Systematic review of the effect of telmisartan on insulin sensitivity in hypertensive patients with insulin resistance or diabetes

Association of the protective effect of telmisartan on hearing loss among patients with hypertension

Aim

Hearing loss, affecting a significant portion of the global population, is prevented with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonism. Understanding potential protective treatments is crucial for public health. We examine the effect of telmisartan, an antihypertensive drug and partial peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist, on hearing loss in patients with hypertension.

Method and results

This retrospective cohort analysis used data from the OMOP Common Data Model database, encompassing information from three tertiary institutions in South Korea. The study included a substantial sample size of 860,103 people diagnosed with hypertension. The study included individuals who had been medically diagnosed with hypertension and had been prescribed antihypertensive drugs, including telmisartan. The study design was established to evaluate the comparative effects of telmisartan and other hypertension medications on hearing loss. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to create a balanced cohort, reducing potential biases between the telmisartan and non-telmisartan groups. From the initial 860,103 patients with hypertension, a propensity score matched cohort was derived from 20,010 patients, with 2,193 in the telmisartan group. After PSM, lower incidence of total hearing loss was observed in the telmisartan group compared to the non-telmisartan group during the 3-year follow-up (0.5% vs. 1.5%, log-rank p = 0.005). In subgroup analysis, this study showed consistent results that lower incidence of total hearing loss was higher in the telmisartan group than in the non-telmisartan group.

Conclusion

Telmisartan was associated with reducing certain types of hearing loss in patients with hypertension. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and understand the mechanisms.

Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive monotherapies in primary prevention of cardiovascular events-a real-world longitudinal inception cohort study

Introduction

Antihypertensive drugs are used preventatively to lower the risk of cardiovascular disease events. Comparative effectiveness studies on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and thiazides have yielded inconsistent results and given little consideration to patient adherence. Using a longitudinal cohort and considering time-varying adherence and confounding factors, we aimed to estimate the real-world effectiveness of five major antihypertensive drug monotherapies in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events.

Methods

Eligible patients for a retrospective inception cohort study were selected using information obtained from the University of Groningen IADB.nl pharmacy prescription database. Cohort 1 comprised adherent patients with a follow-up time exceeding 1 year, and cohort 2 comprised all patients independent of adherence. The exposures were ACEIs, ARBs, BBs, CCBs, and thiazides. The primary outcome was the time to the first prescription for an acute cardiac drug therapy (CDT) measured using valid drug proxies to identify the first major cardiovascular event. A per-protocol analytical approach was adopted with inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW), time-varying Cox regression analysis to obtain the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

In cohort 1 (n = 22,441), 1,294 patients (5.8%) were prescribed an acute CDT with an average follow-up time of 4.2 ± 2.8 years. Following IPTW, the hazard measures of ARBs and thiazides were lower than those of BBs (HRs: 0.79 and 0.80, respectively; 95% CIs: 0.64-0.97 and 0.69-0.94, respectively). Among drug-treated diabetic patients, the hazard measures were even lower, with HR point estimates of 0.43 (CI: 0.19-0.98) for ARBs and 0.32 (CI: 0.13-0.82) for thiazides. In cohort 2 (n = 33,427) and sensitivity analysis, the comparative effectiveness results for thiazides and BBs were similar to those for cohort 1.

Conclusion

The findings of this real-world analysis suggest that the incidence of CDT associated with long-term thiazide or ARB monotherapy is lower than the incidence of CDT with BBs, notably among high-risk patients. Incidences of CDT associated with ACEIs and CCBs were comparable relative to those associated with BBs.

Three-Year Cardiovascular Outcomes of Telmisartan in Patients With Hypertension: An Electronic Health Record-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Telmisartan exhibits superior efficacy in controlling 24-h blood pressure (BP) compared with other angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). However, data on its cardiovascular effects in patients with hypertension are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes in patients taking telmisartan compared to those taking other ARBs.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study used data from the Korea University Medical Center database, built from electronic health records. A total of 19,247 patients taking two or more antihypertensive medications were identified. Patients prescribed telmisartan (telmisartan users) were compared with those prescribed an ARB other than telmisartan (other ARB users). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospitalizations due to heart failure. The adjusted outcomes were compared using 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching.

RESULTS

Overall, 3,437 (17.9%) patients were telmisartan users. These patients were more likely to be younger and male and less likely to have a history of chronic kidney disease, dialysis, or heart failure. In the PS-matched cohort, BP control was similar in both groups; however, telmisartan users exhibited significantly lower visit-to-visit BP variability. The adjusted 3-year MACE rate was similar between telmisartan users (4.6%) and other ARB users (4.7%, log-rank P = 0.75), with comparable safety profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world practice, telmisartan showed cardiovascular outcomes similar to those of other ARBs in patients with hypertension taking two or more antihypertensive drugs.

Effects of telmisartan on metabolic syndrome components: a comprehensive review

Telmisartan is an antagonist of the angiotensin II receptor used in the management of hypertension (alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. It belongs to the drug class of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). Among drugs of this class, telmisartan shows particular pharmacologic properties, including a longer half-life than any other angiotensin II receptor blockers that bring higher and persistent antihypertensive activity. In hypertensive patients, telmisartan has superior efficacy than other antihypertensive drugs (losartan, valsartan, ramipril, atenolol, and perindopril) in controlling blood pressure, especially towards the end of the dosing interval. Telmisartan has a partial PPARγ-agonistic effect whilst does not have the safety concerns of full agonists of PPARγ receptors (thiazolidinediones). Moreover, telmisartan has an agonist activity on PPARα and PPARδ receptors and modulates the adipokine levels. Thus, telmisartan could be considered as a suitable alternative option, with multi-benefit for all components of metabolic syndrome including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and hyperlipidemia. This review will highlight the role of telmisartan in metabolic syndrome and the main mechanisms of action of telmisartan are discussed and summarized. Many studies have demonstrated the useful properties of telmisartan in the prevention and improving of metabolic syndrome and this well-tolerated drug can be greatly proposed in the treatment of different components of metabolic syndrome. However, larger and long-duration studies are needed to confirm these findings in long-term observational studies and prospective trials and to determine the optimum dose of telmisartan in metabolic syndrome.

[Sartans in the treatment of arterial hypertension: focus on telmisartan and azilsartan. A review]

The activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is one of the main pathogenetic mechanisms underlying cardiovascular diseases at all stages of the cardiovascular continuum. This article discusses the role of telmisartan and azilsartan as the most powerful sartans in modern cardiology. Azilsartan and especially telmisartan have a significant organoprotection and are superior to other antihypertensive drugs in terms of lowering blood pressure. However, the effect of azilsartan on hard endpoints has not been studied while the efficacy of telmisartan on hard endpoints has been evaluated in plenty clinical trials including 3 large randomized clinical trials with several thousand patients. The article also presents calculations showing the better cost-effectiveness of telmisartan compared to azilsartan.

Clinical Features of Diabetes Mellitus on Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data from the Cardiovascular Obesity and Rheumatic DISease (CORDIS) Study Group

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are linked by underlying inflammation influencing their development and progression. Nevertheless, the profile of diabetic RA patients and the impact of DM on RA need to be elucidated. This cross-sectional study includes 1523 patients with RA and no episodes of cardiovascular events, followed up in 10 Italian University Rheumatologic Centers between 1 January and 31 December 2019 belonging to the “Cardiovascular Obesity and Rheumatic DISease (CORDIS)” Study Group of the Italian Society of Rheumatology. The demographic and clinical features of DM RA patients were compared to non-diabetic ones evaluating factors associated with increased risk of DM. Overall, 9.3% of the RA patients had DM, and DM type 2 was more common (90.2%). DM patients were significantly older (p < 0.001), more frequently male (p = 0.017), with a significantly higher BMI and mean weight (p < 0.001) compared to non-diabetic patients. DM patients were less likely to be on glucocorticoids (p < 0.001), with a trend towards a more frequent use of b/ts DMARDs (p = 0.08), and demonstrated higher HAQ (p = 0.001). In around 42% of patients (n = 114), DM diagnosis preceded that of RA. Treatment lines were identical in diabetic and non-diabetic RA patients. DM is a comorbidity that may influence RA management and outcome. The association between DM and RA supports the theory of systemic inflammation as a condition underlying the development of both diseases. DM may not have a substantial impact on bDMARDs resistance, although further investigation is required to clarify the implications of biological therapy resistance in RA patients.

Comparative Study of the Effects of Azilsartan and Telmisartan on Insulin Resistance and Metabolic Biomarkers in Essential Hypertension Associated With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Introduction

The complex interplay between the autonomic nervous system, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), and immunity contributes to the pathogenesis of hypertension in diabetes mellitus. The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the effect of azilsartan and telmisartan on insulin resistance and metabolic biomarkers in patients with both hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

The present study was a prospective, randomized, active-controlled, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial. Patients with grade I or II essential hypertension with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized into two groups of 25 patients each. Baseline evaluation of homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), plasma glucose, insulin, leptin and adiponectin levels, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) of patients was done. Patients were reassessed after 12 weeks of drug therapy with azilsartan 40 mg OD (once daily) or telmisartan 40 mg OD.

Results

The mean changes in HOMA-IR from the baseline at the end of 12 weeks of treatment were 0.15 (−0.64, 0.94.52) in the azilsartan group and 0.32 (−0.61, 1.26) in the telmisartan group. The mean difference in the changes from the baseline in HOMA-IR between the two groups was 0.3 (−0.87, 1.48), which was not statistically significant. No statistically significant changes were observed between the two groups in metabolic biomarkers (leptin: -0.84, CI: -4.83 to 3.14, and adiponectin: -0.12, CI: -0.62 to 0.37). Systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) decreased at the end of the 12-week treatment in both the groups; however, there was no significant difference between the two groups (SBP: -2.6, CI: -10.35 to 5.1, and DBP: -3.0, CI: -7.7 to 1.7).

Conclusion

Neither azilsartan nor telmisartan had any significant effects on insulin resistance and metabolic biomarkers after 12 weeks of drug therapy in hypertension patients associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, they showed a comparable antihypertensive effect. The adverse effects observed were mild in nature, and their incidence was comparable between the two groups.

Is Stiffness Parameter β Useful for the Evaluation of Atherosclerosis?~ Its Clinical Implications, Limitations, and Future Perspectives ~

Atherosclerosis comprises two components, atherosis and sclerosis, characterized by morphological wall thickening and functional stiffening, respectively, of the arterial wall. In recent years, much interest has been directed to the role of functional changes in large arteries, i.e., increased stiffness or decreased elasticity, on the development of cardiovascular diseases. In fact, the clinical evaluation of arterial stiffness is increasingly performed in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Local arterial stiffness is measured using an ultrasound technique implemented with an echo-tracking system at the common carotid and femoral arteries. Several indices of local arterial stiffness are obtained by ultrasound, among which stiffness parameter β is unique because it is the least affected by blood pressure at the time of measurement. Evidence from cross-sectional studies indicates that increased stiffness parameter β is associated with a number of cardiovascular risk factors, such as older age, smoking, insufficient physical activity, hypertension, obesity, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and comorbid cardiovascular disease. Results from several prospective observational studies also suggest that carotid stiffness parameter β is a useful surrogate marker of cardiovascular events and/or mortality, although the results differ depending on the characteristics of the study subjects. Furthermore, several interventional studies have shown that carotid stiffness parameter β improved after lifestyle modification or drug treatment. In this review, we summarize the current evidence of stiffness parameter β of the carotid artery and discuss its clinical implications as a marker of vascular health or as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes.

Angiotensin Type 1 Receptor Blockers in Heart Failure

Homeostasis in the cardiovascular system is maintained by physiological functions of the Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System (RAAS). In pathophysiological conditions, over activation of RAAS leads to an increase in the concentration of Angiotensin II (AngII) and over activation of Angiotensin Type 1 Receptor (AT1R), resulting in vasoconstriction, sodium retention and change in myocyte growth. It causes cardiac remodeling in the heart which results in left ventricular hypertrophy, dilation and dysfunction, eventually leading to Heart Failure (HF). Inhibition of RAAS using angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has shown to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality due to HF. ACEi have been shown to have higher drug withdrawal rates due to discomfort when compared to ARBs; therefore, ARBs are the preferred choice of physicians for the treatment of HF in combination with other anti-hypertensive agents. Currently, eight ARBs have been approved by FDA and are clinically used. Even though they bind to the same site of AT1R displacing AngII binding but clinical outcomes are significantly different. In this review, we described the clinical significance of each ARB in the treatment of HF and their clinical outcome.

Anti-Diabetic Effect of Telmisartan Through its Partial PPARγ-Agonistic Activity

Telmisartan is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, which selectively inhibits the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. Thus, it is widely used for hypertension management. Nowadays, telmisartan's effect on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) is gaining wider attention. PPARs are ligand-activated transcription factors that belong to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. Telmisartan is reported to have a partial PPARγ-agonistic effect while avoiding the safety concerns found with full PPARγ agonists (thiazolidinediones). Telmisartan could be an alternative treatment option, with dual benefit for diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension. This review summarizes the anti-diabetic activity of telmisartan via its partial PPARγ-agonistic activity.

The Brain AT2R-a Potential Target for Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Cognitive Impairment: a Comprehensive Review of Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics

Dementia is a potentially avertable tragedy, currently considered among the top 10 greatest global health challenges of the twenty-first century. Dementia not only robs individuals of their dignity and independence, it also has a ripple effect that starts with the inflicted individual's family and projects to the society as a whole. The constantly growing number of cases, along with the lack of effective treatments and socioeconomic impact, poses a serious threat to the sustainability of our health care system. Hence, there is a worldwide effort to identify new targets for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD), the leading cause of dementia. Due to its multifactorial etiology and the recent clinical failure of several novel amyloid-β (Aβ) targeting therapies, a comprehensive "multitarget" approach may be most appropriate for managing this condition. Interestingly, renin angiotensin system (RAS) modulators were shown to positively impact all the factors involved in the pathophysiology of dementia including vascular dysfunction, Aβ accumulation, and associated cholinergic deficiency, in addition to tau hyperphosphorylation and insulin derangements. Furthermore, for many of these drugs, the preclinical evidence is also supported by epidemiological data and/or preliminary clinical trials. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive update on the major causes of dementia including the risk factors, current diagnostic criteria, pathophysiology, and contemporary treatment strategies. Moreover, we highlight the angiotensin II receptor type 2 (AT2R) as an effective drug target and present ample evidence supporting its potential role and clinical applications in cognitive impairment to encourage further investigation in the clinical setting.

Semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase inhibition ameliorates albuminuria and glomerulosclerosis but does not improve tubulointerstitial fibrosis in diabetic nephropathy

Semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase (SSAO) is an enzyme with a unique dual function in controlling inflammation as well as reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. We have demonstrated benefit of SSAO inhibition in acute kidney fibrosis. However the function of SSAO in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is yet to be determined. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a SSAO inhibitor (SSAOi; PXS-4728A) as an antifibrotic agent using a diabetic model of CKD. Diabetic mice were treated with SSAOi for 24 weeks and outcomes compared with untreated diabetic mice and telmisartan treated animals as a standard of care comparator. Extracellular matrix markers, fibronectin and oxidative stress, were downregulated in diabetic mice treated with SSAOi compared with untreated diabetic mice. Expression of the pan-leukocyte marker CD45 was also supressed by SSAOi. SSAO inhibition in diabetic mice resulted in a significant reduction in glomerulosclerosis and associated albuminuria compared to untreated diabetic mice. However, the effect of SSAO inhibition was less obvious in the tubulointerstitial compartment than in the glomeruli. Therefore, SSAO may be a potential target for diabetic glomerulosclerosis.

Beneficial Effects of Adiponectin on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism and Atherosclerotic Progression: Mechanisms and Perspectives

Circulating adiponectin concentrations are reduced in obese individuals, and this reduction has been proposed to have a crucial role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases associated with obesity and the metabolic syndrome. We focus on the effects of adiponectin on glucose and lipid metabolism and on the molecular anti-atherosclerotic properties of adiponectin and also discuss the factors that increase the circulating levels of adiponectin. Adiponectin reduces inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress, which leads to an improvement of insulin resistance. Adiponectin-induced improvement of insulin resistance and adiponectin itself reduce hepatic glucose production and increase the utilization of glucose and fatty acids by skeletal muscles, lowering blood glucose levels. Adiponectin has also β cell protective effects and may prevent the development of diabetes. Adiponectin concentration has been found to be correlated with lipoprotein metabolism; especially, it is associated with the metabolism of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglyceride (TG). Adiponectin appears to increase HDL and decrease TG. Adiponectin increases ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and decreases hepatic lipase, which may elevate HDL. Increased LPL mass/activity and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor and reduced apo-CIII may increase VLDL catabolism and result in the reduction of serum TG. Further, adiponectin has various molecular anti-atherosclerotic properties, such as reduction of scavenger receptors in macrophages and increase of cholesterol efflux. These findings suggest that high levels of circulating adiponectin can protect against atherosclerosis. Weight loss, exercise, nutritional factors, anti-diabetic drugs, lipid-lowering drugs, and anti-hypertensive drugs have been associated with an increase of serum adiponectin level.

PathFX provides mechanistic insights into drug efficacy and safety for regulatory review and therapeutic development

Failure to demonstrate efficacy and safety issues are important reasons that drugs do not reach the market. An incomplete understanding of how drugs exert their effects hinders regulatory and pharmaceutical industry projections of a drug's benefits and risks. Signaling pathways mediate drug response and while many signaling molecules have been characterized for their contribution to disease or their role in drug side effects, our knowledge of these pathways is incomplete. To better understand all signaling molecules involved in drug response and the phenotype associations of these molecules, we created a novel method, PathFX, a non-commercial entity, to identify these pathways and drug-related phenotypes. We benchmarked PathFX by identifying drugs' marketed disease indications and reported a sensitivity of 41%, a 2.7-fold improvement over similar approaches. We then used PathFX to strengthen signals for drug-adverse event pairs occurring in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and also identified opportunities for drug repurposing for new diseases based on interaction paths that associated a marketed drug to that disease. By discovering molecular interaction pathways, PathFX improved our understanding of drug associations to safety and efficacy phenotypes. The algorithm may provide a new means to improve regulatory and therapeutic development decisions.

Telmisartan attenuates hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis in differentiated PC12 cells

The present study investigated the protective actions of telmisartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARBs), against the cell apoptosis induced by exposure to hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) in differentiated PC12 cells. Preincubation of PC12 cells with telmisartan prevented H₂O₂-induced cytotoxicity as indicated by increased MTT (3,(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl)2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide) reduction, decreased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, and improved morphological changes. Hoechst 33,258 staining showed that telmisartan markedly reduced shrunken nuclei of the cells, and Western blot analysis indicated that telmisartan significantly attenuated caspase-3 activity, as indicated by decreased ratio of cleaved Caspase-3 to its precursor and increased ratio of Bcl-2/Bax. The present findings showed that telmisartan protected against cellular oxidative damages by inhibiting apoptotic response.

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy Consisting of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blocker, Calcium Channel Blocker and Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients With Hypertension

Background

Many patients continue to have high blood pressure (BP) even after treatment with high-dose (H)-angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB)/calcium channel blocker (CCB) or middle-dose (M)-ARB/CCB/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ).

Methods

Thirty-two hypertensive patients who had the use of H-ARB/CCB or M-ARB/CCB/HCTZ were enrolled in this study. We applied a changeover with a switch to H-ARB (telmisartan 80 mg/day)/CCB (amlodipine 5 mg/day or nifedipine CR 40 mg/day)/HCTZ (12.5 mg/day).

Results

Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were significantly decreased in all patients and in the H-ARB/CCB and M-ARB/CCB/HCTZ groups after 3 months. Percentage (%) of patients who reached the target BP after 3 months (72%) in all patients was significantly higher than that at 0 months (19%). There were no serious adverse effects in any of the patients.

Conclusions

Combination therapy with H-ARB/CCB/HCTZ was associated with a significant reduction of BP.

Chronic Heart Failure and Comorbid Renal Dysfunction - A Focus on Type 2 Cardiorenal Syndrome

The most important advancements in the Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) are its definition and subsequent classifications. When the predominant pathology and pathophysiology is the heart, i.e. chronic heart failure (CHF), and where any renal impairment (RI) subsequent to this is secondary, the classification is type 2 CRS. There are unique differences in the pathophysiology and progression of individual subclasses. It is important to understand the evolution of CHF and consequences of subsequent RI as they are becoming increasingly prevalent, aggravate morbidity and mortality and limit many therapeutic options. In this paper we discuss the significance of the type 2 CRS patients in the context of the thematic series.

The Different Therapeutic Choices with ARBs. Which One to Give? When? Why?

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system plays an important role in the pathophysiology of hypertension and is closely related with cardio- and cerebrovascular events and chronic kidney diseases. Each angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) is important in the treatment of hypertension, according to the results of recent years. This is a practical review of the available evidence on the different benefits of ARBs beyond their blood pressure-lowering effect, with an emphasis on the differences found between the particular compounds and the therapeutic implications of the findings, with specific reference to the co-morbidities.

Insulin Resistance and Endothelial Dysfunction Constitute a Common Therapeutic Target in Cardiometabolic Disorders

Insulin resistance and other risk factors for atherosclerosis, such as hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, promote endothelial dysfunction and lead to development of metabolic syndrome which constitutes an introduction to cardiovascular disease. The insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction cross talk between each other by numerous metabolic pathways. Hence, targeting one of these pathologies with pleiotropic treatment exerts beneficial effect on another one. Combined and expletive treatment of hypertension, lipid disorders, and insulin resistance with nonpharmacological interventions and conventional pharmacotherapy may inhibit the transformation of metabolic disturbances to fully developed cardiovascular disease. This paper summarises the common therapeutic targets for insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, and vascular inflammatory reaction at molecular level and analyses the potential pleiotropic effects of drugs used currently in management of cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in animal models of vascular, cardiac, metabolic and renal disease

We have reviewed the effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (ARBs) in various animal models of hypertension, atherosclerosis, cardiac function, hypertrophy and fibrosis, glucose and lipid metabolism, and renal function and morphology. Those of azilsartan and telmisartan have been included comprehensively whereas those of other ARBs have been included systematically but without intention of completeness. ARBs as a class lower blood pressure in established hypertension and prevent hypertension development in all applicable animal models except those with a markedly suppressed renin-angiotensin system; blood pressure lowering even persists for a considerable time after discontinuation of treatment. This translates into a reduced mortality, particularly in models exhibiting marked hypertension. The retrieved data on vascular, cardiac and renal function and morphology as well as on glucose and lipid metabolism are discussed to address three main questions: 1. Can ARB effects on blood vessels, heart, kidney and metabolic function be explained by blood pressure lowering alone or are they additionally directly related to blockade of the renin-angiotensin system? 2. Are they shared by other inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, e.g. angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors? 3. Are some effects specific for one or more compounds within the ARB class? Taken together these data profile ARBs as a drug class with unique properties that have beneficial effects far beyond those on blood pressure reduction and, in some cases distinct from those of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. The clinical relevance of angiotensin receptor-independent effects of some ARBs remains to be determined.

Inferring new drug indications using the complementarity between clinical disease signatures and drug effects

BACKGROUND

Drug repositioning is the process of finding new indications for existing drugs. Its importance has been dramatically increasing recently due to the enormous increase in new drug discovery cost. However, most of the previous molecular-centered drug repositioning work is not able to reflect the end-point physiological activities of drugs because of the inherent complexity of human physiological systems.

METHODS

Here, we suggest a novel computational framework to make inferences for alternative indications of marketed drugs by using electronic clinical information which reflects the end-point physiological results of drug's effects on the biological activities of humans. In this work, we use the concept of complementarity between clinical disease signatures and clinical drug effects. With this framework, we establish disease-related clinical variable vectors (clinical disease signature vectors) and drug-related clinical variable vectors (clinical drug effect vectors) by applying two methodologies (i.e., statistical analysis and literature mining). Finally, we assign a repositioning possibility score to each disease-drug pair by the calculation of complementarity (anti-correlation) and association between clinical states ("up" or "down") of disease signatures and clinical effects ("up", "down" or "association") of drugs. A total of 717 clinical variables in the electronic clinical dataset (NHANES), are considered in this study.

RESULTS

The statistical significance of our prediction results is supported through two benchmark datasets (Comparative Toxicogenomics Database and Clinical Trials). We discovered not only lots of known relationships between diseases and drugs, but also many hidden disease-drug relationships. For example, glutathione and edetic-acid may be investigated as candidate drugs for asthma treatment. We examined prediction results by using statistical experiments (enrichment verification, hyper-geometric and permutation test P<0.009 in Comparative Toxicogenomics Database and Clinical Trials) and presented evidences for those with already published literature.

CONCLUSION

The results show that electronic clinical information is a feasible data resource and utilizing the complementarity (anti-correlated relationships) between clinical signatures of disease and clinical effects of drugs is a potentially predictive concept in drug repositioning research. It makes the proposed approach useful to identity novel relationships between diseases and drugs that have a high probability of being biologically valid.

Intramyocellular lipid content in subjects with impaired fasting glucose after telmisartan treatment, a randomised cross-over trial

Ectopic lipid accumulation in skeletal muscle is associated with insulin resistance. Telmisartan improves metabolic parameters in type 2 diabetic patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the in vivo effect of telmisartan on intramyocellular lipid content (IMCL) in subjects with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). We enrolled 10 subjects with IFG in a cross-over, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial, treated with 3 weeks of telmisartan (160 mg daily) or placebo. After completing each treatment, a hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp (1 mU/kg per min; 5 mmol/l; 120 min) to assess insulin action (metabolic clearance rate of glucose, MCR) and (1)H MRS of the m. tibialis anterior using a MR Scanner Siemens Vision operating at 1.5 T to evaluate IMCL content, were performed. Plasma adipokine levels were determined simultaneously. Telmisartan treatment resulted in a lower fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (p < 0.05), but insulin action was comparable to after placebo. Telmisartan did not affect IMCL content. After placebo, IMCL correlated negatively with total cholesterol (p < 0.001), MCR (p < 0.05) and adiponectin (p < 0.05) and positively with FPG (p < 0.05). After telmisartan treatment there was only a positive correlation between IMCL and TNFα (p < 0.05). IMCL content is related to parameters of glucose metabolism and insulin action in sedentary IFG subjects. A short telmisartan treatment did not affect the IMCL content despite its positive effect on FPG. The improvement in FPG was probably mediated through interference with other metabolic pathways.

Bedside-to-Bench Translational Research for Chronic Heart Failure: Creating an Agenda for Clients Who Do Not Meet Trial Enrollment Criteria

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a chronic condition usually without cure. Significant developments, particularly those addressing pathophysiology, mainly started at the bench. This approach has seen many clinical observations initially explored at the bench, subsequently being trialed at the bedside, and eventually translated into clinical practice. This evidence, however, has several limitations, importantly the generalizability or external validity. We now acknowledge that clinical management of CHF is more complicated than merely translating bench-to-bedside evidence in a linear fashion. This review aims to help explore this evolving area from an Australian perspective. We describe the continuation of research once core evidence is established and describe how clinician-scientist collaboration with a bedside-to-bench view can help enhance evidence translation and generalizability. We describe why an extension of the available evidence or generating new evidence is occasionally needed to address the increasingly diverse cohort of patients. Finally, we explore some of the tools used by basic scientists and clinicians to develop evidence and describe the ones we feel may be most beneficial.

Intraclass differences among antihypertensive drugs

The four major classes of antihypertensive drugs—diuretics, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers)—have significant qualitative and quantitative differences in the adverse effects they cause. Structural and chemical differences have been identified within these classes, especially among the calcium channel blockers and, to a lesser extent, among the thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics. However, it has been more difficult to demonstrate that these differences translate into differential effects with respect to either the surrogate endpoint of blood pressure reduction or, more importantly, hypertension-related cardiovascular complications. Based on a hierarchy-of-evidence approach, differences are apparent between hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone based on evidence of moderate quality. Low-quality evidence suggests atenolol is less effective than other β-blockers. However, no significant intraclass differences have been established among the other classes of antihypertensive drugs.

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy of high-dose losartan and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of high-dose losartan (100 mg/day) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ, 12.5 mg/day) compared with those of the combination of high-dose telmisartan (80 mg/day) and HCTZ (12.5 mg/day).

METHODS

Forty hypertensive patients who received a combination of high-dose telmisartan and HCTZ were enrolled. We applied a changeover strategy with switching from a combination of high-dose telmisartan and HCTZ to high-dose losartan and HCTZ. We divided the patients into two groups; those who achieved the target blood pressure (controlled group) and those who did not reach the target blood pressure (uncontrolled group) before the changeover and performed further analysis.

RESULTS

The uncontrolled group showed a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (143±12 mmHg to 126±11 mmHg at three months). In addition, serum uric acid significantly decreased in all subjects, and in each of the controlled and uncontrolled groups. There were no significant changes in other biochemical parameters, such as potassium and hemoglobin A1c, at three months after the changeover in all subjects.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with high-dose losartan and HCTZ was superior to the combination of telmisartan and HCTZ with respect to significant decreases in systolic blood pressure and serum uric acid in hypertensive patients.

The mechanisms of developmentcardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: the role of insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia and hypoadiponektinemia. Treatment and management

In the current paradigm, the primary insulin resistance plays a central role in the development of not only diabetes but also associated with cardiovascular complications, such as arterial hypertension, arteriosclerosis, heart failure, atrial fibrillation. Defense mechanism involves the secretion of adiponectin from adipoctyes and thus helps to block the development of these diseases. Modern antihypertensive treatment options of angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan show that, telmisartan can be used in patients with arterial hypertension because of improving insulin resistance and increasing adiponectin levels.

A meta-analysis of randomized trials of telmisartan versus active controls for insulin resistance in hypertensive patients

To determine whether telmisartan improves insulin resistance compared with other antihypertensive drugs, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of telmisartan. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through December 2013. Eligible studies were prospective RCTs of telmisartan versus other antihypertensive drugs, enrolling individuals with hypertension and reporting insulin levels and/or homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) as outcomes. Of 67 potentially relevant articles screened initially, 33 reports of RCTs enrolling a total of 2033 patients with hypertension were identified and included. Pooled analyses of only the eight double-blind-design trials demonstrated statistically significant reductions in percent changes of insulin levels (mean difference, -5.19%; 95% confidence interval, -8.94% to -1.43%; P = .007) and HOMA-IR (-15.34%; -26.39% to -4.28%; P = .007) with telmisartan relative to other antihypertensive drugs. When data from all the 33 trials were pooled, telmisartan was associated with statistically significant reductions in percent changes of insulin levels (-10.92%; -15.60% to -6.23%; P < .00001) and HOMA-IR (-15.89%; -22.01% to -9.78%; P < .00001) relative to other antihypertensive drugs. In conclusion, telmisartan appears to significantly improve insulin resistance compared with other antihypertensive drugs in patients with hypertension.

Telmisartan ameliorates glutamate-induced neurotoxicity: roles of AT(1) receptor blockade and PPARγ activation

Sartans (Angiotensin II AT(1) Receptor Blockers, ARBs) are powerful neuroprotective agents in vivo and protect against IL-1β neurotoxicity in vitro. The purpose of this research was to determine the extent of sartan neuroprotection against glutamate excitotoxicity, a common cause of neuronal injury and apoptosis. The results show that sartans are neuroprotective, significantly reducing glutamate-induced neuronal injury and apoptosis in cultured rat primary cerebellar granule cells (CGCs). Telmisartan was the most potent sartan studied, with an order of potency telmisartan > candesartan > losartan > valsartan. Mechanisms involved reduction of pro-apoptotic caspase-3 activation, protection of the survival PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β pathway and prevention of glutamate-induced ERK1/2 activation. NMDA receptor stimulation was essential for glutamate-induced cell injury and apoptosis. Participation of AT(1A) receptor was supported by glutamate-induced upregulation of AT(1A) gene expression and AT(1) receptor binding. Conversely, AT(1B) or AT(2) receptors played no role. Glutamate-induced neuronal injury and the neuroprotective effect of telmisartan were decreased, but not abolished, in CGCs obtained from AT(1A) knock-out mice. This indicates that although AT(1) receptors are necessary for glutamate to exert its full neurotoxic potential, part of the neuroprotective effect of telmisartan is independent of AT(1) receptor blockade. PPARγ activation was also involved in the neuroprotective effects of telmisartan, as telmisartan enhanced PPARγ nuclear translocation and the PPARγ antagonist GW9662 partially reversed the neuroprotective effects of telmisartan. The present results substantiate the therapeutic use of sartans, in particular telmisartan, in neurodegenerative diseases and traumatic brain disorders where glutamate neurotoxicity plays a significant role.

An update on telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide combinations for the management of hypertensive patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors

International hypertension guidelines endorse the use of combination therapy to achieve blood pressure control in the majority of patients. Angiotensin AT1 receptor blockers, in combination with diuretics, are among the preferred combinations, with telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) being an effective and well-tolerated combination. This article provides an up-to-date review of the existing data on telmisartan/HCTZ combination for the management of hypertension in patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors, including reports emerging from a number of recent clinical trials and secondary analyses of older trials. The accumulated evidence from clinical trials demonstrates that telmisartan/HCTZ combinations are effective and well tolerated in patients with mild-to-severe hypertension, including subgroups of patients with cardiovascular risk factors such as advanced age, obesity, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus and treatment-resistant hypertension.

Telmisartan plus amlodipine single-pill combination for the management of hypertensive patients with a metabolic risk profile (added-risk patients)

OBJECTIVE

Hypertensive patients with metabolic risk factors, including obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, often require a combination of antihypertensive agents to achieve blood pressure (BP) targets. This article considers the evidence supporting telmisartan/amlodipine combination therapy for the treatment of hypertension in patients with metabolic risk factors.

METHODS

Clinical trials of telmisartan/amlodipine at doses of 40-80 mg/5-10 mg (T40-80/A5-10) in free, fixed-dose and single-pill combinations were identified through electronic searches (MEDLINE and congress abstracts) up to and including June 2012, and from the Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) trial database. All identified trials were reviewed for data on hypertensive patients with obesity, diabetes, or both. Post-hoc subgroup analyses were carried out using the BI database to determine the relevant information if it was not previously reported.

RESULTS

Thirteen clinical trials including 6886 patients were identified with data relevant for inclusion in this review. The telmisartan/amlodipine combination allowed a high proportion of hypertensive patients with metabolic conditions to achieve BP targets, particularly among patients who had previously failed to achieve BP targets with monotherapy. BP reductions and goal rate achievement were similarly high among patients with and without the presence of metabolic risk factors. BP reductions were maintained throughout the 24 h dosing period, and 24 h goal rates were obtained in a high proportion of patients. Particularly large reductions in BP with telmisartan/amlodipine were recorded among patients with severe hypertension (systolic BP ≥180 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this post-hoc analysis further support the ability of the telmisartan/amlodipine combination to effectively reduce BP in hypertensive patients with obesity, diabetes, or metabolic syndrome, enabling the majority of patients to achieve target BP. This combination is also well tolerated, and may be considered a suitable option for these added-risk hypertensive patients.

Telmisartan 80 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg single-pill combination in the treatment of hypertension

INTRODUCTION

International guidelines emphasize the importance of blood pressure (BP) control to reduce cardiovascular risk. Telmisartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, provides large BP reductions and also prevents cardiovascular events in patients at high risk. The thiazide diuretic, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), has a complementary mode of action, and combination with telmisartan is an established and rational treatment option for patients uncontrolled on monotherapy. A single-pill combination (SPC) of telmisartan 80 mg with high-strength HCTZ 25 mg (T80/H25) is widely available.

AREA COVERED

Clinical data on T80/H25 SPC for the management of hypertension was identified via MEDLINE searches. T80/H25 SPC provides greater BP reductions and higher goal achievement rates in patients who cannot achieve BP goal with T80/HCTZ 12.5 mg SPC, and also as initial therapy compared with T80 monotherapy. T80/H25 also reduced BP significantly more than valsartan 160 mg/H25 combination, and demonstrated favorable tolerability in clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Patients with hypertension often do not achieve BP goal, even when treated, leaving them at increased cardiovascular risk. In part this is due to poor adherence, which can be exacerbated by treatment side effects. High BP goal achievement with SPC T80/H25, with maintained tolerability, provides a treatment option for increasing BP control.

Candesartan cilexetil improves angiotensin II type 2 receptor-mediated neurite outgrowth via the PI3K-Akt pathway in fructose-induced insulin-resistant rats

We have shown previously that stimulation of the angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT(2)R) results in nerve facilitation. In this study, we determined the capacity of candesartan to correct expression patterns characteristic of neuropathy and AT(2)R-mediated neurite outgrowth in the fructose-induced insulin-resistant rat, which is one of the human hyperinsulinemia models. Wistar rats received a 15% (w/v) fructose solution in their drinking water for 4 weeks (fructose-drinking rats [FDRs]), with or without candesartan (5 mg/kg/day). We evaluated physiological and behavioral parameters and performed immunohistochemical studies. We found that the FDR developed insulin resistance and downregulated both AT(2)R neuronal function and phosphorylated Akt expression in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons. Candesartan improved neurite outgrowth in the FDR, which was associated with the restoration of AT(2)R and phosphorylated Akt expression. Furthermore, downregulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibited AT(2)R-mediated neurite outgrowth in control DRG cells. PI3K activation increased AT(2)R-mediated neurite outgrowth and phosphorylated Akt expression in FDR DRG cells. These results suggest that the decrease of AT(2)R-mediated neurite outgrowth in FDRs is likely to be the result of decreased PI3K-dependent Akt activation. Candesartan improved AT(2)R neuronal function and Akt phosphorylation, which were associated with sensory nerve defects and insulin sensitivity in the FDR.