Hepatitis E superinfection produces severe decompensation in patients with chronic liver disease

Clinical characteristics of 1279 patients with hepatitis E in Tianjin

Hepatitis E virus infection is a major cause of acute hepatitis, typically self-limiting but occasionally leading to liver failure. Understanding disease progression factors could inform prevention strategies. This study aimed to analyse the characteristics of a large cohort of hospitalised hepatitis E patients in Tianjin, China, and explore factors influencing their progression to liver failure. A total of 1279 hospitalised patients with hepatitis E were included in this cross-sectional study in Tianjin, China. Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U-test were used for comparisons. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association. Among these 1279 patients, 107 (8.4%) developed liver failure. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.150-2.887, p = 0.011), liver cirrhosis (95% [CI] 2.229-7.224, p < 0.001), and hepatitis B (95% [CI] 1.159-4.512, p = 0.017) were more likely to progress to liver failure. Hepatitis E patients with comorbid DM, liver cirrhosis, or hepatitis B virus co-infection have higher risks of developing liver failure. Hepatitis E vaccination may be recommended for these vulnerable patients to curb disease severity.

The Re-Emergence of Hepatitis E Virus in Europe and Vaccine Development

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is one of the leading causes of acute viral hepatitis. Transmission of HEV mainly occurs via the fecal-oral route (ingesting contaminated water or food) or by contact with infected animals and their raw meat products. Some animals, such as pigs, wild boars, sheep, goats, rabbits, camels, rats, etc., are natural reservoirs of HEV, which places people in close contact with them at increased risk of HEV disease. Although hepatitis E is a self-limiting infection, it could also lead to severe illness, particularly among pregnant women, or chronic infection in immunocompromised people. A growing number of studies point out that HEV can be classified as a re-emerging virus in developed countries. Preventative efforts are needed to reduce the incidence of acute and chronic hepatitis E in non-endemic and endemic countries. There is a recombinant HEV vaccine, but it is approved for use and commercially available only in China and Pakistan. However, further studies are needed to demonstrate the necessity of applying a preventive vaccine and to create conditions for reducing the spread of HEV. This review emphasizes the hepatitis E virus and its importance for public health in Europe, the methods of virus transmission and treatment, and summarizes the latest studies on HEV vaccine development.

Prophylactic Hepatitis E Vaccine

The hepatitis E has been increasingly recognized as an underestimated global disease burden in recent years. Subpopulations with more serious infection associated damage or death include pregnant women, patients with basic liver diseases, and elderly persons. Vaccine would be the most effective means for prevention of HEV infection. The lack of an efficient cell culture system for HEV makes the development of classic inactive or attenuated vaccine infeasible. Hence, the recombinant vaccine approaches are explored deeply. The neutralizing sites are located almost exclusively in the capsid protein, pORF2, of the virion. Based on pORF2, many vaccine candidates showed potential of protecting primate animals, two of them were tested in human and evidenced to be well-tolerated in adults and highly efficacious in preventing hepatitis E. The world's first hepatitis E vaccine, Hecolin^® (HEV 239 vaccine), was licensed in China and launched in 2012.

Chitosan-functionalized graphene oxide as adjuvant in HEV P239 vaccine

Searching appropriate adjuvants for vaccine is a potent method to intense the immune efficacy. In the present study, we developed a novel Hepatitis E virus (HEV) vaccine by utilizing chitosan modified nano-graphene oxide (GO-CS) as an adjuvant to support HEV antigen P239 protein (GO/CS/P239). The characterization of GO/CS/P239 was observed by atomic force microscope. The safety of GO/CS/P239 was measured by CCK-8 method, hemolysis test and acute challenge test. The anti-HEV titers and cytokines production were analyzed by double antibody sandwich ELISA. As the results showed, by contrast with a vaccine that contained only the P239 protein, GO/CS/P239 vaccine can promote immune cells to produce more IgG antibodies and cytokines, which were able to stimulate the organism to produce stronger both cellular and humoral immunity. Collectively, GO/CS/P239 particles have been demonstrated to be safe both in vitro and in vivo, and can facilitate sufficient immune response to protect organisms from virus infection, which suggested that our exploration offers a promising alternative vaccine that can control HEV infection.

Jaundice, Coombs Positive Hemolytic Anaemia, and Liver Failure: An Unusual Trio

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a single-stranded RNA virus with 20 million cases reported worldwide. Infected individuals may either remain asymptomatic or develop acute or even fulminant hepatitis. HEV has been implicated in causing Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) among patients with underlying cirrhosis. Among the causes of cirrhosis, Wilson's disease is an identified cause that results in an increased accumulation of copper in the liver, brain, and other organs. It is noted that Coombs negative hemolytic anaemia is also seen in the clinical spectrum of Wilson's disease, however, Coombs positivity has not been documented. We present a case of a young female who had an undiagnosed chronic liver disease (CLD). The patient developed acute decompensation with HEV infection along with Coombs positive hemolytic anaemia. Her autoimmune hepatitis screen was negative, so the patient was worked up for other causes of CLD, which led to a diagnosis of underlying Wilson's disease. The patient was started on penicillamine and zinc acetate. However, during the disease, the patient developed acute decompensation and unfortunately expired before her transplant could take place. Our case documentation is of importance as Coombs positivity in patients with Wilson's disease has not been reported before. Attending physicians should be suspicious of Wilson's disease in a patient with Coombs positive hemolytic anaemia when other causes cannot be identified. It is also important to promptly identify any other cause of CLD to educate patients regarding factors leading to acute decompensation and progression to ACLF.

Acute hepatitis E virus superinfection increases mortality in patients with cirrhosis

Background

Although acute hepatitis E is not fatal in healthy individuals, it is unclear whether hepatitis E superinfection increases the mortality in patients with pre-existing liver disease. Thus, we investigated the prognosis of patients with acute hepatitis E according to their cirrhosis diagnosis, and the prognosis according to the development of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) in patients with cirrhosis and chronic liver disease (CLD).

Methods

This study included 74 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with acute viral hepatitis E between January 2007 and December 2019. Of them, 39 patients without CLD, 13 patients with non-cirrhotic CLD, and 22 patients with cirrhotic CLD were analyzed.

Results

Among the 74 patients with HEV infection, 7 (9.5%) died within 180 days: 5 with underlying cirrhosis (71.4%) and 2 without cirrhosis (28.6%). The 180-day mortality was significant higher for patients with cirrhosis than for patients without cirrhosis (22.7% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.013). The age- and sex-adjusted proportional-hazard model revealed an approximately eightfold increase in the 180-day mortality risk in patients with cirrhosis compared to patients without cirrhosis. In addition, development of hepatitis E virus-related ACLF due to acute liver function deterioration in patients with pre-existing CLD or cirrhosis worsened the 180-day mortality rate.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the acute hepatitis E mortality rate was low in healthy individuals but higher in patients with cirrhosis, and especially high in those with ACLF.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07050-w.

Hepatitis E virus infection in a patient with alcohol related chronic liver disease: a case report of acute-on-chronic liver failure

Background

The hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection has been described as a causing factor for acute-on-chronic-liver-failure (ACLF) in patients with underlying chronic liver disease (CLD), such as chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, which could end in the failure of one or more organs and high short-term mortality. There are scarce data about the association of HEV in patients with chronic liver disorders in South America.

Case presentation

A 56-year-old hypertensive male with a history of type 2 diabetes was diagnosed with alcohol-related-liver cirrhosis in February 2019. A year later, the patient was admitted to hospital due to fatigue, jaundice and acholia. No evidence of hepatitis A virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, Epstein–Barr virus, herpes zoster virus and cytomegalovirus infections were found. Nevertheless, in February and March, 2020 the patient was positive for HEV-IgM and HEV-IgG, and HEV genotype 3 RNA was detected in sera. Afterwards, he presented grade I hepatic encephalopathy and, therefore, was diagnosed with acute hepatitis E-on-chronic liver disease. The patient reported a recent travel to the Argentine coast, where he consumed seafood. Besides, he reveled to have consumed pork meat and had no history of blood transfusion.

Conclusion

This report describes a unique case of hepatitis E virus infection in a patient with alcohol-related cirrhosis. This is the first report of a patient with HEV-related ACLF in Argentina and it invokes the importance of HEV surveillance and treatment among patients with CLD, such as alcohol-related cirrhosis.

An Autopsy Case of Primary Biliary Cholangitis with Histological Submassive Hepatic Necrosis Caused by Acute Hepatitis E Virus Infection

A 59-year-old woman who had been diagnosed with cirrhotic primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) 5 years earlier was admitted for severe jaundice (total bilirubin: 30.1 mg/dL). We suspected that her cirrhotic PBC had deteriorated acutely for some reason. Her general condition deteriorated quickly, and she passed away on day 18 of admission. Hepatitis E virus (HEV)-IgA antibodies were positive, and Genotype 3b HEV involvement was confirmed from a blood sample taken on admission. Histopathological findings revealed cirrhosis and submassive loss and necrosis of hepatocytes. Clinicians should consider the possibility of acute HEV infection as a trigger for acute PBC exacerbation.

Need for hepatitis A prevention in patients with chronic liver disease in the changing epidemiological setting of India

The burden of chronic liver disease (CLD) in India is high, particularly among middle-aged men, with nearly 220,000 deaths due to cirrhosis in 2017. CLD increases the risk of infection, severe disease (e.g. hepatitis A virus or HAV superinfection, acute-on-chronic liver failure, fulminant hepatic failure), and mortality. Hence, various countries recommend HAV vaccination for CLD patients. While historic Indian studies showed high seroprevalences of protective HAV antibodies among Indian adults with CLD, the most recent ones found that nearly 7% of CLD patients were susceptible to HAV infection. Studies in healthy individuals have shown that HAV infection in childhood is decreasing in India, resulting in an increasing population of adults susceptible to HAV infection. As patients with CLD are at increased risk of severe HAV infection, now may be the time to recommend HAV vaccination among people with CLD in India.

Hepatitis E virus seroprevalence in patients with chronic hepatitis C at a university hospital in Brazil

Aim: We investigated the prevalence of anti-hepatitis E virus (HEV) antibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis C and the relationship with liver injury stage. Materials & methods: In total, 451 patients were included and the presence of anti-HEV antibodies was evaluated by ELISA. Results: Anti-HEV IgG antibodies were detected in 45 (10.0%) patients and anti-HEV IgM were detected in two IgG-positive patients (4.4%). The distributions of liver fibrosis, steatosis, inflammatory activity, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance and liver enzyme levels were similar between HEV-positive and HEV-negative patients. However, HEV-positive patients had a higher mean age (p = 0.030). The seroprevalence by age group increased from 2.2 (18–30 years) to 53.3% (>60 years). HEV infection was not related to advanced fibrosis. Conclusion: This investigation showed that the seroprevalence of HEV among patients with chronic hepatitis C is similar to that of blood donors in the same region.

Viral Hepatitis E and Chronicity: A Growing Public Health Concern

Hepatitis E viral infection recently emerges as a global health concern. Over the last decade, the understanding of hepatitis E virus (HEV) had changed with the discovery of new genotypes like genotype-7 and genotype-8 with associated host and mode of infection. Diversification in the mode of hepatitis E infection transmission through blood transfusion, and organ transplants in contrast to classical feco-oral and zoonotic mode is the recent medical concern. The wide spectrum of infection ranging from self-limiting to acute liver failure is now overpowered by HEV genotype-specific chronic infection especially in transplant patients. This concern is further escalated by the extra-hepatic manifestations of HEV targeting the central nervous system (CNS), kidney, heart, and pancreas. However, with the development of advanced efficient cell culture systems and animal models simulating the infection, much clarity toward understanding the pathogenetic mechanism of HEV has been developed. Also this facilitates the development of vaccines research or therapeutics. In this review, we highlight all the novel findings in every aspect of HEV with special emphasis on recently emerging chronic mode of infection with specific diagnosis and treatment regime with an optimistic hope to help virologists and/or liver specialists working in the field of viral hepatitis.

HCV and HEV: two players in an Egyptian village, a study of prevalence, incidence, and co-infection

The highest recorded hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence worldwide is in Egypt. A high prevalence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) in chronic liver disease has been reported. The aim of this study was to study prevalence, incidence, and outcome of HCV infection in an Egyptian Nile Delta village and the relation between HEV infection and HCV-related chronic hepatic affection. This prospective cohort study included 2085 Nagreej village residents. Mass HCV screening was conducted and testing for HEV antibodies among HCV-infected patients performed. The annual incidence of HCV was recorded. Five hundred five (24.22%) of the tested villagers were positive for HCV RNA. Prevalence escalated with age and male sex. The main recorded risk factors were a history of surgery, dental procedures, hospitalization, blood transfusion, and antischistosomal treatment. HEV IgG antibody was positive in 71.4% of individuals with chronic HCV and 96.1% with advanced liver disease (cirrhosis ± hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)). After 1 year, 29 of the 1390 HCV Ab negative villagers had a positive HCV PCR, placing an annual incidence of new HCV infections at 2.09%. The Egyptian HCV prevalence remains high with infection particularly among the elderly. The annual incidence in a small Nile Delta village is 2.086%. HCV-HEV co-infection may lead to a worse prognosis among Egyptians with chronic liver disease.

Poor Outcomes of Acute Hepatitis E in Patients With Cirrhotic Liver Diseases Regardless of Etiology

Background: Chronic liver diseases (CLDs) have been documented to exacerbate clinical outcomes of acute hepatitis E (AHE). This study aimed to uncover the role of etiology and status of CLD in the adverse outcomes of AHE. We found that superinfection with hepatitis E virus (HEV) in patients with cirrhotic CLD can cause a worsen outcome, leading to exacerbation of AHE, compared with HEV-infected patients without CLD or with noncirrhotic CLD. Additional analysis revealed that the etiology of CLD is not associated with outcomes of AHE patients. These finding suggests that the overall liver status plays a predominant role in determining the outcomes of AHE.

Incidence, predictors and prognosis of genotype 4 hepatitis E related liver failure: A tertiary nested case-control study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection has been recognized an important insult of acute or acute-on-chronic liver failure (A(C)LF). This study aimed to identify the incidence, predictors and outcomes of A(C)LF in patients with hepatitis E.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed of hepatitis E between 2012 and 2018 in the tertiary hospital were retrospectively and consecutively analysed. Patients with hepatitis E who developed A(C)LF were enrolled as cases (HEV-LF) and controls were randomly selected from those who did not develop liver failure with 1:3 ratio in the same cohort.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and nine patients were diagnosed with hepatitis E, among which 80 were identified with HEV-related liver failure (HEV-LF) with HEV as the solely acute aetiology of A(C)LF. Sequencing of HEV genome showed genotype (GT) 4 strains in all available serum samples. Hepatitis E patients with cirrhosis underwent higher risk to develop liver failure, compared to non-cirrhotic patients. Hydrothorax, respiratory infections, lower γ-glutamyl transferase, higher lactate dehydrogenase and alpha-foetoprotein were found to be independent predictors of A(C)LF in patients with hepatitis E. The 28-day and 90-day mortality for HEV-LF was 12.86% and 30.36% respectively. Renal injury and lower triglyceride were independent factors associated with 28-day mortality. Lower alanine aminotransferase and higher International normalized ratio were independent predictors of 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with GT4 hepatitis E are at high risk to develop A(C)LF. Different CLD status impacted the incidence of HEV-LF distinctively. The identified variables shall help to identify HEV patients with high risk for developing liver failure and the risk for death.

Unexpected high seroprevalence of hepatitis E virus in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of the present study was to describe the frequency of HEV infection and associated risk factors in patients with cirrhosis from Argentina.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated HEV seroprevalence (IgG anti-HEV) and acute infections (IgM and RNA) in patients with cirrhosis (n = 140) vs. healthy controls (n = 300). Additionally, we compared the same outcomes in individuals with alcohol-related cirrhosis (n = 43) vs. patients with alcohol use disorder (without cirrhosis, n = 72).

RESULTS

The overall HEV seroprevalence in the cohort of subjects with cirrhosis was 25% (35/140), compared to 4% in the healthy control group [12/300; OR = 8; (95% CI = 4-15.99); p<0.05]. HEV seropositivity was significantly higher in alcohol-related cirrhosis compared to other causes of cirrhosis [39.5% vs. 12.4%; OR = 4.71; (95% CI = 1.9-11.6); p<0.05] and to healthy controls [OR = 15.7; (95% CI = 6.8-36.4); p = 0.0001]. The HEV seroprevalence in alcoholic-related cirrhosis vs. with alcohol use disorder was 39.5% vs. 12.5% [OR = 4.58; (95% CI = 1.81-11.58); p<0.001].

CONCLUSION

We found a high seroprevalence of HEV in patients with cirrhosis and in individuals with alcohol use disorder. The simultaneous presence of both factors (cirrhosis + alcohol) showed more association to HEV infection. Larger studies with prospective follow up are needed to further clarify this interaction.

Variable Outcome of Acute Viral Hepatitis in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients in Bangladesh

Diabetes mellitus (DM) are common in Bangladesh, and this country is also well-known for frequent outbreaks of acute viral hepatitis (AVH). The study presented here was designed for the clinical courses of acute hepatitis with and without DM. A total of 300 patients with AVH were enrolled into two groups; group A; patients of AVH with DM (N = 140) and group B; patients with AVH without DM (N = 160). There was no significant difference regarding age, sex, and levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) between the two groups. The main cause of AVH was hepatitis E virus (HEV) in 100 and 112 patients of groups A and B, respectively. Jaundice persisted for more than 6 months in 68 of 140 (49%) patients of group A, whereas, this was found in only 11 of 160 patients of group B. Forty-two patients of group A showed evidence of esophageal varices; however, the endoscopic assessment did not reveal any abnormality in patients with group B. Moderate to several hepatic fibrosis was seen in 19 of 140 patients with group A, however, these were not detected in any patient of group B (patient with AVH without DM). Even more important is the fact that four patients of group A died of liver failure, whereas there was no mortality in any patient of group B. The study presented here indicates that all patients with DM with superimposed AVH should be carefully followed up with the possibility of development of severe liver diseases and even mortality.

How to cite this article: Harun-or-Rashid, Khan MR, et al. Variable Outcome of Acute Viral Hepatitis in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients in Bangladesh. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol 2019;9(1): 20-22.

High seroprevalence of anti-Hepatitis E antibodies in Austrian patients with autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Increasing numbers of autochthonous hepatitis E virus infections have been reported in Europe. Chronic infections have been shown in immune-compromised patients after solid organ transplantation. Hepatitis E virus might be a possible trigger for autoimmune hepatitis and might cause disease flares or relapses in the further course of disease. Aim of this study was to investigate the presence of hepatitis E virus antibodies and hepatitis E virus RNA, and to analyse their impact on immunosuppressive treatment in patients with autoimmune hepatitis.

METHODS

Sera from 92 autoimmune hepatitis patients (73/79.3% female, age: 42.2 ± 16.3 years [mean ± SD]) were tested. Patients were scored according to the simplified and revised scoring systems of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. The prevalence of anti- hepatitis E virus antibodies (Beijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy Enterprises Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) and hepatitis E virus RNA was determined.

RESULTS

19/20.7% autoimmune hepatitis patients tested positive for hepatitis E virus-IgG, which was higher than in previous reports of healthy Austrian individuals (12.4%, P = 0.031); hepatitis E virus RNA was not detectable in any patient. Anti-hepatitis E virus positive patients were older (49.5 ± 9.5 vs 40.4 ± 17.2 years [mean ± SD], P = 0.033) but did not differ in laboratory findings at diagnosis (AST: 14.6 [1.3-70.6] vs 9.5 [0.7-62.7] × ULN [median/range]; P = 0.387, alanine aminotransferase: 18.3 [1.6-62.7] vs. 12.9 [0.8-62.6] × ULN; P = 0.511; IgG: 1.4 [1.0-2.5] vs 1.3 [0.6-3.8] g/dL × ULN; P = 0.278) nor in alanine aminotransferase levels after six months (0.7 [0.5-2.4] vs 1.0 U/L × ULN [0.1-22.4]; P = 0.077).

CONCLUSIONS

No chronic hepatitis E virus infection was observed in our cohort of autoimmune hepatitis patients. Anti- hepatitis E virus-IgG positive patients were older and the seroprevalence was nearly twice as high as reported previously in healthy Austrian individuals, suggesting that hepatitis E virus-infection might act as trigger for the development of autoimmune hepatitis.

Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: Etiology of Chronic and Acute Precipitating Factors and Their Effect on Mortality

BACKGROUND

The present study is planned to assess etiologies, course, and outcome in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).

METHODS

Two hundred and eight (182 males and 26 females) patients of ACLF fulfilling modified Asia Pacific Association For Study Of Liver Consensus criteria 2009 admitted to the gastroenterology department of SMS Medical College and hospital, Jaipur, between October 2015 and December 2017 were included. We evaluated etiology of underlying chronic disease and the acute event precipitating decompensation in ACLF.

RESULTS

Most common etiology of chronic liver disease (CLD) was alcohol with 133 (63.94 %) patients. Viral hepatitis, cryptogenic cirrhosis, autoimmunity, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and Wilson disease as causes of CLD were present in 32 (15.4%), 29 (13.94%), 9 (4.3%), 3 (1.4%), and 2 (1%) cases, respectively. Alcohol, sepsis, bleeding, reactivation of hepatitis B, hepatitis E, antitubercular drugs, and autoimmune hepatitis as the causes of acute event were present in 100 (48.08%), 34 (16.35%), 19 (9.1%), 17 (8.2 %), 15 (7.2%), 13 (6.25%), and 2 (0.96%) patients, respectively. In 8 (3.85%) patients, the precipitating event could not be known. Mortality (in-hospital) in this study was 37.5%. Higher model for end-stage liver disease score and high Child-Turcotte-Pugh score score were significantly associated with mortality (P <0.001). Patients with higher ACLF grade were associated with higher mortality. Alcohol as a cause of CLD was significantly associated with mortality (p=0.0146, 95% confidence interval between 3.802 and 30.979). There was no significant difference regarding acute precipitating events between survivors and nonsurvivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Alcohol was the most common cause for chronic etiology as well as acute precipitating event. Alcohol as a cause of CLD was significantly associated with mortality.

Infections in Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation has become an important treatment modality for patients with end-stage liver disease/cirrhosis, acute liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens for liver transplantation have improved significantly over the past 20 years, infectious complications continue to contribute to the morbidity and mortality in this patient population. The use of standardized screening protocols for both donors and recipients, coupled with targeted prophylaxis against specific pathogens, has helped to mitigate the risk of infection in liver transplant recipients. Patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis have immunological deficits that place them at increased risk for infection while awaiting liver transplantation. The patient undergoing liver transplantation is prone to develop healthcare-acquired infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms that could potentially affect patient outcomes after transplantation. The complex nature of liver transplant surgery that involves multiple vascular and hepatobiliary anastomoses further increases the risk of infection after liver transplantation. During the early post-transplantation period, healthcare-acquired bacterial and fungal infections are the most common types of infection encountered in liver transplant recipients. The period of maximal immunosuppression that occurs at 1–6 months after transplantation can be complicated by opportunistic infections due to both primary infection and reactivation of latent infection. Severe community-acquired infections can complicate the course of liver transplantation beyond 12 months after transplant surgery. This chapter provides an overview of liver transplantation including indications, donor-recipient selection criteria, surgical procedures, and immunosuppressive therapies. A focus on infections in patients with chronic liver disease/cirrhosis and an overview of the specific infectious complications in liver transplant recipients are presented.

Role of Hepatitis E Virus Infection in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Chronic liver disease (CLD) with a variety of causes is currently reported to be one of the main causes of death worldwide. Patients with CLD experience deteriorating liver function and fibrosis, progressing to cirrhosis, chronic hepatic decompensation (CHD), end-stage liver disease (ESLD), and death. Patients may develop acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), typically related to a precipitating event and associated with increased mortality. The objective of this review was to analyze the role of acute hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection in patients with CLD, focusing on the impact of this infection on patient survival and prognosis in several world regions.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on hepatitis E virus infection

Infection with hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, representing an important global health problem. Our understanding of HEV has changed completely over the past decade. Previously, HEV was thought to be limited to certain developing countries. We now know that HEV is endemic in most high-income countries and is largely a zoonotic infection. Given the paradigm shift in our understanding of zoonotic HEV and that locally acquired HEV is now the commonest cause of acute viral hepatitis in many European countries, the focus of these Clinical Practice Guidelines will be on HEV genotype 3 (and 4).

Absence of chronic hepatitis E virus infection in liver transplant recipients: Report from a hyperendemic region

Most cases of chronic hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection in solid organ transplant recipients are attributable to genotype 3. Although India is hyperendemic for HEV genotype 1, chronic infection in transplant patients has not been reported. In this study, 30 liver transplant recipients were followed up by systematic testing for various markers of HEV (IgM, IgG, HEV-Ag, and RNA) on blood and stool samples obtained pre-transplant, and then at 3 and 6 months post-transplant to look for HEV exposure and persistence. Evidence of HEV infection was found in 6 (20%) cases post-transplant but none of the recipients demonstrated active viremia or antigenemia. This suggests that the circulating genotype of HEV in our population might have limited potential to cause chronic infections.

Comparison of hepatitis E virus seroprevalence between HBsAg-positive population and healthy controls in Shandong province, China

Background

Persons with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection were reported to suffer severe disease after hepatitis E virus (HEV) superinfection, but the studies regarding HEV seroprevalence in this population were limited. A recent study in Vietnam found higher HEV seroprevalence among CHB patients compared with healthy controls.

Methods

A community-based case-control study was conducted in two counties of Shandong province, China, where hepatitis E incidence was at the highest (Rushan) and lowest (Zhangqiu) in the province based on data from routine public health surveillance. Four townships were selected randomly from each county and all residents in these townships were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Those tested positive for HBsAg (CHB group) and the 1:1 age and sex-matched HBsAg-negative residents (control group) were included. Anti-HEV IgM and IgG were tested and positive rates of IgG and IgM were compared between the CHB group and the control group.

Results

In total, 2048 CHB participants and 2054 controls were included in the study. In the CHB group, HEV IgG seroprevalence was 9.16% (95% CI: 7.47–11.09) in Zhangqiue and 38.06% (95% CI: 35.07–41.19) in Rushan (P < 0.001); the corresponding rates of IgM were 0.1% (95% CI: 0.002–0.54) and 1.57% (95% CI: 0.90–2.53), respectively (P < 0.001). HEV IgG seroprevalence was similar between CHB group and the control group in both counties (P = 0.21, P = 0.47, respectively) and the same results were found for the positive rate of IgM (P = 0.103, P = 0.262, respectively). Multivariable analysis showed the status of HBsAg was not independently associated with the status of anti-HEV IgG in either Zhangqiu or Rushan [P = 0.187, OR = 1.23(95% CI: 0.90, 1.68); P = 0.609, OR = 1.05 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.26)].

Conclusions

The seroprevalence of HEV varies greatly in different geographic areas, but the seroprevalence is similar between populations with and without CHB. CHB patients residing in high HEV endemic areas might be at higher risk for HBV-HEV superinfection.

Prophylactic Hepatitis E Vaccine

Hepatitis E has been increasingly recognized as an underestimated global disease burden in recent years. Subpopulations with more serious infection-associated damage or death include pregnant women, patients with basic liver diseases, and elderly persons. Vaccine would be the most effective means for prevention of HEV infection. The lack of an efficient cell culture system for HEV makes the development of classic inactive or attenuated vaccine infeasible. Hence, the recombinant vaccine approaches are explored deeply. The neutralizing sites are located almost exclusively in the capsid protein, pORF2, of the virion. Based on pORF2, many vaccine candidates showed potential of protecting primate animals; two of them were tested in human and evidenced to be well tolerated in adults and highly efficacious in preventing hepatitis E. The world's first hepatitis E vaccine, Hecolin^® (HEV 239 vaccine), was licensed in China and launched in 2012.

Hepatitis E virus infection as a promoting factor for hepatocellular carcinoma in Cameroon: Preliminary Observations

OBJECTIVES

To determine the seroprevalence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection in patients with chronic hepatitis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to assess its potential consequences for disease progression.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective case-control study on patients with HCC hepatitis B or C related and non-HCC patients including patients with CLD and patients without clinical evidence of liver disease. Anti-HEV IgG and IgM were tested by ELISA using commercially available kits. Liver damage was assessed by alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, platelets and prothrombin measurements.

RESULTS

We observed a significant anti-HEV IgG carriage in HCC patients compared to non-HCC subjects with CLD (41.8% vs 12.6%; P=9.1 E-6; OR=4.8, 95%CI: 2.3-10.6). HCC patients with HEV infection display more profound alterations of circulating liver enzymes, platelets count and prothrombin time than HCC patients without sero-reactivity to HEV.

CONCLUSION

Overall, this study indicates a high prevalence of HEV infection in Cameroonian patients with CLD and HCC. These data suggest either that patients with liver tumors are more susceptible to hepeviral infection or that, in a tropical context, HEV might promote the progression of liver diseases towards tumor.

High seroprevalence against hepatitis E virus in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) genotype 3 is endemic in Europe. Superinfection with HEV in patients with underlying chronic liver disease can cause hepatic decompensation leading to increased morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVES

The prevalence of anti-HEV antibodies was investigated in 204 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and different stages of fibrosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Sera were analyzed for anti-HEV IgG, IgM and HEV RNA.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 55 years (IQR 40-62 years); 126 (62%) were men. Ninety-eight (48%) patients had a METAVIR fibrosis stage F2 or higher. The prevalence of anti-HEV IgG was 30% (62/204), which was significantly higher than among Swedish blood donors (17%, p<0.01). The prevalence of anti-HEV antibodies was associated with higher age (OR 1.08 (1.05-1.11); p<0.01). It was also higher for patients with a prior history of blood transfusion (48%) as compared to intravenous drug use (IDU; 26%) as the risk factor for acquisition of the HCV infection (OR 2.72 (1.2-6.19); p<0.02). The prevalence of anti-HEV IgG was also significantly higher in patients with significant fibrosis, i.e. ≥F2 (38%; OR 2.04 (1.11-3.76); p=0.02) and/or neoplasm (72%; OR 7.27 (2.46-21.44); p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

When adjusted for age, the prevalence of anti-HEV antibodies was significantly higher in patients with previous or current malignant liver disease compared to blood donors. The lack of significant correlation between HCV and HEV infections indicate low level of transmission of HEV by IDU. HEV infections warrant more attention, especially in patients with preexisting liver disease.

Clinical features of acute hepatitis E super-infections on chronic hepatitis B

AIM

To examine the clinical features and risk factors for adverse outcomes in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) superimposed with hepatitis E virus (HEV).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 228 patients with acute HEV infection (showing clinical acute hepatitis symptomology and positivity for anti-HEV immunoglobulin M) with underlying CHB (confirmed by positivity for hepatitis B surface antigen and/or hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA over 6 mo) who had been admitted to the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, which represents the regional tertiary hospital for infectious diseases in Shanghai city, China. Data for adverse outcomes were collected, and included severe liver diseases (defined as liver failure and/or acute liver decompensation) and liver-related mortality. Logistic regression modeling was performed to determine the risk factors for adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

The symptoms caused by superimposed acute hepatitis E (AHE) were much more severe in cirrhotic patients (n = 94) than in non-cirrhotic patients (n = 134), as evidenced by significantly higher liver complications (77.7% vs 28.4%, P < 0.001) and mortality rate (21.3% vs 7.5%, P = 0.002). Most of the cirrhotic patients (n = 85, 90.4%) had no prior decompensation. Among the non-cirrhotic patients, superimposed AHE caused progressively more severe diseases that corresponded with the CHB disease stages, from immune tolerant to immune reactivation phases. Few risk factors were identified in the cirrhotic patients, but risk factors for non-cirrhotic patients were found to be intermediate HBV DNA levels (OR: 5.1, P = 0.012), alcohol consumption (OR: 6.4, P = 0.020), and underlying diabetes (OR: 7.5, P = 0.003) and kidney diseases (OR: 12.7, P = 0.005). Only 28.7% of the cirrhotic patients and 9.0% of the non-cirrhotic patients had received anti-HBV therapy previously and, in all cases, the efficacy had been suboptimal.

CONCLUSION

CHB-related cirrhosis and intermediate HBV DNA level were associated with severe disease in superinfected patients, and successful antiviral treatment might counter this outcome.

Hepatitis E Virus Does Not Contribute to Hepatic Decompensation Among Patients With Advanced Chronic Hepatitis C

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatitis E (HEV) can cause acute-on-chronic liver failure in persons with pre-existing liver disease. We investigated whether HEV infection contributes to hepatic decompensation in patients with previously stable, advanced chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study using stored serum samples from subjects enrolled in the randomized phase of the Hepatitis C Antiviral Long-Term Treatment Against Cirrhosis Trial (n = 1050; mean age, 51 y; 70% male; 40% with cirrhosis at baseline). Cases were subjects who developed hepatic decompensation within a 24-week period. Controls (3 per case) were subjects without hepatic decompensation matched for fibrosis stage and followed up for a similar period. A serum sample obtained within 6 months after the decompensation event in cases and the same follow-up period in controls were tested for anti-HEV IgG. Subjects with a positive result had a baseline sample similarly tested for anti-HEV IgG. We measured levels of anti-HEV IgM and HEV RNA in blood samples from incident cases.

RESULTS

Of the 1050 subjects analyzed, 314 (30%) experienced a clinical event. Of the 314 subjects who experienced decompensation as defined, 89 (28%) were tested for anti-HEV, along with 267 controls (without decompensation). Similar proportions of cases and controls tested positive for anti-HEV (22.5% and 20.6%, respectively; P = .70). Ten incident HEV infections were identified-4 in cases (4.5%) and 6 in controls (2.2%) (P = .28). HEV RNA was not detected in blood samples from the 10 incident infections. Only 2 of the 4 incident infections among cases were related temporally to the decompensation event.

CONCLUSIONS

HEV does not appear to be a significant cause of hepatic decompensation among persons with previously stable, advanced chronic hepatitis C in the United States.

Hepatitis E virus: Current epidemiology and vaccine

Hepatitis E virus infections have been continuously reported in Indian subcontinent, Africa, southeast and central Asia, posing great health threats to the public, especially to pregnant women. Hecolin® is the only licensed HEV vaccine developed by Xiamen Innovax Biotech Co., Ltd. Extensive characterizations on antigenicity, physicochemical properties, efficacy in clinical trials, and manufacturing capability have made Hecolin® a promising vaccine for HEV control. However, there are many obstacles in large scale application of Hecolin®. Efforts are needed to further evaluate safety and efficacy in HEV risk populations, and to complement HEV standards for quality control. Passing World Health Organization prequalification and licensing outside China are priorities as these are also hindering Hecolin® promotion. Multilateral cooperation among Chinese vaccine manufacturers, Chinese National Regulatory Authorization (NRA) and WHO will expedite the entrance of Hecolin® into international market, so that Hecolin® could play its due role in global hepatitis E control.

Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) in Coastal Eastern India: "A Single-Center Experience"

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Acute-On-Chronic liver failure (ACLF) is an emerging entity. The present study was undertaken to analyze the clinical profile and natural course of ACLF patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ACLF was defined as per Asia Pacific Association for the Study of Liver consensus criteria 2009. Patients fulfilling these criteria with some deviations were included and prospectively evaluated for clinical profile, etiologies of acute decompensation (AD) and underlying chronic liver disease, and short-term natural course [3 months].

RESULTS

Out of 123 patients with ACLF (mean age: 45.83 ± 12.05 years; male:female 109:14), 45.53% cases had prior history of AD, and 54.47% presented for the first time as ACLF. Etiologies of cirrhosis were alcohol, cryptogenic, and chronic hepatitis B virus infection in 65.04%, 23.57%, and 11.38% cases, respectively. Recent history of alcohol intake (within 4 weeks) [42.27%] followed by bacterial infections [36.58%] were the common etiologic precipitants for AD. Only 87 (70.73%) out of 123 cases could be followed up for a duration of 3 months; 62 (71.26%) cases died by 3 months. Most deaths occurred in the alcoholics compared to nonalcoholics [(43/53) 81.13% vs. (19/34) 55.88%; P = 0.01]. No significant difference in mortality rate was observed between ACLF cases with history of prior AD compared to newly diagnosed ACLF cases [30/40 (75%) vs. 32/47 (68.09%); P = 0.477]. The prognostic markers [MELD, MELD-Na, CTP] were not significantly different between survivors and nonsurvivors.

CONCLUSION

ACLF patients in our population had high short-term mortality rates with majority of deaths in alcoholics. Alcohol intake and bacterial infections were mainly responsible for AD in our study.

Prophylaxis against hepatitis E: at risk populations and human vaccines

Hepatitis E is an emerging global disease caused by hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection. While in developing countries the infection was primarily due to poor sanitary conditions through intake of contaminated water or undercooked meats of infected animals, increasing cases of chronic hepatitis E resulting in rapidly progressive liver cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease have been reported in organ transplant patients or in immune compromised patients in developed countries. Fortunately, hepatitis E is now a vaccine preventable disease with a HEV239 based vaccine licensed for human use. Much work is needed to enable its use outside China. This review recounted the development process of the vaccine, outlined the critical quality attributes of the vaccine antigen and, most importantly, listed the populations at risk for HEV infection and the subsequent disease. These at risk populations could benefit the most from the vaccination if the vaccine is widely adopted.

Hepatitis E Virus Infection as a Possible Cause of Acute Liver Failure in Europe

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In Western countries, infection with the hepatitis E virus (HEV) is considered to be rare and imported from endemic regions. However, the prevalence of HEV infection has increased among adults in central Europe. HEV infection can cause acute liver failure (ALF), but there have been only a few confirmed cases of HEV-associated ALF in Europe. We investigated the number of cases of indeterminate ALF associated with HEV infection.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 80 patients diagnosed with ALF or acute hepatitis at the University Hospital Essen in Germany from November 2006 through December 2013. Clinical data were collected from the hospital databases; archived sera were tested for IgG and IgM against HEV, as well as HEV RNA.

RESULTS

Sera from 12 patients (15%) tested positive for IgG against HEV IgG; 7 of these samples did not test positive for HEV IgM or HEV RNA. Sera from 64 patients (80%) did not test positive for IgG or IgM against HEV or HEV RNA. Sera from 8 patients (10%) tested positive for HEV RNA (only 4 of these were positive for HEV IgG) and had clinical findings to support acute HEV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

In a hospital in Germany, approximately 10% to 15% of patients with ALF had evidence for HEV infection. Serologic tests for IgG against HEV are insufficient to identify or exclude HEV infection; tests for HEV RNA also should be performed on patients with ALF of ambiguous etiology.

Prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients treated with artificial liver support system

AIM: To establish a new model for predicting survival in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients treated with an artificial liver support system.

METHODS: One hundred and eighty-one ACLF patients who were admitted to the hospital from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 and were treated with an artificial liver support system were enrolled in this retrospective study, including a derivation cohort (n = 113) and a validation cohort (n = 68). Laboratory parameters at baseline were analyzed and correlated with clinical outcome. In addition to standard medical therapy, ACLF patients underwent plasma exchange (PE) or plasma bilirubin adsorption (PBA) combined with plasma exchange. For the derivation cohort, Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate survival curves, and Cox regression was used in survival analysis to generate a prognostic model. The performance of the new model was tested in the validation cohort using a receiver-operator curve.

RESULTS: The mean overall survival for the derivation cohort was 441 d (95%CI: 379-504 d), and the 90- and 270-d survival probabilities were 70.3% and 58.3%, respectively. The mean survival times of patients treated with PBA plus PE and patients treated with PE were 531 d (95%CI: 455-605 d) and 343 d (95%CI: 254-432 d), respectively, which were significantly different (P = 0.012). When variables with bivariate significance were selected for inclusion into the multivariate Cox regression model, number of complications, age, scores of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and type of artificial liver support system were defined as independent risk factors for survival in ACLF patients. This new prognostic model could accurately discriminate the outcome of patients with different scores in this cohort (P < 0.001). The model also had the ability to assign a predicted survival probability for individual patients. In the validation cohort, the new model remained better than the MELD.

CONCLUSION: A novel model was constructed to predict prognosis and accurately discriminate survival in ACLF patients treated with an artificial liver support system.

Hepatitis E virus and fulminant hepatitis--a virus or host-specific pathology?

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Fulminant hepatitis is a rare outcome of infection with hepatitis E virus. Several recent reports suggest that virus variation is an important determinant of disease progression. To critically examine the evidence that virus-specific factors underlie the development of fulminant hepatitis following hepatitis E virus infection.

METHODS

Published sequence information of hepatitis E virus isolates from patients with and without fulminant hepatitis was collected and analysed using statistical tests to identify associations between virus polymorphisms and disease outcome.

RESULTS

Fulminant hepatitis has been reported following infection with all four hepatitis E virus genotypes that infect humans comprising multiple phylogenetic lineages within genotypes 1, 3 and 4. Analysis of virus sequences from individuals infected by a common source did not detect any common substitutions associated with progression to fulminant hepatitis. Re-analysis of previously reported associations between virus substitutions and fulminant hepatitis suggests that these were probably the result of sampling biases.

CONCLUSIONS

Host-specific factors rather than virus genotype, variants or specific substitutions appear to be responsible for the development of fulminant hepatitis.

Making the case for the development of a vaccination against hepatitis E virus

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is a global problem that affects 20 million individuals, and cause acute hepatitis in 3.5 million, with approximately 70,000 deaths worldwide per year. While the acute disease is generally self-limited, however, it may progress to fatal fulminant liver failure in certain individuals. Contaminated water supplies disseminate this virus through the faecal-oral route, and swine is thought to be its zoonotic reservoir. Attempts have been made to develop effective HEV vaccines, and two candidates have undergone successful clinical trials. In this review, we discuss HEV epidemiology, genotypes, microbiological structure, as well as the most recent advances in vaccination developments.

The impact of hepatitis E in the liver transplant setting

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection has been identified as a cause of graft hepatitis in liver transplant recipients. The true frequency and clinical importance of HEV infections after liver transplantations is a matter of debate. It is proposed that consumption of HEV-contaminated undercooked meat is a main source for HEV infections in developed countries--which might also account for some hepatitis E cases after organ transplantation. However, HEV is also transmitted by transfusion of blood products, likely representing a previously underestimated risk particularly for patients in the transplant setting. HEV infection can take chronic courses in immunocompromised individuals, associated in some cases with rapid progression to cirrhosis within 1-2 years of infection. Diagnosis in transplanted patients is based on HEV RNA testing as antibody assays are not sensitive enough. Selection of immunosuppressive drugs is important as different compounds may influence viral replication and the course of liver disease. Ribavirin has antiviral activity against HEV and should be administered for at least three months in chronically infected individuals; however, treatment failure may occur. HEV infections have also been linked to a variety of extrahepatic manifestations both during and after resolution of infection. In this review we summarize the emerging data on hepatitis E with a particular focus on the importance of HEV infections for liver transplant recipients.

Does leptospirosis behave adversely in cirrhosis of the liver?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Leptospirosis, endemic in India, is complicated by jaundice and renal failure. Whether leptospirosis could result in a worsening of preexisting chronic liver disease (CLD) is not known. Aim of the study was to analyze the clinical profile and natural course of leptospirosis in decompensated CLD in comparison to those acquiring the infection in an otherwise healthy individual.

METHODS

Cases were patients with liver cirrhosis who presented with fever and/or jaundice and were screened and found positive for leptospirosis. Controls were patients diagnosed to have leptospirosis during the same period, but in the absence of liver disease. Both cases and controls were followed up until recovery or death.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients had cirrhosis of the liver, and 91 controls had leptospirosis. Significantly more number of cirrhotics had jaundice (87.1 % vs. 16.5 %; p = 0.001), elevated blood urea (41.9 % vs. 18.7 %; p = 0.01), and serum creatinine (41.9 % vs. 19.8 %; p = 0.03) compared to the controls. There were four deaths due to hepatorenal dysfunction and coagulopathy in cirrhotics and no deaths in the control group (4 vs. 0; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Leptospirosis should be considered as yet another important cause of acute-on-chronic liver failure in endemic areas associated with poor outcome. Death is often due to hepatorenal dysfunction.

Need for immunization against hepatotropic viruses in children with chronic liver disease

OBJECTIVES

Infection with hepatotropic viruses is a common cause of acute deterioration and adverse outcome in children with chronic liver disease (CLD). Such superimposed infections may be preventable through vaccination. The present study aimed to evaluate the exposure rates of hepatitis A, B, and E viruses in children with CLD and suggest an optimal vaccination strategy.

METHODS

Children with CLD were prospectively evaluated with a demographic, clinical, and investigative proforma. Hepatitis B surface antigen positive cases were labeled as hepatitis B virus-CLD, and all other etiologies as non-HBV-related CLD. Patients were tested for exposure to hepatitis A (total anti-hepatitis A virus [HAV], immunoglobulin M anti-HAV), hepatitis B (hepatitis B surface antigen, total anti-hepatitis B core, anti-hepatitis B surface), and hepatitis E (IgG anti-hepatitis E virus).

RESULTS

A total of 142 children with CLD (age 9.1 ± 3.7 years, 83 [58.5%] boys) were enrolled. A total of 3.5% (5/142) and 38.7% (55/142) had received HAV and HBV vaccines, respectively. A total of 134 (94.4%) were total anti-HAV positive including 5 postimmunization patients, with higher positivity in those older than 5 years (19/25 vs 115/117; P = 0.001). Of the 115 patients with non-HBV-related CLD, 45 (39.1%) had exposure to HBV (40 total anti-hepatitis B core positive and 5 anti-HBs positive without immunization). Only 28 of 142 (19.7%) patients were IgG anti-HEV positive, with no difference across age.

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 90.8%, 39.1%, and 19.7% of children with CLD from the developing world are exposed to hepatitis A, B, and E infections, respectively. Selective hepatitis A vaccination (patients younger than 5 years of age) and universal hepatitis B vaccination are required to protect children with CLD. Sanitation improvement and HEV vaccine trial are needed for prevention against HEV.

Prognostic factors in acute-on-chronic liver failure: a prospective study from western India

The profile of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has not been reported from western India. This study was undertaken to analyze the etiology and clinical profile of patients with ACLF and correlate these with outcome. Fifty-four consecutive cases of ACLF were investigated for underlying chronic liver disease (CLD) and acute insult and followed up for 6 months. Mortality, Child–Pugh score, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score were recorded. The most common etiologies of CLD were hepatitis B (29.6 %) and cryptogenic (27.7 %). Prognosis was worse in patients with hepatitis B or alcohol as cause of CLD (mortality 79 %). Acute viral hepatitis A or E was the commonest cause of acute insult (33.3 %) and with statistically better outcome (60 % survival) as compared to sepsis, gastrointestinal bleed, or flare of HBV (survival 5 %, p < 0.05). On univariate analysis age, past history of decompensation, leukocytosis, serum bilirubin and creatinine, international normalized ratio, presence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, Child–Pugh score and hepatorenal syndrome were significant predictors of mortality. Multivariate analysis revealed a MELD score of >27 and presence of encephalopathy as independent predictors of mortality. Patients with ACLF had high mortality especially when they had underlying chronic hepatitis B or alcoholic liver disease. Presence of encephalopathy and MELD score were independent baseline predictors of mortality. Child–Pugh score was helpful for prognostication.

RNA-seq based transcriptome analysis of hepatitis E virus (HEV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) replicon transfected Huh-7 cells

Pathogenesis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is as varied as they appear similar; while HBV causes an acute and/or chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma, HEV mostly causes an acute self-limiting disease. In both infections, host responses are crucial in disease establishment and/or virus clearance. In the wake of worsening prognosis described during HEV super-infection over chronic HBV hepatitis, we investigated the host responses by studying alterations in gene expression in liver cells (Huh-7 cell line) by transfection with HEV replicon only (HEV-only), HBV replicon only (HBV-only) and both HBV and HEV replicons (HBV+HEV). Virus replication was validated by strand-specific real-time RT-PCR for HEV and HBsAg ELISA of the culture supernatants for HBV. Indirect immunofluorescence for the respective viral proteins confirmed infection. Transcription profiling was carried out by RNA Sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis of the poly-A enriched RNA from the transfected cells. Averages of 600 million bases within 5.6 million reads were sequenced in each sample and ∼15,800 genes were mapped with at least one or more reads. A total of 461 genes in HBV+HEV, 408 in HBV-only and 306 in HEV-only groups were differentially expressed as compared to mock transfection control by two folds (p<0.05) or more. Majority of the significant genes with altered expression clustered into immune-associated, signal transduction, and metabolic process categories. Differential gene expression of functionally important genes in these categories was also validated by real-time RT-PCR based relative gene-expression analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first report of in vitro replicon transfected RNA-Seq based transcriptome analysis to understand the host responses against HEV and HBV.

Patients with Diabetes Mellitus are Prone to Develop Severe Hepatitis and Liver Failure due to Hepatitis Virus Infection

BACKGROUND

Acute viral hepatitis (AVH) is usually a self-limiting illness. Diabetics are prone to develop liver diseases and liver regeneration is impaired in them. Natural course of AVH in diabetics has not been assessed and may be severe.

DESIGN

Observational prospective study to evaluate natural course of AVH in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Consecutive patients with AVH were included and categorized in to those with or without diabetes. Etiology, complications, mortality and recovery parameters of AVH were identified and compared between two groups.

RESULTS

131 consecutive AVH between March 2007 and March 2009 were evaluated; 12 diabetics and 83 non-diabetics (n = 95) were included for analysis. Hepatitis E was the commonest cause (n = 55, 57.89%) in the whole cohort. However, Hepatitis B virus (HBV) as the etiology was significantly higher among diabetics than in non-diabetics (58.33% vs. 25.3%, P = 0.02). In contrast, hepatitis E was the etiology in 61.44% of non-diabetics. Frequency of severe hepatitis was significantly higher in diabetics than in non-diabetics (5/12; 41.67% vs. 9/83; 10.64%, P < 0.005). 5 of 14 (36%) with severe hepatitis were diabetics. Liver failure and death occurred in 2 (16%) diabetics, while none among the non-diabetics had liver failure. Multiple variable logistic regression analysis revealed that acute hepatitis B (OR 4.7 (95% CI 1.34-16.47)) and diabetes (OR 4.0 (95% CI 0.96-16.47)) were associated with severe hepatitis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with diabetes are at risk to contact HBV infection and severe hepatitis.

Endemic hepatitis E in the Czech Republic

BACKGROUND

An increasing incidence of endemic hepatitis E (HE) has been reported in developed countries. Thus, an evaluation of the clinical characteristics of the disease and the utility of the current diagnostic methods is warranted.

METHODS

Fifty-one adult acute patients with HE hospitalized in a single center between the years 2009 and 2012 were evaluated. Serological and molecular techniques (detection of hepatitis E virus [HEV] RNA from stool and serum samples by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) with sequencing and phylogenetic analysis were used for diagnosis, and the clinical, laboratory, and epidemiological parameters of the patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-nine (96.1%) patients had acute endemic HE and 2 (3.9%) had an imported infection. In the cohort of patients with acute symptomatic HE (n = 47), men outnumbered women (40:7), the patients were in older middle age (mean, 60.57 years), and they had elevated median values of total bilirubin (6.67 mg/dL), alanine aminotransferase (2288.82 U/L), aspartate aminotransferase (1251.76 U/L), gamma-glutamyl transferase (360.53 U/L), and alkaline phosphatase (197.06 U/L). Serology was positive in 50 (98%) of the patients, and 1 case was diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction only. HEV RNA was detected in at least 1 specimen from 84.3% of the patients, and 28 of 29 tested isolates belonged to genotype 3. The eating of meat, innards, other home-prepared pork products, or the tasting of raw meat before cooking were the most frequently reported data (reported by 25 patients [49.0%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Large numbers of the endemic cases of HE were caused by HEV genotype 3, and the clinical characteristics of endemic HE were demonstrated.

Influence of chronic HBV infection on superimposed acute hepatitis E

AIM: To investigate the influence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection [based on the status of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), HBV DNA, and cirrhosis] on superimposed acute hepatitis E.

METHODS: A total of 294 patients were recruited from the Department of Infectious Diseases of the Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, from January 2003 to January 2012. The patients were classified into two groups: an HBV + hepatitis E virus (HEV) group (a group with chronic HBV infection that was superinfected with acute hepatitis E, n = 118) and an HEV group (a group with acute hepatitis E, n = 176). We retrospectively analyzed and compared the clinical features of the two groups. Statistical analyses were performed using the χ² test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and the Student’s t test for continuous variables. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS: The peak values of prothrombin time, serum total bilirubin, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores were significantly higher in the HBV + HEV group. More patients in the HBV + HEV group had complications (39.8% vs 16.5%, P = 0.000) and developed liver failure (35.6% vs 8.5%, P = 0.000). Additionally, the mortality of the HBV + HEV group was significantly higher (20.3% vs 7.4%, P = 0.002). Further analysis of the HBV + HEV group showed that there were no significant differences in complication occurrence, liver failure incidence, or mortality between patients with different HBeAg and HBV DNA statuses. However, in patients with underlying cirrhosis, complication occurrence and liver failure incidence significantly increased. In total, 12.7% of the patients in the HBV + HEV group received anti-HBV treatment, but this therapy failed to reduce mortality in patients who developed liver failure.

CONCLUSION: The presence of underlying cirrhosis in chronic HBV infection results in more severe clinical outcomes with superimposed acute hepatitis E. Anti-HBV treatment cannot improve the prognosis of liver failure caused by HBV-HEV superinfection.

Hepatitis E and Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is the most common cause of acute viral hepatitis (AVH) globally. It causes large scale epidemics of AVH across the low- and middle income countries in Asia and Africa, and also causes sporadic cases of AVH in the same geographical region. AVH due to HEV is usually an acute, self-limiting illness, similar in clinical presentation to AVH caused by hepatitis A virus (HAV). When HEV causes AVH in patients of chronic liver disease it may worsen rapidly to a syndrome called acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) leading to very high mortality. Acute deterioration of liver function in a patient with compensated chronic liver disease is the characteristic feature of ACLF. The typical disease course of patients with ACLF is the appearance of organ failure, which progresses to multi-organ failure and death. Many publications have reported HEV as one of the leading causes for ACLF from Asia and Africa, where HEV is endemic. The mortality rate of HEV-related ACLF (HEV-ACLF) ranges from 0% to 67% with a median being 34%. These patients require admission in the intensive care unit and they benefit from a team approach of clinicians with expertise in both hepatology and critical care. The goals of treatment are to prevent further deterioration in liver function, reverse precipitating factors, and support failing organs. Liver transplantation is required in selected patients to improve survival and quality of life. One preliminary report suggests that ribavirin may be an effective and safe drug for treatment of HEV-ACLF however this requires validation in large trials.

Immunogenicity and safety of hepatitis E vaccine in healthy hepatitis B surface antigen positive adults

A recombinant hepatitis E vaccine, Hecolin, has been proven safe and effective in healthy adults. As hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive individuals have a higher risk of poor prognosis after super-infection with hepatitis E virus (HEV), the safety and immunogenicity of Hecolin in this population should be assessed. The present study is an extending analysis of data from a large randomized controlled clinical trial of Hecolin. Healthy participants (n = 14,065) without current or previous evidence of chronic liver disease were randomized to receive Hecolin or placebo (hepatitis B vaccine) and donated their blood samples before vaccination and subsequently over 31 mo. Most of the adverse events were mild and comparable between participants with and without baseline hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Rates of serious adverse events in HBsAg (+) or HBsAg (-) participants were also comparable between both groups. Almost all participants in the Hecolin group seroconverted to anti-HEV one month after full vaccination. The antibody response rates and levels were similar in HBsAg (+) and HBsAg (-) participants (98.38%, 19.32 Wu/mL vs. 98.69%, 19.00 Wu/mL). The two-year antibody dynamics of HBsAg (+) participants overlapped perfectly with those of HBsAg (-) participants. In conclusion, the safety and immunogenicity of Hecolin for HBsAg (+) adults is very similar to that for the general population.