1
|
McCallen JD, Dave M, LaFata SS, Cameron BA, Xue AZ, Kiran A, Ocampo AA, Lee CJ, Borinsky SA, Redd WD, Cotton CC, Eluri S, Reed CC, Dellon ES. Topical Steroids Are Effective and Safe in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis Over a Median of 6.5 Years of Chronic Use. J Clin Gastroenterol 2024:00004836-990000000-00355. [PMID: 39365834 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000002081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 10/06/2024]
Abstract
GOALS To determine long-term efficacy and safety of tCS for treatment of EoE. BACKGROUND Maintenance therapy with topical corticosteroids (tCS) is recommended for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but data for long-term use are still needed. STUDY This retrospective cohort study assessed newly diagnosed patients with EoE who were treated with a tCS and had a follow-up endoscopy with biopsy after at least 5 years. Histologic symptomatic and endoscopic responses were extracted from medical records. Patients who did and did not have long-term tCS treatment were compared at baseline, and outcomes for patients were assessed at their last endoscopy while on tCS. RESULTS Of 431 patients with EoE treated with tCS, 104 met inclusion criteria for long-term use. For patients with long-term tCS use, the median time (IQR) on tCS was 6.5 years (5.4 to 8.8 y). At the last endoscopy, 54% had histologic response (<15 eos/hpf), but those with excellent adherence had a histologic response of 64%. Endoscopic severity also decreased with improved adherence which was strongly associated with EREFS (1.7 vs. 2.8 vs. 4.0 for excellent, good, and poor adherence; P<0.001). Symptomatic response was 68% overall, but only 40% in those with poor adherence (P=0.07). Complications of taking tCS were uncommon (adrenal insufficiency: 1%; osteopenia: 1%; and esophageal candidiasis: 4% at final endoscopy). CONCLUSIONS Long-term tCS (median 6.5 y) were generally effective, especially with better adherence, and also safe, with only rare serious complications. These data can be used to help patients make clinical decisions about chronic tCS use in EoE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mili Dave
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Stephanie A Borinsky
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Swathi Eluri
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | - Evan S Dellon
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
S2k guideline Gastroesophageal reflux disease and eosinophilic esophagitis of the German Society of Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS). ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:1786-1852. [PMID: 39389106 DOI: 10.1055/a-2344-6282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/12/2024]
|
3
|
Schlager H, Baumann-Durchschein F, Steidl K, Häfner M, Dinkhauser P, Weitersberger M, Holzinger J, Mader M, Gröchenig HP, Madl C, Schreiner P. Diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal food impaction in adults : A position paper issued by the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH). Wien Klin Wochenschr 2024; 136:479-499. [PMID: 39230674 PMCID: PMC11387459 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-024-02401-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
This position paper deals with an expert consensus on diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal food impaction issued by the Austrian Eosinophilic Esophagitis Network, a working group under the patronage of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH). In need of a standardized approach on the management of EoE, recommendations were made based on international guidelines and landmark studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hansjörg Schlager
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, University Hospital Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria.
| | - Franziska Baumann-Durchschein
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, University Hospital Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Karin Steidl
- Department of Internal Medicine, Barmherzige Brüder St. Veit/Glan, St. Veit, Austria
| | - Michael Häfner
- 2nd Medical Department, Barmherzige Schwestern Krankenhaus, Vienna, Austria
| | - Patrick Dinkhauser
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Endocrinology and Rheumatology, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
| | - Michael Weitersberger
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Linz, Austria
| | - Josef Holzinger
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria
| | - Markus Mader
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten-Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität, St. Pölten, Austria
| | - Hans Peter Gröchenig
- Department of Internal Medicine, Barmherzige Brüder St. Veit/Glan, St. Veit, Austria
| | - Christian Madl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung, Krankenanstaltenverbund Wien (KAV), Vienna, Austria
| | - Philipp Schreiner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martin LJ, Zhang X, Chehade M, Davis CM, Dellon ES, Falk GW, Gupta SK, Hirano I, Hiremath GS, Katzka DA, Khoury P, Leung J, Menard-Katcher P, Gonsalves N, Pesek RD, Spergel JM, Wechsler JB, Kliewer K, Arva NC, Collins MH, Pletneva M, Yang GY, Furuta GT, Rothenberg ME, Aceves SS. Long-term durability between parent and child patient-reported outcomes in eosinophilic esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2024:S0091-6749(24)00740-1. [PMID: 39059504 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because young children cannot self-report symptoms, there is a need for parent surrogate reports. Although early work suggested parent-child alignment for eosinophil esophagitis (EoE) patient-reported outcomes (PROs), the longitudinal alignment is unclear. OBJECTIVE We sought to assess the agreement and longitudinal stability of PROs between children with EoE and their parents. METHODS A total of 292 parent-child respondents completed 723 questionnaires over 5 years in an observational trial in the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers. The change in and agreement between parent and child Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score version 2 (PEESSv2.0) and Pediatric Quality of Life Eosinophilic Esophagitis Module (PedsQL-EoE) PROs over time were assessed using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. Clinical factors influencing PROs and their agreement were evaluated using linear mixed models. RESULTS The cohort had a median disease duration equaling 3.7 years and was predominantly male (73.6%) and White (85.3%). Child and parent PEESSv2.0 response groups were identified and were stable over time. There was strong correlation between child and parent reports (PEESSv2.0, 0.83;PedsQL-EoE, 0.74), with minimal pairwise differences for symptoms. Longitudinally, parent-reported PedsQL-EoE scores were stable (P ≥ .32), whereas child-reported PedsQL-EoE scores improved (P = .026). A larger difference in parent and child PedsQL-EoE reports was associated with younger age (P < .001), and differences were driven by psychosocial PRO domains. CONCLUSIONS There is strong longitudinal alignment between child and parent reports using EoE PROs. These data provide evidence that parent report is a stable proxy for objective EoE symptoms in their children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa J Martin
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Xue Zhang
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Mirna Chehade
- Mount Sinai Center for Eosinophilic Disorders, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Carla M Davis
- Division of Immunology, Allergy, and Retrovirology, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex; Food Allergy Program, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex
| | - Evan S Dellon
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Gary W Falk
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Sandeep K Gupta
- Children's of Alabama, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala
| | - Ikuo Hirano
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kenneth Griffin Esophageal Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| | - Girish S Hiremath
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| | - David A Katzka
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Paneez Khoury
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
| | - John Leung
- Division of Allergy/Immunology, Tuft's Medical Center, Boston, Mass; Division of Gastroenterology, Tuft's Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| | - Paul Menard-Katcher
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo
| | - Nirmala Gonsalves
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kenneth Griffin Esophageal Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| | - Robert D Pesek
- Division of Allergy/Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medicine Sciences, Little Rock, Ark; Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Ark
| | - Jonathan M Spergel
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Joshua B Wechsler
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Ill
| | - Kara Kliewer
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Nicoleta C Arva
- Department of Pathology, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| | - Margaret H Collins
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Maria Pletneva
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Guang-Yu Yang
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| | - Glenn T Furuta
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, Colo; Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Disease Program, Mucosal Inflammation Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | - Marc E Rothenberg
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Seema S Aceves
- University of California San Diego, Rady Children's Hospital of San Diego, San Diego, Calif.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Falk GW, Pesek R. Pharmacologic Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2024; 44:245-264. [PMID: 38575221 DOI: 10.1016/j.iac.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), swallowed topical corticosteroids (STSs), and dupilumab are highly effective therapies for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. Shared decision-making informs the choice of therapy and factors such as ease of use, safety, cost, and efficacy should be addressed. PPIs are the most common medication utilized early in the disease course; however, for nonresponders, STSs are an excellent alternative. Dupilumab is unlikely to replace PPIs or STSs as first-line therapy, except in highly specific circumstances. Identification of novel biologic pathways and the development of small molecules may lead to a wider range of treatment options in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary W Falk
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 7th Floor South Pavilion PCAM, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Robbie Pesek
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Arkansas Children's Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 13 Children's Way, Slot 512-13, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Snyder DL, Alexander JA, Ravi K, Fidler JL, Katzka DA. Course of Esophageal Strictures in Eosinophilic Esophagitis Using Structured Esophagram Protocol. GASTRO HEP ADVANCES 2024; 3:448-453. [PMID: 39131715 PMCID: PMC11307459 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastha.2024.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Background and Aims A key unknown in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is the long-term course of esophageal stenosis. Our aim was to evaluate the course of esophageal strictures using structured serial esophagrams and determine predictors of diameter improvement in patients with EoE. Methods This was a retrospective study of 78 EoE patients who completed 2 structured esophagrams at an academic tertiary referral center between 2003 and 2021. Maximum and minimum esophageal diameters were measured during esophagram using a standardized protocol to reduce measurement errors. Results The median age at first esophagram was 36.2 (12.9-64.3) years; 60.3% of patients were male; 41 patients had active EoE; and 9 were inactive. Of the patients, 39.7% had allergic rhinitis, asthma (32.1%), and atopic dermatitis (7.7%). Medical therapies at second esophagram and esophagogastroduodenoscopy included proton pump inhibitors (39.5%), swallowed topical steroids (31.6%), diet elimination (13.2%), biologic therapies (1.3%), and clinical trial medications (1.3%). Median maximum diameter significantly increased by 1.0 mm (Q1: -1.0 mm, Q3: 3.0 mm) (P = .034), independent of dilation (P = .744). Increase was most profound in patients starting in the lowest maximum diameter group (9-15 mm) with median increase of 3.0 mm. For patients in disease remission at the second esophagram, there was a significant increase in maximum diameter per year compared to active disease at 0.8 mm (Q1: 0.0 mm, Q3: 5.3 mm) and 0.0 mm (Q1: -0.4 mm, Q3: 0.6 mm) respectively (P = .019). Conclusion Long-term improvement in esophageal strictures in patients with EoE may occur but is modest and likely occurs over years. Progression also appears to be minimal. Continuous medical treatment may reduce the rate of stricture recurrence and may improve stricture diameter over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana L. Snyder
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Karthik Ravi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jeff L. Fidler
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - David A. Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Casabona Francés S, Ruiz de León San Juan A, Sanz García A, Ortega Rabbione GJ, Majano P, Pérez Fernández MT, Lucendo AJ, Santander C. Esophageal biomechanics assessed by impedance planimetry (EndoFLIPTM) in healthy subjects and in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Normality values. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2023; 115:693-699. [PMID: 37449498 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9560/2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND active eosinophilic esophagitis is associated with esophageal caliber, distensibility and motility changes that may be reversed with treatment. OBJECTIVES to study esophageal diameter, distensibility and contractility in healthy subjects compared to patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, both before and after treatment. METHODS a quasi-experimental study, EndoFLIP™, was used to analyze the esophageal body and esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) in all three groups, and a program was designed to obtain esophageal diameter, distensibility and contractility values. RESULTS ten healthy volunteers (24-61 years, six men) and nine patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (21-52 years, seven men) were included. The esophagogastric junction distensibility index was 5.07 mm2/Hg in the control subjects, 2.40 mm2/Hg in the subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis before treatment and 2.46 mm2/Hg after treatment. The distensibility plateau was 20.02 mm, 15.43 mm and 17.41 mm, respectively, and the diameter was 21.90 mm, 17.73 mm and 18.30 mm, showing significant differences (p < 0.05), except between control subjects and patients after treatment (p = 0.079). Repetitive antegrade contractions developed in 90 % of control subjects, 66.7 % of eosinophilic esophagitis patients before treatment and 88.9 % of the latter after treatment (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS esophago-gastric junction distensibility index, distensibility plateau and diameter values were higher in controls than in patients, although six weeks of treatment seems a short period to observe significant changes in esophageal biomechanics. Repetitive antegrade contractions are the predominant pattern in healthy subjects and eosinophilic esophagitis. We provide normality values for esophageal biomechanics, measured by impedance planimetry in our setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ancor Sanz García
- Unidad de Análisis de Datos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP)
| | | | - Pedro Majano
- Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Maslenkina K, Mikhaleva L, Mikhalev A, Kaibysheva V, Atiakshin D, Motilev E, Buchwalow I, Tiemann M. Assessment of the Severity and the Remission Criteria in Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Biomedicines 2023; 11:3204. [PMID: 38137426 PMCID: PMC10740698 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11123204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated disease that manifests with dysphagia and is characterized by the predominantly eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa. Several instruments have been developed to assess the symptoms of EoE: the Daily Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ), EoE Activity Index (EEsAI), Pediatric EoE Symptom Severity (PEESSv2), etc. The use of the EREFS is a gold standard for endoscopic diagnosis. The EoE histologic scoring system (EoEHSS) was elaborated for the assessment of histological features in EoE. However, the remission criteria are not clearly defined and vary greatly in different studies. Gastroenterologists establish the severity of EoE mainly based on endoscopic findings. At the same time, EoE requires a multidisciplinary approach. The recently developed Index of Severity of Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE) that is built on symptoms, endoscopic findings, and histological features is promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ksenia Maslenkina
- A.P. Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology, Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (K.M.); (L.M.); (E.M.)
| | - Liudmila Mikhaleva
- A.P. Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology, Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (K.M.); (L.M.); (E.M.)
| | - Alexander Mikhalev
- Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Pirogov Russian National Research University, 117997 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (V.K.)
| | - Valeria Kaibysheva
- Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Pirogov Russian National Research University, 117997 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (V.K.)
| | - Dmitri Atiakshin
- Research and Educational Resource Center for Immunophenotyping, Digital Spatial Profiling and Ultrastructural Analysis Innovative Technologies, RUDN University, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., 117198 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Eugeny Motilev
- A.P. Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology, Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (K.M.); (L.M.); (E.M.)
| | - Igor Buchwalow
- Research and Educational Resource Center for Immunophenotyping, Digital Spatial Profiling and Ultrastructural Analysis Innovative Technologies, RUDN University, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., 117198 Moscow, Russia;
- Institute for Hematopathology, Fangdieckstr. 75a, 22547 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Markus Tiemann
- Institute for Hematopathology, Fangdieckstr. 75a, 22547 Hamburg, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pehrsson M, de Rooij WE, Bay-Jensen AC, Karsdal MA, Mortensen JH, Bredenoord AJ. Extracellular matrix remodeling proteins as biomarkers for clinical assessment and treatment outcomes in eosinophilic esophagitis. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:357. [PMID: 37845632 PMCID: PMC10577915 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02977-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic progressive inflammatory disease of the esophagus, characterized by extracellular matrix remodeling and fibrotic stricture formation. Disease monitoring requires multiple re-endoscopies with esophageal biopsies. Hence non-invasive methods for determining tissue fibrosis and treatment efficacy are warranted. AIMS To investigate the ability of extracellular matrix proteins in serum as potential biomarkers of tissue remodeling and clinical, endoscopic, and histological disease outcomes in adult EoE patients. METHODS Protein-fingerprint assays were used to measure neo-epitope specific fragments of collagen remodeling, human-neutrophil elastase degraded calprotectin, and citrullinated or non-citrullinated vimentin in the serum of an adult EoE-cohort. Biomarker analysis, symptoms, endoscopic features and histological disease activity (eosinophils(eos) per high-power-field(hpf)) were evaluated at baseline and after six weeks of dietary intervention. RESULTS Patients with a baseline (Endoscopic Reference score) EREFS fibrosis subscore ≥ 2 presented with increased fibrolysis of cross-linked type III collagen (CTX-III) (p < 0.01), whereas low CTX-III levels were observed in patients achieving histological remission (< 15 eos/hpf) (vs. no histological remission (p < 0.05). Progression of endoscopic fibrosis after intervention was associated with increased levels of type-III (PRO-C3) and -VI collagen (PRO-C6) formation (all; p < 0.05). A baseline EREFS inflammatory subscore ≥ 2 correlated with higher neutrophilic activity (Cpa9-HNE) at week 6 (p < 0.05). Moreover, increased degradation of type-III (C3M) and -IV (C4M/PRO-C4) collagens were associated with remission of food impaction after intervention (all; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Serum extracellular matrix remodeling proteins demonstrated potential as surrogate biomarkers for assessing histological disease remission, endoscopic fibrosis, and remission of symptoms of food impaction after diet intervention in adult EoE patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Pehrsson
- Biomarkers and Research, Nordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Willemijn E de Rooij
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | - Albert Jan Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Henriksen SD, Hansen SK, Heinesen M, Terkelsen JH, Hollænder M, Bredal K, Melgaard D, Krarup AL. The phenotype of adults with complicated eosinophilic esophagitis is dominated by a 5-year longer diagnostic delay: A population-based study of the DanEoE cohort. JGH Open 2023; 7:553-558. [PMID: 37649863 PMCID: PMC10463020 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Background and Aim The DanEoE is a previously described population- and register-based cohort of 236 adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in a well-defined Danish region with a population of 580 000 and free medical treatment. The aim of the study was to compare the phenotype and treatment response between EoE patients with complications to patients without complications at diagnosis. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study of the DanEoE cohort's 236 adult EoE patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2017 in the North Denmark Region. Patients were divided into a group who had had complications (dilated or food bolus obstruction [FBO]) before or at the diagnosis, and a group without. Results At the diagnostic endoscopy, 61% had never had a complication, and 39% had either had FBO (n = 77) or been dilated (n = 15). The complicated group had the same mean age at symptom debut (37 [SD = 16] vs 37 [SD = 17] years, P = 1.0), but were diagnosed significantly later with a resulting longer diagnostic delay (13 [SD = 13] vs 7.9 [SD = 11] years, P = 0.01). Almost half of all patients were never treated to symptomatic remission (uncomplicated 40%, complicated 49%). The histological remission was not secured in the majority (uncomplicated 68%, complicated 70%). Despite this, <15% of patients with previous FBO experienced this after the diagnosis. Conclusion In the population-based DanEoE cohort, results indicated that the complicated EoE phenotype was a patient with a 5-year longer diagnostic delay. In the current study, the complication status did not predict the treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine D Henriksen
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
- Clinical Cancer Research CenterAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
| | - Stine K Hansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
| | - Mia Heinesen
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma CenterAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
| | - Jacob H Terkelsen
- Department of Clinical MedicineAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma CenterAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
| | - Martin Hollænder
- Department of Clinical MedicineAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma CenterAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
| | - Kasper Bredal
- Department of Clinical MedicineAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma CenterAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
| | - Dorte Melgaard
- Department of Clinical MedicineAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
- North Denmark Regional HospitalHjørringDenmark
- Mech‐Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
| | - Anne L Krarup
- Department of Clinical MedicineAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma CenterAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Murray FR, Kreienbühl A, Straumann A, Biedermann L, Schreiner P. Natural History of Patients Lost to Follow-up After Esophageal Food Impaction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:2413-2414. [PMID: 35868442 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fritz Ruprecht Murray
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Stadtspital Triemli Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Kreienbühl
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alex Straumann
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Luc Biedermann
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Schreiner
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
S2k-Leitlinie Gastroösophageale Refluxkrankheit und eosinophile Ösophagitis der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) – März 2023 – AWMF-Registernummer: 021–013. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:862-933. [PMID: 37494073 DOI: 10.1055/a-2060-1069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
|
13
|
Chang JW, Kliewer K, Haller E, Lynett A, Doerfler B, Katzka DA, Peterson KA, Dellon ES, Gonsalves N. Development of a Practical Guide to Implement and Monitor Diet Therapy for Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:1690-1698. [PMID: 36933603 PMCID: PMC10293042 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/20/2023]
Abstract
Dietary therapy for short- and long-term management of eosinophilic esophagitis is an effective yet poorly understood and underutilized treatment strategy. Despite several prospective trials demonstrating the efficacy of dietary therapies, successful clinical implementation is hampered by the need for a multidisciplinary approach including dietitian support and provider expertise. The availability of these resources is not readily available to most gastroenterologists. Without standardized guidance on starting or completing the diet for gastrointestinal providers and/or consulting dietitians, provider attitudes toward dietary therapy vary greatly depending on familiarity and knowledge gaps in using diet therapy. This review aims to summarize evidence in support of dietary therapy in eosinophilic esophagitis while providing guidance on initiation and implementation of dietary therapy for providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy W Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Kara Kliewer
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Emily Haller
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Amanda Lynett
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Bethany Doerfler
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - David A Katzka
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Kathryn A Peterson
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Evan S Dellon
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Nirmala Gonsalves
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mechanisms and clinical management of eosinophilic oesophagitis: an overview. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 20:101-119. [PMID: 36253463 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-022-00691-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Since the first description of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) less than three decades ago, we have observed a striking increase in the number of patients diagnosed with EoE and the understanding of its clinical and immunopathogenic background. Nonetheless, a plethora of open questions await elucidation. In this Review, we discuss the current state of knowledge regarding the underlying mechanisms, particularly environmental factors and their interaction with genetic susceptibility. Subsequently, we discuss how to translate these factors into the diagnostic and therapeutic management of this chronic, immune-mediated disorder. Finally, we dissect the still long list of unmet needs, such as reasons for and handling refractory EoE and atypical clinical presentations. These open questions can guide us through future research steps and potentially foster reconsideration of the diagnostic guidelines of EoE.
Collapse
|
15
|
Schreiner P, Safroneeva E, Schoepfer A, Greuter T, Biedermann L, Schlag C, Labenz J, Auth MKH, Bredenoord AJ, Chang JW, Bonis PA, Rothenberg ME, Collins MH, Hirano I, Gupta SK, Katzka DA, Dellon ES, Straumann A, Furuta GT, Gonsalves N. Management of eosinophilic esophagitis associated food impaction in Europe and the United States. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6516224. [PMID: 35088073 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is the most common cause of esophageal food impaction (EFI). Approaches to management of EFI due to EoE have not been well characterized. We conducted a web-based survey to understand approaches to management of EFI due to EoE among endoscopists. Questions focused on management of patients from presentation to post-endoscopy follow-up. The survey was administered to a list of eligible candidates provided by societies of gastroenterology. A total of 308 endoscopists completed the questionnaire. The majority (83%) practiced in Europe and treated adults (78%). Most agreed patients should be advised to seek emergency care (66%) within 1 to 2 hours (41% agreement). There was agreement that medications to induce vomiting should be avoided (84%) and that blood tests or imaging studies were usually not required before endoscopy. By contrast, there was more variability in the type of sedation recommended and the need for endotracheal intubation, especially when comparing more experienced with less experienced EoE-endoscopists. Overall, fewer than half (43%) respondents recommended obtaining esophageal biopsies during the initial endoscopy. However, there were significant differences in the proportion who recommended biopsies based on level of EoE-experience (25, 52, 77%, P < 0.001; less vs. moderate vs. very experienced) and comparing pediatric and adult endoscopists (32, vs. 79%, P < 0.001; adult vs. pediatric). There exists heterogeneity among endoscopists in recommendations to manage EFI in patients with EoE. These findings support development of clinical guidelines and new studies to clarify the rationale for best practices. Key summary: Established knowledge-The optimal management of patients with esophageal food impaction due to eosinophilic esophagitis from presentation at the emergency department to postendoscopy care is unclear. New findings-Considerable recommendation variation exists in the management of EFI in patients with EoE. Our findings provide a rationale for the creation of consensus practice guidelines and further study into best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Schreiner
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ekaterina Safroneeva
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alain Schoepfer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Greuter
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Luc Biedermann
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Schlag
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joachim Labenz
- Department of Medicine, Diakonie Hospital Jung- Stilling, Siegen, Germany
| | - Marcus K H Auth
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust and University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Albert J Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joy W Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Peter A Bonis
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marc E Rothenberg
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Margaret H Collins
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ikuo Hirano
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sandeep K Gupta
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University/Community Health Network, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - David A Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Evan S Dellon
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Alex Straumann
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Glenn T Furuta
- Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado and Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Diseases Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Nirmala Gonsalves
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chang NC, Ketchem CJ, Eluri S, Tappata M, Thakkar K, Corder SR, Sninsky JA, Reed CC, Dellon ES. Loss to Follow-Up and Health Care Utilization After Initial Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:3576-3583. [PMID: 34585285 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07259-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disease, but the extent of patient loss to follow-up (LTFU) and health care utilization has not been fully investigated. AIM To determine frequency and predictors of LTFU and health care utilization in EoE patients. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we extracted data from patients with a new diagnosis of EoE. Follow-up time for each patient was calculated as the time from the first diagnostic endoscopy to the last GI-related contact date in the medical record. Patients with and without LTFU were compared, and the volume of EoE-related health care interactions was recorded. RESULTS Of 944 EoE cases, 249 (26%) met the definition for LTFU. Major reasons for LTFU were never being scheduled (45%) and inability to contact patients (40%). Factors independently associated with regular follow-up were having insurance (aOR 2.89; 95% CI 1.85-4.50), white race (aOR 2.16; 95% CI 1.37-3.41), and longer symptom length (aOR 1.04 per year; 95% CI 1.01-1.08). At the time of last contact, patients with follow-up had better symptom response (55% vs. 12%; p < 0.001), improved esophageal caliber (14.3 vs. 12.4 mm; p = 0.005), and more histologic response (45% vs. 4% at 15 eos/hpf; p < 0.001). Health care utilization was high, with an average of 4.6 endoscopies and 4.0 clinic visits over the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS LTFU of newly diagnosed EoE cases was common and associated with lack of insurance, non-white race, and shorter symptom duration. Those who followed up had high health care utilization but improved response rates. Strategies are needed to help decrease LTFU in EoE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole C Chang
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB#7080, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA
| | - Corey J Ketchem
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB#7080, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA
| | - Swathi Eluri
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB#7080, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA
| | - Manaswita Tappata
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB#7080, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA
| | - Kisan Thakkar
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB#7080, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA
| | - S Ryanne Corder
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB#7080, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA
| | - Jared A Sninsky
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB#7080, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA
| | - Craig C Reed
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB#7080, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA
| | - Evan S Dellon
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB#7080, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA. .,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB#7080, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dhar A, Haboubi HN, Attwood SE, Auth MKH, Dunn JM, Sweis R, Morris D, Epstein J, Novelli MR, Hunter H, Cordell A, Hall S, Hayat JO, Kapur K, Moore AR, Read C, Sami SS, Turner PJ, Trudgill NJ. British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN) joint consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults. Gut 2022; 71:1459-1487. [PMID: 35606089 PMCID: PMC9279848 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly common cause of dysphagia in both children and adults, as well as one of the most prevalent oesophageal diseases with a significant impact on physical health and quality of life. We have provided a single comprehensive guideline for both paediatric and adult gastroenterologists on current best practice for the evaluation and management of EoE. METHODS The Oesophageal Section of the British Society of Gastroenterology was commissioned by the Clinical Standards Service Committee to develop these guidelines. The Guideline Development Group included adult and paediatric gastroenterologists, surgeons, dietitians, allergists, pathologists and patient representatives. The Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcomes process was used to generate questions for a systematic review of the evidence. Published evidence was reviewed and updated to June 2021. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the evidence and make recommendations. Two rounds of voting were held to assess the level of agreement and the strength of recommendations, with 80% consensus required for acceptance. RESULTS Fifty-seven statements on EoE presentation, diagnosis, investigation, management and complications were produced with further statements created on areas for future research. CONCLUSIONS These comprehensive adult and paediatric guidelines of the British Society of Gastroenterology and British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition are based on evidence and expert consensus from a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals, including patient advocates and patient support groups, to help clinicians with the management patients with EoE and its complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjan Dhar
- Gastroenterology, Darlington Memorial Hospital, Darlington, UK .,Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Hasan N Haboubi
- Cancer Biomarker Group, Swansea University, Swansea, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Llandough, Llandough, UK
| | | | - Marcus K H Auth
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK,University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jason M Dunn
- Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK,Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rami Sweis
- Research Department of Tissue and Energy, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Danielle Morris
- Department of Gastroenterology, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Stevenage, UK
| | - Jenny Epstein
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Hannah Hunter
- Department of Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Amanda Cordell
- Trustee & Chair, EOS Network, Eosinophilic Disease Charity, London, UK
| | - Sharon Hall
- Department of Paediatric Allergy, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jamal O Hayat
- Gastroenterology, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kapil Kapur
- Gastroenterology, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK
| | - Andrew Robert Moore
- Gastroenterology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Carol Read
- Medical advisor/Patient advocate, EOS Network, Eosinophilic Disease Charity, London, UK
| | - Sarmed S Sami
- Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Paul J Turner
- National Heart and Lung Institute Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, London, UK,Paediatric Allergy, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nigel J Trudgill
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell General Hospital, West Bromwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lucendo AJ, Molina-Infante J. Current treatment options and long-term outcomes in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2022; 18:859-872. [PMID: 35770955 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2022.2096591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dietary and pharmacological (proton pump inhibitors, swallowed topical corticosteroids) therapies are effective for induction of clinical and histological remission of eosinophilic esophagitis. However, data evaluating their long-term efficacy and safety is limited. AREAS COVERED Since eosinophilic esophagitis is chronic, clinical, endoscopic, and histological features usually recur when successful treatments are stopped. In untreated patients, persistent esophageal eosinophilic inflammation may progress to fibrostenosis over time, giving place to strictures and narrow-caliber esophagi. This article comprehensively reviews available data on long-term maintenance of eosinophilic esophagitis with pharmacological and dietary treatment. It also discusses limitations re: available literature and outlines data gaps on adherence to therapy and monitoring disease activity in the long-term. EXPERT OPINION Evidence indicates that long-term maintenance therapy may decrease the risk of esophageal stricture, food bolus impaction, and need for dilation in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Further knowledge on eosinophilic esophagitis phenotypes is needed to ascertain who will benefit best from sustained therapy. Unanswered questions include an adequate definition for sustained remission, best strategies for maintenance drugs and diets, enhancement of treatment adherence, and proper monitoring for long-term surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo J Lucendo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Tomelloso, Tomelloso, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Molina-Infante
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Caceres, Caceres, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dellon ES, Khoury P, Muir AB, Liacouras CA, Safroneeva E, Atkins D, Collins MH, Gonsalves N, Falk GW, Spergel JM, Hirano I, Chehade M, Schoepfer AM, Menard-Katcher C, Katzka DA, Bonis PA, Bredenoord AJ, Geng B, Jensen ET, Pesek RD, Feuerstadt P, Gupta SK, Lucendo AJ, Genta RM, Hiremath G, McGowan EC, Moawad FJ, Peterson KA, Rothenberg ME, Straumann A, Furuta GT, Aceves SS. A Clinical Severity Index for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Development, Consensus, and Future Directions. Gastroenterology 2022; 163:59-76. [PMID: 35606197 PMCID: PMC9233087 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Disease activity and severity of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) dictate therapeutic options and management, but the decision-making process for determining severity varies among practitioners. To reduce variability in practice patterns and help clinicians monitor the clinical course of the disease in an office setting, we aimed to create an international consensus severity scoring index for EoE. METHODS A multidisciplinary international group of adult and pediatric EoE researchers and clinicians, as well as non-EoE allergy immunology and gastroenterology experts, formed 3 teams to review the existing literature on histology, endoscopy, and symptoms of EoE in the context of progression and severity. A steering committee convened a 1-day virtual meeting to reach consensus on each team's opinion on salient features of severity across key clinicopathologic domains and distill features that would allow providers to categorize disease severity. RESULTS Symptom features and complications and inflammatory and fibrostenotic features on both endoscopic and histologic examination were collated into a simplified scoring system-the Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE)-that can be completed at routine clinic visits to assess disease severity using a point scale of 0-6 for mild, 7-14 for moderate, and ≥15 for severe EoE. CONCLUSIONS A multidisciplinary team of experts iteratively created a clinically usable EoE severity scoring system denominated "I-SEE" to guide practitioners in EoE management by standardizing disease components reflecting disease severity beyond eosinophil counts. I-SEE should be validated and refined using data from future clinical trials and routine clinical practice to increase its utilization and functionality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan S Dellon
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Paneez Khoury
- Human Eosinophil Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Amanda B Muir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Chris A Liacouras
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Pediatric Eosinophilic Disorders, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ekaterina Safroneeva
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Dan Atkins
- Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Diseases Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado; Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Margaret H Collins
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Nirmala Gonsalves
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Gary W Falk
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jonathan M Spergel
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ikuo Hirano
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mirna Chehade
- Mount Sinai Center for Eosinophilic Disorders, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Alain M Schoepfer
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Calies Menard-Katcher
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado; Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | | | - Albert J Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bob Geng
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California
| | - Elizabeth T Jensen
- Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Robert D Pesek
- Division of Allergy/Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medicine Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas; Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Paul Feuerstadt
- Division of Gastroenterology, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut; Physicians Alliance of Connecticut, Gastroenterology Center, Hamden, Connecticut
| | - Sandeep K Gupta
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology/Hepatology/Nutrition, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Indiana; Community Health Network, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Alfredo J Lucendo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Tomelloso, Ciudad Real, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Girish Hiremath
- Department of Pediatrics, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Emily C McGowan
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Fouad J Moawad
- Division of Gastroenterology, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California
| | - Kathryn A Peterson
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Marc E Rothenberg
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | - Glenn T Furuta
- Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado; Department of Pediatrics, Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Diseases Program and Mucosal Inflammation Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Seema S Aceves
- Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California; Division of Allergy, Immunology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dellon ES, Khoury P, Muir AB, Liacouras CA, Safroneeva E, Atkins D, Collins MH, Gonsalves N, Falk GW, Spergel JM, Hirano I, Chehade M, Schoepfer AM, Menard-Katcher C, Katzka DA, Bonis PA, Bredenoord AJ, Geng B, Jensen ET, Pesek RD, Feuerstadt P, Gupta SK, Lucendo AJ, Genta RM, Hiremath G, McGowan EC, Moawad FJ, Peterson KA, Rothenberg ME, Straumann A, Furuta GT, Aceves SS. A Clinical Severity Index for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Development, Consensus, and Future Directions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 150:33-47. [PMID: 35606166 PMCID: PMC9549868 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Disease activity and severity of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) dictate therapeutic options and management, but the decision-making process for determining severity varies among practitioners. To reduce variability in practice patterns and help clinicians monitor the clinical course of the disease in an office setting, we aimed to create an international consensus severity scoring index for EoE. METHODS A multidisciplinary international group of adult and pediatric EoE researchers and clinicians, as well as non-EoE allergy immunology and gastroenterology experts, formed 3 teams to review the existing literature on histology, endoscopy, and symptoms of EoE in the context of progression and severity. A steering committee convened a 1-day virtual meeting to reach consensus on each team's opinion on salient features of severity across key clinicopathologic domains and distill features that would allow providers to categorize disease severity. RESULTS Symptom features and complications and inflammatory and fibrostenotic features on both endoscopic and histologic examination were collated into a simplified scoring system-the Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE)-that can be completed at routine clinic visits to assess disease severity using a point scale of 0-6 for mild, 7-14 for moderate, and ≥15 for severe EoE. CONCLUSIONS A multidisciplinary team of experts iteratively created a clinically usable EoE severity scoring system denominated "I-SEE" to guide practitioners in EoE management by standardizing disease components reflecting disease severity beyond eosinophil counts. I-SEE should be validated and refined using data from future clinical trials and routine clinical practice to increase its utilization and functionality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan S Dellon
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
| | - Paneez Khoury
- Human Eosinophil Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda
| | - Amanda B Muir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia
| | - Chris A Liacouras
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Center for Pediatric Eosinophilic Disorders, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | | - Dan Atkins
- Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Diseases Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora; Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora
| | - Margaret H Collins
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
| | - Nirmala Gonsalves
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago
| | - Gary W Falk
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Jonathan M Spergel
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Ikuo Hirano
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago
| | - Mirna Chehade
- Mount Sinai Center for Eosinophilic Disorders, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York
| | - Alain M Schoepfer
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne
| | - Calies Menard-Katcher
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora; Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora
| | | | | | - Albert J Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam
| | - Bob Geng
- University of California San Diego, San Diego; Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego
| | - Elizabeth T Jensen
- Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem
| | - Robert D Pesek
- Division of Allergy/Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medicine Sciences, Little Rock; Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock
| | - Paul Feuerstadt
- Division of Gastroenterology, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven; Physicians Alliance of Connecticut, Gastroenterology Center, Hamden
| | - Sandeep K Gupta
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology/Hepatology/Nutrition, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis; Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis; Community Health Network, Indianapolis
| | - Alfredo J Lucendo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Tomelloso, Ciudad Real; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Madrid; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa, Madrid
| | | | - Girish Hiremath
- Department of Pediatrics, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville
| | - Emily C McGowan
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| | | | | | - Marc E Rothenberg
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati
| | | | - Glenn T Furuta
- Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; Department of Pediatrics, Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Diseases Program and Mucosal Inflammation Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | - Seema S Aceves
- Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego; Division of Allergy, Immunology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bon L, Safroneeva E, Bussmann C, Biedermann L, Schreiner P, Vavricka SR, Schoepfer AM, McCright-Gill T, Simon HU, Straumann A, Chehade M, Greuter T. Close follow-up is associated with fewer stricture formation and results in earlier detection of histological relapse in the long-term management of eosinophilic esophagitis. United European Gastroenterol J 2022; 10:308-318. [PMID: 35384368 PMCID: PMC9004232 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS No recommendations exist regarding optimal follow-up schedule in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) under maintenance treatment. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated a long-term surveillance concept at the Swiss EoE clinic, where clinical, endoscopic and histological disease activity is assessed annually regardless of EoE symptoms. Data on 159 adult patients under maintenance steroid treatment with available follow-up were analyzed. Patients were classified as having close (duration between visits <18 months) or non-close follow-up (≥18 months). RESULTS We analyzed a total of 309 follow-up visits of 159 patients (123 males, age at diagnosis 38.9 ± 15.4 years). 157 (51%) visits were within a close follow-up schedule (median duration between visits of 1.0 years (interquartile range (IQR) 0.9-1.2)), while 152 visits (49%) were not (median duration between visits 2.9 years (IQR 2.0-4.1)). There was no difference regarding ongoing clinical, endoscopic, and histological disease activity, and adherence to prescribed steroid treatment between the two groups. However, stricture formation was significantly less frequently observed at visits within a close follow-up schedule (22.9 vs. 33.6%, p = 0.038). Absence of close follow-up was a significant risk factor for stricture development in a multivariate regression model. Patients who achieved histological remission and were followed within a close-follow-up schedule had significantly earlier detection of histological relapse compared to patients not within such close follow-up. CONCLUSION Close follow-up is associated with fewer stricture formation and appears to result in earlier detection of histological relapse in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. We advocate for regular assessment of disease activity (every 12-18 months) in order to detect relapsing disease as early as possible, and therefore potentially minimize the risk for EoE complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenz Bon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ekaterina Safroneeva
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Luc Biedermann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Schreiner
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephan R Vavricka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Center for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alain M Schoepfer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Lausanne - Centre Hopitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Talaya McCright-Gill
- Mount Sinai Center for Eosinophilic Disorders, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hans-Uwe Simon
- Institute of Biochemistry, Medical School Brandenburg, Neuruppin, Germany.,Institute of Pharmacology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alex Straumann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mirna Chehade
- Mount Sinai Center for Eosinophilic Disorders, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Thomas Greuter
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Lausanne - Centre Hopitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Główczewski A, Krogulska A. Formulations of Topical Steroids in Eosinophilic Esophagitis-Current Treatment and Emerging Possibilities. J Clin Med 2022; 11:1454. [PMID: 35268544 PMCID: PMC8910832 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disorder characterised by eosinophilic inflammation and esophageal dysfunction symptoms. The recommended first-line treatment options are proton pump inhibitors and swallowed topical steroids (STS). However, current recommendations regarding STS are based on relatively few studies employing various doses and formulations. Our aim was to review the STS formulations currently used in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis, to demonstrate in a practical way the variety of exiting application methods, and to present emerging options for STS delivery to the esophagus. After the literature review, we established that the three most commonly used STS formulations include mist from an inhaler, viscous suspensions compounded with vehicles for oral use, and a recently introduced proprietary medication in the form of orodispersible tablets. Several drug delivery technologies with potential use in EoE are under investigation. To ensure optimal adherence, the choice of formulation should be based on efficacy, patient preferences and experience of the clinician, as well as current recommendations. Further studies are needed to compare the efficacy and acceptability of existing STS types, and to develop new, well-tolerated and effective drug formulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Główczewski
- Department of Pediatrics, Allergology and Gastroenterology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland;
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Budesonide Oral Suspension Improves Outcomes in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Results from a Phase 3 Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:525-534.e10. [PMID: 33887475 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease for which there is currently no pharmacologic therapy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. METHODS In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, patients 11-55 years of age with EoE and dysphagia were randomized 2:1 to receive budesonide oral suspension (BOS) 2.0 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks at academic or community care practices. Co-primary endpoints were the proportion of stringent histologic responders (≤6 eosinophils/high-power field) or dysphagia symptom responders (≥30% reduction in Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire [DSQ] score) over 12 weeks. Changes in DSQ score (key secondary endpoint) and EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS) (secondary endpoint) from baseline to week 12, and safety parameters were examined. RESULTS Overall, 318 patients (BOS, n = 213; placebo, n = 105) were randomized and received ≥1 dose of study treatment. More BOS-treated than placebo-treated patients achieved a stringent histologic response (53.1% vs 1.0%; Δ52% [95% confidence interval (CI), 43.3%-59.1%]; P < .001) or symptom response (52.6% vs 39.1%; Δ13% [95% CI, 1.6%-24.3%]; P = .024) over 12 weeks. BOS-treated patients also had greater improvements in least-squares mean DSQ scores and EREFS over 12 weeks than placebo-treated patients: DSQ, -13.0 (SEM 1.2) vs -9.1 (SEM 1.5) (Δ-3.9 [95% CI, -7.1 to -0.8]; P = .015); EREFS, -4.0 (SEM 0.3) vs -2.2 (SEM 0.4) (Δ-1.8 [95% CI, -2.6 to -1.1]; P < .001). BOS was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS In patients with EoE, BOS 2.0 mg twice daily was superior to placebo in improving histologic, symptomatic, and endoscopic outcomes over 12 weeks. BOS 2.0 mg twice daily was well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02605837.
Collapse
|
24
|
Greuter T, Godat A, Ringel A, Almonte HS, Schupack D, Mendoza G, McCright-Gill T, Dellon ES, Hirano I, Alexander J, Chehade M, Safroneeva E, Bussmann C, Biedermann L, Schreiner P, Schoepfer AM, Straumann A, Katzka DA. Effectiveness and Safety of High- vs Low-Dose Swallowed Topical Steroids for Maintenance Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Multicenter Observational Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:2514-2523.e2. [PMID: 32798703 PMCID: PMC8108396 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Data evaluating efficacy of different doses of swallowed topical corticosteroids (STC) in the long-term management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are lacking. We assessed long-term effectiveness and safety of different STC doses for adults with EoE after achievement of histological remission. METHODS We performed a retrospective multicenter study at five EoE referral centers (US and Switzerland). We analyzed data on 82 patients with EoE in histological remission and ongoing STC treatment with therapeutic adherence of ≥75% (58 males; mean age at diagnosis, 37.2±14.4 years). Patients were followed for a median of 2.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.0-3.8 years). We collected data from 217 follow-up endoscopy visits. The primary endpoint was time to histological relapse. RESULTS Histological relapse occurred in 67% of patients. Relapse rates were comparable in patients taking low dose (≤0.5 mg per day, n = 58) and high dose STC (>0.5 mg per day, n = 24) with 72 vs 54% (ns). However, histological relapse occurred significantly earlier with low dose STC (1.0 vs 1.8 years, P = .030). There was no difference regarding rates of and time to stricture formation for low vs high dose STC. Esophageal candidiasis was observed in 6% of patients (5% for low dose, 8% for high dose, ns). No dysplasia or mucosal atrophy was detected. CONCLUSION Histological relapse frequently occurs in EoE despite ongoing STC treatment regardless of STC doses. However, relapse develops later in patients on high dose STC without an increase in side-effects. Doses higher than 0.5 mg/day may be considered for EoE maintenance treatment, but advantage over lower doses appears to be small.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Greuter
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Internal Medicine, GZO - Zurich Regional Health Center, Wetzikon, Switzerland; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Anne Godat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Department of Internal Medicine, GZO – Zurich Regional Health Center, Wetzikon, Switzerland
| | - Amit Ringel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Hector Samuel Almonte
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Daniel Schupack
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Gabriela Mendoza
- Mount Sinai Center for Eosinophilic Disorders, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Talaya McCright-Gill
- Mount Sinai Center for Eosinophilic Disorders, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Evan S. Dellon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ikuo Hirano
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jeffrey Alexander
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mirna Chehade
- Mount Sinai Center for Eosinophilic Disorders, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Ekaterina Safroneeva
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Luc Biedermann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Schreiner
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alain M. Schoepfer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Lausanne – Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alex Straumann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David A. Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rosenwald K, Pan Z, Andrews R, Menard-Katcher C. Follow-up and symptom persistence after esophageal food impaction. Dis Esophagus 2021; 34:6276257. [PMID: 33993222 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal food impactions (EFI) are associated with esophageal pathology, most commonly eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Obtaining biopsies provides opportunity for diagnosis, which is important since treatment of EoE decreases the risk for future EFI. Outpatient follow-up rates remain suboptimal and outcomes of patients without timely follow-up are unknown. We aimed to identify the factors associated with pediatric subspecialty follow-up post-EFI and to determine the symptom burden in patients without follow-up. We performed a retrospective review of patients presenting with EFI at a tertiary children's hospital between 2010 and 2018. Patients without subspecialty follow-up within 1 year of EFI were included in a prospective telephone survey investigating the barriers to care, outcomes, and symptoms. Clinical characteristics were compared between groups. Multivariate analysis was used to control for multiple variables. There were 127 EFI identified in 123 individuals (73% male, mean age: 12.2 years). Esophageal biopsies were collected in 76% of cases, and 49% of patients had follow-up. Individuals with follow-up were more likely (P ≤ 0.05) to have had biopsies. In a multivariate analysis, written recommendation for follow-up (Odds Ratio: 6.9 [2.4-19.5], P = 0.001) as well as atopic history and identified stricture were associated with a higher likelihood of follow-up. Those without follow-up had subsequent stricture (35%), dilation (44%), or EFI (39%), and 55% (12/22) described ongoing esophageal symptoms. Identification of treatable findings at time of EFI and ongoing symptom burden after EFI support an imperative for follow-up after EFI. Clear recommendations are a modifiable factor that may improve follow-up in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kent Rosenwald
- Randall Children's Hospital at Legacy Emanuel Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Zhaoxing Pan
- Biostatistics Core of Children's Hospital Colorado Research Institute, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rachel Andrews
- Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado,, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Calies Menard-Katcher
- Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado and Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Alexander R, Alexander JA, Akambase J, Harmsen WS, Geno D, Tholen C, Katzka DA, Ravi K. Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Predictors of Nonresponse. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:3096-3104. [PMID: 32995996 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06633-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identification of clinical predictors of response to first-line therapies for EoE is needed to guide initial medical management. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with EoE from 2011 to 2018 was conducted. Clinical and diagnostic variables including demographics, endoscopic, and esophagram findings were compared between PPI responders and PPI nonresponders. All patients underwent a standard 8-week twice-daily PPI trial, with PPI responsiveness defined as < 15 eos/hpf on repeat EGD. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for nonresponse, and ROC curves were created to identify cutoff values. RESULTS A total of 223 EoE patients (135 male, median age 39 (29-51)) were identified, with PPI nonresponse (PPI-NR) in 71% of patients. PPI-NR was seen in all 10 patients with failure of scope passage, with an OR of 9.06 by univariate analysis (P = 0.1485). In a multivariable model, age per 10 years (OR 0.71; P = 0.007), BMI per 1 kg/m2 (OR 0.94; P = 0.03), and peripheral eosinophil count per 100 per mm3 (OR 1.37; P = 0.003) were independent risk factors. Dichotomization to maximize sensitivity and specificity identified age ≤ 36 years old, BMI ≤ 25.2 kg/m2, and peripheral eos > 460 per mm3 as predictive thresholds for PPI-NR. The probability of PPI-NR was 72.4-84.5% with 1 risk factor, 87.9-93.8% with 2 risk factors, and 97.2% with all 3 risk factors. CONCLUSIONS Young age, reduced BMI, elevated peripheral eosinophil count, and likely inability to pass an endoscope predict lack of response to PPIs in patients with EoE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Alexander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Alexander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Joseph Akambase
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - William Scott Harmsen
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Debra Geno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Crystal Tholen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - David A Katzka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Karthik Ravi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Diet or Medication? THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:3249-3256. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.07.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
28
|
Mehta P, Pan Z, Skirka S, Kwan BM, Menard-Katcher C. Medication Adherence Aligns with Age and a Behavioral Checklist but Not Symptoms or Quality of Life for Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis. J Pediatr 2021; 235:246-252.e1. [PMID: 33811869 PMCID: PMC8316273 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.03.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To measure adherence rates to swallowed topical steroids in children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), describe factors related to adherence, and determine the association between adherence, symptoms, perceived disease severity, and quality of life in children with EoE. STUDY DESIGN Subjects in this cross-sectional study of 117 children between 5 and 18 years old with EoE completed the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptoms Score V2.0 (PEESS), Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Eosinophilic Esophagitis Module (PedsQL EoE), a Medication-Taking Checklist (MTC), and a demographics questionnaire. Adherence rate was calculated based on reported number of missed doses/prescribed doses in the last week. Parent-reported measures were used for children aged 5-12 years and self-report was used for children aged 13-18 years. RESULTS Adolescents had lower adherence rates than younger children (76.2 ± 24.5% vs 88.6 ± 16.7%, P = .002). Adherence rates were not associated with disease history, PEESS, or PedsQL EoE scores but instead correlated with MTC scores (Pearson r of 0.65, P < .001 for child-report and Pearson r of 0.74, P < .001 for parent-report). Symptomatology was associated with worse quality of life (PEESS Frequency: r = -0.7, P < .001; PEESS Severity: r = -0.71, P < .001 for children 5-12 years old; PEESS Frequency: r = -0.61, P < .001; PEESS Severity: r = -.5, P < .001 for adolescents). CONCLUSIONS Unrelated to their clinical history, demographic factors, symptoms, and quality of life, adolescents with EoE have lower medication adherence rates. The MTC may serve as a clinical tool to discuss adherence and provide targeted educational counseling regarding adherence interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooja Mehta
- Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
| | - Zhaoxing Pan
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Colorado School of Medicine
| | | | - Bethany M. Kwan
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine
| | - Calies Menard-Katcher
- Children’s Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chang JW, Rubenstein JH, Mellinger JL, Kodroff E, Strobel MJ, Scott M, Mack D, Book W, Sable K, Kyle S, Paliana A, Dellon ES. Motivations, Barriers, and Outcomes of Patient-Reported Shared Decision Making in Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:1808-1817. [PMID: 32621259 PMCID: PMC9110111 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06438-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about patient choice in treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). AIM Determine motivators and barriers to using common EoE therapies and describe patient-reported shared decision making (SDM) and satisfaction with treatment. METHODS We developed and administered a Web-based survey on factors influencing EoE treatment choice, SDM, and satisfaction. Adults with EoE and adult caregivers of pediatric EoE patients were recruited via patient advocacy groups and at two centers. Descriptive statistics of multiple response questions and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify predictors of SDM and satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS A total of 243 adults (mean age 38.7 years) and 270 adult caregivers of children (mean age 9.5 years) completed the survey. Preventing worsening disease was the most common motivator to treat EoE. Barriers to topical steroids were potential side effects, cost, and preferring a medication-free approach. Inconvenience and quality of life were barriers to diet. Potential adverse events, discomfort, and cost were barriers to dilation. Nearly half (42%) of patients experienced low SDM, but those followed by gastroenterologists were more likely to experience greater SDM compared to non-specialists (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.03-3.15). Patients receiving more SDM were more satisfied with treatment, regardless of provider or treatment type (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.76-3.92). CONCLUSIONS Patients with EoE pursue treatment mostly to prevent worsening disease. Common barriers to treatment are inconvenience and financial costs. SDM is practiced most by gastroenterologists, but nearly half of patients do not experience SDM, indicating a substantial area of need in EoE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy W. Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 3912 Taubman Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, SPC 5362, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Joel H. Rubenstein
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 3912 Taubman Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, SPC 5362, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA,Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jessica L. Mellinger
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 3912 Taubman Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, SPC 5362, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Ellyn Kodroff
- Campaign Urging Research for Eosinophilic Diseases, Lincolnshire, IL, USA
| | - Mary J. Strobel
- American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Denise Mack
- American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Wendy Book
- American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kathleen Sable
- American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Scholeigh Kyle
- Campaign Urging Research for Eosinophilic Diseases, Lincolnshire, IL, USA
| | - Allisa Paliana
- Campaign Urging Research for Eosinophilic Diseases, Lincolnshire, IL, USA
| | - Evan S. Dellon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Center for Esophageal and Swallowing Disorders, University of North Carolina, Chapel‑Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Schupack DA, Ravi K, Geno DM, Pierce K, Mara K, Katzka DA, Alexander JA. Effect of Maintenance Therapy for Eosinophilic Esophagitis on Need for Recurrent Dilation. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:503-510. [PMID: 32166623 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06192-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eosinophilic esophagitis is an inflammatory condition in which eosinophil infiltration leads to esophageal remodeling and stricturing, with dilation therapy often needed. Achieving histologic remission reduces the need for repeat dilation, although little is known about the effects of long-term maintenance therapy. AIMS To further assess the relationship between short-term histologic remission and maintenance therapy on need for repeat dilation in eosinophilic esophagitis. METHODS A total of 77 patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (59.7% male; mean age 41.6 years) seen at a single medical center from June 2000 to August 2017 were included. Information on history of dilation and therapy [proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), steroids, elimination diet] was collected. Mean follow-up was 164 weeks. Fifty-one patients achieved histologic remission and 42 of these remained on maintenance therapy (23 PPIs, 14 topical steroids, and 5 dietary therapy). Standard phone interview was completed in cases with lack of follow-up. Only patients who underwent esophageal dilation to ≥ 17 mm were included. RESULTS A significantly lower proportion of patients on maintenance therapy required repeat dilation (12/42) compared with patients not on maintenance therapy (8/9) (hazard ratio 0.12; p < 0.001). Of patients who received maintenance therapy, 9.1% required re-dilation. The difference in need for repeat dilation in patients who achieved histologic remission on therapy (14/26) versus those who did not (20/51) was not significant (hazard ratio 1.34; p = 0.45). CONCLUSION In a retrospective analysis of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, we found that a significantly lower proportion who received maintenance therapy (PPIs, steroids, or dietary exclusions) required repeat dilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Schupack
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Karthik Ravi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Debra M Geno
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Katrina Pierce
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Kristin Mara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - David A Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Alexander
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Nguyen N, Kramer RE, Menard-Katcher C. Endoscopy in Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Front Pediatr 2021; 9:713027. [PMID: 34504816 PMCID: PMC8421673 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.713027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopy and mucosal biopsies are essential to the diagnosis of EoE. Together they either confirm or exclude mucosal eosinophilia and provide a visual inspection of the esophagus that may be consistent with EoE or suggest other underlying etiologies. Endoscopy also plays an important therapeutic role in the management of EoE including the assessment of treatment response and treatment of associated complications including esophageal stricture and food impaction. Assessment of treatment response largely depends on endoscopy and mucosal biopsies although less invasive strategies may eventually provide alternative means to assess mucosal inflammation. Herein we will review current use of endoscopy in EoE, including recently developed technologies and their role in the management of EoE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Nguyen
- Department of Pediatrics, Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Robert E Kramer
- Department of Pediatrics, Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Calies Menard-Katcher
- Department of Pediatrics, Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Reddy A, Ashat D, Murali AR. Recent insights on the use of topical steroids in eosinophilic esophagitis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 14:953-963. [PMID: 32567417 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2020.1785869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated, chronic inflammatory disorder of the esophagus. Topical steroids have been used in the management of EoE for over 15 years. However, there are no Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug therapies for EoE. AREAS COVERED This review discusses the current understanding of EoE and the role of topical steroids in the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with EoE. We performed a comprehensive review of the literature, summarized randomized control trials from 2006 to 2020, and provided a simplified management algorithm for EoE. EXPERT OPINION In patients with EoE, topical steroids are effective in inducing clinical and histologic remission. Formulations of topical steroids that maximize the exposure to esophageal mucosa have the highest efficacy. A majority of patients who achieve remission with topical steroids develop clinical and histologic relapse off therapy within a year. Current evidence suggests that maintenance therapy with long-term topical steroids decreases the risk of relapse and progression to fibrostenotic disease. While uncertainty over the dose and duration of maintenance topical steroids and their potential side effects exists, long-term maintenance therapy with topical steroids appears to be the way forward to improve long-term outcomes in patients with EoE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Reddy
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Divya Ashat
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, IA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Arvind R Murali
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, IA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Case Series: Role of Pill Esophagram to Identify Pediatric Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis Amenable to Therapeutic Dilation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2020; 71:530-532. [PMID: 32960542 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disease of the esophagus that leads to esophageal remodeling. Dysphagia is a common symptom that likely results from the inflammatory process or remodeling. Identifying patients that may benefit from dilation can be challenging because of difficulties in detecting subtle narrowing in patients with EoE. Here we report the benefits of a pill esophagram in the detection of esophageal narrowing in EoE. We identified a series of children with EoE and symptoms of dysphagia who underwent barium esophagram with a barium-coated pill to assess symptoms. Three subjects had a normal fluoroscopic esophagram but had pill retention for greater than 5 minutes. Subsequent esophagoscopy and esophageal dilation revealed mucosal rent after dilation. Subtle esophageal narrowing may not be captured with barium esophagram alone in children with EoE and dysphagia. Use of the barium pill in symptomatic patients can assist in identifying patients who may benefit from esophageal dilation.
Collapse
|
34
|
Nennstiel S, Schlag C. Treatment of eosinophlic esophagitis with swallowed topical corticosteroids. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:5395-5407. [PMID: 33024392 PMCID: PMC7520613 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i36.5395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an emerging chronic local immune-mediated disease of the esophagus. Beside proton pump inhibitors and food-restriction-diets swallowed topical corticosteroids (STC) can be offered as a first line therapy according to current guidelines. This review describes the background and practical management of STCs in EoE. So far, mainly asthma inhalers containing either budesonide or fluticasone have been administered to the esophagus by swallowing these medications “off label”. Recently esophagus-targeted formulations of topical steroids have been developed showing clinicopathological response rates up to 85% - an orodispersible tablet of budesonide has been approved as the first “in label” medication for EoE in Europe in June 2018. Whereas it was shown that disease remission induction of EoE by STCs is highly effective, there is still a lack of data regarding long-term and maintenance therapy. However, current studies on STC maintenance therapy add some movement into the game.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Nennstiel
- Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Christoph Schlag
- Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Munich 81675, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lynch KL, Falk GW. Good news for the treatment of narrow-caliber esophagus in eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:54-55. [PMID: 32586566 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kristle L Lynch
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gary W Falk
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Whelan KA, Godwin BC, Wilkins B, Elci OU, Benitez A, DeMarshall M, Sharma M, Gross J, Klein-Szanto AJ, Liacouras CA, Dellon ES, Spergel JM, Falk GW, Muir AB, Nakagawa H. Persistent Basal Cell Hyperplasia Is Associated With Clinical and Endoscopic Findings in Patients With Histologically Inactive Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:1475-1482.e1. [PMID: 31499251 PMCID: PMC7058491 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Revised: 08/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Although eosinophil count is the standard used to monitor disease activity in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), there are often disparities between patient-reported symptoms and eosinophil counts. We examined the prevalence of epithelial alterations, namely basal cell hyperplasia (BCH) and spongiosis, among patients with inactive EoE (eosinophil counts below 15 following therapy) and aimed to determine whether maintenance of these changes in epithelial morphology are associated with persistent clinical findings. METHODS Esophageal biopsies of 243 patients (mean age, 16.9 years) undergoing routine endoscopy at the University of Pennsylvania were evaluated for epithelial BCH and spongiosis. Univariable analysis was used to calculate the association between epithelial changes and symptoms as well as endoscopic findings and peak eosinophil count. We validated our findings using data from a cohort of patients at the University of North Carolina. RESULTS The discovery and validation cohorts each included patients with inactive EoE, based on histologic factors, but ongoing BCH and spongiosis. Ongoing BCH, but not spongiosis, in patients with inactive EoE was associated with symptoms (odds ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.03-4.42; P = .041) and endoscopic findings (odds ratio, 7.10; 95% CI, 3.12-16.18; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS In patients with EoE, the presence of BCH might indicate ongoing disease activity, independent of eosinophil count. This might account for the persistent symptoms in patients who are considered to be in remission based on histologic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly A. Whelan
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140,Fels Institute for Cancer Research & Molecular Biology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140
| | - Bridget C. Godwin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Benjamin Wilkins
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Okan U. Elci
- Westat-Biostatistics and Data Management Core, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Alain Benitez
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Maureen DeMarshall
- Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Medha Sharma
- Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jonathan Gross
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Andres J. Klein-Szanto
- Histopathology Facility and Cancer Biology Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | - Chris A. Liacouras
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Evan S. Dellon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
| | - Jonathan M. Spergel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Division of Allergy and Immunology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Gary W. Falk
- Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Amanda B. Muir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Hiroshi Nakagawa
- Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Dellon ES, Woosley JT, Arrington A, McGee SJ, Covington J, Moist SE, Gebhart JH, Galanko JA, Baron JA, Shaheen NJ. Rapid Recurrence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity After Successful Treatment in the Observation Phase of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:1483-1492.e2. [PMID: 31499249 PMCID: PMC7058486 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is chronic and recurs if treatment is discontinued. We aimed to determine rates of recurrence, and whether initial treatment with oral viscous budesonide (OVB) resulted in less recurrence than fluticasone from a multidose inhaler (MDI). METHODS This was the observation phase of a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial comparing OVB with MDI for initial EoE treatment. Subjects with a histologic response (<15 eosinophils/high-power field) in the trial entered an observation phase in which treatment was discontinued and symptoms were monitored. Patients underwent an endoscopy or a biopsy when symptoms recurred or at 1 year. We analyzed time to symptom recurrence and assessed endoscopic severity and histologic relapse (≥15 eosinophils/high-power field) at follow-up endoscopy. RESULTS Thirty-three of the 58 subjects (57%) had symptom recurrence before 1 year. The overall median time to symptom recurrence was 244 days. There was no difference in the rate of symptom recurrence for subjects treated with OVB vs MDI (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.52-2.08). At symptom recurrence, 78% of patients had histologic relapse. The patients had significant increases in mean Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire score (3.8 vs 8.7; P < .001), and the EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (1.3 vs 4.6; P < .001) compared with end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS EoE disease activity recurred rapidly after initial histologic response to topical steroids (either OVB or MDI). Because most subjects had recurrent endoscopic and histologic signs not reliably detected by symptoms, maintenance therapy should be recommended in EoE patients achieving histologic response to topical steroids. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT02019758.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan S. Dellon
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, and Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - John T. Woosley
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ashley Arrington
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, and Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Sarah J. McGee
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, and Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jacquelyn Covington
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, and Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Susan E. Moist
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, and Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jessica H. Gebhart
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, and Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Joseph A. Galanko
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, and Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - John A. Baron
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, and Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Nicholas J. Shaheen
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, and Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Challenges with the technical review of eosinophilic esophagitis: discussion points for the practicing allergist. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2020; 124:411-413. [PMID: 32336460 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
39
|
Challenges and updates in the management of eosinophilic esophagitis. GASTROENTEROLOGY REVIEW 2020; 15:27-33. [PMID: 32215124 PMCID: PMC7089863 DOI: 10.5114/pg.2019.84476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is a chronic T helper cell-2 mediated inflammatory condition and is considered as a primary cause of dysphagia and foregut symptoms. There are many challenges regarding the treatment options of EE. Different therapeutic approaches are best at meeting different endpoints. There are unresolved questions such as whether the goal for treatment should be to control esophageal eosinophilia and inflammation or to achieve symptomatic improvement. Still, proton pump inhibitors are used in differential diagnosis, along with their anti-inflammatory and anti-acid properties. Conducted trials continue to recommend the use of topical corticosteroids and empiric food elimination diets as first-line therapeutic modalities. The growing knowledge on the pathogenesis of EE has allowed further progression of encouraging targeted biologic therapies. However, the guidelines for EE management should be updated accordingly in the coming years, including fast evolving data on non-invasive diagnostic strategies, new treatment modalities, and the long-term prognosis of the disease.
Collapse
|
40
|
Gonsalves NP, Aceves SS. Diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020; 145:1-7. [PMID: 31910983 PMCID: PMC6986782 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Revised: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an eosinophil-rich, TH2 antigen-mediated disease of increasing pediatric and adult worldwide prevalence. Diagnosis requires greater than or equal to 15 eosinophils per high-power field on light microscopy. Symptoms reflect esophageal dysfunction, and typical endoscopic features include linear furrows, white plaques, and concentric rings. Progressive disease leads to pathologic tissue remodeling, with ensuing esophageal rigidity and loss of luminal diameter caused by strictures. Therapies include proton pump inhibitors, elimination diets, and topical corticosteroids. Effective treatment can reverse tissue fibrosis in some patients, as well as decrease the rate of food impactions. Esophageal dilation might be required to increase luminal patency. The chronic nature of EoE necessitates long-term therapy to avoid disease recurrence and complications. This review serves the function of providing the current state-of-the-art diagnostic criteria and disease management for adult and pediatric EoE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirmala P Gonsalves
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
| | - Seema S Aceves
- Division of Allergy Immunology, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, University of California, San Diego, and Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, Calif.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Safroneeva E, Hafner D, Kuehni C, Zwahlen M, Trelle S, Biedermann L, Greuter T, Vavricka S, Straumann A, Schoepfer A. Systematic Assessment of Adult Patients’ Satisfaction with Various Eosinophilic Esophagitis Therapies. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2019; 181:211-220. [DOI: 10.1159/000504846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
42
|
Limketkai BN, Shah SC, Hirano I, Bellaguarda E, Colombel JF. Epidemiology and implications of concurrent diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis and IBD based on a prospective population-based analysis. Gut 2019; 68:2152-2160. [PMID: 30923072 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2018] [Revised: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoO) and IBD are immune-mediated diseases of the gastrointestinal tract with possible overlapping pathogenic mechanisms. Our aim was to define the epidemiology and clinical implications of concurrent EoO and IBD diagnoses. DESIGN We conducted a prospective cohort analysis using the Truven MarketScan database (2009-2016) to estimate the incidence and prevalence of EoO in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or UC and vice versa. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate the risk of EoO-related or IBD-related complications among patients with concurrent diagnoses. RESULTS Among 134 013 536 individuals, the incidence of EoO, CD and UC were 23.1, 51.2 and 55.2 per 100 000 person-years, respectively. The risk of EoO was higher among patients with CD (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 5.4, p<0.01; prevalence ratio (PR) 7.8, p<0.01) or UC (IRR 3.5, p<0.01; PR 5.0, p<0.01), while the risk of IBD was higher among patients with EoO (CD: IRR 5.7, p<0.01; PR 7.6, p<0.01; UC: IRR 3.4, p<0.01; PR 4.9, p<0.01) versus individuals without either diagnosis. Concurrent diagnosis of EoO and IBD was associated with greater composite risk of IBD-related complications (CD: adjusted HR (aHR) 1.09, p=0.01; UC: aHR 1.10, p=0.04) but lower composite risk of EoO-related complications (aHR 0.59; p<0.01). CONCLUSION Based on a population-based prospective cohort analysis, the risk of EoO is significantly higher among patients with IBD and vice versa. Concurrent diagnoses might modify the risk of IBD-related and EoO-related complications. Studies defining the mechanisms underlying these observations are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berkeley N Limketkai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Shailja C Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ikuo Hirano
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Emanuelle Bellaguarda
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jean-Frederic Colombel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Long-term Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis- Current Concepts and Perspectives for Steroid Use. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2019; 9:e212. [PMID: 30802222 PMCID: PMC6303250 DOI: 10.1038/s41424-018-0074-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the esophagus, which requires short- and long-term treatment. In addition, patients under long-term treatment for any chronic condition should have a structured follow-up. The mainstays in EoE treatment are drugs (such as swallowed topical corticosteroids [STC] and proton pump inhibitors), dietary exclusions, and endoscopic dilations. STC are the most widely used treatment and have proven efficacy in inducing clinical, endoscopic and histological remission in active EoE. However, data regarding maintaining disease remission and long-term management are limited. Ongoing disease activity and relapses despite STC treatment are frequently observed. This sheds light on the urgent need for adequate maintenance strategies, which have not been well defined. In terms of follow-up concepts, to date neither guidelines nor consensus recommendations have been published. To summarize the current knowledge on long-term diagnostic and therapeutic STC management of EoE, we conducted a literature search using PubMed and Embase applying the following key search items: Eosinophilic esophagitis, eosinophils, esophagus, swallowed topical corticosteroids, fluticasone, budesonide, long-term, treatment, therapy, and follow-up. In addition, we present empirically developed long-term management concepts applied at two large EoE centers, with a special focus on STC treatments. Finally, we highlight areas of future research and perspectives regarding the long-term management of EoE.
Collapse
|
44
|
Dellon ES, Gupta SK. A Conceptual Approach to Understanding Treatment Response in Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:2149-2160. [PMID: 30710696 PMCID: PMC6667323 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.01.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
While the diagnosis and initial treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis are becoming more standardized, there are still major gaps in knowledge related to measuring treatment response. One such question centers on how to measure treatment response and what treatment endpoints should be. This impacts not only patient care and engagement in decision-making, but also the field of drug development. In addition, studies so far have use a myriad of treatment endpoints including over a dozen histologic endpoint criteria. This review will discuss the various stakeholders involved in assessment of treatment endpoints of a complex condition, including patients, practitioners and regulatory agencies, and the care settings in which treatment response is assessed, including routine clinical care, clinical trials, and observational studies. Potential parameters or treatment endpoints such as histology, symptoms, patient-reported outcomes, endoscopy, and biomarkers are discussed along with associated challenges and opportunities. A framework on how to define treatment outcomes is discussed and a conceptual approach treatment response is proposed. This takes into account histology, symptoms, and endoscopic findings and harnesses existing, validated tools. It includes definitions of nonresponse, complete normalization, and a graded response category between these 2 extremes, and also permits flexibility and latitude for modifications as newer knowledge emerges. In addition, ways to position the pediatric population in these endeavors are discussed as are future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan S Dellon
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Sandeep K Gupta
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, IL
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
One-Hour Esophageal String Test: A Nonendoscopic Minimally Invasive Test That Accurately Detects Disease Activity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114:1614-1625. [PMID: 31567192 PMCID: PMC6784776 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), a chronic food allergic disease, lacks sensitive and specific peripheral biomarkers. We hypothesized that levels of EoE-related biomarkers captured using a 1-hour minimally invasive Esophageal String Test (EST) would correlate with mucosal eosinophil counts and tissue concentrations of these same biomarkers. We aimed to determine whether a 1-hour EST accurately distinguishes active from inactive EoE or a normal esophagus. METHODS In a prospective, multisite study, children and adults (ages 7-55 years) undergoing a clinically indicated esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed an EST with an esophageal dwell time of 1 hour. Subjects were divided into 3 groups: active EoE, inactive EoE, and normal esophageal mucosa. Eosinophil-associated protein levels were compared between EST effluents and esophageal biopsy extracts. Statistical modeling was performed to select biomarkers that best correlated with and predicted eosinophilic inflammation. RESULTS One hundred thirty-four subjects (74 children, 60 adults) with active EoE (n = 62), inactive EoE (n = 37), and patient controls with a normal esophagus (n = 35) completed the study. EST-captured eosinophil-associated biomarkers correlated significantly with peak eosinophils/high-power field, endoscopic visual scoring, and the same proteins extracted from mucosal biopsies. Statistical modeling, using combined eotaxin-3 and major basic protein-1 concentrations, led to the development of EoE scores that distinguished subjects with active EoE from inactive EoE or normal esophagi. Eighty-seven percent of children, 95% of parents, and 92% of adults preferred the EST over endoscopy if it provided similar information. DISCUSSION The 1-hour EST accurately distinguishes active from inactive EoE in children and adults and may facilitate monitoring of disease activity in a safe and minimally invasive fashion.
Collapse
|
46
|
|
47
|
Collins CA, Palmquist J, Proudfoot JA, Qian A, Wangberg H, Khosh-Hemmat E, Dohil R, Aceves SS. Evaluation of long-term course in children with eosinophilic esophagitis reveals distinct histologic patterns and clinical characteristics. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019; 144:1050-1057.e5. [PMID: 31255641 PMCID: PMC6820855 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic and increasingly prevalent antigen-driven disease. There is a paucity of information on long-term course in children. OBJECTIVE We sought to understand the longitudinal trajectory of pediatric EoE during routine clinical care. METHODS We prospectively enrolled children into an EoE database and reviewed their medical and pathologic records over 13 years. RESULTS From 2011 to 2015, 146 children with EoE seen for their first visit at our center had 2 or more years of follow-up and 3 or more endoscopies over an average follow-up period of 5.13 years (range, 2-13 years). Longitudinal eosinophilic inflammation during treatment demonstrated 3 patterns over time. Children with less than 15 eosinophils/high-power field (hpf) for greater than 75% of their follow-up period were termed continuous responders (CRs). Children with waxing and waning inflammation of less than 15 eosinophils/hpf for less than 75% but 25% or more of the follow-up period were termed intermittent responders (IRs). Nonresponders (NRs) were defined as having less than 15 eosinophils/hpf for less than 25% of their follow-up. Fifty-nine (40%) of 146 patients were CRs, 65 (45%) of 146 were IRs, and 22 (15%) of 146 were NRs. CRs differed from IRs and NRs on the parameter of male/female ratio (1:1 in CRs, 4:1 in IRs, and 6:1 in NRs; P < .001) and in their initial response to any therapy, including proton pump inhibitors (P < .001). Endoscopic severity correlated with esophageal eosinophilia (r = 0.73, P < .001). On multivariate analysis, female sex and initial therapeutic response to medications or elimination diet were associated with long-term control of esophageal eosinophilia. CONCLUSIONS Long-term pediatric EoE followed 3 different longitudinal trajectories of inflammation. The long-term histologic groups differed significantly in biological sex and initial therapeutic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathleen A Collins
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, Calif
| | - Jacob Palmquist
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, Calif
| | - James A Proudfoot
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Altman Clinical Translational Research Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, Calif
| | - Alex Qian
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif
| | - Hannah Wangberg
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif
| | - Emad Khosh-Hemmat
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, Calif
| | - Ranjan Dohil
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, Calif
| | - Seema S Aceves
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif; Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, Calif.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Carr S, Chan ES, Watson W. Correction to: Eosinophilic esophagitis. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 2019; 15:22. [PMID: 31007687 PMCID: PMC6456987 DOI: 10.1186/s13223-019-0336-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an atopic condition of the esophagus that has become increasingly recognized over the last 15 years. Diagnosis of the disorder is dependent on the patient’s clinical manifestations, and must be confirmed by histologic findings on esophageal mucosal biopsies. Patients with EoE should be referred to an allergist for optimal management, which may include dietary modifications and pharmacologic agents such as proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and corticosteroids, and for the diagnosis and management of comorbid atopic conditions. Mechanical dilation of the esophagus may also be necessary. The epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of EoE are discussed in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Carr
- 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada
| | - Edmond S Chan
- 2Division of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.,3EoE Clinic, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Wade Watson
- 4Division of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Safety and Efficacy of Budesonide Oral Suspension Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:666-673.e8. [PMID: 29902649 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of budesonide oral suspension (BOS) maintenance therapy in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). METHODS We performed an open-label extension study of a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with EoE (11-40 years old) who completed double-blind BOS (n = 45) or placebo therapy (n = 37) received 24 weeks' open-label BOS (2.0 mg once daily for 12 weeks, with optional dose increase [1.5-2.0 mg twice daily] for 12 weeks thereafter). Predefined efficacy outcomes included: proportion of patients with a histologic response (≤6 eosinophils/high-power field [eos/hpf]) and change in mean peak eosinophil counts after 24 weeks. Analyses were stratified by patients who received placebo (placebo/BOS) or BOS (BOS/BOS) during the double-blind trial. RESULTS BOS was well tolerated and drug-related adverse events were uncommon (placebo/BOS, 19% [7/37]; BOS/BOS, 4% [2/45]). Incidence of oral candidiasis (1 per group) and esophageal candidiasis (placebo/BOS group, n = 4) remained low. Changes in morning serum cortisol levels were not clinically relevant. A histologic response was observed in 49% (16/33) of patients receiving placebo/BOS and 23% (9/39) receiving BOS/BOS. Mean peak eosinophil counts (baseline vs week 24 or early termination) were: placebo/BOS, 118.8 vs 29.1; P < .001 and BOS/BOS, 38.1 vs 72.4; P = .01. Of the patients who responded to double-blind therapy, 42% maintained a histologic response during the open-label extension; 4% of nonresponders gained response. CONCLUSIONS In an open-label extension study of patients with EoE, BOS was well tolerated and drug-related adverse events were uncommon. BOS maintained a histologic response in some initial responders, but few initial nonresponders had a response. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01642212.
Collapse
|
50
|
Greuter T, Safroneeva E, Bussmann C, Biedermann L, Vavricka SR, Katzka DA, Schoepfer AM, Straumann A. Maintenance Treatment Of Eosinophilic Esophagitis With Swallowed Topical Steroids Alters Disease Course Over A 5-Year Follow-up Period In Adult Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:419-428.e6. [PMID: 29902648 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2018] [Revised: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Although swallowed topical corticosteroids (STCs) are effective in inducing remission of active eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), there are few data on maintenance of long-term remission. We evaluated the long-term effectiveness of STC therapy for adults with EoE. METHODS We performed a retrospective study using the Swiss EoE database. We analyzed data on 229 patients with EoE treated with STCs (175 male; mean age at diagnosis, 39±15 years; median time until diagnosis, 6 years) from 2000 through 2014. Patients were followed for a median of 5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3-7 years). We collected data from 819 follow-up visits on clinical, endoscopic and histological disease characteristics. The primary endpoint was proportions of clinical, endoscopic, and histological remission in all patients and groups, based on the status and duration of STC treatment. RESULTS Patients were taking STCs at 336 of the follow-up visits (41.0% of visits). The median duration of STC use before a follow-up visit was 347 days (IQR, 90-750 days) corresponding to 677 doses (IQR, 280-1413 doses) of 0.25 mg each. At the visits, higher proportions of patients who were still taking STCs were in clinical remission (31.0%) compared to patients not taking STCs (4.5%) (P <.001), as well as endoscopic remission (48.8% vs 17.8%; P < .001), histologic remission (44.8% vs 10.1%; P < .001), and complete remission (16.1% vs 1.3%; P < .001). Higher cumulative doses of STCs and longer durations of treatment were associated with higher proportions of clinical and complete remission. No dysplasia or mucosal atrophy was detected. Esophageal candidiasis was observed at 2.7% of visits in patients taking STCs. CONCLUSION In an analysis of data from the Swiss EoE database, we found maintenance therapy with STCs to achieve complete remission at 16.1% of follow-up visits, which was higher than in patients receiving no treatment (1.3%). Given the good safety profile of low-dose STC, we advocate for a prolonged treatment. Dose-finding trials are needed to achieve higher remission rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Greuter
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Ekaterina Safroneeva
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Luc Biedermann
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephan R Vavricka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David A Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Alain M Schoepfer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Lausanne - Centre Hopitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alex Straumann
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|