1
|
Oberoi S, Qumseya A, Xue W, Harrison DJ, Rudzinski ER, Wolden SL, Dasgupta R, Venkatramani R, Gupta AA. Feasibility of combining temsirolimus to vincristine, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine and irinotecan chemotherapy for children with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from Children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e30436. [PMID: 37243336 PMCID: PMC10676447 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Temsirolimus has shown in vivo activity against rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). We aimed to determine the feasibility of incorporating temsirolimus within the standard Children's Oncology Group (COG) chemotherapy backbone of vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) alternating with vincristine and irinotecan (VI) in children with intermediate-risk (IR) RMS. METHODS The feasibility phase of the COG IR-RMS trial, ARST1431 (NCT02567435), assigned 10 patients to receive 15 mg/m2 /dose (dose level 1) of temsirolimus on days 1, 8, and 15 of each of three weekly VAC and VI cycles for the first 12 weeks of induction chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of the feasibility phase was to establish the safe dose and safety of combining temsirolimus with VAC/VI. The combination regimen was deemed feasible if less than 40% of patients developed a priori defined nonhematological dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). RESULTS Ten patients (seven males and three females; median age = 4.5 years [range: 0.2-14.4 years]) with IR-RMS were enrolled and received dose level 1 of temsirolimus. Eight patients had FOXO1-negative disease, while two had FOXO1-positive disease. Two patients had metastatic disease. Of 10 patients, two developed DLTs: grade 3 oral mucositis and pneumonitis. Four patients (40%) had grade 4 neutropenia. No treatment-related mortality occurred. The median duration of the completion of the feasibility phase was 12.1 weeks (range: 11.7-15 weeks). CONCLUSIONS Weekly temsirolimus at 15 mg/m2 /dose during VAC/VI chemotherapy was feasible and well tolerated. The efficacy of this regimen is currently being tested in a phase III randomized trial against VAC/VI chemotherapy alone in the ARST1431 trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sapna Oberoi
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Section of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Amria Qumseya
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health Professions College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health Professions College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Douglas J Harrison
- Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA
| | - Erin R. Rudzinski
- Department of Laboratories, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Suzanne L Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Roshni Dasgupta
- Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Rajkumar Venkatramani
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children’s Cancer Center, Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Abha A. Gupta
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferrari A, Gatz SA, Minard-Colin V, Alaggio R, Hovsepyan S, Orbach D, Gasparini P, Defachelles AS, Casanova M, Milano GM, Chisholm JC, Jenney M, Bisogno G, Rogers T, Mandeville HC, Shipley J, Miah AB, Merks JHM, van der Graaf WTA. Shedding a Light on the Challenges of Adolescents and Young Adults with Rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:6060. [PMID: 36551545 PMCID: PMC9775932 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a typical tumour of childhood but can occur at any age. Several studies have reported that adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with RMS have poorer survival than do younger patients. This review discusses the specific challenges in AYA patients with pediatric-type RMS, exploring possible underlying factors which may influence different outcomes. Reasons for AYA survival gap are likely multifactorial, and might be related to differences in tumor biology and intrinsic aggressiveness, or differences in clinical management (that could include patient referral patterns, time to diagnosis, enrolment into clinical trials, the adequacy and intensity of treatment), as well as patient factors (including physiology and comorbidity that may influence treatment tolerability, drug pharmacokinetics and efficacy). However, improved survival has been reported in the most recent studies for AYA patients treated on pediatric RMS protocols. Different strategies may help to further improve outcome, such as supporting trans-age academic societies and national/international collaborations; developing specific clinical trials without upper age limit; defining integrated and comprehensive approach to AYA patients, including the genomic aspects; establishing multidisciplinary tumor boards with involvement of both pediatric and adult oncologists to discuss all pediatric-type RMS patients; developing dedicated projects with specific treatment recommendations and registry/database.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Susanne Andrea Gatz
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Veronique Minard-Colin
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave-Roussy, Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Rita Alaggio
- Pathology Department, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, 00165 Roma, Italy
| | - Shushan Hovsepyan
- Pediatric Cancer and Blood Disorders Centre of Armenia, Yerevan 0014, Armenia
| | - Daniel Orbach
- SIREDO Oncology Center, Institut Curie, PSL University, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Patrizia Gasparini
- Tumor Genomics Unit, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Michela Casanova
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Julia C. Chisholm
- Children and Young People’s Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Meriel Jenney
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Children′s Hospital for Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK
| | - Gianni Bisogno
- Hematology Oncology Division, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Timothy Rogers
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 3NU, UK
| | - Henry C. Mandeville
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Janet Shipley
- Sarcoma Molecular Pathology Team, Divisions of Molecular Pathology and Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Aisha B. Miah
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Johannes H. M. Merks
- Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Winette T. A. van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dakik L, Basbous M, Tamim H, Moubarak Y, Tarek N, Hamideh D, Muwakkit S, Abboud M, Saab R. Vincristine-induced neurotoxicity in pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma: A retrospective analysis of clinical features and outcome. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2022; 39:644-649. [PMID: 35262458 DOI: 10.1080/08880018.2022.2047849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Vincristine is an essential component of rhabdomyosarcoma treatment. However, it can cause motor neurotoxicity, necessitating dose reductions. We retrospectively reviewed the rates and patterns of vincristine-induced motor neuropathy in children treated for rhabdomyosarcoma, and investigated effects on outcome. Fifteen of 43 patients (35%) developed motor neuropathies necessitating dose reductions, which ranged from 1.7% to 58% of planned cumulative dose. Older age was the only significant clinical risk factor. Almost half (47%) recovered during treatment with subsequent dose escalation. Most patients had complete resolution of symptoms upon follow-up. There was no discernible effect of treatment reduction on survival or relapse rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lama Dakik
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Maya Basbous
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Hani Tamim
- Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut Faculty of Medicine, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Yacoub Moubarak
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Nidale Tarek
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Dima Hamideh
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Samar Muwakkit
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Miguel Abboud
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Raya Saab
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Optimizing Rhabdomyosarcoma Treatment in Adolescents and Young Adults. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092270. [PMID: 35565399 PMCID: PMC9105996 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common form of soft tissue sarcoma in children, but can also develop in adolescents and young adults (AYA). The mainstay of treatment is multi-agent chemotherapy, ideally with concomitant local treatment, including surgical resection and/or radiation therapy. Although most treatment decisions for RMS in AYA are based on scientific evidence accumulated through clinical studies of pediatric RMS, treatment outcomes are significantly inferior in AYA patients than in children. Factors responsible for the significantly poor outcomes in AYA are tumor biology, the physiology specific to the age group concerned, refractoriness to multimodal treatments, and various psychosocial and medical care issues. The present review aims to examine the various issues involved in the treatment and care of AYA patients with RMS, discuss possible solutions, and provide an overview of the literature on the topic with several observations from the author's own experience. Clinical trials for RMS in AYA are the best way to develop an optimal treatment. However, a well-designed clinical trial requires a great deal of time and resources, especially when targeting such a rare population. Until clinical trials are designed and implemented, and their findings duly analyzed, we must provide the best possible practice for RMS treatment in AYA patients based on our own expertise in manipulating the dosage schedules of various chemotherapeutic agents and administering local treatments in a manner appropriate for each patient. Precision medicine based on state-of-the-art cancer genomics will also form an integral part of this personalized approach. In the current situation, the only way to realize such a holistic treatment approach is to integrate new developments and findings, such as gene-based diagnostics and treatments, with older, fundamental evidence that can be selectively applied to individual cases.
Collapse
|
5
|
Population-based survival of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma of the head and neck over four decades. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 142:110599. [PMID: 33422992 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical trials have reported increases in the survival of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) from 25% in 1970 to 73% in 2001. The purpose of this study was to examine whether survival of pediatric patients with RMS of the head and neck improved at the US population level. METHODS A population-based cohort of patients with rhabdomyosarcoma of the head and neck aged 0-19 years in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry from 1973 to 2013 was queried. The cumulative incidence competing risks (CICR) method was used to estimate risk and survival trends. RESULTS 718 cases were identified for analysis. Survival rates at 1-, 5-, and 10-years after diagnosis were 91.2%, 73.2%, and 69.4% respectively. Survival rates at 1 year after diagnosis increased from 82.6% to 93.1% during the study period. In the subdistributional hazard analysis, there was a significantly improved disease-specific risk of death in the first year after diagnosis. Overall risk of death did not improve significantly. Favorable prognostic factors included age <10 years at diagnosis, smaller tumor size, absence of distant metastasis, localized tumors, earlier stage at presentation, grossly complete surgical resection, and embryonal or botryoid histology. CONCLUSIONS Disease-specific survival in the first year following diagnosis improved, but the change in overall survival at the population level was not statistically significant. These findings should be interpreted in light of the inclusion of patients with distant metastasis at diagnosis, who have poor prognoses, together with the limited statistical power afforded in studies of rare diseases.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ferrari A, Bernasconi A, Bergamaschi L, Botta L, Andreano A, Castaing M, Rugge M, Bisogno G, Falcini F, Sacerdote C, Tagliabue G, Michiara M, Cirilli C, Barchielli A, Filiberti RA, Vitale MF, Tumino R, Stracci F, Chiaravalli S, Casanova M, Gasparini P, Milano GM, Gatta G, Trama A. Impact of Rhabdomyosarcoma Treatment Modalities by Age in a Population-Based Setting. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2020; 10:309-315. [PMID: 32758055 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2020.0043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) has a worse prognosis in adults than in children, but there is evidence of a better outcome in the former if treated using a pediatric-like approach. This study describes treatment for RMS in patients more than 10 years old and examines to what extent treatment contributes to explain the different age-related survival observed and to what extent treatment centers impact treatment appropriateness. Methods: A retrospective population-based study was developed considering 104 RMS cases (excluding the pleomorphic subtype) diagnosed in Italy between 2000 and 2015. Patients were grouped by age (10-19 vs. 20-60 years old) and scored according to whether or not their chemotherapy was consistent with the schemes used in pediatric protocols (score 1 = chemotherapy in line with pediatric protocols). Treatment centers were grouped according to whether or not they have a pediatric-dedicated unit affiliated to the national pediatric oncology network (Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica [AIEOP]). Results: Older patients were more likely to have tumors at unfavorable sites (p = 0.045). A treatment score of 1 was assigned to 85% of younger patients, but only to 32% of older patients (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the proportion of score 1 was higher in younger patients treated in centers with an AIEOP Unit. A multivariate model confirmed age as a significant prognostic factor (Hazard rate ratio [HR] = 2.06; p = 0.04) and showed a significant impact of treatment on survival (HR = 2.13; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Adult RMS patients are still relatively unlikely to be treated with pediatric protocols and in centers with a pediatric oncology expertise. This may explain the survival gap between older and younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Bernasconi
- Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Bergamaschi
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Botta
- Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Anita Andreano
- Epidemiology Unit, Agency for Health Protection (ATS) of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marine Castaing
- Integrated Cancer Registry of Catania-Messina-Siracusa-Enna, Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Massimo Rugge
- Veneto Tumour Registry, Azienda Zero, Padova, Italy.,Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Gianni Bisogno
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Fabio Falcini
- Romagna Cancer Registry, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), IRCCS, Meldola (Forlì), Italy-Azienda Usl della Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Carlotta Sacerdote
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, AO Citta' della Salute e della Scienza-University of Turin and Center for Cancer Prevention, Turin, Italy
| | - Giovanna Tagliabue
- Cancer Registry Unit, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Maria Michiara
- Parma Cancer Registry, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Barchielli
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO), Firenze, Italy
| | | | | | - Rosario Tumino
- Cancer Registry and Histopathology Department, Provincial Health Authority (ASP), Ragusa, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Stracci
- Umbria Cancer Registry, Public Health section Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Stefano Chiaravalli
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Casanova
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Gasparini
- Tumor Genomics Unit, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gemma Gatta
- Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Annalisa Trama
- Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Spreafico F, Ferrari A, Mascarin M, Collini P, Morosi C, Biasoni D, Biassoni V, Schiavello E, Gandola L, Gattuso G, Chiaravalli S, Massimino M. Wilms tumor, medulloblastoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma in adult patients: lessons learned from the pediatric experience. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2019; 38:683-694. [DOI: 10.1007/s10555-019-09831-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
8
|
Nakano K, Ae K, Matsumoto S, Takahashi S. The VAC regimen for adult rhabdomyosarcoma: Differences between adolescent/young adult and older patients. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2019; 16:e47-e52. [PMID: 31657883 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared to pediatric patients, adult rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) patients have poor prognoses, but the differences in prognoses and treatment sensitivity between adolescent/young adult (AYA) patient and older RMS patients have not been established. AIM To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of the vincristine/dactinomycin/cyclophosphamide (VAC) regimen, that is, the standard combination chemotherapy regimen for pediatric RMS, in AYA and older patients. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of adolescent and adult RMS patients treated at our institution and patients treated with the VAC were enrolled in the analyses. The differences in the efficacy and safety of VAC between the AYA patients (15-39 years old) and older patients (≥40 years old) were compared. RESULTS Total of 23 patients were enrolled (14 AYA patients and nine older patients) were enrolled. With the median follow-up of 89.4 weeks (range 17.7-263.1 weeks), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the VAC regimen were 61.4 weeks (95% CI, 32.6-90.3) and 104.0 weeks (95% CI, 43.8-164.2), respectively, with no significant differences in the PFS or OS between the AYA and older patients. There were no differences in the response rate of the VAC between AYA (64.3%) and older (66.7%), either. Safety profiles were similar between the AYA and older groups, but exposure to antitumor drugs of the VAC tended to be lower in the older group; median number of total cycle of the VAC was 13 in AYA and 10 in older, cumulative cyclophosphamide dose was 16.8 g/m2 in AYA and 12.8 g/m2 in older, and number of vincristine skips was six in AYA and 12 in older, respectively. CONCLUSION There were no significant differences in responses to the VAC among AYA and older patients with RMS. With the appropriate dose modification, the VAC regimen could be a feasible treatment option for RMS patients >40 years old.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Nakano
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Orthopedic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ae
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seiichi Matsumoto
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunji Takahashi
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Orthopedic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ferrari A, Bleyer A, Patel S, Chiaravalli S, Gasparini P, Casanova M. The challenge of the management of adolescents and young adults with soft tissue sarcomas. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e27013. [PMID: 29493075 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas are relatively frequent in adolescents and young adults and their clinical management may be complex, partly due to tumor associated factors, but also because different approaches have been adopted by pediatric and adult medical oncologists dealing with the same disease. However, times are changing and in the last few years, management has tended to converge towards a common strategy. Continued and increased international collaboration between pediatric and adult sarcoma groups is of critical importance to improve the quality of treatment as well as research programs dedicated to young patients with soft tissue sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Archie Bleyer
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Shreyaskumar Patel
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stefano Chiaravalli
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Gasparini
- Tumor Genomics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Casanova
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nasioudis D, Alevizakos M, Chapman-Davis E, Witkin SS, Holcomb K. Rhabdomyosarcoma of the lower female genital tract: an analysis of 144 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4438-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
11
|
Castagnola E, Ruberto E, Guarino A. Gastrointestinal and liver infections in children undergoing antineoplastic chemotherapy in the years 2000. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:5853-5866. [PMID: 27433098 PMCID: PMC4932220 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i25.5853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2016] [Revised: 05/27/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To review gastrointestinal and liver infections in children undergoing antineoplastic chemotherapy. To look at gut microflora features in oncology children.
METHODS: We selected studies published after year 2000, excluding trials on transplanted pediatric patients. We searched English language publications in MEDLINE using the keywords: “gastrointestinal infection AND antineoplastic chemotherapy AND children”, “gastrointestinal infection AND oncology AND children”, “liver infection AND antineoplastic chemotherapy AND children”, “liver abscess AND chemotherapy AND child”, “neutropenic enterocolitis AND chemotherapy AND children”, “thyphlitis AND chemotherapy AND children”, “infectious diarrhea AND children AND oncology”, “abdominal pain AND infection AND children AND oncology”, “perianal sepsis AND children AND oncology”, “colonic pseudo-obstruction AND oncology AND child AND chemotherapy”, “microflora AND children AND malignancy”, “microbiota AND children AND malignancy”, “fungal flora AND children AND malignancy”. We also analysed evidence from several articles and book references.
RESULTS: Gastrointestinal and liver infections represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children undergoing antineoplastic chemotherapy. Antineoplastic drugs cause immunosuppression in addition to direct toxicity, predisposing to infections, although the specific risk is variable according to disease and host features. Common pathogens potentially induce severe diseases whereas opportunistic microorganisms may attack vulnerable hosts. Clinical manifestations can be subtle and not specific. In addition, several conditions are rare and diagnostic process and treatments are not standardized. Diagnosis may be challenging, however early diagnosis is needed for quick and appropriate interventions. Interestingly, the source of infection in those children can be exogenous or endogenous. Indeed, mucosal damage may allow the penetrance of endogenous microbes towards the bowel wall and their translocation into the bloodstream. However, only limited knowledge of intestinal dysbiosis in oncology children is available.
CONCLUSION: The diagnostic work-up requires a multimodal approach and should be implemented (also by further studies on new biomarkers) for a prompt and individualized therapy.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Teeth changes after chemotherapy are of clinical importance, but no morphological studies were conducted on microscopic level. AIM To assess morphological changes in teeth developing under chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-nine adolescents aged 13-16 years that received chemotherapy at the age of 2-13 were included in the study. Teeth morphology was evaluated by means of clinical and radiological data as well as microscopy of extracted teeth (n=13). Thirty healthy children aged 13-16 and 8 teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons served as a control. RESULTS Chemotherapy has arresting impact on teeth development confirmed by aplasia of germs when influenced on stages I-II (p=0.0001), preliminary apexogenesis resulting in shortened roots in teeth at the later stages of growth and development (p=0.01). Enamel and dentine defects usually located in cervical area are also a specific feature, while caries incidence was not higher when compared to control group. CONCLUSION Children receiving chemotherapy have high risk of secondary teeth loss because of germs aplasia and extraction of severely decayed teeth. Early diagnostics helps to prevent secondary deformations of dental arches by prompt prosthetic rehabilitation. Root morphology changes should be considered by root canal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M V Korolenkova
- Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|