5-HT1A receptor agonist properties of antipsychotics determined by [35S]GTPgammaS binding in rat hippocampal membranes

Atypical antipsychotics attenuate MK801-induced social withdrawal and hyperlocomotion in the RHA rat model of schizophrenia-relevant features

RATIONALE

The administration of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) antagonists constitutes a widely used model that produce both positive (e.g., hyperactivity) and negative (e.g., social withdrawal) symptoms relevant for schizophrenia in rodents. These effects can be reversed with the administration of atypical (second and third generation) antipsychotics.

OBJECTIVES

In this study we combined the NMDAR-antagonist model with the Roman High-Avoidance (RHA) strain, a psychogenetically selected model of schizophrenia-relevant features. We also studied whether some atypical antipsychotic drugs (clozapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole) would be able to attenuate or reverse the behavioural alterations induced by MK801 and whether such effects might be dependent on the rat strain.

METHODS

MK801 dose-response study was conducted in RHA and Roman Low-Avoidance (RLA) male rats. After that, the 0.15 mg/kg MK801 dose was selected to carry out pharmacological studies versus atypical antipsychotics.

RESULTS

In the first experiment we establish that MK801 (dizocilpine), a NMDAR antagonist, produces dose-related hyperactivity and social withdrawal, which are more marked in RHA than RLA rats. The administration of the atypical antipsychotics clozapine (2.5 mg/kg) or ziprasidone (2.5 mg/kg) partially reversed or attenuated some of the social behaviour deficits and hyperactivity induced by the administration of MK801. Aripiprazole (3 mg/kg), a third-generation antipsychotic, reversed or attenuated the social preference deficit, the hyperactivity and the impairment of social latency induced by MK801.

CONCLUSIONS

These results seem to be in line with previous studies with the NMDAR-antagonist model and add face (MK801-induced social withdrawal and hyperactivity) and predictive (attenuation of MK801-induced effects by atypical antipsychotics) validity to the RHA rat strain as a model of schizophrenia-relevant features.

Agonistic properties of a series of psychotropic drugs at 5-HT1A receptors in rat and human brain membranes determined by [35S]GTPγS binding assay

BACKGROUND

Many psychoactive compounds have been developed to have more beneficial clinical efficacy than conventional drugs by adding agonistic action at 5-HT_1A receptors. The aim of the present study was to evaluate several psychotropic drugs that had been reported to behave as an agonist at 5-HT_1A receptor (aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, asenapine, lurasidone, and vortioxetine) in both rat and postmortem human brain membranes.

METHODS

The [³⁵S]GTPγS binding assay for G_i/o proteins coupled with 5-HT_1A receptors was performed in rat brain membranes and postmortem human brain membranes.

RESULTS

The specific binding was stimulated by brexpiprazole in rat hippocampus, human hippocampus, and human prefrontal cortex. Aripiprazole also behaved as an agonist in the same brain regions. Interestingly, its potency was much higher in rat hippocampal membranes than in human brain membranes, indicating the possibility of species differences. Although vortioxetine was an efficacious stimulator at high concentrations, its potency was undeterminable because of a lack of saturability. In addition to 5-HT_1A receptor agonism, involvement of other components, e.g., 5-HT_1B receptor agonism, was speculated by the biphasic inhibitory effects of the selective 5-HT_1A receptor neutral antagonist. Negligible stimulatory effects were obtained as to lurasidone and asenapine.

CONCLUSIONS

Our previous studies have raised the concept of a psychoactive drug group with a common pharmacological mechanism of action, i.e., 5-HT_1A receptor agonism, consisting of perospirone, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, clozapine, quetiapine, nemonapride, and trazodone. The present study demonstrates the data indicating that brexpiprazole and probably vortioxetine are included in this drug group. Lurasidone and asenapine are excluded from this group.

Clozapine's multiple cellular mechanisms: What do we know after more than fifty years? A systematic review and critical assessment of translational mechanisms relevant for innovative strategies in treatment-resistant schizophrenia

Almost fifty years after its first introduction into clinical care, clozapine remains the only evidence-based pharmacological option for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), which affects approximately 30% of patients with schizophrenia. Despite the long-time experience with clozapine, the specific mechanism of action (MOA) responsible for its superior efficacy among antipsychotics is still elusive, both at the receptor and intracellular signaling level. This systematic review is aimed at critically assessing the role and specific relevance of clozapine's multimodal actions, dissecting those mechanisms that under a translational perspective could shed light on molecular targets worth to be considered for further innovative antipsychotic development. In vivo and in vitro preclinical findings, supported by innovative techniques and methods, together with pharmacogenomic and in vivo functional studies, point to multiple and possibly overlapping MOAs. To better explore this crucial issue, the specific affinity for 5-HT₂R, D1R, α_2c, and muscarinic receptors, the relatively low occupancy at dopamine D2R, the interaction with receptor dimers, as well as the potential confounder effects resulting in biased ligand action, and lastly, the role of the moiety responsible for lipophilic and alkaline features of clozapine are highlighted. Finally, the role of transcription and protein changes at the synaptic level, and the possibility that clozapine can directly impact synaptic architecture are addressed. Although clozapine's exact MOAs that contribute to its unique efficacy and some of its severe adverse effects have not been fully understood, relevant information can be gleaned from recent mechanistic understandings that may help design much needed additional therapeutic strategies for TRS.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CX. Classification of Receptors for 5-hydroxytryptamine; Pharmacology and Function

5-HT receptors expressed throughout the human body are targets for established therapeutics and various drugs in development. Their diversity of structure and function reflects the important role 5-HT receptors play in physiologic and pathophysiological processes. The present review offers a framework for the official receptor nomenclature and a detailed understanding of each of the 14 5-HT receptor subtypes, their roles in the systems of the body, and, where appropriate, the (potential) utility of therapeutics targeting these receptors. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review provides a comprehensive account of the classification and function of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors, including how they are targeted for therapeutic benefit.

Functional characterization of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B serotonin receptor signaling through G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channels in a fluorescence-based membrane potential assay

The 5-HT_1A and 5-HT_1B serotonin receptors are abundantly expressed in the CNS and constitute validated as well as putative drug targets in a variety of psychiatric and cognitive disorders, alcoholism/addiction, pain and migraine. In the present study we have characterized the functional properties of human 5-HT_1A and 5-HT_1B stably co-expressed with the human G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying K⁺ channel 2 (GIRK2) in HEK293 cells in the fluorescence-based FLIPR® Membrane Potential Blue (FMP) assay. Serotonin and other agonists induced robust decreases in fluorescence levels in the 5-HT_1A/GIRK2- and 5-HT_1B/GIRK2-HEK293 cells in a concentration-dependent manner in the assay, and these responses could be inhibited by selective 5-HT_1A/5-HT_1B antagonists and by the Gα_i/o-protein inhibitor pertussis toxin (PTX). Five additional stable HEK293 cell lines co-expressing 5-HT_1A or 5-HT_1B with GIRK2 and one of the PTX-insensitive Gα_i/o-subunit mutants Gα_i1^C351I, Gα_i2^C352I and Gα_o1^C351I were constructed, and 5-HT_1A/5-HT_1B-mediated responses through these specific Gα_i/o-subunits were measured in these cells pretreated with PTX in the FMP assay. The functional properties of 16 reference 5-HT₁ agonists were characterized at the seven cell lines, which constitutes the most detailed pharmacological profiling and comparison of 5-HT_1A and 5-HT_1B receptor signaling in the same assay published to date. We propose that this approach to assay 5-HT₁-mediated signaling through endogenous Gα_i/o-proteins in HEK293 cells or through specific Gα_i/o-subunits in a fairly high-throughput manner holds some advantages to other functional assays for Gα_i/o-coupled receptors. The assay will facilitate detailed profiling of the Gα_i/o- and Gβγ-mediated signaling of 5-HT_1A and 5-HT_1B at the molecular level, and it could also be used to identify novel modulators for the receptors.

HTR1A Polymorphisms and Clinical Efficacy of Antipsychotic Drug Treatment in Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate whether HTR1A gene polymorphisms impact the efficacy of antipsychotic drugs in patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

Candidate gene studies that were published in English up to August 6, 2015 were identified by a literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google scholar. Data were pooled from individual clinical trials considering overall symptoms, positive symptoms and negative symptoms, and standard mean differences were calculated by applying a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The present meta-analysis included a total of 1281 patients from 10 studies. Three polymorphisms of HTR1A (rs6295, rs878567, and rs1423691) were selected for the analysis. In the pooled data from all studies, none of these HTR1A polymorphisms correlated significantly with either overall symptoms or positive symptoms. However, C allele carriers of the rs6295 polymorphism showed a significantly greater negative symptoms improvement than G allele carriers (P=.04, standardized mean difference =-0.14, 95％CI = 0.01 to 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our present analysis indicate that the HTR1A rs6295 polymorphism may impact negative symptoms improvement but not on either overall symptoms or positive symptoms improvement. However, this meta-analysis was based on a small number of studies and patients, and the effect size on negative symptoms was small. Given this limitation, the results should be confirmed by further investigations.

HTR1A Gene Polymorphisms and 5-HT1A Receptor Partial Agonist Antipsychotics Efficacy in Schizophrenia

Individual differences in serotonin 1A (5-HT1A) receptor may result in variable response to antipsychotics with 5-HT1A receptor partial agonism. We investigated the relationship between 5-HT1A receptor gene (HTR1A) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and efficacy of antipsychotics with 5-HT1A receptor partial agonism in Japanese patients with schizophrenia. Perospirone or aripiprazole was administered to 100 patients with schizophrenia in a randomized controlled study. Candidate SNPs were rs6295 (which affects HTR1A expression and function), rs1364043, rs878567, and rs10042486. Efficacy at week 12 of treatment was evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) 5-factor subscales (excitement/hostility, depression/anxiety, cognition, positive, and negative). Rs1364043 T allele was correlated with the percent change in the PANSS 5-factor negative score (P < 0.01). Haplotype analysis showed that the rs10042486-rs6295-rs1364043 T-C-G haplotype was correlated with worse negative score improvement (haplotype frequency, 0.675; P = 0.014), and the relatively rare T-G-T haplotype correlated with better efficacy (haplotype frequency, 0.05; P = 0.031). This is the first study to show that rs10042486-rs6295-rs1364043 HTR1A variants may be correlated with the improvement of the PANSS 5-factor negative score during treatment with 5-HT1A partial agonist antipsychotics. Studies with larger sample sizes and in different ethnic groups are warranted.

There is no association between the serotonin receptor gene and bipolar I disorder in the Korean population

OBJECTIVE

Despite the close relationship between the functional polymorphism C(-1019)G (rs6295) of the serotonergic 1A receptor (5-HT1A) and mood, few studies have investigated the relationship between rs6295 and bipolar disorder.

AIMS

In this study, we aimed to investigate whether rs6295 is associated with clinical prognosis and treatment response in patients with bipolar I disorder acute manic episodes.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-eight patients with bipolar I disorder and one hundred sixty-eight healthy controls were recruited. Associations between patients with bipolar I disorder and healthy controls were compared. In addition, age at onset, number of admissions, and treatment response, including response rate, mean changes in manic symptoms, number of anti-manic agents and the total dosage of mood stabilizers for acute manic symptoms were compared between the rs6295 GG and CG+ CC groups in patients with bipolar I disorder. We conducted a separate subgroup analysis according to gender.

RESULTS

There were no differences in frequency between patients and controls. In patients with bipolar disorder, clinical prognosis and treatment response were no different between GG and CG+ CC groups. However, in a subgroup analysis according to gender, male, but not female, patients in the GG group had a longer duration of illness and a greater number of both previous episodes and psychiatric ward admissions than did the GC+ CC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies should investigate the relationship between 5-HT1A polymorphisms and bipolar disorder in terms of mood episode and gender.

Clozapine effects on adenylyl cyclase activity and serotonin type 1A receptors in human brain post-mortem

Although the pharmacological profile of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine has been extensively studied in animal models, little information is available on its effects in the human brain. In particular, much interest is focused on the understanding of clozapine activity on serotonin (5-HT) neurotransmission, particularly on 5-HT receptor of type 1A (5-HT(1A)) that seems to play a pivotal role in the control of the 5-HT system. The present work, therefore, aimed at evaluating the effects of clozapine and its major metabolite, norclozapine, on the modulation of adenylyl cyclase (AC) velocity via 5-HT(1A) receptors in human post-mortem brain regions, in particular the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and raphe nuclei. Concomitantly, the ability of the two compounds to displace the specific binding of the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist [³H]-8-hydroxy-(2-di-N-propylamino) tetralin ([³H]-8-OH-DPAT) was evaluated in the same brain areas. The results showed that both clozapine and norclozapine, although with a 20-fold lower affinity, displaced [³H]8-OH-DPAT binding in all of the brain regions analysed, suggesting their interaction with 5-HT(1A) receptors. At the same time, clozapine and, to a lesser extent, norclozapine were found to inhibit the forskolin (FK)-stimulated AC system, while decreasing cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) concentrations in the hippocampus only. The receptor characterisation of the clozapine effect on AC observed in the hippocampus by the use of antagonists showed a mixed profile, involving not only the 5-HT(1A) receptor but also a muscarinic (M) receptor subtype, most likely the M₄ one. These findings, while considering all the limitations due to the use of post-mortem tissues, are strongly suggestive of a region-dependent pharmacological action of clozapine in the human brain that may explain its peculiar clinical effects and open up research towards novel targets for future antipsychotic drugs.

Functional binding assays for estimation of the intrinsic efficacy of ligands at the 5-HT1A receptor: application for screening drug candidates

INTRODUCTION

Determination of the intrinsic efficacy of ligands at the 5-HT1A receptor is important for selecting drug candidates, e.g. in the case of schizophrenia where partial agonism is a favorable property shared by different atypical antipsychotics.

METHODS

Using seven ligands with different intrinsic efficacies and rat hippocampus synaptosomes, we compared critically three "functional" binding assays based on the ternary complex model that considers that the activated conformation of the receptor is the one coupled to G-protein.

RESULTS

The Ki ratio method, based on the difference of affinity of the competing drug when using an antagonist vs. an agonist as radioligand, discriminated the ligands according to their intrinsic efficacies, with values from 77 for the full agonist 5-hydroxytryptamine to 0.09 for the inverse agonist WAY 100,635. The GTP-shift method, based on the decrease of affinity observed with agonists when GTP is added to the competition binding assay, was equally effective in classifying the drugs according to their intrinsic efficacy. The lower sensibility of the GTP-shift assay was investigated and explained by the different ionic conditions used in the two assays and the way competition curves were analyzed. Albeit more direct, the assay based on agonist-stimulated [(35)S]-GTPγS binding to G proteins was more expensive and of greater variability in our hands.

DISCUSSION

We conclude that the GTP-shift procedure described herein for 5-HT1A receptors may expedite drug discovery efforts by predicting at the same time the affinity and intrinsic efficacy of ligands through a simple, rapid and economic ligand binding assay.

Two cases of mild serotonin toxicity via 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A receptor stimulation

We propose the possibility of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1A receptor involvement in mild serotonin toxicity. A 64-year-old woman who experienced hallucinations was treated with perospirone (8 mg/day). She also complained of depressed mood and was prescribed paroxetine (10 mg/day). She exhibited finger tremors, sweating, coarse shivering, hyperactive knee jerks, vomiting, diarrhea, tachycardia, and psychomotor agitation. After the discontinuation of paroxetine and perospirone, the symptoms disappeared. Another 81-year-old woman, who experienced delusions, was treated with perospirone (8 mg/day). Depressive symptoms appeared and paroxetine (10 mg/day) was added. She exhibited tachycardia, finger tremors, anxiety, agitation, and hyperactive knee jerks. The symptoms disappeared after the cessation of paroxetine and perospirone. Recently, the effectiveness of coadministrating 5-HT1A agonistic psychotropics with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has been reported, and SSRIs with 5-HT1A agonistic activity have been newly approved in the treatment of depression. Perospirone is a serotonin-dopamine antagonist and agonistic on the 5-HT1A receptors. Animal studies have indicated that mild serotonin excess induces low body temperature through 5-HT1A, whereas severe serotonin excess induces high body temperature through 5-HT2A activation. Therefore, it could be hypothesized that mild serotonin excess induces side effects through 5-HT1A, and severe serotonin excess induces lethal side effects with hyperthermia through 5-HT2A. Serotonin toxicity via a low dose of paroxetine that is coadministered with perospirone, which acts agonistically on the 5-HT1A receptor and antagonistically on the 5-HT2A receptor, clearly indicated 5-HT1A receptor involvement in mild serotonin toxicity. Careful measures should be adopted to avoid serotonin toxicity following the combined use of SSRIs and 5-HT1A agonists.

Pharmacological characterization of N1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-N4-hexylpiperazine as a multi-target antagonist of α1A/α1D-adrenoceptors and 5-HT1A receptors that blocks prostate contraction and cell growth

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a progressive disease related to the imbalance of cell growth and apoptosis, and it plays a key role in the development of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The main pharmacological treatment is based on α1A-adrenoceptor blockers, but in several cases monotherapy has failed. Recent studies of prostate pathophysiology have noted the role of α1D-adrenoceptors and 5-HT1A receptors in prostate cell proliferation in addition to the usual role of α1A-adrenoceptors in prostate contraction. N-phenylpiperazine is a scaffold structure that may confer drug affinity for these three receptors. Therefore, the present work aimed to investigate the pharmacological characteristics of N1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-N4-hexylpiperazine (LDT66). Using isometric contraction assays with rat prostate and aorta, LDT66 reduced phenylephrine-induced contractions and showed K B values of 3.4 and 2.2 nM for α1A- and α1D-adrenoceptors, respectively. According to the functional binding assays data, LDT66 showed a high affinity (nanomolar range) for the 5-HT1A receptors, behaving as an antagonist. LDT66 also showed a low affinity (micromolar range) for receptors unrelated to BPH such as α1B-adrenoceptors, α2A-adrenoceptors, muscarinic and 5-HT2A receptors, which is a desirable profile in order to prevent putative side effects. Accordingly, LDT66 (100 μg/kg) showed a marginal hypotensive effect. Using the DU-145 prostate cells, control experiments characterized the α1D-adrenoceptor- and 5-HT1A receptor-mediated cell growth by phenylephrine and 5-HT, respectively. LDT66 (50 nM) prevented both effects similarly. In conclusion, LDT66 is a high-affinity multi-target antagonist of relevant receptors for BPH, and it may be a new starting point for multi-target drug development to treat BPH and LUTS.

A 12-week randomized, open-label study of perospirone versus aripiprazole in the treatment of Japanese schizophrenia patients

OBJECT

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole and perospirone in Japanese patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

In this 12-week, randomized, flexible-dose, open-label study, patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were randomized to receive aripiprazole (3-30 mg/day, n=49) or perospirone (8-48 mg/day, n=51). Efficacy and safety were evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S), the Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS) and the Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) before treatment and every 4 weeks after the initiation of treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients completed this study (aripiprazole, n=31; perospirone, n=27). No significant differences in gender, episode, age, schizophrenia type, weight, previous treatment and PANSS score were observed between the two groups at baseline. Both groups showed significant improvements during the study, with reductions in the total PANSS scores (Repeated measure analysis of variance, both p<0.0001). There were no significant differences in the PANSS change scores, CGI-S change scores, DIEPSS total score, BAS total score or over time between groups. The most common adverse event was insomnia in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In Japanese schizophrenia patients, aripiprazole and perospirone showed equal efficacy, tolerability and patient compliance. Both drugs showed good efficacy for treating schizophrenia. This paper is the first randomized study to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of aripiprazole and perospirone in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia.

Receptor targets for antidepressant therapy in bipolar disorder: an overview

The treatment of bipolar depression is one of the most challenging issues in contemporary psychiatry. Currently only quetiapine and the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination are officially approved by the FDA against this condition. The neurobiology of bipolar depression and the possible targets of bipolar antidepressant therapy remain relatively elusive. We performed a complete and systematic review to identify agents with definite positive or negative results concerning efficacy followed by a second systematic review to identify the pharmacodynamic properties of these agents. The comparison of properties suggests that the stronger predictors for antidepressant efficacy in bipolar depression were norepinephrine alpha-1, dopamine D1 and histamine antagonism, followed by 5-HT2A, muscarinic and dopamine D2 and D3 antagonism and eventually by norepinephrine reuptake inhibition and 5HT-1A agonism. Serotonin reuptake which constitutes the cornerstone in unipolar depression treatment does not seem to play a significant role for bipolar depression. Our exhaustive review is compatible with a complex model with multiple levels of interaction between the major neurotransmitter systems without a single target being either necessary or sufficient to elicit the antidepressant effect in bipolar depression.

Pharmacological blockade of dopamine D2 receptors by aripiprazole is not associated with striatal sensitization

The partial agonist profile of novel antipsychotics such as aripiprazole has hardly been demonstrated in biochemical assays on animal tissues. As it is established that responses induced by dopamine D₂ receptor agonists are increased in models of dopaminergic sensitization, this paradigm was used in order to facilitate the detection of the partial agonist properties of aripiprazole. At variance with all other partial and full agonists tested, the partial agonist properties of aripiprazole were not revealed in guanosine 5′-O-(γ-[³⁵S]thiotriphosphate ([³⁵S]GTPγS) binding assays on striatal membranes from haloperidol-treated rats. Hence,aripiprazole behaved as an antagonist, efficiently inhibiting the functional response to dopamine. Similarly, in behavioural assays, aripiprazole dose-dependently inhibited the stereotypies elicited by apomorphine. However, at variance with haloperidol, repeated administrations of aripiprazole(3 weeks) at the doses of 10 and 30 mg/kg did not induce any up-regulation or hyperfunctionality of the dopamine D₂ receptors in the striatum. These data highlight the putative involvement of other pharmacological targets for aripiprazole that would support in the prevention of secondary effects commonly associated with the blockade of striatal dopamine D₂ receptors. Hence, in additional experiments, aripiprazole was found to efficiently promote [³⁵S]GTPγS binding in hippocampal membranes through the activation of 5-HT(₁A) receptors. Further experiments investigating the second messenger cascades should be performed so as to establish the functional properties of aripiprazole and understand the mechanism underlying the prevention of dopamine receptor regulation in spite of the observed antagonism.

Aripiprazole attenuates established behavioral sensitization induced by methamphetamine

Psychostimulant-induced behavioral sensitization is an experimental model of the stimulant psychosis and the vulnerability to relapse in schizophrenia. This study investigated the effects of aripiprazole, an antipsychotic drug that has dopamine D2 receptor partial agonist activity, on established sensitization induced by methamphetamine (MAP) in mice. Repeated treatment with MAP (1.0mg/kg, s.c.) for 10 days progressively increased the ability of MAP to increase locomotor activity. The enhanced locomotion induced by a challenge dose of MAP (0.24 mg/kg, s.c.) also occurred after withdrawal from MAP pretreatment. Repeated treatment with aripiprazole from days 10 to 14 during withdrawal from MAP administration attenuated the effect of MAP pretreatment, enhancing the motor response to a challenge dose of stimulant 3 days after the aripiprazole preparation. In contrast, sulpiride, a dopamine D2 receptor specific antagonist, and risperidone, a serotonin 5-HT2 and dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, did not show effects similar to aripiprazole. The attenuation effect of aripiprazole was blocked by pretreatment with the specific serotonin 5-HT1A antagonist WAY100635. These results of aripiprazole suggest that the attenuation effect of aripiprazole was mediated by 5-HT1A receptors and imply that aripiprazole may have therapeutic value in treating drug-induced psychosis and schizophrenia.