The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for Surveillance and Medical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Alternative lengthening of telomeres and Ki-67 proliferation index provide complementary information on recurrence risk after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Given the heterogeneous clinical behavior of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), improved prognostic markers are needed to guide management and post-resection surveillance. Patients who underwent resection of large (≥3 cm) sporadic well-differentiated pNETs from 2000 to 2019 were identified. The Ki-67 proliferation index was determined using immunohistochemistry, and alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) status was assessed using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Recurrence-free and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariable Cox regression analysis evaluated factors associated with recurrence-free survival. A total of 106 patients were identified. ALT was positive in 57 (54%) and negative in 49 (46%). Ki-67 was ≥3% in 74 (70%) and <3% in 32 (30%). Tumors with Ki-67 ≥3% were more likely to be ALT positive (61% vs. 38%, p = .046). Stratifying by ALT status and Ki-67 proliferation index, median recurrence-free survival was 4.6 years for patients with ALT-positive/Ki-67 ≥3% tumors, 3.1 years for patients with ALT-positive/Ki-67 <3% tumors, 12.4 years for patients with ALT-negative/Ki-67 ≥3% tumors, and 20.2 years for patients with ALT-negative/Ki-67 <3% tumors (p < .001). Initial recurrence was distant in 82% and locoregional in 18%. Across all groups, overall survival was similar (p = .19). In multivariable analysis, advanced age, ALT positivity, perineural invasion, and lymph node metastases were associated with increased recurrence risk (all p < .05). ALT and Ki-67 provide complementary information on post-resection recurrence risk, which can guide subsequent surveillance and management strategies. These data support the incorporation of ALT testing into routine clinical practice.

Metastatic insulinoma-outcomes in the current era

BACKGROUND

Multimodal interventions in neuroendocrine tumors appear to have a beneficial impact on survival. Metastatic insulinoma is associated with hypoglycemia and, historically, a shortened life expectancy.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic insulinomas treated at a tertiary care center between 2006 and 2023.

RESULTS

Clinical data on 14 patients with metastatic insulinoma (metastases to the liver, skeleton, and lung) were reviewed in this descriptive study. The patients underwent various treatments including surgery; liver directed therapies (embolization, selective internal radiotherapy), somatostatin analogs; targeted agents (everolimus); systemic chemotherapy (capecitabine/temozolomide; carboplatin/etoposide); external beam radiation; and peptide receptor radiotherapy. Seven subjects died during follow-up. The time of the 7 deaths ranged from 2.5 to 10.4 years (median time to death was 8.2 years). This compares to previous reports of median survival of about 2 years. Seven subjects are alive 1.2-12.3 years after diagnosis. Hypoglycemia was well-controlled and did not cause the deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal interventions in metastatic insulinoma can be effective in managing hypoglycemia. The patients on multimodal treatments also lived a long time when considering previous published reports of median survival of just 2 years. Our findings challenge previous assumptions regarding clinical outcomes in this patient population.

Detection of Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres via Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for the Prognostication of PanNETs and Other Neoplasms

Molecular studies have shown alternative lengthening to telomeres (ALT) to be an important prognostic biomarker of shorter relapse-free survival (RFS) for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and other neoplasms. However, the preferred method of detecting ALT in tissue is by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which has several clinical limitations. These issues necessitate the creation of a chromogenic ALT assay that can be easily implemented into routine practice. A chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) assay was developed using genetically modified osteosarcoma cell lines, 20 normal pancreata, 20 ALT-positive PanNETs, and 20 ALT-negative PanNETs. Thereafter, it was validated on a multiinstitutional cohort of 360 surgically resected PanNETs and correlated with multiple clinicopathologic features, RFS, and FISH results. Separately, 109 leiomyosarcomas (LMS) were evaluated by both CISH and FISH, and, similarly, the prognostic significance of ALT status was assessed. Upon optimization, ALT-CISH was identified in 112 of 360 (31%) primary PanNETs and was 100% concordant with FISH testing. ALT correlated with several adverse prognostic findings and distant metastasis (all P < .004). The 5-year RFS for patients with ALT-positive PanNETs was 35% as compared with 94% for ALT-negative PanNETs. By multivariate analysis, ALT was an independent prognostic factor for shorter RFS. Similarly, ALT was associated with shorter RFS in patients with LMS and, analogous to PanNETs, a negative, independent prognostic factor. ALT-CISH was developed and validated in not only PanNETs but also sarcomas, specifically LMS. CISH testing has multiple advantages over FISH that facilitate its widespread clinical use in the detection of ALT and prognostication of patients with diverse neoplasms.

Real-World Study of Lanreotide Autogel in Routine Practice in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs) in Hong Kong and Taiwan

INTRODUCTION

There is a lack of data on the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of lanreotide autogel in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) of Chinese ethnicity. This noninterventional, retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of lanreotide autogel in patients of Chinese ethnicity with GEP-NETs in clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients' charts were abstracted from five hospitals in Hong Kong and Taiwan (July-September 2021), where lanreotide autogel is approved for treating GEP-NETs. Included patients were adults with unresectable, metastatic, or locally advanced GEP-NETs who received a first injection (index) of lanreotide autogel 120 mg between 01 January 2017 and 30 June 2020 (planned sample size: N = 30). Follow-up ran from index to a maximum of 48 (± 4) weeks or until disease progression, start of new antitumor treatment, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at week 48 (±4), and secondary endpoints included PFS rate at week 24 (±4), estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. All analyses were descriptive.

RESULTS

Of 27 patients enrolled, 22 (81.5%) had 48 weeks of follow-up. Tumors of pancreatic origin were the most common (73.9%). PFS rate was 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.72 - 0.99) at 24 weeks and 0.82 (0.53-0.94) at 48 weeks. Overall, 74.1% patients experienced ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event; none were serious. No deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Lanreotide autogel was well tolerated and showed good tumor control rate in a real-world setting. These findings align with results from previous studies in Caucasian, Japanese, and Korean patients, thus supporting lanreotide autogel for treating patients with GEP-NETs of Chinese ethnicity.

Efficacy and Safety of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) showed promising potential in the management of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). However, there is still a lack of evidence on its relative efficacy and safety compared with other treatment options. This review aims to synthesize the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of PRRT for pNETs compared to different treatments. An electronic search was conducted from inception to May 2024. Comparative studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies, that focused on the use of PRRT for treating pNETs were included. Efficacy outcomes included disease control rate (DCR), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety outcomes were grade 3-4 hematological and renal toxicity and adverse events (AEs). Nine studies met the inclusive criteria. Among them, only one (11.1%) study was an RCT. Meta-analysis between full and reduced dosages of 177Lu-DOTATATE for G1-G2 pNETs revealed no significant differences in DCR, CR, PR, SD, and PFS between the groups. However, the full dosage group showed superior efficacy in some outcomes (DCR, CR, and PR). When PRRT was compared to other treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted agents, it was associated with longer PFS and OS. Additionally, PRRT combined with capecitabine and salvage PRRT also showed efficacy in advanced cases. Safety analysis indicated that PRRT is well-tolerated, with minimal severe toxicity reported. PRRT is a promising therapeutic option for patients with advanced pNETs, offering a balance of efficacy and safety compared to other available treatments based on the low quality of evidence. Full-dosage PRRT may provide better outcomes than reduced dosages, and salvage PRRT remains effective for progressive disease. However, further high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings and optimize PRRT usage in pNETs.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Locoregional Treatments for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) represent approximately 2% of all solid pancreatic tumors. The incidence of pNENs has been increasing in the last decade. The clinical manifestations of pNENs range from hormone secretion syndromes in functioning neoplasms (F-pNENs) to local infiltration or distant metastases in late-stage diagnoses or incidental findings in small non-functioning neoplasms (NF-pNENs). While surgery is the gold-standard treatment for larger and more aggressive tumors, small and low-grade tumors (G1) may be followed-up due to the indolent course of disease. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided ablative techniques, such as ethanol injection (EUS-EI) and radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA), have emerged as promising options for loco-regional ablations in selected cases. Despite promising safety profile and efficacy, high-quality evidence is needed to support their widespread adoption. This article reviews the current state of EUS-guided locoregional therapies, patient selection criteria, procedural details, and associated risks.

Clinical Relevance of ATRX/DAXX Gene Mutations and ALT in Functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) represent a subset of PanNETs that cause symptoms due to hormonal activity. Insulinoma is the most common functioning PanNET type. Mutations in the alpha thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked (ATRX) and death domain-associated protein (DAXX) genes result in genomic instability. ATRX/DAXX mutations and associated alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) are common in non-functioning PanNETs and associated with aggressive tumor behavior. Recent reports have shown that ATRX/DAXX mutations and ALT are also present in functioning PanNETs. In this review, we summarize the literature addressing ATRX/DAXX mutations and ALT in functioning PanNETs and discuss the clinical relevance with regard to distinguishing aggressive and indolent functioning tumors. ATRX/DAXX gene mutations and/or ALT have been reported in insulinoma, glucagonoma, gastrinoma, VIPoma and calcitoninoma. In insulinoma, the presence of ATRX/DAXX mutations and ALT are associated with aggressive behavior and could therefore be used as prognostic biomarkers. Although ATRX/DAXX mutation and ALT assessment may currently not be the standard of care in routine diagnostic pathology practice, the use of DAXX/ATRX immunohistochemistry at least can be encouraged not only for non-functioning but also for functioning PanNETs.

Pediatric Neuroendocrine Tumors in Denmark: Incidence, Management, and Outcome From 1995 to 2020

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), although rare, are considered one of the most common gastrointestinal and bronchopulmonary pediatric neoplasms. We aimed to determine the incidence, tumor characteristics, management, and outcome of NETs and explore the role of genetic predisposition, focusing on low and intermediate grade tumors.

METHODS

Using the Danish National Pathology Registry, we conducted a nationwide retrospective study including all Danish children aged ≤18 years diagnosed with a pathology-proven NET between 1995 and 2020.

RESULTS

We identified 220 patients, with a 1.89:1 female to male ratio. The yearly incidence was 6.84 per 1 million children, with no significant change in incidence throughout the observation period. NETs were located in the appendix (93.2%), the pulmonary system (4.5%), and pancreas (2.3%). One recurrence was noted in the pancreas in a genetically predisposed patient with multiple neuroendocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), resulting in an overall recurrence rate of 0.5% (0% in appendiceal NETs; 0% in bronchopulmonary NETs; 20.0% in pancreatic NETs). No NET-related mortality was registered. Four patients had a known predisposing genetic condition, one appendiceal NET associated with neurofibromatosis type 1, and three pancreatic NETs associated with MEN1. Postsurgical surveillance regimes, choice of tumor markers, and imaging modality varied throughout the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed a stable incidence of pediatric NETs during the study period. The overall recurrence rate was 0.5% and no NET-related mortality was observed. Known genetic predisposition was present in 1.8% of patients. Future guidelines should consider the apparent indolent nature and excellent prognosis of these tumors.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors-Diagnostic Pitfalls of Non-Diabetic Severe Hypoglycemia: Literature Review and Case Report

Background: Hypoglycemia in the case of persons without diabetes is a rare event, being usually, initially misinterpreted based on the symptoms that can mimic various diseases, especially of a neuro-psychiatric nature. In the case of the identification of insulin-mediated hypoglycemia, the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, which represent the most common and worrisome causes of non-diabetic insulin-mediated hypoglycemia, must be considered. Case Report: We present the case of a 57-year-old patient, hospitalized for a history of approximately one month of recurrent episodes of symptoms suggestive for severe hypoglycemia. The biological evaluation performed during an episode of hypoglycemia showed a plasma glucose value of 44 mg/dL, insulinemia 16.3 µU/mL, C peptide 3.72 ng/mL, HbA1c 4.99%, absence of urinary ketone bodies and anti-insulin antibodies <0.03 U/mL. The CT and MRI examination showed a 15.3/15 mm rounded tumor in the pancreatic corporeo-caudal region. The pancreatic tumor formation was enucleated and the histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the diagnosis of the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with a positive reaction for chromogranin A, synaptophysin and insulin, without malignancy features (Ki 67 positive in 1% of the tumor cells). The postoperative evolution was favorable, without episodes of hypoglycemia, the fasting insulinemia one day after surgery being 4.1 µU/mL and HbA1c at three weeks postoperatively being 5.51%. Conclusions: The management of patients with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia secondary to insulinoma involves multidisciplinary collaboration with an important role in recognizing symptoms suggestive of hypoglycemia in a person without diabetes, initiating biological and imaging evaluation, establishing the optimal therapeutic option and histopathological confirmation.

The University of Iowa Neuroendocrine Tumor Clinic

The Iowa Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET) Clinic was founded and developed by two remarkable physicians, Thomas and Sue O'Dorisio. Tom was an Endocrinologist and close friend and colleague of Aaron Vinik. Both men were pioneers in studies of gastrointestinal hormones and the management of patients with NETs. Sue was a Pediatric Oncologist and research scientist with great expertise in new drug development and clinical trials. She and Tom were leaders in bringing somatostatin analogs and somatostatin-conjugated radioligands to the clinic for the therapy and diagnosis of NETs. All three physicians received lifetime achievement awards for their contributions to the field of NETs. This is the story of how the Iowa NET Clinic developed over the years to become a model for the multidisciplinary mantagement of patients with NETs, culminating in its designation as a European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society NET Center of Excellence, and the receipt of a Specialized Project of Research Excellence (SPORE) grant for the study of NETs from the National Institutes of Health.

The importance of microvascular invasion in patients with non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The oncological importance of lymphatic, microvascular, and perineural invasions and their association with outcomes in patients with non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (NF-PanNEN) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the role of these factors in the prognosis of patients with NF-PanNEN.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 115 patients who underwent curative resection and were pathologically and clinically diagnosed with NF-PanNEN. We evaluated the relationship between clinicopathological factors and recurrence.

RESULTS

Thirty (26%), 38 (33%), and 11 (10%) patients had lymphatic, microvascular, and nerve invasions, respectively. Twenty-one patients (18%) experienced recurrence, with a median time to recurrence of 2.6 years (range: 0.3-8.2). The 3-, 5-, and 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 88.3%, 84.4%, and 79.1%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, World Health Organization Grade G2-3 (vs. G1, hazard ratio (HR): 16.2), T factor T3-4 (vs. T1-2, HR: 5.2), and the presence of microvascular invasion (vs. absence, HR: 5.6) were significant risk factors for RFS. When these risk factors were assigned as risk score of three, one, and one points depending on the HR, the 5-year recurrence rates in patients with risk score groups 0-1 and 2-5 were 98.6% and 53.3%, (P < 0.001). Moreover, only the presence of microvascular invasion significantly increased the likelihood of recurrence within 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of microvascular invasion is an independent risk factor for recurrence in patients with NF-PanNEN. Our risk scoring system, which includes "the presence of microvascular invasion," may be useful for predicting recurrence.

Biomarkers to Inform Prognosis and Treatment for Unresectable or Metastatic GEP-NENs

Importance

Evidence-based treatment decisions for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) require individualized patient-centered decision-making that accounts for patient and cancer characteristics.

Objective

To create an accessible guidance document to educate clinicians and patients on biomarkers informing prognosis and treatment in unresectable or metastatic GEP-NENs.

Methods

A multidisciplinary panel in-person workshop was convened to define methods. English language articles published from January 2016 to January 2023 in PubMed (MEDLINE) and relevant conference abstracts were reviewed to investigate prognostic and treatment-informing features in unresectable or metastatic GEP-NENs. Data from included studies were used to form evidence-based recommendations. Quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. Consensus was reached via electronic survey following a modified Delphi method.

Findings

A total of 131 publications were identified, including 8 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 6 randomized clinical trials, 29 prospective studies, and 88 retrospective cohort studies. After 2 rounds of surveys, 24 recommendations and 5 good clinical practice statements were developed, with full consensus among panelists. Recommendations focused on tumor and functional imaging characteristics, blood-based biomarkers, and carcinoid heart disease. A single strong recommendation was made for symptomatic carcinoid syndrome informing treatment in midgut neuroendocrine tumors. Conditional recommendations were made to use grade, morphology, primary site, and urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic levels to inform treatment. The guidance document was endorsed by the Commonwealth Neuroendocrine Tumour Collaboration and the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society.

Conclusions and Relevance

The study results suggest that select factors have sufficient evidence to inform care in GEP-NENs, but the evidence for most biomarkers is weak. This article may help guide management and identify gaps for future research to advance personalized medicine and improve outcomes for patients with GEP-NENs.

Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

This review examines the diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs), a heterogeneous group of tumors with expression of neuroendocrine markers. PanNENs include both well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PanNECs). The diagnosis is confirmed through markers such as chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and INSM1, which establish neuroendocrine differentiation. The World Health Organization classification categorizes PanNENs based on tumor differentiation and proliferative activity (Ki-67 and/or mitotic index) into well-differentiated PanNETs (grade 1 to grade 3) and poorly differentiated PanNECs. In most cases, the morphology and proliferation index are sufficient to distinguish PanNETs from PanNECs. However, distinguishing grade 3 PanNETs from PanNECs can be challenging on the basis of morphology and proliferative activity alone. Additional key diagnostic markers for distinguishing grade 3 PanNET from PanNEC include SSTR2A expression and molecular immunohistochemical markers such as p53, Rb1, menin, ATRX, and DAXX. PanNECs are by definition high-grade tumors with highly aggressive clinical behavior, while PanNETs have a variable prognosis that is difficult to predict using current biomarkers such as tumor grade and size. Several studies have shown that ATRX or DAXX loss is strongly associated with a higher risk of PanNET metastasis and recurrence. They are therefore key prognostic markers in PanNETs. In addition, chromosomal copy number variations can further help assess PanNET aggressiveness and prognosis. Molecular profiling is increasingly important for improving the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of PanNENs.

Management of functional neuroendocrine tumors

Functional neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are those associated with specific symptoms related to the hormonal secretion of the NENs. Although less than 25 % of NENs are functional at diagnosis,1 the associated syndromes significantly increase the patient burden of disease. Management of hormonal NEN symptoms may involve tumor resection or other reduction strategies (e.g., chemotherapy, embolotherapy, etc), but also specific therapies directed at decreasing hormonal synthesis, secretion, or end-organ effects. In this review, we focus on specific symptomatic management of many of the NEN syndromes, which may be pursued in addition to management primarily directed at tumor bulk and growth. A continued focus on symptom management related to the hormonal secretions of NENs, in the context of other efforts to reduce tumor bulk and growth, could significantly improve patient wellbeing.

Advances in Management of Nonfunctional Pancreas Neuroendocrine Tumors

This article presents updates in the surgical management of non-functional sporadic pancreas neuroendocrine tumors NET, including considerations for assessment of biologic behavior to support decision-making, indications for surgery, and surgical approaches tailored to the unique nature of neuroendocrine tumors.

Expression profiles of cadherin 17 and claudin 18.2 in comparison with peptide hormonal expression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: Implications for targeted immunotherapy

Cadherin 17 (CDH17) and claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) are highly selective markers of intestinal and gastric lineages and are expressed in adenocarcinomas of various organs. They have also been identified as potential targets for immunotherapy. Expression of CDH17 and CLDN18.2 has been observed in a subset of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs). This study investigates the immunohistochemical expression of CDH17 and CLDN18 in PanNETs in comparison with hormonal expression profiles to provide baseline data for determining candidate indications for targeted therapy with CDH17 and CLDN18.2 in PanNETs, including insulinomas (n = 22), glucagonomas (n = 13), gastrinomas (n = 3), serotoninomas (n = 2) and PanNETs not otherwise specified (NOS) (n = 17). In the normal pancreas, CDH17 was expressed in the lateral membrane of ducts and some islet cells, whereas CLDN18 was occasionally expressed in the intercalated ducts and centroacinar cells. In PanNETs, CDH17 and CLDN18 was detected by membranous staining. CDH17 expression was observed in 10 to 17 (58.8 %) PanNETs NOS, 3 of 13 (23.1 %) glucagonomas, 1 of 3 (33.3 %,) gastrinomas, 1 of 2 (50 %) serotoninomas, and none of the insulinomas. According to predefined criteria, 7 of 17 (41.2 %) PanNETs NOS, 1 of 3 (33.3 %) gastrinomas, and 1 of 2 (50 %) serotoninomas were classified as CDH17-positive. There were no significant differences in clinicopathological features between CDH17-positive and CDH17-negative PanNETs, except for a higher tumour grade in the former (p<0.05). For CLDN18, expression was noted in 2 out of 3 (66.7 %) gastrinomas, one with focal staining and the other with diffuse staining. One of three (33.3 %) gastrinomas was classified as CLDN18-positive using predefined criteria. These findings suggest that a particular subset of PanNETs, including PanNET NOS, gastrinoma, and serotoninoma, may be potential candidates for CDH17-targeted immunotherapy. Additionally, gastrinoma may be a potential candidate for immunotherapy targeting CLDN18.2.

Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Surgical Strategies and Controversies

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are uncommon tumors which are increasing in incidence. The management of these tumors continues to evolve. This review examines the current role of surgery in the treatment of these tumors.

METHODS

Studies published over the past 10 years were identified using several databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and Science Direct. Search terms included PNETs, treatment, and surgery. Clinical practice guidelines and updates from several major groups were reviewed.

RESULTS

Surgery continues to have a major role in the treatment of sporadic functional and nonfunctional PNETs. Pancreas-sparing approaches are increasingly accepted as alternatives to formal pancreatic resection in selected patients. Options such as watch and wait or endoscopic ablation may be reasonable alternatives to surgery for non-functional PNETs < 2 cm in size. Surgical decision-making in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 patients remains complex and in some situations such as gastrinoma quite controversial. The role of surgery has significantly diminished in patients with advanced disease due to the advent of more effective systemic and liver-directed therapies. However, the optimal treatments and sequencing in advanced disease remain poorly defined, and it has been suggested that surgery is underutilized in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery remains a major treatment modality for PNETs. Given the plethora of available treatments, ongoing controversies and the changing landscape, management has become increasingly complex. An experienced multidisciplinary team which includes surgery is essential to manage these patients.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: epidemiology, genetics, and treatment

The incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NEN) is increasing at a rapid pace and is becoming an increasingly important consideration in clinical care. Epidemiological data from multiple countries indicate that the incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NEN) exhibits regional, site-specific, and gender-based variations. While the genetics and pathogenesis of some GEP NEN, particularly pancreatic NENs, have been investigated, there are still many mechanisms that require further investigation. The management of GEP NEN is diverse, but surgery remains the primary option for most cases. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective treatment, and several clinical trials are exploring the potential of immunotherapy and targeted therapy, as well as combination therapy.

Update in the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms are a diverse group of neoplasms that can occur in various areas throughout the body. Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) most often arise in the gastrointestinal tract, termed gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Although GEP-NETs are still uncommon, their incidence and prevalence have been steadily increasing over the past decades. The primary treatment for GEP-NETs is surgery, which offers the best chance for a cure. However, because GEP-NETs are often slow-growing and do not cause symptoms until they have spread widely, curative surgery is not always an option. Significant advances have been made in systemic and locoregional treatment options in recent years, including peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy with α and β emitters, somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, and targeted molecular therapies.

Carcinoid crisis in Lutetium-177-Dotatate therapy of neuroendocrine tumors: an overview of pathophysiology, risk factors, recognition, and treatment

PURPOSE

Lutetium-177-Dotatate (Lutathera®) is a combined radionuclide-peptide that is FDA-approved for the treatment of well-differentiated, somatostatin receptor-positive, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Carcinoid crisis is a rare, but potentially life-threatening risk of this radiopharmaceutical, of which prompt recognition and treatment is essential to reducing morbidity. This manuscript provides an overview of the topic to promote awareness of this adverse event, with emphasis on early recognition and management. In addition, we present our institution's experience with Lutetium-177-Dotatate-associated complications across a five-year period.

METHODS

A literature review of lutetium-177-dotatate therapy and its potential implication of carcinoid crisis was performed. Additionally, a review of our institution's experience is presented.

RESULTS

The incidence of carcinoid crisis induced by Lutetium-177-Dotatate therapy is estimated to range between 1 and 2% of treatment recipients. Those who have tumors located within the midgut, higher tumor burden, and the presence of metastasis have an increased risk of developing carcinoid crisis, among other risk factors. Carcinoid crisis is most often encountered within 12-48 h of receiving the first treatment dose, with the most common symptoms being nausea/vomiting, flushing, and diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

Carcinoid crisis is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of Lutetium-177-Dotatate therapy. Knowledge of risk factors and prompt recognition of symptoms is essential to successful treatment, with early initiation of intravenous octreotide serving a critical step in reducing morbidity of this adverse event.

Comparative analysis of international guidelines on the management of advanced non-functioning well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

This review presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of international guidelines for managing advanced, non-functioning, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs). PanNETs, which represent a significant proportion of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, exhibit diverse clinical behaviors and prognoses based on differentiation, grading, and other molecular markers. The varying therapeutic strategies proposed by different guidelines reflect their distinct emphases and regional considerations, such as the ESMO guideline's focus on advanced disease management and the ENETS guidance paper's multidisciplinary approach. This review examines the most recent guidelines from ESMO, NCCN, ASCO, ENETS, and NANETS, analyzing the recommendations for first-line therapies and subsequent treatment pathways in different clinical scenarios. Significant variations are observed in the recommendations, particularly concerning the choice and sequence of systemic therapies, the role of tumor grading and the Ki-67 index in therapeutic decisions, and the integration of regional regulatory and clinical practices. The analysis highlights the need for a tailored approach to managing advanced NF panNETs, advocating for flexibility in applying guidelines to account for individual patient circumstances and the evolving evidence base. This work underscores the complexities of managing this patient population and the critical role of a multidisciplinary team in optimizing treatment outcomes.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy versus Capecitabine/Temozolomide for the Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background: Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT), a form of Radioligand Therapy (RLT), and Capecitabine/Temozolomide (CAPTEM) are cornerstones of systemic therapy for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Data regarding comparative efficacy are lacking. Herein, we compare the efficacy of PRRT vs. CAPTEM as second-line/beyond regimens and treatment sequencing. Methods: Clinicopathologic, radiographic, and genomic data were captured for metastatic PNETs seen in our multi-disciplinary NET clinic between 2013 and 2023. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) after progression on a previous line of systemic therapy. The secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), time to response (TTR), and overall survival (OS). Results: Fifty-nine cases were included. PFS was similar in the PRRT (n = 29) and CAPTEM (n = 30) groups (PRRT = 21.90 months vs. CAPTEM = 20.03 months; HR 0.99; p = 0.97). On subgroup analysis, PRRT had longer PFS in cases without extrahepatic metastases (26.47 months vs. 17.67 months; p = 0.03) and cases with a mutation in the MEN1, DAXX, and/or ATRX genes (28.43 months vs. 18.67 months; p = 0.03). PRRT had reduced PFS in patients with grade 3 disease (7.83 months vs. 16.33 months; p = 0.02). ORR did not vary significantly (34.78% vs. 40.91%; p = 0.67). CAPTEM responders showed shorter TTR (6.03 months vs. 11.15 months; p = 0.03). In patients who received both, OS did not vary based on the sequence (HR 1.20; p = 0.75). Conclusions: PFS, ORR, and OS are similar when using PRRT vs. CAPTEM as second-line-and-beyond therapy for patients with metastatic PNETs. However, patients with MEN1, DAXX, and/or ATRX mutations or without extrahepatic metastases might better benefit from PRRT and patients with grade 3 disease from CAPTEM. Candidates for surgical debulking or with tumor-induced symptoms may benefit from initial treatment with CAPTEM due to shorter TTR.

Loss of ATRX and DAXX in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Association with recurrence risk, cellular phenotype, and heterogeneity

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms in terms of biological behavior. This study aims to develop a practical algorithm based on emerging biomarkers, including chromatin-remodeling molecules DAXX/ATRX/H3K36me3, in conjunction with established prognostic factors, such as WHO grade and size. In immunohistochemical analyses, 18 of the 111 (16.2%) primary PanNETs showed DAXX or ATRX loss in a mutually exclusive manner. DAXX/ATRX loss was significantly correlated with higher recurrence risk and better predicted postoperative recurrence than WHO grade. We proposed a novel algorithm for stratifying patients with resectable PanNET into three groups according to recurrence risk: (A) WHO Grade 1 and ≤2 cm (very low-risk); for the others, (B) retained DAXX/ATRX (low-risk) and (C) DAXX/ATRX complete/heterogeneous loss (high-risk). Furthermore, we elucidated the intratumoral heterogeneities of PanNETs. Among cases with DAXX or ATRX loss, nine cases demonstrated heterogeneous loss of expression of DAXX/ATRX/H3K36me3. The majority of cases with DAXX/ATRX loss, either homogeneous or heterogeneous loss, showed uniform α-cell-like phenotype (ARX1+/PDX1-). In cases of metastatic or recurrent tumors, the expression pattern was identical to that observed in at least part of the primary tumor. In some instances, the expression pattern differed among different metastatic or recurrent tumors of the same patient. In summary, we propose a clinically useful and practical algorithm for postoperative recurrence risk stratification in PanNETs, by combining DAXX/ATRX status with WHO grade and size. Moreover, our findings highlighted the frequent spatiotemporal heterogeneity of chromatin-remodeling molecule expression in PanNETs with an α-cell phenotype, offering insights into tumorigenesis.

Surgical Management and Long-Term Evaluation of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) arise from neuroendocrine cells and are a rare class of heterogenous tumors with increasing incidence. The diagnosis, staging, treatment, and prognosis of PNETs depend heavily on identifying the histologic features and biological mechanisms. Here, the authors provide an overview of the diagnostic workup (biomarkers and imaging), grade, and staging of PNETs. The authors also explore associated genetic mutations and molecular pathways and describe updated guidelines on surgical and systemic treatment modalities.

Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms; Principles of Treatment Strategies. What Referring Clinicians Want to Know

ABSTRACT

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a diverse group of tumors that express neuroendocrine markers and primarily affect the lungs and digestive system. The incidence of NENs has increased over time due to advancements in imaging and diagnostic techniques. Effective management of NENs requires a multidisciplinary approach, considering factors such as tumor location, grade, stage, symptoms, and imaging findings. Treatment strategies vary depending on the specific subtype of NEN. In this review, we will focus on treatment strategies and therapies including the information relevant to clinicians in order to undertake optimal management and treatment decisions, the implications of different therapies on imaging, and how to ascertain their possible complications and treatment effects.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Agonist, Antagonist and Alternatives

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) today is a well-established treatment strategy for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET). First performed already more than 30 years ago, PRRT was incorporated only in recent years into the major oncology guidelines, based on its proven efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Following the phase 3 NETTER-1 trial, which led to the final registration of the radiopharmaceutical Luthatera® for G1/G2 NET patients in 2017, the long-term results of the phase 3 NETTER-2 trial may pave the way for a new treatment option also for advanced G2/G3 patients as first-line therapy. The growing knowledge about the synergistic effect of combined therapies could also allow alternative (re)treatment options for NET patients, in order to create a tailored treatment strategy. The evolving thera(g)nostic concept could be applied for the identification of patients who might benefit from different image-guided treatment strategies. In this scenario, the use of dual tracer PET/CT in NET patients, using both [18F]F-FDG/[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-somatostatin analog (SSA) for diagnosis and follow-up, is under discussion and could also result in a powerful prognostic tool. In addition, alternative strategies based on different metabolic pathways, radioisotopes, or combinations of different medical approaches could be applied. A number of different promising "doors" could thus open in the near future for the treatment of NET patients - and the "key" will be thera(g)nostic!

Advancements in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Imaging and Future Frontiers

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a diverse group of tumors with varying clinical behaviors. Their incidence has risen due to increased awareness, improved diagnostics, and aging populations. The 2019 World Health Organization classification emphasizes integrating radiology and histopathology to characterize NENs and create personalized treatment plans. Imaging methods like CT, MRI, and PET/CT are crucial for detection, staging, treatment planning, and monitoring, but each of them poses different interpretative challenges and none are immune to pitfalls. Treatment options include surgery, targeted therapies, and chemotherapy, based on the tumor type, stage, and patient-specific factors. This review aims to provide insights into the latest developments and challenges in NEN imaging, diagnosis, and management.

Consensus on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of grade 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

The World Health Organization (WHO) 2017 classifications for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) subdivided grade 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) into G3 well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (G3 pNETs) and poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (pNECs), according to the mitotic count, Ki-67 index, and cell differentiation. As a new category, G3 pNETs remain a challenging group of tumors to manage by lacking large randomized trials and consensus to support its clinical practice. Therefore, the Chinese Pancreatic Surgery Association, Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association gathered experts in this field to formulate this consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of G3 pNETs.

Interference With VIP to Distinguish Between Real and False VIPoma: National Study From the French Endocrine Tumors Group

Background

Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-secreting tumors (VIPomas) are digestive neuroendocrine tumors in which the hormonal secretion is life-threatening. Biological confirmation is obtained by demonstrating an elevation in plasma VIP, usually using radioimmunoassay (RIA). In some cases, analytical interference is suspected. We developed 3 different techniques to detect interference in VIP RIA.

Methods

Three techniques were used: RIA after Sephadex column chromatography separation, RIA after polyethylene glycol precipitation, and 125I-labeled VIP binding test. We included patients with suspicion of false positive VIP (FPV) elevation. We then compared results with those of a group of "real," proven VIPoma (RV).

Results

A total of 15 patients with FPV elevation and 9 RV patients were included. Interference was detected in all FPV patients vs none in RV. Clinical and biochemical parameters did not differ between FPV and RV patients, but VIP concentration in RIA was significantly higher in FPV patients than in RV patients (228 pmol/L vs 66 pmol/L, P = .038). Using a 125I-labeled VIP binding test, median proportion of radioactivity in the pellet was significantly higher in FPV than in RV patients (53% vs 13%, P < .0001). A 20.5% threshold presented excellent performances (sensitivity 100% [79.6-100], specificity 100% [70.1-100]).

Conclusion

We developed 3 different laboratory techniques to reveal interference in RIA VIP assays. The diagnostic performance of all 3 was excellent. These techniques must be employed in cases of discordance between VIP elevation and clinical presentation.

Liver-Directed Locoregional Therapies for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases: Recent Advances and Management

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous class of cancers, predominately occurring in the gastroenteropancreatic system, which pose a growing health concern with a significant rise in incidence over the past four decades. Emerging from neuroendocrine cells, these tumors often elicit paraneoplastic syndromes such as carcinoid syndrome, which can manifest as a constellation of symptoms significantly impacting patients' quality of life. The prognosis of NETs is influenced by their tendency for metastasis, especially in cases involving the liver, where the estimated 5-year survival is between 20 and 40%. Although surgical resection remains the preferred curative option, challenges emerge in cases of neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastasis (NELM) with multifocal lobar involvement, and many patients may not meet the criteria for surgery. Thus, minimally invasive and non-surgical treatments, such as locoregional therapies, have surfaced. Overall, these approaches aim to prioritize symptom relief and aid in overall tumor control. This review examines locoregional therapies, encompassing catheter-driven procedures, ablative techniques, and radioembolization therapies. These interventions play a pivotal role in enhancing progression-free survival and managing hormonal symptoms, contributing to the dynamic landscape of evolving NELM treatment. This review meticulously explores each modality, presenting the current state of the literature on their utilization and efficacy in addressing NELM.

Liver transplantation as an alternative for the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastasis: Appraisal of the current evidence

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is still in debate. Studies comparing LT with liver resection (LR) for NELM are scarce, as patient selection is heterogeneous and experience is limited. The goal of this review was to provide a critical analysis of the evidence on LT versus LR in the treatment of NELM.

DATA SOURCES

A scoping literature search on LT and LR for NELM was performed with PubMed, including English articles up to March 2023.

RESULTS

International guidelines recommend LR for NELM in resectable, well-differentiated tumors in the absence of extrahepatic metastatic disease with superior results of LR compared to systemic or liver-directed therapies. Advanced liver surgery has extended resectability criteria whilst entailing increased perioperative risk and short disease-free survival. In highly selected patients (based on the Milan criteria) with unresectable NELM, oncologic results of LT are promising. Prognostic factors include tumor biology (G1/G2) and burden, waiting time for LT, patient age and extrahepatic spread. Based on low-level evidence, LT for low-grade NELM within the Milan criteria resulted in improved disease-free survival and overall survival compared to LR. The benefits of LT were lost in patients beyond the Milan NELM-criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

With adherence to strict selection criteria especially tumor biology, LT for NELM is becoming a valuable option providing oncologic benefits compared to LR. Recent evidence suggests even stricter selection criteria with regard to tumor biology.

Approach to the Patient: Insulinoma

Insulinomas are hormone-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with an estimated incidence of 1 to 4 cases per million per year. Extrapancreatic insulinomas are extremely rare. Most insulinomas present with the Whipple triad: (1) symptoms, signs, or both consistent with hypoglycemia; (2) a low plasma glucose measured at the time of the symptoms and signs; and (3) relief of symptoms and signs when the glucose is raised to normal. Nonmetastatic insulinomas are nowadays referred to as "indolent" and metastatic insulinomas as "aggressive." The 5-year survival of patients with an indolent insulinoma has been reported to be 94% to 100%; for patients with an aggressive insulinoma, this amounts to 24% to 67%. Five percent to 10% of insulinomas are associated with the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome. Localization of the insulinoma and exclusion or confirmation of metastatic disease by computed tomography is followed by endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging for indolent, localized insulinomas. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography or positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging is a highly sensitive localization technique for seemingly occult, indolent, localized insulinomas. Supportive measures and somatostatin receptor ligands can be used for to control hypoglycemia. For single solitary insulinomas, curative surgical excision remains the treatment of choice. In aggressive malignant cases, debulking procedures, somatostatin receptor ligands, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, everolimus, sunitinib, and cytotoxic chemotherapy can be valuable options.

A nomogram to preoperatively predict the aggressiveness of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on CT features

OBJECTIVES

To develop a nomogram to predict the aggressiveness of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs) based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) features.

METHODS

This study included 176 patients undergoing radical resection for NF-pNETs. These patients were randomly divided into the training (n = 123) and validation sets (n = 53). A nomogram was developed based on preoperative predictors of aggressiveness of the NF-pNETs which were identified by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The aggressiveness of NF-pNETs was defined as a composite measure including G3 grading, N+, distant metastases, and/ or disease recurrence.

RESULTS

Altogether, the number of patients with highly aggressive NF-pNETs was 37 (30.08 %) and 15 (28.30 %) in the training and validation sets, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified that tumor size, biliopancreatic duct dilatation, lymphadenopathy, and enhancement pattern were preoperative predictors of aggressiveness. Those variables were used to develop a nomogram with good concordance statistics of 0.89 and 0.86 for predicting aggressiveness in the training and validation sets, respectively. With a nomogram score of 59, patients with NF-pNETs were divided into low-aggressive and high-aggressive groups. The high-aggressive group had decreased overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Moreover, the nomogram showed good performance in predicting OS and DFS at 3, 5, and 10 years.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram integrating CT features helped preoperatively predict the aggressiveness of NF-pNETs and could potentially facilitate clinical decision-making.

When Should Lymphadenectomy Be Performed in Non-Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors? A Population-Based Analysis of the German Clinical Cancer Registry Group

BACKGROUND

Patient selection for lymphadenectomy remains a controversial aspect in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), given the growing importance of parenchyma-sparing resections and minimally invasive procedures.

METHODS

This population-based analysis was derived from the German Cancer Registry Group during the period from 2000 to 2021. Patients with upfront resected non-functional non-metastatic pNETs were included.

RESULTS

Out of 5520 patients with pNET, 1006 patients met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-three percent of the patients were male. The median age was 64 ± 17 years. G1, G2, and G3 pNETs were found in 57%, 37%, and 7% of the patients, respectively. Lymph node metastasis (LNM) was present in 253 (24%) of all patients. LNM was an independent prognostic factor (HR 1.79, CI 95% 1.21-2.64, p = 0.001) for disease-free survival (DFS). The 3-, 5-, and 10-year disease-free survival in nodal negative tumors compared to nodal positive was 82% vs. 53%, 75% vs. 38%, and 48% vs. 16%. LNM was present in 5% of T1 tumors, 25% of T2 tumors, and 49% of T3-T4 tumors. In T1 tumors, G1 was the most predominant tumor grade (80%). However, in T2 tumors, G2 and G3 represented 44% and 5% of all tumors. LNM was associated with tumors located in the pancreatic head (p < 0.001), positive resection margin (p < 0.001), tumors larger than 2 cm (p < 0.001), and higher tumor grade (p < 0.001). The multivariable analysis showed that tumor size, tumor grade, and location were independent prognostic factors associated with LNM that could potentially be used to predict LNM preoperatively.

CONCLUSION

LNM is an independent negative prognostic factor for DFS in pNETs. Due to the low incidence of LNM in T1 tumors (5%), parenchyma-sparing surgery seems oncologically adequate in small G1 pNETs, while regional lymphadenectomy should be recommended in T2 or G2/G3 pNETs.

Accurate non-invasive grading of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with a CT derived radiomics signature

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop a radiomics-signature using computed tomography (CT) data for the preoperative prediction of grade of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on patients undergoing resection for NF-PNETs between 2010 and 2019. A total of 2436 radiomic features were extracted from arterial and venous phases of pancreas-protocol CT examinations. Radiomic features that were associated with final pathologic grade observed in the surgical specimens were subjected to joint mutual information maximization for hierarchical feature selection and the development of the radiomic-signature. Youden-index was used to identify optimal cutoff for determining tumor grade. A random forest prediction model was trained and validated internally. The performance of this tool in predicting tumor grade was compared to that of EUS-FNA sampling that was used as the standard of reference.

RESULTS

A total of 270 patients were included and a fusion radiomic-signature based on 10 selected features was developed using the development cohort (n = 201). There were 149 men and 121 women with a mean age of 59.4 ± 12.3 (standard deviation) years (range: 23.3-85.0 years). Upon internal validation in a new set of 69 patients, a strong discrimination was observed with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.90) with corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% (95% CI: 79.7-95.3) and 73.3% (95% CI: 62.9-83.8) respectively. Of the study population, 143 patients (52.9%) underwent EUS-FNA. Biopsies were non-diagnostic in 26 patients (18.2%) and could not be graded due to insufficient sample in 42 patients (29.4%). In the cohort of 75 patients (52.4%) in whom biopsies were graded the radiomic-signature demonstrated not different AUC as compared to EUS-FNA (AUC: 0.69 vs. 0.67; P = 0.723), however greater sensitivity (i.e., ability to accurately identify G2/3 lesion was observed (80.8% vs. 42.3%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive assessment of tumor grade in patients with PNETs using the proposed radiomic-signature demonstrated high accuracy. Prospective validation and optimization could overcome the commonly experienced diagnostic uncertainty in the assessment of tumor grade in patients with PNETs and could facilitate clinical decision-making.

Premalignant Lesions in the Kidney Transplant Candidate

End-stage kidney disease patients who are referred for transplant undergo an extensive evaluation process to ensure their health prior to transplant due in part to the shortage of available organs. Although management and surveillance guidelines exist for malignancies identified in the transplant and waitlist populations, less is written about the management of premalignant lesions in this population. This review covers the less common premalignant lesions (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, thymoma, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor) that can be found in the transplant candidate population. High-level evidence for the management of these rarer premalignant lesions in the transplant population is lacking, and this review extrapolates evidence from the general population and should not be a substitute for a multidisciplinary discussion with medical and surgical oncologists.

VIPoma: An Unusual Cause of Chronic Diarrhea

Chronic diarrhea is a significant challenge in clinical practice because of its high prevalence and various causes. Comprehensive clinical assessment and stepwise laboratory approach are crucial for an accurate diagnosis. This report presents a case of an adult woman who experienced chronic watery diarrhea, complicated by renal impairment and multiple electrolyte imbalances, including hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, and metabolic acidosis. The diagnosis of a vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-secreting tumor (VIPoma) with liver metastases was confirmed by elevated serum levels of a vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and imaging findings of a pancreatic mass with multiple hepatic lesions. Preoperative management, including fluid rehydration, electrolyte correction, and somatostatin analog therapy, significantly improved her clinical symptoms. Subsequent surgical tumor removal and radiofrequency ablation of the hepatic lesions resulted in complete resolution of symptoms and normalized VIP levels. This case emphasizes the importance of early recognition of this rare tumor in patients with chronic diarrhea to improve clinical outcomes.

The association between jaundice and poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (Ki67 index > 55.0%)

BACKGROUND

Jaundice occurs in some pancreatic disease. However, its occurrences and role in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) has not been well studied. In this study we showed the association between jaundice and the risk of high grade and poorly differentiated PNENs.

METHODS

Ninety-three patients with head-neck PNENs were included. Poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms were defined by a ki67 index > 55.0%. Logistic regression was used to show the association between demographic information, clinical signs and symptoms and the risk of poorly differentiated tumors. A nomogram model was developed to predict poorly differentiated tumor.

RESULTS

Eight of 93 PNEN patients (8.6%) had jaundice. The age and ki67 index in patients with jaundice were significantly higher than those patients without jaundice. All jaundice occurred in patients with grade 3 PNENs. Mutivariable regression analysis showed that age (odds ratio(OR) = 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.02-1.19), tumor size (OR = 1.42, 95%CI:1.01-2.00) and jaundice (OR = 14.98, 95%CI: 1.22-184.09) were associated with the risk of poorly differentiated PNENs. The age and size combination showed a good performance in predicting poorly differentiated PNENs (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.71-0.90). The addition of jaundice further improved the age- and size-based model (AUC = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.91). A nomogram was developed based on age, tumor size and jaundice.

CONCLUSION

Our data showed that jaundice was associated with the risk of high grade PNENs and poorly differentiated PNENs.

Systemic Therapy for Tumor Control in Metastatic Well-Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop recommendations for systemic therapy for well-differentiated grade 1 (G1) to grade 3 (G3) metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are recommended as first-line systemic therapy for most patients with G1-grade 2 (G2) metastatic well-differentiated GI-NETs. Observation is an option for patients with low-volume or slow-growing disease without symptoms. After progression on SSAs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is recommended as systematic therapy for patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive tumors. Everolimus is an alternative second-line therapy, particularly in nonfunctioning NETs and patients with SSTR-negative tumors. SSAs are standard first-line therapy for SSTR-positive pancreatic (pan)NETs. Rarely, observation may be appropriate for asymptomatic patients until progression. Second-line systemic options for panNETs include PRRT (for SSTR-positive tumors), cytotoxic chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. For SSTR-negative tumors, first-line therapy options are chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. There are insufficient data to recommend particular sequencing of therapies. Patients with G1-G2 high-volume disease, relatively high Ki-67 index, and/or symptoms related to tumor growth may benefit from early cytotoxic chemotherapy. For G3 GEP-NETs, systemic options for G1-G2 may be considered, although cytotoxic chemotherapy is likely the most effective option for patients with tumor-related symptoms, and SSAs are relatively ineffective. Qualifying statements are provided to assist with treatment choice. Multidisciplinary team management is recommended, along with shared decision making with patients, incorporating their values and preferences, potential benefits and harms, and other characteristics and circumstances, such as comorbidities, performance status, geographic location, and access to care.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Monitoring and Surveillance of Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Undergoing Radioligand Therapy

Radioligand therapy (RLT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is a standard of care for adult patients with somatostatin-receptor (SSTR)-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Taking advantage of this precision nuclear medicine approach requires diligent monitoring and surveillance, from the use of diagnostic SSTR-targeted radioligand imaging for the selection of patients through treatment and assessments of response. Published evidence-based guidelines assist the multidisciplinary healthcare team by providing acceptable approaches to care; however, the sheer heterogeneity of GEP-NETs can make these frameworks difficult to apply in individual clinical circumstances. There are also contradictions in the literature regarding the utility of novel approaches in monitoring and surveilling patients with GEP-NETs receiving RLT. This article discusses the emerging evidence on imaging, clinical biochemistry, and tumor assessment criteria in the management of patients receiving RLT for GEP-NETs; additionally, it documents our own best practices. This allows us to offer practical guidance on how to effectively implement monitoring and surveillance measures to aid patient-tailored clinical decision-making.

Ten-Fold Elevation of Chromogranin A Level Unrelated to a Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Case Report of the Diagnostic Interference of Proton Pump Inhibitors

Chromogranin A (CgA) is a well-known biomarker for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, due to its non-specificity, a proper assessment of CgA test results requires a detailed knowledge of the factors, conditions, and medications influencing its serum concentration. We describe a case of a 61-year-old patient presenting with a mass suspicious of a gastrointestinal NET and an exceedingly high level of serum CgA persistent after mass resection. Following a thorough review of patient's medical history and clinical presentation, along with radiographic and pathological findings, no evidence of a NET was detected. A trial of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) withdrawal led to a dramatic normalization of CgA level, marking it as the culprit causing this tumor marker elevation. This case highlights the significant impact of PPI use on CgA level, and should incentivize clinicians to provide proper education to patients prior to testing.

Guidelines for surveillance of patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease: Consensus statement of the International VHL Surveillance Guidelines Consortium and VHL Alliance

Von Hippel‐Lindau disease is a rare inherited cancer‐predisposition syndrome. The authors report the updated recommendations for the multiorgan surveillance protocols.

Survival and Symptomatic Relief After Cytoreductive Hepatectomy for Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases: Long-Term Follow-up Evaluation of More Than 500 Patients

BACKGROUND

Distant metastases are the strongest predictor of poor prognosis for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Cytoreductive hepatectomy (CRH) can relieve symptoms of hormonal excess and prolong survival for patients with liver metastases (NETLMs), but long-term outcomes are poorly characterized.

METHODS

This retrospective single-institution analysis analyzed patients who underwent CRH for well-differentiated NETLMs from 2000 to 2020. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated symptom-free interval and overall and progression-free survival. Multivariable Cox regression analysis evaluated factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 546 patients. The most common primary sites were the small intestine (n = 279) and the pancreas (n = 194). Simultaneous primary tumor resection was performed for 60 % of the cases. Major hepatectomy comprised 27% of the cases, but this rate decreased during the study period (p < 0.001). Major complications occurred in 20%, and the 90-day mortality rate was 1.6%. Functional disease was present in 37 %, and symptomatic relief was achieved in 96%. The median symptom-free interval was 41 months (62 months after complete cytoreduction and 21 months with gross residual disease) (p = 0.021). The median overall survival was 122 months, and progression-free survival was 17 months. In the multivariable analysis, worse overall survival was associated with age, pancreatic primary tumor, Ki-67, number and size of lesions, and extrahepatic metastases, with Ki-67 as the strongest predictor (odds ratio [OR], 1.90 for Ki-67 [3-20%; p = 0.018] and OR, 4.25 for Ki-67 [>20%; p < 0.001]).

CONCLUSION

The study showed that CRH for NETLMs is associated with low perioperative morbidity and mortality and excellent overall survival, although the majority will experience recurrence/progression. For patients with functional tumors, CRH can provide durable symptomatic relief.

Role of Selected Circulating Tumor Biomarkers in Patients with Skeletal Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

We investigated the diagnostic capacity of selected circulating biomarkers (CBMs) for the early detection of bone metastasis (BMets) in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs). A total of 115 patients with PanNENs and 40 controls were enrolled. We measured the serum levels of ferritin, cytokeratin 18 (CY18), CA19-9, CA125, AFP, CEA, and beta-2 microglobulin (B2M). A total of eight PanNEN patients developed BMets, and one hundred seven remained BMets-free. We observed a significantly higher level of CA125 and CY18 in BMets patients vs. non-BMets patients (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively). CA125, CY18, and B2M area under receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) analyses differentiated both patients groups; CA125 area under the curve (AUC) 0.77, p < 0.01; CY18 AUC data were 0.72, p = 0.03, and B2M AUC 0.67, p = 0.02. On the basis of CBM metrics in both subgroups, we reached a sensitivity/specificity for CA125 of 75/76%; for CY18 of 75/69%, for B2M of 100/50%, for CA125, and the CY18 combination of 93/90%, respectively. According to current results, CA125 and CY18 seem to have the potential capacity as fair biomarkers for BMets detection, despite the small number of cases. Further studies are warranted in the larger PanNEN patient group.

Grading Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Via Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration: A Multi-institutional Study

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors associated with concordance between World Health Organization (WHO) grade on cytological analysis (c-grade) and histopathological analysis (h-grade) of surgical specimen in patients with PanNETs and examine trends in utilization and accuracy of EUS-FNA in preoperatively predicting grade.

BACKGROUND

WHO grading system is prognostic in pancreatic neuroendo-crine tumors (PanNETs). The concordance between c-grade and h-grade is reported to be between 50% and 92%.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study was performed on patients undergoing resection for PanNETs at four high-volume centers between 2010 and 2019. Patients with functional or syndrome-associated tumors, and those receiving neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Factors associated with concordance between c-grade and h-grade and trends of utilization of EUS-FNA were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 869 patients included, 517 (59.5%) underwent EUS-FNA; 452 (87.4%) were diagnostic of PanNETs and WHO-grade was reported for 270 (59.7%) patients. The concordance between c-grade and h-grade was 80.4% with moderate concordance ( Kc = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.41-0.63). Significantly higher rates of concordance were observed in patients with smaller tumors (<2 vs. ≥2cm, 81.1% vs. 60.4%, P = 0.005). Highest concordance (98.1%) was observed in patients with small tumors undergoing assessment between 2015-2019 with a near-perfect concordance ( Kc = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.61-1.00). An increase in the utilization of EUS-FNA (56.1% to 64.1%) was observed over the last 2 decades ( P = 0.017) and WHO-grade was more frequently reported (44.2% vs. 77.6%, P < 0.001). However, concordance between c-grade and h-grade did not change significantly (P = 0.118).

CONCLUSION

Recently, a trend towards increasing utilization and improved diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA has been observed in PanNETs. Concordance between c-grade and h-grade is associated with tumor size with near-perfect agreement when assessing PanNETs <2cm in size.

Selected Serum Biomarkers (Leptin, Chromogranin A, CA19-9, CEA) in Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm and Associations with Metabolic Syndrome

Metabolic abnormalities are well-known risk factors for many cancers, even though no clearly established link with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) has yet been investigated. This research aimed to assess the serum levels of leptin, chromogranin A (CgA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in patients with PanNENs and to search for associations between PanNENs, these selected serum biomarkers, and metabolic abnormalities in the form of metabolic syndrome (MS). Second, we aimed to investigate whether MS increases the risk of PanNENs. The serum concentrations of biomarkers, metabolic parameters (glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides), and anthropometric measurements (weight, height, BMI) were assessed in 106 patients with PanNENs and 40 healthy volunteers. Patients with PanNENs showed higher serum concentrations of CA19-9, CEA, and CgA in comparison to controls (p < 0.001, p = 0.042, and p = 0.025, respectively). Statistically significant differences in CEA levels were found in PanNENs patients with MS (p = 0.043). PanNENs patients with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² and who were female exhibited significantly higher leptin levels (p < 0.001 and p = 0.013, respectively). Additionally, this study reflects the importance of determining markers. Future research should focus on understanding the impact of metabolic disturbances on PanNENs and accounting for the relationship between PanNENs and MS, such as other malignancies.

Targeting neuroendocrine tumors with octreotide and lanreotide: Key points for clinical practice from NET specialists

Octreotide and lanreotide are the two somatostatin analogs (SSA) currently available in clinical practice. They have been approved first to control the clinical syndrome (mainly carcinoid syndrome) associated with functioning neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and later for tumor growth control in advanced low/intermediate grade NET. Although evidence regarding their role, especially as antiproliferative therapy, has been increasing over the years some clinical indications remain controversial. Solicited by AIOM (Italian Association of Medical Oncology) a group of clinicians from various specialties, including medical oncology, endocrinology, and gastroenterology, deeply involved in NET for their clinical and research activity, addressed eight open questions, critically reviewing evidence and guidelines and sharing clinical take-home messages. The questions regarded the use of long-acting octreotide and lanreotide in the following settings: functioning and non-functioning NET refractory to label dose, first-line metastatic pulmonary NET, combination with other therapy with an antiproliferative intent, maintenance in NET responding to other therapies, adjuvant treatment, Ki-67-related cut-off, somatostatin receptor imaging, safety, and feasibility. The level of evidence is not absolute for the majority of these clinical contexts, so it is recommended to distinguish routine versus sporadic utilization in very selected cases. Mention of such specific issues by the main European guidelines (ENETS, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, and ESMO, European Society for Medical Oncology) was explored and their position reported. However, different clinical decisions on single patients could be made if the case is carefully discussed within a NET-dedicated multidisciplinary team.

Status of Surveillance and Nonsurgical Therapy for Small Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) occur in < 1/100,000 patients and most are nonfunctioning (NF). Approximately 5% occur as part of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Anatomic and molecular imaging have a pivotal role in the diagnosis, staging and active surveillance. Surgery is generally recommended for nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) >2 cm to prevent metastases. For tumors ≤2 cm, active surveillance is a viable alternative. Tumor size and grade are important factors to guide management. Assessment of death domain-associated protein 6/alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked and alternative lengthening of telomeres are promising novel prognostic markers. This review summarizes the status of surveillance and nonsurgical management for small NF-PNETs, including factors that can guide management.

Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are relatively uncommon malignancies, characterized as either functional or nonfunctional secondary to their secretion of biologically active hormones. A wide range of clinical behavior can be seen, with the primary prognostic indicator being tumor grade as defined by the Ki67 proliferation index and mitotic index. Surgery is the primary treatment modality for PNETs. While functional PNETs should undergo resection for symptom control as well as potential curative intent, nonfunctional PNETs are increasingly managed nonoperatively. There is increasing data to suggest small, nonfunctional PNETs (less than 2 cm) are appropriate follow with nonoperative active surveillance. Evidence supports surgical management of metastatic disease if possible, and occasionally even surgical management of the primary tumor in the setting of widespread metastases. In this review, we highlight the evolving surgical management of local and metastatic PNETs.