Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1997-2006: the HRSA Breakthrough Collaboratives and the 58 DSA Challenge

Choosing the larger kidney on CT volumetry: a study on the early post-donation kidney function of living donors

BACKGROUND

Selecting the smaller kidney for donation has been advocated if there is a size difference of > 10% between the 2 kidneys but has never been prospectively evaluated. With increase in donor nephrectomies, it is important to evaluate this to minimize loss of renal function to donors.

METHODS

75 consecutive donor nephrectomy patients were included in our longitudinal study. The Split Renal Volume (SRV) of bilateral kidneys were measured using contrasted computer tomography scans and patients segregated into 2 groups depending on donated kidney having more (Group 1) or less than (Group 2) 52.5% of SRV.

RESULTS

Patients in Group 1 (n = 19) and 2 (n = 56) were of similar age (43.8 vs. 48.3), BMI (22.4 vs. 25.2), sex (57.9 vs. 55.4% women), respectively. Although total kidney volumes were similar in both groups, Group 1 had significantly smaller right kidney volumes (120.4 ± 24.9 vs. 142.7 ± 28.4 mls, p = 0.003). EGFR pre-operatively (116.3 ± 20.8 vs. 106.3 ± 23.8 mL/min/1.73 m2) and at 6-months (65.7 ± 13.3 vs. 66.9 ± 15.5 mL/min/1.73 m2) were not different between groups. However, patients in Group 1 had significantly greater absolute (50.6 ± 14.9 vs. 39.5 ± 14.7 mL/min/1.73 m2) and relative decline (43.0 ± 8.6 vs. 36.3 ± 10.6%) in eGFR at 6 months (p = 0.06, 0.009).

CONCLUSION

With a SRV difference of 5% between the 2 sides, removal of the larger kidney for living kidney donation resulted in greater early decline of renal function than kidney donors whose larger or equivalent kidney is preserved.

Comorbid Conditions in Kidney Transplantation: Outcome Analysis at King Abdulaziz Medical City

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is most commonly performed for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and provides the best chance for a cure. The surgery is shown to be beneficial to a patient's quality of life after transplantation in multiple studies. But graft failure is a serious consequence that might happen. The term graft failure refers to the failure of a transplanted kidney to function properly. There are various reasons why this can happen, such as rejection, infection, or medication complications.

METHODS

 A retrospective cohort study of comorbid conditions in patients who underwent renal transplantation at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) between 2016 and 2022. Data were collected by chart review using the BestCare system. The data collected included patients' demographics, comorbidities, calculated Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), surgery-related data, laboratory data, and the outcome of transplantation. The categorical data were presented using percentages and frequencies, while the numerical data were presented as mean and standard deviation. The Chi-square test was used for inferential statistics to find the association between categorical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 669 patients were included in the current study. Of these, 422 (63.1%) were men, and the mean age was 44 years. The incidence of graft failure within one year at KAMC was found to be 1.2% (eight cases). Regarding the CCI and its association with graft failure within one year, 37 (5.5%) patients had a myocardial infarction (MI) and 17 (2.5%) had congestive heart failure; however, no patients with MI or congestive heart failure experienced graft failure, and no significant association was found between MI or congestive heart failure and graft failure (p-value = 1.000 for both). A total of 417 (62.3%) patients had no or diet-controlled diabetes, 122 (18.2%) had uncomplicated diabetes mellitus (DM), and 130 (19.4%) had end-organ damage. DM and graft failure were not significantly associated (p-value = 1.000). A total of 286 (42.8%) patients had ESRD of unknown etiology, 109 (16.3%) patients had ESRD caused by diabetic nephropathy, and 100 (14.9%) had ESRD resulting from hypertension, apart from other causes.

CONCLUSION

Most patients were found to have ESRD of unknown etiology and the most frequently reported known risk factor for ESRD and subsequent transplantation was found to be diabetic nephropathy, followed by hypertension.

Breast milk MSCs upregulated β-cells PDX1, Ngn3, and PCNA expression via remodeling ER stress /inflammatory /apoptotic signaling pathways in type 1 diabetic rats

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is one of the autoimmune diseases characterized by beta-cell dysfunction with serious health complications. Br-MSCs represent a novel valid candidate in regenerative medicine disciplines. Yet, the full potential of Br-MSCs in managing type 1 diabetes remains elusive. Indeed, this study was designed to explore a novel approach investigating the possible regenerative capacity of Br-MSCs in type1 diabetic islet on the level of the cellular mRNA expression of different molecular pathways involved in pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction. Sixty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned into 3 groups (20 rats each); the control group, type1 diabetic group, and the type 1 diabetic Br-MSCs treated group. And, for the first time, our results revealed that intraperitoneally transplanted Br-MSCs homed to the diabetic islet and improved fasting blood glucose, serum insulin level, pancreatic oxidative stress, upregulated pancreatic mRNA expression for: regenerative markers (Pdx1, Ngn3, PCNA), INS, beta-cell receptors (IRS1, IRβ, PPARγ), pancreatic growth factors (IGF-1, VEGFβ1, FGFβ), anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL10) and anti-apoptotic marker (BCL2) too, Br-MSCs downregulated pancreatic mRNA expression for: inflammatory markers (NFKβ, TNFα, IL1β, IL6, IL8, MCP1), apoptotic markers for both intrinsic and extrinsic pathways (FAS, FAS-L, P53, P38, BAX, Caspase3), ER stress markers (ATF6, ATF3, ATF4, BIP, CHOP, JNK, XBP1) and autophagy inhibitor (mTOR). In conclusion, Br-MSCs could be considered as a new insight in beta cell regenerative therapy improving the deteriorated diabetic islet microenvironment via modulating; ER stress, inflammatory, and apoptotic signaling pathways besides, switching on the cellular quality control system (autophagy) thus enhancing beta-cell function.

Alloimmunity in pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite significant improvement in pancreas allograft survival, rejection continues to be a major clinical problem. This review will focus on emerging literature related to the impact of pretransplant and de-novo DSA (dnDSA) in pancreas transplant recipients, and the diagnosis and treatment of T-cell-medicated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in this complex group of patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data suggest that pretransplant DSA and the emergence of dnDSA in pancreas transplant recipients are both associated with increased risk of ABMR. The pancreas allograft biopsy is essential for the specific diagnosis of TCMR and/or ABMR, distinguish rejection from other causes of graft dysfunction, and to guide-targeted therapy. This distinction is important especially in the setting of solitary pancreas transplants but also in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants where solid evidence has now emerged demonstrating discordant biopsy findings. Treatment of rejection in a functioning pancreas can prolong allograft survival.

SUMMARY

The accurate and timely diagnosis of active alloimmune destruction in pancreas transplant recipients is paramount to preserving graft function in the long term. This review will discuss new, rapidly evolving information that is valuable for the physician caring for these patients to achieve optimal immunological outcomes.

How Should Pancreas Transplant Rejection Be Treated?

BACKGROUND

Limited published data exist to guide the treatment of pancreas transplant rejection.

METHODS

We reviewed the treatment and outcomes of 158 first episodes of biopsy-proven pancreas rejection between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2016. Within each Banff grade of rejection, we compared response rates and long-term outcomes with steroids alone versus steroids plus antithymocyte globulin (ATG).

RESULTS

Of 158 pancreas recipients with rejection, 65 were treated with steroids alone. Eighty-three percent of patients with grade I, 60% with grade II, and 33.33% with grade III rejection responded to treatment with steroids alone. Ninety-three patients were treated with steroids plus ATG. The response rates were 69% in grade I, 76% in grade II, and 73% in grade III. Response rates and graft survival were not different with grade I rejection treated with steroids alone versus steroids plus ATG. However, response rates and graft survival were significantly better with grade III rejection treated with the addition of ATG, and graft survival rates were significantly better with grade II rejection treated with the addition of ATG.

CONCLUSIONS

Grade I pancreas rejection can usually be successfully treated with steroids alone, whereas grade II and III rejection should usually be treated with steroids plus ATG, as the addition of ATG improves both response rates and graft survival.

Simultaneous recipient external iliac endarterectomy and renal transplant - a propensity score matched analysis

Patients with end-stage renal disease and severe iliac atherosclerosis are frequently denied renal transplant due to technical challenges, and risk of potential steal syndrome in the allograft, or ipsilateral limb. Few studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of performing an endarterectomy in this setting. A single-center retrospective review of renal transplant patients from 1/2013 to 12/2017 was performed. Patients requiring endarterectomy at the time of transplant were matched to a nonendarterectomized cohort in a 1:2 fashion using propensity score matching. Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Simultaneous endarterectomy and renal transplant were performed in 23 patients and subsequently matched to 42 controls. Ankle-brachial index was lower in the endarterectomized group (P = 0.04). Delayed graft function (26.1% vs. 19%, P = 0.54), graft loss (8.7% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.53), 1-year mortality (8.7% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.53), and renal function at 12 months were comparable in both groups. There were no incidents of ipsilateral limb loss in the endarterectomized population. This is the first matched study investigating endarterectomy and renal transplant. Long-term follow-up of limb and graft function is indicated. Despite the small sample size, our findings suggest that a combined procedure can safely provide renal transplantation access to a previously underserved population.

Assessment of the Kidney Donor Profile Index in a European cohort

Background

Recently, transplant societies have had to change their allocation policies to counter global organ shortages. However, strategies differ significantly and long-term outcomes and cross-regional applicability remain to be evaluated.

Methods

Therefore, we retrospectively analysed the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of 987 adult kidney transplants at our centre using data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) as a reference.

Results

In our cohort, the median KDPI was 66%, with a higher proportion of >85% KDPI kidneys compared with the US cohort (32.3% versus 9.2%). Among elderly patients (≥65 years of age), 62% received >95% KDPI kidneys, which were primarily allocated within the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP). After 10 years, the rate of death-censored graft survival was 70.5%. Recipients of >85% KDPI kidneys were significantly older, demonstrating higher mortality, poorer graft survival and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate. Patients receiving ≥99% KDPI kidneys had a satisfactory 5-year death-censored graft survival (72.9%). The 5-year survival rate of patients living with a functioning graft exceeded the matched OPTN data in the whole KDPI range, despite a higher proportion of elderly recipients. Multivariate analysis revealed KDPI as an independent risk factor for graft loss (hazard ratio 1.14/10%, P < 0.001), although C-statistics of 0.62 indicated limited discriminative ability for individuals.

Conclusion

The analysis demonstrated KDPI as a potentially useful tool for donor quality assessment in a European cohort. Most importantly, our analysis revealed acceptable outcomes even for very high KDPI kidneys.

Strategies for an Expanded Use of Kidneys From Elderly Donors

The old-for-old allocation policy used for kidney transplantation (KT) has confirmed the survival benefit compared to remaining listed on dialysis. Shortage of standard donors has stimulated the development of strategies aimed to expand acceptance criteria, particularly of kidneys from elderly donors. We have systematically reviewed the literature on those different strategies. In addition to the review of outcomes of expanded criteria donor or advanced age kidneys, we assessed the value of the Kidney Donor Profile Index policy, preimplantation biopsy, dual KT, machine perfusion and special immunosuppressive protocols. Survival and functional outcomes achieved with expanded criteria donor, high Kidney Donor Profile Index or advanced age kidneys are poorer than those with standard ones. Outcomes using advanced age brain-dead or cardiac-dead donor kidneys are similar. Preimplantation biopsies and related scores have been useful to predict function, but their applicability to transplant or refuse a kidney graft has probably been overestimated. Machine perfusion techniques have decreased delayed graft function and could improve graft survival. Investing 2 kidneys in 1 recipient does not make sense when a single KT would be enough, particularly in elderly recipients. Tailored immunosuppression when transplanting an old kidney may be useful, but no formal trials are available.Old donors constitute an enormous source of useful kidneys, but their retrieval in many countries is infrequent. The assumption of limited but precious functional expectancy for an old kidney and substantial reduction of discard rates should be generalized to mitigate these limitations.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections in cynomolgus monkey transplant recipients and institution of a screening program for the prevention and control of tuberculosis

Background

Tuberculosis is a major health concern in not only humans, but also in non-human primates. In this paper, we report recent cases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in cynomolgus monkeys from Cambodia used in transplantation research in a Korean facility and describe a program instituted to prevent and control subsequent infections.

Case presentation

All monkeys were antibody negative for tuberculosis during quarantine; however, suspected tuberculosis gross lesions were observed in two cynomolgus monkeys who underwent allograft kidney transplantation. Lung tissue from one monkey was found to be weakly positive by PCR for detection of M. tuberculosis. After PCR confirmation of tuberculosis, we decided to sacrifice the remaining animals and instituted a program for preventing subsequent infections. During necropsy of the remaining monkeys, two additional suspected tuberculosis cases were observed. A total of four monkeys with nodular lesions in the respiratory tract, suspected to be tuberculosis, demonstrated no clinical signs. Acid-fast bacilli were identified on slides from the lung or liver in all four monkeys. Two of four monkeys tested PCR positive. We decided that new monkeys entering from Cambodia should undergo a single gastric aspiration PCR and tuberculin skin testing (TST) every 2 weeks until four consecutive negatives to detect latent tuberculosis are obtained before starting experiments. Monkeys should then undergo a chest X-ray monthly and TST every 6 months.

Conclusions

Detection of latent tuberculosis by an effective preventive screening program before starting experiments is an essential process to reduce the risk of reactivation of tuberculosis, especially in studies using immunosuppressive drugs. It also serves to protect the health of captive non-human primates, their caretakers and researchers.

Outcomes of living kidney donors with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are more likely to have reduced kidney function develop over time. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and safety outcomes of living kidney donors with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study at a tertiary referral hospital to assess the outcomes of living kidney donors with rheumatoid arthritis. All 6 adults with rheumatoid arthritis who underwent nephrectomy as living kidney donors between January 2000 and September 2014 were included. Eighteen nondonors with rheumatoid arthritis (3 nondonors per donor) were randomly selected for comparison by matching the year of birth and comorbidity score.

RESULTS

None of the donors with rheumatoid arthritis had a flare-up of arthritis at a median follow-up time of 5.9 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.1-7.5 years), while 5 (27.8%) nondonors with rheumatoid arthritis had a flare-up at a median follow-up time of 4.7 years (IQR, 3.1-6.7 years). After nephrectomy, donors' estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased to a mean of 43.53 (SD, 4) mL/min per 1.73 m2 at 7 days after the index date. The estimated glomerular filtration rate of donors subsequently increased significantly at rate of 3.99 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (P<.001). None of the donors with rheumatoid arthritis had end-stage renal disease develop or died at median follow-up times of 5.9 (IQR, 3.1-7.5) years and 8.2 (IQR, 5.8-9.7) years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Healthy kidney donors with rheumatoid arthritis have good outcomes, with no increased risk of decline in renal function, end-stage renal disease, or death.

Outcomes of living kidney donors with medullary sponge kidney

BACKGROUND

Patients with medullary sponge kidney (MSK) commonly encounter recurrent nephrolithiasis. The existing knowledge on safety of donors with MSK has not been studied.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary referral hospital to assess the outcomes of living kidney donors with MSK. All adults with MSK (N = 26) who underwent nephrectomy as living kidney donors between January 2000 and September 2014 were included. Non-donors with MSK (N = 78) were randomly selected by matching the year of birth and the comorbidity score with a ratio of 1:3 for comparison.

RESULTS

The incident rates of symptomatic stone were 0.7, 0.4 and 4.9 events/100 patient-years in donors, recipients and non-donors, respectively. After adjusting for history of kidney stones and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the kidney stone-related event was significantly lower in donors than in non-donors (hazard ratio 0.14; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.66). One recipient of MSK living donor had symptomatic stone at median follow-up time of 8.4 years (interquartile range 5.6-12.4 years). None of MSK donors had hypercalciuria, hypocitraturia or hyperoxaluria prior to kidney donation. At 5 years after the index surgery date, there was no significant difference in eGFR between donors and non-donors (76.1 versus 70.9 mL/min/1.73 m², P = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings are reassuring for the safety of MSK kidney donors with normal kidney function, low kidney stone risk and no significant comorbidity.

Outcomes of kidneys utilized from deceased donors with severe acute kidney injury

BACKGROUND

Significant numbers of kidneys are discarded due to raised terminal creatinine of the donor.

AIM

To determine long-term outcomes of kidneys utilized from donors with severe acute kidney injury (AKI).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included all patients who received kidneys from deceased donors between years 2000 and 2012. AKI was defined according to the acute kidney injury network (AKIN) classification. The primary outcomes were patient and graft survival and secondary outcomes were renal function at different time points, delayed graft function, acute rejection and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighty-four recipients received kidneys from 261 deceased donors. One hundred and fourteen patients (40%) received kidneys from the donors with AKI. Forty-two patients received kidneys from the donors with severe AKI (AKIN-3 category). Mean age of the donor and recipient was 36 and 37 years, respectively. Main cause of death in donors was road traffic accident (34%) followed by cerebrovascular accident (33%). Terminal creatinine was 85 and 262 μmol/l in non-AKI and AKI groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Significantly more patients in the AKI group had delayed graft function (P = 0.006), prolonged hospital stay (P < 0.001) and high creatinine at discharge (P = 0.002). However, acute rejection rates (P = 0.25), 1-, 5- and 10-year graft survival (P = 0.57) and patient survival (P = 0.77) were not different between AKI and non-AKI groups. The outcomes in the AKIN-3 category were comparable with the non-AKI group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown favorable long-term outcomes of kidneys utilized from donors with severe AKI. This study may encourage healthcare professionals to consider accepting such kidneys.

Midterm Outcome of Living-Related Kidney Transplantation From Aged Donors: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the most effective treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Using grafts from aged donors is increasing worldwide. Our aim was to better understand the safety and effectiveness of aged living donors.

METHODS

First, 482 cases with living-related kidney transplantation were analyzed retrospectively. The cases were divided into 2 groups by donor age ≥ 55 years (aged donor group, 136 cases) and <55 years (young donor group, 346 cases). Then donor and recipient characteristics were summarized. In addition, the renal function of graft was compared between young donor group and aged donor group. Finally, patient and graft survivals were examined with the use of Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared with the use of the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The mean donor estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in the aged donor group compared with in the young donor group. After KT, the mean eGFR of the graft in the recipient was also lower in the aged donor group than in the young donor group. To confirm the effect of aged kidney grafts on renal function, we measured proteinuria. Compared with the young donor group, in the aged donor group incidence of proteinuria and 24-hour urinary protein were significantly higher. However, the incidence of delayed graft function was not significantly different between the 2 groups. We found that aged kidney grafts had no significant effect on long-term patient and graft survivals.

CONCLUSIONS

With the current lack of organs, aged kidney grafts are an acceptable alternative. Use of organs from aged donors safely expands the living donor pool.

Changing organ allocation policy for kidney transplantation in the United States

The new kidney allocation scheme (KAS) in effect since December 4^th 2014 was designed to overcome the shortcomings of previous system. A key feature of the new KAS is preferential allocation of best quality organs to wait-list candidates with the longest predictive survival in a concept called longevity matching. Highly sensitized recipients would get extra points and enjoy widespread sharing of organs in order to increase accessibility to transplant. Wait-list candidates with blood group B will be offered organs from donors with A2 and A2B blood type in order to shorten their wait-list time. Time on the wait list will start from day of listing or date of initiation of dialysis whichever comes first which should benefit candidates with limited resources who might be late to get on the transplant list. Pay back system has been eliminated in the new KAS. These changes in organ allocation policy may lead to increase in median half-life of the allograft and increase the number of transplants; thus resulting in better utilization of a scarce resource. There could be unintended negative consequences which may become evident over time.

Outcomes of liver transplantation alone after listing for simultaneous kidney: comparison to simultaneous liver kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Data on patient and liver graft survival comparing liver transplantation alone after listing for kidney with simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) transplantation are scanty.

METHODS

United Network Organ Sharing network database (1994-2011) queried for liver transplantation alone after being listed for kidney and SLK transplants.

RESULTS

Of 65,206 first liver transplants, 3549 were listed for simultaneous kidney. Of these, 422 (12%) received only liver (LIST) and differed from SLK recipients for the white race (64% vs. 57%; 0.005), diabetes (27% vs. 37%; P = 0.02), model for end-stage liver disease era (68% vs. 82%; P = 0.0001), serum creatinine (2.9±1.9 vs. 4.3±2.5; P < 0.0001), dialysis (35% vs. 64%; P < 0.0001), and donor risk index (1.6±0.4 vs. 1.5±0.3; P < 0.0001). Overall survival was poorer in the LIST group (55% vs. 76%; P < 0.0001). A higher proportion of patients died within 2 days of transplantation in LIST group (11% vs. 0.5%; P < 0.0001), mostly from cardiovascular causes. After excluding these patients, odds of patient mortality and liver graft loss were about 1.2-fold and twofold higher in the LIST group. A total of 103 (24%) patients needed a renal transplantation in the LIST group with 16 (4%) receiving kidney within first year after transplantation. After excluding patients receiving kidney within first year, about 33% recovered renal function to above estimated GFR of greater than 60 mL per min.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines are needed for patient selection to list for and receipt of simultaneous liver kidney transplantation.

rhErythropoietin-b as a tissue protective agent in kidney transplantation: a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Extended criteria donor (ECD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys are at increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF). Experimental evidence suggests that erythropoietin (EPO) attenuates renal damage in acute kidney injury. This study piloted the administration of high dose recombinant human EPO-beta at implantation of ECD and DCD kidneys, and evaluated biomarkers of kidney injury post-transplant.

METHODS

Forty patients were randomly assigned to receive either rhEPO-b (100,000 iu) (n = 19 in the intervention group, as 1 patient was un-transplantable post randomisation), or placebo (n = 20) in this, double blind, placebo-controlled trial at Manchester Royal Infirmary from August 2007 to June 2009. Participants received either an ECD (n = 17) or DCD (n = 22) kidney. Adverse events, renal function, haematopoietic markers, and rejections were recorded out to 90 days post-transplant. Biomarkers of kidney injury (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, Kidney Injury Molecule-1 and IL-18) were measured in blood and urine during the first post-operative week.

RESULTS

The incidence of DGF (53% vs 55%) (RR = 1.0; CI = 0.5-1.6; p = 0.93) and slow graft function (SGF) (32% vs 25%) (RR = 1.1; CI = 0.5-1.9; p = 0.73) respectively, serum creatinine, eGFR, haemoglobin and haematocrit, blood pressure, and acute rejection were similar in the 2 study arms. High dose rhEPO-b had little effect on the temporal profiles of the biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

High dose rhEPO-b appears to be safe and well tolerated in the early post- transplant period in this study, but has little effect on delayed or slow graft function in recipients of kidneys from DCD and ECD donors. Comparing the profiles of biomarkers of kidney injury (NGAL, IL-18 and KIM-1) showed little difference between the rhEPO-b treated and placebo groups. A meta-analysis of five trials yielded an overall estimate of the RR for DGF of 0.89 (CI = 0.73; 1.07), a modest effect favouring EPO but not a significant difference. A definitive trial based on this estimate would require 1000-2500 patients per arm for populations with base DGF rates of 50-30% and 90% power. Such a trial is clearly unfeasible.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT Number 2006-005373-22 ISRCTN ISRCTN85447324 registered 19/08/09.

Complement Interception Across Humoral Incompatibility in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Clinical Perspective

The humoral barrier in transplant biology is the result of preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), directed either against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) or non-HLA antigens such as blood group (ABO) molecules. The term "sensitization" applies to patients carrying these antibodies. Transplantation is widely accepted as a life-saving opportunity for patients with terminal end-organ disease. However, in sensitized patients, transplant outcome is hampered by antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) as a consequence of DSA exposure. Furthermore, sensitized patients have limited access to "matched" organs from the both living and deceased donor pool.Considering the crucial role of the complement system in the pathophysiology of AMR and the availability of complement intervention therapeutics, there is a growing interest in complement-targeting strategies. This review highlights the emerging importance of monitoring and modulation of the complement system in the context of enabling transplantation across humoral incompatibility in sensitized recipients with preformed anti-HLA or natural anti-ABO antibodies. It also discusses the significance of the complement system in the induction of accommodation and further emphasizes current and future perspectives of novel complement therapeutics.

Imaging in pancreatic transplants

Pancreatic transplantation, performed alone or in conjunction with kidney transplantation, is an effective treatment for advanced type I diabetes mellitus and select patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Following advancements in surgical technique, postoperative management, and immunosuppression, pancreatic transplantation has significantly improved the length and quality of life for patients suffering from pancreatic dysfunction. While computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have more limited utility, ultrasound is the preferred initial imaging modality to evaluate the transplanted pancreas; gray-scale assesses the parenchyma and fluid collections, while Doppler interrogation assesses vascular flow and viability. Ultrasound is also useful to guide percutaneous interventions for the transplanted pancreas. With knowledge of the surgical anatomy and common complications, the abdominal radiologist plays a central role in the perioperative and postoperative evaluation of the transplanted pancreas.

Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection through solid organ transplantation: confirmation via whole genome sequencing

We describe two cases of donor-derived methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia that developed after transplantation of organs from a common donor who died from acute MRSA endocarditis. Both recipients developed recurrent MRSA infection despite appropriate antibiotic therapy, and required prolonged hospitalization and hospital readmission. Comparison of S. aureus whole genome sequence of DNA extracted from fixed donor tissue and recipients' isolates confirmed donor-derived transmission. Current guidelines emphasize the risk posed by donors with bacteremia from multidrug-resistant organisms. This investigation suggests that, particularly in the setting of donor endocarditis, even a standard course of prophylactic antibiotics may not be sufficient to prevent donor-derived infection.

Progression of alterations in lipid metabolism in kidney transplant recipients over 5 years of follow-up

BACKGROUND

Alterations in lipid metabolism frequently affect kidney transplant recipients and contribute to the onset of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases that threaten graft integrity. The purpose of this research study was to investigate the pattern of hyperlipidaemia and its progression, as well as to study potential risk factors in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

In this study, 119 kidney transplant recipients of both sexes were monitored over a period of 5 years in our posttransplant clinic. During this period, all patients had pretransplant and posttransplant blood tests to measure levels of the following: total cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins (LDL), high-density lipoproteins (HDL) and triglycerides. Furthermore, the subjects were also weighed and their height measured. Their body mass index was then calculated using the weight (kg)/height (m(2) ) formula.

RESULTS

In the 5 years following the transplant, the patients experienced a significant increase in the levels of their biochemical markers as well as in their BMI. Consequently, a greater number suffered from dyslipidaemia, diabetes and hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney transplants can often trigger hyperlipidaemia, as reflected in higher levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins and high-density lipoproteins. The results of our study also showed that despite statin therapy, the patients had higher triglyceride levels, which made them more vulnerable to diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and graft rejection.

Patient selection and volume in the era surrounding implementation of Medicare conditions of participation for transplant programs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate evidence of practice changes affecting kidney transplant program volumes, and donor, recipient and candidate selection in the era surrounding the introduction of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) conditions of participation (CoPs) for organ transplant programs.

DATA

Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients; CMS ESRD and Medicare claims databases.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of national registry data.

METHODS

A Cox proportional hazards model of 1-year graft survival was used to derive risks associated with deceased-donor kidney transplants performed from 2001 to 2010.

FINDINGS

Among programs with ongoing noncompliance with the CoPs, kidney transplant volumes declined by 38 percent (n = 766) from 2006 to 2011, including a 55 percent drop in expanded criteria donor transplants. Volume increased by 6 percent (n = 638) among programs remaining in compliance. Aggregate risk of 1-year graft failure increased over time due to increasing recipient age and obesity, and longer ESRD duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Although trends in aggregate risk of 1-year kidney graft loss do not indicate that the introduction of the CoPs has systematically reduced opportunities for marginal candidates or that there has been a systematic shift away from utilization of higher risk deceased donor kidneys, total volume and expanded criteria donor utilization decreased overall among programs with ongoing noncompliance.

Type 2 diabetes: is pancreas transplantation an option?

Transplantation of the whole vascularized pancreas can provide insulin secretion in patients with insulin-dependent, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). It restores euglycemia in most patients, with the potential to impact the chronic diabetic complications and quality of life. Pancreas transplantation (PT) is presently controversial for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). For those patients with severe glycemic dysregulation, T2D can be associated with the same life-threatening sequelae as T1D such as severe hypoglycemia and kidney failure that could be corrected by pancreas (and kidney) transplantation. Thus, clinical indications and patient selection criteria are very important. This chapter will review the current status of PT for T2D and discuss the options and evolution of transplant perspectives.

Impact of donor and recipient age difference on long-term allograft survival after living donor renal transplantation: analysis of 478 cases

INTRODUCTION

Either deceased or living-related renal transplantation constitutes the best therapeutic option for patients with end-stage renal disease. In this retrospective study, an attempt to identify parameters that affect allograft survival in living donor renal transplantation was made.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and July 2012, 478 adult patients received a renal transplant from a living-related donor in our center and their records were retrospectively reviewed in November 2012. Data concerning donor age, recipient age, donor/recipient age difference, donor/recipient gender, and ABO compatibility/incompatibility were recorded and associated with renal allograft survival rate.

RESULTS

Renal allograft survival rate was 96%, 89.5%, and 77.7% in the first, fifth, and 10th yr after transplantation, respectively. Only the difference between donor and recipient age was statistically significant in relation to graft survival. In cases with age difference >13 yr, graft survival rate was lower from the third yr onward.

CONCLUSIONS

Only the age difference between donor and recipient exerts an adverse impact on graft outcome after living donor renal transplantation, whereas donor age, recipient age, donor/recipient gender, and ABO incompatibility do not significantly influence renal allograft survival.

Single pediatric kidney transplantation in adult recipients: comparable outcomes with standard-criteria deceased-donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Single pediatric kidney transplantation (SKT) in adult recipients has traditionally been considered a high risk because of concerns of technical complications leading to poor graft outcomes. The primary goal of this single-center, retrospective analysis was to compare outcomes after SKT to standard-criteria deceased-donor kidney transplantation (SCDKT).

METHODS

We compared outcomes in adult recipients after SKT (n=31; mean donor weight, 27 kg); SCDKT (n=283); pediatric en bloc (n=21), living-donor (n=275), and extended criteria-donor (n=100) kidney transplantations.

RESULTS

The death-censored 5-year graft survival after SKT was significantly superior to SCDKT (81.4% vs. 74.5%, P=0.02). The serum creatinine level at 5 years after transplantation was significantly lower in SKT compared with that in SCDKT (1.2 vs. 1.6 mg/dL, P<0.0001). There was a significantly higher incidence of arterial anastomotic stenosis (6.8% vs. 0.4%, P=0.02) and hydronephrosis (12.9% vs. 5.3%, P=0.02) in the SKT cohort compared with SCDKT. Subgroup analysis of the SKT cohort by donor age less than 5 years vs. 6 to 10 years (mean weight, 16.4 vs. 32.7 kg) revealed no differences in patient or graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a higher incidence of posttransplantation vascular and urological complications, long-term graft survival after SKT (in weight-matched pediatric donors and selected adult recipients) was comparable with that after SCDKT. SKT from very small donors (age, ≤5 years) yielded excellent long-term patient and graft survivals. The use of pediatric donor kidneys should be encouraged to address the problem of organ shortage.

Acute pancreas allograft rejection is associated with increased risk of graft failure in pancreas transplantation

The effect of acute allograft rejection (AR) on long-term pancreas allograft function is unclear. We retrospectively studied 227 consecutive pancreas transplants performed at our institution between January 1, 998 and December 31, 2009 including: 56 simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK), 69 pancreas transplantation alone (PTA); and 102 pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplants. With a median follow-up of 6.1 (IQR 3-9) years, 57 patients developed 79 episodes of AR, and 19 experienced more than one episode. The cumulative incidence for AR was 14.7%, 19.7%, 26.6% and 29.1% at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years. PTA transplant (hazards ratio [HR]=2.28, p=0.001) and donor age (per 10 years) (HR=1.34, p=0.006) were associated with higher risk for AR. The first AR episode after 3 months post PT was associated with increased risk for complete loss (CL) (HR 3.79, p<0.001), and the first AR episode occurring during 3- to 12-month and 12- to 24-month periods after PT were associated with significantly increased risk for at least partial loss (PL) (HR 2.84, p=0.014; and HR 6.25, p<0.001, respectively). We conclude that AR is associated with increased risk for CL and at least PL. The time that the first AR is observed may influence subsequent graft failure.

Peritonitis caused by Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Leifsonia aquatica, and Gordonia spp. in a patient undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

Peritonitis has remained the most common serious complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). In most cases, these infections are monomicrobial, and the pathogens involved most commonly are Staphylococci. Recently, polymicrobial infections with rare organisms have been reported more often.

CASE REPORT

We describe a patient who developed recurrent episodes of CAPD-associated peritonitis with a total of four pathogens: Methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Leifsonia aquatica, and Gordonia spp. The infection most likely was acquired when the patient used tap water for dialysis during a camping trip. All episodes were treated successfully with antibiotics. Finally, the device was removed, and later, a new catheter was implanted, which still is in use.

CONCLUSION

Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis may be caused by rare organisms. Antibiotics may be able to treat disease temporarily, but removal of contaminated catheters usually is required.

Innovations in organ donation

The growing disparity between organ availability for transplantation and the number of patients in need has challenged the donation and transplantation community of practice to develop innovative processes, ideas, and techniques to bridge the gaps. Advances in the sharing of best practices in the donation community have contributed greatly over the last 8 years. Broader sharing of updated guidelines for declaration of brain death in conjunction with improvements in deceased donor management have increased opportunities for organ donation. New techniques for organ preservation and organ resuscitation have allowed for better utilization of the potential donor pool. This review will highlight processes, ideas, and techniques in organ donation.

Reuse of a previously transplanted kidney: does success come with a price?

Longer wait times for deceased donor kidney transplant have prompted newer initiatives to expedite the process. Reuse of a previously transplanted kidney might be appropriate in certain circumstances. However, one must also consider the unique issues that may arise after such transplants. We describe our experience in one such case where the donor kidney had lesions of focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis and signs of alloreactivity (positive C4d staining) prior to transplantation and the recipient developed ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, which was perhaps transmitted from the donor. Despite the challenges, the allograft function remained stable 5 years after reuse.

Temporary inactive status on renal transplant waiting list: causes, risk factors, and outcomes

Approximately 30% of all patients listed for a kidney transplant in the United States are on inactive status. The consequences of temporary inactivation and rates of transplantation in this group of patients have not been reported. We undertook a retrospective cohort study at our transplant center examining all patients listed between 2001 and 2007. We examined the rate of inactivation, risk factors, duration, and outcomes including transplantation rates and patient survival while on the waiting list and after transplantation. There were 436 patients included in the analysis; 322 (73.9%) were never inactivated and 114 patients (26.1%) were temporarily inactive. The most common causes for inactivation were cardiovascular and suspected malignancy. Time to reactivation was similar among different causes. Waiting times for transplantation (excluding time of inactivation) was 18.7 ± 0.9 versus 39.9 ± 2.3 months for active compared with temporarily inactive patients (log-rank P < .0001). Sixty-five percent of patients were reactivated within 24 months. Approximately one-third of patients were never reactivated. Patient survival was similar among both groups. Temporary inactivation is an independent risk factor for a prolonged waiting time even if time of inactivation is not accounted for. Effective strategies for monitoring patients temporarily inactive on the waiting list should be developed.

What kind of changes occurred in clinical characteristics of deceased kidney donor recipients after national allocation system in Turkey? A single-center retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

Clinical characteristics of recipients of deceased donor renal transplantations were evaluated in the period before versus after implementation of The National Allocation System (NAS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated retrospectively clinical profiles of the 42 after NAS (June 2008-December 2010) versus 42 consecutive deceased donor renal transplantation patients before NAS. Patient and graft survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method; graft function was assessed based on creatinine clearance with the Cockcroft Gault equation. Patient and donor data were obtained from medical records.

RESULTS

Recipients were older in the pre-NAS group (39 ± 8 vs 33 ± 8 years, respectively; P = .001) and median duration of preoperative dialysis was longer in the post-NAS group (103 ± 61 months vs 50 ± 36 months, respectively; P = .000). The average number of human leukocyte antigen-mismatched antigens were pre-NAS 3.4 ± 1.0 versus post-NAS 3.9 ± 1.2 (P = .05). Considering the recipients serological status 9 were hepatitis C virus (HCV)(+) and 2 hepatitis B virus (HBV)(+) among the post-NAS versus no HBV(+) and only 1 HCV(+) patient pre-NAS. Kaplan-Meier analysis of graft survival rates showed 90% at 1 and 85% at 3 years pre-NAS. Similar to 95% at 1 and 86% at 3 years for the post-NAS group (P > .05). Likewise, patient survival rates for both groups at 1 and 3 years were 97%. The mean parameter of donor age, allograft loss, cold ischemia time, patient death, number of retransplantations, HBV(+) patients, and delayed graft function were similar between groups (P > .05).

DISCUSSION

After NAS the transplant recipients were older, had a longer duration of dialysis, greater number of HLA mismatched antigens and, more HCV(+). No differences were observed in short-term patient and graft survival rates.

Rational rationing or discrimination: balancing equity and efficiency considerations in kidney allocation

After 6 years of deliberation, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network recently released a concept document proposing changes to the kidney allocation algorithm, sparking a heated debate about priority-setting of scarce health resources and discrimination. Proponents of the proposal argue that it will result in an additional 15,223 life years following transplant annually for recipients, yet the benefit will not be equally distributed and will likely benefit younger patients. Critics argue that the new model will promote age discrimination and may lead to a further decrease in live kidney donation. If true, these concerns could undermine fairness and damage public trust in the organ allocation system. We address these objections and consider their merit, highlighting both benefits and shortcomings of the proposal. We argue that, despite weaknesses of the proposal and the importance of maintaining consistency in patient and provider expectations over time, the proposal represents a needed first step in balancing equity and efficiency.

Living kidney donors ages 70 and older: recipient and donor outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The profound organ shortage has resulted in longer waiting times and increased mortality for those awaiting kidney transplantation. Consequently, patients are turning to older living donors. It is unclear if an upper age limit for donation should exist, both in terms of recipient and donor outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

In the United States, 219 healthy adults aged ≥70 have donated kidneys at 80 of 279 transplant centers. Competing risks models with matched controls were used to study the independent association between older donor age and allograft survival, accounting for the competing risk of recipient mortality as well as other transplant factors.

RESULTS

Among recipients of older live donor allografts, graft loss was significantly higher than matched 50-to 59-year-old live donor allografts (subhazard ratio [SHR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16 to 2.28, P = 0.005) but similar to matched nonextended criteria 50-to 59-year-old deceased donor allografts (SHR 1.19, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.63, P = 0.3). Mortality among living kidney donors aged ≥70 was no higher than healthy matched controls drawn from the NHANES-III cohort; in fact, mortality was lower, probably reflecting higher selectivity among older live donors than could be captured in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES-III; HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.65, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support living donation among older adults but highlight the advantages of finding a younger donor, particularly for younger recipients.

Associations of body mass index and weight loss with mortality in transplant-waitlisted maintenance hemodialysis patients

A body mass index (BMI) below morbid obesity range is often a requirement for kidney transplant wait-listing, but data linking BMI changes to mortality during the waitlist period are lacking. By linking the 6-year (7/2001-6/2007) national databases of a large dialysis organization and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified 14 632 waitlisted hemodialysis patients without kidney transplantation. Time-dependent survival models examined the mortality predictability of 13-week-averaged BMI, pretransplant serum creatinine as a muscle mass surrogate and their changes over time. The patients were on average 52 ± 13 years old, 40% women and had a BMI of 26.9 ± 6.3 kg/m². Each kg/m² increase of BMI was associated with a death hazard ratio (HR) of 0.96 (95%CI: 0.95-0.97). Compared to the lowest creatinine quintile, the 4th and 5th quintiles had death HRs of 0.75 (0.66-0.86) and 0.57 (0.49-0.66), respectively. Compared to minimal (< ± 1 kg) weight change over 6 months, those with 3 kg- < 5 kg and ≥ 5 kg weight loss had death HRs of 1.31 (1.14-1.52) and 1.51 (1.30-1.75), respectively. Similar associations were observed with creatinine changes over time. Transplant-waitlisted hemodialysis patients with lower BMI or muscle mass and/or unintentional weight or muscle loss have higher mortality in this observational study. Impact of intentional weight change remains unclear.

Impact of Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines on the prevalence of chronic kidney disease after living donor nephrectomy

PURPOSE

We evaluated the prevalence of chronic kidney disease stage 3 or worse based on the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines after living kidney donation at a single institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The collected data of 86 consecutive patients who underwent uneventful donor nephrectomy between 1987 and 2008 were evaluated retrospectively. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was determined using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease from serum creatinine levels collected before and after surgery in kidney donor followup clinics. Chronic kidney disease was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) according to the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines. Cox regression analyses were then used to determine the impact of predictors on the development of chronic kidney disease.

RESULTS

All donors (mean age 41.2, SD 9.9 years) had a mean preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate of 88.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (SD 16.3). Median followup was 6.4 years (range 0.9 to 21.0). Progression to stage 3 or worse chronic kidney disease was seen in 24.4% (95% CI 15.2-33.7) of patients. There were 2 patient deaths secondary to cancer and none required dialysis. Multivariable analysis showed that preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 82 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) was an independent risk factor for post-donation chronic kidney disease. For every 1 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) increase in baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, the hazard of postoperative chronic kidney disease was reduced by 7% (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.97, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative stage 3 chronic kidney disease or worse occurs in 24.4% of kidney donors. Long-term prospective studies and closer followup of donors are needed to identify its implications, given the associated risk of cardiovascular diseases with chronic kidney disease in the general population.

Perfusion storage reduces apoptosis in a porcine kidney model of donation after cardiac death

BACKGROUND

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidneys suffer a high incidence of delayed graft function attributable to warm ischemia and cold ischemia (CI). Neither the mechanism of injury nor type of cell death has been described. Clinical studies suggest that perfusion storage (PS) of DCD kidneys may reduce injury although the mechanism of protection is unknown. In a porcine model of DCD, we hypothesized that DCD kidneys have increased caspase-1 due to warm ischemia (WI) and increased caspase-3 and apoptosis due to CI.

METHODS

Male Yorkshire pigs subjected to cardiac death were perfused with cold University of Wisconsin solution. The perfused kidneys were removed and stored in cold University of Wisconsin solution for 24 hr. Kidney biopsies were obtained before cardiac death and at 0 and 24 hr of CI.

RESULTS

There was an increase in caspase-1 activity due to WI before cold preservation. CI was associated with a massive increase in apoptosis, caspase-3/7 activity, and caspase-3 protein expression. Next, we hypothesized that PS would protect against apoptosis. We compared DCD kidneys subjected to static versus PS for 24 hr. PS significantly reduced proximal tubular apoptosis and was associated with increased B-cell lymphoma-extra large, and hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1α.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that in DCD kidneys, WI preferentially activates caspase-1, whereas CI activates caspase-3 and causes apoptosis. PS may protect DCD kidneys through activation of antiapoptotic pathways involving B-cell lymphoma-extra large and hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1α.

Reduced expression of arrestin beta 2 by graft monocytes during acute rejection of rat kidneys

During acute rejection, numerous pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic monocytes accumulate in the vasculature of experimental renal allografts. Arrestins (ARRBs) are cellular regulators of inflammation, but nothing is known about their expression during rejection. Intravascular mononuclear graft leukocytes were isolated 4 days after kidney transplantation. ARRB1 and ARRB2 mRNA expression was reduced in blood leukocytes from allografts undergoing acute rejection, whereas on the protein level only ARRB2 was changed. Flow cytometry and confocal microscopy revealed ARRB1 and ARRB2 expression by monocytes and T cells, with a selective decrease in ARRB2 expression in monocytes during acute rejection. I-κB directly interacted with ARRB2 and the levels of both proteins strongly correlated. Concomitantly, the mRNA expression of NF-κB targeted genes increased. Our results suggest that activation of blood monocytes in renal isografts is dampened by high ARRB2 levels. During acute rejection, ARRB2 levels are reduced and classical monocyte activation is enabled via NF-κB activation.

Favorable outcomes with machine perfusion and longer pump times in kidney transplantation: a single-center, observational study

BACKGROUND

Hypothermic machine perfusion (MP) preservation is used for all deceased donor kidney transplants at our center. Kidneys are placed in cold storage at retrieval, then transferred to MP on arrival. Because a lack of consensus regarding optimal use of MP still exists, we evaluated the overall impact of using MP at our center and the prognostic value of MP (Pump) time.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 339 adult, primary deceased donor kidney transplant recipients who were pooled across three prospective, randomized immunosuppression trials (since 2000) at our center. In addition to providing overall results for delayed graft function (DGF) (requirement for dialysis in the first week), slow graft function (SGF), first biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), and graft failure, stepwise logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to determine the prognostic value of pump time, particularly after controlling for other significant prognosticators.

RESULTS

Mean cold storage and pump times were 6.6 and 26.7 hr, consistent across immunosuppression protocols. Overall DGF and SGF rates were 4.4% (15/339) and 12.1% (41/339). DGF was equally low for pump time less than 24 vs. more than or equal to 24 hr, 5.2% (6/116) vs. 4.0% (9/223) (P=0.63), with similar results after adjusting for known DGF predictors. A significantly lower first BPAR rate was observed for longer pump time (as a continuous variable) among more immunologically active recipients (those having more risk factors: DGF, age <50 yr, and non-white) (univariable P=0.005; multivariable P=0.009), with an estimated hazard ratio of 0.43 (P=0.006) favoring pump time more than or equal to 24 hr among those with more than or equal to two risk factors. CONCLUSIONS.: In this single-center, observational study, MP with prolonged pump times was associated with low DGF/SGF and first BPAR rates, supporting continued use of MP.

An analysis of the lack of donor pancreas utilization from younger adult organ donors

Donor pancreas utilization rates for whole organ transplant have remained low and have decreased over time. To identify the reasons for nonuse of pancreas from donors who meet common baseline acceptance criteria, we examined Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data from 2005 to 2007 and identified a subgroup of 1763 "potential pancreas donors" defined by age (19-40 years), body mass index (<30 kg/m), successful liver donation, and negative viral serology testing, which were not used. We characterize this cohort of potential donors including reasons for refusal, factors that may contribute to pancreas acceptance and function, and potential explanations for the lack of growth in pancreas organ utilization.

Imaging of pancreas transplantation and its complications

Pancreas transplantation is an effective treatment for type 1 diabetes mellitus and is being increasingly performed worldwide. Early recognition of graft-related complications is fundamental for graft survival; thus, radiologists must be aware of the transplantation technique, pancreas-graft imaging and postoperative complications. We present normal pancreas-graft imaging appearances and the imaging features of postoperative complications.