1
|
Mösges R, Zeyen C, Raskopf E, Acikel C, Sahin H, Allekotte S, Cuevas M, Shamji MH, Subiza JL, Casanovas M. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with mannan-conjugated birch pollen allergoids. Allergy 2024; 79:990-1000. [PMID: 37822222 DOI: 10.1111/all.15910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is still great need to develop new strategies to improve the efficacy of allergen immunotherapies with optimal safety standards for patients. A new promising approach is to couple allergoids to mannan. The objective of this phase IIa/IIb study was to identify the optimal dose of mannan-conjugated birch pollen allergoids for the short-course treatment of birch pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. METHODS For this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study, 246 birch pollen-allergic adults received 0.5 mL placebo or 1000, 3000 or 10,000 mTU/mL of mannan-conjugated birch pollen allergoids at five pre-seasonal visits. Efficacy was assessed by comparing allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and use of anti-allergic medication during the peak of the birch pollen season 2020. Immunologic, tolerability and safety effects were also analysed. RESULTS The highest dose of mannan-conjugated birch pollen allergoids reduced the combined symptom and medication score during the peak birch pollen season by a median of 24.7% compared to placebo. The production of Bet v 1 specific IgG4 significantly increased in a dose-dependent manner (3.6- and 4.5-fold) in the 3000 and 10,000 mTU/mL groups. The Bet v 1 specific IgE/IgG4 ratio was also strongly reduced (up to -70%). No fatalities nor serious adverse events were reported, and no adrenaline was used. In total, four systemic reactions occurred (two grade I and two grade II). CONCLUSION All doses of mannan-conjugated birch pollen allergoids can be considered as safe. Since the application of 10,000 mTU/mL resulted in the highest efficacy, this dose qualifies for further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph Mösges
- ClinCompetence Cologne GmbH, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Zeyen
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Hacer Sahin
- ClinCompetence Cologne GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Mandy Cuevas
- Carl Gustav Carus Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine (and University Hospital), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Section, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sarfraz Z, Sarfraz A, Cherrez-Ojeda I. Investigating Experimental Treatments for Rhinitis: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review. EAR, NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL 2024:1455613231222363. [PMID: 38205635 DOI: 10.1177/01455613231222363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Rhinitis is a common inflammatory condition that affects the nasal passages, significantly impacting quality of life and placing a considerable burden on healthcare systems. While traditional treatments offer limited relief, there is a growing interest in novel therapies. This systematic review aims to analyze investigational new treatments for rhinitis. Methods: A search was conducted in ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the European Union Clinical Trials Register, as well as PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Both ongoing and completed clinical trials exploring innovative therapies for rhinitis, including immunotherapy, probiotics, and stem cell therapy, were included. Results: This systematic review compiled information from 74 clinical trials-51 completed and 23 ongoing-focused on new treatments for rhinitis. A significant portion of the completed studies (44) focused on various forms of immunotherapy, which showed potential for long-term effectiveness and had a high safety profile. Another seven completed trials investigated probiotics as a treatment method, yielding mixed results, though they did show promise in managing symptoms, particularly when combined with other treatments. The ongoing trials are primarily investigating immunotherapy, with a smaller number looking at probiotics and stem cell therapy. This shows a continued exploration of innovative and diverse therapies for managing rhinitis. Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of emerging rhinitis therapies to improve patient outcomes and enhance quality of life. Continued research is recommended for developing more effective, personalized, and targeted therapeutic strategies for rhinitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zouina Sarfraz
- Department of Medicine, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Azza Sarfraz
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, SD, Pakistan
| | - Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda
- Department of Allergy and Pulmnology, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Guayas, Ecuador
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pfaar O, Portnoy J, Nolte H, Chaker AM, Luna-Pech JA, Patterson A, Pandya A, Larenas-Linnemann D. Future Directions of Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: Experts' Perspective. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2024; 12:32-44. [PMID: 37716529 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.08.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is broadly used all over the world as the only available disease-modifying treatment option. The aim of this experts' perspective is to address 7 important unmet needs for the further direction of AIT and to provide the readership with the authors' positions on these topics. An international group of experts in the field of AIT have formulated 7 important aspects for the future position of AIT, performed a current literature review, and proposed a consented position on these topics. The aspects discussed and consented by the authors include: (1) alternative routes of allergen application in AIT, (2) potential of recombinant vaccines, (3) the role of allergy diagnosis based on component-resolved diagnosis for AIT composition, (4) the impact of COVID-19 vaccination for further innovations in AIT, (5) potential of combining biologics to AIT, (6) future innovations in high-risk children/adolescents, and (7) the future regulatory position on AIT. Important unmet needs and topics for AIT have been addressed in this expert review. The authors' views and personal position on these 7 aspects have also been elaborated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jay Portnoy
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Mo
| | | | - Adam M Chaker
- TUM School of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Center of Allergy and Environment, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jorge A Luna-Pech
- Departamento de Disciplinas Filosófico, Metodológico e Instrumentales, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
| | - Amber Patterson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio; Auni Allergy, Findlay, Ohio
| | - Aarti Pandya
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Mo
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Kam PJ, Zielen S, Bernstein JA, Berger U, Berger M, Cuevas M, Cypcar D, Fuhr-Horst A, Greisner WA, Jandl M, Laßmann S, Worm M, Matz J, Sher E, Smith C, Steven GC, Mösges R, Shamji MH, DuBuske L, Borghese F, Oluwayi K, Zwingers T, Seybold M, Armfield O, Heath MD, Hewings SJ, Kramer MF, Skinner MA. Short-course subcutaneous treatment with PQ Grass strongly improves symptom and medication scores in grass allergy. Allergy 2023; 78:2756-2766. [PMID: 37366581 DOI: 10.1111/all.15788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A modified grass allergen subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) product with MicroCrystalline Tyrosine and monophosphoryl lipid-A as an adjuvant system (Grass MATA MPL [PQ Grass]) is being developed as short-course treatment of grass-pollen allergic rhinitis (SAR) and/or rhinoconjunctivitis. We sought to evaluate the combined symptom and medication score (CSMS) of the optimized cumulative dose of 27,600 standardized units (SU) PQ Grass in a field setting prior to embarking on a pivotal Phase III trial. METHODS In this exploratory, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial subjects were enrolled across 14 sites (Germany and the United States of America). Six pre-seasonal subcutaneous injections of PQ Grass (using conventional or extended regimens) or placebo were administered to 119 subjects (aged 18-65 years) with moderate-to-severe SAR with or without asthma that was well-controlled. The primary efficacy endpoint was CSMS during peak grass pollen season (GPS). Secondary endpoints included Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire standardized (RQLQ-S) and allergen-specific IgG4 response. RESULTS The mean CSMS compared to placebo was 33.1% (p = .0325) and 39.5% (p = .0112) for the conventional and extended regimens, respectively. An increase in IgG4 was shown for both regimens (p < .01) as well as an improvement in total RQLQ-S for the extended regimen (mean change -0.72, p = .02). Both regimens were well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS This trial demonstrated a clinically relevant and statistically significant efficacy response to PQ Grass. Unprecedented effect sizes were reached for grass allergy of up to ≈40% compared to placebo for CSMS after only six PQ Grass injections. Both PQ Grass regimens were considered equally safe and well-tolerated. Based on enhanced efficacy profile extended regime will be progressed to the pivotal Phase III trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S Zielen
- Children and Adolescents Department, Allergology, Pulmonology & Cystic Fibrosis, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - J A Bernstein
- Bernstein Clinical Research Center, LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - U Berger
- Aerobiology and Pollen Research Unit, Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Berger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, Hospital Hietzing, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Cuevas
- Clinic and Polyclinic of Otorhinolaryngology, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - D Cypcar
- Allergy Partners of Western North Carolina, Asheville, North Carolina, USA
| | - A Fuhr-Horst
- ENT Research- Institut für klinische Studien, Essen, Germany
| | - W A Greisner
- Bluegrass Allergy Research, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - M Jandl
- Hamburger Institut für Therapieforschung GmbH, Hamburg, Germany
| | - S Laßmann
- Studienzentrum Dr. Sabine Laßmann, Saalfeld, Germany
| | - M Worm
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy-Charite Campus Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Matz
- Chesapeake Clinical Research, Inc, White Marsh, Maryland, USA
| | - E Sher
- Allergy Partners of New Jersey, Ocean Township, New Jersey, USA
| | - C Smith
- Certified Research Associates, Cortland, New York, USA
| | - G C Steven
- Allergy Asthma & Sinus Center, S.C., Greenfield, Wisconsin, USA
| | - R Mösges
- IMSB (Institute of Computational Biology and Medical Statistics), University at Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- ClinCompetence, Cologne, Germany
| | - M H Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - L DuBuske
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - K Oluwayi
- Allergy Therapeutics PLC, Worthing, UK
| | | | - M Seybold
- Allergy Therapeutics PLC, Worthing, UK
| | | | - M D Heath
- Allergy Therapeutics PLC, Worthing, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Šošić L, Paolucci M, Flory S, Jebbawi F, Kündig TM, Johansen P. Allergen immunotherapy: progress and future outlook. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2023:1-25. [PMID: 37122076 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2023.2209319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Allergy, the immunological hypersensitivity to innocuous environmental compounds, is a global health problem. The disease triggers, allergens, are mostly proteins contained in various natural sources such as plant pollen, animal dander, dust mites, foods, fungi and insect venoms. Allergies can manifest with a wide range of symptoms in various organs, and be anything from just tedious to life-threatening. A majority of all allergy patients are self-treated with symptom-relieving medicines, while allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causative treatment option. AREAS COVERED This review will aim to give an overview of the state-of-the-art allergy management, including the use of new biologics and the application of biomarkers, and a special emphasis and discussion on current research trends in the field of AIT. EXPERT OPINION Conventional AIT has proven effective, but the years-long treatment compromises patient compliance. Moreover, AIT is typically not offered in food allergy. Hence, there is a need for new, effective and safe AIT methods. Novel routes of administration (e.g. oral and intralymphatic), hypoallergenic AIT products and more effective adjuvants holds great promise. Most recently, the development of allergen-specific monoclonal antibodies for passive immunotherapy may also allow treatment of patients currently not treated or treatable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Šošić
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marta Paolucci
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Flory
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fadi Jebbawi
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas M Kündig
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pål Johansen
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Allergen challenge tests in allergen immunotherapy: State of the art. Allergol Select 2023; 7:25-32. [PMID: 36925996 PMCID: PMC10012425 DOI: 10.5414/alx02322e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment effects in allergen immunotherapy (AIT) studies are based on symptomatic improvement, and evaluations of naturally exposed patients do often show weak efficacy. Allergen challenge tests, such as conjunctival (CAC), nasal (NAC), or bronchial (BAC) challenge tests, or challenges in allergen exposure chambers (AEC) are accepted by regulators for AIT phase II studies only. MATERIALS AND METHODS This review aims to describe different allergen challenge test methods, summarizes safety and limitations for each, and discusses their potential for use in AIT trials. RESULTS Organ-specific allergen challenges provide information about individual reactivity, reaction threshold, and organ-specific efficacy of AIT. AECs, targeting all affected organs simultaneously, were developed to investigate disease mechanisms and treatment effects under controlled and reproducible conditions. CONCLUSION A high level of standardization is existing for NAC only; in CAC and BAC, the toolbox is limited to subjective symptom scoring with no validated objective parameters identified yet. AECs are complex and heterogenous; correlation of systems and comparability of study data is claimed. All challenge methods are safe when conducted by experienced staff.
Collapse
|
7
|
Clinical endpoints in allergen immunotherapy: State of the art 2022. Allergol Select 2023; 7:39-46. [PMID: 36925995 PMCID: PMC10012882 DOI: 10.5414/alx02334e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
110 years after the classical study by Noon, numerous studies have confirmed the efficacy of allergen immunotherapy. A variety of clinical endpoints have been used in these trials. This review gives an overview of clinical endpoints for randomized clinical trials on allergen immunotherapy (AIT) in rhinitis and asthma. In addition, real-life studies have been carried out with the same kind of endpoints. In general, AIT studies are characterized by a lack of standardized and validated outcome measures. For allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, digital tools have been developed to monitor patients. Such tools are particularly useful to obtain real-world evidence for AIT. Finally, well-accepted outcome measures are available for cost-effectiveness studies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Both subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are effective clinically against allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma, and modify the underlying immunologic abnormalities. Despite this, many patients who could benefit from receiving SCIT and SLIT do not because of concerns about safety and the inconvenience in receiving SCIT, and the long duration of treatment with both, 3-4 years being required for lasting benefit. Attempts to improve the efficacy and safety, and to shorten the course of allergen immunotherapy have taken many approaches. Some approaches have generated great enthusiasm, only to fail in larger trials and be discarded. Other approaches show some promise but perhaps not enough to achieve regulatory approval. Those approaches that seem to have the best chance of becoming available in the next few years include the following: intralymphatic and epicutaneous immunotherapy, vitamin D in patients with insufficient serum 25 hydroxy vitamin D, probiotics, and allergoids, but all require further studies before being ready for nonexperimental use or, where necessary, for regulatory approval.
Collapse
|
9
|
Dogmas, challenges, and promises in phase III allergen immunotherapy studies. World Allergy Organ J 2021; 14:100578. [PMID: 34659627 PMCID: PMC8487954 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The concept of treatment of an allergy with the offending allergen was introduced more than a century ago. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease modifying treatment of allergic diseases caused by inhalational allergens and insect venoms. Despite this, only few AIT products have reached licensure in the US or an official marketing authorization status in European countries. Moreover, most of these AIT products are provided on an individual patient basis as named patient products (NPP) in Europe, while individualized preparations of (mixed) allergenic extract vials for subcutaneous administration (compounding) is common practice in the US. AIT products are generally considered safe and well tolerated, but the major practical clinical development challenge is to define the optimal dose and prove the efficacy and safety of these products using state-of-the art Phase II and pivotal Phase III studies. In planning Phase II-III AIT studies, a thorough understanding of the study challenges is essential (e.g. variability and non-validated status of subjective primary endpoints, limitations of pollen season definitions) and dogmas of these products (e.g., for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) trials double-blinding conditions cannot be maintained, resulting in stronger placebo responses in the active treatment group and inflated treatment effects in Phase III). There is future promise for more objective biomarker endpoints (e.g. basophil activation (CD63 and CD203c), subsets of regulatory dendritic, T and B cells, IL-10–producing group 2 innate lymphoid cells; alone or in combination) to overcome several of these dogmas and challenges; innovation in AIT clinical trials can only progress with integral biomarker research to complement the traditional endpoints in Phase II-III clinical development. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of these dogmas, challenges and recommendations based on published data, to facilitate the design of Phase III studies and improve the evidence basis of safe and effective AIT products.
Collapse
|
10
|
Wraith DC, Krishna MT. Peptide allergen-specific immunotherapy for allergic airway diseases-State of the art. Clin Exp Allergy 2021; 51:751-769. [PMID: 33529435 DOI: 10.1111/cea.13840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only means of altering the natural immunological course of allergic diseases and achieving long-term remission. Pharmacological measures are able to suppress the immune response and/or ameliorate the symptoms but there is a risk of relapse soon after these measures are withdrawn. Current AIT approaches depend on the administration of intact allergens, often comprising crude extracts of the allergen. We propose that the challenges arising from current approaches, including the risk of serious side-effects, burdensome duration of treatment, poor compliance and high cost, are overcome by application of peptides based on CD4+ T cell epitopes rather than whole allergens. Here we describe evolving approaches, summarize clinical trials involving peptide AIT in allergic rhinitis and asthma, discuss the putative mechanisms involved in their action, address gaps in evidence and propose future directions for research and clinical development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Wraith
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mamidipudi T Krishna
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tiotiu A, Novakova P, Guillermo G, Correira de Sousa J, Braido F. Management of adult asthma and chronic rhinitis as one airway disease. Expert Rev Respir Med 2021; 15:1135-1147. [PMID: 34030569 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1932470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic rhinitis is defined as nasal inflammation with the presence of minimum two symptoms such as nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing and/or itching one hour daily for a minimum of 12 weeks/year. According their etiology, four groups of rhinitis are described: allergic, infectious, non-allergic non-infectious and mixed.Chronic rhinitis is frequently associated with asthma, shares similar mechanisms of the pathogenesis and has a negative impact of its outcomes sustaining the concept of unified airways disease.Areas covered: The present review summarizes the complex relationship between chronic rhinitis and asthma on the basis of recent epidemiological data, clinical characteristics, diagnosis and therapeutic management. All four groups are discussed with the impact of their specific treatment on asthma outcomes. Some medications are common for chronic rhinitis and asthma while others are more specific but able to treat the associated comorbidity.Expert opinion: The systematic assessment of chronic rhinitis in patients with asthma and its specific treatment improves both disease outcomes. Conversely, several therapies of asthma demonstrated beneficial effects on chronic rhinitis. Treating both diseases at the same time by only one medication is an interesting option to explore in the future in order to limit drugs administration, related costs and side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelica Tiotiu
- Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Nancy, France; 9 Rue Du Morvan, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,Development, Adaptation and Disadvantage. Cardiorespiratory Regulations and Motor Control (EA 3450 DevAH), University of Lorraine, - Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Plamena Novakova
- ;department of Allergology, Medical University of Sofia, University Hospital "Alexandrovska"; 1, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Guidos Guillermo
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Gustavo A. Madero, Ciudad De México, CDMX, Mexico
| | - Jaime Correira de Sousa
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal. ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal; Campus De, Braga, Portugal
| | - Fulvio Braido
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases Department, University of Genoa, Genova GE, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Linton S, Burrows AG, Hossenbaccus L, Ellis AK. Future of allergic rhinitis management. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2021; 127:183-190. [PMID: 33971355 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present a comprehensive, clinically focused scoping review of therapeutic agents and practices comprising the future of allergic rhinitis (AR) management. DATA SOURCES A review of the published literature was performed using the PubMed database, published abstracts, and virtual presentations from scientific meetings and posted results on ClinicalTrials.gov. STUDY SELECTIONS Primary manuscripts with trial results, case reports, case series, and clinical trial data from ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and articles highlighting expert perspectives on management of AR were selected. RESULTS Telemedicine, social media, and mHealth facilitate integrated care for AR management. Pharmacotherapy remains the standard of care for AR management; however, treatment combinations are recommended. Intralymphatic immunotherapy and peptide immunotherapy are the most promising new allergen immunotherapy options. Studies of targeted biologics for AR are ongoing. Probiotics may be beneficial for AR management, particularly Bifidobacterium spp, and as an add-on to allergen immunotherapy. CONCLUSION AR is a chronic and often comorbid condition that requires integrated care for optimal management. New formulations and combinations of existing AR therapies are the most promising and merit future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Linton
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Center-Kingston General Hospital Site, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alyssa G Burrows
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Center-Kingston General Hospital Site, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lubnaa Hossenbaccus
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Center-Kingston General Hospital Site, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anne K Ellis
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Center-Kingston General Hospital Site, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tie K, Miller C, Zanation AM, Ebert CS. Subcutaneous Versus Sublingual Immunotherapy for Adults with Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses. Laryngoscope 2021; 132:499-508. [PMID: 33929726 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) or sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) better improves patient outcomes and quality of life for adults with allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis (AR/C) with or without mild to moderate asthma. METHODS Systematic review methodology was based on the Cochrane Collaboration handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science) were queried from inception to July 30, 2020. Two independent reviewers screened potentially relevant studies and assessed risk of bias. Outcomes of interest were symptom score (SS), medication score (MS), combined symptom medication score (CSMS), and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ). Meta-analyses with an adjusted indirect comparison were conducted in RevMan 5.4.1. RESULTS Seven SCIT versus SLIT randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated no significant differences for any outcomes, but insufficient data precluded direct meta-analysis. For the adjusted indirect comparison, 46 RCTs over 39 studies were included for SCIT versus placebo (n = 13) and SLIT versus placebo (n = 33). Statistically significant results favoring SCIT were found for SS (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31-0.49), MS (SMD = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.14-0.39), CSMS (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.17-0.67), and RQLQ (MD = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.04-0.44). Statistically significant results favoring SLIT were found for SS (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.32-0.53), MS (SMD = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.28-0.53), CSMS (SMD = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.29-0.45), and RQLQ (MD = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.20-0.43). No significant differences were found between SCIT and SLIT for SS (SMD = -0.02; 95% CI = -0.15 to 0.11), MS (SMD = -0.14; 95% CI = -0.31 to 0.03), CSMS (SMD = 0.05; 95% CI = -0.21 to 0.31), or RQLQ (MD = -0.08; 95% CI = -0.31 to 0.15). CONCLUSION SCIT and SLIT are comparably effective treatments for adults with AR/C. More RCTs analyzing SCIT versus SLIT are needed to directly compare the two. Laryngoscope, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Tie
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Craig Miller
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Adam M Zanation
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Charles S Ebert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Akinfenwa O, Rodríguez-Domínguez A, Vrtala S, Valenta R, Campana R. Novel vaccines for allergen-specific immunotherapy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 21:86-99. [PMID: 33369572 PMCID: PMC7810419 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is a highly economic, effective and disease-modifying form of allergy treatment but requires accurate prescription and monitoring. New molecular approaches are currently under development to improve AIT by reducing treatment-related side effects, cumbersome protocols and patients' compliance. We review the current advances regarding refined diagnosis for prescription and monitoring of AIT and the development of novel molecular vaccines for AIT. Finally, we discuss prophylactic application of AIT. RECENT FINDINGS There is evidence that molecular allergy diagnosis not only assists in the prescription and monitoring of AIT but also allows a refined selection of patients to increase the likelihood of treatment success. New data regarding the effects of AIT treatment with traditional allergen extracts by alternative routes have become available. Experimental approaches for AIT, such as virus-like particles and cell-based treatments have been described. New results from clinical trials performed with recombinant hypoallergens and passive immunization with allergen-specific antibodies highlight the importance of allergen-specific IgG antibodies for the effect of AIT and indicate opportunities for preventive allergen-specific vaccination. SUMMARY Molecular allergy diagnosis is useful for the prescription and monitoring of AIT and may improve the success of AIT. Results with molecular allergy vaccines and by passive immunization with allergen-specific IgG antibodies indicate the importance of allergen-specific IgG capable of blocking allergen recognition by IgE and IgE-mediated allergic inflammation as important mechanism for the success of AIT. New molecular vaccines may pave the road towards prophylactic allergen-specific vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluwatoyin Akinfenwa
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Azahara Rodríguez-Domínguez
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Susanne Vrtala
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rudolf Valenta
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- NRC Institute of Immunology FMBA of Russia
- Laboratory for Immunopathology, Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
| | - Raffaela Campana
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dorofeeva Y, Shilovskiy I, Tulaeva I, Focke‐Tejkl M, Flicker S, Kudlay D, Khaitov M, Karsonova A, Riabova K, Karaulov A, Khanferyan R, Pickl WF, Wekerle T, Valenta R. Past, present, and future of allergen immunotherapy vaccines. Allergy 2021; 76:131-149. [PMID: 32249442 PMCID: PMC7818275 DOI: 10.1111/all.14300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is an allergen-specific form of treatment for patients suffering from immunoglobulin E (IgE)-associated allergy; the most common and important immunologically mediated hypersensitivity disease. AIT is based on the administration of the disease-causing allergen with the goal to induce a protective immunity consisting of allergen-specific blocking IgG antibodies and alterations of the cellular immune response so that the patient can tolerate allergen contact. Major advantages of AIT over all other existing treatments for allergy are that AIT induces a long-lasting protection and prevents the progression of disease to severe manifestations. AIT is cost effective because it uses the patient´s own immune system for protection and potentially can be used as a preventive treatment. However, broad application of AIT is limited by mainly technical issues such as the quality of allergen preparations and the risk of inducing side effects which results in extremely cumbersome treatment schedules reducing patient´s compliance. In this article we review progress in AIT made from its beginning and provide an overview of the state of the art, the needs for further development, and possible technical solutions available through molecular allergology. Finally, we consider visions for AIT development towards prophylactic application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulia Dorofeeva
- Division of ImmunopathologyDepartment of Pathophysiology and Allergy ResearchCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Igor Shilovskiy
- National Research Center, Institute of immunology, FMBA of RussiaMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Inna Tulaeva
- Division of ImmunopathologyDepartment of Pathophysiology and Allergy ResearchCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of Clinical Immunology and AllergyLaboratory of ImmunopathologySechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Margarete Focke‐Tejkl
- Division of ImmunopathologyDepartment of Pathophysiology and Allergy ResearchCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Sabine Flicker
- Division of ImmunopathologyDepartment of Pathophysiology and Allergy ResearchCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Dmitriy Kudlay
- National Research Center, Institute of immunology, FMBA of RussiaMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Musa Khaitov
- National Research Center, Institute of immunology, FMBA of RussiaMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Antonina Karsonova
- Department of Clinical Immunology and AllergyLaboratory of ImmunopathologySechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Ksenja Riabova
- Department of Clinical Immunology and AllergyLaboratory of ImmunopathologySechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Alexander Karaulov
- Department of Clinical Immunology and AllergyLaboratory of ImmunopathologySechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Roman Khanferyan
- Department of Immunology and AllergyRussian People’s Friendship UniversityMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Winfried F. Pickl
- Institute of ImmunologyCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Thomas Wekerle
- Section of Transplantation ImmunologyDepartment of SurgeryMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Rudolf Valenta
- Division of ImmunopathologyDepartment of Pathophysiology and Allergy ResearchCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- National Research Center, Institute of immunology, FMBA of RussiaMoscowRussian Federation
- Department of Clinical Immunology and AllergyLaboratory of ImmunopathologySechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscowRussian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jacquet A. Perspectives in Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy: Molecular Evolution of Peptide- and Protein-Based Strategies. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2020; 21:203-223. [PMID: 31416410 DOI: 10.2174/1389203720666190718152534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Allergen-specific Immunotherapy (AIT), through repetitive subcutaneous or sublingual administrations of allergen extracts, represents up to now the unique treatment against allergic sensitizations. However, the clinical efficacy of AIT can be largely dependent on the quality of natural allergen extracts. Moreover, the long duration and adverse side effects associated with AIT negatively impact patient adherence. Tremendous progress in the field of molecular allergology has made possible the design of safer, shorter and more effective new immunotherapeutic approaches based on purified and characterized natural or recombinant allergen derivatives and peptides. This review will summarize the characteristics of these different innovative vaccines including their effects in preclinical studies and clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alain Jacquet
- Center of Excellence in Vaccine Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cevhertas L, Ogulur I, Maurer DJ, Burla D, Ding M, Jansen K, Koch J, Liu C, Ma S, Mitamura Y, Peng Y, Radzikowska U, Rinaldi AO, Satitsuksanoa P, Globinska A, Veen W, Sokolowska M, Baerenfaller K, Gao Y, Agache I, Akdis M, Akdis CA. Advances and recent developments in asthma in 2020. Allergy 2020; 75:3124-3146. [PMID: 32997808 DOI: 10.1111/all.14607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In this review, we discuss recent publications on asthma and review the studies that have reported on the different aspects of the prevalence, risk factors and prevention, mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of asthma. Many risk and protective factors and molecular mechanisms are involved in the development of asthma. Emerging concepts and challenges in implementing the exposome paradigm and its application in allergic diseases and asthma are reviewed, including genetic and epigenetic factors, microbial dysbiosis, and environmental exposure, particularly to indoor and outdoor substances. The most relevant experimental studies further advancing the understanding of molecular and immune mechanisms with potential new targets for the development of therapeutics are discussed. A reliable diagnosis of asthma, disease endotyping, and monitoring its severity are of great importance in the management of asthma. Correct evaluation and management of asthma comorbidity/multimorbidity, including interaction with asthma phenotypes and its value for the precision medicine approach and validation of predictive biomarkers, are further detailed. Novel approaches and strategies in asthma treatment linked to mechanisms and endotypes of asthma, particularly biologicals, are critically appraised. Finally, due to the recent pandemics and its impact on patient management, we discuss the challenges, relationships, and molecular mechanisms between asthma, allergies, SARS-CoV-2, and COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lacin Cevhertas
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Christine Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK‐CARE) Davos Switzerland
- Department of Medical Immunology Institute of Health Sciences, Bursa Uludag University Bursa Turkey
| | - Ismail Ogulur
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Marmara University Istanbul Turkey
| | - Debbie J. Maurer
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
| | - Daniel Burla
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
| | - Mei Ding
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Christine Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK‐CARE) Davos Switzerland
- Department of Allergology Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan Hubei China
| | - Kirstin Jansen
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
| | - Jana Koch
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Swiss Institute for Bioinformatics (SIB) Davos Switzerland
| | - Chengyao Liu
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Beijing TongRen HospitalCapital Medical University Beijing China
| | - Siyuan Ma
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Beijing TongRen HospitalCapital Medical University Beijing China
| | - Yasutaka Mitamura
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
| | - Yaqi Peng
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Otorhinolaryngology HospitalThe First Affiliated HospitalSun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China
| | - Urszula Radzikowska
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Christine Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK‐CARE) Davos Switzerland
- Department of Regenerative Medicine and Immune Regulation Medical University of Bialystok Bialystok Poland
| | - Arturo O. Rinaldi
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
| | - Pattraporn Satitsuksanoa
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Christine Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK‐CARE) Davos Switzerland
| | - Anna Globinska
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
| | - Willem Veen
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Christine Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK‐CARE) Davos Switzerland
| | - Milena Sokolowska
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
| | - Katja Baerenfaller
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Swiss Institute for Bioinformatics (SIB) Davos Switzerland
| | - Ya‐dong Gao
- Department of Allergology Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan Hubei China
| | - Ioana Agache
- Faculty of Medicine Transylvania University Brasov Romania
| | - Mübeccel Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
| | - Cezmi A. Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Christine Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK‐CARE) Davos Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Breiteneder H, Peng Y, Agache I, Diamant Z, Eiwegger T, Fokkens WJ, Traidl‐Hoffmann C, Nadeau K, O'Hehir RE, O'Mahony L, Pfaar O, Torres MJ, Wang D, Zhang L, Akdis CA. Biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of therapy responses in allergic diseases and asthma. Allergy 2020; 75:3039-3068. [PMID: 32893900 PMCID: PMC7756301 DOI: 10.1111/all.14582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Modern health care requires a proactive and individualized response to diseases, combining precision diagnosis and personalized treatment. Accordingly, the approach to patients with allergic diseases encompasses novel developments in the area of personalized medicine, disease phenotyping and endotyping, and the development and application of reliable biomarkers. A detailed clinical history and physical examination followed by the detection of IgE immunoreactivity against specific allergens still represents the state of the art. However, nowadays, further emphasis focuses on the optimization of diagnostic and therapeutic standards and a large number of studies have been investigating the biomarkers of allergic diseases, including asthma, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, food allergy, urticaria and anaphylaxis. Various biomarkers have been developed by omics technologies, some of which lead to a better classification of distinct phenotypes or endotypes. The introduction of biologicals to clinical practice increases the need for biomarkers for patient selection, prediction of outcomes and monitoring, to allow for an adequate choice of the duration of these costly and long‐lasting therapies. Escalating healthcare costs together with questions about the efficacy of the current management of allergic diseases require further development of a biomarker‐driven approach. Here, we review biomarkers in diagnosis and treatment of asthma, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, viral infections, chronic rhinosinusitis, food allergy, drug hypersensitivity and allergen immunotherapy with a special emphasis on specific IgE, the microbiome and the epithelial barrier. In addition, EAACI guidelines on biologicals are discussed within the perspective of biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heimo Breiteneder
- Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Ya‐Qi Peng
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University Zurich Davos Switzerland
- CK CARE Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education Davos Switzerland
- Otorhinolaryngology Hospital The First Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat‐Sen University Guangzhou China
| | - Ioana Agache
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Faculty of Medicine Transylvania University of Brasov Brasov Romania
| | - Zuzana Diamant
- Department of Respiratory Medicine & Allergology Institute for Clinical Science Skane University Hospital Lund University Lund Sweden
- Department of Respiratory Medicine First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Thomayer Hospital Prague Czech Republic
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology University of GroningenUniversity Medical Center Groningen Groningen Netherlands
| | - Thomas Eiwegger
- Translational Medicine Program, Research Institute Hospital for Sick Children Toronto ON Canada
- Department of Immunology University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
- Division of Immunology and Allergy Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program The Hospital for Sick Children Departments of Paediatrics and Immunology University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
| | - Wytske J. Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Amsterdam University Medical Centres Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Claudia Traidl‐Hoffmann
- CK CARE Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education Davos Switzerland
- Chair and Institute of Environmental Medicine UNIKA‐T Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Zentrum München Augsburg Germany
- ZIEL ‐ Institute for Food & Health Technical University of Munich Freising‐Weihenstephan Germany
| | - Kari Nadeau
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy & Asthma Research Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| | - Robyn E. O'Hehir
- Department of Allergy, immunology and Respiratory Medicine Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology Service Alfred Health Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Liam O'Mahony
- Departments of Medicine and Microbiology APC Microbiome Ireland National University of Ireland Cork Ireland
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Section of Rhinology and Allergy University Hospital MarburgPhilipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - Maria J. Torres
- Allergy Unit Regional University Hospital of Malaga‐IBIMA‐UMA‐ARADyAL Malaga Spain
| | - De‐Yun Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore
| | - Luo Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Allergy Beijing TongRen Hospital Beijing China
| | - Cezmi A. Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University Zurich Davos Switzerland
- CK CARE Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education Davos Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Meng Y, Wang C, Zhang L. Advances and novel developments in allergic rhinitis. Allergy 2020; 75:3069-3076. [PMID: 32901931 DOI: 10.1111/all.14586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an upper airway disease with high prevalence in the world, and therefore needs to be thoroughly investigated and treated accordingly. Although the mechanisms underlying the pathology and treatment of AR have been widely studied, many aspects of AR are still unclear and warrant further investigations. The purpose of the present review was therefore to report recently published papers, which highlight the novel mechanisms and treatments of AR. These include role of environment, important proteins and cells, and some other factors in the pathogenesis of AR; as well as the role of immunotherapy and biologics in the treatment of AR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Meng
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Beijing TongRen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China
- Research Unit of Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Nasal Diseases Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Beijing China
| | - Chengshuo Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Beijing TongRen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China
- Research Unit of Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Nasal Diseases Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Beijing China
| | - Luo Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Beijing TongRen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China
- Research Unit of Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Nasal Diseases Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Beijing China
- Department of Allergy Beijing TongRen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology Beijing China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kucuksezer UC, Ozdemir C, Cevhertas L, Ogulur I, Akdis M, Akdis CA. Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy and allergen tolerance. Allergol Int 2020; 69:549-560. [PMID: 32900655 DOI: 10.1016/j.alit.2020.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the mainstay treatment for the cure of allergic disorders, with depicted efficacy and safety by several trials and meta-analysis. AIT impressively contributes to the management of allergic rhinitis, asthma and venom allergies. Food allergy is a new arena for AIT with promising results, especially via novel administration routes. Cell subsets with regulatory capacities are induced during AIT. IL-10 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β are the main suppressor cytokines, in addition to surface molecules such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) within the micro milieu. Modified T- and B-cell responses and antibody isotypes, increased activity thresholds for eosinophils, basophils and mast cells and consequent limitation of inflammatory cascades altogether induce and maintain a state of sustained allergen-specific unresponsiveness. Established tolerance is reflected into the clinical perspectives as improvement of allergy symptoms together with reduced medication requirements and evolved disease severity. Long treatment durations, costs, reduced patient compliance and risk of severe, even life-threatening adverse reactions during treatment stand as major limiting factors for AIT. By development of purified non-allergenic, highly-immunogenic modified allergen extracts, and combinational usage of them with novel adjuvant molecules via new routes may shorten treatment durations and possibly reduce these drawbacks. AIT is the best model for custom-tailored therapy of allergic disorders. Better characterization of disease endotypes, definition of specific biomarkers for diagnosis and therapy follow-up, as well as precision medicine approaches may further contribute to success of AIT in management of allergic disorders.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Allergen immunotherapy is the only treatment modality which alters the natural course of allergic diseases by restoring immune tolerance against allergens. Deeper understanding of tolerance mechanisms will lead to the development of new vaccines, which target immune responses and promote tolerance. RECENT FINDINGS Successful allergen immunotherapy (AIT) induces allergen-specific peripheral tolerance, characterized mainly by the generation of allergen-specific Treg cells and reduction of Th2 cells. At the early phase, AIT leads to a decrease in the activity and degranulation of mast cells and basophils and a decrease in inflammatory responses of eosinophils in inflamed tissues. Treg cells show their effects by secreting inhibitory cytokines including interleukin (IL)-10, transforming growth factor-β, interfering with cellular metabolisms, suppressing antigen presenting cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) and by cytolysis. AIT induces the development of regulatory B cells producing IL-10 and B cells expressing allergen-specific IgG4. Recent investigations have demonstrated that AIT is also associated with the formation of ILC2reg and DCreg cells which contribute to tolerance induction. SUMMARY Research done so far, has shown that multiple molecular and cellular factors are dysregulated in allergic diseases and modified by AIT. Studies should now focus on finding the best target and ideal biomarkers to identify ideal candidates for AIT.
Collapse
|
22
|
Pfaar O, Zieglmayer P. Allergen exposure chambers: implementation in clinical trials in allergen immunotherapy. Clin Transl Allergy 2020; 10:33. [PMID: 32742636 PMCID: PMC7388504 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-020-00336-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergen exposure chambers (AECs) have been developed for controlled allergen challenges of allergic patients mimicking natural exposure. As such, these facilities have been utilized e.g., for proof of concept, dose finding or the demonstration of onset of action and treatment effect sizes of antiallergic medication. Moreover, clinical effects of and immunological mechanisms in allergen immunotherapy (AIT) have been investigated in AECs. In Europe AIT products have to fulfill regulatory requirements for obtaining market authorization through Phase I to III clinical trials. Multiple Phase II (dose-range-finding or proof-of-concept) trials on AIT products have been performed in AECs. However, they are not accepted by regulatory bodies for pivotal (Phase III) trials and a more thorough technical and clinical validation is requested. Recently, a Position Paper of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) has outlined unmet needs in further development of AECs. The following review aims to address some of these needs on the basis of recently published data in the first part, whereas the second part overviews published examples of most relevant Phase II trials in AIT performed in AEC facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hossenbaccus L, Linton S, Garvey S, Ellis AK. Towards definitive management of allergic rhinitis: best use of new and established therapies. ALLERGY, ASTHMA, AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN SOCIETY OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY 2020; 16:39. [PMID: 32508939 PMCID: PMC7251701 DOI: 10.1186/s13223-020-00436-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa impacting up to 25% of Canadians. The standard of care for AR includes a treatment plan that takes into account patient preferences, the severity of the disease, and most essentially involves a shared decision-making process between patient and provider. BODY Since their introduction in the 1940s, antihistamines (AHs) have been the most utilized class of medications for the treatment of AR. First-generation AHs are associated with adverse central nervous system (CNS) and anticholinergic side effects. On the market in the 1980s, newer generation AHs have improved safety and efficacy. Compared to antihistamines, intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) have significantly greater efficacy but longer onset of action. Intranasal AH and INCS combinations offer a single medication option that offers broader disease coverage and faster symptom control. However, cost and twice-per-day dosing remain a major limitation. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying option and can be provided through subcutaneous (SCIT) or sublingual (SLIT) routes. While SCIT has been the definitive management option for many years, SLIT tablets (SLIT-T) have also been proven to be safe and efficacious. CONCLUSION There is a range of available treatment options for AR that reflect the varying disease length and severity. For mild to moderate AR, newer generation AHs should be the first-line treatment, while INCS are mainstay treatments for moderate to severe AR. In patients who do not respond to INCS, a combination of intranasal AH/INCS (AZE/FP) should be considered, assuming that cost is not a limiting factor. While SCIT remains the option with the most available allergens that can be targeted, it has the potential for severe systemic adverse effects and requires weekly visits for administration during the first 4 to 6 months. SLIT-T is a newer approach that provides the ease of being self-administered and presents a reduced risk for systemic reactions. In any case, standard care for AR includes a treatment plan that takes into account disease severity and patient preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lubnaa Hossenbaccus
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Canada
| | - Sophia Linton
- Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Canada
| | - Sarah Garvey
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Canada
| | - Anne K. Ellis
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pfaar O, Gerth van Wijk R, Klimek L, Bousquet J, Creticos PS. Clinical trials in allergen immunotherapy in the age group of children and adolescents: current concepts and future needs. Clin Transl Allergy 2020; 10:11. [PMID: 32346471 PMCID: PMC7181492 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-020-00314-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only treatment option available for allergic patients with disease-modifying intention. Both efficacy and safety has been demonstrated for multiple trials in children, adolescents and adults. Though regulatory requirements for marketing authorization have been clearly outlined and an increasing number of high quality trials has been initiated, multiple concepts and details in study design may be further elaborated, harmonized and improved. An international group of experts in the field of AIT has thoroughly reviewed and discussed current concepts and provided an outlook on further improvement especially in the age group of children and adolescents. Emphasis of the group's discussion as a basis for this article was put on (i) the regulatory background of marketing authorization of AIT products including the 'Pediatric Investigational Plan', (ii) patient reported outcomes and endpoints in AIT trials, (iii) considerations regarding the 'minimal clinically important difference', (iv) the role of placebo effects in AIT clinical trials and clinical routine and (v) the potential of mobile Health for future development of AIT. Current concepts in AIT have been optimized throughout the recent decades, but there remains room for improvement e.g., in the topics outlined in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Pfaar
- 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - R Gerth van Wijk
- 2Section of Allergology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - J Bousquet
- MACVIA-France, Contre les Maladies Chroniques pour un Vieillissement Actif en France, European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing Reference Site, Montpellier, France.,5INSERM U 1168, VIMA: Ageing and Chronic Diseases Epidemiological and Public Health Approaches, Villejuif, France, Universite Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, UMR-S 1168, Montigny le Bretonneux, France
| | - P S Creticos
- 6Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA.,Creticos Research Group, Crownsville, MD 21032 USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pechsrichuang P, Jacquet A. Molecular approaches to allergen-specific immunotherapy: Are we so far from clinical implementation? Clin Exp Allergy 2020; 50:543-557. [PMID: 32078207 DOI: 10.1111/cea.13588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Conventional allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT), based on administrations of allergen extracts, represents up to now the unique protocol for the desensitization of allergic patients. Whereas the effectiveness of AIT was evidenced for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma, such strategy remains experimental for food allergies up to now. However, important issues are commonly associated with AIT as the quality of natural allergen extracts, the long duration and adverse side-effects which negatively affect successful desensitization together with the patient compliance. The rapid progression of molecular allergology made possible the quest of safer, shorter and more effective immunotherapeutic approaches. The aim of this review was to provide an update on these different innovative recombinant derivatives including their efficacy but also their limitations. Despite promising preclinical and early clinical studies, the absence of convincing data in large phase III trials precludes so far the translation of these immunotherapeutic candidates into the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phornsiri Pechsrichuang
- Faculty of Medicine, Center of Excellence in Vaccine Research and Development, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Alain Jacquet
- Faculty of Medicine, Center of Excellence in Vaccine Research and Development, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pfaar O, Agache I, Blay F, Bonini S, Chaker AM, Durham SR, Gawlik R, Hellings PW, Jutel M, Kleine‐Tebbe J, Klimek L, Kopp MV, Nandy A, Rabin RL, Ree R, Renz H, Roberts G, Salapatek A, Schmidt‐Weber CB, Shamji MH, Sturm GJ, Virchow JC, Wahn U, Willers C, Zieglmayer P, Akdis CA. Perspectives in allergen immunotherapy: 2019 and beyond. Allergy 2019; 74 Suppl 108:3-25. [PMID: 31872476 DOI: 10.1111/all.14077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The seventh "Future of the Allergists and Specific Immunotherapy (FASIT)" workshop held in 2019 provided a platform for global experts from academia, allergy clinics, regulatory authorities and industry to review current developments in the field of allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Key domains of the meeting included the following: (a) Biomarkers for AIT and allergic asthma; (b) visions for the future of AIT; (c) progress and data for AIT in asthma and the updates of GINA and EAACI Asthma Guidelines (separated for house dust mite SCIT, SLIT tablets and SLIT drops; patient populations) including a review of clinically relevant endpoints in AIT studies in asthma; (d) regulatory prerequisites such as the "Therapy Allergen Ordinance" in Germany; (e) optimization of trial design in AIT clinical research; (f) challenges planning and conducting phase III (field) studies and the future role of Allergen Exposure Chambers (AEC) in AIT product development from the regulatory point of view. We report a summary of panel discussions of all six domains and highlight unmet needs and possible solutions for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Section of Rhinology and Allergy University Hospital Marburg Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - Ioana Agache
- Faculty of Medicine Transylvania University Brasov Romania
| | - Frédéric Blay
- Pneumology Department New Civil Hospital Strasbourg‐Cedex France
| | - Sergio Bonini
- Institute of Translational Medicine Italian National Research Council Rome Italy
| | - Adam M. Chaker
- Department of Otolaryngology and Center of Allergy and Environment TUM School of Medicine Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
| | - Stephen R. Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
- MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
| | - Radoslaw Gawlik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allergology and Clinical Immunology Silesian University of Medicine Katowice Poland
| | - Peter W. Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology University Hospitals of Leuven Leuven Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Neuroscience University of Ghent Ghent Belgium
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland
- All‐Med Medical Research Institute Wroclaw Poland
| | - Jörg Kleine‐Tebbe
- Allergy & Asthma Center Westend Outpatient Clinic and Clinical Research Center Berlin Germany
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden Germany
| | - Matthias V. Kopp
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonology University of Luebeck Luebeck Germany
- Member of the Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung (DZL) Airway Research Center North (ARCN) Luebeck Germany
| | - Andreas Nandy
- Research & Development Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG Reinbek Germany
| | - Ronald L. Rabin
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring MD USA
| | - Ronald Ree
- Departments of Experimental Immunology and of Otorhinolaryngology Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Harald Renz
- Department Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiochemistry Molecular Diagnostics University Giessen and Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - Graham Roberts
- Paediatric Allergy and Respiratory Medicine University of Southampton Southampton UK
- David Hide Asthma and Allergy Centre St Mary’s Hospital Isle of Wight UK
| | | | - Carsten B. Schmidt‐Weber
- Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM) Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Center Munich Munich Germany
- Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL) Lübeck Germany
| | - Mohamed H. Shamji
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
- MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
| | - Gunter J. Sturm
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
- Allergy Outpatient Clinic Reumannplatz Vienna Austria
| | - J. Christian Virchow
- Department Pulmonology & Interdisciplinary Intensive Care Medicine Rostock University Medical Center Rostock Germany
| | - Ulrich Wahn
- Department for Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology Charité Medical University Berlin Germany
| | | | | | - Cezmi A. Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
- Christine‐Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK‐CARE) Davos Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bousquet J, Akdis CA, Grattan C, Eigenmann PA, Hoffmann‐Sommergruber K, Agache I, Jutel M. Highlights and recent developments in airway diseases in EAACI journals (2018). Allergy 2019; 74:2329-2341. [PMID: 31573676 DOI: 10.1111/all.14068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) supports three journals: Allergy, Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, and Clinical and Translational Allergy. EAACI's major goals include supporting the promotion of health, in which the prevention of allergy and asthma plays a critical role, and disseminating the knowledge of allergic disease to all stakeholders. In 2018, the remarkable progress in the identification of basic mechanisms of allergic and respiratory diseases as well as the translation of these findings into clinical practice were observed. Last year's highlights include publication of EAACI guidelines for allergen immunotherapy, many EAACI Position Papers covering important aspects for the specialty, better understanding of molecular and cellular mechanisms, identification of biomarkers for disease prediction and progress monitoring, novel prevention and intervention studies, elucidation of mechanisms of multimorbidities, introduction of new drugs to the clinics, recently completed phase three clinical studies, and publication of a large number of allergen immunotherapy studies and meta-analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Bousquet
- Fondation partenariale FMC VIA‐LR MACVIA‐France Montpellier France
- INSERM U 1168 VIMA: Ageing and Chronic Diseases Epidemiological and Public Health Approaches Villejuif France
- UMR‐S 1168 Université Versailles St‐Quentin‐en‐Yvelines Montigny le Bretonneux France
- EUFOREA Brussels Belgium
| | - Cezmi A. Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Christine Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education Davos Switzerland
| | - Clive Grattan
- St John's Institute of Dermatology Guy's Hospital London UK
| | | | | | - Ioana Agache
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Faculty of Medicine Transylvania University Brasov Brasov Romania
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology ALL‐MED Medical Research Institute Wroclaw Medical University Wrocław Poland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
Komlósi ZI, Kovács N, Sokolowska M, van de Veen W, Akdis M, Akdis CA. Highlights of Novel Vaccination Strategies in Allergen Immunotherapy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2019; 40:15-24. [PMID: 31761116 DOI: 10.1016/j.iac.2019.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Increasing safety while maintaining or even augmenting efficiency are the main goals of research for novel vaccine development and improvement of treatment schemes in allergen immunotherapy (AIT). To increase the efficacy of AIT, allergens have been coupled to innate immunostimulatory substances and new adjuvants have been introduced. Allergens have been modified to increase their uptake and presentation. Hypoallergenic molecules have been developed to improve the safety profile of the vaccines. Administration of recombinant IgG4 antibodies is a new, quick, passive immunization strategy with remarkable efficiency. Results of some current investigations aiming at further improvement of AIT vaccines have been summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsolt István Komlósi
- Department of Genetics, Cell- and Immunobiology, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad Sqr. 4, Budapest 1089, Hungary.
| | - Nóra Kovács
- Department of Genetics, Cell- and Immunobiology, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad Sqr. 4, Budapest 1089, Hungary; Lung Health Hospital, Munkácsy Mihály Str. 70, Törökbálint 2045, Hungary
| | - Milena Sokolowska
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), Hermann-Burchard Strasse 9, Davos Wolfgang CH7265, Switzerland; Christine Kühne - Center for Allergy Research and Education, Hermann-Burchard Strasse 1, Davos Wolfgang CH7265, Switzerland
| | - Willem van de Veen
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), Hermann-Burchard Strasse 9, Davos Wolfgang CH7265, Switzerland; Christine Kühne - Center for Allergy Research and Education, Hermann-Burchard Strasse 1, Davos Wolfgang CH7265, Switzerland
| | - Mübeccel Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), Hermann-Burchard Strasse 9, Davos Wolfgang CH7265, Switzerland; Christine Kühne - Center for Allergy Research and Education, Hermann-Burchard Strasse 1, Davos Wolfgang CH7265, Switzerland
| | - Cezmi A Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), Hermann-Burchard Strasse 9, Davos Wolfgang CH7265, Switzerland; Christine Kühne - Center for Allergy Research and Education, Hermann-Burchard Strasse 1, Davos Wolfgang CH7265, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Novakova P, Tiotiu A, Baiardini I, Krusheva B, Chong-Neto H, Novakova S. Allergen immunotherapy in asthma: current evidence. J Asthma 2019; 58:223-230. [PMID: 31638840 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1684517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background: Allergic asthma is the predominant phenotype in clinical practice. Allergen immunotherapy is the only curative and specific approach for the treatment of allergies with clinical benefits for several years after its discontinuation. Despite advances, the use of allergen immunotherapy in allergic asthma is still suboptimal and controversial.Objective: The purpose of this article is to review the published data about the impact of allergen immunotherapy with the most commonly used allergen extracts on allergic asthma outcomes, including both clinical parameters and patients' subjective experience (quality of life).Methods: As data sources several databases were used, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (2002-2019) and search in English and Spanish languages was performed using the following terms: "allergen immunotherapy" and "asthma" in combination with "house dust mite", "birch pollen", "grass pollen", "olive tree pollen", "molds", "pets" and "asthma quality of life". Randomised control trials and meta-analysis from reviewed publications were selected.Results: Emerging data relating to the positive impact on asthma outcomes of allergen immunotherapy allows the addition of this treatment as a therapeutic option in mild to moderate asthmatics sensitized to house dust mite and pollens. Limited data are available for patients sensitized to molds and pets, as well in severe allergic asthma population.Conclusion: Allergen immunotherapy remains a potential therapeutic option for some patients with allergic asthma. Further research is needed to define the optimal period of treatment, the possible therapeutic role in the treatment of severe allergic asthma, and the cost-effectiveness of allergen immunotherapy in asthmatic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Plamena Novakova
- Clinic of Clinical Allergy, Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Angelica Tiotiu
- Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.,EA3450 DevAH - Development, Adaptation and Disadvantage. Cardio-Respiratory Regulations and Motor Control, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.,Airways Disease Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ilaria Baiardini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Borislava Krusheva
- Department of Allergology and Asthma, Aleksandrovska University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Herberto Chong-Neto
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Silviya Novakova
- Allergy Unit, Internal Consulting Department, University Hospital "St. George", Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Peptide allergen immunotherapy-unraveling new pathways. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019; 144:658-660. [PMID: 31288045 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
32
|
Entwicklung der subkutanen Allergen-Immuntherapie (Teil 2): präventive Aspekte der SCIT und Innovationen. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-019-1847-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
33
|
Development of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (part 2): preventive aspects and innovations. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40629-019-0097-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
34
|
Boonpiyathad T, Sokolowska M, Morita H, Rückert B, Kast JI, Wawrzyniak M, Sangasapaviliya A, Pradubpongsa P, Fuengthong R, Thantiworasit P, Sirivichayakul S, Kwok WW, Ruxrungtham K, Akdis M, Akdis CA. Der p 1-specific regulatory T-cell response during house dust mite allergen immunotherapy. Allergy 2019; 74:976-985. [PMID: 30485456 DOI: 10.1111/all.13684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only available treatment for allergic diseases that can induce specific immune tolerance to allergens. The key mechanisms involved in this process include changes in allergen-specific regulatory T (Treg) cells. METHODS We studied 25 allergic rhinitis patients undergoing subcutaneous house dust mite-specific immunotherapy. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were studied before and after 10, 30 weeks, and 3 years of AIT. Der p 1-specific T regulatory cell responses were investigated by characterization of Der p 1-MHC class II tetramer-positive cells and correlated with nasal symptom score. RESULTS Twelve of 25 AIT patients matched with their MHC class II expression to the Der p 1 peptide-MHC class II tetramers. A significant increase in the numbers of Der p 1-specific FOXP3+ Helios+ CD25+ CD127- Treg cells after 30 weeks was observed, which slightly decreased after 3 years of AIT. In contrast, Der p 1-specific immunoglobulin-like transcript 3 (ILT3)+ CD25+ Treg cells decreased substantially from baseline after 3 years of AIT. ILT3+ Treg cells displayed compromised suppressive function and low FOXP3 expression. In addition, Der p 1-specific IL-10 and IL-22 responses have increased after 30 weeks, but only IL-10+ Der p 1-specific Treg cells remained present at high frequency after 3 years of AIT. Increased number of FOXP3+ Helios+ and IL-10+ and decreased ILT3+ Treg cell responses correlated with improved allergic symptoms. CONCLUSION The results indicate that AIT involves upregulation of the activated allergen-specific Treg cells and downregulation of dysfunctional allergen-specific Treg cell subset. Correction of dysregulated Treg cells responses during AIT is associated with improved clinical response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadech Boonpiyathad
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Christine Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education Davos Switzerland
- Department of Medicine Phramongkutklao Hospital Bangkok Thailand
- Faculty of Medicine Chulalongkorn University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Milena Sokolowska
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Christine Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education Davos Switzerland
| | - Hideaki Morita
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Research Institute for Child Health and Development Tokyo Japan
| | - Beate Rückert
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
| | - Jeannette I. Kast
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
| | - Marcin Wawrzyniak
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - William W. Kwok
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Seattle Washington
- Department of Immunology University of Washington Seattle Washington
| | | | - Mübeccel Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
| | - Cezmi A. Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
- Christine Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education Davos Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sharif H, Singh I, Kouser L, Mösges R, Bonny MA, Karamani A, Parkin RV, Bovy N, Kishore U, Robb A, Katotomichelakis M, Holtappels G, Derycke L, Corazza F, von Frenckell R, Wathelet N, Duchateau J, Legon T, Pirotton S, Durham SR, Bachert C, Shamji MH. Immunologic mechanisms of a short-course of Lolium perenne peptide immunotherapy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019; 144:738-749. [PMID: 30844425 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Revised: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A 3-week short-course of adjuvant-free hydrolysates of Lolium perenne peptide (LPP) immunotherapy for rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma over 4 physician visits is safe, well tolerated, and effective. OBJECTIVE We sought to investigate immunologic mechanisms of LPP immunotherapy in a subset of patients who participated in a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (clinical.govNCT02560948). METHODS Participants were randomized to receive LPP (n = 21) or placebo (n = 11) for 3 weeks over 4 visits. Grass pollen-induced basophil, T-cell, and B-cell responses were evaluated before treatment (visit [V] 2), at the end of treatment (V6), and after the pollen season (V8). RESULTS Combined symptom and rescue medication scores (CSMS) were lower during the peak pollen season (-35.1%, P = .03) and throughout the pollen season (-53.7%, P = .03) in the LPP-treated group compared with those in the placebo-treated group. Proportions of CD63+ and CD203cbrightCRTH2+ basophils were decreased following LPP treatment at V6 (10 ng/mL, P < .0001) and V8 (10 ng/mL, P < .001) compared to V2. No change in the placebo-treated group was observed. Blunting of seasonal increases in levels of grass pollen-specific IgE was observed in LPP-treated but not placebo-treated group. LPP immunotherapy, but not placebo, was associated with a reduction in proportions of IL-4+ TH2 (V6, P = .02), IL-4+ (V6, P = .003; V8, P = .004), and IL-21+ (V6, P = .003; V8, P = .002) follicular helper T cells. Induction of FoxP3+, follicular regulatory T, and IL-10+ regulatory B cells were observed at V6 (all P < .05) and V8 (all P < .05) in LPP-treated group. Induction of regulatory B cells was associated with allergen-neutralizing IgG4-blocking antibodies. CONCLUSION For the first time, we demonstrate that the immunologic mechanisms of LPP immunotherapy are underscored by immune modulation in the T- and B-cell compartments, which is necessary for its effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanisah Sharif
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair & Development, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Iesha Singh
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair & Development, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lubna Kouser
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair & Development, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ralph Mösges
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMSIE), Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Angeliki Karamani
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair & Development, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca V Parkin
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair & Development, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Abigail Robb
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair & Development, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Lara Derycke
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Francis Corazza
- Laboratory of Clinical Biology, CHU Brugmann, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Stephen R Durham
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair & Development, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Claus Bachert
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair & Development, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zhu Y, Zhong T, Ge D, Li Q, Wu J. Multi-Factor Analysis of Single-Center Asthma Control in Xiamen, China. Front Pediatr 2019; 7:498. [PMID: 31850293 PMCID: PMC6901658 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the effects of air pollutants, age, allergic history, family allergic history, treatment, treatment steps, and compliance on uncontrolled childhood asthma in Xiamen, China. The clinical data of children with asthma in the pediatric outpatient department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University from January 2016 to June 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the assessment of the patients' outcome including well-controlled, partly-controlled and uncontrolled, 7,211 cases of 3,268 patients were selected. Rank sum test and ordered multi-class logistic regression analysis were used. In the rank sum test, age, allergic history, family allergic history, season, treatment, treatment steps and compliance were found associated with uncontrolled rate (all P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that PM10, NO2, and SO2 raised uncontrolled-asthma rate (aOR 1.311, aOR 1.281, aOR 1.252, respectively). Older children had lower uncontrolled rate (OR = 0.849, 95% CI: 0.758-0.950), children with higher treatment steps had higher uncontrolled rate (OR = 1.227, 95%CI: 1.040-1.448), and children with better treatment compliance have lower uncontrolled rate (OR = 0.374 95% CI: 0.331-0.424). The order of the uncontrolled rate of asthma from high to low was winter, spring, autumn, and summer. PM10, NO2, SO2, age, season, treatment steps, and treatment compliance have significance for predicting the control rate of childhood asthma in Xiamen, China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Zhu
- Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Taoling Zhong
- National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Dandan Ge
- Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Qiyuan Li
- National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Jinzhun Wu
- Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Reitsma S, Subramaniam S, Fokkens WWJ, Wang DY. Recent developments and highlights in rhinitis and allergen immunotherapy. Allergy 2018; 73:2306-2313. [PMID: 30260494 DOI: 10.1111/all.13617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 09/09/2018] [Accepted: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
This review paper aims to provide an overview of recent developments in the field of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis, as well as allergen immunotherapy. Recent advances in phenotyping and endotyping various forms of rhinitis have brought us one step closer towards tailoring treatment more appropriately for a given patient. Updates on local allergic rhinitis are also covered. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an area of significant interest, with multiple original papers and recent position papers and guidelines published. Evidence related to the application of AIT in seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis (AR), local allergic rhinitis and novel and expanded applications is discussed in the publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sietze Reitsma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology; Amsterdam UMC; University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Soma Subramaniam
- Department of Otolaryngology; Ng Teng Fong General Hospital; Singapore Singapore
| | - Wytske W. J. Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology; Amsterdam UMC; University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - De Yun Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology; National University of Singapore; Singapore Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pfaar O, Lou H, Zhang Y, Klimek L, Zhang L. Recent developments and highlights in allergen immunotherapy. Allergy 2018; 73:2274-2289. [PMID: 30372537 DOI: 10.1111/all.13652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Revised: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment option for patients with IgE-mediated inhalant allergies. Though used in clinical practice for more than 100 years, most innovations in AIT efficacy and safety have been developed in the last two decades. This expert review aimed to highlight the recent progress in AIT for both application routes, the sublingual (SLIT) and subcutaneous (SCIT) forms. As such, it covers recent aspects regarding efficacy and safety in clinical trials and real-life data and outlines new concepts in consensus and position papers as well as in guidelines for AIT. Potential clinical and nonclinical biomarkers are discussed. This review also focuses on potential future perspectives in AIT, such as alternative application routes, immune-modulating adjuvants, and recombinant vaccines. In conclusion, this state of the art review provides a comprehensive overview of AIT and highlights unmet needs for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Section of Rhinology and Allergy; University Hospital Marburg; Philipps-Universität Marburg; Marburg Germany
| | - Hongfei Lou
- Department of Otolaryngology; Head and Neck Surgery; Beijing TongRen Hospital; Capital Medical University; Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases; Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology; Beijing China
- Department of Allergy; Beijing TongRen Hospital; Capital Medical University; Beijing China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology; Head and Neck Surgery; Beijing TongRen Hospital; Capital Medical University; Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases; Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology; Beijing China
- Department of Allergy; Beijing TongRen Hospital; Capital Medical University; Beijing China
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology; Wiesbaden Germany
| | - Luo Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology; Head and Neck Surgery; Beijing TongRen Hospital; Capital Medical University; Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases; Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology; Beijing China
- Department of Allergy; Beijing TongRen Hospital; Capital Medical University; Beijing China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mösges R, Bachert C, Panzner P, Calderon MA, Haazen L, Pirotton S, Wathelet N, Durham SR, Bonny MA, Legon T, von Frenckell R, Pfaar O, Shamji MH. Short course of grass allergen peptides immunotherapy over 3 weeks reduces seasonal symptoms in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with/without asthma: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Allergy 2018. [PMID: 29512827 PMCID: PMC6175232 DOI: 10.1111/all.13433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Background Immunotherapy with peptide hydrolysates from Lolium perenne (LPP) is an alternative treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis with or without asthma. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of a cumulative dose of 170 μg LPP administered subcutaneously over 3 weeks. Methods In a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial, 554 adults with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis were randomized (1:2 ratio) to receive 8 subcutaneous injections of placebo or 170 μg LPP administered in increasing doses in 4 visits over 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the combined symptom and medication score (CSMS) measured over the peak pollen season. Reactivity to conjunctival provocation test (CPT) and quality of life (QOL) was assessed as secondary endpoints. Results The mean reduction in CSMS in the LPP vs placebo group was −15.5% (P = .041) during the peak period and −17.9% (P = .029) over the entire pollen season. LPP‐treated group had a reduced reactivity to CPT (P < .001) and, during the pollen season, a lower rhinoconjunctivitis QOL global score (P = .005) compared with placebo group. Mostly mild and WAO grade 1 early systemic reaction (ESR) were observed ≤30 minutes in 10.5% of LPP‐treated patients, whereas 3 patients with a medical history of asthma (<1%) experienced a serious ESR that resolved with rescue medication. Conclusion Lolium perenne pollen peptides administered over 3 weeks before the grass pollen season significantly reduced seasonal symptoms and was generally safe and well‐tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Mösges
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology; Cologne Germany
| | - C. Bachert
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory; Ghent University Hospital; Ghent Belgium
| | - P. Panzner
- Department of Immunology and Allergology; Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen; Charles University in Prague; Pilsen Czech Republic
| | - M. A. Calderon
- Immune Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation; Repair and Development, NHLI; Imperial College; London MRC Asthma UK Centre, UK
| | | | | | | | - S. R. Durham
- Immune Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation; Repair and Development, NHLI; Imperial College; London MRC Asthma UK Centre, UK
| | | | | | | | - O. Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Universitätsmedizin Mannheim; Medical Faculty Mannheim; Heidelberg University; Mannheim Germany
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology; Wiesbaden Germany
| | - M. H. Shamji
- Immune Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation; Repair and Development, NHLI; Imperial College; London MRC Asthma UK Centre, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Gunawardana NC, Durham SR. New approaches to allergen immunotherapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018; 121:293-305. [PMID: 30025907 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE New insights into mechanisms should enable strategic improvement of allergen immunotherapy, aiming to make it safer, faster, more effective, and able to induce long-term tolerance. We review novel approaches with potential to translate into clinical use. DATA SOURCES Database searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. STUDY SELECTIONS Search terms were based on current and novel approaches in immunotherapy. Literature was selected primarily from recent randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trials and meta-analyses. RESULTS Alum, microcrystalline tyrosine, and calcium phosphate are adjuvants in current use. Toll-like receptor-4 agonists combined with allergen have potential to shorten duration of treatment. Other novel adjuvants, nanoparticles, and virus-like particles in combination with allergen have shown early promise. Omalizumab lessens systemic side effects but does not improve efficacy. Intralymphatic immunotherapy for aeroallergens, epicutaneous immunotherapy for food allergens, and use of modified allergens (allergoids), recombinant allergens (and hypoallergenic variants), and T- and B-cell peptide approaches have shown evidence of efficacy and permitted shortened courses but have only rarely been compared with conventional extracts. CONCLUSION Novel routes of immunotherapy, use of modified allergens, and combination of allergens with immunostimulatory adjuvants or immune modifiers have been developed to augment downregulation of T-helper cell type 2 immunity and/or induce "protective" blocking antibodies. Although these strategies have permitted shortened courses, confirmatory phase 3 trials are required to confirm efficacy and safety and head-to-head trials are required for comparative efficacy. Currently, subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapies using in-house standardized crude extracts remain the only approaches proved to induce long-term tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha C Gunawardana
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen R Durham
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|