1
|
Halloran PF, Madill-Thomsen KS, Böhmig G, Bromberg J, Budde K, Barner M, Mackova M, Chang J, Einecke G, Eskandary F, Gupta G, Myślak M, Viklicky O, Akalin E, Alhamad T, Anand S, Arnol M, Baliga R, Banasik M, Bingaman A, Blosser C, Brennan D, Chamienia A, Chow K, Ciszek M, de Freitas D, Dęborska-Materkowska D, Debska-Ślizień A, Djamali A, Domański L, Durlik M, Fatica R, Francis I, Fryc J, Gill J, Gill J, Glyda M, Gourishankar S, Grenda R, Gryczman M, Hruba P, Hughes P, Jittirat A, Jurekovic Z, Kamal L, Kamel M, Kant S, Kasiske B, Kojc N, Konopa J, Lan J, Mannon R, Matas A, Mazurkiewicz J, Miglinas M, Mueller T, Narins S, Naumnik B, Patel A, Perkowska-Ptasińska A, Picton M, Piecha G, Poggio E, Bloudíčkova SR, Samaniego-Picota M, Schachtner T, Shin S, Shojai S, Sikosana M, Slatinská J, Smykal-Jankowiak K, Solanki A, Haler ŽV, Vucur K, Weir MR, Wiecek A, Włodarczyk Z, Yang H, Zaky Z. Subthreshold rejection activity in many kidney transplants currently classified as having no rejection. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00461-1. [PMID: 39117038 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.07.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
Most kidney transplant patients who undergo biopsies are classified as having no rejection based on consensus thresholds. However, we hypothesized that because these patients have normal adaptive immune systems, T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) may exist as subthreshold activity in some transplants currently classified as no rejection. To examine this question, we studied genome-wide microarray results from 5086 kidney transplant biopsies (4170 patients). An updated archetypal analysis designated 56% of biopsies as no rejection. Subthreshold molecular TCMR and/or ABMR activity molecular activity was detectable as elevated classifier scores in many biopsies classified as no rejection, with ABMR activity in many TCMR biopsies and TCMR activity in many ABMR biopsies. In biopsies classified as no rejection histologically and molecularly, molecular TCMR classifier scores correlated with increases in histologic TCMR features and molecular injury, lower eGFR, and higher risk of graft loss, and molecular ABMR activity correlated with increased glomerulitis and donor-specific antibody. No rejection biopsies with high subthreshold TCMR or ABMR activity had a higher probability of having TCMR or ABMR respectively diagnosed in a future biopsy. We conclude that many kidney transplant recipients have unrecognized subthreshold TCMR or ABMR activity, with significant implications for future problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip F Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | | | | | | | - Klemens Budde
- Charite-Medical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Martina Mackova
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jessica Chang
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | | | - Gaurav Gupta
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | - Ondrej Viklicky
- Institute for Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Tarek Alhamad
- Washington University at St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sanjiv Anand
- Intermountain Transplant Services, Murray, UT, USA
| | - Miha Arnol
- University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | | | - Adam Bingaman
- Methodist Transplant and Specialty Hospital, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | - Daniel Brennan
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Kevin Chow
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Iman Francis
- Henry Ford Transplant Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Justyna Fryc
- Medical University in Bialystok, Białystok, Poland
| | - John Gill
- St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Ryszard Grenda
- The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Petra Hruba
- The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Peter Hughes
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | | | | | - Layla Kamal
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | - Sam Kant
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Nika Kojc
- University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - James Lan
- St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Roslyn Mannon
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | | | - Marius Miglinas
- Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | - Seth Narins
- PinnacleHealth Transplant Associates, Harrisburg, PA, USA
| | | | - Anita Patel
- Henry Ford Transplant Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sung Shin
- University of Ulsan College of Medicine/Assan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | - Ashish Solanki
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Harold Yang
- PinnacleHealth Transplant Associates, Harrisburg, PA, USA
| | - Ziad Zaky
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Osmanodja B, Akifova A, Budde K, Oellerich M, Beck J, Bornemann-Kolatzki K, Schütz E, Velden J, Lehmann C, Krüger BM, Bachmann A, Kowald J. Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA as a Companion Biomarker for AMR Treatment With Daratumumab: Case Series. Transpl Int 2024; 37:13213. [PMID: 39149569 PMCID: PMC11325154 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.13213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is among the most frequent causes for graft loss after kidney transplantation. While there are no approved therapies, several case reports with daratumumab and the very recent phase 2 trial of felzartamab in AMR have indicated the potential efficacy of therapeutic interventions targeting CD38. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is an emerging biomarker with injury-specific release and a short half-life, which could facilitate early diagnosis of AMR and monitoring of treatment response. We describe two cases of patients with chronic active AMR, who were treated with monthly daratumumab infusions, and in whom donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) was measured longitudinally to monitor treatment response. In both patients, daratumumab treatment led to stabilization of kidney function parameters, a strong decline of dd-cfDNA below the previously established threshold for rejection, and partial or complete histologic resolution of AMR activity. Our case series suggests that dd-cfDNA may be a useful companion biomarker for longitudinal monitoring of anti-CD38 treatment in patients with AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bilgin Osmanodja
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aylin Akifova
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Oellerich
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Julia Beck
- Chronix Biomedical GmbH, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Joachim Velden
- Department of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claudia Lehmann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Laboratory for Transplantation Immunology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bastian Malte Krüger
- Medical Department III, Division of Nephrology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anette Bachmann
- Medical Department III, Division of Nephrology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jan Kowald
- Medical Department III, Division of Nephrology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hinze C, Lovric S, Halloran PF, Barasch J, Schmidt-Ott KM. Epithelial cell states associated with kidney and allograft injury. Nat Rev Nephrol 2024; 20:447-459. [PMID: 38632381 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-024-00834-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
The kidney epithelium, with its intricate arrangement of highly specialized cell types, constitutes the functional core of the organ. Loss of kidney epithelium is linked to the loss of functional nephrons and a subsequent decline in kidney function. In kidney transplantation, epithelial injury signatures observed during post-transplantation surveillance are strong predictors of adverse kidney allograft outcomes. However, epithelial injury is currently neither monitored clinically nor addressed therapeutically after kidney transplantation. Several factors can contribute to allograft epithelial injury, including allograft rejection, drug toxicity, recurrent infections and postrenal obstruction. The injury mechanisms that underlie allograft injury overlap partially with those associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the native kidney. Studies using advanced transcriptomic analyses of single cells from kidney or urine have identified a role for kidney injury-induced epithelial cell states in exacerbating and sustaining damage in AKI and CKD. These epithelial cell states and their associated expression signatures are also observed in transplanted kidney allografts, suggesting that the identification and characterization of transcriptomic epithelial cell states in kidney allografts may have potential clinical implications for diagnosis and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Hinze
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Svjetlana Lovric
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Philip F Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplant Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jonathan Barasch
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Kai M Schmidt-Ott
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xu Y, Wang Y, Zhang D, Zhang H, Wang Y, Wang W, Hu X. An autophagy-associated diagnostic signature based on peripheral blood for antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplantation. Transpl Immunol 2024; 84:102021. [PMID: 38452984 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2024.102021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) emerged as a major cause of graft loss in renal transplantation. Needle biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of ABMR in renal allografts. Thus, noninvasive diagnosis methods of ABMR with high accuracy are urgently needed to prevent unnecessary biopsies. METHODS We collected peripheral blood transcriptome data from two independent renal transplantation cohorts with patients with ABMR, stable well-functioning transplants (STA), and T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by comparing the ABMR group with the STA group. In addition, functional enrichment analysis and gene set enrichment analysis were performed to seek new key underlying mechanisms in ABMR. Subsequently, we utilized a Boruta algorithm and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic algorithm to establish a diagnostic model which was then evaluated and validated in an independent cohort. RESULTS According to functional enrichment analysis, autophagy was found to be the primary upregulated biological process in ABMR. Based on algorithms, three autophagy-associated genes, ubiquitin specific peptidase 33 (USP33), Ras homolog mTORC1 binding (RHEB), and ABL proto-oncogene 2 (ABL2), were selected to establish the diagnostic model in the training cohort. This autophagy-related gene model possessed good diagnostic value in distinguishing ABMR from STA blood samples in the training cohort (AUC = 0.907) and in the validation cohort (AUC = 0.972). In addition, this model also showed good discernibility in distinguishing ABMR from TCMR in the training and validation cohorts (AUCs = 0.908 and 0.833). CONCLUSION We identified and validated an autophagy-associated diagnostic model with high accuracy for renal transplant patients with ABMR. Our study provided a new potential test for the non-invasive diagnosis of ABMR in clinical practice and highlighted the importance of autophagy in ABMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Xu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China; Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Yuxuan Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China; Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Di Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China; Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China; Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Yicun Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China; Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China; Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Xiaopeng Hu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China; Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Streichart L, Felldin M, Ekberg J, Mjörnstedt L, Lindnér P, Lennerling A, Bröcker V, Mölne J, Holgersson J, Daenen K, Wennberg L, Lorant T, Baid-Agrawal S. Tocilizumab in chronic active antibody-mediated rejection: rationale and protocol of an in-progress randomized controlled open-label multi-center trial (INTERCEPT study). Trials 2024; 25:213. [PMID: 38519988 PMCID: PMC10958896 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08020-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (caAMR) in kidney transplants is associated with irreversible tissue damage and a leading cause of graft loss in the long-term. However, the treatment for caAMR remains a challenge to date. Recently, tocilizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the human interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor, has shown promise in the treatment of caAMR. However, it has not been systematically investigated so far underscoring the need for randomized controlled studies in this area. METHODS The INTERCEPT study is an investigator-driven randomized controlled open-label multi-center trial in kidney transplant recipients to assess the efficacy of tocilizumab in the treatment of biopsy-proven caAMR. A total of 50 recipients with biopsy-proven caAMR at least 12 months after transplantation will be randomized to receive either tocilizumab (n = 25) added to our standard of care (SOC) maintenance treatment or SOC alone (n = 25) for a period of 24 months. Patients will be followed for an additional 12 months after cessation of study medication. After the inclusion biopsies at baseline, protocol kidney graft biopsies will be performed at 12 and 24 months. The sample size calculation assumed a difference of 5 ml/year in slope of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between the two groups for 80% power at an alpha of 0.05. The primary endpoint is the slope of eGFR at 24 months after start of treatment. The secondary endpoints include assessment of the following at 12, 24, and 36 months: composite risk score iBox, safety, evolution and characteristics of donor-specific antibodies (DSA), graft histology, proteinuria, kidney function assessed by measured GFR (mGFR), patient- and death-censored graft survival, and patient-reported outcomes that include transplant-specific well-being, adherence to immunosuppressive medications and perceived threat of the risk of graft rejection. DISCUSSION No effective treatment exists for caAMR at present. Based on the hypothesis that inhibition of IL-6 receptor by tocilizumab will reduce antibody production and reduce antibody-mediated damage, our randomized trial has a potential to provide evidence for a novel treatment strategy for caAMR, therewith slowing the decline in graft function in the long-term. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04561986. Registered on September 24, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lillian Streichart
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marie Felldin
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jana Ekberg
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lars Mjörnstedt
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Lindnér
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Annette Lennerling
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Verena Bröcker
- Department of Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Johan Mölne
- Department of Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jan Holgersson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg and Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kristien Daenen
- Department of Nephrology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lars Wennberg
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tomas Lorant
- Section of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Seema Baid-Agrawal
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Banno T, Hirai T, Oki R, Yagisawa T, Unagami K, Kanzawa T, Omoto K, Shimizu T, Ishida H, Takagi T. Higher Donor Age and Severe Microvascular Inflammation Are Risk Factors for Chronic Rejection After Treatment of Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection. Transpl Int 2024; 37:11960. [PMID: 38371907 PMCID: PMC10869508 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.11960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Recent developments in intensive desensitization protocols have enabled kidney transplantation in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-sensitized recipients. However, cases of active antibody-mediated rejection (AABMR), when they occur, are difficult to manage, graft failure being the worst-case scenario. We aimed to assess the impact of our desensitization and AABMR treatment regimen and identify risk factors for disease progression. Among 849 patients who underwent living-donor kidney transplantation between 2014 and 2021 at our institution, 59 were diagnosed with AABMR within 1 year after transplantation. All patients received combination therapy consisting of steroid pulse therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, and plasmapheresis. Multivariable analysis revealed unrelated donors and preformed donor-specific antibodies as independent risk factors for AABMR. Five-year death-censored graft survival rate was not significantly different between patients with and without AABMR although 27 of 59 patients with AABMR developed chronic AABMR (CABMR) during the study period. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that a donor age greater than 59 years and microvascular inflammation (MVI) score (g + ptc) ≥4 at AABMR diagnosis were independent risk factors for CABMR. Our combination therapy ameliorated AABMR; however, further treatment options should be considered to prevent CABMR, especially in patients with old donors and severe MVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taro Banno
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshihito Hirai
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rikako Oki
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yagisawa
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Unagami
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taichi Kanzawa
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuya Omoto
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomokazu Shimizu
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideki Ishida
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bakis H, Bouthemy C, Corcuff JB, Lauro C, Guidicelli G, Cargou M, Guibet C, Taton B, Merville P, Couzi L, Moreau K, Visentin J. 25-hydroxyvitamin D sufficiency is associated with lower de novo anti-HLA donor specific antibody and better kidney transplant outcomes. HLA 2024; 103:e15187. [PMID: 37604171 DOI: 10.1111/tan.15187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), de novo anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs) and ensuing antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) reduce kidney transplantation (KT) survival. The immunomodulatory effects of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] could be beneficial for KT outcomes. We aimed to evaluating the association between 25(OH)D levels, the development of dnDSAs, clinical TCMR and ABMR, and graft survival. This single center retrospective study included 253 KT recipients (KTRs) transplanted without preformed DSA between 2010 and 2013. We measured 25(OH)D in successive serum samples: at KT (M0) and M12 for the entire cohort, and additionally at M24 and/or M36 when sera were available. We assessed graft outcomes up to 5 years post-KT. The proportion of KTRs having sufficient 25(OH)D at KT (M0) was high (81.4%) and then dropped at M12 (71.1%). KTRs with sufficient 25(OH)D at M0 experienced less clinical TCMR (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19-0.88 in multivariate analysis). A sufficient 25(OH)D at M12 was independently associated with a longer dnDSA-free survival (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.17-0.69). There was no association between 25(OH)D and clinical AMBR. Studying the KTRs with 25(OH)D measurements at M12, M24 and M36 (n = 203), we showed that 25(OH)D sufficiency over the 3 first-years post-KT was associated with a longer graft survival in multivariate analyses (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.70). To our knowledge, this study is the first showing an association between 25(OH)D sufficiency post-KT and dnDSA occurrence in KTRs. Moreover, we reinforce previously published data showing an association between 25(OH)D, TCMR and graft survival in KT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo Bakis
- CHU de Bordeaux, Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation, Dialyse et Aphérèses, Bordeaux, France
| | - Charlène Bouthemy
- CHU de Bordeaux, Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Immunogénétique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
- Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, ImmunoConcEpT, UMR 5164, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Benoît Corcuff
- CHU de Bordeaux, Laboratoire d'Hormonologie et de Médecine Nucléaire, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
- Univ. Bordeaux, Nutrition and Integrated Neurobiology, UMR INRA 1286, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cindy Lauro
- CHU de Bordeaux, Laboratoire d'Hormonologie et de Médecine Nucléaire, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Gwendaline Guidicelli
- CHU de Bordeaux, Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Immunogénétique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marine Cargou
- CHU de Bordeaux, Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Immunogénétique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Claire Guibet
- CHU de Bordeaux, Laboratoire d'Hormonologie et de Médecine Nucléaire, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Benjamin Taton
- CHU de Bordeaux, Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation, Dialyse et Aphérèses, Bordeaux, France
- Univ. Bordeaux, Univ. Bordeaux, Inria Bordeaux Sud-Ouest, Bordeaux, France
| | - Pierre Merville
- CHU de Bordeaux, Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation, Dialyse et Aphérèses, Bordeaux, France
- Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, ImmunoConcEpT, UMR 5164, Bordeaux, France
| | - Lionel Couzi
- CHU de Bordeaux, Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation, Dialyse et Aphérèses, Bordeaux, France
- Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, ImmunoConcEpT, UMR 5164, Bordeaux, France
| | - Karine Moreau
- CHU de Bordeaux, Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation, Dialyse et Aphérèses, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jonathan Visentin
- CHU de Bordeaux, Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Immunogénétique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
- Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, ImmunoConcEpT, UMR 5164, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Süsal CC, Kraft L, Ender A, Süsal C, Schwenger A, Amann K, Böhmig GA, Schwenger V. Blood group-specific apheresis in combination with daratumumab as a rescue therapy of acute antibody-mediated rejection in a case of ABO- and human leukocyte antigen-incompatible kidney transplantation. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2023; 11:2050313X231211050. [PMID: 38022864 PMCID: PMC10631334 DOI: 10.1177/2050313x231211050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
We report a case of antibody-mediated rejection treated with the human CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab in a 58-year-old female patient with end-stage kidney disease due to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease who received an ABO- and human leukocyte antigen antibody-incompatible living donor kidney transplant. The patient experienced an episode of severe antibody-mediated rejection within the first week of transplantation. Blood-group-antibody selective immunoadsorption in combination with administration of four doses of daratumumab (each 1800 mg s.c.) led to a persistent decrease of ABO- and more interestingly donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibody reactivity and resulted in clinical and histopathological remission with full recovery of graft function, which has remained stable until post-transplant day 212. This case illustrates the potential of targeting CD38 in antibody-mediated rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Can C Süsal
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum Stuttgart—Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Leonie Kraft
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum Stuttgart—Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Andrea Ender
- Central Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Blood Donation, Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Caner Süsal
- Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Amelie Schwenger
- Experimental Immunology, Department for Children and Adolescents Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Kerstin Amann
- Department of Nephropathology, Department of Pathology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Vedat Schwenger
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum Stuttgart—Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fernando SC, Polkinghorne KR, Lim WH, Mulley WR. Early Versus Late Acute AMR in Kidney Transplant Recipients-A Comparison of Treatment Approaches and Outcomes From the ANZDATA Registry. Transplantation 2023; 107:2424-2432. [PMID: 37322595 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major cause of kidney allograft failure and demonstrates different properties depending on whether it occurs early (<6 mo) or late (>6 mo) posttransplantation. We aimed to compare graft survival and treatment approaches for early and late AMR in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS Transplant characteristics were obtained for patients with an AMR episode reported to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry from January 2003 to December 2019. The primary outcome of time to graft loss from AMR diagnosis, with death considered a competing risk, was compared between early and late AMR using flexible parametric survival models. Secondary outcomes included treatments used, response to treatment, and time from AMR diagnosis to death. RESULTS After adjustment for other explanatory factors, late AMR was associated with twice the risk of graft loss relative to early AMR. The risk was nonproportional over time, with early AMR having an increased early risk. Late AMR was also associated with an increased risk of death. Early AMR was treated more aggressively than late with more frequent use of plasma exchange and monoclonal/polyclonal antibodies. There was substantial variation in treatments used by transplant centers. Early AMR was reported to be more responsive to treatment than late. CONCLUSIONS Late AMR is associated with an increased risk of graft loss and death compared with early AMR. The marked heterogeneity in the treatment of AMR highlights the need for effective, new therapeutic options for these conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanduni C Fernando
- Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Kevan R Polkinghorne
- Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Wai H Lim
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - William R Mulley
- Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hou YB, Chang S, Chen S, Zhang WJ. Intravenous immunoglobulin in kidney transplantation: Mechanisms of action, clinical applications, adverse effects, and hyperimmune globulin. Clin Immunol 2023; 256:109782. [PMID: 37742791 DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2023.109782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been developed for over 40 years. The mechanisms of action of IVIG are complex and diverse, and there may be multiple mechanisms that combine to influence it. IVIG has been used in kidney transplantation for desensitization, treatment of antibody-mediated rejection, and ABO-incompatible transplantation. and treatment or prevention of some infectious diseases. Hyperimmune globulins such as cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin (CMV-IG) and hepatitis B hyperimmune globulin (HBIG) have also been used to protect against cytomegalovirus and hepatitis B virus, respectively. However, IVIG is also associated with some rare but serious adverse effects and some application risks, and clinicians need to weigh the pros and cons and develop individualized treatment programs to benefit more patients. This review will provide an overview of the multiple mechanisms of action, clinical applications, adverse effects, and prophylactic measures of IVIG, and hyperimmune globulin will also be introduced in it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Bo Hou
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Sheng Chang
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Song Chen
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Wei-Jie Zhang
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Betriu S, Rovira J, Arana C, García-Busquets A, Matilla-Martinez M, Ramirez-Bajo MJ, Bañon-Maneus E, Lazo-Rodriguez M, Bartoló-Ibars A, Claas FHJ, Mulder A, Heidt S, Juan M, Bayés-Genís B, Campistol JM, Palou E, Diekmann F. Chimeric HLA antibody receptor T cells for targeted therapy of antibody-mediated rejection in transplantation. HLA 2023; 102:449-463. [PMID: 37503860 DOI: 10.1111/tan.15156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
The presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA), mainly against HLA, increases the risk of allograft rejection. Moreover, antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) remains an important barrier to optimal long-term outcomes after solid organ transplantation. The development of chimeric autoantibody receptor T lymphocytes has been postulated for targeted therapy of autoimmune diseases. We aimed to develop a targeted therapy for DSA desensitization and ABMR, generating T cells with a chimeric HLA antibody receptor (CHAR) that specifically eliminates DSA-producing B cells. We have genetically engineered an HLA-A2-specific CHAR (A2-CHAR) and transduced it into human T cells. Then, we have performed in vitro experiments such as cytokine measurement, effector cell activation, and cytotoxicity against anti-HLA-A2 antibody-expressing target cells. In addition, we have performed A2-CHAR-Tc cytotoxic assays in an immunodeficient mouse model. A2-CHAR expressing T cells could selectively eliminate HLA-A2 antibody-producing B cells in vitro. The cytotoxic capacity of A2-CHAR expressing T cells mainly depended on Granzyme B release. In the NSG mouse model, A2-CHAR-T cells could identify and eradicate HLA-A2 antibody-producing B cells even when those cells are localized in the bone marrow. This ability is effector:target ratio dependent. CHAR technology generates potent and functional human cytotoxic T cells to target alloreactive HLA class I antibody-producing B cells. Thus, we consider that CHAR technology may be used as a selective desensitization protocol or an ABMR therapy in transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergi Betriu
- Department of Immunology, Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carolt Arana
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Institut Clínic de Nefrologia i Urologia (ICNU), Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ainhoa García-Busquets
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marina Matilla-Martinez
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria J Ramirez-Bajo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisenda Bañon-Maneus
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Lazo-Rodriguez
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Frans H J Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arend Mulder
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Manel Juan
- Department of Immunology, Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Beatriu Bayés-Genís
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Institut Clínic de Nefrologia i Urologia (ICNU), Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M Campistol
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Institut Clínic de Nefrologia i Urologia (ICNU), Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Palou
- Department of Immunology, Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Institut Clínic de Nefrologia i Urologia (ICNU), Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Böhmig GA, Halloran PF, Feucht HE. On a Long and Winding Road: Alloantibodies in Organ Transplantation. Transplantation 2023; 107:1027-1041. [PMID: 36944603 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
Today we know that both the humoral and the cellular arm of the immune system are engaged in severe immunological challenges. A close interaction between B and T cells can be observed in most "natural" challenges, including infections, malignancies, and autoimmune diseases. The importance and power of humoral immunity are impressively demonstrated by the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Organ transplant rejection is a normal immune response to a completely "artificial" challenge. It took a long time before the multifaceted action of different immunological forces was recognized and a unified, generally accepted opinion could be formed. Here, we address prominent paradigms and paradigm shifts in the field of transplantation immunology. We identify several instances in which the transplant community missed a timely paradigm shift because essential, available knowledge was ignored. Moreover, we discuss key findings that critically contributed to our understanding of transplant immunology but sometimes developed with delay and in a roundabout way, as was the case with antibody-mediated rejection-a main focus of this article. These include the discovery of the molecular principles of histocompatibility, the recognition of the microcirculation as a key interface of immune damage, the refinement of alloantibody detection, the description of C4d as a footmark of endothelium-bound antibody, and last but not least, the developments in biopsy-based diagnostics beyond conventional morphology, which only now give us a glimpse of the enormous complexity and pathogenetic diversity of rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Philip F Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, ATAGC, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Estimation of Sensitization Status in Renal Transplant Recipients by Assessing Indirect Pathway CD4+ T cell Response to Donor Cell-pulsed Dendritic Cell. Transplantation 2023; 107:1079-1088. [PMID: 36814087 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND . Generation of donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibody (DSA) via indirect allorecognition is detrimental to long-term survival of transplant organs. The detection of such immune responses would make it possible to define patients with high risk of sensitization. In this study, we established a novel method for evaluating indirect allorecognition to assess sensitization in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS . Recipient CD14+ monocytes were mixed with donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells; cultured in the presence of IL-4, GM-CSF, IL-1β, and TNFα; and used as pulsed dendritic cells (DCs). Cell proliferation and cytokine production were evaluated by carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester-based T cell proliferation assay and Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot assay, respectively. RESULTS . CD4+ T cell proliferation was strongly observed in following coculture with allogeneic antigen-pulsed DC leading to interferon-γ and IL-21 production. About 1% of CD4+ T cells exhibited Tfh-like phenotype (PD-1highCXCR5+ICOS+CD40L+). Recipient DC pulsed with donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells was cocultured with recipient CD45RA+CD4+ and CD45RA-CD4+ (generally defined as naive and memory in humans, respectively) T cells. Irrespective of preformed or de novo DSA status, CD45RA+CD4+ T cells constantly produced IL-21. In contrast, IL-21-produced CD45RA-CD4+ T cells were significantly higher in preformed DSA-positive patients than those in negative patients (80.8 ± 51.2 versus 14.8 ± 20.4, P < 0.001). In de novo DSA-positive patients, IL-21-produced CD45RA-CD4+ T cells were significantly increased after transplantation compared with before transplantation (9.23 ± 9.08 versus 43.9 ± 29.1, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS . Assessment of indirect pathway CD4+ T cell response could provide new insights into the underlying mechanism of de novo DSA production, leading to the development of effective strategies against antibody-mediated rejection.
Collapse
|
14
|
Moein M, Gao SX, Martin SJ, Farkouh KM, Li BW, Ball AS, Dvorai RH, Saidi RF. Conversion to Belatacept in kidney transplant recipients with chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR). Transpl Immunol 2023; 76:101737. [PMID: 36379374 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The costimulatory inhibitor Belatacept (Bela) has been shown to be an effective alternative in several clinical situations, including chronic antibody-mediated rejection, calcineurin toxicity, and de novo alloantibody formation. To further explore the usefulness of Belatacept under various clinical scenarios, we performed a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all recipients who had a BPAR diagnosis of CAMR and were converted to a Belatacept maintenance immunosuppression regimen after kidney transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHOD We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of all kidney transplants adult patients at SUNY Upstate Medical Hospital from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2021. Our inclusion criteria were the patients who have been diagnosed with CAMR according to their renal biopsy based on the 2013 Banff criteria. The primary objective was to compare the kidney viability and function using GFR between the two interest groups and finally compare the outcomes. RESULTS A total of 48 patients met our inclusion criteria based on the kidney biopsy result, which showed chronic antibody-mediated graft rejection (CAMR). Nineteen patients (39.6%) were converted to the Belatacept, and we continued the previous immunosuppression regimen in 29 patients (60.4%). The mean time from the transplant date to the diagnosis of CAMR was 1385 days in the Belatacept group and 914 days for the non-Belatacept group (P = 0.15). The mean GFR comparison at each time point between the groups did not show a significant difference, and Belatacept did not show superiority compared to the standard immunosuppression regimen in terms of kidney function preservation. 1 (5.2%) patient from the Belatacept group and 1 (3.4%) patient from the non-Belatacept group had a biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) after CAMR confirmation, and it was comparable (P = 0.76). De novo synthesis of the DSA rate was 12.5% in the Belatacept group and 15% In the non-Belatacept group, which was comparable. (P = 0.90). The patient survival rate was 100% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that compared to the standard Tacrolimus/MMF/Prednisone regimen, Belatacept did not significantly benefit in preserving the GFR in long-term follow-ups and stabilizing the DSA production, which is one of the main factors resulting in chronic graft failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoudreza Moein
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Shuqi X Gao
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Samuel J Martin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Katie M Farkouh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Benson W Li
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Angela S Ball
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Reut Hod Dvorai
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Reza F Saidi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Anti-interleukin-6 Antibody Clazakizumab in Antibody-mediated Renal Allograft Rejection: Accumulation of Antibody-neutralized Interleukin-6 Without Signs of Proinflammatory Rebound Phenomena. Transplantation 2023; 107:495-503. [PMID: 35969004 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Blockade of interleukin-6 (IL-6) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for antibody-mediated rejection. Subtherapeutic anti-IL-6 antibody level or treatment cessation following prolonged cytokine neutralization may result in proinflammatory rebound phenomena via accumulation of IL-6 and/or modulated gene expression of major components of the IL-6/IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) axis. METHODS We evaluated biologic material obtained from a randomized controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody clazakizumab in late antibody-mediated rejection. Twenty kidney transplant recipients, allocated to clazakizumab or placebo, received 4-weekly doses over 12 wks, followed by a 40-wk extension where all recipients received clazakizumab. Serum proteins were detected using bead-based immunoassays and RNA transcripts using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (peripheral blood) or microarray analysis (serial allograft biopsies). RESULTS Clazakizumab treatment resulted in a substantial increase in median total (bound and unbound to drug) serum IL-6 level (1.4, 8015, and 13 600 pg/mL at 0, 12, and 52 wks), but median level of free (unbound to drug) IL-6 did not increase (3.0, 2.3, and 2.3 pg/mL, respectively). Neutralization of IL-6 did not boost soluble IL-6R or leukocyte or allograft expression of IL-6, IL-6R, and glycoprotein 130 mRNA. Cessation of treatment at the end of the trial did not result in a meaningful increase in C-reactive protein or accelerated progression of graft dysfunction during 12 mo of follow-up. CONCLUSION Our results argue against clinically relevant rebound phenomena and modulation of major components of the IL-6/IL-6R axis following prolonged IL-6 neutralization with clazakizumab.
Collapse
|
16
|
Piñeiro GJ, Lazo-Rodriguez M, Ventura-Aguiar P, Ramirez-Bajo MJ, Banon-Maneus E, Lozano M, Cid J, Hierro-Garcia N, Cucchiari D, Revuelta I, Montagud-Marrahi E, Palou E, Bayés-Genís B, Campistol JM, Diekmann F, Rovira J. Extracorporeal Photopheresis Improves Graft Survival in a Full-Mismatch Rat Model of Kidney Transplantation. Transpl Int 2023; 36:10840. [PMID: 36713113 PMCID: PMC9876976 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.10840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an immunomodulatory therapy based on the infusion of autologous cellular products exposed to ultraviolet light (UV) in the presence of a photosensitizer. The study evaluates the ECP efficacy as induction therapy in a full-mismatch kidney transplant rat model. Dark Agouti to Lewis (DA-L) kidney transplant model has been established. ECP product was obtained from Lewis rat recipients after DA kidney graft transplantation (LewDA). Leukocytes of those LewDA rats were exposed to 8-methoxy psoralen, and illuminated with UV-A. The ECP doses assessed were 10 × 106 and 100 × 106 cells/time point. Lewis recipients received seven ECP infusions. DA-L model was characterized by the appearance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and kidney function deterioration from day three after kidney transplant. The dysfunction progressed rapidly until graft loss (6.1 ± 0.5 days). Tacrolimus at 0.25 mg/kg prolonged rat survival until 11.4 ± 0.7 days (p = 0.0004). In this context, the application of leukocytes from LewDA sensitized rats accelerated the rejection (8.7 ± 0.45, p = 0.0012), whereas ECP product at high dose extended kidney graft survival until 26.3 ± 7.3 days, reducing class I and II DSA in surviving rats. ECP treatment increases kidney graft survival in full-mismatch rat model of acute rejection and is a suitable immunomodulatory therapy to be explored in kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaston J. Piñeiro
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Lazo-Rodriguez
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria J. Ramirez-Bajo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisenda Banon-Maneus
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miquel Lozano
- Apheresis Unit, Department of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Cid
- Apheresis Unit, Department of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Natalia Hierro-Garcia
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Cucchiari
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Montagud-Marrahi
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Palou
- Department of Immunology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Beatriu Bayés-Genís
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M. Campistol
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain,*Correspondence: Fritz Diekmann, ; Jordi Rovira,
| | - Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,*Correspondence: Fritz Diekmann, ; Jordi Rovira,
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
The Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System: Assessment of Rejection and Injury in Heart Transplant Biopsies. Transplantation 2023; 107:27-44. [PMID: 36508644 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This review describes the development of the Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) for heart transplant endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs). MMDx-Heart uses microarrays to measure biopsy-based gene expression and ensembles of machine learning algorithms to interpret the results and compare each new biopsy to a large reference set of earlier biopsies. MMDx assesses T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), recent parenchymal injury, and atrophy-fibrosis, continually "learning" from new biopsies. Rejection-associated transcripts mapped in kidney transplants and experimental systems were used to identify TCMR, AMR, and recent injury-induced inflammation. Rejection and injury emerged as gradients of intensity, rather than binary classes. AMR was one-third donor-specific antibody (DSA)-negative, and many EMBs first considered to have no rejection displayed minor AMR-like changes, with increased probability of DSA positivity and subtle inflammation. Rejection-associated transcript-based algorithms now classify EMBs as "Normal," "Minor AMR changes," "AMR," "possible AMR," "TCMR," "possible TCMR," and "recent injury." Additionally, MMDx uses injury-associated transcript sets to assess the degree of parenchymal injury and atrophy-fibrosis in every biopsy and study the effect of rejection on the parenchyma. TCMR directly injures the parenchyma whereas AMR usually induces microcirculation stress but relatively little initial parenchymal damage, although slowly inducing parenchymal atrophy-fibrosis. Function (left ventricular ejection fraction) and short-term risk of failure are strongly determined by parenchymal injury. These discoveries can guide molecular diagnostic applications, either as a central MMDx system or adapted to other platforms. MMDx can also help calibrate noninvasive blood-based biomarkers to avoid unnecessary biopsies and monitor response to therapy.
Collapse
|
18
|
LL-37-Coupled Porous Composite Scaffold for the Treatment of Infected Segmental Bone Defect. Pharmaceutics 2022; 15:pharmaceutics15010088. [PMID: 36678716 PMCID: PMC9864206 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Increased multiantibiotic-resistant bacteria means that infected bone defects remain a significant challenge to clinics. Great interest has emerged in the use of non-antibiotic antimicrobials to reduce the rate of multiantibiotic-resistant bacterial infection and facilitate bone regeneration. The cationic antimicrobial peptide LL-37 is the sole human cathelicidin and has shown nonspecific activity against a broad spectrum of microorganisms. In this study, we fabricated the poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/β-calcium phosphate/peptide LL-37 (PLGA/TCP/LL-37, PTL) scaffold with low-temperature 3D-printing technology for the treatment of infected segmental bone defects. The prepared scaffolds were divided into three groups: a high LL-37 concentration group (PTHL), low LL-37 concentration group (PTLL) and blank control group (PT). The cytocompatibility and antimicrobial activity of the engineered scaffolds were tested in vitro, and their osteogenesis properties were assessed in vivo in a rat infected bone defect model. We found the fabricated PTL scaffold had a well-designed porous structure that could support a steady and prolonged LL-37 release. Furthermore, the PTHL group showed strong antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) without any inhibition of the proliferation or alkaline phosphatase activity of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) in vitro. In addition, the infected femoral defects implanted with PTHL group displayed new bone formation in four weeks without any evidence of residual bacteria, which showed similar antibacterial outcomes to the vancomycin and cancellous bone mixture group. In conclusion, the PTHL composite scaffold is a promising non-antibiotic antimicrobial graft with good biodegradability, biocompatibility, and osteogenic capability for infected bone defects.
Collapse
|
19
|
The Value of Single-cell Technologies in Solid Organ Transplantation Studies. Transplantation 2022; 106:2325-2337. [PMID: 35876376 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Single-cell technologies open up new opportunities to explore the behavior of cells at the individual level. For solid organ transplantation, single-cell technologies can provide in-depth insights into the underlying mechanisms of the immunological processes involved in alloimmune responses after transplantation by investigating the role of individual cells in tolerance and rejection. Here, we review the value of single-cell technologies, including cytometry by time-of-flight and single-cell RNA sequencing, in the context of solid organ transplantation research. Various applications of single-cell technologies are addressed, such as the characterization and identification of immune cell subsets involved in rejection or tolerance. In addition, we explore the opportunities for analyzing specific alloreactive T- or B-cell clones by linking phenotype data to T- or B-cell receptor data, and for distinguishing donor- from recipient-derived immune cells. Moreover, we discuss the use of single-cell technologies in biomarker identification and risk stratification, as well as the remaining challenges. Together, this review highlights that single-cell approaches contribute to a better understanding of underlying immunological mechanisms of rejection and tolerance, thereby potentially accelerating the development of new or improved therapies to avoid allograft rejection.
Collapse
|
20
|
Bharadwaj P, Shrestha S, Pongracz T, Concetta C, Sharma S, Le Moine A, de Haan N, Murakami N, Riella LV, Holovska V, Wuhrer M, Marchant A, Ackerman ME. Afucosylation of HLA-specific IgG1 as a potential predictor of antibody pathogenicity in kidney transplantation. Cell Rep Med 2022; 3:100818. [PMID: 36384101 PMCID: PMC9729883 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the leading cause of graft failure. While donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are associated with a higher risk of AMR, not all patients with DSAs develop rejection, suggesting that the characteristics of alloantibodies determining their pathogenicity remain undefined. Using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-specific antibodies as a model, we apply systems serology tools to investigate qualitative features of immunoglobulin G (IgG) alloantibodies including Fc-glycosylation patterns and FcγR-binding properties. Levels of afucosylated anti-A2 antibodies are elevated in seropositive patients, especially those with AMR, suggesting potential cytotoxicity via FcγRIII-mediated mechanisms. Afucosylation of both glycoengineered monoclonal and naturally glycovariant polyclonal serum IgG specific to HLA-A2 drives potentiated binding to, slower dissociation from, and enhanced signaling through FcγRIII, a receptor widely expressed on innate effector cells, and greater cytotoxicity against HLA-A2+ cells mediated by natural killer (NK) cells. Collectively, these results suggest that afucosylated DSA may be a biomarker of AMR and contribute to pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pranay Bharadwaj
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| | - Sweta Shrestha
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| | - Tamas Pongracz
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Catalano Concetta
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium; Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Shilpee Sharma
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Alain Le Moine
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Noortje de Haan
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Naoka Murakami
- Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leonardo V Riella
- Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vanda Holovska
- HLA Laboratory, Laboratoire Hospitalier Universitaire de Bruxelles (LHUB), Hôpital Erasme ULB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Manfred Wuhrer
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Arnaud Marchant
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Margaret E Ackerman
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Anti-interleukin-6 Antibody Clazakizumab in Antibody-mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection: Effect on Donor-derived Cell-free DNA and C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 10. Transplant Direct 2022; 8:e1406. [PMID: 36382130 PMCID: PMC9649278 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Targeting interleukin-6 (IL-6) was shown to counteract donor-specific antibody production and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) activity. It is not known whether, or to what extent, IL-6 antagonism modulates biomarkers indicative of tissue damage (donor-derived cell-free DNA [dd-cfDNA]) and parenchymal inflammation (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand [CXCL] 10). METHODS We report a secondary endpoint analysis of a phase 2 trial of anti-IL-6 antibody clazakizumab in late AMR (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03444103). Twenty kidney transplant recipients were randomized to treatment with clazakizumab or placebo over 12 wk (part A), followed by an extension in which all recipients received clazakizumab through week 52 (part B). Biomarkers were evaluated at day 0 and after 12 and 52 wk, respectively. RESULTS Fractional dd-cfDNA (dd-cfDNA[%]) did not significantly change under clazakizumab, with no differences between study arms (clazakizumab versus placebo) at week 12 (1.65% [median; interquartile range: 0.91%-2.78%] versus 0.97% [0.56%-2.30%]; P = 0.25) and no significant decrease from weeks 12 to 52 (1.15% [0.70%-2.38%] versus 1.0% [0.61%-1.70%]; P = 0.25). Similarly, urine CXCL10 was not different between groups at week 12 (55.7 [41.0-91.4] versus 60.2 [48.8-208.7.0] pg/mg creatinine; P = 0.44) and did not change over part B (CXCL10 [pg/mg creatinine]: from 58 [46.3-93.1] to 67.4 [41.5-132.0] pg/mL creatinine; P = 0.95). Similar results were obtained for serum CXCL10. There was no association between biomarker levels and resolution of molecular and morphologic AMR activity. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that IL-6 blockade does not significantly affect levels of dd-cfDNA[%] and CXCL10. Subtle responses to this therapeutic principle may be overlooked by early biomarker surveillance.
Collapse
|
22
|
The Immunohistochemical Expression of the Von Willebrand Factor: A Potential Tool to Predict Kidney Allograft Outcomes. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2022; 30:687-693. [PMID: 36251974 DOI: 10.1097/pai.0000000000001078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Few reports assessed endothelial activation biomarkers in kidney allograft biopsies using immunohistochemistry. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the association between posttransplant outcomes and the immunohistochemistry expression of Caveolin-1, Von Willebrand Factor (Vwf), and T-Cadherin in for-cause biopsies diagnosed as interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy of unknown etiology. Samples with antibody-mediated changes were excluded. The patients were followed for 3 years after the biopsy or until graft loss/death. Seventy-one (71) samples from 66 patients were included. Eighteen (25.4%) patients lost their grafts, mainly due to chronic rejection (33.3%). Caveolin-1 and T-Cadherin were not associated with graft loss. Vwf had good accuracy in predicting graft failure (AUC 0.637, 95% CI 0.486 to 0.788 P=0.101). The presence of more than 10% of Vwf positivity in the microvasculature (Vwf >10%) was associated with reduced death-censored graft survival (58.2% vs. 85.4% P=0.006), and this result was also observed in the subgroup presenting mild interstitial fibrosis (ci=1) (65.7% vs. 88.6% P=0.033). The multivariate analysis showed that Vwf >10% was an independent risk factor for graft loss (HR=2.88, 95% CI 1.03 to 8.02 P=0.043). In conclusion, Vwf might be an additional tool to predict allograft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy of unknown etiology, probably reflecting immune endothelial activation.
Collapse
|
23
|
Girnita AL, Wang L, Colovai AI, Ahearn P, Azzi Y, Menon MC, Fernandez-Vina M, Gebel HM, Steve Woodle E, Cravedi P, Maltzman JS, Akalin E. Analysis of Cross-sectional and Longitudinal HLA and Anti-viral Responses After COVID Infection in Renal Allograft Recipients: Differences and Correlates. Transplantation 2022; 106:2085-2091. [PMID: 36070571 PMCID: PMC9521392 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Characterization of anti-HLA versus anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (anti-SARS-CoV-2) immune globulin isotypes in organ transplant recipients after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection has not been reported. We aimed to determine changes in anti-HLA antibodies in renal transplant patients with COVID-19 and compare the immunoglobulin and epitope-binding pattern versus anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study of 46 kidney transplant recipients including 21 with longitudinal sampling. Using a semi-quantitative multiplex assay, we determined immunoglobulin (Ig) M, IgA, IgG, and IgG1-2-3-4 antibodies against Class I and Class II HLA, and 5 SARS-CoV-2 epitopes including the nucleocapsid protein and multiple regions of the spike protein. RESULTS Fourteen of 46 (30%) patients had donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (donor-specific antibody [DSA]), 12 (26%) had non-DSA anti-HLA antibodies and 45 (98%) had anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Most DSAs targeted HLA-DQ (71%), with a dominant IgG isotype and IgG1 subtype prevalence (93%), and/or IgG3 (64%), followed by IgG2 (36%). Comparatively, there was a higher prevalence of IgA (85% versus 14%, P = 0.0001) and IgM (87%, versus 36%, P = 0.001) in the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody profile, when compared to DSAs, respectively. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody profile was characterized by increased prevalence of IgM and IgA, when compared to DSAs. The median calculated panel reactive antibody before COVID-19 diagnosis (24%) tended to decrease after COVID-19 diagnosis (10%) but it was not statistically significant ( P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS Anti-HLA antibody strength and calculated panel reactive antibody in kidney transplant recipients after COVID-19 do not significantly increase after infection. Although the IgG isotype was the dominant form in both HLA and SARS-CoV-2 antigens, the alloimmune response had a low IgA pattern, whereas anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were high IgA/IgM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alin L. Girnita
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Lin Wang
- Department of Pathology, Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Stanford Blood Center, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Adriana I. Colovai
- Department of Transplantation, Kidney Transplant Program, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Patrick Ahearn
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Yorg Azzi
- Department of Transplantation, Kidney Transplant Program, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Madhav C. Menon
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | - E. Steve Woodle
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Paolo Cravedi
- Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Jonathan S. Maltzman
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Enver Akalin
- Department of Transplantation, Kidney Transplant Program, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Frischknecht L, Deng Y, Wehmeier C, de Rougemont O, Villard J, Ferrari-Lacraz S, Golshayan D, Gannagé M, Binet I, Wirthmueller U, Sidler D, Schachtner T, Schaub S, Nilsson J. The impact of pre-transplant donor specific antibodies on the outcome of kidney transplantation – Data from the Swiss transplant cohort study. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1005790. [PMID: 36211367 PMCID: PMC9532952 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1005790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pre-transplant donor specific antibodies (DSA), directed at non-self human leukocyte antigen (HLA) protein variants present in the donor organ, have been associated with worse outcomes in kidney transplantation. The impact of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and the target HLA antigen of the detected DSA has, however, not been conclusively studied in a large cohort with a complete virtual cross-match (vXM). Methods We investigated the effect of pre-transplant DSA on the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), graft loss, and the rate of eGFR decline in 411 DSA positive transplants and 1804 DSA negative controls. Results Pre-transplant DSA were associated with a significantly increased risk of ABMR, graft loss, and accelerated eGFR decline. DSA directed at Class I and Class II HLA antigens were strongly associated with increased risk of ABMR, but only DSA directed at Class II associated with graft loss. DSA MFI markedly affected outcome, and Class II DSA were associated with ABMR already at 500-1000 MFI, whereas Class I DSA did not affect outcome at similar low MFI values. Furthermore, isolated DSA against HLA-DP carried comparable risks for ABMR, accelerated eGFR decline, and graft loss as DSA against HLA-DR. Conclusion Our results have important implications for the construction and optimization of vXM algorithms used within organ allocation systems. Our data suggest that both the HLA antigen target of the detected DSA as well as the cumulative MFI should be considered and that different MFI cut-offs could be considered for Class I and Class II directed DSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Frischknecht
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Yun Deng
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Wehmeier
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Olivier de Rougemont
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jean Villard
- Transplantation Immunology Unit and National Reference Laboratory for Histocompatibility, Department of Diagnostic, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sylvie Ferrari-Lacraz
- Transplantation Immunology Unit and National Reference Laboratory for Histocompatibility, Department of Diagnostic, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Déla Golshayan
- Transplantation Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Monique Gannagé
- Service of Immunology and Allergy, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Binet
- Nephrology & Transplantation Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Urs Wirthmueller
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Sidler
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Berne University Hospital and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Schachtner
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jakob Nilsson
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: Jakob Nilsson,
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chamoun B, Sánchez-Sancho P, Torres IB, Gabaldon A, Perelló M, Sellarés J, Moreso F, Serón D. Tocilizumab in the treatment of active chronic humoral rejection resistant to standard therapy. Nefrologia 2022; 42:578-584. [PMID: 36717307 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2021.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is no consensus on the most appropriate treatment for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR). Recent studies suggest that treatment with tocilizumab (TCZ) may stabilize graft function, decrease the intensity of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) and reduce inflammation of microcirculation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Observational study with renal allograft recipients diagnosed with cAMR (n = 5) who had not submitted a response to traditional treatment based on the combination of plasma replacements, immunoglobulins, and rituximab. Patients were told to be treated with TCZ as compassionate use in six doses per month (8 mg/kg/month). Renal function, proteinuria, and the intensity of DSAs were monitored during follow-up. RESULTS Five patients, average age 60 ± 13 years, three male and two retrasplants (cPRA average 55%) with preformed DSAs. Treatment with TCZ was initiated within 47 ± 52 days of biopsy. In two cases treatment was discontinued after the first dose, by severe bicitopenia with cytomegalovirus viremia and by graft failure, respectively. In the three patients who completed treatment, no stability of renal function (serum creatinine from 1.73 ± 0.70 to 2.04 ± 0.52 mg/dL, e-FGR 4 6 ± 15 to 36 ± 16 mL/min), showed increased proteinuria (3.2 ± 4.0 to 6.9 ± 11.0 g/g) and the intensity of DSAs maintain stable. No changes were observed in the degree of inflammation of microcirculation (g+pt 4.2 ± 0.8 vs. 4.3 ± 1.0) or in the degree of transplant glomerulopathy (cg 1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 1.8 ± 1.0). CONCLUSIONS TCZ therapy does not appear to be effective in modifying the natural history of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection, does not improve the degree of inflammation of microcirculation and does not reduces the intensity of DSAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betty Chamoun
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Pablo Sánchez-Sancho
- Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irina B Torres
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Alejandra Gabaldon
- Servicio de Patología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manel Perelló
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joana Sellarés
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Moreso
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniel Serón
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chamoun B, Sánchez-Sancho P, Torres IB, Gabaldon A, Perelló M, Sellarés J, Moreso F, Serón D. Tocilizumab en el tratamiento del rechazo humoral crónico activo resistente a terapia estándar. Nefrologia 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2021.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
27
|
Yi SG, Gaber AO, Chen W. B-cell response in solid organ transplantation. Front Immunol 2022; 13:895157. [PMID: 36016958 PMCID: PMC9395675 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.895157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The transcriptional regulation of B-cell response to antigen stimulation is complex and involves an intricate network of dynamic signals from cytokines and transcription factors propagated from T-cell interaction. Long-term alloimmunity, in the setting of organ transplantation, is dependent on this B-cell response, which does not appear to be halted by current immunosuppressive regimens which are targeted at T cells. There is emerging evidence that shows that B cells have a diverse response to solid organ transplantation that extends beyond plasma cell antibody production. In this review, we discuss the mechanistic pathways of B-cell activation and differentiation as they relate to the transcriptional regulation of germinal center B cells, plasma cells, and memory B cells in the setting of solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie G. Yi
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
- *Correspondence: Stephanie G. Yi,
| | - Ahmed Osama Gaber
- Division of Transplant Immunology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Wenhao Chen
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Eller K, Böhmig GA, Banas MC, Viklicky O. Editorial: Advances in the diagnosis and treatment in kidney transplantation. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:967749. [PMID: 35991631 PMCID: PMC9382307 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.967749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Eller
- Division of Nephrology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- *Correspondence: Kathrin Eller
| | - Georg A. Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Miriam C. Banas
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Ondrej Viklicky
- Department of Nephrology, Transplant Center, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yilmaz VT, Dandin O, Kisaoglu A, Avanaz A, Kamaci D, Toru HS, Demiryilmaz I, Koksoy S, Aydinli B, Kocak H. Prognosis and Treatment for Active and Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients; Single Center Experience. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:1809-1815. [PMID: 35907695 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.03.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic factors and treatment alternatives of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in renal transplant patients. METHODS Three thousand renal transplant patients were included in the study. The patients were first divided into 2 groups. Group 1: ABMR [-] recipients (n = 2871), Group 2: ABMR (+) recipients (n = 129). ABMR patients were compared among themselves by dividing them into 3 subgroups (early-active, late-active, chronic-active). The study was performed retrospectively. Different combinations of methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), rituximab, plasmapheresis (PP), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) were used in the treatment and the results were compared. RESULTS Graft survival and functions were worse and the rates of CAD, delayed graft function, BK virus, and cytomegalovirus higher in patients with ABMR. Also, graft survival was lower in patients with serum creatinine ≥3 (P = 0.001), GFR <30 (P <0.001), and spot urine protein to creatinine ratio ≥1 (P = 0.042) at the time of diagnosis. High interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy scores in chronic ABMR cases and high intimal arteritis scores in active ABMR cases were poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS The study showed that ABMR has a poor prognosis in terms of clinical parameters, and treatment should be individualized according to pathologic findings and graft functions at the time of diagnosis. Pulse methylprednisolone and IVIG should be used in the treatment of all ABMR patients, but PP, rituximab, and ATG should be used in selected cases. ABMR has a poor prognosis and treatment should be individualized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vural Taner Yilmaz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey.
| | - Ozgur Dandin
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Abdullah Kisaoglu
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Ali Avanaz
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Davut Kamaci
- Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Havva Serap Toru
- Department of Pathology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Ismail Demiryilmaz
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Sadi Koksoy
- Department of Microbiology and Clinical Immunology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Bulent Aydinli
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Kocak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Crane C, Loop L, Anterasian C, Geng B, Ingulli E. Balancing B cell responses to the allograft: implications for vaccination. Front Immunol 2022; 13:948379. [PMID: 35967363 PMCID: PMC9363634 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.948379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Balancing enough immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection and yet maintaining an intact immune system to respond to vaccinations, eliminate invading pathogens or cancer cells is an ongoing challenge to transplant physicians. Antibody mediated allograft rejection remains problematic in kidney transplantation and is the most common cause of graft loss despite current immunosuppressive therapies. The goal of immunosuppressive therapies is to prevent graft rejection; however, they prevent optimal vaccine responses as well. At the center of acute and chronic antibody mediated rejection and vaccine responses is the B lymphocyte. This review will highlight the role of B cells in alloimmune responses including the dependency on T cells for antibody production. We will discuss the need to improve vaccination rates in transplant recipients and present data on B cell populations and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response rates in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarkson Crane
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, University of California at San Diego and Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Lauren Loop
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of California at San Diego and Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Christine Anterasian
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of California at San Diego and Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Bob Geng
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of California at San Diego and Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Elizabeth Ingulli
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, University of California at San Diego and Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Elizabeth Ingulli,
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Dyslipidemia in Transplant Patients: Which Therapy? J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11144080. [PMID: 35887846 PMCID: PMC9318180 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the most important cause of death worldwide in recent years; an increasing trend is also shown in organ transplant patients subjected to immunosuppressive therapies, in which cardiovascular diseases represent one of the most frequent causes of long-term mortality. This is also linked to immunosuppressant-induced dyslipidemia, which occurs in 27 to 71% of organ transplant recipients. The aim of this review is to clarify the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying dyslipidemia in patients treated with immunosuppressants to identify immunosuppressive therapies which do not cause dyslipidemia or therapeutic pathways effective in reducing hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, or both, without further adverse events.
Collapse
|
32
|
Gassen RB, Borges TJ, Pérez-Sáez MJ, Zhang H, Al Jurdi A, Llinàs-Mallol L, Aoyama B, Lima M, Pascual J, Sage PT, Murakami N, Riella LV. T cell depletion increases humoral response by favoring T follicular helper cells expansion. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:1766-1778. [PMID: 35320600 PMCID: PMC9262847 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection is a major cause of long-term graft loss in kidney transplant patients. T follicular helper (Tfh) cells are crucial for assisting B cell differentiation and are required for an efficient antibody response. Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is a widely used lymphocyte-depleting induction therapy. However, less is known about how ATG affects Tfh cell development and donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation. We observed an increase in circulating Tfh cells at 6 months after kidney transplant in patients who received ATG. Using an NP-OVA immunization model, we found that ATG-treated mice had a higher percentage of Tfh cells, germinal center B cells, and higher titers of antigen-specific antibodies compared to controls. ATG-treated animals had lower levels of IL-2, a known Bcl-6 repressor, but higher levels of IL-21, pSTAT3 and Bcl-6, favoring Tfh differentiation. In a mouse kidney transplant model, ATG-treated recipients showed an increase in Tfh cells, DSA and C4d staining in the allograft. Although ATG was effective in depleting T cells, it favored the expansion of Tfh cells following depletion. Concomitant use of IL-2, tacrolimus, or rapamycin with ATG was essential to control Tfh cell expansion. In summary, ATG depletion favors Tfh expansion, enhancing antibody-mediated response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Benedetti Gassen
- Center of Transplantation Science, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thiago J Borges
- Center of Transplantation Science, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - María José Pérez-Sáez
- Renal Division, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hengcheng Zhang
- Renal Division, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ayman Al Jurdi
- Center of Transplantation Science, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Bruno Aoyama
- Renal Division, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maurício Lima
- Renal Division, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julio Pascual
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter T Sage
- Renal Division, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Naoka Murakami
- Renal Division, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leonardo V. Riella
- Center of Transplantation Science, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mayer KA, Budde K, Jilma B, Doberer K, Böhmig GA. Emerging drugs for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: a focus on phase II & III trials. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2022; 27:151-167. [PMID: 35715978 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2022.2091131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a leading cause of kidney allograft failure. Its therapy continues to be challenge, and no treatment has been approved for the market thus far. AREAS COVERED In this article, we discuss the pathophysiology and phenotypic presentation of ABMR, the current level of evidence to support the use of available therapeutic strategies, and the emergence of tailored drugs now being evaluated in systematic clinical trials. We searched PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov and Citeline's Pharmaprojects for pertinent information on emerging anti-rejection strategies, laying a focus on phase II and III trials. EXPERT OPINION Currently, we rely on the use of apheresis for alloantibody depletion and intravenous immunoglobulin (referred to as standard of care), preferentially in early active ABMR. Recent systematic trials have questioned the benefits of using the CD20 antibody rituximab or the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. However, there are now several promising treatment approaches in the pipeline, which are being trialed in phase II and III studies. These include interleukin-6 antagonism, CD38-targeting antibodies, and selective inhibitors of complement. On the basis of the information that has emerged so far, it seems that innovative treatment strategies for clinical use in ABMR may be available within the next 5-10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina A Mayer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Jilma
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Konstantin Doberer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pearl M, Weng PL, Chen L, Dokras A, Pizzo H, Garrison J, Butler C, Zhang J, Reed EF, Kim IK, Choi J, Haas M, Zhang X, Vo A, Chambers ET, Ettenger R, Jordan S, Puliyanda D. Long term tolerability and clinical outcomes associated with tocilizumab in the treatment of refractory antibody mediated rejection (AMR) in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14734. [PMID: 35657013 PMCID: PMC9378624 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment options for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are limited. Recent studies have shown that inhibition of interleukin-6 (IL-6)/interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) signaling can reduce inflammation and slow AMR progression. METHODS We report our experience using monthly tocilizumab (anti-IL6R) in 25 pediatric renal transplant recipients with AMR, refractory to IVIg/Rituximab. From January 2013 to June 2019, a median (IQR) of 12 (6.019.0) doses of tocilizumab were given per patient. Serial assessments of renal function, biopsy findings, and HLA DSA (by immunodominant HLA DSA [iDSA] and relative intensity score [RIS]) were performed. RESULTS Median (IQR) time from transplant to AMR was 41.4 (24.367.7) months, and time from AMR to first tocilizumab was 10.6 (8.317.6) months. At median (IQR) follow up of 15.8 (8.435.7) months post-tocilizumab initiation, renal function was stable except for 1 allograft loss. There was no significant decrease in iDSA or RIS. Follow up biopsies showed reduction in peritubular capillaritis (p = .015) and C4d scoring (p = .009). The most frequent adverse events were cytopenias. CONCLUSIONS Tocilizumab in pediatric patients with refractory AMR was well tolerated and appeared to stabilize renal function. The utility of tocilizumab in the treatment of AMR in this population should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Pearl
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Patricia L Weng
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lucia Chen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Aditi Dokras
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Helen Pizzo
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Garrison
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Carrie Butler
- Department of Pathology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jennifer Zhang
- Department of Pathology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Elaine F Reed
- Department of Pathology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Irene K Kim
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jua Choi
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mark Haas
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Xiaohai Zhang
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ashley Vo
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Eileen Tsai Chambers
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Robert Ettenger
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Stanley Jordan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Dechu Puliyanda
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hafez MH. New Immunosuppressive Strategies to Achieve Better Compliance and Results. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2022; 20:17-20. [PMID: 35570594 DOI: 10.6002/ect.pediatricsymp2022.l8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
36
|
Siddiqui MA, Baskin E, Yarbug Karakayali F, Gemici A, Gulleroglu K, Caltik Yilmaz A, Moray G, Haberal M. Use of Eculizumab in Pediatric Patients with Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2022; 20:49-52. [PMID: 35570600 DOI: 10.6002/ect.pediatricsymp2022.o15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Late antibody-mediated rejection triggered by donor-specific antibodies is a leading cause of kidney allograft failure. Effective treatment options for late antibody-mediated rejection are limited in renal transplant recipients. Here, we report 2 pediatric cases of severe late antibody-mediated rejection resistant to conventional immunosuppressive therapy who were successfully treated with eculizumab. Two patients who fulfilled the late antibody-mediated rejection diagnostic criteria (positive donor-specific antibodies, elevated mean fluorescence index, acute and/or chronic morphological lesions in the microvasculature, and abnormal kidney function test) were included in this study. Both patients were previously unsensitized with negative panel-reactive antibody. Case 1 was a 12-year-old male patient with kidney failure secondary to vesicoureteral reflux who underwent related-living donor kidney transplantation 2 years ago. Eleven months later, he was diagnosed with late antibody-mediated rejection. Despite an aggressive conventional immunosuppressive regimen, signs of rejection persisted. After the patient was treated with 2 doses of eculizumab, his mean fluorescence index dropped and serum creatinine decreased from 3.8 to 1.5 mg/dL. Case 2 was an unsensitized 16-year-old male patient with kidney failure secondary posterior urethral valve who underwent related-living donor kidney transplantation 4 years ago. Two years later, he was diagnosed with late antibody-mediated rejection. Despite an aggressive conventional immunosuppressive regimen, signs of rejection persisted. After treatment with 2 doses of eculizumab, his mean fluorescence index dropped and serum creatinine decreased from 2.1 to 1.01 mg/dL. In both patients, eculizumab therapy effectively reduced the markers of late antibody-mediated rejection and improved the kidney function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meraj Alam Siddiqui
- From the Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wu K, Schmidt D, López del Moral C, Osmanodja B, Lachmann N, Halleck F, Choi M, Bachmann F, Ronicke S, Duettmann W, Naik M, Schrezenmeier E, Rudolph B, Budde K. Poor Outcomes in Patients With Transplant Glomerulopathy Independent of Banff Categorization or Therapeutic Interventions. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:889648. [PMID: 35646957 PMCID: PMC9133540 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.889648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundTransplant glomerulopathy (TG) may indicate different disease entities including chronic AMR (antibody-mediated rejection). However, AMR criteria have been frequently changed, and long-term outcomes of allografts with AMR and TG according to Banff 2017 have rarely been investigated.Methods282 kidney allograft recipients with biopsy-proven TG were retrospectively investigated and diagnosed according to Banff'17 criteria: chronic AMR (cAMR, n = 72), chronic active AMR (cAAMR, n = 76) and isolated TG (iTG, n = 134). Of which 25/72 (34.7%) patients of cAMR group and 46/76 (60.5%) of cAAMR group were treated with antihumoral therapy (AHT).ResultsUp to 5 years after indication biopsy, no statistically significant differences were detected among iTG, cAMR and cAAMR groups in annual eGFR decline (−3.0 vs. −2.0 vs. −2.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year), 5-year median eGFR (21.5 vs. 16.0 vs. 20.0 ml/min/1.73 m2), 5-year graft survival rates (34.1 vs. 40.6 vs. 31.8%) as well as urinary protein excretion during follow-up. In addition, cAMR and cAAMR patients treated with AHT had similar graft and patient survival rates in comparison with those free of AHT, and similar comparing with iTG group. The TG scores were not associated with 5-year postbiopsy graft failure; whereas the patients with higher scores of chronic allograft scarring (by mm-, ci- and ct-lesions) had significantly lower graft survival rates than those with mild scores. The logistic-regression analysis demonstrated that Banff mm-, ah-, t-, ci-, ct-lesions and the eGFR level at biopsy were associated with 5-year graft failure.ConclusionsThe occurrence of TG is closely associated with graft failure independent of disease categories and TG score, and the long-term clinical outcomes were not influenced by AHT. The Banff lesions indicating progressive scarring might be better suited to predict an unfavorable outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaiyin Wu
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- *Correspondence: Kaiyin Wu
| | - Danilo Schmidt
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Covadonga López del Moral
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bilgin Osmanodja
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nils Lachmann
- HLA Laboratory, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, BIH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Halleck
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mira Choi
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Friederike Bachmann
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Ronicke
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wiebke Duettmann
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcel Naik
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva Schrezenmeier
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Birgit Rudolph
- Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Humboldt-Universitätzu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sazpinar O, Gaspert A, Sidler D, Rechsteiner M, Mueller TF. Histologic and Molecular Patterns in Responders and Non-responders With Chronic-Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplants. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:820085. [PMID: 35573002 PMCID: PMC9099145 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.820085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionThere is no proven therapy for chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (caABMR), the major cause of late kidney allograft failure. Histological and molecular patterns associated with possible therapy responsiveness are not known.MethodsBased on rigorous selection criteria this single center, retrospective study identified 16 out of 1027 consecutive kidney transplant biopsies taken between 2008 and 2016 with pure, unquestionable caABMR, without other pathologic features. The change in estimated GFR pre- and post-biopsy/treatment were utilized to differentiate subjects into responders and non-responders. Gene sets reflecting active immune processes of caABMR were defined a priori, including endothelial, inflammatory, cellular, interferon gamma (IFNg) and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) related-genes based on the literature. Transcript measurements were performed in RNA extracted from stored, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples using NanoString™ technology. Histology and gene expression patterns of responders and non-responders were compared.ResultsA reductionist approach applying very tight criteria to identify caABMR and treatment response excluded the vast majority of clinical ABMR cases. Only 16 out of 139 cases with a written diagnosis of chronic rejection fulfilled the caABMR criteria. Histological associations with therapy response included a lower peritubular capillaritis score (p = 0.028) along with less glomerulitis. In contrast, no single gene discriminated responders from non-responders. Activated genes associated with NK cells and endothelial cells suggested lack of treatment response.ConclusionIn caABMR active microvascular injury, in particular peritubular capillaritis, differentiates treatment responders from non-responders. Transcriptome changes in NK cell and endothelial cell associated genes may further help to identify treatment response. Future prospective studies will be needed which include more subjects, who receive standardized treatment protocols to identify biomarkers for treatment response.Clinical Trial Registration[ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT03430414].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onur Sazpinar
- Clinic of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ariana Gaspert
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Sidler
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Markus Rechsteiner
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas F. Mueller
- Clinic of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: Thomas F. Mueller,
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Borski A, Kainz A, Kozakowski N, Regele H, Kläger J, Strassl R, Fischer G, Faé I, Wenda S, Kikić Ž, Bond G, Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Mayer KA, Eder M, Wahrmann M, Haindl S, Doberer K, Böhmig GA, Eskandary F. Early Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Trajectories After Kidney Transplant Biopsy as a Surrogate Endpoint for Graft Survival in Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:817127. [PMID: 35530045 PMCID: PMC9069161 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.817127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) after kidney transplantation is a major cause of long-term allograft loss with currently no proven treatment strategy. Design for trials testing treatment for late ABMR poses a major challenge as hard clinical endpoints require large sample sizes. We performed a retrospective cohort study applying commonly used selection criteria to evaluate the slope of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) within an early and short timeframe after biopsy as a surrogate of future allograft loss for clinical trials addressing late ABMR. Methods Study subjects were identified upon screening of the Vienna transplant biopsy database. Main inclusion criteria were (i) a solitary kidney transplant between 2000 and 2013, (ii) diagnosis of ABMR according to the Banff 2015 scheme at >12 months post-transplantation, (iii) age 15-75 years at ABMR diagnosis, (iv) an eGFR > 25 mL/min/1.73 m2 at ABMR diagnosis, and (v) a follow-up for at least 36 months after ABMR diagnosis. The primary outcome variable was death-censored graft survival. A mixed effects model with linear splines was used for eGFR slope modeling and association of graft failure and eGFR slope was assessed applying a multivariate competing risk analysis with landmarks set at 12 and 24 months after index biopsy. Results A total of 70 allografts from 68 patients were included. An eGFR loss of 1 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year significantly increased the risk for allograft failure, when eGFR slopes were modeled over 12 months [HR 1.1 (95% CI: 1.01-1.3), p = 0.020] or over 24 months [HR 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1-1.4), p = 0.001] after diagnosis of ABMR with landmarks set at both time points. Covariables influencing graft loss in all models were histologic evidence of glomerulonephritis concurring with ABMR as well as the administration of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) at the time of transplantation. Conclusion Our study supports the use of the eGFR slope modeled for at least 12 months after biopsy-proven diagnosis of late ABMR, as a surrogate parameter for future allograft loss. The simultaneous occurrence of glomerulonephritis together with ABMR at index biopsy and the use of ATG at the time of transplantation-likely representing a confounder in pre-sensitized recipients-were strongly associated with worse transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Borski
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Kainz
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Heinz Regele
- Department of Pathology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Kläger
- Department of Pathology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Strassl
- Division of Clinical Virology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gottfried Fischer
- Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ingrid Faé
- Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sabine Wenda
- Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Željko Kikić
- Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gregor Bond
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Katharina A. Mayer
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Eder
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Wahrmann
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Susanne Haindl
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Konstantin Doberer
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg A. Böhmig
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Farsad Eskandary
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mayer KA, Budde K, Halloran PF, Doberer K, Rostaing L, Eskandary F, Christamentl A, Wahrmann M, Regele H, Schranz S, Ely S, Firbas C, Schörgenhofer C, Kainz A, Loupy A, Härtle S, Boxhammer R, Jilma B, Böhmig GA. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of monoclonal CD38 antibody felzartamab in late antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection: study protocol for a phase 2 trial. Trials 2022; 23:270. [PMID: 35395951 PMCID: PMC8990453 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06198-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a cardinal cause of renal allograft loss. This rejection type, which may occur at any time after transplantation, commonly presents as a continuum of microvascular inflammation (MVI) culminating in chronic tissue injury. While the clinical relevance of ABMR is well recognized, its treatment, particularly a long time after transplantation, has remained a big challenge. A promising strategy to counteract ABMR may be the use of CD38-directed treatment to deplete alloantibody-producing plasma cells (PC) and natural killer (NK) cells. METHODS This investigator-initiated trial is planned as a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, multi-center phase 2 trial designed to assess the safety and tolerability (primary endpoint), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the fully human CD38 monoclonal antibody felzartamab (MOR202) in late ABMR. The trial will include 20 anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive renal allograft recipients diagnosed with active or chronic active ABMR ≥ 180 days post-transplantation. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive felzartamab (16 mg/kg per infusion) or placebo for a period of 6 months (intravenous administration on day 0, and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks). Two follow-up allograft biopsies will be performed at weeks 24 and 52. Secondary endpoints (preliminary assessment) will include morphologic and molecular rejection activity in renal biopsies, immunologic biomarkers in the blood and urine, and surrogate parameters predicting the progression to allograft failure (slope of renal function; iBOX prediction score). DISCUSSION Based on the hypothesis that felzartamab is able to halt the progression of ABMR via targeting antibody-producing PC and NK cells, we believe that our trial could potentially provide the first proof of concept of a new treatment in ABMR based on a prospective randomized clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) 2021-000545-40 . Registered on 23 June 2021. CLINICALTRIALS gov NCT05021484 . Registered on 25 August 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina A Mayer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philip F Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Konstantin Doberer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Farsad Eskandary
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anna Christamentl
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Wahrmann
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Heinz Regele
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sabine Schranz
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sarah Ely
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christa Firbas
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Alexander Kainz
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- INSERM UMR 970, Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Bernd Jilma
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Jouve T, Noble J, Naciri-Bennani H, Dard C, Masson D, Fiard G, Malvezzi P, Rostaing L. Early Blood Transfusion After Kidney Transplantation Does Not Lead to dnDSA Development: The BloodIm Study. Front Immunol 2022; 13:852079. [PMID: 35432350 PMCID: PMC9009267 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.852079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Outcomes after kidney transplantation are largely driven by the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA), which may be triggered by blood transfusion. In this single-center study, we investigated the link between early blood transfusion and dnDSA development in a mainly anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-induced kidney-transplant cohort. We retrospectively included all recipients of a kidney transplant performed between 2004 and 2015, provided they had >3 months graft survival. DSA screening was evaluated with a Luminex assay (Immucor). Early blood transfusion (EBT) was defined as the transfusion of at least one red blood-cell unit over the first 3 months post-transplantation, with an exhaustive report of transfusion. Patients received either anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG) or basiliximab induction, plus tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid maintenance immunosuppression. A total of 1088 patients received a transplant between 2004 and 2015 in our center, of which 981 satisfied our inclusion criteria. EBT was required for 292 patients (29.7%). Most patients received ATG induction (86.1%); the others received basiliximab induction (13.4%). dnDSA-free graft survival (dnDSA-GS) at 1-year post-transplantation was similar between EBT+ (2.4%) and EBT- (3.0%) patients (chi-squared p=0.73). There was no significant association between EBT and dnDSA-GS (univariate Cox’s regression, HR=0.88, p=0.556). In multivariate Cox’s regression, adjusting for potential confounders (showing a univariate association with dnDSA development), early transfusion remained not associated with dnDSA-GS (HR 0.76, p=0.449). However, dnDSA-GS was associated with pretransplantation HLA sensitization (HR=2.25, p=0.004), hemoglobin >10 g/dL (HR=0.39, p=0.029) and the number of HLA mismatches (HR=1.26, p=0.05). Recipient’s age, tacrolimus and mycophenolic-acid exposures, and graft rank were not associated with dnDSA-GS. Early blood transfusion did not induce dnDSAs in our cohort of ATG-induced patients, but low hemoglobin level was associated with dnDSAs-GS. This suggests a protective effect of ATG induction therapy on preventing dnDSA development at an initial stage post-transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Jouve
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- Faculty of Health, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- *Correspondence: Thomas Jouve,
| | - Johan Noble
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- Faculty of Health, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Hamza Naciri-Bennani
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Céline Dard
- Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Laboratory, Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS), La Tronche, France
| | - Dominique Masson
- Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Laboratory, Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS), La Tronche, France
| | - Gaëlle Fiard
- Faculty of Health, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- Urology and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- Faculty of Health, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ma X, Dai Y, Witzke O, Xu S, Lindemann M, Kribben A, Dolff S, Wilde B. Chloroquine Suppresses Effector B-Cell Functions and Has Differential Impact on Regulatory B-Cell Subsets. Front Immunol 2022; 13:818704. [PMID: 35211119 PMCID: PMC8860819 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.818704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Chloroquine (CQ) is approved for treatment of B-cell mediated diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. However, the exact mode of action in these diseases has not been studied and it remains unclear which effect CQ has on B-cells. Thus, it was the aim of this study to investigate to which extent CQ affects functionality of effector and regulatory B-cell. Methods For this purpose, B-cells were isolated from peripheral blood of healthy controls and renal transplant patients. B-cells were stimulated in presence or absence of CQ and Interleukin-10 (IL-10) and Granzyme B (GrB) secretion were assessed. In addition, effector functions such as plasma cell formation, and Immunoglobulin G (IgG) secretion were studied. Results CQ suppressed Toll-Like-Receptor (TLR)-9 induced B-cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. IL-10pos regulatory B-cells were suppressed by CQ already at low concentrations whereas anti-IgG/IgM-induced GrB secreting regulatory B-cells were less susceptible. Plasma blast formation and IgG secretion was potently suppressed by CQ. Moreover, purified B-cells from renal transplant patients were also susceptible to CQ-induced suppression of effector B-cell functions as observed by diminished IgG secretion. Conclusion In conclusion, CQ had a suppressive effect on IL-10 regulatory B-cells whereas GrB secreting regulatory B-cells were less affected. Effector functions of B-cells such as plasma blast formation and IgG secretion were also inhibited by CQ. Effector B-cells derived from renal transplant patients already under immunosuppression could be suppressed by CQ. These findings may partly explain the clinical efficacy of CQ in B-cell mediated autoimmune diseases. The application of CQ in other disease contexts where suppression of effector B-cells could offer a benefit, such as renal transplantation, may hypothetically be advantageous.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Ma
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Nephrology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Yang Dai
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Oliver Witzke
- Department of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Shilei Xu
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Monika Lindemann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Kribben
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Dolff
- Department of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Benjamin Wilde
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Carapito R, Aouadi I, Verniquet M, Untrau M, Pichot A, Beaudrey T, Bassand X, Meyer S, Faucher L, Posson J, Morlon A, Kotova I, Delbos F, Walencik A, Aarnink A, Kennel A, Suberbielle C, Taupin JL, Matern BM, Spierings E, Congy-Jolivet N, Essaydi A, Perrin P, Blancher A, Charron D, Cereb N, Maumy-Bertrand M, Bertrand F, Garrigue V, Pernin V, Weekers L, Naesens M, Kamar N, Legendre C, Glotz D, Caillard S, Ladrière M, Giral M, Anglicheau D, Süsal C, Bahram S. The MHC class I MICA gene is a histocompatibility antigen in kidney transplantation. Nat Med 2022; 28:989-998. [PMID: 35288692 PMCID: PMC9117142 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01725-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The identity of histocompatibility loci, besides human leukocyte antigen (HLA), remains elusive. The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I MICA gene is a candidate histocompatibility locus. Here, we investigate its role in a French multicenter cohort of 1,356 kidney transplants. MICA mismatches were associated with decreased graft survival (hazard ratio (HR), 2.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.45–3.11; P < 0.001). Both before and after transplantation anti-MICA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were strongly associated with increased antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) (HR, 3.79; 95% CI: 1.94–7.39; P < 0.001; HR, 9.92; 95% CI: 7.43–13.20; P < 0.001, respectively). This effect was synergetic with that of anti-HLA DSA before and after transplantation (HR, 25.68; 95% CI: 3.31–199.41; P = 0.002; HR, 82.67; 95% CI: 33.67–202.97; P < 0.001, respectively). De novo-developed anti-MICA DSA were the most harmful because they were also associated with reduced graft survival (HR, 1.29; 95% CI: 1.05–1.58; P = 0.014). Finally, the damaging effect of anti-MICA DSA on graft survival was confirmed in an independent cohort of 168 patients with ABMR (HR, 1.71; 95% CI: 1.02–2.86; P = 0.041). In conclusion, assessment of MICA matching and immunization for the identification of patients at high risk for transplant rejection and loss is warranted. Analysis of a multicenter cohort of kidney transplants shows that mismatches in the MICA locus and the presence of anti-MICA donor-specific antibodies are associated with reduced graft survival and increased rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Carapito
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. .,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. .,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Franco (Strasbourg)-Japanese (Nagano) Nextgen HLA Laboratory, Strasbourg, France. .,Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Plateau Technique de Biologie, Pôle de Biologie, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France. .,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Ismail Aouadi
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Franco (Strasbourg)-Japanese (Nagano) Nextgen HLA Laboratory, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Martin Verniquet
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Franco (Strasbourg)-Japanese (Nagano) Nextgen HLA Laboratory, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Meiggie Untrau
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Franco (Strasbourg)-Japanese (Nagano) Nextgen HLA Laboratory, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Angélique Pichot
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Franco (Strasbourg)-Japanese (Nagano) Nextgen HLA Laboratory, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Thomas Beaudrey
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Nephrology-Transplantation Department, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Xavier Bassand
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Nephrology-Transplantation Department, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Sébastien Meyer
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Franco (Strasbourg)-Japanese (Nagano) Nextgen HLA Laboratory, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Loic Faucher
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,CHU Nantes, Université de Nantes, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Juliane Posson
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMR_S 970, Paris, France.,Kidney Transplant Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Aurore Morlon
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,BIOMICA SAS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Irina Kotova
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,BIOMICA SAS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Florent Delbos
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS) Centre Pays de la Loire, Laboratoire HLA, Nantes, France
| | - Alexandre Walencik
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS) Centre Pays de la Loire, Laboratoire HLA, Nantes, France
| | - Alice Aarnink
- Laboratory of Histocompatibility, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Nancy, France
| | - Anne Kennel
- Laboratory of Histocompatibility, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Nancy, France
| | - Caroline Suberbielle
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire Jean Dausset, Laboratoire d'Immunologie et d'Histocompatibilité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S 976, Human Immunology, Pathophysiology, Immunotherapy (HIPI), Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis Université de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire Jean Dausset, Laboratoire d'Immunologie et d'Histocompatibilité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S 976, Human Immunology, Pathophysiology, Immunotherapy (HIPI), Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis Université de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Benedict M Matern
- Center of Translational Immunology, HLA and Tissue Typing, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Spierings
- Center of Translational Immunology, HLA and Tissue Typing, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Congy-Jolivet
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Immunogénétique Moléculaire (LIMT, EA 3034), Faculté de Médecine Purpan, Université Toulouse III (Université Paul Sabatier, UPS), Toulouse, France.,Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Arnaud Essaydi
- Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS) Grand-Est, Laboratoire HLA, Strasbourg, France
| | - Peggy Perrin
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Nephrology-Transplantation Department, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Antoine Blancher
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Immunogénétique Moléculaire (LIMT, EA 3034), Faculté de Médecine Purpan, Université Toulouse III (Université Paul Sabatier, UPS), Toulouse, France.,Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Dominique Charron
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire Jean Dausset, Laboratoire d'Immunologie et d'Histocompatibilité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S 976, Human Immunology, Pathophysiology, Immunotherapy (HIPI), Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis Université de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | | | - Myriam Maumy-Bertrand
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut de Recherche Mathématique Avancée (IRMA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR 7501, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) Institut de Recherche en Mathématiques, Interactions et Applications (IRMIA), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Frédéric Bertrand
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut de Recherche Mathématique Avancée (IRMA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR 7501, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) Institut de Recherche en Mathématiques, Interactions et Applications (IRMIA), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Valérie Garrigue
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Service de Néphrologie-Transplantation-Dialyse Péritonéale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
| | - Vincent Pernin
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Service de Néphrologie-Transplantation-Dialyse Péritonéale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
| | - Laurent Weekers
- Division of Nephrology, University of Liege Hospital (ULiege CHU), Liege, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Departments of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rangueil, INSERM UMR1291 - CNRS UMR5051 - Université Toulouse III, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), Toulouse, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Service de Transplantation Rénale Adulte, Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Denis Glotz
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMR_S 970, Paris, France.,Kidney Transplant Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Caillard
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Nephrology-Transplantation Department, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Marc Ladrière
- Department of Renal Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Nancy, France
| | - Magali Giral
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,CHU Nantes, Université de Nantes, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Service de Transplantation Rénale Adulte, Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMR_S 1151, Paris, France
| | - Caner Süsal
- Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Seiamak Bahram
- Laboratoire d'ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S1109, Plateforme GENOMAX, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg (CRBS), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. .,Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) TRANSPLANTEX, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. .,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Franco (Strasbourg)-Japanese (Nagano) Nextgen HLA Laboratory, Strasbourg, France. .,Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Plateau Technique de Biologie, Pôle de Biologie, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France. .,Institut Thématique Interdisciplinaire (ITI) de Médecine de Précision de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Koslik MA, Friebus-Kardash J, Heinemann FM, Kribben A, Bräsen JH, Eisenberger U. Differential Treatment Effects for Renal Transplant Recipients With DSA-Positive or DSA-Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:816555. [PMID: 35174191 PMCID: PMC8841765 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.816555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is the main cause of renal allograft loss. The most common treatment strategy is based on plasmapheresis plus the subsequent administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Unfortunately, no approved long-term therapy is available for ABMR. The current study was designed to analyze the effect of various ABMR treatment approaches on allograft survival and to compare treatment effects in the presence or absence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). Methods This single-center study retrospectively analyzed 102 renal allograft recipients who had biopsy-proven ABMR after transplant. DSA was detectable in 61 of the 102 patients. Initial standard treatment of ABMR consisted of plasmapheresis (PS) or immunoadsorption (IA), followed by a single course of IVIG. In case of nonresponse or recurrence, additional immunosuppressive medications, such as rituximab, bortezomib, thymoglobulin, or eculizumab, were administered. In a second step, persistent ABMR was treated with increased maintenance immunosuppression, long-term therapy with IVIG (more than 1 year), or both. Results Overall graft survival among transplant patients with ABMR was <50% after 3 years of follow-up. Compared to the use of PS/IA and IVIG alone, the use of additional immunosuppressive medications had no beneficial effect on allograft survival (p = 0.83). Remarkably, allografts survival rates were comparable between patients treated with the combination of PS/IA and IVIG and those treated with a single administration of IVIG (p = 0.18). Renal transplant patients with ABMR but without DSAs benefited more from increased maintenance immunosuppression than did DSA-positive patients with ABMR (p = 0.01). Recipients with DSA-positive ABMR exhibited significantly better allograft survival after long-term application of IVIG for more than 1 year than did recipients with DSA-negative ABMR (p = 0.02). Conclusions The results of our single-center cohort study involving kidney transplant recipients with ABMR suggest that long-term application of IVIG is more favorable for DSA-positive recipients, whereas intensification of maintenance immunosuppression is more effective for recipients with DSA-negative ABMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius Andreas Koslik
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Justa Friebus-Kardash
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Falko Markus Heinemann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Transplantation Diagnostics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Kribben
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jan Hinrich Bräsen
- Nephropathology Unit, Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hanover, Germany
| | - Ute Eisenberger
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- *Correspondence: Ute Eisenberger
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Yerly P, Rotman S, Regamey J, Aubert V, Aur S, Kirsch M, Hullin R, Pascual M. Complement blockade with eculizumab to treat acute symptomatic humoral rejection after heart transplantation. Xenotransplantation 2022; 29:e12726. [PMID: 35001433 PMCID: PMC9285545 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) is a major barrier preventing successful discordant organ xenotransplantation, but it also occurs in allotransplantation due to anti‐HLA antibodies. Symptomatic acute AMR is rare after heart allograft but carries a high risk of mortality, especially >1 year after transplant. As complement activation may play a major role in mediating tissue injury in acute AMR, drugs blocking the terminal complement cascade like eculizumab may be useful, particularly since “standards of care” like plasmapheresis are not based on strong evidence. Eculizumab was successfully used to treat early acute kidney AMR, a typical condition of “active AMR,” but showed mitigated results in late AMR, where “chronic active” lesions are more prevalent. Here, we report the case of a heart recipient who presented with acute heart failure due to late acute AMR with eight de novo donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA), and who fully recovered allograft function and completely cleared DSA following plasmapheresis‐free upfront eculizumab administration in addition to thymoglobulin, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), and rituximab. Several clinical (acute onset, abrupt and severe loss of graft function), biological (sudden high‐level production of DSA), and pathological features (microvascular injury, C4d deposits) of this cardiac recipient are shared with early kidney AMR and may indicate a strong role of complement in the pathogenesis of acute graft injury that may respond to drugs like eculizumab. Terminal complement blockade should be further explored to treat acute AMR in recipients of heart allografts and possibly also in recipients of discordant xenografts in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Yerly
- Service of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Samuel Rotman
- Service of Clinical Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Julien Regamey
- Service of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Vincent Aubert
- Service of Immunology and Allergology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stefania Aur
- Service of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Kirsch
- Service of Cardiac Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Roger Hullin
- Service of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Pascual
- Center for Organ Transplantation, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Halloran PF, Einecke G, Sikosana MLN, Madill-Thomsen K. The Biology and Molecular Basis of Organ Transplant Rejection. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2022; 272:1-26. [PMID: 35091823 DOI: 10.1007/164_2021_557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Allograft rejection is defined as tissue injury in a transplanted allogeneic organ produced by the effector mechanisms of the adaptive alloimmune response. Effector T lymphocytes and IgG alloantibodies cause two different types of rejection that can occur either individually or simultaneously: T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). In TCMR, cognate effector T cells infiltrate the graft and orchestrate an interstitial inflammatory response in the kidney interstitium in which effector T cells engage antigen-presenting myeloid cells, activating the T cells, antigen-presenting cells, and macrophages. The result is intense expression of IFNG and IFNG-induced molecules, expression of effector T cell molecules and macrophage molecules and checkpoints, and deterioration of parenchymal function. The diagnostic lesions of TCMR follow, i.e. interstitial inflammation, parenchymal deterioration, and intimal arteritis. In ABMR, HLA IgG alloantibodies produced by plasma cells bind to the donor antigens on graft microcirculation, leading to complement activation, margination, and activation of NK cells and neutrophils and monocytes, and endothelial injury, sometimes with intimal arteritis. TCMR becomes infrequent after 5-10 years post-transplant, probably reflecting adaptive mechanisms such as checkpoints, but ABMR can present even decades post-transplant. Some rejection is triggered by inadequate immunosuppression and non-adherence, challenging the clinician to target effective immunosuppression even decades post-transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip F Halloran
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | - Gunilla Einecke
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Majid L N Sikosana
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wu K, Schmidt D, López del Moral C, Osmanodja B, Lachmann N, Zhang Q, Halleck F, Choi M, Bachmann F, Ronicke S, Duettmann W, Naik MG, Schrezenmeier E, Rudolph B, Budde K. Poor Long-Term Renal Allograft Survival in Patients with Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection, Irrespective of Treatment-A Single Center Retrospective Study. J Clin Med 2021; 11:jcm11010199. [PMID: 35011939 PMCID: PMC8745558 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11010199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The Banff 2017 report permits the diagnosis of pure chronic antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) in absence of microcirculation inflammation. We retrospectively investigated renal allograft function and long-term outcomes of 67 patients with cAMR, and compared patients who received antihumoral therapy (cAMR-AHT, n = 21) with patients without treatment (cAMRwo, n = 46). At baseline, the cAMR-AHT group had more concomitant T-cell-mediated rejection (9/46 (19.2%) vs. 10/21 (47.6%); p = 0.04), a higher g-lesion score (0.4 ± 0.5 versus 0.1 ± 0.3; p = 0.01) and a higher median eGFR decline in the six months prior to biopsy (6.6 vs. 3.0 mL/min; p = 0.04). The median eGFR decline six months after biopsy was comparable (2.6 vs. 4.9 mL/min, p = 0.61) between both groups, and three-year graft survival after biopsy was statistically lower in the cAMR-AHT group (35.0% vs. 61.0%, p = 0.03). Patients who received AHT had more infections (0.38 vs. 0.20 infections/patient; p = 0.04). Currently, antihumoral therapy is more often administered to patients with cAMR and rapidly deteriorating renal function or concomitant TCMR. However, long-term graft outcomes remain poor, despite treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaiyin Wu
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (D.S.); (C.L.d.M.); (B.O.); (Q.Z.); (F.H.); (M.C.); (F.B.); (S.R.); (W.D.); (M.G.N.); (E.S.); (K.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-450-514002; Fax: +49-30-450-514902
| | - Danilo Schmidt
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (D.S.); (C.L.d.M.); (B.O.); (Q.Z.); (F.H.); (M.C.); (F.B.); (S.R.); (W.D.); (M.G.N.); (E.S.); (K.B.)
| | - Covadonga López del Moral
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (D.S.); (C.L.d.M.); (B.O.); (Q.Z.); (F.H.); (M.C.); (F.B.); (S.R.); (W.D.); (M.G.N.); (E.S.); (K.B.)
| | - Bilgin Osmanodja
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (D.S.); (C.L.d.M.); (B.O.); (Q.Z.); (F.H.); (M.C.); (F.B.); (S.R.); (W.D.); (M.G.N.); (E.S.); (K.B.)
| | - Nils Lachmann
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Qiang Zhang
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (D.S.); (C.L.d.M.); (B.O.); (Q.Z.); (F.H.); (M.C.); (F.B.); (S.R.); (W.D.); (M.G.N.); (E.S.); (K.B.)
| | - Fabian Halleck
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (D.S.); (C.L.d.M.); (B.O.); (Q.Z.); (F.H.); (M.C.); (F.B.); (S.R.); (W.D.); (M.G.N.); (E.S.); (K.B.)
| | - Mira Choi
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (D.S.); (C.L.d.M.); (B.O.); (Q.Z.); (F.H.); (M.C.); (F.B.); (S.R.); (W.D.); (M.G.N.); (E.S.); (K.B.)
| | - Friederike Bachmann
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (D.S.); (C.L.d.M.); (B.O.); (Q.Z.); (F.H.); (M.C.); (F.B.); (S.R.); (W.D.); (M.G.N.); (E.S.); (K.B.)
| | - Simon Ronicke
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (D.S.); (C.L.d.M.); (B.O.); (Q.Z.); (F.H.); (M.C.); (F.B.); (S.R.); (W.D.); (M.G.N.); (E.S.); (K.B.)
| | - Wiebke Duettmann
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (D.S.); (C.L.d.M.); (B.O.); (Q.Z.); (F.H.); (M.C.); (F.B.); (S.R.); (W.D.); (M.G.N.); (E.S.); (K.B.)
- Berlin Institute of Health, Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcel G. Naik
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (D.S.); (C.L.d.M.); (B.O.); (Q.Z.); (F.H.); (M.C.); (F.B.); (S.R.); (W.D.); (M.G.N.); (E.S.); (K.B.)
- Berlin Institute of Health, Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva Schrezenmeier
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (D.S.); (C.L.d.M.); (B.O.); (Q.Z.); (F.H.); (M.C.); (F.B.); (S.R.); (W.D.); (M.G.N.); (E.S.); (K.B.)
- Berlin Institute of Health, Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Birgit Rudolph
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (D.S.); (C.L.d.M.); (B.O.); (Q.Z.); (F.H.); (M.C.); (F.B.); (S.R.); (W.D.); (M.G.N.); (E.S.); (K.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Feng D, Huang Z, Chen H, Tao J, Gao X, Liu J, Sun L, Wang Z, Han Z, Ju X, Tan R, Gu M. Iguratimod reduces panel reactive antibody in high mismatched renal transplant recipients: One single-center experience. Clin Transplant 2021; 36:e14565. [PMID: 34931720 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of iguratimod (IGU) for reducing panel reactive antibody (PRA) in high-mismatched renal transplant recipients. METHODS Eligible recipients positive for PRAs who received or did not receive IGU treatment were enrolled. We retrospectively reviewed, collected, and analyzed statistically the clinical data of the recipients. RESULTS A total of 80 recipients were included for further analysis. After IGU was administered for nine months, no significant difference was found in the change rates of donor specific antibodies between two groups. Meanwhile, the reduction in the PRAs in the IGU group was greater than that in the non-IGU group in anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and class II, anti-HLA class I, anti-HLA class II, anti-HLA A, and anti-HLA DR antibodies. However, no differences were found in the anti-HLA B, anti-HLA Cw, anti-HLA DP, and anti-HLA DQ antibodies between the two groups. No serious adverse events were reported, and the incidence of adverse events was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION PRA levels in high-mismatched renal transplant recipients were significantly reduced after the administration of IGU. The high safety of IGU was also determined. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dengyuan Feng
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| | - Zhengkai Huang
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| | - Hao Chen
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| | - Jun Tao
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| | - Xiang Gao
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| | - Jiawen Liu
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| | - Li Sun
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| | - Zijie Wang
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| | - Zhijian Han
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| | - Xiaobing Ju
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| | - Ruoyun Tan
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| | - Min Gu
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Piñeiro GJ, Montagud-Marrahi E, Ríos J, Ventura-Aguiar P, Cucchiari D, Revuelta I, Lozano M, Cid J, Cofan F, Esforzado N, Palou E, Oppenheimer F, Campistol JM, Bayés-Genís B, Rovira J, Diekmann F. Influence of Persistent Inflammation in Follow-Up Biopsies After Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:761919. [PMID: 34869466 PMCID: PMC8632955 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.761919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite recent advances in immunosuppression treatment, antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) remains the leading cause of kidney graft loss. Information about prognostic markers and the efficacy of treatment is scarce. Methods: Retrospective study with kidney recipients diagnosed an active ABMR from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2019 to explore the influence of persistent inflammation in follow-up biopsies on graft survival after ABMR treatment. Results: About 116 patients were included. Active ABMR were treated with a combination of plasma exchange (PE), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), rituximab, and steroids. At 6 months of treatment, 63 (54.3%) patients presented a stabilization or improvement in kidney-graft function. The effectiveness varied depending on the timepoint of the presentation between transplantation and rejection, which is lower for those with late ABMR (63 vs. 21% for early vs. late ABMR, respectively). Ninety patients (77%) underwent a control biopsy after ABMR treatment, from which 46 (51%) responded to the treatment. Microvascular inflammation (MVI) persisted in 64 (71%) biopsies, whereas tubulitis persisted in 17 (19%) biopsies. Death-censored graft survival at 1 year was significantly lower in patients with persistent MVI (86% vs. 95% without persistent MVI, P = 0.002), or with persistent tubulitis (44% vs. 66% without tubulitis, P = 0.02). In the Cox Regression analysis, the persistence of MVI [hazard ratio (HR), 4.50 (95%CI, 1.35–14.96), P = 0.01] and tubulitis [HR 2.88 95%CI (1.24–6.69), P = 0.01) in follow-up biopsies significantly increased the risk of graft failure. Conclusion: Persistent inflammation in follow-up biopsies after ABMR treatment was associated with an increased risk of graft loss, even without meeting Banff rejection criteria. Study Registration: Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS): 14566/RG 24161. Study code: UTRINM-2017-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaston J Piñeiro
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Montagud-Marrahi
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Ríos
- Medical Statistics Platform, Institut d'Investigacions Biomques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Cucchiari
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miquel Lozano
- Apheresis Unit, Department of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Cid
- Apheresis Unit, Department of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frederic Cofan
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nuria Esforzado
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Palou
- Department of Immunology, Hospital Clc de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Federico Oppenheimer
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M Campistol
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriu Bayés-Genís
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Cheng H, Xu B, Zhang L, Wang Y, Chen M, Chen S. Bortezomib alleviates antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation by facilitating Atg5 expression. J Cell Mol Med 2021; 25:10939-10949. [PMID: 34734681 PMCID: PMC8642675 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.16998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) is one of the most dominant mechanisms responsible for the loss of kidney grafts. Previous researches have shown that donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) are the major mediators of AMR. In order to prolong the survival time of grafts, it is vital to reduce the incidence of AMR and inhibit the generation of DSAs. We established an animal model of AMR by performing kidney transplantation in pre‐sensitized rats. Then, we investigated the effect of bortezomib (BTZ) on AMR. We found that BTZ could reduce the serum level of DSAs and alleviate post‐transplantation inflammation in peritubular capillaries (PTCs) and glomeruli, which was demonstrated by the reduction of C4d and IgG deposition in PTCs, and the reduced number of B cell and plasma cell in peripheral blood and the transplanted kidney (p < 0.05). Our results also suggested that BTZ increased the number of regulatory T cell (Treg) and significantly reduced the proportion of T helper (Th17) cell (p < 0.05). Besides, BTZ induced the significant upregulation of anti‐inflammatory cytokines but downregulated pro‐inflammatory cytokines (p < 0.05). After dealing with Atg5 siRNA‐lentivirus, the effect of BTZ alleviating AMR was reversed and Th17/Treg proportions were also significantly modulated. Collectively, these findings show that BTZ slows down the process of AMR and Atg5 may be the key mechanism. Furthermore, Atg5 silencing results may be demonstrated that Atg5 alleviated AMR by modulating the ratio of Th17/Treg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Cheng
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeastern China University, Nanjing, China
| | - Bin Xu
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeastern China University, Nanjing, China
| | - Lijie Zhang
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeastern China University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yi Wang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeastern China University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shuqiu Chen
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeastern China University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|