1
|
Oliveras L, Coloma A, Lloberas N, Lino L, Favà A, Manonelles A, Codina S, Couceiro C, Melilli E, Sharif A, Hecking M, Guthoff M, Cruzado JM, Pascual J, Montero N. Immunosuppressive drug combinations after kidney transplantation and post-transplant diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2024; 38:100856. [PMID: 38723582 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2024.100856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation (KT). This systematic review investigated the effect of different immunosuppressive regimens on the risk of PTDM. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included KT recipients with any immunosuppression and reported PTDM outcomes up to 1 October 2023. The analysis included 125 RCTs. We found no differences in PTDM risk within induction therapies. In de novo KT, there was an increased risk of developing PTDM with tacrolimus versus cyclosporin (RR 1.71, 95%CI [1.38-2.11]). No differences were observed between tacrolimus+mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) and tacrolimus+MMF/MPA, but there was a tendency towards a higher risk of PTDM in the cyclosporin+mTORi group (RR 1.42, 95%CI [0.99-2.04]). Conversion from cyclosporin to an mTORi increased PTDM risk (RR 1.89, 95%CI [1.18-3.03]). De novo belatacept compared with a calcineurin inhibitor resulted in 50% lower risk of PTDM (RR 0.50, 95%CI [0.32-0.79]). Steroid avoidance resulted in 31% lower PTDM risk (RR 0.69, 95%CI [0.57-0.83]), whereas steroid withdrawal resulted in no differences. Immunosuppression should be decided on an individual basis, carefully weighing the risk of future PTDM and rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laia Oliveras
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Coloma
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Nuria Lloberas
- Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luis Lino
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Alexandre Favà
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Anna Manonelles
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sergi Codina
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Couceiro
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Melilli
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Adnan Sharif
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Manfred Hecking
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Clinical Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martina Guthoff
- Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology, Nephrology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Josep M Cruzado
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Hospital 12 de Octubre, Nephrology Department, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Nuria Montero
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Nephrology Department. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kanbay M, Copur S, Topçu AU, Guldan M, Ozbek L, Gaipov A, Ferro C, Cozzolino M, Cherney DZI, Tuttle KR. An update review of post-transplant diabetes mellitus: Concept, risk factors, clinical implications and management. Diabetes Obes Metab 2024; 26:2531-2545. [PMID: 38558257 DOI: 10.1111/dom.15575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Kidney transplantation is the gold standard therapeutic alternative for patients with end-stage renal disease; nevertheless, it is not without potential complications leading to considerable morbidity and mortality such as post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). This narrative review aims to comprehensively evaluate PTDM in terms of its diagnostic approach, underlying pathophysiological pathways, epidemiological data, and management strategies. METHODS Articles were retrieved from electronic databases using predefined search terms. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies investigating PTDM diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and management strategies. RESULTS PTDM emerges as a significant complication following kidney transplantation, influenced by various pathophysiological factors including peripheral insulin resistance, immunosuppressive medications, infections, and proinflammatory pathways. Despite discrepancies in prevalence estimates, PTDM poses substantial challenges to transplant. Diagnostic approaches, including traditional criteria such as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c, are limited in their ability to capture early PTDM manifestations. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) emerges as a valuable tool, particularly in the early post-transplant period. Management strategies for PTDM remain unclear, within sufficient evidence from large-scale randomized clinical trials to guide optimal interventions. Nevertheless, glucose-lowering agents and life style modifications constitute primary modalities for managing hyperglycemia in transplant recipients. DISCUSSION The complex interplay between PTDM and the transplant process necessitates individualized diagnostic and management approaches. While early recognition and intervention are paramount, modifications to maintenance immunosuppressive regimens based solely on PTDM risk are not warranted, given the potential adverse consequences such as increased rejection risk. Further research is essential to refine management strategies and enhance outcomes for transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Kanbay
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sidar Copur
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - A Umur Topçu
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Guldan
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Lasin Ozbek
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Abduzhappar Gaipov
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Charles Ferro
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospitals Birmingham and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mario Cozzolino
- Department of Health Sciences, Renal Division, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - David Z I Cherney
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katherine R Tuttle
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alajous S, Budhiraja P. New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus after Kidney Transplantation. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1928. [PMID: 38610694 PMCID: PMC11012473 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus after Transplantation (NODAT) emerges as a prevalent complication post-kidney transplantation, with its incidence influenced by variations in NODAT definitions and follow-up periods. The condition's pathophysiology is marked by impaired insulin sensitivity and β-cell dysfunction. Significant risk factors encompass age, gender, obesity, and genetics, among others, with the use of post-transplant immunosuppressants intensifying the condition. NODAT's significant impact on patient survival and graft durability underscores the need for its prevention, early detection, and treatment. This review addresses the complexities of managing NODAT, including the challenges posed by various immunosuppressive regimens crucial for transplant success yet harmful to glucose metabolism. It discusses management strategies involving adjustments in immunosuppressive protocols, lifestyle modifications, and pharmacological interventions to minimize diabetes risk while maintaining transplant longevity. The importance of early detection and proactive, personalized intervention strategies to modify NODAT's trajectory is also emphasized, advocating for a shift towards more anticipatory post-transplant care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pooja Budhiraja
- Division of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fitzsimmons WE, Naesens M. Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplant-An Endpoint Not Predictive of Treatment Effect on Graft Survival. Transplantation 2024; 108:593-597. [PMID: 37322579 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- William E Fitzsimmons
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wilson NK, Kataria AD. Immunosuppression in solid organ-transplant recipients and impact on nutrition support. Nutr Clin Pract 2024; 39:109-116. [PMID: 38030572 DOI: 10.1002/ncp.11099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
A key component to nutrition support is to consider immunosuppressive agents, the interaction with nutrients, and how the side effects of the medications influence nutrition support. The immunosuppression of the solid organ-transplant recipient involves the individualized titration of multiple therapeutic agents to prevent allorecognition and, thus, rejection of the transplanted organ. Induction immunosuppression includes the agents used at the time of transplant to prevent early rejection. Maintenance immunosuppression typically consists of oral medications taken for life. Regular therapeutic monitoring of immunosuppression is necessary to balance the risk of rejection with that of infections and malignancy. In the acute-care setting, multidisciplinary collaboration, including pharmacy and nutrition, is needed to optimize the route of administration, titration, and side effects of immunosuppression. Long-term nutrition management after transplant is also vital to prevent exacerbating adverse effects of immunosuppressive therapies, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and bone loss. This review summarizes common immunosuppressive agents currently utilized in solid organ-transplant recipients and factors that may influence decisions on nutrition support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole K Wilson
- Department of Pharmacy, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ann D Kataria
- Department of Pharmacy, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van den Born JC, Meziyerh S, Vart P, Bakker SJL, Berger SP, Florquin S, de Fijter JW, Gomes-Neto AW, Idu MM, Pol RA, Roelen DL, van Sandwijk MS, de Vries DK, de Vries APJ, Bemelman FJ, Sanders JSF. Comparison of 2 Immunosuppression Minimization Strategies in Kidney Transplantation: The ALLEGRO Trial. Transplantation 2024; 108:556-566. [PMID: 37650722 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence on the optimal maintenance of immunosuppressive regimen in kidney transplantation recipients is limited. METHODS The Amsterdam, LEiden, GROningen trial is a randomized, multicenter, investigator-driven, noninferiority, open-label trial in de novo kidney transplant recipients, in which 2 immunosuppression minimization strategies were compared with standard immunosuppression with basiliximab, corticosteroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolic acid. In the minimization groups, either steroids were withdrawn from day 3, or tacrolimus exposure was reduced from 6 mo after transplantation. The primary endpoint was kidney transplant function at 24 mo. RESULTS A total of 295 participants were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Noninferiority was shown for the primary endpoint; estimated glomerular filtration rate at 24 mo was 45.3 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in the early steroid withdrawal group, 49.0 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in the standard immunosuppression group, and 44.7 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in the tacrolimus minimization group. Participants in the early steroid withdrawal group were significantly more often treated for rejection ( P = 0.04). However, in this group, the number of participants with diabetes mellitus during follow-up and total cholesterol at 24 mo were significantly lower. CONCLUSIONS Tacrolimus minimization can be considered in kidney transplant recipients who do not have an increased immunological risk. Before withdrawing steroids the risk of rejection should be weighed against the potential metabolic advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joost C van den Born
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Soufian Meziyerh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Priya Vart
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Stephan J L Bakker
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan P Berger
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Sandrine Florquin
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - António W Gomes-Neto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mirza M Idu
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert A Pol
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marit S van Sandwijk
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dorottya K de Vries
- Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Aiko P J de Vries
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Stephan F Sanders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pham NYT, Cruz D, Madera-Marin L, Ravender R, Garcia P. Diabetic Kidney Disease in Post-Kidney Transplant Patients. J Clin Med 2024; 13:793. [PMID: 38337487 PMCID: PMC10856396 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common occurrence in post-kidney transplantation and is associated with greater mortality, allograft failure, and increased risk of infections. The primary goal in the management of PTDM is to achieve glycemic control to minimize the risk of complications while balancing the need for immunosuppression to maintain the health of the transplanted kidney. This review summarizes the effects of maintenance immunosuppression and therapeutic options among kidney transplant recipients. Patients with PTDM are at increased risk of diabetic kidney disease development; therefore, in this review, we focus on evidence supporting the use of novel antidiabetic agents and discuss their benefits and potential side effects in detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ngoc-Yen T. Pham
- Division of Nephrology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA
| | - Diego Cruz
- Hospital General San Juan de Dios, Guatemala City 01001, Guatemala;
| | - Luis Madera-Marin
- Division of Nephrology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA
| | - Raja Ravender
- Division of Nephrology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA
| | - Pablo Garcia
- Division of Nephrology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stumpf J, Thomusch O, Opgenoorth M, Wiesener M, Pascher A, Woitas RP, Suwelack B, Rentsch M, Witzke O, Rath T, Banas B, Benck U, Sommerer C, Kurschat C, Lopau K, Weinmann-Menke J, Jaenigen B, Trips E, Hugo C. Excellent efficacy and beneficial safety during observational 5-year follow-up of rapid steroid withdrawal after renal transplantation (Harmony FU study). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2023; 39:141-150. [PMID: 37391381 PMCID: PMC10730794 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfad130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We previously reported excellent efficacy and improved safety aspects of rapid steroid withdrawal (RSWD) in the randomized controlled 1-year "Harmony" trial with 587 predominantly deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients randomized either to basiliximab or rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction therapy and compared with standard immunosuppressive therapy consisting of basiliximab, low tacrolimus once daily, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. METHODS The 5-year post-trial follow-up (FU) data were obtained in an observational manner at a 3- and a 5-year visit only for those Harmony patients who consented to participate and covered clinical events that occurred from the second year onwards. RESULTS Biopsy-proven acute rejection and death-censored graft loss rates remained low and independent of RSWD. Rapid steroid withdrawal was an independent positive factor for patient survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.554, 95% confidence interval 0.314-0.976; P = .041).The reduced incidence of post-transplantation diabetes mellitus in RSWD patients during the original 1-year study period was not compensated by later incidences during FU. Incidences of other important outcome parameters such as opportunistic infections, malignancies, cardiovascular morbidity/risk factors, donor-specific antibody formation or kidney function did not differ during FU period. CONCLUSIONS With all the limitations of a post-trial FU study, the Harmony FU data confirm excellent efficacy and beneficial safety aspects of RSWD under modern immunosuppressive therapy over the course of 5 years after kidney transplantation in an immunologically low-risk, elderly population of Caucasian kidney transplant recipients. Trial registration: Clinical trial registration number: Investigator Initiated Trial (NCT00724022, FU study DRKS00005786).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Stumpf
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Nephrology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Oliver Thomusch
- Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Department of General Surgery, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mirian Opgenoorth
- University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Department Nephrology and Hypertension, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Wiesener
- University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Department Nephrology and Hypertension, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andreas Pascher
- University Hospital of Münster, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, and Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow/Mitte, Department of Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rainer Peter Woitas
- University Hospital of Bonn, Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Nephrology, Bonn, Germany
| | - Barbara Suwelack
- University Hospital of Münster, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Department of Internal Medicine D, Transplantnephrology, Münster, Germany
| | - Markus Rentsch
- University Hospital of Großhadern Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Witzke
- University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Department of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, Essen, Germany
| | - Thomas Rath
- Westpfalz Klinikum, Department of Nephrology, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Bernhard Banas
- University Hospital Regensburg, Division of Nephrology, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Urs Benck
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Department of Medicine V, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Claudia Sommerer
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Kurschat
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kai Lopau
- University Hospital, Julius-Maximilians-University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Jaenigen
- Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Department of General Surgery, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Evelyn Trips
- Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Hugo
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Nephrology, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stoler ST, Chan M, Chadban SJ. Nutrition in the Management of Kidney Transplant Recipients. J Ren Nutr 2023; 33:S67-S72. [PMID: 37482148 DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation offers patients with end stage kidney disease the best outcomes. Concentration on nutrition is pivotal throughout the transplant life course. Nutritional requirements change during each phase of transplantation, from pretransplant evaluation and wait-time, acute transplantation, maintenance and ultimately declining graft function, and care should be taken to consider each stage. In this article we concentrate on addressing each phase, with additional focus on current hot topics of dysglycaemia management and on the impact of diet on gut microbiome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara T Stoler
- Department of Renal Medicine, Kidney Centre, Level 2 Professor Marie Bashir Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Maria Chan
- Departments of Renal Medicine, Dietetics and Nutrition, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia; St. George Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Steven J Chadban
- Department of Renal Medicine, Kidney Centre, Level 2 Professor Marie Bashir Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Kidney Node, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pierce DR, Gruessner A, Campara M, DiCocco P, Spaggiari M, Tzvetanov I, Tang I, Benedetti E, Lichvar AB. Impact of early corticosteroid withdrawal on simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant long-term outcomes: Single center experience and comparison to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15063. [PMID: 37392191 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There remains a paucity of modern data comparing early steroid withdrawal (ESW) versus chronic corticosteroid (CCS) immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplant recipients with long-term follow-up. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of ESW compared to CCS post-SPK. METHODS This was a retrospective single-center matched comparison with the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR). Patients from University of Illinois Hospital (UIH) represented the ESW group and were compared to those matched CCS patients from the IPTR. Included patients were adult recipients of a primary SPK transplant between 2003 and 2018 within the US receiving rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction. Patients were excluded if they had early technical failures, missing IPTR data, graft thrombosis, re-transplant, or positive crossmatch SPK. RESULTS A total of 156 patients were matched and included in the analysis. Patients were predominantly African American (46.15%) males (64.1%) with Type 1 diabetes etiology (92.31%). Overall pancreas allograft survival (hazard ratio [HR] = .89, 95% confidence interval [CI] .34-2.30, p = .81) and kidney allograft survival (HR = .80, 95%CI .32-2.03, p = .64) were similar between the two groups. Immunologic pancreas allograft loss was statistically similar at 1-year (ESW 1.3% vs. CCS 0%, p = .16), 5-year (ESW 1.3% vs. CCS 7.7%, p = .16), and 10-year (ESW 11.0% vs. CCS 7.7%, p = .99). The 1-year (ESW 2.6% vs. CCS 0%, p > .05), 5-year (ESW 8.3% vs. CCS 7.0%, p > .05), and 10-year (ESW 22.7% vs. CCS 9.9%, p = .2575) immunologic kidney allograft loss were also statistically similar. There was no difference in 10-year overall patient survival (ESW 76.2% vs. CCS 65.6%, p = .63). CONCLUSIONS No differences were found between allograft or patient survival post-SPK when comparing an ESW or CCS protocol. Future assessment is needed to determine differences in metabolic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana R Pierce
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Angelika Gruessner
- Department of Medicine/Nephrology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Maya Campara
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Pierpaolo DiCocco
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mario Spaggiari
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ivo Tzvetanov
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ignatius Tang
- Department of Nephrology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Enrico Benedetti
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Alicia B Lichvar
- Center for Transplantation, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shim YE, Ko Y, Lee JP, Jeon JS, Jun H, Yang J, Kim MS, Lim SJ, Kwon HE, Jung JH, Kwon H, Kim YH, Lee J, Shin S. Evaluating anti-thymocyte globulin induction doses for better allograft and patient survival in Asian kidney transplant recipients. Sci Rep 2023; 13:12560. [PMID: 37532735 PMCID: PMC10397229 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39353-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is currently the most widely prescribed induction regimen for preventing acute rejection after solid organ transplantation. However, the optimal dose of ATG induction regimen in Asian kidney recipients is unclear. Using the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry, we performed a retrospective cohort study of 4579 adult patients who received renal transplantation in South Korea and divided them into three groups according to the induction regimen: basiliximab group (n = 3655), low-dose ATG group (≤ 4.5 mg/kg; n = 467), and high-dose ATG group (> 4.5 mg/kg; n = 457). We applied the Toolkit for Weighting and Analysis of Nonequivalent Groups (TWANG) package to generate high-quality propensity score weights for intergroup comparisons. During four-year follow-ups, the high-dose ATG group had the highest biopsy-proven acute rejection rate (basiliximab 20.8% vs. low-dose ATG 22.4% vs. high-dose ATG 25.6%; P < 0.001). However, the rates of overall graft failure (4.0% vs. 5.0% vs. 2.6%; P < 0.001) and mortality (1.7% vs. 2.8% vs. 1.0%; P < 0.001) were the lowest in the high-dose ATG group. Our results show that high-dose ATG induction (> 4.5 mg/kg) was superior to basiliximab and low-dose ATG induction in terms of graft and patient survival in Asian patients undergoing kidney transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Eun Shim
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Youngmin Ko
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Pyo Lee
- Department of Nephrology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Seok Jeon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Heungman Jun
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaeseok Yang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myoung Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Jun Lim
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye Eun Kwon
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo Hee Jung
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyunwook Kwon
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Hoon Kim
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Jungbok Lee
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| | - Sung Shin
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ordaya EE, Shaughnessy M, Elkin B, Husmann RL, Stauffer JC, Luengas EM, Chang BH, Tessier KM, Walker PF, Stauffer WM. Transplantation and immigration: Comparing infectious complications and outcomes between foreign-born and US-born kidney transplant recipients in Minnesota. Transpl Infect Dis 2023; 25:e14039. [PMID: 36856346 PMCID: PMC10085839 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Foreign-born kidney transplant recipients (FBKTRs) are at increased risk for reactivation of latent infections that may impact outcomes. We aimed to compare the etiology of infections and outcomes between FBKTR and United States KTRs (USKTR). METHODS We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 at two transplant centers in Minnesota. Frequency and etiology of infections as well as outcomes (graft function, rejection, and patient survival) at 1-year post-transplant between FBKTR and USKTR were compared. RESULTS Of the 573 transplant recipients, 124 (21.6%) were foreign-born and 449 (78.4%) US-born. At least one infection occurred in 411 (71.7%) patients (38.2% bacterial, 55% viral, 9.4% fungal). Viral infections were more frequent in FBKTR, particularly BK viremia (38.7% vs. 21.2%, p < .001). No statistical differences were found for bacterial or fungal infections; no parasitic infections were identified in either group. No geographically-restricted infections were noted aside from a single case of Madura foot in a FBKTR. Rejection episodes were more common in USKTR (p = .037), but stable/improving graft function (p = .976) and mortality (p = .451) at 1-year posttransplantation were similar in both groups. After adjusting for covariates, previous transplantation was associated with a higher number of infections (IRR 1.35, 95% confidence intervals 1.05-1.73, p = .020). CONCLUSION Although viral infections were more frequent in FBKTR, overall frequency and etiology of most infections and outcomes were similar between FBKTR and USKTR suggesting that comprehensive transplant care is providing timely prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of latent infections in FBKTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eloy E. Ordaya
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Megan Shaughnessy
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin HealthCare, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Baila Elkin
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Department of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Rachel L. Husmann
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin HealthCare, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Jacob C. Stauffer
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Bickey H. Chang
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Katelyn M. Tessier
- Masonic Cancer Center, Biostatistics Core, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Patricia F. Walker
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - William M. Stauffer
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Human Migration and Health, Center for Global Health and Social Responsibility, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ko Y, Wee YM, Shin S, Kim MJ, Choi MY, Kim DH, Lim SJ, Jung JH, Kwon H, Kim YH, Han DJ. A prospective, randomized, non-blinded, non-inferiority pilot study to assess the effect of low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin with low-dose tacrolimus and early steroid withdrawal on clinical outcomes in non-sensitized living-donor kidney recipients. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0280924. [PMID: 36857393 PMCID: PMC9976999 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal dose of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) as an induction regimen in Asian living-donor kidney recipients is unclear. METHODS This is a pilot study in which 36 consecutive patients undergoing living-donor kidney transplantation were randomly assigned to receive either 4.5 mg/kg (n = 19) or 6.0 mg/kg (n = 17) of ATG; all patients had corticosteroid withdrawal within 7 days. The primary end point was a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, de novo donor-specific antibody formation, and graft failure. RESULTS At 12 months post-transplant, biopsy-proven acute rejection was more common in the ATG4.5 group (21.1%) than in the ATG6.0 group (0%)(P = .048). Importantly, the rate of the composite end point was significantly higher in the ATG4.5 group (36.8% vs 0%)(P = .006). There were significant differences in neither the renal function nor adverse events between the two groups. One case of death-censored graft failure occurred in the ATG4.5 group and no mortality was observed overall. Compared with pre-transplantation, T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and natural killer T (NKT) cells were significantly decreased in the first week post-transplantation except for B cells. Although T and NKT cells in both groups and NK cells in the ATG4.5 group had recovered to the pre-transplant levels, NK cells in the ATG6.0 group remained suppressed until six months post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS Compared with ATG 6.0 mg/kg, ATG 4.5 mg/kg with early corticosteroid withdrawal and low dose maintenance regimen was associated with higher rates of acute rejection in non-sensitized Asian living-donor kidney recipients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02447822.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youngmin Ko
- Department of Surgery, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yu-Mee Wee
- Department of Medical Science, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Shin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- * E-mail:
| | - Mi Joung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Monica Young Choi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Hyun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Jun Lim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Hee Jung
- Department of Surgery, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyunwook Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Hoon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Duck Jong Han
- Department of Surgery, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Long-term Prolonged-release Tacrolimus-based Immunosuppression in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: 5-Y Prospective Follow-up of Patients in the ADVANCE Study. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1432. [PMID: 36875940 PMCID: PMC9977488 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Although prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) is widely approved for posttransplantation immunosuppression in kidney recipients, large-scale studies are required to assess long-term outcomes. We present follow-up data from the Advagraf-based Immunosuppression Regimen Examining New Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Kidney Transplant Recipients (ADVANCE) trial, in which kidney transplant patients (KTPs) received corticosteroid minimization with PR-T. Methods ADVANCE was a 24-wk, randomized, open-label, phase-4 study. De novo KTPs received PR-T with basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil and were randomized to receive an intraoperative corticosteroid bolus plus tapered corticosteroids until day 10 (arm 1) or an intraoperative corticosteroid bolus (arm 2). In this 5-y, noninterventional follow-up, patients received maintenance immunosuppression according to standard practice. The primary endpoint was graft survival (Kaplan-Meier). Secondary endpoints included patient survival, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection-free survival, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (4-variable modification of diet in renal disease). Results Follow-up study included 1125 patients. Overall graft survival at 1 and 5 y posttransplantation was 93.8% and 88.1%, respectively, and was similar between treatment arms. At 1 and 5 y, patient survival was 97.8% and 94.4%, respectively. Five-year graft and patient survival rates in KTPs who remained on PR-T were 91.5% and 98.2%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated similar risk of graft loss and death between treatment arms. Five-year biopsy-confirmed acute rejection-free survival was 84.1%. Mean ± standard deviation values of estimated glomerular filtration rate were 52.7 ± 19.5 and 51.1 ± 22.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 1 and 5 y, respectively. Fifty adverse drug reactions were recorded, probably tacrolimus-related in 12 patients (1.5%). Conclusions Graft survival and patient survival (overall and for KTPs who remained on PR-T) were numerically high and similar between treatment arms at 5 y posttransplantation.
Collapse
|
15
|
Recipient and Graft Outcomes in Simultaneous Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation With Steroid Avoidance in the United States. Transplantation 2023; 107:521-528. [PMID: 36195029 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Steroid avoidance in kidney transplantation has been proven noninferior. Long-term outcome data on steroid avoidance in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) remains scant. METHODS Utilizing the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 2000 and 2020, we studied all primary crossmatch negative SPK recipients (N = 5683) who received antithymocyte globulin induction and were discharged alive with functioning grafts on tacrolimus and mycophenolate ± steroid maintenance. Recipients were grouped according to steroid use into 2 groups: steroid maintenance (n = 4191) and steroid avoidance (n = 1492). Kaplan-Meier curves censored at 10 y were generated for recipient and allograft survival by steroid maintenance. Predictors for recipient and graft survival were examined using Cox Proportional Hazards. Models were adjusted for age, body mass index, ethnicity, diabetes type, human leukocyte-antigen mismatches, cold ischemia time, transplant era, preemptive transplantation, and pancreas donor risk index with the transplant center included as a random effect. RESULTS Steroid avoidance gained popularity over time, accounting for over one-fourth of the studied cohort. One-year acute rejection rates by steroid avoidance were comparable for kidney (8.6% versus 9%, P = 0.783); however, the pancreas rejection rate was lower in the steroid avoidance group (7.9% versus 10%; P = 0.035). After adjustment, steroid avoidance did not influence recipient survival (lower level of confidence interval, adjusted hazard ratio, upper level of confidence interval: 0.94, 1.15, 1.39), pancreas (0.75, 0.93, 1.16), or kidney (0.95, 1.18, 1.45) death-censored survival, compared with steroid maintenance. CONCLUSIONS Accounting for the recipient and graft characteristics, steroid avoidance is associated with similar recipient, pancreas, and kidney graft outcomes compared with steroid maintenance in SPK recipients after antithymocyte globulin induction with tacrolimus and mycophenolate maintenance.
Collapse
|
16
|
Population Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes from the Renal Transplant Outcome Prediction Validation Study (TOPVAS). J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11247421. [PMID: 36556037 PMCID: PMC9781432 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is the preferred method for selected patients with kidney failure. Despite major improvements over the last decades, a significant proportion of organs are still lost every year. Causes of graft loss and impaired graft function are incompletely understood and prognostic tools are lacking. Here, we describe baseline characteristics and outcomes of the non-interventional Transplant Outcome Prediction Validation Study (TOPVAS). A total of 241 patients receiving a non-living kidney transplant were recruited in three Austrian transplantation centres and treated according to local practices. Clinical information as well as blood and urine samples were obtained at baseline and consecutive follow-ups up to 24 months. Out of the overall 16 graft losses, 11 occurred in the first year. The patient survival rate was 96.7% (95% CI: 94.3-99.1%) in the first year and 94.3% (95% CI: 91.1-97.7%) in the second year. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improved from 37.1 ± 14.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 at hospital discharge to 45.0 ± 14.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 24 months. The TOPVAS study provides information on current kidney graft and patient survival, eGFR trajectories, and rejection rates, as well as infectious and surgical complication rates under different immunosuppressive drug regimens. More importantly, it provides an extensive and well-characterized biobank for the future discovery and validation of prognostic methods.
Collapse
|
17
|
Schmid-Mohler G, Huber L, Mueller TF. Variable Selection for Assessing Risk Factors for Weight and Body fat Gain During the First Year After Kidney Transplantation. Prog Transplant 2022; 32:309-313. [PMID: 36136080 PMCID: PMC9660260 DOI: 10.1177/15269248221122891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background: Body fat and overall weight gain are common after kidney transplantation and are associated with poor clinical outcomes. Therefore, identification of at-risk patients is relevant for preventive interventions. Clinical Question: What variables influence weight and fat gain in patients in the first year after kidney transplantation? Literature Search Prospective and retrospective cohort studies published in or after 2001 naming fat and/or overall weight gain during the first year after kidney transplantation as outcome variable(s) were systematically searched in Medline/Pubmed in November 2018 and March 2022. Clinical Appraisal: We identified 16 studies examining a wide variety of potential factors influencing weight and fat gain over the first posttransplant years. These included genetic, socio-demographic, behavioral, biomedical, psychological and environmental factors. For a number of variables, study results were contradictory: some studies indicated preventive impacts on weight or fat gain; others concluded that the same factors increased it. Cases were discussed with 2 clinical experts. We eventually agreed on 13 potentially relevant risk factors for post-transplant weight/fat gain: age, gender, genes, income, ethnicity, education, eating habits, physical activity, smoking cessation, baseline BMI, baseline fat, depression and perceived overall wellbeing. Integration into Practice Before integration into clinical practice, a critical evaluation of all potential risk factors' suitability for assessment will be necessary. In addition to feasibility, operational definitions and measurement methods must also be considered. Evaluation: To reduce the list of risk factors to the most relevant, a first testing within a prospectively collected data set is planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Schmid-Mohler
- Center of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Gabriela Schmid-Mohler, University Hospital
Zurich, Centre of Clinical Nursing Science, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich.
| | - Laura Huber
- Center of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas F. Mueller
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bredewold OW, Chan J, Svensson M, Bruchfeld A, de Fijter JW, Furuland H, Grinyo JM, Hartmann A, Holdaas H, Hellberg O, Jardine A, Mjörnstedt L, Skov K, Smerud KT, Soveri I, Sørensen SS, Zonneveld AJV, Fellström B. Cardiovascular Risk Following Conversion to Belatacept From a Calcineurin Inhibitor in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Kidney Med 2022; 5:100574. [PMID: 36593877 PMCID: PMC9803830 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective In kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), a belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen is associated with beneficial effects on cardiovascular (CV) risk factors compared with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimens. Our objective was to compare the calculated CV risk between belatacept and CNI (predominantly tacrolimus) treatments using a validated model developed for KTRs. Study Design Prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, international multicenter trial. Setting & Participants KTRs aged 18-80 years with a stable graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate > 20 mL/min/1.73 m2), 3-60 months after transplantation, treated with tacrolimus or cyclosporine A, were eligible for inclusion. Intervention Continuation with a CNI-based regimen or switch to belatacept for 12 months. Outcomes Comparison of the change in the estimated 7-year risk of major adverse CV events and all-cause mortality, changes in traditional markers of CV health, as well as measures of arterial stiffness. Results Among the 105 KTRs randomized, we found no differences between the treatment groups in the predicted risk for major adverse CV events or mortality. Diastolic blood pressure, measured both centrally by using a SphygmoCor device and peripherally, was lower after the belatacept treatment than after the CNI treatment. The mean changes in traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, including kidney transplant function, were otherwise similar in both the treatment groups. The belatacept group had 4 acute rejection episodes; 2 were severe rejections, of which 1 led to graft loss. Limitations The heterogeneous baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate and time from transplantation to trial enrollment in the participants. A limited study duration of 1 year. Conclusions We found no effects on the calculated CV risk by switching to the belatacept treatment. Participants in the belatacept group had not only lower central and peripheral diastolic blood pressure but also a higher rejection rate. Funding The trial has received a financial grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb. Trial Registration EudraCT no. 2013-001178-20.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Obbo W. Bredewold
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands,Address for Correspondence: Obbo W. Bredewold, MD, Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Joe Chan
- Department of Renal Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - My Svensson
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Annette Bruchfeld
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden,Department of Renal Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital and CLINTEC Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan W. de Fijter
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Furuland
- Department of Medical Science, Renal Unit, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Josep M. Grinyo
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anders Hartmann
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hallvard Holdaas
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Olof Hellberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Alan Jardine
- Department of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lars Mjörnstedt
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Karin Skov
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | | | - Inga Soveri
- Department of Medical Science, Renal Unit, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Søren S. Sørensen
- Department of Nephrology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Bengt Fellström
- Department of Medical Science, Renal Unit, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Association Between Maintenance Immunosuppressive Regimens and COVID-19 Mortality in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 2022; 106:2063-2067. [PMID: 35883236 PMCID: PMC9521383 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid organ transplant recipients are at high risk for fatal forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a cohort study among kidney transplant (KT) recipients from the French Solid Organ Transplant COVID-19 Registry to investigate the association between maintenance immunosuppressive drugs and 60-d mortality. METHODS Data from all KT recipients with COVID-19 included in the French Solid Organ Transplant COVID-19 Registry between February 28, 2020, and December 30, 2020, were retrieved. We evaluated associations between immunosuppressive drugs and death within 60 d using logistic regression, with all baseline characteristics considered to influence outcome or immunosuppressive regimen. The Benjamini-Hochberg correction was used for controlling false positive rate; 40 multiple imputations were performed. Adjusted P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS There were 1451 KT recipients included. Median age was 58 y, and 66.4% were men. Most frequent comorbidities were hypertension (81.9%), diabetes (34.5%), and cardiovascular disease (29.5%). Median time since transplant was 71 mo. Maintenance immunosuppression regimens included calcineurin inhibitors (1295, 89.2%), antimetabolites (1205, 83%), corticosteroids (1094, 75.4%), mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (144, 9.9%), and belatacept (58, 4.0%). Among 1451 transplant recipients, 201 (13.9%) died within 60 d. Older age and higher baseline serum creatinine were associated with mortality (odds ratios, 1.09 [1.07-1.11] and 1.01 [1.005-1.009], P < 0.001). Corticosteroid-free regimens were associated with a significantly lower risk of death (odds ratio, 0.48 [0.31-0.76]; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS Corticosteroid-free regimens were associated with a lower risk of death in KT recipients with COVID-19. Long-term exposure to corticosteroids impairs immune functions and may predispose solid organ transplant recipients to severe forms of COVID-19.
Collapse
|
20
|
Blonde L, Umpierrez GE, Reddy SS, McGill JB, Berga SL, Bush M, Chandrasekaran S, DeFronzo RA, Einhorn D, Galindo RJ, Gardner TW, Garg R, Garvey WT, Hirsch IB, Hurley DL, Izuora K, Kosiborod M, Olson D, Patel SB, Pop-Busui R, Sadhu AR, Samson SL, Stec C, Tamborlane WV, Tuttle KR, Twining C, Vella A, Vellanki P, Weber SL. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. Endocr Pract 2022; 28:923-1049. [PMID: 35963508 PMCID: PMC10200071 DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 69.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide updated and new evidence-based recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes mellitus to clinicians, diabetes-care teams, other health care professionals and stakeholders, and individuals with diabetes and their caregivers. METHODS The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology selected a task force of medical experts and staff who updated and assessed clinical questions and recommendations from the prior 2015 version of this guideline and conducted literature searches for relevant scientific papers published from January 1, 2015, through May 15, 2022. Selected studies from results of literature searches composed the evidence base to update 2015 recommendations as well as to develop new recommendations based on review of clinical evidence, current practice, expertise, and consensus, according to established American Association of Clinical Endocrinology protocol for guideline development. RESULTS This guideline includes 170 updated and new evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes. Recommendations are divided into four sections: (1) screening, diagnosis, glycemic targets, and glycemic monitoring; (2) comorbidities and complications, including obesity and management with lifestyle, nutrition, and bariatric surgery, hypertension, dyslipidemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease; (3) management of prediabetes, type 2 diabetes with antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy and glycemic targets, type 1 diabetes with insulin therapy, hypoglycemia, hospitalized persons, and women with diabetes in pregnancy; (4) education and new topics regarding diabetes and infertility, nutritional supplements, secondary diabetes, social determinants of health, and virtual care, as well as updated recommendations on cancer risk, nonpharmacologic components of pediatric care plans, depression, education and team approach, occupational risk, role of sleep medicine, and vaccinations in persons with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS This updated clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations to assist with person-centered, team-based clinical decision-making to improve the care of persons with diabetes mellitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - S Sethu Reddy
- Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel Einhorn
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, La Jolla, California
| | | | | | - Rajesh Garg
- Lundquist Institute/Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Darin Olson
- Colorado Mountain Medical, LLC, Avon, Colorado
| | | | | | - Archana R Sadhu
- Houston Methodist; Weill Cornell Medicine; Texas A&M College of Medicine; Houston, Texas
| | | | - Carla Stec
- American Association of Clinical Endocrinology, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - Katherine R Tuttle
- University of Washington and Providence Health Care, Seattle and Spokane, Washington
| | | | | | | | - Sandra L Weber
- University of South Carolina School of Medicine-Greenville, Prisma Health System, Greenville, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nelson J, Alvey N, Bowman L, Schulte J, Segovia M, McDermott J, Te HS, Kapila N, Levine DJ, Gottlieb RL, Oberholzer J, Campara M. Consensus recommendations for use of maintenance immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation: Endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, American Society of Transplantation, and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Pharmacotherapy 2022; 42:599-633. [DOI: 10.1002/phar.2716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joelle Nelson
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacy Services University Health San Antonio Texas USA
- Pharmacotherapy Education and Research Center University of Texas Health San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA
- Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacotherapy Division, College of Pharmacy The University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA
| | - Nicole Alvey
- Department of Pharmacy Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA
- Science and Pharmacy Roosevelt University College of Health Schaumburg Illinois USA
| | - Lyndsey Bowman
- Department of Pharmacy Tampa General Hospital Tampa Florida USA
| | - Jamie Schulte
- Department of Pharmacy Services Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | | | - Jennifer McDermott
- Richard DeVos Heart and Lung Transplant Program, Spectrum Health Grand Rapids Michigan USA
- Department of Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine Grand Rapids Michigan USA
| | - Helen S. Te
- Liver Transplantation, Center for Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine University of Chicago Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA
| | - Nikhil Kapila
- Department of Transplant Hepatology Duke University Hospital Durham North Carolina USA
| | - Deborah Jo Levine
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA
| | - Robert L. Gottlieb
- Baylor University Medical Center and Baylor Scott and White Research Institute Dallas Texas USA
| | - Jose Oberholzer
- Department of Surgery/Division of Transplantation University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA
| | - Maya Campara
- Department of Surgery University of Illinois Chicago Chicago Illinois USA
- Department of Pharmacy Practice University of Illinois Chicago Chicago Illinois USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Aziz F, Jorgenson M, Garg N, Parajuli S, Mohamed M, Raza F, Mandelbrot D, Djamali A, Dhingra R. New Approaches to Cardiovascular Disease and Its Management in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 2022; 106:1143-1158. [PMID: 34856598 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Cardiovascular events, including ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and arrhythmia, are common complications after kidney transplantation and continue to be leading causes of graft loss. Kidney transplant recipients have both traditional and transplant-specific risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In the general population, modification of cardiovascular risk factors is the best strategy to reduce cardiovascular events; however, studies evaluating the impact of risk modification strategies on cardiovascular outcomes among kidney transplant recipients are limited. Furthermore, there is only minimal guidance on appropriate cardiovascular screening and monitoring in this unique patient population. This review focuses on the limited scientific evidence that addresses cardiovascular events in kidney transplant recipients. Additionally, we focus on clinical management of specific cardiovascular entities that are more prevalent among kidney transplant recipients (ie, pulmonary hypertension, valvular diseases, diastolic dysfunction) and the use of newer evolving drug classes for treatment of heart failure within this cohort of patients. We note that there are no consensus documents describing optimal diagnostic, monitoring, or management strategies to reduce cardiovascular events after kidney transplantation; however, we outline quality initiatives and research recommendations for the assessment and management of cardiovascular-specific risk factors that could improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Aziz
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - Margaret Jorgenson
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - Neetika Garg
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - Sandesh Parajuli
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - Maha Mohamed
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - Farhan Raza
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - Didier Mandelbrot
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - Arjang Djamali
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - Ravi Dhingra
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Aiyegbusi O, McGregor E, McManus SK, Stevens KI. Immunosuppression Therapy in Kidney Transplantation. Urol Clin North Am 2022; 49:345-360. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2021.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
24
|
Cheung CY, Tang SCW. Personalized immunosuppression after kidney transplantation. Nephrology (Carlton) 2022; 27:475-483. [PMID: 35238110 DOI: 10.1111/nep.14035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
With advances in immunosuppressive therapy, there have been significant improvements in acute rejection rates and short-term allograft survival in kidney transplant recipients. However, this success has not been translated into long-term benefits by the same magnitude. Optimization of immunosuppression is important to improve the clinical outcome of transplant recipients. It is important to note that each patient has unique attributes and immunosuppression management should not be a one-size-fits-all approach. Elderly transplant patients are less likely to develop acute rejection but more likely to die from infectious and cardiovascular causes than younger patients. For those with post-transplant cancers and BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy, reduction of immunosuppression can increase the risk of rejection. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is routinely used for dosage adjustment of several immunosuppressive drugs. It has been hoped that pharmacogenetics can be used to complement TDM in optimizing drug exposure. Among the various drug-genotype pairs being investigated, tacrolimus and CYP3A5 gives the most promising results. Different studies have consistently shown that CYP3A5 expressers require a higher tacrolimus dose and take longer time to achieve target blood tacrolimus levels than nonexpressers. However, for pharmacogenetics to be widely used clinically, further trials are necessary to demonstrate the clinical benefits of genotype-guided dosing such as reduction of rejection and drug-related toxicities. The development of different biomarkers in recent years may help to achieve true personalized therapy in transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi Yuen Cheung
- Renal Unit, Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Sydney Chi Wai Tang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abdelsalam NR, Balbaa MG, Osman HT, Ghareeb RY, Desoky ESM, Elshehawi AM, Aljuaid BS, Elnahal AS. Inheritance of resistance against northern leaf blight of maize using conventional breeding methods. Saudi J Biol Sci 2022; 29:1747-1759. [PMID: 35280531 PMCID: PMC8913385 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.10.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the important cereal crops along with wheat and rice worldwide. The purpose of this study was to use classical genetic approaches to assess the resistance of various maize parents and hybrids to the northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) disease in two different locations in Egypt. Eight parents, 28 F1, and 2 check hybrids were evaluated. The analysis of variance showed high significant variations between maize parents and their hybrids for the studied parameters and NCLB disease, besides there are significant variations between both locations. Results of maize parents showed that Sids 63, Giza 602, and Giza 628 cultivars exhibited the highest values and were resistant to NCLB in both locations comparing with Nubaria 39 and Gemmiza 18 that were susceptible to NCLB disease. Concerning the maize hybrids, analysis of variance and mean squares of growth characters in both locations indicated high significant variations between the maize hybrids including the check hybrids. When combined between the two locations for current parameters against NCLB, the data pointed that the Sakha location values for maize hybrids were much closed to the combining data in parents and the hybrids detected high resistance to this disease comparing with Nubaria location. All tested maize lines (38 lines), including parents and hybrids were classified as follows, two lines were rated as 1 (highly resistant), three were rated as 2 (resistant), sixteen were rated as 3 (moderate resistant), eight were rated 4 (moderately susceptible) and nine were rated 5 (susceptible). The data explaining that the crossing between high resistant maize cultivars produced high levels of resistance to NCLB disease. Therefore, our results verified that classical breeding could efficiently increase the resistance levels of maize germplasm against NCLB disease by developing new cultivars with superior performance in terms of grain yield, disease resistance and grain quality.
Collapse
|
26
|
Bang JB, Oh C, Kim YS, Kim SH, Yu HC, Kim C, Ju MK, So BJ, Lee SH, Han SY, Jung CW, Kim JK, Ahn HJ, Lee SH, Jeon JY. Safety and metabolic advantages of steroid withdrawal after 6 months posttransplant in de novo kidney transplantation: A 1‐year prospective cohort study. Immun Inflamm Dis 2022; 10:e576. [PMID: 34913271 PMCID: PMC8926512 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction This prospective multicenter study aimed at investigating the safety and metabolic advantages of steroid withdrawal (SW) therapy in kidney transplant recipients with tacrolimus–mycophenolate mofetil‐based immunosuppression. Methods We analyzed 179 recipients who received kidney transplantation from March 2016 and September 2018. In 179 recipients, 114 patients maintained an immunosuppressive regimen including steroids (steroid continuation [SC] group). The remaining 65 patients were determined to withdraw steroid therapy after 6 months posttransplant (SW group). Metabolic parameters and graft functions of the two groups were evaluated. Results The estimated glomerular filtration rates at 12 months posttransplant were 67.29 ± 20.29 ml/min/1.73 m2 in SC group and 73.72 ± 17.57 ml/min/1.73 m2 in SW group (p < .001). The acute rejection occurred to four recipients in the SC group (3.5%) and no acute rejection occurred to SW group recipients during the 6–2 months posttransplant period. Oral glucose tolerance tests revealed that recipients in the SW group were more improved in glucose metabolism than the SC group during 6–12 months posttransplant. In addition, cholesterol levels and blood pressure decreased after the withdrawal of steroids in the SW group. Conclusion In conclusion, a 6‐month withdrawal of steroids in recipients with low immunological risk and stable graft function can be safely conducted and result in improvement of metabolic profiles. Stable recipients without biopsy‐proven acute rejection and proteinuria can safely withdraw from steroids out of a maintenance immunosuppressive regimen 6‐months posttransplant. A long‐term follow‐up study is needed to verify our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun B. Bang
- Department of Surgery Ajou University School of Medicine Suwon South Korea
| | - Chang‐Kwon Oh
- Department of Surgery Ajou University School of Medicine Suwon South Korea
| | - Yu S. Kim
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Research Institute for Transplantation Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Sung H. Kim
- Department of Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine Wonju South Korea
| | - Hee C. Yu
- Department of Surgery Jeonbuk National University College of Medicine Jeonju South Korea
| | - Chan‐Duck Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Kyungpook National University Hospital Daegu South Korea
| | - Man Ki Ju
- Department of Surgery Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Byung J. So
- Department of Surgery Wonkwang University Hospital Iksan South Korea
| | - Sang Ho Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine Kyung Hee University Seoul South Korea
| | - Sang Y. Han
- Department of Internal Medicine Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital Goyang South Korea
| | - Cheol W. Jung
- Department of Surgery Korea University College of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Joong K. Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine Bong Seng Memorial Hospital Busan South Korea
| | - Hyung J. Ahn
- Department of Surgery Kyung Hee University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea
| | - Su H. Lee
- Department of Surgery Ajou University School of Medicine Suwon South Korea
| | - Ja Y. Jeon
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism Ajou University School of Medicine Suwon South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Panel-reactive Antibody and the Association of Early Steroid Withdrawal With Kidney Transplant Outcomes. Transplantation 2022; 106:648-656. [PMID: 33826598 PMCID: PMC8490476 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early steroid withdrawal (ESW) is a viable maintenance immunosuppression strategy in low-risk kidney transplant recipients. A low panel-reactive antibody (PRA) may indicate low-risk condition amenable to ESW. We aimed to identify the threshold value of PRA above which ESW may pose additional risk and to compare the association of ESW with transplant outcomes across PRA strata. METHODS We studied 121 699 deceased-donor kidney-only recipients in 2002-2017 from Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Using natural splines and ESW-PRA interaction terms, we explored how the associations of ESW with transplant outcomes change with increasing PRA values and identified a threshold value for PRA. Then, we assessed whether PRA exceeding the threshold modified the associations of ESW with 1-y acute rejection, death-censored graft failure, and death. RESULTS The association of ESW with acute rejection exacerbated rapidly when PRA exceeded 60. Among PRA ≤60 recipients, ESW was associated with a minor increase in rejection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.001.051.10) and with a tendency of decreased graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.910.971.03). However, among PRA >60 recipients, ESW was associated with a substantial increase in rejection (aOR, 1.191.271.36; interaction P < 0.001) and with a tendency of increased graft failure (aHR, 0.981.081.20; interaction P = 0.028). The association of ESW with death was similar between PRA strata (PRA ≤60, aHR, 0.910.961.01; and PRA >60, aHR, 0.900.991.09; interaction P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that the association of ESW with transplant outcomes is less favorable in recipients with higher PRA, especially those with PRA >60, suggesting a possible role of PRA in the risk assessment for ESW.
Collapse
|
28
|
Grundman JB, Wolfsdorf JI, Marks BE. Post-Transplantation Diabetes Mellitus in Pediatric Patients. Horm Res Paediatr 2022; 93:510-518. [PMID: 33789298 DOI: 10.1159/000514988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
More than 80% of pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients now survive into young adulthood and many encounter transplant-related complications. Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM), sometimes also referred to as post-transplant diabetes or new onset diabetes after transplant, occurs in 3-20% of pediatric SOT recipients depending upon the organ transplanted, age at transplantation, immunosuppressive regimen, family history, and time elapsed since transplant. To diagnose PTDM, hyperglycemia must persist beyond the initial hospitalization for transplantation when a patient is on stable doses of immunosuppressive medications. Though standard diagnostic criteria used by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) to diagnose diabetes are employed, clinicians need to be aware of the limitations of using these criteria in this unique patient population. Management of PTDM parallels strategies used for type 2 diabetes (T2D), while also carefully considering comorbidities and potential interactions with immunosuppressive medications in these patients. In caring for patients with PTDM, it is important to be familiar with these interactions and comorbidities in order to coordinate care with the transplant team and optimize outcomes for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jody B Grundman
- Division of Endocrinology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Joseph I Wolfsdorf
- Division of Endocrinology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brynn E Marks
- Division of Endocrinology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.,George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Legendre C. Steroid Avoidance in Low-Immunologic Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients: The New Normal? Kidney Int Rep 2022; 7:144-145. [PMID: 35155852 PMCID: PMC8821038 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
30
|
Ekberg J, Baid-Agrawal S, Jespersen B, Källén R, Rafael E, Skov K, Lindnér P. A Randomized Controlled Trial on Safety of Steroid Avoidance in Immunologically Low-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 7:259-269. [PMID: 35155865 PMCID: PMC8821032 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.11.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Steroid-based immunosuppression after transplantation increases the risk of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), with adverse effects on patient and graft survival. In the SAILOR study, we investigated the safety and efficacy of complete steroid avoidance in immunologically low-risk kidney recipients without diabetes on the current standard-of-care maintenance regimen with tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Methods In this 2-year, multicenter, open-label trial, a total of 222 patients were randomized to receive either steroid avoidance protocol (tacrolimus/MMF/antithymocyte globulin [ATG] induction [n = 113]) or steroid maintenance protocol (tacrolimus/MMF/prednisolone/basiliximab-induction [n = 109]). Results At 1 year, no significant differences were found between steroid avoidance and steroid maintenance arms in the incidence of PTDM, the primary end point (12.4% vs. 18.3%, respectively, P = 0.30, CI: 16.3–4.4), or in overall biopsy-proven rejections (15% vs. 13.8%, respectively, P = 0.85). At 2 years, the composite end point of freedom from acute rejection, graft loss, and death (81% vs. 85%, respectively, P = 0.4), kidney function, or adverse events was comparable between the 2 arms. Moreover, 63.9% of the patients in the steroid avoidance arm remained free from steroids at 2 years. Conclusion The SAILOR study provides further evidence for the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of early steroid-free treatment at 2 years in immunologically low-risk kidney recipients with tacrolimus/MMF maintenance regimen.
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a global healthcare crisis. Kidney transplant (KTx) patients and the patients with chronic kidney disease are two of the most vulnerable populations to the risks of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A systematic literature search on PubMed and Web of Science was conducted. We analyzed published case reports, case series and articles on COVID-19’s clinical presentation, management, outcomes and vaccination among kidney transplant recipients. A total of 33 studies were included in the study, which included 1676 KTx recipients and 108 waiting list patients infected with COVID-19. These studies reported the clinical presentation, management and immunosuppressive adjustment among the KTx recipients. The remaining studies focused on other aspects, such as vaccination and transplantation, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mortality due to COVID-19 was observed to be the highest for KTx recipients, followed by patients on hemodialysis, and lowest in the general population. There is no definitive treatment of COVID-19 yet, and managing transplant patients is enigmatic of this: the treatment is based on symptom management. There is an urgent need for guidelines on managing kidney transplant recipients and immunosuppressive adjustments for the course of COVID-19 treatment.
Collapse
|
32
|
Axelrod DA, Cheungpasitporn W, Bunnapradist S, Schnitzler MA, Xiao H, McAdams-DeMarco M, Caliskan Y, Bae S, Ahn JB, Segev DL, Lam NN, Hess GP, Lentine KL. Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus and Immunosuppression Selection in Older and Obese Kidney Recipients. Kidney Med 2022; 4:100377. [PMID: 35072042 PMCID: PMC8767140 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2021.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (DM) after kidney transplantation increases morbidity and mortality, particularly in older and obese recipients. We aimed to examine the impact of immunosuppression selection on the risk of posttransplant DM among both older and obese kidney transplant recipients. Study Design Retrospective database study. Setting & Participants Kidney-only transplant recipients aged ≥18 years from 2005 to 2016 in the United States from US Renal Data System records, which integrate Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing records with Medicare billing claims. Exposures Various immunosuppression regimens in the first 3 months after transplant. Outcomes Development of DM >3 months-to-1 year posttransplant. Analytical Approach We used multivariable Cox regression to compare the incidence of posttransplant DM by immunosuppression regimen with the reference regimen of thymoglobulin (TMG) or alemtuzumab (ALEM) with tacrolimus + mycophenolic acid + prednisone using inverse propensity weighting. Results 12.7% of kidney transplant recipients developed posttransplant DM with higher incidences in older (≥55 years vs <55 years: 16.7% vs 10.1%) and obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2 vs BMI < 30 kg/m2: 17.1% vs 10.9%) patients. The incidence of posttransplant DM was lower with steroid avoidance [TMG/ALEM + no prednisone (8.4%) and IL2rAb + no prednisone (9.7%)] than TMG/ALEM with triple therapy (13.1%). After adjustment for donor and recipient characteristics, TMG/ALEM with steroid avoidance was beneficial for all groups [age < 55 years: adjusted HR (aHR), 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.72); age ≥ 55 years: aHR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.60-0.79); BMI < 30 kg/m2: aHR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.60-0.78); BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2: aHR, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.57-0.79)]. However, IL2rAb with steroid avoidance was beneficial only for older patients (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.99) and for those with BMI < 30 kg/m2 (aHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87). Limitations Retrospective study and lacked data on immunosuppression levels. Conclusions The beneficial impact of steroid avoidance using tacrolimus on posttransplant DM appears to differ by patient age and induction regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Mark A. Schnitzler
- Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Huiling Xiao
- Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Yasar Caliskan
- Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Sunjae Bae
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - JiYoon B. Ahn
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | | - Krista L. Lentine
- University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
- Address for Correspondence: Krista L. Lentine, MD, PhD, Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, 1402 S. Grand Blvd., St. Louis, MO, 63104.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Effect of Early Steroid Withdrawal on Posttransplant Diabetes Among Kidney Transplant Recipients Differs by Recipient Age. Transplant Direct 2021; 8:e1260. [PMID: 34912947 PMCID: PMC8670588 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background. Posttransplant diabetes (PTD), a major complication after kidney transplantation (KT), is often attributable to immunosuppression. The risk of PTD may increase with more potent steroid maintenance and older recipient age. Methods. Using United States Renal Data System data, we studied 12 488 adult first-time KT recipients (2010–2015) with no known pre-KT diabetes. We compared the risk of PTD among recipients who underwent early steroid withdrawal (ESW) versus continued steroid maintenance (CSM) using Cox regression with inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounding. We tested whether the risk of PTD resulting from ESW differed by recipient age (18–29, 30–54, and ≥55 y). Results. Of 12 488, 28.3% recipients received ESW. The incidence rate for PTD was 13 per 100 person-y and lower among recipients who received ESW (11 per 100 person-y in ESW; 14 per 100 person-y in CSM). Overall, ESW was associated with lower risk of PTD compared with CSM (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.720.790.86), but the risk differed by recipient age (Pinteraction = 0.09 for comparison between recipients aged 18–29 and those aged 30–54; Pinteraction = 0.01 for comparison between recipients aged 18–29 and those aged ≥55). ESW was associated with lower risk of PTD among recipients aged ≥55 (aHR = 0.620.710.81) and those aged 30–54 (aHR = 0.730.830.95), but not among recipients aged 18–29 (aHR = 0.811.181.72). Although recipients who received ESW had a higher risk of acute rejection across the age groups (adjusted odds ratio = 1.011.171.34), recipients with no PTD had a lower risk of mortality (aHR = 0.580.660.74). Conclusions. The beneficial association of ESW with decreased PTD was more pronounced among recipients aged ≥55, supporting an age-specific assessment of the risk-benefit balance regarding ESW.
Collapse
|
34
|
Ali H, Soliman K, Mohamed MM, Rahman M, Herberth J, Fülöp T, Elsayed I. Impact of kidney transplantation on functional status. Ann Med 2021; 53:1302-1308. [PMID: 34387134 PMCID: PMC8366639 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1962963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Functional capacity (FC) is known to affect morbidity and mortality in kidney transplantation. Despite this important role, little is known about the variables influencing post-transplant FC. Our study aims at identifying these crucial associations. METHOD Our study included 16,684 renal transplant recipients (RTR). Patients had transplant between 1 September 2018 and 1 September 2019. Mild functional impairment was defined as those with a KPSS score > or = 80; moderate functional impairment was defined as those with a KPSS score between 50 and 70 and severe functional impairment was defined as those with a KPSS score < or =40. The outcome measured was FC at follow-up one-year post-transplant. Abnormal FC at follow-up was defined as those with KPSS score less than 80%. Normal FC at follow-up was defined as those with KPSS score equal or above 80%. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess with the relationship between patient characteristics and abnormal functional status post-transplant. RESULTS Three groups were identified; those with none-to-mild functional impairment at time of transplant (Group A; n = 8388), those who had moderate impairment at time of transplant (Group B; n = 7694) and those who had severe impairment at time of transplant (Group C; n = 602). Abnormal FC at one-year post transplant was present in 7.69%, 28.89%, 49.49% of patients in group A, B and C, respectively. Glucocorticoid withdrawal was associated with lower risk of developing abnormal FC post-transplant (OR = 0.75, p value = .02, 95% confidence intervals: 0.64 to 0.97), while recipient diabetes was associated with higher risk of abnormal FC (OR = 1.44, p value <.01, 95% confidence intervals: 1.20 to 1.74) in adjusted model. CONCLUSION Kidney transplantation is associated with substantial improvement in all stages of FC in KTRs. Glucocorticoid withdrawal and diabetes mellitus are potentially modifiable factors of FC and merit further considerations during pre-transplant workup and post-transplant immunosuppressive therapeutic planning.Key messagesKidney transplantation is associated with substantial improvement in all stages of FC in KTRs.Glucocorticoid withdrawal and diabetes mellitus are potentially modifiable factors of FC and merit further considerations during pre-transplant workup and post-transplant immunosuppressive therapeutic planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hatem Ali
- Renal Department, University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | - Karim Soliman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud M. Mohamed
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Manzur Rahman
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Stoke University Hospitals, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Johann Herberth
- Medicine Services, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Tibor Fülöp
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Medicine Services, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Ingi Elsayed
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Stoke University Hospitals, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a prevalent complication in kidney transplant recipients, and has been associated with worse short-term and long-term outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS While hyperglycemia is frequently seen in the early posttransplant period because of surgical stress, infection, and use of high-dose steroids, the diagnosis of PTDM should be established after patients are clinically stable and on stable maintenance immunosuppression. In the early posttransplant period, hyperglycemia is typically treated with insulin, and pilot data have suggested potential benefit of lower vs. higher glycemic targets in this setting. Growing data indicate lifestyle modifications, including dietary interventions, physical activity, and mitigation of obesity, are associated with improved posttransplant outcomes. While there are limited data to support a first-line antidiabetic medication for PTDM, more established pharmacotherapies such as sulfonylureas, meglitinides, and dipetidyl peptidase IV inhibitors are commonly used. Given recent trials showing the benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists upon kidney outcomes in nontransplant patients, further study of these agents specifically in kidney transplant recipients are urgently needed. SUMMARY Increasing evidence supports a multidisciplinary approach, including lifestyle modification, obesity treatment, judicious immunosuppression selection, and careful utilization of novel antidiabetic therapies in PTDM patients.
Collapse
|
36
|
Adebiyi O, Umukoro P, Sharfuddin A, Taber T, Chen J, Lane KA, Li X, Goggins W, Yaqub MS. Patient and Graft Survival Outcomes During 2 Eras of Immunosuppression Protocols in Kidney Transplantation: Indiana University Retrospective Cohort Experience. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:2841-2852. [PMID: 34774307 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 1964 when Indiana University performed its first kidney transplant, immunosuppression protocol was steroid-based until 2004 when steroid-free immunosuppression protocol was adopted. We describe clinical outcomes on our patients administered early steroid withdrawal (ESW) protocol (5 days) compared with our historical cohort (HC), who were on chronic steroid-based immunosuppression. METHODS We performed a retrospective study evaluating kidney transplant recipients between 1993 and 2003 (HC, n = 1689) and between 2005 and 2016 (ESW cohort, n = 2097) at the Indiana University program, with a median follow-up of 10.5 years and 6.1 years, respectively. Primary outcomes were patient and death-censored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years in both study cohorts. Secondary outcomes were 1-year rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection; graft function at 1, 3, and 5 years; and risk of post-transplant infection (BK virus and cytomegalovirus) in the ESW cohort. Cox proportional model and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to estimate survival probabilities. Fisher exact tests were used to compare episodes of acute rejection in the ESW cohort. RESULTS No difference was observed in patient survival between the ESW and HC cohorts (P = .13). Compared with the ESW cohort, death-censored graft survival was significantly worse in the HC (5 year: 86.4% vs 90.6%, log-rank P < .001). One-year acute rejection reported in the ESW cohort alone was 15.7% and significantly worse in Black patients and younger patients (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS In this sizeable single-center cohort study with significant ethnic diversity, ESW is a viable alternative to steroid-based immunosuppression protocol in kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Umukoro
- Indiana University Health Transplant, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Tim Taber
- Indiana University Health Transplant, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Jeanne Chen
- Indiana University Health Transplant, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Kathleen A Lane
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis Indiana
| | - Xiaochun Li
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis Indiana
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Martinez Cantarin MP. Diabetes in Kidney Transplantation. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2021; 28:596-605. [PMID: 35367028 DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common complications after kidney transplantation and is associated with unfavorable outcomes including death. DM can be present before transplant but post-transplant DM (PTDM) refers to diabetes that is diagnosed after solid organ transplantation. Despite its high prevalence, optimal treatment to prevent complications of PTDM is unknown. Medical therapy of pre-existent DM or PTDM after transplant is challenging because of frequent interactions between antidiabetic and immunosuppressive agents. There is also frequent need for medication dose adjustments due to residual kidney disease and a higher risk of medication side effects in patients treated with immunosuppressive agents. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors have demonstrated a favorable cardio-renal profile in patients with DM without a transplant and hence hold great promise in this patient population although there is concern about the higher risk of urinary tract infections. The significant gaps in our understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of DM after kidney transplantation need to be urgently addressed.
Collapse
|
38
|
Kurian SM, Spierling Bagsic SR, Case J, Barrick BL, Schaffer R, Rice JC, Marsh CL. UNOS/OPTN Data-guided Assessment of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis After Kidney Transplantation and Evaluation of Immunosuppressive Protocols in a Steroid-free Center. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e738. [PMID: 34386576 PMCID: PMC8354624 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a common recurrent glomerulopathy associated with graft loss and patient survival after kidney transplantation (KT). However, its natural history, clinical predictors, and treatment response are still poorly understood. Steroid withdrawal regimens in KT have been associated with improvements in cardiovascular risk and patient outcomes. The Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation (SCOT) uses a rapid low-dose steroid withdrawal immunosuppression (IS) protocol for KT maintenance. METHODS We assessed the impact of our protocol on FSGS disease recurrence over a 10-y period to reassess our steroid and IS protocols and to evaluate if our patient outcomes diverge from published data. We compared 4 groups: steroids always, steroid free, steroid switch on, and steroid weaned off. We used IS and induction-matched retrospective data from United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to investigate patient and graft survival for FSGS at SCOT. RESULTS Our analysis results differ from earlier studies showing that FSGS was associated with a higher risk of graft loss, perhaps because of selection of a UNOS data set filtered to match the SCOT IS protocol for making direct comparisons. Overall outcomes of graft failure and recipient death did not differ between SCOT patients and steroid-free transplant patient data from the UNOS data for FSGS. SCOT recurrence rate for FSGS was 7.5%, which was lower than in most published single-center studies. CONCLUSIONS Based on our results, we believe that it is safe to continue the steroid avoidance protocols at SCOT and the steroid-free protocol may not be detrimental when the adverse effects and toxicities associated with steroid use are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil M. Kurian
- Division of Organ Transplant, Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation, Scripps Clinic & Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA
- Scripps Clinic Bio-Repository and Bio-Informatics Core, Scripps Clinic & Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - Jamie Case
- Division of Organ Transplant, Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation, Scripps Clinic & Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA
- Scripps Clinic Bio-Repository and Bio-Informatics Core, Scripps Clinic & Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA
| | - Bethany L. Barrick
- Division of Organ Transplant, Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation, Scripps Clinic & Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA
- Scripps Clinic Bio-Repository and Bio-Informatics Core, Scripps Clinic & Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA
| | - Randolph Schaffer
- Division of Organ Transplant, Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation, Scripps Clinic & Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA
| | - James C. Rice
- Division of Organ Transplant, Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation, Scripps Clinic & Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA
| | - Christopher L. Marsh
- Division of Organ Transplant, Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation, Scripps Clinic & Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA
- Scripps Clinic Bio-Repository and Bio-Informatics Core, Scripps Clinic & Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Early Steroid Withdrawal After Kidney Transplantation in Patients at Risk for New-Onset Diabetes After Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:2216-2226. [PMID: 34454728 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.07.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious complication after kidney transplantation because of worse graft survival and increased risk of cardiovascular events. It is partly induced by immunosuppressive therapies such as corticosteroids. This study aimed to assess whether early corticosteroid withdrawal on day 4 (early steroid withdrawal [ESW] group) could prevent the development of NODAT within 2 years posttransplantation while maintaining good graft and patient survival rates. METHODS This was an observational, single-center, retrospective study. All patients received an induction therapy of antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab and maintenance therapy of tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil/corticosteroids. Patients were either weaned off corticosteroids on day 4 (ESW group) or were maintained on corticosteroids for at least 3 months (standard group). NODAT was defined as the initiation of any oral hypoglycemic agent or insulin at 3 months and up to 2 years posttransplantation in previously nondiabetic recipients. RESULTS Between January, 1, 2010, and December 14, 2014, 492 recipients were included in this study; 88 received the ESW strategy, and 404 received the standard strategy. Age and body mass index (BMI) were significantly higher in the ESW group. The incidence of NODAT was 36.8% in the ESW group and 8.8% in the standard group (odds ratio [OR], 47.5; P < .001). Compared with a matched sample from the standard group that had the same probability to benefit from ESW at baseline, ESW was still associated with a significantly increased risk of NODAT (OR, 4.41; P = .018). Among recipients with a BMI >25 kg/m2, the ESW strategy significantly decreased the risk of NODAT compared with the standard strategy (OR, 0.07; P = .013). Safety endpoints (eg, acute rejection, de novo-specific antibodies, graft function/survival) did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION Despite a reassuring safety profile, ESW on day 4 after kidney transplantation only had a marginal effect on the incidence of NODAT.
Collapse
|
40
|
Aziz F. New Onset Diabetes Mellitus after Transplant: The Challenge Continues. KIDNEY360 2021; 2:1212-1214. [PMID: 35369659 PMCID: PMC8676398 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0004042021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Aziz
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sundaram Hariharan
- From the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh (S.H.); Hennepin Healthcare, the University of Minnesota, and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients - all in Minneapolis (A.K.I.); and the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (G.D.)
| | - Ajay K Israni
- From the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh (S.H.); Hennepin Healthcare, the University of Minnesota, and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients - all in Minneapolis (A.K.I.); and the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (G.D.)
| | - Gabriel Danovitch
- From the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh (S.H.); Hennepin Healthcare, the University of Minnesota, and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients - all in Minneapolis (A.K.I.); and the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (G.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wojciechowski D, Wiseman A. Long-Term Immunosuppression Management: Opportunities and Uncertainties. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 16:1264-1271. [PMID: 33853841 PMCID: PMC8455033 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.15040920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The long-term management of maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients remains complex. The vast majority of patients are treated with the calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus as the primary agent in combination with mycophenolate, with or without corticosteroids. A tacrolimus trough target 5-8 ng/ml seems to be optimal for rejection prophylaxis, but long-term tacrolimus-related side effects and nephrotoxicity support the ongoing evaluation of noncalcineurin inhibitor-based regimens. Current alternatives include belatacept or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. For the former, superior kidney function at 7 years post-transplant compared with cyclosporin generated initial enthusiasm, but utilization has been hampered by high initial rejection rates. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have yielded mixed results as well, with improved kidney function tempered by higher risk of rejection, proteinuria, and adverse effects leading to higher discontinuation rates. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors may play a role in the secondary prevention of squamous cell skin cancer as conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to an mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor resulted in a reduction of new lesion development. Early withdrawal of corticosteroids remains an attractive strategy but also is associated with a higher risk of rejection despite no difference in 5-year patient or graft survival. A major barrier to long-term graft survival is chronic alloimmunity, and regardless of agent used, managing the toxicities of immunosuppression against the risk of chronic antibody-mediated rejection remains a fragile balance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Wojciechowski
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kaufman D, Woodle ES, Shields A, Leone J, Matas A, Wiseman A, West-Thielke P, Sa T, King E, Alloway R. Belatacept for Simultaneous Calcineurin Inhibitor and Chronic Corticosteroid Immunosuppression Avoidance. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 16:1387-1397. [PMID: 34233921 PMCID: PMC8729588 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.13100820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplantation is associated with numerous toxicities. CD28-mediated T cell costimulation blockade using belatacept may reduce long-term nephrotoxicity, compared with calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression. The efficacy and safety of simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance and rapid steroid withdrawal were tested in a randomized, prospective, multi-center study. Methods All kidney transplants were performed using rapid steroid withdrawal immunosuppression. Recipients were randomized to 1:1:1 to receive belatacept with alemtuzumab induction, belatacept with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction, or tacrolimus with rATG induction. The composite endpoint consisted of death, kidney allograft loss, or an MDRD calculated eGFR of <45 ml/min/1.73m2 at 2 years. Results The composite endpoint was observed for 11/107 (10%) participants assigned to belatacept/alemtuzumab, 13/104 (13%) assigned to belatacept /rATG, and 21/105 (21%) assigned to tacrolimus/rATG (belatacept/alemtuzumab vs tacrolimus/rATG p = 0.99: belatacept/rATG vs tacrolimus/rATG p = 0.66). Patient and graft survival rates were similar between all groups. eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73m2 was observed for 9/107 (8%) participants assigned to belatacept/alemtuzuab, 8/104 (8%) participants assigned to belatacept/rATG, and 20/105 (19%) participants assigned to tacrolimus/rATG (p<0.05 for each belatacept group vs tacrolimus/rATG). Biopsy-proven acute rejection was observed for 20/107 (19%) participants assigned to belatacept/alemtuzuab, 26/104 (25%) participants assigned to belatacept/rATG, and 7/105 (7%) participants assigned to tacrolimus/rATG (belatacept/alemtuzumab vs tacrolimus/rATG p = 0.006: belatacept/rATG vs tacrolimus/rATG p < 0.001). Gastrointestinal and neurologic adverse events were less frequent with belatacept versus calcineurin based immunosuppression. Conclusions Overall two-year outcomes were similar comparing maintenance immunosuppression based on belatacept versus tacrolimus, each protocol with rapid steroid withdrawal. The incidence of eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73m2 was significantly lower but the incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection significantly higher with belatacept compared with tacrolimus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dixon Kaufman
- D Kaufman, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
| | - E Steve Woodle
- E Woodle, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, United States
| | - Adele Shields
- A Shields, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, United States
| | - John Leone
- J Leone, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, United States
| | - Arthur Matas
- A Matas, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
| | | | | | - Ting Sa
- T Sa, Biostastics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
| | - Eileen King
- E King, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, United States
| | - Rita Alloway
- R Alloway, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, United States
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gilewski W, Banach J, Rogowicz D, Wołowiec Ł, Sielski S, Grześk G. Treatment of Hypertension Because of Immunosuppressive Therapy After Solid Organ Transplantation-Pharmacological Approach. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2021; 77:735-744. [PMID: 34001720 DOI: 10.1097/fjc.0000000000001009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Solid organs transplantation procedures have been performed for more than half a century. Growing knowledge of immune response and development of new immunosuppressive regimens guarantee more and more successful outcomes. However, many of the applied drugs lead to cardiovascular complications, the most frequent of which is hypertension. This article describes epidemiology, pathogenetic mechanisms, and treatment of hypertension induced by immunosuppressive medication. The main impact is focused on drugs belonging to the following groups: calcineurin inhibitors, the inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin, and glucocorticosteroids. We analyze the mechanism of action of the main hypertensive drugs and their influence on the reversing hypertonic action of the immunosuppressive agents. In the absence of current guidelines addressing this problem, this article is an attempt to fill the gap, helping clinicians to choose proper medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wojciech Gilewski
- Department of Cardiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Faculty of Health Sciences
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Clinical Relevance of Corticosteroid Withdrawal on Graft Histological Lesions in Low-Immunological-Risk Kidney Transplant Patients. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10092005. [PMID: 34067039 PMCID: PMC8125434 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10092005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The impact of corticosteroid withdrawal on medium-term graft histological changes in kidney transplant (KT) recipients under standard immunosuppression is uncertain. As part of an open-label, multicenter, prospective, phase IV, 24-month clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02284464) in low-immunological-risk KT recipients, 105 patients were randomized, after a protocol-biopsy at 3 months, to corticosteroid continuation (CSC, n = 52) or corticosteroid withdrawal (CSW, n = 53). Both groups received tacrolimus and MMF and had another protocol-biopsy at 24 months. The acute rejection rate, including subclinical inflammation (SCI), was comparable between groups (21.2 vs. 24.5%). No patients developed dnDSA. Inflammatory and chronicity scores increased from 3 to 24 months in patients with, at baseline, no inflammation (NI) or SCI, regardless of treatment. CSW patients with SCI at 3 months had a significantly increased chronicity score at 24 months. HbA1c levels were lower in CSW patients (6.4 ± 1.2 vs. 5.7 ± 0.6%; p = 0.013) at 24 months, as was systolic blood pressure (134.2 ± 14.9 vs. 125.7 ± 15.3 mmHg; p = 0.016). Allograft function was comparable between groups and no patients died or lost their graft. An increase in chronicity scores at 2-years post-transplantation was observed in low-immunological-risk KT recipients with initial NI or SCI, but CSW may accelerate chronicity changes, especially in patients with early SCI. This strategy did, however, improve the cardiovascular profiles of patients.
Collapse
|
46
|
Aref A, Sharma A, Halawa A. Does steroid-free immunosuppression improve the outcome in kidney transplant recipients compared to conventional protocols? World J Transplant 2021; 11:99-113. [PMID: 33954088 PMCID: PMC8058645 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v11.i4.99] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Steroids continue to be the cornerstone of immune suppression since the early days of organ transplantation. Steroids are key component of induction protocols, maintenance therapy and in the treatment of various forms of rejection. Prolonged steroid use resulted in significant side effects on almost all the body organs owing to the presence of steroid receptors in most of the mammalian cells. Kidney allograft recipients had to accept the short and long term complications of steroids because of lack of effective alternatives. This situation changed with the intro-duction of newer and more effective immune suppression agents with a relatively more acceptable side effect profile. As a result, the clinicians have been contemplating if it is the time to abandon the unquestionable reliance on maintenance steroids in modern transplantation practice. This review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of various steroid-minimization approaches (steroid avoidance, early steroid withdrawal, and late steroid withdrawal) in kidney transplant recipients. A meticulous electronic search was conducted through the available data resources like SCOPUS, MEDLINE, and Liverpool University library e-resources. Relevant articles obtained through our search were included. A total number of 90 articles were eligible to be included in this review [34 randomised controlled trials (RCT) and 56 articles of other research modalities]. All articles were evaluating the safety and efficacy of various steroid-free approaches in comparison to maintenance steroids. We will cover only the RCT articles in this review. If used in right clinical context, steroid-free protocols proved to be comparable to steroid-based maintenance therapy. The appropriate approach should be tailored individually according to each recipient immuno-logical challenges and clinical condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Aref
- Department of Nephrology, Sur hospital, Sur 411, Oman
| | - Ajay Sharma
- Department of Transplantation, Royal Liverpool University Hospitals, Liverpool 111, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmed Halawa
- Department of Transplantation, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield S5 7AU, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Okihara M, Takeuchi H, Kikuchi Y, Akashi I, Kihara Y, Konno O, Iwamoto H, Oda T, Tanaka S, Unezaki S, Hirano T. Individual Lymphocyte Sensitivity to Steroids as a Reliable Biomarker for Clinical Outcome after Steroid Withdrawal in Japanese Renal Transplantation. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10081670. [PMID: 33924724 PMCID: PMC8070672 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10081670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, steroid reduction/withdrawal regimens have been attempted to minimize the side effects of steroids in renal transplantation. However, some recipients have experienced an increase/resumption of steroid administrations and acute graft rejection (AR). Therefore, we investigated the relationship between the individual lymphocyte sensitivity to steroids and the clinical outcome after steroid reduction/withdrawal. We cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from 24 recipients with concanavalin A (Con A) in the presence of methylprednisolone (MPSL) or cortisol (COR) for four days, and the 50% of PBMC proliferation (IC50) values and the PBMC sensitivity to steroids were calculated. Regarding the experience of steroid increase/resumption and incidence of AR within one year of steroid reduction/withdrawal, the IC50 values of these drugs before transplantation in the clinical event group were significantly higher than those in the event-free group. The cumulative incidence of steroid increase/resumption and AR in the PBMC high-sensitivity groups to these drugs before transplantation were significantly lower than those in the low-sensitivity groups. These observations suggested that an individual’s lymphocyte sensitivity to steroids could be a reliable biomarker to predict the clinical outcome after steroid reduction/withdrawal and to select the patients whose dose of steroids can be decreased and/or withdrawn after transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaaki Okihara
- Department of Kidney Transplantation Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, 1163 Tatemachi, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 193-0998, Japan; (M.O.); (I.A.); (Y.K.); (O.K.); (H.I.)
| | - Hironori Takeuchi
- Department of Pharmacy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan;
| | - Yukiko Kikuchi
- Department of Practical Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan; (Y.K.); (S.U.)
| | - Isao Akashi
- Department of Kidney Transplantation Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, 1163 Tatemachi, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 193-0998, Japan; (M.O.); (I.A.); (Y.K.); (O.K.); (H.I.)
| | - Yu Kihara
- Department of Kidney Transplantation Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, 1163 Tatemachi, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 193-0998, Japan; (M.O.); (I.A.); (Y.K.); (O.K.); (H.I.)
| | - Osamu Konno
- Department of Kidney Transplantation Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, 1163 Tatemachi, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 193-0998, Japan; (M.O.); (I.A.); (Y.K.); (O.K.); (H.I.)
| | - Hitoshi Iwamoto
- Department of Kidney Transplantation Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, 1163 Tatemachi, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 193-0998, Japan; (M.O.); (I.A.); (Y.K.); (O.K.); (H.I.)
| | - Takashi Oda
- Department of Nephrology, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, 1163 Tatemachi, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 193-0998, Japan;
| | - Sachiko Tanaka
- Clinical Pharmacology, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan;
| | - Sakae Unezaki
- Department of Practical Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan; (Y.K.); (S.U.)
| | - Toshihiko Hirano
- Clinical Pharmacology, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-042-676-5794
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Woodle ES, Gill JS, Clark S, Stewart D, Alloway R, First R. Early Corticosteroid Cessation vs Long-term Corticosteroid Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Long-term Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:307-314. [PMID: 33533901 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.6929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Importance The complications of corticosteroids make the inclusion of these drugs in immunosuppressive protocols for kidney transplant patients undesirable. However, cessation of corticosteroids is associated with a higher risk of short-term rejection, and the long-term outcomes of patients withdrawn from corticosteroids remain uncertain. Objective To compare long-term kidney transplant outcomes of patients randomized to continue or withdraw corticosteroids. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted between November 1999 and December 2002 with linkage to a mandatory national registry with validated outcome ascertainment until June 8, 2018. The study included 28 kidney transplant centers in the United States, including 386 low- to moderate-immune risk adult recipients of a living or deceased donor kidney transplant without delayed graft function or short-term rejection in the first week after transplant. Analyses were intention to treat. Analysis began September 2018 and ended June 2019. Interventions Patients were randomized to receive tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with or without corticosteroids 7 days after transplant. Main Outcomes and Measures Kidney allograft failure from any cause including death and allograft failure censored for patient death defined by the requirement for long-term dialysis or repeat transplant. Results Of 385 patients, 191 were assigned to withdraw from corticosteroids (mean [SD] age, 46.5 [12.1] years), and 194 patients were assigned to continued corticosteroids (mean [SD] age, 46.3 [12.6] years). The median (interquartile range) follow-up time was 15.8 (12.0-16.3) years after transplant. The adjusted hazard ratios of allograft failure from any cause including death was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.62-1.10; P = .19) and for allograft failure censored for patient death was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.52-1.19; P = .25) and did not differ between the patients assigned to withdraw from corticosteroids vs assigned to continued corticosteroids. Results were consistent in a per-protocol analysis among 223 patients who continued the trial-assigned treatment of corticosteroid withdrawal (n = 114) or corticosteroids (n = 109) through at least 5 years after transplant. The outcomes of trial participants in either treatment group did not differ from similarly treated contemporary registry patients who met trial eligibility criteria and were treated with the same immunosuppressive drugs. Conclusions and Relevance Long-term corticosteroids may not be necessary as part of a calcineurin-based multiple drug immunosuppressive regimen in low- to moderate-immune risk kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Steve Woodle
- College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - John S Gill
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Division of Nephrology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephanie Clark
- Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Rita Alloway
- College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Roy First
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Tacrolimus was discovered in 1984 and entered clinical use shortly thereafter, contributing to successful solid organ transplantation across the globe. In this review, we cover development of tacrolimus, its evolving clinical utility, and issues affecting its current usage. Since earliest use of this class of immunosuppressant, concerns for calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity have led to efforts to minimize or eliminate these agents in clinical regimens but with limited success. Current understanding of the role of tacrolimus focuses more on its efficacy in preventing graft rejection and graft loss. As we enter the fourth decade of tacrolimus use, newer studies utilizing novel combinations (as with the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, everolimus, and T-cell costimulation blockade with belatacept) offer potential for enhanced benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song C Ong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Robert S Gaston
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
- CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting, Inc., Covington, KT
| |
Collapse
|