Emergency Femoral Hernia Repair: A Study Based on a National Register

Risk factors for incarceration in groin hernia: a prospective observational study

PURPOSE

Groin hernia is one of the most common benign pathologies requiring surgical intervention. Incarcerated groin hernia is a cause of serious morbidity and mortality. In our study, we aimed to identify the risk factors for incarceration in patients with groin hernia and to better understand the factors associated with incarceration, we studied patients who applied to our clinic for groin hernia and underwent surgery.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed, including all patients who applied to the general surgery out patient clinic or emergency department at Bakirköy Dr Sadi Konuk Training & Research Hospital and were diagnosed with groin or incarcerated groin hernia and underwent hernia repair surgery. Patients were divided into two groups; elective surgery and emergency surgery (incarcerated hernia). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for incarceration.

RESULTS

The study was performed with a total of 654 cases between January 2021 and February 2023. Of these, 79.4% (n = 519) had elective surgery and 20.6% (n = 135) had emergency surgery. Increase in defect width, which was determined according to the EHS classification, was significantly associated with an incarcerated hernia (ODDS ratio 4.463 and 17.636, respectively). Additionally, female gender, femoral hernia type, chronic cough, and chronic constipation were found to be independent risk factors for incarceration.

CONCLUSION

Female gender, chronic cough, chronic constipation, femoral hernia type, and increased defect diameter are independent risk factors for urgent surgery and therefore incarceration in groin.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The ClinicalTrials.gov ID number of the study is NCT04785430.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes After Emergency Groin Hernia Surgery: A Nationwide Population-Based Study from the Swedish Hernia Register

Background/Objectives: Emergency groin hernia repairs have consistently presented a higher risk of mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to compare both short- and long-term outcomes associated with emergency groin hernia surgery. Methods: A nationwide, population-based cohort study was conducted using prospective collected data from the Swedish Hernia Register combined with a questionnaire assessing patient-reported chronic pain. All patients who underwent a groin hernia repair between 2012 and 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality, chronic pain 1-year post-surgery, 30-day postoperative complication, and bowel resection and reoperation for recurrence for emergency versus elective repairs. Risk factors for these outcomes in emergency repair were investigated. Results: A total of 94,349 repairs were analyzed, with 5401 (5%) emergency repairs. Emergency repairs involved older patients (median age 74 vs. 65), more women (25% vs. 9%), more ASA grade III (38% vs. 12%), more femoral hernias (19% vs. 3%) and smaller defects (24% vs. 17%) compared to elective repairs. Multivariable analysis revealed increased rates and significant risks for 30-day mortality (2.7%, OR 11.61), chronic pain (20.6%, OR 1.30), 30-day postoperative complications (21.9%, OR 2.12) and bowel resection (7.8%, OR 408) compared to elective repairs. No significant difference was observed for reoperation for recurrence. Key risk factors for the outcomes following emergency repairs were higher age, higher ASA grade and femoral hernias. Conclusions: Emergency hernia surgery continues to pose a high risk of mortality and morbidity. Elective repair should be considered in frail patients and those with potential femoral hernias.

A Systematic Review of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Management of Inguinal Hernias in the 21st Century

Background: In the 21st century, the management of groin hernias (GHs) has evolved from watchful waiting (WW) to robotic hernia repair (RHR). The present study interrogates the status of robotics in the context of current repairs and provides one author's perspectives. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines for studies comparing open (OHR) to robotic hernia repair (RHR); RHR to laparoscopic hernia repair (LHR); or OHR vs. LHR vs. RHR. The historical context was extracted from previous reviews. Results: Fifty-four studies were included in the analysis. Three techniques have withstood the test of time: OHR (tissue and mesh repairs), laparo-endoscopic (TEP and TAPP), and RHR. The literature indicates that RHR is safe and effective for the management of groin hernias. Operative times and costs remain a concern when using this technique. While the number of overall complications with RHR is similar to OHR, in a minority of cases, complications are more consequential with the robotic platform. Conclusions: RHR has emerged as an unequivocally powerful technique for the management of GHs. OHR remains the technique of choice for local/regional anesthesia, posterior recurrences, and in centers that lack other platforms. In low- and middle-income countries, OHR is the most utilized technique. Centers of excellence should offer all techniques of repair including WW.

Geriatric nutritional risk index as a predictor of major postoperative complications in emergency femoral hernia patients

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the prognostic values of GNRI for major postoperative complications in emergency femoral hernia patients.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 105 emergency femoral hernia patients. GNRI was calculated using preoperative body weight, height, and serum albumin. The primary outcome was a composite of major postoperative complications. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between GNRI and major complications. The ability of GNRI in detecting major complications was assessed by area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The prevalence of low, moderate, and severe nutritional risk was 18.1%, 25.7%, and 10.5%. Five patients (4.8%) had major postoperative complications. Higher GNRI was associated with lower risk of major complications after adjusting for age and sex (aOR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81-1.00, P = 0.044). The AUC for GNRI identifying major complications was 0.812 (95% CI: 0.640-0.984, P = 0.019), and the optimal cut-point value was 90.96 (sensitivity: 80.0%; specificity: 72.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

GNRI is significantly associated with major postoperative complications. It is a simple and useful prognostic tool for femoral hernia patients in emergency settings.

Impact of patient's sex on groin hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Groin hernia repair (GHR) is a performed procedure worldwide, with approximately 20 million surgeries carried out each year. Despite being less common in females, there is a lack of research on how sex influences the outcomes of GHR. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess how patient sex impacts results in GHR.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched for studies up to October 2023 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The studies included focused on sex outcomes for both robotic and open GHR procedures. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - Of Interventions tool. Our statistical analysis was performed using the metafor package in RStudio.

RESULTS

After screening a total of 3917 articles, we identified 29 studies that met our criteria, comprising a total of 1,236,694 patients. Among them, 98,641 (7.98%) patients were females. Our findings showed that females had higher rates of hernia recurrence (RR 1.28), chronic pain (RR 1.52), and surgical site infections (SSIs) (RR 1.46) compared to males. Females showed a lower tendency to undergo minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with a relative risk of 0.82 (95% CI 0.69-0.97; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Females tend to face higher rates of complications after GHR such as an elevated risk of chronic pain, recurrence, and surgical site infections (SSI). Moreover, they undergo fewer MIS options compared to males. These results underscore the importance of research to enhance outcomes for women undergoing GHR.

Prospective comparison of two surgical approaches for incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernia: preperitoneal hernioplasty through the lower abdominal median incision and laparoscope (TAPP)

The optimal surgical approach of incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernia is controversial. Retrospective studies showed that surgical approaches through lower abdominal median incision or laparoscopic are superior to the oblique inguinal incision, respectively. Whether transabdominal laparoscopic approach is superior to the lower abdominal median incision approach needs prospective research.Prospective comparative study of patients with incarcerated and strangulated groin hernia admitted to Jinshan hospital for emergency surgery from January 2018 to June 2022. They were divided into two groups according to different surgical approach. The open preperitoneal repair group (OPR) was operated through the lower abdominal median incision. Laparoscopic preperitoneal repair group (TAPP) was completed under transabdominal laparoscope. The perioperative complications and long-term results of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Eighty-two patients met the inclusion criteria, 40 in OPR group and 42 in TAPP group. Baseline data of the two groups were comparable. Thirteen cases (15.9%) of the two groups underwent intestinal resection and anastomosis. Seventy cases (90.2%) underwent the 1st stage mesh repair, including 5 cases of preperitoneal hernioplasty after intestinal resection. The average operation time of TAPP group was 13 min longer (60.7 ± 13.7 min vs 47.8 ± 19.8 min P < 0.001), and the visual analogue scale pain score at 24 h after operation was lower (3.5 ± 1.2 vs 4.4 ± 1.7 P = 0.019) than that of OPR group. There was 1 case of bladder injury (2.5%) in OPR group and 1 case of inferior abdominal artery injury (2.4%) in TAPP group. There was no difference in the rate of the 1st stage hernioplasty between the two groups. In OPR group, 2 cases (5%) extended the incision for more than 2 cm, while in TAPP group, 1 case (2.4%) converted to laparotomy. The time of hospital stay (3.2 ± 1.8 d vs 4.3 ± 2.7 d, P = 0.036) and return to normal activities (7.9 ± 2.7 d vs 11.0 ± 4.4 d, P < 0.001) were shorter in TAPP group. The rate of total postoperative complications including chronic pain, surgical-site infection, seroma, hernia recurrence and so on was 11.9% in TAPP group, which was not significantly different from 25% in OPR group (P = 0.212). There were no cases of mesh related infection and death within 30 days in both groups.TAPP is safe and feasible for the operation of acute incarcerated inguinal hernia. TAPP had better comfort and faster recovery over open preperitoneal repair for the appropriate patients with incarcerated/strangulated inguinal hernia, which can reduce acute pain, shorten hospital stay and return to normal activities earlier.

Recurrence Rates after Primary Femoral Hernia Open Repair a Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Femoral hernia accounts for 22% of groin hernia operations in women and for 1.1% in men. Numerous surgical approaches have been reported but there is no consensus. Many of the recurrence rates are reported in old literature, while recent reports are scarce. The aim of the present study was to review rates of recurrences in patients who underwent open repair of a primary femoral hernia.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search in the electronic literature, using the search terms "femoral hernia" and "recurrence". We included studies published from 2002 that had as primary or secondary endpoint to evaluate the recurrence after surgery. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCT and by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies.

RESULTS

Fifteen eligible articles were included in our systematic review. A total of 1087 procedures were performed according to the defined criteria. The metanalytic evaluation highlighted a higher probability of recurrence for non-mesh than mesh repairs (6.5% vs 1.9%; RR 0.924, 95% CI: 0.857 - 0.996). In patients treated in emergency settings the rate of recurrences was 3.7%; in patients who received elective repairs it was 0.71%. Six studies reported that most of recurrences occurred within the first post-operative year.

CONCLUSION

We found that crude recurrence rate after open repair of a primary femoral hernia is about 4%. This rate is higher in case of non-mesh techniques and in emergency surgery. Our results support the recommendation that femoral hernias should be repaired with mesh techniques.

Extended Lichtenstein Repair for an Additional Femoral Canal Hernia

The Lichtenstein procedure is one of the most performed surgeries worldwide. However, proper examination to exclude a femoral hernia is often not performed, resulting in a high number of missed hernias. For patients in whom a femoral hernia is suspected pre- or intraoperatively, we describe a novel surgical technique of a femoral extension to the classic Lichtenstein repair. We aim to investigate its safety and clinical outcome. Methods: The femoral-extended Lichtenstein is applied when a femoral hernia is suspected. The fascia transversalis is opened, the lacunar ligament incised, and the hernia reduced. A self-gripping mesh covers the femoral orifice equally on all sides. In a prospective single-center study, we compared 50 consecutive femoral-extended to 50 classic Lichtenstein repairs, evaluating operative time, patient-reported pain (intensity, duration), and recurrence. Results: The technique seems feasible and safe. Apart from 3 min additional surgical time, no difference in pain scoring or hernia recurrence was observed between both groups. Conclusions: We successfully introduced a femoral-extended Lichtenstein repair for patients with suspected femoral herniation.

A new groin hernia classification with clinical relevance

INTRODUCTION

Groin hernia is one of the most commonly managed surgical diseases around the world. The typical question asked by patients is "Does my hernia require urgent surgery?". The currently available classifications are insufficient to stratify patients into different groups. We propose a new classification that incorporates diverse clinical elements together with anatomical and other vital information, which allows us to stratify patients into different groups.

METHOD

A task force was formed by the Hong Kong Hernia Society, working with international expert hernia surgeons. The framework of the classification system was formulated. Clinical elements that are important in groin disease stratification were identified. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed. Those which dictate the severity of the disease were selected and compiled to form the new proposed classification. Application of this classification model to a single hernia surgeon's registry in The Hong Kong Adventist Hospital Hernia Centre was done for initial evaluation.

RESULT

This new classification incorporates important clinical characteristics forming a total of nine grades of differentiation, together with the anatomical details and special information. This comprehensive system allows the stratification of patients into different groups based on disease severity. It also enables more accurate data collection for future audits, comparisons of disease progression over time, and the effect of different management strategies for different-stage patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the first classification system which incorporates essential clinical parameters, which allows the stratification of groin hernia into different stages. Further studies and validation should be performed to evaluate the usefulness and value of this classification in groin hernia management.

Managing ischemic and necrotic incarcerated femoral hernia contents and their risk factors

PURPOSE

Incarcerated femoral hernia patients had high risk of hernia contents necrosis. We provide our experience of management ischemia and necrosis of hernia contents in emergency incarcerated femoral hernia patients, and to investigate its risk factors.

METHODS

This is a case-control study. Eighty-nine incarcerated femoral patients who underwent emergency surgery from January 2015 to December 2021 were included, and divided into normal group (60 cases) and ischemia/necrosis group (29 cases) according to the intraoperative condition of hernia contents. The surgical methods, intraoperative and postoperative conditions were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of ischemia and necrosis of hernia contents.

RESULTS

Open preperitoneal tension-free repair was the most commonly used surgical methods (68.5%) for incarcerated femoral patients. The utilization rate of laparoscopic repair in the ischemia/necrosis group was lower than that in the normal group (13.8% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.475). The proportion of mesh placement in the normal group was significantly higher than that in the ischemia/necrosis group (98.3% vs 65.5%, P < 0.001). The hernia contents resection rate (55.2% vs 1.7%), operation time (90 vs 40 min), intraoperative bleeding (5 vs 2 ml), ICU admission rate (31.0% vs 1.7%), and hospital stay (7 vs 4 d) were significantly higher in the ischemia/necrosis group than those in normal group. Results of multivariate logistic regression showed that incarceration time more than 9 h (aOR = 19.3, 95%CI: 1.9-192.9) was an independent risk factor for ischemia and necrosis of hernia contents in emergency incarcerated femoral hernia patients.

CONCLUSION

Open tension-free repair was the most commonly used surgical methods for emergency incarcerated femoral hernia patients. Ischemia and necrosis of hernia contents will increase bowel resection rate and prolong operation and hospital stay. Long incarceration time is an independent risk factor for ischemia and necrosis of hernia contents.

Obesity and abdominal hernia in ambulatory patients, 2018-2023

PURPOSE

To determine the relationship between abdominal hernia and obesity. Although obesity is frequently cited as a risk factor for abdominal hernia, few studies have confirmed this association (Menzo et al. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14:1221-1232. 10.1016/j.soard.2018.07.005, 2018).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of primary care ambulatory patients aged older than 16 years treated at UCLA Health from 01/01/2018 to 06/06/2023. Abdominal hernia was identified by clinic encounter ICD-10 codes (K40-K46).

RESULTS

There were 41,703 hernias identified among 1,362,440 patients (306.1 per10,000) with a mean age of 62.5 ± 16.1 years, and 57.6% were men. Nearly half (44.7%) of all abdominal hernias were diaphragmatic. There was an approximately equal distribution of the ventral (28.7%) and inguinal (24.3%) hernia. Each hernia type had a different relationship with obesity: The odds of having a ventral hernia increased with BMI in both sexes: BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2 odds ratio (OR) = 1.65, (CI 1.56-1.74); BMI 30-39.9 kg/m2 OR = 2.42 (CI 2.29-2.56), BMI 40-49.9 kg/m2 OR = 2.28 (CI 2.05-2.54) and BMI >  = 50 kg/m2 OR = 2.54 (CI 2.03-3.17) all relative to normal BMI. In contrast, the odds of having an inguinal hernia decreased with obesity relative to normal weight [obesity (BMI 30-39.9 kg/m2): OR = 0.60 (CI 0.56-0.65)], morbid obesity (BMI 40-49.9 kg/m2): OR = 0.29 (CI 0.23-0.37). The OR for diaphragmatic hernia peaks with obesity in women and overweight status in men but was found to decrease with morbid obesity [OR = 1.18 (CI 1.07-1.30)]. There was no significant difference between men and women in the prevalence of femoral hernia (men: 0.7/per10,000, women: 0.9/per10,000, p = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between hernia and obesity is complex with some hernias decreasing in prevalence as obesity increases. Further research is needed to better understand this paradoxical relationship.

Elective Appendectomy Following Antibiotics for Appendicitis

This Viewpoint considers which may be the better long-term approach to appendicitis—interval elective appendectomy or nonsurgical treatment with antibiotics.

Laparoscopic surgery for De Garengeot's hernia in a man after inguinal hernia surgery with a mesh plug: a case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

De Garengeot's hernia is a rare case of a femoral hernia that contains the appendix. Here we report a case of De Garengeot's hernia that occurred in a male patient who had a history of inguinal hernia surgery using a mesh plug. There were no reports of De Garengeot's hernia with a history of surgery for inguinal hernia, and the surgical question was whether we could successfully treat a patient with minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery using a mesh.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case involved 75-year-old man with a history of right indirect inguinal hernia surgery using a mesh plug without on-lay mesh, who presented with a 5-day history of a right groin lump. Abdominal CT revealed an incarcerated appendix within the right femoral hernia and fluid collection around the appendix. Laparoscopic surgery was initiated and the incarcerated appendix was released with traction. There was no contamination around the appendix or the femoral ring, the appendix was removed, and the femoral hernia was repaired using mesh. Laparoscopic surgery was useful in first evaluating the inflammatory status of the appendix. As it was determined that there was little inflammation around the appendix and femoral ring, it was possible to repair the hernia using mesh.

CONCLUSIONS

De Garengeot's hernias are rare and there is currently no standardized approach. Even if it is a recurrent hernia in the groin, laparoscopic surgery can be useful for diagnosis and treatment, but the use of mesh requires further careful consideration.

STRONGHOLD first-year results of biomechanically calculated abdominal wall repair: a propensity score matching

PURPOSE

Every year around 70,000 people in Germany suffer from an abdominal incisional hernia that requires surgical treatment. Five years after reconstruction about 25% reoccur. Incisional hernias are usually closed with mesh using various reconstruction techniques, summarized here as standard reconstruction (SR). To improve hernia repair, we established a concept for biomechanically calculated reconstructions (BCR). In the BCR, two formulas enable customized patient care through standardized biomechanical measures. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of SR and BCR of incisional hernias after 1 year of follow-up based on the Herniamed registry.

METHODS

SR includes open retromuscular mesh augmented incisional hernia repair according to clinical guidelines. BCR determines the required strength (Critical Resistance to Impacts related to Pressure = CRIP) preoperatively depending on the hernia size. It supports the surgeon in reliably determining the Gained Resistance, based on the mesh-defect-area-ratio, further mesh and suture factors, and the tissue stability. To compare SR and BCR repair outcomes in incisional hernias at 1 year, propensity score matching was performed on 15 variables. Included were 301 patients with BCR surgery and 23,220 with standard repair.

RESULTS

BCR surgeries show a significant reduction in recurrences (1.7% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.0041), pain requiring treatment (4.1% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.001), and pain at rest (6.9% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.033) when comparing matched pairs. Complication rates, complication-related reoperations, and stress-related pain showed no systematic difference.

CONCLUSION

Biomechanically calculated repairs improve patient care. BCR shows a significant reduction in recurrence rates, pain at rest, and pain requiring treatment at 1-year follow-up compared to SR.

Female sex and ipsilateral reoperation risk following mesh-based inguinal hernia repair: a cohort study including 131,626 repairs in adults from an integrated healthcare system over a 10-year period

PURPOSE

We sought to compare females and males for the risk of reoperation following different inguinal hernia repair approaches (open, laparoscopic, and robotic).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients aged ≥ 18 who underwent first inguinal hernia repair with mesh within a US integrated healthcare system (2010-2020). Data were obtained from the system's integrated electronic health record. Multiple Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to evaluate the association between sex and risk for ipsilateral reoperation during follow-up. Analysis was stratified by surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, and robotic).

RESULTS

The study cohort was comprised of 110,805 patients who underwent 131,626 inguinal hernia repairs with mesh, 10,079 (7.7%) repairs were in females. After adjustment for confounders, females had a higher risk of reoperation than males following open groin hernia repair (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.98, 95% CI 1.74-2.25), but a lower reoperation risk following laparoscopic repair (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.97). The crude 5-year cumulative reoperation probability following robotic repair was 2.8% in males and no reoperations were observed for females. Of females who had a reoperation, 10.3% (39/378) were for a femoral hernia, while only 0.6% (18/3110) were for femoral hernias in males.

CONCLUSION

In a large multi-center cohort of mesh-based inguinal hernia repair patients, we found a higher risk for reoperation in females after an open repair approach compared to males. Lower risk was observed for females through a minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or robotic) and may be due to the ability to identify an occult femoral hernia through these approaches.

No Reason to Use Mesh in Groin Hernia Repair in Adolescents

Groin hernias are common and hernia repair is one of the most frequent surgical procedures performed worldwide. Despite this, there is no international guideline on the management of groin hernias in adolescents. Mesh reinforcement is used for repair in adults but not in young children. Adolescents, positioned between these age groups, pose unique challenges for surgeons due to their varying growth patterns. Placing a synthetic mesh in growing patients is a concern, particularly in relation to chronic pain. Traditionally, the hernia literature has defined adults as individuals aged 18 years and above. Considering that growth can continue until age 19, this review proposes a revised definition of adolescence for patients with groin hernias encompassing ages 10 to 19. Symptomatic groin hernias in adolescents should be repaired with an open non-mesh technique because of acceptable recurrence rates and the desire to avoid introducing synthetic foreign materials into young patients with ongoing growth potential. Watchful waiting is suggested for asymptomatic groin hernias, postponing repair until the adolescent has become a fully grown adult and symptoms from the hernia develop. Most groin hernias in adolescents are lateral hernias, but before pursuing a watchful waiting strategy in females, an ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging scan is suggested to rule out the presence of a femoral hernia that may need repair.

Predictive factors of bowel necrosis in patients with incarcerated femoral hernia

PURPOSE

Intestinal necrosis is a frequent complication in patients with incarcerated femoral hernias (IFH). Knowing the low incidence of IFH, few series with large samples studied predictive factors of intestinal necrosis. The main objectives of our study were to determine the predictive preoperative factors of intestinal necrosis in patients with IFH and to compare its morbidity with that related to incarcerate inguinal hernias (IIH).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study in which we included patients with incarcerated groin hernias (IGH). This is a single-center study between January 2004 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (admitted for IFH) and group B (admitted for IIH). Intestinal necrosis was confirmed intraoperatively.

RESULTS

383 patients with IGH were included in the study: 91 patients had IFH (23.76%) and 282 patients had IIH (76.24%). In patients with IFH, the median age was 67 years. We had 60 females (66%) and 31 males (34%). Bowel ischemia was present in 29 patients (32%). Bowel necrosis was present in 14 patients (16%). We identified three independent variables predicting bowel necrosis in patients with IFH: Duration from symptoms to surgery, NLR (Neutrophil to Lymphocyte ratio), and urea. Bowel ischemia and bowel necrosis were significantly higher in patients with IFH compared to those with IIH.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, we found that duration from symptoms to surgery, NLR, and urea were significantly predictive of intestinal necrosis in patients with IFH.

Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair for Female Patients: Experience from a High-volume Center in 20 years

BACKGROUND

Although laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) is widely performed worldwide, few studies have focused on the procedure in female patients. This study investigated the characteristics and outcomes of female patients with inguinal hernias who underwent LIHR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 7380 patients with inguinal hernia admitted to the General Surgery Department of Ruijin Hospital and underwent LIHR from January 2001 to December 2020. The clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 572 female patients were enrolled in this study. The proportion of femoral hernias in female patients was higher in women than in male patients (17.4% vs. 0.3%, respectively). Mesothelial cysts of the round uterine ligament (MCURL) were noted in 74 patients. The mean age of patients with MCURL was lower than that of patients without MCURL (46.4 vs. 55.6, P =0.018). Seventy cases (93.3%) of MCURL were resected laparoscopically, and 5 cases were resected through an auxiliary small incision. The round ligament was cut off in 335 patients and preserved in 237. No significant differences were observed in the number of hospitalization days, recurrence rates, or complications between the transection and preservation groups. None of the cases were converted to laparotomy, and no recurrence was noted during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

LIHR is safe and feasible in female patients. Treatment of femoral hernia, MCURL, and the round ligament of the uterus should be carefully considered during LIHR in female patients.

Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair

BACKGROUND

A groin hernia is a collective name for inguinal and femoral hernias, which can present acutely with incarceration or strangulation of the hernia sac content, requiring emergency treatment. Timely repair of emergency groin hernias is crucial due to the risk of reduced blood supply and thus damage to the bowel, but the optimal surgical approach is unclear. While mesh repair is the standard treatment for elective hernia surgery, using mesh for emergency groin hernia repair remains controversial due to the risk of surgical site infection.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of mesh compared with non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair in adult patients with an inguinal or femoral hernia.

SEARCH METHODS

On 5 August 2022, we searched the following databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, and Embase Ovid, as well as two trial registers for ongoing and completed trials. Additionally, we performed forward and backward citation searches for the included trials and relevant review articles. We searched without any language or publication restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mesh with non-mesh repair in emergency groin hernia surgery in adults. We included any mesh and any non-mesh repairs. All studies fulfilling the study, participant, and intervention criteria were included irrespective of reported outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology. We presented dichotomous data as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We based missing data analysis on best- and worst-case scenarios. For outcomes with sufficiently low heterogeneity, we performed meta-analyses using the random-effects model. We analysed subgroups when feasible, including the degree of contamination. We used RoB 2 for risk of bias assessment, and summarised the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 trials randomising 1241 participants undergoing emergency groin hernia surgery with either mesh (626 participants) or non-mesh hernia repair (615 participants). The studies were conducted in China, the Middle East, and South Asia. Most patients were men, and most participants had an inguinal hernia (41 participants had femoral hernias). The mean/median age in the mesh group ranged from 35 to 70 years, and from 41 to 69 years in the non-mesh group. All studies were performed in a hospital emergency setting (tertiary care) and lasted for 11 to 139 months, with a median study duration of 31 months. The majority of the studies only included participants with clean to clean-contaminated surgical fields. For all outcomes, we considered the certainty of the evidence to be very low, mainly downgraded due to high risk of bias (due to deviations from intended intervention and missing outcome data), indirectness, and imprecision. Mesh hernia repair may have no effect on or slightly increase the risk of 30-day surgical site infections (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.88; I² = 21%; 2 studies, 454 participants) when compared with non-mesh hernia repair, but the evidence is very uncertain. The evidence is also very uncertain about the effect of mesh hernia repair compared with non-mesh hernia repair on 30-day mortality (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.28; 1 study, 208 participants). In summary, the results showed 70 more (from 5 fewer to 200 more) surgical site infections and 29 more (from 32 fewer to 175 more) deaths within 30 days of mesh hernia repair per 1000 participants compared with non-mesh hernia repair. The evidence is very uncertain about 90-day surgical site infections after mesh versus non-mesh hernia repair (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.15 to 6.64; 1 study, 60 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No 30-day recurrences were recorded, and mesh hernia repair may not reduce recurrence within one year (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.03; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 104 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Within 30 days of hernia repair, no meshes were removed from clean to clean-contaminated fields, but 6.7% of meshes (1 study, 208 participants) were removed from contaminated to dirty surgical fields. Among the four studies reporting 90-day mesh removal, no events occurred. We were not able to identify any studies reporting complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification or reoperation for complications within 30 days of repair.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that in terms of 30-day surgical site infections, 30-day mortality, and hernia recurrence within one year, the evidence for the use of mesh hernia repair compared with non-mesh hernia repair in emergency groin hernia surgery is very uncertain. Unfortunately, firm conclusions cannot be drawn due to very low-certainty evidence and meta-analyses based on small-sized and low-quality studies. There is a need for future high-quality RCTs or high-quality registry-based studies if RCTs are unfeasible.

Comparison of patient characteristics and treatment approaches for femoral and inguinal hernias utilizing dynamic ultrasound at a single institution

PURPOSE

To assess the differences in management approach to femoral versus inguinal hernias and to identify patient characteristics associated with each hernia type.

METHODS

Imaging studies for patients who had undergone dynamic ultrasound evaluation for the symptom of groin pain between January 1, 2010, and March 31, 2019, at a single institution Musculoskeletal Department were analyzed. Positive femoral hernia imaging studies were compared to studies for inguinal hernias and matching medical records for imaging studies were analyzed. Association of patient characteristics (age, sex, smoking, diabetes) with hernia type was assessed. Primary outcomes were surgical versus non-surgical approach, type of surgery, number of follow-up visits, and pain resolution.

RESULTS

A total of 1319 patients presented with groin pain and were assessed with dynamic ultrasound (534 female; 785 male; mean [± SD] age 48.2 ± 16.5). While 409 (31.0%) patients had a femoral hernia detected, 666 (50.6%) had an inguinal hernia detected (p < .05). Significantly more inguinal hernias were surgically repaired than femoral hernias (65.0% vs 53.9% p = .008), and more inguinal hernias than femoral hernias were treated with open surgery (71.0% vs 57.7%; p = .014). Patients with femoral hernias had significantly more follow-up clinic visits than patients with inguinal hernias (mean [± SD] 2.65 ± 4.80 vs 1.76 ± 1.27; p = .010). No difference in the percentage of patients who had pain resolution was observed (82.2% inguinal vs 75.0% femoral; p = .13).

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral hernias were managed more conservatively than inguinal hernias at our institution.

Female Groin Hernia Repairs in the Swedish Hernia Register 1992-2022: A Review With Updates

Introduction: Groin hernias in women is much less common than in men; it constitutes only 9% of all groin hernia operations. Historically, studies have been performed on men and the results applied to both genders. However, prospectively registered operations within national registers have contributed to new knowledge regarding groin hernias in women. The aim of this paper was to investigate and present a body of literature based upon the Swedish Hernia Register together with recent data from the register's annual report. Patients and Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched for studies based on the Swedish Hernia Register between 1992 and 2023. Based on the initial reading of abstracts, studies that presented results separately for women were selected and read. Recent data were acquired from the 2022 annual report of the Swedish Hernia Register. Results: A total of 73 studies of interest were identified. Of these, 52 included women, but only 19 presented separate results for women. Four themes emerged and were analysed further: emergency surgery and mortality, femoral hernias, the risk of reoperation for recurrence, and chronic pain following female groin hernia repairs. Discussion: Studies from the Swedish Hernia Register clearly describe that both the presentation of hernias and outcomes after repair differ significantly between the two genders. The differences that have been identified over the years have been incorporated into the national guidelines. Register data indicates that the guidelines have been implemented and are fairly well adhered to. As a result, significant improvements in outcomes regarding recurrences have been made for women with groin hernias in Sweden.

Transverse colon and omental incarceration in femoral hernia: a case report

A femoral hernia is one of the groin hernias with a high chance of incarceration and strangulation due to its narrow neck. Here, we report a case of transverse colon incarceration. A 65-year-old female patient presented with groin mass that failed to reduce and a dragging pain. Elective open femoral herniorrhaphy was done with the finding of viable incarcerated massive momentum along with transverse colon. Femoral hernias have a female-to-male ratio of about 10:1. Postmenopausal, increasing age, and constipation were some of the risk factors identified in our patient. Various types of organs can be found in the femoral hernia sac but one of the rarely reported organ was found in our case: a transverse colon. Femoral hernia with a large bulky soft mass can get incarcerated easily but relatively less prone to strangulation.

A rare case of femoral hernia containing a strangulated appendix: a case report, operating techniques and literature review

Femoral hernias accounting for 2-4% of all hernias rarely involve appendicitis, known as De Garengeout hernia, with only a few reported cases. We present a case of a 66-year-old woman with acute right groin pain but no signs of intestinal obstruction. Physical examination revealed a tender, partially reducible mass in the right groin. Computed tomography scan confirmed a femoral hernia containing incarcerated bowel loops, leading to urgent surgical intervention. The McEvedys approach was used for appendicectomy and hernia repair. The patient recovered without complications. Strangulated femoral hernia with the appendix is a rare condition posing diagnostic challenges. Early recognition is crucial to prevent complications like perforation and abscess formation. Cross-sectional imaging aids in diagnosis. Surgical intervention, either open or laparoscopic, is the preferred treatment, based on surgeon expertise and patient-specific factors. Timely diagnosis and prompt surgery minimise complications.

Frailty as a Predictor of Surgical Outcomes Following Femoral Hernia Repair

BACKGROUND

Femoral hernias are associated with significant morbidity and mortality due to risk of strangulation. Frailty has shown to be strongly associated with adverse outcomes. A modified five-factor frailty index (mFI-5) is a simple validated predictor of postoperative complications and mortality within the ACS-NSQIP^® database. This study aims to evaluate the impact of frailty and age on 30-day outcomes after femoral hernia repair.

METHODS

Patients who underwent femoral hernia repair were queried using the ACS-NSQIP database (2017) and divided into two groups based on frailty score (FS): Frail (FS = 1-5) and Non-frail (FS = 0). We evaluated the association between postoperative outcomes and frailty, age, sex, presentation, ASA class, timing of surgery, and surgical approaches. Univariate analysis followed by a multivariable logistic regression model was performed to evaluate postoperative morbidity.

RESULTS

Of a total of 1,295 patients, 540 (42.7%) were in the Frail group. No differences in sex and race proportions were observed between groups. The Frail group had a higher rate of serious morbidity (4.4% vs 1.9%, P < .001), overall morbidity (7.8% vs 3.4%, P < .010), readmission rate (5.4% vs 2.3%, P = .003), and median (IQR) hospital length of stay (1 [0, 4] vs 0 [0, 1] days, P < .001). In multivariable analysis, male sex, presentation with complication, emergency surgery, and FS were associated with increased odds of overall morbidity. All deaths were in the Frail group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Frailty, male sex, presentation with obstruction/strangulation, and emergency surgery are independent predictors of increased 30-day morbidity. Thirty-day mortality was noted in the Frail group.

The Utility of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Emergency Management of Femoral Hernias: A Systematic Review

Background: Femoral hernias are a relatively rare type of hernia but have a high complication rate, with a high proportion either presenting as an emergency or requiring emergency management. Minimal access surgery has been shown to be safe, with good results, in an elective setting, but there is little published evidence of its utility in an emergency. Methods: A systematic review was conducted searching PubMed, OVID, Embase, and Cochrane reviews for ((Femoral hernia) AND (laparoscop* OR minimal access OR robotic)) AND (strangulat* OR obstruct* OR incarcerat*). Results: 286 manuscripts were identified of which 33 were relevant. 24 were individual case reports, 3 case series, 4 cohort studies or case control series, and 2 high level reviews of National registers. Conclusion: Minimal access surgery can avoid an unnecessary laparotomy for the assessment of hernial contents, especially via a TAPP approach. Minimal access repair of femoral hernias as an emergency is feasible and can be done safely with results similar to open surgery but good quality evidence is lacking.

Comparison of Postoperative Outcome in Children Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair Using Regional With General Versus General Anesthesia Alone: A Single Center Study

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common general surgical procedures. It has been performed under local, regional, or general anesthesia. We hypothesized that using regional plus general anesthesia rather than general anesthesia alone would improve outcomes in neonates and pediatric patients undergoing hernia repair.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study, including all pediatric patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair from 2015-2021. We divided patients into two groups. The first group was labeled "general anesthesia" (GA), while the second group was labeled "combined general and regional anesthesia" (GA+RA). We compared both groups in terms of demographic data, intraoperative outcome variables, and postoperative outcome variables.

RESULTS

 212 children fulfilled the study criteria, with 57 in the GA group and 155 in the GA+RA group. Demographic and preoperative data were comparable between both groups except for age, which was 60.3±49.4 months in the GA group versus 26.7±33.13 months in the GA+RA group (p<.0001). Outcome variables demonstrated statistically significant improvement in postoperative pain occurrence, length of hospital stay, incidence of bradycardia, and need for mechanical ventilation in the GA+RA group in comparison to the GA group with P values of 0.031, 0.02, 0.005, and 0.02, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Using regional and general anesthesia techniques rather than general anesthesia alone is associated with a decrease in postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, incidence of bradycardia, and need for mechanical ventilation. Further studies are still warranted to validate our conclusions.

Emergency hernia repair: a retrospective cross-sectional study on the treatment modalities and adherence to guidelines in a tertiary public hospital

BACKGROUND

Emergency presentations of hernias can pose significant morbidity. In addition, providing optimal surgical intervention can be challenging due to patient and disease factors with multiple treatment modalities available. Recently there have been several guidelines written to help standardize practices in hernia management. The aim of our study was to review emergency hernia operations at our tertiary level teaching hospital, the method of repair and how this matched to international guidelines.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all the patients who underwent emergency hernia surgery for strangulated/incarcerated hernias in our department over a 3-year period. Adherence to guidelines was assessed looking at appropriateness of mesh utilization, as well as the appropriateness of antibiotic usage.

RESULTS

A total of 184 cases from April 1st 2018 to March 31st 2021 were included. Of these hernias 12% contained necrotic or perforated bowel, 42% contained viable incarcerated bowel, and 45% contained just incarcerated fat. The compliance to the appropriate use of mesh overall was 85%, with a variation by hernia type. The global compliance to appropriate antibiotic therapy was high, at 89.7%. With antibiotic use compliance being very high in clean wounds (95.6%), and dirty wounds (100%). But lower in clean/contaminated or contaminated wounds (36.8%).

CONCLUSION

Compliance at our hospital was globally good. Areas of decreased compliance seem to be mostly regarding mesh use and antibiotic use in potentially contaminated fields and the concept of risk of bacterial translocation versus actual contamination, as well as in mesh use in smaller umbilical hernias.

Hernioscopy: A Description of an Adjunct Technique in Emergency Femoral Hernia Surgery

Femoral hernias commonly present as an emergency with a large proportion strangulated or with contents that are threatened. Many surgical options are available including minimally invasive surgery and multiple open approaches. A low approach allows a relatively simple repair of the hernia and has a long-established history of safety with reproducible outcomes and low recurrence rates. It is technically less challenging than a high approach but does not allow easy assessment or management of hernia sac contents. We highlight and describe a technique that can be used when the hernia reduces spontaneously at induction, or when the surgeon cannot be confident that the contents are viable. Hernioscopy is the technique of utilizing a laparoscope inserted via the hernia sac to either examine the abdominal contents or facilitate the safe creation of pneumoperitoneum and further insertion of ports transabdominally when the patient has pelvic adhesions. We describe the operative steps taken to make this a feasible approach and reduce the need for unnecessary laparotomies and the associated morbidity.

Open preperitoneal vs. open anterior repair for the treatment of emergency femoral hernia: a bicentric retrospective study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative results, in terms of complications and recurrence, between the anterior and open preperitoneal approaches in emergency femoral hernia.

METHODS

This bi-centric retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent emergency femoral hernia repair between January 2010 and December 2018. Postoperative complications and recurrence were analyzed comparing anterior and open preperitoneal approaches. The predictors of complications, mortality and recurrence were investigated using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 204 patients met the inclusion criteria. Open anterior approach was performed in 128 (62.7%) patients and open preperitoneal was performed in 76 (37.3%). Open preperitoneal approach was associated with lower rates of recurrence (P = 0.033) and associated midline laparotomies (P = 0.006). Multivariable analysis identified patients with chronic nephropathy (OR, 3.801; 95%CI, 1.034-13.974; P = 0.044), preoperative bowel obstruction (OR, 2.376; 95%CI, 1.118-5.047; P = 0.024) and required midline laparotomy (OR, 12.467; 95%CI, 11.392-102.372; P = 0.030) as risk factors for complications and ASA ≥ III (OR, 7.820; 95%CI, 1.279-47.804; P = 0.026), COPD (OR, 5.064; 95%CI, 1.188-21.585; P = 0.028), necrotic contents (OR, 36.968; 95%CI, 4.640-294.543; P = 0.001), and required midline laparotomy (OR, 11.047; 95%CI, 1.943-62.809; P = 0.007). as risk factors for 90-day mortality. Male gender (OR, 4.718; 95%CI, 1.668-13.347; P = 0.003) and anterior approach (OR, 5.292; 95%CI, 1.114-25.149; P = 0.036) were risk factors for recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Open preperitoneal approach may be superior to anterior approach in the emergency setting because it can avoid the morbidity of associated midline laparotomies, with a lower long-term recurrence rate.

Comparison of mesh repair and suture repair for the treatment of incarcerated femoral hernia: a retrospective, single-center study

BACKGROUND

Femoral hernias often present with incarceration or strangulation that requires emergency surgery. However, recommendations vary regarding optimal approaches for incarcerated femoral hernia. The aim of this study is to compare clinical efficacy between mesh repair and suture repair for the treatment of incarcerated femoral hernia.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-center analysis of the clinical data from 48 patients with incarcerated femoral hernia, including 16 patients who underwent mesh repair (mesh repair group) and 32 patients who underwent traditional suture repair (suture repair group).

RESULTS

The mean age, body mass index, incarceration duration, hernia sac size, operation duration, and the rates of postoperative incision infection, recurrence, chronic pain, and mortality were not significantly different between the suture repair and mesh repair groups (P > 0.05 for all). In contrast, the female/male ratio; the rates of bowel obstruction, coexisting diseases, and nighttime operation; and the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade were higher and the rate of prophylactic antibiotic use and the mean cost of hospitalization were lower in the suture repair group than in the mesh repair group (P < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

The surgical approach should be chosen based on the patient's condition. Mesh repair for the emergency treatment of incarcerated femoral hernia is safe and effective, whereas suture repair is suitable for elderly patients, those with more coexisting diseases, and those with limited life expectancy.

Shared genetic architecture of hernias: A genome-wide association study with multivariable meta-analysis of multiple hernia phenotypes

Abdominal hernias are common and characterised by the abnormal protrusion of a viscus through the wall of the abdominal cavity. The global incidence is 18.5 million annually and there are limited non-surgical treatments. To improve understanding of common hernia aetiopathology, we performed a six-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 62,637 UK Biobank participants with either single or multiple hernia phenotypes including inguinal, femoral, umbilical and hiatus hernia. Additionally, we performed multivariable meta-analysis with metaUSAT, to allow integration of summary data across traits to generate combined effect estimates. On individual hernia analysis, we identified 3404 variants across 38 genome-wide significant (p < 5×10-8) loci of which 11 are previously unreported. Robust evidence for five shared susceptibility loci was discovered: ZC3H11B, EFEMP1, MHC region, WT1 and CALD1. Combined hernia phenotype analyses with additional multivariable meta-analysis of summary statistics in metaUSAT revealed 28 independent (seven previously unreported) shared susceptibility loci. These clustered in functional categories related to connective tissue and elastic fibre homeostasis. Weighted genetic risk scores also correlated with disease severity suggesting a phenotypic-genotypic severity correlation, an important finding to inform future personalised therapeutic approaches to hernia.

Comparison of open preperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair for primary unilateral femoral hernia: a retrospective cohort study of 132 case

BACKGROUND

Femoral hernia (FH) is traditionally treated by open surgery (OS). Laparoscopic treatment has also shown good results in treating FH. However, there have been few comparative studies of these two techniques. Therefore, our aim was to compare the outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgical FH treatment.

METHODS

Adult patients with primary unilateral FH undergoing OS or transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair at our hospital from January 2013 to June 2018 were included in this study. Patients with history of abdominal surgery, contraindications to general anesthesia and those not wishing to receive general anesthesia received OS. Demographics, operation details and complications were compared retrospectively between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were recruited to the study, 62 and 70 of whom underwent OS and TAPP, respectively. Compared to OS group, the TAPP group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (3.0 vs. 2.0 days, respectively, P < 0.05) and a lower postoperative pain score (3.0 vs. 1.0, P < 0.05), and took less time to return to normal activities (13.0 vs. 6.0 days, respectively, P < 0.05). The overall complication rates were equivalent between the groups (10 vs. 9.7%, OR = 1.037, 95% CI 0.329-3.270).

CONCLUSIONS

Both laparoscopic and open surgery appear to be safe and effective in a cohort of patients with femoral hernia and laparoscopic surgery might offer some advantages in reducing length of hospital stay, lower postoperative pain score and quicker return to activities.

Mortality after emergency versus elective groin hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Emergency groin hernia repair is associated with increased mortality risk, but the actual risk is unknown. Therefore, this review aimed to investigate 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality in adult patients who had undergone emergency or elective groin hernia repair.

METHODS

This review was reported following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and a protocol (CRD42021244412) was registered to PROSPERO. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL in April 2021. Studies were included if they reported 30- or 90-day mortality following an emergency or elective groin hernia repair. Meta-analyses were conducted when possible, and subgroup analyses were made for bowel resection, sex, and hernia type. According to the study design, the risk of bias was assessed using either the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies with 30,740 patients receiving emergency repair and 457,253 receiving elective repair were included. The 30-day mortality ranged from 0-11.8% to 0-1.7% following emergency and elective repair, respectively. The risk of 30-day mortality following emergency repair was estimated to be 26-fold higher than after elective repair (RR = 26.0, 95% CI 21.6-31.4, I2 = 0%). A subgroup meta-analysis on bowel resection in emergency repair estimated 30-day mortality to be 7.9% (95% CI 6.5-9.3%, I2 = 6.4%). Subgroup analyses on sex and hernia type showed no differences regarding the mortality risk in elective surgery. However, femoral hernia and female sex significantly increased the risk of mortality in emergency surgery, both given by a risk ratio of 1.7.

CONCLUSION

The overall mortality after emergency groin hernia repair is 26-fold higher than after elective repair, but the increased risk is attributable mostly to female and femoral hernias.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO protocol (CRD42021244412).

Risk of bowel resection in incarcerated inguinal hernia: watch out for ASA score and hernia type

PURPOSE

Incarcerated inguinal hernias can promote bowel ischemia. Emergent bowel resection is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. Risk factors for bowel resection might identify patients who benefit from elective inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

Sixty-five consecutive patients undergoing emergency inguinal hernia repair between 2012 and 2018 at our institution were entered in a prospective database. Data analysis was approved by the local ethics committee. Patient characteristics, surgery data, and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with and without bowel resection. Risk factors for bowel resection were assessed with univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Patients requiring bowel resection were more often female (87%, P = 0.004) and presented in 67% with a femoral hernia. Postoperative complications occurred more often after hernia reduction and bowel resection compared to no resection (67% vs. 36%, P = 0.035). ASA score 3-4 and femoral herniation were independent predictors of bowel resection (P = 0,046 and P = 0,047, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Highly comorbid patients can profit from early elective hernia repair to prevent bowel resection.

Mesh versus non‐mesh for emergency groin hernia repair

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:

Laparoscopic approach as a safe and effective option for incarcerated femoral hernias

INTRODUCTION

The laparoscopic approach for elective femoral herniorrhaphy is well established. However, femoral hernias often present as incarcerations and require emergency repair surgery, mainly using the open approach. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the efficacy of the laparoscopic approach for incarcerated femoral hernias.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent emergency surgery for incarcerated femoral hernia between April 2016 and August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Laparoscopy was performed whenever possible; however, conversion to an open approach remained a fallback option for when laparoscopic repair was not possible. In laparoscopic repair, incarcerated femoral hernias reduced using traction, water pressure, and preperitoneal methods. Data of patients who underwent open repair and laparoscopy were then compared.

RESULTS

During the observation period, 20 patients underwent emergency surgery for incarcerated femoral hernia. Eleven patients subsequently underwent repair using a laparoscopic approach, and eight underwent repair using an open approach. Only one patient underwent intestinal resection without hernia repair due to perforated bowel. Operative time for laparoscopic repair was longer. Mesh repair was performed in 18 patients. Four patients each in the laparoscopic repair and open group required intestinal resection.

CONCLUSION

Incarcerated femoral hernias can be safely repaired using the laparoscopic approach.

Emergency hernia repair in the elderly: multivariate analysis of morbidity and mortality from an Italian registry

PURPOSE

The incidence of inguinal hernia is higher in elderly because of aging-related diseases like prostatism, bronchitis, collagen laxity. A conservative management is common in elderly to reduce surgery-related risks, however watchful waiting can expose to obstruction and strangulation. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of emergency surgery in a large series of elderly with complicated groin hernia and to identify the independent risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality. The predictive performance of prognostic risk scores has been also assessed.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study carried out between January 2017 and June 2018 in elderly patients who underwent emergency surgery for complicated hernia in 38 Italian hospitals. Pre-operative, surgical and postoperative data were recorded for each patient. ASA score, Charlson's comorbidity index, P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM were assessed.

RESULTS

259 patients were recruited, mean age was 80 years. A direct repair without mesh was performed in 62 (23.9%) patients. Explorative laparotomy was performed in 56 (21.6%) patients and bowel resection was necessary in 44 (17%). Mortality occurred in seven (2.8%) patients. Fifty-five (21.2%) patients developed complications, 12 of whom had a major one. At univariate and multivariate analyses, Charlson's comorbidity index ≥ 6, altered mental status, and need for laparotomy were associated with major complications and mortality CONCLUSION: Emergency surgery for complicated hernia is burdened by high morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. Preoperative comorbidity played a pivotal role in predicting complications and mortality and therefore Charlson's comorbidity index could be adopted to select patients for elective operation.

FEMORAL HERNIA: UNCOMMON, BUT ASSOCIATED WITH POTENTIALLY SEVERE COMPLICATIONS

BACKGROUND

Although the laparoscopic access is becoming the preferable treatment for femoral hernia, there are only few studies on this important subject.

AIM

To assess the outcomes of the totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic (TEP) access in the treatment of femoral hernia.

METHODS

Data of 62 patients with femoral hernia who underwent herniorrhaphy were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnosis of femoral hernia was established by clinical and/or imaging exams in 55 patients and by laparoscopic findings in seven.

RESULTS

There were 55 (88.7%) females and 7 (11.3%) males, with female to male ratio of 8:1. The mean age was of 58.9±15.9 years, ranging from 22 to 92 years. Most patients (n=53; 85.5%) had single hernia and the remaining (n=9; 14.5%) bilateral, making a total of 71 hernias operated. Prior lower abdominal operations were recorded in 21 (33.9%) patients. Conversion to laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal procedure was performed in four (6.5%). Open herniorrhaphy was needed in two (3.2%), one with spontaneous enterocutaneous fistula in the groin region (Richter's hernia) and the another with incidental perforation of the adjacent small bowel that occurred during dissection of hernia sac. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

Femoral hernia is uncommon, and it may be associated with potentially severe complications. Most femoral hernias may be successfully treated with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic access, with low conversion and complication rates.

Groin abscess, a rare complication of strangulated femoral hernia: Case report

Femoral hernias account for 8%–11% of all groin hernias and 3%–5% of all anterior abdominal wall hernias. While groin hernias are more common in males, femoral hernias are developed more commonly in female, accounting for 22%–34% of all groin hernias compared with 1.1% in male. The lifetime risk of developing groin hernia in male is approximately 25% but in female less than 5%, so in all female patients with groin hernias, femoral hernias should be included in the differential diagnosis until proven otherwise. The main concern of a femoral hernia is the higher risk of bowel strangulation, presenting emergently in 32%–39% of patients. We report a case of strangulated femoral hernia in a 78-year-old female who was presented to emergency department with groin abscess based on ultrasound image; patient was then diagnosed as having strangulated femoral hernia and taken to the operating theater, where she was found having strangulated segment of small intestine, so the patient underwent bowel resection and anastomosis with repair of the defect extraperitoneally, and ultimately, the patient improved and discharged from the hospital. Strangulated femoral hernia can present with groin abscess. Furthermore, femoral hernia should be ruled out in elderly patient presented with groin abscess, especially female patients.

Trends in Emergent Groin Hernia Repair-An Analysis From the Herniamed Registry

Introduction: While the proportion of emergency groin hernia repairs in developed countries is 2.5–7.7%, the percentage in developing countries can be as high as 76.9%. The mortality rate for emergency groin hernia repair in developed countries is 1.7–7.0% and can rise to 6–25% if bowel resection is needed. In this present analysis of data from the Herniamed Registry, patients with emergency admission and operation within 24 h are analyzed.

Methods: Between 2010 and 2019 a total of 13,028 patients with emergency admission and groin hernia repairs within 24 h were enrolled in the Herniamed Registry. The outcome results were assigned to the year of repair and summarized as curves. The total patient collective is broken down into the subgroups with pre-operative manual reduction (taxis) of the hernia content, operative reduction of the hernia content without bowel resection and with bowel resection. The explorative Fisher's exact test was used for statistical assessment of significant differences with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing.

Results: The proportion of emergency admissions with groin hernia repair within 24 h was 2.7%. The percentage of women across the years was consistently 33%. The part of femoral hernias was 16%. The proportion of patients with pre-operative reduction (taxis) remained unchanged at around 21% and the share needing bowel resection was around 10%. The proportion of TAPP repairs rose from 21.9% in 2013 to 38.0% in 2019 (p < 0.001). Between the three groups with pre-operative taxis, without bowel resection and with bowel resection, highly significant differences were identified between the patients with regard to the rates of post-operative complications (4% vs. 6.5% vs. 22.7%; p < 0.0001), complication-related reoperations (1.9% vs. 3.8% vs. 17.7%; p < 0.0001), and mortality rate (0.3% vs. 0.9% vs. 7.5%; p < 0.001). In addition to emergency groin hernia repair subgroups female gender and age ≥66 years are unfavorable influencing factors for perioperative outcomes.

Conclusion: For patients with emergency groin hernia repair the need for surgical reduction or bowel resection, female gender and age ≥66 years have a highly significantly unfavorable influence on the perioperative outcomes.

Clinicopathological characteristics of De Garengeot hernia: six case reports and literature review

BACKGROUND

De Garengeot hernia, wherein the appendix is present within a femoral hernia, is a rare disease; therefore, the clinicopathological features remain to be clarified. This study aimed to reveal the clinicopathological characteristics of De Garengeot hernia.

CASE PRESENTATION

Six patients who underwent appendectomy and herniorrhaphy between 1999 and 2018 were included. The incidence of De Garengeot hernia was 3.2% among the 182 femoral hernias that required surgery during the study period. The median age of the patients was 78 years, and five patients were women. The median body mass index was 20.1. Patients frequently had fever or elevated CRP level. Preoperative diagnoses based on computed tomography were femoral (n = 3), inguinal (n = 2), and De Garengeot (n = 1) hernias. Emergency and elective surgeries were performed in four and two patients, respectively. Histopathological examination of the resected appendix showed gangrenous appendicitis (n = 3), perforated appendicitis (n = 2), and appendiceal ischemia (n = 1) in the patients. Postoperatively, one patient developed sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative diagnosis of De Garengeot hernia is often difficult, and patients frequently have severe appendicitis. Precise diagnosis is required, and emergency surgery should be considered depending on the severity of appendicitis.

Bowel obstruction as a serious complication of patients with femoral hernia

PURPOSE

The implications of bowel obstruction occurring secondary to femoral hernia have not been discussed in the literature recently. Thus, we report our experience of treating patients with femoral hernias complicated by bowel obstruction versus patients with femoral hernias not complicated by bowel obstruction.

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were patients admitted to our hospital for the treatment of femoral hernias between 2016 and 2019. We used the Fisher and Student's T test to compare the preoperative characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients with bowel obstruction versus those without bowel obstruction.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients (mean age, 66.9 ± 15.1 years) were treated, 18 (33.9%) of whom underwent elective surgery and 35 (66%) of whom required emergency surgery (p = 0.001). The mean time between the development of symptoms and hospitalization was 4.5 ± 3.1 days for the patients with bowel obstruction and 1.6 ± 3.2 days for those without bowel obstruction (p = 0.001). The length of hospital stay was 11.1 ± 21.1 days for the patients with bowel obstruction and 1 ± 1.8 days for those without bowel obstruction (p = 0.028). Overall morbidity and mortality rates were 13.2% and 5.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Femoral hernias causing bowel obstruction are associated with greater time between the development of symptoms, hospitalization, and with a longer hospital stay.

Incarcerated Bladder Diverticulum in a Femoral Hernia Presenting as Recurrent Hematuria

Groin hernias are extremely common surgical pathologies and usually contain intra-abdominal viscera surrounded by peritoneum. Femoral hernias are the least common types of hernia and are predominately found in females. In rare cases, an extraperitoneal organ may be pulled into the hernia sac to become part of the content. Urinary bladder diverticulum should be considered as a possible femoral hernia content in elderly patients presenting with recurrent symptoms of lower urinary tract infections and hematuria. A high index of suspicion followed by appropriate imaging assists in making a correct preoperative diagnosis and improves postoperative outcomes. We present an uncommon case of herniation of a urinary bladder diverticulum into a femoral hernia presenting with recurrent hematuria in an elderly female.

Atypical femoral hernia called Laugier's hernia: clinical features, radiological findings, and management at a single center

PURPOSE

Laugier's hernia is a rare clinical entity compared with a typical femoral hernia. Therefore, the clinical features, radiological findings, and appropriate treatment strategies remain largely unclear. In this study, we present 15 Laugier's hernia cases. Additionally, we review the relevant literature and discuss the clinical features, radiological findings, and appropriate treatment strategies pertaining to Laugier's hernia compared with a typical femoral hernia.

METHODS

Among 1260 hernia patients, we retrospectively enrolled 15 Laugier's hernia patients (1.19%) and 89 femoral hernia patients (7.06%) who underwent herniorrhaphy and compared the demographic characteristics and radiological findings between the two groups.

RESULTS

Regarding the patient characteristics, a significant difference was observed in the presence of pain (p < 0.001) and ileus symptoms (p = 0.001). Regarding the hernia characteristics, significant differences were observed in the size of the hernial sac (p = 0.001), contents of the hernial sac (p = 0.003), repositioning of the hernial sac (p < 0.001), and repair with polypropylene mesh (p < 0.001). The characteristic multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) findings enabled the preoperative diagnosis of Laugier's hernia versus conventional femoral hernia.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should be alert to the possibility of atypical femoral hernias while examining femoral hernia or inguinal hernia patients. If Laugier's hernia is suspected, preoperative MDCT is recommended.