Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of the acute phase of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A systematic review

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the treatment of the acute phase of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).

SUMMARY

A systematic review of the literature was conducted on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection through July 2023. Search terms included "heparin-induced thrombocytopenia AND direct-oral-anticoagulants" in addition to a list of oral anticoagulants. Adult patients who used direct oral anticoagulants as the initial treatment for the acute phase of HIT were included. A total of 1,188 articles were initially identified, with 770 articles reviewed following removal of duplicates. Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 articles were ultimately included. Rivaroxaban was the most-utilized DOAC (28 patients), followed by apixaban (7 patients) and dabigatran (1 patient). All patients with thrombocytopenia demonstrated successful platelet recovery, with two patients presenting with normal platelet counts. One patient developed a deep venous thrombosis with no other new or recurrent thromboses. There were no reported clinically significant adverse events in any patient. Obstacles and deterrents to the use of the standards of care in the acute phase of HIT exist. Argatroban and bivalirudin require intravenous infusion and require close aPTT monitoring and dose adjustment. Fondaparinux requires injection and is contraindicated with body weight <50kg. DOACs would offer the novel ability for an oral treatment in the treatment of the acute phase HIT and allow for minimal monitoring and consistent dosing strategies. Therefore, DOACs are an intriguing choice for the treatment of the acute phase of HIT.

CONCLUSION

Data from 12 publications and across 36 patients suggests that the use of DOACs in the acute phase of HIT may be a safe and efficacious treatment option with favorable ease of monitoring and management.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with very high antibody titer is associated with slower platelet recovery and higher risk of thrombosis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic disorder mediated by platelet-activating antibodies targeting platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin complex. A higher antibody titer is reflected in a higher optical density (OD) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for heparin-PF4 antibodies. This single-institution retrospective study of 116 HIT patients examined the effect of heparin-PF4 OD on time to platelet recovery, vascular thrombosis, and in-hospital mortality. Patients were divided into 3 cohorts based on heparin-PF4 OD: cohort 1 had an OD ≥ 2 and ≤ 2.4, cohort 2 had an OD > 2.4 and ≤ 2.8, and cohort 3 had an OD > 2.8. A higher OD titer was associated with significantly increased time to platelet recovery when compared between cohorts 1 versus 2 (HR = 0.599, p = 0.0221) and 1 versus 3 (HR = 0.515, p = 0.0014), as well as an increased risk of thrombosis (79.4%-cohort 3 vs 53.8%-cohort 2 vs 46.1%-cohort 1, p = 0.04), but had no impact on mortality (2.62-alive vs 2.65-deceased, p = 0.7432). A higher OD titer can inform risk assessment and support decision-making in HIT patients; however, prospective studies are needed to further clarify the impact of heparin-PF4 OD on outcomes.

Management of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Contemporary Review

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life- and limb-threatening immune-mediated emergency classically associated with heparin therapy. This review focuses on type II HIT, characterized by the development of antibodies against platelet-factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin after exposure, causing life-threatening thrombocytopenia, arterial thrombosis, and/or venous thrombosis. The high morbidity and mortality rates emphasize the need for early recognition and urgent intervention with discontinuation of heparin and initiation of non-heparin anticoagulation. We discuss the management of HIT with an emphasis on recent developments: (i) incorporating the phases of HIT (i.e., suspected, acute, subacute A and B, and remote) into its management, categorized according to platelet count, immunoassay, and functional assay results and (ii) direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which are increasingly used in appropriate cases of acute HIT (off-label). In comparison to parenteral options (e.g., bivalirudin and danaparoid), they are easier to administer, are more cost-effective, and obviate the need for transition to an oral anticoagulant after platelet recovery. We also identify the knowledge gaps and suggest areas for future research.

Results of an international survey of opinions on the definitions and treatments for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Platelet Immunology

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is rare, affecting fewer than 1 in 1500 hospital admissions. Despite the increasing adoption of new therapies in HIT, such as direct oral anticoagulants and pooled immunoglobulins, there is limited high-quality evidence to guide clinicians. Numerous uncommon presentations of HIT and HIT-like entities have recently been recognized, and a harmonized approach to their classification is required to study them better. We present the results of an international survey of opinions from experts and practitioners in the field of platelet immunology regarding the role of direct oral anticoagulants in HIT, novel definitions of subclassifications of HIT-like platelet factor 4 immune conditions (spontaneous autoimmune HIT, persistent autoimmune HIT, and treatment-refractory HIT), and the role for intravenous immunoglobulins in the treatment paradigm of HIT and these HIT-like conditions. From 102 survey responses, there was broad acceptance of rivaroxaban (74.5%) and apixaban (73.5%) even before platelet recovery, as well as for intravenous immunoglobulin in the management of spontaneous (85.6%), persistent (83.7%), and treatment-refractory HIT (87.4%). With this mandate for harmonizing terminologies and treatment approaches in special situations without robust clinical data owing to their rarity, we plan to conduct a robust survey, establish international consensus, and draft management guidelines for HIT and platelet factor 4 immune diseases in the near future.

Temporal presentations of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia following cardiac surgery: A single-center, retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an important adverse drug reaction that can occur postcardiac surgery. Preoperative exposure to unfractionated heparin (UFH) is common, raising the issue of how frequently cardiac surgery-associated HIT occurs after immunizing preoperative exposure to heparin.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency and clinical picture of HIT occurring within 4 days of cardiac surgery (early presentation) versus later presentations (typical, delayed).

METHODS

We identified patients with laboratory-confirmed HIT following cardiac surgery over 30 years in a single cardiac surgery center. Three different clinical presentations of HIT were identified: typical (HIT-related platelet count fall beginning between postoperative days [PODs] 5-10), delayed (patients with falls after POD10 or who presented following hospital discharge), and early (established before POD5, including during cardiac surgery [acute intraoperative HIT]).

RESULTS

Of 129 patients identified with HIT complicating cardiac surgery, 100 had typical and 16 had delayed presentation of HIT; only 13 patients (10.1%) presented with early HIT, all of whom had received exposure to UFH during the 10 days before cardiac surgery. No patient was identified in whom remote preoperative UFH exposure was implicated in explaining early HIT. Notably, five patients appeared to have had acute intraoperative HIT, without immediate adverse consequences.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 90% of patients with HIT after cardiac surgery appear to develop this complication due to immunization triggered by cardiac surgery; however, in approximately 10% of patients, early presentation during the first four PODs (or intraoperatively) can be explained by recent immunizing exposure to heparin.

Evaluation of the use of direct oral anticoagulants for the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Historically, treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) includes a non-heparin parenteral anticoagulant with bridging to warfarin once platelets recover. Data supporting the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for HIT treatment are limited. Given the paucity of evidence for the use of DOACs in HIT, the aim of this study is to describe the prescribing patterns of DOACs for HIT at our institution. This is a single center, retrospective chart evaluation of patients admitted from January 2017 to October 2020 with a confirmed diagnosis of HIT. Twenty-six patients were identified; 21 patients (81%) received initial parenteral treatment and 5 patients (19.2%) with initial DOAC treatment. The most frequently used DOAC was apixaban at the VTE treatment dose [15 (57.7%)] followed by the reduced dose of apixaban [5 (19.2%)]. Of the patients initially treated with a parenteral agent, 11 (42.3%) were transitioned to a DOAC after platelet recovery, 7 (26.9%) transitioned as platelets were steadily increasing, and 3 (11.5%) transitioned at the time of discharge (prior to platelet recovery). Platelet recovery was achieved in 23 patients (88.5%) at a median of 5 days (IQR 2.8-8.3) after HIT diagnosis. No new thrombotic or bleeding events occurred within 30 days of HIT diagnosis. In our patients treated with a DOAC for HIT, no progression of HIT was observed. Apixaban was the most frequently utilized DOAC. Most patients received a parenteral anticoagulant prior to DOAC initiation. All patients managed with a DOAC as initial treatment achieved platelet recovery within 30 days of HIT diagnosis.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative anticoagulation in suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening complication associated with high medical costs. Factor Xa inhibitors have gradually replace approved treatment with intravenous direct thrombin inhibitors despite their off-label indication, because of easier management and favorable economic profile.Whether they are cost-effective remains unclear. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of approved and off-label anticoagulants in patients with suspected HIT, based on census data from the largest Swiss hospital between 2015 and 2018. We constructed a decision tree model that reflects important clinical events associated with HIT. Relevant cost data were obtained from the finance department or estimated based on the Swiss-wide cost tariff. We estimated averted adverse events (AE) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio as primary outcome parameters. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses with 2000 simulations to assess the robustness of our results. In the base-case analysis, the total cost of averting one AE was 49,565 CHF for argatroban; 30,380 CHF for fondaparinux, and 30,610 CHF for rivaroxaban; after adjusting for 4Ts score: 41,152 CHF (argatroban); 27,710 CHF (fondaparinux) and 37,699 CHF (rivaroxaban). Fondaparinux and rivaroxaban were more clinically-effective than argatroban with AE averted of 0.820; 0.834 and 0.917 for argatroban, fondaparinux and rivaroxaban, respectively. Treatment with fondaparinux resulted in less cost and more AE averted, hence dominating argatroban. Results were most sensitive to AE rates and prolongation of stay. Monte Carlo simulations affirmed our base-case analysis. This is the first cost-effectiveness analysis comparing argatroban with fondaparinux and rivaroxaban using primary data. Fondaparinux and rivaroxaban resulted in more averted AE but fondaparinux had greater cost savings. Fondaparinux could be a viable alternative to argatroban.

Recent Advances in Anticoagulant Treatment of Immune Thrombosis: A Focus on Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome

For more than 10 years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly prescribed for the prevention and treatment of thrombotic events. However, their use in immunothrombotic disorders, namely heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), is still under investigation. The prothrombotic state resulting from the autoimmune mechanism, multicellular activation, and platelet count decrease, constitutes similarities between HIT and APS. Moreover, they both share the complexity of the biological diagnosis. Current treatment of HIT firstly relies on parenteral non-heparin therapies, but DOACs have been included in American and French guidelines for a few years, providing the advantage of limiting the need for treatment monitoring. In APS, vitamin K antagonists are conversely the main treatment (+/− anti-platelet agents), and the use of DOACs is either subject to precautionary recommendations or is not recommended in severe APS. While some randomized controlled trials have been conducted regarding the use of DOACs in APS, only retrospective studies have examined HIT. In addition, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is now a part of immunothrombotic disorders, and guidelines have been created concerning an anticoagulant strategy in this case. This literature review aims to summarize available data on HIT, APS, and VITT treatments and define the use of DOACs in therapeutic strategies.

Rivaroxaban and apixaban for the treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse hematologic drug reaction that results in thrombocytopenia. This potentially life-threatening event is due to the administration of heparin products, such as unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). The incidence of HIT occurs in <0.1%-7% of hospitalized patients treated with heparin products, with a risk of thrombosis as high as 50%. In 2018, the American Society of Hematology (ASH) recommended the utilization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in clinically stable patients at average bleeding risk with HIT. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prescribing patterns of rivaroxaban and apixaban for the treatment of suspected or confirmed HIT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review from January 2013 through October 2019 at the University of Chicago Medicine. Twelve patients were identified to have received a DOAC for suspected or confirmed HIT.

RESULTS

Rivaroxaban was utilized in seven (58%) patients, six of whom received argatroban prior to starting rivaroxaban. Five (71%) of these patients were started on the recommended dose of rivaroxaban for VTE. Apixaban was utilized in five (42%) patients; four patients were started on argatroban and transitioned to apixaban. One patient was started on the suggested dose of apixaban for VTE.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

After starting DOACs for suspected HIT, no patients had new thrombosis during hospitalization. Eight patients (67%) followed up at our institution within 6 months of their discharge date. No subsequent thrombi formation were identified for any of these patients. The results of this study add to the expanding literature regarding the safety and efficacy of DOAC use in HIT, and indicate DOACs are being increasingly utilized for the treatment of confirmed or suspected HIT.

[Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Update]

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication of heparin therapy. It is due to the synthesis of antibodies most often directed against platelet factor 4 (FP4) modified by heparin (H). HIT is manifested by a platelet count fall, associated with a high risk of venous or arterial thrombosis. The diagnosis of HIT is based on the assessment of clinical probability (4Ts score or change in platelet count after cardiac surgery) and the demonstration of heparin-modified anti-FP4 antibodies (FP4/H). If the immunological tests are positive, functional tests should be performed. In case of suspicion of HIT, it is necessary to urgently stop heparin therapy, to perform a doppler ultrasound of the lower limbs, and to prescribe an alternative anticoagulation agent at a curative dose. Currently, danaparoid sodium and argatroban are authorized. The diagnosis and management of HIT remain complex and requires multidisciplinary collaboration.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants as Successful Treatment of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Parisian Retrospective Case Series

Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic life-threatening disorder caused by an adverse reaction to heparin exposure. In this context, it is imperative to stop heparin immediately and to replace it by a non-heparin anticoagulant therapy. Despite their advantages, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is only emerging for HIT treatment, and their use remains rare. Objective: To improve our knowledge on the emerging role of DOACs as treatment of HIT and give an overview of our local practices in this context. Patients/Methods: This is a multi-centric retrospective case series of HIT patients referred to our Parisian pharmacovigilance network and treated with DOACs. Results: We report the cases of seven patients from four healthcare centers, diagnosed with HIT (4T score ≥ 4, positive anti-PF4/heparin immunoassay and positive serotonin-release assay) and treated with DOACs. After a few days on substitutive parenteral treatment (n = 6) or directly at HIT diagnosis (n = 1), these patients were treated with either rivaroxaban (n = 6) or apixaban (n = 1) during acute HIT phase. Mean time to platelet count recovery after heparin discontinuation was 3.3 days (range 3-5). No patient experienced major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding or thrombosis that could be related to DOAC treatment during follow-up. Conclusions: Our cases studies are consistent with recent guidelines credit to the potential and safe use of DOAC during acute HIT in clinically stable patients.

Oral Factor Xa (FXa) Inhibitors for Treatment of Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Background::

Heparin is the most commonly used injectable anticoagulant for many indications, ranging from the treatment of atrial fibrillation to the prevention of clotting in patients undergoing surgery. Currently, only argatroban and bivalirudin are FDA approved for the management of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in the United States, both of which are direct thrombin inhibitors. The agents being reviewed, apixaban and rivaroxaban, are oral direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors. Currently, neither has FDA approval for use in HIT. The objective of this review is to summarize the current evidence available regarding the use of oral factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of HIT.

Methods::

A literature search was conducted using Medline and Ovid Embase. Search terms included heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, HIT, apixaban, rivaroxaban, Xa Inhibitor, direct thrombin inhibitor, NOAC, and DOAC. Studies and case reports were included if they evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral FXa inhibitors for the treatment of HIT. Additional literature and case reports were found through bibliographic review.

Results and Discussion:

Currently, available literature includes an in vitro study with apixaban, case reports, and retrospective and prospective cohort studies. The in vitro study evaluated the interaction between apixaban and platelets in the presence of HIT antibodies, which assessed its potential for use in HIT management. Fourteen case reports and one case series were also identified, of which six described treatment with apixaban and eight with rivaroxaban. Lastly, four cohort studies were published evaluating the use of direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including oral factor Xa inhibitors in patients with HIT. Although there are no published randomized control trials evaluating the use of FXa inhibitors in the management of HIT, there are several findings that may guide clinicians on the use of these agents in practice.

Conclusion::

As indicated by the case reports, case series and cohort studies detailing clinical use and described in this manuscript, there are data and positive patient outcomes that support the potential use of these agents for HIT, and are an impetus for future studies.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of anticoagulants for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of non-heparin anticoagulants for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are not fully established, and the optimal treatment strategy is unknown. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to determine precise rates of platelet recovery, new or progressive thromboembolism (TE), major bleeding, and death for all non-heparin anticoagulants and to study potential sources of variability.

METHODS

Following a detailed protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42020219027), EMBASE and Medline were searched for all studies reporting clinical outcomes of patients treated with non-heparin anticoagulants (argatroban, danaparoid, fondaparinux, direct oral anticoagulants [DOAC], bivalirudin, and other hirudins) for acute HIT. Proportions of patients with the outcomes of interest were pooled using a random-effects model for each drug. The influence of the patient population, the diagnostic test used, the study design, and the type of article was assessed.

RESULTS

Out of 3194 articles screened, 92 studies with 119 treatment groups describing 4698 patients were included. The pooled rates of platelet recovery ranged from 74% (bivalirudin) to 99% (fondaparinux), TE from 1% (fondaparinux) to 7% (danaparoid), major bleeding from 1% (DOAC) to 14% (bivalirudin), and death from 7% (fondaparinux) to 19% (bivalirudin). Confidence intervals were mostly overlapping, and results were not influenced by patient population, diagnostic test used, study design, or type of article.

DISCUSSION

Effectiveness and safety outcomes were similar among various anticoagulants, and significant factors affecting these outcomes were not identified. These findings support fondaparinux and DOACs as viable alternatives to conventional anticoagulants for treatment of acute HIT in clinical practice.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment

Introduction: Immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an infrequent complication following heparin exposure but with potentially fatal outcome due to thrombotic complications. Prompt suspension of heparin is necessary if HIT is suspected, followed by initiation of non-heparin anticoagulant therapy.Areas covered: In this review, the pathophysiology and challenges in diagnosing HIT are elucidated. Current and emerging treatment options are discussed with special focus on parenteral thrombin inhibitors (argatroban, bivalirudin), parenteral factor Xa inhibitors (danaparoid, fondaparinux) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs [rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran]) including dosing strategies for DOACs. The database PubMed was employed without time boundaries.Expert opinion: Only argatroban holds regulatory approval for HIT treatment in both U.S. and Europe. This treatment is, however, challenged by the need for close monitoring and high costs. Fondaparinux has been increasingly used for off-label treatment and during recent years, evidence for the use of DOACs has emerged. Preliminary results from observational studies hold promise for future use of DOACs in the acute and subacute phase of HIT. However, so far, the use of DOACs in acute HIT should be reserved for clinically stable patients without severe thrombotic complications. Importantly, both fondaparinux and DOAC use is contraindicated in severe renal insufficiency.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Focus on Thrombosis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an immune-mediated disorder caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Thrombosis is a central and unpredictable feature of this syndrome. Despite optimal management, disease morbidity and mortality from thrombosis remain high. The hypercoagulable state in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is biologically distinct from other thrombophilic disorders in that clinical complications are directly attributable to circulating ultra-large immune complexes. In some individuals, ultra-large immune complexes elicit unchecked cellular procoagulant responses that culminate in thrombosis. To date, the clinical and biologic risk factors associated with thrombotic risk in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia remain elusive. This review will summarize our current understanding of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with attention to its clinical features, cellular mechanisms, and its management.

Pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

There are currently no effective substitutes for high intensity therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) for cardiovascular procedures based on its rapid onset of action, ease of monitoring and reversibility. The continued use of UFH in these and other settings requires vigilance for its most serious nonhemorrhagic complication, heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT is an immune prothrombotic disorder caused by antibodies that recognize complexes between platelet factor 4 (PF4) and polyanions such as heparin (H).The pathogenicity of anti-PF4/H antibodies is likely due to the formation of immune complexes that initiate intense procoagulant responses by vascular and hematopoietic cells that lead to the generation of platelet microparticles, monocyte and endothelial cell procoagulant activity, and neutrophil extracellular traps, among other outcomes. The development of anti-PF4/H antibodies after exposure to UFH greatly exceeds the incidence of clinical disease, but the biochemical features that distinguish pathogenic from nonpathogenic antibodies have not been identified. Diagnosis relies on pretest clinical probability, screening for anti-PF4/H antibodies and documentation of their platelet activating capacity. However, both clinical algorithms and test modalities have limited predictive values making diagnosis and management challenging. Given the unacceptable rates of recurrent thromboembolism and bleeding associated with current therapies, there is an unmet need for novel rational nonanticoagulant therapeutics based on the pathogenesis of HIT. We will review recent developments in our understanding of the pathogenesis of HIT and its implications for future approaches to diagnosis and management.

Failure of Fondaparinux in Autoimmune Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune adverse reaction to heparin that is associated with life-threatening thrombotic complications. More rarely, HIT may begin after stopping of heparin or after flushes of heparin (autoimmune HIT). Fondaparinux has been proposed as a candidate treatment for HIT, but there are few data on its use in autoimmune HIT. An 86-year-old man with a history of diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia was admitted to our hospital for carotid endarterectomy. During surgery, only one heparin dose of 5,000 U was used. Platelet count started to decrease on the 11th day after surgery. Since the patient was not receiving heparin treatment/prophylaxis, HIT was not suspected. On day 19, platelet count was 61 × 10 ³ /μL, and the patient was investigated for a diagnosis of HIT. Immunoglobulin (Ig)-G-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was positive and HIT was confirmed by a platelet aggregation test; fondaparinux 5 mg once a day was started. During fondaparinux treatment, platelet count did not increase and a lower leg deep vein thrombosis occurred. Fondaparinux was stopped and rivaroxaban 15 mg twice a day was started. Platelet count returned to base line after 10 days from fondaparinux withdrawal. There was no thrombotic event or bleeding complication during rivaroxaban treatment. Anecdotal evidence suggests risk of failure of fondaparinux treatment for autoimmune HIT and supports the use of rivaroxaban for treatment of HIT, justifying larger studies.

Rivaroxaban Treatment for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report and a Review of the Current Experience

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a life-threatening complication of exposure to heparin. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia results from an autoantibody directed against platelet factor 4 in complex with heparin. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is traditionally treated with bivalirudin, argatroban, danaparoid, or fondaparinux. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants administration to treat heparin-induced thrombocytopenia has been reported. Direct oral anticoagulants do not cause platelet activation in the presence of heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies, nor do they provoke autoantibody production. Direct oral anticoagulants offer advantages such as consistent and predictable anticoagulation, oral administration with good patient compliance, and a good safety profile. We report a case of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with deep venous thrombosis successfully treated with rivaroxaban and review the current experience with rivaroxaban for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Refractory Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia With Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Treated With IVIg, Steroids, and a Combination of Anticoagulants: A Case Report

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II is caused by antibody production that bind complexes between heparin and platelet factor 4 leading to platelet consumption and thrombosis. In a small subset of cases referred to as autoimmune HIT, the antibodies activate platelets even in the absence of heparin. Refractory HIT is a type of autoimmune HIT in which thrombocytopenia persists for weeks after heparin discontinuation and carries increased risk for thrombosis and more severe thrombocytopenia. We present a case of refractory HIT with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) that was successfully treated with a change in anticoagulant alongside steroids and a second trial of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg).

Rivaroxaban as an Alternative Agent for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a high-risk adverse drug reaction because of its associated risk of life- and limb-threatening thrombosis. Rivaroxaban may be considered as an ideal nonheparin anticoagulant alternative for the management of HIT. In this preliminary retrospective study, the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban to control the clinically suspected HIT (4Ts score 4 points or greater) were evaluated. Patients with chronic kidney disease, hepatic impairment, mechanical heart valves, and active bleeding were excluded. Forty-two eligible patients who received rivaroxaban for clinically suspected HIT were evaluated by medical records review, with 12-month follow-up after the first dose of rivaroxaban. End points included confirmed thrombosis (primary end point), mortality, and adverse treatment-related events. HIT-associated thrombosis was found in 17/42 (40.5%) patients before receiving rivaroxaban. After rivaroxaban therapy, platelet counts normalized in all patients, with only 1/42 (2.3%) patients developing new thrombosis. No hemorrhagic event was recorded in the patients. Twelve patients (28.6%) died, but the cause of death was not related to the thrombosis, hemorrhage, or adverse effects of rivaroxaban. Our findings are consistent with the available emerging data, suggesting that rivaroxaban is a safe and effective drug for the management of clinically suspected HIT. Rivaroxaban is a particularly valuable treatment option in developing countries, where there are issues of cost and availability of approved alternative agents.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT): Review of incidence, diagnosis, and management

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life and limb-threatening complication of heparin exposure. Here, we review the pathogenesis, incidence, diagnosis, and management of HIT. The first step in thwarting devastating complications from this entity is to maintain a high index of clinical suspicion, followed by an accurate clinical scoring assessment using the 4Ts. Next, appropriate stepwise laboratory testing must be undertaken in order to rule out HIT or establish the diagnosis. In the interim, all heparin must be stopped immediately, and the patient administered alternative anticoagulation. Here we review alternative anticoagulation choice, therapy alternatives in the difficult-to-manage patient with HIT, and the problem of overdiagnosis.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia treated with fondaparinux: single center experience

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the most frequent drug-induced, immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulation with heparin must be stopped immediately and replaced by some suggested alternative - lepirudin, danaparoid or argatroban. Fondaparinux has been also successfully used in HIT.

METHODS

We present a cohort of 10 patients diagnosed with HIT and treated in a university hospital in a period of four years. Diagnosis was based on Keeling´s scoring system, screening immunologic test for HIT (STic EXPERT® HIT) and sandwich ELISA (detection of IgG/heparin-PF4 antibodies). While other alternative anticoagulants are not readily available in our hospital, we used fondaparinux in all cases.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2018, eight males and two females (mean age 67 years, range 46-86 years) were diagnosed with HIT in our hospital. This complication developed in 9 cases after low-molecular-weight heparin and in one after heparin flushes in hemodialysis. A drop-in platelet count developed in all patients, thrombotic complications in 7 and skin necrosis in 2 cases. Fondaparinux was used in all patients, including two cases with severe renal impairment, the dose was chosen individually. We observed complete platelet recovery in all cases. One patient died because of advanced malignancy, others did not have any complication. In 6 cases we switched to oral anticoagulation after platelet recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

In our group of 10 HIT patients fondaparinux was shown to be both safe and effective, even in those with severe renal impairment. Additional studies are warranted to confirm this observation.

Potential Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Management of Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare, potentially life-threatening condition secondary to unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin exposure. This immune-mediated drug reaction manifests as thrombocytopenia with a paradoxical hypercoagulable state that can result in life-threatening thrombosis. It is imperative to ensure cessation of heparin-based products as soon as HIT is identified. Traditional treatment options include argatroban, bivalirudin, fondaparinux, and danaparoid with a transition to warfarin upon platelet recovery. These anticoagulants are notwithstanding limitations including parenteral administration and routine laboratory monitoring leading to prolonged hospitalizations, emphasizing the need for new therapies. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly investigated for the management of HIT and may overcome the aforementioned challenges of current therapies. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the current HIT guidelines, discuss limitations to contemporary treatment options, provide insight into the emerging evidence for the DOACs rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, and conclude with a clinical summary for their use in this setting. The PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE databases were searched for peer-reviewed literature from January 1, 2012, to June 31, 2018. Twenty-seven articles met inclusion criteria for review: 1 prospective trial, 5 retrospective cohort studies, and 21 case reports totaling 104 patients treated with a DOAC for HIT. The DOACs prevented new and recurrent thrombosis in 98% (n=102) of cases, and bleeding complications occurred in 3% (n=3). While current literature remains limited, it is suggestive of a potential role of DOACs for HIT, which has led to their integration into the 2018 American Society Hematology Guidelines with a conditional recommendation.

Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Critically Ill Patients

The direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly used over vitamin K antagonists in recent years because they do not require monitoring and have an immediate anticoagulation effect. In general, DOACs have exhibited a better safety profile and noninferiority for prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation compared with vitamin K antagonists in the non-ICU population; whether this finding holds true in patients who are critically ill remains unknown. The current review addresses the role of DOACs in special ICU populations, use of these agents for VTE prophylaxis, perioperative management of DOACs, drug monitoring, and potential drug interactions of DOACs in critically ill patients. Adverse events and available reversal agents for DOACs are also discussed.

Non vitamin K oral anticoagulants versus antiplatelets in embolic stroke of undetermined source: most updated evidence

Recent trial data have expanded the horizons of newer indications of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC). Most recently they are being evaluated for use in embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). ESUS are particularly known for their recurrences. So, identifying the causes and treating those etiological factors are the keys to secondary prevention of ESUS. Although traditional experts still opine for the use of antiplatelets for secondary prevention of ESUS as for other causes of embolic stroke, there are still room for improvement in delivery of optimal treatment strategy. So, NOAC is being tried as an alternative to traditional atiplatelet therapy in head-to-head trials. Unfortunately, recent trial data (from NAVIGATE-ESUS and RESPECT-ESUS) have not shown any added benefits (with comparable bleeding risk) of NOAC compared to aspirin in prevention of ESUS. This review intends to highlight the concept of ESUS, its varied etiologies, discuss the published and ongoing trials and tries to dig the reasons why the overall trial data have been disappointing. It also discusses the arenas where NOAC may be proved to be better than antiplatelets. Overall, we have stressed on the personalized case-to-case basis decision making while choosing the appropriate therapy in secondary prevention of ESUS.

Drug-associated thrombocytopenia

Many drugs have been implicated in drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DITP). Patients with DITP develop a drop in platelet count 5 to 10 days after drug administration with an increased risk of hemorrhage. The diagnosis of DITP is often challenging, because most hospitalized patients are taking multiple medications and have comorbidities that can also cause thrombocytopenia. Specialized laboratory diagnostic tests have been developed and are helpful to confirm the diagnosis. Treatment of DITP involves discontinuation of the offending drug. The platelet count usually starts to recover after 4 or 5 half-lives of the responsible drug or drug metabolite. High doses of intravenous immunoglobulin can be given to patients with severe thrombocytopenia and bleeding. Although in most cases, DITP is associated with bleeding, life-threatening thromboembolic complications are common in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Binding of antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibodies to Fc receptors on platelets and monocytes causes intravascular cellular activation, leading to an intensely prothrombotic state in HIT. The clinical symptoms include a decrease in platelet counts by >50% and/or new thromboembolic complications. Two approaches can help to confirm or rule out HIT: assessment of the clinical presentation using scoring systems and in vitro demonstration of antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibodies. The cornerstone of HIT management is immediate discontinuation of heparin when the disease is suspected and anticoagulation using nonheparin anticoagulant. In this review, we will provide an update on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of both DITP and HIT.

Anticoagulating patients with high-risk acquired thrombophilias

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria are 3 acquired thrombophilias that carry a high risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism. Management of these conditions has largely included anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist after an initial period of a parenteral anticoagulant, for as long as the thrombotic risk is still present. The available evidence for the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is limited and primarily consists of case series and cohort studies, which are summarized in this chapter. Randomized trials evaluating DOACs in patients with APS are reviewed. Further research is needed prior to widely adopting DOACs for use in these high-risk acquired thrombophilias; however, there may be selected low-risk subgroups where DOAC use is possible after careful consideration and patient discussion.

Anticoagulating patients with high-risk acquired thrombophilias

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria are 3 acquired thrombophilias that carry a high risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism. Management of these conditions has largely included anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist after an initial period of a parenteral anticoagulant, for as long as the thrombotic risk is still present. The available evidence for the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is limited and primarily consists of case series and cohort studies, which are summarized in this chapter. Randomized trials evaluating DOACs in patients with APS are reviewed. Further research is needed prior to widely adopting DOACs for use in these high-risk acquired thrombophilias; however, there may be selected low-risk subgroups where DOAC use is possible after careful consideration and patient discussion.

Pharmacogenetics to prevent heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: what do we know?

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening, immune-mediated adverse reaction to heparin anticoagulants. The inability to predict HIT represents a considerable liability associated with heparin administration. Genetic studies of HIT are challenging due to the scarcity of true HIT cases, potential for misclassification, and many environmental risk factors. Genetic studies have not consistently identified risk alleles for HIT, the production of platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies or the thromboembolic complications of HIT. Genes implicated in HIT and platelet factor 4/heparin antibody levels include FCGR2A, TDAG8, HLA-DR and others. Compelling evidence also suggests that the FCGR2A H131R polymorphism is associated with HIT-related thrombosis. There is a need for well-powered, multiethnic studies with laboratory confirmation of HIT, detailed patient- and drug-specific data, and inclusion of both serologic and thromboembolic outcomes. Genomic biomarkers identified from such studies offer the possibility of shifting current clinical practice paradigms from early detection and treatment to prevention.

Systematic review of fondaparinux for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: When there are no randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Fondaparinux is commonly used for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) despite lack of approval for this indication. High quality randomized controlled trials of this agent are unlikely to be forthcoming.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review is to update the literature on the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for treatment of confirmed and probable HIT based on the available evidence.

METHODS

Primary articles were identified using Web of Science and PubMed database searches for English-language studies from January 2006 to November 2017. Selected studies enrolled consecutive adult patients who received fondaparinux as the primary anticoagulant to treat acute HIT; confirmed the diagnosis by serological testing with a serotonin-release assay; heparin-induced platelet activation assay or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; provided clinical criteria used to define HIT and reported clinically important outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies were identified with 154 HIT positive patients. Ten experienced a new thrombotic event while receiving fondaparinux (6.5%, 95% CI, 3.4 to 11.7%) and 26 experienced major bleeding (16.9%, 95% CI, 11.7 to 23.6%). Mortality due to thrombosis or bleeding was reported in 5 patients (3.2%, 95% CI, 1.2 to 7.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Fondaparinux appears to be an effective and safe anticoagulant for treatment of acute HIT despite the absence of randomized trials. Caution should exercised when using fondaparinux in patients with renal insufficiency.

Characterization of hospitalized cardiovascular patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Little is known about heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a pro-thrombotic, potentially life-threatening immune-mediated reaction to heparin exposure, in conservative and interventional cardiovascular medicine.

HYPOTHESIS

The 4T score, validated for prediction of HIT in surgical patients before, is also suitable for assessing HIT probability in cardiovascular patients with unclear thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

A total of 403 consecutive patients from our Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology in whom a HIT screening test was performed between 2009 and 2016 were identified. All 72 patients with a positive screening test were subjected to a functional confirmation test (heparin-induced platelet activation test, HIPA), resulting in 23 patients with serologically confirmed HIT (positive screening test, positive HIPA) and 49 patients with nonconfirmed HIT (positive screening test, negative HIPA).

RESULTS

The 4TScore had a sensitivity of 82.6% and a specificity of 28.6% in our patients, suggesting that it might not sufficiently predict the clinical probability of HIT in cardiovascular patients. In both confirmed and nonconfirmed HIT, intrahospital mortality was high without a significant difference (30% in confirmed HIT vs 43% in nonconfirmed HIT). Bacteremia was more often found in patients with nonconfirmed HIT, suggesting infection as a frequent differential diagnosis of thrombocytopenia in these patients (49% vs 17%, P = 0.0185).

CONCLUSION

HIT screening should be initiated in cardiovascular patients with unclear thrombocytopenia despite a low 4Tscore in order to distinguish patients requiring alternative anticoagulants from those with other causes such as infections. Further research is needed to specify the risk profile for HIT in cardiovascular patients.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia (HIT) is a severe and potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction. Patients become extremely hypercoagulable, and this can lead to life-threatening and limb-threatening thrombosis with a mortality of 5%-10%. HIT is an antibody-mediated process in which platelet activation occurs. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion along with a scoring system and laboratory testing. Patients suspected of having HIT must not receive any further heparin or low-molecular weight heparin and must be started on an alternative anticoagulant such as argatroban or danaparoid. Fondaparinux may also be considered but is not licenced for this indication.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines with the AGREE II instrument

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), the risk of death or thromboembolic complication associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) remains high. Our aim was to systematically review the quality of CPGs for HIT and summarize the recommendations.

METHODS

CPGs for HIT were systematically searched on PubMed, Embase, guidelines' websites, and Google up to August 6, 2017. Independently, three appraisers assessed the quality of CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument and extracted the data. Recommendations were summarized, and a comparative study was conducted to analyze the consistency among guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 11 CPGs were evaluated. The quality assessed by AGREE II varied widely, not only between domains within guidelines, but also between guidelines across domains. The domain of scope and purpose and clarity of presentation obtained the highest median scores, while the domain of rigor of development and editorial independence obtained the lowest median scores. The ACCP guideline and BSH guideline were recommended for use in dealing with HIT, achieving a score of at least 50% in all six AGREE II domains. Recommendations across guidelines were inconsistent, especially in the choice of non-heparin anticoagulant for HIT.

CONCLUSIONS

Future HIT guidelines should place more emphasis on methodological quality and improve efforts to include cost and local availability of drugs when providing recommendations.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in the Critically Ill Patient

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is associated with clinically significant morbidity and mortality. Patients who are critically ill are commonly thrombocytopenic and exposed to heparin. Although HIT should be considered, it is not usually the cause of thrombocytopenia in the medical-surgical ICU population. A systematic approach to the patient who is critically ill who has thrombocytopenia according to clinical features, complemented by appropriate laboratory confirmation, should lead to a reduction in inappropriate laboratory testing and reduce the use of more expensive and less reliable anticoagulants. If the patient is deemed as being at intermediate or high risk for HIT or if HIT is confirmed by means of the serotonin-release assay, heparin should be stopped, heparin-bonded catheters should be removed, and a direct antithrombin or fondaparinux should be initiated to reduce the risk of thrombosis. Warfarin is absolutely contraindicated in the acute phase of HIT; if administered, its effects must be reversed by using vitamin K.

HITs and misses in 100 years of heparin

Heparin was discovered 100 years ago, and the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome was described 40 years ago. That the most powerful anticoagulant of the last century can also produce the most extreme prothrombotic diathesis is but one of the paradoxes that surround heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Standard treatment is alternative anticoagulation. Advances continue to be made regarding pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment. Currently, an epidemic of overdiagnosis threatens the well-being of patients, so efforts to educate clinicians on when and how to make this diagnosis are pressing.

Management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize recent findings on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a prothrombotic disorder caused by platelet-activating IgG targeting platelet factor 4 (PF4)/polyanion complexes.

RECENT FINDINGS

HIT can explain unusual clinical events, including adrenal hemorrhages, arterial/intracardiac thrombosis, skin necrosis, anaphylactoid reactions, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Sometimes, HIT begins/worsens after stopping heparin ('delayed-onset' HIT). Various HIT-mimicking disorders are recognized (e.g., acute disseminated intravascular coagulation/'shock liver' with limb ischemia). HIT has features of both B-cell and T-cell immune responses; uptake of PF4/heparin complexes into macrophages ('macropinocytosis') facilitates the anti-PF4/heparin immune response. Antibody-induced activation of monocytes and platelets via their FcγIIA receptors triggers an intense procoagulant response. Sometimes, HIT antibodies recognize PF4 bound to (platelet-associated) chondroitin sulfate, explaining how HIT might occur without concurrent or recent heparin (delayed-onset HIT, 'spontaneous HIT syndrome'). The molecular structure of HIT antigen(s) has been characterized, providing a rationale for future drug design to avoid HIT and improve its treatment. The poor correlation between partial thromboplastin time and plasma argatroban levels (risking subtherapeutic anticoagulation) and need for intravenous administration of argatroban have led to increasing 'off-label' treatment with fondaparinux or one of the direct oral anticoagulants.

SUMMARY

Understanding the molecular mechanisms and unusual clinical features of HIT will improve its management.

Real-world monitoring of direct oral anticoagulants in clinic and hospitalization settings

Background:

The monitoring of the effects of direct oral anticoagulants may be beneficial during emergencies and adverse events. We aimed to explore direct oral anticoagulant monitoring in “real-world” settings, in which monitoring methods are limited and loading time can be estimated based on only patient reports.

Methods:

In 164 patients, plasma anti-Xa activity was assessed using a STA^®-Liquid Anti-Xa reagent (Diagnostica Stago, Asnieres, France), and prothrombin time was measured using HemosIL^® RecombiPlasTin 2G (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA). The loading time was calculated according to the previous dosing time reported by the patient. In the clinic setting, rivaroxaban and apixaban were administered to 103 patients with atrial fibrillation and a blood sample was tested once during a clinic visit. In the hospitalization setting, edoxaban was administered to 61 patients undergoing arthroplasty for prophylaxis of a venous thrombosis and blood samples were tested 3 and 18 h after the last intake.

Results:

Plasma Xa activity in the clinical setting ranged widely (rivaroxaban: 1.1–424.4 ng/mL, apixaban: 15.4–469.2 ng/mL) during the 11.7 ± 7.0 h following the previous dose. The values varied over a wide range (up to a factor of 2) at the same loading time, especially around the peak period. The plasma anti-Xa activity of rivaroxaban and apixaban showed linear correlations with prothrombin time (R² = 0.828 and 0.717, respectively). Edoxaban administration prolonged the prothrombin time by only 1.6 ± 1.1 s from the trough to the peak, to a degree that was negatively correlated with age, but not with plasma creatinine level, creatinine clearance, or body mass index.

Conclusion:

In real-world settings, plasma anti-Xa monitoring should be interpreted considering the wide variations in data, reflecting the variability in patient-reported loading time and interpatient variability.