1
|
Bentley LK, Nisthar D, Fujioka E, Curtice C, DeLand SE, Donnelly B, Harrison AL, Heywood EI, Kot CY, Ortuño Crespo G, Poulin S, Halpin PN, Dunn DC. Marine megavertebrate migrations connect the global ocean. Nat Commun 2025; 16:4089. [PMID: 40341077 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-59271-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2025] [Indexed: 05/10/2025] Open
Abstract
Animal migrations are extensive, ubiquitous, and in decline. To effectively protect migratory species, it is often crucial to identify the interconnected sets of sites they rely upon. Gaps between primary ecological research and synthesised information that is useful to policymakers has limited effective conservation of long-distance migrants, particularly in the marine realm. By synthesising 1304 references to identify 1787 sites and develop model migratory networks for 109 species, we show the minimum extent of marine megafauna connectivity across the global oceans. Our analyses underscore the importance of transboundary cooperation for migratory species conservation at scales larger than current regional structures afford and provide a free online system that will enable policymakers to efficiently summarise how marine migrants use and connect their jurisdictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily K Bentley
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
- School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Dina Nisthar
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
- School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Ei Fujioka
- Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Corrie Curtice
- Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sarah E DeLand
- Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ben Donnelly
- Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Autumn-Lynn Harrison
- Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Migratory Bird Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ellie I Heywood
- Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Connie Y Kot
- Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Guillermo Ortuño Crespo
- Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sarah Poulin
- Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Patrick N Halpin
- Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel C Dunn
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
- School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rexer‐Huber K, Clay TA, Catry P, Debski I, Parker G, Ramos R, Robertson BC, Ryan PG, Sagar PM, Stanworth A, Thompson DR, Tuck GN, Weimerskirch H, Phillips RA. Metapopulation distribution shapes year-round overlap with fisheries for a circumpolar seabird. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2025; 35:e70019. [PMID: 40256790 PMCID: PMC12010314 DOI: 10.1002/eap.70019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 11/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 04/22/2025]
Abstract
Although fisheries bycatch is the greatest threat to many migratory marine megafauna, it remains unclear how population exposure to bycatch varies across the global range of threatened species. Such assessments across multiple populations are crucial for understanding variation in impacts and for identifying the management bodies responsible for reducing bycatch. Here, we combine extensive biologging data from white-chinned petrel (Procellaria aequinoctialis) populations (representing >98% of their global breeding population) with pelagic and demersal longline and trawl fishing effort to map the global distribution and fisheries-overlap hotspots for the most bycaught seabird in the Southern Hemisphere. We tracked the year-round movements of 132 adults in 2006-2018 and examined spatial overlap among seven populations comprising three genetically distinct groupings (metapopulations). Foraging areas during the nonbreeding season were more concentrated than during breeding, with birds from all populations migrating to continental shelf or upwelling zones, but with low spatial overlap among metapopulations. Fisheries overlap differed more among than within metapopulations, underlining that these should be considered separate management units. Overlap with pelagic longline fisheries was greatest for Indian Ocean populations, and from the fleets of South Africa, Japan, Taiwan, and Spain, off southern Africa and in the High Seas. Overlap with demersal longline and trawl fisheries was greatest for Indian and Atlantic Ocean populations, within the Exclusive Economic Zones of South Africa, Namibia, and Argentina, and with the South Korean demersal longline fleet in the High Seas. The high overlap with South Korean longliners in the southwest Atlantic Ocean is of particular concern as demersal fishing in this region is not covered by any Regional Fisheries Management Organization (RFMO). We also identified fisheries-overlap hotspots within RFMOs where there are no seabird-bycatch mitigation requirements (1.5%-53.1% of total overlap within the area of competence of each RFMO), or where current mitigation regulations need to be strengthened. Our recommendations are that management bodies target the high-priority fisheries we have identified for improved bycatch monitoring, mandatory best-practice bycatch mitigation, and close monitoring of compliance, given the conservation concerns for white-chinned petrels and other threatened seabirds.
Collapse
Grants
- Institut Polaire Français Paul-Emile Victor, France
- New Zealand Federation of Graduate Women
- University of Otago
- Falkland Islands Government
- South African National Antarctic Programme
- BAS Polar Science for Planet Earth Programme, UK
- Department of Conservation, New Zealand
- LA/P/0069/2020 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal
- UIDB/04292/2020 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal
- PRO2006-01 Ministry of Primary Industries, New Zealand
- JS Watson Trust
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, New Zealand
- Natural Environment Research Council, UK
- New Zealand Federation of Graduate Women
- University of Otago
- Department of Conservation, New Zealand
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal
- JS Watson Trust
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, New Zealand
- Natural Environment Research Council, UK
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalinka Rexer‐Huber
- Department of ZoologyUniversity of OtagoDunedinOtagoNew Zealand
- Parker ConservationDunedinOtagoNew Zealand
| | - Thomas A. Clay
- Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa CruzSanta CruzCaliforniaUSA
- People and Nature, Environmental Defense FundMontereyCaliforniaUSA
| | - Paulo Catry
- Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre (MARE)/ARNET – Aquatic Research Network, Ispa – Instituto UniversitárioLisbonPortugal
| | - Igor Debski
- Aquatic Unit, Department of ConservationWellingtonNew Zealand
| | - Graham Parker
- Department of ZoologyUniversity of OtagoDunedinOtagoNew Zealand
| | - Raül Ramos
- Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Facultat de BiologiaUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Peter G. Ryan
- FitzPatrick Institute of African OrnithologyUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschWestern CapeSouth Africa
| | - Paul M. Sagar
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd.WellingtonNew Zealand
| | | | - David R. Thompson
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd.WellingtonNew Zealand
| | - Geoffrey N. Tuck
- The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Environment Business UnitHobartTasmaniaAustralia
| | - Henri Weimerskirch
- Centre d'Étude Biologique de Chizé, UMR 7273 CNRS – Université de La RochelleVilliers‐en‐BoisFrance
| | - Richard A. Phillips
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research CouncilCambridgeCambridgeshireUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gilmour ME, Pollock K, Adams J, Block BA, Caselle JE, Filous A, Friedlander AM, Game ET, Hazen EL, Hill M, Holmes ND, Lafferty KD, Maxwell SM, McCauley DJ, Schallert R, Shaffer SA, Wolff NH, Wegmann A. Multi-Species Telemetry Quantifies Current and Future Efficacy of a Remote Marine Protected Area. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2025; 31:e70138. [PMID: 40231377 PMCID: PMC11997735 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.70138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2024] [Revised: 02/10/2025] [Accepted: 02/20/2025] [Indexed: 04/16/2025]
Abstract
Large-scale marine protected areas (LSMPAs; > 1000 km2) provide important refuge for large mobile species, but most do not encompass species' ranges. To better understand current and future LSMPA value, we concurrently tracked nine species (seabirds, cetaceans, pelagic fishes, manta rays, reef sharks) at Palmyra Atoll and Kingman Reef (PKMPA) in the U.S. Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument. PKMPA and the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone encompassed 39% and 54% of species movements (n = 83; tracking duration range: 0.5-350 days), respectively. Species distribution models indicated 73% of PKMPA contained highly suitable habitat. Under two projected future scenarios (SSP 1-2.6, "Sustainability"; SSP 3-7.0, "Rocky Road"), strong sea surface temperature gradients initially could cause abrupt oceanic change resulting in predicted habitat loss in 2040-2050, followed by an equilibrium response and regained habitat by 2090-2100. Current and future suitable habitats were available adjacent to PKMPA, suggesting that increased MPA size could enhance protection. Our three-tiered approach combining animal tracking with publicly available remote sensing data and future projected environmental scenarios could be used to design, study, and monitor protected areas throughout the world. Holistic approaches that encompass diverse species and habitat use can enhance assessments of protected area designs. Animal telemetry and remote sensing may be helpful for ascertaining the extent to which other MPAs protect large mobile species in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan E. Gilmour
- U.S. Geological SurveyWestern Ecological Research Center, Santa Cruz Field StationSanta CruzCaliforniaUSA
- Earth Science DivisionNational Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research CenterMoffett FieldCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Josh Adams
- U.S. Geological SurveyWestern Ecological Research Center, Santa Cruz Field StationSanta CruzCaliforniaUSA
| | - Barbara A. Block
- Department of OceansStanford UniversityPacific GroveCaliforniaUSA
| | - Jennifer E. Caselle
- Marine Science InstituteUniversity of California Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Alan M. Friedlander
- Pristine SeasNational Geographic SocietyWashington, DCUSA
- Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine BiologyUniversity of HawaiʻiHawaiiUSA
| | | | - Elliott L. Hazen
- Ecosystem Science DivisionSouthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationMontereyCaliforniaUSA
| | - Marie Hill
- Pacific Islands Fisheries Science CenterNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationHonoluluHawaiiUSA
| | | | - Kevin D. Lafferty
- U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Santa Barbara Field Station c/o Marine Science InstituteUniversity of California Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraCaliforniaUSA
| | - Sara M. Maxwell
- School of Interdisciplinary Arts and SciencesUniversity of WashingtonBothellWAUSA
| | - Douglas J. McCauley
- Marine Science InstituteUniversity of California Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraCaliforniaUSA
| | - Robert Schallert
- Department of OceansStanford UniversityPacific GroveCaliforniaUSA
| | - Scott A. Shaffer
- Department of Biological SciencesSan Jose State UniversitySan JoseCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saunders SP, DeLuca WV, Bateman BL, Deppe JL, Grand J, Knight EJ, Meehan TD, Michel NL, Seavy NE, Smith MA, Taylor L, Witko CJ, Wilsey CB. Multispecies migratory connectivity indicates hemispheric-scale risk to bird populations from global change. Nat Ecol Evol 2025; 9:491-504. [PMID: 39962302 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02575-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2025]
Abstract
Global agreements to reduce the extinction risk of migratory species depend critically on intersecting migratory connectivity-the linking of individuals between regions in different seasons-and spatial patterns of environmental change. Here we integrate movement data from >329,000 migratory birds of 112 species to develop a parameter representing exposure to global change: multispecies migratory connectivity. We then combine exposure with projected climate and land-cover changes as a measure of hazard and species conservation assessment scores as a metric of vulnerability to estimate the relative risk of migratory bird population declines across the Western Hemisphere. Multispecies migratory connectivity (exposure) is the strongest driver of risk relative to hazard and vulnerability, indicating the importance of synthesizing connectivity across species to comprehensively assess risk. Connections between breeding regions in Canada and non-breeding regions in South America are at the greatest risk, which underscores the particular susceptibility of long-distance migrants. Over half (54%) of the connections categorized as very high risk include breeding regions in the eastern United States. This three-part framework serves as an ecological risk assessment designed specifically for migratory species, providing both decision support for global biodiversity conservation and opportunities for intergovernmental collaboration to sustain migratory bird populations year-round.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jill L Deppe
- National Audubon Society, Science Division, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joanna Grand
- National Audubon Society, Science Division, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erika J Knight
- National Audubon Society, Science Division, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Nicole L Michel
- National Audubon Society, Science Division, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Melanie A Smith
- National Audubon Society, Science Division, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lotem Taylor
- National Audubon Society, Science Division, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chad J Witko
- National Audubon Society, Science Division, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chad B Wilsey
- National Audubon Society, Science Division, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Davidson SC, Cagnacci F, Newman P, Dettki H, Urbano F, Desmet P, Bajona L, Bryant E, Carneiro APB, Dias MP, Fujioka E, Gambin D, Hoenner X, Hunter C, Kato A, Kot CY, Kranstauber B, Lam CH, Lepage D, Naik H, Pye JD, Sequeira AMM, Tsontos VM, van Loon E, Vo D, Rutz C. Establishing bio-logging data collections as dynamic archives of animal life on Earth. Nat Ecol Evol 2025; 9:204-213. [PMID: 39753915 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02585-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 10/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2025]
Abstract
Rapid growth in bio-logging-the use of animal-borne electronic tags to document the movements, behaviour, physiology and environments of wildlife-offers opportunities to mitigate biodiversity threats and expand digital natural history archives. Here we present a vision to achieve such benefits by accounting for the heterogeneity inherent to bio-logging data and the concerns of those who collect and use them. First, we can enable data integration through standard vocabularies, transfer protocols and aggregation protocols, and drive their wide adoption. Second, we need to develop integrated data collections on standardized data platforms that support data preservation through public archiving and strategies that ensure long-term access. We outline pathways to reach these goals, highlighting the need for resources to govern community data standards and guide data mobilization efforts. We propose the launch of a community-led coordinating body and provide recommendations for how stakeholders-including government data centres, museums and those who fund, permit and publish bio-logging work-can support these efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C Davidson
- Department Animal Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.
- Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
- Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Francesca Cagnacci
- Animal Ecology Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all' Adige, Italy.
- National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), Palermo, Italy.
| | - Peggy Newman
- Atlas of Living Australia, CSIRO, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Holger Dettki
- Swedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
- Wireless Remote Animal Monitoring, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | - Peter Desmet
- Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lenore Bajona
- Ocean Tracking Network, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Medical Research Development Office, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Edmund Bryant
- Wildlife Computers, Redmond, WA, USA
- Wildtrack Telemetry Systems Ltd, Skipton, UK
| | | | - Maria P Dias
- CE3C - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ei Fujioka
- Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Xavier Hoenner
- Australian Ocean Data Network, Integrated Marine Observing System, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | | | - Akiko Kato
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS - La Rochelle Université, Villiers-en-Bois, France
| | - Connie Y Kot
- Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System Program Office, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Bart Kranstauber
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Chi Hin Lam
- Large Pelagics Research Center, Gloucester, MA, USA
- Big Fish Intelligence Company Limited, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | | - Hemal Naik
- Department of Ecology of Animal Societies, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behaviour, Radolfzell, Germany
- Centre of the Advanced Study of Collective Behavior, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Jonathan D Pye
- Ocean Tracking Network, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Ana M M Sequeira
- Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- UWA Oceans Institute and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Vardis M Tsontos
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Emiel van Loon
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Danny Vo
- Wildlife Computers, Redmond, WA, USA
| | - Christian Rutz
- Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gallo-Cajiao E, Morrison TH, Fuller RA. Agreements for conserving migratory shorebirds in the Asia-Pacific are better fit for addressing habitat loss than hunting. AMBIO 2024; 53:1336-1354. [PMID: 38727940 PMCID: PMC11300418 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-024-02018-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
A full-life cycle approach is a tenet of migratory species conservation, yet the degree to which this is achieved remains largely unassessed. This knowledge gap can be addressed using the concept of social-ecological fit, understood as the match between governance and ecological dimensions. Here, we assess the social-ecological fit for conserving migratory shorebirds in the Asia-Pacific, focusing on habitat loss and hunting. We identify the governance architectures for addressing these two threats and then assess the coordinating capacity of each architecture, measure institutional coverage for each species across their range, and determine the degree of institutional connectivity along their migratory network. We find that social-ecological fit is higher for the governance of habitat designation than for hunting management, with implications for governance practice. Analyses of social-ecological fit thus provide critical insights on the potential effectiveness of governance and therefore are a useful first step for migratory species conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Gallo-Cajiao
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
- School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
- Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
| | - Tiffany H Morrison
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia
- School of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Richard A Fuller
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Franklin PA, Bašić T, Davison PI, Dunkley K, Ellis J, Gangal M, González-Ferreras AM, Gutmann Roberts C, Hunt G, Joyce D, Klöcker CA, Mawer R, Rittweg T, Stoilova V, Gutowsky LFG. Aquatic connectivity: challenges and solutions in a changing climate. JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY 2024; 105:392-411. [PMID: 38584261 DOI: 10.1111/jfb.15727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
The challenge of managing aquatic connectivity in a changing climate is exacerbated in the presence of additional anthropogenic stressors, social factors, and economic drivers. Here we discuss these issues in the context of structural and functional connectivity for aquatic biodiversity, specifically fish, in both the freshwater and marine realms. We posit that adaptive management strategies that consider shifting baselines and the socio-ecological implications of climate change will be required to achieve management objectives. The role of renewable energy expansion, particularly hydropower, is critically examined for its impact on connectivity. We advocate for strategic spatial planning that incorporates nature-positive solutions, ensuring climate mitigation efforts are harmonized with biodiversity conservation. We underscore the urgency of integrating robust scientific modelling with stakeholder values to define clear, adaptive management objectives. Finally, we call for innovative monitoring and predictive decision-making tools to navigate the uncertainties inherent in a changing climate, with the goal of ensuring the resilience and sustainability of aquatic ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Franklin
- National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Tea Bašić
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, UK
| | - Phil I Davison
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, UK
| | - Katie Dunkley
- Christ's College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan Ellis
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mayuresh Gangal
- Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
- Nature Conservation Foundation, Mysore, India
| | - Alexia M González-Ferreras
- IHCantabria - Instituto de Hidráulica Ambiental de la Universidad de Cantabria. C/Isabel Torres 15, Santander, Spain
- School of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
| | | | - Georgina Hunt
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Domino Joyce
- Biological Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - C Antonia Klöcker
- Institute of Marine Research, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rachel Mawer
- Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Timo Rittweg
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Division of Integrative Fisheries Management, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden, Berlin, Germany
| | - Velizara Stoilova
- Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kays R, Wikelski M. The Internet of Animals: what it is, what it could be. Trends Ecol Evol 2023; 38:859-869. [PMID: 37263824 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
One of the biggest trends in ecology over the past decade has been the creation of standardized databases. Recently, this has included live data, formal linkages between disparate databases, and automated analytics, a synergy that we recognize as the Internet of Animals (IoA). Early IoA systems relate animal locations to remote-sensing data to predict species distributions and detect disease outbreaks, and use live data to inform management of endangered species. However, meeting the future potential of the IoA concept will require solving challenges of taxonomy, data security, and data sharing. By linking data sets, integrating live data, and automating workflows, the IoA has the potential to enable discoveries and predictions relevant to human societies and the conservation of animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roland Kays
- Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA; North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC, USA; Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Republic of Panama.
| | - Martin Wikelski
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Republic of Panama; Department of Animal Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behaviour, Radolfzell, Germany; Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fattorini N, Costanzo A, Romano A, Rubolini D, Baillie S, Bairlein F, Spina F, Ambrosini R. Eco-evolutionary drivers of avian migratory connectivity. Ecol Lett 2023. [PMID: 37125435 DOI: 10.1111/ele.14223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Migratory connectivity, reflecting the extent by which migrants tend to maintain their reciprocal positions in seasonal ranges, can assist in the conservation and management of mobile species, yet relevant drivers remain unclear. Taking advantage of an exceptionally large (~150,000 individuals, 83 species) and more-than-a-century-long dataset of bird ringing encounters, we investigated eco-evolutionary drivers of migratory connectivity in both short- and long-distance Afro-Palearctic migratory birds. Connectivity was strongly associated with geographical proxies of migration costs and was weakly influenced by biological traits and phylogeny, suggesting the evolutionary lability of migratory behaviour. The large intraspecific variability in avian migration strategies, through which most species geographically split into distinct migratory populations, explained why most of them were significantly connected. By unravelling key determinants of migratory connectivity, our study improves knowledge about the resilience of avian migrants to ecological perturbations, providing a critical tool to inform transboundary conservation and management strategies at the population level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niccolò Fattorini
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
- NBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessandra Costanzo
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Romano
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Rubolini
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
- Istituto di Ricerca sulle Acque, IRSA-CNR, Brugherio, Italy
| | | | - Franz Bairlein
- Institute of Avian Research, Wilhelmshaven, Germany
- Max-Planck-Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany
| | - Fernando Spina
- Area Avifauna Migratrice, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA), Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy
| | - Roberto Ambrosini
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guilherme JL, Jones VR, Catry I, Beal M, Dias MP, Oppel S, Vickery JA, Hewson CM, Butchart SHM, Rodrigues ASL. Connectivity between countries established by landbirds and raptors migrating along the African-Eurasian flyway. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2023; 37:e14002. [PMID: 36073347 PMCID: PMC10107209 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The conservation of long-distance migratory birds requires coordination between the multiple countries connected by the movements of these species. The recent expansion of tracking studies is shedding new light on these movements, but much of this information is fragmented and inaccessible to conservation practitioners and policy makers. We synthesized current knowledge on the connectivity established between countries by landbirds and raptors migrating along the African-Eurasian flyway. We reviewed tracking studies to compile migration records for 1229 individual birds, from which we derived 544 migratory links, each link corresponding to a species' connection between a breeding country in Europe and a nonbreeding country in sub-Saharan Africa. We used these migratory links to analyze trends in knowledge over time and spatial patterns of connectivity per country (across species), per species (across countries), and at the flyway scale (across all countries and all species). The number of tracking studies available increased steadily since 2010 (particularly for landbirds), but the coverage of existing tracking data was highly incomplete. An average of 7.5% of migratory landbird species and 14.6% of raptor species were tracked per country. More data existed from central and western European countries, and it was biased toward larger bodied species. We provide species- and country-level syntheses of the migratory links we identified from the reviewed studies, involving 123 populations of 43 species, migrating between 28 European and 43 African countries. Several countries (e.g., Spain, Poland, Ethiopia, Democratic Republic of Congo) are strategic priorities for future tracking studies to complement existing data, particularly on landbirds. Despite the limitations in existing tracking data, our data and results can inform discussions under 2 key policy instruments at the flyway scale: the African-Eurasian Migratory Landbirds Action Plan and the Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and Eurasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João L. Guilherme
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRDMontpellierFrance
- BirdLife InternationalCambridgeUK
| | | | - Inês Catry
- CIBIO/InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Laboratório AssociadoUniversidade do PortoVairãoPortugal
- CIBIO/InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Laboratório AssociadoUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
- BIOPOLIS Program in GenomicsBiodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIOVairãoPortugal
| | - Martin Beal
- BirdLife InternationalCambridgeUK
- MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences CentreISPA – Instituto UniversitárioLisbonPortugal
| | - Maria P. Dias
- BirdLife InternationalCambridgeUK
- cE3c ‐ Center for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & CHANGE ‐ Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Department of Animal BiologyFaculty of Sciences of the University of Lisbon, 1749‐016 Lisboa, Campo GrandeLisbonPortugal
| | - Steffen Oppel
- RSPB Centre for Conservation ScienceRoyal Society for the Protection of Birds, The LodgeSandyUK
| | - Juliet A. Vickery
- RSPB Centre for Conservation ScienceRoyal Society for the Protection of Birds, The LodgeSandyUK
- British Trust for Ornithology, The NunneryThetfordUK
- Department of ZoologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
| | | | - Stuart H. M. Butchart
- BirdLife InternationalCambridgeUK
- Department of ZoologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Palacios‐Abrantes J, Frölicher TL, Reygondeau G, Sumaila U, Tagliabue A, Wabnitz C, Cheung W. Timing and magnitude of climate-driven range shifts in transboundary fish stocks challenge their management. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2022; 28:2312-2326. [PMID: 35040239 PMCID: PMC9302671 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Climate change is shifting the distribution of shared fish stocks between neighboring countries' Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) and the high seas. The timescale of these transboundary shifts determines how climate change will affect international fisheries governance. Here, we explore this timescale by coupling a large ensemble simulation of an Earth system model under a high emission climate change scenario to a dynamic population model. We show that by 2030, 23% of transboundary stocks will have shifted and 78% of the world's EEZs will have experienced at least one shifting stock. By the end of this century, projections show a total of 45% of stocks shifting globally and 81% of EEZs waters with at least one shifting stock. The magnitude of such shifts is reflected in changes in catch proportion between EEZs sharing a transboundary stock. By 2030, global EEZs are projected to experience an average change of 59% in catch proportion of transboundary stocks. Many countries that are highly dependent on fisheries for livelihood and food security emerge as hotspots for transboundary shifts. These hotspots are characterized by early shifts in the distribution of an important number of transboundary stocks. Existing international fisheries agreements need to be assessed for their capacity to address the social-ecological implications of climate-change-driven transboundary shifts. Some of these agreements will need to be adjusted to limit potential conflict between the parties of interest. Meanwhile, new agreements will need to be anticipatory and consider these concerns and their associated uncertainties to be resilient to global change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliano Palacios‐Abrantes
- Institute for the Oceans and FisheriesThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
- Center for LimnologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonWisconsinUSA
| | - Thomas L. Frölicher
- Climate and Environmental PhysicsPhysics InstituteUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Oeschger Centre for Climate Change ResearchUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Gabriel Reygondeau
- Institute for the Oceans and FisheriesThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - U. Rashid Sumaila
- Institute for the Oceans and FisheriesThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
- School of Public Policy and Global AffairsThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | | | - Colette C. C. Wabnitz
- Institute for the Oceans and FisheriesThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
- Stanford Center for Ocean SolutionsStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - William W. L. Cheung
- Institute for the Oceans and FisheriesThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kot CY, Åkesson S, Alfaro‐Shigueto J, Amorocho Llanos DF, Antonopoulou M, Balazs GH, Baverstock WR, Blumenthal JM, Broderick AC, Bruno I, Canbolat AF, Casale P, Cejudo D, Coyne MS, Curtice C, DeLand S, DiMatteo A, Dodge K, Dunn DC, Esteban N, Formia A, Fuentes MMPB, Fujioka E, Garnier J, Godfrey MH, Godley BJ, González Carman V, Harrison A, Hart CE, Hawkes LA, Hays GC, Hill N, Hochscheid S, Kaska Y, Levy Y, Ley‐Quiñónez CP, Lockhart GG, López‐Mendilaharsu M, Luschi P, Mangel JC, Margaritoulis D, Maxwell SM, McClellan CM, Metcalfe K, Mingozzi A, Moncada FG, Nichols WJ, Parker DM, Patel SH, Pilcher NJ, Poulin S, Read AJ, Rees ALF, Robinson DP, Robinson NJ, Sandoval‐Lugo AG, Schofield G, Seminoff JA, Seney EE, Snape RTE, Sözbilen D, Tomás J, Varo‐Cruz N, Wallace BP, Wildermann NE, Witt MJ, Zavala‐Norzagaray AA, Halpin PN. Network analysis of sea turtle movements and connectivity: A tool for conservation prioritization. DIVERS DISTRIB 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
13
|
Harrison A, Woodard PF, Mallory ML, Rausch J. Sympatrically breeding congeneric seabirds ( Stercorarius spp.) from Arctic Canada migrate to four oceans. Ecol Evol 2022; 12:e8451. [PMID: 35127008 PMCID: PMC8794761 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Polar systems of avian migration remain unpredictable. For seabirds nesting in the Nearctic, it is often difficult to predict which of the world's oceans birds will migrate to after breeding. Here, we report on three related seabird species that migrated across four oceans following sympatric breeding at a central Canadian high Arctic nesting location. Using telemetry, we tracked pomarine jaeger (Stercorarius pomarinus, n = 1) across the Arctic Ocean to the western Pacific Ocean; parasitic jaeger (S. parasiticus, n = 4) to the western Atlantic Ocean, and long-tailed jaeger (S. longicaudus, n = 2) to the eastern Atlantic Ocean and western Indian Ocean. We also report on extensive nomadic movements over ocean during the postbreeding period (19,002 km) and over land and ocean during the prebreeding period (5578 km) by pomarine jaeger, an irruptive species whose full migrations and nomadic behavior have been a mystery. While the small sample sizes in our study limit the ability to make generalizable inferences, our results provide a key input to the knowledge of jaeger migrations. Understanding the routes and migratory divides of birds nesting in the Arctic region has implications for understanding both the glacial refugia of the past and the Anthropocene-driven changes in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Autumn‐Lynn Harrison
- Migratory Bird CenterSmithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological ParkWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Paul F. Woodard
- Canadian Wildlife Service, Northern RegionYellowknifeNTCanada
| | | | - Jennie Rausch
- Canadian Wildlife Service, Northern RegionYellowknifeNTCanada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Roberson LA, Beyer HL, O'Hara C, Watson JEM, Dunn DC, Halpern BS, Klein CJ, Frazier MR, Kuempel CD, Williams B, Grantham HS, Montgomery JC, Kark S, Runting RK. Multinational coordination required for conservation of over 90% of marine species. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2021; 27:6206-6216. [PMID: 34488246 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Marine species are declining at an unprecedented rate, catalyzing many nations to adopt conservation and management targets within their jurisdictions. However, marine species and the biophysical processes that sustain them are naive to international borders. An understanding of the prevalence of cross-border species distributions is important for informing high-level conservation strategies, such as bilateral or regional agreements. Here, we examined 28,252 distribution maps to determine the number and locations of transboundary marine plants and animals. More than 90% of species have ranges spanning at least two jurisdictions, with 58% covering more than 10 jurisdictions. All jurisdictions have at least one transboundary species, with the highest concentrations of transboundary species in the USA, Australia, Indonesia, and the Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction. Distributions of mapped biodiversity indicate that overcoming the challenges of multinational governance is critical for a much wider suite of species than migratory megavertebrates and commercially exploited fish stocks-the groups that have received the vast majority of multinational management attention. To effectively protect marine biodiversity, international governance mechanisms (particularly those related to the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on Migratory Species, and Regional Seas Organizations) must be expanded to promote multinational conservation planning, and complimented by a holistic governance framework for biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie A Roberson
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Hawthorne L Beyer
- Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Casey O'Hara
- National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, California, USA
- Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - James E M Watson
- Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Daniel C Dunn
- Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Benjamin S Halpern
- National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, California, USA
- Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Carissa J Klein
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Melanie R Frazier
- National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Caitlin D Kuempel
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, California, USA
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Brooke Williams
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Hedley S Grantham
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Jamie C Montgomery
- National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Salit Kark
- Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rebecca K Runting
- School of Geography, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Davies TE, Carneiro APB, Campos B, Hazin C, Dunn DC, Gjerde KM, Johnson DE, Dias MP. Tracking data and the conservation of the high seas: Opportunities and challenges. J Appl Ecol 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Daniel C. Dunn
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science School of Earth and Environmental Science University of Queensland St Lucia QLD Australia
| | | | | | - Maria P. Dias
- BirdLife International Cambridge UK
- ISPA—Instituto Universitário MARE—Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre Lisboa Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Murphy EJ, Johnston NM, Hofmann EE, Phillips RA, Jackson JA, Constable AJ, Henley SF, Melbourne-Thomas J, Trebilco R, Cavanagh RD, Tarling GA, Saunders RA, Barnes DKA, Costa DP, Corney SP, Fraser CI, Höfer J, Hughes KA, Sands CJ, Thorpe SE, Trathan PN, Xavier JC. Global Connectivity of Southern Ocean Ecosystems. Front Ecol Evol 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.624451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Southern Ocean ecosystems are globally important. Processes in the Antarctic atmosphere, cryosphere, and the Southern Ocean directly influence global atmospheric and oceanic systems. Southern Ocean biogeochemistry has also been shown to have global importance. In contrast, ocean ecological processes are often seen as largely separate from the rest of the global system. In this paper, we consider the degree of ecological connectivity at different trophic levels, linking Southern Ocean ecosystems with the global ocean, and their importance not only for the regional ecosystem but also the wider Earth system. We also consider the human system connections, including the role of Southern Ocean ecosystems in supporting society, culture, and economy in many nations, influencing public and political views and hence policy. Rather than Southern Ocean ecosystems being defined by barriers at particular oceanic fronts, ecological changes are gradual due to cross-front exchanges involving oceanographic processes and organism movement. Millions of seabirds and hundreds of thousands of cetaceans move north out of polar waters in the austral autumn interacting in food webs across the Southern Hemisphere, and a few species cross the equator. A number of species migrate into the east and west ocean-basin boundary current and continental shelf regions of the major southern continents. Human travel in and out of the Southern Ocean region includes fisheries, tourism, and scientific vessels in all ocean sectors. These operations arise from many nations, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere, and are important in local communities as well as national economic, scientific, and political activities. As a result of the extensive connectivity, future changes in Southern Ocean ecosystems will have consequences throughout the Earth system, affecting ecosystem services with socio-economic impacts throughout the world. The high level of connectivity also means that changes and policy decisions in marine ecosystems outside the Southern Ocean have consequences for ecosystems south of the Antarctic Polar Front. Knowledge of Southern Ocean ecosystems and their global connectivity is critical for interpreting current change, projecting future change impacts, and identifying integrated strategies for conserving and managing both the Southern Ocean and the broader Earth system.
Collapse
|
17
|
Davies TE, Carneiro AP, Tarzia M, Wakefield E, Hennicke JC, Frederiksen M, Hansen ES, Campos B, Hazin C, Lascelles B, Anker‐Nilssen T, Arnardóttir H, Barrett RT, Biscoito M, Bollache L, Boulinier T, Catry P, Ceia FR, Chastel O, Christensen‐Dalsgaard S, Cruz‐Flores M, Danielsen J, Daunt F, Dunn E, Egevang C, Fagundes AI, Fayet AL, Fort J, Furness RW, Gilg O, González‐Solís J, Granadeiro JP, Grémillet D, Guilford T, Hanssen SA, Harris MP, Hedd A, Huffeldt NP, Jessopp M, Kolbeinsson Y, Krietsch J, Lang J, Linnebjerg JF, Lorentsen S, Madeiros J, Magnusdottir E, Mallory ML, McFarlane Tranquilla L, Merkel FR, Militão T, Moe B, Montevecchi WA, Morera‐Pujol V, Mosbech A, Neves V, Newell MA, Olsen B, Paiva VH, Peter H, Petersen A, Phillips RA, Ramírez I, Ramos JA, Ramos R, Ronconi RA, Ryan PG, Schmidt NM, Sigurðsson IA, Sittler B, Steen H, Stenhouse IJ, Strøm H, Systad GHR, Thompson P, Thórarinsson TL, Bemmelen RS, Wanless S, Zino F, Dias MP. Multispecies tracking reveals a major seabird hotspot in the North Atlantic. Conserv Lett 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/conl.12824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ewan Wakefield
- Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow U.K
| | | | | | | | - Bruna Campos
- EuroNatur Foundation Radolfzell Germany
- Stichting BirdLife Europe Brussels Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Loïc Bollache
- UMR 6249 Chrono‐environnement Université de Bourgogne Franche‐Comté Besançon France
- Groupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique Francheville France
| | - Thierry Boulinier
- Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive CNRS ‐ Université de Montpellier ‐ Université Paul‐Valéry Montpellier – EPHE Montpellier France
| | - Paulo Catry
- MARE ‐ Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre ISPA ‐ Instituto Universitário Lisbon Portugal
| | - Filipe R. Ceia
- University of Coimbra, MARE‐Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Dep. Life Sciences Coimbra Portugal
| | - Olivier Chastel
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC) UMR 7372 CNRS‐La Rochelle Université Villiers‐en‐bois France
| | | | - Marta Cruz‐Flores
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Dept. de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jérôme Fort
- Littoral, Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs) UMR 7266 CNRS‐La Rochelle Université La Rochelle France
| | - Robert W. Furness
- Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow U.K
| | - Olivier Gilg
- UMR 6249 Chrono‐environnement Université de Bourgogne Franche‐Comté Besançon France
- Groupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique Francheville France
| | - Jacob González‐Solís
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Dept. de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | | | - David Grémillet
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC) UMR 7372 CNRS‐La Rochelle Université Villiers‐en‐bois France
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology Rondebosch South Africa
| | | | | | | | - April Hedd
- Wildlife Research Division Environment and Climate Change Mount Pearl NL Canada
| | - Nicholas Per Huffeldt
- Department of Bioscience Aarhus University Roskilde Denmark
- Greenland Institute of Natural Resources Nuuk Greenland
| | - Mark Jessopp
- School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, Environmental Research Institute University College Cork Ireland
| | | | - Johannes Krietsch
- Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Ecology and Evolution Jena Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Ornithology Department of Behavioural Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics Seewiesen Germany
| | - Johannes Lang
- Groupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique Francheville France
- Justus‐Liebig‐University Giessen, Clinic for Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians and Fish Working Group for Wildlife Research Giessen Germany
| | | | | | - Jeremy Madeiros
- Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of Bermuda Paget Bermuda
| | | | | | | | - Flemming R. Merkel
- Department of Bioscience Aarhus University Roskilde Denmark
- Greenland Institute of Natural Resources Nuuk Greenland
| | - Teresa Militão
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Dept. de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | - Børge Moe
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Trondheim Norway
| | | | - Virginia Morera‐Pujol
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Dept. de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | - Anders Mosbech
- Department of Bioscience Aarhus University Roskilde Denmark
| | - Verónica Neves
- MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, IMAR & Okeanos Horta Portugal
| | | | - Bergur Olsen
- Faroe Marine Research Institute Tórshavn Faroe Islands
| | - Vitor H. Paiva
- University of Coimbra, MARE‐Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Dep. Life Sciences Coimbra Portugal
| | - Hans‐Ulrich Peter
- Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Ecology and Evolution Jena Germany
| | | | | | | | - Jaime A. Ramos
- University of Coimbra, MARE‐Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Dep. Life Sciences Coimbra Portugal
| | - Raül Ramos
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Dept. de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | - Robert A. Ronconi
- Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada Dartmouth NS Canada
| | - Peter G. Ryan
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology Rondebosch South Africa
| | | | | | - Benoît Sittler
- Groupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique Francheville France
- University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul Thompson
- Lighthouse Field Station, School of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Cromarty U.K
| | - Thorkell L. Thórarinsson
- Northeast Iceland Nature Research Centre Húsavík Iceland
- Icelandic Institute of Natural History Garðabær Iceland
| | | | | | | | - Maria P. Dias
- BirdLife International Cambridge U.K
- MARE ‐ Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre ISPA ‐ Instituto Universitário Lisbon Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Critical In-Water Habitats for Post-Nesting Sea Turtles from the Southern Gulf of Mexico. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/jmse9080793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Marine turtles are globally endangered species that spend more than 95% of their life cycle in in-water habitats. Nevertheless, most of the conservation, recovery and research efforts have targeted the on-land habitats, due to their easier access, where adult females lay their eggs. Targeting the large knowledge gaps on the in-water critical habitats of turtles, particularly in the Large Marine Ecosystem Gulf of Mexico, is crucial for their conservation and recovery in the long term. We used satellite telemetry to track 85 nesting females from their beaches after they nested to identify their feeding and residency habitats, their migratory corridors and to describe the context for those areas. We delimited major migratory corridors in the southern Gulf of Mexico and West Caribbean and described physical features of internesting and feeding home ranges located mainly around the Yucatan Peninsula and Veracruz, Mexico. We also contributed by describing general aggregation and movement patterns for the four marine turtle species in the Atlantic, expanding the knowledge of the studied species. Several tracked individuals emigrated from the Gulf of Mexico to as far as Nicaragua, Honduras, and the Bahamas. This information is critical for identifying gaps in marine protection and for deciphering the spatial connectivity in large ocean basins, and it provides an opportunity to assess potential impacts on marine turtle populations and their habitats.
Collapse
|
19
|
Nelms SE, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Arnould JPY, Avila IC, Bengtson Nash S, Campbell E, Carter MID, Collins T, Currey RJC, Domit C, Franco-Trecu V, Fuentes MMPB, Gilman E, Harcourt RG, Hines EM, Hoelzel AR, Hooker SK, Johnston DW, Kelkar N, Kiszka JJ, Laidre KL, Mangel JC, Marsh H, Maxwell SM, Onoufriou AB, Palacios DM, Pierce GJ, Ponnampalam LS, Porter LJ, Russell DJF, Stockin KA, Sutaria D, Wambiji N, Weir CR, Wilson B, Godley BJ. Marine mammal conservation: over the horizon. ENDANGER SPECIES RES 2021. [DOI: 10.3354/esr01115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Marine mammals can play important ecological roles in aquatic ecosystems, and their presence can be key to community structure and function. Consequently, marine mammals are often considered indicators of ecosystem health and flagship species. Yet, historical population declines caused by exploitation, and additional current threats, such as climate change, fisheries bycatch, pollution and maritime development, continue to impact many marine mammal species, and at least 25% are classified as threatened (Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable) on the IUCN Red List. Conversely, some species have experienced population increases/recoveries in recent decades, reflecting management interventions, and are heralded as conservation successes. To continue these successes and reverse the downward trajectories of at-risk species, it is necessary to evaluate the threats faced by marine mammals and the conservation mechanisms available to address them. Additionally, there is a need to identify evidence-based priorities of both research and conservation needs across a range of settings and taxa. To that effect we: (1) outline the key threats to marine mammals and their impacts, identify the associated knowledge gaps and recommend actions needed; (2) discuss the merits and downfalls of established and emerging conservation mechanisms; (3) outline the application of research and monitoring techniques; and (4) highlight particular taxa/populations that are in urgent need of focus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SE Nelms
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall, TR10 9EZ, UK
| | - J Alfaro-Shigueto
- ProDelphinus, Jose Galvez 780e, Miraflores, Perú
- Facultad de Biologia Marina, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Perú
| | - JPY Arnould
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia
| | - IC Avila
- Grupo de Ecología Animal, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| | - S Bengtson Nash
- Environmental Futures Research Institute (EFRI), Griffith University, Nathan Campus, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
| | - E Campbell
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall, TR10 9EZ, UK
- ProDelphinus, Jose Galvez 780e, Miraflores, Perú
| | - MID Carter
- Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, UK
| | - T Collins
- Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Blvd., Bronx, NY 10460, USA
| | - RJC Currey
- Marine Stewardship Council, 1 Snow Hill, London, EC1A 2DH, UK
| | - C Domit
- Laboratory of Ecology and Conservation, Marine Study Center, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Brazil
| | - V Franco-Trecu
- Departamento de Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Uruguay
| | - MMPB Fuentes
- Marine Turtle Research, Ecology and Conservation Group, Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
| | - E Gilman
- Pelagic Ecosystems Research Group, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
| | - RG Harcourt
- Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - EM Hines
- Estuary & Ocean Science Center, San Francisco State University, 3150 Paradise Dr. Tiburon, CA 94920, USA
| | - AR Hoelzel
- Department of Biosciences, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
| | - SK Hooker
- Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, UK
| | - DW Johnston
- Duke Marine Lab, 135 Duke Marine Lab Road, Beaufort, NC 28516, USA
| | - N Kelkar
- Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Jakkur PO, Bangalore 560064, Karnataka, India
| | - JJ Kiszka
- Department of Biological Sciences, Coastlines and Oceans Division, Institute of Environment, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
| | - KL Laidre
- Polar Science Center, APL, University of Washington, 1013 NE 40th Street, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - JC Mangel
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall, TR10 9EZ, UK
- ProDelphinus, Jose Galvez 780e, Miraflores, Perú
| | - H Marsh
- James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 48111, Australia
| | - SM Maxwell
- School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington Bothell, Bothell WA 98011, USA
| | - AB Onoufriou
- School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, UK
- Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
| | - DM Palacios
- Marine Mammal Institute, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, Newport, OR, 97365, USA
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA
| | - GJ Pierce
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall, TR10 9EZ, UK
- Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
| | - LS Ponnampalam
- The MareCet Research Organization, 40460 Shah Alam, Malaysia
| | - LJ Porter
- SMRU Hong Kong, University of St. Andrews, Hong Kong
| | - DJF Russell
- Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, UK
- Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, UK
| | - KA Stockin
- Animal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | - D Sutaria
- School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington Bothell, Bothell WA 98011, USA
| | - N Wambiji
- Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute, P.O. Box 81651, Mombasa-80100, Kenya
| | - CR Weir
- Ketos Ecology, 4 Compton Road, Kingsbridge, Devon, TQ7 2BP, UK
| | - B Wilson
- Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Argyll, PA37 1QA, UK
| | - BJ Godley
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall, TR10 9EZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Beal M, Dias MP, Phillips RA, Oppel S, Hazin C, Pearmain EJ, Adams J, Anderson DJ, Antolos M, Arata JA, Arcos JM, Arnould JPY, Awkerman J, Bell E, Bell M, Carey M, Carle R, Clay TA, Cleeland J, Colodro V, Conners M, Cruz-Flores M, Cuthbert R, Delord K, Deppe L, Dilley BJ, Dinis H, Elliott G, De Felipe F, Felis J, Forero MG, Freeman A, Fukuda A, González-Solís J, Granadeiro JP, Hedd A, Hodum P, Igual JM, Jaeger A, Landers TJ, Le Corre M, Makhado A, Metzger B, Militão T, Montevecchi WA, Morera-Pujol V, Navarro-Herrero L, Nel D, Nicholls D, Oro D, Ouni R, Ozaki K, Quintana F, Ramos R, Reid T, Reyes-González JM, Robertson C, Robertson G, Romdhane MS, Ryan PG, Sagar P, Sato F, Schoombie S, Scofield RP, Shaffer SA, Shah NJ, Stevens KL, Surman C, Suryan RM, Takahashi A, Tatayah V, Taylor G, Thompson DR, Torres L, Walker K, Wanless R, Waugh SM, Weimerskirch H, Yamamoto T, Zajkova Z, Zango L, Catry P. Global political responsibility for the conservation of albatrosses and large petrels. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2021; 7:7/10/eabd7225. [PMID: 33658194 PMCID: PMC7929510 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd7225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Migratory marine species cross political borders and enter the high seas, where the lack of an effective global management framework for biodiversity leaves them vulnerable to threats. Here, we combine 10,108 tracks from 5775 individual birds at 87 sites with data on breeding population sizes to estimate the relative year-round importance of national jurisdictions and high seas areas for 39 species of albatrosses and large petrels. Populations from every country made extensive use of the high seas, indicating the stake each country has in the management of biodiversity in international waters. We quantified the links among national populations of these threatened seabirds and the regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) which regulate fishing in the high seas. This work makes explicit the relative responsibilities that each country and RFMO has for the management of shared biodiversity, providing invaluable information for the conservation and management of migratory species in the marine realm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Beal
- MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ISPA-Instituto Universitário, Lisboa, Portugal.
- BirdLife International, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Maria P Dias
- MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ISPA-Instituto Universitário, Lisboa, Portugal
- BirdLife International, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Richard A Phillips
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
| | - Steffen Oppel
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Carolina Hazin
- BirdLife International, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Elizabeth J Pearmain
- BirdLife International, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Josh Adams
- U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Santa Cruz Field Station, 2885 Mission St, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA
| | - David J Anderson
- Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
| | - Michelle Antolos
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
| | - Javier A Arata
- Independent researcher, 204-100 Coe Hill Dr, Toronto, ON M6S 3E1, Canada
| | - José Manuel Arcos
- SEO/BirdLife, Marine Programme, C/Murcia 2-8, local 13, 08026 Barcelona, Spain
| | - John P Y Arnould
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia
| | - Jill Awkerman
- Gulf Ecology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561, USA
| | - Elizabeth Bell
- Wildlife Management International Limited, P.O. Box 607, Blenheim 7240, New Zealand
| | - Mike Bell
- Wildlife Management International Limited, P.O. Box 607, Blenheim 7240, New Zealand
| | - Mark Carey
- Department of Environmental Management and Ecology, La Trobe University Albury-Wodonga Campus, Wodonga, VIC 3689, Australia
| | - Ryan Carle
- Oikonos Ecosystem Knowledge, Yerbas Buenas 498, Valparaíso, Chile
| | - Thomas A Clay
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jaimie Cleeland
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
| | | | - Melinda Conners
- Department of Ocean Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Marta Cruz-Flores
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Department de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (BEECA), Universitat de Barcelona, Av Diagonal 643, Barcelona 08028, Spain
| | - Richard Cuthbert
- World Land Trust, Blyth House, Bridge Street, Halesworth, Suffolk IP19 8AB, UK
| | - Karine Delord
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS La Rochelle Université, 79360 Villiers en Bois, France
| | - Lorna Deppe
- The Hutton's Shearwater Charitable Trust, 100 Watsons Road, Blenheim 7273, New Zealand
| | - Ben J Dilley
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
| | | | - Graeme Elliott
- Department of Conservation, Private Bag 5, Nelson, New Zealand
| | - Fernanda De Felipe
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Department de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (BEECA), Universitat de Barcelona, Av Diagonal 643, Barcelona 08028, Spain
| | - Jonathan Felis
- U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Santa Cruz Field Station, 2885 Mission St, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA
| | - Manuela G Forero
- Department of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (EBD-CSIC), Avenida de Américo Vespucio, 26 Isla de la Cartuja 41092, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Amanda Freeman
- Nature North, P.O. Box 1536, Atherton, QLD 4883, Australia
| | - Akira Fukuda
- Shizuoka University, Johoku 3-5-1, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Jacob González-Solís
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Department de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (BEECA), Universitat de Barcelona, Av Diagonal 643, Barcelona 08028, Spain
| | - José Pedro Granadeiro
- CESAM, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Ernesto Vasconcelos, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - April Hedd
- Environment and Climate Change Canada, Wildlife Research Division, 6 Bruce Street, Mount Pearl, NL A1N 4T3, Canada
| | - Peter Hodum
- Oikonos Ecosystem Knowledge, Yerbas Buenas 498, Valparaíso, Chile
- Biology Department, University of Puget Sound, 1500 N. Warner St., Tacoma, WA 98416, USA
| | - José Manuel Igual
- Animal Demography and Ecology Unit, Institut Mediterrani d'Estudis Avançats (IMEDEA, CSIC-UIB), Miquel Marques 21, 07190 Esporles, Balears, Spain
| | - Audrey Jaeger
- UMR ENTROPIE (Université de La Réunion, IRD, CNRS, IFREMER, Université de Nouvelle-Calédonie) Université de La Réunion, Université de La Réunion, 15 Avenue René Cassin, CS92003, 97744 Saint Denis messag cedex 9, La Réunion, France
| | - Todd J Landers
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
- Auckland Museum, The Domain, Parnell, Auckland 1052, New Zealand
- Auckland Council, Private Bag 92300, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
| | - Matthieu Le Corre
- UMR ENTROPIE (Université de La Réunion, IRD, CNRS, IFREMER, Université de Nouvelle-Calédonie) Université de La Réunion, Université de La Réunion, 15 Avenue René Cassin, CS92003, 97744 Saint Denis messag cedex 9, La Réunion, France
| | - Azwianewi Makhado
- Oceans and Coasts, Department of Environment, Agriculture and Fisheries, Cape Town, South Africa
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
| | - Benjamin Metzger
- BirdLife Malta, 57/28 Marina Court, Abate Rigord Street, Ta' Xbiex, XBX 1120, Malta
| | - Teresa Militão
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Department de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (BEECA), Universitat de Barcelona, Av Diagonal 643, Barcelona 08028, Spain
| | | | - Virginia Morera-Pujol
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Department de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (BEECA), Universitat de Barcelona, Av Diagonal 643, Barcelona 08028, Spain
| | - Leia Navarro-Herrero
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Department de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (BEECA), Universitat de Barcelona, Av Diagonal 643, Barcelona 08028, Spain
| | - Deon Nel
- WWF-Netherlands, Driebergseweg 10, 3708 JB Zeist, The Netherlands
| | - David Nicholls
- Chisholm Institute, Bonbeach Campus, Breeze Street, Carmm, VIC 3197, Australia
| | - Daniel Oro
- Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes CEAB (CSIC), Acces Cala Sant Francesc 14, 17300 Blanes, Spain
| | - Ridha Ouni
- Tunisian Wildlife Conservation Society. Faculté des Sciences Mathématique, physique et biologiques de Tunis (FST), Campus Universitaire, El Manar, CP 2092 Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Kiyoaki Ozaki
- Division of Avian Conservation, Yamashina Institute for Ornithology, 115 Konoyama, Abiko, Chiba 270-11, Japan
| | - Flavio Quintana
- Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos (IBIOMAR), National Research Council of Argentina (CONICET), Bv. Almte Brown 2915, Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina
| | - Raül Ramos
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Department de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (BEECA), Universitat de Barcelona, Av Diagonal 643, Barcelona 08028, Spain
| | - Tim Reid
- Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Commonwealth Science and Industrial Research Organization, CSIRO, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia
| | - José Manuel Reyes-González
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Department de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (BEECA), Universitat de Barcelona, Av Diagonal 643, Barcelona 08028, Spain
| | | | - Graham Robertson
- Independent researcher, 9 Roba Court, Kingston, Tasmania 7050, Australia
| | - Mohamed Salah Romdhane
- Université de Carthage Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie, 43 Avenue Charles Nicole, 1082 Tunis, Tunisie
| | - Peter G Ryan
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
| | - Paul Sagar
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd., 10 Kyle Street, Riccarton, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand
| | - Fumio Sato
- Division of Avian Conservation, Yamashina Institute for Ornithology, 115 Konoyama, Abiko, Chiba 270-11, Japan
| | - Stefan Schoombie
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
| | - R Paul Scofield
- Canterbury Museum, Rolleston Avenue, Christchurch 8053, New Zealand
| | - Scott A Shaffer
- Department of Biological Sciences, San Jose State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, CA 95192-0100, USA
| | - Nirmal Jivan Shah
- Nature Seychelles Centre for Environment and Education, Sanctuary at Roche Caiman, Mahe, Seychelles
| | - Kim L Stevens
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
| | | | - Robert M Suryan
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Newport, OR 97365, USA
| | - Akinori Takahashi
- National Institute of Polar Research, Tachikawa, Tokyo 190-8518, Japan
| | - Vikash Tatayah
- Mauritian Wildlife Foundation, Grannum Road, Vacoas, Mauritius
| | - Graeme Taylor
- Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 10420, Wellington 6143, New Zealand
| | - David R Thompson
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd., 301 Evans Bay Parade, Hataitai, Wellington 6021, New Zealand
| | - Leigh Torres
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Marine Mammal Institute, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA
| | - Kath Walker
- Department of Conservation, Private Bag 5, Nelson, New Zealand
| | - Ross Wanless
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
- Institute of Marine Affairs and Resources Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Susan M Waugh
- Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, 2 The Terrace, Wellington 6011, New Zealand
| | - Henri Weimerskirch
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS La Rochelle Université, 79360 Villiers en Bois, France
| | - Takashi Yamamoto
- Meiji Institute for Advanced Study of Mathematical Sciences, Nakano, Tokyo 164-8525, Japan
| | - Zuzana Zajkova
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Department de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (BEECA), Universitat de Barcelona, Av Diagonal 643, Barcelona 08028, Spain
| | - Laura Zango
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Department de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (BEECA), Universitat de Barcelona, Av Diagonal 643, Barcelona 08028, Spain
| | - Paulo Catry
- MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ISPA-Instituto Universitário, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nakanishi W, Miyagi S, Tokodai K, Fujio A, Sasaki K, Shono Y, Unno M, Kamei T. Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on recovery after open hepatectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg Treat Res 2020; 99:320-328. [PMID: 33304859 PMCID: PMC7704272 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2020.99.6.320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is beneficial to patients undergoing digestive surgery. However, its efficacy in patients undergoing open hepatectomy remains unclear. Methods Consecutive patients scheduled for open hepatectomy were randomly assigned to undergo either ERAS or conventional postoperative management. The primary endpoint was the amount of time that elapsed before patients were considered medically fit for discharge (MFD) and length of hospital stay (LOHS). Secondary endpoints included morbidity, mortality, the time to first flatus, defecation, first walk, and freedom from infusion. Perioperative serum nutritional markers, insulin resistance, respiratory quotient (RQ), and resting energy expenditure (REE) were also assessed. Results Between August 2014 and March 2017, 57 patients were randomized into 2 groups; ERAS group (n = 29) and conventional management (n = 28). The median MFD was not significantly different between the ERAS and conventional management groups (6.5 vs. 7 days; P = 0.381). Recovery from gastrointestinal paresis was significantly quicker in the ERAS group (1.8 vs. 2.4 days; P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in serum markers, insulin resistance, RQ, and REE. Conclusion This trial did not demonstrate greater efficacy of the ERAS protocol following open hepatectomy in terms of the MFD and LOHS. However, the ERAS protocol was associated with better recovery from postoperative gastrointestinal paresis, suggesting that it is useful for patients undergoing open hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wataru Nakanishi
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Shigehito Miyagi
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Tokodai
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Atsushi Fujio
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kengo Sasaki
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Shono
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takashi Kamei
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fromant A, Bost CA, Bustamante P, Carravieri A, Cherel Y, Delord K, Eizenberg YH, Miskelly CM, Arnould JPY. Temporal and spatial differences in the post-breeding behaviour of a ubiquitous Southern Hemisphere seabird, the common diving petrel. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 2020; 7:200670. [PMID: 33391785 PMCID: PMC7735348 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.200670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
The non-breeding period plays a major role in seabird survival and population dynamics. However, our understanding of the migratory behaviour, moulting and feeding strategies of non-breeding seabirds is still very limited, especially for small-sized species. The present study investigated the post-breeding behaviour of three distant populations (Kerguelen Archipelago, southeastern Australia, New Zealand) of the common diving petrel (CDP) (Pelecanoides urinatrix), an abundant, widely distributed zooplanktivorous seabird breeding throughout the southern Atlantic, Indian and Pacific oceans. The timing, geographical destination and activity pattern of birds were quantified through geolocator deployments during the post-breeding migration, while moult pattern of body feathers was investigated using stable isotope analysis. Despite the high energetic cost of flapping flight, all the individuals quickly travelled long distances (greater than approx. 2500 km) after the end of the breeding season, targeting oceanic frontal systems. The three populations, however, clearly diverged spatially (migration pathways and destinations), and temporally (timing and duration) in their post-breeding movements, as well as in their period of moult. Philopatry to distantly separated breeding grounds, different breeding phenologies and distinct post-breeding destinations suggest that the CDP populations have a high potential for isolation, and hence, speciation. These results contribute to improving knowledge of ecological divergence and evolution between populations, and inform the challenges of conserving migratory species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aymeric Fromant
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), UMR 7372 CNRS—La Rochelle Université, 79360 Villiers en Bois, France
| | - Charles-André Bost
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), UMR 7372 CNRS—La Rochelle Université, 79360 Villiers en Bois, France
| | - Paco Bustamante
- Littoral Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR 7266 CNRS—La Rochelle Université, 2 rue Olympe de Gouges, 17000 La Rochelle, France
- Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), 1 rue Descartes, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Alice Carravieri
- Littoral Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR 7266 CNRS—La Rochelle Université, 2 rue Olympe de Gouges, 17000 La Rochelle, France
| | - Yves Cherel
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), UMR 7372 CNRS—La Rochelle Université, 79360 Villiers en Bois, France
| | - Karine Delord
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), UMR 7372 CNRS—La Rochelle Université, 79360 Villiers en Bois, France
| | - Yonina H. Eizenberg
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia
| | - Colin M. Miskelly
- Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
| | - John P. Y. Arnould
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Palacios-Abrantes J, Reygondeau G, Wabnitz CCC, Cheung WWL. The transboundary nature of the world's exploited marine species. Sci Rep 2020; 10:17668. [PMID: 33087747 PMCID: PMC7578035 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74644-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Regulatory boundaries and species distributions often do not align. This is especially the case for marine species crossing multiple Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs). Such movements represent a challenge for fisheries management, as policies tend to focus at the national level, yet international collaborations are needed to maximize long-term ecological, social and economic benefits of shared marine species. Here, we combined species distributions and the spatial delineation of EEZs at the global level to identify the number of commercially exploited marine species that are shared between neighboring nations. We found that 67% of the species analyzed are transboundary (n = 633). Between 2005 and 2014, fisheries targeting these species within global-EEZs caught on average 48 million tonnes per year, equivalent to an average of USD 77 billion in annual fishing revenue. For select countries, over 90% of their catch and economic benefits were attributable to a few shared resources. Our analysis suggests that catches from transboundary species are declining more than those from non-transboundary species. Our study has direct implications for managing fisheries targeting transboundary species, highlighting the need for strengthened effective and equitable international cooperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabriel Reygondeau
- Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Colette C C Wabnitz
- Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Center for Ocean Solutions, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - William W L Cheung
- Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Levin LA, Wei C, Dunn DC, Amon DJ, Ashford OS, Cheung WWL, Colaço A, Dominguez‐Carrió C, Escobar EG, Harden‐Davies HR, Drazen JC, Ismail K, Jones DOB, Johnson DE, Le JT, Lejzerowicz F, Mitarai S, Morato T, Mulsow S, Snelgrove PVR, Sweetman AK, Yasuhara M. Climate change considerations are fundamental to management of deep-sea resource extraction. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2020; 26:4664-4678. [PMID: 32531093 PMCID: PMC7496832 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Climate change manifestation in the ocean, through warming, oxygen loss, increasing acidification, and changing particulate organic carbon flux (one metric of altered food supply), is projected to affect most deep-ocean ecosystems concomitantly with increasing direct human disturbance. Climate drivers will alter deep-sea biodiversity and associated ecosystem services, and may interact with disturbance from resource extraction activities or even climate geoengineering. We suggest that to ensure the effective management of increasing use of the deep ocean (e.g., for bottom fishing, oil and gas extraction, and deep-seabed mining), environmental management and developing regulations must consider climate change. Strategic planning, impact assessment and monitoring, spatial management, application of the precautionary approach, and full-cost accounting of extraction activities should embrace climate consciousness. Coupled climate and biological modeling approaches applied in the water and on the seafloor can help accomplish this goal. For example, Earth-System Model projections of climate-change parameters at the seafloor reveal heterogeneity in projected climate hazard and time of emergence (beyond natural variability) in regions targeted for deep-seabed mining. Models that combine climate-induced changes in ocean circulation with particle tracking predict altered transport of early life stages (larvae) under climate change. Habitat suitability models can help assess the consequences of altered larval dispersal, predict climate refugia, and identify vulnerable regions for multiple species under climate change. Engaging the deep observing community can support the necessary data provisioning to mainstream climate into the development of environmental management plans. To illustrate this approach, we focus on deep-seabed mining and the International Seabed Authority, whose mandates include regulation of all mineral-related activities in international waters and protecting the marine environment from the harmful effects of mining. However, achieving deep-ocean sustainability under the UN Sustainable Development Goals will require integration of climate consideration across all policy sectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A. Levin
- Integrative Oceanography Division and Center for Marine Biodiversity and ConservationScripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaCAUSA
| | - Chih‐Lin Wei
- Institute of OceanographyNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Daniel C. Dunn
- School of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of QueenslandSt LuciaQldAustralia
| | - Diva J. Amon
- Life Sciences DepartmentNatural History MuseumLondonUK
| | - Oliver S. Ashford
- Integrative Oceanography Division and Center for Marine Biodiversity and ConservationScripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaCAUSA
| | - William W. L. Cheung
- Institute for the Oceans and FisheriesThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Ana Colaço
- IMARInstituto do Mar, and Instituto de Investigação em Ciências do Mar – Okeanos da Universidade dos AçoresHortaPortugal
| | - Carlos Dominguez‐Carrió
- IMARInstituto do Mar, and Instituto de Investigação em Ciências do Mar – Okeanos da Universidade dos AçoresHortaPortugal
| | - Elva G. Escobar
- Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y LimnologíaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico CityMexico
| | - Harriet R. Harden‐Davies
- Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and SecurityUniversity of WollongongWollongongNSWAustralia
| | - Jeffrey C. Drazen
- Department of OceanographyUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Khaira Ismail
- Faculty of Science and Marine EnvironmentUniversiti Malaysia TerengganuKuala TerengganuMalaysia
| | - Daniel O. B. Jones
- Ocean Biogeochemistry and Ecosystems GroupNational Oceanography CentreSouthamptonUK
| | - David E. Johnson
- Global Ocean Biodiversity InitiativeSeascape Consultants Ltd.RomseyUK
| | - Jennifer T. Le
- Integrative Oceanography Division and Center for Marine Biodiversity and ConservationScripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaCAUSA
| | - Franck Lejzerowicz
- Jacobs School of EngineeringUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCAUSA
| | - Satoshi Mitarai
- Marine Biophysics UnitOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate UniversityOkinawaJapan
| | - Telmo Morato
- IMARInstituto do Mar, and Instituto de Investigação em Ciências do Mar – Okeanos da Universidade dos AçoresHortaPortugal
| | - Sandor Mulsow
- Instituto Ciencias Marinas y LimnológicasUniversidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile
| | - Paul V. R. Snelgrove
- Department of Ocean Sciences and Biology DepartmentMemorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John'sNLCanada
| | - Andrew K. Sweetman
- The Lyell Centre for Earth and Marine Science and TechnologyHeriot Watt UniversityEdinburghUK
| | - Moriaki Yasuhara
- School of Biological Sciences and Swire Institute of Marine ScienceThe University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Armstrong AJ, Armstrong AO, McGregor F, Richardson AJ, Bennett MB, Townsend KA, Hays GC, van Keulen M, Smith J, Dudgeon CL. Satellite Tagging and Photographic Identification Reveal Connectivity Between Two UNESCO World Heritage Areas for Reef Manta Rays. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE 2020; 7. [PMID: 0 DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
|
26
|
Maxwell SM, Gjerde KM, Conners MG, Crowder LB. Mobile protected areas for biodiversity on the high seas. Science 2020; 367:252-254. [PMID: 31949070 DOI: 10.1126/science.aaz9327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sara M Maxwell
- School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington Bothell, Bothell, WA, USA.
| | - Kristina M Gjerde
- IUCN Global Marine and Polar Programme, World Commission on Protected Areas, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Melinda G Conners
- School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Larry B Crowder
- Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Barrett SCH. Proceedings B
2019: the year in review. Proc Biol Sci 2020; 287:20192626. [DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|