1
|
Ean M, Tripura R, Sothea P, Savoeun U, Peto TJ, Bunthynn S, Callery JJ, Soviet U, Dysoley L, Yeong Cheah P, Adhikari B. A youth advisory group on health and health research in rural Cambodia. Glob Bioeth 2024; 35:2361968. [PMID: 38859929 PMCID: PMC11164040 DOI: 10.1080/11287462.2024.2361968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Engaging young people in health research has been promoted globally. We explored the outcomes of youth advisory group on health and research engagement (YAGHRE) in rural Cambodia. In May 2021, the Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU) partnered with a local health centre and a secondary school to establish a youth engagement group. Ten students underwent training and led health engagement activities in schools and communities. Activities were documented as field notes and audio-visual materials which underwent content analysis using theory of change supplemented by iterative discussions with YAGHRE members and stakeholders. Five major outcomes were identified: 1. Increased respect. Engagement activities developed based on input from students and stakeholders may have fostered greater respect. 2. Built trust and relationships. Frequent visits to MORU's laboratory and interactions with researchers appeared to contribute to the building of trust and relationship. 3. Improved health and research literacy. Learning new health and research topics, through participatory activities may have improved literacy; 4. Improved uptake of health and research interventions. Health promotional activities and communication with research participants potentially increased the uptake of interventions; 5. Improved community health. YAGHRE's health promotional interventions may have contributed in enhancing community's health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mom Ean
- Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Rupam Tripura
- Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Phann Sothea
- Techo Siem Pang High School, Provincial Department of Education, Youth and Sport, Siem Pang, Stung Treng, Cambodia
| | - Uch Savoeun
- Siem Pang Health Centre, Provincial Health Department, Siem Pang, Stung Treng, Cambodia
| | - Thomas J. Peto
- Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sam Bunthynn
- District Governor Office, Siem Pang District Administration, Siem Pang, Stung Treng, Cambodia
| | - James J. Callery
- Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ung Soviet
- Provincial Health Department, Stung Treng, Cambodia
- CNM National Centre for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Lek Dysoley
- Provincial Health Department, Stung Treng, Cambodia
- CNM National Centre for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
- School of Public Health, National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Phaik Yeong Cheah
- Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Bipin Adhikari
- Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abimbola S, van de Kamp J, Lariat J, Rathod L, Klipstein-Grobusch K, van der Graaf R, Bhakuni H. Unfair knowledge practices in global health: a realist synthesis. Health Policy Plan 2024; 39:636-650. [PMID: 38642401 PMCID: PMC11145905 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czae030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Unfair knowledge practices easily beset our efforts to achieve health equity within and between countries. Enacted by people from a distance and from a position of power ('the centre') on behalf of and alongside people with less power ('the periphery'), these unfair practices have generated a complex literature of complaints across various axes of inequity. We identified a sample of this literature from 12 journals and systematized it using the realist approach to explanation. We framed the outcome to be explained as 'manifestations of unfair knowledge practices'; their generative mechanisms as 'the reasoning of individuals or rationale of institutions'; and context that enable them as 'conditions that give knowledge practices their structure'. We identified four categories of unfair knowledge practices, each triggered by three mechanisms: (1) credibility deficit related to pose (mechanisms: 'the periphery's cultural knowledge, technical knowledge and "articulation" of knowledge do not matter'), (2) credibility deficit related to gaze (mechanisms: 'the centre's learning needs, knowledge platforms and scholarly standards must drive collective knowledge-making'), (3) interpretive marginalization related to pose (mechanisms: 'the periphery's sensemaking of partnerships, problems and social reality do not matter') and (4) interpretive marginalization related to gaze (mechanisms: 'the centre's learning needs, social sensitivities and status preservation must drive collective sensemaking'). Together, six mutually overlapping, reinforcing and dependent categories of context influence all 12 mechanisms: 'mislabelling' (the periphery as inferior), 'miseducation' (on structural origins of disadvantage), 'under-representation' (of the periphery on knowledge platforms), 'compounded spoils' (enjoyed by the centre), 'under-governance' (in making, changing, monitoring, enforcing and applying rules for fair engagement) and 'colonial mentality' (of/at the periphery). These context-mechanism-outcome linkages can inform efforts to redress unfair knowledge practices, investigations of unfair knowledge practices across disciplines and axes of inequity and ethics guidelines for health system research and practice when working at a social or physical distance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seye Abimbola
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Department of Global Public Health and Bioethics, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Judith van de Kamp
- Department of Global Public Health and Bioethics, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Joni Lariat
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Lekha Rathod
- Department of Global Public Health and Bioethics, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands
- Luxembourg Operational Research and Epidemiology Support Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Luxembourg City L-1617, Luxembourg
| | - Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch
- Department of Global Public Health and Bioethics, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
| | - Rieke van der Graaf
- Department of Global Public Health and Bioethics, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Himani Bhakuni
- Department of Global Public Health and Bioethics, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands
- York Law School, University of York, York YO10 5GD, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ndambo MK, Pickersgill M, Bunn C, Stewart RC, Umar E, Nyasulu M, McIntosh AM, Manda-Taylor L. Maternal mental health research in Malawi: Community and healthcare provider perspectives on acceptability and ethicality. SSM - MENTAL HEALTH 2023; 3:100213. [PMID: 38045108 PMCID: PMC10311285 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Maternal mental health (MMH) is recognised as globally significant. The prevalence of depression and factors associated with its onset among perinatal women in Malawi has been previously reported, and the need for further research in this domain is underscored. Yet, there is little published scholarship regarding the acceptability and ethicality of MMH research to women and community representatives. The study reported here sought to address this in Malawi by engaging with communities and healthcare providers in the districts where MMH research was being planned. Qualitative data was collected in Lilongwe and Karonga districts through 20 focus group discussions and 40 in-depth interviews with community representatives and healthcare providers from January through April 2021. All focus groups and interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim (in local languages Chichewa and Tumbuka), translated into English, and examined through thematic content analysis. Participants' accounts suggest that biopsychosocial MMH research could be broadly acceptable within the communities sampled, with acceptability framed in part through prior encounters with biomedical and public health research and care in these regions, alongside broader understandings of the import of MMH. Willingness and consent to participate do not depend on specifically biomedical understandings of MMH, but rather on familiarity with individuals regarded as living with mental ill-health. However, the data further suggest some 'therapeutic misconceptions' about MMH research, with implications for how investigations in this area are presented by researchers when recruiting and working with participants. Further studies are needed to explore whether accounts of the acceptability and ethicality of MMH research shift and change during and following research encounters. Such studies will enhance the production of granular recommendations for further augmenting the ethicality of biomedical and public health research and researchers' responsibilities to participants and communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martyn Pickersgill
- Centre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Bunn
- Malawi Epidemiology Intervention Research Unit, Malawi
- School of Social and Political Sciences, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Robert C. Stewart
- Malawi Epidemiology Intervention Research Unit, Malawi
- Division of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Eric Umar
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Malawi
| | | | - Andrew M. McIntosh
- Division of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Lucinda Manda-Taylor
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Malawi
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li I, Grady C. Integrating Community Perspectives on Inclusion and Protection into IRB Structures. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023; 23:94-97. [PMID: 37220374 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2201212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
|
5
|
Perez KM, Asim M, Weiss EM, Valentine GC, Kavi A, Somannavar MS, Iwuh I, Chiweza C, Tickell KD, Singa BO, Beima-Sofie K, Batra M, Walson JL, Umoren R, Kelley M, Saleem S. Considering Risks to Researchers and Staff in Low-Resource Settings during Public Health Crises: A Proposed Conceptual Model. CHILDREN 2023; 10:children10030463. [PMID: 36980021 PMCID: PMC10047058 DOI: 10.3390/children10030463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
Human subjects research protections have historically focused on mitigating risk of harm and promoting benefits for research participants. In many low-resource settings (LRS), complex and often severe challenges in daily living, poverty, geopolitical uprisings, sociopolitical, economic, and climate crises increase the burdens of even minimal risk research. While there has been important work to explore the scope of ethical responsibilities of researchers and research teams to respond to these wider challenges and hidden burdens in global health research, less attention has been given to the ethical dilemmas and risk experienced by frontline researcher staff as they perform research-related activities in LRS. Risks such as job insecurity, moral distress, infection, or physical harm can be exacerbated during public health crises, as recently highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. We highlight the layers of risk research staff face in LRS and present a conceptual model to characterize drivers of this risk, with particular attention to public health crises. A framework by which funders, institutions, principal investigators, and/or research team leaders can systematically consider these additional layers of risk to researchers and frontline staff is an important and needed addition to routine research proposals and protocol review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krystle M. Perez
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Muhammad Asim
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Elliott M. Weiss
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Gregory C. Valentine
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Avinash Kavi
- KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi 590010, India
| | - Manjunath S. Somannavar
- KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi 590010, India
| | - Ibezimako Iwuh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Texas Children’s Global Women’s Health Centre of Excellence, Lilongwe Private Bag B-397, Malawi
| | - Chikondi Chiweza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Texas Children’s Global Women’s Health Centre of Excellence, Lilongwe Private Bag B-397, Malawi
| | - Kirkby D. Tickell
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Benson O. Singa
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi P.O. Box 54840-00200, Kenya
| | - Kristin Beima-Sofie
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Maneesh Batra
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Judd L. Walson
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Rachel Umoren
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Maureen Kelley
- Center for Ethics in Health Care, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Sarah Saleem
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ardrey J, Jehan K, Desmond N, Kumbuyo C, Nyirenda D, Gordon SB, Mortimer K, Tolhurst R. 'Why would they spend all this money and give us these items for free?': Exploring precarity and power in a cleaner cookstove intervention in rural Malawi. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 3:e0001537. [PMID: 36963027 PMCID: PMC10022019 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
We carried out a qualitative study to gain a deeper understanding of the social context of the Cooking and Pneumonia Study (CAPS) and implications for implementation of clean cooking and similar interventions. Such initiatives are recognised as complex, power-laden processes, which has consequences for outcomes and uptake. However, understanding of how precarious livelihoods and unequal power differentials impact on trials of technology is limited and potentially hampers the achievement of the SDGs including SDG 7, Affordable and Clean Energy. An in-depth exploration of experiences and perceptions of cooking and cookstove use within CAPS was completed using qualitative methods and the participatory methodology Photovoice. Ten CAPS participants from each of five villages participated in Photovoice activities and five village representatives were interviewed. Twelve fieldworkers participated in gender specific focus groups and four were interviewed. A thematic content approach was used for data analysis. The analysis showed that economic and power inequity underpinned the complex social relationships within CAPS impacting on trial participation, perceptions of the cookstoves, and on the potential of the intervention to affect health and other benefits. Power can be understood as relational and productive within the research environment. This is illustrated by an analysis of the role of fieldworkers and community representatives who needed to negotiate resistance to trial compliance decisions, including 'satanic' rumours about cookstoves and blood-taking. Transformative approaches that challenge existing power inequities are needed to maximise the success and beneficence of cookstove and other health promoting interventions, and achievement of the SDGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Ardrey
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Jehan
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Desmond
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | | | - Deborah Nyirenda
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Stephen B. Gordon
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin Mortimer
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Tolhurst
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fehr A, Nieto-Sanchez C, Muela J, Manneh E, Baldeh D, Ceesay O, D’Alessandro U, Dabira E, Kingori P, Grietens KP, Bardají A, Bunders-Aelen J, Zuiderent-Jerak T. Doing 'reciprocity work': The role of fieldworkers in a mass drug administration trial in the Gambia. Glob Public Health 2022; 17:4116-4128. [PMID: 36183416 PMCID: PMC7614349 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2125998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
In their roles as nurses, data collectors, or other, fieldworkers undertake myriad tasks working intimately with and on the bodies of others - a type of work called 'body work'. This work further includes the micro-political relations shaping these interactions, and studies have shown the importance of these relationships in the success of clinical trials, particularly in the Gambia. This study seeks to expand the concept of body work to understand the roles and interactions of fieldworkers within the trial community, and the effect on a mass drug administration (MDA) clinical trial. We conducted a mixed-methods social science study alongside the MDA in 2018-2019, including in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and semi-structured observations with the population involved (and not) in the MDA, as well as the MRC fieldworkers. We found that fieldworkers participated in what we call 'reciprocity work'. Through their regular tasks and interactions, they necessarily showed respect and established trust in a way that formed and contributed to reciprocal relationships, the results of which impacted the trial and individuals' autonomy in the decision-making process. Understanding the role of fieldworkers and their reciprocity work is a vital component in comprehending how research ethics are made and conducted in global health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Fehr
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Claudia Nieto-Sanchez
- Unit of Socio-Ecological Health Research, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Joan Muela
- Medical Anthropology Research Centre, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Ebrima Manneh
- Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia, Banjul, Gambia
| | - Dullo Baldeh
- Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia, Banjul, Gambia
| | - Omar Ceesay
- Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia, Banjul, Gambia
| | | | - Edgard Dabira
- Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia, Banjul, Gambia
| | | | - Koen Peeters Grietens
- Unit of Socio-Ecological Health Research, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Azucena Bardají
- IS Global, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kaehler N, Adhikari B, Cheah PY, von Seidlein L, Day NPJ, Dondorp AM, Pell C. Community engagement for malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Sub-region: a qualitative study among malaria researchers and policymakers. Malar J 2022; 21:46. [PMID: 35164770 PMCID: PMC8845385 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04069-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Community engagement has increasingly received attention in malaria research and programme interventions, particularly as countries aim for malaria elimination. Although community engagement strategies and activities are constantly developing, little is known about how those who implement research or programmes view community engagement. This article explores the perspectives of researchers and policy makers in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) on community engagement for malaria control and elimination.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 17 policymakers and 15 senior researchers working in the field of malaria. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed in English. Transcribed data were analysed using deductive and inductive approaches in QSR NVivo. Themes and sub-themes were generated.
Results
Researchers and policymakers emphasized the importance of community engagement in promoting participation in malaria research and interventions. Building trust with the community was seen as crucial. Respondents emphasized involving authority/leadership structures and highlighted the need for intense and participatory engagement. Geographic remoteness, social, cultural, and linguistic diversity were identified as barriers to meaningful engagement. Local staff were described as an essential ‘connect’ between researchers or policymakers and prospective participants. Sharing information with community members, using various strategies including creative and participatory methods were highlighted.
Conclusions
Policymakers and researchers involved in malaria prevention and control in the GMS viewed community engagement as crucial for promoting participation in research or programmatic interventions. Given the difficulties of the ‘last mile’ to elimination, sustained investment in community engagement is needed in isolated areas of the GMS where malaria transmission continues. Involving community-based malaria workers is ever more critical to ensure the elimination efforts engage hard-to-reach populations in remote areas of GMS.
Collapse
|
9
|
Molyneux S, Sukhtankar P, Thitiri J, Njeru R, Muraya K, Sanga G, Walson JL, Berkley J, Kelley M, Marsh V. Model for developing context-sensitive responses to vulnerability in research: managing ethical dilemmas faced by frontline research staff in Kenya. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:e004937. [PMID: 34244204 PMCID: PMC8268889 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-004937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Health research in low-resource settings often involves individuals and populations defined as 'vulnerable'. There is growing attention in the literature to the ethical dilemmas that frontline research staff face while conducting such research. However, there is little documented as to how research staff might support one another in identifying and handling these dilemmas in different contexts. Over the course of conducting empirical ethics research embedded in the Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition Network, we developed an approach to examine and respond to the ethical issues and dilemmas faced by the study teams, particularly frontline staff. In this paper we describe the specific tools and approach we developed, which centred on regular cross-team ethics reflection sessions, and share lessons learnt. We suggest that all studies involving potentially vulnerable participants should incorporate activities and processes to support frontline staff in identifying, reflecting on and responding to ethical dilemmas, throughout studies. We outline the resources needed to do this and share piloted tools for further adaptation and evaluation. Such initiatives should complement and feed into-and certainly not in any way replace or substitute for-strong institutional ethics review, safeguarding and health and safety policies and processes, as well broader staff training and career support initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sassy Molyneux
- KEMRI-Wellcome Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Priya Sukhtankar
- Department of Child Health, Gloucester Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK
| | - Johnstone Thitiri
- KEMRI-Wellcome Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Rita Njeru
- Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kui Muraya
- Kemri-Wellcome Trust, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Gladys Sanga
- KEMRI-Wellcome Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Judd L Walson
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - James Berkley
- KEMRI-Wellcome Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maureen Kelley
- Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Vicki Marsh
- KEMRI-Wellcome Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kapumba BM, Desmond N, Seeley J. What do we know about ancillary care practices in East and Southern Africa? A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Wellcome Open Res 2021. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16858.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite growing calls for the provision of ancillary care to study participants during medical research, there remains a noticeable gap in ethical guidelines for medical researchers in resource-constrained settings (RCS). We reviewed recent studies to determine the extent to which ancillary care is provided in East and Southern Africa and to examine the ethical justifications researchers provide to support their views on ancillary care obligations. Methods: A systematic search for qualitative and mixed methods studies on ancillary care was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, African Wide Information, PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and Scopus. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Department of Bioethics and H3 Africa websites and Google Scholar were further searched. Studies conducted in East and Southern Africa between 2004 and 2020, as well as those that reported on ancillary care provided to study participants were included. All studies included in this review were evaluated for methodological quality as well as bias risk. NVivo version 12 was used for thematic analysis. Results: Overall, 4,710 articles were identified by the initial search. After the data extraction and quality assessment, 24 articles were included. Key areas presented include ancillary care approaches and the themes of researcher motivation for providing ancillary care and expectations of participants in medical research. The review shows that while some international researchers do provide ancillary care to their study participants, approaches are not standardised without consistent guidelines for ethical practice for ancillary care. We found limited empirical studies in RCS that report on ancillary care, hence findings in this review are based on single studies rather than a collection of multiple studies. Conclusions: This paper emphasizes the value of establishing ethics guidelines for medical researchers in RCS who consider provision of ancillary care to their participants, and the need to account for these ethical guidelines in medical research.
Collapse
|
11
|
Nkosi B, Seeley J, Chimbindi N, Zuma T, Kelley M, Shahmanesh M. Managing ancillary care in resource-constrained settings: Dilemmas faced by frontline HIV prevention researchers in a rural area in South Africa. Int Health 2020; 12:543-550. [PMID: 33165553 PMCID: PMC7651306 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We describe the findings from a research ethics case study, linked with a team evaluating a package of intervention services to prevent HIV infection in adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) living in a rural and poor setting of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. METHODS We conducted qualitative interviews (n=77) with members of the linked research team evaluating the intervention programme, programme implementing staff, AGYW enrolled in the intervention programme, caregivers, ethics committee members, Public Engagement officers, community advisory board members and community stakeholders. Data were analysed iteratively using thematic framework analysis. Themes were determined by the study aims combined with an inductive development of codes emerging from the data. RESULTS The findings show that the burden of providing ancillary care fell primarily on the shoulders of frontline researchers and programme staff. Dilemmas around responding to gender-based violence illustrated the limits of 'referral to services' as a solution for meeting ancillary care obligations in contexts with barriers to basic health and social services. CONCLUSION Our findings show important gaps in meeting ancillary care needs. Participants' needs required social and economic support which frontline researchers and implementing partners were not able to meet, causing moral distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janet Seeley
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| | - Natsayi Chimbindi
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Thembelihle Zuma
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Maureen Kelley
- Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Maryam Shahmanesh
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kombe FK, Marsh V, Molyneux S, Kamuya DM, Ikamba D, Kinyanjui SM. Enhancing fieldworkers' performance management support in health research: an exploratory study on the views of field managers and fieldworkers from major research centres in Africa. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028453. [PMID: 31857297 PMCID: PMC6937094 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fieldworkers are part of the system that promotes scientific and ethical standards in research, through data collection, consenting and supporting research, due to their insider cultural knowledge and fluency in local languages. The credibility and integrity of health research, therefore, rely on how fieldworkers adhere to institutional and research procedures and guidelines. OBJECTIVES This study mapped out existing practices in training, support and performance management of fieldworkers in Africa, described fieldworkers' and their managers' experiences, and lessons learnt. A consultative process, involving field managers from 15 international health research institutions, was used to identify appropriate ways of addressing the challenges fieldworkers face. METHODS In phase 1, we conducted 32 telephone interviews with 20 field managers and 12 senior fieldworkers from 18 major research centres in Africa, Medical Research Council-UK and the INDEPTH Network Secretariat. In phase 2, we held a 2.5-day workshop involving 25 delegates, including 18 field managers from the institutions that were involved in phase 1 and 7 additional stakeholders from the KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP). An earlier report from phase 1 was published in BMC MedicalEthics in 2015. Data transcribed from the interviews and workshop proceedings were analysed thematically using NVivo V.10 software. RESULTS Most institutions employed fieldworkers, usually with 12 years of formal education and residing within the geographical areas of research, to support studies. Although their roles were common, there were marked differences in the type of training, professional development schemes and fieldworkers support. Fieldworkers faced various challenges, with the potential to affect their ethical and scientific practices. DISCUSSION Fieldworkers undertake vital tasks that promote data quality and ethical practice in research. There is a need for research institutions to develop a structured support system, provide fieldworkers with interpersonal skills training, and provide space for discussion, reflection and experience sharing to help fieldworkers tackle the practical and ethical challenges they face.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis Kazungu Kombe
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- African Research Integrity Network, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Vicki Marsh
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Dorcas Mwikali Kamuya
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Samson Muchina Kinyanjui
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rennie S, Day S, Mathews A, Gilbertson A, Luseno WK, Tucker JD, Henderson GE. The Role of Inclusion Benefits in Ethics Committee Assessment of Research Studies. Ethics Hum Res 2019; 41:13-22. [PMID: 31108576 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The relationship between risks and benefits is central to the ethics of research involving human participants. Traditionally, to be ethically justifiable, risks should be reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits (if any) to subjects and to the potential social benefits resulting from research. This calculus is being further complicated by findings from an increasing number of social science studies that reveal that prospective and actual research participants frequently describe various types of inclusion benefits (for example, personal benefits such as access to or improved health care, increased knowledge about their disease or condition, and greater solidarity with the local community) as important to them. What is the ethical significance of such inclusion benefits, particularly those nonmedical in nature, for research ethics committees' risk-benefit assessment of research studies? We argue that, unless participants are clearly mistaken in their perceptions, ethics committees should take these types of inclusion benefits into account, and we suggest a few ways this might look in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Rennie
- Associate professor in the Department of Social Medicine and the Center for Bioethics at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Suzanne Day
- Postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Social Medicine and the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Allison Mathews
- Postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Social Medicine and Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Adam Gilbertson
- Postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Social Medicine and the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and an associate research scientist at Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
| | - Winfred K Luseno
- Research scientist at the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
| | - Joseph D Tucker
- Associate professor at the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Gail E Henderson
- Professor in the Department of Social Medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Campbell JI, Musiimenta A, Burns B, Natukunda S, Musinguzi N, Haberer JE, Eyal N. The importance of how research participants think they are perceived: results from an electronic monitoring study of antiretroviral therapy in Uganda. AIDS Care 2018; 31:761-766. [PMID: 30606037 DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1556381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Novel monitoring technologies in HIV research, such as electronic adherence monitors (EAMs), have changed the nature of researcher-participant interactions. Yet little is known about how EAMs and the resulting interaction between researchers and participants affect research participation and the data gathered. We interviewed participants and research assistants (RAs) in an observational cohort study involving EAMs for HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Uganda. We qualitatively explored interviewees' views about ethical issues surrounding EAMs and assessed data with conventional and directed content analysis. Participants valued their relationships with RAs and were preoccupied with RAs' perceptions of them. Participants were pleased when the EAM revealed regular adherence, and annoyed when it revealed non-adherence that contradicted self-reported pill-taking behavior. For many, the desire to maintain a good impression incentivized adherence. But some sought to creatively conceal non-adherence, or refused to use the EAM to avoid revealing non-adherence to RAs. These findings show that participants' perceptions of the study staff's perceptions of them affected the experience of being monitored, study participation, and ultimately the data gathered in the study. Investigators in monitoring-based research should be aware that social interactions between participants and study staff could affect both the practical and ethical conduct of that research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey I Campbell
- a Department of Pediatrics , Boston Medical Center and Boston Children's Hospital , Boston , MA , USA
| | | | - Bridget Burns
- c Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Sylvia Natukunda
- b Mbarara University of Science and Technology , Mbarara , Uganda
| | | | | | - Nir Eyal
- d Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston , MA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Phiri M, Gooding K, Nyirenda D, Sambakunsi R, Kumwenda MK, Desmond N. "Not just dogs, but rabid dogs": tensions and conflicts amongst research volunteers in Malawi. Glob Bioeth 2018; 29:65-80. [PMID: 30202397 PMCID: PMC6127836 DOI: 10.1080/11287462.2018.1509925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Building trust between researchers and communities involved in research is one goal of community engagement. This paper examines the implications of community engagement for trust within communities, including trust among community volunteers who assist with research and between these volunteers and other community members. We describe the experiences of two groups of community volunteers recruited as part of an HIV and TB intervention trial in Malawi: cluster representatives, recruited both to act as key informants for TB suspects and mortality reporting and to identify and report community concerns, and community counsellors, recruited to provide semi-supervised HIV self-testing. We examine tensions experienced due to playing multiple roles, and the implications of volunteer responsibilities for short- and long-term community relationships. Data was collected through a workshop, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with volunteers and community members. While the volunteer system initially enhanced trust among volunteers and with the community, relationships deteriorated when cluster representatives assumed an additional supervisory role part-way through the trial. Combined with challenging recruitment targets and unequal power relations between volunteers, this new role damaged trust, with implications for volunteer well-being and social relationships. These experiences suggest researchers should consider potential social implications when designing community engagement systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackwellings Phiri
- Malawi Liverpool Welcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Kate Gooding
- Malawi Liverpool Welcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.,Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| | - Deborah Nyirenda
- Malawi Liverpool Welcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Rodrick Sambakunsi
- Malawi Liverpool Welcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | | | - Nicola Desmond
- Malawi Liverpool Welcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.,Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ward CL, Shaw D, Anane-Sarpong E, Sankoh O, Tanner M, Elger B. The Ethics of End-of-Trial Obligations in a Pediatric Malaria Vaccine Trial: The Perspectives of Stakeholders From Ghana and Tanzania. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018; 13:258-269. [PMID: 29756531 DOI: 10.1177/1556264618771809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This study explores stakeholder experiences and perspectives on end-of-trial obligations at the close of a phase II/III Pediatric Malaria Vaccine Trial (PMVT) [GSK/PATH-MVI RTS, S) (NCT00866619]. We conducted 52 key informant interviews with major stakeholders of an international multicentre PMVT in Ghana and Tanzania. The responses fell into four main themes: (a) Communicating End-of-Trial, (b) Maintaining Health Care Services, (c) Dissemination of Results, and (d) Post-Trial Access. Interviewee responses shared important practical experiences and insights that complement current thinking in the literature on research ethics guidance: (a) accompany end-of-trial communication with information on personal and family health care responsibilities, (b) establish public health indicators to measure the impact of research on a health care system,
Collapse
|
17
|
Rennie S, Groves AK, Hallfors DD, Iritani BJ, Odongo FS, Luseno WK. The Significance of Benefit Perceptions for the Ethics of HIV Research Involving Adolescents in Kenya. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2017; 12:269-279. [PMID: 28728497 DOI: 10.1177/1556264617721556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Assessment of benefits is traditionally regarded as crucial to the ethical evaluation of research involving human participants. We conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) with health and other professionals engaged with adolescents, caregivers/parents, and adolescents in Siaya County, Kenya, to solicit opinions about appropriate ways of conducting HIV research with adolescents. Our data revealed that many focus group participants have a profoundly positive conception of participation in health research, including studies conferring seemingly few benefits. In this article, we identify and analyze five different but interrelated types of benefits as perceived by Kenyan adolescent and adult stakeholders in HIV research, and discuss their ethical significance. Our findings suggest that future empirical and conceptual research should concentrate on factors that may trigger researcher obligations to improve benefit perceptions among research participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Rennie
- 1 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Bonita J Iritani
- 3 Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Winnie K Luseno
- 3 Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kamuya DM, Molyneux CS, Theobald S. Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice. BMJ Glob Health 2017; 2:e000320. [PMID: 29225935 PMCID: PMC5717932 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Revised: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a growing literature documenting the complex realities of consent processes in the field, and the negotiations and ethical dilemmas involved. Much has also been written about how gender and power shape household decision-making processes. However, these bodies of literature have rarely been brought together to inform research theory and practice in low-income settings. In this paper, qualitative research (observation, focus group discussions and interviews) were used alongside large clinical community-based studies conducted on the Kenyan Coast to explore how gender and power relations within households and communities and between fieldworkers and communities shape consent processes and interactions. This exploration is embedded in relevant literature and the implications for community-based health research policy and practice are considered. Across diverse forms of households, we observed significant consultation on whether or not to participate in research. Although men are typically described as household decision-makers, in practice, decision-making processes are often far more nuanced, with many women using their agency to control, sometimes subtly, the decisions made. Where decisions are made without adequately consulting women, many find strategies to exercise their choice, in ways that safeguard important relationships within households in the longer term. We also found that the gender of field staff who typically conduct research activities in the field, including consent processes, can influence household dynamics and decision-making processes with important implications for the science and ethics of research. It is essential that frontline field staff and their supervisors are aware of the complex and gendered realities of consent processes at household level, and their implications, and that they develop appropriate context-informed approaches that support ethical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorcas M Kamuya
- Health Systems and Research Ethics Department, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Coast, Kenya.,The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Catherine S Molyneux
- Health Systems and Research Ethics Department, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Coast, Kenya.,The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.,Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Sally Theobald
- Department of International Public Health Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK.,Visiting Fellow Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ssali A, Poland F, Seeley J. Exploring informed consent in HIV clinical trials: A case study in Uganda. Heliyon 2016; 2:e00196. [PMID: 27872904 PMCID: PMC5110465 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2016] [Revised: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 11/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In settings with low literacy levels ensuring that participants are fully-informed before they consent to participate in clinical trials is a challenge. We explored the experiences and concerns of key actors in the informed consent process in two HIV clinical trials. METHOD Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 46 respondents including trial participants, research study team and research ethics committee members about their experiences during the informed consent process. Three focus group discussions were conducted with 14 Community Advisory Board (CAB) members and 17 trial participants. Data were analysed to identify key themes. FINDINGS The consent process was highlighted as an important procedure by all the key actors however each group had a particular area of emphasis. Signing a consent form was given importance by research team and ethics committee members, because it provided documented evidence of a participant's willingness to join a clinical trial. Participants did not welcome the presence of a witness for a non-literate participant because understanding study information was not closely related to an ability to read and write. CONCLUSION This study's findings indicated that obtaining a volunteer's signature or thumbprint on a consent form did not necessarily mean that the participant was fully-informed about the information relevant to their taking part nor that they understood all the information shared with them. Informed consent requires sufficient time in the research process to have staff trained well enough before research begins. Ensuring and gaining informed consent should be understood and treated as a relation-centred, dynamic supportive process throughout the duration of a research study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnes Ssali
- Medical Research Council/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, P.O Box 49, Entebbe, Uganda
| | | | - Janet Seeley
- Medical Research Council/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, P.O Box 49, Entebbe, Uganda
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kingori P, Gerrets R. Morals, morale and motivations in data fabrication: Medical research fieldworkers views and practices in two Sub-Saharan African contexts. Soc Sci Med 2016; 166:150-159. [PMID: 27566044 PMCID: PMC5034849 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2015] [Revised: 08/10/2016] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Data fabrication, incorrect collection strategies and poor data management, are considered detrimental to high-quality scientific research. While poor data management have been occasionally excused, fabrication constitutes a cardinal sin - scientific misconduct. Scholarly examinations of fabrication usually seek to expose and capture its prevalence and, less frequently, its consequences and causes. Most accounts centre on high-income countries, individual senior researchers and scientists who are portrayed as irrational, immoral or deceptive. We argue that such accounts contain limitations in overlooking data collected in 'the field', in low-income countries, by junior researchers and non-scientists. Furthermore, the processes and motivations for fabrication and subversive practices are under-examined. Drawing on two separate ethnographies, conducted in 2004-2009 in medical research projects in sub-Saharan Africa, this paper investigates fabrication among fieldworkers using data from observations and informal conversations, 68 interviews and 7 Focus Group Discussions involving diverse stakeholders. Based on an interpretative approach, we examined fieldworkers' accounts that fabrications were motivated by irreconcilable moral concerns, faltering morale resulting from poor management, and inadequate institutional support. To fieldworkers, data fabrication constituted a 'tool' for managing their quotidian challenges. Fabrications ranged from active to passive acts, to subvert, resist and readdress tensions deriving from employment inequalities and challenging socio-economic conditions. We show that geographical and hierarchical distance between high-ranking research actors and fieldworkers in contemporary configurations of international medical research can compartmentalise, and ultimately undermine, the relationships necessary to produce high-quality data. In focusing on fieldworkers, we argue for the inclusion of wide-ranging perspectives in examinations of data fabrication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Kingori
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX27LP, United Kingdom.
| | - René Gerrets
- Department of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018WV Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
O’Neill S, Dierickx S, Okebe J, Dabira E, Gryseels C, d’Alessandro U, Peeters Grietens K. The Importance of Blood Is Infinite: Conceptions of Blood as Life Force, Rumours and Fear of Trial Participation in a Fulani Village in Rural Gambia. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0160464. [PMID: 27525652 PMCID: PMC4985146 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2015] [Accepted: 07/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials require high levels of participation and low drop-out rates to be successful. However, collecting blood samples from individuals recruited into clinical trials can be challenging when there is reticence about blood-taking. In addition to concerns regarding the feasibility of medical research, fears of 'blood-stealing' and 'blood-selling' have ethical implications related to cultural sensitivity and informed consent. This study explores anxieties around blood-taking during a malaria treatment trial in the Gambia. METHODS This case study is based on ethnographic research in one theoretically selected village due to the high reticence to screening for the clinical trial 'Primaquine's gametocytocidal efficacy in malaria asymptomatic carriers treated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine' carried out in the Gambia between 2013 and 2014. Data collection tools included in-depth interviews, participant observation, informal conversations and group discussions. RESULTS In total only 176 of 411 habitants (42%) in the village accepted having a bloodspot taken to screen for malaria. Although trial recruitment was initially high in the village, some families refused screening when rumours started spreading that the trial team was taking too much blood. Concerns about 'loss of blood' were equated to loss of strength and lack of good food to replenish bodily forces. Families in the study village were concerned about the weakness of their body while they had to harvest their crops at the time of recruitment for the trial. CONCLUSION A common recommendation to prevent and avoid rumours against public health interventions and trials is the provision of full and consistent information during the consent procedure, which is assumed to lead to more accurate knowledge of the purpose of the intervention and increased trial participation. However, even when information provision is continuous, the emergence of rumours can be related to times of uncertainty and perceptions of vulnerability, which are often a reflection of structural inequalities and diverging value orientations between communities and public health institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah O’Neill
- Unit of Medical Anthropology, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Susan Dierickx
- Unit of Medical Anthropology, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- RHEA, Centre of Expertise on Gender, Diversity and Intersectionality, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Joseph Okebe
- Medical Research Council Gambia, Fajara, The Gambia
- University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Charlotte Gryseels
- Unit of Medical Anthropology, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Umberto d’Alessandro
- Unit of Medical Anthropology, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- Medical Research Council Gambia, Fajara, The Gambia
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Koen Peeters Grietens
- Unit of Medical Anthropology, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
- Partners for Applied Social Sciences (PASS) International, Tessenderlo, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gouda HN, Kelly-Hanku A, Wilson L, Maraga S, Riley ID. "Whenever they cry, I cry with them": Reciprocal relationships and the role of ethics in a verbal autopsy study in Papua New Guinea. Soc Sci Med 2016; 163:1-9. [PMID: 27376593 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2016] [Revised: 06/22/2016] [Accepted: 06/23/2016] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Verbal autopsy (VA) methods usually involve an interview with a recently bereaved individual to ascertain the most probable cause of death when a person dies outside of a hospital and/or did not receive a reliable death certificate. A number of concerns have arisen around the ethical and social implications of the use of these methods. In this paper we examine these concerns, looking specifically at the cultural factors surrounding death and mourning in Papua New Guinea, and the potential for VA interviews to cause emotional distress in both the bereaved respondent and the VA fieldworker. Thirty one semi-structured interviews with VA respondents, the VA team and community relations officers as well as observations in the field and team discussions were conducted between June 2013 and August 2014. While our findings reveal that VA participants were often moved to cry and feel sad, they also expressed a number of ways they benefited from the process, and indeed welcomed longer transactions with the VA interviewers. Significantly, this paper highlights the ways in which VA interviewers, who have hitherto been largely neglected in the literature, navigate transactions with the participants and make everyday decisions about their relationships with them in order to ensure that they and VA interviews are accepted by the community. The role of the VA fieldworker should be more carefully considered, as should the implications for training and institutional support that follow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H N Gouda
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - A Kelly-Hanku
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Eastern Highlands, Papua New Guinea
| | - L Wilson
- School of Political Science and International Studies, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - S Maraga
- Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Eastern Highlands, Papua New Guinea
| | - I D Riley
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kelley MC, Brazg T, Wilfond BS, Lengua LJ, Rivin BE, Martin-Herz SP, Diekema DS. Ethical challenges in research with orphans and vulnerable children: a qualitative study of researcher experiences. Int Health 2016; 8:187-96. [DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihw020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2015] [Accepted: 03/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
24
|
Desclaux A, Sow K. « Humaniser » les soins dans l’épidémie d’Ebola ? Les tensions dans la gestion du care et de la biosécurité dans le suivi des sujets contacts au Sénégal. ANTHROPOLOGIE ET SANTÉ 2015. [DOI: 10.4000/anthropologiesante.1751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
25
|
Kombe F. Enhancing quality and integrity in biomedical research in Africa: an international call for greater focus, investment and standardisation in capacity strengthening for frontline staff. BMC Med Ethics 2015; 16:77. [PMID: 26567112 PMCID: PMC4643532 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0071-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The integrity of biomedical research depends heavily on the quality of research data collected. In turn, data quality depends on processes of data collection, a task undertaken by frontline research staff in many research programmes in Africa and elsewhere. These frontline research staff often have additional responsibilities including translating and communicating research in local languages, seeking informed consent for study participation and maintaining supportive relationships between research institutions and study participants and wider communities. The level of skills that fieldworkers need to undertake these responsibilities clearly affects the quality of data collected, the ethics of research ‘on the ground’ and the short and long term acceptability of research. We organised an international workshop in Kenya in July 2014 to discuss the role of frontline staff in scientific research. A total of 25 field managers from 9 African countries and the UK met for 2.5 days to discuss the relationship between data quality and institutional performance management systems and how they affect career progression and supportive supervision policies of research frontline staff. From this workshop, and supporting an expanding literature on the role of fieldworkers in international health research, participants agreed that fieldworkers’ roles present them with practical and ethical challenges that their routine training does not adequately prepare them for. We argue that the common and complex challenges facing fieldworkers should in part be addressed through increased investment and collaborative agreements across types of research institutions in Africa. We call for standardization of core elements of training for this critically important cadre of research staff who perform similar roles and encounter similar challenges in many African settings. Although many valuable training elements are offered in institutions, there is a need to develop broader, more grounded and innovative strategies to address complex realities for fieldworkers, and support the integrity and ethics of health research in these settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francis Kombe
- KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jao I, Kombe F, Mwalukore S, Bull S, Parker M, Kamuya D, Molyneux S, Marsh V. Research Stakeholders' Views on Benefits and Challenges for Public Health Research Data Sharing in Kenya: The Importance of Trust and Social Relations. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0135545. [PMID: 26331716 PMCID: PMC4557837 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2015] [Accepted: 07/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing recognition of the importance of sharing research data within the international scientific community, but also of the ethical and social challenges this presents, particularly in the context of structural inequities and varied capacity in international research. Public involvement is essential to building locally responsive research policies, including on data sharing, but little research has involved stakeholders from low-to-middle income countries. METHODS Between January and June 2014, a qualitative study was conducted in Kenya involving sixty stakeholders with varying experiences of research in a deliberative process to explore views on benefits and challenges in research data sharing. In-depth interviews and extended small group discussions based on information sharing and facilitated debate were used to collect data. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis, and charting flow and dynamics in debates. FINDINGS The findings highlight both the opportunities and challenges of communicating about this complex and relatively novel topic for many stakeholders. For more and less research-experienced stakeholders, ethical research data sharing is likely to rest on the development and implementation of appropriate trust-building processes, linked to local perceptions of benefits and challenges. The central nature of trust is underpinned by uncertainties around who might request what data, for what purpose and when. Key benefits perceived in this consultation were concerned with the promotion of public health through science, with legitimate beneficiaries defined differently by different groups. Important challenges were risks to the interests of study participants, communities and originating researchers through stigmatisation, loss of privacy, impacting autonomy and unfair competition, including through forms of intentional and unintentional 'misuse' of data. Risks were also seen for science. DISCUSSION Given background structural inequities in much international research, building trust in this low-to-middle income setting includes ensuring that the interests of study participants, primary communities and originating researchers will be promoted as far as possible, as well as protected. Important ways of building trust in data sharing include involving the public in policy development and implementation, promoting scientific collaborations around data sharing and building close partnerships between researchers and government health authorities to provide checks and balances on data sharing, and promote near and long-term translational benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Jao
- Health Systems and Research Ethics Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Francis Kombe
- Health Systems and Research Ethics Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Salim Mwalukore
- Health Systems and Research Ethics Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Susan Bull
- Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Parker
- Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Dorcas Kamuya
- Health Systems and Research Ethics Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- Health Systems and Research Ethics Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Vicki Marsh
- Health Systems and Research Ethics Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Campbell MM, Susser E, de Vries J, Baldinger A, Sibeko G, Mndini MM, Mqulwana SG, Ntola OA, Ramesar RS, Stein DJ. Exploring researchers' experiences of working with a researcher-driven, population-specific community advisory board in a South African schizophrenia genomics study. BMC Med Ethics 2015; 16:45. [PMID: 26135122 PMCID: PMC4487967 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0037-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2014] [Accepted: 06/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community engagement within biomedical research is broadly defined as a collaborative relationship between a research team and a group of individuals targeted for research. A Community Advisory Board (CAB) is one mechanism of engaging the community. Within genomics research CABs may be particularly relevant due to the potential implications of research findings drawn from individual participants on the larger communities they represent. Within such research, CABs seek to meet instrumental goals such as protecting research participants and their community from research-related risks, as well as intrinsic goals such as promoting the respect of participants and their community. However, successful community engagement depends on the degree to which CABs legitimately represent and engage with communities targeted for research. Currently, there is little literature describing the use of CABs in genomics research taking place in developing countries, and even less in the field of genomics research relating to mental illness. The aim of this article is to describe and consider the contributions made by a researcher-driven, population-specific CAB in a genomics of schizophrenia research project taking place in South Africa, from the perspective of the research team. DISCUSSION Four broad discussion topics emerged during the CAB meetings namely: 1) informed consent procedures, 2) recruitment strategies, 3) patient illness beliefs and stigma experiences, and 4) specific ethical concerns relating to the project. The authors consider these discussions in terms of their contributions to instrumental and intrinsic goals of community engagement. The CAB gave valuable input on the consent processes and materials, recruitment strategies and suggested ways of minimizing the potential for stigma and discrimination. All of these contributions were of an instrumental nature, and helped improve the way in which the research took place. In addition, and perhaps more importantly, the CAB made a unique and important contribution relating to intrinsic functions such as promoting the respect and dignity of research participants and their community. This was particularly evident in ensuring sensitivity and respect of the community's traditional beliefs about schizophrenia and its treatment, and in this way promoting a respectful relationship between the research team and the participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan M Campbell
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, J-Block, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Ezra Susser
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Jantina de Vries
- Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Adam Baldinger
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, J-Block, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Goodman Sibeko
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, J-Block, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Michael M Mndini
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, J-Block, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Sibonile G Mqulwana
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, J-Block, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Odwa A Ntola
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, J-Block, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Raj S Ramesar
- MRC Human Genetics Research Unit, Division of Human Genetics, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Dan J Stein
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, J-Block, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jao I, Kombe F, Mwalukore S, Bull S, Parker M, Kamuya D, Molyneux S, Marsh V. Involving Research Stakeholders in Developing Policy on Sharing Public Health Research Data in Kenya: Views on Fair Process for Informed Consent, Access Oversight, and Community Engagement. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2015; 10:264-77. [PMID: 26297748 PMCID: PMC4548475 DOI: 10.1177/1556264615592385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Increased global sharing of public health research data has potential to advance scientific progress but may present challenges to the interests of research stakeholders, particularly in low-to-middle income countries. Policies for data sharing should be responsive to public views, but there is little evidence of the systematic study of these from low-income countries. This qualitative study explored views on fair data-sharing processes among 60 stakeholders in Kenya with varying research experience, using a deliberative approach. Stakeholders' attitudes were informed by perceptions of benefit and concerns for research data sharing, including risks of stigmatization, loss of privacy, and undermining scientific careers and validity, reported in detail elsewhere. In this article, we discuss institutional trust-building processes seen as central to perceptions of fairness in sharing research data in this setting, including forms of community involvement, individual prior awareness and agreement to data sharing, independence and accountability of governance mechanisms, and operating under a national framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Jao
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Francis Kombe
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | | | | | | | - Dorcas Kamuya
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya Oxford University, UK
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya Oxford University, UK
| | - Vicki Marsh
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya Oxford University, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kamuya DM, Theobald SJ, Marsh V, Parker M, Geissler WP, Molyneux SC. "The one who chases you away does not tell you go": silent refusals and complex power relations in research consent processes in Coastal Kenya. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0126671. [PMID: 25978465 PMCID: PMC4433355 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2014] [Accepted: 04/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Consent processes have attracted significant research attention over the last decade, including in the global south. Although relevant studies suggest consent is a complex negotiated process involving multiple actors, most guidelines assume consent is a one-off encounter with a clear 'yes' or 'no' decision. In this paper we explore the concept of 'silent refusals', a situation where it is not clear whether potential participants want to join studies or those in studies want to withdraw from research, as they were not actively saying no. We draw on participant observation, in-depth interviews and group discussions conducted with a range of stakeholders in two large community based studies conducted by the KEMRI Wellcome Trust programme in coastal Kenya. We identified three broad inter-related rationales for silent refusals: 1) a strategy to avoid conflicts and safeguard relations within households, - for young women in particular-to appear to conform to the wishes of elders; 2) an approach to maintain friendly, appreciative and reciprocal relationships with fieldworkers, and the broader research programme; and 3) an effort to retain study benefits, either for individuals, whole households or wider communities. That refusals and underlying rationales were silent posed multiple dilemmas for fieldworkers, who are increasingly recognised to play a key interface role between researchers and communities in many settings. Silent refusals reflect and reinforce complex power relations embedded in decisions about research participation, with important implications for consent processes and broader research ethics practice. Fieldworkers need support to reflect upon and respond to the ethically charged environment they work in.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorcas M. Kamuya
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Sally J. Theobald
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Vicki Marsh
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Parker
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Wenzel P. Geissler
- Department of Social Anthropology, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sassy C. Molyneux
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Community engagement strategies for genomic studies in Africa: a review of the literature. BMC Med Ethics 2015; 16:24. [PMID: 25889051 PMCID: PMC4407431 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0014-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2014] [Accepted: 03/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community engagement has been recognised as an important aspect of the ethical conduct of biomedical research, especially when research is focused on ethnically or culturally distinct populations. While this is a generally accepted tenet of biomedical research, it is unclear what components are necessary for effective community engagement, particularly in the context of genomic research in Africa. METHODS We conducted a review of the published literature to identify the community engagement strategies that can support the successful implementation of genomic studies in Africa. Our search strategy involved using online databases, Pubmed (National Library of Medicine), Medline and Google scholar. Search terms included a combination of the following: community engagement, community advisory boards, community consultation, community participation, effectiveness, genetic and genomic research, Africa, developing countries. RESULTS A total of 44 articles and 1 thesis were retrieved of which 38 met the selection criteria. Of these, 21 were primary studies on community engagement, while the rest were secondary reports on community engagement efforts in biomedical research studies. 34 related to biomedical research generally, while 4 were specific to genetic and genomic research in Africa. CONCLUSION We concluded that there were several community engagement strategies that could support genomic studies in Africa. While many of the strategies could support the early stages of a research project such as the recruitment of research participants, further research is needed to identify effective strategies to engage research participants and their communities beyond the participant recruitment stage. Research is also needed to address how the views of local communities should be incorporated into future uses of human biological samples. Finally, studies evaluating the impact of CE on genetic research are lacking. Systematic evaluation of CE strategies is essential to determine the most effective models of CE for genetic and genomic research conducted in African settings.
Collapse
|
31
|
Kamuya DM, Marsh V, Njuguna P, Munywoki P, Parker M, Molyneux S. "When they see us, it's like they have seen the benefits!": experiences of study benefits negotiations in community-based studies on the Kenyan Coast. BMC Med Ethics 2014; 15:90. [PMID: 25539983 PMCID: PMC4391117 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-90] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2014] [Accepted: 12/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benefit sharing in health research has been the focus of international debates for many years, particularly in developing countries. Whilst increasing attention is being given to frameworks that can guide researchers to determine levels of benefits to participants, there is little empirical research from developing countries on the practical application of these frameworks, including in situations of extreme poverty and vulnerability. In addition, the voices of those who often negotiate and face issues related to benefits in practice - frontline researchers and fieldworkers (FWs) - are rarely included in these debates. Against this background, this paper reports on experiences of negotiating research participation and benefits as described by fieldworkers, research participants and researchers in two community based studies. METHODS The findings reported here are from a broader social science study that explored the nature of interactions between fieldworkers and participants in two community based studies on the Kenyan Coast. Between January and July 2010, data were collected using participant observation, and through group discussions and in-depth interviews with 42 fieldworkers, 4 researchers, and 40 study participants. RESULTS Participants highly appreciated the benefits provided by studies, particularly health care benefits. Fieldworkers were seen by participants and other community members as the gatekeepers and conduits of benefits, even though those were not their formal roles. Fieldworkers found it challenging to ignore participant and community requests for more benefits, especially in situations of extreme poverty. However, responding to requests by providing different sorts and levels of benefits over time, as inadvertently happened in one study, raised expectations of further benefits and led to continuous negotiations between fieldworkers and participants. CONCLUSIONS Fieldworkers play an important intermediary role in research; a role imbued with multiple challenges and ethical dilemmas for which they require appropriate support. Further more specific empirical research is needed to inform the development of guidance for researchers on benefit sharing, and on responding to emergency humanitarian needs for this and other similar settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorcas M Kamuya
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom. .,KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
| | - Vicki Marsh
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom. .,KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
| | | | | | - Michael Parker
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom.
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom. .,KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tindana P, Molyneux CS, Bull S, Parker M. Ethical issues in the export, storage and reuse of human biological samples in biomedical research: perspectives of key stakeholders in Ghana and Kenya. BMC Med Ethics 2014; 15:76. [PMID: 25326753 PMCID: PMC4210627 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2014] [Accepted: 10/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For many decades, access to human biological samples, such as cells, tissues, organs, blood, and sub-cellular materials such as DNA, for use in biomedical research, has been central in understanding the nature and transmission of diseases across the globe. However, the limitations of current ethical and regulatory frameworks in sub-Saharan Africa to govern the collection, export, storage and reuse of these samples have resulted in inconsistencies in practice and a number of ethical concerns for sample donors, researchers and research ethics committees. This paper examines stakeholders’ perspectives of and responses to the ethical issues arising from these research practices. Methods We employed a qualitative strategy of inquiry for this research including in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with key research stakeholders in Kenya (Nairobi and Kilifi), and Ghana (Accra and Navrongo). Results The stakeholders interviewed emphasised the compelling scientific importance of sample export, storage and reuse, and acknowledged the existence of some structures governing these research practices, but they also highlighted the pressing need for a number of practical ethical concerns to be addressed in order to ensure high standards of practice and to maintain public confidence in international research collaborations. These concerns relate to obtaining culturally appropriate consent for sample export and reuse, understanding cultural sensitivities around the use of blood samples, facilitating a degree of local control of samples and sustainable scientific capacity building. Conclusion Drawing on these findings and existing literature, we argue that the ethical issues arising in practice need to be understood in the context of the interactions between host research institutions and local communities and between collaborating institutions. We propose a set of ‘key points-to-consider’ for research institutions, ethics committees and funding agencies to address these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Tindana
- Navrongo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, P,O, Box 114, Navrongo, Ghana.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zvonareva O, Akrong L. Developing Clinical Research Relationship: Views from Within. Dev World Bioeth 2014; 15:257-66. [DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
34
|
Angwenyi V, Kamuya D, Mwachiro D, Kalama B, Marsh V, Njuguna P, Molyneux S. Complex realities: community engagement for a paediatric randomized controlled malaria vaccine trial in Kilifi, Kenya. Trials 2014; 15:65. [PMID: 24565019 PMCID: PMC3974049 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2013] [Accepted: 02/07/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Community engagement (CE) is increasingly promoted for biomedical research conducted in resource poor settings for both intrinsic and instrumental purposes. Given the potential importance of CE, but also complexities and possibility of unexpected negative outcomes, there is need for more documentation of CE processes in practice. We share experiences of formal CE for a paediatric randomized controlled malaria vaccine trial conducted in three sites within Kilifi County, Kenya. Methods Social scientists independent of the trial held in-depth individual interviews with trial researchers (n = 5), community leaders (n = 8) and parents (15 with enrolled children and 4 without); and group discussions with fieldworkers (n = 6) and facility staff (n = 2). We conducted a survey of participating households (n = 200) and observed over 150 CE activities. Results The overall CE plan was similar across the three study sites, although less community-based information in site C. Majority perceived CE activities to clear pre-existing concerns and misconceptions; increase visibility, awareness of and trust in trial staff. Challenges included: some community leaders attempting to exert pressure on people to enrol; local wording in information sheets and consent forms feeding into serious anxieties about the trial; and concerns about reduced CE over time. Negative effects of these challenges were mitigated through changes to on-going CE activities, and final information sharing and consent being conducted individually by trained clinical staff. One year after enrolment, 31% (n = 62) of participants’ parents reported malaria prevention as the main aim of the activities their children were involved in, and 93% wanted their children to remain involved. Conclusion The trial teams’ goals for CE were relatively clear from the outset. Other actors’ hopes and expectations (like higher allowances and future employment) were not openly discussed, but emerged over the course of engagements. Encouraging open discussion of all actors’ intentions and goals from the outset takes time, risks raising expectations that cannot be met, and is complex. However, doing so in future similar trials may allow successes here to be built upon, and some challenges minimized or avoided. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00866619 (registration 19-Mar-2009).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sassy Molyneux
- The Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P,O, Box, 230-80108, Kilifi, Kenya.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Consent and community engagement (CE) in health research are two aspects of a single concern-that research is carried out in a respectful manner where social value is maximized. There are important overlaps and interdependencies between consent and CE; for example, CE can provide insights into how best to tailor consent to context and can be an important component of consent processes. Engaging communities can also have intrinsic and instrumental value beyond consent; for example, as a means of showing respect and identifying appropriate ways of working respectfully. In this paper we critically examine how CE and consent processes are characterized, conducted, and evaluated in diverse health research contexts, and propose a preliminary research agenda to support future learning in these critical areas.
Collapse
|
36
|
Okello G, Jones C, Bonareri M, Ndegwa SN, McHaro C, Kengo J, Kinyua K, Dubeck MM, Halliday KE, Jukes MCH, Molyneux S, Brooker SJ. Challenges for consent and community engagement in the conduct of cluster randomized trial among school children in low income settings: experiences from Kenya. Trials 2013; 14:142. [PMID: 23680181 PMCID: PMC3661351 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2012] [Accepted: 04/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are a number of practical and ethical issues raised in school-based health research, particularly those related to obtaining consent from parents and assent from children. One approach to developing, strengthening, and supporting appropriate consent and assent processes is through community engagement. To date, much of the literature on community engagement in biomedical research has concentrated on community- or hospital-based research, with little documentation, if any, of community engagement in school-based health research. In this paper we discuss our experiences of consent, assent and community engagement in implementing a large school-based cluster randomized trial in rural Kenya. Methods Data collected as part of a qualitative study investigating the acceptability of the main trial, focus group discussions with field staff, observations of practice and authors’ experiences are used to: 1) highlight the challenges faced in obtaining assent/consent; and 2) strategies taken to try to both protect participant rights (including to refuse and to withdraw) and ensure the success of the trial. Results Early meetings with national, district and local level stakeholders were important in establishing their co-operation and support for the project. Despite this support, both practical and ethical challenges were encountered during consenting and assenting procedures. Our strategy for addressing these challenges focused on improving communication and understanding of the trial, and maintaining dialogue with all the relevant stakeholders throughout the study period. Conclusions A range of stakeholders within and beyond schools play a key role in school based health trials. Community entry and information dissemination strategies need careful planning from the outset, and with on-going consultation and feedback mechanisms established in order to identify and address concerns as they arise. We believe our experiences, and the ethical and practical issues and dilemmas encountered, will be of interest for others planning to conduct school-based research in Africa. Trial registration National Institute of Health NCT00878007
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Okello
- Health Systems Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Collaborative Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kombe F, Anunobi EN, Tshifugula NP, Wassenaar D, Njadingwe D, Mwalukore S, Chinyama J, Randrianasolo B, Akindeh P, Dlamini PS, Ramiandrisoa FN, Ranaivo N. Promoting research integrity in Africa: an African voice of concern on research misconduct and the way forward. Dev World Bioeth 2013; 14:158-66. [PMID: 23594261 DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
African researchers and their collaborators have been making significant contributions to useful research findings and discoveries in Africa. Despite evidence of scientific misconduct even in heavily regulated research environments, there is little documented information that supports prevalence of research misconduct in Africa. Available literature on research misconduct has focused on the developed world, where credible research integrity systems are already in place. Public attention to research misconduct has lately increased, calling for attention to weaknesses in current research policies and regulatory frameworks. Africa needs policies, structural and governance systems that promote responsible conduct of research. To begin to offset this relative lack of documented evidence of research misconduct, contributors working in various research institutions from nine African countries agreed to share their experiences to highlight problems and explore the need to identify strategies to promote research integrity in the African continent. The experiences shared include anecdotal but reliable accounts of previously undocumented research misconduct, including some 'normal misbehavior' of frontline staff in those countries. Two broad approaches to foster greater research integrity are proposed including promotion of institutional and individual capacity building to instil a culture of responsible research conduct in existing and upcoming research scientist and developing deterrent and corrective policies to minimize research misconduct and other questionable research practices. By sharing these experiences and through the strategies proposed, the authors hope to limit the level of research misconduct and promote research integrity in Africa.
Collapse
|
38
|
Molyneux S, Njue M, Boga M, Akello L, Olupot-Olupot P, Engoru C, Kiguli S, Maitland K. 'The words will pass with the blowing wind': staff and parent views of the deferred consent process, with prior assent, used in an emergency fluids trial in two African hospitals. PLoS One 2013; 8:e54894. [PMID: 23408950 PMCID: PMC3569446 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2012] [Accepted: 12/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To document and explore the views and experiences of key stakeholders regarding the consent procedures of an emergency research clinical trial examining immediate fluid resuscitation strategies, and to discuss the implications for similar trials in future. METHODS A social science sub-study of the FEAST (Fluid Expansion As Supportive Therapy) trial. Interviews were held with trial team members (n = 30), health workers (n = 15) and parents (n = 51) from two purposively selected hospitals in Soroti, Uganda, and Kilifi, Kenya. FINDINGS Overall, deferred consent with prior assent was seen by staff and parents as having the potential to protect the interests of both patients and researchers, and to avoid delays in starting treatment. An important challenge is that the validity of verbal assent is undermined when inadequate initial information is poorly understood. This concern needs to be balanced against the possibility that full prior consent on admission potentially causes harm through introducing delays. Full prior consent also potentially imposes worries on parents that clinicians are uncertain about how to proceed and that clinicians want to absolve themselves of any responsibility for the child's outcome (some parents' interpretation of the need for signed consent). Voluntariness is clearly compromised for both verbal assent and full prior consent in a context of such vulnerability and stress. Further challenges in obtaining verbal assent were: what to do in the absence of the household decision-maker (often the father); and how medical staff handle parents not giving a clear agreement or refusal. CONCLUSION While the challenges identified are faced in all research in low-income settings, they are magnified for emergency trials by the urgency of decision making and treatment needs. Consent options will need to be tailored to particular studies and settings, and might best be informed by consultation with staff members and community representatives using a deliberative approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sassy Molyneux
- Health Systems and Social Science Research Group, Kenya Medical Research Institute-ellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|