Disposition of clozapine in man: lack of association with debrisoquine and S-mephenytoin hydroxylation polymorphisms

Optimisation of pharmacotherapy in psychiatry through therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests: focus on antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

For psychotic disorders (i.e. schizophrenia), pharmacotherapy plays a key role in controlling acute and long-term symptoms. To find the optimal individual dose and dosage strategy, specialized tools are used. Three tools have been proven useful to personalize drug treatments: therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of drug levels, pharmacogenetic testing (PG), and molecular neuroimaging.

METHODS

In these Guidelines, we provide an in-depth review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics for 50 antipsychotics. Over 30 international experts in psychiatry selected studies that have measured drug concentrations in the blood (TDM), gene polymorphisms of enzymes involved in drug metabolism, or receptor/transporter occupancies in the brain (positron emission tomography (PET)).

RESULTS

Study results strongly support the use of TDM and the cytochrome P450 (CYP) genotyping and/or phenotyping to guide drug therapies. Evidence-based target ranges are available for titrating drug doses that are often supported by PET findings.

CONCLUSION

All three tools discussed in these Guidelines are essential for drug treatment. TDM goes well beyond typical indications such as unclear compliance and polypharmacy. Despite its enormous potential to optimize treatment effects, minimize side effects and ultimately reduce the global burden of diseases, personalized drug treatment has not yet become the standard of care in psychiatry.

Impact of patient-specific factors on clozapine metabolism in individuals with treatment-resistant schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

BACKGROUND

There is high inter-individual variability in clozapine metabolism due to genetic and non-genetic differences. Patient-specific factors such as smoking, inflammation indicated by elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), and certain concurrent medications have a significant influence on clozapine metabolism.

AIM

To assess which patient-specific factors best explain variability in clozapine metabolism estimated by clozapine concentration to dose (C/D) ratios.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis using electronic medical data was conducted on 172 inpatients at the BC Psychosis Program. Patients with normal renal and liver function were included if they were on clozapine and had at least one steady-state plasma concentration. The degree of influence of each factor on the variability of clozapine metabolism in the entire cohort and subgroups stratified by fluvoxamine use was evaluated using multiple linear regression analysis of C/D ratios.

RESULTS

Model fit testing showed that the entire cohort model accounts for 52.7% of C/D ratio variability, while the no fluvoxamine and fluvoxamine models accounted for 40.8% and 43.8%. In the entire cohort (n = 172), fluvoxamine use explained the highest variance, and C/D ratios were higher by 30.6% on average. The second strongest predictor was elevated CRP > 10 mg/L, and C/D ratios were higher by 22.9% on average. Subsequently, obesity, nonsmoker status, and female sex explained a significant but modest proportion of variance. Among participants on fluvoxamine (n = 58), only fluvoxamine dose was associated with an increase, and for every 25 mg increase in dose, C/D ratios increased by 5% on average.

CONCLUSION

In a clinical population, this study replicated the relationship between reduced rate of clozapine metabolism and the use of fluvoxamine, elevated CRP, obesity, nonsmoking status, and female sex; and the magnitude of the effects were large enough to be clinically relevant.

Pharmacogenetic Dose Modeling Based on CYP2C19 Allelic Phenotypes

Pharmacogenetic variability in drug metabolism leads to patient vulnerability to side effects and to therapeutic failure. Our purpose was to introduce a systematic statistical methodology to estimate quantitative dose adjustments based on pharmacokinetic differences in pharmacogenetic subgroups, addressing the concerns of sparse data, incomplete information on phenotypic groups, and heterogeneity of study design. Data on psychotropic drugs metabolized by the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP2C19 were used as a case study. CYP2C19 activity scores were estimated, while statistically assessing the influence of methodological differences between studies, and used to estimate dose adjustments in genotypic groups. Modeling effects of activity scores in each substance as a population led to prudential predictions of adjustments when few data were available ('shrinkage'). The best results were obtained with the regularized horseshoe, an innovative Bayesian approach to estimate coefficients viewed as a sample from two populations. This approach was compared to modeling the population of substance as normally distributed, to a more traditional "fixed effects" approach, and to dose adjustments based on weighted means, as in current practice. Modeling strategies were able to assess the influence of study parameters and deliver adjustment levels when necessary, extrapolated to all phenotype groups, as well as their level of uncertainty. In addition, the horseshoe reacted sensitively to small study sizes, and provided conservative estimates of required adjustments.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine in adults with schizophrenia: a review of challenges and strategies

INTRODUCTION

Clozapine (CLZ) is the superior drug in treatment of schizophrenia. Serum concentration of CLZ is associated with clinical response and dose-dependents side effects, where generalized tonic-clonic seizures are most critical. Thus, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of CLZ may guide individual dosing to reach target exposure and prevent dose-dependent side effects. However, current TDM methods are not capable of predicting the risk of agranulocytosis, which is a dose-independent side effect restricting use of CLZ to treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS).

AREAS COVERED

The article provides an overview of clinical, pharmacological, and toxicological aspects of CLZ, and the role of TDM as a tool for dose titration and follow-up in patients with TRS. Main focus is on current challenges and strategies in CLZ TDM, including future perspectives on potential identification/analysis of CLZ metabolite biomarkers reflecting the risk of granulocyte toxicity.

EXPERT OPINION

The association between CLZ serum concentration, clinical response and risk of seizures is indisputable. TDM should therefore always guide CLZ dose titration. Development of advanced TDM methods, including biomarkers predicting the risk of granulocyte toxicity might extend TDM to be a tool for deciding which patients that can be treated safely with CLZ, potentially increasing its utility beyond TRS.

Perfused human hepatocyte microtissues identify reactive metabolite-forming and mitochondria-perturbing hepatotoxins

Hepatotoxins cause liver damage via many mechanisms but the formation of reactive metabolites and/or damage to liver mitochondria are commonly implicated. We assess 3D human primary hepatocyte microtissues as a platform for hepatotoxicity studies with reactive metabolite-forming and mitochondria-perturbing compounds. We show that microtissues formed from cryopreserved human hepatocytes had bile canaliculi, transcribed mRNA from genes associated with xenobiotic metabolism and expressed functional cytochrome P450 enzymes. Hierarchical clustering was used to distinguish dose-dependent hepatotoxicity elicited by clozapine, fialuridine and acetaminophen (APAP) from control cultures and less liver-damaging compounds, olanzapine and entecavir. The regio-isomer of acetaminophen, N-acetyl-meta-aminophenol (AMAP) clustered with the hepatotoxic compounds. The principal metabolites of APAP were formed and dose-dependent changes in metabolite profile similar to those seen in patient overdose was observed. The toxicological profile of APAP was indistinguishable from that of AMAP, confirming AMAP as a human hepatotoxin. Tissue oxygen consumption rate was significantly decreased within 2h of exposure to APAP or AMAP, concomitant with glutathione depletion. These data highlight the potential utility of perfused metabolically functional human liver microtissues in drug development and mechanistic toxicology.

Pharmacogenetic tests for antipsychotic medications: clinical implications and considerations

Optimizing antipsychotic pharmacotherapy is often challenging due to significant variability in effectiveness and tolerability. Genetic factors influencing pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may contribute to some of this variability. Research studies have characterized these pharmacogenetic relationships, and some genetic markers are now available as clinical tests. These advances in pharmacogenetics research and test availability have great potential to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life in psychiatric patients. For clinicians considering using pharmacogenetics, it is important to understand the clinical implications and also the limitations of markers included in currently available tests. This review focuses on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic gene variants that are currently available in commercial genetic testing panels. Associations of these variants with clinical efficacy and adverse effects, as well as other clinical implications, in antipsychotic pharmacotherapy are discussed.

Potential Role of Patients' CYP3A-Status in Clozapine Pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND

The atypical antipsychotic clozapine is effective in treatment-resistant schizophrenia; however, the success or failure of clozapine therapy is substantially affected by the variables that impact the clozapine blood concentration. Thus, elucidating the inter-individual differences in clozapine pharmacokinetics can facilitate the personalized therapy.

METHODS

Since a potential role in clozapine metabolism is assigned to CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A enzymes, the association between the patients' CYP status (CYP genotypes, CYP expression) and clozapine clearance was evaluated in 92 psychiatric patients.

RESULTS

The patients' CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 genotypes and CYP1A2 expression seemed to have no effect on clozapine serum concentration, whereas CYP3A4 expression significantly influenced the normalized clozapine concentration (185.53±56.53 in low expressers vs 78.05±29.57 or 66.52±0.25 (ng/mL)/(mg/kg) in normal or high expressers, P<.0001), in particular that the patients expressed CYP1A2 at a relatively low level. The functional CYP3A5*1 allele seemed to influence clozapine concentrations in those patients who expressed CYP3A4 at low levels. The dose requirement for the therapeutic concentration of clozapine was substantially lower in low CYP3A4 expresser patients than in normal/high expressers (2.18±0.64 vs 4.98±1.40 mg/kg, P<.0001). Furthermore, significantly higher plasma concentration ratios of norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine were observed in the patients displaying normal/high CYP3A4 expression than in the low expressers.

CONCLUSION

Prospective assaying of CYP3A-status (CYP3A4 expression, CYP3A5 genotype) may better identify the patients with higher risk of inefficiency or adverse reactions and may facilitate the improvement of personalized clozapine therapy; however, further clinical studies are required to prove the benefit of CYP3A testing for patients under clozapine therapy.

Pharmacogenetic tests for antipsychotic medications: clinical implications and considerations

Optimizing antipsychotic pharmacotherapy is often challenging due to significant variability in effectiveness and tolerability. Genetic factors influencing pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may contribute to some of this variability. Research studies have characterized these pharmacogenetic relationships, and some genetic markers are now available as clinical tests. These advances in pharmacogenetics research and test availability have great potential to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life in psychiatric patients. For clinicians considering using pharmacogenetics, it is important to understand the clinical implications and also the limitations of markers included in currently available tests. This review focuses on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic gene variants that are currently available in commercial genetic testing panels. Associations of these variants with clinical efficacy and adverse effects, as well as other clinical implications, in antipsychotic pharmacotherapy are discussed.

Interethnic variation of CYP2C19 alleles, 'predicted' phenotypes and 'measured' metabolic phenotypes across world populations

The present study evaluates the worldwide frequency distribution of CYP2C19 alleles and CYP2C19 metabolic phenotypes ('predicted' from genotypes and 'measured' with a probe drug) among healthy volunteers from different ethnic groups and geographic regions, as well as the relationship between the 'predicted' and 'measured' CYP2C19 metabolic phenotypes. A total of 52 181 healthy volunteers were studied within 138 selected original research papers. CYP2C19*17 was 42- and 24-fold more frequent in Mediterranean-South Europeans and Middle Easterns than in East Asians (P<0.001, in both cases). Contrarily, CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 alleles were more frequent in East Asians (30.26% and 6.89%, respectively), and even a twofold higher frequency of these alleles was found in Native populations from Oceania (61.30% and 14.42%, respectively; P<0.001, in all cases), which may be a consequence of genetic drift process in the Pacific Islands. Regarding CYP2C19 metabolic phenotype, poor metabolizers (PMs) were more frequent among Asians than in Europeans, contrarily to the phenomenon reported for CYP2D6. A correlation has been found between the frequencies of CYP2C19 poor metabolism 'predicted' from CYP2C19 genotypes (gPMs) and the poor metabolic phenotype 'measured' with a probe drug (mPMs) when subjects are either classified by ethnicity (r=0.94, P<0.001) or geographic region (r=0.99, P=0.002). Nevertheless, further research is needed in African and Asian populations, which are under-represented, and additional CYP2C19 variants and the 'measured' phenotype should be studied.

Pharmacogenetics in schizophrenia: a review of clozapine studies

OBJECTIVES

Clozapine is quite effective to treat schizophrenia, but its use is complicated by several factors. Although many patients respond to antipsychotic therapy, about 50% of them exhibit inadequate response, and ineffective medication trials may entail weeks of unremitted illness, potential adverse drug reactions, and treatment nonadherence. This review of the literature sought to describe the main pharmacogenetic studies of clozapine and the genes that potentially influence response to treatment with this medication in schizophrenics.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database for studies published in English in the last 20 years using keywords related to the topic.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Our search yielded 145 studies that met the search and selection criteria. Of these, 21 review articles were excluded. The 124 studies included for analysis showed controversial results. Therefore, efforts to identify key gene mechanisms that will be useful in predicting clozapine response and side effects have not been fully successful. Further studies with new analysis approaches and larger sample sizes are still required.

CYP450 pharmacogenetic treatment strategies for antipsychotics: a review of the evidence

Although a number of first- and second-generation antipsychotics are available, achieving optimal therapeutic response for patients with schizophrenia can be challenging. The presence of polymorphic alleles for cytochrome P (CYP) 450 may result in lack of expression, altered levels of expression, or altered function of CYP450 enzymes. CYP2D6, CYP1A2, and CYP3A4/5 are major enzymes in the metabolism of antipsychotics and polymorphisms of alleles for these proteins are associated with altered plasma levels. Consequently, standard dosing may result in drug plasma concentrations that are subtherapeutic or toxic in some patients. Patient CYP450 genotype testing can predict altered pharmacokinetics, and is currently available and relatively inexpensive. Evidence-based guidelines provide dose recommendations for some antipsychotics. To date few studies have demonstrated a significant association with genotype-guided antipsychotic use and clinical efficacy. However, many studies have been small, retrospective or cohort designs, and many have not been adequately powered. Numerous studies have shown a significant association between genotype and adverse effects, such as CYP2D6 polymorphisms and tardive dyskinesia. This review summarizes evidence for the role of CYP450 genetic variants in the response to antipsychotic medications and the clinical implications of pharmacogenetics in the management of patients with schizophrenia.

Characterization of human cytochrome P450s involved in the bioactivation of clozapine

Clozapine is known to cause hepatotoxicity in a small percentage of patients. Oxidative bioactivation to reactive intermediates by hepatic cytochrome P450s (P450s) has be proposed as a possible mechanism. However, in contrast to their role in formation of N-desmethylclozapine and clozapine N-oxide, the involvement of individual P450s in the bioactivation to reactive intermediates is much less well characterized. The results of the present study show that 7 of 14 recombinant human P450s were able to bioactivate clozapine to a glutathione-reactive nitrenium ion. CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 showed the highest specific activity. Enzyme kinetical characterization of these P450s showed comparable intrinsic clearance of bioactivation, implicating that CYP3A4 would be more important because of its higher hepatic expression, compared with CYP2D6. Inhibition experiments using pooled human liver microsomes confirmed the major role of CYP3A4 in hepatic bioactivation of clozapine. By studying bioactivation of clozapine in human liver microsomes from 100 different individuals, an 8-fold variability in bioactivation activity was observed. In two individuals bioactivation activity exceeded N-demethylation and N-oxidation activity. Quinidine did not show significant inhibition of bioactivation in any of these liver fractions, suggesting that CYP2D6 polymorphism is not an important factor in determining susceptibility to hepatotoxicity of clozapine. Therefore, interindividual differences and drug-drug interactions at the level of CYP3A4 might be factors determining exposure of hepatic tissue to reactive clozapine metabolites.

A Kinetic Model for Simultaneous Fit of Clozapine and Norclozapine Concentrations in Chronic Schizophrenic Patients during Long-Term Treatment

OBJECTIVE

The pharmacokinetic profiles of clozapine and its main metabolite, norclozapine, were investigated in 18 chronic schizophrenic inpatients during long-term treatment.

PATIENTS

Patients received stable daily doses (between 300 and 900mg) for at least 1 month. Plasma drug concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from both noncompartmental and compartmental approaches with zero-order input rate using a kinetic model for simultaneous fit of clozapine and norclozapine (active metabolite) concentrations.

RESULTS

Large interpatient variations in pharmacokinetic parameters of the two drugs were observed. Plasma clozapine concentration peaked on average at 2 hours. The mean elimination rate constants from compartments 1 (k(10)) and 2 (k(20 ), elimination rate constant of norclozapine) were 0.087 and 0.156h(-1), respectively. The rate of formation of norclozapine, k(12), averaged 1.25h(-1). The mean fraction of the administered dose converted to norclozapine was estimated to be 66%. The apparent clearance of clozapine (CL/F) averaged 44.7 L/h and the volume of distribution (V(c)/F) was 7.00 L/kg. The pharmacokinetics of clozapine after multiple doses were linear over the range of clozapine plasma concentrations of 145 to 1411 microg/L.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study assessing the pharmacokinetic profile of clozapine plus norclozapine in plasma during long-term treatment. This pharmacokinetic model can be used to determine the population pharmacokinetic parameters of clozapine and norclozapine in order to optimise individual dosage regimens using a Bayesian methodology.

ABCB1 and cytochrome P450 polymorphisms: clinical pharmacogenetics of clozapine

To examine the genetic factors influencing clozapine kinetics in vivo, 75 patients treated with clozapine were genotyped for CYPs and ABCB1 polymorphisms and phenotyped for CYP1A2 and CYP3A activity. CYP1A2 activity and dose-corrected trough steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine correlated significantly (r = -0.61; P = 1 x 10), with no influence of the CYP1A2*1F genotype (P = 0.38). CYP2C19 poor metabolizers (*2/*2 genotype) had 2.3-fold higher (P = 0.036) clozapine concentrations than the extensive metabolizers (non-*2/*2). In patients comedicated with fluvoxamine, a strong CYP1A2 inhibitor, clozapine and norclozapine concentrations correlate with CYP3A activity (r = 0.44, P = 0.075; r = 0.63, P = 0.007, respectively). Carriers of the ABCB1 3435TT genotype had a 1.6-fold higher clozapine plasma concentrations than noncarriers (P = 0.046). In conclusion, this study has shown for the first time a significant in vivo role of CYP2C19 and the P-gp transporter in the pharmacokinetics of clozapine. CYP1A2 is the main CYP isoform involved in clozapine metabolism, with CYP2C19 contributing moderately, and CYP3A4 contributing only in patients with reduced CYP1A2 activity. In addition, ABCB1, but not CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A5, nor CYP3A7 polymorphisms, influence clozapine pharmacokinetics.

CYP2D6 polymorphism: implications for antipsychotic drug response, schizophrenia and personality traits

The CYP2D6 gene is highly polymorphic, causing absent (poor metabolizers), decreased, normal or increased enzyme activity (extensive and ultrarapid metabolizers). The genetic polymorphism of the CYP2D6 influences plasma concentration of a wide variety of drugs metabolized in the liver by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 enzyme, including antipsychotic drugs used for schizophrenia treatment. Additionally, CYP2D6 is involved in the metabolism of endogenous substrates in the brain, and reported to be located in regions such as the cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum, which are impaired in schizophrenia. Moreover, recently we have found that CYP2D6 poor metabolizers are under-represented in a case-control association study of schizophrenia. Furthermore, null CYP2D6 activity in healthy volunteers is associated with personality characteristics of social cognitive anxiety, which may bear some resemblance to milder forms of psychotic-like symptoms. In keeping with this, CYP2D6 may influence, not only variability to drug response, but also vulnerability to disease in schizophrenia patients.

Metabolic drug interactions with newer antipsychotics: a comparative review

Newer antipsychotics introduced in clinical practice in recent years include clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and amisulpride. These agents are subject to drug-drug interactions with other psychotropic agents or with medications used in the treatment of concomitant physical illnesses. Most pharmacokinetic interactions with newer antipsychotics occur at the metabolic level and usually involve changes in the activity of the major drug-metabolizing enzymes involved in their biotransformation, i.e. the cytochrome P450 (CYP) monooxygenases and/or uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT). Clozapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2, with additional contribution by other CYP isoforms. Risperidone is metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and, to a lesser extent, CYP3A4. Olanzapine undergoes both direct conjugation and CYP1A2-mediated oxidation. Quetiapine is metabolized by CYP3A4, while sertindole and aripiprazole are metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Ziprasidone pathways include aldehyde oxidase-mediated reduction and CYP3A4-mediated oxidation. Amisulpride is primarily excreted in the urine and undergoes relatively little metabolism. While novel antipsychotics are unlikely to interfere with the elimination of other drugs, co-administration of inhibitors or inducers of the major enzymes responsible for their metabolism may modify their plasma concentrations, leading to potentially significant effects. Most documented metabolic interactions involve antidepressant and anti-epileptic drugs. Of a particular clinical significance is the interaction between fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, and clozapine. Differences in the interaction potential among the novel antipsychotics currently available may be predicted based on their metabolic pathways. The clinical relevance of these interactions should be interpreted in relation to the relative width of their therapeutic index. Avoidance of unnecessary polypharmacy, knowledge of the interaction profiles of individual agents, and careful individualization of dosage based on close evaluation of clinical response and, possibly, plasma drug concentrations are essential to prevent and minimize potentially adverse drug interactions in patients receiving newer antipsychotics.

Plasma clozapine levels and clinical response in treatment-refractory Chinese schizophrenic patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical efficacy of clozapine in relation with its plasma level in a group of Chinese patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In addition, the relationship between plasma level and side effects were examined.

METHOD

Fifty-one patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia were put on a fixed dose of clozapine at 300 mg/day for 6 weeks. Non-responders to week 6 received 500 mg/day in subsequent 6 weeks. Responders to week 6 continued to receive 300 mg/day. Clozapine plasma levels were checked at weeks 6 and 12.

FINDINGS

No association was found between clozapine plasma level, response and side effects. Sodium valproate was found to elevate clozapine plasma level while lowering norclozapine/clozapine ratio.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine plasma level was not found to be associated with response and side effect in Chinese treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients. Various explanations were postulated for the lack of relationship observed between clozapine plasma level and response in this population.

Pharmacogenetics of antidepressants and antipsychotics: the contribution of allelic variations to the phenotype of drug response

Genetic factors contribute to the phenotype of drug response. We systematically analyzed all available pharmacogenetic data from Medline databases (1970-2003) on the impact that genetic polymorphisms have on positive and adverse reactions to antidepressants and antipsychotics. Additionally, dose adjustments that would compensate for genetically caused differences in blood concentrations were calculated. To study pharmacokinetic effects, data for 36 antidepressants were screened. We found that for 20 of those, data on polymorphic CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 were found and that in 14 drugs such genetic variation would require at least doubling of the dose in extensive metabolizers in comparison to poor metabolizers. Data for 38 antipsychotics were examined: for 13 of those CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype was of relevance. To study the effects of genetic variability on pharmacodynamic pathways, we reviewed 80 clinical studies on polymorphisms in candidate genes, but those did not for the most part reveal significant associations between neurotransmitter receptor and transporter genotypes and therapy response or adverse drug reactions. In addition associations found in one study could not be replicated in other studies. For this reason, it is not yet possible to translate pharmacogenetic parameters fully into therapeutic recommendations. At present, antidepressant and antipsychotic drug responses can best be explained as the combinatorial outcome of complex systems that interact at multiple levels. In spite of these limitations, combinations of polymorphisms in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic pathways of relevance might contribute to identify genotypes associated with best and worst responders and they may also identify susceptibility to adverse drug reactions.

Nonresponse to clozapine and ultrarapid CYP1A2 activity: clinical data and analysis of CYP1A2 gene

Clozapine (CLO), an atypical antipsychotic, depends mainly on cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) for its metabolic clearance. Four patients treated with CLO, who were smokers, were nonresponders and had low plasma levels while receiving usual doses. Their plasma levels to dose ratios of CLO (median; range, 0.34; 0.22 to 0.40 ng x day/mL x mg) were significantly lower than ratios calculated from another study with 29 patients (0.75; 0.22 to 2.83 ng x day/mL x mg; P < 0.01). These patients were confirmed as being CYP1A2 ultrarapid metabolizers by the caffeine phenotyping test (median systemic caffeine plasma clearance; range, 3.85; 3.33 to 4.17 mL/min/kg) when compared with previous studies (0.3 to 3.33 mL/min/kg). The sequencing of the entire CYP1A2 gene from genomic DNA of these patients suggests that the -164C > A mutation (CYP1A2*1F) in intron 1, which confers a high inducibility of CYP1A2 in smokers, is the most likely explanation for their ultrarapid CYP1A2 activity. A marked (2 patients) or a moderate (2 patients) improvement of the clinical state of the patients occurred after the increase of CLO blood levels above the therapeutic threshold by the increase of CLO doses to very high values (ie, up to 1400 mg/d) or by the introduction of fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, at low dosage (50 to 100 mg/d). Due to the high frequency of smokers among patients with schizophrenia and to the high frequency of the -164C > A polymorphism, CYP1A2 genotyping could have important clinical implications for the treatment of patients with CLO.

Interactions between the cytochrome P450 system and the second-generation antipsychotics

Awareness of the metabolism of second-generation antipsychotics by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system can inform the clinician about how to avoid and manage drug-drug interactions involving these enzymes. Clozapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2, with additional contributions by CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Risperidone is metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and to a lesser extent by CYP3A4. Olanzapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2 and to a lesser extent by CYP2D6. Quetiapine and ziprasidone are metabolized by CYP3A4. At the usual clinical doses, these drugs appear not to significantly affect the metabolism of other medications. There is, however, a lack of in vivo metabolic data, especially for the 3 newest second-generation antipsychotics: olanzapine, quetiapine and ziprasidone.

Cytochrome p450 phenotyping/genotyping in patients receiving antipsychotics: useful aid to prescribing?

Many antipsychotics, including perphenazine, zuclopenthixol, thioridazine, haloperidol and risperidone, are metabolised to a significant extent by the polymorphic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6, which shows large interindividual variation in activity. Significant relationships between CYP2D6 genotype and steady-state concentrations have been reported for perphenazine, zuclopenthixol, risperidone and haloperidol when used in monotherapy. Other CYPs, especially CYP1A2 and CYP3A4, also contribute to the interindividual variability in the kinetics of antipsychotics and the occurrence of drug interactions. For many antipsychotics, the role of the different CYPs at therapeutic drug concentrations remains to be clarified. Some studies have suggested that poor metabolisers for CYP2D6 would be more prone to oversedation and possibly parkinsonism during treatment with classical antipsychotics, whereas other, mostly retrospective, studies have been negative or inconclusive. For the newer antipsychotics, such data are lacking. Whether phenotyping or genotyping for CYP2D6 or other CYPs can be used to predict an optimal dose range has not been studied so far. Genotyping or phenotyping can today be recommended as a complement to plasma concentration determination when aberrant metabolic capacity (poor or ultrarapid) of CYP2D6 substrates is suspected. The current rapid developments in molecular genetic methodology and pharmacogenetic knowledge can in the near future be expected to provide new tools for prediction of the activity of the various drug-metabolising enzymes. Further prospective clinical studies in well-defined patient populations and with adequate evaluation of therapeutic and adverse effects are required to establish the potential of pharmacogenetic testing in clinical psychiatry.

Clozapine, norclozapine plasma levels, their sum and ratio in 50 psychotic patients: influence of patient-related variables

Steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine, its major metabolite, as well as their sum and ratio (norclozapine/clozapine), were evaluated in 50 in- and outpatients taking clozapine and naturalistically recruited. Drug plasma concentrations were measured by means of a reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RPLC) method with an ultraviolet detection. Daily doses (milligrams per kilogram of body weight) of clozapine correlated positively with clozapine plasma parameters, except with the norclozapine/clozapine ratio, in all patients. When the patients were divided in subgroups with respect to gender, the corresponding plasma concentrations were no longer dose-related in men. A lack of significant correlation was observed also in patients (n=23) co-treated with typical neuroleptics. Conversely, dose-concentration correlations were significant in either smoker or nonsmoker patients. No significant relationship between body weight and clozapine plasma parameters was reported. Further, we observed (1) a trend towards higher medians of clozapine or total analytes in women than those reported in men (P=.09 and .07); (2) no significant difference in plasma levels obtained in subjects younger than 34 years and subjects 34 years old or older; (3) a trend towards higher norclozapine and clozapine plus norclozapine levels (P=.05 and .08) in nonsmoker than smoker patients; (4) no significant difference between clozapine plasma parameters measured in patients co-medicated with typical neuroleptics and in patients receiving clozapine alone.

Carbamazepine-risperidone interactions in patients with epilepsy

Because concomitant administration of psychoactive and antiepileptic drugs is increasing progressively in neurologic and psychiatric practice, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interactions between risperidone (RISP) and carbamazepine (CBZ) plasma concentrations in a group of patients with epilepsy with behavioral disturbances. The authors assessed eight patients on CBZ monotherapy (CBZ extended-release capsules) at a mean dosage of 625 +/- 253 mg/day (range, 400-1,200 mg/day) for at least 1 year. RISP (1 mg in one daily dose) was added to CBZ therapy for the occurrence of behavior disturbances. CBZ blood levels were assessed before (T0), 24 hours after (T1), and 2 weeks after (T2) RISP administration. Steady-state plasma concentrations of CBZ increased from 6.67 +/- 0.41 microg/mL at baseline to 7.37 +/- 0.59 microg/mL (p < 0.01) at T1, to 7.95 +/- 0.47 microg/mL (p < 0.0001) at T2. The pharmacokinetic data suggest either a possible role of RISP in inhibiting the cytochrome P450 microsomal enzyme system (CYP)-3A4 pathway or a potential role of CYP2D6 in CBZ metabolism.

Cytochrome P450 polymorphisms and response to antipsychotic therapy

Antipsychotic drugs are used for the treatment of schizophrenia and other related psychotic disorders. The antipsychotics currently available include older or classical compounds and newer or atypical agents. Most antipsychotic drugs are highly lipophilic compounds and undergo extensive metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in order to be excreted. There is a wide interindividual variability in the biotransformation of antipsychotic drugs, resulting in pronounced differences in steady-state plasma concentrations and, possibly, in therapeutic and toxic effects, during treatment with fixed doses. Many classical and some newer antipsychotics are metabolized to a significant extent by the polymorphic CYP2D6, which shows large interindividual variation in activity. Other CYPs, especially CYP1A2 and CYP3A4, also contribute to the interindividual variability in the kinetics of antipsychotics and occurrence of drug interactions. No relationship between CYP2D6 genotype or activity and therapeutic effects of classical antipsychotic drugs has been found in the few studies performed. On the other hand, some investigations suggest that poor metabolizers (PMs) of CYP2D6 would be more prone to over-sedation and, possibly, Parkinsonism during treatment with classical antipsychotics, while other studies, mostly retrospective, have been negative or inconclusive. For the newer antipsychotics, such data are lacking. To date, CYP2D6 phenotyping and genotyping appear, therefore, to be clinically useful for dose predicting only in special cases and for a limited number of antipsychotics, while their usefulness in predicting clinical effects must be further explored.

Treatment-resistance to clozapine in association with ultrarapid CYP1A2 activity and the C-->A polymorphism in intron 1 of the CYP1A2 gene: effect of grapefruit juice and low-dose fluvoxamine

Antipsychotic response to clozapine varies markedly among patients with schizophrenia. The disposition of clozapine is dependent, in part, on the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 1A2 enzyme in vivo. In theory, a very high CYP1A2 activity may lead to subtherapeutic concentrations and treatment resistance to clozapine. This prospective case study evaluates the clinical significance of ultrarapid CYP1A2 activity and a recently discovered single nucleotide (C --> A) polymorphism in intron 1 of the CYP1A2 gene (CYP1A2*F) for treatment resistance to clozapine. In addition, we describe the effect of grapefruit juice or low-dose fluvoxamine (25-50 mg/d) coadministration on clozapine and active metabolite norclozapine steady-state plasma concentration and antipsychotic response.

Smoking in patients receiving psychotropic medications: a pharmacokinetic perspective

Many psychiatric patients smoke, and are believed to be heavier smokers than those without psychiatric disorders. Cigarette smoking is one of the environmental factors that contributes to interindividual variations in response to an administered drug. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) present in cigarette smoke induce hepatic aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylases, thereby increasing metabolic clearance of drugs that are substrates for these enzymes. PAHs have been shown to induce 3 hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes, primarily CYP1A1, 1A2 and 2E1. Drug therapy can also be affected pharmacodynamically by nicotine. The most common effect of smoking on drug disposition in humans is an increase in biotransformation rate, consistent with induction of drug-metabolising enzymes. Induction of hepatic enzymes has been shown to increase the metabolism and to decrease the plasma concentrations of imipramine, clomipramine, fluvoxamine and trazodone. The effect of smoking on the plasma concentrations of amitriptyline and nortriptyline is variable. Amfebutamone (bupropion) does not appear to be affected by cigarette smoking. Smoking is associated with increased clearance of tiotixene, fluphenazine, haloperidol and olanzapine. Plasma concentrations of chlorpromazine and clozapine are reduced by cigarette smoking. Clinically, reduced drowsiness in smokers receiving chlorpromazine, and benzodiazepines, compared with nonsmokers has been reported. Increased clearance of the benzodiazepines alprazolam, lorazepam, oxazepam, diazepam and demethyl-diazepam is found in cigarette smokers, whereas chlordiazepoxide does not appear to be affected by smoking. Carbamazepine appears to be minimally affected by cigarette smoke, perhaps because hepatic enzymes are already stimulated by its own autoinductive properties. Cigarette smoking can affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of many psychotropic drugs. Clinicians should consider smoking as an important factor in the disposition of these drugs.

Contributions of five human cytochrome P450 isoforms to the N-demethylation of clozapine in vitro at low and high concentrations

The authors assessed the in vitro contribution of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms 1A2, 3A4, 2C9, 2C19, and 2D6 to the N-demethylation of clozapine mediated by human liver microsomal preparations (HLM). In contrast to previous studies, the authors focused on a relatively low hepatic concentration level, 5 microM, to assess the conditions at a therapeutically relevant hepatic concentration level of clozapine. The optimal concentrations of specific inhibitors were initially established using cDNA-expressed CYP isoforms. The mean contributions of CYPs 1A2, 2C19, 3A4, 2C9, and 2D6 amounted to 30%, 24%, 22%, 12%, and 6%, respectively, with regard to the total HLM-mediated N-demethylation. Thus, the present in vitro study on clozapine N-demethylation suggests that CYP1A2 is the most important form at low concentrations, which is in agreement with clinical findings. CYP2C19 is also of considerable importance, while the roles of CYP2C9 and 2D6 are more modest. CYP3A4 attained a dominating role with an average contribution of 37% at a high clozapine concentration (50 microM). The rate of other metabolic routes mediated by CYP2D6 only corresponded to about one fifth of the CYP2D6 catalyzed N-demethylation rate.

CYP1A2 activity as measured by a caffeine test predicts clozapine and active metabolite steady-state concentrationin patients with schizophrenia

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug and displays efficacy in 30% to 60% of patients with schizophrenia who do not respond to traditional antipsychotics. A clozapine concentration greater than 1,150 nmol/L increases the probability of antipsychotic efficacy. However, plasma clozapine concentration can vary more than 45-fold during long-term treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of CYP1A2 to variability in steady-state concentration of clozapine and its active metabolite norclozapine. Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were prospectively monitored during clozapine treatment (N = 18). The in vivo CYP1A2 activity was measured using the caffeine metabolic ratio (CMR) in overnight urine. Trough plasma samples were drawn after at least 5 days of treatment with a constant regimen of clozapine. A significant negative association was found between the CMR and the dose-corrected clozapine (r(s) = -0.87,p < 0.01) and norclozapine (r(s) = -0.76,p < 0.01) concentrations. Nonsmokers displayed a higher clozapine (3.2-fold) and norclozapine (2.3-fold) concentration than smokers (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was marked person-to-person variation in CYP1A2 activity during multiple-dose clozapine treatment (coefficient of variation = 60%). Age, weight, serum creatinine, and grapefruit juice consumption did not significantly contribute to variability in clozapine and norclozapine concentration (p > 0.05). In conclusion, CYP1A2 is one of the important contributors to disposition of clozapine during multiple-dose treatment. Although further in vitro experiments are necessary, the precise metabolic pathways catalyzed by CYP1A2 seem to be subsequent to the formation of norclozapine, hitherto less recognized quantitatively important alternate disposition routes, or both. From a clinical perspective, an environmentally induced or constitutively high CYP1A2 expression can lead to a decrease in steady-state concentration of clozapine as well as its active metabolite norclozapine. Thus, interindividual variability in CYP1A2 activity may potentially explain treatment resistance to clozapine in some patients. CYP1A2 phenotyping with a simple caffeine test may contribute to individualization of clozapine dosage and differentiate between treat ment noncompliance and high CYP1A2 activity.

Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Potential of Risperidone With Cytochrome P450 Isozymes as Assessed by the Dextromethorphan, the Caffeine, and the Mephenytoin Test

Two published case reports showed that addition of risperidone (1 and 2 mg/d) to a clozapine treatment resulted in a strong increase of clozapine plasma levels. As clozapine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 isozymes, a study was initiated to assess the in vivo interaction potential of risperidone on various cytochrome P450 isozymes. Eight patients were phenotyped with dextromethorphan (CYP2D6), mephenytoin (CYP2C19), and caffeine (CYP1A2) before and after the introduction of risperidone. Before risperidone, all eight patients were phenotyped as being extensive metabolizers of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. Risperidone at dosages between 2 and 6 mg/d does not appear to significantly inhibit CYP1A2 and CYP2C19 in vivo (median plasma paraxanthine/caffeine ratios before and after risperidone: 0.65, 0.69; p = 0.89; median urinary (S)/(R) mephenytoin ratios before and after risperidone:0.11, 0.12; p = 0.75). Although dextromethorphan metabolic ratio is significantly increased by risperidone (median urinary dextromethorphan/dextrorphan ratios before and after risperidone: 0.010, 0.018; p = 0.042), risperidone can be considered a weak in vivo CYP2D6 inhibitor, as this increase is modest and none of the eight patients was changed from an extensive to a poor metabolizer. The reported increase of clozapine concentrations by risperidone can therefore not be explained by an inhibition of CYP1A2, CYP2D6, CYP2C19 or by any combination of the three.

Determination of clozapine and its N-desmethyl metabolite by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection

A rapid high-performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed for the simultaneous determination of the atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine and its principal metabolite, N-desmethyl clozapine in human plasma. After liquid-liquid extraction the compounds were separated in a reversed-phase column and measured by ultraviolet absorption at 230 nm. For both compounds inter-day variations were <3.8%, and, based on a plasma sample volume of 2 ml, the limits of quantification were 25 ng/ml. Analytical interference from coadministered psychoactive drugs and their metabolites was also studied, and no interference was found from the most commonly used antidepressants and antipsychotic drugs. The assay is sufficiently sensitive and easy to use for the analysis of plasma samples in human clinical trials and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between dietary caffeine and medications

Caffeine from dietary sources (mainly coffee, tea and soft drinks) is the most frequently and widely consumed CNS stimulant in the world today. Because of its enormous popularity, the consumption of caffeine is generally thought to be safe and long term caffeine intake may be disregarded as a medical problem. However, it is clear that this compound has many of the features usually associated with a drug of abuse. Furthermore, physicians should be aware of the possible contribution of dietary caffeine to the presenting signs and symptoms of patients. The toxic effects of caffeine are extensions of their pharmacological effects. The most serious caffeine-related CNS effects include seizures and delirium. Other symptoms affecting the cardiovascular system range from moderate increases in heart rate to more severe cardiac arrhythmia. Although tolerance develops to many of the pharmacological effects of caffeine, tolerance may be overwhelmed by the nonlinear accumulation of caffeine when its metabolism becomes saturated. This might occur with high levels of consumption or as the result of a pharmacokinetic interaction between caffeine and over-the-counter or prescription medications. The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-inducible cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 participates in the metabolism of caffeine as well as of a number of clinically important drugs. A number of drugs, including certain selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (particularly fluvoxamine), antiarrhythmics (mexiletine), antipsychotics (clozapine), psoralens, idrocilamide and phenylpropanolamine, bronchodilators (furafylline and theophylline) and quinolones (enoxacin), have been reported to be potent inhibitors of this isoenzyme. This has important clinical implications, since drugs that are metabolised by, or bind to, the same CYP enzyme have a high potential for pharmacokinetic interactions due to inhibition of drug metabolism. Thus, pharmacokinetic interactions at the CYP1A2 enzyme level may cause toxic effects during concomitant administration of caffeine and certain drugs used for cardiovascular, CNS (an excessive dietary intake of caffeine has also been observed in psychiatric patients), gastrointestinal, infectious, respiratory and skin disorders. Unless a lack of interaction has already been demonstrated for the potentially interacting drug, dietary caffeine intake should be considered when planning, or assessing response to, drug therapy. Some of the reported interactions of caffeine, irrespective of clinical relevance, might inadvertently cause athletes to exceed the urinary caffeine concentration limit set by sports authorities at 12 mg/L. Finally, caffeine is a useful and reliable probe drug for the assessment of CYP1A2 activity, which is of considerable interest for metabolic studies in human populations.

Cytochrome P450 and therapeutic drug monitoring with respect to clozapine

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug that is mainly used for the treatment of refractory schizophrenia. Clozapine is eliminated by oxidation in the liver, predominantly by cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2). Due to the influence of inhibitors, inducers and genetic factors on CYP1A2-activity, several studies have reported a very large interindividual variability in clozapine plasma concentrations at a fixed dose. A number of methods have been published for the measurement of clozapine and metabolites in plasma. Plasma concentrations are most frequently measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Most methods measure clozapine and the main metabolite, norclozapine, whereas two methods measure clozapine and two metabolites. Several studies suggest that a minimum effective clozapine plasma concentration of >350 microg/l must be achieved in order to ensure acceptable clinical response, whereas the upper limit of the therapeutic interval not yet has been clearly defined. The occurrence of agranulocytosis, the most serious side-effect of clozapine treatment does not seem to be dose-related and it is not possible to predict which patients are at risk of developing agranulocytosis. The risk of central nervous system side-effects seems to increase with concentrations above 1300 microg/l. Monitoring of clozapine plasma concentrations is recommended during concomitant use of other drugs that are known to interact with the oxidation of clozapine, such as carbamazepine (inducer) or fluvoxamine (inhibitor). Overall, it is concluded that therapeutic drug monitoring may be of value in the clinical management of clozapine.

Metabolism, pharmacogenetics, and metabolic drug-drug interactions of antipsychotic drugs

1. Antipsychotic drugs are extensively metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. 2. Dispositions of a number of antipsychotic drugs have been shown to cosegregate with polymorphism of CYP2D6. 3. Metabolic drug-drug interactions have frequently been observed when antipsychotics are coadministered with other drugs. 4. Many antipsychotic drugs are converted to active metabolites which can contribute to the therapeutic or side effects of the parent drug. 5. Information concerning the individual CYP isoenzymes involved in the metabolism of antipsychotic drugs is important for the safe clinical use of this group of drugs.

Drug metabolism and atypical antipsychotics

The introduction of the atypical antipsychotics clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine and sertindole for the treatment of schizophrenia has coincided with an increased awareness of the potential of drug-drug interactions, particularly involving the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. The current literature describing the pharmacokinetics of the metabolism of these agents, including their potential to influence the metabolism of other medications, is reviewed. Clozapine appears to be metabolized primarily by CYP1A2 and CYP3A4, with additional contributions by CYP2C19 and CYP2D6. In addition, clozapine may inhibit the activity of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, and induce CYP1A, CYP2B and CYP3A. Risperidone is metabolized by CYP2D6, and possibly CYP3A4. In vitro data indicate that olanzapine is metabolized by CYP1A2 and CYP2D6. Quetiapine is metabolised by CYP3A4 and sertindole by CYP2D6. There is, however, a general paucity of in vivo data regarding the metabolism of the atypical antipsychotics, indicating a need for further research in this area.

Characterization of the human hepatic cytochromes P450 involved in the in vitro oxidation of clozapine

It was aimed to identify the cytochrome(s) P450 (CYPs) involved in the N-demethylation and N-oxidation of clozapine (CLZ) by various approaches using human liver microsomes or microsomes from human B-lymphoblastoid cell lines. The maximum rates of formation were measured in the microsomal fraction of human livers and the Michaelis-Menten kinetics one enzyme model was found to best fit the data with mean K(M) for CLZ N-oxide and N-desmethyl-CLZ of 336 and 120 microM, respectively. Significant correlations were observed between the maximum rates of formation (Vmax) for CLZ N-oxide and N-desmethyl-CLZ with the microsomal immunoreactive contents of CYP1A2 (r = 0.92, P < 0.009 and r = 0.77, P < 0.077; respectively) and CYP3A (r = 0.89, P < 0.02 and r = 0.82, P < 0.05; respectively). Antibodies directed against CYP1A2 and CYP3A inhibited formation of CLZ N-oxide in human liver microsomes by 10.7+/-6.1%) and 37.2+/-6.9% of control, respectively, whereas CLZ N-demethylation was inhibited by 32.2+/-15.4% and 33.6+/-7.4%, respectively. Troleandomycin (CYP3A inhibitor) and furafylline (CYP1A2 inhibitor) inhibited CLZ N-oxidation in human liver microsomes by 23.2+/-12.1% and 7.8+4.3%, respectively, whereas CLZ N-demethylation was inhibited by 17.5+/-13.9% and 25.6+/-16.5%, respectively. While ketoconazole did not inhibit N-oxidation of CLZ, the N-demethylation pathway was inhibited by 34.1+/-10.0%. Formation in stable expressed enzymes indicated involvement of CYP3A and CYP1A2 in CLZ N-oxide formation and CYP2D6, CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 in CLZ N-demethylation. This apparent involvement of CYP2D6 in the N-demethylation of CLZ did not corroborate with the findings of other experiments. In conclusion, these data indicate that while both CYP isoforms readily catalyze both metabolic routes in vitro, CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 are more important in N-demethylation and N-oxidation, respectively.

Combination treatment with clozapine and paroxetine in schizophrenia: safety and tolerability data from a prospective open clinical trial

Clozapine is a drug with many side effects, some of them with potentially hazardous outcome (e.g. seizures, agranulocytosis), if not carefully monitored. It has been shown that the metabolism of clozapine may be affected by concomitant treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), while there have been reports of improved efficacy on negative symptomatology of clozapine in combination with SSRIs. Therefore, this prospective open clinical trial was performed to investigate the safety and tolerability of the coadministration of clozapine and paroxetine under control of serum concentrations of clozapine and its metabolites and the effect of this combination treatment on psychopathological outcome was evaluated. A total of 14 patients suffering from schizophrenia or schizodepressive disorder with predominant negative symptomatology were included. The duration of the study was at least 6 weeks for each patient. Initial treatment was a monotherapy with clozapine at a daily dose of 2.5 mg/kg weight. After two measurements of serum concentrations of clozapine and metabolites during steady state conditions, an add-on therapy with 20 mg paroxetine was initiated. No concomitant medication was allowed. The main finding of our prospective study was that addition of paroxetine to a monotherapy with clozapine was a well tolerated medication that did not give rise to new clinically relevant side effects. After addition of paroxetine the serum concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites remained virtually constant. The results of the psychopathological measurements indicated a further clinical improvement, although the small open study could not test for efficacy.

Debate resolved: there are differential effects of serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors on cytochrome P450 enzymes

In 1993, it was first proposed that an important difference between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) was the degree of inhibition of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme 2D6 that they produced under usually dosing conditions (Preskorn, 1993). Specifically, fluoxetine and paroxetine, in contrast to sertraline, were identified as causing substantial increases in the plasma levels of coadministered drugs, which were principally dependent on CYP 2D6 for their metabolism. Over the next 5 years, this position was hotly contested (Preskorn and Nemeroff, 1997). However, an extensive body of research has now accumulated, which incontrovertibly supports the original position. This paper will reviews this research and extends the discussion to all five SSRIs and four other important CYP enzymes: 1A2, 2C9/10, 2C19, and 3A3/4.

Pharmacokinetics of clozapine and its metabolites in psychiatric patients: plasma protein binding and renal clearance

AIMS

N-Desmethylclozapine and clozapine N-oxide are major metabolites of the atypical neuroleptic clozapine in humans and undergo renal excretion. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent the elimination of these metabolites in urine contributes to the total fate of clozapine in patients and how they are handled by the kidney.

METHODS

From 15 psychiatric patients on continuous clozapine monotherapy, blood and urine samples were obtained during four 2 h intervals, and clozapine and its metabolites were assayed in serum and urine by solid-phase extraction and h.p.l.c. Unbound fractions of the compounds were measured by equilibrium dialysis.

RESULTS

The following unbound fractions in serum were found (geometric means): clozapine 5.5%, N-desmethylclozapine 9.7%, and clozapine N-oxide 24.6%. Renal clearance values calculated from unbound concentrations in serum and quantities excreted in urine were for clozapine on average 11% of the creatinine clearance, whereas those of N-desmethylclozapine and clozapine N-oxide amounted to 300 and 640%, respectively. The clearances of unbound clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine increased with increasing urine volume and decreasing pH. All renal clearance values exhibited large interindividual variations. The sum of clozapine and its metabolites in urine represented on average 14% of the dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine, N-desmethylclozapine and clozapine N-oxide are highly protein-bound in serum. Clozapine is, after glomerular filtration, largely reabsorbed in the tubule, whereas the metabolites undergo net tubular secretion. Metabolic pathways alternative or subsequent to N-demethylation and N-oxidation must make major contributions to the total fate of clozapine in patients.

Pharmacokinetic interactions of clozapine with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: differential effects of fluvoxamine and paroxetine in a prospective study

Pharmacokinetic interactions of clozapine and its metabolites N-desmethylclozapine and clozapine N-oxide with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluvoxamine and paroxetine were investigated in a prospective study in schizophrenic patients under steady-state conditions. Thirty patients were treated with clozapine at a target dose of 2.5 to 3.0 mg/kg of body weight. After gradual dose escalation, serum concentrations of clozapine and two metabolites were determined twice at 7-day intervals after steady-state conditions had been reached. Then, fluvoxamine (50 mg/day) or paroxetine (20 mg/day) was added in 16 and 14 patients, respectively. Serum concentrations of clozapine and its metabolites were measured after 1, 7, and 14 days of coadministration with the SSRI. Mean trough concentrations of steady-state serum concentrations of clozapine, N-desmethylclozapine, and clozapine N-oxide were markedly elevated under fluvoxamine by about threefold of baseline concentrations whereas paroxetine induced only minor, nonsignificant changes. Estimation of the mean elimination half-life of clozapine 2 weeks after start of fluvoxamine comedication revealed an increase from 17 hours to about 50 hours whereas there was no change under paroxetine coadministration. The N-desmethylclozapine/clozapine ratio did not change significantly with either SSRI. Under monotherapy, clozapine mean serum concentrations in smokers were significantly lower by 32% compared with nonsmokers. Similarly, N-demethylation ratios were about 20 to 50% higher in smokers. Thus, in all patients, fluvoxamine induced relevant increases in serum concentrations of clozapine and its metabolites, probably by the inhibition of enzymes catalyzing the degradation of clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine, whereas paroxetine, at a usual clinically effective dosage of 20 mg/day, did not cause significant pharmacokinetic interactions.

Paroxetine potentiates the central nervous system side effects of perphenazine: contribution of cytochrome P4502D6 inhibition in vivo

BACKGROUND

Paroxetine is a frequently used antidepressant and a potent inhibitor of the CYP2D6 isozyme in vitro (inhibition constant [Ki] = 0.15 micromol/L). Most classic antipsychotic agents such as perphenazine are metabolized by the CYP2D6 isozyme and are often coadministered with antidepressant agents. This study assessed the extent of changes in CYP2D6 isozyme activity in vivo after pretreatment with paroxetine and its consequences on perphenazine kinetics and central nervous system effects.

METHODS

Eight extensive metabolizers for CYP2D6 were administered a single dose of perphenazine (0.11 mg/kg orally) or placebo following a randomized double-blind design. Perphenazine plasma concentrations and effects were assessed for a period of 8 hours. Subsequently, subjects were treated with a standard therapeutic dose of paroxetine (20 mg/day orally) for 10 days and test sessions with perphenazine and placebo were repeated.

RESULTS

Paroxetine treatment resulted in a twofold to 21-fold decrease in CYP2D6 activity (p < 0.001). After pretreatment with paroxetine, perphenazine peak plasma concentrations increased twofold to 13-fold (p < 0.01). This was associated with a significant increase in central nervous system side effects of perphenazine, including oversedation, extrapyramidal symptoms, and impairment of psychomotor performance and memory (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Coadministration of perphenazine after pretreatment with a standard therapeutic dose of paroxetine increased the plasma concentration and central nervous system side effects of perphenazine, primarily as a result of inhibition of the CYP2D6 isozyme. In patients who are at steady state with paroxetine, a reduction of perphenazine dose may be required to prevent central nervous system side effects.

Pharmacokinetic interactions involving clozapine

BACKGROUND

Metabolism of clozapine is complex and not fully understood. Pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs have been described but, in some cases, their mechanism is unknown.

METHOD

Published trials and case reports relevant to the human metabolism of clozapine and to suspected pharmacokinetic interactions were reviewed.

RESULTS

Metabolism of clozapine appears to be largely controlled by the function of the hepatic cytochrome p450IA2 (CYPIA2). Compounds which induce CYPIA2 activity (carbamazepine, tobacco smoke) may reduce plasma clozapine levels. Inhibitors of CYPIA2 (caffeine, erythromycin) have the opposite effect. Drugs which inhibit the hepatic cytochrome p4502D6 (CYP2D6) have also been reported to elevate plasma clozapine levels. The mechanism of this interaction is unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-administration of clozapine and compounds reported to alter its metabolism should be avoided where possible. A host of other interactions can be predicted and so caution should be exercised when co-administering drugs which affect the function of CYPIA2 and CYP2D6. The pharmacokinetics of clozapine require further investigation so that its safe use can be assured.

Use of in vitro and in vivo data to estimate the likelihood of metabolic pharmacokinetic interactions

This article reviews the information available to assist pharmacokineticists in the prediction of metabolic drug interactions. Significant advances in this area have been made in the last decade, permitting the identification in early drug development of dominant cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoform(s) metabolising a particular drug as well as the ability of a drug to inhibit a specific CYP isoform. The major isoforms involved in human drug metabolism are CYP3A, CYP2D6, CYP2C, CYP1A2 and CYP2E1. Often patients are taking multiple concurrent medications, and thus an assessment of potential drug-drug interactions is imperative. A database containing information about the clearance routes for over 300 drugs from multiple therapeutic classes, including analgesics, anti-infectives, psychotropics, anticonvulsants, cancer chemotherapeutics, gastrointestinal agents, cardiovascular agents and others, was constructed to assist in the semiquantitative prediction of the magnitude of potential interactions with drugs under development. With knowledge of the in vitro inhibition constant of a drug (Ki) for a particular CYP isoform, it is theoretically possible to assess the likelihood of interactions for a drug cleared through CYP-mediated metabolism. For many agents, the CYP isoform involved in metabolism has not been identified and there is substantial uncertainty given the current knowledge base. The mathematical concepts for prediction based on competitive enzyme inhibition are reviewed in this article. These relationships become more complex if the inhibition is of a mixed competitive/noncompetitive nature. Sources of uncertainty and inaccuracy in predicting the magnitude of in vivo inhibition includes the nature and design of in vitro experiments to determine Ki, inhibitor concentration in the hepatic cytosol compared with that in plasma, prehepatic metabolism, presence of active metabolites and enzyme induction. The accurate prospective prediction of drug interactions requires rigorous attention to the details of the in vitro results, and detailed information about the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of the inhibitor and inhibited drug. With the discussion of principles and accompanying tabulation of literature data concerning the clearance of various drugs, a framework for reasonable semiquantitative predictions is offered in this article.

Will routine therapeutic drug monitoring have a place in clozapine therapy?

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic medication with proven efficacy in the management of refractory schizophrenia. It is also recommended for patients who do not tolerate the extrapyramidal adverse effects of traditional antipsychotic medications. However, the therapeutic promise of clozapine has been limited by a higher incidence of agranulocytosis. Currently, plasma clozapine concentrations are not routinely used in clinical management. Therapeutic effects are monitored empirically during a 6 to 8 week titration period in which the dosage is raised to 300 to 450 mg/day. Clozapine nevertheless fulfils a number of criteria which make it a candidate for therapeutic monitoring. These include an identifiable therapeutic range, an unpredictable dose-concentration relationship between patients, a potential for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction with other drugs and a high probability of patient noncompliance. The therapeutic threshold plasma concentration appears to be about 400 micrograms/L. Concentrations above 1000 micrograms/L increase the risk of adverse effects on the central nervous system (confusion, delirium and generalised seizures). There is no evidence to link increased concentrations of clozapine or its metabolite to the development of agranulocytosis. We conclude that therapeutic drug monitoring can play a useful role in the clinical management of patients treated with clozapine. The clinician is advised to primarily use clinical judgement during dosage escalation, but intermittent monitoring is recommended to quickly optimise a therapeutic dosage for each patient. At steady state, occasional measurements could be made when clinical signs indicate possible toxicity or lack of effect (possibly caused by a lack of compliance or drug interaction). Long term monitoring would, in our view, not be necessary.