Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage

Integrating structured and unstructured data for predicting emergency severity: an association and predictive study using transformer-based natural language processing models

BACKGROUND

Efficient triage in emergency departments (EDs) is critical for timely and appropriate care. Traditional triage systems primarily rely on structured data, but the increasing availability of unstructured data, such as clinical notes, presents an opportunity to enhance predictive models for assessing emergency severity and to explore associations between patient characteristics and severity outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combining structured and unstructured data to predict emergency severity more accurately.

METHODS

Data from the 2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) for adult ED patients were used. Emergency severity was categorized into urgent (scores 1-3) and non-urgent (scores 4-5) based on the Emergency Severity Index. Unstructured data, including chief complaints and reasons for visit, were processed using a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model. Structured data included patient demographics and clinical information. Four machine learning models-Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting-were applied to three data configurations: structured data only, unstructured data only, and combined data. A mean probability model was also created by averaging the predicted probabilities from the structured and unstructured models.

RESULTS

The study included 8,716 adult patients, of whom 74.6% were classified as urgent. Association analysis revealed significant predictors of emergency severity, including older age (OR = 2.13 for patients 65 +), higher heart rate (OR = 1.56 for heart rates > 90 bpm), and specific chronic conditions such as chronic kidney disease (OR = 2.28) and coronary artery disease (OR = 2.55). Gradient Boosting with combined data demonstrated the highest performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.789, an accuracy of 0.726, and a precision of 0.892. The mean probability model also showed improvements over structured-only models.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining structured and unstructured data improved the prediction of emergency severity in ED patients, highlighting the potential for enhanced triage systems. Integrating text data into predictive models can provide more accurate and nuanced severity assessments, improving resource allocation and patient outcomes. Further research should focus on real-time application and validation in diverse clinical settings.

Emergency Severity Index Version 4 and Triage of Pediatric Emergency Department Patients

Importance

Most emergency departments (EDs) across the US use the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) to predict acuity and resource needs. A comprehensive assessment of ESI accuracy among pediatric patients is lacking.

Objective

To assess the frequency of mistriage using ESI (version 4) among pediatric ED visits using automated measures of mistriage and identify characteristics associated with mistriage.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used operational measures for each ESI level to classify encounters as undertriaged, overtriaged, or correctly triaged to assess the accuracy of the ESI and identify characteristics of mistriage. Participants were pediatric patients at 21 EDs within Kaiser Permanente Northern California from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. During that time, version 4 of the ESI was in use by these EDs. Visits with missing ESI, incomplete ED time variables, patients transferred from another ED, and those who left against medical advice or without being seen were excluded. Data were analyzed between January 2022 and June 2023.

Exposures

Assigned ESI level.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Rates of undertriage and overtriage by assigned ESI level based on mistriage algorithm, patient and visit characteristics associated with undertriage and overtriage.

Results

This study included 1 016 816 pediatric ED visits; the mean (SD) age of patients was 7.3 (5.6) years, 479 610 (47.2%) were female, and 537 206 (52.8%) were male. Correct triage occurred in 346 918 visits (34.1%; 95% CI, 34.0%-34.2%), while overtriage and undertriage occurred in 594 485 visits (58.5%; 95% CI, 58.4%-58.6%) and 75 413 visits (7.4%; 95% CI, 7.4%-7.5%), respectively. In adjusted analyses, undertriage was more common among children at least 6 years old compared with those younger 6 years; male patients compared with female patients; patients with Asian, Black, or Hispanic or other races or ethnicities compared with White patients; patients with comorbid illnesses compared with those without; and patients who arrived by ambulance compared with nonambulance patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

This multicenter retrospective study found that mistriage with ESI version 4 was common in pediatric ED visits. There is an opportunity to improve pediatric ED triage, both in early identification of critically ill patients (limit undertriage) and in more accurate identification of low-acuity patients with low resource needs (limit overtriage). Future research should include assessments based on version 5 of the ESI, which was released after this study was completed.

The effectiveness of a modified Manchester Triage System for geriatric patients: A retrospective quantitative study

AIM

Geriatric patients are increasingly dominating the daily routine in emergency department (ED). The atypical clinical presentation of disease, multimorbidity, frailty and cognitive impairment of geriatric patients pose particular challenges for triage in the ED. Efficient and accurate emergency triage plays a key role in differentiating between geriatric patients who need timely treatment and those who can wait safely. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the modified Manchester Triage System (mMTS) in classifying geriatric patients.

DESIGN

An observational retrospective study.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 18,796 geriatric patients (≥65 years) attending the ED of a tertiary care hospital in Zhejiang province between 1 June 2020 and 30 June 2022. Baseline information on patients was collected and divided into two different study groups according to triage level: high priority (red/orange) and low priority (yellow/green). The sensitivity and specificity of the mMTS were estimated by verifying the triage classification received by the emergency geriatric patients and their survival at 7 days or the need for acute surgery within 72 h.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 17,764 geriatric patients with a median age of 72 years in ED. 10.7% (1896/17,764) of the geriatric patients were assigned to the high priority code group (red/orange) and 89.3% (15,868/17,764) were in the low priority code group (yellow/green). The sensitivity of the mMTS associated with death within 7 days was 85.7% (77.5-91.4), specificity was 89.8% (89.3-90.2), and accuracy was 89.8% (89.3-90.2). 1.8% of patients required surgery within 72 h. The sensitivity was 62.6% (57.0-67.9), specificity was 90.3% (89.8-90.7), and negative predictive value was 99.2% (99.0-99.4).

CONCLUSIONS

The mMTS has good specificity, accuracy and negative predictive value for geriatric patients. However, its incorrect prediction of triage in high-priority code patients results in lower sensitivity, which may serve as a protective strategy for these individuals. The current emergency triage system does not completely screen geriatric patients with severe acute illness who present to the ED, and it is necessary to add comprehensive assessment tools that match the characteristics of geriatric patients to improve triage outcomes.

Pediatric mental health emergency department visits from 2017 to 2022: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected children's mental health (MH) and changed patterns of MH emergency department (ED) utilization. Our objective was to assess how pediatric MH ED visits during the COVID-19 pandemic differed from expected prepandemic trends.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied MH ED visits by children 5 to <18 years old at nine U.S. hospitals participating in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Registry from 2017 to 2022. We described visit length by time period: prepandemic (January 2017-February 2020), early pandemic (March 2020-December 2020), midpandemic (2021), and late pandemic (2022). We estimated expected visit rates from prepandemic data using multivariable Poisson regression models. We calculated rate ratios (RRs) of observed to expected visits per 30 days during each pandemic time period, overall and by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified 175,979 pediatric MH ED visits. Visit length exceeded 12 h for 7.3% prepandemic, 8.4% early pandemic, 15.0% midpandemic, and 19.2% late pandemic visits. During the early pandemic, observed visits per 30 days decreased relative to expected rates (RR 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.84), were similar to expected rates during the midpandemic (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96-1.07), and then decreased below expected rates during the late pandemic (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.98). During the late pandemic, visit rates were higher than expected for females (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.20) and for bipolar disorders (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.38-2.75), schizophrenia spectrum disorders (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.10-2.59), and substance-related and addictive disorders (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18-2.05).

CONCLUSIONS

During the late pandemic, pediatric MH ED visits decreased below expected rates; however, visits by females and for specific conditions remained elevated, indicating a need for increased attention to these groups. Prolonged ED visit lengths may reflect inadequate availability of MH services.

Can artificial intelligence help ED nurses more accurately triage patients?

ABSTRACT

The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) is the most popular tool used to triage patients in the US and abroad. Evidence has shown that ESI has its limitations in correctly assigning acuity. To address this, AI can be incorporated into the triage process, decreasing the likelihood of assigning an incorrect ESI level.

Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives

The dawn of Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare stands as a milestone in medical innovation. Different medical fields are heavily involved, and pediatric emergency medicine is no exception. We conducted a narrative review structured in two parts. The first part explores the theoretical principles of AI, providing all the necessary background to feel confident with these new state-of-the-art tools. The second part presents an informative analysis of AI models in pediatric emergencies. We examined PubMed and Cochrane Library from inception up to April 2024. Key applications include triage optimization, predictive models for traumatic brain injury assessment, and computerized sepsis prediction systems. In each of these domains, AI models outperformed standard methods. The main barriers to a widespread adoption include technological challenges, but also ethical issues, age-related differences in data interpretation, and the paucity of comprehensive datasets in the pediatric context. Future feasible research directions should address the validation of models through prospective datasets with more numerous sample sizes of patients. Furthermore, our analysis shows that it is essential to tailor AI algorithms to specific medical needs. This requires a close partnership between clinicians and developers. Building a shared knowledge platform is therefore a key step.

Emergency medical service use at a pediatric center in Turkey, during the COVID-19 pandemic period

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate aspects of pediatric patients presenting to a hospital in Turkey via emergency ambulance services, including incidence of visits to the hospital, acuity of illness and most common diagnoses, during the one-year period before and after the onset of the coronavrrus dsease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

METHODS

This was a retrospective and single center analysis of children, transported by Emergency Medical Services to the Emergency Department (ED) of a children's hospital in Turkey, between 10 March 2019 and 11 March 2021.

RESULTS

Percentage of high acuity group (68.1% vs.76.9%) during pandemic period was significantly lower than prepandemic period (p < 0.001). On the contrary, the percentage of patients using emergency ambulance service with a low level of acuity increased during the pandemic period compared to the prepandemic period (31.9% vs. 23.1%) (p < 0.001). A significant decrease was observed in the cases of lower respiratory tract infections, febrile status epilepticus and excessive alcohol use during the pandemic period. No significant differences were found hospitalizations requiring PICU and mortality in ED during the pandemic period.

CONCLUSION

During the COVID-19 pandemic; also, a decrease in admissions was observed for those with high-risk conditions. On the contrary, an increase was detected in patients with low acuity levels. Efforts should be made to ensure access to safe and quality emergency care during the pandemic.

Models to predict length of stay in the emergency department: a systematic literature review and appraisal

INTRODUCTION

Prolonged Length of Stay (LOS) in ED (Emergency Department) has been associated with poor clinical outcomes. Prediction of ED LOS may help optimize resource utilization, clinical management, and benchmarking. This study aims to systematically review models for predicting ED LOS and to assess the reporting and methodological quality about these models.

METHODS

The online database PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (10 Sep 2023) was searched for English language articles that reported prediction models of LOS in ED. Identified titles and abstracts were independently screened by two reviewers. All original papers describing either development (with or without internal validation) or external validation of a prediction model for LOS in ED were included.

RESULTS

Of 12,193 uniquely identified articles, 34 studies were included (29 describe the development of new models and five describe the validation of existing models). Different statistical and machine learning methods were applied to the papers. On the 39-point reporting score and 11-point methodological quality score, the highest reporting scores for development and validation studies were 39 and 8, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Various studies on prediction models for ED LOS were published but they are fairly heterogeneous and suffer from methodological and reporting issues. Model development studies were associated with a poor to a fair level of methodological quality in terms of the predictor selection approach, the sample size, reproducibility of the results, missing imputation technique, and avoiding dichotomizing continuous variables. Moreover, it is recommended that future investigators use the confirmed checklist to improve the quality of reporting.

Structured Callouts, the Shared Mental Model, and Teamwork: A Video-Based Study in a Pediatric Emergency Department

OBJECTIVES

The shared mental model is essential to high-quality resuscitations. A structured callout (SCO) is often performed to establish the shared mental model, but the literature on SCOs is limited. The objectives of this study are to describe performance of SCOs during pediatric medical emergencies and to determine whether a SCO is associated with better teamwork.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study in the resuscitation area of an academic pediatric emergency department, where performance of a SCO is a standard expectation. Only medical or nontrauma patients were eligible for inclusion. Data collection was performed by structured video review by 2 observers and verified by a third blinded observer. A SCO was defined as team leader (Pediatric Emergency Medicine fellow or faculty physician) verbalization of at least 1 element of the patient history/examination or an assessment of patient physiology and 1 element of the diagnostic or therapeutic plan. We independently measured teamwork using the Teamwork Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) tool.

RESULTS

We reviewed 60 patient encounters from the pediatric emergency department resuscitation area between April 2018 and June 2020. Median patient age was 6 years; the team leader was a Pediatric Emergency Medicine fellow in 55% of encounters. The physician team leader performed a SCO in 38 (63%) of patient encounters. The TEAM scores were collected for 46 encounters. Mean TEAM score (SD) was 42.3 (1.7) in patients with a SCO compared with 40.0 (3.0) in those without a SCO ( P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Performance of a SCO was associated with better teamwork, but the difference was of unclear clinical significance.

Triage Accuracy in Pediatrics Using the Emergency Severity Index

INTRODUCTION

Although the Emergency Severity Index is the most widely used tool in the United States to prioritize care for patients who seek emergency care, including children, there are significant deficiencies in the tool's performance. Inaccurate triage has been associated with delayed treatment, unnecessary diagnostic testing, and bias in clinical care. We evaluated the accuracy of the Emergency Severity Index to stratify patient priority based on predicted resource utilization in pediatric emergency department patients and identified covariates influencing performance.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, retrospective study used a data platform that links clinical and research data sets from a single freestanding pediatric hospital in the United States. Chi-square analysis was used to describes rates of over- and undertriage. Mixed effects ordinal logistic regression identified associations between Emergency Severity Index categories assigned at triage and key emergency department resources using discrete data elements and natural language processing of text notes.

RESULTS

We analyzed 304,422 emergency department visits by 153,984 unique individuals in the final analysis; 80% of visits were triaged as lower acuity Emergency Severity Index levels 3 to 5, with the most common level being Emergency Severity Index 4 (43%). Emergency department visits scored Emergency Severity Index levels 3 and 4 were triaged accurately 46% and 38%, respectively. We noted racial differences in overall triage accuracy.

DISCUSSION

Although the plurality of patients was scored as Emergency Severity Index 4, 50% were mistriaged, and there were disparities based on race indicating Emergency Severity Index mistriages pediatric patients. Further study is needed to elucidate the application of the Emergency Severity Indices in pediatrics using a multicenter emergency department population with diverse clinical and demographic characteristics.

Nucleated Red Blood Cells Are Predictive of In-Hospital Mortality for Pediatric Patients

PURPOSE

We sought to establish whether nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) are predictive of disposition, morbidity, and mortality for pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study examining all ED encounters from patients aged younger than 19 years between January 2016 and March 2020, during which a complete blood count was obtained. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to test the presence of NRBCs as an independent predictor of patient-related outcomes.

RESULTS

The prevalence of NRBCs was 8.9% (4195/46,991 patient encounters). Patient with NRBCs were younger (median age 4.58 vs 8.23 years; P < 0.001). Those with NRBCs had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (30/2465 [1.22%] vs 65/21,741 [0.30%]; P < 0.001), sepsis (19% vs 12%; P < 0.001), shock (7% vs 4%; P < 0.001), and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (0.62% vs 0.09%; P < 0.001). They were more likely to be admitted (59% vs 51%; P < 0.001), have longer median hospital length of stay {1.3 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.22-4.14) vs 0.8 days (IQR, 0.23-2.64); P < 0.001}, and median intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (3.9 [IQR, 1.87-8.72] vs 2.6 days [IQR, 1.27-5.83]; P < 0.001). Multivariable regression revealed presence of NRBCs as an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-3.53; P < 0.001), ICU admission (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.11-1.51; P < 0.001), CPR (aOR, 3.83; 95% CI, 2.33-6.30; P < 0.001), and 30-day return to the ED (aOR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.15-1.26; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of NRBCs is an independent predictor for mortality, including in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, CPR, and readmission within 30 days for children presenting to the ED.

Pediatric Firearm Injury Emergency Department Visits From 2017 to 2022: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pediatric firearm injuries increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, but recent trends in firearm injury emergency department (ED) visits are not well described. We aimed to assess how pediatric firearm injury ED visits during the pandemic differed from expected prepandemic trends.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied firearm injury ED visits by children <18 years old at 9 US hospitals participating in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Registry before (January 2017 to February 2020) and during (March 2020 to November 2022) the pandemic. Multivariable Poisson regression models estimated expected visit rates from prepandemic data. We calculated rate ratios (RRs) of observed to expected visits per 30 days, overall, and by sociodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified 1904 firearm injury ED visits (52.3% 15-17 years old, 80.0% male, 63.5% non-Hispanic Black), with 694 prepandemic visits and 1210 visits during the pandemic. Death in the ED/hospital increased from 3.1% prepandemic to 6.1% during the pandemic (P = .007). Firearm injury visits per 30 days increased from 18.0 prepandemic to 36.1 during the pandemic (RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.63-2.91). Increases beyond expected rates were seen for 10- to 14-year-olds (RR 2.61, 95% CI 1.69-5.71), females (RR 2.46, 95% CI 1.55-6.00), males (RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.53-2.86), Hispanic children (RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.30-9.91), and Black non-Hispanic children (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.34-3.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Firearm injury ED visits for children increased beyond expected prepandemic trends, with greater increases among certain population subgroups. These findings may inform firearm injury prevention efforts.

The Management of Children and Youth With Pediatric Mental and Behavioral Health Emergencies

Mental and behavioral health (MBH) visits of children and youth to emergency departments are increasing in the United States. Reasons for these visits range from suicidal ideation, self-harm, and eating and substance use disorders to behavioral outbursts, aggression, and psychosis. Despite the increase in prevalence of these conditions, the capacity of the health care system to screen, diagnose, and manage these patients continues to decline. Several social determinants also contribute to great disparities in child and adolescent (youth) health, which affect MBH outcomes. In addition, resources and space for emergency physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and prehospital practitioners to manage these patients remain limited and inconsistent throughout the United States, as is financial compensation and payment for such services. This technical report discusses the role of physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners, and provides guidance for the management of acute MBH emergencies in children and youth. Unintentional ingestions and substance use disorder are not within the scope of this report and are not specifically discussed.

The Association of Emergency Severity Index Score and Patient and Family Experience in a Pediatric Emergency Department

The study aim was to determine the relationship between a patient's Emergency Severity Index (ESI) score and their or their family's response to the key performance indicator (KPI) question on the post-visit patient and family experience (PFE) survey. Retrospective review of patients presenting to the Pediatric Emergency Department between July 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, who completed the KPI question on an associated post-visit survey. We performed univariate analyses on all candidate variables; multivariable linear regression identified independent predictors of KPI on the PFE survey. A total of 8136 patients were included in the study. Although ESI score was significantly associated with PFE in univariate analysis, this association was lost in the multivariable model. Independent associations were appreciated with race/ethnicity, time to provider, length of stay, and procedure performance during the visit. Although ESI is not independently associated with PFE in this study, its interaction with factors such as time to provider, length of stay, and procedure performance may be important for emergency department providers creating interventions to impact experience during low acuity visits.

Implementation of Prediction Models in the Emergency Department from an Implementation Science Perspective-Determinants, Outcomes, and Real-World Impact: A Scoping Review

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Prediction models offer a promising form of clinical decision support in the complex and fast-paced environment of the emergency department (ED). Despite significant advancements in model development and validation, implementation of such models in routine clinical practice remains elusive. This scoping review aims to survey the current state of prediction model implementation in the ED and to provide insights on contributing factors and outcomes from an implementation science perspective.

METHODS

We searched 4 databases from their inception to May 20, 2022: MEDLINE (through PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL. Articles that reported implementation outcomes and/or contextual determinants under the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM)/Practical, Robust, Implementation, and Sustainability Model (PRISM) framework were included. Characteristics of studies, models, and results of the RE-AIM/PRISM domains were summarized narratively.

RESULTS

Thirty-six reports on 31 implementations were included. The most common prediction models implemented were early warning scores. The most common implementation strategies used were training stakeholders, infrastructural changes, and using evaluative or iterative strategies. Only one report examined ED patients' perspectives, whereas the rest were focused on the experience of health care workers or organizational stakeholders. Key determinants of successful implementation include strong stakeholder engagement, codevelopment of workflows and implementation strategies, education, and usability.

CONCLUSION

Examining ED prediction models from an implementation science perspective can provide valuable insights and help guide future implementations.

Reliability and validity of Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria: case study of a single center in China

BACKGROUND

We aimed to examine the reliability and validity of Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria in order to provide a reference for the development of pediatric emergency triage within other hospitals.

METHODS

We developed Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria based on the conditions/symptom, vital signs, and the Pediatric Early Warning Score system within our hospital using the Delphi method in 2020. The simulation scenario triage and real-life triage which were conducted in our hospital during January - March 2021, and the retrospective study of triage records extracted from our hospital's health information system in February 2022, were used to measure the agreement in triage decisions between the triage nurses, and between the triage nurses and the expert team.

RESULTS

For the 20 simulation cases, the Kappa value of triage decisions between the triage nurses was 0.6 (95% CI 0.352-0.849), and the Kappa value of triage decisions between the triage nurses and the expert team was 0.73 (95% CI 0.540-0.911). For the 252 cases in the real-life triage, the Kappa value of triage decisions between the triage nurses and the expert team was 0.824 (95% CI 0.680-0.962). For the 20,540 cases selected for the retrospective study of triage records, the Kappa value of triage decisions between the triage nurses was 0.702 (95% CI 0.691-0.713); that between Triage Nurse 1 and the expert team was 0.634 (95% CI 0.623-0.647); and that between Triage Nurse 2 and the expert team was 0.725 (95% CI 0.713-0.736). The overall agreement rate in triage decisions between the triage nurses and the expert team in the simulation scenario triage was 80%; that between the triage nurses and the expert team in the real-life triage was 97.6%; and that between the triage nurses in the retrospective study was 91.9%. In the retrospective study, the agreement rates in triage decisions between Triage Nurse 1 and the expert team, and between Triage Nurse 2 and the expert team, were 88.0% and 92.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria that developed within our hospital is reliable and valid, and can promote rapid and effective triage by triage nurses.

Undertriage for Children With Caregivers Preferring Languages Other Than English

OBJECTIVES

Undertriage, the underestimation of acuity, can result in delayed care and potential morbidity in the emergency department (ED). Although inequities in ED care based on language preference have been noted, little is known about its association with undertriage. We evaluated for differences in undertriage based on caregiver language preference.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients aged younger than 21 years, triaged as Emergency Severity Index (ESI) level 4 or 5 (nonurgent), to the pediatric ED from January 1, 2019, through January 31, 2021. Indicators of undertriage were defined as hospital admission, significant ED resource use, or return visits with admission. We used logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to measure the association of preferred language with undertriage.

RESULTS

Of 114 266 ED visits included in the study, 22 525 (19.8%) represented patients with caregivers preferring languages other than English. These children were more likely to experience undertriage compared with those with caregivers preferring English (3.7% [English] versus 4.6% [Spanish] versus 5.9% [other languages]; Spanish versus English: odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-1.4] and other languages versus English: OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2). Differences remained after adjusting for sex, insurance, mode of arrival, and clustering by triage nurse (Spanish versus English: adjusted OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.3-1.5) and other languages versus English: adjusted OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Children accompanied by caregivers preferring languages other than English are more likely to be undertriaged in the pediatric ED. Efforts to improve the triage process are needed to promote equitable care for this population.

Use and Cost Analysis of Comprehensive Respiratory Panel Testing in a Pediatric Emergency Department

OBJECTIVES

Fever and respiratory infections are among the leading causes of pediatric emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Although typically self-resolving, clinicians may perform diagnostic tests to determine microbial etiologies of these illnesses. Although comprehensive respiratory viral panels can quickly identify causative organisms, cost to the hospital and patient may be significant. The objective of this study was to analyze the financial impact of comprehensive respiratory viral panel use in relation to associated clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This study was a single-center, retrospective chart review of pediatric emergency department patients who were evaluated between October 1, 2016, and April 30, 2018, with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code diagnoses of acute upper respiratory infection, fever unspecified, and/or bronchiolitis. Our primary outcome was the effect of comprehensive respiratory viral panel testing and results on the total health care charge to patients. Secondary outcomes were the effect of comprehensive respiratory viral panel testing and results on emergency department length of stay and antimicrobial use.

RESULTS

A total of 5766 visits were included for primary analysis, with 229 (4%) undergoing comprehensive respiratory viral panel testing. Of these, 163 had a positive result (71%) for at least 1 organism. The total cost was significantly higher in the group that underwent comprehensive respiratory viral panel testing ($643.39 [$534.18-$741.15] vs $295.15 [$249.72-$353.92]; P < 0.001). There was no decrease in emergency department length of stay or significant change in antimicrobial use associated with comprehensive respiratory viral panel use.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the utilization of comprehensive respiratory viral panels in pediatric emergency department patients with bronchiolitis, unspecified fever, and/or acute upper respiratory infection adds significant cost to patient care without a decrease in their length of stay or antimicrobial use. Further studies are needed to determine the appropriate targeted use of comprehensive respiratory viral panels.

Adolescents with chronic conditions: Engagement with children's mental health systems during the Covid-19 pandemic

PURPOSE

The Covid-19 pandemic contributed to adverse adolescent mental health outcomes globally. Adolescents with chronic conditions have four times the odds of self-harm than peers. Little evidence exists to guide pediatric nurses on how to engage this vulnerable population with mental health support as the pandemic continues. In adults with chronic conditions, positive health assets (health access literacy, health self-efficacy, and emotional well-being) are directly related to improved patient engagement. The objective of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of engagement with mental health supports in adolescents with chronic conditions to inform practice.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Using mixed methods, we surveyed and interviewed adolescents with chronic conditions aged 10-20 years. Random sampling was applied to avoid bias. Valid and reliable scales were used to measure health access literacy, health self-efficacy, and emotional well-being. Textual data were collected using a semistructured interview guide. Integrated data analysis was conducted using structural equation models and interpretive phenomenology.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-four participants provided numerical data and 17 participants provided textual data (mean age 15.5 years; 56% female, 5.8% agender; 56% White; 16.9% Black or African American, 4.5% Asian; 51.9% Hispanic or Latinx; 23.4% LGBTQ+). The structural model was an acceptable fit for the data (comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.97, Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] = 0.95). Participants reported higher levels of health access literacy (M = 3.88, SD = 0.848) than health self-efficacy (M = 2.98, SD = 0.646), and engagement (M = 1.78, SD = 1.71). Health access literacy predicted emotional well-being (β = .33, p < .001, 95% confidence interval [CI] [.20, .50]) and health self-efficacy (β = .52, p < .001, 95% CI [0.42, .062]). Emotional well-being positively predicted health self-efficacy (β = .21, p < .003, 90% CI [0.10, 0.033]). Health self-efficacy predicted engagement (β = .20, p < .01, 90% CI [0.07, 0.034]). Participants reported not engaging until "it was really, really bad" citing fear, stigma, and lack of connectedness with providers as barriers.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Regardless of health access literacy and health self-efficacy, adolescents with chronic conditions may not engage until crisis levels. Pediatric nurses can aim to engage with this vulnerable population proactively.

Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of ANKUTRIAGE, a New Decision Support System in Pediatric Emergency Triage

BACKGROUND

The intensity of emergency services is an increasing health problem all over the world, necessitating an effective triage system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the "ANKUTRIAGE" in children.

METHODS

This prospective, longitudinal study was carried out at a pediatric emergency department. ANKUTRIAGE, a 5-level computer-aided triage decision support system, was developed. Patients younger than 18 years who do not need emergency intervention, who had complete vital sign measurements, who gave consent for the study, and who were admitted to the emergency service during working hours with trained personnel were included. For validity, agreement between the urgency levels determined by ANKUTRIAGE and the reference triage systems: Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale and Emergency Severity Index, was evaluated. In addition, the association of urgency levels with clinical outcomes was studied. To assess reliability, patients were evaluated by 2 blinded healthcare professionals using ANKUTRIAGE and a quadratic weighted κ was estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 1232 children with a median age of 4.00 years were included. ANKUTRIAGE acuity levels significantly correlated with the number of resources used, the number of patients undergoing life-saving procedures, pediatric intensive care unit, and overall hospitalization rates, respectively ( P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001). The agreement of ANKUTRIAGE with Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale was found to be 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.94), with an Emergency Severity Index of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.70-0.80). The interrater agreement between 2 evaluators who used ANKUTRIAGE reflected as excellent consistency 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.95; κ > 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

ANKUTRIAGE demonstrated high agreement with clinical outcomes and with proven triage systems and reflected high reliability between users. ANKUTRIAGE will enable a more standardized and practical triage, especially in crowded pediatric emergency departments and in situations where triage is performed by health professionals with different experience and professions.

Validity of the Brazilian pediatric triage system CLARIPED at a secondary level of emergency care

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the validity of the triage system CLARIPED in a pediatric population in the city of São Paulo, Brazil.

METHODS

Prospective, observational study in a secondary-level pediatric emergency service from Sep-2018 to Ago-2019. A convenience sample of all patients aged 0-18 years triaged by the computerized CLARIPED system was selected. Associations between urgency levels and patient outcomes were analyzed to assess construct validity. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) to identify the most urgent patients were estimated, as well as under-triage and over-triage rates.

RESULTS

The distribution of 24,338 visits was: RED 0.02%, ORANGE 0.9%, YELLOW 23.5%, GREEN 47.9%, and BLUE 27.7% (highest to the lowest level of urgency). The frequency of the following outcomes increased with increasing urgency: hospital admission (0.0%, 0.02%, 0.1%, 7.1% and 20%); stay in ED observation room (1.9%, 2,4%, 4.8%, 24.1%, 60%); use of ≥ 2 diagnostic/therapeutic resources (2.3%, 3.0%, 5.9%, 28.8%, 40%); ED length of stay (12, 12, 15, 99.5, 362 min). The most urgent patients (RED, ORANGE, and YELLOW) exhibited higher chances of using ≥ 2 resources (OR 2.55; 95%CI: 2.23-2.92) or of being hospitalized (OR 23.9; 95%CI: 7.17-79.62), compared to the least urgent (GREEN and BLUE). The sensitivity to identify urgency was 0.88 (95%CI: 0.70-0.98); specificity, 0.76 (95%CI: 0.75-0.76); NPV, 0.99 (95%CI: 0.99-1.00); overtriage rate, 23.0%, and undertriage, 11.5%.

CONCLUSION

This study corroborates the validity and safety of CLARIPED, demonstrating significant correlations with clinical outcomes, good sensitivity, and low undertriage rate in a secondary-level Brazilian pediatric emergency service.

Using the Delphi method to establish pediatric emergency triage criteria in a grade A tertiary women's and children's hospital in China

BACKGROUND

We aimed to establish simplified and quantifiable triage criteria in pediatric emergency care, improving the efficiency of pediatric emergency triage and ensuring patient safety.

METHODS

We preliminarily determined the pediatric emergency triage criteria with references to pediatric emergency department characteristics and internationally recognized triage tools after literature review and discussion. The final determination of the triage criteria was reached after two rounds of Delphi surveys completed by18 experts from 3 hospitals in China.

RESULTS

Both round 1 and round 2 surveys had a 100% response rate. The overall expert authority coefficient in the two rounds of surveys was 0.872. The experts had 100% enthusiasm for participating in the surveys. Kendall's coefficients of concordance for conditions/symptoms in patients triaged to level 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 0.149, 0.193, 0.102, and 0.266, respectively. All p-values were less than 0.05. The coefficients of variation in conditions/symptoms, vital signs, and the Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) ranged between 0.00 and 0.205, meeting the inclusion criteria. The pediatric emergency triage criteria containing conditions/symptoms, vital signs, PEWS scores, and other 4 level 1 indicators, 51 level 2 indicators and 23 level 3 indicators were built. The maximum waiting time to treatment for the patients triaged to level 1, 2, 3, and 4 was immediate, within 10 min, within 30 min, and within 240 min, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The pediatric emergency triage criteria established in this study was scientific and reliable. It can be used to quickly identify the patients requiring urgent and immediate care, thereby ensuring the priorities for the care of critically ill patients.

Validity of the computerized version of the pediatric triage system CLARIPED for emergency care

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the validity of the computerized version of the pediatric triage system CLARIPED.

METHODS

Prospective, observational study in a tertiary emergency department (ED) from Jan-2018 to Jan-2019. A convenience sample of patients aged 0-18 years who had computerized triage and outcome variables registered. Construct validity was assessed through the association between urgency levels and patient outcomes. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), undertriage, and overtriage rates were assessed.

RESULTS

19,122 of 38,321 visits were analyzed. The urgency levels were: RED (emergency) 0.02%, ORANGE (high urgency) 3.21%, YELLOW (urgency) 35.69%, GREEN (low urgency) 58.46%, and BLUE (no urgency) 2.62%. The following outcomes increased according to the increase in the level of urgency: hospital admission (0.4%, 0.6%, 3.1%, 11.9% and 25%), stay in the ED observation room (2.8%, 4.7%, 15.9%, 40.4%, 50%), ≥ 2 diagnostic or therapeutic resources (7.8%, 16.5%, 33.7%, 60.6%, 75%), and ED length of stay in minutes (18, 24, 67, 120, 260). The odds of using ≥ 2 resources or being hospitalized were significantly greater in the most urgent patients (Red, Orange, and Yellow) compared to the least urgent (Green and Blue): OR 7.88 (95%CI: 5.35-11.6) and OR 2.85 (95%CI: 2.63-3.09), respectively. The sensitivity to identify urgency was 0.82 (95%CI: 0.77-0.85); specificity, 0.62 (95%CI: 0.61-0.6; NPV, 0.99 (95%CI: 0.99-1.00); overtriage rate, 4.28% and undertriage, 18.41%.

CONCLUSION

The computerized version of CLARIPED is a valid and safe pediatric triage system, with a significant correlation with clinical outcomes, good sensitivity, and low undertriage rate.

Implementation of prediction models in the emergency department from an implementation science perspective—Determinants, outcomes and real-world impact: A scoping review protocol

The number of prediction models developed for use in emergency departments (EDs) have been increasing in recent years to complement traditional triage systems. However, most of these models have only reached the development or validation phase, and few have been implemented in clinical practice. There is a gap in knowledge on the real-world performance of prediction models in the ED and how they can be implemented successfully into routine practice. Existing reviews of prediction models in the ED have also mainly focused on model development and validation. The aim of this scoping review is to summarize the current landscape and understanding of implementation of predictions models in the ED. This scoping review follows the Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. We will include studies that report implementation outcomes and/or contextual determinants according to the RE-AIM/PRISM framework for prediction models used in EDs. We will include outcomes or contextual determinants studied at any point of time in the implementation process except for effectiveness, where only post-implementation results will be included. Conference abstracts, theses and dissertations, letters to editors, commentaries, non-research documents and non-English full-text articles will be excluded. Four databases (MEDLINE (through PubMed), Embase, Scopus and CINAHL) will be searched from their inception using a combination of search terms related to the population, intervention and outcomes. Two reviewers will independently screen articles for inclusion and any discrepancy resolved with a third reviewer. Results from included studies will be summarized narratively according to the RE-AIM/PRISM outcomes and domains. Where appropriate, a simple descriptive summary of quantitative outcomes may be performed.

Disparities in Pediatric Emergency Department Length of Stay and Utilization Associated With Primary Language

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate the association between primary language and length of stay (LOS) in the pediatric emergency department (ED) within the context of known disparities impacting healthcare experiences and outcomes for patients with language barriers.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive encounters of patients presenting to, and discharged from, an urban pediatric ED from May 2015 through April 2018. Encounters were grouped into English primary language (EPL), Spanish (SPL), and other (OPL). Mean LOS comparisons were stratified by Emergency Severity Index (ESI). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine the relationship between LOS and variables, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, and time of presentation.

RESULTS

A total of 139,163 encounters were included. A higher proportion of SPL and OPL encounters were characterized as lower ESI acuity compared with EPL. Significantly longer LOS for SPL and OPL encounters was observed in the 2 lower acuity strata. The ESI 4-5 stratum demonstrated the greatest LOS disparity between EPL, SPL, and OPL (94 vs 103 vs 103 minutes, respectively, P < 0.001). In the highest acuity stratum, ESI 1-2, there was a nonsignificant trend toward longer LOS among EPL encounters (P = 0.08). The multivariate model accounted for 24% of LOS variance, but effect sizes were small for all variables except for ESI and age.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Spanish or other non-EPL who were triaged to lower acuity ESI levels experienced longer LOS in the pediatric ED than English-speaking counterparts. They also used the ED more frequently for low acuity issues, possibly reflecting disparities in access to primary care.

Machine learning-based prediction of critical illness in children visiting the emergency department

OBJECTIVES

Triage is an essential emergency department (ED) process designed to provide timely management depending on acuity and severity; however, the process may be inconsistent with clinical and hospitalization outcomes. Therefore, studies have attempted to augment this process with machine learning models, showing advantages in predicting critical conditions and hospitalization outcomes. The aim of this study was to utilize nationwide registry data to develop a machine learning-based classification model to predict the clinical course of pediatric ED visits.

METHODS

This cross-sectional observational study used data from the National Emergency Department Information System on emergency visits of children under 15 years of age from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017. The primary and secondary outcomes were to identify critically ill children and predict hospitalization from triage data, respectively. We developed and tested a random forest model with the under sampled dataset and validated the model using the entire dataset. We compared the model's performance with that of the conventional triage system.

RESULTS

A total of 2,621,710 children were eligible for the analysis and included 12,951 (0.5%) critical outcomes and 303,808 (11.6%) hospitalizations. After validation, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.991 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.991-0.992) for critical outcomes and 0.943 (95% CI 0.943-0.944) for hospitalization, which were higher than those of the conventional triage system.

CONCLUSIONS

The machine learning-based model using structured triage data from a nationwide database can effectively predict critical illness and hospitalizations among children visiting the ED.

Racial and Language Disparities in Pediatric Emergency Department Triage

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the impact race and language have on emergency department (ED) triage scores while accounting for illness severity. We hypothesized that non-White and non-English-speaking patients were assigned lower-acuity triage scores compared with White and English-speaking patients, respectively.

METHODS

We used a chart review-based retrospective cohort study design, examining patients aged 0 to 17 years at our pediatric ED from July 2015 through June 2016. Illness severity was measured using a truncated Modified Pediatric Early Warning Score calculated from patient vital signs. We used univariate and multivariate multinomial logistic regression to assess the association between race and language with Emergency Severity Index scores.

RESULTS

Our final data set consisted of 10,815 visits from 8928 patients. Non-Hispanic (NH) White patients accounted for 34.6% of patients. In the adjusted analyses, non-White patients had significantly reduced odds of receiving a score of 2 (emergency) (odds ratio [OR], 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.49) or 3 (urgent) (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.45-0.56) and significantly higher odds of receiving a score of 5 (minor) (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.07-1.69) versus a score of 4 (nonurgent). We did not find a consistent disparity in Emergency Severity Index scores when comparing English- and non-English-speaking patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm that non-White patients receive lower triage scores than White patients. A more robust tool is required to account for illness severity and will be critical to understanding whether the relationship we describe reflects bias within the triage system or differences in ED utilization by racial groups.

Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index (Version 4) in Postpartum Women after Cesarean Delivery

OBJECTIVE

The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) version 4 is a 5-level triage system (1 being the highest acuity and 5 being the lowest acuity) used in the emergency department (ED). Our goal of the study was to compare rates of readmission according to ESI in postpartum women.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of all women who presented to the ED within 6 weeks after cesarean delivery. The acuity level was assigned by triage nurses at the time of triage presentation. Our primary outcome was postpartum readmission. To examine if the addition of blood pressure to vital sign abnormalities would improve the prediction for readmission, we created a modified ESI. We identified women who had an ESI of level 3 and reassigned to a modified ESI of level 2 if blood pressure was in the severe range. Receiver operating characteristic curves with area under the curve (AUC) were created and compared between ESI and modified ESI.

RESULTS

Of 439 women, ESI distribution was 0.2% ESI 1, 23.7% ESI 2, 56.0% ESI 3, 19.4% ESI 4, and 0.7% ESI 5. Readmission rates by ESI level were 100% ESI 1, 47% ESI 2, 18% ESI 3, 2% ESI 4, and 0% ESI 5 (p < 0.001). Of 246 women who were assigned an ESI of 3, total 25 had severe range blood pressures and were reassigned to a modified ESI of 2. Of these 25 women, 14 were readmitted. The AUC of the modified ESI was statistically higher than that of the standard ESI (AUC: 0.77 and 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.82 vs. AUC: 0.73 and 95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.78; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The ESI was a useful tool to identify women who required postpartum readmission. Incorporation of severe range blood pressure as a parameter of acuity improved the prediction of readmission.

KEY POINTS

· ESI does not consider blood pressure.. · The ESI version 4 was predictive of postpartum readmission.. · Consideration of a severe range blood pressure significantly improved the prediction of readmission..

Physician Risk Perception and Testing Behaviors for Children With Fever

OBJECTIVES

Risk tolerance and risk perceptions may impact clinicians' decisions to obtain diagnostic tests. We sought to determine whether physician risk perception was associated with the decision to obtain blood or imaging tests among children who present to the emergency department with fever.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study in the Boston Children's Hospital emergency department. We included children aged 6 months to 18 years from May 1, 2014 to April 30, 2019, with fever. Our primary outcome was diagnostic testing: obtaining a blood and/or imaging test. We assessed risk perception using 3 scales: the Risk Tolerance Scale (RTS), Stress From Uncertainty Scale (SUS), and Malpractice Fear Scale (MFS). A z score was assigned to each physician for each scale. Mixed-effects logistic regression assessed the association between physician risk perception and blood or imaging testing. We also examined the relationship between each risk perception scale and several secondary outcomes: blood testing, urine testing, diagnostic imaging, specialist consultation, hospitalization, and revisit within 72 hours.

RESULTS

The response rate was 55/56 (98%). We analyzed 12,527 encounters. Blood/imaging testing varied between physicians (median, 48%; interquartile range, 41%-53%; range, 30%-71%). Risk Tolerance Scale responses were not associated with blood/imaging testing (odds ratio [OR], 1.03 per SD of increased risk perception; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.13). Stress From Uncertainty Scale responses were not associated with blood/imaging testing (OR, 1.04 per SD; 95% CI, 0.95-1.14). Malpractice Fear Scale responses were not associated with blood/imaging testing (OR, 1.00 per SD; 95% CI, 0.91-1.09). There was no significant association between RTS, MFS, or SUS and any secondary outcome, except that there was a weak association between SUS and specialist consultation (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Across 55 pediatric emergency physicians with variable testing practices, there was no association between risk perception and blood/imaging testing in febrile children.

Pediatric Emergency Department Discharge Instructions for Spanish-Speaking Families: Are We Getting It Right?

OBJECTIVES

Patients who speak Spanish are less likely to comply with discharge instructions, adhere to appointments, and take medications than English-speaking patients. However, adherence is improved when discharge instructions are provided in Spanish. This study was designed to assess the frequency of providing written discharge instructions in Spanish to patients who speak Spanish and request interpretation services, and to determine factors associated with receiving written discharge instructions in the preferred language in a pediatric emergency department (ED).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of all discharges of Spanish-speaking patients who requested an interpreter in 1 year from a large urban pediatric ED and an associated community ED. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient and visit level characteristics associated with receiving written discharge instructions in Spanish.

RESULTS

Sixty-one percent of 11,545 patient encounters where a Spanish interpreter was requested received written discharge instructions in Spanish. Patients aged 1 to 3 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.87; 95% CI, 2.18-3.77) and aged 4 to 12 years (aOR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.6-2.65), those seen without a trainee (aOR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.25-1.5), and those with low acuity triage levels (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.29-1.97) were more likely to receive discharge instruction in Spanish. Female patients were less likely to receive Spanish discharge instructions (aOR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.83-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Discharged pediatric ED patients often do not receive written instructions in the preferred language. Patient and provider factors are associated with receiving written instructions in Spanish. Quality improvement efforts are needed to ensure appropriate language discharge education.

Validation of the Computerized Pediatric Triage Tool, pediaTRI, in the Pediatric Emergency Department of Lenval Children's Hospital in Nice: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

A reliable pediatric triage tool is essential for nurses working in pediatric emergency departments to quickly identify children requiring priority care (high-level emergencies) and those who can wait (low-level emergencies). In the absence of a gold standard in France, the objective of our study was to validate our 5-level pediatric triage tool -pediaTRI- against the reference tool: the Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) System.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively included 100,506 children who visited the Pediatric Emergency Department at Lenval Children's Hospital (Nice, France) in 2016 and 2017. The performance of pediaTRI to identify high-level emergencies (severity levels 1 and 2) was evaluated in comparison with a PEWS ≥ 4/9. Data from 2018-19 was used as an independent validation cohort.

RESULTS

pediaTRI agreed with the PEWS score for 84,896 of the patients (84.5%): 15.0% (14.8-15.2) of the patients were over-triaged and 0.5% (0.5-0.6) under-triaged compared with the PEWS score. pediaTRI had a sensitivity of 76.4% (74.6-78.2), a specificity of 84.7% (84.4-84.9), and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 5.0 (4.8-5.1) and 0.3 (0.3-0.3), respectively, for the identification of high-level emergencies. However, the positive likelihood ratios were lower for patients presenting with a medical complaint [4.1 (4.0-4.2) v 10.4 (7.9-13.7 for trauma), and for younger children [1.2 (1.1-1.2) from 0 to 28 days, and 1.9 (1.8-2.0) from 28 days to 3 months].

CONCLUSION

pediaTRI has a moderate to good validity to triage children in a Pediatric Emergency Department with a tendency to over-triage compared with the PEWS system. Its validity is lower for younger children and for children consulting for a medical complaint.

Impact of Ondansetron Prescription on Return Emergency Department Visits Among Children with Acute Gastroenteritis

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine if providing ondansetron prescription to children with acute gastroenteritis seen in the emergency department (ED) is associated with reduced unscheduled ED revisits.

METHODS

This was a retrospective comparative cohort study conducted in a tertiary urban pediatric ED. We evaluated otherwise healthy children 6 months to 18 years old who presented to the ED between 2010 and 2015 and were discharged home with acute gastroenteritis diagnosis. Illness severity was determined using dehydration score, emergency severity index, and presenting symptoms. The incidence of unscheduled 72-hour ED revisit among patients discharged home with ondansetron prescription was compared with those without a prescription.

RESULTS

Of the 11,785 eligible patients, 35.5% (N = 4,187) of patients were discharged home with ondansetron prescription. After adjustment for emergency severity index, age, insurance source, race, time of index visit registration, intravenous fluid use, and ED-administered ondansetron, there were no differences in the rates of ED revisit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.12 [0.92, 1.33]) or admission after ED revisit (aOR = 0.81 [0.51, 1.27]) among children with versus without ondansetron prescription. No difference was found in the proportion of alternative diagnoses among returning patients with versus without ondansetron prescription (aOR = 0.56 [0.20, 1.59]).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no association between ondansetron prescription and ED revisit among children seen in the ED with suspected acute gastroenteritis. In the appropriate setting, however, physicians may consider prescribing ondansetron for symptom control in conjunction with careful discharge instructions.

The Pediatric Disease Spectrum in an Emergency Department at a Tertiary Care Center in Beirut, Lebanon

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the most common diagnoses for pediatric emergency department (ED) visits at a tertiary care center in Lebanon.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of pediatric patients (aged ≤18 years) presenting to the American University of Beirut Medical Center ED during 2010-2011 was completed. The common diagnoses among 5 age groups (<1, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, and 15-18 years) in 3 categories (all pediatric ED visits, treat and release, admitted visits) were assessed. Diagnoses were classified according to the Clinical Classifications Software. Descriptive statistics and Pearson χ2 test were used.

RESULTS

A total of 12,637 pediatric ED visits were included. The majority (90.2%) were among the treat-and-release group. The mean age for all patients was 7.2 years, 57.1% of whom were males. The top 5 most common diagnoses for all ED visits included fever of unknown origin, external injuries, upper respiratory tract infections, open wounds, and abdominal pain. Cardiac conditions were the most common reason for admission in children younger than 1 year, intestinal infection among 1 to 4 years old, pneumonia among 5 to 9 years old, and appendicitis among 10 to 14 and 15 to 18 years. Seasonal analysis showed fever of unknown origin to be the most common diagnosis across all seasons.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to assess pediatric ED visits in a Lebanese setting. The top most common reason was communicable diseases, with fever of unknown origin being the most common reason for all visits, contrary to North America where injury and poisoning are the most common. Noncommunicable diseases (cardiac, pneumonia, gastroenteritis, and appendicitis) were common reasons for admission in different age groups.

Decision-making for children requiring interhospital transport: assessment of a novel triage tool

OBJECTIVE

The use of specialist retrieval teams to transport critically ill children is associated with reduced risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity; however, there is a paucity of data to guide decision-making related to retrieval team activation. We aimed to assess the accuracy of a novel triage tool designed to identify critically ill children at the time of referral for interhospital transport.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Regional paediatric retrieval and transport services.

PATIENTS

Data were collected for 1815 children referred consecutively for interhospital transport from 87 hospitals in Queensland and northern New South Wales.

INTERVENTION

Implementation of the Queensland Paediatric Transport Triage Tool.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Accuracy was assessed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value for predicting transport by a retrieval team, or admission to intensive care following transport.

RESULTS

A total of 574 (32%) children were transported with a retrieval team. Prediction of retrieval (95% CIs): sensitivity 96.9% (95% CI 95.1% to 98.1%), specificity 91.4% (95% CI 89.7% to 92.9%), negative predictive value 98.4% (95% CI 97.5% to 99.1%). There were 412 (23%) children admitted to intensive care following transport. Prediction of intensive care admission: sensitivity 96.8% (95% CI 94.7% to 98.3%), specificity 81.2% (95% CI 79.0% to 83.2%), negative predictive value 98.9% (95% CI 98.1% to 99.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The triage tool predicted the need for retrieval or intensive care admission with high sensitivity and specificity. The high negative predictive value indicates that, in our setting, children categorised as acutely ill rather than critically ill are generally suitable for interhospital transport without a retrieval team.

Identifying children at high risk for infection-related decompensation using a predictive emergency department-based electronic assessment tool

OBJECTIVES

Electronic alert systems to identify potential sepsis in children presenting to the emergency department (ED) often either alert too frequently or fail to detect earlier stages of decompensation where timely treatment might prevent serious outcomes.

METHODS

We created a predictive tool that continuously monitors our hospital's electronic health record during ED visits. The tool incorporates new standards for normal/abnormal vital signs based on data from ∼1.2 million children at 169 hospitals. Eighty-two gold standard (GS) sepsis cases arising within 48 h were identified through retrospective chart review of cases sampled from 35,586 ED visits during 2012 and 2014-2015. An additional 1,027 cases with high severity of illness (SOI) based on 3 M's All Patient Refined - Diagnosis-Related Groups (APR-DRG) were identified from these and 26,026 additional visits during 2017. An iterative process assigned weights to main factors and interactions significantly associated with GS cases, creating an overall "score" that maximized the sensitivity for GS cases and positive predictive value for high SOI outcomes.

RESULTS

Tool implementation began August 2017; subsequent improvements resulted in 77% sensitivity for identifying GS sepsis within 48 h, 22.5% positive predictive value for major/extreme SOI outcomes, and 2% overall firing rate of ED patients. The incidence of high-severity outcomes increased rapidly with tool score. Admitted alert positive patients were hospitalized nearly twice as long as alert negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our ED-based electronic tool combines high sensitivity in predicting GS sepsis, high predictive value for physiologic decompensation, and a low firing rate. The tool can help optimize critical treatments for these high-risk children.

Pediatric Observational Priority Score and Early Warning Scoring System to Predict Admission Status in Pediatric Patients in Haji Adam Malik General Hospital

Background: Doctors must be able to quickly and accurately assess clinical condition of patients, especially in the emergency rooms. An easy scoring system but producing meaningful clinical conclusions is the reason for creating various scoring systems. Includes a scoring system for predicting the admission status of patients. Aim: To determine the diagnostic value of POPS and EWSS to predicting admission status of pediatric patients in the emergency department. Methods: Diagnostic tests for POPS and EWSS were done to predict the admission status of pediatric patients in the emergency department of Haji Adam Malik general hospital from May to October 2020. Subjects aged 1 month to 18 years were excluded if they left the emergency department prior to assessment, had trauma cases, died, inpatients due to social indications, and patients who came only to continue therapy were also excluded. POPS and EWSS assessments were carried out by the researcher and the admission status of the patients were determined by the doctor in charge in the emergency department. Results: There were 119 children meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. POPS score ≥3 had sensitivity 82.65%, specificity 85.71%, and AUC 0.88 (p <0.001). EWSS score ≥2 had sensitivity 83.67%, specificity 71.43%, and AUC 0.83 (p <0.001). Conclusion: POPS and EWSS had good diagnostic values in predicting the admission status of pediatric patients in the emergency department. POPS has a slightly higher diagnostic value than EWSS.

Pediatric Primary Care Relationships and Non-Urgent Emergency Department Use in Children

OBJECTIVE

Non-urgent emergency department (ED) use contributes to healthcare costs and disrupts continuity of care. Factors influencing patient/guardian decision-making in non-urgent situations are poorly understood. We sought to determine the association of patient/guardian - primary care provider (PCP) relationship with non-urgent ED usage and explore related factors.

METHODS

In an urban practice, we recruited 218 parent-child pairs and administered a survey with the PCP relationship (PDRQ-9), caregiver knowledge of office resources, and care-seeking behavior. We performed a 12-month retrospective chart review to document non-urgent ED visits. We evaluated the association of PDRQ9 and non-urgent ED usage by regression analysis.

RESULTS

Mean child age was 7.0 ± 5 years, and 32.6% of children had at least one non-urgent ED visit. Mean PDRQ9 score was 39.8 ± 7.3 and was not associated with non-urgent ED use (P = .46). Lower child age (P < .001) and shorter time coming to the PCP practice (P < .001) were both associated with increased non-urgent ED use. Only 36.4% reported usually going to their PCP when they are sick. Knowledge of office resources was limited, and when prompted with acute, non-urgent medical scenarios, in 4 of 5 scenarios, 50% or more of participants chose to go to the ED over communicating with or going to their PCP.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find an association between patient-doctor relationship strength and non-urgent ED usage. Many patients/guardians were unaware of the practice's resources and selected the ED as first choice for acute, non-urgent medical scenarios. Additional work is needed to determine interventions to reduce non-urgent ED use.

Characteristics of visits and predictors of admission from a paediatric emergency room in Saudi Arabia

Background

The Emergency Room (ER) is one of the most used areas in healthcare institutions. Problems with over utilisation and overcrowding have been reported worldwide. This study aims at examining the characteristics of paediatric ER visits, the rate of hospital admissions and its associated predictors at King Fahd Hospital of the University in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.

Methods

This is a retrospective, medical record-based study. Variables included gender, age group, nationality, complaints, Triage level, shifts and seasons. Descriptive statistics were reported as frequencies/percentages. P-values were obtained through a Chi-Squared test while unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios were estimated by binary logistic regression, where admission was considered as the outcome.

Results

The total number of paediatric patients included was 46,374, and only 2.5% were admitted. Males comprised 55.4% while females comprised 44.6%. The most common age group were toddlers, and 92.4% of the total sample were Saudis. The most common complaint was fever (26.9%) followed by respiratory symptoms (24.9%). Only 7 patients (0.02%) were classified as triage I (Resuscitation), and most were triage IV (Less urgent) (71.0%). Most visits occurred during the winter months. Adjusted ORs showed that neonates had higher odds of admission (OR = 3.85, 95%CI = 2.57–5.76). Moreover, those presenting with haematological conditions showed an OR of 65.49 (95%CI = 47.85–89.64), followed by endocrine conditions showing an OR of 34.89 (95%CI = 23.65–51.47). Triage I had a very high odds of admission (OR = 19.02, 95%CI = 2.70–133.76), whereas triage V was associated with a very low odds of admission (OR = 0.30, 95%CI = 0.23–0.38).

Conclusions

A low rate of hospital admission was found in comparison with other rates worldwide. This was mostly attributed to an alarmingly high number of non-urgent ER visits. This further emphasises the problem with improper use of ER services, as these cases should be more appropriately directed towards primary healthcare centres. Further studies to examine the impact of prioritising patients in the ER based on the identified predictors of hospital admission, in addition to the standard triage system, are suggested.

Evaluation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index in a tertiary care labor and delivery unit

BACKGROUND

The Maternal-Fetal Triage Index is a 5-level system to facilitate the care of pregnant women seeking care in an obstetrical triage unit (priority 1 being the highest acuity and priority 5 being the lowest acuity). Although the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends implementing labor and delivery triage tools, it remains unclear whether the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index facilitates the timely evaluation of high-acuity pregnant women.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine the duration of a labor and delivery triage evaluation before and after the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index. We also sought to examine the duration of a labor and delivery triage evaluation according to priority levels by the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective quality improvement study of all women presenting to an urban, tertiary labor and delivery triage unit at 16 weeks' gestation or later from December 2017 to February 2018 (historical cohort) and December 2018 to February 2019 (study cohort). As part of a quality improvement initiative, the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index was implemented in the labor and delivery unit in May 2018. All registered nurses who worked in the labor and delivery unit completed a formal education course and assigned the priority levels at the time of triage presentation. The primary outcome was the duration of a labor and delivery triage evaluation, which was defined as the time interval from triage presentation to the completion of history and physical examination in the electronic medical record. Secondary outcomes included the rates of labor and delivery unit admissions.

RESULTS

There were 1305 and 1374 women in the historical cohort and study cohort, respectively. The duration of labor and delivery triage evaluation was longer for the study cohort than for the historical cohort (64 minutes vs 61 minutes; P=.02). Of the 1374 women in the study cohort, there were 28 (2%), 290 (21%), 459 (33%), 462 (34%), and 135 (10%) women with priority levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 assigned, respectively. Women with a higher priority according to the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index had a shorter labor and delivery triage evaluation (priority 1, 57 minutes; priority 2, 66 minutes; priority 3, 63 minutes; priority 4, 62 minutes; and priority 5, 83 minutes; P<.001). The rates of admission were higher in the priority 1 and 5 groups (priority 1, 89.3%; priority 2, 41.4%; priority 3, 57.3%; priority 4, 53.3%; and priority 5, 92.6%; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the historical cohort, the duration of labor and delivery triage evaluation was longer in the study cohort. However, in the study cohort, women classified as higher priority according to the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index had a shorter labor and delivery triage evaluation. Our study supports the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' recommendation on the implementation and utilization of labor and delivery triage tools such as the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index.

Practice Pattern Variation in Test Ordering for Low-Acuity Pediatric Emergency Department Patients

OBJECTIVES

Rising costs in healthcare have focused attention on interventions to optimize efficiency of patient care, including decreasing unnecessary diagnostic testing. The primary objective of this study was to determine the variability of laboratory and radiology testing among licensed independent providers (LIPs) with different training backgrounds treating low-acuity patients in a pediatric emergency department (PED).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of the electronic health records of all encounters with patients 21 years or younger, triaged as low-acuity, visiting 2 urban, academic PEDs from January 2012 to December 2013. We calculated frequency of orders for specific tests, including complete blood counts, aerobic blood cultures, urine cultures, and chest radiographs. Bivariable analyses were used to measure associations of test ordering between these LIP dyad groups: physician versus nurse practitioner (NP); physicians with pediatric emergency medicine fellowship training (PEM) versus physicians without PEM training and physicians with at least 5 years since residency graduation versus less than 5 years. We used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders, including ED location, trainee co-management, and patient characteristics. We also performed sensitivity analyses by location.

RESULTS

There were 148,570 total encounters treated by 12 NPs and 144 physicians, of whom 60 were PEM physicians. Seventy-three physicians had 5 or more years of experience. Testing rates per patient encounter ranged from 0% to 40% for individual providers. In bivariable analyses, testing was more likely when the LIP was a physician (odds ratio [OR] = 1.2, 95% confidence interval = 1.1-1.2) or PEM trained (OR = 1.3, 1.2-1.3). In multivariable analyses, testing was more likely for encounters with PEM providers (adjusted OR [AdjOR] = 1.2, 1.1-1.3). A sensitivity analysis on a subset of encounters seen exclusively at our PED-based urgent care revealed that testing was also more likely for encounters seen by PEM physicians (AdjOR = 1.5, 1.4-1.7) and with NPs (AdjOR = 1.2, 1.1-1.4) compared with physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified substantial variation in test ordering patterns for LIPs treating low-acuity patients. There were significant differences in ordering practices between providers from different training backgrounds, most significantly when comparing PEM with non-PEM providers. Further research should examine interventions to standardize practice across disciplines.

The Medical Resuscitation Committee: Interprofessional Program Development to Optimize Care for Critically Ill Medical Patients in an Academic Pediatric Emergency Department

ABSTRACT

Provision of optimal care to critically ill patients in a pediatric emergency department is challenging. Specific challenges include the following: (a) patient presentations are highly variable, representing the full breadth of human disease and injury, and are often unannounced; (b) care team members have highly variable experience and skills and often few meaningful opportunities to practice care delivery as a team; (c) valid data collection, for quality assurance/improvement and clinical research, is limited when relying on traditional approaches such as medical record review or self-report; (d) specific patient presentations are relatively uncommon for individual providers, providing few opportunities to establish and refine the requisite knowledge and skill; and (e) unscientific or random variation in care delivery. In the current report, we describe our efforts for the last decade to address these challenges and optimize care delivery to critically ill patients in a pediatric emergency department. We specifically describe the grassroots development of an interprofessional medical resuscitation program. Key components of the program are as follows: (a) a database of all medical patients undergoing evaluation in the resuscitation suite, (b) peer review and education through video-based case review, (c) a program of emergency department in situ simulation, and (d) the development of cognitive aids for high-acuity, low-frequency medical emergencies.

Analysis of medication patterns for pediatric asthma patients in emergency department: Does the sequence placement of glucocorticoids administration matter?

Objectives: Timely glucocorticoid administration is associated with decreased admission rate and is thus a common quality metric for ED asthma care; less is known about the impact of the timing of glucocorticoids in the context of the sequence of asthma medications administered. Therefore, we investigated the distribution of asthma medication sequences in one ED and analyzed the effect of the sequence placement of glucocorticoids administration on treatment outcomes.Methods: A retrospective study using five-year electronic health record data obtained from an academic urban children's hospital ED was conducted. We clustered the sequences of medication administration using an exact string-matching algorithm to identify the most frequently used asthma medication sequences. Then, we used the identified patterns to perform statistical tests to examine the effect of the sequence placement of glucocorticoids administration on the outcomes length-of-stay and ED disposition.Results: A total of 4,844 encounters were included in our study. The ten most common treatment sequences accounted for 43% of all encounters. Stratified analyses confirmed that treatment sequences pattern was correlated with patient severity, but ED crowding does not impact treatment sequences. In multivariable models, glucocorticoids administration earlier in the treatment sequence was associated with shorter length of stay and lower hospital admission rates.Conclusions: By analyzing medication sequence patterns for the ED encounter of pediatric asthma, we found that the earlier sequence placement of glucocorticoids administration is associated with improved outcomes. Our findings can help inform quality improvement and clinical guideline development related to ED asthma care for children.

Infection control strategy and primary care assistance in Campania region during the national lockdown due to COVID-19 outbreak: the experience of two tertiary emergency centers

Background

COVID-19 pandemic has markedly affected emergency care, due to sudden limitation of health care capacity by general practitioners (GP) and urgent need for infection control strategies. We evaluated the activity of the Emergency Department (ED) during the national lockdown (March 8–April 30), as well as the outcomes of our infection control strategy.

Results

Despite a reduction in access by one fifth, a proportion of febrile patients comparable to 2019 was seen (829/2492, 33.3% vs 4580/13.342, 34.3%, p = 0.3). Diagnostic swab for COVID-19 was performed in 25% of patients, especially in subjects with co-morbidities or multiple access. Six infected cases were identified, all presenting with febrile disease. Only two positive patients fulfilled the criteria for diagnostic swab provided by the Italian Health Authorities, because of close contact with suspected or confirmed cases.

The rate of admission for febrile or respiratory conditions was higher than the same period of 2019 (33.4% vs 25.9%, p < 0.0001). None of the 105 health-care professionals working during the study time lapse exhibited anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion. Among the 589 patients with information available, 54.9% declared no medical consultation at all prior to coming to ED, while only 40 (of which 27 with fever) had been examined by their GP before coming to ED. Nevertheless, 35.6% of the cases were already taking medications. None of the 9 patients requiring intensive care reported recent pediatric consultation, despite symptoms duration up to 30 days.

Conclusion

Our results provide evidence that the reduced capacity of primary care facilities during the national lockdown may have caused a high rate of self-medication as well as a delayed provision of care in some patients. Identification of pediatric patients affected with SARS-CoV-2 infection remains a challenge because of the absence of reliable predictive factors. Finally, the use of specific triage centers, with dedicated pathways to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection, trace contacts and allow adequate care after swabs, is effective in preventing spreading of the infection.

Ultrasound guided peripheral IV placement: An observational study of the learning curve in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement (USGPIV) has demonstrated benefits in children including higher success rates and fewer attempts compared to the traditional technique. Little is known about the experience needed to establish competence with USGPIV in children. In adult patients, nurses with four USGPIV attempts had a subsequent 70% probability of success after training. The objective of this study is to measure the competency of nurses with USGPIV in children after training.

METHODS

Pediatric nurses completed 2 h of training on USGPIV, after which they used ultrasound at their discretion for children with difficult access. Data was collected prospectively via study forms and retrospectively from medical records. Mixed effects logistic regression models were used to estimate the probability of successful USGPIV placement.

RESULTS

Thirty-five nurses underwent training from the pediatric emergency department and intravenous access team. The overall USGPIV success rate was 70%. Participants with less nursing experience made more USGPIV attempts than those with more experience, but had similar success rates. Forty percent of participants performed ten or more attempts during the study period. Mixed effects logistic regression estimated that it took nine USGPIV attempts after training for learners to achieve a 70% probability of success for the subsequent attempt.

CONCLUSION

After training, 40% of participants adopted USGPIV into their practice. When developing training programs for USGPIV for children with difficult access, trainers can anticipate the experience needed to acquire this skill and the fact that not everyone trained will use this skill in their daily practice.

Use and Misuse of Emergency Room for Children: Features of Walk-In Consultations and Parental Motivations in a Hospital in Southern Italy

Objective: Inappropriate use of the emergency department (ED) represents a major worldwide issue both in pediatric and adult age. Herein, we aim to describe features of pediatric visits to the ED of Salerno University Hospital and to evaluate parental reasons behind the decision to walk in. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study evaluating ED encounters for children from January 2014 to December 2019. The appropriateness of visits was measured with a national tool assessing every ED encounter, namely, "the Mattoni method," which consists of the combination of the triage code assigned, the diagnostic resources adopted, and the consultation outcomes. Moreover, 64 questionnaires were collected from a sample of parents in the waiting rooms in January 2020. Results: A total number of 42,507 visits were recorded during the study period (19,126 females; mean age ± SD: 4.3 ± 3.8 years), the majority of whom were inappropriate (75.8% over the considered period; 73.6% in 2014; 74.6% in 2015; 76.3% in 2016; 76.7% in 2017; 77.9% in 2018; 75.5% in 2019). Most of the inappropriate consultations arrived at the ED by their own vehicle (94.4%), following an independent decision of the parents (97.2%), especially in the evening and at night on Saturdays/Sundays/holidays (69.7%). A multivariate analysis revealed the following: patients of younger age (OR: 1.11, 95% C.I. 1.06-1.16; p < 0.0019), night visits (OR 1.39; 95% C.I.: 1.32-1.47; p < 0.001), patients living in the municipality of Salerno (OR 1.28; 95% C.I.: 1.22-1.34; p < 0.001), weekend day visits (OR 1.48; 95% C.I.: 1.41-1.56; p < 0.001), and independent parental decision without previous contact with primary care pediatrician (OR 3.01; 95% C.I.: 2.64-3.44; p < 0.001) were all significant independent predictors of inappropriate consultation. The most frequent trigger of ED encounters was fever (51.4%). Hospital admission made up 17.6% of all consultations. The questionnaire showed that most parents were aware of the lack of urgency (20.3%) or minor urgency (53.1%) of the visit. The reasons for walking in were the impossibility to receive a home consultation (70%), the difficulty of contacting their family pediatrician during weekends and holidays (54.4%), as well as the search for a quick, effective, diagnosis and therapy (48.4%). Conclusions: The study suggests a highly inappropriate use of ED for children in our region. This issue deserves considerable attention by health care system leaders in order to optimally integrate hospitals and primary care.

Pediatric emergency care: Associations between process factors and outcomes - Children's and parents' views combined with register data

BACKGROUND

Care quality in hospital units can be assessed based on three elements: structure, process, and outcomes. Relationships between elements are particularly important but have largely been unexplored.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationships between factors of the emergency care process, length of stay, and care outcomes (i.e. care quality and patient satisfaction).

METHODS

Medical and administrative registry data from children's visits were combined with cross-sectional survey data and analyzed using descriptive methods, median test, and linear regression. Eighty-nine child-parent pairs from four emergency departments participated.

RESULTS

The shortest length of stay had children at the lowest triage level (p < 0.001) Children with more diagnostic tests (p < 0.001) and more procedures (p < 0.001) performed had the longest length of stay. In linear regression analysis (f = 6.626, df = 6, p = 0.001, R² = 0.214), the satisfaction of child-parent pairs was associated with performance of more tests and procedures, higher triage levels, and child streaming onto the pediatrician care track.

CONCLUSIONS

Care process factors affect length of children's stay in emergency departments and could predict children's and parents' satisfaction with, and evaluations of, care quality.