Renal Function in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving Different Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus Regimens-The DIAMOND Study

Bridging the critically ill patient with acute to chronic liver failure to liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) has emerged as an effective therapy for severe forms of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), an entity characterized by the development of multiorgan failure and high short-term mortality. The aim of critical care management of ACLF patients is to rapidly treat precipitating events and aggressively support failing organs to ensure that patients may successfully undergo LT or, less frequently, recover. Malnutrition and sarcopenia are frequently present, adversely impacting the prognosis of these patients. Management of critical care patients with ACLF is complex and requires the participation of different specialties. Once the patient is stabilized, a rapid evaluation for salvage LT should be performed because the time window for LT is often narrow. The development of sepsis and prolonged organ support may preclude LT or diminish its chances of success. The current review describes strategies to bridge severe ACLF patients to LT, highlights the minimal evaluation required for listing and the currently suggested contraindications to proceed with LT, and addresses different aspects of management during the perioperative and early posttransplant period.

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.

Randomized controlled trial of sustained release tacrolimus vs twice daily tacrolimus in adult living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

To compare the safety and efficacy of once-daily tacrolimus (ODT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus (BDT) in adult live donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

In this open-labelled randomized trial, 174 adult patients undergoing LDLT were randomized into ODT or BDT, combined with basiliximab induction and mycophenolate mofetil (steroid-free regimen). Tacrolimus was started at a total dose of 1 mg and the trough level was aimed at 3-7 ng/ml. The primary endpoint was eGFR at 1,3- and 6 months post-transplant, using CKD- EPI equation. Secondary endpoints included biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), metabolic complications, post-operative bilio-vascular complications and patient survival.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in eGFR between the two groups at 6 months (ODT -96 ± 19, BDT -91 ± 21, p value-0.164). BPAR was comparable (18/84 in ODT, 19/88 in BDT, p value-0.981). For a similar dosage of tacrolimus, the median trough tacrolimus levels attained were significantly lower for ODT than BDT during the first-month post-transplant (p value-0.001). Metabolic complications due to immunosuppression, post-operative bilio-vascular complications and patient survival was similar between the two groups at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily tacrolimus has similar renal safety and efficacy as twice-daily tacrolimus when used in combination with basiliximab induction and mycophenolate in adult LDLT.

Effectiveness and safety of once-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo liver transplant recipients: The PRETHI study

Data comparing long-term effectiveness and safety of once-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo liver transplantation are scarce. We compared the effectiveness, pharmacokinetic profile, and safety of LCPT (Envarsus) and PR-Tac (Advagraf) for up to 12 months post-transplant. Adult de novo liver transplant recipients who started IR-Tac (Prograf) and were converted to LCPT or PR-Tac 3-5 days post-transplant were included. Data from 163 patients were analyzed, 87 treated with LCPT and 76 with PR-Tac. The incidence of treatment failure was 30.5% in the LCPT group versus 23.0% in the PR-Tac group (p = .291). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was reported in 26.8% of patients in the LCPT group and 17.6% in the PR-Tac group (p = .166). Graft loss was experienced in one patient (1.2%) in the LCPT group and three patients (4.1%) in the PR-Tac group (p = .346). Death was registered in three patients (3.7%) in the LCPT group and three patients (4.1%) in the PR-Tac group (p > .999). Patients in the LCPT group showed 45.7% higher relative bioavailability (Cmin /total daily dose [TDD]; p < .01) with similar Cmin and 33.3% lower TDD versus PR-Tac (p < .01). The evolution of renal function, safety profile, and the incidence of post-transplant renal failure, dyslipidemia, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were similar in patients treated with LCPT and PR-Tac. In de novo liver transplant patients, LCPT and PR-Tac showed comparable effectiveness with higher relative bioavailability, similar Cmin and lower TDD in the LCPT group. Renal function, safety, and post-transplant complications were comparable in LCPT and PR-Tac groups.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conversion from the tacrolimus capsule to tablet in stable liver transplant recipients with maintenance therapy: a 24-week, open-label, single-center, phase IV exploratory clinical study

Purpose

The tablet form of tacrolimus is more convenient for drug ingestion than the capsule form. We examined the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus tablets and a satisfaction survey after formula conversion in liver transplant (LT) recipients.

Methods

This study was an open-label, prospective clinical trial for tacrolimus formula 1:1 conversion from capsule to tablet in 41 adult LT recipients with tacrolimus maintenance therapy of more than 1 month. The primary endpoint was incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) within 24 weeks. Surveys 1 week before and 4 weeks after formula conversion were conducted for total daily dose of medication, number, scale of discomfort and satisfaction.

Results

The overall incidence of BPAR was 0% and there was no graft loss or patient death. The incidence of adverse effects was 34.1% (n = 14) after formula conversion. The most common severe adverse effect was abnormal liver function test (n = 5): biliary complications (n = 4) and alcoholic recidivism (n = 1). Total daily dose and number of tacrolimus doses were significantly lower after formula conversion (P < 0.05) without changes in trough level. According to survey analysis, there was no significant difference in discomfort and satisfaction scales from capsule to tablet conversion (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The present study suggests that the new tablet formula can be a useful treatment option to maintain a consistent level of tacrolimus with a lower total daily dose and number in adult LT recipients.

Liver transplantation immunology: Immunosuppression, rejection, and immunomodulation

Outcomes after liver transplantation have continuously improved over the past decades, but long-term survival rates are still lower than in the general population. The liver has distinct immunological functions linked to its unique anatomical configuration and to its harbouring of a large number of cells with fundamental immunological roles. The transplanted liver can modulate the immunological system of the recipient to promote tolerance, thus offering the potential for less aggressive immunosuppression. The selection and adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs should be individualised to optimally control alloreactivity while mitigating toxicities. Routine laboratory tests are not accurate enough to make a confident diagnosis of allograft rejection. Although several promising biomarkers are being investigated, none of them is sufficiently validated for routine use; hence, liver biopsy remains necessary to guide clinical decisions. Recently, there has been an exponential increase in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors due to the unquestionable oncological benefits they provide for many patients with advanced-stage tumours. It is expected that their use will also increase in liver transplant recipients and that this might affect the incidence of allograft rejection. Currently, the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients is limited and cases of severe allograft rejection have been reported. In this review, we discuss the clinical relevance of alloimmune disease, the role of minimisation/withdrawal of immunosuppression, and provide practical guidance for using checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients.

Liver Transplantation in Recipients With a Positive Crossmatch: A Retrospective Single-Center Match-Pair Analysis

A positive crossmatch (XM+) is considered a contraindication to solid abdominal organ transplantation except liver transplantation (LT). Conflicting reports exist regarding the effects of XM+ on post-transplant outcomes. The goal of this retrospective single-center analysis is to evaluate the influence of XM+ on relevant outcome parameters such as survival, graft rejection, biliary and arterial complications. Forty-nine adult patients undergoing LT with a XM+ between 2002 and 2017 were included. XM+ LT recipients were matched 1:2 with crossmatch negative (XM-) LT recipients based on the balance of risk (BAR) score. Patient and graft survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes in XM+ and XM- groups were conducted. Patient and graft survival were similar in XM+ and XM- patients. Rejection episodes did not differ either. Recipients with a strong XM+ were more likely to develop a PCR+ CMV infection. A XM+ was not associated with a higher incidence of biliary or arterial complications. Donor age, cold ischemia time, PCR+ CMV infection and a rejection episode were associated with the occurrence of ischemic type biliary lesions. A XM+ has no effects on patient and graft survival or other relevant outcome parameters following LT.

The optimal immunosuppression management to prevent early rejection after liver transplantation: A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

The optimal immunosuppression protocol to prevent early acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation (LT) avoiding prolonged hospitalization and early hospital readmission is undefined.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the most suitable immunosuppression regimen for inclusion in ERAS programs in order to minimize early ACR after LT and to provide expert panel recommendations DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.

METHODS

Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. Studies from January 2000 onward focusing on early ACR were included. Rates of early renal dysfunction and infection were evaluated. CRD42021245586 RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies met inclusion criteria; 23 randomized controlled trials, 14 retrospective or prospective observational comparative or noncomparative studies. Several sources of biases which potentially confound conclusions were identified: heterogeneity in immunosuppression protocols, higher serum tacrolimus levels than currently used in clinical practice, differences in the definition of ACR.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus is the standard immunosuppression after LT and can be used in combination with other drugs such as corticosteroids and MMF, and in association with anti-IL2 receptor antibody (IL2Ra) induction. (Quality of Evidence; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). Low dose or delayed introduction of tacrolimus in association with corticosteroids and MMF and/or anti-IL2Ra induction can be used to reduce acute kidney injury. (Quality of Evidence; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). Use of tacrolimus in association with corticosteroids and MMF and/or anti-IL2Ra induction does not lead to increased infection rates. (Quality of Evidence; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Weak).

[Update: Immunosuppression in organ transplantation]

Immunosuppression is an essential prerequisite for successful transplantation. In order to reduce the sometimes-considerable side effects, combination therapies with different agents are used. This article aims to provide an up-to-date overview of immunosuppression after liver and kidney transplantation.

Renal function after liver transplantation: Real-world experience with basiliximab induction and delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Routine use of delayed reduced-dose calcineurin-inhibitor treatment with induction immunosuppression in liver transplantation to minimize post-operative kidney injury is still scarce.

AIM

To evaluate real-world experience of basiliximab induction with delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, kidney function was evaluated pre- and postoperatively by measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR). Adult patients undergoing liver transplantation between 2000 and 2017 were divided into a conventional treatment group (immediate-introduction of tacrolimus, target trough levels 10-15 ng/mL, and corticosteroids, n = 203) and a revised treatment group (basiliximab induction, reduced-dose tacrolimus, target through levels 5-8 ng/mL, delayed until day three, and mycophenolate mofetil 2000 mg/day, n = 343).

RESULTS

Mean mGFR was similar between groups at wait-listing (85.3 vs 84.1 ml/min/1.73m², p = 0.60), but higher in the revised treatment group at 3 (56.8 vs 63.4 ml/min/1.73m², p = 0.004) and 12 months post-transplant (60.9 vs 69.7 ml/min/1.73m², p<0.001); this difference remained after correcting for multiple confounders and was independent of pre-transplant mGFR. In the revised treatment group, biopsy proven acute rejection rate was lower (38% vs. 21%, p<0.001), and graft-survival better (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Basiliximab induction with delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus is associated with less kidney injury when compared to standard-dose tacrolimus, without increased risk of rejection, graft loss or death.

Chronic Kidney Disease After Liver Transplantation

Improved survival after liver transplantation has led to an aging cohort of recipients at risk of renal dysfunction. The etiology of renal dysfunction is typically multifactorial; calcineurin inhibitors nephrotoxicity, pretransplant renal dysfunction, and perioperative acute kidney injury are important risk factors. Metabolic complications such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease also contribute to the development of renal disease. Most LT recipients will eventually develop some degree of renal dysfunction. Criteria to select candidates for simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation have been established. Both delayed introduction of CNIs and renal-sparing immunosuppressive regimens may reduce progression of renal dysfunction.

Immunosuppression, Compliance, and Tolerance After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: State of the Art

Orthotopic liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for several otherwise irreversible forms of acute and chronic liver diseases. Early implemented immunosuppressant regimens have had disappointing results with high rejection rates. However, new drugs have reduced the daily immunosuppression requirements, thereby improving graft and patient survival as well as kidney function. Liver rejection is a T-cell-driven immune response and is the active target of immunosuppressive agents. Immunosuppressants can be divided into pharmacological or biological drugs: the gold standard is the calcineurin inhibitors, steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors. Compliance with these agents is essential, although they can increase the risk of infections and neoplastic diseases. In some patients, graft tolerance can be achieved. Graft tolerance is defined as the absence of acute and chronic rejection in a graft, with normal function and histology in an immunosuppression-free, fully immunocompetent host, usually as the final result of a successful attempt at immunosuppression withdrawal. The occurrence of immunosuppressive-related complications has led to new protocols aimed at protecting renal function and preventing de novo cancer and dysmetabolic syndrome. The backbone of immunosuppression remains calcineurin inhibitors in association with other drugs, mainly over the short-term period. To avoid rejection and the side effects on renal dysfunction, de novo cancer, and cardiovascular syndrome, optimal long-term immunosuppressive therapy should be tailored in liver transplant recipients.

[Kidney failure after liver transplantation]

One third of cirrhotic patients present impaired kidney function. It has multifactorial causes and has a harmful effect on patients' morbi-mortality before and after liver transplant. Kidney function does not improve in all patients after liver transplantation and liver-transplant recipients are at high risk of developing chronic kidney disease. Causes for renal dysfunction can be divided in three groups: preoperative, peroperative and postoperative factors. To date, there is no consensus for the modality of evaluation the risk for chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation, and for its prevention. In the present review, we describe the outcome of kidney function after liver transplantation, and the prognostic factors of chronic kidney disease to determine a risk stratification for each patient. Furthermore, we discuss therapeutic options to prevent kidney dysfunction in this setting, and highlight the indications of combined liver-kidney transplantation.

Chronic rejection after liver transplantation: Opening the Pandora’s box

Chronic rejection (CR) of liver allografts causes damage to intrahepatic vessels and bile ducts and may lead to graft failure after liver transplantation. Although its prevalence has declined steadily with the introduction of potent immunosuppressive therapy, CR still represents an important cause of graft injury, which might be irreversible, leading to graft loss requiring re-transplantation. To date, we still do not fully appreciate the mechanisms underlying this process. In addition to T cell-mediated CR, which was initially the only recognized type of CR, recently a new form of liver allograft CR, antibody-mediated CR, has been identified. This has indeed opened an era of thriving research and renewed interest in the field. Liver biopsy is needed for a definitive diagnosis of CR, but current research is aiming to identify new non-invasive tools for predicting patients at risk for CR after liver transplantation. Moreover, the minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy might influence the establishment of subclinical CR-related injury, which should not be disregarded. Therapies for CR may only be effective in the “early” phases, and a tailored management of the immunosuppression regimen is essential for preventing irreversible liver damage. Herein, we provide an overview of the current knowledge and research on CR, focusing on early detection, identification of non-invasive biomarkers, immunosuppressive management, re-transplantation and future perspectives of CR.

A meta-analysis of the cumulative incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes associated with chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a relatively common complication after liver transplantation (LT), and significantly impacts overall survival. We sought to assess the cumulative incidence, risk factors and mortality associated with post-LT CKD. CKD was defined as eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m² as estimated by the Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. Single-arm meta-analysis was done to evaluate the cumulative incidence of CKD at 1-, 3-, and 5-year timepoints post-LT. Risk factors for CKD were evaluated using hazard ratios (HR). Twenty-one studies involving 44 383 patients were included. Cumulative incidence of stage 3-5 CKD was 31.44% (CI 0.182-0.447), 36.71% (CI 0.188-0.546), and 43.52% (CI 0.296-0.574) at 1, 3, and 5 years after LT, respectively. Stage 5 CKD cumulative incidence increased from 0.274% (CI 0.001-0.005) at 1 year to 2.06% (CI 0.009-0.045) at 5 years post-LT. Age, female sex, diabetes, and peri-operative acute kidney injury (AKI) were significant risk factors for CKD. Stage 4-5 CKD was associated with a decrease in overall survival (HR 3.23, 95% CI 1.74-5.98, P < 0.01). CKD after LT is relatively common, and is associated with significantly reduced overall survival. Identification of patients at high risk of developing CKD allows physicians to prophylactically use renal-sparing immunosuppression which may be crucial in achieving desirable clinical outcomes.

Kidney Failure after Liver Transplantation

One-third of patients with cirrhosis present kidney failure (AKI and CKD). It has multifactorial causes and a harmful effect on morbidity and mortality before and after liver transplantation. Kidney function does not improve in all patients after liver transplantation, and liver transplant recipients are at a high risk of developing chronic kidney disease. The causes of renal dysfunction can be divided into three groups: pre-operative, perioperative and post-operative factors. To date, there is no consensus on the modality to evaluate the risk of chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation, or for its prevention. In this narrative review, we describe the outcome of kidney function after liver transplantation, and the prognostic factors of chronic kidney disease in order to establish a risk categorization for each patient. Furthermore, we discuss therapeutic options to prevent kidney dysfunction in this context, and highlight the indications of combined liver–kidney transplantation.

Liver Transplantation in Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure

Liver transplantation (LT) has revolutionized outcomes for cirrhotic patients. Current liver allocation policies dictate patients with highest short-term mortality receive the highest priority, thus, several patients become increasingly ill on the waitlist. Given cirrhosis is a progressive disease, it can be complicated by the occurrence of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), a syndrome defined by an acute deterioration of liver function associated with extrahepatic organ failures requiring intensive care support and a high short-term mortality. Successfully bridging to transplant includes accurate prognostication and prioritization of ACLF patients awaiting LT, optimizing intensive care support pre-LT, and tailoring immunosuppressive and anti-infective therapies post-LT. Furthermore, predicting futility (too sick to undergo LT) in ACLF is challenging. In this review, we summarize the role of LT in ACLF specifically highlighting (a) current prognostic scores in ACLF, (b) critical care management of the ACLF patient awaiting LT, (c) donor issues to consider in transplant in ACLF, and (d) exploring of recent post-LT outcomes in ACLF and potential opportunities to improve outcomes including current care gaps and unmet research needs.

Long-term, Prolonged-release Tacrolimus-based Immunosuppression in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients: 5-year Prospective Follow-up of Patients in the DIAMOND Study

Background

Immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is reportedly associated with risk of renal impairment in liver transplant recipients. It is believed that this can be mitigated by decreasing initial exposure to CNIs or delaying CNI introduction until 3-4 d posttransplantation. The ADVAGRAF studied in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and basiliximab in liver transplantation (DIAMOND) trial evaluated different administration strategies for prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T).

Methods

DIAMOND was a 24-wk, open-label, phase 3b trial in de novo liver transplant recipients randomized to: PR-T 0.2 mg/kg/d (Arm 1); PR-T 0.15-0.175 mg/kg/d plus basiliximab (Arm 2); or PR-T 0.2 mg/kg/d delayed until day 5 posttransplant plus basiliximab (Arm 3). In a 5-y follow-up, patients were maintained on an immunosuppressive regimen according to standard clinical practice (NCT02057484). Primary endpoint: graft survival (Kaplan-Meier analysis).

Results

Follow-up study included 856 patients. Overall graft survival was 84.6% and 73.5% at 1 and 5 y post transplant, respectively. Five-year rates for Arms 1, 2, and 3 were 74.7%, 71.5%, and 74.5%, respectively. At 5 y, death-censored graft survival in the entire cohort was 74.7%. Overall graft survival in patients remaining on PR-T for ≥30 d was 79.1%. Graft survival in patients who remained on PR-T at 5 y was 87.3%. Patient survival was 86.6% at 1 y and 76.3% at 5 y, with survival rates similar in the 3 treatment arms at 5 y. Estimated glomerular filtration rate at the end of the 24-wk initial study and 5 y posttransplant was 62.1 and 61.5 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively, and was similar between the 3 treatment arms at 5 y. Overall, 18 (2.9%) patients had ≥1 adverse drug reaction, considered possibly related to PR-T in 6 patients.

Conclusions

In the DIAMOND study patient cohort, renal function, graft survival, and patient survival were similar between treatment arms at 5 y posttransplant.

Update: Immunsuppression bei Organtransplantationen

Die Immunsuppression ist eine wesentliche Grundvoraussetzung für eine erfolgreiche Transplantation. Zur Reduktion der teils beträchtlichen Nebenwirkungen werden Kombinationstherapien mit unterschiedlichen Wirkstoffen durchgeführt. Dieser Beitrag soll einen aktuellen Überblick zur Immunsuppression nach Leber- und Nierentransplantation geben.

Renal disease in the allograft recipient

Chronic renal failure after liver transplantation (LT) is significantly more frequent than after lung or heart transplantation and it results in an increased short and long-term mortality. Renal impairment may occur before LT (functional or due to preexisting parenchymal kidney disease), in the peri-operative period or later after LT. The number of patients with renal failure after LT has increased due to the liver allocation based on MELD and to the more liberal use of higher risk grafts. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is the most important cause of renal dysfunction but is a modifiable factor. Strategy to prevent CNI-associated nephrotoxicity is post-op CNI minimization by induction therapy and reduced dose and/or delayed introduction of CNI in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or everolimus with no penalty in term of rejection. With everolimus, usually started one month after LT, a drastic minimization of CNI is possible and this results in superior kidney function until at least 3 years follow up. At the moment of renal impairment a drastic reduction of CNI dose together with the introduction of MMF results in an improvement in GFR at 6 to 2 years with a low rate of acute rejection. However, secondary prevention fails to normalize renal function in most of the patients once e GFR <60 ml/min/1.73m²ml.

Infectious Complications of Biological and Small Molecule Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapies

The past 2 decades have seen a revolution in our approach to therapeutic immunosuppression. We have moved from relying on broadly active traditional medications, such as prednisolone or methotrexate, toward more specific agents that often target a single receptor, cytokine, or cell type, using monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, or targeted small molecules. This change has transformed the treatment of many conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, cancers, asthma, and inflammatory bowel disease, but along with the benefits have come risks. Contrary to the hope that these more specific agents would have minimal and predictable infectious sequelae, infectious complications have emerged as a major stumbling block for many of these agents. Furthermore, the growing number and complexity of available biologic agents makes it difficult for clinicians to maintain current knowledge, and most review articles focus on a particular target disease or class of agent. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge about infectious complications of biologic and small molecule immunomodulatory agents, aiming to create a single resource relevant to a broad range of clinicians and researchers. For each of 19 classes of agent, we discuss the mechanism of action, the risk and types of infectious complications, and recommendations for prevention of infection.

Improved Survival in Liver Transplant Patients Receiving Prolonged-release Tacrolimus-based Immunosuppression in the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR): An Extension Study

BACKGROUND

We compared, through the European Liver Transplant Registry, long-term liver transplantation outcomes with prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) versus immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-T)-based immunosuppression. This retrospective analysis comprises up to 8-year data collected between 2008 and 2016, in an extension of our previously published study.

METHODS

Patients with <1 month follow-up were excluded; patients were propensity score matched for baseline characteristics. Efficacy measures included: univariate/multivariate analyses of risk factors influencing graft/patient survival up to 8 years posttransplantation, and graft/patient survival up to 4 years with PR-T versus IR-T. Overall, 13 088 patients were included from 44 European centers; propensity score-matched analyses comprised 3006 patients (PR-T: n = 1002; IR-T: n = 2004).

RESULTS

In multivariate analyses, IR-T-based immunosuppression was associated with reduced graft survival (risk ratio, 1.49; P = 0.0038) and patient survival (risk ratio, 1.40; P = 0.0215). There was improvement with PR-T versus IR-T in graft survival (83% versus 77% at 4 y, respectively; P = 0.005) and patient survival (85% versus 80%; P = 0.017). Patients converted from IR-T to PR-T after 1 month had a higher graft survival rate than patients receiving IR-T at last follow-up (P < 0.001), or started and maintained on PR-T (P = 0.019). One graft loss in 4 years was avoided for every 14.3 patients treated with PR-T versus IR-T.

CONCLUSIONS

PR-T-based immunosuppression might improve long-term outcomes in liver transplant recipients than IR-T-based immunosuppression.

Peri-transplant renal dysfunction in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis undergoing liver transplantation

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently the most common etiology of chronic liver disease (CLD) caused by an accumulation of fat in the liver and globally is the leading indication of liver transplantation. Emerging data has recognized an increased association of NAFLD with risk of other metabolic liver diseases like type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular diseases. Pathophysiologically, NAFLD patients have a state of low-grade systemic inflammation, insulin resistance and atherogenic dyslipidemia which causes renal dysfunction. Patients with NAFLD cirrhosis awaiting liver transplant (LT) face unique challenges and have a significantly higher requirement of simultaneous-liver-kidney transplant as compared to other etiologies. Further, NAFLD not only recurs but also occurs as a de novo manifestation post-LT. There is also a significantly higher risk of waiting list stagnation and dropouts due to burdensome cardiometabolic disorders in NAFLD patients. The current review aims to understand the prevalence and pathogenetic basis of renal dysfunction in NAFLD. Additionally, the review describes the choice of immunosuppression protocols and use of intraoperative renal replacement therapy in context of intra and post-operative renal dysfunction in NAFLD patients. Prospective controlled trials focusing on NAFLD and development of CKD are needed to assess the existence of a causal and/or a bidirectional relationship between NAFLD and CKD.

Long-Term Outcomes of Liver Transplantation in Patients With Pretransplant Renal Dysfunction Treated With Induction Therapy and Delayed Reduced De Novo Once-Daily Tacrolimus

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Renal dysfunction is related to short- and long-term survival after liver transplantation. We present herein a retrospective analysis of our experience with liver transplantation in recipients with pretransplant renal dysfunction treated with induction therapy followed by delayed/reduced de novo once-daily tacrolimus.

METHODS

Liver transplantations performed between April 2008 and August 2011 were included in this study. Pretransplant renal dysfunction was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min. Interleukin-2 receptor antagonists were used for induction therapy. Initial once-daily tacrolimus dose was 0.10 mg/kg/day or 0.07 mg/kg/day if combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Tacrolimus target trough levels were 4 to 6 ng/mL during the first post-transplant year and <4 ng/mL the rest of the follow-up.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients comprised the study cohort with a median follow-up of 56.4 months (range, 11-78). Median day of tacrolimus introduction was 7 (range, 3-12). Once-daily tacrolimus was withdrawn in 6 patients (31.6%) due to evolution of renal dysfunction in all cases. At 5 years, 30% of the patients were under MMF monotherapy. Mean tacrolimus trough levels were maintained under 5 ng/mL. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 5 years was 55.3 ± 12.7 mL/min. No patient needed hemodialysis or renal transplantation over the follow-up. Patient survival at 5 years was 78.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction therapy followed by delayed/reduced de novo once-daily tacrolimus and maintenance of low tacrolimus exposition during the follow-up is effective to maintain long-term renal function and to achieve favorable patient survival in liver transplant recipients with pretransplant renal dysfunction.

Sequential Cohort Analysis After Liver Transplantation Shows de Novo Extended Release Tacrolimus Is Safe, Efficacious, and Minimizes Renal Dysfunction

The use of once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (ERT) is associated with improved long-term graft and patient survival when compared with twice-daily tacrolimus (BDT), but the underlying reasons for differential survival are unclear. The aim of the study was to compare clinical outcomes known to impact on posttransplant survival for de novo BDT and ERT in liver transplantation (LT) recipients.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, prospective sequential cohort analysis of adult patients undergoing LT during a change in protocol from de novo BDT to ERT, with a 6-month post-LT follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 160 transplanted patients were evaluated; 82 were in the BDT group and 78 were in the ERT group. The cohorts were matched for standard variables and a similar proportion in each group received induction interleukin-2 receptor antibody (36% and 31%). There were no significant differences in the measured outcomes of patient and graft survival, biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes, post LT diabetes, and toxicity. A significantly lower number of patients developed chronic kidney disease Stage3-4 in the ERT cohort compared with BDT cohort. In patients with pre-LT renal dysfunction who received antibody induction, estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased significantly in the BDT but not the ERT group.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that once-daily ERT is as safe and efficacious as BDT in de novo LT but optimally conserves renal function post-LT.

Induction immunosuppression in adults undergoing liver transplantation: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is considered the definitive treatment for people with liver failure. As part of post-liver transplantation management, immunosuppression (suppressing the host immunity) is given to prevent graft rejections. Immunosuppressive drugs can be classified into those that are used for a short period during the beginning phase of immunosuppression (induction immunosuppression) and those that are used over the entire lifetime of the individual (maintenance immunosuppression), because it is widely believed that graft rejections are more common during the first few months after liver transplantation. Some drugs such as glucocorticosteroids may be used for both induction and maintenance immunosuppression because of their multiple modalities of action. There is considerable uncertainty as to whether induction immunosuppression is necessary and if so, the relative efficacy of different immunosuppressive agents.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative benefits and harms of different induction immunosuppressive regimens in adults undergoing liver transplantation through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different induction immunosuppressive regimens according to their safety and efficacy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers until July 2019 to identify randomised clinical trials in adults undergoing liver transplantation.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or status) in adults undergoing liver transplantation. We excluded randomised clinical trials in which participants had multivisceral transplantation and those who already had graft rejections.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the odds ratio (OR), rate ratio, and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) based on an available case analysis, according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 25 trials (3271 participants; 8 treatments) in the review. Twenty-three trials (3017 participants) were included in one or more outcomes in the review. The trials that provided the information included people undergoing primary liver transplantation for various indications and excluded those with HIV and those with renal impairment. The follow-up in the trials ranged from three to 76 months, with a median follow-up of 12 months among trials. All except one trial were at high risk of bias, and the overall certainty of evidence was very low. Overall, approximately 7.4% of people who received the standard regimen of glucocorticosteroid induction died and 12.2% developed graft failure. All-cause mortality and graft failure was lower with basiliximab compared with glucocorticosteroid induction: all-cause mortality (HR 0.53, 95% CrI 0.31 to 0.93; network estimate, based on 2 direct comparison trials (131 participants; low-certainty evidence)); and graft failure (HR 0.44, 95% CrI 0.28 to 0.70; direct estimate, based on 1 trial (47 participants; low-certainty evidence)). There was no evidence of differences in all-cause mortality and graft failure between other induction immunosuppressants and glucocorticosteroids in either the direct comparison or the network meta-analysis (very low-certainty evidence). There was also no evidence of differences in serious adverse events (proportion), serious adverse events (number), renal failure, any adverse events (proportion), any adverse events (number), liver retransplantation, graft rejections (any), or graft rejections (requiring treatment) between other induction immunosuppressants and glucocorticosteroids in either the direct comparison or the network meta-analysis (very low-certainty evidence). However, because of the wide CrIs, clinically important differences in these outcomes cannot be ruled out. None of the studies reported health-related quality of life.

FUNDING

the source of funding for 14 trials was drug companies who would benefit from the results of the study; two trials were funded by neutral organisations who have no vested interests in the results of the study; and the source of funding for the remaining nine trials was unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on low-certainty evidence, basiliximab induction may decrease mortality and graft failure compared to glucocorticosteroids induction in people undergoing liver transplantation. However, there is considerable uncertainty about this finding because this information is based on small trials at high risk of bias. The evidence is uncertain about the effects of different induction immunosuppressants on other clinical outcomes, including graft rejections. Future randomised clinical trials should be adequately powered, employ blinding, avoid post-randomisation dropouts (or perform intention-to-treat analysis), and use clinically important outcomes such as mortality, graft failure, and health-related quality of life.

Renal Outcomes of Liver Transplantation Recipients Receiving Standard Immunosuppression and Early Renal Sparing Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single Center Study

New-onset stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) after liver transplantation (LT) is associated with high morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. In 2010, we instituted an early renal sparing immunosuppression (RSI) protocol for LT recipients with severe renal dysfunction (pre-LT dialysis/estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<30mL/min/1.73 m2 or post-LT acute kidney injury) consisting of 2 doses of basiliximab for induction and delaying tacrolimus to post-LT day 4-7. We examined the effect of early RSI on post-LT renal outcomes.

METHODS

Data on all adults who had LT between January 1, 2010, and December 12, 2014 were collected. We calculated the renal risk index (RRI) score for each LT recipient (https://rri.med.umich.edu). Primary outcome was new-onset post-LT stage 4-5 CKD.

RESULTS

Of 214 LT recipients, 121 (57%) received early RSI and 93 (43%) received standard immunosuppression. Cumulative incidence of new-onset stage 4-5 CKD was higher in early RSI compared with standard immunosuppression (P = 0.03). Female sex and RRI score were the significant risk factors for development of post-LT stage CKD in the entire study cohort as well as the LT recipients with RRI ≥ sixth decile (high-risk group).

CONCLUSIONS

Delaying tacrolimus initiation combined with basiliximab induction did not have a durable effect on long-term renal outcomes in high-risk LT recipients. Further studies are needed to identify the effective strategies to preserve renal function by targeting patients at high risk for CKD progression.

Efficacy and safety of prolonged-release versus immediate-release tacrolimus inde novoliver transplant recipients in South Korea: a randomized open-label phase 4 study (MAPLE)

Background

Prolonged-release tacrolimus is associated with better long-term graft and patient survival than the immediate-release formulation in liver transplant patients. However, no clinical data are available to assess the efficacy and safety of early conversion from twice-daily, immediate-release tacrolimus to once-daily, prolonged-release tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients in Korea.

Methods

A 24-week, randomized, open-label study was conducted in 36 liver transplant recipients. All patients received immediate- release tacrolimus (0.1–0.2 mg/kg/day, divided into two doses) for 4 weeks after transplantation, at which time 50% of the patients were converted, at a ratio of 1 mg to 1 mg, to prolonged-release tacrolimus (once-daily). The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) from weeks 4 to 24 after transplantation (per-protocol set). Medication adherence, adverse event profiles, laboratory tests, vital signs, and physical changes were also recorded.

Results

BCAR frequency at 24 weeks was similar between the two treatment groups; two cases (mean±standard deviation, 0.14±0.53 cases) of BCAR were reported in one patient treated with prolonged-release tacrolimus (n=14), while no such cases were reported among patients treated with immediate-release tacrolimus (n=12). The tacrolimus blood concentration at weeks 12 and 24, medication adherence, and adverse event profiles were also similar between the formulations, with no unusual laboratory test results, vital signs, or physical changes reported.

Conclusions

Early conversion to a simplified, once-daily, prolonged-release tacrolimus regimen may be an effective treatment option for liver transplant recipients in Korea. Larger-scale studies are warranted to confirm non-inferiority to immediate-release tacrolimus formulation in de novo liver transplant recipients.

The Effect of Donor Age and Recipient Characteristics on Renal Outcomes in Patients Receiving Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus After Liver Transplantation: Post-Hoc Analyses of the DIAMOND Study

Background

The DIAMOND study of de novo liver transplant patients showed that prolonged-release tacrolimus exposure in the acute post-transplant period maintained renal function over 24 weeks of treatment. To assess these findings further, we performed a post-hoc analysis in patients according to baseline kidney function, Model for End-stage Liver Disease [MELD] scores, and donor age.

Material/Methods

Patients received prolonged-release tacrolimus (initial-dose, Arm 1: 0.2 mg/kg/day, Arm 2: 0.15–0.175 mg/kg/day, Arm 3: 0.2 mg/kg/day delayed until Day 5), mycophenolate mofetil and 1 steroid bolus. Arms 2 and 3 also received basiliximab. The recommended tacrolimus target trough levels to Day 42 post-transplantation were 5–15 ng/mL in all arms. In this post-hoc analysis, change in renal outcome, based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), Modified Diet in Renal Disease-4 (MDRD4), values from baseline to Week 24 post-transplantation, were assessed according to baseline patient factors: eGFR (≥60 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m²), MELD score (<25 and ≥25) and donor age (<50 and ≥50 years).

Results

Baseline characteristics were comparable (Arms 1–3: n=283, n=287, n=274, respectively). Patients with baseline renal function, eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m², experienced a decrease in eGFR in all tacrolimus treatment arms. In patients with lower baseline renal function (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²), an advantage for renal function was observed with both the early lower-dose and delayed higher-dose tacrolimus regimens compared with the early introduction of higher-dose tacrolimus. At Week 24, renal function was higher in the early-lower tacrolimus arm with older donors, and the delayed higher-dose tacrolimus arm with younger donors, both compared with early higher-dose tacrolimus.

Conclusions

Pre-transplantation factors, such as renal function and donor age, could guide the choice of prolonged-release tacrolimus regimen following liver transplantation.

Pharmacokinetic Profile of Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus When Administered via Nasogastric Tube in De Novo Liver Transplantation: A Sub-Study of the DIAMOND Trial

Background

For patients unable to swallow during the immediate post-transplant period, immunosuppressant therapy may be initiated by administering prolonged-release tacrolimus as a suspension via a nasogastric tube.

Material/Methods

In this sub-study of the DIAMOND randomized controlled trial of prolonged-release tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients, we investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of prolonged-release tacrolimus when administered via nasogastric tube immediately post-transplant. PK analyses were performed on whole-blood samples collected on Day 1 of tacrolimus administration and on Day 3 post-transplantation. Endpoints included AUC_0–24, C_max, T_max, and C_min.

Results

In total, 10 patients were included in the PK sub-study. The overall mean daily dose of prolonged-release tacrolimus administered via nasogastric tube was higher on Day 1 (0.179 mg/kg) vs. Day 3 (0.140 mg/kg). Mean AUC_0–24 was higher and less variable on Day 3 vs. Day 1 (AUC_0–24 (coefficient of variation; CV): 301 (50.8) vs. 193 (94.5) ng·h/mL). Mean C_max was lower and median T_max was shorter on Day 1 vs. Day 3 (C_max (CV): 15.1 (73.9) vs. 19.1 (47.9) ng/mL; T_max (range): 2.0 (2.0–24.0) vs. 4.5 (0.5–24.0) h). A similar pattern was also observed when data were normalized for dose and body weight.

Conclusions

In contrast to previously reported findings in healthy volunteers, nasogastric administration of prolonged-release tacrolimus suspension in liver transplant patients did not substantially affect the PK profile of tacrolimus vs. intact capsules. Nasogastric administration is thus a feasible option to ensure appropriate early tacrolimus exposure in de novo liver transplant recipients.

International Liver Transplantation Society Consensus Statement on Immunosuppression in Liver Transplant Recipients

Effective immunosupression management is central to achieving optimal outcomes in liver transplant recipients. Current immunosuppression regimens and agents are highly effective in minimizing graft loss due to acute and chronic rejection but can also produce a substantial array of toxicities. The utilization of immunosuppression varies widely, contributing to the wide disparities in posttransplant outcomes reported between transplant centers. The International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS) convened a consensus conference, comprised of a global panel of expert hepatologists, transplant surgeons, nephrologists, and pharmacologists to review the literature and experience pertaining to immunosuppression management to develop guidelines on key aspects of immunosuppression. The consensus findings and recommendations of the ILTS Consensus guidelines on immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients are presented in this article.

Efficacy and Safety of Delayed Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus Initiation in De Novo Hepatitis C Virus-Negative Orthotopic Liver Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center, Single-Arm, Prospective Study

Background

Delaying initiation of tacrolimus after liver transplantation (LT) is a potential renal-sparing strategy. We assessed safety and efficacy of delayed initiation of prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) in de novo LT.

Material/Methods

This was a single-center, single-arm, prospective, 12-month observational study of hepatitis C virus-negative orthotopic LT patients. Immunosuppression included PR-T (initially 0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg/day) initiated on Day 3 post LT, basiliximab (20 mg) on post-transplantation Day 0 and Day 4, and intraoperative corticosteroids (500 mg). Patients received maintenance corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) according to center protocol. MMF dose was adjusted according to thrombocyte count. The primary endpoint was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measured using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 4-variable formula at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) and dialysis requirement. Adverse events were recorded.

Results

Sixty-nine patients (mean age 55.0 years) were included. Most patients started MMF on Day 1 (60.9%) or Day 2 (10.1%), and PR-T on Day 3 (55.1%) or Day 4 (29.0%). Mean tacrolimus trough levels (ng/mL) were: Day 7, 9.5±6.3; Day 10, 9.4±5.4; Month 1, 8.0±3.1; Month 3, 7.8±3.7; Month 6, 8.0±4.1; and Month 12, 7.2±3.1. Mean 12-month eGFR was 77.2±24.5 mL/min/1.73 m²; 72.5% of patients had eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m² at 12 months; 89.9% had no eGFR measurements <40 mL/min/1.73 m² during the study. Renal insufficiency (any eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²) was diagnosed in 27.5% of patients; one patient required dialysis. There were no BCAR episodes; the infection rate was 36.2%, and 3 patients died. Overall, 19 patients (27.5%) developed de novo diabetes mellitus, 18 patients (26.1%) had hypercholesterolemia, and 12 patients (17.4%) had hypertriglyceridemia.

Conclusions

Quadruple therapy with delayed administration of PR-T was well tolerated and efficacious, and was associated with acceptable renal function over 12 months.

Safety and Efficacy of Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: An Open-Label, Prospective, Single-Arm, Phase 4 Study

BACKGROUND After liver transplantation (LT), nonadherence to immunosuppressants due to the complex regimen can lead to graft rejection and loss. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (Bid-Tac) to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (OD-Tac) in living donor LT (LDLT) recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Among patients who underwent LDLT between November 2015 and October 2016, those who agreed to participate in this study were screened, and those with good general condition and stable liver functions were enrolled. Participants underwent a conversion from Bid-Tac to OD-Tac with a dose ratio of 1: 1 at about 10-14 weeks after LDLT and were followed-up for 24 weeks. RESULTS Thirty-one patients were enrolled. The median number of conversion days after LDLT was 12.3 weeks (range, 10.3-13.8). Adherence was evaluated during the outpatient visits at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 after Tac conversion, and 100% adherence was observed at all time points. There were no cases of acute rejection, graft loss, or patient death after Tac conversion. Nineteen cases of adverse events occurred in 11 patients (35.5%), none of which were severe. Alopecia was the most common, affecting 3 (9.7%) patients, followed by pruritus (n=2, 6.45%). There were no changes in renal function or in liver function test, serum glucose level, and lipid profile. CONCLUSIONS Early Tac conversion from Bid-Tac to OD-Tac is safe and feasible. However, further studies are needed to elucidate its long-term effects.

Protecting renal function: a relevant decision for liver transplantation

Advances in surgical technique, as well as in medical management and immunosuppression (IS), have represented a significant improvement in the survival of patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT), with 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates of 86%, 73%, and 62%, respectively, according to the Spanish liver transplant registry.

Acute Kidney Injury Before and After Liver Transplant

The development of acute kidney injury in the setting of liver disease is a significant event both before and after liver transplant. Whether acute kidney injury is the cause of or merely associated with worse outcomes, the development of renal failure is significant from a prognostic as well as from a diagnostic and therapeutic standpoint. Although not every etiology is reversible, there are number of etiologies that are correctable, to include hypovolemia, nephrotoxic medications, and acute tubular necrosis. In the post-liver transplant period, renal failure is associated with graft failure as well as worse outcomes overall. Prompt recognition, workup, and intervention can significantly impact outcomes and survival both before and after liver transplant.

Key role of renal biopsy in management of progressive chronic kidney disease in liver graft recipients

AIMS

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT). The etiology of CKD is broad and may only be assessed accurately by renal histology. The current study aimed to analyze the safety of renal biopsy in daily clinical practice as well as its usefulness regarding management of CKD after LT.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data and renal biopsies obtained from patients with severe renal impairment (overt proteinuria, progressive deterioration of renal function) after LT with respect to safety, etiology of renal disease, and therapeutic consequences.

RESULTS

Renal biopsies were obtained from 14 patients at median (minimum-maximum) 3 (0.2-12) years after LT. No major complications associated with renal biopsy were observed. Histomorphological alterations were varied (nephrosclerosis, n = 5; IgA-glomerulonephritis, n = 4; tenofovir-associated nephropathy, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type 1, membranous glomerulonephritis, amyloid A amyloidosis, and calcineurin inhibitor nephropathy, n = 1, respectively). The diagnosis of specific renal diseases other than calcineurin-inhibitor nephrotoxicity facilitated specific treaments and avoided unnecessary modification of immunosuppression in the majority of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal biopsy in patients with CKD after LT seems safe and may offer specific therapeutic options. Furthermore, unnecessary changes of immunosuppression can be avoided in a considerable number of patients.

Steroid-free immunosuppression with low-dose tacrolimus is safe and significantly reduces the incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus following liver transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Corticosteroids (CS) are traditionally used as part of the basal immunosuppression (IS) following liver transplantation (LT) but are known to be associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the incidence of transient as well as persistent NODM, rejection rate and patient- and graft survival between patients receiving steroid-based and steroid-free maintenance IS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 238 patients liver transplanted (2008-2011) with deceased donor livers were divided into two groups, one group that received steroid-based IS (tacrolimus (TAC), corticosteroids (CS), ± mycophenolate mofetil (MMF); n = 155) (2008-2011) and another group of non-autoimmune recipients that received steroid-free IS (TAC, MMF; n = 83) according to our new maintenance IS-protocol starting January 2010. The primary and secondary end-points were patient- and graft survival, rejection rates and the incidence of NODM. The median follow-up times were 1248 days and 681 days, respectively.

RESULTS

The one-year patient- and graft survival in the steroid-based and steroid-free group was 92.7% and 93.3% (ns) and 87.6% and 84.9% (ns), respectively. The incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) was 27.7% in both groups (ns) during follow-up. The overall incidence of persistent NODM in the two groups were 16.8% and 2.9%, respectively (p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that steroid-free low-dose tacrolimus-based IS following LT is safe and decreases the incidence of NODM significantly.

Ab initio Everolimus-based Versus Standard Calcineurin Inhibitor Immunosuppression Regimen in Liver Transplant Recipients

AIM

We designed a retrospective case-control study to determine the efficacy and feasibility of everolimus (EVR) combined with low-dose tacrolimus (Tac) ab initio versus standard-dose Tac after liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

Seventy-one adult LT patients, receiving EVR and low-dose Tac without corticosteroids or induction therapy from postoperative day 1 (EVR group) were compared with a well-matched control group of 61 recipients treated with standard-dose Tac in association with antimetabolite.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics for the two groups were comparable. The overall patient and graft survival rates were similar (P = .908). Liver function was stable during the follow-up. In the EVR group, biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in two cases (2.8%), whereas chronic rejection occurred in one (1.4%). The EVR group experienced a better renal function already after 2 weeks (estimated glomerular filtration rate: 89.85 [36.46 to 115.3] mL/min/1.73 m² vs. 68.77 [16.11 to 115.42] mL/min/1.73 m²; P = .013), which was also observed after a median time of 27 months (range, 0 to 82 months) from LT (estimated glomerular filtration rate: 80 [45 to 118.3] mL/min/1.73 m² vs. 70.9 [45 to 88.4] mL/min/1.73 m²; P = .04). After a median time of 27 months, the EVR group showed lower incidence of arterial hypertension and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

Ab initio EVR-based immunosuppression could be a valid option immediately after surgery in recipients at high-risk for post-LT renal impairment.

Once-daily tacrolimus in liver transplantation: a 'me-too drug', or a therapeutic advantage

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide latest information on differences between standard tacrolimus (TAC BID) and slow-released formulation of tacrolimus (Advagraf) in liver transplantation (LTx), and to discuss the latter's therapeutic value as a distinct entity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two articles on de-novo studies, several on conversion and one on survival analysis from the European Liver Transplant Registry published recently showed that low-dose Advagraf immediately after transplantation provided same protection to the kidney as standard dose delayed until day 5, and was associated with lower rejection rate; to maintain the same trough level after late conversion to Advagraf, an approximately 1.25-fold higher dose was needed on average; if studied by questionnaire, conversion improved medication adherence; and registry data provided evidence of long-term survival benefit of Advagraf over TAC BID (7 and 8% graft and patient survival rates over a 3-year period; P < 0.002 and P < 0.003, respectively).

SUMMARY

Pharmacokinetic differences between TAC BID and Advagraf translate into less interpatient and intrapatient variability and improve adherence. If survival benefit of Advagraf administration de novo after LTx as demonstrated by the European Liver Transplant Registry analysis is confirmed in an independent cohort, Advagraf will leave the area of the 'me-too' drugs to become the immunosuppressant of choice.

Short- and Long-term Outcomes of De Novo Liver Transplant Patients Treated With Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is the key immunosuppressive drug for liver transplantation. Once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (TAC-PR) exhibits good drug adherence but has difficulty controlling the trough level in the early phase of liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare the feasibility and efficacy of immediately starting oral TAC-PR versus traditional twice-daily tacrolimus (TAC-BID) in de novo liver transplantation recipients.

METHODS

The study included 28 patients treated with conventional TAC-BID and 60 patients treated with TAC-PR (median follow-up 70.5 months). Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were similar except for the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma and type of graft. Dose adjustment was more frequently required for TAC-PR than TAC-BID (73.3% vs 42.9%, P = 0.006), but trough levels of TAC during the first 3 months after liver transplantation were controlled well in both groups. The rate of acute cellular rejection and long-term renal function were similar in both groups. In both groups, renal function worsened during the first 6 months after transplantation and remained stable until the end of the follow-up period. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 96.4%, 85.7%, and 85.7% for TAC-BID and 96.7%, 94.8%, and 94.8% for TAC-PR, respectively. The overall survival curve for TAC-PR was not inferior to that of TAC-BID.

CONCLUSIONS

The TAC-PR protocol was feasible and effective with strict adjustment.

Anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies for the prevention of rejection in liver transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antibody induction therapy aims at preventing acute cellular rejection by reducing T-cell proliferation and activation. We evaluated the efficacy and side effects of two anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (IL2RAs), basiliximab and daclizumab, for prevention of liver transplant rejection in adult patients.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on basiliximab or daclizumab were identified by searching multiple databases and reference lists published up to July, 2015. Endpoints included acute rejection events and mortality rates. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and pooled for a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Patients treated with IL2RA-based therapy were less likely to suffer acute rejection compared to control group (steroid or steroid-free). Patients in all groups had similar mortality rate. In the subgroup analysis, basiliximab and daclizumab-based therapies did not reduced acute rejection rate. No significant difference was found in mortality rate between both types of IL-2RA treatment groups and control groups. In the subgroup analysis regarding experimental design, no significant difference in the acute rejection and mortality rates were found between "steroid plus IL2RA versus steroid" and "IL2RA versus steroid" groups.

CONCLUSION

IL2RA-based induction therapy reduces rate of acute rejection events but does not reduce mortality. However, optimal regimen relating to IL2RA-based induction therapy remains undetermined. KEY MESSAGES IL2RA-based induction therapy was effective in reduction of acute rejection events but it did not reduce mortality rate. Basiliximab-based induction therapy might be more effective than daclizumab-based induction therapy in reduction of acute rejection. No significant difference in acute rejection and mortality rate was found between types of IL2RAs or IL2RA-steroid combined therapy.