eligibility required treatment-naïve nAMD, receiving at least three anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections, followed by a treatment discontinuation of at least six months and subsequence fluid recurrence. To quantify fluid, a regulatory approved deep learning algorithm (Vienna Fluid Monitor, RetInSight, Vienna, Austria) was used. Fifty-six eyes of 56 patients with a mean age of 76.29 ± 6.58 years at baseline fulfilled the inclusion criteria. From baseline to the end of the first treatment-free interval, SRF volume had decreased significantly (58.0 nl (IQR 10-257 nl) to 8.73 nl (IQR 1-100 nl), p < 0.01). The quantitative increase in IRF volume from baseline to the end of the first treatment-free interval was not statistically significant (1.35 nl (IQR 0-107 nl) to 5.18 nl (IQR 0-24 nl), p = 0.13). PED also did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.71). At the end of the second treatment discontinuation there was quantitatively more IRF (17.3 nl) than SRF (3.74 nl). In conclusion, discontinuation of treatment with anti-VEGF therapy may change the fluid pattern in nAMD.

The effects of age-related macular degeneration on work productivity: A meta-analysis

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of vision loss and blindness in older adults. Given the aging population in developed countries and the increased participation of older adults in the labour market, this paper aims to understand the impact of AMD on workplace productivity. Economic studies, comparative studies, observational studies, cohort studies, case series, randomized control trials, clinical trials, multicenter studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINHAL, as well as grey literature, were systematically searched to obtain all relevant literature. Duplicate records were removed, and two independent reviewers screened records for relevance. After screening, a risk of bias assessment was carried out. Data were extracted and a meta-analysis was performed using STATA 15.0. Fixed-effect and random-effect models were computed based on heterogeneity. Seven studies consisting of 3,060,864 subjects from 5 different countries were included in this systematic review. Mean wages lost due to impaired work productivity ranged from $1,395 to $55,180. The mean unemployment rate attributed to AMD ranged from 5.50% to 77.00%. Meta-analysis results indicated a significant unemployment rate (SMD = 0.44, CI: [0.27, 0.62]). Patients with AMD experience impaired work productivity as demonstrated by the wages lost and significantly higher rates of unemployment.

Long-term results of treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration using antiangiogenic drugs: A review of the literature

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the main causes of visual acuity (VA) loss in people over 50 years of age worldwide, with neovascular AMD (nAMD) accounting for 80% of cases of severe vision loss due to this disease. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs have been used for the treatment of this disease for more than a decade, changing drastically the visual prognosis of these patients. However, initial studies reporting data on outcomes were short term. Currently, there are different series published on the long-term results of AMD after treatment with anti-VEGF, and the aim of this review is to synthesize these results. The mean follow-up of the included studies was 8.2 years (range 5-12 years). The mean initial VA was 55.3 letters in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) (range 45.6-65) and the mean final VA was 50.1 letters (range 33.0-64.3), with a mean loss of 5.2 letters. At the end of follow-up, 29.4% of the patients maintained a VA > 70 letters. The 67.9% of patients remained stable at the end of follow-up (< 15 letter loss), with a severe loss (≥ 15 letters) of 30.1%. Fibrosis and atrophy were the main causes of long-term VA loss, occurring at the end of follow-up in 52.5% and 60.5%, respectively.

Treatment of age-related macular degeneration with aflibercept using a treat, extend and fixed protocol; A 4-year study of treatment outcomes, durability, safety and quality of life (An extension to the MATE randomised controlled trial)

PURPOSE

Data are limited pertaining to the long-term benefits of aflibercept treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The aim of this study was to provide outcomes, safety, durability and quality-of-life data with aflibercept using a modified treat, extend and fixed regime over 4 years.

METHODS

Prospective, multicentre, single cohort observational study of treatment-naïve nAMD participants treated with aflibercept as 2-year extension of the MATE-trial that compared early and late Treat-and-Extend for 2 years. Refracted ETDRS best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), treatment interval and adverse events were assessed. Quality-of-life was measured using the Macular Disease Dependent Quality of Life (MacDQoL) and Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaires (MacTSQ).

RESULTS

Twenty-six of 40 participants completing the MATE-trial were enrolled with 20 completing the total 4-year study. Mean BCVA was 60.7 at Month 0 and 64.8 ETDRS letters at Month 48 while CRT decreased from 423.7 μm to 292.2 μm. Five participants discontinued treatment due to inactivity. The mean number of treatments and visits for the remaining participants was 27 and 30.0, respectively, with treatment intervals extended to 12 weeks in four participants at Month 48. Both AMD-specific QoL and treatment satisfaction remained stable between Months 0 and 48 and mean BCVA significantly correlated with AMD-specific QoL scores at Months 12, 24 and 48.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that BCVA can be maintained over 48 months when following a treat-extend-and-fix regimen of aflibercept with intervals out to 12 weeks, while maintaining AMD-specific QoL and treatment satisfaction.

Exploring Current Molecular Targets in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration toward the Perspective of Long-Term Agents

Long-lasting anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have become an option to reduce treatment frequency, with ongoing research exploring optimal responses and safety profiles. This review delves into molecular targets, pharmacological aspects, and strategies for achieving effective and enduring disease control in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The molecular pathways involved in macular neovascularization, including angiogenesis and arteriogenesis, are explored. VEGF, PlGF, Ang-1, and Ang-2 play crucial roles in regulating angiogenesis, influencing vessel growth, maturation, and stability. The complex interplay of these factors, along with growth factors like TGFβ and bFGF, contributes to the pathogenesis of neovascular membranes. Current anti-VEGF therapies, including bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab, and faricimab, are discussed with a focus on their pharmacokinetics and clinical applications. Strategies to achieve sustained disease control in AMD involve smaller molecules, increased drug dosages, and novel formulations. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular targets and pharmacological aspects of neovascular AMD treatment.

Can objective parameters in optical coherence tomography be useful markers in the treatment and follow-up of type 1 and type 2 macular neovascularizations related to neovascular age-related macular degeneration?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the responses of type 1 and type 2 macular neovascularizations (MNV) caused by neovascular type age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD) to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments using quantitative parameters determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Additionally, it was also intended to assess the connections between these quantitative parameters and changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections required within a year.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In our retrospective and observational study, the data of 90 eyes of 90 patients diagnosed with n-AMD and treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF with the "Pro re nata" method were evaluated. Subtypes of existing MNVs were distinguished with previously taken optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images. In spectral domain OCT examinations, central macular thickness (CMT) and central macular volume (CMV) values were recorded at baseline and 12th month. The number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections during the 12 month follow-up period was also recorded for each patient. Obtained data were compared between MNV types.

RESULTS

Of the n-AMD cases examined in the study, 56.66% had type 1 MNV and 43.34% had type 2 MNV. The mean baseline BCVA logMAR values in eyes with type 2 MNV (1.15 ± 0.43) were higher than those observed in eyes with type 1 MNV (0.76 ± 0.42) (p = 0.001). Similarly, mean baseline CMT and CMV values in eyes with type 2 MNV were higher than those observed in eyes with type 1 MNV (respectively 424.89 ± 49.46 μm vs. 341.39 ± 37.06 μm; 9.17 ± 0.89 μm3 vs. 8.49 ± 0.53 μm3; p < 0.05). After 12 months of treatment, logMAR values of BCVA (0.86 ± 0.42) in subjects with type 2 MNV were higher than those in subjects with type 1 MNV (0.57 ± 0.37) (p = 0.001). Mean CMT and CMV values at 12th month in subjects with type 2 MNV (379.11 ± 46.36 μm and 8.66 ± 0.79 μm3, respectively) were observed to be higher than those with type 1 MNV (296.95 ± 33.96 μm and 8.01 ± 0.52 mm3, respectively) (p < 0.05). In type 2 MNVs, positive correlations were observed between both baseline and 12th month BCVA logMAR values and baseline CMV (p < 0.05). Similarly, in type 2 MNVs, a positive correlation was observed between 12th month BCVA logMAR values and 12th month CMV (p < 0.05). The total number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections at 12 months was similar in both groups (p = 0.851).

CONCLUSION

In this study, in which we performed a subtype analysis of MNV cases, we observed that the visual function was worse at the beginning and the end of the 12th month, and the CMT and CMV values were higher in the type 2 MNV group compared to the type 1 MNV cases. In addition, we found significant correlations between BCVA logMAR values and CMV values in type 2 MNV cases. In the follow-up of these cases, CMT, which is a more widely used quantitative method, and CMV, which is a newer OCT measurement parameter, may be more useful in patient follow-up and evaluation of treatment efficacy, especially for type 2 MNV cases.

Injectable, Antioxidative, and Tissue-Adhesive Nanocomposite Hydrogel as a Potential Treatment for Inner Retina Injuries

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been recognized as prevalent contributors to the development of inner retinal injuries including optic neuropathies such as glaucoma, non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, traumatic optic neuropathy, and Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, among others. This underscores the pivotal significance of oxidative stress in the damage inflicted upon retinal tissue. To combat ROS-related challenges, this study focuses on creating an injectable and tissue-adhesive hydrogel with tailored antioxidant properties for retinal applications. GelCA, a gelatin-modified hydrogel with photo-crosslinkable and injectable properties, is developed. To enhance its antioxidant capabilities, curcumin-loaded polydopamine nanoparticles (Cur@PDA NPs) are incorporated into the GelCA matrix, resulting in a multifunctional nanocomposite hydrogel referred to as Cur@PDA@GelCA. This hydrogel exhibits excellent biocompatibility in both in vitro and in vivo assessments, along with enhanced tissue adhesion facilitated by NPs in an in vivo model. Importantly, Cur@PDA@GelCA demonstrates the potential to mitigate oxidative stress when administered via intravitreal injection in retinal injury models such as the optic nerve crush model. These findings underscore its promise in advancing retinal tissue engineering and providing an innovative strategy for acute neuroprotection in the context of inner retinal injuries.

Comparison of antiangiogenic agents (ranibizumab, aflibercept, bevacizumab and ziv-aflibercept) in the therapeutic response to the exudative form of age-related macular degeneration according to the treat-and-extend protocol- true head-to-head study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the structural and functional changes in eyes with neovascular age related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a real-world setting, using Treat and Extend protocol (T&E), comparing four antiangiogenic agents.

METHODS

Prospective, observational, case series study performed in 131 patients with the exudative form of nAMD. Patients were randomly assigned into four groups according to the antiangiogenic agent. During the first year, all eyes received at least 3 monthly intravitreal injections of antiangiogenic agents, and afterwards, were submitted to the T&E.

RESULTS

There was statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between pre- and post-treatment in the best corrected visual acuity measurements by drug used. Patients who used aflibercept had significantly fewer injections than patients using the other drugs (mean = 9.03). No significant difference was observed between the drugs bevacizumab, ranibizumab and ziv-aflibercept. With regard to biomarkers, patients who used aflibercept and had lower baseline central retinal thickness, absence of hyperreflective foci and no subretinal hyperreflective material had the lowest number of injections.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that over 2 years, Intravitreal aflibercept on T&E provided better visual and anatomical improvements when compared to other drugs used in this study with significantly fewer injections.

Modified early intensive and treat-and-extend regimen of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular edema in Taiwan

Given the rising prevalence of patients with diabetes and increasing treatment burden for patients with vision-threatening diabetic macular edema (DME), we aimed to explore the efficacy of modified early intensive and treat-and-extend regimen of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy under the Taiwan National Insurance Bureau reimbursement policy. We obtained data on 69 eyes treated with initial 4-monthly intravitreal injections of aflibercept or ranibizumab, plus individualized treat-and-extend regimen. At 12 months, the mean (SD) change in LogMAR best corrected visual acuity from baseline was - 0.28 (0.31) in all eyes, while that in the aflibercept and ranibizumab groups were - 0.30 (0.34) and - 0.25 (0.28), respectively. Central retinal thickness decreased by 137.2 (122.4) in all eyes, 138.1 (134.2) in the aflibercept group, and 136.2 (110.9) in the ranibizumab group. Additionally, the aflibercept group had a lower mean number of injections than the ranibizumab group (8.5 vs. 8.7). The last extended dosing interval of > 12 weeks was 31.0% and 16.7% of the eyes in the aflibercept and ranibizumab groups, respectively. The modified anti-VEGF regimens effectively managed DME in terms of functional and anatomical outcomes, and efficiently reduced the healthcare burden by reducing the number of injections and extending treatment intervals within 12 months.

Anti-VEGF Drugs in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Focus on Dosing Regimen-Related Safety and Efficacy

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the main causes of visual impairment and severe visual loss, and can progress to two advanced forms-neovascularization and atrophic. The field of anti-AMD drugs has undergone huge developments in recent years, from single-target intravitreal administration to current clinical studies with multi-target and non-invasive agents, offering interesting new pharmacological opportunities for the treatment of this disease. Hence, we summarize some of the approved anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs for neovascular AMD, especially their structural characteristics, clinical manifestations, dosing regimens, and safety issues of the anti-VEGF drugs highlighted. In addition, advances in atrophic AMD drug research are also briefly described.

Clinical Correlation of Retinal Fluid Fluctuation Represented by Fluctuation Index in Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration: TOWER Study Report 2

Purpose

To explore outcomes and biomarkers associated with retinal fluid instability represented by a new parameter in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Methods

Patients with treatment-naïve nAMD receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections for a duration of 1 to 3 years were consecutively reviewed. Fluctuation Index (FI) of each eye, calculated by averaging the sum of differences in 1-mm central subfield thickness between each follow-up from months 3 to 24, was arranged into ascending order from the lowest to the highest and split equally into low, moderate, and high fluctuation groups. Outcomes were analyzed at 24 months.

Results

Of 558 eyes, FI values showed a negative correlation with a degree-response gradient with 24-month visual improvement. After controlling for baseline best-corrected visual acuity and potential confounders, eyes with low fluctuation gained more Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters than those in the moderate and high fluctuation group (Δ, 10.1 and 14.0 letters, respectively). Significant best-corrected visual acuity improvement from baseline to month 24 (11.8 letters) was observed exclusively in the low fluctuation group despite the indifference in the number of injections and types of anti-VEGF drug used among groups. Patients presenting with central subfield thickness of ≥405 µm or intraretinal fluid coinciding with subretinal fluid showed a significant association with foveal thickness instability during the maintenance phase.

Conclusions

Apart from the central subfield thickness values, unstable macular thickening represented by the FI was associated with some baseline features and may contribute to substandard visual outcomes.

Translational Relevance

FI may be a valuable tool for assessing therapeutic adequacy in the treatment of nAMD.

Treat-and-extend dosing of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis

Intravitreal injections of antiangiogenic agents are pivotal in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The comparative efficacy and safety of treat-and-extend (T&E) versus bimonthly, monthly, and pro re nata (PRN) dosing remains unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis of English-language RCTs reporting on efficacy and/or safety outcomes of dosing regimens of anti-VEGF agents in nAMD was performed. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, ETDRS letters) at last follow-up represented the primary endpoint, while central subfield thickness (CSFT, μm), injection burden, and ocular adverse events were secondary endpoints. A random effects meta-analysis was performed, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Across six RCTs, 781 T&E-, 663 monthly-, 130 PRN-, and 123 bimonthly treated eyes were included. Mean changes in BCVA and CSFT at last follow-up were similar between T&E versus monthly (WMD, -0.62 letters; 95% CI, -2.12 to 0.87; P = 0.41; WMD, 5.30 microns; 95% CI, -10.67 to 21.26; P = 0.52, respectively), bimonthly (WMD, 1.68 letters; 95% CI, -3.55 to 6.91; P = 0.53; WMD, -18.91 microns; 95% CI, -46.41 to 8.60; P = 0.18, respectively), and PRN (BCVA WMD, 1.08 letters; 95% CI, -2.95 to 5.11; P = 0.60) regimens. T&E was associated with a reduced injection burden versus monthly (WMD, -4.52 injections; 95% CI, -6.66 to 2.39; P < 0.001) but higher injection burden versus PRN (WMD, 1.81 injections; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.51; P < 0.001) dosing. There was no significant difference in safety outcomes amongst comparators. There was no significant difference in efficacy and safety between T&E, bimonthly, monthly, and PRN dosing. T&E resulted in fewer injections versus monthly and fewer clinic visits versus PRN.

[Management optimization of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Spain: Evolution towards proactive treatment models]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Healthcare resources optimization is crucial to assume the growing demand of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This work provides guidelines and support so that each hospital can lead its change management.

METHODS

The OPTIMUS project (n=10 hospitals) was based on face-to-face interviews with the key staff of the ophthalmology services, and alignment with the main responsible for each centre (nominal group) to identify potential needs for improving nAMD. The OPTIMUS nominal group was expanded to 12 centres (eVOLUTION). Through different remote work sessions, different guides and tools were defined and developed to implement proactive treatment strategies, one-step treatment administration and potential for remote visits (eConsult) in nAMD.

RESULTS

The information collected from the OPTIMUS interviews and working groups (n=10 centres) defined roadmaps to promote the development of protocols and proactive treatment strategies, including healthcare workload optimization and one-stop treatment administration in nAMD. With eVOLUTION, processes and tools were developed to promote eConsult: (i) healthcare burden calculator; (ii) definition of potential patients for telematic management; (iii) definition of nAMD management archetypes; (iv) definition of processes for implementation of eConsult by archetype; and (v) key performance indicators for changing evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Managing change is an internal task that requires an adequate diagnosis of processes and feasible implementation roadmaps. OPTIMUS and eVOLUTION provide the basic tools for an autonomous advance of hospitals in the optimization of AMD management, with the available resources.

Efficacy of a Modified Treat-and-Extend Aflibercept Regimen for Macular Oedema in Eyes with Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: 2-Year Prospective Study

This prospective, multicentre, interventional study evaluated the efficacy of a modified treat-and-extend (mTAE) aflibercept regimen as personalized therapy for macular oedema (MO) due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Fifty eyes were studied from 50 patients who were enrolled between November 2016 and July 2019. All patients received intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) injections on an mTAE regimen for 24 months. Primary outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were BCVA and CST at 24 months. Mean (standard deviation) baseline BCVA (logMAR) and CST were 0.50 (0.51) and 557 (240) µm, respectively. BCVA and CST showed significant improvements at month 12 (0.19 (0.38) and 275 (98) µm, respectively; both p < 0.0001, paired t-test). BCVA and CST also showed significant improvements at 24 months (0.26 (0.50) and 255 (91) µm, respectively, p = 0.0004 and p < 0.0001, paired t-test). The mean numbers of IVA injections and clinic visits over the 24-month study period were 6.2 (3.0) and 10.3 (1.0), respectively. The mTAE regimen of IVA injections for MO due to CRVO was effective in improving BCVA and decreasing CST at 24 months. The mTAE regimen might be an effective personalized therapy for CRVO.

Predictors of treatment outcomes following treat-and-extend regimen with aflibercept for branch retinal vein occlusion: post-hoc analysis of the PLATON trial

We investigated predictors of visual outcomes and injection interval in macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated with a treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen. All 48 patients in a multicenter study were followed for 52 weeks and received three monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections before the TAE regimen, with treatment intervals adjusted by 4 weeks, up to a maximum of 16 weeks. Various laboratory biomarkers and optical coherence tomography parameters were evaluated. Patients were classified into the extension failure group if they had ≥ 1 treatment interval decreased due to an increase in the central macular thickness compared to the previous visit and 18 patients were assigned to this group. In multivariate logistic analyses, presence of microaneurysms and prominent middle limiting membrane (p-MLM) sign, increased initial external limiting membrane (ELM) disruption, and higher total cholesterol were correlated with inhibiting a sustained extension in the injection interval (P = 0.015, P = 0.032, P = 0.037, P = 0.009, respectively). Therefore, in the patients with ME secondary to BRVO with these risk factors, early consideration of frequent injection may improve treatment outcome.

Long-term changes in the choroidal thickness in patients with unilateral central retinal vein occlusion

The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term changes in the choroidal thickness in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. This retrospective study included 41 eyes from 41 patients with treatment-naïve unilateral CRVO. We compared the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and central macular thickness (CMT) of CRVO eyes with those of fellow eyes at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. Baseline SFCT was significantly higher in CRVO eyes than in fellow eyes (p < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference in the SFCT between CRVO eyes and fellow eyes at 12 months and 24 months. When compared with baseline SFCT, SFCT significantly decreased at 12 months and 24 months in CRVO eyes (all p < 0.001). In patients with unilateral CRVO, SFCT in the CRVO eye was significantly thicker than in the fellow eye at baseline, and after 12 months and 24 months, there was no difference from the fellow eye.

Safety and Efficacy of a Treat-and-Extend Regimen of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents for Diabetic Macular Edema or Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

[Box: see text] Background and Objective: This meta-analysis evaluates treat-and-extend regimens relative to monthly and as-needed (prn) regimens using anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for diabetic macular edema and macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Comparative studies evaluating a treat-and-extend regimen relative to a monthly or prn regimen with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema or macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion were included following a systematic literature search.

RESULTS

Seven studies of 984 eyes were included. Relative to a monthly regimen, treat-and-extend was similar for change in best-corrected visual acuity at final follow-up (P = .59) and had a lower number of injections (P < .00001). Relative to a prn regimen, treat-and-extend was similar for change in best-corrected visual acuity at final follow-up (P = .84) and was associated with a higher number of injections (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis found that a treat-and extend regimen was nonsignificantly different compared to monthly and prn regimens in efficacy and safety end points. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54(3):131-138.].

Difference in characteristics and lesion reactivation between type 3 macular neovascularization with and without subretinal fluid at baseline

PURPOSE

To compare the characteristics and incidence rates of lesion reactivation after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in type 3 macular neovascularization (MNV) with and without subretinal fluid (SRF) at baseline.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 95 patients diagnosed with type 3 MNV. After the initial loading injections, re-treatment was performed when lesion reactivation occurred defined as the re-accumulation of subretinal or intraretinal fluid or the new development of a retinal/subretinal hemorrhage. The differences in the baseline characteristics and the incidence rates of lesion reactivation were compared between patients with SRF (SRF group, n = 42) and those without SRF (non-SRF group, n = 53).

RESULTS

At diagnosis, the mean visual acuity was worse (0.68 ± 0.41 vs 0.50 ± 0.36; P = 0.032), mean central retinal thickness was greater (515.4 ± 145.9 μm vs 383.8 ± 105.5 μm; P < 0.001), and the incidence of focal retinal hemorrhages was higher (90.5% vs 66.0%; P = 0.005) in the SRF group than in the non-SRF group. In the SRF group, the first lesion reactivation was noted in 89.7% at a mean of 5.8 ± 4.4 months after the third injection. In the non-SRF group, the first lesion reactivation was noted in 70.6% at a mean of 6.1 ± 3.8 months. There was a significant difference in lesion reactivation between the two groups (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in the baseline characteristics and incidence of lesion reactivation between type 3 MNV with and without SRF suggests that the presence of SRF may be indicative of more advanced disease with a high risk of visual deterioration. This result also suggests the need for more active treatment to preserve vision in patients with SRF.

Treat and extend regimen for diabetic macular oedema-a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Various treatment regimens are currently practiced in the treatment of CI-DMO (centre-involving diabetic macular oedema). In recent years, there has been a growing body of evidence supporting a treat and extend (T&E) regimen for DMO which offers the promise of comparable visual and anatomical outcomes while reducing injection burden. This meta-analysis was hence performed to evaluate the aforementioned outcomes in the treatment of DMO. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria.

METHODS

A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases was performed. We employed the terms 'treat AND extend AND (diabetic AND macular AND edema OR oedema)' to ensure a comprehensive search. The search workflow adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

RESULTS

The pooled analysis of the mean number of injections in 1 year for T&E-aflibercept (AFL), T&E-ranibizumab (RBZ) and collectively was 9.1 (95% CI: 7.63-10.63), 10.0 (95% CI: 9.55-10.47) and 9.6 (95% CI: 8.62-10.49), respectively. Improvements in vision at 1 year for T&E-AFL, T&E-RBZ and collectively were 6.26 (95% CI: 3.24-9.29), 7.14 (95% CI: 4.76-9.52) and 7.08 (95% CI: 5.32-8.84) letters, respectively. The improvements in central subfield thickness at 1 year for T&E-AFL, T&E-RBZ and collectively were 131.94 (95% CI: 100.29-163.60), 108.64 (95% CI: 82.82-134.46) and 121.32 (95% CI: 102.89-139.75) microns, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis of T&E for DMO did not show a clear advantage in reducing the number of injections compared to landmark clinical trials with pro-re-nata (PRN) treatment regimens in the first year of treatment with limited gains in visual and anatomical outcomes. However, the T&E approach offers the potential for fewer patient visits, thereby reducing treatment burden. Longer term studies on T&E with a standardised protocol would be required to assess the longevity of the vision gain in the first year despite a likely reduced treatment burden compared to the PRN trials.

Intravitreal Injection Planning during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Study of Two Tertiary University Centers in Italy

The COVID-19 pandemic has hampered the optimum management of retinal diseases. This study examined the impact of the pandemic on the intravitreal-injection practice in two academic centers in Italy along with the related medico-legal implications. A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records from 16 March 2020 to 14 March 2021 at the ophthalmological departments of University of Cagliari (SGD) and University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro (UMG) was conducted. The data collected between 16 March 2020 and 14 June 2020 (lockdown), 15 June 2020 and 13 September 2020 (unlock), and 14 September 2020 and 14 March 2021 (second wave) were compared with those of the same period of the previous year. Weekly data on the administered drug and the number and type of treated disease were collected and analyzed. During the lockdown, a drop of 59% at SGD (p < 0.00001) and 77% at UMG (p < 0.00001) in intravitreal injections was found. In the first year of the pandemic, the reduction in injections was approximately of 27% (p < 0.0008) and 38% (p < 0.0001) at SGD and UMG, respectively. The COVID-19-related containment measures and the health resources redistribution have led to a delay in the treatment of chronic diseases of the retina, prioritizing the undeferrable ones. The lack of management guidelines has conceived relevant ethical and medico-legal issues that need to be considered in future measures planning.

OCT-angiography follow-up of choroidal neovascularization treated with treat-and- extend aflibercept regimen to avoid over-treatment

PURPOSE

To propose optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) for the follow-up of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with a treat-and-extend (T&E) aflibercept regimen to avoid overtreatment.

METHODS

Retrospective, cohort, pilot study. We analysed 16 consecutive-treatment naïve nAMD eyes following up 2-years at the Eye Clinic, Bari, Italy. Intravitreal aflibercept injections in the T&E regimen for no less than 12 months, during which the macula was dry without any sign of intraretinal or subretinal fluid (SRF) at each visit, were performed. Parametric data were evaluated using an analysis of variance (ANOVA); any non-parametric statistical calculations were performed using the Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

The average number of injections during follow-up was: 8.8 ± 1. Treatment regimen adjustments were 4 weeks (W), 8W (4 + 4), 10W (8 + 2), 12W (8 + 4, or 10 + 2). No significant CNV size change from 4 to 8W (-0.027 ± 0.22 mm², p = 0.088), and from 8 to 12W (-0.04 ± 0.11 mm², p = 0.065) were found. Likewise, no significant decrease in choriocapillaris flow (CF) was detected (p = 0.056).

CONCLUSION

We suggest that OCT-A may be useful in the evaluation of dry macula to decide the best approach for perchance adjusting injection intervals based on changes of CNV size.

Comparison of 24-month treatment outcomes between as-needed treatment and switching to treat-and-extend in type 3 macular neovascularization

This study aimed to compare 24-month treatment outcomes between patients with type 3 macular neovascularization (MNV) treated using an as-needed regimen and those who switched to treat-and-extend (TAE). This retrospective study included 32 patients who were initially treated with an as-needed regimen but switched to TAE (TAE group) and 74 patients who were treated with an as-needed regimen throughout the follow-up period (as-needed group). The number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and degree of change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over 24 months were compared between the two groups. The incidence of fibrotic scarring, tears of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and subretinal hemorrhage was also evaluated. The number of anti-VEGF injections was higher in the TAE group (mean: 11.7) than in the as-needed group (mean: 6.9; P < 0.001). The BCVA outcome (measured using the mean logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]) was significantly better in the TAE group (mean improvement of logMAR 0.15) than in the as-needed group (mean deterioration of logMAR 0.15). The incidence of fibrotic scarring (6.3% vs. 18.9%), RPE tears (3.1% vs. 6.8%), and subretinal hemorrhage (0% vs. 9.5%) was relatively lower in the TAE group. Treatment outcomes of the TAE group were better than those of the as-needed group, suggesting that switching to the TAE regimen would be a useful approach for patients with type 3 MNV requiring efficient treatment.

Clinical outcome using a modified treat-and-extend protocol for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

AIM

To compare outcome between patients treated using a modified treat-and-extend (mT&E) protocol and patients treated using a conventional T&E protocol.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of two groups of treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients within a single centre were evaluated. One group treated using the conventional T&E protocol, with visual acuity, dilated fundus examination (DFE) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) performed at each visit. The second group treated using the mT&E protocol in which visual acuity and DFE were performed only every three visits. The main outcome measures were time spent per clinical visit, visual and anatomical outcomes measured for 36 months.

RESULTS

The T&E and mT&E groups included 135 eyes in 116 patients and 119 eyes in 94 patients, respectively, with similar baseline characteristics. At 36 months, the number of injections administered (7.9±2.9 vs 8.1±2.3 injections, respectively; p=0.55), the percentage of eyes that gained ≥15 Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (23% vs 25.2%, respectively; p=0.39) and the percentage of eyes that lost ≥15 ETDRS letters (21.5% vs 17.7%; p=0.43, respectively) were similar between the T&E and mT&E groups. However, waiting and contact time were reduced during the OCT-only visits compared with the full visits, with an average of 41 min saved per patient encounter.

CONCLUSIONS

Both protocols yielded similar visual and anatomical outcomes. However, the mT&E protocol reduced the number of full visits, with considerably less time spent at the clinic.

Difference in Lesion Reactivation between Pure Type 2 and Mixed Type 1 and 2 Macular Neovascularization and its Influence on Long-Term Treatment Outcomes

PURPOSE

To compare lesion reactivation and treatment outcomes between pure type 2 and mixed type 1 and 2 macular neovascularization (MNV) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 155 patients diagnosed with type 2 MNV. After the initial loading injections, as-needed retreatment was provided. The difference in first lesion reactivation after the initial treatment was evaluated between pure type 2 MNV (pure type 2 group, n = 37) and mixed type 1 and 2 MNV (mixed group, n = 118). The degree of change in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 32.7 ± 13.7 months. Lesion reactivation differed significantly between the type 2 (60.0%) and mixed (84.5%) (P = .004) groups. The degree of visual change during the follow-up period also differed significantly between the pure type 2 (mean 2.8 lines of improvement) and mixed (mean 0.2 lines of deterioration) (P = .008) groups. In multivariate analysis, lesion type (P = .012) and baseline visual acuity (P = .002) were significantly associated with ≥2 lines of visual improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesion reactivation and treatment outcomes differed between pure type 2 and mixed type 1 and 2 MNV. These results suggested the need for different treatment strategies for these two MNV subtypes.

Short-Term Morphofunctional Changes in Previously Treated Neovascular AMD Eyes Switched to Brolucizumab

The purpose of the study is to explore the morphofunctional fluctuations in eyes treated for neovascular AMD (nAMD) when treatment is switched from aflibercept or ranibizumab to brolucizumab. A total of 31 eyes of 31 patients with nAMD with type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV) were included. All patients were imaged using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The OCT acquisition was performed at the following visits: (i) “T1 visit” corresponding to the last follow-up examination in which an intravitreal injection of aflibercept or ranibizumab was performed before switching to brolucizumab because of the lack of improvement and (ii) “T2 visit” corresponding to the examination performed 1 month after T1, the latter visit corresponding to the day when a switch to brolucizumab injection was performed, (iii) and 1 month after the latter injection “(T3)”. The main outcome measures were: (1) central macular thickness (CMT), (2) choroidal vascularity index (CVI), (3) subfoveal choroidal thickness (CT), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Functional outcome showed significant differences at each time. Mean ± SD BCVA was 0.43 ± 0.12 LogMAR at T1 and 0.56  ±  0.16 LogMAR at T2 (p = 0.038). A significant improvement in BCVA was displayed at T3 (0.34  ±  0.21 LogMAR) as compared with T2 (p  = 0.019). CMT analysis showed fluctuations three times. In detail, T2 displayed a thicker CMT in comparison with T1, although not statistically significant (p = 0.12). Contrariwise, T3 showed a thinner CMT in comparison with T2 (p = 0.002). Analyzing CVI among the three different times, the luminal choroidal area (LCA) and total choroidal area (TCA) showed significantly different values before and after switching to brolucizumab. T2 showed a significant reduction in both vessel lumen and total area compared with T1 (p = 0.032 and p  =  0.046, respectively). Moreover, T3 showed a greater value of both LCA and TCA in comparison with T2 (p = 0.008 and p  =  0.01, respectively). CT did not show significant differences at each time (p > 0.05). Our results reported early experiences on morphofunctional fluctuations in patients with nAMD who switched to brolucizumab. The anatomical impact of brolucizumab administration appears to result in choroidal vascular enlargement, accompanied by the resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF).

Evaluation of remote assessment reliability in the follow-up of patients with diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To compare the reliability of office versus remote assessments in the decision to use intravitreal injection for patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHOD

We retrospectively evaluated office and remote assessments for decision agreement regarding treatment by intravitreal injection or non-treatment for DME. Remote assessment consisted in remote evaluation of patient medical data by three reviewers with different skills. Two OCT analysis strategies were performed with the same office assessment data: 1) macular mapping with only two OCT B-scans passing through the fovea, and 2) macular mapping with complete macular scans. Agreement for treatment decisions and OCT analysis strategies were analysed using Cohen's Kappa coefficient (κ).

RESULTS

Data from 49 patients (96 eyes) were included. Treatment decision agreement with two OCT B-scans passing through the fovea was considered excellent for all reviewers (κ between 0.80 and 0.85, varying between reviewers). Treatment decision agreement with complete macular scans was considered excellent (κ between 0.85 and 0.93, varying between reviewers). Agreement between the two OCT analysis strategies and reviewers was considered excellent.

CONCLUSION

Remote assessment in a telemedicine model can be a useful alternative for DME patient follow-up.

Delayed anti-VEGF injections during the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in visual acuity in patients with three common retinal diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the regular injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) in patients with various retinal diseases globally. It is unclear to what extent delayed anti-VEGF injections have worsened patients’ visual acuity. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the impact of delayed anti-VEGF injections on the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and diabetic macular edema (DME). We searched four computer databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus) from inception to January 5, 2022. Data were pooled using the random-effects model. Results were reported by less than 4 months and 4 months or longer for the time period between the first injection during the pandemic and the last pre-pandemic injection. All BCVA measures were converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for analyses. Among patients who received injections 4 months or longer apart, the mean difference in BCVA was 0.10 logMAR (or 5 ETDRS letters) (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06∼0.14) for nAMD patients, 0.01 logMAR (or∼ 1 ETDRS letter) (95% CI -0.25∼0.27) for RVO patients, and 0.03 logMAR (or ∼1 ETDRS letters) (95% CI -0.06∼0.11) for DME patients. These results suggest that patients with nAMD needing scheduled anti-VEGF injections may require priority treatment over those with RVO and DME in the event of disturbed anti-VEGF injections from COVID-19 lockdowns or similar scenarios.

Predicting treat-and-extend outcomes and treatment intervals in neovascular age-related macular degeneration from retinal optical coherence tomography using artificial intelligence

Purpose

To predict visual outcomes and treatment needs in a treat &amp; extend (T&amp;E) regimen in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) using a machine learning model based on quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging biomarkers.

Materials and methods

Study eyes of 270 treatment-naïve subjects, randomized to receiving ranibizumab therapy in the T&amp;E arm of a randomized clinical trial were considered. OCT volume scans were processed at baseline and at the first follow-up visit 4 weeks later. Automated image segmentation was performed, where intraretinal (IRF), subretinal (SRF) fluid, pigment epithelial detachment (PED), hyperreflective foci, and the photoreceptor layer were delineated using a convolutional neural network (CNN). A set of respective quantitative imaging biomarkers were computed across an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid to describe the retinal pathomorphology spatially and its change after the first injection. Lastly, using the computed set of OCT features and available clinical and demographic information, predictive models of outcomes and retreatment intervals were built using machine learning and their performance evaluated with a 10-fold cross-validation.

Results

Data of 228 evaluable patients were included, as some had missing scans or were lost to follow-up. Of those patients, 55% reached and maintained long (8, 10, 12 weeks) and another 45% stayed at short (4, 6 weeks) treatment intervals. This provides further evidence for a high disease activity in a major proportion of patients. The model predicted the extendable treatment interval group with an AUROC of 0.71, and the visual outcome with an AUROC of up to 0.87 when utilizing both, clinical and imaging features. The volume of SRF and the volume of IRF, remaining at the first follow-up visit, were found to be the most important predictive markers for treatment intervals and visual outcomes, respectively, supporting the important role of quantitative fluid parameters on OCT.

Conclusion

The proposed Artificial intelligence (AI) methodology was able to predict visual outcomes and retreatment intervals of a T&amp;E regimen from a single injection. The result of this study is an urgently needed step toward AI-supported management of patients with active and progressive nAMD.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of preanalytical factors and methodological differences influencing the measurement of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor

BACKGROUND

Intraocular treatment with antibodies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) inhibits pathological vessel growth in adults and preterm infants. Recently, concerns regarding the impact of anti-VEGF treatment on systemic VEGF levels in preterm infants have been raised. Earlier studies suggest that preanalytical and methodological parameters impact analytical VEGF concentrations, but we have not found a comprehensive systematic review covering preanalytical procedures and methods for VEGF measurements.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to evaluate the most critical factors during sample collection, sample handling, and the analytical methods that influence VEGF levels and therefore should be considered when planning a prospective collection of samples to get reproducible, comparable results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed and Scopus databases were searched 2021/Nov/11. In addition, identification of records via other methods included reference, citation, and Google Scholar searches. Rayyan QCRI was used to handle duplicates and the selection process. Publications reporting preanalytical handling and/or methodological comparisons using human blood samples were included. Exclusion criteria were biological, environmental, genetic, or physiological factors affecting VEGF. The data extraction sheets included bias assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool, evaluating patient selection, index-test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Concentrations of VEGF and results from statistical comparisons of analytical methods and/or preanalytical sample handling and/or different sample systems were extracted. The publications covering preanalytical procedures were further categorized based on the stage of the preanalytical procedure. Meta-analysis was used to visualize VEGF concentrations among healthy individuals. The quality of evidence was rated according to GRADE.

RESULTS

We identified 1596 publications, and, after the screening process, 43 were considered eligible for this systematic review. The risk of bias estimation was difficult for 2/4 domains due to non-reported information. Four critical steps in the preanalytical process that impacted VEGF quantification were identified: blood drawing and the handling before, during, and after centrifugation. Sub-categorization of those elements resulted in nine findings, rated from moderate to very low evidence grade. The choice of sample system was the most reported factor. VEGF levels (mean [95% CI]) in serum (n = 906, 20 publications), (252.5 [213.1-291.9] pg/mL), were approximated to ninefold higher than in plasma (n = 1122, 23 publications), (27.8 [23.6-32.1] pg/mL), based on summarized VEGF levels with meta-analysis. Notably, most reported plasma levels were below the calibration range of the used method.

CONCLUSION

When measuring circulating VEGF levels, choice of sample system and sample handling are important factors to consider for ensuring high reproducibility and allowing study comparisons. Protocol: CRD42020192433.

Are intravitreal injections essential during the COVID-19 pandemic? Global preferred practice patterns and practical recommendations

Tertiary outpatient ophthalmology clinics are high-risk environments for COVID-19 transmission, especially retina clinics, where regular follow-up is needed for elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. Intravitreal injection therapy (IVT) for chronic macular diseases, is one of the most common procedures performed, associated with a significant burden of care because of the vigorous treatment regimen associated with multiple investigations. While minimizing the risk of COVID-19 infection transmission is a priority, this must be balanced against the continued provision of sight-saving ophthalmic care to patients at risk of permanent vision loss. This review aims to give evidence-based guidelines on managing IVT during the COVID-19 pandemic in common macular diseases such as age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macula edema and retinal vascular disease and to report on how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected IVT practices worldwide.

To illustrate some real-world examples, 18 participants in the International Retina Collaborative, from 15 countries and across four continents, were surveyed regarding pre- and during- COVID-19 pandemic IVT practices in tertiary ophthalmic centers. The majority of centers reported a reduction in the number of appointments to reduce the risk of the spread of COVID-19 with varying changes to their IVT regimen to treat various macula diseases. Due to the constantly evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the uncertainty about the normal resumption of health services, we suggest that new solutions for eye healthcare provision, like telemedicine, may be adopted in the future when we consider new long-term adaptations required to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Dosing Regimens of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema Beyond the First Year: VIOLET, a Prospective Randomized Trial

INTRODUCTION

The purpose was to compare two flexible regimens of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) with fixed dosing every 8 weeks, beyond the first year of treatment, in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). VIOLET was a 100-week, randomized, Phase IIIb, non-inferiority study in patients with center-involving DME previously treated with IVT-AFL for ≥ 1 year according to the European label.

METHODS

Patients received an initial dose of IVT-AFL at study baseline and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to treat-and-extend (T&E), pro re nata (PRN), or fixed regimens. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline (randomization) to Week 52.

RESULTS

Full analysis set comprised 458 patients (baseline mean BCVA: 72.5, 71.0, and 72.7 letters in the T&E, PRN, and fixed-dose groups, respectively). Patients received a mean (min-max) of 10.0 (2-14; T&E), 11.5 (1-25; PRN), and 12.3 (3-13; fixed) injections over 100 weeks, with 13.3 (4-23), 25.0 (3-29), and 16.1 (5-25) clinic visits, respectively. At Week 52, mean (± standard deviation) BCVA changes from baseline were + 0.5 ± 6.7 (T&E), + 1.7 ± 6.8 (PRN), and + 0.4 ± 6.7 (fixed-dosing) letters (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]: T&E 0.01 [- 1.46, 1.47] and PRN 0.95 (- 0.52, 2.42) letters versus fixed dosing; p < 0.0001 for both non-inferiority tests [4-letter margin]). The IVT-AFL safety profile was consistent with previous studies.

CONCLUSION

The treatment burden associated with intravitreal injections for DME is lowest with T&E regimens, but there are a range of flexible IVT-AFL dosing regimens, allowing physicians to adopt an individualized treatment plan.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02818998.