The Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study: Rationale for Selection of Interventions

Hemoglobin Normalization Results in Lower Dialysis Dose, Despite High Dialysate Flow. Single Needle Offers Inadequate Dialysis

Anemia correction by erythropoietin favorably affects dialysis outcome but may also reduce dialysis efficiency increasing morbidity and mortality. Single needle dialysis (SN) and high dialysate flow (DF) are dialysis variations. We studied the effect of hemoglobin (Hb) normalization on dialysis adequacy under high DF. We also compared double needle (DN) and SN dialysis efficiency. Seventeen stable anuric patients (13 M, 4 F), aged 62 (40–90), on hemodialysis for 48 months (8–204), were studied in two, 6 months apart, periods of low (A) and high Hb (B), during a midweek 4 h dialysis with DN and SN. DF was 500 in A and 800ml/min in B. Rebound urea samples, 20 min post dialysis, were used for computer calculated double pool urea kinetics.

Hb levels were 128±8 g/L (B) vs. 119±14 g/L (A), P<0.03. Despite the use of higher DF less dialysis was delivered in B vs. A, under DN or SN (DN: URR 64.8±5.8 vs. 69.7±5.2%, Kt/Vequil. 1.09±0.19 vs. 1.26±0.21, nPCR 1.37±0.29 vs. 1.60±0.36g/kg/day, changes <0.001, SN: URR 49.7±7.5% vs. 52.6±8.8%, Kt/Vequil. 0.74±0.16 vs. 0.82±0.23, nPCR 1.05±0.33 vs. 1.20±0.31, changes NS). SN was found significantly (P<0.001) less efficient than DN in A and B. Serum creatinine drop was significantly (P<0.001) less in both periods with SN vs. DN. Hb (SN in B) correlated inversely to Kt/V (r = –0.5705, P<0.02) and URR (r = –0.6432, P=0.005).

Hb correction to normality is associated with a decrease in dialysis efficiency. The use of high dialysate flow does not compensate for this loss. SN delivers inadequate dialysis independently of dialysate flow or hemoglobin concentration.

Modeling the Dose of Home Dialysis

The growing interest in daily dialysis and combined continuous and intermittent dialysis treatments has created the need for a dialysis dosing model that is valid over a wide range of dosing frequency and intensity. Three models have been described for this purpose and are reviewed here. They have in common the concept of a continuous clearance value which is equivalent to the summed intermittent dialysis prescribed. The continuous clearance models all define a point on the saw-toothed blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration profile and calculate the continuous clearance required to achieve this at the same urea generation rate. The points modeled are the peak predialysis concentration (pkKt/V), the average Co (standard Kt/V, stdKt/V), and time-averaged urea concentration (TAC), which is termed equivalent renal clearance (EKRt/V). At the present time the only data for evaluation of clinical relevance of the three models is continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) outcome. The stdKt/V predicts that optimal CAPD outcome requires weekly stdKt/V 2.0, while the pkKt/V and EKRt/V models predict optimal doses of 1.8 and 3.0. These results suggest that the stdKt/V is the most realistic model, but data over much higher levels of therapy are not yet available to judge generalizability. The stdKt/V model was used to assess dose in two hemodialysis studies with 5 to 6 dialyses per week and showed that in one study the stdKt/V was only 2.0, while in the second study it was 5.6. These results show that dose can vary widely with a similar number of dialyses per week and point to the need for a generalized dosing model to guide and compare studies of daily home dialysis.

Chronic Hemodialysis Therapy in the West

BACKGROUND

Chronic hemodialysis (HD) in the 1960s encompassed a wide variety of prescriptions from twice weekly to five times per week HD. Over time, HD prescriptions in the West became standardized at three times per week, 2.5-4 h per session, with occasional additional treatments for volume overload.

SUMMARY

When clinical trials of dialysis dose failed to show significant benefit of extending time compared with the traditional dialysis prescription, interest in more frequent HD was renewed. Consequently, there has been growth in home HD therapies as well as alternative dialysis prescriptions. Data from recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits and risks of these more frequent therapies, with surprising differences in outcomes between short daily HD and long nocturnal HD. More frequent therapies improve control of both hypertension and hyperphosphatemia, but at the expense of increased vascular access complications and, at least for nocturnal HD, a faster loss of residual renal function.

KEY MESSAGES

In the West, the standard HD prescription is three treatments per week with a minimal time of 3.0 h and dialysis is performed in an outpatient dialysis center. A minority of patients will have a fourth treatment per week for volume issues. Alternative HD prescriptions, although rare, are more available compared to the recent past.

FACTS FROM EAST AND WEST

(1) While developed Western and Asian countries provide end-stage renal disease patients full access to HD, healthcare systems from South and South-East Asia can offer access to HD only to a limited fraction of the patients in need. Even though the annual costs of HD are much lower in less developed countries (for instance 30 times lower in India compared to the US), patients often cannot afford costs not covered by health insurance. (2) The recommended dialysis pattern in the West is at least three sessions weekly with high-flux dialyzers. Studies from Shanghai and Taiwan might however indicate a benefit of twice versus thrice weekly sessions. In less developed Asian countries, a twice weekly pattern is common, sometimes with dialyzer reuse and inadequate water treatment. A majority of patients decrease session frequency or discontinue the program due to financial constraint. (3) As convective therapies are gaining popularity in Europe, penetration in Asia is low and limited by costs. (4) In Asian countries, in particular in the South and South-East, hepatitis and tuberculosis infections in HD patients are higher than in the West and substantially increase mortality. (5) Progress has recently been made in countries like Thailand and Brunei to provide universal HD access to all patients in need. Nevertheless, well-trained personnel, reliable registries and better patient follow-up would improve outcomes in low-income Asian countries.

Association between serum 2-microglobulin level and infectious mortality in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Secondary analysis of the Hemodialysis Study showed that serum beta(2)-microglobulin levels predicted all-cause mortality and that high-flux dialysis was associated with decreased cardiac deaths in hemodialysis patients. This study examined the association of serum beta(2)-microglobulin levels and dialyzer beta(2)-microglobulin kinetics with the two most common causes of deaths: Cardiac and infectious diseases. Cox regression analyses were performed to relate cardiac or infectious deaths to cumulative mean follow-up predialysis serum beta(2)-microglobulin levels while controlling for baseline demographics, comorbidity, residual kidney function, and dialysis-related variables.

RESULTS

The cohort of 1813 patients experienced 180 infectious deaths and 315 cardiac deaths. The adjusted hazard ratio for infectious death was 1.21 (95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.37) per 10-mg/L increase in beta(2)-microglobulin. This association was independent of the prestudy years on dialysis. In contrast, the association between serum beta(2)-microglobulin level and cardiac death was not statistically significant. In similar regression models, higher cumulative mean Kt/V of beta(2)-microglobulin was not significantly associated with either infectious or cardiac mortality in the full cohort but exhibited trends suggesting an association with lower infectious mortality (relative risk 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.01, for each 0.1-U increase in beta(2)-microglobulin Kt/V) and lower cardiac mortality (relative risk 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1.00) in the subgroup with >3.7 prestudy years of dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

These results generally support the notion that middle molecules are associated with systemic toxicity and that their accumulation predisposes dialysis patients to infectious deaths, independent of the duration of maintenance dialysis.

Hemodialysis timing, survival, and cardiovascular outcomes in the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study

BACKGROUND

The timing of medical therapies has been shown to influence the outcomes and side effects of treatments for disease. This report examines the extent to which hemodialysis treatment time of day was associated with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity and all-cause mortality in a secondary analysis of the Hemodialysis Study.

METHODS

Dialysis start time defined dialysis shift: morning beginning between 0400 and 0930 hours (n = 822); midday, between 0930 and 1530 hours (n = 851); and evening, between 1530 and 2200 hours (n = 172). Outcome measures included all-cause mortality, cardiac death, composite end point of all-cause mortality or first cardiac hospitalization, and composite end point of first cardiac hospitalization or cardiac death.

RESULTS

Morning hemodialysis was associated with a lower likelihood of cardiovascular events compared with the evening shift in all-cause mortality or first cardiac hospitalization (evening versus morning, relative risk [RR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.65; P = 0.043), as well as first cardiac hospitalization or cardiac death (evening versus morning, RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.89; P = 0.007). No differences were noted in the other 2 outcomes, and there was no statistically significant difference between the morning and midday shifts. Although crude mortality rates were greater in the midday compared with morning (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.39; P = 0.008), this association was attenuated after adjustment (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.22; P = 0.64).

CONCLUSION

Making extensive adjustment for patient characteristics, this report does not support the association of lower all-cause mortality with morning hemodialysis or a particular benefit for older patients.

Plasma interleukin-6 predicts cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a mediator and marker of the chronic inflammatory process that is responsible for much of the morbidity and mortality seen in hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study evaluated circulating plasma IL-6 as a predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality and studied its relationship to prevalent comorbidity and hypoalbuminemia, in a cohort of stable HD patients enrolled in the HEMO study.

METHODS

Clinical data included demographic, medical, and routine laboratory parameters. Comorbidities were graded using the Index of Co-Existing Diseases (ICED). Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Blood samples were drawn at enrollment and annually, and plasma IL-6 levels measured with high-sensitivity enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Median plasma IL-6 level in 206 patients was 7.9 pg/mL (range, 0.1 to 90.3 pg/mL) and was higher in patients with vascular disease ( P = 0.03), higher ICED scores ( P = 0.01), and lower Karnofsky indices ( P < 0.01). Serum albumin was inversely related to plasma IL-6 levels ( P = 0.03, r = -0.16). Unadjusted median survival time was 1,209 days in the lowest quartile of plasma IL-6 and 806 days in the highest ( P = 0.02, log rank test). A 1-log increase in plasma IL-6 was associated with a 1.19-fold higher adjusted risk for all-cause mortality ( P = 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.40) and a 1.43-fold higher adjusted risk of cardiovascular mortality ( P = 0.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.92). Hazard ratio estimates were higher when IL-6 levels over time were incorporated as a time-dependent covariate.

CONCLUSION

Plasma IL-6 levels are strongly associated with comorbidity in HD patients and are a powerful predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.

The dose of dialysis in hemodialysis patients: impact on nutrition

Multiple lines of evidence have indicated that the dose of hemodialysis impacts upon patient outcome. Among these outcome measures, nutrition is inextricably linked to the adequacy of the treatment. All of the methods of determining dialysis adequacy are based on assessing the removal of toxic substances retained in renal failure, the majority of which are derivatives of protein metabolism. Urea kinetics, employing urea as a surrogate for quantifying the elimination of small molecular weight nitrogenous substances, is the method that has been most thoroughly validated to date as defining a dose range for thrice-weekly hemodialysis: Both inadequate and optimal levels of hemodialysis dose have been identified by prospective, randomized clinic trials utilizing Kt/V(urea) as the index of adequacy. The impact of urea kinetics on nutritional status during thrice-weekly hemodialysis is discussed. Recently, in an attempt to improve outcome beyond that achievable with thrice-weekly hemodialysis, alternative regimens, consisting of daily treatments, have received increasing interest. In order to compare the dose of hemodialysis associated with these regimens with conventional thrice-weekly regimens in terms of removal of small molecular weight substances, standard Kt/V(urea), a parameter that combines treatment dose with treatment frequency, and thus allows for various intermittent therapies to be compared to continuous therapy, must be used. In addition, membrane flux and middle molecule removal, factors that have not yet been well defined as parameters of adequacy during thrice-weekly regimens, may be shown to be important indices with longer hemodialysis treatments, particularly daily nocturnal hemodialysis. The impact that these alternative regimens have had on nutritional status in hemodialysis patients and how they compare to conventional therapy are important considerations.

Cardiac diseases in maintenance hemodialysis patients: results of the HEMO Study

BACKGROUND

Cardiac disease is a common cause of death in chronic hemodialysis patients. A subanalysis of the data on cardiac diseases in the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study was performed. The specific objectives were: (1) to analyze the prevalence of cardiac disease at baseline; (2) to characterize the incidence of various types of cardiac events during follow-up; (3) to examine the association of cardiac events during follow-up with baseline cardiac diseases; and (4) to examine the effect of dose and flux interventions on various types of cardiac events.

METHODS

The HEMO Study is a randomized multi-center trial on 1846 chronic hemodialysis patients at 15 clinical centers comprising 72 dialysis units. The scheduled maximum follow-up duration was 0.9 to 6.6 years, with the mean actual follow-up of 2.84 years. The interventions were standard-dose versus high-dose and low-flux versus high-flux hemodialysis in a 2 x 2 factorial design.

RESULTS

At baseline, 80% of patients had cardiac diseases, including ischemic heart disease (IHD) (39%), congestive heart failure (40%), arrhythmia (31%), and other heart diseases (63%). There were a total of 1685 cardiac hospitalizations, with angina and acute myocardial infarction accounting for 42.7% of these hospitalizations. There were 343 cardiac deaths during follow-up, accounting for 39.4% of all deaths. IHD was implicated in 61.5% of the cardiac deaths. Any cardiac disease at baseline was highly predictive of cardiac death during follow-up [relative risk (RR) 2.57; 95% CI 1.73-3.83]. There were no significant effects of dose or flux assignments on the primary outcome of all-cause mortality or the main secondary cardiac composite outcome of first cardiac hospitalization or all-cause mortality. Assignment to high-flux dialysis was, however, associated with decreased cardiac mortality and the composite outcome of first cardiac hospitalization or death from cardiac causes.

CONCLUSION

The HEMO Study identified IHD to be a major cause of cardiac hospitalizations and cardiac deaths. Future strategies for the prevention of cardiac diseases in the maintenance hemodialysis population should focus on this entity. Although high-flux dialysis did not reduce all-cause mortality, it might improve cardiac outcomes. This hypothesis needs to be further examined.

POOR NUTRITIONAL STATUS AND INFLAMMATION: Anthropometric and Body Composition Assessment in Dialysis Patients

Anthropometric and body composition assessments provide important information about the nutritional status of dialysis patients. Anthropometric measurements describe body size, fatness, and leanness in dialysis patients and have been collected in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and HEMO studies. Dialysis patients present special problems for anthropometry, including decreased functional status and increased comorbidity, that challenge nutrition assessment methodology. Recumbent anthropometric techniques are recommended and stature is estimated from knee height. Measures of weight, stature, calf circumference, arm circumference, and triceps and subscapular skinfolds have recently been reported for dialysis patients, who tend to be shorter, lighter, and have less adipose tissue than healthy persons of the same age. The HEMO study anthropometric data provide a clinical reference for assessing the nutritional status of dialysis patients. The most common body composition methods used with dialysis patients are dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), bioelectrical impedance, total body water (TBW), and prediction equations, but they are not recommended for assessment of predialysis patients, as estimates are best obtained postdialysis. The TBW volume used in calculating the dose of dialysis has commonly been predicted from the limited, out-of-date equations of Watson, based on nonrepresentative samples. New prediction equations are available for white, black, and Mexican American children and adults. Watson's data are not representative of the TBW of U.S. men and women. The greater TBW in non-Hispanic black men and women and Mexican American women reflects the greater levels of obesity in the U.S. population.

Racial differences in health-related quality of life among hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND; Despite technical progress in therapy, hemodialysis patients continue to report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) substantially lower than that of the general population. While African Americans with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) survive longer than members of other races, few studies have compared the HRQOL of African Americans with that of non-African Americans.

METHODS

We examined differences in sociodemographic, clinical, and HRQOL variables by race. A multiple regression model assessed the extent to which race was associated with differences in HRQOL scores after adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical variables. Racial differences in the relationship between comorbid disease severity and HRQOL were explored. RESULTS; In adjusted models, African Americans had higher scores in the Index of Well-Being and burden of kidney disease, but lower scores in cognitive function (all P < 0.05). For scales reflecting symptoms and effects of kidney disease, sleep quality, and the Physical Component Summary, the fall in HRQOL with increasing comorbidity was significantly greater in non-African Americans (all P < 0.05). After adjustment, there were no racial differences in scores on the Mental Component Summary, social support, dialysis staff encouragement, or patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, ESRD is the only chronic illness for which African Americans report significantly better psychologic well being and a lower burden of disease than non-African Americans. Further research is needed to understand whether these experiences affect health care utilization, medical decision making, and patient survival. Clarification of the reasons for race differences may suggest measures to improve HRQOL for all patients with ESRD.

Dialyzer Performance in the HEMO Study:In Vivo K 0 A and True Blood Flow Determined from a Model of Cross-Dialyzer Urea Extraction

Inlet and outlet blood urea concentrations (Cin and Cout) can be used to directly measure dialyzer performance if simultaneous blood flow measurements (Qb) are available. Dialyzer clearance, for example, is the product of the urea extraction ratio [ER = (Cin - Cout)/Cin] and Qb. Urea concentrations are measured routinely in all hemodialysis clinics, but Qb is usually reported as the product of the pump rotational speed and pump segment stroke volume, which can be inaccurate at high flow rates. Dialyzer urea extraction is also a function of Qb, dialysate flow (Qd), and the membrane permeability-area coefficient (K0A) for urea. To determine true in vivo values for Qb and K0A in the absence of direct flow measurements, we developed a model based on an existing mathematical equation for hemodialyzer ER under conditions of countercurrent flow. Qb, K0A, and other variables were adjusted to fit the modeled ER to ER measured in 1,285 patients treated with Qb that ranged from 200 to 450 ml/min during the HEMO Study. Fitting was performed by least squares nonlinear regression using parametric and nonparametric methods for estimating true flow. As Qb rose above 250 ml/min, both methods for estimating actual Qb showed increasing deviations from the flow reported by the blood pump meter. Modeled values for K0A differed significantly among dialyzer models, ranging from 71% to 96% of the in vitro values. The previously described 14% increase in K0A, as Qd increased in vitro from 500 to 800 ml/min, was much less in vivo, averaging only 5.5 +/- 1.5% higher. Dialyzer reprocessing was associated with a 6.3 +/- 1.0% reduction in K0A and an approximate 2% fall in urea clearance per 10 reuses (p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed a small but significant dialysis center effect on ER but no independent effects of other variables, including the ultrafiltration rate, diabetic status, race, ethnicity, sex, method of reuse, treatment time, access recirculation, and use of central venous accesses. The new algorithm allowed a more accurate determination of true Qb and in vivo K0A in the absence of direct flow measurements in a large population treated with a wide range of blood flow rates. Application of this technique for more than 1000 patients in the HEMO Study confirmed that in vitro measurements using simple crystalloid solutions cannot readily substitute for in vivo measurements of dialyzer function, and permitted a more accurate calculation of each patient's prescribed dialysis dose and urea volume.

Bias in assessment of health-related quality of life in a hemodialysis population: a comparison of self-administered and interviewer-administered surveys in the HEMO study

ABSTRACT. Examined is the relationship of patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) to the mode of survey administration in the Hemodialysis Study. In addition to self-administered surveys to assess HRQOL, interviewer-administered surveys were made available to include patients with poor vision, decreased manual dexterity, or strong preference. For examining the predictors of participation by self-administration of the survey, multiple logistic regression was performed. For examining the relationship of HRQOL results to mode of survey administration, adjusted differences between the self-administered and interviewer-administered groups were obtained from multiple linear regression models accounting for sociodemographic and case-mix factors. A total of 978 of the first 1000 subjects in the Hemodialysis Study completed the survey by interview (n = 427) or by self-administration (n = 551). The interviewer-administered group was older, was more likely black, had longer duration of ESRD, had a higher prevalence of diabetes, and had more severe comorbidity (all P < 0.01). After adjustment for these differences, patients in the interviewer-administered group had higher scores on scales that measured Role-Physical, Role-Emotional, and Effects of Kidney Disease (all P < 0.001). Dialysis studies that restrict HRQOL measurement to patients who are able to complete surveys without assistance will not accurately represent the health of the overall hemodialysis population. Clinical studies and clinical practices using HRQOL as an outcome should include interviewer administration or risk a selection bias against subjects with older age, minority status, and higher level of comorbidity. Future investigation should include research of survey modalities with a low response burden such as telephone interview, computer-assisted interview, and proxy administration.

Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

The effects of the dose of dialysis and the level of flux of the dialyzer membrane on mortality and morbidity among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis are uncertain.

METHODS

We undertook a randomized clinical trial in 1846 patients undergoing thrice-weekly dialysis, using a two-by-two factorial design to assign patients randomly to a standard or high dose of dialysis and to a low-flux or high-flux dialyzer.

RESULTS

In the standard-dose group, the mean (+/-SD) urea-reduction ratio was 66.3+/-2.5 percent, the single-pool Kt/V was 1.32+/-0.09, and the equilibrated Kt/V was 1.16+/-0.08; in the high-dose group, the values were 75.2+/-2.5 percent, 1.71+/-0.11, and 1.53+/-0.09, respectively. Flux, estimated on the basis of beta2-microglobulin clearance, was 3+/-7 ml per minute in the low-flux group and 34+/-11 ml per minute in the high-flux group. The primary outcome, death from any cause, was not significantly influenced by the dose or flux assignment: the relative risk of death in the high-dose group as compared with the standard-dose group was 0.96 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.10; P=0.53), and the relative risk of death in the high-flux group as compared with the low-flux group was 0.92 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.05; P=0.23). The main secondary outcomes (first hospitalization for cardiac causes or death from any cause, first hospitalization for infection or death from any cause, first 15 percent decrease in the serum albumin level or death from any cause, and all hospitalizations not related to vascular access) also did not differ significantly between either the dose groups or the flux groups. Possible benefits of the dose or flux interventions were suggested in two of seven prespecified subgroups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing hemodialysis thrice weekly appear to have no major benefit from a higher dialysis dose than that recommended by current U.S. guidelines or from the use of a high-flux membrane.

Nutritional status affects quality of life in Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study patients at baseline

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate associations between frequently used indicators for assessing nutritional status and health-related quality of life in hemodialysis patients after controlling for demographics, comorbidity, and dialysis dose.

DESIGN

Survey of 1,387 hemodialysis patients enrolled at baseline in the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study. Nutritional status indicators included dietary energy intake, equilibrated normalized protein catabolic rate (enPCR), serum creatinine (SCr), serum albumin (SAlb), body mass index (BMI), calf circumference, and appetite. Health-related quality of life was measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (MOS-SF-36) summary measures: the Physical Component Scale (PCS) and Mental Component Scale (MCS).

SETTING

Fifteen clinical sites throughout the United States providing in-center hemodialysis.

RESULTS

The mean PCS score was 36.1 +/- 10 SD, lower than normative data in healthy populations. PCS scores were lower among women, whites, and those with diabetes, severe comorbidities, and poor appetites. Appetite, dietary energy intake, SAlb, and SCr were strongly associated with PCS scores even after controlling for demographics and comorbidity. The sum of the parameter estimates for the effects of nutritional status on PCS was large, 7 points or more depending on the individual's nutritional status indicators. The mean MCS score was 49.7 +/- 10.1 SD, similar to scores in healthy populations, but lower among those with severe comorbidities, poor appetites, advanced age, and more years on dialysis. Appetite, age, and years on dialysis were significantly associated with MCS after controlling for other demographics and comorbidity. Dialysis dose did not significantly alter these relationships.

CONCLUSION

Easy-to-use indicators for assessing nutritional status (appetite, energy intake, SAlb, and SCr) together are strongly associated with health-related quality of life, even after controlling for comorbidities and dose of dialysis in hemodialysis patients, providing an additional reason for maximizing patients' nutritional status and health.

Is decreased treatment time in hemodialysis patients harmful if solute clearance is maintained?

An association between decreased duration of hemodialysis and increased morbidity and mortality in patients has been suggested. Whether this is due only to decreased solute clearance is unclear. In this prospective randomised study the effect of reducing treatment time whilst maintaining constant solute clearance was examined in fourteen patients. The study lasted for a period of 36 weeks (3x12 week study periods) and used a crossover design. The patients dialysis prescription (KW) was not changed on entering the study and was maintained during short (150 minutes) and long dialysis (240 minutes) by varying blood flow, dialysate flow and dialyzer surface area. The delivered KW was kinetically assessed. Fractional urea clearance was also measured during each treatment period by measurement of urea concentration in spent dialysate and total body water using 3H2O. At the end of each treatment period a full biochemical and hematological profile, nutritional intake and status, 24 h ambulatory blood pressure, nerve conduction studies, and quality of life questionnaire were performed. Within patients the delivered single pool KW was uniform throughout the 3 treatment periods and fractional urea clearance did not vary. However, Kt/W assessed using equilibrated models (Daugardis and Smye) was significantly lower in the short dialysis period. No differences between short and long dialysis sessions were noted in any of the measured variables. Thus, over a 36 week period there is no evidence to suggest that hemodialysis patients are adversely affected by decreased duration of treatment provided that solute clearance is maintained.

Association of nutritional markers with physical and mental health status in prevalent hemodialysis patients from the HEMO study

OBJECTIVE

To determine associations of potentially modifiable nutritional factors with physical and mental health status after adjusting for sociodemographic and comorbid conditions.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional multivariable analysis.

SETTING

Fifteen dialysis centers across the United States participating in the Reduction of Morbidity and Mortality Among Hemodialysis Patients (HEMO) study.

PATIENTS

Enrollment of 1,545 prevalent hemodialysis subjects in the HEMO study. INDEPENDENT (PREDICTOR) VARIABLES: The following nutritional markers were assessed in this analysis: serum albumin, energy intake, protein catabolic rate, serum creatinine, midarm muscle circumference, calf circumference, and smoking status. Smoking status, although not a nutritional factor per se, was also included because it is a modifiable lifestyle factor.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Physical and mental health status were assessed using the medical staff-assessed Karnofsky Index and the patient self-assessed Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

After adjusting for sociodemographic factors and comorbid conditions, serum albumin, serum creatinine, and calf circumference were independently associated with Karnofsky Index scores. Similarly, serum creatinine and calf circumference were also independently associated with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score of the SF-36. Of the nutritional variables selected, no variables were significantly associated with the Mental Component Summary (MCS) score of the SF-36.

CONCLUSIONS

Markers of poor nutrition were associated with decreased physical functioning scores, independent of case mix. Measures that improve nutrition may therefore have wide-reaching effects to improve not only morbidity and mortality but also health-related quality of life for patients with end-stage renal disease.

The importance of convective transport

BACKGROUND

Despite technological advances in dialysis equipment and modalities, survival, morbidity, and quality of life of hemodialysis patients are still severely affected by acute intradialytic and long-term complications, possibly related to the treatment itself. Convective treatments, such as high-flux hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, and hemofiltration are increasingly suggested as further improvements over standard diffusive hemodialysis. The membranes used for these techniques are high-flux semisynthetic and synthetic membranes. Characteristics of these membranes are high permeability, which allows convective removal of water and electrolytes and higher clearance of middle and large molecular weight solutes, and high biocompatibility, which minimizes the "inflammatory response" secondary to interactions between blood and the artificial material of the hemodialysis system.

METHODS

With the specific aim of verifying the superiority of convective treatments in reducing morbidity and mortality, we performed a review of the published literature.

RESULTS

Some epidemiological studies suggest that convective treatments reduce morbidity and mortality among dialysis patients. However, the results of the published prospective randomized controlled trials are conflicting. Moreover, since convective treatments are usually performed with synthetic biocompatible membranes, it is hard to separate the effect of convection from the effect of biocompatibility.

CONCLUSIONS

To finally assess the effect of high-flux membranes on morbidity and mortality, the results of two randomized, controlled clinical trials (HEMO study and MPO study) specifically designed with this aim are needed.

Online hemodiafiltration versus acetate-free biofiltration: a prospective crossover study

Online hemodiafiltration (online HDF) and acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) are 2 innovative renal replacement therapies. Convincing evidence has shown that both techniques are superior to conventional hemodialysis in many aspects. The aim of the present investigation was to compare online HDF and AFB in 12 stable maintenance hemodialysis patients in a prospective, randomized crossover trial. Twelve stable dialysis patients, age 49.7 +/- 11.3 years and on dialysis for 83.5 +/- 76.7 months, were treated prospectively and randomly by either AFB, predilution HDF (pre-HDF), or postdilution HDF (post-HDF) for a total of 36 weeks using exclusively F60S high-flux dialyzers. Routine blood biochemical tests, bone metabolism parameters, and clearance for both small and larger molecular weight substances were measured at defined intervals. During the trial period inter- and intradialysis symptoms, e.g., hypotensive episodes and intradialysis arterial blood gas analyses, were recorded. Both online HDF and AFB were well accepted by the overwhelming majority of patients and also by the dialysis staff. Pretreatment sodium, total and ionized calcium, chloride, bicarbonate, and urea did not differ within or between the 3 treatment groups. Potassium increased slightly in HDF patients while phosphate and beta2-microglobulin (beta2-M) decreased in all groups. After dialysis, AFB patients exhibited a significantly higher bicarbonate concentration and lower potassium level when identical potassium concentrations in dialysate were used. Patients receiving AFB manifested less intradialysis partial pressure of oxygen drop and partial pressure of carbon dioxide rise than those on HDF treatments. HDF treatments could afford higher single-pool and double-pool Kt/V, higher effective urea and beta2M clearance, and lower total interdialysis symptom scores than the AFB treatment method. While bone metabolism parameters did not differ between the 3 dialysis modalities, some parameters such as deoxypyridinoline in HDF and osteocalcin, pyridinoline, and deoxypyridinoline in AFB deteriorated at the end of the crossover study. Aluminum concentration decreased progressively to about one-third of prestudy values at the end of the study with all 3 treatments. AFB was associated with a lower predialysis mean arterial pressure (MAP), a smaller drop in MAP during treatment, and similar hypotension episodes compared with the 2 HDF treatments. Albumin concentration showed a trend to decrease during the first 2 months of the trial period followed by a slight increase thereafter but still significantly lower than initial value at the end of crossover. Both online HDF and AFB share most of the features of optimal renal replacement therapy. Online HDF is superior to AFB in such aspects as increased delivered dialysis dose both for small and larger molecular weight toxins and less interdialysis symptoms. On the other hand, AFB is associated with a smaller effect on arterial blood gas values and improved intradialysis hemodynamic tolerance. Some dialysis-related symptoms and complications in the case of our AFB practice could be attributable, at least in part, to low dialysate calcium level.

Relationship between volume status and blood pressure during chronic hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

The relationship between volume status and blood pressure (BP) in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients remains incompletely understood. Specifically, the effect of interdialytic fluid accumulation (or intradialytic fluid removal) on BP is controversial.

METHODS

We determined the association of the intradialytic decrease in body weight (as an indicator of interdialytic fluid gain) and the intradialytic decrease in plasma volume (as an indicator of postdialysis volume status) with predialysis and postdialysis BP in a cross-sectional analysis of a subset of patients (N=468) from the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study. Fifty-five percent of patients were female, 62% were black, 43% were diabetic and 72% were prescribed antihypertensive medications. Dry weight was defined as the postdialysis body weight below which the patient developed symptomatic hypotension or muscle cramps in the absence of edema. The intradialytic decrease in plasma volume was calculated from predialysis and postdialysis total plasma protein concentrations and was expressed as a percentage of the plasma volume at the beginning of HD.

RESULTS

Predialysis systolic and diastolic BP values were 153.1 +/- 24.7 (mean +/- SD) and 81.7 +/- 14.8 mm Hg, respectively; postdialysis systolic and diastolic BP values were 136.6 +/- 22.7 and 73.9 +/- 13.6 mm Hg, respectively. As a result of HD, body weight was reduced by 3.1 +/- 1.3 kg and plasma volume was contracted by 10.1 +/- 9.5%. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that each kg reduction in body weight during HD was associated with a 2.95 mm Hg (P=0.004) and a 1.65 mm Hg (P=NS) higher predialysis and postdialysis systolic BP, respectively. In contrast, each 5% greater contraction of plasma volume during HD was associated with a 1.50 mm Hg (P=0.026) and a 2.56 mm Hg (P < 0.001) lower predialysis and postdialysis systolic BP, respectively. The effects of intradialytic decreases in body weight and plasma volume were greater on systolic BP than on diastolic BP.

CONCLUSIONS

HD treatment generally reduces BP, and these reductions in BP are associated with intradialytic decreases in both body weight and plasma volume. The absolute predialysis and postdialysis BP levels are influenced differently by acute intradialytic decreases in body weight and acute intradialytic decreases in plasma volume; these parameters provide different information regarding volume status and may be dissociated from each other. Therefore, evaluation of volume status in chronic HD patients requires, at minimum, assessments of both interdialytic fluid accumulation (or the intradialytic decrease in body weight) and postdialysis volume overload.

Comparison of causes of death using HEMO Study and HCFA end-stage renal disease death notification classification systems. The National Institutes of Health-funded Hemodialysis. Health Care Financing Administration

Few data are available on the accuracy of death classification in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The National Institutes of Health-funded Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study allows the opportunity to compare cause of death recorded on the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) Death Notification Form 2746 with death classified by the HEMO Study. The HEMO Study cause of death is determined by trained HEMO Study Outcome Review Committee physicians. In this interim analysis, there were 220 deaths coded by both classification systems. Using the HEMO Study classification system, the most common cause of death was ischemic heart disease (20.4%), followed by arrhythmia and conduction problems (10.4%), cerebrovascular disease (8.6%), and non-access-related infections (7.7%). Using the HEMO Study final death classification as the reference standard, most differences in the two classification systems were related to coding of heart disease. Sensitivity for the HCFA classification ranged from 9.1% for congestive heart failure to 91.7% for malignancy, whereas specificity values were all greater than 78%. Positive predictive values ranged from 11.8% for other heart disease and conditions to 100% for malignancy and hepatobiliary disease, whereas negative predictive values were all greater than 85%. The kappa statistic between the two death classification systems ranged from 0.12 for congestive heart failure to 0.95 for malignancy. Studies using death classification from the HCFA ESRD death notification form for deaths secondary to either cardiovascular diseases or unknown causes should be interpreted cautiously.

Building the Evidence in Peritoneal Dialysis: Use of Randomized Controlled Trials, and Observational and Registry Data

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) has achieved widespread acceptance without being subjected to the rigors of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCCTs). The RCCT remains the “gold standard” of evidenced-based medicine, but ethical, logistic, and financial limitations mean that not all questions are amenable to a RCCT.

Renal registries collect, aggregate, analyze, and interpret data on the occurrence and outcome of renal failure in a defined population. Observational data can be used only to show associations, not causality. Nevertheless, most clinical practice guidelines in nephrology are derived from observational data.

The nephrology community needs to join forces to decide the questions that deserve the time, energy, and resources of an RCCT. Prospective observational data can be enhanced by collaboration, standardized definitions, development of a risk-adjustment tool, and consensus among the key players, including professional associations, government, industry, and hospitals. The challenge is to provide evidence-based practice guidelines for the delivery of care to the end-stage renal patient.

HEMO equilibrated Kt/V goals are difficult to achieve in large male patients

The long-term outcome of chronic hemodialysis patients is influenced by the adequacy of dialysis treatment. A major objective of the ongoing US HEMO Study is to determine if a higher target value of treatment as measured by the equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V), a calculation of dialysis adequacy developed for the study, of 1.45 results in a better outcome than the presently accepted target value for eKt/V of 1.05 (approximately equal to spKt/V of 1.2). eKt/V corrects for urea rebound and gives a better estimate of actual treatment received. To examine the feasibility of achieving the higher eKt/V in large hemodialysis patients, a retrospective analysis of 389 monthly eKt/V values from 65 men on chronic hemodialysis of larger than average size dialyzed at high blood and dialysate flows (QB 400, QD 800 ml/min) with large dialyzers (1.8-2.2 m2) for longer than 4 hours three times weekly was performed. A total of 278 treatments considered optimal by a blood water urea clearance estimate were included in the final analyses. The mean body weight and Chertow water volume were 84.3+/-16.5 kgm and 50.0+/-6.7 L, respectively. The mean sp Kt/V was 1.29+/-0.17. The mean eKt/V was 1.16+/-0.14 and was inversely correlated with weight and water volume (p < 0.0001). Despite the large dialyzers and high blood and dialysate flow rates, no patient weighing more than 80 kgm or with body water volume exceeding 46 liters achieved an eKt/V of 1.45. This study suggests that creative dialyses will be required to achieve the HEMO "high arm" target in large patients.

Comorbidity assessment using the Index of Coexistent Diseases in a multicenter clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study is a multicenter trial designed to determine whether hemodialysis dose and membrane flux affect survival. Comorbid conditions are also important determinants of survival, and thus, an accurate and reliable method to assess comorbidity was required. Comorbidity was being assessed at baseline and annually in the HEMO Study using the Index of Coexistent Disease (ICED). We describe the instrument, its implementation in the HEMO Study, and the results of comorbidity assessment in the first 1000 randomized patients in the trial.

METHODS

The ICED aggregated the presence and severity of 19 medical conditions and 11 physical impairments within two scales: the Index of Disease Severity (IDS) and the Index of Physical Impairment (IPI). The final ICED score was determined by an algorithm combining the peak scores for the IDS and IPI. The range of the ICED was from 0 to 3, reflecting increasing severity.

RESULTS

Study personnel at 15 clinical centers were trained to update and abstract data from the dialysis medical records. Availability of data, measures of construct validity, and measures of reliability were adequate; 99.8% and 60.6% of patients had comorbid conditions in at least one IDS or IPI category, respectively. The distribution of patients by ICED level was 0 (0.2%), 1 (34.9%), 2 (31.2%), and 3 (33.7%). In multivariable analysis, the following factors were significantly associated with more severe comorbidity: older age, diabetes and other causes of renal disease, a lower level of education, employment status (unemployed and retired), longer duration of dialysis, and lower serum creatinine. There was a significant variation in the severity of comorbidity among clinical centers after adjustment for other factors. The R2 of the model was 25.3%, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variation in the ICED was not explained by these factors.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that comorbidity assessment using the ICED is feasible in multicenter clinical trials of dialysis patients. There is a large burden of comorbidity in dialysis patients, which is not well explained by the cause of renal disease, demographic, and socioeconomic factors and common clinical and laboratory measurements. These variables should not be considered substitutes for comorbid conditions in case-mix adjustment. Comorbidity assessment is useful to describe the sample population, to improve the precision of the treatment effect, and to use possibly as an outcome measurement.

Explaining counter-intuitive clinical outcomes predicted by Kt/V

Population-based studies of maintenance hemodialysis patients have demonstrated a reproducible relationship between the dose of hemodialysis and mortality and morbidity outcomes. In these analyses, which have aggregated hemodialysis patient subgroups, improved outcomes are associated with greater doses of hemodialysis. However, remarkable counterintuitive findings are observed if patients are analyzed by subgroups based on their race, gender, and anthropometric and blood-based biomarkers of nutritional state. For example, blacks generally receive lower doses of hemodialysis than whites, but enjoy relatively improved survival; patients who receive the highest doses of hemodialysis have an increased death risk; and the dose response curve between hemodialysis and survival is altered based on the patients' body mass index. These seemingly paradoxical relationships between hemodialysis dose and patient survival can be explained because of the use of mathematical urea kinetic constructs as clinical outcome predictors; they integrate a measure of solute removal (K x t) with an anthropometric surrogate of nutrition, the urea distribution volume (V). Both these measures have an independent influence on patient survival and in some clinical circumstances are of unequal power as clinical outcome predictors. These complex interactions must be kept in perspective as clinical care is delivered in the context of hemodialysis dose.

The role of the dietitian in a multicenter clinical trial of dialysis therapy: the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study

The Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study is a randomized multicenter prospective clinical trial, supported by the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health. The trial is designed to assess the effects of a standard versus higher dialysis dose and low versus high dialysis membrane flux on morbidity and mortality of chronic hemodialysis patients. The role of the dietitian in the HEMO Study is to support and maintain the nutritional status of randomized participants. To ensure participant safety, nutritional status is closely monitored by a variety of biochemical and participant-reported parameters. Serum albumin and equilibrated normalized protein catabolic rates are obtained monthly. Appetite assessment and dietary energy and protein intakes using a 2-day diet diary assisted recall are ascertained at baseline and on a yearly basis. Consumption of vitamins, minerals, and nutritional supplements, including oral enterals, tube feedings, and parenteral nutrition, is obtained at least once a year. In addition, anthropometry is performed at baseline and on a yearly basis. Prespecified changes in serum albumin level or body weight trigger action by the dietitian to prevent protein calorie malnutrition. The HEMO Study dietitians play a vital role in carrying out the nutrition program for the trial. The HEMO Study should provide important information about the natural history of the nutritional status of chronic hemodialysis patients and the impact of dialysis dose and dialysis membrane flux on these parameters.

Cardiovascular disease determinants in chronic renal failure: clinical approach and treatment

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), as the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT), has a central role in everyday nephrological practice.

METHODS

Consensus was reached on key points relating to the clinical approach and treatment of the main cardiovascular risk factors in RRT patients (hypertension, anaemia, hyperparathyroidism, dyslipidaemia, new emerging risk factors). In addition, the role of convective treatments on cardiovascular outcomes was examined.

RESULTS

Hypertension should be managed by aiming at blood pressure values of < or =140/90 mmHg (< or =160/90 mmHg in the elderly), firstly by ensuring target dry body weight is achieved. No single class of drug has proved superior to others in RRT patients, provided that the blood pressure target is achieved, although ACE inhibitors have shown specific organ protection in high-risk patients (HOPE study) and are well tolerated. Anaemia should be managed by using erythropoietin and iron supplements, aiming at haemoglobin levels of 12 g/dl and keeping serum ferritin levels < 500 ng/ml. The management of hyperparathyroidism is currently unsatisfactory, as calcium supplements have the potential to increase cardiovascular calcification. While awaiting new calcium- and aluminium-free phosphate binders, it is essential to ensure dialysis adequacy. Clinical studies are in progress to assess the real impact of lipid-lowering drugs in RRT. In the meantime, serum LDL-cholesterol < 160 mg/dl and triglycerides < 500 mg/dl may be desirable targets. The impact of new emerging risk factors (inflammation and chronic infection, hyperhomocysteinaemia, metabolic waste-product accumulation) and their proper management are still under research. Convective dialysis treatments may confer some degree of protection from dialysis-related amyloidosis and mortality, but clinical data on this important issue are still controversial and no definitive conclusions can be drawn at present.

CONCLUSION

CVD prevention and treatment is a great challenge for the nephrologist. Achieving evidence-based consensus can help in encouraging the implementation of best clinical practice in line with the progress of current knowledge.

Changing hemodialysis thresholds for optimal survival

BACKGROUND

The urea reduction ratio (URR), a measure quantitating solute removal during hemodialysis, is the fractional reduction of the blood urea concentration during a single hemodialysis treatment. The URR is the principal measure of hemodialysis dose in the United States. Based on studies of patients dialyzed prior to 1994, a minimum URR value of 65% was recommended to optimize survival. Because of new hemodialysis technologies and evolving demographics of the hemodialysis population, the relationship between the amount of hemodialysis and mortality was examined in contemporary cohorts.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort included> 15,000 patients per year receiving hemodialysis during 1994 through 1997. Each patient's URR was averaged for the three months prior to the beginning of each year. Mortality odds ratios were calculated for patients by URR. To determine the URR value above which no further improvement in mortality was seen ("threshold"), spline functions were tested in logistic regression models, both unadjusted and adjusted for case mix measures. The strength of fit for URR, defined by a range of candidate thresholds from 55 to 75%, was evaluated in increments of 1% for each year using spline functions.

RESULTS

The median URR was 63.2, 65.4, 67.4, and 68.1% for 1994 through 1997, respectively. The median length of hemodialysis treatments increased only six minutes from the beginning to the end of the period of analysis. Using spline functions, the threshold URR values were 61.1, 65.0, 68.0, and 71.0% for 1994 through 1997 in models adjusted for case mix. The ratio of median URR to URR threshold decreased from 1.03 in 1994 to 0.97 in 1997.

CONCLUSIONS

From 1994 to 1997, the median URR and the URR threshold for mortality benefit increased. Although an increased need in the amount of hemodialysis may be a consequence of changes in patients' demographic characteristics, the likely explanation(s) is a change in the dialysis procedure and/or blood sampling favoring higher URR values without changing the amount of dialysis provided. The recommended minimum URR of 65% appears to be too low to confer an optimal mortality benefit in the context of current practices.

Factors associated with the prevalence of arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients in the HEMO study. Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous (AV) fistulas are the vascular access of choice for hemodialysis patients, but only about 20% of hemodialysis patients in the United States dialyze with fistulas. There is little information known about the factors associated with this low prevalence of fistulas.

METHODS

Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent contribution of factors associated with AV fistula use among patients enrolled in the HEMO Study. The analysis was conducted in 1824 patients with fistulas or grafts at 45 dialysis units (15 clinical centers).

RESULTS

Thirty-four percent of the patients had fistulas. The prevalence of fistulas varied markedly from 4 to 77% among the individual dialysis units (P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis revealed five demographic and clinical factors that were each independently associated with a lower likelihood of having a fistula, even after adjustment for dialysis unit. Specifically, the prevalence of fistulas was lower in females than males [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.37, 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.48], lower in patients with peripheral vascular disease than in those without (AOR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.79), lower in blacks than in non-blacks (AOR 0.64, 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.89), lower in obese patients (AOR per 5 kg/m(2) body mass index, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.87), and lower in older patients (AOR per 10 years, 0.85, 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.94). The differences in the prevalence of fistulas among the dialysis units remained statistically significant (P < 0.001) after adjustment for these demographic and clinical factors. Finally, there were substantial variations in the prevalence of fistulas even among dialysis units in a single metropolitan area.

CONCLUSIONS

Future efforts to increase the prevalence of fistulas in hemodialysis patients should be directed at both hemodialysis units and patient subpopulations with a low fistula prevalence.

Design and statistical issues of the hemodialysis (HEMO) study

The Hemodialysis Study is a multicenter clinical trial of hemodialysis prescriptions for patients with end stage renal disease. Participants from over 65 dialysis facilities associated with 15 clinical centers in the United States are randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to dialysis prescriptions targeted to a standard dose or a high dose, and to either low or high flux membranes. The primary outcome variable is mortality; major secondary outcomes are defined based on hospitalizations due to cardiovascular or infectious complications, and on the decline of serum albumin. The Outcome Committee, consisting of study investigators, uses a blinded review system to classify causes of death and hospitalizations related to the major secondary outcomes. The dialysis dose intervention is directed by the Data Coordinating Center using urea kinetic modeling programs that analyze results from dialysis treatments to monitor adherence to the study targets, adjust suggested dialysis prescriptions, and assist in trouble-shooting problems with the delivery of dialysis. The study design has adequate power to detect reductions in mortality rate equal to 25% of the projected baseline mortality rate for both of the interventions.

Whither goest Kt/V?

Uremia is characterized by gross contamination of body water with a wide spectrum of retained solutes normally excreted by the kidney. The rationale for dialysis therapy is that these retained solutes have concentration-dependent toxicity, which can be ameliorated through removal by dialysis. Apart from the well-established clinical consequences of abnormalities in fluid, electrolyte, acid base metabolism, and retained beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2 m), there is very little understanding of solute-specific uremic toxicity. Evidence is reviewed to demonstrate the following: (1) Many aspects of the uremic syndrome are controlled by adequate dialysis of low molecular weight solutes. (2) Urea can serve as a generic molecule to quantitate the fractional clearance of body water by dialysis (Kt/V) of retained low molecular weight solutes. (3) Urea has no concentration-dependent toxicity, and the generation rate of putative toxic low molecular weight solutes is not proportional to urea generation. The major clinical consequences and controversies stemming from these interrelationships are reviewed. Kinetic approaches to determine Kt/V dose equivalency between intermittent and continuous dialysis therapy are reviewed. We conclude that Kt/V can and will be generalized to describe the kinetics of other solutes such as beta2m as our knowledge of uremic toxicity grows, and hence, it is predicted that it will goeth and goeth and goeth.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risks in chronic hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular diseases are the most common causes of death among chronic hemodialysis patients, yet the risk factors for these events have not been well established.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we examined the relationship between several traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors and the presence or history of cardiovascular events in 936 hemodialysis patients enrolled in the baseline phase of the Hemodialysis Study sponsored by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The adjusted odds ratios for each of the selected risk factors were estimated using a multivariable logistic regression model, controlling for the remaining risk factors, clinical center, and years on dialysis.

RESULTS

Forty percent of the patients had coronary heart disease. Nineteen percent had cerebrovascular disease, and 23% had peripheral vascular disease. As expected, diabetes and smoking were strongly associated with cardiovascular diseases. Increasing age was also an important contributor, especially in the group less than 55 years and in nondiabetic patients. Black race was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular diseases than non-blacks. Interestingly, neither serum total cholesterol nor predialysis systolic blood pressure was associated with coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral vascular disease. Further estimation of the coronary risks in our cohort using the Framingham coronary point score suggests that traditional risk factors are inadequate predictors of coronary heart disease in hemodialysis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Some of the traditional coronary risk factors in the general population appear to be also applicable to the hemodialysis population, while other factors did not correlate with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in this cross-sectional study. Nontraditional risk factors, including the uremic milieu and perhaps the hemodialysis procedure itself, are likely to be contributory. Further studies are necessary to define the cardiovascular risk factors in order to devise preventive and interventional strategies for the chronic hemodialysis population.

Economic evaluation and end-stage renal disease: from basics to bedside

Economic evaluation is the comparative analysis of alternative health care interventions in terms of their relative costs (resource use) and effectiveness (health effects). High-quality studies of economic evaluation have been increasingly published in medical journals and read by clinicians, although publication of these studies in nephrology journals has been a more recent phenomenon. This article shows how the basic principles of economics can be applied to health care through the use of economic evaluation. Different types of economic evaluation are discussed, and pitfalls common to such studies are identified. A simple framework is introduced that can be used to interpret the results of economic evaluations. Using this framework, selected therapies for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are categorized to highlight therapies that are very efficient, encourage their use, and draw attention to therapies in current use that are less effective and more expensive (ie, less efficient) than alternative therapy. Using examples pertinent to care of the patient with ESRD, we show how economic evaluation can be used to link medical outcomes, quality of life, and costs in a common index for multiple therapies with disparate outcome measures. This article highlights the need for clinical studies and economic evaluations of therapies in ESRD for which the effects of the therapy on health outcomes and/or costs are unknown.