1
|
Xiong Y, Gao Y, Qi Y, Zhi Y, Xu J, Wang K, Yang Q, Wang C, Zhao M, Meng X. Accuracy of artificial intelligence algorithms in predicting acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2025; 25:44. [PMID: 39875868 PMCID: PMC11776246 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-025-02869-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2025] [Indexed: 01/30/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a serious threat to human life. Hence, early and accurate diagnosis and treatment are crucial for patient survival. This meta-analysis evaluates the accuracy of artificial intelligence in the early diagnosis of ARDS and provides guidance for future research and applications. METHODS A search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM), and VIP databases was systematically conducted, from their establishment to November 2023, to obtain eligible studies for the analysis and evaluation of the predictive effect of AI on ARDS. The retrieved literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the quality of the included studies was assessed using QUADAS-2, and the included studies were statistically analyzed. RESULTS Among the 2, 996 studies, 33 were included in this meta-analysis, which showed that the pooled sensitivity of AI in predicting ARDS was 0.81 (0.76-0.85), the pooled specificity was 0.88 (0.84-0.91), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.91 (0.88-0.93). The analyzed studies included 28 models, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.79 (0.76-0.82), a pooled specificity of 0.85 (0.83-0.88), and an AUC of 0.89 (0.86-0.91). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled AUC of the AI models ANN, CNN, LR, RF, SVM, and XGB were 0.86 (0.83-0.89), 0.91 (0.88-0.93), 0.86 (0.83-0.89), and 0.89 (0.86-0.91), 0.90 (0.87-0.92), 0.93 (0.90-0.95), respectively. In an additional subgroup analysis, we evaluated the predictive performance of the AI models trained using different predictors. This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023491546). CONCLUSION AI has good sensitivity and specificity for predicting ARDS, indicating a high clinical application value. Algorithmic models such as CNN, SVM, and XGB have improved prediction performance. The subgroup analysis revealed that the model trained using images combined with other predictors had the best predictive performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaxin Xiong
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Yuan Gao
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Yucheng Qi
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Yingfei Zhi
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Jia Xu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Kuo Wang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Qiuyue Yang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Changsong Wang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China
- Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Mingyan Zhao
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China.
- Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Heilongjiang, China.
| | - Xianglin Meng
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China.
- Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Heilongjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saba L, Maindarkar M, Khanna NN, Puvvula A, Faa G, Isenovic E, Johri A, Fouda MM, Tiwari E, Kalra MK, Suri JS. An Artificial Intelligence-Based Non-Invasive Approach for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Stratification in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Narrative Review. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2024; 25:463. [PMID: 39742217 PMCID: PMC11683711 DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2512463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2024] [Revised: 10/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/03/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a severe condition associated with numerous cardiovascular complications, including heart failure. The complex biological and morphological relationship between OSA and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) poses challenges in predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes. While artificial intelligence (AI) has shown potential for predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) and stroke risks in other conditions, there is a lack of detailed, bias-free, and compressed AI models for ASCVD and stroke risk stratification in OSA patients. This study aimed to address this gap by proposing three hypotheses: (i) a strong relationship exists between OSA and ASCVD/stroke, (ii) deep learning (DL) can stratify ASCVD/stroke risk in OSA patients using surrogate carotid imaging, and (iii) including OSA risk as a covariate with cardiovascular risk factors can improve CVD risk stratification. Methods The study employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) search strategy, yielding 191 studies that link OSA with coronary, carotid, and aortic atherosclerotic vascular diseases. This research investigated the link between OSA and CVD, explored DL solutions for OSA detection, and examined the role of DL in utilizing carotid surrogate biomarkers by saving costs. Lastly, we benchmark our strategy against previous studies. Results (i) This study found that CVD and OSA are indirectly or directly related. (ii) DL models demonstrated significant potential in improving OSA detection and proved effective in CVD risk stratification using carotid ultrasound as a biomarker. (iii) Additionally, DL was shown to be useful for CVD risk stratification in OSA patients; (iv) There are important AI attributes such as AI-bias, AI-explainability, AI-pruning, and AI-cloud, which play an important role in CVD risk for OSA patients. Conclusions DL provides a powerful tool for CVD risk stratification in OSA patients. These results can promote several recommendations for developing unique, bias-free, and explainable AI algorithms for predicting ASCVD and stroke risks in patients with OSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 40138 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mahesh Maindarkar
- School of Bioengineering Sciences and Research, MIT Art, Design and Technology University, 412021 Pune, India
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, 110001 New Delhi, India
| | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Department of Radiology, and Pathology, Annu’s Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, 524101 Nellore, India
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Radiology, and Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 09123 Cagliari, Italy
- Now with Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Esma Isenovic
- Department of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 192204 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Amer Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
| | - Ekta Tiwari
- Cardiology Imaging, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology Nagpur, 440010 Nagpur, India
| | - Manudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- University Center for Research & Development, Chandigarh University, 140413 Mohali, India
- Department of CE, Graphics Era Deemed to be University, 248002 Dehradun, India
- Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Nagpur Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), 440008 Pune, India
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™️, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jang W, Lee J. Improving Neonatal Care with AI: Class Weight Optimization for Respiratory Distress Syndrome Prediction in Very Low Birth Weight Infants. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2024; 2024:1-5. [PMID: 40039795 DOI: 10.1109/embc53108.2024.10782854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2025]
Abstract
In this study, we developed an AI model to predict Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in premature infants, aiming to reduce unnecessary treatment with artificial pulmonary surfactant. We analyzed data from 13,120 infants in 76 hospitals, considering various factors including infant information, maternity details, birth process, family background, resuscitation, and lab results. seven machine learning algorithms were compared, with Support Vector Machine (SVM) showing the highest accuracy. We further improved prediction performance with a 5-layer Deep Neural Network (DNN) using selected features from SVM-based analysis. To address imbalanced data, we employed ensemble methods and class weight optimization. The final model achieved exceptional results on an independent test dataset, with a specificity of 87.36%, sensitivity of 90.65%, balanced accuracy of 89.01%, and an AUC of 0.9612, surpassing other models.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bhagawati M, Paul S, Mantella L, Johri AM, Laird JR, Singh IM, Singh R, Garg D, Fouda MM, Khanna NN, Cau R, Abraham A, Al-Maini M, Isenovic ER, Sharma AM, Fernandes JFE, Chaturvedi S, Karla MK, Nicolaides A, Saba L, Suri JS. Deep learning approach for cardiovascular disease risk stratification and survival analysis on a Canadian cohort. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING 2024; 40:1283-1303. [PMID: 38678144 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03100-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
The quantification of carotid plaque has been routinely used to predict cardiovascular risk in cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary artery disease (CAD). To determine how well carotid plaque features predict the likelihood of CAD and cardiovascular (CV) events using deep learning (DL) and compare against the machine learning (ML) paradigm. The participants in this study consisted of 459 individuals who had undergone coronary angiography, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, and focused carotid B-mode ultrasound. Each patient was tracked for thirty days. The measurements on these patients consisted of maximum plaque height (MPH), total plaque area (TPA), carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), and intraplaque neovascularization (IPN). CAD risk and CV event stratification were performed by applying eight types of DL-based models. Univariate and multivariate analysis was also conducted to predict the most significant risk predictors. The DL's model effectiveness was evaluated by the area-under-the-curve measurement while the CV event prediction was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazard model (CPHM) and compared against the DL-based concordance index (c-index). IPN showed a substantial ability to predict CV events (p < 0.0001). The best DL system improved by 21% (0.929 vs. 0.762) over the best ML system. DL-based CV event prediction showed a ~ 17% increase in DL-based c-index compared to the CPHM (0.86 vs. 0.73). CAD and CV incidents were linked to IPN and carotid imaging characteristics. For survival analysis and CAD prediction, the DL-based system performs superior to ML-based models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mrinalini Bhagawati
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India
| | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India
| | - Laura Mantella
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Amer M Johri
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, 94574, USA
| | - Inder M Singh
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA
| | - Rajesh Singh
- Division of Research and Innovation, UTI, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India
| | - Deepak Garg
- School of Cowereter Science and Artificial Intelligence, SR University, Warangal, Telangana, 506371, India
| | - Mostafa M Fouda
- Department of ECE, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, 83209, USA
| | | | - Riccardo Cau
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 40138, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Mostafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Esma R Isenovic
- Department of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, National Institute of The Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 11001, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Aditya M Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA
| | | | - Seemant Chaturvedi
- Department of Neurology & Stroke Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mannudeep K Karla
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 40138, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA.
- Department of ECE, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, 83209, USA.
- Department of CE, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, 248002, Dehradun, India.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Saba L, Maindarkar M, Johri AM, Mantella L, Laird JR, Khanna NN, Paraskevas KI, Ruzsa Z, Kalra MK, Fernandes JFE, Chaturvedi S, Nicolaides A, Rathore V, Singh N, Isenovic ER, Viswanathan V, Fouda MM, Suri JS. UltraAIGenomics: Artificial Intelligence-Based Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment by Fusion of Ultrasound-Based Radiomics and Genomics Features for Preventive, Personalized and Precision Medicine: A Narrative Review. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2024; 25:184. [PMID: 39076491 PMCID: PMC11267214 DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2505184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) diagnosis and treatment are challenging since symptoms appear late in the disease's progression. Despite clinical risk scores, cardiac event prediction is inadequate, and many at-risk patients are not adequately categorised by conventional risk factors alone. Integrating genomic-based biomarkers (GBBM), specifically those found in plasma and/or serum samples, along with novel non-invasive radiomic-based biomarkers (RBBM) such as plaque area and plaque burden can improve the overall specificity of CVD risk. This review proposes two hypotheses: (i) RBBM and GBBM biomarkers have a strong correlation and can be used to detect the severity of CVD and stroke precisely, and (ii) introduces a proposed artificial intelligence (AI)-based preventive, precision, and personalized ( aiP 3 ) CVD/Stroke risk model. The PRISMA search selected 246 studies for the CVD/Stroke risk. It showed that using the RBBM and GBBM biomarkers, deep learning (DL) modelscould be used for CVD/Stroke risk stratification in the aiP 3 framework. Furthermore, we present a concise overview of platelet function, complete blood count (CBC), and diagnostic methods. As part of the AI paradigm, we discuss explainability, pruning, bias, and benchmarking against previous studies and their potential impacts. The review proposes the integration of RBBM and GBBM, an innovative solution streamlined in the DL paradigm for predicting CVD/Stroke risk in the aiP 3 framework. The combination of RBBM and GBBM introduces a powerful CVD/Stroke risk assessment paradigm. aiP 3 model signifies a promising advancement in CVD/Stroke risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 40138 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mahesh Maindarkar
- School of Bioengineering Sciences and Research, MIT Art, Design and Technology University, 412021 Pune, India
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Laura Mantella
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA 94574, USA
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, 110001 New Delhi, India
| | | | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Manudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - Seemant Chaturvedi
- Department of Neurology & Stroke Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 20742, USA
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, 2368 Agios Dometios, Cyprus
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA 95823, USA
| | - Narpinder Singh
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, 248002 Uttarakhand, India
| | - Esma R. Isenovic
- Department of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, National Institute of The Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Department of Computer Engineering, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, 248002 Uttarakhand, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chiumello D, Coppola S, Catozzi G, Danzo F, Santus P, Radovanovic D. Lung Imaging and Artificial Intelligence in ARDS. J Clin Med 2024; 13:305. [PMID: 38256439 PMCID: PMC10816549 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) can make intelligent decisions in a manner akin to that of the human mind. AI has the potential to improve clinical workflow, diagnosis, and prognosis, especially in radiology. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a very diverse illness that is characterized by interstitial opacities, mostly in the dependent areas, decreased lung aeration with alveolar collapse, and inflammatory lung edema resulting in elevated lung weight. As a result, lung imaging is a crucial tool for evaluating the mechanical and morphological traits of ARDS patients. Compared to traditional chest radiography, sensitivity and specificity of lung computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound are higher. The state of the art in the application of AI is summarized in this narrative review which focuses on CT and ultrasound techniques in patients with ARDS. A total of eighteen items were retrieved. The primary goals of using AI for lung imaging were to evaluate the risk of developing ARDS, the measurement of alveolar recruitment, potential alternative diagnoses, and outcome. While the physician must still be present to guarantee a high standard of examination, AI could help the clinical team provide the best care possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Chiumello
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo University Hospital Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy
- Coordinated Research Center on Respiratory Failure, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Coppola
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo University Hospital Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Catozzi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Fiammetta Danzo
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, 20157 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Pierachille Santus
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, 20157 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Dejan Radovanovic
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, 20157 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kumari V, Kumar N, Kumar K S, Kumar A, Skandha SS, Saxena S, Khanna NN, Laird JR, Singh N, Fouda MM, Saba L, Singh R, Suri JS. Deep Learning Paradigm and Its Bias for Coronary Artery Wall Segmentation in Intravascular Ultrasound Scans: A Closer Look. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2023; 10:485. [PMID: 38132653 PMCID: PMC10743870 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10120485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION Coronary artery disease (CAD) has the highest mortality rate; therefore, its diagnosis is vital. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a high-resolution imaging solution that can image coronary arteries, but the diagnosis software via wall segmentation and quantification has been evolving. In this study, a deep learning (DL) paradigm was explored along with its bias. METHODS Using a PRISMA model, 145 best UNet-based and non-UNet-based methods for wall segmentation were selected and analyzed for their characteristics and scientific and clinical validation. This study computed the coronary wall thickness by estimating the inner and outer borders of the coronary artery IVUS cross-sectional scans. Further, the review explored the bias in the DL system for the first time when it comes to wall segmentation in IVUS scans. Three bias methods, namely (i) ranking, (ii) radial, and (iii) regional area, were applied and compared using a Venn diagram. Finally, the study presented explainable AI (XAI) paradigms in the DL framework. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS UNet provides a powerful paradigm for the segmentation of coronary walls in IVUS scans due to its ability to extract automated features at different scales in encoders, reconstruct the segmented image using decoders, and embed the variants in skip connections. Most of the research was hampered by a lack of motivation for XAI and pruned AI (PAI) models. None of the UNet models met the criteria for bias-free design. For clinical assessment and settings, it is necessary to move from a paper-to-practice approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vandana Kumari
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, India; (V.K.); (S.K.K.)
| | - Naresh Kumar
- Department of Applied Computational Science and Engineering, G L Bajaj Institute of Technology and Management, Greater Noida 201310, India
| | - Sampath Kumar K
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, India; (V.K.); (S.K.K.)
| | - Ashish Kumar
- School of CSET, Bennett University, Greater Noida 201310, India;
| | - Sanagala S. Skandha
- Department of CSE, CMR College of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad 501401, India;
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar 751003, India;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Narpinder Singh
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era, Deemed to be University, Dehradun 248002, India;
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09100 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Rajesh Singh
- Department of Research and Innovation, Uttaranchal Institute of Technology, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun 248007, India;
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostics and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Graphic Era, Deemed to be University, Dehradun 248002, India
- Monitoring and Diagnosis Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khanna NN, Singh M, Maindarkar M, Kumar A, Johri AM, Mentella L, Laird JR, Paraskevas KI, Ruzsa Z, Singh N, Kalra MK, Fernandes JFE, Chaturvedi S, Nicolaides A, Rathore V, Singh I, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Isenovic ER, Viswanathan V, Khanna P, Fouda MM, Saba L, Suri JS. Polygenic Risk Score for Cardiovascular Diseases in Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Review. J Korean Med Sci 2023; 38:e395. [PMID: 38013648 PMCID: PMC10681845 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) related mortality and morbidity heavily strain society. The relationship between external risk factors and our genetics have not been well established. It is widely acknowledged that environmental influence and individual behaviours play a significant role in CVD vulnerability, leading to the development of polygenic risk scores (PRS). We employed the PRISMA search method to locate pertinent research and literature to extensively review artificial intelligence (AI)-based PRS models for CVD risk prediction. Furthermore, we analyzed and compared conventional vs. AI-based solutions for PRS. We summarized the recent advances in our understanding of the use of AI-based PRS for risk prediction of CVD. Our study proposes three hypotheses: i) Multiple genetic variations and risk factors can be incorporated into AI-based PRS to improve the accuracy of CVD risk predicting. ii) AI-based PRS for CVD circumvents the drawbacks of conventional PRS calculators by incorporating a larger variety of genetic and non-genetic components, allowing for more precise and individualised risk estimations. iii) Using AI approaches, it is possible to significantly reduce the dimensionality of huge genomic datasets, resulting in more accurate and effective disease risk prediction models. Our study highlighted that the AI-PRS model outperformed traditional PRS calculators in predicting CVD risk. Furthermore, using AI-based methods to calculate PRS may increase the precision of risk predictions for CVD and have significant ramifications for individualized prevention and treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
- Asia Pacific Vascular Society, New Delhi, India
| | - Manasvi Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
- Bennett University, Greater Noida, India
| | - Mahesh Maindarkar
- Asia Pacific Vascular Society, New Delhi, India
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
- School of Bioengineering Sciences and Research, Maharashtra Institute of Technology's Art, Design and Technology University, Pune, India
| | | | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Laura Mentella
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA, USA
| | | | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Narpinder Singh
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
| | | | | | - Seemant Chaturvedi
- Department of Neurology & Stroke Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Cyprus
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Inder Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | - Jagjit S Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mostafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Esma R Isenovic
- Department of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, National Institute of The Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Beograd, Serbia
| | | | - Puneet Khanna
- Department of Anaesthesiology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - Mostafa M Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Asia Pacific Vascular Society, New Delhi, India
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
- Department of Computer Engineering, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, India.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Al-Maini M, Maindarkar M, Kitas GD, Khanna NN, Misra DP, Johri AM, Mantella L, Agarwal V, Sharma A, Singh IM, Tsoulfas G, Laird JR, Faa G, Teji J, Turk M, Viskovic K, Ruzsa Z, Mavrogeni S, Rathore V, Miner M, Kalra MK, Isenovic ER, Saba L, Fouda MM, Suri JS. Artificial intelligence-based preventive, personalized and precision medicine for cardiovascular disease/stroke risk assessment in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a narrative review. Rheumatol Int 2023; 43:1965-1982. [PMID: 37648884 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-023-05415-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
The challenges associated with diagnosing and treating cardiovascular disease (CVD)/Stroke in Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) arise from the delayed onset of symptoms. Existing clinical risk scores are inadequate in predicting cardiac events, and conventional risk factors alone do not accurately classify many individuals at risk. Several CVD biomarkers consider the multiple pathways involved in the development of atherosclerosis, which is the primary cause of CVD/Stroke in RA. To enhance the accuracy of CVD/Stroke risk assessment in the RA framework, a proposed approach involves combining genomic-based biomarkers (GBBM) derived from plasma and/or serum samples with innovative non-invasive radiomic-based biomarkers (RBBM), such as measurements of synovial fluid, plaque area, and plaque burden. This review presents two hypotheses: (i) RBBM and GBBM biomarkers exhibit a significant correlation and can precisely detect the severity of CVD/Stroke in RA patients. (ii) Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based preventive, precision, and personalized (aiP3) CVD/Stroke risk AtheroEdge™ model (AtheroPoint™, CA, USA) that utilizes deep learning (DL) to accurately classify the risk of CVD/stroke in RA framework. The authors conducted a comprehensive search using the PRISMA technique, identifying 153 studies that assessed the features/biomarkers of RBBM and GBBM for CVD/Stroke. The study demonstrates how DL models can be integrated into the AtheroEdge™-aiP3 framework to determine the risk of CVD/Stroke in RA patients. The findings of this review suggest that the combination of RBBM with GBBM introduces a new dimension to the assessment of CVD/Stroke risk in the RA framework. Synovial fluid levels that are higher than normal lead to an increase in the plaque burden. Additionally, the review provides recommendations for novel, unbiased, and pruned DL algorithms that can predict CVD/Stroke risk within a RA framework that is preventive, precise, and personalized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON, L4Z 4C4, Canada
| | - Mahesh Maindarkar
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA
- Asia Pacific Vascular Society, New Delhi, 110001, India
| | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, DY1 2HQ, UK
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Asia Pacific Vascular Society, New Delhi, 110001, India
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, 110001, India
| | | | - Amer M Johri
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Laura Mantella
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, SGPIMS, Lucknow, 226014, India
| | - Aman Sharma
- Department of Immunology, SGPIMS, Lucknow, 226014, India
| | - Inder M Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, 94574, USA
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 09124, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jagjit Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27753, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, UHID, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centre, Athens, Greece
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA, 95823, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Centre, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI, 02906, USA
| | - Manudeep K Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Esma R Isenovic
- Department of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 40138, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mostafa M Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, 83209, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sanga P, Singh J, Dubey AK, Khanna NN, Laird JR, Faa G, Singh IM, Tsoulfas G, Kalra MK, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Rathore V, Agarwal V, Ahluwalia P, Fouda MM, Saba L, Suri JS. DermAI 1.0: A Robust, Generalized, and Novel Attention-Enabled Ensemble-Based Transfer Learning Paradigm for Multiclass Classification of Skin Lesion Images. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3159. [PMID: 37835902 PMCID: PMC10573070 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Skin lesion classification plays a crucial role in dermatology, aiding in the early detection, diagnosis, and management of life-threatening malignant lesions. However, standalone transfer learning (TL) models failed to deliver optimal performance. In this study, we present an attention-enabled ensemble-based deep learning technique, a powerful, novel, and generalized method for extracting features for the classification of skin lesions. This technique holds significant promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy by using seven pre-trained TL models for classification. Six ensemble-based DL (EBDL) models were created using stacking, softmax voting, and weighted average techniques. Furthermore, we investigated the attention mechanism as an effective paradigm and created seven attention-enabled transfer learning (aeTL) models before branching out to construct three attention-enabled ensemble-based DL (aeEBDL) models to create a reliable, adaptive, and generalized paradigm. The mean accuracy of the TL models is 95.30%, and the use of an ensemble-based paradigm increased it by 4.22%, to 99.52%. The aeTL models' performance was superior to the TL models in accuracy by 3.01%, and aeEBDL models outperformed aeTL models by 1.29%. Statistical tests show significant p-value and Kappa coefficient along with a 99.6% reliability index for the aeEBDL models. The approach is highly effective and generalized for the classification of skin lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prabhav Sanga
- Department of Information Technology, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India; (P.S.); (A.K.D.)
- Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Jaskaran Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA (I.M.S.); (V.R.)
| | - Arun Kumar Dubey
- Department of Information Technology, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India; (P.S.); (A.K.D.)
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA (I.M.S.); (V.R.)
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Mannudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Jagjit S. Teji
- Department of Pediatrics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada;
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA (I.M.S.); (V.R.)
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India;
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Department of Uro Oncology, Medanta the Medicity, Gurugram 122001, India;
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA (I.M.S.); (V.R.)
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Graphic Era University (G.E.U.), Dehradun 248002, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Saceleanu VM, Toader C, Ples H, Covache-Busuioc RA, Costin HP, Bratu BG, Dumitrascu DI, Bordeianu A, Corlatescu AD, Ciurea AV. Integrative Approaches in Acute Ischemic Stroke: From Symptom Recognition to Future Innovations. Biomedicines 2023; 11:2617. [PMID: 37892991 PMCID: PMC10604797 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11102617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Among the high prevalence of cerebrovascular diseases nowadays, acute ischemic stroke stands out, representing a significant worldwide health issue with important socio-economic implications. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are important milestones for the management of this multifaceted pathology, making understanding the various stroke-onset symptoms crucial. A key role in acute ischemic stroke management is emphasizing the essential role of a multi-disciplinary team, therefore, increasing the efficiency of recognition and treatment. Neuroimaging and neuroradiology have evolved dramatically over the years, with multiple approaches that provide a higher understanding of the morphological aspects as well as timely recognition of cerebral artery occlusions for effective therapy planning. Regarding the treatment matter, the pharmacological approach, particularly fibrinolytic therapy, has its merits and challenges. Endovascular thrombectomy, a game-changer in stroke management, has witnessed significant advances, with technologies like stent retrievers and aspiration catheters playing pivotal roles. For select patients, combining pharmacological and endovascular strategies offers evidence-backed benefits. The aim of our comprehensive study on acute ischemic stroke is to efficiently compare the current therapies, recognize novel possibilities from the literature, and describe the state of the art in the interdisciplinary approach to acute ischemic stroke. As we aspire for holistic patient management, the emphasis is not just on medical intervention but also on physical therapy, mental health, and community engagement. The future holds promising innovations, with artificial intelligence poised to reshape stroke diagnostics and treatments. Bridging the gap between groundbreaking research and clinical practice remains a challenge, urging continuous collaboration and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicentiu Mircea Saceleanu
- Neurosurgery Department, Sibiu County Emergency Hospital, 550245 Sibiu, Romania;
- Neurosurgery Department, “Lucian Blaga” University of Medicine, 550024 Sibiu, Romania
| | - Corneliu Toader
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (R.-A.C.-B.); (H.P.C.); (B.-G.B.); (D.-I.D.); (A.B.); (A.D.C.); (A.V.C.)
- Department of Vascular Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurovascular Diseases, 020022 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Horia Ples
- Centre for Cognitive Research in Neuropsychiatric Pathology (NeuroPsy-Cog), “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300736 Timisoara, Romania
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Razvan-Adrian Covache-Busuioc
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (R.-A.C.-B.); (H.P.C.); (B.-G.B.); (D.-I.D.); (A.B.); (A.D.C.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Horia Petre Costin
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (R.-A.C.-B.); (H.P.C.); (B.-G.B.); (D.-I.D.); (A.B.); (A.D.C.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Bogdan-Gabriel Bratu
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (R.-A.C.-B.); (H.P.C.); (B.-G.B.); (D.-I.D.); (A.B.); (A.D.C.); (A.V.C.)
| | - David-Ioan Dumitrascu
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (R.-A.C.-B.); (H.P.C.); (B.-G.B.); (D.-I.D.); (A.B.); (A.D.C.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Andrei Bordeianu
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (R.-A.C.-B.); (H.P.C.); (B.-G.B.); (D.-I.D.); (A.B.); (A.D.C.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Antonio Daniel Corlatescu
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (R.-A.C.-B.); (H.P.C.); (B.-G.B.); (D.-I.D.); (A.B.); (A.D.C.); (A.V.C.)
| | - Alexandru Vlad Ciurea
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (R.-A.C.-B.); (H.P.C.); (B.-G.B.); (D.-I.D.); (A.B.); (A.D.C.); (A.V.C.)
- Neurosurgery Department, Sanador Clinical Hospital, 010991 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jang W, Choi YS, Kim JY, Yon DK, Lee YJ, Chung SH, Kim CY, Yeo SG, Lee J. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Respiratory Distress Syndrome Prediction for Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Korean Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e47612. [PMID: 37428525 PMCID: PMC10366668 DOI: 10.2196/47612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a disease that commonly affects premature infants whose lungs are not fully developed. RDS results from a lack of surfactant in the lungs. The more premature the infant is, the greater is the likelihood of having RDS. However, even though not all premature infants have RDS, preemptive treatment with artificial pulmonary surfactant is administered in most cases. OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence model to predict RDS in premature infants to avoid unnecessary treatment. METHODS In this study, 13,087 very low birth weight infants who were newborns weighing less than 1500 grams were assessed in 76 hospitals of the Korean Neonatal Network. To predict RDS in very low birth weight infants, we used basic infant information, maternity history, pregnancy/birth process, family history, resuscitation procedure, and test results at birth such as blood gas analysis and Apgar score. The prediction performances of 7 different machine learning models were compared, and a 5-layer deep neural network was proposed in order to enhance the prediction performance from the selected features. An ensemble approach combining multiple models from the 5-fold cross-validation was subsequently developed. RESULTS Our proposed ensemble 5-layer deep neural network consisting of the top 20 features provided high sensitivity (83.03%), specificity (87.50%), accuracy (84.07%), balanced accuracy (85.26%), and area under the curve (0.9187). Based on the model that we developed, a public web application that enables easy access for the prediction of RDS in premature infants was deployed. CONCLUSIONS Our artificial intelligence model may be useful for preparations for neonatal resuscitation, particularly in cases involving the delivery of very low birth weight infants, as it can aid in predicting the likelihood of RDS and inform decisions regarding the administration of surfactant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woocheol Jang
- Biomedical Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Sung Choi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Yoo Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Keon Yon
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Joo Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Hoon Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chae Young Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Geun Yeo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinseok Lee
- Biomedical Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gomez-Gonzalez E, Muñoz O, Gomez-Martin JC, Aceituno-Castro J, Fernandez-Muñoz B, Navas-Garcia JM, Barriga-Rivera A, Fernandez-Lizaranzu I, Munoz-Gonzalez FJ, Parrilla-Giraldez R, Requena-Lancharro D, Gil-Gamboa P, Ramos JL, Rosell-Valle C, Gomez-Gonzalez C, Martin-Lopez M, Relimpio-Lopez MI, Perales-Esteve MA, Puppo-Moreno A, Garcia-Cozar FJ, Olvera-Collantes L, de Los Santos-Trigo S, Gomez E, Sanchez-Pernaute R, Padillo-Ruiz J, Marquez-Rivas J. Polarimetric imaging for the detection of synthetic models of SARS-CoV-2: A proof of concept. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER 2023; 302:108567. [PMID: 36945203 PMCID: PMC9987604 DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2023.108567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Objective To conduct a proof-of-concept study of the detection of two synthetic models of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using polarimetric imaging. Approach Two SARS-CoV-2 models were prepared as engineered lentiviruses pseudotyped with the G protein of the vesicular stomatitis virus, and with the characteristic Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. Samples were prepared in two biofluids (saline solution and artificial saliva), in four concentrations, and deposited as 5-µL droplets on a supporting plate. The angles of maximal degree of linear polarization (DLP) of light diffusely scattered from dry residues were determined using Mueller polarimetry from87 samples at 405 nm and 514 nm. A polarimetric camera was used for imaging several samples under 380-420 nm illumination at angles similar to those of maximal DLP. Per-pixel image analysis included quantification and combination of polarization feature descriptors in 475 samples. Main results The angles (from sample surface) of maximal DLP were 3° for 405 nm and 6° for 514 nm. Similar viral particles that differed only in the characteristic spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2, their corresponding negative controls, fluids, and the sample holder were discerned at 10-degree and 15-degree configurations. Significance Polarimetric imaging in the visible spectrum may help improve fast, non-contact detection and identification of viral particles, and/or other microbes such as tuberculosis, in multiple dry fluid samples simultaneously, particularly when combined with other imaging modalities. Further analysis including realistic concentrations of real SARS-CoV-2 viral particles in relevant human fluids is required. Polarimetric imaging under visible light may contribute to a fast, cost-effective screening of SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens when combined with other imaging modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio Gomez-Gonzalez
- Group of Interdisciplinary Physics, Department of Applied Physics III at the ETSI Engineering School, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville 41092, Spain
- Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Spain
| | - Olga Muñoz
- Cosmic Dust Laboratory, Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, CSIC, Granada 18008, Spain
| | | | - Jesus Aceituno-Castro
- Cosmic Dust Laboratory, Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, CSIC, Granada 18008, Spain
- Centro Astronomico Hispano Alemán, Almeria 04550, Spain
| | - Beatriz Fernandez-Muñoz
- Unidad de Producción y Reprogramación Celular, Red Andaluza de Diseño y Traslación de Terapias Avanzadas, Fundacion Publica Andaluza Progreso y Salud, Sevilla 41092, Spain
| | | | - Alejandro Barriga-Rivera
- Group of Interdisciplinary Physics, Department of Applied Physics III at the ETSI Engineering School, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville 41092, Spain
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Isabel Fernandez-Lizaranzu
- Group of Interdisciplinary Physics, Department of Applied Physics III at the ETSI Engineering School, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville 41092, Spain
- Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier Munoz-Gonzalez
- Group of Interdisciplinary Physics, Department of Applied Physics III at the ETSI Engineering School, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville 41092, Spain
| | | | - Desiree Requena-Lancharro
- Group of Interdisciplinary Physics, Department of Applied Physics III at the ETSI Engineering School, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville 41092, Spain
| | - Pedro Gil-Gamboa
- Group of Interdisciplinary Physics, Department of Applied Physics III at the ETSI Engineering School, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville 41092, Spain
| | - José Luis Ramos
- Cosmic Dust Laboratory, Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, CSIC, Granada 18008, Spain
| | - Cristina Rosell-Valle
- Unidad de Producción y Reprogramación Celular, Red Andaluza de Diseño y Traslación de Terapias Avanzadas, Fundacion Publica Andaluza Progreso y Salud, Sevilla 41092, Spain
| | - Carmen Gomez-Gonzalez
- Service of Intensive Care, University Hospital 'Virgen del Rocio', Sevilla 41013, Spain
| | - Maria Martin-Lopez
- Unidad de Producción y Reprogramación Celular, Red Andaluza de Diseño y Traslación de Terapias Avanzadas, Fundacion Publica Andaluza Progreso y Salud, Sevilla 41092, Spain
| | - Maria Isabel Relimpio-Lopez
- Department of General Surgery, College of Medicine, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville 41009, Spain
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital 'Virgen Macarena', Sevilla 41009, Spain
- OftaRed, Institute of Health 'Carlos III', Madrid 28029, Spain
| | - Manuel A Perales-Esteve
- Group of Interdisciplinary Physics, Department of Applied Physics III at the ETSI Engineering School, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville 41092, Spain
- Department of Electronic Engineering at the ETSI Engineering School, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville 41092, Spain
| | - Antonio Puppo-Moreno
- Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Spain
- Service of Intensive Care, University Hospital 'Virgen del Rocio', Sevilla 41013, Spain
| | - Francisco Jose Garcia-Cozar
- Department of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health, University of Cadiz, Cadiz 11003, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomedica de Cádiz (INIBICA), Cadiz 11009, Spain
| | - Lucia Olvera-Collantes
- Department of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health, University of Cadiz, Cadiz 11003, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomedica de Cádiz (INIBICA), Cadiz 11009, Spain
| | | | - Emilia Gomez
- Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Sevilla 41092, Spain
| | - Rosario Sanchez-Pernaute
- Unidad de Producción y Reprogramación Celular, Red Andaluza de Diseño y Traslación de Terapias Avanzadas, Fundacion Publica Andaluza Progreso y Salud, Sevilla 41092, Spain
| | | | - Javier Marquez-Rivas
- Group of Interdisciplinary Physics, Department of Applied Physics III at the ETSI Engineering School, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville 41092, Spain
- Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Spain
- Service of Neurosurgery, University Hospital 'Virgen del Rocío', Sevilla 41013, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bhagawati M, Paul S, Agarwal S, Protogeron A, Sfikakis PP, Kitas GD, Khanna NN, Ruzsa Z, Sharma AM, Tomazu O, Turk M, Faa G, Tsoulfas G, Laird JR, Rathore V, Johri AM, Viskovic K, Kalra M, Balestrieri A, Nicolaides A, Singh IM, Chaturvedi S, Paraskevas KI, Fouda MM, Saba L, Suri JS. Cardiovascular disease/stroke risk stratification in deep learning framework: a review. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2023; 13:557-598. [PMID: 37405023 PMCID: PMC10315429 DOI: 10.21037/cdt-22-438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
The global mortality rate is known to be the highest due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Thus, preventive, and early CVD risk identification in a non-invasive manner is vital as healthcare cost is increasing day by day. Conventional methods for risk prediction of CVD lack robustness due to the non-linear relationship between risk factors and cardiovascular events in multi-ethnic cohorts. Few recently proposed machine learning-based risk stratification reviews without deep learning (DL) integration. The proposed study focuses on CVD risk stratification by the use of techniques mainly solo deep learning (SDL) and hybrid deep learning (HDL). Using a PRISMA model, 286 DL-based CVD studies were selected and analyzed. The databases included were Science Direct, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, and Google Scholar. This review is focused on different SDL and HDL architectures, their characteristics, applications, scientific and clinical validation, along with plaque tissue characterization for CVD/stroke risk stratification. Since signal processing methods are also crucial, the study further briefly presented Electrocardiogram (ECG)-based solutions. Finally, the study presented the risk due to bias in AI systems. The risk of bias tools used were (I) ranking method (RBS), (II) region-based map (RBM), (III) radial bias area (RBA), (IV) prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST), and (V) risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of interventions (ROBINS-I). The surrogate carotid ultrasound image was mostly used in the UNet-based DL framework for arterial wall segmentation. Ground truth (GT) selection is vital for reducing the risk of bias (RoB) for CVD risk stratification. It was observed that the convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms were widely used since the feature extraction process was automated. The ensemble-based DL techniques for risk stratification in CVD are likely to supersede the SDL and HDL paradigms. Due to the reliability, high accuracy, and faster execution on dedicated hardware, these DL methods for CVD risk assessment are powerful and promising. The risk of bias in DL methods can be best reduced by considering multicentre data collection and clinical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mrinalini Bhagawati
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India
| | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA, USA
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, PSIT, Kanpur, India
| | - Athanasios Protogeron
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention & Research Unit Clinic & Laboratory of Pathophysiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - George D. Kitas
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Aditya M. Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Omerzu Tomazu
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, A.O.U., di Cagliari -Polo di Monserrato s.s, Cagliari, Italy
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - John R. Laird
- Cardiology Department, St. Helena Hospital, St. Helena, CA, USA
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
| | | | - Manudeep Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | - Seemant Chaturvedi
- Department of Neurology & Stroke Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kosmas I. Paraskevas
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Central Clinic of Athens, N. Iraklio, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dubey AK, Chabert GL, Carriero A, Pasche A, Danna PSC, Agarwal S, Mohanty L, Nillmani, Sharma N, Yadav S, Jain A, Kumar A, Kalra MK, Sobel DW, Laird JR, Singh IM, Singh N, Tsoulfas G, Fouda MM, Alizad A, Kitas GD, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Kukuljan M, Al-Maini M, El-Baz A, Saba L, Suri JS. Ensemble Deep Learning Derived from Transfer Learning for Classification of COVID-19 Patients on Hybrid Deep-Learning-Based Lung Segmentation: A Data Augmentation and Balancing Framework. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:1954. [PMID: 37296806 PMCID: PMC10252539 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION Lung computed tomography (CT) techniques are high-resolution and are well adopted in the intensive care unit (ICU) for COVID-19 disease control classification. Most artificial intelligence (AI) systems do not undergo generalization and are typically overfitted. Such trained AI systems are not practical for clinical settings and therefore do not give accurate results when executed on unseen data sets. We hypothesize that ensemble deep learning (EDL) is superior to deep transfer learning (TL) in both non-augmented and augmented frameworks. METHODOLOGY The system consists of a cascade of quality control, ResNet-UNet-based hybrid deep learning for lung segmentation, and seven models using TL-based classification followed by five types of EDL's. To prove our hypothesis, five different kinds of data combinations (DC) were designed using a combination of two multicenter cohorts-Croatia (80 COVID) and Italy (72 COVID and 30 controls)-leading to 12,000 CT slices. As part of generalization, the system was tested on unseen data and statistically tested for reliability/stability. RESULTS Using the K5 (80:20) cross-validation protocol on the balanced and augmented dataset, the five DC datasets improved TL mean accuracy by 3.32%, 6.56%, 12.96%, 47.1%, and 2.78%, respectively. The five EDL systems showed improvements in accuracy of 2.12%, 5.78%, 6.72%, 32.05%, and 2.40%, thus validating our hypothesis. All statistical tests proved positive for reliability and stability. CONCLUSION EDL showed superior performance to TL systems for both (a) unbalanced and unaugmented and (b) balanced and augmented datasets for both (i) seen and (ii) unseen paradigms, validating both our hypotheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arun Kumar Dubey
- Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India
| | - Gian Luca Chabert
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09123 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessandro Carriero
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09123 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessio Pasche
- Department of Radiology, “Maggiore della Carità” Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Pietro S. C. Danna
- Department of Radiology, “Maggiore della Carità” Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Lopamudra Mohanty
- ABES Engineering College, Ghaziabad 201009, India
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Bennett University, Greater Noida 201310, India
| | - Nillmani
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 221005, India
| | - Neeraj Sharma
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 221005, India
| | - Sarita Yadav
- Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India
| | - Achin Jain
- Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India
| | - Ashish Kumar
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Bennett University, Greater Noida 201310, India
| | - Mannudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - David W. Sobel
- Men’s Health Centre, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI 02906, USA
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Narpinder Singh
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era, Deemed to be University, Dehradun 248002, India
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110001, India
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Melita Kukuljan
- Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada
| | - Ayman El-Baz
- Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09123 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Khanna NN, Maindarkar MA, Viswanathan V, Fernandes JFE, Paul S, Bhagawati M, Ahluwalia P, Ruzsa Z, Sharma A, Kolluri R, Singh IM, Laird JR, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Saba L, Agarwal V, Sharma A, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Rathore V, Naidu S, Liblik K, Johri AM, Turk M, Mohanty L, Sobel DW, Miner M, Viskovic K, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou AD, Kitas GD, Fouda MM, Chaturvedi S, Kalra MK, Suri JS. Economics of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Diagnosis vs. Treatment. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:2493. [PMID: 36554017 PMCID: PMC9777836 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Motivation: The price of medical treatment continues to rise due to (i) an increasing population; (ii) an aging human growth; (iii) disease prevalence; (iv) a rise in the frequency of patients that utilize health care services; and (v) increase in the price. Objective: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is already well-known for its superiority in various healthcare applications, including the segmentation of lesions in images, speech recognition, smartphone personal assistants, navigation, ride-sharing apps, and many more. Our study is based on two hypotheses: (i) AI offers more economic solutions compared to conventional methods; (ii) AI treatment offers stronger economics compared to AI diagnosis. This novel study aims to evaluate AI technology in the context of healthcare costs, namely in the areas of diagnosis and treatment, and then compare it to the traditional or non-AI-based approaches. Methodology: PRISMA was used to select the best 200 studies for AI in healthcare with a primary focus on cost reduction, especially towards diagnosis and treatment. We defined the diagnosis and treatment architectures, investigated their characteristics, and categorized the roles that AI plays in the diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms. We experimented with various combinations of different assumptions by integrating AI and then comparing it against conventional costs. Lastly, we dwell on three powerful future concepts of AI, namely, pruning, bias, explainability, and regulatory approvals of AI systems. Conclusions: The model shows tremendous cost savings using AI tools in diagnosis and treatment. The economics of AI can be improved by incorporating pruning, reduction in AI bias, explainability, and regulatory approvals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110001, India
| | - Mahesh A. Maindarkar
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India
| | | | | | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India
| | - Mrinalini Bhagawati
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi 110017, India
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
| | - Raghu Kolluri
- Ohio Health Heart and Vascular, Columbus, OH 43214, USA
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 40138 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow 226014, India
| | - Aman Sharma
- Department of Immunology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow 226014, India
| | - Jagjit S. Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada
| | | | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
| | - Kiera Liblik
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27753 Delmenhorst, Germany
| | - Lopamudra Mohanty
- Department of Computer Science, ABES Engineering College, Ghaziabad 201009, India
| | - David W. Sobel
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Centre, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI 02906, USA
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Athanasios D. Protogerou
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Research Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
| | - Seemant Chaturvedi
- Department of Neurology & Stroke Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | | | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lee P, Kim H, Zitouni MS, Khandoker A, Jelinek HF, Hadjileontiadis L, Lee U, Jeong Y. Trends in Smart Helmets With Multimodal Sensing for Health and Safety: Scoping Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022; 10:e40797. [PMID: 36378505 PMCID: PMC9709670 DOI: 10.2196/40797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As a form of the Internet of Things (IoT)-gateways, a smart helmet is one of the core devices that offers distinct functionalities. The development of smart helmets connected to IoT infrastructure helps promote connected health and safety in various fields. In this regard, we present a comprehensive analysis of smart helmet technology and its main characteristics and applications for health and safety. OBJECTIVE This paper reviews the trends in smart helmet technology and provides an overview of the current and future potential deployments of such technology, the development of smart helmets for continuous monitoring of the health status of users, and the surrounding environmental conditions. The research questions were as follows: What are the main purposes and domains of smart helmets for health and safety? How have researchers realized key features and with what types of sensors? METHODS We selected studies cited in electronic databases such as Google Scholar, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO on smart helmets through a keyword search from January 2010 to December 2021. In total, 1268 papers were identified (Web of Science: 87/1268, 6.86%; EBSCO: 149/1268, 11.75%; ScienceDirect: 248/1268, 19.55%; and Google Scholar: 784/1268, 61.82%), and the number of final studies included after PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) study selection was 57. We also performed a self-assessment of the reviewed articles to determine the quality of the paper. The scoring was based on five criteria: test environment, prototype quality, feasibility test, sensor calibration, and versatility. RESULTS Smart helmet research has been considered in industry, sports, first responder, and health tracking scenarios for health and safety purposes. Among 57 studies, most studies with prototype development were industrial applications (18/57, 32%), and the 2 most frequent studies including simulation were industry (23/57, 40%) and sports (23/57, 40%) applications. From our assessment-scoring result, studies tended to focus on sensor calibration results (2.3 out of 3), while the lowest part was a feasibility test (1.6 out of 3). Further classification of the purpose of smart helmets yielded 4 major categories, including activity, physiological and environmental (hazard) risk sensing, as well as risk event alerting. CONCLUSIONS A summary of existing smart helmet systems is presented with a review of the sensor features used in the prototyping demonstrations. Overall, we aimed to explore new possibilities by examining the latest research, sensor technologies, and application platform perspectives for smart helmets as promising wearable devices. The barriers to users, challenges in the development of smart helmets, and future opportunities for health and safety applications are also discussed. In conclusion, this paper presents the current status of smart helmet technology, main issues, and prospects for future smart helmet with the objective of making the smart helmet concept a reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Lee
- KAIST Institute for Health Science and Technology, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Heepyung Kim
- KAIST Institute for Health Science and Technology, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - M Sami Zitouni
- College of Engineering and IT, University of Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ahsan Khandoker
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- Healthcare Engineering Innovation Center, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Herbert F Jelinek
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- Healthcare Engineering Innovation Center, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Leontios Hadjileontiadis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- Healthcare Engineering Innovation Center, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Uichin Lee
- KAIST Institute for Health Science and Technology, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- School of Computing, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Jeong
- KAIST Institute for Health Science and Technology, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rana A, Dumka A, Singh R, Panda MK, Priyadarshi N. A Computerized Analysis with Machine Learning Techniques for the Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease: Past Studies and Future Perspectives. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:2708. [PMID: 36359550 PMCID: PMC9689408 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease of the brain that causes motor symptoms including slower movement, rigidity, tremor, and imbalance in addition to other problems like Alzheimer's disease (AD), psychiatric problems, insomnia, anxiety, and sensory abnormalities. Techniques including artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) have been established for the classification of PD and normal controls (NC) with similar therapeutic appearances in order to address these problems and improve the diagnostic procedure for PD. In this article, we examine a literature survey of research articles published up to September 2022 in order to present an in-depth analysis of the use of datasets, various modalities, experimental setups, and architectures that have been applied in the diagnosis of subjective disease. This analysis includes a total of 217 research publications with a list of the various datasets, methodologies, and features. These findings suggest that ML/DL methods and novel biomarkers hold promising results for application in medical decision-making, leading to a more methodical and thorough detection of PD. Finally, we highlight the challenges and provide appropriate recommendations on selecting approaches that might be used for subgrouping and connection analysis with structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), DaTSCAN, and single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) data for future Parkinson's research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arti Rana
- Computer Science & Engineering, Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Uttarakhand Technical University, Dehradun 248007, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Ankur Dumka
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Women Institute of Technology, Dehradun 248007, Uttarakhand, India
- Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun 248001, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Rajesh Singh
- Division of Research and Innovation, Uttaranchal Institute of Technology, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun 248007, Uttarakhand, India
- Department of Project Management, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana, Campeche 24560, Mexico
| | - Manoj Kumar Panda
- Department of Electrical Engineering, G.B. Pant Institute of Engineering and Technology, Pauri 246194, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Neeraj Priyadarshi
- Department of Electrical Engineering, JIS College of Engineering, Kolkata 741235, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Far wall plaque segmentation and area measurement in common and internal carotid artery ultrasound using U-series architectures: An unseen Artificial Intelligence paradigm for stroke risk assessment. Comput Biol Med 2022; 149:106017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
20
|
Jain PK, Dubey A, Saba L, Khanna NN, Laird JR, Nicolaides A, Fouda MM, Suri JS, Sharma N. Attention-Based UNet Deep Learning Model for Plaque Segmentation in Carotid Ultrasound for Stroke Risk Stratification: An Artificial Intelligence Paradigm. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2022; 9:326. [PMID: 36286278 PMCID: PMC9604424 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9100326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Stroke and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) significantly affect the world population. The early detection of such events may prevent the burden of death and costly surgery. Conventional methods are neither automated nor clinically accurate. Artificial Intelligence-based methods of automatically detecting and predicting the severity of CVD and stroke in their early stages are of prime importance. This study proposes an attention-channel-based UNet deep learning (DL) model that identifies the carotid plaques in the internal carotid artery (ICA) and common carotid artery (CCA) images. Our experiments consist of 970 ICA images from the UK, 379 CCA images from diabetic Japanese patients, and 300 CCA images from post-menopausal women from Hong Kong. We combined both CCA images to form an integrated database of 679 images. A rotation transformation technique was applied to 679 CCA images, doubling the database for the experiments. The cross-validation K5 (80% training: 20% testing) protocol was applied for accuracy determination. The results of the Attention-UNet model are benchmarked against UNet, UNet++, and UNet3P models. Visual plaque segmentation showed improvement in the Attention-UNet results compared to the other three models. The correlation coefficient (CC) value for Attention-UNet is 0.96, compared to 0.93, 0.96, and 0.92 for UNet, UNet++, and UNet3P models. Similarly, the AUC value for Attention-UNet is 0.97, compared to 0.964, 0.966, and 0.965 for other models. Conclusively, the Attention-UNet model is beneficial in segmenting very bright and fuzzy plaque images that are hard to diagnose using other methods. Further, we present a multi-ethnic, multi-center, racial bias-free study of stroke risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pankaj K. Jain
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 221005, India
| | - Abhishek Dubey
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 221005, India
- Department of Electronics and Communication, Shree Mata Vaishno Devi University, Jammu 182301, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09100 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Narender N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospital, New Delhi 110076, India
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Heath St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia 2409, Cyprus
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Neeraj Sharma
- Department of Electronics and Communication, Shree Mata Vaishno Devi University, Jammu 182301, India
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jena B, Saxena S, Nayak GK, Balestrieri A, Gupta N, Khanna NN, Laird JR, Kalra MK, Fouda MM, Saba L, Suri JS. Brain Tumor Characterization Using Radiogenomics in Artificial Intelligence Framework. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:4052. [PMID: 36011048 PMCID: PMC9406706 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14164052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain tumor characterization (BTC) is the process of knowing the underlying cause of brain tumors and their characteristics through various approaches such as tumor segmentation, classification, detection, and risk analysis. The substantial brain tumor characterization includes the identification of the molecular signature of various useful genomes whose alteration causes the brain tumor. The radiomics approach uses the radiological image for disease characterization by extracting quantitative radiomics features in the artificial intelligence (AI) environment. However, when considering a higher level of disease characteristics such as genetic information and mutation status, the combined study of "radiomics and genomics" has been considered under the umbrella of "radiogenomics". Furthermore, AI in a radiogenomics' environment offers benefits/advantages such as the finalized outcome of personalized treatment and individualized medicine. The proposed study summarizes the brain tumor's characterization in the prospect of an emerging field of research, i.e., radiomics and radiogenomics in an AI environment, with the help of statistical observation and risk-of-bias (RoB) analysis. The PRISMA search approach was used to find 121 relevant studies for the proposed review using IEEE, Google Scholar, PubMed, MDPI, and Scopus. Our findings indicate that both radiomics and radiogenomics have been successfully applied aggressively to several oncology applications with numerous advantages. Furthermore, under the AI paradigm, both the conventional and deep radiomics features have made an impact on the favorable outcomes of the radiogenomics approach of BTC. Furthermore, risk-of-bias (RoB) analysis offers a better understanding of the architectures with stronger benefits of AI by providing the bias involved in them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biswajit Jena
- Department of CSE, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, India
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Department of CSE, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, India
| | - Gopal Krishna Nayak
- Department of CSE, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, India
| | | | - Neha Gupta
- Department of IT, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi 110056, India
| | - Narinder N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA
| | - Manudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, AOU, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnosis and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Suri JS, Agarwal S, Saba L, Chabert GL, Carriero A, Paschè A, Danna P, Mehmedović A, Faa G, Jujaray T, Singh IM, Khanna NN, Laird JR, Sfikakis PP, Agarwal V, Teji JS, R Yadav R, Nagy F, Kincses ZT, Ruzsa Z, Viskovic K, Kalra MK. Multicenter Study on COVID-19 Lung Computed Tomography Segmentation with varying Glass Ground Opacities using Unseen Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence Paradigms: COVLIAS 1.0 Validation. J Med Syst 2022; 46:62. [PMID: 35988110 PMCID: PMC9392994 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-022-01850-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Variations in COVID-19 lesions such as glass ground opacities (GGO), consolidations, and crazy paving can compromise the ability of solo-deep learning (SDL) or hybrid-deep learning (HDL) artificial intelligence (AI) models in predicting automated COVID-19 lung segmentation in Computed Tomography (CT) from unseen data leading to poor clinical manifestations. As the first study of its kind, "COVLIAS 1.0-Unseen" proves two hypotheses, (i) contrast adjustment is vital for AI, and (ii) HDL is superior to SDL. In a multicenter study, 10,000 CT slices were collected from 72 Italian (ITA) patients with low-GGO, and 80 Croatian (CRO) patients with high-GGO. Hounsfield Units (HU) were automatically adjusted to train the AI models and predict from test data, leading to four combinations-two Unseen sets: (i) train-CRO:test-ITA, (ii) train-ITA:test-CRO, and two Seen sets: (iii) train-CRO:test-CRO, (iv) train-ITA:test-ITA. COVILAS used three SDL models: PSPNet, SegNet, UNet and six HDL models: VGG-PSPNet, VGG-SegNet, VGG-UNet, ResNet-PSPNet, ResNet-SegNet, and ResNet-UNet. Two trained, blinded senior radiologists conducted ground truth annotations. Five types of performance metrics were used to validate COVLIAS 1.0-Unseen which was further benchmarked against MedSeg, an open-source web-based system. After HU adjustment for DS and JI, HDL (Unseen AI) > SDL (Unseen AI) by 4% and 5%, respectively. For CC, HDL (Unseen AI) > SDL (Unseen AI) by 6%. The COVLIAS-MedSeg difference was < 5%, meeting regulatory guidelines.Unseen AI was successfully demonstrated using automated HU adjustment. HDL was found to be superior to SDL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA, USA.
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA, USA
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Chabert
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessandro Carriero
- Depart of Radiology, "Maggiore Della Carità" Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100, Novara, Italy
| | - Alessio Paschè
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Pietro Danna
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology - AOU of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Tanay Jujaray
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA, USA
- Dept of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Inder M Singh
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Jagjit S Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | | | - Ferenc Nagy
- Internal Medicine Department, University of Szeged, Szeged, 6725, Hungary
| | | | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Mannudeep K Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Khanna NN, Maindarkar M, Puvvula A, Paul S, Bhagawati M, Ahluwalia P, Ruzsa Z, Sharma A, Munjral S, Kolluri R, Krishnan PR, Singh IM, Laird JR, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Dhanjil SK, Saba L, Balestrieri A, Faa G, Paraskevas KI, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Sharma A, Teji J, Al-Maini M, Nicolaides A, Rathore V, Naidu S, Liblik K, Johri AM, Turk M, Sobel DW, Pareek G, Miner M, Viskovic K, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou AD, Mavrogeni S, Kitas GD, Fouda MM, Kalra MK, Suri JS. Vascular Implications of COVID-19: Role of Radiological Imaging, Artificial Intelligence, and Tissue Characterization: A Special Report. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2022; 9:268. [PMID: 36005433 PMCID: PMC9409845 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9080268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Revised: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 virus has caused a pandemic, infecting nearly 80 million people worldwide, with mortality exceeding six million. The average survival span is just 14 days from the time the symptoms become aggressive. The present study delineates the deep-driven vascular damage in the pulmonary, renal, coronary, and carotid vessels due to SARS-CoV-2. This special report addresses an important gap in the literature in understanding (i) the pathophysiology of vascular damage and the role of medical imaging in the visualization of the damage caused by SARS-CoV-2, and (ii) further understanding the severity of COVID-19 using artificial intelligence (AI)-based tissue characterization (TC). PRISMA was used to select 296 studies for AI-based TC. Radiological imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound were selected for imaging of the vasculature infected by COVID-19. Four kinds of hypotheses are presented for showing the vascular damage in radiological images due to COVID-19. Three kinds of AI models, namely, machine learning, deep learning, and transfer learning, are used for TC. Further, the study presents recommendations for improving AI-based architectures for vascular studies. We conclude that the process of vascular damage due to COVID-19 has similarities across vessel types, even though it results in multi-organ dysfunction. Although the mortality rate is ~2% of those infected, the long-term effect of COVID-19 needs monitoring to avoid deaths. AI seems to be penetrating the health care industry at warp speed, and we expect to see an emerging role in patient care, reduce the mortality and morbidity rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110001, India
| | - Mahesh Maindarkar
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India
| | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Annu’s Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Nellore 524101, India
| | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India
| | - Mrinalini Bhagawati
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi 110017, India
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
| | - Smiksha Munjral
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Raghu Kolluri
- Ohio Health Heart and Vascular, Columbus, OH 43214, USA
| | | | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA 94574, USA
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Surinder K. Dhanjil
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 40138 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Research Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Durga Prasanna Misra
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
| | - Aman Sharma
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
| | - Jagjit Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, 2408 Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA 95119, USA
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
| | - Kiera Liblik
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27753 Delmenhorst, Germany
| | - David W. Sobel
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Centre, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI 02906, USA
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Athanasios D. Protogerou
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Research Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centre, 17674 Athens, Greece
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
| | - Manudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Liu YX, Zhu C, Wu ZX, Lu LJ, Yu YT. A bibliometric analysis of the application of artificial intelligence to advance individualized diagnosis and treatment of critical illness. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2022; 10:854. [PMID: 36111047 PMCID: PMC9469176 DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) has been extensively applied in the individualized diagnosis and treatment of critical illness, and numerous studies have been published on this topic. Therefore, a bibliometric analysis of these publications should be performed to provide a direction of hot topics and future research trends. METHODS A bibliometric analysis was performed on the research articles to identify the hot topics and any unsolved issues regarding the use of AI in individualized diagnosis and treatment of critical illness. Articles published from January 2011 to December 2021 were retrieved from the Web of Science (WOS) core collection database for bibliometric analysis, and a cross-sectional analysis of the relevant studies that had been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov was also conducted. RESULTS The number of articles published showed an annually increasing trend, with a worldwide geographic distribution over the past decade. Ultimately, 427 research articles were included in the bibliometric analysis. The relevant articles were divided into four separate clusters that focused on AI application aspects, prediction model establishment, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment and outcome assessments, respectively. "Machine learning" was the most frequent keyword (147 occurrences, 165 links, and 395 total link strengths) followed by "risk", "models", and "mortality". With 205 articles, the United States of America (USA) had interacted the most with other countries (20 links, and 94 total link strength), while the domestic research institutes in China had infrequently collaborated with others. Approximately 130 trials focusing on the application of AI in the intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency department (ED) had been registered at ClinicalTrial.gov, and most of them (n=71, 54.6%) were interventional. The main research objectives of these trials were to provide decision making assistance and establish prediction models. However, only 3.8% (5 trials) of them had reached exact conclusions which favored the application of AI. CONCLUSIONS The application of AI has raised great interest in critical illness and has mainly been focused on decision making assistance and prediction model establishment. Cooperation between agencies engaged in AI research needs to be strengthened. An increasing number of trials have been registered at ClinicalTrial.gov, and the results of them are promising. KEYWORDS Bibliometric analysis; artificial intelligence (AI); individualized diagnosis; critical care medicine; emergency department (ED).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang-Xi Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Cheng Zhu
- Department of Disease Prevention and Control, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-Xiong Wu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Liang-Jing Lu
- Department of Rheumatology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yue-Tian Yu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Skandha SS, Agarwal M, Utkarsh K, Gupta SK, Koppula VK, Suri JS. A novel genetic algorithm-based approach for compression and acceleration of deep learning convolution neural network: an application in computer tomography lung cancer data. Neural Comput Appl 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s00521-022-07567-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
26
|
Teji JS, Jain S, Gupta SK, Suri JS. NeoAI 1.0: Machine learning-based paradigm for prediction of neonatal and infant risk of death. Comput Biol Med 2022; 147:105639. [DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
27
|
Agarwal M, Agarwal S, Saba L, Chabert GL, Gupta S, Carriero A, Pasche A, Danna P, Mehmedovic A, Faa G, Shrivastava S, Jain K, Jain H, Jujaray T, Singh IM, Turk M, Chadha PS, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Sobel DW, Miner M, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Dhanjil SK, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Krishnan PR, Yadav RR, Nagy F, Kincses ZT, Ruzsa Z, Naidu S, Viskovic K, Kalra MK, Suri JS. Eight pruning deep learning models for low storage and high-speed COVID-19 computed tomography lung segmentation and heatmap-based lesion localization: A multicenter study using COVLIAS 2.0. Comput Biol Med 2022; 146:105571. [PMID: 35751196 PMCID: PMC9123805 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVLIAS 1.0: an automated lung segmentation was designed for COVID-19 diagnosis. It has issues related to storage space and speed. This study shows that COVLIAS 2.0 uses pruned AI (PAI) networks for improving both storage and speed, wiliest high performance on lung segmentation and lesion localization. METHOD ology: The proposed study uses multicenter ∼9,000 CT slices from two different nations, namely, CroMed from Croatia (80 patients, experimental data), and NovMed from Italy (72 patients, validation data). We hypothesize that by using pruning and evolutionary optimization algorithms, the size of the AI models can be reduced significantly, ensuring optimal performance. Eight different pruning techniques (i) differential evolution (DE), (ii) genetic algorithm (GA), (iii) particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO), and (iv) whale optimization algorithm (WO) in two deep learning frameworks (i) Fully connected network (FCN) and (ii) SegNet were designed. COVLIAS 2.0 was validated using "Unseen NovMed" and benchmarked against MedSeg. Statistical tests for stability and reliability were also conducted. RESULTS Pruning algorithms (i) FCN-DE, (ii) FCN-GA, (iii) FCN-PSO, and (iv) FCN-WO showed improvement in storage by 92.4%, 95.3%, 98.7%, and 99.8% respectively when compared against solo FCN, and (v) SegNet-DE, (vi) SegNet-GA, (vii) SegNet-PSO, and (viii) SegNet-WO showed improvement by 97.1%, 97.9%, 98.8%, and 99.2% respectively when compared against solo SegNet. AUC > 0.94 (p < 0.0001) on CroMed and > 0.86 (p < 0.0001) on NovMed data set for all eight EA model. PAI <0.25 s per image. DenseNet-121-based Grad-CAM heatmaps showed validation on glass ground opacity lesions. CONCLUSIONS Eight PAI networks that were successfully validated are five times faster, storage efficient, and could be used in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit Agarwal
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Bennett University, India
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, PSIT, Kanpur, India; Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Chabert
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Suneet Gupta
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Bennett University, India
| | - Alessandro Carriero
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessio Pasche
- Depart of Radiology, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100, Novara, Italy
| | - Pietro Danna
- Depart of Radiology, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology - AOU of Cagliari, Italy
| | - Saurabh Shrivastava
- College of Computing Sciences and IT, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, 244001, India
| | - Kanishka Jain
- College of Computing Sciences and IT, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, 244001, India
| | - Harsh Jain
- College of Computing Sciences and IT, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, 244001, India
| | - Tanay Jujaray
- Dept of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | | | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | | | - Amer M Johri
- Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - David W Sobel
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK; Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
| | - Jagjit S Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and Univ. of Nicosia Medical School, Cyprus
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Dept. of Physiology & Biomedical Engg., Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, MN, USA
| | - Azra Alizad
- Dept. of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Frence Nagy
- Department of Radiology, University of Szeged, 6725, Hungary
| | | | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA
| | | | - Manudeep K Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- College of Computing Sciences and IT, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, 244001, India; Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Suri JS, Maindarkar MA, Paul S, Ahluwalia P, Bhagawati M, Saba L, Faa G, Saxena S, Singh IM, Chadha PS, Turk M, Johri A, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou AD, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Kolluri R, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Dhanjil SK, Sockalingam M, Saxena A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Krishnan PR, Omerzu T, Naidu S, Nicolaides A, Paraskevas KI, Kalra M, Ruzsa Z, Fouda MM. Deep Learning Paradigm for Cardiovascular Disease/Stroke Risk Stratification in Parkinson's Disease Affected by COVID-19: A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:1543. [PMID: 35885449 PMCID: PMC9324237 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Motivation: Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the most serious, non-curable, and expensive to treat. Recently, machine learning (ML) has shown to be able to predict cardiovascular/stroke risk in PD patients. The presence of COVID-19 causes the ML systems to become severely non-linear and poses challenges in cardiovascular/stroke risk stratification. Further, due to comorbidity, sample size constraints, and poor scientific and clinical validation techniques, there have been no well-explained ML paradigms. Deep neural networks are powerful learning machines that generalize non-linear conditions. This study presents a novel investigation of deep learning (DL) solutions for CVD/stroke risk prediction in PD patients affected by the COVID-19 framework. Method: The PRISMA search strategy was used for the selection of 292 studies closely associated with the effect of PD on CVD risk in the COVID-19 framework. We study the hypothesis that PD in the presence of COVID-19 can cause more harm to the heart and brain than in non-COVID-19 conditions. COVID-19 lung damage severity can be used as a covariate during DL training model designs. We, therefore, propose a DL model for the estimation of, (i) COVID-19 lesions in computed tomography (CT) scans and (ii) combining the covariates of PD, COVID-19 lesions, office and laboratory arterial atherosclerotic image-based biomarkers, and medicine usage for the PD patients for the design of DL point-based models for CVD/stroke risk stratification. Results: We validated the feasibility of CVD/stroke risk stratification in PD patients in the presence of a COVID-19 environment and this was also verified. DL architectures like long short-term memory (LSTM), and recurrent neural network (RNN) were studied for CVD/stroke risk stratification showing powerful designs. Lastly, we examined the artificial intelligence bias and provided recommendations for early detection of CVD/stroke in PD patients in the presence of COVID-19. Conclusion: The DL is a very powerful tool for predicting CVD/stroke risk in PD patients affected by COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (M.A.M.); (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.); (S.K.D.)
| | - Mahesh A. Maindarkar
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (M.A.M.); (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.); (S.K.D.)
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (S.P.); (M.B.)
| | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (S.P.); (M.B.)
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi 110017, India;
| | - Mrinalini Bhagawati
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (S.P.); (M.B.)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, and Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 09123 Cagliari, Italy; (L.S.); (G.F.)
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Radiology, and Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 09123 Cagliari, Italy; (L.S.); (G.F.)
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Department of CSE, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhuneshwar 751029, India;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (M.A.M.); (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.); (S.K.D.)
| | - Paramjit S. Chadha
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (M.A.M.); (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.); (S.K.D.)
| | - Monika Turk
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (M.T.); (T.O.)
| | - Amer Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India; (N.N.K.); (A.S.)
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;
| | - Sofia Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centre, 176 74 Athens, Greece;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Centre, Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, USA;
| | - David W. Sobel
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece; (D.W.S.); (P.P.S.)
| | | | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece; (D.W.S.); (P.P.S.)
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Athanase D. Protogerou
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Research Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece;
| | - Durga Prasanna Misra
- Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK;
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Raghu Kolluri
- OhioHealth Heart and Vascular, Mansfield, OH 44905, USA;
| | - Jagjit S. Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology, and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1N8, Canada;
| | - Surinder K. Dhanjil
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (M.A.M.); (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.); (S.K.D.)
| | | | - Ajit Saxena
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India; (N.N.K.); (A.S.)
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA;
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA 95823, USA;
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | | | - Tomaz Omerzu
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (M.T.); (T.O.)
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA;
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, Engomi 2408, Cyprus;
| | - Kosmas I. Paraskevas
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Central Clinic of Athens, 106 80 Athens, Greece;
| | - Mannudeep Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA;
| | - Zoltán Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Suri JS, Agarwal S, Chabert GL, Carriero A, Paschè A, Danna PSC, Saba L, Mehmedović A, Faa G, Singh IM, Turk M, Chadha PS, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou AD, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Dhanjil SK, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Krishnan PR, Nagy F, Ruzsa Z, Fouda MM, Naidu S, Viskovic K, Kalra MK. COVLIAS 1.0 Lesion vs. MedSeg: An Artificial Intelligence Framework for Automated Lesion Segmentation in COVID-19 Lung Computed Tomography Scans. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:1283. [PMID: 35626438 PMCID: PMC9141749 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 is a disease with multiple variants, and is quickly spreading throughout the world. It is crucial to identify patients who are suspected of having COVID-19 early, because the vaccine is not readily available in certain parts of the world. Methodology: Lung computed tomography (CT) imaging can be used to diagnose COVID-19 as an alternative to the RT-PCR test in some cases. The occurrence of ground-glass opacities in the lung region is a characteristic of COVID-19 in chest CT scans, and these are daunting to locate and segment manually. The proposed study consists of a combination of solo deep learning (DL) and hybrid DL (HDL) models to tackle the lesion location and segmentation more quickly. One DL and four HDL models—namely, PSPNet, VGG-SegNet, ResNet-SegNet, VGG-UNet, and ResNet-UNet—were trained by an expert radiologist. The training scheme adopted a fivefold cross-validation strategy on a cohort of 3000 images selected from a set of 40 COVID-19-positive individuals. Results: The proposed variability study uses tracings from two trained radiologists as part of the validation. Five artificial intelligence (AI) models were benchmarked against MedSeg. The best AI model, ResNet-UNet, was superior to MedSeg by 9% and 15% for Dice and Jaccard, respectively, when compared against MD 1, and by 4% and 8%, respectively, when compared against MD 2. Statistical tests—namely, the Mann−Whitney test, paired t-test, and Wilcoxon test—demonstrated its stability and reliability, with p < 0.0001. The online system for each slice was <1 s. Conclusions: The AI models reliably located and segmented COVID-19 lesions in CT scans. The COVLIAS 1.0Lesion lesion locator passed the intervariability test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA;
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA;
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, PSIT, Kanpur 209305, India
| | - Gian Luca Chabert
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.L.C.); (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Alessandro Carriero
- Department of Radiology, “Maggiore della Carità” Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale (UPO), Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy;
| | - Alessio Paschè
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.L.C.); (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Pietro S. C. Danna
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.L.C.); (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.L.C.); (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Armin Mehmedović
- University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (A.M.); (K.V.)
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27753 Delmenhorst, Germany;
| | - Paramjit S. Chadha
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 17674 Athens, Greece;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Center, Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, USA;
| | - David W. Sobel
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.L.C.); (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece;
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Athanasios D. Protogerou
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Research Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece;
| | - Durga Prasanna Misra
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK;
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Jagjit S. Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada;
| | | | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia 2408, Cyprus;
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA;
| | - Vijay Rathore
- AtheroPoint LLC, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.K.D.); (V.R.)
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | | | - Ferenc Nagy
- Internal Medicine Department, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA;
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (A.M.); (K.V.)
| | - Manudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Khanna NN, Maindarkar M, Saxena A, Ahluwalia P, Paul S, Srivastava SK, Cuadrado-Godia E, Sharma A, Omerzu T, Saba L, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Kitas GD, Fatemi M, Barqawi AB, Miner M, Singh IM, Johri A, Kalra MM, Agarwal V, Paraskevas KI, Teji JS, Fouda MM, Pareek G, Suri JS. Cardiovascular/Stroke Risk Assessment in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction-A Role of Carotid Wall Arterial Imaging and Plaque Tissue Characterization Using Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:1249. [PMID: 35626404 PMCID: PMC9141739 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The role of erectile dysfunction (ED) has recently shown an association with the risk of stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD) via the atherosclerotic pathway. Cardiovascular disease (CVD)/stroke risk has been widely understood with the help of carotid artery disease (CTAD), a surrogate biomarker for CHD. The proposed study emphasizes artificial intelligence-based frameworks such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) that can accurately predict the severity of CVD/stroke risk using carotid wall arterial imaging in ED patients. METHODS Using the PRISMA model, 231 of the best studies were selected. The proposed study mainly consists of two components: (i) the pathophysiology of ED and its link with coronary artery disease (COAD) and CHD in the ED framework and (ii) the ultrasonic-image morphological changes in the carotid arterial walls by quantifying the wall parameters and the characterization of the wall tissue by adapting the ML/DL-based methods, both for the prediction of the severity of CVD risk. The proposed study analyzes the hypothesis that ML/DL can lead to an accurate and early diagnosis of the CVD/stroke risk in ED patients. Our finding suggests that the routine ED patient practice can be amended for ML/DL-based CVD/stroke risk assessment using carotid wall arterial imaging leading to fast, reliable, and accurate CVD/stroke risk stratification. SUMMARY We conclude that ML and DL methods are very powerful tools for the characterization of CVD/stroke in patients with varying ED conditions. We anticipate a rapid growth of these tools for early and better CVD/stroke risk management in ED patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | - Mahesh Maindarkar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (M.M.); (S.P.)
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint, Roseville, CA 95661, USA;
| | - Ajit Saxena
- Department of Urology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi 110017, India;
| | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (M.M.); (S.P.)
| | - Saurabh K. Srivastava
- College of Computing Sciences and IT, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad 244001, India;
| | - Elisa Cuadrado-Godia
- Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, 08003 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA;
| | - Tomaz Omerzu
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (T.O.); (M.T.)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centre, 176 74 Athens, Greece;
| | - Monika Turk
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (T.O.); (M.T.)
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK;
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, NY 55905, USA;
| | - Al Baha Barqawi
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA;
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Centre, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI 02906, USA;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint, Roseville, CA 95661, USA;
| | - Amer Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | | | - Vikas Agarwal
- Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India;
| | - Kosmas I. Paraskevas
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Central Clinic of Athens, 106 80 Athens, Greece;
| | - Jagjit S. Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA;
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint, Roseville, CA 95661, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Munjral S, Maindarkar M, Ahluwalia P, Puvvula A, Jamthikar A, Jujaray T, Suri N, Paul S, Pathak R, Saba L, Chalakkal RJ, Gupta S, Faa G, Singh IM, Chadha PS, Turk M, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Kolluri R, Teji J, Al-Maini M, Dhanjil SK, Sockalingam M, Saxena A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Viswanathan V, Krishnan PR, Omerzu T, Naidu S, Nicolaides A, Fouda MM, Suri JS. Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Diabetic Retinopathy via Atherosclerotic Pathway in COVID-19/Non-COVID-19 Frameworks Using Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:1234. [PMID: 35626389 PMCID: PMC9140106 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Diabetes is one of the main causes of the rising cases of blindness in adults. This microvascular complication of diabetes is termed diabetic retinopathy (DR) and is associated with an expanding risk of cardiovascular events in diabetes patients. DR, in its various forms, is seen to be a powerful indicator of atherosclerosis. Further, the macrovascular complication of diabetes leads to coronary artery disease (CAD). Thus, the timely identification of cardiovascular disease (CVD) complications in DR patients is of utmost importance. Since CAD risk assessment is expensive for low-income countries, it is important to look for surrogate biomarkers for risk stratification of CVD in DR patients. Due to the common genetic makeup between the coronary and carotid arteries, low-cost, high-resolution imaging such as carotid B-mode ultrasound (US) can be used for arterial tissue characterization and risk stratification in DR patients. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques has facilitated the handling of large cohorts in a big data framework to identify atherosclerotic plaque features in arterial ultrasound. This enables timely CVD risk assessment and risk stratification of patients with DR. Thus, this review focuses on understanding the pathophysiology of DR, retinal and CAD imaging, the role of surrogate markers for CVD, and finally, the CVD risk stratification of DR patients. The review shows a step-by-step cyclic activity of how diabetes and atherosclerotic disease cause DR, leading to the worsening of CVD. We propose a solution to how AI can help in the identification of CVD risk. Lastly, we analyze the role of DR/CVD in the COVID-19 framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smiksha Munjral
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.P.); (A.J.); (T.J.); (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.); (S.K.D.)
| | - Mahesh Maindarkar
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.P.); (A.J.); (T.J.); (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.); (S.K.D.)
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India;
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi 110017, India;
| | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.P.); (A.J.); (T.J.); (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.); (S.K.D.)
- Annu’s Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Nellore 524101, India
| | - Ankush Jamthikar
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.P.); (A.J.); (T.J.); (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.); (S.K.D.)
| | - Tanay Jujaray
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.P.); (A.J.); (T.J.); (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.); (S.K.D.)
- Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95616, USA
| | - Neha Suri
- Mira Loma High School, Sacramento, CA 95821, USA;
| | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India;
| | - Rajesh Pathak
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur 492015, India;
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 40138 Cagliari, Italy; (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | | | - Suneet Gupta
- CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida 201310, India;
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.P.); (A.J.); (T.J.); (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.); (S.K.D.)
| | - Paramjit S. Chadha
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.P.); (A.J.); (T.J.); (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.); (S.K.D.)
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27753 Delmenhorst, Germany;
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110001, India; (N.N.K.); (A.S.)
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia;
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centre, 17674 Athens, Greece;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA;
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Centre, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI 02906, USA;
| | - David W. Sobel
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece; (D.W.S.); (P.P.S.)
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 40138 Cagliari, Italy; (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece; (D.W.S.); (P.P.S.)
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Research Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece;
| | - Durga Prasanna Misra
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK;
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Raghu Kolluri
- OhioHealth Heart and Vascular, Columbus, OH 43214, USA;
| | - Jagjit Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada;
| | - Surinder K. Dhanjil
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.P.); (A.J.); (T.J.); (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.); (S.K.D.)
| | | | - Ajit Saxena
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110001, India; (N.N.K.); (A.S.)
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA;
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA 95119, USA;
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor MVD Research Centre, Chennai 600013, India;
| | | | - Tomaz Omerzu
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 1262 Maribor, Slovenia;
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA;
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia 2408, Cyprus;
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.P.); (A.J.); (T.J.); (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.); (S.K.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mir MH, Jamwal S, Mehbodniya A, Garg T, Iqbal U, Samori IA. IoT-Enabled Framework for Early Detection and Prediction of COVID-19 Suspects by Leveraging Machine Learning in Cloud. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING 2022; 2022:7713939. [PMID: 35432824 PMCID: PMC9006083 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7713939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
COVID-19 is the repugnant but the most searched word since its outbreak in November 2019 across the globe. The world has to battle with it until an effective solution is developed. Due to the advancement in mobile and sensor technology, it is possible to come up with Internet of things-based healthcare systems. These novel healthcare systems can be proactive and preventive rather than traditional reactive healthcare systems. This article proposes a real-time IoT-enabled framework for the detection and prediction of COVID-19 suspects in early stages, by collecting symptomatic data and analyzing the nature of the virus in a better manner. The framework computes the presence of COVID-19 virus by mining the health parameters collected in real time from sensors and other IoT devices. The framework is comprised of four main components: user system or data collection center, data analytic center, diagnostic system, and cloud system. To point out and detect the COVID-19 suspected in real time, this work proposes the five machine learning techniques, namely support vector machine (SVM), decision tree, naïve Bayes, logistic regression, and neural network. In our proposed framework, the real and primary dataset collected from SKIMS, Srinagar, is used to validate our work. The experiment on the primary dataset was conducted using different machine learning techniques on selected symptoms. The efficiency of algorithms is calculated by computing the results of performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, root-mean-square error, and area under the curve score. The employed machine learning techniques have shown the accuracy of above 95% on the primary symptomatic data. Based on the experiment conducted, the proposed framework would be effective in the early identification and prediction of COVID-19 suspect realizing the nature of the disease in better way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmood Hussain Mir
- Department of Computer Sciences, Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri, Jammu and Kashmir 185234, India
| | - Sanjay Jamwal
- Department of Computer Sciences, Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri, Jammu and Kashmir 185234, India
| | - Abolfazl Mehbodniya
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Kuwait College of Science and Technology (KCST), Doha Area, 7th Ring Road, Kuwait
| | - Tanya Garg
- Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab, India
| | - Ummer Iqbal
- National Institute of Technology Srinagar, Srinagar, J&K, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Das S, Nayak GK, Saba L, Kalra M, Suri JS, Saxena S. An artificial intelligence framework and its bias for brain tumor segmentation: A narrative review. Comput Biol Med 2022; 143:105273. [PMID: 35228172 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 01/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a prominent technique for medical diagnosis and represents an essential role in detecting brain tumors. Although AI-based models are widely used in brain lesion segmentation (BLS), understanding their effectiveness is challenging due to their complexity and diversity. Several reviews on brain tumor segmentation are available, but none of them describe a link between the threats due to risk-of-bias (RoB) in AI and its architectures. In our review, we focused on linking RoB and different AI-based architectural Cluster in popular DL framework. Further, due to variance in these designs and input data types in medical imaging, it is necessary to present a narrative review considering all facets of BLS. APPROACH The proposed study uses a PRISMA strategy based on 75 relevant studies found by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Based on the architectural evolution, DL studies were subsequently categorized into four classes: convolutional neural network (CNN)-based, encoder-decoder (ED)-based, transfer learning (TL)-based, and hybrid DL (HDL)-based architectures. These studies were then analyzed considering 32 AI attributes, with clusters including AI architecture, imaging modalities, hyper-parameters, performance evaluation metrics, and clinical evaluation. Then, after these studies were scored for all attributes, a composite score was computed, normalized, and ranked. Thereafter, a bias cutoff (AP(ai)Bias 1.0, AtheroPoint, Roseville, CA, USA) was established to detect low-, moderate- and high-bias studies. CONCLUSION The four classes of architectures, from best-to worst-performing, are TL > ED > CNN > HDL. ED-based models had the lowest AI bias for BLS. This study presents a set of three primary and six secondary recommendations for lowering the RoB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suchismita Das
- CSE Department, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India; CSE Department, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - G K Nayak
- CSE Department, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, AOU, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mannudeep Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™ LLC, Roseville, CA, USA.
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- CSE Department, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Suri JS, Bhagawati M, Paul S, Protogerou AD, Sfikakis PP, Kitas GD, Khanna NN, Ruzsa Z, Sharma AM, Saxena S, Faa G, Laird JR, Johri AM, Kalra MK, Paraskevas KI, Saba L. A Powerful Paradigm for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification Using Multiclass, Multi-Label, and Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Paradigms: A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:722. [PMID: 35328275 PMCID: PMC8947682 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Motivation: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) causes the highest mortality globally. With escalating healthcare costs, early non-invasive CVD risk assessment is vital. Conventional methods have shown poor performance compared to more recent and fast-evolving Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods. The proposed study reviews the three most recent paradigms for CVD risk assessment, namely multiclass, multi-label, and ensemble-based methods in (i) office-based and (ii) stress-test laboratories. Methods: A total of 265 CVD-based studies were selected using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) model. Due to its popularity and recent development, the study analyzed the above three paradigms using machine learning (ML) frameworks. We review comprehensively these three methods using attributes, such as architecture, applications, pro-and-cons, scientific validation, clinical evaluation, and AI risk-of-bias (RoB) in the CVD framework. These ML techniques were then extended under mobile and cloud-based infrastructure. Findings: Most popular biomarkers used were office-based, laboratory-based, image-based phenotypes, and medication usage. Surrogate carotid scanning for coronary artery risk prediction had shown promising results. Ground truth (GT) selection for AI-based training along with scientific and clinical validation is very important for CVD stratification to avoid RoB. It was observed that the most popular classification paradigm is multiclass followed by the ensemble, and multi-label. The use of deep learning techniques in CVD risk stratification is in a very early stage of development. Mobile and cloud-based AI technologies are more likely to be the future. Conclusions: AI-based methods for CVD risk assessment are most promising and successful. Choice of GT is most vital in AI-based models to prevent the RoB. The amalgamation of image-based strategies with conventional risk factors provides the highest stability when using the three CVD paradigms in non-cloud and cloud-based frameworks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Mrinalini Bhagawati
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (M.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (M.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Athanasios D. Protogerou
- Research Unit Clinic, Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Prevention, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - George D. Kitas
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester University, Manchester 46962, UK;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110020, India;
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Department of Internal Medicines, Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Aditya M. Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA;
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Department of CSE, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, India;
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, A.O.U., di Cagliari-Polo di Monserrato s.s., 09045 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - John R. Laird
- Cardiology Department, St. Helena Hospital, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Manudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Kosmas I. Paraskevas
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Central Clinic of Athens, N. Iraklio, 14122 Athens, Greece;
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, A.O.U., di Cagliari-Polo di Monserrato s.s., 09045 Cagliari, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Suri JS, Bhagawati M, Paul S, Protogeron A, Sfikakis PP, Kitas GD, Khanna NN, Ruzsa Z, Sharma AM, Saxena S, Faa G, Paraskevas KI, Laird JR, Johri AM, Saba L, Kalra M. Understanding the bias in machine learning systems for cardiovascular disease risk assessment: The first of its kind review. Comput Biol Med 2022; 142:105204. [PMID: 35033879 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
|
36
|
Gupta N, Gupta SK, Pathak RK, Jain V, Rashidi P, Suri JS. Human activity recognition in artificial intelligence framework: a narrative review. Artif Intell Rev 2022; 55:4755-4808. [PMID: 35068651 PMCID: PMC8763438 DOI: 10.1007/s10462-021-10116-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Human activity recognition (HAR) has multifaceted applications due to its worldly usage of acquisition devices such as smartphones, video cameras, and its ability to capture human activity data. While electronic devices and their applications are steadily growing, the advances in Artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized the ability to extract deep hidden information for accurate detection and its interpretation. This yields a better understanding of rapidly growing acquisition devices, AI, and applications, the three pillars of HAR under one roof. There are many review articles published on the general characteristics of HAR, a few have compared all the HAR devices at the same time, and few have explored the impact of evolving AI architecture. In our proposed review, a detailed narration on the three pillars of HAR is presented covering the period from 2011 to 2021. Further, the review presents the recommendations for an improved HAR design, its reliability, and stability. Five major findings were: (1) HAR constitutes three major pillars such as devices, AI and applications; (2) HAR has dominated the healthcare industry; (3) Hybrid AI models are in their infancy stage and needs considerable work for providing the stable and reliable design. Further, these trained models need solid prediction, high accuracy, generalization, and finally, meeting the objectives of the applications without bias; (4) little work was observed in abnormality detection during actions; and (5) almost no work has been done in forecasting actions. We conclude that: (a) HAR industry will evolve in terms of the three pillars of electronic devices, applications and the type of AI. (b) AI will provide a powerful impetus to the HAR industry in future. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10462-021-10116-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Gupta
- CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP India
- Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | - Vanita Jain
- Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi, India
| | - Parisa Rashidi
- Intelligent Health Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPointTM, Roseville, CA 95661 USA
- Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Paul S, Maindarkar M, Saxena S, Saba L, Turk M, Kalra M, Krishnan PR, Suri JS. Bias Investigation in Artificial Intelligence Systems for Early Detection of Parkinson's Disease: A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:166. [PMID: 35054333 PMCID: PMC8774851 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Motivation: Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) is often based on medical attention and clinical signs. It is subjective and does not have a good prognosis. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has played a promising role in the diagnosis of PD. However, it introduces bias due to lack of sample size, poor validation, clinical evaluation, and lack of big data configuration. The purpose of this study is to compute the risk of bias (RoB) automatically. METHOD The PRISMA search strategy was adopted to select the best 39 AI studies out of 85 PD studies closely associated with early diagnosis PD. The studies were used to compute 30 AI attributes (based on 6 AI clusters), using AP(ai)Bias 1.0 (AtheroPointTM, Roseville, CA, USA), and the mean aggregate score was computed. The studies were ranked and two cutoffs (Moderate-Low (ML) and High-Moderate (MH)) were determined to segregate the studies into three bins: low-, moderate-, and high-bias. RESULT The ML and HM cutoffs were 3.50 and 2.33, respectively, which constituted 7, 13, and 6 for low-, moderate-, and high-bias studies. The best and worst architectures were "deep learning with sketches as outcomes" and "machine learning with Electroencephalography," respectively. We recommend (i) the usage of power analysis in big data framework, (ii) that it must undergo scientific validation using unseen AI models, and (iii) that it should be taken towards clinical evaluation for reliability and stability tests. CONCLUSION The AI is a vital component for the diagnosis of early PD and the recommendations must be followed to lower the RoB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India
| | - Maheshrao Maindarkar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Department of CSE, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhuneshwar 751003, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, 09121 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Monika Turk
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 1262 Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Manudeep Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Suri JS, Agarwal S, Carriero A, Paschè A, Danna PSC, Columbu M, Saba L, Viskovic K, Mehmedović A, Agarwal S, Gupta L, Faa G, Singh IM, Turk M, Chadha PS, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Dhanjil SK, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Krishnan PR, Nagy F, Ruzsa Z, Gupta A, Naidu S, Paraskevas KI, Kalra MK. COVLIAS 1.0 vs. MedSeg: Artificial Intelligence-Based Comparative Study for Automated COVID-19 Computed Tomography Lung Segmentation in Italian and Croatian Cohorts. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:2367. [PMID: 34943603 PMCID: PMC8699928 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: COVID-19 computed tomography (CT) lung segmentation is critical for COVID lung severity diagnosis. Earlier proposed approaches during 2020-2021 were semiautomated or automated but not accurate, user-friendly, and industry-standard benchmarked. The proposed study compared the COVID Lung Image Analysis System, COVLIAS 1.0 (GBTI, Inc., and AtheroPointTM, Roseville, CA, USA, referred to as COVLIAS), against MedSeg, a web-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) segmentation tool, where COVLIAS uses hybrid deep learning (HDL) models for CT lung segmentation. (2) Materials and Methods: The proposed study used 5000 ITALIAN COVID-19 positive CT lung images collected from 72 patients (experimental data) that confirmed the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. Two hybrid AI models from the COVLIAS system, namely, VGG-SegNet (HDL 1) and ResNet-SegNet (HDL 2), were used to segment the CT lungs. As part of the results, we compared both COVLIAS and MedSeg against two manual delineations (MD 1 and MD 2) using (i) Bland-Altman plots, (ii) Correlation coefficient (CC) plots, (iii) Receiver operating characteristic curve, and (iv) Figure of Merit and (v) visual overlays. A cohort of 500 CROATIA COVID-19 positive CT lung images (validation data) was used. A previously trained COVLIAS model was directly applied to the validation data (as part of Unseen-AI) to segment the CT lungs and compare them against MedSeg. (3) Result: For the experimental data, the four CCs between COVLIAS (HDL 1) vs. MD 1, COVLIAS (HDL 1) vs. MD 2, COVLIAS (HDL 2) vs. MD 1, and COVLIAS (HDL 2) vs. MD 2 were 0.96, 0.96, 0.96, and 0.96, respectively. The mean value of the COVLIAS system for the above four readings was 0.96. CC between MedSeg vs. MD 1 and MedSeg vs. MD 2 was 0.98 and 0.98, respectively. Both had a mean value of 0.98. On the validation data, the CC between COVLIAS (HDL 1) vs. MedSeg and COVLIAS (HDL 2) vs. MedSeg was 0.98 and 0.99, respectively. For the experimental data, the difference between the mean values for COVLIAS and MedSeg showed a difference of <2.5%, meeting the standard of equivalence. The average running times for COVLIAS and MedSeg on a single lung CT slice were ~4 s and ~10 s, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The performances of COVLIAS and MedSeg were similar. However, COVLIAS showed improved computing time over MedSeg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (S.A.); (L.G.)
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (S.A.); (L.G.)
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology, Kanpur 209305, India
| | - Alessandro Carriero
- Department of Radiology, “Maggiore della Carità” Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale (UPO), 28100 Novara, Italy;
| | - Alessio Paschè
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Pietro S. C. Danna
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Marta Columbu
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; (K.V.); (A.M.)
| | - Armin Mehmedović
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; (K.V.); (A.M.)
| | - Samriddhi Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (S.A.); (L.G.)
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology, Kanpur 209305, India
| | - Lakshya Gupta
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (S.A.); (L.G.)
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, AOU of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27753 Delmenhorst, Germany;
| | - Paramjit S. Chadha
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 17674 Athens, Greece;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Center, Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, USA;
| | - David W. Sobel
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece;
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Research Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece;
| | - Durga Prasanna Misra
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK;
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Jagjit S. Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada;
| | | | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia 2408, Cyprus;
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA;
| | - Vijay Rathore
- AtheroPoint LLC, Roseville, CA 95611, USA; (S.K.D.); (V.R.)
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engg., Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | | | - Ferenc Nagy
- Internal Medicine Department, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Archna Gupta
- Radiology Department, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India;
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA;
| | | | - Mannudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
A hybrid deep learning paradigm for carotid plaque tissue characterization and its validation in multicenter cohorts using a supercomputer framework. Comput Biol Med 2021; 141:105131. [PMID: 34922173 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early and automated detection of carotid plaques prevents strokes, which are the second leading cause of death worldwide according to the World Health Organization. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers automated solutions for plaque tissue characterization. Recently, solo deep learning (SDL) models have been used, but they do not take advantage of the tandem connectivity offered by AI's hybrid nature. Therefore, this study explores the use of hybrid deep learning (HDL) models in a multicenter framework, making this study the first of its kind. METHODS We hypothesize that HDL techniques perform better than SDL and transfer learning (TL) techniques. We propose two kinds of HDL frameworks: (i) the fusion of two SDLs (Inception with ResNet) or (ii) 10 other kinds of tandem models that fuse SDL with ML. The system Atheromatic™ 2.0HDL (AtheroPoint, CA, USA) was designed on an augmentation framework and three kinds of loss functions (cross-entropy, hinge, and mean-square-error) during training to determine the best optimization paradigm. These 11 combined HDL models were then benchmarked against one SDL model and five types of TL models; thus, this study considers a total of 17 AI models. RESULTS Among the 17 AI models, the best performing HDL system was that comprising CNN and decision tree (DT), as its accuracy and area-under-the-curve were 99.78 ± 1.05% and 0.99 (p<0.0001), respectively. These values are 6.4% and 3.2% better than those recorded for the SDL and TL models, respectively. We validated the performance of the HDL models with diagnostics odds ratio (DOR) and Cohen and Kappa statistics; here, HDL outperformed DL and TL by 23% and 7%, respectively. The online system ran in <2 s. CONCLUSION HDL is a fast, reliable, and effective tool for characterizing the carotid plaque for early stroke risk stratification.
Collapse
|
40
|
Jain PK, Sharma N, Saba L, Paraskevas KI, Kalra MK, Johri A, Laird JR, Nicolaides AN, Suri JS. Unseen Artificial Intelligence-Deep Learning Paradigm for Segmentation of Low Atherosclerotic Plaque in Carotid Ultrasound: A Multicenter Cardiovascular Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:2257. [PMID: 34943494 PMCID: PMC8699942 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The early detection of carotid wall plaque is recommended in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in moderate-risk patients. Previous techniques for B-mode carotid atherosclerotic wall plaque segmentation used artificial intelligence (AI) methods on monoethnic databases, where training and testing are from the "same" ethnic group ("Seen AI"). Therefore, the versatility of the system is questionable. This is the first study of its kind that uses the "Unseen AI" paradigm where training and testing are from "different" ethnic groups. We hypothesized that deep learning (DL) models should perform in 10% proximity between "Unseen AI" and "Seen AI". METHODOLOGY Two cohorts from multi-ethnic groups (330 Japanese and 300 Hong Kong (HK)) were used for the validation of our hypothesis. We used a four-layered UNet architecture for the segmentation of the atherosclerotic wall with low plaque. "Unseen AI" (training: Japanese, testing: HK or vice versa) and "Seen AI" experiments (single ethnicity or mixed ethnicity) were performed. Evaluation was conducted by measuring the wall plaque area. Statistical tests were conducted for its stability and reliability. RESULTS When using the UNet DL architecture, the "Unseen AI" pair one (Training: 330 Japanese and Testing: 300 HK), the mean accuracy, dice-similarity, and correlation-coefficient were 98.55, 78.38, and 0.80 (p < 0.0001), respectively, while for "Unseen AI" pair two (Training: 300 HK and Testing: 330 Japanese), these were 98.67, 82.49, and 0.87 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Using "Seen AI", the same parameters were 99.01, 86.89 and 0.92 (p < 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSION We demonstrated that "Unseen AI" was in close proximity (<10%) to "Seen AI", validating our DL model for low atherosclerotic wall plaque segmentation. The online system runs < 1 s.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pankaj K. Jain
- School of Biomedical Engineering, IIT (BHU), Varanasi 221005, India; (P.K.J.); (N.S.)
| | - Neeraj Sharma
- School of Biomedical Engineering, IIT (BHU), Varanasi 221005, India; (P.K.J.); (N.S.)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 10015 Cagliari, Italy;
| | | | - Mandeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Amer Johri
- Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Andrew N. Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia, Nicosia 1700, Cyprus;
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Suri JS, Agarwal S, Elavarthi P, Pathak R, Ketireddy V, Columbu M, Saba L, Gupta SK, Faa G, Singh IM, Turk M, Chadha PS, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Dhanjil SK, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Krishnan PR, Ferenc N, Ruzsa Z, Gupta A, Naidu S, Kalra MK. Inter-Variability Study of COVLIAS 1.0: Hybrid Deep Learning Models for COVID-19 Lung Segmentation in Computed Tomography. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:2025. [PMID: 34829372 PMCID: PMC8625039 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: For COVID-19 lung severity, segmentation of lungs on computed tomography (CT) is the first crucial step. Current deep learning (DL)-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) models have a bias in the training stage of segmentation because only one set of ground truth (GT) annotations are evaluated. We propose a robust and stable inter-variability analysis of CT lung segmentation in COVID-19 to avoid the effect of bias. Methodology: The proposed inter-variability study consists of two GT tracers for lung segmentation on chest CT. Three AI models, PSP Net, VGG-SegNet, and ResNet-SegNet, were trained using GT annotations. We hypothesized that if AI models are trained on the GT tracings from multiple experience levels, and if the AI performance on the test data between these AI models is within the 5% range, one can consider such an AI model robust and unbiased. The K5 protocol (training to testing: 80%:20%) was adapted. Ten kinds of metrics were used for performance evaluation. Results: The database consisted of 5000 CT chest images from 72 COVID-19-infected patients. By computing the coefficient of correlations (CC) between the output of the two AI models trained corresponding to the two GT tracers, computing their differences in their CC, and repeating the process for all three AI-models, we show the differences as 0%, 0.51%, and 2.04% (all < 5%), thereby validating the hypothesis. The performance was comparable; however, it had the following order: ResNet-SegNet > PSP Net > VGG-SegNet. Conclusions: The AI models were clinically robust and stable during the inter-variability analysis on the CT lung segmentation on COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (P.E.)
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (P.E.)
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, PSIT, Kanpur 209305, India
| | - Pranav Elavarthi
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (P.E.)
- Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, Alexandria, VA 22312, USA
| | - Rajesh Pathak
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur 492001, India;
| | | | - Marta Columbu
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 10015 Cagliari, Italy; (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 10015 Cagliari, Italy; (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Suneet K. Gupta
- Department of Computer Science, Bennett University, Noida 201310, India;
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 10015 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27753 Delmenhorst, Germany;
| | - Paramjit S. Chadha
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | | | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 10558 Athens, Greece;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Center, Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, USA;
| | - David W. Sobel
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 10015 Cagliari, Italy; (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10679 Athens, Greece;
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | | | - Durga Prasanna Misra
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK;
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Jagjit S. Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada;
| | | | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia 2368, Cyprus;
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA;
| | - Vijay Rathore
- AtheroPoint LLC, Roseville, CA 95611, USA; (S.K.D.); (V.R.)
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | | | - Nagy Ferenc
- Internal Medicine Department, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Zoltan Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Archna Gupta
- Radiology Department, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India;
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA;
| | - Mannudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| |
Collapse
|