1
|
Hakeem AR, Asthana S, Johnson R, Brown C, Ahmad N. Impact of Asian and Black Donor and Recipient Ethnicity on the Outcomes After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in the United Kingdom. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12605. [PMID: 38711816 PMCID: PMC11070942 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Patients of Asian and black ethnicity face disadvantage on the renal transplant waiting list in the UK, because of lack of human leucocyte antigen and blood group matched donors from an overwhelmingly white deceased donor pool. This study evaluates outcomes of renal allografts from Asian and black donors. The UK Transplant Registry was analysed for adult deceased donor kidney only transplants performed between 2001 and 2015. Asian and black ethnicity patients constituted 12.4% and 6.7% of all deceased donor recipients but only 1.6% and 1.2% of all deceased donors, respectively. Unadjusted survival analysis demonstrated significantly inferior long-term allograft outcomes associated with Asian and black donors, compared to white donors. On Cox-regression analysis, Asian donor and black recipient ethnicities were associated with poorer outcomes than white counterparts, and on ethnicity matching, compared with the white donor-white recipient baseline group and adjusting for other donor and recipient factors, 5-year graft outcomes were significantly poorer for black donor-black recipient, Asian donor-white recipient, and white donor-black recipient combinations in decreasing order of worse unadjusted 5-year graft survival. Increased deceased donation among ethnic minorities could benefit the recipient pool by increasing available organs. However, it may require a refined approach to enhance outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Rahman Hakeem
- Division of Surgery, Department of Transplantation, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sonal Asthana
- Division of Surgery, Department of Transplantation, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Johnson
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Chloe Brown
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Niaz Ahmad
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Al-Adhami A, Al-Aloul M, Rushton S, Thompson RD, Carby M, Lordan J, Clark S, Spencer H, Tsui S, Parmar J. Early experience of a new national lung allocation scheme in the UK based on clinical urgency. Thorax 2023; 78:1206-1214. [PMID: 37487710 DOI: 10.1136/thorax-2022-219475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A new UK Lung Allocation Scheme (UKLAS) was introduced in 2017, replacing the previous geographic allocation system. Patients are prioritised according to predefined clinical criteria into a three-tier system: the super-urgent lung allocation scheme (SULAS), the urgent lung allocation scheme (ULAS) and the non-urgent lung allocation scheme (NULAS). This study assessed the early impact of this scheme on waiting-list and post-transplant outcomes. METHODS A cohort study of adult lung transplant registrations between March 2015 and November 2016 (era-1) and between May 2017 and January 2019 (era-2). Outcomes from registration were compared between eras and stratified by urgency tier and diagnostic group. RESULTS During era-1, 461 patients were registered. In era-2, 471 patients were registered (19 (4.0%) SULAS, 82 (17.4%) ULAS and 370 (78.6%) NULAS). SULAS patients were younger (median age 35 vs 50 and 55 for urgent and non-urgent, respectively, p=0.0015) and predominantly suffered from cystic fibrosis (53%) or pulmonary fibrosis (37%). Between eras 1 and 2, the odds of transplantation within 6 months of registration were increased (OR=1.41, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.85, p=0.0142) despite only a 5% increase in transplant activity. Median time-to-transplantation during era-1 was 427 days compared with waiting times in era-2 of 8 days for SULAS, 15 days for ULAS and 585 days for NULAS patients. Waiting-list mortality (15% era-1 vs 13% era-2; p=0.5441) and post-transplant survival at 1 year (81.3% era-1 vs 83.3% era-2; p=0.6065) were similar between eras. CONCLUSION The UKLAS scheme prioritises the critically ill and improves transplantation odds. The true impact on waiting-list mortality and post-transplant survival requires further follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Al-Adhami
- Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mohamed Al-Aloul
- Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Sally Rushton
- Statistics and Clinical Studies, NHS Blood and Transplant Organ Donation and Transplantation Directorate, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Martin Carby
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, UK
| | - Jordan Lordan
- Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephen Clark
- Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Helen Spencer
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Steven Tsui
- Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jasvir Parmar
- Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ibrahim M, Callaghan CJ. Beyond donation to organ utilization in the UK. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2023; 28:212-221. [PMID: 37040628 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Optimizing deceased donor organ utilization is gaining recognition as a topical and important issue, both in the United Kingdom (UK) and globally. This review discusses pertinent issues in the field of organ utilization, with specific reference to UK data and recent developments within the UK. RECENT FINDINGS A multifaceted approach is likely required in order to improve organ utilization. Having a solid evidence-base upon which transplant clinicians and patients on national waiting lists can base decisions regarding organ utilization is imperative in order to bridge gaps in knowledge regarding the optimal use of each donated organ. A better understanding of the risks and benefits of the uses of higher risk organs, along with innovations such as novel machine perfusion technologies, can help clinician decision-making and may ultimately reduce the unnecessary discard of precious deceased donor organs. SUMMARY The issues facing the UK with regards to organ utilization are likely to be similar to those in many other developed countries. Discussions around these issues within organ donation and transplantation communities may help facilitate shared learning, lead to improvements in the usage of scarce deceased donor organs, and enable better outcomes for patients waiting for transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Ibrahim
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester
| | - Chris J Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London
- NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kostakis ID, Chandak P, Assia-Zamora S, Gogalniceanu P, Loukopoulos I, Calder F, Stojanovic J, Kessaris N. Pediatric renal transplantation-A UNOS database analysis of donor-recipient size mismatch. Pediatr Transplant 2023; 27:e14470. [PMID: 36651195 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We used the BSAi (Donor BSA/Recipient BSA) to assess whether transplanting a small or large kidney into a pediatric recipient relative to his/her size influences renal transplant outcomes. METHODS We included 14 322 single-kidney transplants in pediatric recipients (0-17 years old) (01/2000-02/2020) from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. We divided cases into four BSAi groups (BSAi ≤ 1, 1 < BSAi ≤ 2, 2 < BSAi ≤ 3, BSAi > 3). RESULTS There were no differences concerning delayed graft function (DGF) or primary non-function (PNF) rates, whether the grafts were from living or brain-dead donors. In both transplants coming from living donors and brain-dead donors, cases with BSAi > 3 and cases with 2 < BSAi ≤ 3 had similar graft survival (p = .13 for transplants from living donors, p = .413 for transplants from brain-dead donors), and both groups had longer graft survival than cases with 1 < BSAi ≤ 2 and cases with BSAi ≤ 1 (p < .001). The difference in 10-year graft survival rates between cases with BSAi > 3 and cases with BSAi ≤ 1 reached around 25% in both donor types. The better graft survival in transplants with BSAi > 2 was confirmed in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS There is no significant impact of donor-recipient size mismatch on DGF and PNF rates in pediatric renal transplants. However, graft survival is significantly improved when the donor's size is more than twice the pediatric recipient's size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis D Kostakis
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.,Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Pankaj Chandak
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.,Nephrology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sergio Assia-Zamora
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.,Nephrology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.,Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, UK
| | - Petrut Gogalniceanu
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.,Nephrology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.,Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, UK
| | - Ioannis Loukopoulos
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.,Nephrology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Francis Calder
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.,Nephrology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Nicos Kessaris
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.,Nephrology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Greenhall GHB, Robb M, Johnson RJ, Ibrahim M, Hilton R, Tomlinson LA, Callaghan CJ, Watson CJE. Utilisation and clinical outcomes of kidney transplants from deceased donors with albuminuria in the UK: a national cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 37:2275-2283. [PMID: 36066902 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinalysis is a standard component of potential deceased kidney donor assessment in the UK. The value of albuminuria as a biomarker for organ quality is uncertain. We examined the relationship between deceased donor albuminuria and kidney utilisation, survival, and function. METHODS We performed a national cohort study on adult deceased donors and kidney transplant recipients between 2016 and 2020, using data from the UK Transplant Registry. We examined the influence of donor albuminuria, defined as ≥ 2 + on dipstick testing, on kidney utilisation, early graft function, graft failure, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). RESULTS Eighteen % (1681/9309) of consented donors had albuminuria. After adjustment for confounders, kidneys from donors with albuminuria were less likely to be accepted for transplantation (74% vs 82%; OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.81). Of 9834 kidney transplants included in our study, 1550 (16%) came from donors with albuminuria. After a median follow-up of 2 years, 8% (118/1550) and 9% (706/8284) of transplants from donors with and without albuminuria failed, respectively. There was no association between donor albuminuria and graft failure (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.11). There was also no association with delayed graft function, patient survival, or eGFR at 1 or 3 years. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests reluctance in the UK to utilise kidneys from deceased donors with dipstick albuminuria but no evidence of an association with graft survival or function. This may represent a potential to expand organ utilisation without negatively impacting transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George H B Greenhall
- Department of Statistics and Clinical Research, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK.,School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew Robb
- Department of Statistics and Clinical Research, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Rachel J Johnson
- Department of Statistics and Clinical Research, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Maria Ibrahim
- Department of Statistics and Clinical Research, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK.,School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Hilton
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Laurie A Tomlinson
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Chris J Callaghan
- School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Christopher J E Watson
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Greenhall GHB, Ushiro-Lumb I, Pavord S, Hunt BJ, Sharma H, Mehra S, Calder F, Kessaris N, Kilbride H, Jones G, Motallebzadeh R, Arslan Z, Marks SD, Graetz K, Pettigrew GJ, Torpey N, Watson C, Roy D, Casey J, Oniscu GC, Currie I, Sutherland A, Clancy M, Dor F, Willicombe M, Sandhu B, Nath J, Weston C, van Dellen D, Roberts DJ, Madden S, Ravanan R, Forsythe J, Khurram MA, Mohamed I, Callaghan CJ. Kidney Transplantation From Deceased Donors With Vaccine-induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis: An Updated Analysis of the UK Experience. Transplantation 2022; 106:1824-1830. [PMID: 35821588 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The emergence and attendant mortality of vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) as a consequence of vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 have resulted in some patients with VITT being considered as deceased organ donors. Outcomes after kidney transplantation in this context are poorly described. Because the disease seems to be mediated by antiplatelet factor 4 antibodies, there is a theoretical risk of transmission via passenger leukocytes within the allograft. METHODS We analyzed the experience of kidney transplantation from donors with VITT in the United Kingdom between January and June 2021. We followed-up all recipients of kidney-only transplants from donors with VITT to detect major postoperative complications or features of disease transmission and assess graft survival and function. RESULTS There were 16 kidney donors and 30 single kidney transplant recipients in our study period. Of 11 preimplantation biopsies, 4 showed widespread glomerular microthrombi. After a median of 5 mo, patient and graft survival were 97% and 90%, respectively. The median 3-mo estimated glomerular filtration rate was 51 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Two recipients had detectable antiplatelet factor 4 antibodies but no evidence of clinical disease after transplantation. Major hemorrhagic complications occurred in 3 recipients, all of whom had independent risk factors for bleeding, resulting in the loss of 2 grafts. The involvement of VITT could not be completely excluded in one of these cases. CONCLUSIONS The UK experience to date shows that favorable outcomes are possible after kidney transplantation from donors with VITT but highlights the need for ongoing vigilance for donor-related complications in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George H B Greenhall
- Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Directorate, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Ines Ushiro-Lumb
- Department of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sue Pavord
- Thrombosis and Haemophilia Centre, Guy's and St.Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Beverley J Hunt
- vDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hemant Sharma
- Department of Transplant and Vascular Access Surgery, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Sanjay Mehra
- Department of Transplant and Vascular Access Surgery, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Francis Calder
- vDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicos Kessaris
- vDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Kilbride
- Kent Kidney Care Centre, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth Jones
- UCL Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Reza Motallebzadeh
- UCL Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Zainab Arslan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen D Marks
- Nephrology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Keith Graetz
- NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gavin J Pettigrew
- Wessex kidney centre, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas Torpey
- Wessex kidney centre, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Watson
- University of Cambidge Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Debabrata Roy
- University of Cambidge Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - John Casey
- Department of Clinical Nephrology and Transplantation, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Gabriel C Oniscu
- Department of Clinical Nephrology and Transplantation, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Currie
- Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Directorate, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Sutherland
- Department of Clinical Nephrology and Transplantation, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Clancy
- Renal transplant unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Frank Dor
- The Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle Willicombe
- The Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Bynvant Sandhu
- The Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Jay Nath
- Renal transplant unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Charles Weston
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - David van Dellen
- Department of Renal Surgery, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - David J Roberts
- Renal unit, Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorchester, United Kingdom
| | - Susanna Madden
- Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Directorate, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Rommel Ravanan
- Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Directorate, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - John Forsythe
- Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Directorate, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Muhammad A Khurram
- Department of Renal and Pancreas Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ismail Mohamed
- Department of Renal and Pancreas Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Chris J Callaghan
- Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Directorate, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Carapito R, Aouadi I, Verniquet M, Untrau M, Pichot A, Beaudrey T, Bassand X, Meyer S, Faucher L, Posson J, Morlon A, Kotova I, Delbos F, Walencik A, Aarnink A, Kennel A, Suberbielle C, Taupin JL, Matern BM, Spierings E, Congy-Jolivet N, Essaydi A, Perrin P, Blancher A, Charron D, Cereb N, Maumy-Bertrand M, Bertrand F, Garrigue V, Pernin V, Weekers L, Naesens M, Kamar N, Legendre C, Glotz D, Caillard S, Ladrière M, Giral M, Anglicheau D, Süsal C, Bahram S. The MHC class I MICA gene is a histocompatibility antigen in kidney transplantation. Nat Med 2022; 28:989-998. [PMID: 35288692 PMCID: PMC9117142 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01725-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The identity of histocompatibility loci, besides human leukocyte antigen (HLA), remains elusive. The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I MICA gene is a candidate histocompatibility locus. Here, we investigate its role in a French multicenter cohort of 1,356 kidney transplants. MICA mismatches were associated with decreased graft survival (hazard ratio (HR), 2.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.45–3.11; P < 0.001). Both before and after transplantation anti-MICA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were strongly associated with increased antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) (HR, 3.79; 95% CI: 1.94–7.39; P < 0.001; HR, 9.92; 95% CI: 7.43–13.20; P < 0.001, respectively). This effect was synergetic with that of anti-HLA DSA before and after transplantation (HR, 25.68; 95% CI: 3.31–199.41; P = 0.002; HR, 82.67; 95% CI: 33.67–202.97; P < 0.001, respectively). De novo-developed anti-MICA DSA were the most harmful because they were also associated with reduced graft survival (HR, 1.29; 95% CI: 1.05–1.58; P = 0.014). Finally, the damaging effect of anti-MICA DSA on graft survival was confirmed in an independent cohort of 168 patients with ABMR (HR, 1.71; 95% CI: 1.02–2.86; P = 0.041). In conclusion, assessment of MICA matching and immunization for the identification of patients at high risk for transplant rejection and loss is warranted. Analysis of a multicenter cohort of kidney transplants shows that mismatches in the MICA locus and the presence of anti-MICA donor-specific antibodies are associated with reduced graft survival and increased rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Carapito
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. .,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. .,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Franco (Strasbourg)-Japanese (Nagano) Nextgen HLA Laboratory, Strasbourg, France. .,Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Plateau Technique de Biologie, Pôle de Biologie, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France. .,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Ismail Aouadi
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Franco (Strasbourg)-Japanese (Nagano) Nextgen HLA Laboratory, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Martin Verniquet
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Franco (Strasbourg)-Japanese (Nagano) Nextgen HLA Laboratory, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Meiggie Untrau
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Franco (Strasbourg)-Japanese (Nagano) Nextgen HLA Laboratory, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Angélique Pichot
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Franco (Strasbourg)-Japanese (Nagano) Nextgen HLA Laboratory, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Thomas Beaudrey
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Nephrology-Transplantation Department, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Xavier Bassand
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Nephrology-Transplantation Department, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Sébastien Meyer
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Franco (Strasbourg)-Japanese (Nagano) Nextgen HLA Laboratory, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Loic Faucher
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,CHU Nantes, Université de Nantes, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Juliane Posson
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMR_S 970, Paris, France.,Kidney Transplant Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Aurore Morlon
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,BIOMICA SAS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Irina Kotova
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,BIOMICA SAS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Florent Delbos
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS) Centre Pays de la Loire, Laboratoire HLA, Nantes, France
| | - Alexandre Walencik
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS) Centre Pays de la Loire, Laboratoire HLA, Nantes, France
| | - Alice Aarnink
- Laboratory of Histocompatibility, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Nancy, France
| | - Anne Kennel
- Laboratory of Histocompatibility, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Nancy, France
| | - Caroline Suberbielle
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire Jean Dausset, Laboratoire d'Immunologie et d'Histocompatibilité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S 976, Human Immunology, Pathophysiology, Immunotherapy (HIPI), Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis Université de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire Jean Dausset, Laboratoire d'Immunologie et d'Histocompatibilité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S 976, Human Immunology, Pathophysiology, Immunotherapy (HIPI), Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis Université de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Benedict M Matern
- Center of Translational Immunology, HLA and Tissue Typing, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Spierings
- Center of Translational Immunology, HLA and Tissue Typing, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Congy-Jolivet
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Immunogénétique Moléculaire (LIMT, EA 3034), Faculté de Médecine Purpan, Université Toulouse III (Université Paul Sabatier, UPS), Toulouse, France.,Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Arnaud Essaydi
- Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS) Grand-Est, Laboratoire HLA, Strasbourg, France
| | - Peggy Perrin
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Nephrology-Transplantation Department, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Antoine Blancher
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Immunogénétique Moléculaire (LIMT, EA 3034), Faculté de Médecine Purpan, Université Toulouse III (Université Paul Sabatier, UPS), Toulouse, France.,Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Dominique Charron
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire Jean Dausset, Laboratoire d'Immunologie et d'Histocompatibilité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S 976, Human Immunology, Pathophysiology, Immunotherapy (HIPI), Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis Université de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | | | - Myriam Maumy-Bertrand
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut de Recherche Mathématique Avancée (IRMA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR 7501, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) Institut de Recherche en Mathématiques, Interactions et Applications (IRMIA), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Frédéric Bertrand
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut de Recherche Mathématique Avancée (IRMA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR 7501, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) Institut de Recherche en Mathématiques, Interactions et Applications (IRMIA), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Valérie Garrigue
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Service de Néphrologie-Transplantation-Dialyse Péritonéale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
| | - Vincent Pernin
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Service de Néphrologie-Transplantation-Dialyse Péritonéale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
| | - Laurent Weekers
- Division of Nephrology, University of Liege Hospital (ULiege CHU), Liege, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Departments of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rangueil, INSERM UMR1291 - CNRS UMR5051 - Université Toulouse III, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), Toulouse, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Service de Transplantation Rénale Adulte, Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Denis Glotz
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMR_S 970, Paris, France.,Kidney Transplant Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Caillard
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Nephrology-Transplantation Department, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Marc Ladrière
- Department of Renal Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Nancy, France
| | - Magali Giral
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,CHU Nantes, Université de Nantes, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Service de Transplantation Rénale Adulte, Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMR_S 1151, Paris, France
| | - Caner Süsal
- Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Seiamak Bahram
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. .,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. .,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Franco (Strasbourg)-Japanese (Nagano) Nextgen HLA Laboratory, Strasbourg, France. .,Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Plateau Technique de Biologie, Pôle de Biologie, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France. .,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wasson S. Waiting, strange: transplant recipient experience, medical time and queer/crip temporalities. MEDICAL HUMANITIES 2021; 47:447-455. [PMID: 34049924 PMCID: PMC8639908 DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2021-012141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
People who receive a 'solid' organ transplant from a deceased person may experience imaginative challenges in making sense of how the transfer impacts their own past and future, as shown in existing scholarship. Building on such work, this article considers how the temporalities of medical encounter itself may also become temporally ambiguous, posing representational challenges both pre-transplantation and post-transplantation. The dominant narrative of transplant in transplantation journals and hospital communications, both clinical and patient-facing, presents surgery as a healing moment, yet the recipient's experience of hospital, pharmacology and daily self-monitoring may be disorienting in multiple ways which resist conventional conceptions of medical temporalities of cure. Examining memoirs by Robert Pensack and Richard McCann, this article suggests the transplant temporalities may be fruitfully approached through scholarship of 'queering' time and 'crip' time. While the medical narrative of transplant focuses on the event of transplantation, these texts construct post-transplant time as still profoundly structured by waiting, expectation and suspense, the transformed body less healed than permanently contingent and fragile in different ways. I do not purport to uncover the 'truth' of bleak survival hidden within a story of the miraculous. Rather, I am reaching for a critical practice to recognise subtle entanglements of medicalised time, and identify a tension and synthesis between miracle and the chronic, an insight which may also be of service for other critical approaches to memoir of heroic medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Wasson
- Department of English and Creative Writing, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Callaghan CJ, Ibrahim M, Counter C, Casey J, Friend PJ, Watson CJE, Karydis N. Outcomes after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors: A UK registry analysis. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:3673-3683. [PMID: 33870619 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
There are concerns that simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors have a higher risk of graft failure than those from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. A UK registry analysis of SPK transplants between 2005 and 2018 was performed. Pancreas survivals of those receiving organs from DCD or DBD donors were compared. Multivariable analyses were used to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups and to identify factors associated with pancreas graft loss. A total of 2228 SPK transplants were implanted; 403 (18.1%) were from DCD donors. DCD donors were generally younger, slimmer, less likely to have stroke as a cause of death, with lower terminal creatinines and shorter pancreas cold ischemic times than DBD donors. Median (IQR) follow-up was 4.2 (1.6-8.1) years. On univariable analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in 5-year death-censored pancreas graft survival between the two donor types (79.5% versus 80.4%; p = .86). Multivariable analysis showed no statistically significant differences in 5-year pancreas graft loss between transplants from DCD (n = 343) and DBD (n = 1492) donors (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.76-1.23; p = .12). The findings from this study support the increased use of SPK transplants from DCD donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris J Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Maria Ibrahim
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Statistics and Clinical Studies, National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Claire Counter
- Statistics and Clinical Studies, National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - John Casey
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter J Friend
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher J E Watson
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, and Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, The NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nikolaos Karydis
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Phillips BL, Ibrahim M, Greenhall GHB, Mumford L, Dorling A, Callaghan CJ. Effect of delayed graft function on longer-term outcomes after kidney transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors in the United Kingdom: A national cohort study. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:3346-3355. [PMID: 33756062 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Kidneys from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors are utilized variably worldwide, in part due to high rates of delayed graft function (DGF) and putative associations with adverse longer-term outcomes. We aimed to determine whether the presence of DGF and its duration were associated with poor longer-term outcomes after kidney transplantation from DCD donors. Using the UK transplant registry, we identified 4714 kidney-only transplants from controlled DCD donors to adult recipients between 2006 and 2016; 2832 recipients (60·1%) had immediate graft function and 1882 (39·9%) had DGF. Of the 1847 recipients with DGF duration recorded, 926 (50·1%) had DGF < 7 days, 576 (31·2%) had DGF 7-14 days, and 345 (18·7%) had DGF >14 days. After risk adjustment, the presence of DGF was not associated with inferior long-term graft or patient survivals. However, DGF duration of >14 days was associated with an increased risk of death-censored graft failure (hazard ratio 1·7, p = ·001) and recipient death (hazard ratio 1·8, p < ·001) compared to grafts with immediate function. This study suggests that shorter periods of DGF have no adverse influence on graft or patient survival after DCD donor kidney transplantation and that DGF >14 days is a novel early biomarker for significantly worse longer-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedict L Phillips
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Maria Ibrahim
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Statistics and Clinical Studies, National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Bristol, UK
| | - George H B Greenhall
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Statistics and Clinical Studies, National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Bristol, UK
| | - Lisa Mumford
- Department of Statistics and Clinical Studies, National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Bristol, UK
| | - Anthony Dorling
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Chris J Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kostakis ID, Karydis N, Kassimatis T, Kessaris N, Loukopoulos I. The implications of donor-recipient size mismatch in renal transplantation. J Nephrol 2021; 34:2037-2051. [PMID: 34033003 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-021-01050-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transplanting kidneys small for recipient's size results in inferior graft function. Body surface area (BSA) is related to kidney size. We used the BSA index (BSAi) (Donor BSA/Recipient BSA) to assess whether the renal graft size is sufficient for the recipient. METHODS We included 26,223 adult single kidney transplants (01/01/2007-31/12/2019) from the UK Transplant Registry. We divided renal transplants into groups: BSAi ≤ 0.75, 0.75 < BSA ≤ 1, 1 < BSAi ≤ 1.25, BSAi > 1.25. We compared delayed graft function rates, primary non-function rates and graft survival among them. (Reference category: BSAi ≤ 0.75). RESULTS Cases with BSAi ≤ 0.75 had the highest delayed graft function rates in living-donor renal transplants (11.1%) (0.75 < BSAi ≤ 1: OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.32-1.1, p = 0.095, 1 < BSAi ≤ 1.25: OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.23-0.89, p = 0.022, BSAi > 1.25: OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.13-0.77, p = 0.011) and in renal transplants from donors after brain death (26.2%) (0.75 < BSAi ≤ 1: OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55-0.96, p = 0.024, 1 < BSAi ≤ 1.25: OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.47-0.83, p = 0.001, BSAi > 1.25: OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.47-0.9, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in renal transplants from donors after circulatory death regarding delayed graft function rates (~ 40% in all groups). Graft survival was similar among BSAi groups in renal transplants from living donors and donors after brain death. Renal transplants from donors after circulatory death with BSAi ≤ 0.75 had the shortest graft survival (0.75 < BSAi ≤ 1: HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41-0.74, p < 0.001, 1 < BSAi ≤ 1.25: HR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.35-0.66, p < 0.001, BSAi > 1.25: HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.31-0.66, p < 0.001). Ten-year graft survival rate was 58.4% for renal transplants from donors after circulatory death with BSAi ≤ 0.75. CONCLUSIONS Delayed graft function risk is higher in renal transplants with BSAi ≤ 0.75 coming from living donors and donors after brain death. Graft survival is greatly reduced in renal transplants from donors after circulatory death with BSAi ≤ 0.75.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis D Kostakis
- Department of Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. .,Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW3 2QG, UK.
| | - Nikolaos Karydis
- Department of Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Theodoros Kassimatis
- Department of Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicos Kessaris
- Department of Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ioannis Loukopoulos
- Department of Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lemin AJ, Foster L. HLA-DPB1 allele frequencies in the West Midlands region of the United Kingdom: A critical evaluation against the common, intermediate and well-documented allele catalogues CWD 2.0.0, EFI CWD and CIWD 3.0.0. HLA 2021; 98:5-13. [PMID: 33934529 DOI: 10.1111/tan.14291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The Birmingham H&I laboratory performed HLA typing on 456 potential deceased solid organ donors in the UK between 2014 and 2016. Accurate DPB1 typing is essential for determining HLA compatibility in transplantation, thus we report HLA-DPB1 for potential deceased solid organ donors. To correctly interpret HLA typing data, laboratories must understand both international and local HLA allele frequencies. In this analysis, we determined HLA-DPB1 allele and genotype frequencies for these 456 donors. HLA-DPB1 diversity was evaluated against the common and well-documented (CWD) alleles 2.0.0 catalogue, the European Federation for Immunogenetics (EFI) CWD catalogue and the common, intermediate and well-documented (CIWD) 3.0.0 catalogue. Additionally, we determined which alleles are common in our local deceased donor population. We observed 27 HLA-DPB1 alleles with DPB1*04:01 being the most frequently observed (allele frequency = 0.4342). All alleles detected locally were present in CIWD 3.0.0, however, DPB1*124:01 and *135:01 were not present in CWD 2.0.0 and DPB1*104:01 and *135:01 were not present in EFI CWD. Twenty of 27 DPB1 alleles identified were defined as locally common and also listed as common in CIWD 3.0.0 representing 62.5% of common alleles in the subset of CIWD 3.0.0 from individuals of a European geographic, ancestral or ethnic background. The alleles HLA-DPB1*16:01 and *20:01 are locally common but not listed as common in EFI CWD and DPB1*104:01 is not listed as common in CWD 2.0.0 catalogue. Our analysis showed that the detected alleles and locally common alleles within our population were aligned with the CIWD 3.0.0 catalogue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew James Lemin
- Department of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, NHS Blood and Transplant, Birmingham, UK
| | - Luke Foster
- Department of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, NHS Blood and Transplant, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Georgiades F, Summers DM, Butler AJ, Russell NKI, Clatworthy MR, Torpey N. Renal transplantation during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the UK: Experience from a large-volume center. Clin Transplant 2020; 35:e14150. [PMID: 33170982 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
There is uncertainty about the safety of kidney transplantation during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic due to the risk of donor transmission, nosocomial infection and immunosuppression use. We describe organ donation and transplant practice in the UK and assess whether kidney transplantation conferred a substantial risk of harm. Data from the UK transplant registry were used to describe kidney donation and transplant activity in the UK, and a detailed analysis of short-term, single-center, patient results in two periods: during the pre-pandemic era from 30th December 2019 to 8th March 2020 ("Pre-COVID era") and the 9th March 2020 to 19th May 2020 ("COVID era"). Donor and recipient numbers fell by more than half in the COVID compared to the pre-COVID era in the UK, but there were more kidney transplants performed in our center (42 vs. 29 COVID vs. pre-COVID respectively). Overall outcomes, including re-operation, delayed graft function, primary non-function, acute rejection, length of stay and graft survival were similar between COVID and pre-COVID era. 6/71 patients became infected with SARS-CoV-2 but all were discharged without critical care requirement. Transplant outcomes have remained similar within the COVID period and no serious sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection were observed in the peri-transplant period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrew J Butler
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Neil K I Russell
- Department of Transplantation, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Nicholas Torpey
- Department of Transplantation, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hamilton AJ, Plumb LA, Casula A, Sinha MD. Associations with kidney transplant survival and eGFR decline in children and young adults in the United Kingdom: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Nephrol 2020; 21:492. [PMID: 33208146 PMCID: PMC7672825 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-02156-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although young adulthood is associated with transplant loss, many studies do not examine eGFR decline. We aimed to establish clinical risk factors to identify where early intervention might prevent subsequent adverse transplant outcomes. Methods Retrospective cohort study using UK Renal Registry and UK Transplant Registry data, including patients aged < 30 years transplanted 1998–2014. Associations with death-censored graft failure were investigated with multivariable Cox proportional hazards. Multivariable linear regression was used to establish associations with eGFR slope gradients calculated over the last 5 years of observation per individual. Results The cohort (n = 5121, of whom n = 371 received another transplant) was 61% male, 80% White and 36% had structural disease. Live donation occurred in 48%. There were 1371 graft failures and 145 deaths with a functioning graft over a 39,541-year risk period. Median follow-up was 7 years. Fifteen-year graft survival was 60.2% (95% CI 58.1, 62.3). Risk associations observed in both graft loss and eGFR decline analyses included female sex, glomerular diseases, Black ethnicity and young adulthood (15–19-year and 20–24-year age groups, compared to 25–29 years). A higher initial eGFR was associated with less risk of graft loss but faster eGFR decline. For each additional 10 mL/min/1.73m2 initial eGFR, the hazard ratio for graft loss was 0.82 (95% CI 0.79, 0.86), p < 0.0001. However, compared to < 60 mL/min/1.73m2, higher initial eGFR was associated with faster eGFR decline (> 90 mL/min/1.73m2; − 3.55 mL/min/1.73m2/year (95% CI -4.37, − 2.72), p < 0.0001). Conclusions In conclusion, young adulthood is a key risk factor for transplant loss and eGFR decline for UK children and young adults. This study has an extended follow-up period and confirms common risk associations for graft loss and eGFR decline, including female sex, Black ethnicity and glomerular diseases. A higher initial eGFR was associated with less risk of graft loss but faster rate of eGFR decline. Identification of children at risk of faster rate of eGFR decline may enable early intervention to prolong graft survival. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-020-02156-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Hamilton
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, G.04, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Lucy A Plumb
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, G.04, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.,UK Renal Registry, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Manish D Sinha
- Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK.,Kings College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fakhlaei R, Selamat J, Khatib A, Razis AFA, Sukor R, Ahmad S, Babadi AA. The Toxic Impact of Honey Adulteration: A Review. Foods 2020; 9:E1538. [PMID: 33114468 PMCID: PMC7692231 DOI: 10.3390/foods9111538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Honey is characterized as a natural and raw foodstuff that can be consumed not only as a sweetener but also as medicine due to its therapeutic impact on human health. It is prone to adulterants caused by humans that manipulate the quality of honey. Although honey consumption has remarkably increased in the last few years all around the world, the safety of honey is not assessed and monitored regularly. Since the number of consumers of honey adulteration have increased in recent years, their trust and interest in this valuable product has decreased. Honey adulterants are any substances that are added to the pure honey. In this regard, this paper provides a comprehensive and critical review of the different types of adulteration, common sugar adulterants and detection methods, and draws a clear perspective toward the impact of honey adulteration on human health. Adulteration increases the consumer's blood sugar, which can cause diabetes, abdominal weight gain, and obesity, raise the level of blood lipids and can cause high blood pressure. The most common organ affected by honey adulterants is the liver followed by the kidney, heart, and brain, as shown in several in vivo research designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafieh Fakhlaei
- Food Safety and Food Integrity (FOSFI), Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia;
| | - Jinap Selamat
- Food Safety and Food Integrity (FOSFI), Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia;
- Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; (A.F.A.R.); (R.S.)
| | - Alfi Khatib
- Pharmacognosy Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Kulliyyah of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan 25200, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia;
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Airlangga University, Surabaya 60155, Indonesia
| | - Ahmad Faizal Abdull Razis
- Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; (A.F.A.R.); (R.S.)
- Natural Medicines and Products Research Laboratory, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Rashidah Sukor
- Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; (A.F.A.R.); (R.S.)
| | - Syahida Ahmad
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology & Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia;
| | - Arman Amani Babadi
- School of Energy and Power Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Equity-Efficiency Trade-offs Associated With Alternative Approaches to Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation: A Patient-level Simulation. Transplantation 2020; 104:795-803. [PMID: 31403554 PMCID: PMC7147404 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background. The number of patients waiting to receive a kidney transplant outstrips the supply of donor organs. We sought to quantify trade-offs associated with different approaches to deceased donor kidney allocation in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and access to transplantation. Methods. An individual patient simulation model was developed to compare 5 different approaches to kidney allocation, including the 2006 UK National Kidney Allocation Scheme (NKAS) and a QALY maximization approach designed to maximize health gains from a limited supply of donor organs. We used various sources of patient-level data to develop multivariable regression models to predict survival, health state utilities, and costs. We simulated the allocation of kidneys from 2200 deceased donors to a waiting list of 5500 patients and produced estimates of total lifetime costs and QALYs for each allocation scheme. Results. Among patients who received a transplant, the QALY maximization approach generated 48 045 QALYs and cost £681 million, while the 2006 NKAS generated 44 040 QALYs and cost £625 million. When also taking into consideration outcomes for patients who were not prioritized to receive a transplant, the 2006 NKAS produced higher total QALYs and costs and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £110 741/QALY compared with the QALY maximization approach. Conclusions. Compared with the 2006 NKAS, a QALY maximization approach makes more efficient use of deceased donor kidneys but reduces access to transplantation for older patients and results in greater inequity in the distribution of health gains between patients who receive a transplant and patients who remain on the waiting list.
Collapse
|
17
|
Cold Pulsatile Machine Perfusion Versus Static Cold Storage for Kidneys Donated After Circulatory Death: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Transplantation 2020; 104:1019-1025. [PMID: 31403552 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of cold pulsatile machine perfusion (MP) for the storage and transportation of kidneys donated after circulatory death are disputed. We conducted a UK-based multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes of kidneys stored with MP versus static cold storage (CS). METHODS Fifty-one pairs of kidneys donated after circulatory death were randomly allocated to receive static CS or cold pulsatile MP. The primary endpoint, delayed graft function, was analyzed by "intention-to-treat" evaluation. RESULTS There was no difference in the incidence of delayed graft function between CS and MP (32/51 (62.8%) and 30/51 (58.8%) P = 0.69, respectively), although the trial stopped early due to difficulty with recruitment. There was no difference in the incidence of acute rejection, or in graft or patient survival between the CS and MP groups. Median estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 months following transplantation was significantly lower in the CS group compared with MP (CS 34 mL/min IQR 26-44 vs MP 45 mL/min IQR 36-60, P = 0.006), although there was no significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate between CS and MP at 12 months posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS This study is underpowered, which limits definitive conclusions about the use of MP, as an alternative to static CS. It did not demonstrate that the use of MP reduces the incidence of delayed graft function in donation after circulatory death kidney transplantation.
Collapse
|
18
|
Kostakis ID, Kassimatis T, Flach C, Karydis N, Kessaris N, Loukopoulos I. Hypoperfusion warm ischaemia time in renal transplants from donors after circulatory death. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 35:1628-1634. [DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The donor hypoperfusion phase before asystole in renal transplants from donors after circulatory death (DCD) has been considered responsible for worse outcomes than those from donors after brain death (DBD).
Methods
We included 10 309 adult renal transplants (7128 DBD and 3181 DCD; 1 January 2010–31 December 2016) from the UK Transplant Registry. We divided DCD renal transplants into groups according to hypoperfusion warm ischaemia time (HWIT). We compared delayed graft function (DGF) rates, primary non-function (PNF) rates and graft survival among them using DBD renal transplants as a reference.
Results
The DGF rate was 21.7% for DBD cases, but ∼40% for DCD cases with HWIT ≤30 min (0–10 min: 42.1%, 11–20 min: 43%, 21–30 min: 38.4%) and 60% for DCD cases with HWIT >30 min (P < 0.001). All DCD groups showed higher DGF risk than DBD renal transplants in multivariable analysis {0–10 min: odds ratio [OR] 2.686 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.352–3.068]; 11–20 min: OR 2.531 [95% CI 2.003–3.198]; 21–30 min: OR 1.764 [95% CI 1.017–3.059]; >30 min: OR 5.814 [95% CI 2.798–12.081]}. The highest risk for DGF in DCD renal transplants with HWIT >30 min was confirmed by multivariable analysis [versus DBD: OR 5.814 (95% CI 2.798–12.081) versus DCD: 0–10 min: OR 2.165 (95% CI 1.038–4.505); 11–20 min: OR 2.299 (95% CI 1.075–4.902); 21–30 min: OR 3.3 (95% CI 1.33–8.197)]. No significant differences were detected regarding PNF rates (P = 0.713) or graft survival (P = 0.757), which was confirmed by multivariable analysis.
Conclusions
HWIT >30 min increases the risk for DGF greatly, but without affecting PNF or graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis D Kostakis
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Theodoros Kassimatis
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Flach
- King’s College London, School of Population Health and Environmental Studies, London, UK
| | - Nikolaos Karydis
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicos Kessaris
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ioannis Loukopoulos
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wallace D, Robb M, Hughes W, Johnson R, Ploeg R, Neuberger J, Forsythe J, Cacciola R. Outcomes of Patients Suspended From the National Kidney Transplant Waiting List in the United Kingdom Between 2000 and 2010. Transplantation 2020; 104:1654-1661. [PMID: 32732844 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United Kingdom, 1 in 3 patients on the National Kidney Transplant Waiting List (NKTWL) is suspended from the list at least once during their wait. The mortality of this large cohort of patients remains underreported and poorly described. METHODS We linked patient records from the UK transplant registry to mortality data from the Office of National Statistics and evaluated the impact of a clinically induced suspension event by estimating hazard ratios (HRs) that compared mortality and graft survival between those who had experienced a suspension event and those who had not. RESULTS Between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010, 16.7% (2221/13 322) of all patients registered on the NKTWL were suspended. Forty-eight percent (588/1225) of those who were suspended and who were never transplanted died, most often from cardiothoracic causes. A suspension event was associated with increased mortality from the time of listing (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.79; 1.64-1.95) and from the time of transplantation (aHR, 1.20; 1.06-1.37; P = 0.005). Graft survival was also poorer in those who had been suspended (aHR, 1.13; 1.01-1.28; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Patients suspended on the NKTWL have a significantly higher rate of mortality both on the waiting list and following transplantation. Earlier prioritization of patients at risk of experiencing a suspension event may improve their outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Wallace
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Robb
- Statistics and Clinical Studies, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Winter Hughes
- Statistics and Clinical Studies, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Johnson
- Statistics and Clinical Studies, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Rutger Ploeg
- Statistics and Clinical Studies, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - James Neuberger
- Statistics and Clinical Studies, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - John Forsythe
- Statistics and Clinical Studies, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Transplant Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Roberto Cacciola
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Transplant Unit, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ibrahim M, Greenhall GHB, Summers DM, Mumford L, Johnson R, Baker RJ, Forsythe J, Pettigrew GJ, Ahmad N, Callaghan CJ. Utilization and Outcomes of Single and Dual Kidney Transplants from Older Deceased Donors in the United Kingdom. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15:1320-1329. [PMID: 32690721 PMCID: PMC7480543 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.02060220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Kidneys from elderly deceased donors are often discarded after procurement if the expected outcomes from single kidney transplantation are considered unacceptable. An alternative is to consider them for dual kidney transplantation. We aimed to examine the utilization of kidneys from donors aged ≥60 years in the United Kingdom and compare clinical outcomes of dual versus single kidney transplant recipients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Data from the United Kingdom Transplant Registry from 2005 to 2017 were analyzed. We examined utilization rates of kidneys retrieved from deceased donors aged ≥60 years, and 5-year patient and death-censored graft survival of recipients of dual and single kidney transplants. Secondary outcomes included eGFR. Multivariable analyses and propensity score analysis were used to correct for differences between the groups. RESULTS During the study period, 7841 kidneys were procured from deceased donors aged ≥60 years, of which 1338 (17%) were discarded; 356 dual and 5032 single kidneys were transplanted. Donors of dual transplants were older (median, 73 versus 66 years; P<0.001) and had higher United States Kidney Donor Risk Indices (2.48 versus 1.98; P<0.001). Recipients of dual transplants were also older (64 versus 61 years; P<0.001) and had less favorable human leukocyte antigen matching (P<0.001). After adjusting for confounders, dual and single transplants had similar 5-year graft survival (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.12). No difference in patient survival was demonstrated. Similar findings were observed in a matched cohort with a propensity score analysis method. Median 12-month eGFR was significantly higher in the dual kidney transplant group (40 versus 36 ml/min per 1.73 m2; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Recipients of kidneys from donors aged ≥60 years have similar 5-year graft survival and better graft function at 12 months with dual compared with single deceased donor kidney transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Ibrahim
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom .,National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom.,Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - George H B Greenhall
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom.,Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dominic M Summers
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Mumford
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Johnson
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Richard J Baker
- Department of Nephrology, St James's University Hospital, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - John Forsythe
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Gavin J Pettigrew
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Niaz Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Chris J Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kidney transplantation following uncontrolled donation after circulatory death. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2020; 25:144-150. [DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
22
|
Watson CJE, Johnson RJ, Mumford L. Overview of the Evolution of the UK Kidney Allocation Schemes. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-020-00270-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
Allocation of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation has evolved since the first utilitarian approach in 1989. This review looks at how the schemes have evolved over the ensuing three decades.
Recent Findings
Four kidney offering schemes have been used in the last 30 years. Successive schemes have evolved from offering only one donor kidney for a nationally prioritised patient to offering both kidneys, from addressing only kidneys from donors after brain death (DBD) to offering kidneys from both DBD and circulatory death donors (DCD) and from prioritising purely on the basis of zero class 2 and minimising class 1 mismatches to a more relaxed approach for older donors and more difficult to match patients while introducing the concept of longevity matching.
Summary
UK kidney offering schemes have evolved through a series of evidence-based analyses to try to optimally address the principles of utility and fairness in kidney offering.
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
Ayorinde JOO, Hamed M, Goh MA, Summers DM, Dare A, Chen Y, Saeb‐Parsy K. Development of an objective, standardized tool for surgical assessment of deceased donor kidneys: The Cambridge Kidney Assessment Tool. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e13782. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 01/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John O. O. Ayorinde
- Department of Surgery Addenbrooke's Hospital University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
| | - Mazin Hamed
- Department of Surgery Addenbrooke's Hospital University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
| | - Mingzheng Aaron Goh
- Department of Surgery Addenbrooke's Hospital University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
| | - Dominic M. Summers
- Department of Surgery Addenbrooke's Hospital University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
| | - Anna Dare
- Department of Surgery Addenbrooke's Hospital University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
| | - Yining Chen
- Department of Statistics London School of Economics London UK
| | - Kourosh Saeb‐Parsy
- Department of Surgery Addenbrooke's Hospital University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
UK renal transplant outcomes in low and high BMI recipients: the need for a national policy. J Nephrol 2019; 33:371-381. [PMID: 31583535 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-019-00654-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We assessed the effect of recipient body mass index (BMI) on the outcomes of renal transplantation and the management of obese patients with end-stage renal disease across the UK. METHODS We analyzed data of 25539 adult renal transplants (2007-2016) from the UK Transplant Registry. Patients were divided in BMI groups [underweight: < 18.5, normal: 18.5-24.9 (reference group), overweight: 25-29.9, class I obese: 30-34.9, class II/III obese: ≥ 35]. We also conducted a national survey of all UK renal transplant centers on the influence of BMI on decisions regarding management of renal transplant candidates. RESULTS BMI ≥ 25 was an independent risk factor for delayed graft function and primary non-function (p ≤ 0.001). Underweight (p = 0.001), class I obese (p = 0.017) and class II/III obese recipients (p < 0.001) had poorer graft survival, however, 5- and 10-year graft survival rates were good. Patient survival was shorter for underweight recipients (p < 0.001) and longer for overweight (p = 0.028) and class I obese recipients (p = 0.013). The national survey revealed significant variability among transplant centers in BMI threshold for listing patients on transplant waiting list and limited support with conservative or surgical procedures for weight control. CONCLUSIONS Obesity alone should not be a barrier for renal transplantation. A national strategy is required to give all patients equal chances in transplantation.
Collapse
|
26
|
Turner D, Battle R, Akbarzad-Yousefi A, Little AM. The omission of the "wet" pre-transplant crossmatch in renal transplant centres in Scotland. HLA 2019; 94:3-10. [PMID: 31025501 DOI: 10.1111/tan.13558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The methods used for assessment of immunological risk for a patient receiving a kidney from a deceased donor have undergone significant change in the last few years. Many centres now proceed to transplant without any additional laboratory-based HLA testing for patients who are well defined as HLA antibody negative. Using rapid HLA antibody tests at the time of donor offer, such as Luminex, it is also possible to omit wet crossmatches in many sensitised patients. This virtual crossmatch (vXM) approach provides benefits in reducing cold ischaemia time (CIT), but also carries risks such as missing clinically relevant non-HLA reactivity or allelic HLA antibody reactivity. A number of factors need to be in place in a laboratory to enable a vXM policy to be extended to both sensitised and non-sensitised patients including access to complete donor HLA typing, ability to undertake Luminex-based HLA antibody testing out of working hours, and access to senior H&I Scientist expertise to assess and interpret results. Other approaches, such as using peripheral blood lymphocytes for crossmatching, may also enable a reduction in CIT and transplant units need to assess the risks of extending vXM processes for their patients against potential benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Turner
- H&I Laboratory, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Richard Battle
- H&I Laboratory, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Ann-Margaret Little
- H&I Laboratory, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.,Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mumford L, Maxwell H, Ahmad N, Marks SD, Tizard J. The impact of changing practice on improved outcomes of paediatric renal transplantation in the United Kingdom: a 25 years review. Transpl Int 2019; 32:751-761. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.13418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Revised: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Mumford
- Statistics and Clinical Studies NHS Blood and Transplant Bristol UK
| | | | - Niaz Ahmad
- Transplant Unit St James University Hospital Leeds UK
| | - Stephen D. Marks
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Jane Tizard
- Children's Renal Unit Bristol Royal Hospital for Children Bristol UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Manook M, Mumford L, Barnett ANR, Osei‐Bordom D, Sandhu B, Veniard D, Maggs T, Shaw O, Kessaris N, Dorling A, Shah S, Mamode N. For the many: permitting deceased donor kidney transplantation across low‐titre blood group antibodies can reduce wait times for blood group B recipients, and improve the overall number of 000MMtransplants ‐ a multicentre observational cohort study. Transpl Int 2019; 32:431-442. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.13389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Manook
- Department of Renal and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | | | | | - Daniel Osei‐Bordom
- Department of Renal and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Bynvant Sandhu
- Department of Renal and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | | | | | | | - Nicos Kessaris
- Department of Renal and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Anthony Dorling
- Department of Renal and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
- MRC Centre for Transplantation King's College London Guy's Hospital London UK
| | | | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Renal and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wu DA, Robb ML, Watson CJE, Forsythe JLR, Tomson CRV, Cairns J, Roderick P, Johnson RJ, Ravanan R, Fogarty D, Bradley C, Gibbons A, Metcalfe W, Draper H, Bradley AJ, Oniscu GC. Barriers to living donor kidney transplantation in the United Kingdom: a national observational study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018; 32:890-900. [PMID: 28379431 PMCID: PMC5427518 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfx036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 02/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) provides more timely access to transplantation and better clinical outcomes than deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). This study investigated disparities in the utilization of LDKT in the UK. Methods. A total of 2055 adults undergoing kidney transplantation between November 2011 and March 2013 were prospectively recruited from all 23 UK transplant centres as part of the Access to Transplantation and Transplant Outcome Measures (ATTOM) study. Recipient variables independently associated with receipt of LDKT versus DDKT were identified. Results. Of the 2055 patients, 807 (39.3%) received LDKT and 1248 (60.7%) received DDKT. Multivariable modelling demonstrated a significant reduction in the likelihood of LDKT for older age {odds ratio [OR] 0.11 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08–0.17], P < 0.0001 for 65–75 years versus 18–34 years}; Asian ethnicity [OR 0.55 (95% CI 0.39–0.77), P = 0.0006 versus White]; Black ethnicity [OR 0.64 (95% CI 0.42–0.99), P = 0.047 versus White]; divorced, separated or widowed [OR 0.63 (95% CI 0.46–0.88), P = 0.030 versus married]; no qualifications [OR 0.55 (95% CI 0.42–0.74), P < 0.0001 versus higher education qualifications]; no car ownership [OR 0.51 (95% CI 0.37–0.72), P = 0.0001] and no home ownership [OR 0.65 (95% CI 0.85–0.79), P = 0.002]. The odds of LDKT varied significantly between countries in the UK. Conclusions. Among patients undergoing kidney transplantation in the UK, there are significant age, ethnic, socio-economic and geographic disparities in the utilization of LDKT. Further work is needed to explore the potential for targeted interventions to improve equity in living donor transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana A Wu
- Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Christopher J E Watson
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - John L R Forsythe
- Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | | | - John Cairns
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Paul Roderick
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Rommel Ravanan
- Department of Renal Medicine, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Damian Fogarty
- Regional Nephrology and Transplant Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Clare Bradley
- Health Psychology Research Unit, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK
| | - Andrea Gibbons
- Health Psychology Research Unit, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK
| | - Wendy Metcalfe
- Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Heather Draper
- Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Conventry, UK (author has moved institutions since acceptance of the article)
| | - Andrew J Bradley
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
HLA Matching in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: HLA Poorly Matched Living Donor Transplants Versus HLA Well-Matched Deceased Donor Transplants. Transplantation 2017; 101:2789-2792. [PMID: 28471872 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Based on an analysis of 542 pediatric kidney transplants recorded by the UK Transplant Registry from 2000 to 2012, it was concluded that the survival rate of HLA poorly matched living donor transplants is not inferior to that of HLA well-matched deceased donor transplants. METHODS We analyzed the impact of HLA matching on kidney graft survival in 3627 pediatric living donor transplants performed during 2000 to 2015 using the data of the Collaborative Transplant Study. The impact of HLA mismatches on graft survival was analyzed and survival rates of transplants from poorly matched living donors were compared with those from well-matched deceased donors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to account for the influence of confounders. RESULTS HLA matching had a statistically significant impact on graft survival of pediatric kidney transplants (P < 0.001). Ten-year graft survival of pediatric transplants from living donors with 4 to 6 HLA-A+B+DR mismatches was significantly worse than that of transplants from well-matched deceased donors with 0 to 1 HLA mismatch (log rank, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS In pediatric kidney transplantation, graft survival of kidneys from deceased donors with 0 to 1 HLA mismatches compares favorably with that of grafts from living donors with 4 to 6 HLA mismatches. If possible, living donor pediatric kidney transplants should be performed from donors with fewer than 4 HLA-A+B+DR mismatches.
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
Wu DA, Watson CJ, Bradley JA, Johnson RJ, Forsythe JL, Oniscu GC. Global trends and challenges in deceased donor kidney allocation. Kidney Int 2017; 91:1287-1299. [DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.09.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2016] [Revised: 09/12/2016] [Accepted: 09/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
34
|
Reese PP, Mohan S. Sense and sensitivity: incompatible patients and their donors in kidney transplantation. Lancet 2017; 389:677-678. [PMID: 28065560 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32053-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2016] [Accepted: 10/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter P Reese
- Renal Electrolyte & Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, and Department of Epidemiology, and The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mirshekar-Syahkal B, Summers D, Bradbury LL, Aly M, Bardsley V, Berry M, Norris JM, Torpey N, Clatworthy MR, Bradley JA, Pettigrew GJ. Local Expansion of Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplant Activity Improves Waitlisted Outcomes and Addresses Inequities of Access to Transplantation. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:390-400. [PMID: 27428662 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Revised: 06/24/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
In the United Kingdom, donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidney transplant activity has increased rapidly, but marked regional variation persists. We report how increased DCD kidney transplant activity influenced waitlisted outcomes for a single center. Between 2002-2003 and 2011-2012, 430 (54%) DCD and 361 (46%) donation after brain death (DBD) kidney-only transplants were performed at the Cambridge Transplant Centre, with a higher proportion of DCD donors fulfilling expanded criteria status (41% DCD vs. 32% DBD; p = 0.01). Compared with U.K. outcomes, for which the proportion of DCD:DBD kidney transplants performed is lower (25%; p < 0.0001), listed patients at our center waited less time for transplantation (645 vs. 1045 days; p < 0.0001), and our center had higher transplantation rates and lower numbers of waiting list deaths. This was most apparent for older patients (aged >65 years; waiting time 730 vs. 1357 days nationally; p < 0.001), who received predominantly DCD kidneys from older donors (mean donor age 64 years), whereas younger recipients received equal proportions of living donor, DBD and DCD kidney transplants. Death-censored kidney graft survival was nevertheless comparable for younger and older recipients, although transplantation conferred a survival benefit from listing for only younger recipients. Local expansion in DCD kidney transplant activity improves survival outcomes for younger patients and addresses inequity of access to transplantation for older recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - D Summers
- University Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - M Aly
- University Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - V Bardsley
- Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - M Berry
- Department of Renal Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - J M Norris
- University Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - N Torpey
- Department of Renal Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - M R Clatworthy
- Department of Renal Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - J A Bradley
- University Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - G J Pettigrew
- University Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gibbons A, Cinnirella M, Bayfield J, Wu D, Draper H, Johnson RJ, Tomson CRV, Forsythe JLR, Metcalfe W, Fogarty D, Roderick P, Ravanan R, Oniscu GC, Watson CJE, Bradley JA, Bradley C. Patient preferences, knowledge and beliefs about kidney allocation: qualitative findings from the UK-wide ATTOM programme. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e013896. [PMID: 28132010 PMCID: PMC5278279 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore how patients who are wait-listed for or who have received a kidney transplant understand the current UK kidney allocation system, and their views on ways to allocate kidneys in the future. DESIGN Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and thematic analysis based on a pragmatic approach. PARTICIPANTS 10 deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients, 10 live-donor kidney transplant recipients, 12 participants currently wait-listed for a kidney transplant and 4 participants whose kidney transplant failed. SETTING Semistructured telephone interviews conducted with participants in their own homes across the UK. RESULTS Three main themes were identified: uncertainty of knowledge of the allocation scheme; evaluation of the system and participant suggestions for future allocation schemes. Most participants identified human leucocyte anitgen matching as a factor in determining kidney allocation, but were often uncertain of the accuracy of their knowledge. In the absence of information that would allow a full assessment, the majority of participants consider that the current system is effective. A minority of participants were concerned about the perceived lack of transparency of the general decision-making processes within the scheme. Most participants felt that people who are younger and those better matched to the donor kidney should be prioritised for kidney allocation, but in contrast to the current scheme, less priority was considered appropriate for longer waiting patients. Some non-medical themes were also discussed, such as whether parents of dependent children should be prioritised for allocation, and whether patients with substance abuse problems be deprioritised. CONCLUSIONS Our participants held differing views about the most important factors for kidney allocation, some of which were in contrast to the current scheme. Patient participation in reviewing future allocation policies will provide insight as to what is considered acceptable to patients and inform healthcare staff of the kinds of information patients would find most useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gibbons
- Health Psychology Research Unit, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK
| | - Marco Cinnirella
- Department ofPsychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK
| | - Janet Bayfield
- Health Psychology Research Unit, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK
| | - Diana Wu
- Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Heather Draper
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
| | - Rachel J Johnson
- Statistics and Clinical Studies, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | | | - John L R Forsythe
- Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Organ Donation and Transplantation, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Wendy Metcalfe
- Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Damian Fogarty
- Regional Nephrology and Transplant Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Paul Roderick
- Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Rommel Ravanan
- Department of Renal Medicine, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Christopher J E Watson
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre and the NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - J Andrew Bradley
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre and the NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Clare Bradley
- Health Psychology Research Unit, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK
- Health Psychology Research Ltd, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Living Donation Has a Greater Impact on Renal Allograft Survival Than HLA Matching in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 2016; 100:2717-2722. [PMID: 26985746 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living donor (LD) kidney transplantation accounts for around half of all pediatric renal transplant recipients and results in improved renal allograft survival. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of HLA matching on deceased and LD renal allograft outcomes in pediatric recipients. METHODS Data were obtained from the UK Transplant Registry held by NHS Blood and Transplant on all children who received a donation after brain death (DBD) or LD kidney-only transplant between 2000 and 2011. HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR mismatches were categorized into 4 levels and 2 groups. Data were fully anonymized. RESULTS One thousand three hundred seventy-eight pediatric renal transplant recipients were analyzed; 804 (58%) received a DBD donor kidney, 574 (42%) received an LD kidney. Five-year renal allograft survival was superior for children receiving a poorly HLA-matched LD kidney transplant (88%, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 84-91%) compared with children receiving a well HLA-matched DBD kidney transplant (83%, 95% CI, 80-86%, log rank test P = 0.03). Five-year renal allograft survival was superior for children receiving an LD kidney with 1 or 2 HLA-DR mismatches (88%, 95% CI, 84-91%) compared with children receiving a DBD kidney with 0 HLA-DR mismatches (83%, 95% CI, 80-86%, log rank test P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS In children, poorly HLA-matched LD renal transplant outcomes are not inferior when compared with well HLA-matched DBD renal transplants. It is difficult to justify preferentially waiting for an improved HLA-matched DBD kidney when a poorer HLA-matched LD kidney transplant is available.
Collapse
|
38
|
Wilkinson TM, Dittmer ID. Should Children Be Given Priority in Kidney Allocation? JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2016; 13:535-545. [PMID: 27392661 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-016-9737-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2015] [Accepted: 04/15/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Kidneys for transplantation are scarce, and many countries give priority to children in allocating them. This paper explains and criticizes the paediatric priority. We set out the relevant ethical principles of allocation, such as utility and severity, and the relevant facts to do with such matters as sensitization and child development. We argue that the facts and principles do not support and sometimes conflict with the priority given to children. We next consider various views on how age or the status of children should affect allocation. Again, these views do not support priority to children in its current form. Since distinctions based on age ought to be positively justified, the failure of all these attempts at justification implies that the priority to children is ethically mistaken. Finally, the paper points to evidence that the paediatric priority reduces the overall supply of kidneys, at least in the United States. Paediatric priority is a real-world policy that seems discriminatory, in some places probably reduces the supply of organs, has no robust official defence, and is unsupported by mainstream ethical principles. Consequently, it should be ended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T M Wilkinson
- Politics and International Relations, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - I D Dittmer
- Department of Renal Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Private Bag 92024, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Weitz M, Sazpinar O, Schmidt M, Neuhaus TJ, Maurer E, Kuehni C, Parvex P, Chehade H, Tschumi S, Immer F, Laube GF. Balancing competing needs in kidney transplantation: does an allocation system prioritizing children affect the renal transplant function? Transpl Int 2016; 30:68-75. [PMID: 27732754 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Revised: 07/28/2016] [Accepted: 10/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Children often merit priority in access to deceased donor kidneys by organ-sharing organizations. We report the impact of the new Swiss Organ Allocation System (SOAS) introduced in 2007, offering all kidney allografts from deceased donors <60 years preferentially to children. The retrospective cohort study included all paediatric transplant patients (<20 years of age) before (n = 19) and after (n = 32) the new SOAS (from 2001 to 2014). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPC), need for antihypertensive medication, waiting times to kidney transplantation (KTX), number of pre-emptive transplantations and rejections, and the proportion of living donor transplants were considered as outcome parameters. Patients after the new SOAS had significantly better eGFRs 2 years after KTX (Mean Difference, MD = 25.7 ml/min/1.73 m2 , P = 0.025), lower UPC ratios (Median Difference, MeD = -14.5 g/mol, P = 0.004), decreased waiting times to KTX (MeD = -97 days, P = 0.021) and a higher proportion of pre-emptive transplantations (Odds Ratio = 9.4, 95% CI = 1.1-80.3, P = 0.018), while the need for antihypertensive medication, number of rejections and living donor transplantations remained stable. The new SOAS is associated with improved short-term clinical outcomes and more rapid access to KTX. Despite lacking long-term research, the study results should encourage other policy makers to adopt the SOAS approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Weitz
- University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Onur Sazpinar
- University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maria Schmidt
- University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Elisabeth Maurer
- Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Kuehni
- Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, Berne, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | - Guido F Laube
- University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Li B, Cairns JA, Robb ML, Johnson RJ, Watson CJE, Forsythe JL, Oniscu GC, Ravanan R, Dudley C, Roderick P, Metcalfe W, Tomson CR, Bradley JA. Predicting patient survival after deceased donor kidney transplantation using flexible parametric modelling. BMC Nephrol 2016; 17:51. [PMID: 27225846 PMCID: PMC4881185 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-016-0264-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2016] [Accepted: 05/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of donor and recipient factors on outcomes following kidney transplantation is commonly analysed using Cox regression models, but this approach is not useful for predicting long-term survival beyond observed data. We demonstrate the application of a flexible parametric approach to fit a model that can be extrapolated for the purpose of predicting mean patient survival. The primary motivation for this analysis is to develop a predictive model to estimate post-transplant survival based on individual patient characteristics to inform the design of alternative approaches to allocating deceased donor kidneys to those on the transplant waiting list in the United Kingdom. METHODS We analysed data from over 12,000 recipients of deceased donor kidney or combined kidney and pancreas transplants between 2003 and 2012. We fitted a flexible parametric model incorporating restricted cubic splines to characterise the baseline hazard function and explored a range of covariates including recipient, donor and transplant-related factors. RESULTS Multivariable analysis showed the risk of death increased with recipient and donor age, diabetic nephropathy as the recipient's primary renal diagnosis and donor hypertension. The risk of death was lower in female recipients, patients with polycystic kidney disease and recipients of pre-emptive transplants. The final model was used to extrapolate survival curves in order to calculate mean survival times for patients with specific characteristics. CONCLUSION The use of flexible parametric modelling techniques allowed us to address some of the limitations of both the Cox regression approach and of standard parametric models when the goal is to predict long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernadette Li
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
| | - John A Cairns
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| | | | | | - Christopher J E Watson
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - John L Forsythe
- Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Rommel Ravanan
- Richard Bright Renal Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Paul Roderick
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Charles R Tomson
- Department of Renal Medicine, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - J Andrew Bradley
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Morgan M, Kenten C, Deedat S, Farsides B, Newton T, Randhawa G, Sims J, Sque M. Increasing the acceptability and rates of organ donation among minority ethnic groups: a programme of observational and evaluative research on Donation, Transplantation and Ethnicity (DonaTE). PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar04040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundBlack, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) groups have a high need for organ transplantation but deceased donation is low. This restricts the availability of well-matched organs and results in relatively long waiting times for transplantation, with increased mortality risks.ObjectiveTo identify barriers to organ donor registration and family consent among the BAME population, and to develop and evaluate a training intervention to enhance communication with ethnic minority families and identify impacts on family consent.MethodsThree-phase programme comprising (1) community-based research involving two systematic reviews examining attitudes and barriers to organ donation and effective interventions followed by 22 focus groups with minority ethnic groups; (2) hospital-based research examining staff practices and influences on family consent through ethics discussion groups (EDGs) with staff, a study on intensive care units (ICUs) and interviews with bereaved ethnic minority families; and (3) development and evaluation of a training package to enhance cultural competence among ICU staff.SettingCommunity focus group study in eight London boroughs with high prevalence of ethnic minority populations. Hospital studies at five NHS hospital trusts (three in London and two in Midlands).Participants(1) Community studies: 228 focus group participants; (2) hospital studies: 35 nurses, 28 clinicians, 19 hospital chaplains, 25 members of local Organ Donation Committees, 17 bereaved family members; and (3) evaluation: 66 health professionals.Data sourcesFocus groups with community residents, systematic reviews, qualitative interviews and observation in ICUs, EDGs with ICU staff, bereaved family interviews and questionnaires for trial evaluation.Review methodsSystematic review and narrative synthesis.Results(1) Community studies: Organ Donor Register – different ethnic/faith and age groups were at varying points on the ‘pathway’ to organ donor registration, with large numbers lacking knowledge and remaining at a pre-contemplation stage. Key attitudinal barriers were uncertainties regarding religious permissibility, bodily concerns, lack of trust in health professionals and little priority given to registration, with the varying significance of these factors varying by ethnicity/faith and age. National campaigns focusing on ethnic minorities have had limited impact, whereas characteristics of effective educational interventions are being conducted in a familiar environment; addressing the groups’ particular concerns; delivery by trained members of the lay community; and providing immediate access to registration. Interventions are also required to target those at specific stages of the donation pathway. (2) Hospital studies: family consent to donation – many ICU staff, especially junior nurses, described a lack of confidence in communication and supporting ethnic minority families, often reflecting differences in emotional expression, faith and cultural beliefs, and language difficulties. The continuing high proportion of family donation discussions that take place without the collaboration of a specialist nurse for organ donation (SNOD) reflected consultants’ views of their own role in family consent to donation, a lack of trust in SNODs and uncertainties surrounding controlled donations after circulatory (or cardiac) death. Hospital chaplains differed in their involvement in ICUs, reflecting their availability/employment status, personal interests and the practices of ICU staff. (3) Evaluation: professional development package – a digital versatile disc-based training package was developed to promote confidence and skills in cross-cultural communication (available at:www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueaR6XYkeVM&feature=youtu.be). Initial evaluation produced positive feedback and significant affirmative attitudinal change but no significant difference in consent rate over the short follow-up period with requirements for longer-term evaluation.LimitationsParticipants in the focus group study were mainly first-generation migrants of manual socioeconomic groups. It was not permitted to identify non-consenting families for interview with data regarding the consent process were therefore limited to consenting families.ConclusionsThe research presents guidance for the effective targeting of donation campaigns focusing on minority ethnic groups and provides the first training package in cultural competence in the NHS.Future workGreater evaluation is required of community interventions in the UK to enhance knowledge of effective practice and analysis of the experiences of non-consenting ethnic minority families.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myfanwy Morgan
- Division of Health and Social Care Research, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Kenten
- Division of Health and Social Care Research, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Deedat
- Division of Health and Social Care Research, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Bobbie Farsides
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Tim Newton
- Dental Institute, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Gurch Randhawa
- Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
| | - Jessica Sims
- Division of Health and Social Care Research, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Magi Sque
- Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton and Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
The current challenges for pancreas transplantation for diabetes mellitus. Pharmacol Res 2015; 98:45-51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2015.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2014] [Revised: 01/26/2015] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
43
|
EXP CLIN TRANSPLANTExp Clin Transplant 2015; 13. [DOI: 10.6002/ect.mesot2014.o65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register]
|
44
|
Kidney donation after circulatory death (DCD): state of the art. Kidney Int 2015; 88:241-9. [PMID: 25786101 DOI: 10.1038/ki.2015.88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 230] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2014] [Revised: 01/12/2015] [Accepted: 01/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The use of kidneys from controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors has the potential to markedly increase kidney transplants performed. However, this potential is not being realized because of concerns that DCD kidneys are inferior to those from donation after brain-death (DBD) donors. The United Kingdom has developed a large and successful controlled DCD kidney transplant program that has allowed for a substantial increase in kidney transplant numbers. Here we describe recent trends in DCD kidney donor activity in the United Kingdom, outline aspects of the donation process, and describe donor selection and allocation of DCD kidneys. Previous UK Transplant Registry analyses have shown that while DCD kidneys are more susceptible to cold ischemic injury and have a higher incidence of delayed graft function, short- and medium-term transplant outcomes are similar in recipients of kidneys from DCD and DBD donors. We present an updated, extended UK registry analysis showing that longer-term transplant outcomes in DCD donor kidneys are also similar to those for DBD donor kidneys, and that transplant outcomes for kidneys from expanded-criteria DCD donors are no less favorable than for expanded-criteria DBD donors. Accordingly, the selection criteria for use of kidneys from DCD donors should be the same as those used for DBD donors. The UK experience suggests that wider international development of DCD kidney transplantation programs will help address the global shortage of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation.
Collapse
|
45
|
Dare AJ, Bolton EA, Pettigrew GJ, Bradley JA, Saeb-Parsy K, Murphy MP. Kidney donation after circulatory death (DCD): state of the art. Kidney Int 2015; 5:163-168. [PMID: 25965144 PMCID: PMC4427662 DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2015] [Accepted: 04/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Ischemia–reperfusion (IR) injury to the kidney occurs in a range of clinically important scenarios including hypotension, sepsis and in surgical procedures such as cardiac bypass surgery and kidney transplantation, leading to acute kidney injury (AKI). Mitochondrial oxidative damage is a significant contributor to the early phases of IR injury and may initiate a damaging inflammatory response. Here we assessed whether the mitochondria targeted antioxidant MitoQ could decrease oxidative damage during IR injury and thereby protect kidney function. To do this we exposed kidneys in mice to in vivo ischemia by bilaterally occluding the renal vessels followed by reperfusion for up to 24 h. This caused renal dysfunction, measured by decreased creatinine clearance, and increased markers of oxidative damage. Administering MitoQ to the mice intravenously 15 min prior to ischemia protected the kidney from damage and dysfunction. These data indicate that mitochondrial oxidative damage contributes to kidney IR injury and that mitochondria targeted antioxidants such as MitoQ are potential therapies for renal dysfunction due to IR injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna J Dare
- Medical Research Council Mitochondrial Biology Unit, Cambridge BioMedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK
| | - Eleanor A Bolton
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Gavin J Pettigrew
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - J Andrew Bradley
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Kourosh Saeb-Parsy
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Michael P Murphy
- Medical Research Council Mitochondrial Biology Unit, Cambridge BioMedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Impact of expanded criteria variables on outcomes of kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death. Transplantation 2015; 99:226-31. [PMID: 25099703 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To expand the donor pool, kidney transplants are being performed using donors who were previously considered unacceptable. We applied the United Network for Organ Sharing criteria to define expanded criteria donors (ECD) within the donation after cardiac death (DCD) and donation after brain stem death (DBD) cohorts. We compared outcomes of DCD and DBD transplants with and without (standard criteria donor [SCD]) the ECD criteria. METHODS This was a single-center retrospective study of all deceased donor transplants from 2004 to 2010 (n=359). Four groups were identified--DBD-SCD (n=154), DBD-ECD (n=93), DCD-SCD (n=78), and DCD-ECD (n=34). Kaplan-Meier analysis of graft and patient survival and multiple regression analysis of 1-year graft function were performed. RESULTS One-year and two-year uncensored graft survivals were similar between DCD-ECD and DCD-SCD cohorts (1 year, 90% and 93%; 2 years, 81% and 93% respectively; log-rank test P=0.2). Median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in DCD-ECD recipients at 12 months (41 vs. 53 mL/min, P=0.003) and 24 months (33 vs. 54 mL/min, P<0.001) compared with DCD-SCD recipients. Compared with DBD-ECD recipients also at 24 months, DCD-ECD recipients showed a lower graft function (median, eGFR 33 vs. 47 mL/min; P=0.007) but similar graft survival. Expanded criteria donor status (B=-9.7, P=0.01) was associated with a lower 1-year eGFR within the DCD cohort, with donor age (B=-0.42, P=0.002) being the only significant ECD variable. CONCLUSION Short-term graft survival in DCD-ECD transplants was comparable to DCD-SCD and DBD-ECD transplants albeit with poorer allograft function at 2 years. Quality-of-life studies are needed to determine the true value of these transplants, particularly when performed to older recipients.
Collapse
|
47
|
van Essen TH, Roelen DL, Williams KA, Jager MJ. Matching for Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) in corneal transplantation - to do or not to do. Prog Retin Eye Res 2015; 46:84-110. [PMID: 25601193 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2014] [Revised: 01/05/2015] [Accepted: 01/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
As many patients with severe corneal disease are not even considered as candidates for a human graft due to their high risk of rejection, it is essential to find ways to reduce the chance of rejection. One of the options is proper matching of the cornea donor and recipient for the Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA), a subject of much debate. Currently, patients receiving their first corneal allograft are hardly ever matched for HLA and even patients undergoing a regraft usually do not receive an HLA-matched graft. While anterior and posterior lamellar grafts are not immune to rejection, they are usually performed in low risk, non-vascularized cases. These are the cases in which the immune privilege due to the avascular status and active immune inhibition is still intact. Once broken due to infection, sensitization or trauma, rejection will occur. There is enough data to show that when proper DNA-based typing techniques are being used, even low risk perforating corneal transplantations benefit from matching for HLA Class I, and high risk cases from HLA Class I and probably Class II matching. Combining HLA class I and class II matching, or using the HLAMatchmaker could further improve the effect of HLA matching. However, new techniques could be applied to reduce the chance of rejection. Options are the local or systemic use of biologics, or gene therapy, aiming at preventing or suppressing immune responses. The goal of all these approaches should be to prevent a first rejection, as secondary grafts are usually at higher risk of complications including rejections than first grafts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T H van Essen
- Department of Ophthalmology, J3-S, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - D L Roelen
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - K A Williams
- Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - M J Jager
- Department of Ophthalmology, J3-S, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands; Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Peking University Eye Center, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Haynes R, Harden P, Judge P, Blackwell L, Emberson J, Landray MJ, Baigent C, Friend PJ. Alemtuzumab-based induction treatment versus basiliximab-based induction treatment in kidney transplantation (the 3C Study): a randomised trial. Lancet 2014; 384:1684-90. [PMID: 25078310 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61095-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) reduce short-term kidney transplant failure, but might contribute to transplant failure in the long-term. The role of alemtuzumab (a potent lymphocyte-depleting antibody) as an induction treatment followed by an early reduction in CNI and mycophenolate exposure and steroid avoidance, after kidney transplantation is uncertain. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab-based induction treatment compared with basiliximab-based induction treatment in patients receiving kidney transplants. METHODS For this randomised trial, we enrolled patients aged 18 years and older who were scheduled to receive a kidney transplant in the next 24 h from 18 transplant centres in the UK. Using minimised randomisation, we randomly assigned patients (1:1; minimised for age, sex, and immunological risk) to either alemtuzumab-based induction treatment (ie, alemtuzumab followed by low-dose tacrolimus and mycophenolate without steroids) or basiliximab-based induction treatment (basiliximab followed by standard-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisolone). Participants were reviewed at discharge from hospital and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after transplantation. The primary outcome was biopsy-proven acute rejection at 6 months, analysed by intention to treat. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01120028, and isrctn.org, number ISRCTN88894088. FINDINGS Between Oct 4, 2010, and Jan 21, 2013, we randomly assigned 852 participants to treatment: 426 to alemtuzumab-based treatment and 426 to basiliximab-based treatment. Overall, individuals allocated to alemtuzumab-based treatment had a 58% proportional reduction in biopsy-proven acute rejection compared with those allocated to basiliximab-based treatment (31 [7%] patients in the alemtuzumab group vs 68 [16%] patients in the basiliximab group; hazard ratio (HR) 0·42, 95% CI 0·28-0·64; log-rank p<0·0001). We detected no between-group difference in treatment effect on transplant failure during the first 6 months (16 [4%] patients vs 13 [3%] patients; HR 1·23, 0·59-2·55; p=0·58) or serious infection (135 [32%] patients vs 136 [32%] patients; HR 1·02, 0·80-1·29; p=0·88). During the first 6 months after transplantation, 11 (3%) patients given alemtuzumab-based treatment and six (1%) patients given basiliximab-based treatment died (HR 1·79, 95% CI 0·66-4·83; p=0·25). INTERPRETATION Compared with standard basiliximab-based treatment, alemtuzumab-based induction therapy followed by reduced CNI and mycophenolate exposure and steroid avoidance reduced the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection in a broad range of patients receiving a kidney transplant. Long-term follow-up of this trial will assess whether these effects translate into differences in long-term transplant function and survival. FUNDING UK National Health Service Blood and Transplant Research and Development Programme, Pfizer, and Novartis UK.
Collapse
|
49
|
Halliday N, Smith C, Atkinson C, O'Beirne J, Patch D, Burroughs AK, Thorburn D, Haque T. Characteristics of Epstein-Barr viraemia in adult liver transplant patients: A retrospective cohort study. Transpl Int 2014; 27:838-46. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.12342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2013] [Revised: 11/25/2013] [Accepted: 04/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Halliday
- Department of Virology; Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - Colette Smith
- Research Department of Infection and Population Health; UCL; London UK
| | - Claire Atkinson
- Department of Virology; Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - James O'Beirne
- Institute of Liver and Digestive Health; Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - David Patch
- Institute of Liver and Digestive Health; Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - Andrew K Burroughs
- Institute of Liver and Digestive Health; Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - Douglas Thorburn
- Institute of Liver and Digestive Health; Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - Tanzina Haque
- Department of Virology; Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Butts RJ, Scheurer MA, Atz AM, Moussa O, Burnette AL, Hulsey TC, Savage AJ. Association of human leukocyte antigen donor-recipient matching and pediatric heart transplant graft survival. Circ Heart Fail 2014; 7:605-11. [PMID: 24833649 DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.113.001008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching on outcomes remains relatively unexplored in pediatric patients. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of donor-recipient HLA matching on graft survival in pediatric heart transplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS The UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) database was queried for heart transplants occurring between October 31, 1987, and December 31, 2012, in a recipient aged ≤17 years with ≥1 postoperative follow-up visit. Retransplants were excluded. Transplants were divided into 3 donor-recipient matching groups: no HLA matches (HLA-no), 1 or 2 HLA matches (HLA-low), and 3 to 6 HLA matches (HLA-high). Primary outcome was graft loss. Four thousand four hundred seventy-one heart transplants met the study inclusion criteria. High degree of donor-recipient HLA matching occurred infrequently: HLA-high (n=269; 6%) versus HLA-low (n=2683; 60%) versus HLA-no (n=1495; 34%). There were no differences between HLA matching groups in the frequency of coronary vasculopathy (P=0.19) or rejection in the first post-transplant year (P=0.76). Improved graft survival was associated with a greater degree of HLA donor-recipient matching: HLA-high median survival, 17.1 (95% confidence interval, 14.0-20.2) years; HLA-low median survival, 14.2 (13.1-15.4) years; and HLA-no median survival, 12.1 (10.9-13.3 years) years; P<0.01, log-rank test. In Cox-regression analysis, HLA matching was independently associated with decreased graft loss: HLA-low versus HLA-no hazard ratio, 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.99), P=0.04; HLA-high versus HLA-no, 0.62 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.90), P<0.01. CONCLUSIONS Decreased graft loss in pediatric heart transplantation was associated with a higher degree of donor-recipient HLA matching, although a difference in the frequency of early rejection or development of coronary artery vasculopathy was not seen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J Butts
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology (R.J.B., M.A.S., A.M.A., A.J.S.), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of HLA Laboratory (O.M.), Department of Transplant Services, Division of Heart Transplant (A.L.B.), and Department of Pediatrics, Division of Epidemiology (T.C.H.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
| | - Mark A Scheurer
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology (R.J.B., M.A.S., A.M.A., A.J.S.), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of HLA Laboratory (O.M.), Department of Transplant Services, Division of Heart Transplant (A.L.B.), and Department of Pediatrics, Division of Epidemiology (T.C.H.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Andrew M Atz
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology (R.J.B., M.A.S., A.M.A., A.J.S.), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of HLA Laboratory (O.M.), Department of Transplant Services, Division of Heart Transplant (A.L.B.), and Department of Pediatrics, Division of Epidemiology (T.C.H.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Omar Moussa
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology (R.J.B., M.A.S., A.M.A., A.J.S.), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of HLA Laboratory (O.M.), Department of Transplant Services, Division of Heart Transplant (A.L.B.), and Department of Pediatrics, Division of Epidemiology (T.C.H.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Ali L Burnette
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology (R.J.B., M.A.S., A.M.A., A.J.S.), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of HLA Laboratory (O.M.), Department of Transplant Services, Division of Heart Transplant (A.L.B.), and Department of Pediatrics, Division of Epidemiology (T.C.H.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Thomas C Hulsey
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology (R.J.B., M.A.S., A.M.A., A.J.S.), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of HLA Laboratory (O.M.), Department of Transplant Services, Division of Heart Transplant (A.L.B.), and Department of Pediatrics, Division of Epidemiology (T.C.H.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Andrew J Savage
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology (R.J.B., M.A.S., A.M.A., A.J.S.), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of HLA Laboratory (O.M.), Department of Transplant Services, Division of Heart Transplant (A.L.B.), and Department of Pediatrics, Division of Epidemiology (T.C.H.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| |
Collapse
|