Histamine H4receptor antagonism reduces hapten-induced scratching behaviour but not inflammation

PTEN deletion in spinal pathways via retrograde transduction with AAV-RG enhances forelimb motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury; Sex differences and late-onset pathophysiologies

Spinal cord injuries (SCI) cause permanent functional impairments due to interruption of motor and sensory pathways. Regeneration of axons does not occur due to lack of intrinsic growth capacity of adult neurons and extrinsic inhibitory factors, especially at the injury site. However, some regeneration can be achieved via deletion of the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) in cells of origin of spinal pathways. Here, we deployed an AAV variant that is retrogradely transported (AAV-rg) to deliver gene modifying cargos to the cells of origin of multiple pathways interrupted by SCI, testing whether this promoted recovery of motor function. PTENf/f;RosatdTomato mice and control RosatdTomato mice received injections of different doses (number of genome copies, GCs) of AAV-rg/Cre into the cervical spinal cord at the time of a C5 dorsal hemisection injury. Forelimb grip strength was tested over time using a grip strength meter. PTENf/f;RosatdTomato mice with AAV-rg/Cre (PTEN-deleted) exhibited substantial improvements in forelimb gripping ability in comparison to controls. Of note, there were major sex differences in the extent of recovery, with male mice exhibiting greater recovery than females. However, at around 5-7 weeks post-injury/injection, many mice with SCI and AAV-rg-mediated PTEN deletion began to exhibit pathophysiologies involving excessive scratching of the ears and back of the neck and rigid forward extension of the hindlimbs. These pathophysiologies increased in incidence and severity over time. Our results reveal that although intra-spinal injections of AAV-rg/Cre in PTENf/f;RosatdTomato mice can enhance forelimb motor recovery after SCI, late-developing functional abnormalities occur with the experimental conditions used here. Mechanisms underlying late-developing pathophysiologies remain to be defined.

PTEN deletion in spinal pathways via retrograde transduction with AAV-rg enhances forelimb motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury; sex differences and late-onset pathophysiologies

Spinal cord injuries (SCI) cause permanent functional impairments due to interruption of motor and sensory pathways. Regeneration of axons does not occur due to lack of intrinsic growth capacity of adult neurons and extrinsic inhibitory factors, especially at the injury site. However, some regeneration can be achieved via deletion of the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) in cells of origin of spinal pathways. Here, we deployed an AAV variant that is retrogradely transported (AAV-rg) to deliver gene modifying cargos to the cells of origin of multiple pathways interrupted by SCI, testing whether this promoted recovery of motor function. PTEN f/f ;Rosa tdTomato mice and control Rosa tdTomato mice received injections of different doses (number of genome copies, GCs) of AAV-rg/Cre into the cervical spinal cord at the time of a C5 dorsal hemisection injury. Forelimb grip strength was tested over time using a grip strength meter. PTEN f/f ;Rosa tdTomato mice with AAV-rg/Cre (PTEN-deleted) exhibited substantial improvements in forelimb gripping ability in comparison to controls. Of note, there were major sex differences in the extent of recovery, with male mice exhibiting greater recovery than females. However, at around 5-7 weeks post-injury/injection, many mice with SCI and AAV-rg-mediated PTEN deletion began to exhibit pathophysiologies involving excessive scratching of the ears and back of the neck and rigid forward extension of the hindlimbs. These pathophysiologies increased in incidence and severity over time. Our results reveal that although intra-spinal injections of AAV-rg/Cre in PTEN f/f ;Rosa tdTomato mice can enhance forelimb motor recovery after SCI, late-developing functional abnormalities occur with the experimental conditions used here. Mechanisms underlying late-developing pathophysiologies remain to be defined.

Adriforant is a functional antagonist of histamine receptor 4 and attenuates itch and skin inflammation in mice

BACKGROUND

Histamine has been postulated to play a role in atopic dermatitis via histamine receptor 4, mediating pruritic and inflammatory effects. The H4R antagonist adriforant (PF-3893787 or ZPL389) indicated clinical efficacy in a Ph2a study in atopic dermatitis. Preclinical investigations of adriforant had been scarce as experiments in transfectants with H4R from several species suggested partial agonism, not seen in human cells.

OBJECTIVE

During the Ph2b trial in AD, we performed experiments to understand the pharmacology of adriforant in primary murine cells and in vivo models. We assessed its effects on ERK phosphorylation and transcriptional changes in bone marrow-derived mast cells, histamine-dependent Ca²⁺ flux in neurons and histamine-induced itch response. In addition, its impact on MC903-induced skin inflammation was evaluated.

RESULTS

We show that, contrary to transfectants, adriforant is a competitive antagonist of the murine histamine receptor 4, antagonizes histamine-induced ERK phosphorylation, normalizes histamine-induced transcriptional changes in mast cells and reduces histamine-dependent Ca²⁺ flux in neurons. Administration to mice reduces acute histamine-induced itch response. In addition, adriforant ameliorates inflammation in the mouse MC903 model.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that functional inhibition of histamine receptor 4 by adriforant reduces itch and inflammation in vivo. The effects observed in mice, however, did not translate to clinical efficacy in patients as the Ph2b clinical trial with adriforant did not meet pre-specified efficacy endpoints. Given the complex pathogenesis of AD, antagonism of histamine receptor 4 alone appears insufficient to reduce disease severity in AD patients, despite the effects seen in mouse models.

Mechanisms of unconventional CD8 Tc2 lymphocyte induction in allergic contact dermatitis: Role of H3/H4 histamine receptors

Histamine (HA) is a potent mediator that plays a central role in inflammation and allergy, acting through four G-protein-coupled receptors (i.e. H₁–H₄). HA is an accepted promoter of type 2 immunity in CD4⁺ T cells during hypersensitivity. Previously, we demonstrated that HA can promote antigen cross-presentation, inducing the activation of antigen-specific CD8⁺ T cells in an asthmatic murine model. Non-classical CD8+ T-cell profiles, such as Tc2 or Tc17, are associated with allergic disease persistence and chronicity. In this paper, we focus on the role of the H₃ receptor (H₃R) and the H₄ receptor (H₄R) in the development of allergic contact dermatitis. We were able to show that induction of the type 2 profiles associated with interleukin 13 production, both by CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes, depend on the interaction of HA with H₃R and H₄R. Blocking both receptors using the selective H₃/H₄ receptor antagonist thioperamide or the selective H₄R ligand JNJ777120 reduces the inflammatory response, inducing an immunosuppressive profile associated with the increased proportion of FOXp3⁺ regulatory T lymphocytes and CD11b⁺Gr-1⁺ myeloid suppressor cells. Interestingly, in dendritic cells, only H₄R blockade, and not H₃R blockade, is capable of modulating most of the inflammatory effects observed in our model.

Druggable Targets and Compounds with Both Antinociceptive and Antipruritic Effects

Pain and itch are both important manifestations of various disorders, such as herpes zoster, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis. Growing evidence suggests that both sensations have shared mediators, overlapping neural circuitry, and similarities in sensitization processes. In fact, pain and itch coexist in some disorders. Determining pharmaceutical agents and targets for treating pain and itch concurrently is of scientific and clinical relevance. Here we review the neurobiology of pain and itch and discuss the pharmaceutical targets as well as novel compounds effective for the concurrent treatment of these sensations.

The role of PTEN in primary sensory neurons in processing itch and thermal information in mice

PTEN is known as a tumor suppressor and plays essential roles in brain development. Here, we report that PTEN in primary sensory neurons is involved in processing itch and thermal information in adult mice. Deletion of PTEN in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) is achieved in adult Drg11-Cre^ER: PTEN^flox/flox (PTEN CKO) mice with oral administration of tamoxifen, and CKO mice develop pathological itch and elevated itch responses on exposure to various pruritogens. PTEN deletion leads to ectopic expression of TRPV1 and MrgprA3 in IB4⁺ non-peptidergic DRG neurons, and the TRPV1 is responsive to capsaicin. Importantly, the elevated itch responses are no longer present in Drg11-Cre^ER: PTEN^flox/flox: TRPV1^flox/flox (PTEN: TRPV1 dCKO) mice. In addition, thermal stimulation is enhanced in PTEN CKO mice but blunted in dCKO mice. PTEN-involved regulation of itch-related gene expression in DRG neurons provides insights for understanding molecular mechanism of itch and thermal sensation at the spinal level.

Dissecting the precise nature of itch-evoked scratching

Itch is a discrete and irritating sensation tightly coupled to a drive to scratch. Acute scratching developed evolutionarily as an adaptive defense against skin irritants, pathogens, or parasites. In contrast, the itch-scratch cycle in chronic itch is harmful, inducing escalating itch and skin damage. Clinically and preclinically, scratching incidence is currently evaluated as a unidimensional motor parameter and believed to reflect itch severity. We propose that scratching, when appreciated as a complex, multidimensional motor behavior, will yield greater insight into the nature of itch and the organization of neural circuits driving repetitive motor patterns. We outline the limitations of standard measurements of scratching in rodent models and present new approaches to observe and quantify itch-evoked scratching. We argue that accurate quantitative measurements of scratching are critical for dissecting the molecular, cellular, and circuit mechanisms underlying itch and for preclinical development of therapeutic interventions for acute and chronic itch disorders.

Production of IL-31 in CD45RO+CLA+H4R+ T Cells in Atopic Dermatitis

IL-31 is involved in pruritus in atopic dermatitis (AD) and the pathogenesis of AD. However, the mechanism of IL-31 production is not fully understood. We sought to investigate the association between CD45RO⁺CLA⁺H4R⁺ T cells and IL-31 production. Immunofluorescence studies were performed retrospectively on punch-biopsy specimens from five people with AD and three healthy controls. In addition, blood samples were collected prospectively from eight patients with AD and eight healthy controls for sorting CD45RO⁺CLA⁺H4R⁺ T cells. There was no overlap of patients between the biopsy group and the blood sampling group. Sorted cells were stimulated with 4-methylhistamine (4MH), and the level of IL-31 was measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Immunofluorescence showed co-localization of H4R and IL-31 in lesional AD skin but not in normal skin of healthy controls. The proportion of CLA⁺H4R⁺ T cells among CD3⁺CD45RO⁺ lymphocytes was 18.3 ± 6.2% in patients with AD and 11.2 ± 7.6% in healthy controls. In the AD group, production of IL-31 by CD45RO⁺CLA⁺H4R⁺ T cells increased from 32.4 ± 13.3 pg/mL to 47.5 ± 18.7 pg/mL by 4MH stimulation after 24 h (p < 0.001). However, in the control group, production of IL-31 was 20.1 ± 10.6 pg/mL without and 22.1 ± 9.3 pg/mL with 4MH stimulation (p > 0.05). According to our study, CD45RO⁺CLA⁺H4R⁺ T cells are an important source of IL-31 in AD, and may be a target for treatment of IL-31-induced pruritus.

An overview of drug discovery efforts for eczema: why is this itch so difficult to scratch?

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a type of allergic/inflammatory dermatitis characterized by itch and an impairment in quality of life.Areas covered: Herein, the authors review drug discovery efforts for AD, highlighting the clinical efficacy of novel drugs, with a particular focus on the relief of pruritus. Topical agents include emollients, topical antihistamines, corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors and herbs. Recently, topical phosphodiesterase E4 (PDE4) inhibitors like crisaborole have become available and are efficacious for mild to moderate AD with few side effects. For more severe AD, monoclonal antibodies like dupilumab are considered as efficacious subcutaneous treatment options. In severe and recalcitrant AD, systemic treatment can ameliorate AD symptoms.Expert opinion: Many topical and systemic medications have demonstrated therapeutic benefits for AD. Indeed, randomized trials have shown that topical PDE4 inhibitors and subcutaneous dupilumab are safe and efficacious. Objective tools to evaluate itch and gauge treatment efficacy is important, but current methodology relies primarily on clinical scores. AD is a systemic atopic disease with a lot of complicated psychosocial issues. Suboptimal efficacy is often due to poor compliance and unrealistic expectation of curative treatment, rendering treatment difficult despite the existence of effective medications.

Effect of H4R Antagonist N-(2-Aminoethyl)-5-Chloro-1H-Indole-2-Carboxamide (Compound A) in a Mouse Model of Allergic Asthma

Context: Allergic asthma is a multifactorial airway disease characterised by chronic lung inflammation and airway remodelling. The histamine H4 receptor involved in the chemotaxis of leukocytes and mast cells to the site of inflammation is suggested to be a potential drug target for allergy and asthma. In this study we examined the effect of Compound A, N-(2-Aminoethyl)-5-chloro-1H-indol-2-carboxamide a H4 receptor antagonist in allergic asthma mice model. Objective: To investigate the anti-asthmatic effect of compound A in in vivo, airway inflammation in ovalbumin (OVA) induced allergic asthma mouse model was used. Methodology: Allergic asthma was induced in Balb/c mice using ovalbumin. BAL fluid was examined for the level of IgE, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and IL-17 using ELISA. Furthermore, infiltration of leucocytes by histopathology and effect of compound A on signalling molecules were examined in lung tissue. Results: In mice pre-treatment with compound A (10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg) at different concentrations markedly reduced the levels of IgE, Th2 cytokine IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and Th17 cytokine IL-17 in BAL fluid. Histopathological examination of lung tissue showed that compound A was able to reduce the level of inflammatory infiltrates. Furthermore, lung tissue from Compound A treated group shown to down-regulate the levels of signalling molecules such as ERK1/2, Akt, SAPK/JNK and NF-κB compared to OVA treated group. Discussion and conclusion: Taken together our data demonstrates that compound A has shown to block the H4R-mediated allergic inflammation in this allergic asthma mice model and may be used as a molecule to study the function of H4R. Abbreviations: Compound A, N-(2-Aminoethyl)-5-chloro-1H-indol-2-carboxamide; JNJ7777120, 1-[(5-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)carbonyl]-4-methylpiperazine; H₄R: Histamine 4 Receptor; AHR: Airway hyper responsiveness.

New and Emerging Therapies for Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease characterized by pruritus, inflammatory erythematous skin lesions, and skin-barrier defect. Current mainstay treatments of emollients, steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and immunosuppressants have limited efficacy and potentially serious side effects. Recent advances and understanding of the pathogenesis of AD have resulted in new therapies that target specific pathways with increased efficacy and the potential for less systemic side effects. New FDA-approved therapies for AD are crisaborole and dupilumab. The JAK-STAT inhibitors (baricitinib, upadacitinib, PF-04965842, ASN002, tofacitinib, ruxolitinib, and delgocitinib) have the most promising results of the emerging therapies. Other drugs with potential include the aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulating agent tapinarof, the IL-4/IL-13 antagonists lebrikizumab and tralokinumab, and the IL-31Rα antagonist nemolizumab. In this review, new and emerging AD therapies will be discussed along with their mechanisms of action and their potential based on clinical study data.

Peripheral and Central Mechanisms of Itch

Itch is a unique sensory experience that is encoded by genetically distinguishable neurons both in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) and central nervous system (CNS) to elicit a characteristic behavioral response (scratching). Itch interacts with the other sensory modalities at multiple locations, from its initiation in a particular dermatome to its transmission to the brain where it is finally perceived. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the molecular and neural mechanisms of itch by starting in the periphery, where itch is initiated, and discussing the circuits involved in itch processing in the CNS.

[Histamine receptors in chronic inflammatory diseases of the nose and paranasal sinuses]

BACKGROUND

Release of histamine from mast cells and basophils in inflammatory diseases of the nose and paranasal sinuses has been demonstrated in allergic and non-allergic processes.

METHODS

A selective literature search was conducted in PubMed and Medline, and publications in German-language journals were additionally analyzed.

RESULTS

The histamine receptors H₁-H₄ play a role in otorhinolaryngologic inflammatory diseases. To date, the histamine receptor subtype 4 (H₄R), which is functionally expressed by immune cells in chronic inflammatory diseases, has received little attention. Stimulation of H₄R influences the release of cytokines and chemokines as well as the migration behavior of immune cells. In animal models blockade of H₄R reduced inflammation symptoms and pruritus.

CONCLUSIONS

H₄R plays a key role in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases and may represent an interesting future therapeutic target.

The role of the histamine H4 receptor in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis are common skin diseases with a high negative impact on patients' quality of life. Both diseases are mediated by a pro-inflammatory infiltrate consisting of several cell types, such as T-cells, antigen-presenting cells and granulocytes and display disturbed keratinocyte differentiation. Given the fact that histamine levels are also highly elevated in inflamed skin, it is likely that histamine plays a relevant role in disease pathology. However, antagonists blocking histamine H₁ receptor or H₂ receptors are largely ineffective in reducing chronic symptoms in AD and psoriasis. Over the last years, much research has been undertaken to shed light into the mode of action of the most recently discovered histamine H₄ receptor. This research has shown that H₄ receptor antagonists display antipruritic and anti-inflammatory effects not only in mouse models but also in first human clinical trials, and therefore, H₄ receptors might present a novel therapeutic target. In this review, we summarize the effects of the H₄ receptors on different cell types, mouse models and clinical studies in regard to AD and psoriasis respectively. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on New Uses for 21st Century. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v177.3/issuetoc.

H4 Receptor Inhibits Lipopolysaccharide-induced NF-κB Activation by Interacting with Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Factor 6

Microglia, the resident immune cells of the central nervous system (CNS), are activated at the beginning of the inflammatory response and induce detrimental neuroinflammation by producing excessive pro-inflammatory cytokines. Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling facilitates the onset of microglia activation. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the negative regulation of NF-κB remain to be fully elucidated. In the present study, our results indicated that H4R expression increased in a rat model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced CNS inflammation. Knockdown of H4R in microglia HAPI cells enhanced the production of cytokines following LPS stimulation. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments further revealed an interaction between H4R and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) in microglia, which was verified both in vivo and in vitro. Our experimental results support our hypothesis that H4R interacts with TRAF6 to inhibit the release of inflammatory cytokines in LPS-induced microglia cells by decreasing TRAF6-mediated ubiquitination of K63. These findings provide theoretical and experimental evidence regarding the role of H4R in the microglia inflammatory response, which may aid in the development of novel treatments for inflammation.

Enhanced therapeutic effects of human mesenchymal stem cells transduced with superoxide dismutase 3 in a murine atopic dermatitis-like skin inflammation model

BACKGROUND

The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been proposed to treat various autoimmune diseases. However, effective strategies for treating atopic dermatitis (AD) are still lacking, and the mechanisms underlying stem cell therapy remain largely unknown. In this study, we sought to explore potential clinical application of superoxide dismutase 3-transduced MSCs (SOD3-MSCs) to experimental AD-like skin inflammation in in vitro and in vivo and its underlying anti-inflammatory mechanisms.

METHODS

SOD3-MSCs were administered subcutaneously to mice with AD, and associated symptoms and biologic changes were evaluated. Human keratinocytes, mast cells, and murine T helper (Th) 2 cells were cocultured in vitro with SOD3-MSCs to investigate potential therapeutic effects of SOD3-MSCs.

RESULTS

In mice with AD, SOD3-MSCs ameliorated AD pathology and enhanced the efficacy of MSC therapy by controlling activated immune cells, by reducing expression levels of proinflammatory mediators in the skin, and by inhibiting the histamine H₄ receptor (H4R)-mediated inflammatory cascade and activation of Janus kinase signal transducer and activator of transcription pathways. Similarly, coculture of SOD3-MSCs with mast cells, keratinocytes, and Th2 cells effectively dampened H4R-dependent persistent inflammatory responses by multiple mechanisms. Moreover, we also showed that SOD3 interacts with H4R and IL-4 receptor α. The functional significance of this interaction could be a markedly reduced inflammatory response in keratinocytes and overall AD pathogenesis, representing a novel mechanism for SOD3's anti-inflammatory effects.

CONCLUSION

SOD3-MSCs can be potentially used as an effective and clinically relevant therapy for AD and other autoimmune disorders.

Efficacy and safety of the histamine H4 receptor antagonist ZPL-3893787 in patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

H₄ receptor antagonists are potential novel treatments for inflammatory skin diseases, including atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to study the efficacy and safety of ZPL-3893787 (a selective H₄ receptor antagonist) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted to evaluate ZPL-3893787 (30 mg) once-daily oral therapy in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients were randomized (2:1) to ZPL-3893787 (n = 65) or placebo (n = 33) for 8 weeks. Patients had a history of AD for more than 12 months, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores of 12 or greater and 48 or less, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores of 3 or greater, pruritus scores of 5 or greater (0- to 10-point scale), and AD on 10% or greater of body surface area. Efficacy parameters included EASI, IGA, SCORAD, and pruritus assessment.

RESULTS

Treatment with oral ZPL-3893787 showed a 50% reduction in EASI score compared with 27% for placebo. The placebo-adjusted reduction in EASI score at week 8 was 5.1 (1-sided P = .01). Clear or almost-clear IGA scores were 18.5% with ZPL-3893787 versus 9.1% with placebo. SCORAD scores exhibited 41% reduction with ZPL-3893787 versus 26% with placebo (placebo-adjusted reduction of 10.0, P = .004). There was a 3-point reduction (scale, 1-10) in pruritus with ZPL-3893787, but there was a similar reduction with placebo, resulting in a nonsignificant difference (P = .249). Patient-reported pruritus subscores obtained from SCORAD were reduced with ZPL-3893787 compared with placebo at week 8 (nonsignificant). ZPL-3893787 was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, these results showed that ZPL-3893787 improved inflammatory skin lesions in patients with AD, confirming H₄ receptor antagonism as a novel therapeutic option.

Atopic dermatitis in cats and dogs: a difficult disease for animals and owners

The purpose of this review article is to give an overview of atopic dermatitis in companion animals and of recent developments including knowledge on immunological background, novel treatment options and difficulties in disease management. The prevalence of hypersensitivities seems to be increasing. The pathogenetic mechanisms are not fully understood, yet multiple gene abnormalities and altered immunological processes are involved. In dogs and cats, the diagnosis of atopic dermatitis is based on history, clinical examination and exclusion of other differential diagnoses. Intradermal testing or testing for serum allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E is only used to identify allergens for inclusion in the extract for allergen immunotherapy. Symptomatic therapy includes glucocorticoids, ciclosporin, essential fatty acids and antihistamines. A selective janus kinase 1 inhibitor and a caninized monoclonal interleukin-31 antibody are the newest options for symptomatic treatment, although longterm effects still need to be assessed. The chronic and often severe nature of the disease, the costly diagnostic workup, frequent clinical flares and lifelong treatment are challenging for owners, pets and veterinarians. Patience and excellent communication skills are needed to achieve a good owner compliance and satisfactory clinical outcome for the animal.

Differential effects of functionally different histamine H4 receptor ligands on acute irritant dermatitis in mice

The anti-inflammatory effects of histamine H4 receptor (H4R) antagonists opened new therapeutic options for the treatment of inflammatory/allergic diseases, but the role of H4R in inflammation is far from being solved. Aim of the present study was to investigate the role of structurally related H4R ligands of the aminopyrimidine class with different efficacies and functionalities (neutral antagonist ST-994, partial agonist ST-1006, inverse agonist ST-1012, and partial inverse agonist ST-1124) on croton oil-induced ear edema and pruritus in mice. The H4R ligands were administered subcutaneously before topical application of croton oil. While ST-1006 and ST-1124 were ineffective at any dose tested (10-100 mg/kg), both ST-994 and ST-1012 (30 and 100 mg/kg) significantly reduced croton oil-induced ear edema. Moreover, ST-994, ST-1006, and ST-1124, but not ST-1012, significantly inhibited croton oil-induced ear pruritus at 30 mg/kg. In accordance with results obtained with the reference H4R antagonist JNJ7777120 (100 mg/kg), histological examination of inflamed ear tissue indicated that treatment with ST-994 (30 mg/kg) led to a significant reduction in the inflammatory severity score and in the number of eosinophils infiltrating the tissue, while the number of degranulated mast cells in inflamed tissues was increased in comparison with the number of intact mast cells. These data indicate that croton oil-induced ear inflammation and pruritus seem to be clearly, but variably, affected by the H4R ligands tested. The potential advantage of dual effect of the H4R neutral antagonist ST-994 has to be carefully considered as a new therapeutic approach to the treatment of inflammatory diseases.

The Role of Histamine and Histamine Receptors in Mast Cell-Mediated Allergy and Inflammation: The Hunt for New Therapeutic Targets

Histamine and its receptors (H1R–H4R) play a crucial and significant role in the development of various allergic diseases. Mast cells are multifunctional bone marrow-derived tissue-dwelling cells that are the major producer of histamine in the body. H1R are expressed in many cells, including mast cells, and are involved in Type 1 hypersensitivity reactions. H2R are involved in Th1 lymphocyte cytokine production. H3R are mainly involved in blood–brain barrier function. H4R are highly expressed on mast cells where their stimulation exacerbates histamine and cytokine generation. Both H1R and H4R have important roles in the progression and modulation of histamine-mediated allergic diseases. Antihistamines that target H1R alone are not entirely effective in the treatment of acute pruritus, atopic dermatitis, allergic asthma, and other allergic diseases. However, antagonists that target H4R have shown promising effects in preclinical and clinical studies in the treatment of several allergic diseases. In the present review, we examine the accumulating evidence suggesting novel therapeutic approaches that explore both H1R and H4R as therapeutic targets for histamine-mediated allergic diseases.

BP180 dysfunction triggers spontaneous skin inflammation in mice

BP180, also known as collagen XVII, is a hemidesmosomal component and plays a key role in maintaining skin dermal/epidermal adhesion. Dysfunction of BP180, either through genetic mutations in junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB) or autoantibody insult in bullous pemphigoid (BP), leads to subepidermal blistering accompanied by skin inflammation. However, whether BP180 is involved in skin inflammation remains unknown. To address this question, we generated a BP180-dysfunctional mouse strain and found that mice lacking functional BP180 (termed ΔNC16A) developed spontaneous skin inflammatory disease, characterized by severe itch, defective skin barrier, infiltrating immune cells, elevated serum IgE levels, and increased expression of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). Severe itch is independent of adaptive immunity and histamine, but dependent on increased expression of TSLP by keratinocytes. In addition, a high TSLP expression is detected in BP patients. Our data provide direct evidence showing that BP180 regulates skin inflammation independently of adaptive immunity, and BP180 dysfunction leads to a TSLP-mediated itch. The newly developed mouse strain could be a model for elucidation of disease mechanisms and development of novel therapeutic strategies for skin inflammation and BP180-related skin conditions.

An assessment of the use of antihistamines in the management of atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Antihistamines are often used to treat pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) despite lack of evidence for their efficacy. The American Academy of Dermatology does not recommend the general use of antihistamines in the management of AD, although the value of short-term sedating antihistamine use for insomnia secondary to itch is recognized.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the use of sedating and nonsedating antihistamines for AD in 2003-2012.

METHODS

The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey provided data on physician visits in 2003-2012. Sedating and nonsedating antihistamine use was identified at visits for AD.

RESULTS

There were 990,000 annual visits for AD. Antihistamines were prescribed for AD in a significant proportion of visits across physician specialties (16%-44%). Dermatologists and pediatricians primarily used sedating antihistamines (58%-70%), whereas the majority of family/general practitioners, internists, and other specialists prescribed nonsedating antihistamines for AD (55%-100%) LIMITATIONS: We were limited by the accuracy of AD diagnosis and medication recording.

CONCLUSIONS

Antihistamines are widely used for the treatment of AD. There is no high-level evidence to suggest that nonsedating antihistamines reduce itch in patients with AD or that sedating antihistamines provide benefit in controlling AD symptoms (except perhaps sleep and AD comorbidities, such as allergic rhinitis).

Clinical Development of Histamine H4 Receptor Antagonists

The discovery of the histamine H₄ receptor (H₄R) provided a new avenue for the exploration of the physiological role of histamine, as well as providing a new drug target for the development of novel antihistamines. The first step in this process was the identification of selective antagonists to help unravel the pharmacology of the H₄R relative to other histamine receptors. The discovery of the selective H₄R antagonist JNJ 7777120 was vital for showing a role for the H₄R in inflammation and pruritus. While this compound has been very successful as a tool for understanding the function of the receptor, it has drawbacks, including a short in vivo half-life and hypoadrenocorticism toxicity in rats and dogs, that prevented advancing it into clinical studies. Further research let to the discovery of JNJ 39758979, which, similar to JNJ 7777120, was a potent and selective H₄R antagonist and showed anti-inflammatory and anti-pruritic activity preclinically. JNJ 39758979 advanced into human clinical studies and showed efficacy in reducing experimental pruritus and in patients with atopic dermatitis. However, development of this compound was terminated due to the occurrence of drug-induced agranulocytosis. This was overcome by developing another H₄R antagonist with a different chemical structure, toreforant, that does not appear to have this side effect. Toreforant has been tested in clinical studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, or psoriasis. In conclusions there have been many H₄R antagonists reported in the literature, but only a few have been studied in humans underscoring the difficulty in finding ligands with all of the properties necessary for testing in the clinic. Nevertheless, the clinical data to date suggests that H₄R antagonists can be beneficial in treating atopic dermatitis and pruritus.

Tlx3 Function in the Dorsal Root Ganglion is Pivotal to Itch and Pain Sensations

Itch, a sensation eliciting a desire to scratch, is distinct from but not completely independent of pain. Inspiring achievements have been made in the characterization of itch-related receptors and neurotransmitters, but the molecular mechanisms controlling the development of pruriceptors remain poorly understood. Here, our RNAseq and in situ hybridization data show that the transcription factor Tlx3 is required for the expression of a majority of itch-related molecules in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG). As a result, Tlx3^F/F;Nav1.8-cre mice exhibit significantly attenuated acute and dry skin-induced chronic itch. Furthermore, our study indicates that TRPV1 plays a pivotal role in the chronic itch evoked by dry skin and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). The mutants also display impaired response to cold and inflammatory pain and elevated response to capsaicin, whereas the responses to acute mechanical, thermal stimuli and neuropathic pain remain normal. In Tlx3^F/F;Nav1.8-cre mice, TRPV1 is derepressed and expands predominantly into IB4⁺ non-peptidergic (NP) neurons. Collectively, our data reveal a molecular mechanism in regulating the development of pruriceptors and controlling itch and pain sensations.

Combined treatment with H1 and H4 receptor antagonists reduces inflammation in a mouse model of atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Histamine 4 receptor (H4R) antagonists are considered as new therapeutics for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) and first clinical trials have already shown promising results. Histamine 1 receptor (H1R) antagonists are traditionally used to treat AD although the evidence for the efficacy is weak. The combined blockade of both, H1R and H4R, might provide synergistic anti-inflammatory.

OBJECTIVE

The study was performed to test the anti-inflammatory potential of a combined treatment with an H1R and an H4R antagonist in a mouse AD model.

METHODS

The development of ovalbumin-induced AD-like skin lesions was analysed mice treated with the H1R inverse agonist mepyramine, the H4R antagonist JNJ-39758979 or a combination of both.

RESULTS

Mice treated with mepyramine plus JNJ-39758979 showed less severe skin lesions, with a diminished influx of inflammatory cells, a reduced epidermal thickening and a lower level of IL-33 in lesional skin. Scratching behaviour was ameliorated in mice treated with the combination. Moreover, total numbers of skin-draining lymph node cells and splenocytes were significantly reduced. Both substances given alone did not elicit this strong anti-inflammatory effect.

CONCLUSION

H1R and H4R antagonists provide synergistic anti-inflammatory effects in a mouse model of AD. The combined therapy with H1R and H4R antagonists might represent a new strategy for the treatment of AD.

Expression of IL-22 in the Skin Causes Th2-Biased Immunity, Epidermal Barrier Dysfunction, and Pruritus via Stimulating Epithelial Th2 Cytokines and the GRP Pathway

Increased expression of Th22 cytokine IL-22 is a characteristic finding in atopic dermatitis (AD). However, the specific role of IL-22 in the pathogenesis of AD in vivo has yet to be elucidated. Consistent with observations in human AD, IL-22 was significantly increased in the AD skin of mice after epicutaneous sensitization to house dust mite allergen. Utilizing a skin-specific inducible transgenic system, we show in the present study that expression of IL-22 in the skin of mice caused an AD-like phenotype characterized by chronic pruritic dermatitis associated with Th2-biased local and systemic immune responses, downregulation of epidermal differentiation complex genes, and enhanced dermatitis upon epicutaneous allergen exposure. IL-22 potently induced the expression of gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP), a neuropeptide pruritogen, in dermal immune cells and sensory afferents and in their skin-innervating sensory neurons. IL-22 also differentially upregulated the expression of GRP receptor (GRPR) on keratinocytes of AD skin. The number of GRP+ cells in the skin correlated with the AD severity and the intensity of pruritus. IL-22 directly upregulated the expression of epithelial-derived type 2 cytokines (thymic stromal lymphopoietin and IL-33) and GRP in primary keratinocytes. Furthermore, GRP not only strongly induced thymic stromal lymphopoietin but it also increased the expression of IL-33 and GRPR synergistically with IL-22. Importantly, we found that the expression of GRP was strikingly increased in the skin of patients with AD. These results indicate that IL-22 plays important pathogenic roles in the initiation and development of AD, in part through inducing keratinocyte production of type 2 cytokines and activation of the GRP/GRPR pathway.

Stimulation of the histamine 4 receptor upregulates thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) in human and murine keratinocytes

The cytokine thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is involved in the development and the progression of allergic diseases. It is mainly released by epithelial cells at barriers such as skin and gut in response to danger signals. Overexpression of TSLP in keratinocytes (KC) can provoke the development of a type 2 inflammatory response. Additionally, TSLP directly acts on sensory neurons and thereby triggers itch. Since histamine is also increased in lesions of inflammatory skin diseases, the aim of this study was to investigate possible effects of histamine as well as different histamine receptor subtype agonists and antagonists on TSLP production in KC. We therefore stimulated human KC with histamine in the presence or absence of the known TSLP-inductor poly I:C and measured TSLP production at protein as well as mRNA level. Histamine alone did not induce TSLP production in human KC, but pre-incubation with histamine prior to challenge with poly I:C resulted in a significant increase of TSLP production compared to stimulation with poly I:C alone. Experiments with different histamine receptor agonists (H1R: 2-pyridylethylamine; H2R: amthamine; H2R/H4R: 4-methylhistamine (4MH)) revealed a dominant role for the H4R receptor, as 4-MH in combination with poly I:C displayed a significant increase of TSLP secretion, while the other agonists did not show any effect. The increase in TSLP production by 4MH was blocked with the H4R antagonist JNJ7777120. This effect was reproducible also in the murine KC cell line MSC. Taken together, our study indicates a new role for the H4 receptor in the regulation of TSLP in keratinocytes. Therefore, blocking of the H4R receptor in allergic diseases might be promising to alleviate inflammation and pruritus via TSLP.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCVIII. Histamine Receptors

Histamine is a developmentally highly conserved autacoid found in most vertebrate tissues. Its physiological functions are mediated by four 7-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors (H1R, H2R, H3R, H4R) that are all targets of pharmacological intervention. The receptors display molecular heterogeneity and constitutive activity. H1R antagonists are long known antiallergic and sedating drugs, whereas the H2R was identified in the 1970s and led to the development of H2R-antagonists that revolutionized stomach ulcer treatment. The crystal structure of ligand-bound H1R has rendered it possible to design new ligands with novel properties. The H3R is an autoreceptor and heteroreceptor providing negative feedback on histaminergic and inhibition on other neurons. A block of these actions promotes waking. The H4R occurs on immuncompetent cells and the development of anti-inflammatory drugs is anticipated.

Histamine H4 receptor knockout mice display reduced inflammation in a chronic model of atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

The histamine H4 receptor (H4R) was brought into focus as a new therapeutic target for the treatment of allergic disorders such as atopic dermatitis (AD). H4R antagonists have already been tested in several animal models of AD, but these studies have yielded conflicting results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The development of ovalbumin-induced AD-like skin lesions was analysed in H4R(-/-) mice and in H4R antagonist (JNJ28307474)-treated mice.

RESULTS

H4R(-/-) mice showed a clear amelioration of the skin lesions, with a diminished influx of inflammatory cells and a reduced epidermal hyperproliferation at lesional skin sites. H4R(-/-) mice had a reduced amount of ovalbumin-specific IgE, a reduced number of splenocytes and lymph node cells with a decreased number of CD4+ T cells. The H4R modulated the cytokine secretion of CD4+ T cells and splenocytes and altered the cellular profile in the lymph nodes. The anti-inflammatory effect could only partially be mimicked by JNJ28307474 and only when the H4R antagonist was given during sensitization and challenge and not when JNJ28307474 was only given during the provocation phase of the allergic reaction.

CONCLUSION

The H4R modulates inflammation in a chronic allergic dermatitis setting. However, results of this study indicate that it is necessary to block the H4R during ontogeny and development of the allergic inflammation.

Histamine and Histamine Receptors in Allergic Dermatitis

In this chapter we will first introduce the pathophysiological process of several skin diseases including allergic dermatitis, a common skin disease, including chronic allergic contact dermatitis (CACD), and atopic dermatitis (AD). In CACD and AD patients, repeated skin exposure to antigens contributes to the development of chronic eczematous lesions. Repeated application of haptens on mice allows emulation of the development of CACD in humans. Further, we will focus on H1, H2, and H4 histamine receptors and their effects on CACD and AD. Histamine-deficient mice, with a knockout histidine decarboxylase (HDC) gene, were used to investigate the role of histamine in CACD and AD. Histamine induces infiltration of inflammatory cells, including mast cells and eosinophils, and elevates Th2 cytokine levels in CACD. Histamine promotes the development of eczematous lesions, elevates IgE serum levels, and induces scratching behavior in CACD. The administration of H1 or H4 receptor antagonists was effective to ameliorate these symptoms in murine CACD models. The combination of H1 and H4 receptor antagonists is a potential therapeutic target for chronic inflammatory skin diseases such as CACD and AD, since combined therapy proved to be more effective than monotherapy.

Assessment of Itch and Pain in Animal Models and Human Subjects

For the past century, scientists have developed a variety of methods to evaluate itch and pain in both animal models and human subjects to throw light on some of the most important pathways mediating these unpleasant sensations. Discoveries in the mechanisms underlying itch and pain in both physiological and pathological conditions relied greatly upon these studies and may eventually lead to the discovery of new therapeutics. However, it was a much more complicated job to access itch and pain in animal models than in human subjects due to the subjective nature of these sensations. The results could be contradictory or even misleading when applying different methodologies in animal models, especially under pathological conditions with a mixed sensation of itch and pain. This chapter introduces and evaluates some of the classical and newly designed methodologies to access the sensation of itch and pain in animal models as well as human subjects.

Expression and function of histamine and its receptors in atopic dermatitis

Background

Atopic dermatitis constitutes a most burdensome chronic inflammatory skin disease. Standard treatment is cumbersome and often targets its main symptom, pruritus, only insufficiently.

Findings

Recent advances in our understanding of the role of histamine and its four receptors suggest new approaches which target the histamine receptors alone or as combination therapies to more efficiently combat pruritus and inflammation in atopic dermatitis.

Conclusions

With this review, we provide an overview on histamine and the expression of its four receptors on skin resident and nonresident cells. Furthermore, we summarize recent studies which suggest anti-histamine therapy to efficiently combat pruritus and inflammation in atopic dermatitis and discuss possible approaches to incorporate these findings into more effective treatment strategies for atopic dermatitis in childhood.

Cherry-picked ligands at histamine receptor subtypes

Histamine, a biogenic amine, is considered as a principle mediator of multiple physiological effects through binding to its H1, H2, H3, and H4 receptors (H1-H4Rs). Currently, the HRs have gained attention as important targets for the treatment of several diseases and disorders ranging from allergy to Alzheimer's disease and immune deficiency. Accordingly, medicinal chemistry studies exploring histamine-like molecules and their physicochemical properties by binding and interacting with the four HRs has led to the development of a diversity of agonists and antagonists that display selectivity for each HR subtype. An overview on H1-R4Rs and developed ligands representing some key steps in development is provided here combined with a short description of structure-activity relationships for each class. Main chemical diversities, pharmacophores, and pharmacological profiles of most innovative H1-H4R agonists and antagonists are highlighted. Therefore, this overview should support the rational choice for the optimal ligand selection based on affinity, selectivity and efficacy data in biochemical and pharmacological studies. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Histamine Receptors'.

Combinatorial Consensus Scoring for Ligand-Based Virtual Fragment Screening: A Comparative Case Study for Serotonin 5-HT(3)A, Histamine H(1), and Histamine H(4) Receptors

In the current study we have evaluated the applicability of ligand-based virtual screening (LBVS) methods for the identification of small fragment-like biologically active molecules using different similarity descriptors and different consensus scoring approaches. For this purpose, we have evaluated the performance of 14 chemical similarity descriptors in retrospective virtual screening studies to discriminate fragment-like ligands of three membrane-bound receptors from fragments that are experimentally determined to have no affinity for these proteins (true inactives). We used a complete fragment affinity data set of experimentally determined ligands and inactives for two G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the histamine H1 receptor (H1R) and the histamine H4 receptor (H4R), and one ligand-gated ion channel (LGIC), the serotonin receptor (5-HT3AR), to validate our retrospective virtual screening studies. We have exhaustively tested consensus scoring strategies that combine the results of multiple actives (group fusion) or combine different similarity descriptors (similarity fusion), and for the first time systematically evaluated different combinations of group fusion and similarity fusion approaches. Our studies show that for these three case study protein targets both consensus scoring approaches can increase virtual screening enrichments compared to single chemical similarity search methods. Our cheminformatics analyses recommend to use a combination of both group fusion and similarity fusion for prospective ligand-based virtual fragment screening.

The histamine H4 receptor: from orphan to the clinic

The histamine H4 receptor (H4R) was first noted as a sequence in genomic databases that had features of a class A G-protein coupled receptor. This putative receptor was found to bind histamine consistent with its homology to other histamine receptors and thus became the fourth member of the histamine receptor family. Due to the previous success of drugs that target the H1 and H2 receptors, an effort was made to understand the function of this new receptor and determine if it represented a viable drug target. Taking advantage of the vast literature on the function of histamine, a search for histamine activity that did not appear to be mediated by the other three histamine receptors was undertaken. From this asthma and pruritus emerged as areas of particular interest. Histamine has long been suspected to play a role in the pathogenesis of asthma, but antihistamines that target the H1 and H2 receptors have not been shown to be effective for this condition. The use of selective ligands in animal models of asthma has now potentially filled this gap by showing a role for the H4R in mediating lung function and inflammation. A similar story exists for chronic pruritus associated with conditions such as atopic dermatitis. Antihistamines that target the H1 receptor are effective in reducing acute pruritus, but are ineffective in pruritus experienced by patients with atopic dermatitis. As for asthma, animal models have now suggested a role for the H4R in mediating pruritic responses, with antagonists of the H4R reducing pruritus in a number of different conditions. The anti-pruritic effect of H4R antagonists has recently been shown in human clinical studies, validating the preclinical findings in the animal models. A selective H4R antagonist inhibited histamine-induced pruritus in health volunteers and reduced pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis. The history to date of the H4R provides an excellent example of the deorphanization of a novel receptor and the translation of this into clinical efficacy in humans.

Molecular determinants for the high constitutive activity of the human histamine H4 receptor: functional studies on orthologues and mutants

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Some histamine H4 receptor ligands act as inverse agonists at the human H4 receptor (hH4 R), a receptor with exceptionally high constitutive activity, but as neutral antagonists or partial agonists at the constitutively inactive mouse H4 receptor (mH4 R) and rat H4 receptor (rH4 R). To study molecular determinants of constitutive activity, H4 receptor reciprocal mutants were constructed: single mutants: hH4 R-F169V, mH4 R-V171F, hH4 R-S179A, hH4 R-S179M; double mutants: hH4 R-F169V+S179A, hH4 R-F169V+S179M and mH4 R-V171F+M181S.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Site-directed mutagenesis with pVL1392 plasmids containing hH4 or mH4 receptors were performed. Wild-type or mutant receptors were co-expressed with Gαi2 and Gβ1 γ2 in Sf9 cells. Membranes were studied in saturation and competition binding assays ([(3) H]-histamine), and in functional [(35) S]-GTPγS assays with inverse, partial and full agonists of the hH4 receptor.

KEY RESULTS

Constitutive activity decreased from the hH4 receptor via the hH4 R-F169V mutant to the hH4 R-F169V+S179A and hH4 R-F169V+S179M double mutants. F169 alone or in concert with S179 plays a major role in stabilizing a ligand-free active state of the hH4 receptor. Partial inverse hH4 receptor agonists like JNJ7777120 behaved as neutral antagonists or partial agonists at species orthologues with lower or no constitutive activity. Some partial and full hH4 receptor agonists showed decreased maximal effects and potencies at hH4 R-F169V and double mutants. However, the mutation of S179 in the hH4 receptor to M as in mH4 receptor or A as in rH4 receptor did not significantly reduce constitutive activity.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

F169 and S179 are key amino acids for the high constitutive activity of hH4 receptors and may also be of relevance for other constitutively active GPCRs.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed issue on Histamine Pharmacology Update published in volume 170 issue 1. To view the other articles in this issue visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.2013.170.issue-1/issuetoc.

Antihistamines and itch

Histamine is one of the best-characterized pruritogens in humans. It is known to play a role in pruritus associated with urticaria as well as ocular and nasal allergic reactions. Histamine mediates its effect via four receptors. Antihistamines that block the activation of the histamine H₁receptor, H₁R, have been shown to be effective therapeutics for the treatment of pruritus associated with urticaria, allergic rhinitis, and allergic conjunctivitis. However, their efficacy in other pruritic diseases such as atopic dermatitis and psoriasis is limited. The other histamine receptors may also play a role in pruritus, with the exception of the histamine H₂receptor, H₂R. Preclinical evidence indicates that local antagonism of the histamine H₃receptor, H₃R, can induce scratching perhaps via blocking inhibitory neuronal signals. The histamine H₄receptor, H₄R, has received a significant amount of attention as to its role in mediating pruritic signals. Indeed, it has now been shown that a selective H₄R antagonist can inhibit histamine-induced itch in humans. This clinical result, in conjunction with efficacy in various preclinical pruritus models, points to the therapeutic potential of H₄R antagonists for the treatment of pruritus not controlled by antihistamines that target the H₁R.

Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group study of a H4 R-antagonist (JNJ-39758979) in Japanese adults with moderate atopic dermatitis

This trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the H4 R-antagonist JNJ-39758979 in adult Japanese patients with moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). Eligible patients were randomly assigned to JNJ-39758979 300 mg, 100 mg or placebo once daily for 6 weeks in this phase 2a, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study. Primary efficacy was assessed via week-6 Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores. Secondary efficacy assessments included Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) and patient-reported outcome (PRO) pruritus assessments (Pruritus Categorical Response Scale [PCRS], Pruritus Numeric Rating Scales [PNRS], Pruritus Interference Numeric Rating Scale [PINRS] and Subject's Global Impressions of Change in Pruritus [SGICP]). Eighty-eight of 105 planned patients were randomized before the study was stopped and unblinded for safety reasons. The study did not meet the primary end-point. However, numerical improvements (i.e. decreases) in median EASI were observed with JNJ-39758979 100 mg (-3.7) and 300 mg (-3.0) versus placebo (-1.3) at week 6. Nominally significant improvements across PRO PCRS, PNRS and SGICP assessments were consistently observed, particularly with JNJ-39758979 300 mg. Safety, including adverse events (AE), was comparable between JNJ-39758979 and placebo with the exception of two patients (both receiving JNJ-39758979 300 mg) with serious AE of neutropenia, leading to premature study discontinuation. No deaths were reported. Except for neutropenia, no clinically relevant changes in laboratory values were observed. Although not conclusive, findings suggest H4 R-antagonism may be beneficial for AD, particularly in controlling pruritus. JNJ-39758979 appears to be associated with drug-induced agranulocytosis, likely an off-target effect.

The role of histamine H1 and H4 receptors in atopic dermatitis: from basic research to clinical study

Histamine plays important roles in inflammation and nervous irritability in allergic disorders, including atopic dermatitis (AD). It has been shown to regulate the expression of pruritic factors, such as nerve growth factor and semaphorin 3A, in skin keratinocytes via histamine H1 receptor (H1R). Furthermore, H1R antagonist reduced the level of IL-31, a cytokine involving the skin barrier and pruritus, in chronic dermatitis lesions in NC/Nga mice and patients with AD. Histamine plays roles in the induction of allergic inflammation by activating eosinophils, mast cells, basophils, and Th2 cells via histamine H4 receptor (H4R). H4R, in addition to H1R, is expressed on sensory neurons, and a decrease in scratching behaviors was observed in H4R-deficient mice and mice treated with a H4R antagonist. We found that the combined administration of H1R and H4R antagonists inhibited the itch response and chronic allergic inflammation, and had a pharmacological effect similar to that of prednisolone. Although the oral administration of H1R antagonists is widely used to treat AD, it is not very effective. In contrast, JNJ39758979, a novel H4R antagonist, had marked effects against pruritus in Japanese patients with AD in a phase II clinical trial. Next generation antihistaminic agents possessing H1R and H4R antagonistic actions may be a potent therapeutic drug for AD.

Histamine H4 receptor ligands: future applications and state of art

Histamine is a chemical transmitter found practically in whole organism and exerts its effects through the interaction with H1 to H4 histaminergic receptors. Specifically, H4 receptors are found mainly in immune cells and blood-forming tissues, thus are involved in inflammatory and immune processes, as well as some actions in central nervous system. Therefore, H4 receptor ligands can have applications in the treatment of chronic inflammatory and immune diseases and may be novel therapeutic option in these conditions. Several H4 receptor ligands have been described from early 2000's until nowadays, being imidazole, indolecarboxamide, 2-aminopyrimidine, quinazoline, and quinoxaline scaffolds the most explored and discussed in this review. Moreover, several studies of molecular modeling using homology models of H4 receptor and QSAR data of the ligands are summarized. The increasing and promising therapeutic applications are leading these compounds to clinical trials, which probably will be part of the next generation of blockbuster drugs.