Pre-hospital delay in patients with diabetic foot problems: influencing factors and subsequent quality of care

Standardized Wound Care: Patchwork Practices?

Standardized care is crucial in health care for ensuring consistent, safe, high-quality, efficient, and evidence-based practices. Care pathways that standardize procedures promote adherence to best practices, reduce variability in treatment, and encourage collaboration among health care teams. This approach ultimately improves patient outcomes, enhances safety, and boosts the overall effectiveness of health care services. However, despite these benefits being widespread across most of the U.S. health care system, wound care stands out as an area where standards can vary significantly. The inconsistency in wound care standards in the United States can be traced to several factors. These include limited structured clinical wound care education, the discretion of health care providers in different business environments, differences in wound care settings, varying access to advanced treatments and technology, patient demographics and socioeconomic status, as well as differences in state laws and regional or institutional practices. Addressing these disparities requires a comprehensive approach that considers the complex interplay of the abovementioned factors. Active measures are needed to improve access, equity, and the quality of wound care services for all patients, regardless of where they live, their socioeconomic status, their health care coverage, or the business interests of providers and their institutions as well as of vendors marketing wound care products inconsistent with evidence-based practice. By understanding and actively addressing these factors, we can work toward achieving more standardized, evidence-based, and patient-centered practices in wound care across the nation.

Development and Validation of the Healthcare-Seeking Intention Questionnaire in Patients with Diabetic High-Risk Foot

Objective

Timely screening and intervention can prevent the development of the diabetic foot. However, delayed visits to the clinic are common among diabetic foot patients. The study aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire to assess healthcare-seeking behavior among patients with diabetic high-risk foot.

Methods

The questionnaire of healthcare-seeking intention for patients with diabetic high-risk foot was developed in two phases: (1) Developing the questionnaire: 1) questionnaire items were formulated after literature review, group discussion and semi-qualitative interview; 2) a two-round modified Delphi method was to examine the content validity and the degree of consistency in questionnaire items; 3) conducting pre-survey to revise the questionnaire items. (2) Assessing the internal reliability and construct validity.

Results

The final questionnaire consisted of five main themes and 28 items with a five-point rating. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the five dimensions were respectively 0.937 (relevant knowledge of diabetic foot), 0.669 (attitudes toward seeking care), 0.896 (social support for seeking care), 0.621 (efficacy in coping with foot symptoms), 0.871 (intention to seek care). The Scale-level Content Validity Index of the five parts was 1.00, 0.80, 1.00, 1.00, and 1.00, respectively. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin values for each dimension was greater than 0.7, and the p-value for Bartlett's test of sphericity was less than 0.05.

Conclusion

This questionnaire showed good validity, internal consistency, and reliability. It provided a potentially useful instrument to evaluate healthcare-seeking intention among patients with diabetic high-risk foot.

Definitive single-stage surgery for treating diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a protocolized pathway including antibiotic bone graft substitute use

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a challenging complication of diabetes mellitus, often leading to poor clinical outcomes and significant socioeconomic burdens. We evaluated the effectiveness of a definitive single-stage protocolized surgical management pathway, including the use of local antibiotic bone graft substitute, for the treatment of infected DFUs with associated osteomyelitis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Medical records were extracted (from January 2017 to December 2020) to establish a database consisting of patients who underwent surgical intervention for the treatment of an infected DFU with osteomyelitis. Patients were divided into conventional (control) and protocolized (intervention) surgical groups depending on the treatment received. Clinical outcomes were assessed over a 12-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 136 consecutive patients were included (conventional = 33, protocolized = 103). The protocolized group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the mean number of operations performed per patient (1.2 vs. 3.5) (P < 0.001) and a shorter accumulative hospital length of stay (12.6 vs. 25.1 days) (P < 0.001) compared to the conventional group. Major amputation rates were significantly lower in the protocolized group (2% vs. 18%) (P < 0.001). Within 12 months of surgical intervention, the protocolized group exhibited an ulcer healing rate of 89%, with a low rate of recurrence (3%).

CONCLUSION

The protocolized surgical pathway, including local antibiotic bone graft substitute use, demonstrated superior outcomes compared to conventional management for the treatment of infected DFUs with osteomyelitis. Further research is needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and generalizability of this approach.

Identification, influencing factors and outcomes of time delays in the management pathway of diabetic foot: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the time delays in the management of diabetic foot and explore influencing factors of these delays and potential outcomes.

METHODS

The researchers searched several electronic databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang, CBM and VIP) for English and Chinese studies that examined time delays in the management pathway of diabetic foot. Two authors independently screened and extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Agency for Health Research and Quality checklist. Due to heterogeneity among the studies, descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The review included 28 articles, comprising 20 cohort studies and 8 cross-sectional studies, that met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 14 were deemed of high quality. The median times from symptom onset to primary health care or specialist care varied from 3 to 46.69 days. The median delay in referral by primary care specialists ranged from 7 to 31 days, and subsequent median times to definitive treatment ranged from 6.2 to 56 days. Multiple complex factors were found to contribute to these delays, including patient demographics (older age, lower education level and income level) and poor patient health-seeking behaviors (inaccurate self-treatment, incorrect recognition and interpretation of symptoms), inaccurate assessment or initial treatment by health primary professionals, complex referral pathways and clinical characteristics of diabetic foot (number of foot ulcers, Wagner grade scale, and hemoglobin A1c index). Negative outcomes associated with these delays included increased risk of major amputation and mortality, decreased wound healing rate, prolonged hospital stay, and increased hospital costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Time delays in the diabetic foot management pathway were both common and serious, contributing to negative health outcomes for patients with diabetic foot. Many complex factors related to patient's poor patient health-seeking behaviors, health system, and clinical characteristics of diabetic foot are responsible for these delays. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new strategies for standard referral practices and strengthen patient awareness of seeking care.

Prevalence and Determinants of Delay in Time-to-Diagnosis for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Patients in Gansu China: A Observational Cohort Study

Current studies of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have shown a significant diagnostic delay. However, the causes and risk factors for this delay are not been well explored in Chinese population. This study aimed to assess the status of diagnostic delay in patients with PAH in China. Additionally, we identified factors associated with the delay. Demographic and clinical data were collected from 153 PAH patients admitted to three tertiary hospitals in Gansu, China, from March 2020 to October 2022. Based on the recorded date, the diagnostic delay was divided into patient delay and health system delay. For analysis, we divided diagnostic delay into 2 groups (≤3 years and >3 years). Factors associated with delay were identified by binary logistic regression. The median diagnostic delay was 3 years (IQR: 0.25-5.88). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that male (OR = 2.48, 95% CI: 1.10-5.58), those with junior high school or below (OR = 3.65, 95% CI: 1.36-9.78), living far away from the tertiary hospital (OR = 2.66, 95% CI: 1.14-6.18), initially visit hospital before 2018 (OR = 3.82, 95% CI: 1.68-8.71), and visit hospital at county level or below (OR = 3.80, 95% CI: 1.42-10.18) were risk factor for diagnostic delay (>3 years). Despite increased awareness, most patients with PAH in Gansu, China still experienced a delay in diagnosis of more than 3 years. Male sex, lower educational background, and being away from tertiary hospitals are risk factors for delay. Furthermore, factors impacting time-to-diagnosis and its impact should be continuously evaluated as therapeutic strategies continue to evolve and improve.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of Endocrinology healthcare workers regarding screening for pre-ulcerative diabetic foot lesions

OBJECTIVE

To investigate knowledge, attitude and practice of screening pre-ulcerative lesions among endocrinology healthcare workers.

METHODS

A new questionnaire was developed and distributed online and 1004 valid questionnaires were returned. T-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1100 questionnaires were returned, and 96 were excluded. The scores of endocrinology healthcare workers' knowledge, attitude, and practice for screening for pre-ulcerative lesions were 45.46 ± 16.26, 92.11 ± 10.50, and 72.27 ± 17.63 respectively. 60.2% participants had been trained to screen for pre-ulcerative lesions, but 39.8% had not been trained. 31.8% of healthcare professionals claimed that their hospital did not have a screening project for pre-ulcer diabetic foot lesions. Positive relationships were found between knowledge and practice and between attitude and practice. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that: level II hospital and tertiary hospital were the main factors influencing the knowledge scores; Undergraduate and participating in relevant training were the main factors influencing the attitude scores; participating in relevant training, hospital conducts relevant projects, and patient cooperation, and working hours were the main factors influencing the practice score.

CONCLUSIONS

Endocrinology healthcare workers need more knowledge regarding pre-ulcerative lesions, and their screening practices need to be strengthened. Increased education and training for pre-ulcerative lesion screening should be implemented among healthcare workers in endocrinology departments.

Analysis of pre-hospital delay in Chinese patients with diabetic foot ulcers: Based on 46 cases

To study the causes of pre-hospital delay in Chinese patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). A retrospective study, investigating a case series of 46 DFUs treated at a single hospital, was conducted to evaluate wound condition, wound treatment, costs, and patients' complete medical records, and analyse the reasons causing the pre-hospital delay. We assessed 46 DFUs aged between 53 and 92 years old. The average pre-hospital delay was 5 months, with nearly 20% being delayed for more than 1 year. The average length of hospital stay in China was 21 days, with an average cost of $8672. Recurrence rate of DFUs was 21%, and three patients were recommended to transfer to upper-level hospital. Besides, the intervention was limited and homogenous and medical records were incomplete. Medical service users' limited understanding of diseases, high costs that patients need to afford, and unsatisfactory treatment by medical service providers are the main reasons for patients' delay in seeking treatment. Recommendations are offered to reduce the pre-hospital delay of Chinese patients with DFUs.

The perceptions of living with diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcers are associated with decreased quality of life in patients with diabetes and impose a heavy burden on patients, their families, and the health care system. For health providers, a deeper understanding of the perceptions of patients is significant. They can provide better management and direction to patients with diabetic foot ulcers, thus improving their quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize the findings of qualitative studies to explore the perceptions of individuals living with diabetic foot ulcers.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.

METHODS

Published qualitative research articles were identified in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, ISI Web of Science, Ovid, and Scopus from inception to January 2022, and bibliographical reports were reviewed. In addition, combing with the search for unpublished studies in the Google Scholar ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database, we conducted a meta-synthesis.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles were eligible for inclusion, and the total number of included individuals was 226, with ages ranging from 28 to 84 years. The perceptions of individuals with diabetic foot ulcers synthesized four overarching themes and their subthemes: perceptions of diabetic foot ulcers (Realization, Reasons), living with diabetic foot ulcers (Change in life, Physical burdens, Emotional burdens, Economic burdens), coping with diabetic foot ulcers (Hospital attendance, Attitude toward amputation, Treatment, Management), and expectations (Expectation of health-personnel, Future expectation).

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with diabetic foot ulcers suffer greatly in their physical, psychological, and social aspects. Comprehensive and individualized patient-centered care and appropriate families and social support for patients with diabetic foot ulcers should be provided.

The amputation and mortality of inpatients with diabetic foot ulceration in the COVID-19 pandemic and postpandemic era: A machine learning study

This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristic and outcomes of inpatients with diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) in 2019 (prelockdown) and 2020 (postlockdown) due to the COVID-19 pandemic, at an emergency medical service unit. Prediction models for mortality and amputation were developed to describe the risk factors using a machine learning-based approach. Hospitalized DFU patients (N = 23) were recruited after the lockdown in 2020 and matched with corresponding inpatients (N = 23) before lockdown in 2019. Six widely used machine learning models were built and internally validated using 3-fold cross-validation to predict the risk of amputation and death in DFU inpatients under the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous DF ulcers, prehospital delay, and mortality were significantly higher in 2020 compared to 2019. Diabetic foot patients in 2020 had higher hs-CRP levels (P = .037) but lower hemoglobin levels (P = .017). The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) performed best in all models for predicting amputation and mortality with the highest area under the curve (0.86 and 0.94), accuracy (0.80 and 0.90), sensitivity (0.67 and 1.00), and negative predictive value (0.86 and 1.00). A long delay in admission and a higher risk of mortality was observed in patients with DFU who attended the emergency center during the COVID-19 post lockdown. The XGBoost model can provide evidence-based risk information for patients with DFU regarding their amputation and mortality. The prediction models would benefit DFU patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Social Deprivation, Healthcare Access and Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Narrative Review

The diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a common and serious complication of diabetes. There is also a strong relationship between the environment of the person living with a DFU and the prognosis of the wound. Financial insecurity seems to have a major impact, but this effect can be moderated by social protection systems. Socioeconomic and socio-educational deprivations seem to have a more complex relationship with DFU risk and prognosis. The area of residence is a common scale of analysis for DFU as it highlights the effect of access to care. Yet it is important to understand other levels of analysis because some may lead to over-interpretation of the dynamics between social deprivation and DFU. Social deprivation and DFU are both complex and multifactorial notions. Thus, the strength and characteristics of the correlation between the risk and prognosis of DFU and social deprivation greatly depend not only on the way social deprivation is calculated, but also on the way questions about the social deprivation−DFU relationship are framed. This review examines this complex relationship between DFU and social deprivation at the individual level by considering the social context in which the person lives and his or her access to healthcare.

People living with diabetes are unaware of their foot risk status or why they are referred to a multidisciplinary foot team

AIM

People with active diabetic foot disease should be rapidly referred by health professionals along a pathway of care to a multidisciplinary foot team. The aim was to investigate patients' self-reported understanding of their foot risk status and reasons for their referral to a multidisciplinary foot team.

METHOD

This seven-month service evaluation included consecutive newly referred patients. Participants completed a questionnaire which asked firstly about their understanding of their foot risk status, secondly about their pathway of care before presentation to the multidisciplinary foot team, and thirdly about their interest in diabetes-related foot education and preferred learning style.

RESULTS

There were 202 participants; 65% were male, mean age was 64±15 years (mean±standard deviation (SD)), 86% had type 2 diabetes, and mean HbA1c was 65±23mmol/mol (8.3±3.7%). Only 4% of participants knew their current foot risk status and 52% did not know why their care had been escalated to a multidisciplinary foot clinic. Participants with type 2 diabetes more readily expressed an interest in further foot education compared with participants with type 1 diabetes, (70% versus 29%, p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show that people with diabetes and foot disease are less aware of their foot risk status or why they are referred to a multidisciplinary team. Participants indicated a variable interest in further learning about foot complications. These findings indicate possible communication and educational barriers between patients and health professionals which may contribute to delayed presentation or suboptimal engagement.

Delay in seeking medical care after the onset of symptoms in patients with sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy

Objective

To investigate the reasons for delays in seeking medical care in patients with diabetic retinopathy and associated risk factors.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data for patients with sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) who attended a hospital in China. Various forms of STDR were identified, including severe non-proliferative DR, clinically significant macular edema and proliferative DR. Demographic, clinical and socioeconomic information was collected and the associated risk factors were evaluated.

Results

Of the 127 patients with STDR, 89.2% sought medical care within 1 month of developing symptoms. Those who sought treatment ≥6 months after symptoms developed had significantly lower income and less knowledge of diabetic complications than those who attended earlier. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that no or infrequent routine examination for diabetic complications were associated with long delays in seeking medical care (odds ratio (OR) 3.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05–9.19; and OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.04–8.40, respectively).

Conclusions

Most patients with STDR sought medical care within 1 month of symptoms developing, but no or infrequent routine examination for diabetic complications was associated with long delays. These results stress the importance of educational programs regarding diabetic complications to encourage timely medical care and prevent poor outcomes.

Factors related to hospital-to-home transitional self-monitoring blood glucose behaviour among patients with diabetes-related foot ulcer

AIMS

To explore the factors related to hospital-to-home transitional self-monitoring blood glucose behaviour among patients with diabetes-related foot ulcer.

BACKGROUND

The 30-day readmission rate of patients with diabetes-related foot ulcer can be reduced when good glycaemic control is achieved. The practice of self-monitoring blood glucose promotes optimal glycaemic control.

DESIGN

A comparative descriptive study.

METHODS

In this study, 200 participants, who had been hospitalized due to diabetes-related foot ulcer, were recruited from August 2017 to July 2018. Before participants were discharged from the hospital, psychosocial factors (family support, threat belief, self-efficacy and knowledge) and pre-hospitalization self-monitoring blood glucose behaviour were collected using a structured questionnaire. Then, after discharge, self-monitoring blood glucose behaviour delivery was collected again.

RESULTS

Five variables explained 47% of the variance in the delivery of self-monitoring of blood glucose at home. The delivery of hospital-to-home transitional self-monitoring blood glucose behaviour was more likely for individuals with higher pre-discharge self-efficacy, higher post-discharge self-efficacy, more attention to pre-hospitalization glycaemic status and post-discharge insulin usage and those without an insensitive foot.

CONCLUSION

Self-monitoring blood-glucose behaviour should be promoted among post-discharge patients with diabetes-related foot ulcer. The modifiable factors identified in this study can be integrated into the discharge plan.

A systematic review with meta-analysis of the impact of access and quality of diabetic foot care delivery in preventing lower extremity amputation

AIMS

To assess the impact of diabetic foot care delivery in preventing lower extremity amputation (LEA).

METHODS

We systematically searched the MEDLINE database for research evaluating the association between any aspect of diabetic foot care delivery and risk of LEA. Meta-analysis was conducted by calculating a pooled odds ratio through a random effects model.

RESULTS

Our search retrieved 5093 articles. In total, 58 articles were included: 9 addressing healthcare access, 4 educating health professionals, 2 implementing guidelines, 6 receiving chiropody/podiatry care services and 37 implementing structured diabetic foot care services (SDFC). All of these aspects of diabetic foot care seemed to have a positive impact on preventing LEA. Only SDFC literature met criteria for performing a meta-analysis. For SDFC impact on preventing overall and major LEA but not for minor LEA compelling evidence was observed [aggregated odds ratio (OR) of 0.45 (95% CI 0.37-0.57), 0.40 (95% CI 0.32-0.51), and 0.87 (95% CI 0.67-1.14), respectively]. However, high heterogeneity (superior to 60%) was observed for all outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Results support a reduction in diabetic LEA frequency in association with structured diabetic foot care, and, in particular, major LEA. Less evidence is available for the remaining aspects of diabetic foot care delivery.

The Prevalence and Correlates of Prehospital Delay and Health Belief in Chinese Patients With Colorectal Cancer

The objective of this study was to describe prehospital delay and health beliefs in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer. A total of 756 adult Chinese patients with a first-time diagnosis of colorectal cancer were recruited during 2016 in Guangzhou, China. All patients completed the Chinese-language version of a questionnaire developed specifically for this study as well as the Chinese-language version of the Champion Health Belief Model Scale. The results of this study showed that the median length of the prehospital delay was 12 weeks and that the average delay was 18.29 (SD = 14.66) weeks. The rate of prehospital delay was 47.35%. The score of health beliefs among these patients was 115.56 (SD = 9.00) and the average score of the entries was 3.21 (SD = 0.25). Health beliefs about colorectal cancer were negatively correlated with prehospital delay. A multiple logistic regression showed that the level of health beliefs, frequency of physical examinations, occupation, and the site of the cancer were the major factors influencing prehospital delay (p < .05). The patients had a low rate of physical examination (41.40%), and colorectal cancer screening was not routine prior to their physical examination. This study showed that the incidence of prehospital delay among Chinese patients with colorectal cancer was 47.35%. Multiple factors influenced prehospital delay among Chinese patients with colorectal cancer.

Missed Opportunities for Timely Recognition of Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia in Patients Undergoing a Major Amputation: A Population Based Cohort Study Using the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink

OBJECTIVE

Opportunities for timely recognition of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) within primary care, such as performing cardiovascular assessment during clinical consultation, are possibly being missed. This study aimed to investigate for potential "missed opportunities" within primary care.

METHODS

This was a population based cohort study, using the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Patients undergoing a major amputation for CLTI between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2016 were included. Primary care consultation and patient clinical data within the one year period prior to amputation were extracted from the CPRD. Dates of last primary care consultation and cardiovascular assessment prior to amputation were evaluated. Timings of latest cardiovascular assessments were stratified into "recent" (7-90 days before amputation) and "late" (> 91 days).

RESULTS

In total, 3 260 patients were included. In the year prior to amputation, patients attended a median of 19 (range 9-32) primary care consultations; however, prescription of secondary preventive medications was poor (antiplatelet 49.7%; lipid lowering agent 40.7%). Overall, 2 175 patients (66.7%) attended a primary care consultation 7-30 days before their amputation. However, only 416 (12.8%) underwent a cardiovascular assessment within this period, with 2 073 (63.6%) undergoing no assessment within 90 days of their amputation. Of these 2 073 patients, 1 230 (59.3%) had a primary care consultation 7-30 days before their procedure. Patients undergoing "late" assessment were younger (p = .003), with higher systolic (p = .008) and diastolic (p = .001) blood pressures than those undergoing "recent" assessment. Differences were also observed between assessment timings by deprivation (p = .003) and ethnicity (p = .006).

CONCLUSION

Missed opportunities for timely recognition potentially exist and may be related to age, deprivation, and ethnicity. Further work is required to investigate these factors, as well as individual amputations to identify the causes precipitating amputation. Greater emphasis on the medical management of peripheral arterial disease and identifying cardiovascular risk factors in patients who may not fit the "at risk" stereotype, are also required.

Phenotypes and outcomes in middle-aged patients with diabetic foot ulcers: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although ageing could increase the risk of delayed healing in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) patients, data from middle-aged patients remains greatly limited. The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical phenotypes, outcomes and predictive factors of DFU in middle-aged patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study conducted with 422 consecutive inpatients with DFUs who visited our hospital between May 2010 and September 2017; participants were recruited and assigned according to age to either the middle-aged group or the elderly group. The Demographics, ulcer characteristics, comorbidities and diabetes complications, laboratory tests, socioeconomic data and final outcomes were collected. Moreover, predictive factors of adverse outcomes in middle-aged DFUs patients were assessed.

RESULTS

Middle-aged patients were more likely to have worse lifestyle and glucose control, were more likely to have microangiopathy as a complication, and tended to have larger and deeper ulcers; however, these patients also had higher rates of healing and lower rates of mortality and major amputaion than elderly patients. Severe infection,living alone,current smoking cigarettes, and having a high white blood cell count were independent risk factors for adverse outcomes in middle-aged patients.

CONCLUSIONS

DFUs are relatively common in middle-aged patients with diabetes, and these patients have unique clinical phenotypes and risk profiles. Nonetheless, further investigation is needed to clarify whether intervention targeting these easily recognizable risk factors can improve healing and survival rates in middle-aged DFU patients.

Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients' Uncertainty Regarding Their Prognosis: A Q-Methodological Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify the subjective patient perspectives toward the uncertainty regarding diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) prognosis.

DESIGN

Q-methodology, which is a qualitative method for analyzing subjective viewpoints, was used.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

Forty patients with DFUs who were admitted to the diabetic wound center of a university hospital in Seoul, South Korea.

METHODS

Data were collected on the subjective viewpoint of patients regarding their DFU prognosis uncertainty and analyzed by the software program PQMethod 2.35 using a principal component analysis and varimax rotation.

RESULTS

This study revealed 4 factors characterizing patient subjective experience related to DFU prognosis: confusion from a lack of knowledge, concerns about a negative future, overdependence on information, and expectations for a positive outlook about favorable results.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest various intervention methods for patients with DFU facing uncertainty about their prognosis based on the 4 viewpoints identified. The identification of the factor causing uncertainty and integration of all uncertainty factors are expected to be used as the basis for reducing patients' uncertainty and helping nurses care for patients more effectively.

Describing Normative Foot Temperatures in Patients With Diabetes-Related Peripheral Neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Prior research shows increased foot temperatures are predictive of diabetes-related foot complications. Our aim was to describe normative skin foot temperatures for individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy to better inform new technologies. We also explored for potential risk factors which correlate with changes in foot temperatures.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients >18 years of age with diabetes mellitus and clinically diagnosed diabetic peripheral neuropathy with pedal digital thermometry performed between 2009 and 2018. A total of 58 patients met these criteria. Univariate modeling was based on covariates that may affect foot temperature including age, peripheral arterial disease, toe pressure, seasonality of measurement, smoking pack-years, caffeine use, insulin use, and calcium channel blocker use.

RESULTS

In patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, mean toe temperatures of 27.67°C (6.300°C), forefoot of 28.58°C (5.36°C), midfoot of 29.21°C (3.81°C), and rearfoot of 29.88°C(3.83°C) were demonstrated. A modest negative correlation between seasonality and toe and metatarsal temperatures (r = -0.38, P < .05; r = -0.43 P < .01, respectively) was demonstrated. Midfoot temperatures were modestly and positively correlated to the presence of small fiber symptoms (r = 0.33, P = .03). Positive modest correlation with rearfoot temperatures and amount of pack-year history (r = 0.30, P = .03) was seen.

CONCLUSION

Normative foot temperatures in neuropathic patients were found to be inversely associated with seasonality at the toe and metatarsal level. Smoking and pack-year history demonstrate modest correlation previously unseen in temperature analyses and warrant further exploration. Normative temperatures in neuropathic patients can better inform new technologies for the prevention of diabetic foot ulcer and Charcot neuroarthropathy.

A systematic review investigating the identification, causes, and outcomes of delays in the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia and diabetic foot ulceration

OBJECTIVE

Patients presenting with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) are at high risk of major lower limb amputation. Long-standing concern exists regarding late presentation and delayed management contributing to increased amputation rates. Despite multiple guidelines existing on the management of both conditions, there is currently no accepted time frame in which to enact specialist care and treatment. This systematic review aimed to investigate potential time delays in the identification, referral, and management of both chronic limb-threatening ischemia and DFU.

METHODS

A systematic review conforming to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards was performed searching MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to November 14, 2018. All English-language qualitative and quantitative articles investigating or reporting the identification, causes, and outcomes of time delays within "high-income" countries (annual gross domestic product per person >$15,000) were included. Data were extracted independently by the investigators. Given the clinical crossover, both conditions were investigated together. A study protocol was designed and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.

RESULTS

A total of 4780 articles were screened, of which 32 articles, involving 71,310 patients and 1388 health care professionals, were included. Twenty-three articles focused predominantly on DFU. Considerable heterogeneity was noted, and only 12 articles were deemed of high quality. Only four articles defined a delay, but this was not consistent between studies. Median times from symptom onset to specialist health care assessment ranged from 15 to 126 days, with subsequent median times from assessment to treatment ranging from 1 to 91 days. A number of patient and health care factors were consistently reported as potentially causative, including poor symptom recognition by the patient, inaccurate health care assessment, and difficulties in accessing specialist services. Twenty articles reported outcomes of delays, namely, rates of major amputation, ulcer healing, and all-cause mortality. Although results were heterogeneous, they allude to delays being associated with detrimental outcomes for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Time delays exist in all aspects of the management pathway, which are in some cases considerable in length. The causes of these are complex but reflect poor patient health-seeking behaviors, inaccurate health care assessment, and barriers to referral and treatment within the care pathway. The adoption of standardized limits for referral and treatment times, exploration of missed opportunities for diagnosis, and investigation of novel strategies for providing specialist care are required to help reduce delays.

Factors associated with foot ulcer self-management behaviours among hospitalised patients with diabetes

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To determine prehospitalised diabetes-related foot ulcer (DFU) self-management behaviours and explore the factors associated with these behaviours.

BACKGROUND

Although there are many studies that explore DFU prevention and treatment, to our knowledge, there are no quantitative studies of DFU self-management behaviours.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional design.

METHODS

From June 2015-June 2016, 199 hospitalised patients with DFU were given a survey questionnaire at a medical centre in northern Taiwan. DFU self-management behaviours, diabetes foot self-care behaviours, beliefs in regard to barriers to DFU self-management behaviours, and knowledge regarding warning signs of DFU deterioration were assessed by well-designed measurement tools. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist was used to ensure quality reporting during this observational study (see Supporting Information Appendix S1).

RESULTS

The results revealed that 62.8% of participants never monitored their blood glucose level when they had foot ulcers, and 63.8% never sought treatment for their wounds when their wounds were not painful. After controlling for demographic and medical variables, stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that the following eight significant variables were associated with DFU self-management behaviours: two DFU self-management barrier beliefs, foot self-care behaviour, no treatment for diabetes, poor financial status, employment, knowledge regarding the warning signs of DFU deterioration, and number of DFU hospitalisations.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes-related foot ulcer self-management behaviours were insufficient. Some modifiable factors and high-risk groups for insufficient DFU self-management behaviour were identified.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Diabetes-related foot ulcer self-management behaviours should be promoted. Interventions that modify the risk factors that were identified in this study can be designed to promote the performance of DFU self-management behaviours.

Barriers to foot care in patients with diabetes as identified by healthcare professionals

AIMS

To seek the views of healthcare professionals as to the barriers to foot care that they perceive as having an impact on clinical outcomes and contributing to the number of amputations.

METHODS

The study involved healthcare professionals from the UK attending our 2015 and 2016 Masterclass diabetic foot conferences. Admission to these conferences was open to all members of the multidisciplinary spectrum who provide care of people with diabetes and foot problems. Attendees were asked to write down concerns that they considered to constitute barriers to foot care for people with diabetes.

RESULTS

A total of 425 responses were received (90.8% of the total attendance at the 2015/2016 conferences). Analysis of the responses produced eight key subject areas in which barriers to care were identified: patient referrals, communication between disciplines, access to specialist services, patient care, funding, organization of care, education and infection. Within these key areas, respondents reported poor recognition and diagnosis of foot problems, lack of awareness of the need for referral both by the person with diabetes and healthcare professionals, difficulties in the referral pathway, lack of access to multidisciplinary care, shortage of resources and lack of education of both people with diabetes and healthcare professionals. The respondents identified these barriers as contributing to delay in people with diabetes receiving specialist help. Such a delay can lead to amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

The crucial barrier to diabetic foot care is delay in accessing specialist care. Until this is addressed, care will be less than optimum and amputations will continue.

Is lack of social support associated with a delay in seeking medical care? A cross-sectional study of Minnesota and Tennessee residents using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have demonstrated an association between social support and lower morbidity and mortality. Delay in seeking medical care is associated with poor health outcomes. The relationship between social support and delay in seeking medical care has not been established. We sought to determine whether lack of social support is associated with higher rates of delays in seeking needed medical care.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional observational study using data from the 2013 and 2014 Centers for Disease Control Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Participants who were asked questions about delays in medical care and social support were included. The primary outcome was a self-reported delay in seeking needed medical care. The primary independent variable of interest was a dichotomised measure of social support. Multivariable logistic regression was performed, adjusting for demographics, socioeconomic status, comorbidities and access to care.

RESULTS

Participants without social support were more likely to report delaying needed medical care when compared with participants with social support (38%vs19%, p<0.001). The association between lack of social support and delays in care persisted after adjustment for demographics, socioeconomic status, comorbidities and access to care (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.45 to 2.06; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of perceived social support is associated with patient-reported delay of needed medical care. This association may contribute to the poor health outcomes experienced by those with a lack of social support.

Illiteracy and diabetic foot complications

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is especially common in the United Arab Emirates. Its complications in patients residing in the region have yet to be fully explored. This study reports on foot problems in our diabetic patients, with emphasis on the impact of illiteracy on foot care and complications due to diabetes.

METHODS

Adults were randomly recruited from the Diabetes Center at Tawam-John Hopkins affiliated hospital. A questionnaire addressing foot care and problems was completed for all patients. In addition, an examination was performed by a trained nurse, an endocrinologist, and a podiatrist.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty-two adults with type 2 (93%) or type 1 (7%) diabetes were enrolled; 67% were females. Patients' mean age was 52 ± 13 years and duration of diabetes ≥ 1 year. Illiterate patients were 51% and were less likely to practice foot care (p=0.002), recognize foot risk factors (p=0.004), use proper footwear (p=0.010), and being physically active (p<0.001). In addition, they were more likely to have diabetic complications, such as neuropathy (p=0.027), eye disease (p=0.032), hypertension (p<0.001), obesity (p=0.003), increased body fat percentage (p<0.001), reduced capillary refill time (p=0.002), reduced monofilament (p=0.003), and reduced vibration (p<0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed literates [OR=2.4, CI=1.1-5.4, p=0.031], female gender [OR=2.7, CI=1.1-6.2, p=0.023], and history of foot ulcer [OR=6.0, CI=2.1-17.2, p=0.001] were predictors of practicing foot care.

CONCLUSION

Illiteracy invoked significant challenges to diabetic attentiveness and imposed increased foot complications. Physicians should realize that illiterate patients are vulnerable and require effective strategies to improve their education about the disease and reduce their diabetic complications.