Metabolic response to different forms of physical exercise in type I diabetics and the duration of the glucose lowering effect

A Prospective, Randomized Trial Testing Different Regimens of Carbohydrate Administration to Prevent Major Reduction in Plasma Glucose Follwing a Standardized Bout of Moderate Physical Activity in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes

AIM/HYPOTHESIS

It was the aim to prospectively study regimes of "preventive" carbohydrate administration to avoid major reduction in plasma glucose during physical activity.

METHODS

24 patients with type 1 diabetes (age 41±12 years; 11 women, 13 men; BMI 26.5±4.7 kg/m²; HbA_1c 9.1±1.5%; insulin dose 0.64±0.22 IU/kg body weight and day) participated in one experiment without physical activity and in three experiments with a 4 km, 60 min hike starting at 2 p.m.. No "preventive" carbohydrates, 2×10 g or 2×20 g carbohydrates (muesli bars) were taken when starting and after 30 min (randomized order). Plasma glucose was determined.

RESULTS

Within 30 min after starting physical activity, plasma glucose fell by approximately 70 mg/dl, making additional carbohydrate intake necessary in 70% of the subjects. This drop was not prevented by any regimens of "preventive" carbohydrate intake. After the nadir, plasma glucose rose faster after the 2×20 g carbohydrate regime (the largest amount tested; p=0.0036). With "preventive" administration of carbohydrates, significantly (p<0.05) less additional "therapeutic" carbohydrates needed to be administered in 6 h following the initiation of the hike.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

In conclusion, in the setting of 2 h postprandial exercise in type 1 diabetes, preventive carbohydrate supplementation alone will not completely eliminate the risk of brisk falls in plasma glucose concentrations or hypoglycaemic episodes. Else, higher amounts or repeated administration of carbohydrates may be necessary.

Gaps in Knowledge and the Need for Patient-Partners in Research Related to Physical Activity and Type 1 Diabetes: A Narrative Review

Regular physical activity (PA) is a cornerstone in the management of complications associated with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Most national guidelines advocate for regular PA for persons living with T1D, however the evidence to support these recommendations has not be reviewed recently. Additionally, in an era of patient-centered care and patient oriented research, the role of patient partners in the area of PA and T1D interventions has never been explored. The purpose of this narrative review is to overcome these two gaps in the literature. Here we review selected epidemiological evidence and identify gaps in research that would add important information to guide practitioners and future guidelines. We also provide an overview of patient-oriented research projects co-developed with persons living with T1D. Significant gaps in the field include: (1) a lack of adequately powered prospective cohort studies using serial measures of PA and hard chronic disease end-points; (2) no multi-centered, highly powered, randomized controlled trials of PA, and long-term health outcomes; (3) little data on the role of new technologies to support PA-related behavior change, and (4) no trials that involved patients in the design and execution of PA-based clinical trials. This review provides a template for scientists and patient partners to develop future research priorities and agendas in the field.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Exercise in Type 1 Diabetes: Past, Present and Future

Prior to the widespread use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), knowledge of the effects of exercise in type 1 diabetes (T1D) was limited to the exercise period, with few studies having the budget or capacity to monitor participants overnight. Recently, CGM has become a staple of many exercise studies, allowing researchers to observe the otherwise elusive late post-exercise period. We performed a strategic search using PubMed and Academic Search Complete. Studies were included if they involved adults with T1D performing exercise or physical activity, had a sample size greater than 5, and involved the use of CGM. Upon completion of the search protocol, 26 articles were reviewed for inclusion. While outcomes have been variable, CGM use in exercise studies has allowed the assessment of post-exercise (especially nocturnal) trends for different exercise modalities in individuals with T1D. Sensor accuracy is currently considered adequate for exercise, which has been crucial to developing closed-loop and artificial pancreas systems. Until these systems are perfected, CGM continues to provide information about late post-exercise responses, to assist T1D patients in managing their glucose, and to be useful as a tool for teaching individuals with T1D about exercise.

Sex-related differences in fuel utilization and hormonal response to exercise: implications for individuals with type 1 diabetes

Sex-related differences in metabolic and neuroendocrine response to exercise in individuals without diabetes have been well established. Men and women differ in fuel selection during exercise, in which women rely to a greater extent on fat oxidation, whereas males rely mostly on carbohydrate oxidation for energy production. The difference in fuel selection appears to be mediated by sex-related differences in hormonal (including catecholamines, growth hormone, and estrogen) response to different types and intensities of exercise. In general, men exhibit an amplified counter-regulatory response to exercise, with elevated levels of catecholamines compared with women. However, women exhibit greater sensitivity to the lipolytic action of the catecholamines and deplete less of their glycogen stores than men during exercise, which suggests that women may experience a greater defense in blood glucose control after exercise than men. Conversely, little is known about sex-related differences in response to exercise in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). A single study investigating sex-related differences in response to moderate aerobic exercise in individuals with T1D found sex-related differences in catecholamine response and fuel selection, but changes in blood glucose were not measured. To our knowledge, there are no studies investigating sex-related differences in blood glucose responses to different types and intensities of exercise in individuals with T1D. This review summarizes sex-related differences in exercise responses that could potentially impact blood glucose levels during exercise in individuals with T1D and highlights the need for further research.

Effects of different types of acute and chronic (training) exercise on glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Exercise has been accepted and generally recommended for the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) and for improving the overall quality of life in affected individuals. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine the overall effects of exercise (acute bouts of exercise and chronic exercise [or training]) on acute and chronic glycaemic control in patients with T1D, the effects of different types of exercise on glycaemic control and which conditions are required to obtain these positive effects.

METHODS

PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge and SPORTDiscus™ were consulted to identify studies on T1D and exercise. Cohen's d statistics were used for calculating mean effect sizes (ES) as follows: small d = 0.3, medium d = 0.5 and large d = 0.8. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to establish the significance of our findings.

RESULTS

From a total of 937 studies, 33 that met the inclusion criteria were selected. Nine studies were used to calculate the ES of a single bout of aerobic exercise; 13 studies to calculate the ES of aerobic training; 2 studies to calculate the ES of strength training; 4 studies to calculate the ES of combined (aerobic and strength) training and 6 studies to calculate the ES of high-intensity exercise (HIE) and training. ES for exercise on acute glycaemic control were large, while they were small for chronic glycaemic control. Aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, mixed exercise (aerobic combined with resistance training) and HIE acutely decreased blood glucose levels. To prevent late-onset hypoglycaemic episodes, the use of single bouts of sprints into an aerobic exercise can be recommended. This meta-analysis also showed that a regular exercise training programme has a significant effect on acute and chronic glycaemic control, although not all exercise forms showed significant results. Specifically, aerobic training is a favourable tool for decreasing chronic glycaemic control, while resistance training, mixed and HIE did not significantly improve chronic glycaemic control. Although, this meta-analysis showed there was a tendency for improvement in glycaemic control due to resistance training or resistance training combined with endurance training, there were not enough studies and/or subjects to confirm this statistically.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this meta-analysis, we can conclude that the addition of brief bouts of high-intensity, sprint-type exercise to aerobic exercise can minimize the risk of sustaining a hypoglycaemic episode. We can also conclude that only regular aerobic training will improve the glycated haemoglobin level of a patient with T1D.

Effects of different types of acute and chronic (training) exercise on glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Exercise has been accepted and generally recommended for the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) and for improving the overall quality of life in affected individuals. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine the overall effects of exercise (acute bouts of exercise and chronic exercise [or training]) on acute and chronic glycaemic control in patients with T1D, the effects of different types of exercise on glycaemic control and which conditions are required to obtain these positive effects.

METHODS

PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge and SPORTDiscus™ were consulted to identify studies on T1D and exercise. Cohen's d statistics were used for calculating mean effect sizes (ES) as follows: small d = 0.3, medium d = 0.5 and large d = 0.8. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to establish the significance of our findings.

RESULTS

From a total of 937 studies, 33 that met the inclusion criteria were selected. Nine studies were used to calculate the ES of a single bout of aerobic exercise; 13 studies to calculate the ES of aerobic training; 2 studies to calculate the ES of strength training; 4 studies to calculate the ES of combined (aerobic and strength) training and 6 studies to calculate the ES of high-intensity exercise (HIE) and training. ES for exercise on acute glycaemic control were large, while they were small for chronic glycaemic control. Aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, mixed exercise (aerobic combined with resistance training) and HIE acutely decreased blood glucose levels. To prevent late-onset hypoglycaemic episodes, the use of single bouts of sprints into an aerobic exercise can be recommended. This meta-analysis also showed that a regular exercise training programme has a significant effect on acute and chronic glycaemic control, although not all exercise forms showed significant results. Specifically, aerobic training is a favourable tool for decreasing chronic glycaemic control, while resistance training, mixed and HIE did not significantly improve chronic glycaemic control. Although, this meta-analysis showed there was a tendency for improvement in glycaemic control due to resistance training or resistance training combined with endurance training, there were not enough studies and/or subjects to confirm this statistically.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this meta-analysis, we can conclude that the addition of brief bouts of high-intensity, sprint-type exercise to aerobic exercise can minimize the risk of sustaining a hypoglycaemic episode. We can also conclude that only regular aerobic training will improve the glycated haemoglobin level of a patient with T1D.

Is early and late post-meal exercise so different in type 1 diabetic lispro users?

To compare blood glucose (BG) responses during a 60 min moderate intensity exercise session performed in early or late postprandial periods. Nine generally well-controlled (HbA(1c): 7.3+/-0.1%) type 1 diabetic patients performed, at least one week apart, two exercise sessions, 60 (early exercise) and 180 min (late exercise) after a standardized breakfast. All subjects were using Humulin N (N) and Humalog (Lispro, LI) insulin. During exercise, the overall decrease in BG was 4.8+/-0.6 mmol/l and 3.6+/-0.8 mmol/l in early and late exercise, respectively (P=0.051). To prevent hypoglycemia, a dextrose infusion was initiated when BG reached 5 mmol/l. The quantity of dextrose infused was 6.2+/-3.0 g and 10.5+/-3.2g in early and late exercise, respectively (NS). The time free of dextrose infusion during exercise was 41.2+/-7.8 min and 31.7+/-7.5 min in early and late exercise, respectively (NS). In N-LI users, overall drop in BG during exercise tends to be greater in the early postprandial period. However, early and late exercise present similar quantity of dextrose infused and time free of dextrose infusion. Consequently, the similar risk of exercise-induced hypoglycemia suggests similar precautions in either exercise times.

Physical activity, sport, and pediatric diabetes

The benefits derived from regular physical activity include improved cardiovascular fitness, increased lean mass, improved blood lipid profile, enhanced psychosocial well-being, and decreased body adiposity. The benefits for children with diabetes may also include blood glucose control and enhanced insulin sensitivity. However, for these children, engagement in vigorous physical activity and sport must be properly controlled through modifications in insulin therapy and nutritional intake so that the benefits of exercise outweigh the risks. The following review describes the various physiological and metabolic factors which occur both during exercise and during sport while describing specific recommendations to control glucose excursions by proper insulin management and diet.

Exercise and diabetes

As rates of diabetes mellitus and obesity continue to increase, physical activity continues to be a fundamental form of therapy. Exercise influences several aspects of diabetes, including blood glucose concentrations, insulin action and cardiovascular risk factors. Blood glucose concentrations reflect the balance between skeletal muscle uptake and ambient concentrations of both insulin and counterinsulin hormones. Difficulties in predicting the relative impact of these factors can result in either hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. Despite the variable impact of exercise on blood glucose, exercise consistently improves insulin action and several cardiovascular risk factors. Beyond the acute impact of physical activity, long-term exercise behaviors have been repeatedly associated with decreased rates of type 2 diabetes. While exercise produces many benefits, it is not without risks for patients with diabetes mellitus. In addition to hyperglycemia, from increased hepatic glucose production, insufficient insulin levels can foster ketogenesis from excess concentrations of fatty acids. At the opposite end of the glucose spectrum, hypoglycemia can result from excess glucose uptake due to either increased insulin concentrations, enhanced insulin action or impaired carbohydrate absorption. To decrease the risk for hypoglycemia, insulin doses should be reduced prior to exercise, although some insulin is typically still needed. Although precise risks of exercise on existing diabetic complications have not been well studied, it seems prudent to consider the potential to worsen nephropathy or retinopathy, or to precipitate musculoskeletal injuries. There is more substantive evidence that autonomic neuropathy may predispose patients to arrhythmias. Of clear concern, increased physical activity can precipitate a cardiac event in those with underlying CAD. Recognizing these risks can prompt actions to minimize their impact. Positive actions that are part of exercise programs for diabetic patients emphasize SMBG, foot care and cardiovascular functional assessment. SMBG provides critical information on the impact of exercise and is recommended for all patients before, during and after exercise. More frequent monitoring (and for longer periods following exercise) is recommended for those with hypoglycemia unawareness or those performing high-intensity exercise. Preventing the sequelae of an exercise-induced severe hypoglycemic reaction can be as simple as carrying glucose tablets or gel, a diabetic identification bracelet or card, or exercising with an individual who is aware of the circumstances. In addition to blood glucose concentrations, proper foot care is critical to people with diabetes who exercise and includes considering type of shoe, type of exercise, inspection of skin surfaces and appropriate evaluation and treatment of lesions (calluses and others). Those with severe neuropathy can consider alternatives to weight-bearing exercises. Precipitation of clinical CAD is of great concern for all diabetic patients participating in exercise activities. Although a sufficiently sensitive and specific screening test for coronary disease has not been identified, those planning an exercise program of moderate intensity or greater should be evaluated. Initial cardiac assessment should include exercise testing as well as identifying risk for autonomic neuropathy. In addition to noting maximal heart rate and blood pressure as well as ischemic changes, exercise tolerance testing can identify anginal thresholds and patients with asymptomatic ischemia. Those without symptoms should be counseled regarding target pulse rates to avoid inducing ischemia. Ischemic changes need to be evaluated for either further diagnostic testing or pharmacological intervention. For patients with diabetes mellitus, the overall benefits of exercise are clearly significant. Clinicians and patients must work together to maximize these benefits while minimizing risks for negative consequences. Identifying and preventing potential problems beforehand can reduce adverse outcomes and promote this important approach to healthy living.

Nutrition and exercise in individuals with diabetes

Individuals with type 1 (insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [IDDM]) and type 2 (non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [NIDDM]) diabetes should be encouraged to exercise. Although there is an absence of consistent evidence that adaptations to routine exercise improve glucose control in type 1 diabetes, there is evidence that shows improved glucose control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Although both groups benefit from exercise, the merit and suitability of routine exercise is measured by the extent to which the advantageous adaptive effects of regular exercise surpass the risks of a sole bout of exercise. In addition, when considering acute versus routine exercise, special considerations must be given to children with diabetes and older adults at risk for insulin resistance. Finally, a greater research focus is needed on engaging in competitive and recreational sports so that children and adults with diabetes may participate safely in activities such as baseball, swimming, basketball, soccer, and hockey.

Effects of difference in amount of exercise training on prevention of diabetes mellitus in the Otsuka-Long-Evans-Tokushima fatty rats, a model of spontaneous non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Exercise training every day has been shown to be effective in preventing the development of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) in a model rat (Otsuka Long Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF)). For determination of whether less vigorous exercise training also has a protective effect against the development of NIDDM in this model, seven male OLETF rats each were assigned to training every other day, every 3 days and every 7 days from 6 to 30 weeks of age. At 30 weeks of age, rats trained every other day, 3 days, 7 days and sedentary rats weighed averages of 547, 548, 603 and 695 g and had abdominal fat deposits of 28, 24, 32 and 72 g, respectively. The mean meterages of running of rats trained every other day, 3 days and 7 days over the whole experimental period were 9630, 5166 and 1685 m/week, respectively. At 30 weeks of age, the cumulative incidence of NIDDM in sedentary rats was 85.7% (6/7), while none of the trained rats became diabetic except for one of rats trained every 7 days. The glucose infusion rate (GIR), an index of insulin sensitivity, in the group trained every 7 days, 60.6 +/- 5.0 mumol.kg-1.min-1, was significantly greater than that in the sedentary group, 21.7 +/- 1.7 mumol.kg-1.min-1. Morphological studies on the pancreas of rats trained every other day and every 3 days showed minimal changes of islets, whereas sections of islets from rats trained every 7 days appeared enlarged and fibrotic, though significantly less so than the islets of sedentary rats.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hormone response of diabetic patients to exercise at cool and warm temperatures

Both exercise and high ambient temperatures stimulate the secretion of counterregulatory hormones which can change glucose homeostasis. We studied whether in diabetic patients there are any differences in the hormonal response to exercise performed at cool or warm ambient temperatures. A study was performed on eight male insulin-dependent patients at rest and during exercise at +10 degrees C and +30 degrees C. Exercise consisted of three consecutive 15-min periods at 60% of maximal aerobic capacity. The concentrations of plasma lactate and counterregulatory hormones at rest were similar at warm and cool temperature, whereas prolactin concentration was higher (P less than 0.01) at +30 degrees C. Exercise resulted in an increase in noradrenaline, growth hormone and prolactin (P less than 0.01), prevented the diurnal decrease in cortisol, but had no effect on glucagon. Hormone responses to exercise were similar at +10 degrees C and at +30 degrees C, except for cortisol and noradrenaline which showed greater responses at warm than at cool temperatures. This may have been due to the higher relative work load at warm compared to cool temperatures as suggested by the higher heart rate and greater increase of lactate at +30 degrees C. These data indicate that within a range of ambient temperatures commonly occurring in sports, the response of counterregulatory hormones is largely independent of ambient temperature in insulin-dependent diabetic patients.

Physiological bases for the treatment of the physically active individual with diabetes

Substrate utilisation and glucose homoeostasis during exercise is controlled by the effects of precise changes in insulin, glucagon and the catecholamines. The important role these hormones play is clearly seen in people with diabetes, as the normal endocrine response is often lost. In individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM), there can be an increased risk of hypoglycaemia during or after exercise or, conversely, there can be a worsening of the diabetic state if insulin deficiency is present. In contrast, it appears that people with non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM) can generally exercise without fear of a deleterious metabolic response. The exercise response both in healthy subjects and in those with diabetes is dependent on many factors such as age, nutritional status and the duration and intensity of exercise. Since there are so many variables which govern individual response to exercise, an exact exercise prescription for all people with diabetes cannot be made. There are many adjustments to the therapeutic regimen which an individual with IDDM can make in order to avoid hypoglycaemia during or after exercise. In general, a reduction in insulin dosage and the added ingestion and continual availability of carbohydrates are wise precautions. On the other hand, exercise should be postponed if blood glucose is greater than 2500 mg/L and ketones are present in the urine. As more is understood about the regulation of substrate metabolism during exercise, more refined therapeutic strategies can be defined. An understanding of the metabolic response to exercise is critical for generating an effective and safe training programme for all diabetic individuals who wish to be physically active.