Factors influencing biased agonism in recombinant cells expressing the human α1A -adrenoceptor

Adrenoceptor Desensitization: Current Understanding of Mechanisms

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) transduce a wide range of extracellular signals. They are key players in the majority of biologic functions including vision, olfaction, chemotaxis, and immunity. However, as essential as most of them are to body function and homeostasis, overactivation of GPCRs has been implicated in many pathologic diseases such as cancer, asthma, and heart failure (HF). Therefore, an important feature of G protein signaling systems is the ability to control GPCR responsiveness, and one key process to control overstimulation involves initiating receptor desensitization. A number of steps are appreciated in the desensitization process, including cell surface receptor phosphorylation, internalization, and downregulation. Rapid or short-term desensitization occurs within minutes and involves receptor phosphorylation via the action of intracellular protein kinases, the binding of β-arrestins, and the consequent uncoupling of GPCRs from their cognate heterotrimeric G proteins. On the other hand, long-term desensitization occurs over hours to days and involves receptor downregulation or a decrease in cell surface receptor protein level. Of the proteins involved in this biologic phenomenon, β-arrestins play a particularly significant role in both short- and long-term desensitization mechanisms. In addition, β-arrestins are involved in the phenomenon of biased agonism, where the biased ligand preferentially activates one of several downstream signaling pathways, leading to altered cellular responses. In this context, this review discusses the different patterns of desensitization of the α 1-, α 2- and the β adrenoceptors and highlights the role of β-arrestins in regulating physiologic responsiveness through desensitization and biased agonism. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: A sophisticated network of proteins orchestrates the molecular regulation of GPCR activity. Adrenoceptors are GPCRs that play vast roles in many physiological processes. Without tightly controlled desensitization of these receptors, homeostatic imbalance may ensue, thus precipitating various diseases. Here, we critically appraise the mechanisms implicated in adrenoceptor desensitization. A better understanding of these mechanisms helps identify new druggable targets within the GPCR desensitization machinery and opens exciting therapeutic fronts in the treatment of several pathologies.

α1-Adrenergic Receptors: Insights into Potential Therapeutic Opportunities for COVID-19, Heart Failure, and Alzheimer's Disease

α1-Adrenergic receptors (ARs) are members of the G-Protein Coupled Receptor superfamily and with other related receptors (β and α2), they are involved in regulating the sympathetic nervous system through binding and activation by norepinephrine and epinephrine. Traditionally, α1-AR antagonists were first used as anti-hypertensives, as α1-AR activation increases vasoconstriction, but they are not a first-line use at present. The current usage of α1-AR antagonists increases urinary flow in benign prostatic hyperplasia. α1-AR agonists are used in septic shock, but the increased blood pressure response limits use for other conditions. However, with the advent of genetic-based animal models of the subtypes, drug design of highly selective ligands, scientists have discovered potentially newer uses for both agonists and antagonists of the α1-AR. In this review, we highlight newer treatment potential for α1A-AR agonists (heart failure, ischemia, and Alzheimer's disease) and non-selective α1-AR antagonists (COVID-19/SARS, Parkinson's disease, and posttraumatic stress disorder). While the studies reviewed here are still preclinical in cell lines and rodent disease models or have undergone initial clinical trials, potential therapeutics discussed here should not be used for non-approved conditions.

Characterization of a novel positive allosteric modulator of the α1A-Adrenergic receptor

α₁-Adrenergic Receptors (ARs) are G-protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) that regulate the sympathetic nervous system via the binding and activation of norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (Epi). α₁-ARs control various aspects of neurotransmission, cognition, cardiovascular functions as well as other organ systems. However, therapeutic drug development for these receptors, particularly agonists, has been stagnant due to unwanted effects on blood pressure regulation. We report the synthesis and characterization of the first positive allosteric modulator (PAM) for the α₁-AR based upon the derivation of the α_1A-AR selective imidazoline agonist, cirazoline. Compound 3 (Cmpd-3) binds the α_1A-AR with high and low affinity sites (0.13pM; 54 ​nM) typical of GPCR agonists, and reverts to a single low affinity site of 100 ​nM upon the addition of GTP. Comparison of Cmpd-3 versus other orthosteric α_1A-AR-selective imidazoline ligands reveal unique properties that are consistent with a type I PAM. Cmpd-3 is both conformationally and ligand-selective for the α_1A-AR subtype. In competition binding studies, Cmpd-3 potentiates NE-binding at the α_1A-AR only on the high affinity state of NE with no effect on the Epi-bound α_1A-AR. Moreover, Cmpd-3 demonstrates signaling-bias and potentiates the NE-mediated cAMP response of the α_1A-AR at nM concentrations with no effects on the NE-mediated inositol phosphate response. There are no effects of Cmpd-3 on the signaling at the α_1B- or α_1D-AR subtypes. Cmpd-3 displays characteristics of a pure PAM with no intrinsic agonist properties. Specific derivation of Cmpd-3 at the R1 ortho-position recapitulated PAM characteristics. Our results characterize the first PAM for the α₁-AR and holds promise for a first-in-class therapeutic to treat various diseases without the side effect of increasing blood pressure intrinsic to classical orthosteric agonists.

The signaling and selectivity of α-adrenoceptor agonists for the human α2A, α2B and α2C-adrenoceptors and comparison with human α1 and β-adrenoceptors

α2‐adrenoceptors, (α2A, α2B and α2C‐subtypes), are Gi‐coupled receptors. Central activation of brain α2A and α2C‐adrenoceptors is the main site for α2‐agonist mediated clinical responses in hypertension, ADHD, muscle spasm and ITU management of sedation, reduction in opiate requirements, nausea and delirium. However, despite having the same Gi‐potency in functional assays, some α2‐agonists also stimulate Gs‐responses whilst others do not. This was investigated. Agonist responses to 49 different α‐agonists were studied (CRE‐gene transcription, cAMP, ERK1/2‐phosphorylation and binding affinity) in CHO cells stably expressing the human α2A, α2B or α2C‐adrenoceptor, enabling ligand intrinsic efficacy to be determined (binding K_D/Gi‐IC₅₀). Ligands with high intrinsic efficacy (e.g., brimonidine and moxonidine at α2A) stimulated biphasic (Gi‐Gs) concentration responses, however for ligands with low intrinsic efficacy (e.g., naphazoline), responses were monophasic (Gi‐only). ERK1/2‐phosphorylation responses appeared to be Gi‐mediated. For Gs‐mediated responses to be observed, both a system with high receptor reserve and high agonist intrinsic efficacy were required. From the Gi‐mediated efficacy ratio, the degree of Gs‐coupling could be predicted. The clinical relevance and precise receptor conformational changes that occur, given the structural diversity of compounds with high intrinsic efficacy, remains to be determined. Comparison with α1 and β1/β2‐adrenoceptors demonstrated subclass affinity selectivity for some compounds (e.g., α2:dexmedetomidine, α1:A61603) whilst e.g., oxymetazoline had high affinity for both α2A and α1A‐subtypes, compared to all others. Some compounds had subclass selectivity due to selective intrinsic efficacy (e.g., α2:brimonidine, α1:methoxamine/etilefrine). A detailed knowledge of these agonist characteristics is vital for improving computer‐based deep‐learning and drug design.

The Pharmacological Effects of Phenylephrine are Indirect, Mediated by Noradrenaline Release from the Cytoplasm

Phenylephrine (PE) is a canonical α₁-adrenoceptor-selective agonist. However, unexpected effects of PE have been observed in preclinical and clinical studies, that cannot be easily explained by its actions on α₁-adrenoceptors. The probability of the involvement of α₂- and β-adrenoceptors in the effect of PE has been raised. In addition, our earlier study observed that PE released noradrenaline (NA) in a [Ca²⁺]_o-independent manner. To elucidate this issue, we have investigated the effects of PE on [³H]NA release and α₁-mediated smooth muscle contractions in the mouse vas deferens (MVD) as ex vivo preparation. The release experiments were designed to assess the effects of PE at the presynaptic terminal, whereas smooth muscle isometric contractions in response to electrical field stimulation were used to measure PE effect postsynaptically. Our results show that PE at concentrations between 0.3 and 30 µM significantly enhanced the resting release of [³H]NA in a [Ca²⁺]_o-independent manner. In addition, prazosin did not affect the release of NA evoked by PE. On the contrary, PE-evoked smooth muscle contractions were inhibited by prazosin administration indicating the α₁-adrenoceptor-mediated effect. When the function of the NA transporter (NAT) was attenuated with nisoxetine, PE failed to release NA and the contractions were reduced by approximately 88%. The remaining part proved to be prazosin-sensitive. The present work supports the substantial indirect effect of PE which relays on the cytoplasmic release of NA, which might explain the reported side effects for PE.

Roles of receptor phosphorylation and Rab proteins in G protein-coupled receptor function and trafficking

The G Protein-Coupled Receptors form the most abundant family of membrane proteins and are crucial physiological players in the homeostatic equilibrium, which we define as health. They also participate in the pathogenesis of many diseases and are frequent targets of therapeutic intervention. Considering their importance, it is not surprising that different mechanisms regulate their function, including desensitization, resensitization, internalization, recycling to the plasma membrane, and degradation. These processes are modulated in a highly coordinated and specific way by protein kinases and phosphatases, ubiquitin ligases, protein adaptors, interaction with multifunctional complexes, molecular motors, phospholipid metabolism, and membrane distribution. This review describes significant advances in the study of the regulation of these receptors by phosphorylation and endosomal traffic (where signaling can take place); we revisited the bar code hypothesis and include two additional observations: a) that different phosphorylation patterns seem to be associated with internalization and endosome sorting for recycling or degradation, and b) that, surprisingly, phosphorylation of some G protein-coupled receptors appears to be required for proper receptor insertion into the plasma membrane. Significance Statement G protein-coupled receptor phosphorylation is an early event in desensitization/ signaling switching, endosomal traffic, and internalization. These events seem crucial for receptor responsiveness, cellular localization, and fate (recycling/ degradation) with important pharmacological/ therapeutic implications. Phosphorylation sites vary depending on the cells in which they are expressed and on the stimulus that leads to such covalent modification. Surprisingly, evidence suggests that phosphorylation also seems to be required for proper insertion into the plasma membrane for some receptors.

Pharmacophore-guided Virtual Screening to Identify New β3-Adrenergic Receptor Agonists

The β₃‐adrenergic receptor (β₃‐AR) is found in several tissues such as adipose tissue and urinary bladder. It is a therapeutic target because it plays a role in thermogenesis, lipolysis, and bladder relaxation. Two β₃‐AR agonists are used clinically: mirabegron 1 and vibegron 2, which are indicated for overactive bladder syndrome. However, these drugs show adverse effects, including increased blood pressure in mirabegron patients. Hence, new β₃‐AR agonists are needed as starting points for drug development. Previous pharmacophore modeling studies of the β₃‐AR did not involve experimental in vitro validation. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct prospective virtual screening and confirm the biological activity of virtual hits. Ligand‐based pharmacophore modeling was performed since no 3D structure of human β₃‐AR is yet available. A dataset consisting of β₃‐AR agonists was prepared to build and validate the pharmacophore models. The best model was employed for prospective virtual screening, followed by physicochemical property filtering and a docking evaluation. To confirm the activity of the virtual hits, an in vitro assay was conducted, measuring cAMP levels at the cloned β₃‐AR. Out of 35 tested compounds, 4 compounds were active in CHO−K1 cells expressing the human β₃‐AR, and 8 compounds were active in CHO−K1 cells expressing the mouse β₃‐AR.

The selectivity of α-adrenoceptor agonists for the human α1A, α1B, and α1D-adrenoceptors

Highly selective drugs offer a way to minimize side-effects. For agonist ligands, this could be through highly selective affinity or highly selective efficacy, but this requires careful measurements of intrinsic efficacy. The α1-adrenoceptors are important clinical targets, and α1-agonists are used to manage hypotension, sedation, attention deficit hypersensitivity disorder (ADHD), and nasal decongestion. With 100 years of drug development, there are many structurally different compounds with which to study agonist selectivity. This study examined 62 α-agonists at the three human α1-adrenoceptor (α1A, α1B, and α1D) stably expressed in CHO cells. Affinity was measured using whole-cell 3 H-prazosin binding, while functional responses were measured for calcium mobilization, ERK1/2-phosphorylation, and cAMP accumulation. Efficacy ratios were used to rank compounds in order of intrinsic efficacy. Adrenaline, noradrenaline, and phenylephrine were highly efficacious α1-agonists at all three receptor subtypes. A61603 was the most selective agonist and its very high α1A-selectivity was due to selective α1A-affinity (>660-fold). There was no evidence of Gq-calcium versus ERK-phosphorylation biased signaling at the α1A, α1B, or α1D-adrenoceptors. There was little evidence for α1A calcium versus cAMP biased signaling, although there were suggestions of calcium versus cAMP bias the α1B-adrenoceptor. Comparisons of the rank order of ligand intrinsic efficacy suggest little evidence for selective intrinsic efficacy between the compounds, with perhaps the exception of dobutamine which may have some α1D-selective efficacy. There seems plenty of scope to develop affinity selective and intrinsic efficacy selective drugs for the α1-adrenoceptors in future.

Targeting Adrenergic Receptors in Metabolic Therapies for Heart Failure

The heart has a reduced capacity to generate sufficient energy when failing, resulting in an energy-starved condition with diminished functions. Studies have identified numerous changes in metabolic pathways in the failing heart that result in reduced oxidation of both glucose and fatty acid substrates, defects in mitochondrial functions and oxidative phosphorylation, and inefficient substrate utilization for the ATP that is produced. Recent early-phase clinical studies indicate that inhibitors of fatty acid oxidation and antioxidants that target the mitochondria may improve heart function during failure by increasing compensatory glucose oxidation. Adrenergic receptors (α₁ and β) are a key sympathetic nervous system regulator that controls cardiac function. β-AR blockers are an established treatment for heart failure and α_1A-AR agonists have potential therapeutic benefit. Besides regulating inotropy and chronotropy, α₁- and β-adrenergic receptors also regulate metabolic functions in the heart that underlie many cardiac benefits. This review will highlight recent studies that describe how adrenergic receptor-mediated metabolic pathways may be able to restore cardiac energetics to non-failing levels that may offer promising therapeutic strategies.

Current Developments on the Role of α1-Adrenergic Receptors in Cognition, Cardioprotection, and Metabolism

The α₁-adrenergic receptors (ARs) are G-protein coupled receptors that bind the endogenous catecholamines, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. They play a key role in the regulation of the sympathetic nervous system along with β and α₂-AR family members. While all of the adrenergic receptors bind with similar affinity to the catecholamines, they can regulate different physiologies and pathophysiologies in the body because they couple to different G-proteins and signal transduction pathways, commonly in opposition to one another. While α₁-AR subtypes (α_1A, α_1B, α_1C) have long been known to be primary regulators of vascular smooth muscle contraction, blood pressure, and cardiac hypertrophy, their role in neurotransmission, improving cognition, protecting the heart during ischemia and failure, and regulating whole body and organ metabolism are not well known and are more recent developments. These advancements have been made possible through the development of transgenic and knockout mouse models and more selective ligands to advance their research. Here, we will review the recent literature to provide new insights into these physiological functions and possible use as a therapeutic target.

GPR55 regulates the responsiveness to, but does not dimerise with, α1A-adrenoceptors

Emerging evidence suggests that G protein coupled receptor 55 (GPR55) may influence adrenoceptor function/activity in the cardiovascular system. Whether this reflects direct interaction (dimerization) between receptors or signalling crosstalk has not been investigated. This study explored the interaction between GPR55 and the alpha 1A-adrenoceptor (α_1A-AR) in the cardiovascular system and the potential to influence function/signalling activities. GPR55 and α_1A-AR mediated changes in both cardiac and vascular function was assessed in male wild-type (WT) and GPR55 homozygous knockout (GPR55^-/-) mice by pressure volume loop analysis and isolated vessel myography, respectively. Dimerization of GPR55 with the α_1A-AR was examined in transfected Chinese hamster ovary-K1 (CHO-K1) cells via Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET). GPR55 and α_1A-AR mediated signalling (extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation) was investigated in neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocytes using AlphaScreen proximity assays. GPR55^-/- mice exhibited both enhanced pressor and inotropic responses to A61603 (α_1A-AR agonist), while in isolated vessels, A61603 induced vasoconstriction was attenuated by a GPR55-dependent mechanism. Conversely, GPR55-mediated vasorelaxation was not altered by pharmacological blockade of α_1A-ARs with tamsulosin. While cellular studies demonstrated that GPR55 and α_1A-AR failed to dimerize, pharmacological blockade of GPR55 altered α_1A-AR mediated signalling and reduced ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Taken together, this study provides evidence that GPR55 and α_1A-AR do not dimerize to form heteromers, but do interact at the signalling level to modulate the function of α_1A-AR in the cardiovascular system.

Terazosin reduces steroidogenic factor 1 and upregulates heat shock protein 90 expression in LH-induced bovine ovarian theca cells

Hyperthecosis syndrome is a common endocrine system metabolic disorder in women of childbearing age. The main symptoms are elevated androgen levels, abnormal ovulation, and excessive oxidative stress. Currently, there is no effective treatment for hyperthecosis syndrome. α(1)-adrenergic receptor (ADRA1) is involved in the metabolic pathway of ovarian steroid hormone. This study studied the mechanism of the ADRA1 inhibitor terazosin in the LH-induced bovine theca cells in vitro. We found that terazosin regulates the expression of steroidogenic factor 1 (SF1) and downstream genes through the ERK1/2 pathway, reducing androgen content. Terazosin promotes the expression of HSP90 and reduces the activity of iNOS. In addition, Terazosin up-regulates the expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and its downstream gene γ-GCS, which improves the ability of theca cells to resist oxidative stress. This study provides a reference for the treatment of human hyperthecosis syndrome.

Effects of agonists and phorbol esters on α1A-adrenergic receptor-Rab protein interactions

In a cell line, stably expressing α1A-adrenoceptors fused to the mCherry red fluorescent protein, noradrenaline, methoxamine, and oxymetazoline induced concentration-dependent increases in intracellular calcium. All of these agents increase α1A-adrenoceptor phosphorylation and internalization. Transient co-expression of these receptors with Rab proteins tagged with the enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein was employed to estimate α1A-adrenoceptor-Rab interaction using Förster Resonance Energy Transfer. Noradrenaline and methoxamine increased α1A-adrenoceptor interaction with Rab5 and Rab7 but did not modify it with Rab9. Oxymetazoline induced adrenoceptor interaction with Rab5 and Rab9 and only an insignificant increase in Rab7 signal. Phorbol myristate acetate increased α1A-adrenoceptor interaction with Rab5 and Rab9 but did not modify it with Rab7. The agonists and the active phorbol ester, all of which induce receptor phosphorylation and internalization, favor receptor interaction with Rab5, i.e., association with early endosomes. Cell stimulation with phorbol myristate acetate induced the α1A-adrenoceptors to interact with the late endosomal marker, Rab9, suggesting that the receptors are directed to slow recycling endosomes once they have transited to the Trans-Golgi network to be retrieved to the plasma membrane. The agonists noradrenaline and methoxamine likely induce a faster recycling and might direct some of the adrenoceptors toward degradation and/or very slow recycling to the plasma membrane. Oxymetazoline produced a mixed pattern of interaction with the Rab proteins. These data indicate that α1A-adrenoceptor agonists can trigger different vesicular traffic and receptor fates within the cells.

α1-Adrenergic Receptors in Neurotransmission, Synaptic Plasticity, and Cognition

α₁-adrenergic receptors are G-Protein Coupled Receptors that are involved in neurotransmission and regulate the sympathetic nervous system through binding and activating the neurotransmitter, norepinephrine, and the neurohormone, epinephrine. There are three α₁-adrenergic receptor subtypes (α_1A, α_1B, α_1D) that are known to play various roles in neurotransmission and cognition. They are related to two other adrenergic receptor families that also bind norepinephrine and epinephrine, the β- and α₂-, each with three subtypes (β₁, β₂, β₃, α_2A, α_2B, α_2C). Previous studies assessing the roles of α₁-adrenergic receptors in neurotransmission and cognition have been inconsistent. This was due to the use of poorly-selective ligands and many of these studies were published before the characterization of the cloned receptor subtypes and the subsequent development of animal models. With the availability of more-selective ligands and the development of animal models, a clearer picture of their role in cognition and neurotransmission can be assessed. In this review, we highlight the significant role that the α₁-adrenergic receptor plays in regulating synaptic efficacy, both short and long-term synaptic plasticity, and its regulation of different types of memory. We will also present evidence that the α₁-adrenergic receptors, and particularly the α_1A-adrenergic receptor subtype, are a potentially good target to treat a wide variety of neurological conditions with diminished cognition.

α1-Adrenergic receptors increase glucose oxidation under normal and ischemic conditions in adult mouse cardiomyocytes

The role of catecholamine receptors in cardiac energy metabolism is unknown. α₁-adrenergic receptors (α₁-ARs) have been identified to play a role in whole body metabolism but its role in cardiac energy metabolism has not been explored. We used freshly prepared primary adult mouse cardiomyocytes and incubated with either ¹⁴C-palmitate or ¹⁴C-glucose tracers to measure oxidation rates in the presence or absence of phenylephrine, an α₁-AR agonist (with β and α₂-AR blockers) under normal cell culture conditions. ¹⁴CO₂ released was collected over a 10 min period in covered tissue culture plates using a 1 M hyamine hydroxide solution placed in well cups, counted by scintillation and converted into nmoles/hr. We found that phenylephrine stimulated glucose oxidation but not fatty acid oxidation in adult primary cardiomyocytes. α₁-AR stimulated glucose oxidation was blocked by the AMPK inhibitor, dorsomorphin dihydrochloride, and the PKC inhibitor, rottlerin. Ischemic conditions were induced by lowering the glucose concentration from 22.5 mM to 1.375 mM. Under ischemic conditions, we found that phenylephrine also increased glucose oxidation. We report a direct role of α₁-ARs in regulating glucose oxidation under normal and ischemic conditions that may lead to new therapeutic approaches in treating ischemia.

Functional activation of Gαq/11 protein via α1 -adrenoceptor in rat cerebral cortical membranes

Although it is recognized that α₁ -adrenoceptors are coupled to diverse intracellular signalling pathways, its primary transduction mechanisms are evoked by activating phospholipase C in the cell membrane through Gα_q/11 , resulting in production of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol. However, there have been few studies that indicate directly the involvement of Gα_q/11 proteins in this signalling pathway in the central nervous system. In the current study, we tried to pharmacologically characterize (-)-adrenaline-stimulated [³⁵ S]GTPγS binding to Gα_q/11 in rat brain membranes. Functional activation of Gα_q/11 coupled to α₁ -adrenoceptor was investigated by using [³⁵ S]GTPγS binding/immunoprecipitation assay in the membranes prepared from rat cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and striatum. The specific [³⁵ S]GTPγS binding to Gα_q/11 was stimulated by (-)-adrenaline in a concentration-dependent and saturable manner in rat cerebral cortical membranes. In hippocampal or striatal membranes, the stimulatory effects of (-)-adrenaline were scarce. The effect of (-)-adrenaline was potently inhibited by prazosin, a potent and selective α₁ -adrenoceptor antagonist, but not by yohimbine, a selective α₂ -adrenoceptor antagonist. The response was mimicked by cirazoline, but not by R(-)-phenylephrine. Although oxymetazoline also stimulated the specific [³⁵ S]GTPγS binding to Gα_q/11 as an apparent "super-agonist", detailed pharmacological characterization revealed that its agonistic properties in this experimental system were derived from off-target effects on 5-HT_2A receptors, but not via α₁ -adrenoceptors. In conclusion, functional coupling of α₁ -adrenoceptors to Gα_q/11 proteins are detectable in rat brain membranes by means of [³⁵ S]GTPγS binding/immunoprecipitation assay. It is necessary to interpret the experimental data with caution when oxymetazoline is included as an agonist at α₁ -adrenoceptors.

Updates in the function and regulation of α1 -adrenoceptors

α₁ -Adrenoceptors are seven transmembrane domain GPCRs involved in numerous physiological functions controlled by the endogenous catecholamines, noradrenaline and adrenaline, and targeted by drugs useful in therapeutics. Three separate genes, whose products are named α_1A -, α_1B -, and α_1D - adrenoceptors, encode these receptors. Although the existence of multiple α₁ -adrenoceptors has been acknowledged for almost 25 years, the specific functions regulated by each subtype are still largely unknown. Despite the limited comprehension, the identification of a single class of subtype-selective ligands for the α_1A - adrenoceptors, the so-called α-blockers for prostate dysfunction, has led to major improvement in therapeutics, demonstrating the need for continued efforts in the field. This review article surveys the tissue distribution of the three α₁ -adrenoceptor subtypes in the cardiovascular system, genitourinary system, and CNS, highlighting the functions already identified as mediated by the predominant activation of specific subtypes. In addition, this review covers the recent advances in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of each of the α₁ -adrenoceptor subtypes by phosphorylation and interaction with proteins involved in their desensitization and internalization. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Adrenoceptors-New Roles for Old Players. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.14/issuetoc.

What makes the α1A -adrenoceptor gene product assume an α1L -adrenoceptor phenotype?

The α_1A -adrenoceptor is abundantly expressed in the lower urinary tract and is the principal therapeutic target for the symptomatic treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men. Prazosin has a lower affinity for the lower urinary tract α_1A -adrenoceptor than α_1A -adrenoceptors found in other parts of the body. This has led to the lower urinary tract α_1A -adrenoceptor being subclassified as an α_1L -adrenoceptor. It was demonstrated that this pharmacologically distinct α_1L -adrenoceptor is a product of the α_1A -adrenoceptor gene, but the mechanism by which this altered phenotype is achieved remains a mystery. Hypotheses for this altered pharmacology include the presence of an interacting protein such as cysteine-rich with EGF-like domain (CRELD) 1 or other GPCRs such as the CXCR2 chemokine or 5-HT_1B receptor. Alternatively, the influence of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) efflux transporters on the pharmacology of α_1A -adrenoceptors has also been investigated. These and other hypotheses will be described and discussed in this review. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Adrenoceptors-New Roles for Old Players. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.14/issuetoc.

Kinetic and system bias as drivers of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 allosteric modulator pharmacology

Allosteric modulators of the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGlu₅) have been proposed as potential therapies for various CNS disorders. These ligands bind to sites distinct from the orthosteric (or endogenous) ligand, often with improved subtype selectivity and spatio-temporal control over receptor responses. We recently revealed that mGlu₅ allosteric agonists and positive allosteric modulators exhibit biased agonism and/or modulation. To establish whether negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) engender similar bias, we rigorously characterized the pharmacology of eight diverse mGlu₅ NAMs. Radioligand inhibition binding studies revealed novel modes of interaction with mGlu₅ for select NAMs, with biphasic or incomplete inhibition of the radiolabeled NAM, [³H]methoxy-PEPy. We assessed mGlu₅-mediated intracellular Ca²⁺ (iCa²⁺) mobilization and inositol phosphate (IP₁) accumulation in HEK293A cells stably expressing low levels of mGlu₅ (HEK293A-rat mGlu₅-low) and mouse embryonic cortical neurons. The apparent affinity of acetylenic NAMs, MPEP, MTEP and dipraglurant, was dependent on the signaling pathway measured, agonist used, and cell type (HEK293A-rat mGlu₅-low versus mouse cortical neurons). In contrast, the acetylenic partial NAM, M-5MPEP, and structurally distinct NAMs (VU0366248, VU0366058, fenobam), had similar affinity estimates irrespective of the assay or cellular background. Biased modulation was evident for VU0366248 in mouse cortical neurons where it was a NAM for DHPG-mediated iCa²⁺ mobilization, but neutral with DHPG in IP₁ accumulation assays. Overall, this study highlights the inherent complexity in mGlu₅ NAM pharmacology that we hypothesize may influence interpretation when translating into preclinical models and beyond in the design and development of novel therapeutics for neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders.

GPCR drug discovery: integrating solution NMR data with crystal and cryo-EM structures

The 826 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in the human proteome regulate key physiological processes and thus have long been attractive drug targets. With the crystal structures of more than 50 different human GPCRs determined over the past decade, an initial platform for structure-based rational design has been established for drugs that target GPCRs, which is currently being augmented with cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of higher-order GPCR complexes. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in solution is one of the key approaches for expanding this platform with dynamic features, which can be accessed at physiological temperature and with minimal modification of the wild-type GPCR covalent structures. Here, we review strategies for the use of advanced biochemistry and NMR techniques with GPCRs, survey projects in which crystal or cryo-EM structures have been complemented with NMR investigations and discuss the impact of this integrative approach on GPCR biology and drug discovery.

α1A-Adrenoceptors activate mTOR signalling and glucose uptake in cardiomyocytes

The capacity of G protein-coupled receptors to modulate mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) activity is a newly emerging paradigm with the potential to link cell surface receptors with cell survival. Cardiomyocyte viability is linked to signalling pathways involving Akt and mTOR, as well as increased glucose uptake and utilization. Our aim was to determine whether the α_1A-adrenoceptor (AR) couples to these protective pathways, and increased glucose uptake. We characterised α_1A-AR signalling in CHO-K1 cells co-expressing the human α_1A-AR and GLUT4 (CHOα_1AGLUT4myc) and in neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocytes (NRVM), and measured glucose uptake, intracellular Ca²⁺ mobilization, and phosphorylation of mTOR, Akt, 5' adenosine monophosphate-activated kinase (AMPK) and S6 ribosomal protein (S6rp). In both systems, noradrenaline and the α_1A-AR selective agonist A61603 stimulated glucose uptake by parallel pathways involving mTOR and AMPK, whereas another α₁-AR agonist oxymetazoline increased glucose uptake predominantly by mTOR. All agonists promoted phosphorylation of mTOR at Ser2448 and Ser2481, indicating activation of both mTORC1 and mTORC2, but did not increase Akt phosphorylation. In CHOα_1AGLUT4myc cells, siRNA directed against rictor but not raptor suppressed α_1A-AR mediated glucose uptake. We have thus identified mTORC2 as a key component in glucose uptake stimulated by α_1A-AR agonists. Our findings identify a novel link between the α_1A-AR, mTORC2 and glucose uptake, that have been implicated separately in cardiomyocyte survival. Our studies provide an improved framework for examining the utility of α_1A-AR selective agonists as tools in the treatment of cardiac dysfunction.

Noradrenaline, oxymetazoline and phorbol myristate acetate induce distinct functional actions and phosphorylation patterns of α1A-adrenergic receptors

In LNCaP cells that stably express α_1A-adrenergic receptors, oxymetazoline increased intracellular calcium and receptor phosphorylation, however, this agonist was a weak partial agonist, as compared to noradrenaline, for calcium signaling. Interestingly, oxymetazoline-induced receptor internalization and desensitization displayed greater effects than those induced by noradrenaline. Phorbol myristate acetate induced modest receptor internalization and minimal desensitization. α_1A-Adrenergic receptor interaction with β-arrestins (colocalization/coimmunoprecipitation) was induced by noradrenaline and oxymetazoline and, to a lesser extent, by phorbol myristate acetate. Oxymetazoline was more potent and effective than noradrenaline in inducing ERK 1/2 phosphorylation. Mass spectrometric analysis of immunopurified α_1A-adrenergic receptors from cells treated with adrenergic agonists and the phorbol ester clearly showed that phosphorylated residues were present both at the third intracellular loop and at the carboxyl tail. Distinct phosphorylation patterns were observed under the different conditions. The phosphorylated residues were: a) Baseline and all treatments: T233; b) noradrenaline: S220, S227, S229, S246, S250, S389; c) oxymetazoline: S227, S246, S381, T384, S389; and d) phorbol myristate acetate: S246, S250, S258, S351, S352, S401, S402, S407, T411, S413, T451. Our novel data, describing the α_1A-AR phosphorylation sites, suggest that the observed different phosphorylation patterns may participate in defining adrenoceptor localization and action, under the different conditions examined.

Factors influencing biased agonism in recombinant cells expressing the human α1A -adrenoceptor

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Agonists acting at GPCRs promote biased signalling via Gα or Gβγ subunits, GPCR kinases and β-arrestins. Since the demonstration of biased agonism has implications for drug discovery, it is essential to consider confounding factors contributing to bias. We have examined bias at human α_1A -adrenoceptors stably expressed at low levels in CHO-K1 cells, identifying off-target effects at endogenous receptors that contribute to ERK1/2 phosphorylation in response to the agonist oxymetazoline.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Intracellular Ca²⁺ mobilization was monitored in a Flexstation® using Fluo 4-AM. The accumulation of cAMP and ERK1/2 phosphorylation were measured using AlphaScreen® proximity assays, and mRNA expression was measured by RT-qPCR. Ligand bias was determined using the operational model of agonism.

KEY RESULTS

Noradrenaline, phenylephrine, methoxamine and A61603 increased Ca²⁺ mobilization, cAMP accumulation and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. However, oxymetazoline showed low efficacy for Ca⁺² mobilization, no effect on cAMP generation and high efficacy for ERK1/2 phosphorylation. The apparent functional selectivity of oxymetazoline towards ERK1/2 was related to off-target effects at 5-HT_1B receptors endogenously expressed in CHO-K1 cells. Phenylephrine and methoxamine showed genuine bias towards ERK1/2 phosphorylation compared to Ca²⁺ and cAMP pathways, whereas A61603 displayed bias towards cAMP accumulation compared to ERK1/2 phosphorylation.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

We have shown that while adrenergic agonists display bias at human α_1A -adrenoceptors, the marked bias of oxymetazoline for ERK1/2 phosphorylation originates from off-target effects. Commonly used cell lines express a repertoire of endogenous GPCRs that may confound studies on biased agonism at recombinant receptors.