Comparison of an age adjusted warfarin loading protocol with empirical dosing and Fennerty's protocol

Chinese stroke patients with atrial fibrillation used Robert's age-adjusted warfarin loading protocol obtained good INR results within therapeutic range

To assess whether Roberts' age-adjusted warfarin loading protocol is effective in Chinese patients and whether the SAMeTT2R2 score can predict international normalized ratio (INR) control. Roberts' protocol for warfarin titration was applied to patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) complicated with ischemic stroke at the Department of Neurology between 2014 and 2019. Clinical and sociodemographic variables were recorded. A minimum of 1-year follow-up was used to calculate the time in therapeutic range (TTR) of the INR. A total of 94 acute ischemic stroke patients with NVAF were included in the study. Seventy-seven (81.9%) of the patients had attained stable INR (2.0-3.0) at the fifth dose, and 90.0% of the patients had achieved stable INR on the ninth day. Seventeen (18.1%) of the patients had an INR > 4 during dose-adjustment period. Patients with INR > 4 had significantly lower body weight (53.8 vs. 63.1 kg, P = 0.014), lower rate of achievement of stable INR (35.3% vs. 92.2%, P = 0.000), and lower rate of TTR ≥ 65% (23.5% vs. 70.1%, P = 0.001), but with no significant increase in bleeding risk. A total of 89 patients underwent long-term INR follow-up, of which 58 (65.2%) patients achieved TTR ≥ 65%. Patients with poor TTR had significantly lower body weight (56.3 vs. 63.7 kg, P = 0.020) and lower rate of stable INR achievement (64.5% vs. 89.7%, P = 0.002). All 94 patients had SAMeTT2R2 score ≥ 2. There was no linear association between SAMeTT2R2 score and the rate of TTR ≥ 65% (Ptrend = 0.095). Chinese ischemic stroke patients with NVAF on warfarin can safely and quickly achieve therapeutic INR using Roberts' age-adjusted protocol and can obtain a good TTR. Lower body weight may be a predictor of poor TTR and INR > 4. Patients who have not attained stable INR after adjusting the dose five times are at high risk for poor TTR. SAMeTT2R2 score may not predict TTR in Chinese ischemic stroke patients with NVAF.

Automated warfarin dose prediction for Asian, American, and Caucasian populations using a deep neural network

Existing warfarin dose prediction algorithms based on pharmacogenetics and clinical parameters have not been used clinically due to the absence of external validation, lack of assessment for clinical utility, and high risk of bias. Moreover, given the high degree of heterogeneity across different datasets used to develop these algorithms, it is unsurprising that prediction errors remain high, and dosing accuracy is dependent on specific ethnic populations. To circumvent these challenges, deep neural models are increasingly used to improve the precision and accuracy of warfarin dose predictions. Hence, this study sought to develop a deep learning-based model using a well-established curated dataset of over 6000 patients from the International Warfarin Pharmacogenomics Consortium (IWPC). Clinically-relevant input data such as physical attributes, medical conditions, concomitant medications, genotype status of functional warfarin genetic polymorphisms, and therapeutic INR were entered followed by applying a unique and robust training and validation method. The deep model yielded a low average mean absolute error (MAE) of 7.6 mg/week and a relatively low mean percentage of error of 40.9% in Asians, 14.2 mg/week MAE and 36.9% in African Americans, and 12.7 mg/week MAE and 45.4% mean percentage of error in White Caucasians. This model also resulted in 36.4% of all patients with a predicted dose within 20% of the administered dose. Hence, our proposed deep model provides an alternative to predicting warfarin dose in the clinical setting upon validation in ethnically-similar datasets.

The Random Effects Warfarin Days' Supply (REWarDS) Model: Development and Validation of a Novel Method for Estimating Exposure to Warfarin Using Administrative Data

Warfarin's complex dosing is a significant barrier to measurement of its exposure in observational studies using population databases. Using population-based administrative data (1996-2019) from British Columbia, Canada, we developed a method based on statistical modeling (Random Effects Warfarin Days' Supply (REWarDS)) that involves fitting a random-effects linear regression model to patients' cumulative dosage over time for estimation of warfarin exposure. Model parameters included a minimal universally available set of variables from prescription records for estimation of patients' individualized average daily doses of warfarin. REWarDS estimates were validated against a reference standard (manual calculation of the daily dose using the free-text administration instructions entered by the dispensing pharmacist) and compared with alternative methods (fixed window, fixed tablet, defined daily dose, and reverse wait time distribution) using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), the intraclass correlation coefficient, and the root mean squared error. REWarDS-estimated days' supply showed strong correlation and agreement with the reference standard (r = 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90, 0.90); intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.95); root mean squared error = 8.24 days) and performed better than all of the alternative methods. REWarDS-estimated days' supply was valid and more accurate than estimates from all other available methods. REWarDS is expected to confer optimal precision in studies measuring warfarin exposure using administrative data.

Comparison of Warfarin Initiation at 3 mg Versus 5 mg for Anticoagulation of Patients with Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Background

The increased warfarin sensitivity observed after mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) operations dictates clinical discretion in warfarin dose initiation. Evidence is still lacking with regard to anticoagulation management of MVR patients.

Objective

This study aimed to compare initiating warfarin at the recommended dosing regimen versus empirically lowered doses intended to account for the variation in warfarin sensitivity.

Methods

A prospective, single-blind, randomized, comparative study was conducted in postoperative MVR patients. Patients were randomly assigned to either the 5 mg group (n = 25) or the 3 mg group (n = 25) and were initiated on a 5 or 3 mg warfarin dose, respectively. Time to target international normalized ratio (INR), time in therapeutic range, occurrence of bleeding/thromboembolic events, and cost of bridging with enoxaparin were assessed for both groups.

Results

Target INR was achieved earlier in the 5 mg group than in the 3 mg group (p = 0.033), with a mean ± SD of 5.3 ± 2.0 and 6.6 ± 2.0, respectively (95% confidence interval of the mean difference 1.022–1.890). Bleeding events did not differ significantly between the two groups. The cost of enoxaparin consumption per patient was significantly higher in the 3 mg group versus the 5 mg group (p = 0.002).

Conclusions

The initiation of warfarin at a 5 mg dose in MVR patients was more efficacious than the 3 mg dose in terms of time to reach the target INR. Moreover, the cost of enoxaparin bridging was significantly reduced with a 5 mg warfarin initiation dose. Bleeding events were comparable.

ClinicalTrials.gov ID

NCT04235569, 22 January 2020.

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication: Validation of the Translated Arabic Version among Patients Undergoing Warfarin Therapy in Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVES

To validate the psychometric properties of the translated Arabic version of the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM 1.4) for patients on warfarin therapy in Saudi anticoagulation clinics (ACCs).

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the Security Forces Hospital ACC in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. It involved administering questionnaires related to patients' satisfaction and assessing adherence through interviews. The quality of the international normalized ratio control was assessed using the Rosendaal method. A psychometric evaluation of TSQM 1.4 was carried out, addressing internal consistency and known-groups and convergent validity.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients completed the questionnaire with an 80% response rate. The independent Cronbach α values for the effectiveness, side effects, and global satisfaction domains were consistently higher than 0.75, demonstrating good internal consistency and suitability of these domains for application in the current patients' setting. When these domains were used together in a multivariable logistic regression model of adherence, the only domain that remained significant was TSQM effectiveness (P = 0.017). Interestingly, a higher likelihood of moderate to optimal international normalized ratio control was significantly and independently associated with increased satisfaction scores in the effectiveness and convenience domains, but not in the side effects and global satisfaction domains.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence in favor of the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of TSQM 1.4 as a useful measure of satisfaction with anticoagulant therapy in patients visiting ACCs. The TSQM subscales in this patient setting seem to detect a clinically meaningful change over time, enhancing the potential of their use in routine practice.

Comparing Usual Care With a Warfarin Initiation Protocol After Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

The immediate postoperative warfarin sensitivity for patients receiving heart valve prostheses is increased. Established warfarin initiation protocols may lack clinical applicability, resulting in dosing based on clinical judgment.

OBJECTIVE

To compare current practice for warfarin initiation with a known warfarin initiation protocol, with doses proportionally reduced to account for the increased postoperative sensitivity.

METHODS

We compared the Mechanical Heart Valve Warfarin Initiation Protocol (Protocol group) with current practice (clinical judgment-Empirical group) for patients receiving mechanical heart valves in an observational before-and-after format. End points were the time to achieve a stable therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR), doses held in the first 6 days, and overanticoagulation in the first 6 days.

RESULTS

The Protocol group (n = 37) achieved a stable INR more rapidly than the Empirical group (n = 77; median times 5.1 and 8.7 days, respectively; P = 0.002). Multivariable analysis indicated that the Protocol group (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.22; P = 0.005) and men (HR = 1.76; P = 0.043) more rapidly achieved a stable therapeutic INR. Age, serum albumin, amiodarone, presence of severe heart failure, and surgery type had no impact. Protocol patients had fewer doses held (1.1% vs 10.1%, P < 0.001) and no difference in overanticoagulation (2.7% vs 9.1%, P = 0.27).

CONCLUSION

The Mechanical Heart Valve Warfarin Initiation Protocol provided a reliable approach to initiating warfarin in patients receiving mechanical aortic or mitral valves.

Warfarin initiation nomograms for venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common condition in hospital patients. Considerable controversy is ongoing regarding optimal initial warfarin dosing for patients with acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Achieving a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) with warfarin as soon as possible is important because this minimizes the duration of parenteral medication necessary to attain immediate anticoagulation, and it potentially decreases the cost and inconvenience of treatment. Although a 5-mg loading-dose nomogram tends to prevent excessive anticoagulation, a 10-mg loading-dose nomogram may achieve a therapeutic INR more quickly. This is an update of a review first published in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of a 10-mg warfarin nomogram compared with a 5-mg warfarin nomogram among patients with VTE.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update the Cochrane Vascular Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched September 2015) and the Cochrane Register of Studies (CENTRAL (2015, Issue 8). Clinical trials databases were also searched. The review authors searched PubMed (last searched 11 June 2015) and LILACS (last searched 11 June 2015). In addition, the review authors contacted pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled studies comparing warfarin initiation nomograms of 10 and 5 mg in patients with VTE.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors contacted study authors for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials involving 494 participants were included. Three studies involving 383 participants provided data on the proportion of participants who had achieved a therapeutic INR by day five. Significant benefit of a 10-mg warfarin nomogram was observed (risk ratio (RR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.54; moderate quality evidence), although with substantial heterogeneity (I(2) = 90%). The review authors analyzed each study separately because it was not possible to perform a subgroup analysis by inpatient or outpatient status. One study showed significant benefit of a 10-mg warfarin nomogram for the proportion of outpatients with VTE who had achieved a therapeutic INR by day five (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.25), with the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB = 3, 95% CI 2 to 4); another study showed significant benefit of a 5-mg warfarin nomogram in outpatients with VTE (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.93) with NNTB = 5 (95% CI 3 to 28); a third study, consisting of both inpatients and outpatients, showed no difference (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.80).No difference was observed in recurrent venous thromboembolism at 90 days when the warfarin nomogram of 10 mg was compared with the warfarin nomogram of 5 mg (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.39 to 5.56; 3 studies, 362 participants, low quality evidence); no difference was observed in major bleeding at 14 to 90 days (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.51; 4 studies, 494 participants, moderate quality evidence). No difference was observed in minor bleeding at 14 to 90 days (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.83; 2 studies, 243 participants, very low quality evidence) or in length of hospital stay (mean difference (MD) -2.3 days, 95% CI -7.96 to 3.36; 1 study, 111 participants, low quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute thromboembolism (DVT or PE) aged 18 years or older, considerable uncertainty surrounds the use of a 10-mg or a 5-mg loading dose for initiation of warfarin to achieve an INR of 2.0 to 3.0 on the fifth day of therapy. Heterogeneity among analyzed studies, mainly caused by differences in types of study participants and length of follow-up, limits certainty surrounding optimal warfarin initiation nomograms.

Variation in warfarin prescribing and dosing in the UK: a national survey of anticoagulation clinics

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Clinical practice in the initiation, prescribing, dosing and monitoring of warfarin in the UK varies, but this has not been adequately documented. The objective was to undertake a survey on current clinical practice in this area, and how it compares with national guidelines that have been developed by the British Committee for Standards in Haematology.

METHODS

A national online survey of anticoagulation clinics was performed using Survey Monkey(®) . The survey was designed to capture data for prescribing, dosing and monitoring of anticoagulation with warfarin.

RESULTS

Of 85 clinics who responded to the survey, most were run by secondary care (68%), facilitated by specialist nurses (58%) and followed standard guidelines for the management of warfarin (87%). The majority of clinics indicated their target international normalized ratio (INR) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) (69/73; 94·5%) was between 2·0 and 3·0, but the indicated target INR for mechanical heart valves was more variable. Initiation and loading dosing regimens were a major source of variability with uncertainty surrounding individual patient factors such as age, ethnicity and BMI.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Current practice amongst UK anticoagulation clinics largely follows current national guidelines but better guidance on dosing, taking into account factors that determine interindividual variability in daily warfarin dose requirements would improve and standardize oral anticoagulation with warfarin.

How to manage warfarin therapy

Long-term treatment with warfarin is recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke and those with recurrent venous thrombosis or prosthetic heart valves. Patient education before commencing warfarin - regarding signs and symptoms of bleeding, the impact of diet, potential drug interactions and the actions to take if a dose is missed - is pivotal to successful use. Scoring systems such as the CHADS2 score are used to determine if patients with atrial fibrillation are suitable for warfarin treatment. To rapidly achieve stable anticoagulation, use an age-adjusted protocol for starting warfarin. Regular monitoring of the anticoagulant effect is required. Evidence suggests that patients who self-monitor using point-of-care testing have better outcomes than other patients.

Warfarin initiation nomograms for venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common condition in hospital patients. Considerable controversy is ongoing regarding optimal initial warfarin dosing for patients with acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Achieving a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) with warfarin as soon as possible is important because this minimizes the duration of parenteral medication necessary to attain immediate anticoagulation, and it potentially decreases the cost and inconvenience of treatment. Although a 5-mg loading-dose nomogram tends to prevent excessive anticoagulation, a 10-mg loading-dose nomogram may achieve a therapeutic INR more quickly.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of a 10-mg warfarin nomogram compared with a 5-mg warfarin nomogram among patients with VTE.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched January 2013) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2012, Issue 12). The review authors searched PubMed (last searched 10 April 2013) and LILACS (last searched 28 February 2013). In addition, the review authors contacted pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled studies comparing warfarin initiation nomograms of 10 and 5 mg in patients with VTE.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors contacted study authors for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials involving 494 participants were included. Three studies involving 383 participants provided data on the proportion of participants who had achieved a therapeutic INR by day five. Significant benefit of a 10-mg warfarin nomogram was observed (risk ratio [RR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 1.54), although with substantial heterogeneity (I(2) = 90%). The review authors analyzed each study separately because it was not possible to perform a subgroup analysis. One study showed significant benefit of a 10-mg warfarin nomogram for the proportion of outpatients with VTE who had achieved a therapeutic INR by day five (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.25), with the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB = 3, 95% CI 2 to 4); another study showed significant benefit of a 5-mg warfarin nomogram in outpatients with VTE (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.93) with NNTB = 5 (95% CI 3 to 28); a third study showed no difference (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.80). No difference was observed in recurrent venous thromboembolism (RVTE) at 90 days when the warfarin nomogram of 10 mg was compared with the warfarin nomogram of 5 mg (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.39 to 5.56); no difference was observed in major bleeding at 14 days (RR 1.69, 95% CI 0.22 to 13.04) and at 90 days (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.10 to 3.78). No difference was observed in minor bleeding at 14 to 90 days (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.83) or in length of hospital stay (mean difference [MD] -2.30 days, 95% CI -7.96 to 3.36).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute thromboembolism (DVT or PE) aged 18 years or older, considerable uncertainty surrounds the use of a 10-mg or a 5-mg loading dose for initiation of warfarin to achieve an INR of 2.0 to 3.0 on the fifth day of therapy. Heterogeneity among analyzed studies limits certainty surrounding optimal warfarin initiation nomograms.

Optimal loading dose of warfarin for the initiation of oral anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

Warfarin is used as an oral anticoagulant. However, there is wide variation in patient response to warfarin dose. This variation, as well as the necessity of keeping within a narrow therapeutic range, means that selection of the correct warfarin dose at the outset of treatment is not straightforward.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of different initiation doses of warfarin in terms of time in-range, time to INR in-range and effect on serious adverse events.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, DARE and the NHS Health economics database on The Cochrane Library (2012, Issue 4); MEDLINE (1950 to April 2012) and EMBASE (1974 to April 2012).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials which compared different initiation regimens of warfarin.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. Authors also assessed the risk of bias and extracted data from the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 12 studies of patients commencing warfarin for inclusion in the review. The overall risk of bias was found to be variable, with most studies reporting adequate methods for randomisation but only two studies reporting adequate data on allocation concealment. Four studies (355 patients) compared 5 mg versus 10 mg loading doses. All four studies reported INR in-range by day five. Although there was notable heterogeneity, pooling of these four studies showed no overall difference between 5 mg versus 10 mg loading doses (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.77, P = 0.46, I(2) = 83%). Two of these studies used two consecutive INRs in-range as the outcome and showed no difference between a 5 mg and 10 mg dose by day five (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.19, P = 0.37, I(2 )= 22%); two other studies used a single INR in-range as the outcome and showed a benefit for the 10 mg initiation dose by day 5 (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.21, P = 0.05, I(2 )= 72%). Two studies compared a 5 mg dose to other doses: a 2.5 mg initiation dose took longer to achieve the therapeutic range (2.7 versus 2.0 days; P < 0.0001), but those receiving a calculated initiation dose achieved a target range quicker (4.2 days versus 5 days, P = 0.007). Two studies compared age adjusted doses to 10 mg initiation doses. More elderly patients receiving an age adjusted dose achieved a stable INR compared to those receiving a 10 mg initial dose (and Fennerty regimen). Four studies used genotype guided dosing in one arm of each trial. Three studies reported no overall differences; the fourth study, which reported that the genotype group spent significantly more time in-range (P < 0.001), had a control group whose INRs were significantly lower than expected. No clear impacts from adverse events were found in either arm to make an overall conclusion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The studies in this review compared loading doses in several different situations. There is still considerable uncertainty between the use of a 5 mg and a 10 mg loading dose for the initiation of warfarin. In the elderly, there is some evidence that lower initiation doses or age adjusted doses are more appropriate, leading to fewer high INRs. However, there is insufficient evidence to warrant genotype guided initiation.

Effect of genetic variants, especially CYP2C9 and VKORC1, on the pharmacology of warfarin

The genes encoding the cytochrome P450 2C9 enzyme (CYP2C9) and vitamin K-epoxide reductase complex unit 1 (VKORC1) are major determinants of anticoagulant response to warfarin. Together with patient demographics and clinical information, they account for approximately one-half of the warfarin dose variance in individuals of European descent. Recent prospective and randomized controlled trial data support pharmacogenetic guidance with their use in warfarin dose initiation and titration. Benefits from pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin dosing have been reported to extend beyond the period of initial dosing, with supportive data indicating benefits to at least 3 months. The genetic effects of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 in African and Asian populations are concordant with those in individuals of European ancestry; however, frequency distribution of allelic variants can vary considerably between major populations. Future randomized controlled trials in multiethnic settings using population-specific dosing algorithms will allow us to further ascertain the generalizability and cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin therapy. Additional genome-wide association studies may help us to improve and refine dosing algorithms and potentially identify novel biological pathways.

Prospective evaluation of a pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin loading and maintenance dose regimen for initiation of therapy

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes that affect warfarin metabolism (cytochrome P450 2C9 gene, CYP2C9) and response (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 gene, VKORC1) have an important influence on warfarin therapy, particularly during initiation; however, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal pharmacogenetics-based initiation strategy. We conducted a prospective cohort study in which patients requiring warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism were initiated with a novel pharmacogenetics-initiation protocol (WRAPID, Warfarin Regimen using A Pharmacogenetics-guided Initiation Dosing) that incorporated loading and maintenance doses based on genetics, clinical variables, and response (n = 167, followed up for 90 days), to assess the influence of genetic variations on anticoagulation responses. Application of the WRAPID algorithm resulted in a negligible influence of genetic variation in VKORC1 or CYP2C9 on time to achievement of first therapeutic response (P = .52, P = .28) and risk of overanticoagulation (P = .64, P = .96). After adjustment for covariates, time to stable anticoagulation was not influenced by VKORC1 or CYP2C9 genotype. Importantly, time spent within or above the therapeutic range did not differ among VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotype groups. Moreover, the overall time course of the anticoagulation response among the genotype groups was similar and predictable. We demonstrate the clinical utility of genetics-guided warfarin initiation with the WRAPID protocol to provide safe and optimal anticoagulation therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism.

Impact of Introducing Anticoagulation-Related Prescribing Guidelines in a Hospital Setting using Academic Detailing

AIM

Assess the impact of using academic detailing-assisted guideline roll-out on warfarin initiation, reversal of warfarin overanticoagulation, and uptake of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis across 4 metropolitan teaching hospitals.

METHODS

Baseline data were collected for 3 months prior to intervention. Prescribers were then informed about the guidelines, including feedback of current hospital performance and the basis for the guidelines. Post-intervention data were collected for 3 months after guideline implementation.

RESULTS

Uptake of DVT prophylaxis in medical patients increased from 52.8% to 67.0% (p=0.004). No impact on operative surgical patients was seen, possibly due to the high pre-existing rate of uptake (86.1% vs 84.1%, p=0.7). DVT prophylaxis rates in non-operative surgical patients were similar to medical patients, with similar, but non-significant improvements. The time to reach a stable therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) after warfarin initiation was reduced (p=0.03) as were the number of INR's >4 in the first week of therapy (p=0.03). There were significant improvements in appropriate vitamin K use for warfarin overanticoagulation in patients with an INR above 6 (48% vs 74%, p=0.007), timely follow-up tests (49% vs 62%, p=0.009), and the proportion of next INR's being less than 4 (49% vs 61%, p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of academic detailing to facilitate guideline roll-out had a positive impact on nearly all areas studied. The academic detailing process within the hospital setting was received enthusiastically by prescribers.

Vitamin K antagonist use in the elderly: special considerations

As the population ages, the number of patients aged 75 years and over treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is steadily increasing. In this age group, the two main indications for oral anticoagulant therapy are the treatment of venous thromboembolic disease and the prevention of systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. In both indications, a target international normalized ratio of 2.5 (range: 2.0-3.0) is recommended. Although VKAs are beneficial in thromboembolic disorders, they are still underused. In this review, we will focus on two crucial topics in elderly patients, the specific management of VKAs in these patients and the hemorrhagic risk. Current recommendations concerning the management at the start of treatment, education and adequate monitoring may help to minimize the hemorrhagic risk in these frail patients.

Optimal loading dose for the initiation of warfarin: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Selection of the right warfarin dose at the outset of treatment is not straightforward, and current evidence is lacking to determine the optimal strategy for initiation of therapy.

METHODS

We included randomized controlled trials in patients commencing anticoagulation with warfarin, comparing different loading dose or different regimens.We searched Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and the NHS Health Economics Database up to June 2009. Primary outcomes were time to stable INR and adverse events. We summarised results as proportion of INRs in range from date of initiation and compared dichotomous outcomes using relative risks (RR) and calculated 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

We included 11 studies of 1,340 patients newly initiated on warfarin. In two studies that used single INR measures, a loading dose of 10 mg compared to 5 mg led to more patients in range on day five. However, in two studies which measured two consecutive INRs, a loading dose of 10 mg compared to 5 mg did not lead to more patients in range on day five (RR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.19, p = 0.37). Patients receiving a 2.5 mg initiation does took longer to achieve the therapeutic range, whilst those receiving a calculated initiation dose achieved target range 0.8 days quicker (4.2 days vs. 5 days, p = 0.007). More elderly patients receiving an age adjusted dose achieved a stable INR compared to the Fennerty protocol (48% vs. 22% p = 0.02) and significantly fewer patients on the age adjusted regimens had high out-of-range INRs. Two studies report no significant differences between genotype guided and 5 mg or 10 mg initiation doses and in the one significant genotype study the control group INRs were significantly lower than expected.

CONCLUSION

Our review findings suggest there is still considerable uncertainty between a 10 mg and a 5 mg loading dose for initiation of warfarin. In the elderly, lower initiation doses or age adjusted doses are more appropriate, leading to less higher INRs. Currently there is insufficient evidence to warrant genotype guided initiation, and adequately powered trials to detect effects on adverse events are currently warranted.

Warfarin therapy: in need of improvement after all these years

BACKGROUND

Warfarin therapy has been used clinically for over 60 years, yet continues to be problematic because of its narrow therapeutic index and large inter-individual variability in patient response. As a result, warfarin is a leading cause of serious medication-related adverse events, and its efficacy is also suboptimal.

OBJECTIVE

To review factors that are responsible for variable response to warfarin, including clinical, environmental, and genetic factors, and to explore some possible approaches to improving warfarin therapy.

RESULTS

Recent efforts have focused on developing dosing algorithms that included genetic information to try to improve warfarin dosing. These dosing algorithms hold promise, but have not been fully validated or tested in rigorous clinical trials. Perhaps equally importantly, adherence to warfarin is a major problem that should be addressed with innovative and cost-effective interventions.

CONCLUSION

Additional research is needed to further test whether interventions can be used to improve warfarin dosing and outcomes.

Pharmacogenetics of warfarin: regulatory, scientific, and clinical issues

Using pharmacogenetics-based therapy, clinicians can estimate the therapeutic warfarin dose by genotyping patients for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that affect warfarin metabolism or sensitivity. SNPs in the cytochrome P450 complex (CYP2C9) affect warfarin metabolism: patients who have the CYP2C9*2 and/or CYP2C9*3 variants metabolize warfarin slowly and are more likely to have an elevated International Normalized Ratio INR or to hemorrhage during warfarin initiation than patients without these variants. SNPs in vitamin K epoxide reductase (VKORC1) correlate with warfarin sensitivity. Patients who are homozygous for a common VKORC1 promoter polymorphism, -1639 G>A (also designated as VKOR 3673, haplotype A, or haplotype*2), are warfarin sensitive and typically require lower warfarin doses. By providing an estimate of the therapeutic warfarin dose, pharmacogenetics-based therapy may improve the safety of anticoagulant therapy. To improve drug safety, the FDA updates labels of previously approved drugs as new clinical and genetic evidence accrues. The labels of medical products serve to inform prescribers and patients about potential ways to improve the benefit/risk ratio and/or optimize doses of medical products. On August 16, 2007, the FDA updated the label of warfarin to include information on pharmacogenetic testing and to encourage, but not require, the use of this information in dosing individual patients initiating warfarin therapy. The FDA completed the label update in August 2007.

Pharmacogenetics-Based Coumarin Therapy

To reduce the risk of hemorrhage, experts advocate prescribing the anticipated therapeutic dose to patients who are beginning coumarin therapy, but until now there was no accurate way to estimate that dose. Using pharmacogenetics-based coumarin therapy, clinicians can now estimate the therapeutic dose by genotyping their patients for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that affect coumarin metabolism or sensitivity.

SNPs in the cytochrome P450 complex (CYP2C9) affect coumarin metabolism. Patients with either of two common variants, CYP2C9*2 or CYP2C9*3, metabolize coumarins slowly and are twice as likely to have a laboratory or clinical adverse event, unless their initial coumarin doses are reduced. SNPs in vitamin K epoxide reductase (VKORC1) correlate with coumarin sensitivity. Patients known to be homozygous for a common VKORC1 promoter polymorphism, −1639 G>A (also designated as VKOR 3673, haplotype A, or haplotype*2), should be started on lower coumarin doses than genotype GG patients. By providing an estimate of the therapeutic coumarin dose, pharmacogenetics-based therapy may improve the safety and effectiveness of coumarin therapy.

Haemorrhagic Complications of Vitamin K Antagonists in the Elderly

In patients >75 years of age, the two main indications for oral anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are treatment of venous thromboembolic disease and prevention of systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. In both indications, a target International Normalized Ratio of 2.5 (range 2.0-3.0) is recommended. Bleeding is the adverse effect feared by physicians that most limits the use of VKAs in older frail patients. In this paper, we discuss (i) the risk of VKA-related bleeding with advancing age; (ii) the severity of bleeding complications and particularly the risk of intracranial haemorrhage in older patients; (iii) the risk factors for bleeding related to patient characteristics; and (iv) the risk factors or determinants for bleeding related to treatment variables (warfarin induction and maintenance administration, instability of anticoagulation, poor compliance and patient's education level, and concomitant use of drugs). Avoiding over-anticoagulation and/or reducing periods of overdosing in the course of oral anticoagulant treatment with tailored monitoring may help to minimise the risk of bleeding in older patients.

Use of specific indicators to detect warfarin-related adverse events

PURPOSE

The use of specific indicators, or "triggers," to identify adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with warfarin therapy is described.

SUMMARY

Automated triggers provided by laboratory and pharmacy data were used to identify potential ADEs associated with warfarin therapy among patients treated in the emergency room or admitted to six community hospitals between July 2002 and December 2003. The triggers consisted of an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of greater than 3.0 and pharmacy orders for vitamin K. Pharmacists reviewed the triggers monthly for clinical determination of ADEs during preintervention and postintervention periods. Interventions consisted of staff education and real-time adjustments in therapy. A 39% overall reduction in ADEs occurred between the preintervention and postintervention periods. Harmful ADEs declined by 70%.

CONCLUSION

INRs of greater than 3.0 and vitamin K administration appeared to be reliable indicators of warfarin-associated ADEs, and detection with these indicators appeared to reduce ADEs when combined with appropriate interventions.

Factors Affecting the Maintenance Stable Warfarin Dosage in Hong Kong Chinese Patients

BACKGROUND

Multiple factors can affect the anticoagulation effect of warfarin. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between different clinical factors and outcomes of warfarin therapy in Hong Kong Chinese patients.

METHODS

The study was conducted at the anticoagulation clinic of the Prince of Wales Hospital from 1 April to 31 December 2003. Clinical data collected included demographics, indications of warfarin, dietary vitamin K consumption, and drug-drug interactions. Blood samples were obtained for the genetic polymorphism analysis of CYP 2 C 9. Linear and multiple regression analysis were used for statistical analysis to determine the correlation between variables and the importance of various factors as the determinants of warfarin dosage requirement.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients were recruited. The mean warfarin dosage was 3.30+/-2.23 mg/day. The warfarin dosage ranged from 0.75 to 12 mg/day. The mean age was 59+/-14 years old. Age, dietary vitamin K consumption, chronic heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, smoking and drinking status were found to be factors statistically significant affecting warfarin dosage. We detected no single nucleotide polymorphism in CYP 2 C 9 exon 4.

CONCLUSION

Age, dietary vitamin K consumption, warfarin indication for atrial fibrillation, co-morbid with CHF, smoking and drinking status were found to be the factors that affected the warfarin requirement in Hong Kong Chinese patients. However, the genetic polymorphism in exon 4 of CYP 2 C 9 may not be associated with the warfarin sensitivity in this patient population.

Warfarin Maintenance Dosing Patterns in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

The use of anticoagulant therapy is expanding among the elderly population, in part because of the increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation. Published data describing the warfarin maintenance dose requirements for this age group are limited. Because warfarin therapy is often initiated in the outpatient setting where significant barriers to daily monitoring exist for this patient population, a better understanding of the factors that predict lower dose requirements may reduce the risk of unanticipated over-anticoagulation and hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE

To define the effects of age and gender on the warfarin maintenance dose among ambulatory adult patients with an international normalized ratio target between 2.0 and 3.0.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study and retrospective cohort secondary data source.

SETTING

One hundred one community-based physician practices with dedicated warfarin management systems and an academic medical center anticoagulation clinic.

PATIENTS

A total of 4,616 patients comprised the prospective cohort, and 7,586 patients comprised the retrospective cohort. Of the 12,202 patients, 2,359 were > or = 80 years of age.

MEASUREMENTS

Median weekly and daily maintenance warfarin dose.

RESULTS

The warfarin dose was inversely related to age and was strongly associated with gender. The median weekly dose ranged from 45 mg (6.4 mg/d) for men who were < 50 years of age to 22 mg (3.1 mg/d) for women > or = 80 years of age. The weekly dose declined by 0.4 mg/yr (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.44; p < 0.001) and women required 4.5 mg less per week than men (95% CI, 3.8 to 5.3; p < 0.001). Among patients who were > 70 years of age, the often-suggested initiation dose of 5 mg/d will be excessive for 82% of women and 65% of men.

CONCLUSIONS

Warfarin dose requirements decrease greatly with age. Older women require the lowest warfarin doses. These observations suggest that, when warfarin is being initiated, the commonly employed empiric starting dose of 5 mg/d will lead to over-anticoagulation for the majority of patients in the geriatric age group; lower initiation and maintenance doses should be considered for the elderly.

Initiation of warfarin therapy in elderly medical inpatients: a safe and accurate regimen

PURPOSE

Elderly patients are at high risk of over-anticoagulation when treated with warfarin, especially during treatment induction. We developed a simple low-dose regimen for starting warfarin therapy in elderly inpatients. The daily maintenance dosage is predicted from the international normalized ratio (INR) measured the day after the third daily intake of a 4-mg dose. We conducted a prospective multicenter study to evaluate the accuracy and safety of this regimen.

METHODS

We studied 106 elderly (age >or=70 years) inpatients (mean [+/- SD] age, 85 +/- 6 years; range, 71 to 97 years) who had a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0. Accuracy in predicting the daily maintenance dose from INR value on day 3 was evaluated.

RESULTS

The predicted daily maintenance warfarin dose (3.1 +/- 1.6 mg/d) correlated closely with the actual maintenance dose (3.2 +/- 1.7 mg/d; R(2) = 0.84). The predicted dose was equal to the actual dose in 77 patients (73%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 64% to 81%) and within 1 mg in 101 patients (95%; 95% CI: 91% to 99%). The mean time needed to achieve a therapeutic INR was 6.7 +/- 3.3 days (median, 6.0 days); the mean time needed to achieve the maintenance dose was 9.2 +/- 4.5 days (median, 7.0 days). None of the patients had an INR >4.0 during this period. One fatal bleeding event was recorded in a patient with an INR in the therapeutic range.

CONCLUSION

Our warfarin induction regimen was simple, safe, and accurate in predicting the daily maintenance warfarin dose in elderly hospitalized patients.

Personalized versus non-personalized computerized decision support system to increase therapeutic quality control of oral anticoagulant therapy: an alternating time series analysis

Background

The quality control of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) during the initiation and maintenance treatment is generally poor. Physicians' ordering of OAT (especially fluindione and warfarin) can be improved by dose adjustment algorithms, taking into account the results of International Normalized Ratio (INR). Reminders at the point of care, computerized or not, have been demonstrated to be effective in changing physicians prescription behavior.

However, few studies have addressed the benefit of personalized reminders versus non personalized reminders, whereas the personalized reminders require more development to access patient record data and integrate with the computerized physician order entry system.

The Hospital Information System of George Pompidou European Hospital integrates an electronic medical record, lab test and drugs order entry system. This system allows to evaluate such reminders and to consider their implementation for routine use as well as the continuous evaluation of their impact on medical practice quality indicators.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of two types of reminders on overtreatment by oral anticoagulant: a simple reminder of text formatted dose adjustment table and a personalized recommendation for oral anticoagulant dose and next date of INR control, adapted to patient data. Both types of reminders appear to the physician at the moment of drug ordering.

Methods

The study is an alternating time series experiment with three 6 months periods, each one including every 2 months according to a Latin square scheme: a control period without any reminder, a period with the simple non personalized reminder, a period with personalized reminder. All patients hospitalized in departments using the computerized physician order entry system and ordered fluindione or warfarin, will be included in the study between November 2004 and May 2006.

Main outcome will be the proportion of overcoagulation, as expressed by the proportion of observation time with INR over 4.5, assuming INR change linearly. Secondary outcome is the incidence of major haemorrhagic events. Data will be collected thanks to Hospital Information Systems databases.

Data will be analyzed taking into account patient and physician clustering effect.

Evaluation of a warfarin initiation protocol for older people

A protocol for initiation of warfarin therapy, targeted specifically for older people and based on individual responses to initial warfarin doses, was evaluated in a case-control study. People within the protocol group: (i) received higher initial doses of warfarin, (ii) reached an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2 more quickly, (iii) spent more time with INR of 2-3 in the first week and (iv) were less likely to be over-anticoagulated. However, the proportion of people who reached an INR of 2 too quickly (in <4 days) was no greater. The protocol correctly predicted the maintenance dose range of warfarin in over 70% of cases.

Assessment of an age-adjusted warfarin initiation protocol

OBJECTIVE

To examine the time taken to reach a stable international normalized ratio (INR), as well as the incidence of overanticoagulation of an age-adjusted warfarin initiation protocol.

METHODS

Inpatients and outpatients commencing warfarin therapy at 2 teaching hospitals were dosed according to the age-adjusted protocol. Data were collected prospectively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Time to reach a stable INR of 2-3 and the number of patients experiencing an INR > or =4 during the first week of warfarin therapy.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were assessed; at the completion of the 4-day titration protocol, 63% had achieved a stable INR. After an additional 2 days of empiric dosage adjustment by the attending physician, 86% of the subjects demonstrated a stable INR. Five patients (7%) experienced an INR > or =4. These patients had a nonsignificant trend toward a lower plasma albumin level compared with other patients (p = 0.057, Student's t-test). The INR-driven dose adjustments on days 3 and 4 of this protocol coped with other variables that have been shown to affect maintenance warfarin dosing. These included weight, gender, pharmacologic factors affecting clearance, and the presence of certain predesignated risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The age-adjusted dosing protocol rapidly achieved a stable INR with minimal overanticoagulation. Patients with low serum albumin levels (<3.0 g/dL) may be sensitive to the effects of warfarin during the loading phase.

[Oral anticoagulants in the elderly]

PURPOSE

Atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism are particularly frequent in the elderly. Whether or not prescribe oral anticoagulant treatment in the elderly is therefore a common question for the physician. Despite the benefits of anticoagulation demonstrated in clinical trials, oral anticoagulant therapy is underused in the elderly.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Indications for oral anticoagulation are discussed specifically in the elderly with a literature review. Only the length of anticoagulation treatment after a venous thromboembolism remained a purpose of discussion regarding the severity of the pathology. The frequency of systemic thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is increasing with age. Oral anticoagulation reduces this risk. This benefice is to compare with the increasing rate of major bleeding complications in the elderly and in patient who had stroke, hyper-tension, diabetes mellitus or gastrointestinal bleeding. The objective of this article is to focus on the mode to measure oral anticoagulant benefice/risk ratio in the elderly and to propose several ways to minimize the risk for bleeding.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

The potential drug side effect severity of oral anticoagulation must lead to find the "reasonable" clinical indications in term of benefice/risk ratio and what measures should be take to increase the safety of oral anticoagulation in the elderly. The comprehensive geriatric evaluation should be considered as a decision-aid tool in long-term oral anticoagulation in the frail elderly. Anticoagulation clinics, informatics'-prescription coupled with dose-adaptation decision-aid adapted to the elderly should be helpful in this research of quality. Finally, prescribers education supports must insist on the early course of therapy that is at higher risk of bleeding.

Oral anticoagulants. Pharmacologic issues for use in the elderly

There has been a marked expansion of the indications for oral anticoagulant therapy, particularly among the elderly. Despite the documented benefits, the use of warfarin remains strikingly low among patients 80 years of age and older. Elderly patients often exhibit an enhanced dose response to warfarin. On average, steady-state warfarin doses decrease by 11% per decade of age. Pharmacokinetic changes in the elderly are negligible. Pharmacodynamic differences have not been well characterized. Initiating warfarin dosing in the elderly should be done cautiously, with doses of 5 mg or less. Doses should be adjusted downward in the presence of congestive heart failure, advanced obstructive lung disease, liver disease, malignancy, protracted diarrhea, enteral feedings, or concurrent potentiating medications. Numerous medications interfere with the anticoagulant response of warfarin. The most powerful potentiating drugs are those that interfere with the metabolism of (S)-warfarin. Examples include amiodarone, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and metronidazole. These drugs should be prescribed with caution in the elderly and mandate frequent INR monitoring during the induction period. An extensive assessment of patient-specific factors that might increase the hazards related to warfarin therapy needs to be conducted and documented before initiating oral anticoagulant therapy. Patients and their caregivers need to understand the risks and benefits, and to recognize signs of abnormal bleeding and the need for frequent monitoring. Patients should be encouraged to maintain consistency in their vitamin K intake and should strive to meet the recommended dietary allowance for vitamin K. To improve anticoagulation control, physicians and other health care providers need to be aware of the many warfarin drug interactions and be cognizant of the increased dose response of warfarin seen in the elderly. Concurrent prescription of multiple drugs known to affect warfarin's anticoagulant response should be minimized and use of nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be limited given their deleterious effects on the gastric mucosa. Transitions from inpatient care to subacute care and back to outpatient care are particularly vulnerable periods for patients' anticoagulation control. Enhanced provider communication and more seamless transitions help to ensure optimal INR follow-up and timely warfarin dose adjustment if indicated.

Evaluation of warfarin initiation regimens in elderly inpatients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare initial warfarin doses of 5 mg or below and doses above 5 mg in hospitalized elderly.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of charts identified from computerized pharmacy records.

SETTING

County teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Inpatients aged 65 years or older receiving at least three warfarin doses.

INTERVENTION

We measured the time to first international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0 or greater, bleeding complications, number of warfarin doses held, and vitamin K use.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The average initial low dose (33 patients) was 4.8 +/- 0.8 mg and the average initial high dose (40 patients) was 9.0 +/-1.2 mg. The mean time to first INR of 2.0 or greater was similar, 3.4 and 3.0 days, respectively (p=0.38). The low-dose group had fewer bleeds (7 vs 13, p=0.28) and doses held (11 vs 18 patients, p=0.27, 30 vs 50 doses). Four patients in each group received vitamin K (p=0.8). Forty-four percent of patients with an INR of 4 or above and 48% of patients who had a dose held were on a long-term drug or had a new drug added that could cause a major drug interaction with warfarin.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, hospitalized elderly who received a low versus high initial dose of warfarin achieved therapeutic INRs in a similar time and had lower but not significantly different safety outcomes.