1
|
Sloane KL, Hamilton RH. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Ameliorate Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment. Brain Sci 2024; 14:614. [PMID: 38928614 PMCID: PMC11202055 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14060614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Post-stroke cognitive impairment is a common and disabling condition with few effective therapeutic options. After stroke, neural reorganization and other neuroplastic processes occur in response to ischemic injury, which can result in clinical improvement through spontaneous recovery. Neuromodulation through transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising intervention to augment underlying neuroplasticity in order to improve cognitive function. This form of neuromodulation leverages mechanisms of neuroplasticity post-stroke to optimize neural reorganization and improve function. In this review, we summarize the current state of cognitive neurorehabilitation post-stroke, the practical features of tDCS, its uses in stroke-related cognitive impairment across cognitive domains, and special considerations for the use of tDCS in the post-stroke patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly L. Sloane
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Roy H. Hamilton
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zietz A, Kaufmann JE, Wiesner K, Fischer SK, Wiegert M, Verhagen-Kamerbeek WD, Rottenberger Y, Schwarz A, Peters N, Gensicke H, Medlin F, Möller JC, Bujan B, Bonati LH, Arnold M, Schaedelin S, Müri RM, Hemkens LG, Michel P, Lyrer PA, Held JP, Ford GA, Luft AR, Traenka C, Engelter ST. Enhancement of STroke REhabilitation with Levodopa (ESTREL): Rationale and design of a randomized placebo-controlled, double blind superiority trial. Eur Stroke J 2024:23969873241255867. [PMID: 38853524 DOI: 10.1177/23969873241255867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Novel therapeutic approaches are needed in stroke recovery. Whether pharmacological therapies are beneficial for enhancing stroke recovery is unclear. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter involved in motor learning, reward, and brain plasticity. Its prodrug levodopa is a promising agent for stroke recovery. AIM AND HYPOTHESIS To investigate the hypothesis that levodopa, in addition to standardized rehabilitation therapy based on active task training, results in an enhancement of functional recovery in acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke patients compared to placebo. DESIGN ESTREL (Enhancement of Stroke REhabilitation with Levodopa) is a randomized (ratio 1:1), multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group superiority trial. PARTICIPANTS 610 participants (according to sample size calculation) with a clinically meaningful hemiparesis will be enrolled ⩽7 days after stroke onset. Key eligibility criteria include (i) in-hospital-rehabilitation required, (ii) capability to participate in rehabilitation, (iii) previous independence in daily living. INTERVENTION Levodopa 100 mg/carbidopa 25 mg three times daily, administered for 5 weeks in addition to standardized rehabilitation. The study intervention will be initiated within 7 days after stroke onset. COMPARISON Matching placebo plus standardized rehabilitation. OUTCOMES The primary outcome is the between-group difference of the Fugl-Meyer-Motor Assessment (FMMA) total score measured 3 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported health and wellbeing (PROMIS 10 and 29), patient-reported assessment of improvement, Rivermead Mobility Index, modified Rankin Scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and as measures of harm: mortality, recurrent stroke, and serious adverse events. CONCLUSION The ESTREL trial will provide evidence of whether the use of Levodopa in addition to standardized rehabilitation in stroke patients leads to better functional recovery compared to rehabilitation alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annaelle Zietz
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Josefin E Kaufmann
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Karin Wiesner
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sandro Kevin Fischer
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martina Wiegert
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Wilma Dj Verhagen-Kamerbeek
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Yannik Rottenberger
- Department of Neurology, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anne Schwarz
- Department of Neurology, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nils Peters
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Stroke Center, Klinik Hirslanden, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Henrik Gensicke
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Bartosz Bujan
- Neurorehabilitation, Klinik Lengg Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Leo H Bonati
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Research Department, Rheinfelden Rehabilitation Clinic, Switzerland
| | - Marcel Arnold
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Schaedelin
- Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - René M Müri
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lars G Hemkens
- Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Pragmatic Evidence Lab, Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin (METRIC-B), Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Patrik Michel
- Stroke Center, Service of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Philippe A Lyrer
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jeremia P Held
- Department of Neurology, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Rehabilitation Triemli Zurich, Valens Clinics, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gary A Ford
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andreas R Luft
- Department of Neurology, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Cereneo, Center for Neurology and Rehabilitation, Vitznau, Switzerland
| | - Christopher Traenka
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefan T Engelter
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leow LA, Jiang J, Bowers S, Zhang Y, Dux PE, Filmer HL. Intensity-dependent effects of tDCS on motor learning are related to dopamine. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:553-560. [PMID: 38604563 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), are popular methods for inducing neuroplastic changes to alter cognition and behaviour. One challenge for the field is to optimise stimulation protocols to maximise benefits. For this to happen, we need a better understanding of how stimulation modulates cortical functioning/behaviour. To date, there is increasing evidence for a dose-response relationship between tDCS and brain excitability, however how this relates to behaviour is not well understood. Even less is known about the neurochemical mechanisms which may drive the dose-response relationship between stimulation intensities and behaviour. Here, we examine the effect of three different tDCS stimulation intensities (1 mA, 2 mA, 4 mA anodal motor cortex tDCS) administered during the explicit learning of motor sequences. Further, to assess the role of dopamine in the dose-response relationship between tDCS intensities and behaviour, we examined how pharmacologically increasing dopamine availability, via 100 mg of levodopa, modulated the effect of stimulation on learning. In the absence of levodopa, we found that 4 mA tDCS improved and 1 mA tDCS impaired acquisition of motor sequences relative to sham stimulation. Conversely, levodopa reversed the beneficial effect of 4 mA tDCS. This effect of levodopa was no longer evident at the 48-h follow-up, consistent with previous work characterising the persistence of neuroplastic changes in the motor cortex resulting from combining levodopa with tDCS. These results provide the first direct evidence for a role of dopamine in the intensity-dependent effects of tDCS on behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Ann Leow
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia; Edith Cowan University, St Lucia, Australia.
| | - Jiaqin Jiang
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Samantha Bowers
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Yuhan Zhang
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Paul E Dux
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Hannah L Filmer
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Buck O, Found T, Weldon R, Lim LW, Aquili L. Dietary tyrosine consumption modulates the effects of tDCS, but not tRNS, on planning behaviour. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:572-574. [PMID: 38648971 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Buck
- College of Health and Education, School of Psychology, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia
| | - Tenielle Found
- College of Health and Education, School of Psychology, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia
| | - Rachel Weldon
- College of Health and Education, School of Psychology, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia
| | - Lee Wei Lim
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Luca Aquili
- College of Health and Education, School of Psychology, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sehatpour P, Kreither J, Lopez-Calderon J, Shastry AM, De Baun HM, Martinez A, Javitt DC. Network-level mechanisms underlying effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on visuomotor learning in schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry 2023; 13:360. [PMID: 37993420 PMCID: PMC10665365 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-023-02656-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Motor learning is a fundamental skill to our daily lives. Dysfunction in motor performance in schizophrenia (Sz) has been associated with poor social and functional outcomes. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive electrical brain stimulation approach, can influence underlying brain function with potential for improving motor learning in Sz. We used a well-established Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) to study motor learning, in combination with simultaneous tDCS and EEG recording, to investigate mechanisms of motor and procedural learning deficits in Sz, and to develop refined non-invasive brain stimulation approaches to improve neurocognitive dysfunction. We recruited 27 individuals with Sz and 21 healthy controls (HC). Individuals performed the SRTT task as they received sham and active tDCS with simultaneous EEG recording. Reaction time (RT), neuropsychological, and measures of global functioning were assessed. SRTT performance was significantly impaired in Sz and showed significant correlations with motor-related and working memory measures as well as global function. Source-space time-frequency decomposition of EEG showed beta-band coherence across supplementary-motor, primary-motor and visual cortex forming a network involved in SRTT performance. Motor-cathodal and visual-cathodal stimulations resulted in significant modulation in coherence particularly across the motor-visual nodes of the network accompanied by significant improvement in motor learning in both controls and patients. Here, we confirm earlier reports of SRTT impairment in Sz and demonstrate significant reversal of the deficits with tDCS. The findings support continued development of tDCS for enhancement of plasticity-based interventions in Sz, as well as source-space EEG analytic approaches for evaluating underlying neural mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pejman Sehatpour
- Division of Experimental Therapeutics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Schizophrenia Research Division, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
| | - Johanna Kreither
- PIA Ciencias Cognitivas, Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Cognitivas, Facultad de Psicología, and Laboratorio de Neurofisiología, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile
| | | | - Adithya M Shastry
- Division of Experimental Therapeutics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Heloise M De Baun
- Division of Experimental Therapeutics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Antigona Martinez
- Division of Experimental Therapeutics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Schizophrenia Research Division, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA
| | - Daniel C Javitt
- Division of Experimental Therapeutics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Schizophrenia Research Division, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kuo HI, Hsieh MH, Lin YT, Nitsche MA. Acute Aerobic Exercise at Different Intensities Modulates Motor Learning Performance and Cortical Excitability in Sedentary Individuals. eNeuro 2023; 10:ENEURO.0182-23.2023. [PMID: 37932044 PMCID: PMC10668209 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0182-23.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Converging evidence indicates the beneficial effects of aerobic exercise on motor learning performance. Underlying mechanisms might be an impact of aerobic exercise on neuroplasticity and cortical excitability. Evidence suggests that motor learning and cortical excitability alterations correlate with the intensity of aerobic exercise and the activity level of participants. Thus, this study aims to investigate the effects of different aerobic exercise intensities on motor learning and cortical excitability in sedentary individuals. The study was conducted in a crossover and double-blind design. Twenty-six healthy sedentary individuals (13 women and 13 men) performed a motor learning task and received a cortical excitability assessment before and after a single session of low-, moderate-, and high-intensity aerobic exercise or a control intervention. The study revealed that motor learning performance and cortical excitability were significantly enhanced in the moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, compared with the other conditions. These findings suggest aerobic exercise intensity-dependent effects on motor learning in sedentary adults. The underlying mechanism might be an exercised-induced alteration of cortical excitability, specifically a reduction of GABA activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiao-I Kuo
- School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10055, Taiwan
- Department of Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 10055, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Hsien Hsieh
- Department of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 10055, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Ting Lin
- Department of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 10055, Taiwan
| | - Michael A Nitsche
- Department Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors, 44139 Dortmund, Germany
- Bielefeld University, University Hospital OWL, Protestant Hospital of Bethel Foundation, University Clinic of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy and University Clinic of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leow LA, Marcos A, Nielsen E, Sewell D, Ballard T, Dux PE, Filmer HL. Dopamine Alters the Effect of Brain Stimulation on Decision-Making. J Neurosci 2023; 43:6909-6919. [PMID: 37648451 PMCID: PMC10573748 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1140-23.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), show promise in treating a range of psychiatric and neurologic conditions. However, optimization of such applications requires a better understanding of how tDCS alters cognition and behavior. Existing evidence implicates dopamine in tDCS alterations of brain activity and plasticity; however, there is as yet no causal evidence for a role of dopamine in tDCS effects on cognition and behavior. Here, in a preregistered, double-blinded study, we examined how pharmacologically manipulating dopamine altered the effect of tDCS on the speed-accuracy trade-off, which taps ubiquitous strategic operations. Cathodal tDCS was delivered over the left prefrontal cortex and the superior medial frontal cortex before participants (N = 62, 24 males, 38 females) completed a dot-motion task, making judgments on the direction of a field of moving dots under instructions to emphasize speed, accuracy, or both. We leveraged computational modeling to uncover how our interventions altered latent decisional processes driving the speed-accuracy trade-off. We show that dopamine in combination with tDCS (but not tDCS alone nor dopamine alone) not only impaired decision accuracy but also impaired discriminability, which suggests that these manipulations altered the encoding or representation of discriminative evidence. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first direct evidence implicating dopamine in the way tDCS affects cognition and behavior.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT tDCS can improve cognitive and behavioral impairments in clinical conditions; however, a better understanding of its mechanisms is required to optimize future clinical applications. Here, using a pharmacological approach to manipulate brain dopamine levels in healthy adults, we demonstrate a role for dopamine in the effects of tDCS in the speed-accuracy trade-off, a strategic cognitive process ubiquitous in many contexts. In doing so, we provide direct evidence implicating dopamine in the way tDCS affects cognition and behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Ann Leow
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia
| | - Anjeli Marcos
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia
| | - Esteban Nielsen
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia
| | - David Sewell
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia
| | - Timothy Ballard
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia
| | - Paul E Dux
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia
| | - Hannah L Filmer
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vergallito A, Varoli E, Pisoni A, Mattavelli G, Del Mauro L, Feroldi S, Vallar G, Romero Lauro LJ. State-dependent effectiveness of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical excitability. Neuroimage 2023; 277:120242. [PMID: 37348625 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The extensive use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in experimental and clinical settings does not correspond to an in-depth understanding of its underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. In previous studies, we employed an integrated system of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) to track the effect of tDCS on cortical excitability. At rest, anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) over the right Posterior Parietal Cortex (rPPC) elicits a widespread increase in cortical excitability. In contrast, cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) fails to modulate cortical excitability, being indistinguishable from sham stimulation. Here we investigated whether an endogenous task-induced activation during stimulation might change this pattern, improving c-tDCS effectiveness in modulating cortical excitability. In Experiment 1, we tested whether performance in a Visuospatial Working Memory Task (VWMT) and a modified Posner Cueing Task (mPCT), involving rPPC, could be modulated by c-tDCS. Thirty-eight participants were involved in a two-session experiment receiving either c-tDCS or sham during tasks execution. In Experiment 2, we recruited sixteen novel participants who performed the same paradigm but underwent TMS-EEG recordings pre- and 10 min post- sham stimulation and c-tDCS. Behavioral results showed that c-tDCS significantly modulated mPCT performance compared to sham. At a neurophysiological level, c-tDCS significantly reduced cortical excitability in a frontoparietal network likely involved in task execution. Taken together, our results provide evidence of the state dependence of c-tDCS in modulating cortical excitability effectively. The conceptual and applicative implications are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Vergallito
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy; NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milano, Italy.
| | - Erica Varoli
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Alberto Pisoni
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy; NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milano, Italy
| | - Giulia Mattavelli
- IUSS Cognitive Neuroscience (ICON) Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, Pavia, Italy; Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory of Pavia Institute, 27100, Italy
| | - Lilia Del Mauro
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
| | - Sarah Feroldi
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vallar
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy; NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milano, Italy; MiBTec - Mind and Behavior Technological Center, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonor J Romero Lauro
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy; NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Passera B, Harquel S, Chauvin A, Gérard P, Lai L, Moro E, Meoni S, Fraix V, David O, Raffin E. Multi-scale and cross-dimensional TMS mapping: A proof of principle in patients with Parkinson's disease and deep brain stimulation. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1004763. [PMID: 37214390 PMCID: PMC10192635 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1004763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping has become a critical tool for exploratory studies of the human corticomotor (M1) organization. Here, we propose to gather existing cutting-edge TMS-EMG and TMS-EEG approaches into a combined multi-dimensional TMS mapping that considers local and whole-brain excitability changes as well as state and time-specific changes in cortical activity. We applied this multi-dimensional TMS mapping approach to patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the sub-thalamic nucleus (STN) ON and OFF. Our goal was to identifying one or several TMS mapping-derived markers that could provide unprecedent new insights onto the mechanisms of DBS in movement disorders. Methods Six PD patients (1 female, mean age: 62.5 yo [59-65]) implanted with DBS-STN for 1 year, underwent a robotized sulcus-shaped TMS motor mapping to measure changes in muscle-specific corticomotor representations and a movement initiation task to probe state-dependent modulations of corticospinal excitability in the ON (using clinically relevant DBS parameters) and OFF DBS states. Cortical excitability and evoked dynamics of three cortical areas involved in the neural control of voluntary movements (M1, pre-supplementary motor area - preSMA and inferior frontal gyrus - IFG) were then mapped using TMS-EEG coupling in the ON and OFF state. Lastly, we investigated the timing and nature of the STN-to-M1 inputs using a paired pulse DBS-TMS-EEG protocol. Results In our sample of patients, DBS appeared to induce fast within-area somatotopic re-arrangements of motor finger representations in M1, as revealed by mediolateral shifts of corticomuscle representations. STN-DBS improved reaction times while up-regulating corticospinal excitability, especially during endogenous motor preparation. Evoked dynamics revealed marked increases in inhibitory circuits in the IFG and M1 with DBS ON. Finally, inhibitory conditioning effects of STN single pulses on corticomotor activity were found at timings relevant for the activation of inhibitory GABAergic receptors (4 and 20 ms). Conclusion Taken together, these results suggest a predominant role of some markers in explaining beneficial DBS effects, such as a context-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability and the recruitment of distinct inhibitory circuits, involving long-range projections from higher level motor centers and local GABAergic neuronal populations. These combined measures might help to identify discriminative features of DBS mechanisms towards deep clinical phenotyping of DBS effects in Parkinson's Disease and in other pathological conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brice Passera
- CNRS UMR 5105, Laboratoire Psychologie et Neurocognition, LPNC, Grenoble, France
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Sylvain Harquel
- CNRS UMR 5105, Laboratoire Psychologie et Neurocognition, LPNC, Grenoble, France
- CNRS, INSERM, IRMaGe, Grenoble, France
- Defitech Chair in Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute and Brain Mind Institute, EPFL, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alan Chauvin
- CNRS UMR 5105, Laboratoire Psychologie et Neurocognition, LPNC, Grenoble, France
| | - Pauline Gérard
- CNRS UMR 5105, Laboratoire Psychologie et Neurocognition, LPNC, Grenoble, France
| | - Lisa Lai
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Elena Moro
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Sara Meoni
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Valerie Fraix
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Olivier David
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
- Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, U1106, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France
| | - Estelle Raffin
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
- Defitech Chair in Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute and Brain Mind Institute, EPFL, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guerra A, Colella D, Cannavacciuolo A, Giangrosso M, Paparella G, Fabbrini G, Berardelli A, Bologna M. Short-term plasticity of the motor cortex compensates for bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Dis 2023; 182:106137. [PMID: 37120094 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) show impaired short-term potentiation (STP) mechanisms in the primary motor cortex (M1). However, the role played by this neurophysiological abnormality in bradykinesia pathophysiology is unknown. In this study, we used a multimodal neuromodulation approach to test whether defective STP contributes to bradykinesia. We evaluated STP by measuring motor-evoked potential facilitation during 5 Hz-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and assessed repetitive finger tapping movements through kinematic techniques. Also, we used transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to drive M1 oscillations and experimentally modulate bradykinesia. STP was assessed during tACS delivered at beta (β) and gamma (γ) frequency, and during sham-tACS. Data were compared to those recorded in a group of healthy subjects. In PD, we found that STP was impaired during sham- and γ-tACS, while it was restored during β-tACS. Importantly, the degree of STP impairment was associated with the severity of movement slowness and amplitude reduction. Moreover, β-tACS-related improvements in STP were linked to changes in movement slowness and intracortical GABA-A-ergic inhibition during stimulation, as assessed by short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI). Patients with prominent STP amelioration had greater SICI reduction (cortical disinhibition) and less slowness worsening during β-tACS. Dopaminergic medications did not modify β-tACS effects. These data demonstrate that abnormal STP processes are involved in bradykinesia pathophysiology and return to normal levels when β oscillations increase. STP changes are likely mediated by modifications in GABA-A-ergic intracortical circuits and may represent a compensatory mechanism against β-induced bradykinesia in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Guerra
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS 86077, Italy; Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00185, Italy
| | - Donato Colella
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00185, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Giovanni Fabbrini
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS 86077, Italy; Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00185, Italy
| | - Alfredo Berardelli
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS 86077, Italy; Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00185, Italy
| | - Matteo Bologna
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS 86077, Italy; Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00185, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
D'Urso G, Toscano E, Barone A, Palermo M, Dell'Osso B, Di Lorenzo G, Mantovani A, Martinotti G, Fornaro M, Iasevoli F, de Bartolomeis A. Transcranial direct current stimulation for bipolar depression: systematic reviews of clinical evidence and biological underpinnings. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2023; 121:110672. [PMID: 36332699 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Despite multiple available treatments for bipolar depression (BD), many patients face sub-optimal responses. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been advocated in the management of different conditions, including BD, especially in treatment-resistant cases. The optimal dose and timing of tDCS, the mutual influence with other concurrently administered interventions, long-term efficacy, overall safety, and biological underpinnings nonetheless deserve additional assessment. The present study appraised the existing clinical evidence about tDCS for bipolar depression, delving into the putative biological underpinnings with a special emphasis on cellular and molecular levels, with the ultimate goal of providing a translational perspective on the matter. Two separate systematic reviews across the PubMed database since inception up to August 8th 2022 were performed, with fourteen clinical and nineteen neurobiological eligible studies. The included clinical studies encompass 207 bipolar depression patients overall and consistently document the efficacy of tDCS, with a reduction in depression scores after treatment ranging from 18% to 92%. The RCT with the largest sample clearly showed a significant superiority of active stimulation over sham. Mild-to-moderate and transient adverse effects are attributed to tDCS across these studies. The review of neurobiological literature indicates that several molecular mechanisms may account for the antidepressant effect of tDCS in BD patients, including the action on calcium homeostasis in glial cells, the enhancement of LTP, the regulation of neurotrophic factors and inflammatory mediators, and the modulation of the expression of plasticity-related genes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on the matter to concurrently provide a synthesis of the clinical evidence and an in-depth appraisal of the putative biological underpinnings, providing consistent support for the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tDCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giordano D'Urso
- Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Unit of Psychiatry and Psychology, Unit of Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Clinical Department of Head and Neck, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
| | - Elena Toscano
- Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Unit of Psychiatry and Psychology, Unit of Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Clinical Department of Head and Neck, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Annarita Barone
- Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Unit of Psychiatry and Psychology, Unit of Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Clinical Department of Head and Neck, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Mario Palermo
- Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Unit of Psychiatry and Psychology, Unit of Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Clinical Department of Head and Neck, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Bernardo Dell'Osso
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi Sacco, Ospedale Luigi Sacco Polo Universitario, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Bipolar Disorders Clinic, Stanford University, CA, USA; CRC "Aldo Ravelli" for Neuro-technology & Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Di Lorenzo
- Laboratory of Psychophysiology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Italy; Psychiatric and Clinical Psychology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Mantovani
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Scienze della Salute "V. Tiberio" Università degli Studi del Molise, Campobasso, Italy; Dipartimento di Salute Mentale e delle Dipendenze, Azienda Sanitaria Regionale del Molise (ASReM), Campobasso, Italy
| | - Giovanni Martinotti
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging, Clinical Sciences, University Gabriele d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy; Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacology, Clinical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Herts, UK
| | - Michele Fornaro
- Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Unit of Psychiatry and Psychology, Unit of Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Clinical Department of Head and Neck, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Felice Iasevoli
- Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Unit of Psychiatry and Psychology, Unit of Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Clinical Department of Head and Neck, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Andrea de Bartolomeis
- Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Unit of Psychiatry and Psychology, Unit of Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Clinical Department of Head and Neck, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhou K, Zhou Y, Zeng Y, Zhang J, Cai X, Qin J, Li Z, Yan F. Research Hotspots and Global Trends of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke: A Bibliometric Analysis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2023; 19:601-613. [PMID: 36950717 PMCID: PMC10025138 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s400923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Transcranial direct current stimulation has been widely used in the clinical treatment of stroke. The purpose of this study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of scientific literature in this field. Methods Articles and reviews regarding transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke from January 01, 2004 to May 31, 2022 were identified from the Science Citation Index-Expanded of the Web of Science Core Collection database. CiteSpace 6.1.R2, Bibliometrix and the Bibliometric Online Analysis Platform were used to analyze data. Results A total of 905 papers were obtained, with the highest number of publications coming from the USA. The institutions and authors with the most publications were Harvard Medical School and Fregni F respectively. Nitsche MA had the most co-citations, followed by Fregni F. Neurosciences was the most fruitful research area and Brain Stimulation had the highest H-index. The research topics could be divided into three sections: mechanisms of treatment, comparison of efficacy with transcranial magnetic stimulation, clinical application of post-stroke dysfunction. The field of "walking", "strength" and "virtual reality therapy" are the future research hotspots of transcranial direct current stimulation. Conclusion The overall research showed a slow growth trend, and the outstanding contribution of the USA in this field cannot be ignored. Relevant researchers are suggested to focus on international collaboration and actively conduct high-quality randomized controlled clinical trials on research hotspots and frontiers in order to identify the optimal stimulation paradigm for clinical purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kebing Zhou
- School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yu Zhou
- Department of Rehabilitation, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuena Zeng
- School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiahui Zhang
- School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyan Cai
- School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jieying Qin
- School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhiying Li
- School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fengxia Yan
- School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Fengxia Yan; Jiahui Zhang, School of Nursing, Jinan University, 601 Huangpu Avenue West, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510632, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-20-85225836, Fax +86-20-8522227, Email ;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Westwood SJ, Criaud M, Lam SL, Lukito S, Wallace-Hanlon S, Kowalczyk OS, Kostara A, Mathew J, Agbedjro D, Wexler BE, Cohen Kadosh R, Asherson P, Rubia K. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with cognitive training in adolescent boys with ADHD: a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Psychol Med 2023; 53:497-512. [PMID: 34225830 PMCID: PMC9899574 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291721001859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could be a side-effect-free alternative to psychostimulants in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although there is limited evidence for clinical and cognitive effects, most studies were small, single-session and stimulated left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). No sham-controlled study has stimulated the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC), which is the most consistently under-functioning region in ADHD, with multiple anodal-tDCS sessions combined with cognitive training (CT) to enhance effects. Thus, we investigated the clinical and cognitive effects of multi-session anodal-tDCS over rIFC combined with CT in double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial (RCT, ISRCTN48265228). METHODS Fifty boys with ADHD (10-18 years) received 15 weekday sessions of anodal- or sham-tDCS over rIFC combined with CT (20 min, 1 mA). ANCOVA, adjusting for baseline measures, age and medication status, tested group differences in clinical and ADHD-relevant executive functions at posttreatment and after 6 months. RESULTS ADHD-Rating Scale, Conners ADHD Index and adverse effects were significantly lower at post-treatment after sham relative to anodal tDCS. No other effects were significant. CONCLUSIONS This rigorous and largest RCT of tDCS in adolescent boys with ADHD found no evidence of improved ADHD symptoms or cognitive performance following multi-session anodal tDCS over rIFC combined with CT. These findings extend limited meta-analytic evidence of cognitive and clinical effects in ADHD after 1-5 tDCS sessions over mainly left dlPFC. Given that tDCS is commercially and clinically available, the findings are important as they suggest that rIFC stimulation may not be indicated as a neurotherapy for cognitive or clinical remediation for ADHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J. Westwood
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Marion Criaud
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sheut-Ling Lam
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Steve Lukito
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Olivia S. Kowalczyk
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Neuroimaging, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Afroditi Kostara
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph Mathew
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Bruce E. Wexler
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Roi Cohen Kadosh
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Philip Asherson
- Social Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Katya Rubia
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wu C, Yang L, Feng S, Zhu L, Yang L, Liu TCY, Duan R. Therapeutic non-invasive brain treatments in Alzheimer's disease: recent advances and challenges. Inflamm Regen 2022; 42:31. [PMID: 36184623 PMCID: PMC9527145 DOI: 10.1186/s41232-022-00216-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the major neurodegenerative diseases and the most common form of dementia. Characterized by the loss of learning, memory, problem-solving, language, and other thinking abilities, AD exerts a detrimental effect on both patients' and families' quality of life. Although there have been significant advances in understanding the mechanism underlying the pathogenesis and progression of AD, there is no cure for AD. The failure of numerous molecular targeted pharmacologic clinical trials leads to an emerging research shift toward non-invasive therapies, especially multiple targeted non-invasive treatments. In this paper, we reviewed the advances of the most widely studied non-invasive therapies, including photobiomodulation (PBM), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and exercise therapy. Firstly, we reviewed the pathological changes of AD and the challenges for AD studies. We then introduced these non-invasive therapies and discussed the factors that may affect the effects of these therapies. Additionally, we review the effects of these therapies and the possible mechanisms underlying these effects. Finally, we summarized the challenges of the non-invasive treatments in future AD studies and clinical applications. We concluded that it would be critical to understand the exact underlying mechanisms and find the optimal treatment parameters to improve the translational value of these non-invasive therapies. Moreover, the combined use of non-invasive treatments is also a promising research direction for future studies and sheds light on the future treatment or prevention of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chongyun Wu
- Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Sports Science, School of Physical Education and Sports Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Luoman Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital (PUTH), Beijing, 100083, China
| | - Shu Feng
- Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Sports Science, School of Physical Education and Sports Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Ling Zhu
- Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Sports Science, School of Physical Education and Sports Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Luodan Yang
- Department of Neurology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA. .,Department of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
| | - Timon Cheng-Yi Liu
- Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Sports Science, School of Physical Education and Sports Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
| | - Rui Duan
- Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Sports Science, School of Physical Education and Sports Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Westwood SJ, Bozhilova N, Criaud M, Lam SL, Lukito S, Wallace-Hanlon S, Kowalczyk OS, Kostara A, Mathew J, Wexler BE, Kadosh RC, Asherson P, Rubia K. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with cognitive training on EEG spectral power in adolescent boys with ADHD: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. IBRO Neurosci Rep 2022; 12:55-64. [PMID: 35746969 PMCID: PMC9210460 DOI: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a possible alternative to psychostimulants in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), but its mechanisms of action in children and adolescents with ADHD are poorly understood. We conducted the first 15-session, sham-controlled study of anodal tDCS over right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC) combined with cognitive training (CT) in 50 children/adolescents with ADHD. We investigated the mechanisms of action on resting and Go/No-Go Task-based QEEG measures in a subgroup of 23 participants with ADHD (n, sham = 10; anodal tDCS = 13). We failed to find a significant sham versus anodal tDCS group differences in QEEG spectral power during rest and Go/No-Go Task performance, a correlation between QEEG and Go/No-Go Task performance, and changes in clinical and cognitive measures. These findings extend the non-significant clinical and cognitive effects in our sample of 50 children/adolescents with ADHD. Given that the subgroup of 23 participants would have been underpowered, the interpretation of our findings is limited and should be used as a foundation for future investigations. Larger, adequately powered randomized controlled trials should explore different protocols titrated to the individual and using comprehensive measures to assess cognitive, clinical, and neural effects of tDCS and its underlying mechanisms of action in ADHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J. Westwood
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
- School of Psychology, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY UK
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Science, University of Westminster, London W1W 6UW, UK
- Correspondence to: Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry - PO85 Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King’s College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.
| | - Natali Bozhilova
- Social Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
- School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
- Correspondence to: School of Psychology Elizabeth Fry Building, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.
| | - Marion Criaud
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
| | - Sheut-Ling Lam
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
| | - Steve Lukito
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
| | - Sophie Wallace-Hanlon
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
- School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
| | - Olivia S. Kowalczyk
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
| | - Afroditi Kostara
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
| | - Joseph Mathew
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
| | - Bruce E. Wexler
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 06520–8096, USA
| | - Roi Cohen Kadosh
- School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
| | - Philip Asherson
- Social Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
| | - Katya Rubia
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Inter-Individual Variability in tDCS Effects: A Narrative Review on the Contribution of Stable, Variable, and Contextual Factors. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12050522. [PMID: 35624908 PMCID: PMC9139102 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12050522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Due to its safety, portability, and cheapness, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) use largely increased in research and clinical settings. Despite tDCS’s wide application, previous works pointed out inconsistent and low replicable results, sometimes leading to extreme conclusions about tDCS’s ineffectiveness in modulating behavioral performance across cognitive domains. Traditionally, this variability has been linked to significant differences in the stimulation protocols across studies, including stimulation parameters, target regions, and electrodes montage. Here, we reviewed and discussed evidence of heterogeneity emerging at the intra-study level, namely inter-individual differences that may influence the response to tDCS within each study. This source of variability has been largely neglected by literature, being results mainly analyzed at the group level. Previous research, however, highlighted that only a half—or less—of studies’ participants could be classified as responders, being affected by tDCS in the expected direction. Stable and variable inter-individual differences, such as morphological and genetic features vs. hormonal/exogenous substance consumption, partially account for this heterogeneity. Moreover, variability comes from experiments’ contextual elements, such as participants’ engagement/baseline capacity and individual task difficulty. We concluded that increasing knowledge on inter-dividual differences rather than undermining tDCS effectiveness could enhance protocols’ efficiency and reproducibility.
Collapse
|
17
|
Kolmančič K, Zupančič NK, Trošt M, Flisar D, Kramberger MG, Pirtošek Z, Kojović M. Continuous Dopaminergic Stimulation Improves Cortical Maladaptive Changes in Advanced Parkinson's Disease. Mov Disord 2022; 37:1465-1473. [PMID: 35436354 DOI: 10.1002/mds.29028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the progression of Parkinson's disease (PD), pulsatile treatment with oral levodopa causes maladaptive changes within basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuits, which are clinically expressed as motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. At the level of the motor cortex, these changes may be detected using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), as abnormal corticospinal and intracortical excitability and absent response to plasticity protocols. OBJECTIVE We investigated the effect of continuous dopaminergic stimulation on cortical maladaptive changes related to oral levodopa treatment. METHODS Twenty patients with advanced PD were tested using TMS within 1 week before and again 6 months after the introduction of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel. We measured resting and active motor thresholds, input/output curve, short interval intracortical inhibition curve, cortical silent period, and response to intermittent theta burst stimulation. Patients were clinically assessed with Part III and Part IV of the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. RESULTS Six months after the introduction of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, motor fluctuations scores (P = 0.001) and dyskinesias scores (P < 0.001) were reduced. Resting and active motor threshold (P = 0.012 and P = 0.015) and x-intercept of input/output curve (P = 0.005) were also decreased, while short-interval intracortical inhibition and response to intermittent theta bust stimulation were improved (P = 0.026 and P = 0.031, respectively). Changes in these parameters correlated with clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS In patients with advanced PD, switching from intermittent to continuous levodopa delivery increased corticospinal excitability and improved deficient intracortical inhibition and abnormal motor cortex plasticity, along with amelioration of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Continuous dopaminergic stimulation ameliorates maladaptive changes inflicted by chronic pulsatile dopaminergic stimulation. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaja Kolmančič
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nina K Zupančič
- Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maja Trošt
- Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dušan Flisar
- Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Milica G Kramberger
- Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Zvezdan Pirtošek
- Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maja Kojović
- Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ghanavati E, Salehinejad MA, De Melo L, Nitsche MA, Kuo MF. NMDA receptor-related mechanisms of dopaminergic modulation of tDCS-induced neuroplasticity. Cereb Cortex 2022; 32:5478-5488. [PMID: 35165699 PMCID: PMC9712712 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Dopamine is a key neuromodulator of neuroplasticity and an important neuronal substrate of learning, and memory formation, which critically involves glutamatergic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Dopamine modulates NMDA receptor activity via dopamine D1 and D2 receptor subtypes. It is hypothesized that dopamine focuses on long-term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity, i.e. reduces diffuse widespread but enhances locally restricted plasticity via a D2 receptor-dependent NMDA receptor activity reduction. Here, we explored NMDA receptor-dependent mechanisms underlying dopaminergic modulation of LTP-like plasticity induced by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Eleven healthy, right-handed volunteers received anodal tDCS (1 mA, 13 min) over the left motor cortex combined with dopaminergic agents (the D2 receptor agonist bromocriptine, levodopa for general dopamine enhancement, or placebo) and the partial NMDA receptor agonist D-cycloserine (dosages of 50, 100, and 200 mg, or placebo). Cortical excitability was monitored by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potentials. We found that LTP-like plasticity was abolished or converted into LTD-like plasticity via dopaminergic activation, but reestablished under medium-dose D-cycloserine. These results suggest that diffuse LTP-like plasticity is counteracted upon via D2 receptor-dependent reduction of NMDA receptor activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elham Ghanavati
- Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystr. 67, 44139 Dortmund, Germany
| | - Mohammad Ali Salehinejad
- Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystr. 67, 44139 Dortmund, Germany
| | - Lorena De Melo
- Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystr. 67, 44139 Dortmund, Germany,International Graduate School of Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstr. 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Min-Fang Kuo
- Corresponding address: Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystr 67, 44139 Dortmund, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bell SB, Turner B, Sawaki L, DeWall N. When brain stimulation backfires: the effects of prefrontal cortex stimulation on impulsivity. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2022; 17:101-108. [PMID: 32342101 PMCID: PMC8824560 DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can sometimes cause the opposite of its intended effect. These reverse effects may be related in part to individual differences in personality and neurochemistry. Previous studies have demonstrated that dopamine levels can impact the effects of tDCS. In the present study, 124 healthy participants took the UPPS impulsive behavior scale. Participants then underwent a single, randomized anodal or sham tDCS session on the prefrontal cortex. While the effects of tDCS were still active, they performed the Stop Signal Task, a measure of state impulsivity. tDCS was associated with increased errors on this task in people who had higher scores on the UPPS in two facets of impulsivity that correlate with dopamine levels. tDCS had no effects on people who are low in trait impulsivity. These results suggest that the reverse effects of tDCS could be associated with inter-individual differences in personality and neurochemistry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Beth Bell
- School of Community Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Tulsa, OK 74135, USA
| | - Brian Turner
- Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
| | - Lumy Sawaki
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
| | - Nathan DeWall
- Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hansen CA, Miller DR, Annarumma S, Rusch CT, Ramirez-Zamora A, Khoshbouei H. Levodopa-induced dyskinesia: a historical review of Parkinson's disease, dopamine, and modern advancements in research and treatment. J Neurol 2022; 269:2892-2909. [PMID: 35039902 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-10963-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Over the past two decades, animal models of Parkinson's disease (PD) have helped to determine the plausible underlying mechanism of levo-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA)-induced dyskinesia following L-DOPA treatment. However, our understanding of the mechanisms related to this phenomenon remains incomplete. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive review of treatment protocols used for assessing the occurrence of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia, L-DOPA absorption, distribution, drug/food interaction, and discuss current strategies and future directions. This review offers a historical perspective using L-DOPA in animal models of PD and the occurrence of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carissa A Hansen
- Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Douglas R Miller
- Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Stephanie Annarumma
- Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Carley T Rusch
- Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.,Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Habibeh Khoshbouei
- Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
da Silva Machado CB, da Silva LM, Gonçalves AF, Andrade PRD, Mendes CKTT, de Assis TJCF, Godeiro Júnior CDO, Andrade SM. Multisite non-invasive brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: A scoping review. NeuroRehabilitation 2021; 49:515-531. [PMID: 34776426 PMCID: PMC8764602 DOI: 10.3233/nre-210190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, characterized by cardinal motor symptoms in addition to cognitive impairment. New insights concerning multisite non-invasive brain stimulation effects have been gained, which can now be used to develop innovative treatment approaches. OBJECTIVE: Map the researchs involving multisite non-invasive brain stimulation in PD, synthesize the available evidence and discuss future directions. METHODS: The databases PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS and The Cochrane Library were searched from inception until April 2020, without restrictions on the date of publication or the language in which it was published. The reviewers worked in pairs and sequentially evaluated the titles, abstracts and then the full text of all publications identified as potentially relevant. RESULTS: Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria. The target brain regions included mainly the combination of a motor and a frontal area, such as stimulation of the primary motor córtex associated with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Most of the trials showed that this modality was only more effective for the motor component, or for the cognitive and/or non-motor, separately. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the results being encouraging for the use of the multisite aproach, the indication for PD management should be carried out with caution and deserves scientific deepening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Clécio de Oliveira Godeiro Júnior
- Division of Neurology, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Alpes University, La Tronche, Grenoble, France.,Division of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Onofre Lopes, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pol F, Salehinejad MA, Baharlouei H, Nitsche MA. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on gait in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Transl Neurodegener 2021; 10:22. [PMID: 34183062 PMCID: PMC8240267 DOI: 10.1186/s40035-021-00245-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gait problems are an important symptom in Parkinson’s disease (PD), a progressive neurodegenerative disease. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulatory intervention that can modulate cortical excitability of the gait-related regions. Despite an increasing number of gait-related tDCS studies in PD, the efficacy of this technique for improving gait has not been systematically investigated yet. Here, we aimed to systematically explore the effects of tDCS on gait in PD, based on available experimental studies. Methods Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) approach, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PEDro databases were searched for randomized clinical trials assessing the effect of tDCS on gait in patients with PD. Results Eighteen studies were included in this systematic review. Overall, tDCS targeting the motor cortex and supplementary motor area bilaterally seems to be promising for gait rehabilitation in PD. Studies of tDCS targeting the dorosolateral prefrontal cortex or cerebellum showed more heterogeneous results. More studies are needed to systematically compare the efficacy of different tDCS protocols, including protocols applying tDCS alone and/or in combination with conventional gait rehabilitation treatment in PD. Conclusions tDCS is a promising intervention approach to improving gait in PD. Anodal tDCS over the motor areas has shown a positive effect on gait, but stimulation of other areas is less promising. However, the heterogeneities of methods and results have made it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Therefore, systematic explorations of tDCS protocols are required to optimize the efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fateme Pol
- Musculoskeletal Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Ali Salehinejad
- Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Hamzeh Baharlouei
- Musculoskeletal Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
| | - Michael A Nitsche
- Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Medical Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Inhibitory Effect of Apomorphine on Focal and Nonfocal Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:pharmaceutics13050718. [PMID: 34068263 PMCID: PMC8153161 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Dopamine is crucial for neuroplasticity, which is considered to be the neurophysiological foundation of learning and memory. The specific effect of dopamine on plasticity such as long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) is determined by receptor subtype specificity, concentration level, and the kind of plasticity induction technique. In healthy human subjects, the dopamine precursor levodopa (L-DOPA) exerts a dosage-dependent non-linear effect on motor cortex plasticity. Low and high dosage L-DOPA impaired or abolished plasticity, while medium-dose preserved and reversed plasticity in previous studies. Similar dosage-dependent effects were also observed for selective D1-like and D2-like receptor activation that favor excitatory and inhibitory plasticity, respectively. However, such a dosage-dependent effect has not been explored for a nonselective dopamine agonist such as apomorphine in humans. To this aim, nonfocal and focal motor cortex plasticity induction using paired associative stimulation (PAS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) were performed respectively in healthy participants under 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mg apomorphine or placebo drug. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-elicited motor-evoked potentials were used to monitor motor cortical excitability alterations. We hypothesized that, similar to L-DOPA, apomorphine will affect motor cortex plasticity. The results showed that apomorphine with the applied dosages has an inhibitory effect for focal and nonfocal LTP-like and LTD-like plasticity, which was either abolished, diminished or reversed. The detrimental effect on plasticity induction under all dosages of apomorphine suggests a predominantly presynaptic mechanism of action of these dosages.
Collapse
|
24
|
Hordacre B, McCambridge AB, Ridding MC, Bradnam LV. Can Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhance Poststroke Motor Recovery? Development of a Theoretical Patient-Tailored Model. Neurology 2021; 97:170-180. [PMID: 33986136 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
New treatments that can facilitate neural repair and reduce persistent impairments have significant value in promoting recovery following stroke. One technique that has gained interest is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as early research suggested it could enhance plasticity and enable greater behavioral recovery. However, several studies have now identified substantial intersubject variability in response to tDCS and clinical trials revealed insufficient evidence of treatment effectiveness. A possible explanation for the varied and negative findings is that the physiologic model of stroke recovery that researchers have used to guide the application of tDCS-based treatments in stroke is overly simplistic and does not account for stroke heterogeneity or known determinants that affect the tDCS response. Here, we propose that tDCS could have a more clearly beneficial role in enhancing stroke recovery if greater consideration is given to individualizing treatment. By critically reviewing the proposed mechanisms of tDCS, stroke physiology across the recovery continuum, and known determinants of tDCS response, we propose a new, theoretical, patient-tailored approach to delivering tDCS after stroke. The proposed model includes a step-by-step principled selection strategy for identifying optimal neuromodulation targets and outlines key areas for further investigation. Tailoring tDCS treatment to individual neuroanatomy and physiology is likely our best chance at producing robust and meaningful clinical benefit for people with stroke and would therefore accelerate opportunities for clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenton Hordacre
- From Innovation, Implementation and Clinical Translation in Health (IIMPACT in Health) (B.H., M.C.R.), Allied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide; Graduate School of Health, Discipline of Physiotherapy (A.B.M.), University of Technology Sydney, Australia; and Department of Exercise Sciences (L.V.B.), University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Alana B McCambridge
- From Innovation, Implementation and Clinical Translation in Health (IIMPACT in Health) (B.H., M.C.R.), Allied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide; Graduate School of Health, Discipline of Physiotherapy (A.B.M.), University of Technology Sydney, Australia; and Department of Exercise Sciences (L.V.B.), University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Michael C Ridding
- From Innovation, Implementation and Clinical Translation in Health (IIMPACT in Health) (B.H., M.C.R.), Allied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide; Graduate School of Health, Discipline of Physiotherapy (A.B.M.), University of Technology Sydney, Australia; and Department of Exercise Sciences (L.V.B.), University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Lynley V Bradnam
- From Innovation, Implementation and Clinical Translation in Health (IIMPACT in Health) (B.H., M.C.R.), Allied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide; Graduate School of Health, Discipline of Physiotherapy (A.B.M.), University of Technology Sydney, Australia; and Department of Exercise Sciences (L.V.B.), University of Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Beheshti I, Ko JH. Modulating brain networks associated with cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease. Mol Med 2021; 27:24. [PMID: 33691622 PMCID: PMC7945662 DOI: 10.1186/s10020-021-00284-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a relatively well characterised neurological disorder that primarily affects motor and cognitive functions. This paper reviews on how transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can be used to modulate brain networks associated with cognitive deficits in PD. We first provide an overview of brain network abnormalities in PD, by introducing the brain network modulation approaches such as pharmacological interventions and brain stimulation techniques. We then present the potential underlying mechanisms of tDCS technique, and specifically highlight how tDCS can be applied to modulate brain network abnormality associated with cognitive dysfunction among PD patients. More importantly, we address the limitations of existing studies and suggest possible future directions, with the aim of helping researchers to further develop the use of tDCS technique in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iman Beheshti
- Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, University of Manitoba, 130-745 Bannatyne Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0J9, Canada.,Kleysen Institute for Advanced Medicine, Health Science Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Ji Hyun Ko
- Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, University of Manitoba, 130-745 Bannatyne Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0J9, Canada. .,Kleysen Institute for Advanced Medicine, Health Science Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. .,Graduate Program in Biomedical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kuo HI, Qi FX, Paulus W, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA. Noradrenergic Enhancement of Motor Learning, Attention, and Working Memory in Humans. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2021; 24:490-498. [PMID: 33617635 PMCID: PMC8278798 DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyab006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Noradrenaline has an important role as a neuromodulator of the central nervous system. Noradrenergic enhancement was recently shown to enhance glutamate-dependent cortical facilitation and long term potentiation-like plasticity. As cortical excitability and plasticity are closely linked to various cognitive processes, here we aimed to explore whether these alterations are associated with respective cognitive performance changes. Specifically, we assessed the impact of noradrenergic enhancement on motor learning (serial reaction time task), attentional processes (Stroop interference task), and working memory performance (n-back letter task). METHODS The study was conducted in a cross-over design. Twenty-five healthy humans performed the respective cognitive tasks after a single dose of the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor reboxetine or placebo administration. RESULTS The results show that motor learning, attentional processes, and working memory performance in healthy participants were improved by reboxetine application compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS The results of the present study thus suggest that noradrenergic enhancement can improve memory formation and executive functions in healthy humans. The respective changes are in line with related effects of noradrenaline on cortical excitability and plasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiao-I Kuo
- School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan,Dept. Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Feng-Xue Qi
- Key Laboratory of Sport Training of General Admission of Sport of China, Beijing Sport University, Xinxin Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China,Department of Sport Training, Sport Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Min-Fang Kuo
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Michael A Nitsche
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany,Dept. Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany,Department of Neurology, University Medical Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany,Correspondence: M. A. Nitsche, MD, Department Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystrasse 67, 44139 Dortmund, Germany ()
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Korai SA, Ranieri F, Di Lazzaro V, Papa M, Cirillo G. Neurobiological After-Effects of Low Intensity Transcranial Electric Stimulation of the Human Nervous System: From Basic Mechanisms to Metaplasticity. Front Neurol 2021; 12:587771. [PMID: 33658972 PMCID: PMC7917202 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.587771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) of the brain is an evolving field that has brought remarkable attention in the past few decades for its ability to directly modulate specific brain functions. Neurobiological after-effects of tES seems to be related to changes in neuronal and synaptic excitability and plasticity, however mechanisms are still far from being elucidated. We aim to review recent results from in vitro and in vivo studies that highlight molecular and cellular mechanisms of transcranial direct (tDCS) and alternating (tACS) current stimulation. Changes in membrane potential and neural synchronization explain the ongoing and short-lasting effects of tES, while changes induced in existing proteins and new protein synthesis is required for long-lasting plastic changes (LTP/LTD). Glial cells, for decades supporting elements, are now considered constitutive part of the synapse and might contribute to the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity. This review brings into focus the neurobiological mechanisms and after-effects of tDCS and tACS from in vitro and in vivo studies, in both animals and humans, highlighting possible pathways for the development of targeted therapeutic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohaib Ali Korai
- Division of Human Anatomy - Laboratory of Neuronal Networks, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Federico Ranieri
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Papa
- Division of Human Anatomy - Laboratory of Neuronal Networks, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.,ISBE Italy, SYSBIO Centre of Systems Biology, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cirillo
- Division of Human Anatomy - Laboratory of Neuronal Networks, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.,Neurology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yamada Y, Sumiyoshi T. Neurobiological Mechanisms of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Psychiatric Disorders; Neurophysiological, Chemical, and Anatomical Considerations. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:631838. [PMID: 33613218 PMCID: PMC7890188 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.631838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique for the treatment of several psychiatric disorders, e.g., mood disorders and schizophrenia. Therapeutic effects of tDCS are suggested to be produced by bi-directional changes in cortical activities, i.e., increased/decreased cortical excitability via anodal/cathodal stimulation. Although tDCS provides a promising approach for the treatment of psychiatric disorders, its neurobiological mechanisms remain to be explored. Objectives: To review recent findings from neurophysiological, chemical, and brain-network studies, and consider how tDCS ameliorates psychiatric conditions. Findings: Enhancement of excitatory synaptic transmissions through anodal tDCS stimulation is likely to facilitate glutamate transmission and suppress gamma-aminobutyric acid transmission in the cortex. On the other hand, it positively or negatively modulates the activities of dopamine, serotonin, and acetylcholine transmissions in the central nervous system. These neural events by tDCS may change the balance between excitatory and inhibitory inputs. Specifically, multi-session tDCS is thought to promote/regulate information processing efficiency in the cerebral cortical circuit, which induces long-term potentiation (LTP) by synthesizing various proteins. Conclusions: This review will help understand putative mechanisms underlying the clinical benefits of tDCS from the perspective of neurotransmitters, network dynamics, intracellular events, and related modalities of the brain function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuji Yamada
- Department of Psychiatry, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomiki Sumiyoshi
- Department of Preventive Intervention for Psychiatric Disorders, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schneider N, Dagan M, Katz R, Thumm PC, Brozgol M, Giladi N, Manor B, Mirelman A, Hausdorff JM. Combining transcranial direct current stimulation with a motor-cognitive task: the impact on dual-task walking costs in older adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2021; 18:23. [PMID: 33526043 PMCID: PMC7852224 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00826-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The performance of a secondary task while walking increases motor-cognitive interference and exacerbates fall risk in older adults. Previous studies have demonstrated that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may improve certain types of dual-task performance, and, that tDCS delivered during the performance of a task may augment the benefits of stimulation, potentially reducing motor-cognitive interference. However, it is not yet known if combining multi-target tDCS with the simultaneous performance of a task related to the tDCS targets reduces or increases dual-task walking costs among older adults. The objectives of the present work were (1) To examine whether tDCS applied during the performance of a task that putatively utilizes the brain networks targeted by the neuro-stimulation reduces dual-task costs, and (2) to compare the immediate after-effects of tDCS applied during walking, during seated-rest, and during sham stimulation while walking, on dual-task walking costs in older adults. We also explored the impact on postural sway and other measures of cognitive function. Methods A double-blind, ‘within-subject’ cross-over pilot study evaluated the effects of 20 min of anodal tDCS targeting both the primary motor cortex (M1) and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) in 25 healthy older adults (73.9 ± 5.2 years). Three stimulation conditions were assessed in three separate sessions: (1) tDCS while walking in a complex environment (tDCS + walking), (2) tDCS while seated (tDCS + seated), and (3) walking in a complex environment with sham tDCS (sham + walking). The complex walking condition utilized virtual reality to tax motor and cognitive abilities. During each session, usual-walking, dual-task walking, quiet standing sway, and cognitive function (e.g., Stroop test) were assessed before and immediately after stimulation. Dual-task costs to gait speed and other measures were computed. Results The dual-task cost to gait speed was reduced after tDCS + walking (p = 0.004) as compared to baseline values. Neither tDCS + seated (p = 0.173) nor sham + walking (p = 0.826) influenced this outcome. Similar results were seen for other gait measures and for Stroop performance. Sway was not affected by tDCS. Conclusions tDCS delivered during the performance of challenging walking decreased the dual-task cost to walking in older adults when they were tested just after stimulation. These results support the existence of a state-dependent impact of neuro-modulation that may set the stage for a more optimal neuro-rehabilitation. Trial registration: Clinical Trials Gov Registrations Number: NCT02954328.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nofar Schneider
- Center for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Moria Dagan
- Center for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Racheli Katz
- Department of Physical Therapy, Sacker School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Pablo Cornejo Thumm
- Center for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Marina Brozgol
- Center for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nir Giladi
- Center for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Department of Neurology, Sacker School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Brad Manor
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anat Mirelman
- Center for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Department of Neurology, Sacker School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jeffery M Hausdorff
- Center for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv, Israel. .,Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. .,Department of Physical Therapy, Sacker School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel. .,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Impact of COMT val158met on tDCS-induced cognitive enhancement in older adults. Behav Brain Res 2021; 401:113081. [PMID: 33359367 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies suggest that genetic polymorphisms and aging modulate inter-individual variability in brain stimulation-induced plasticity. However, the relationship between genetic polymorphisms and behavioral modulation through transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in older adults remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE Link individual tDCS responsiveness, operationalized as performance difference between tDCS and sham condition, to common genetic polymorphisms in healthy older adults. METHODS 106 healthy older participants from five tDCS-studies were re-invited to donate blood for genotyping of apoliproprotein E (APOE: ε4 carriers and ε4 non-carriers), catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT: val/val, val/met, met/met), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF: val/val, val/met, met/met) and KIdney/BRAin encoding gene (KIBRA: C/C, C/T, T/T). Studies had assessed cognitive performance during tDCS and sham in cross-over designs. We now asked whether the tDCS responsiveness was related to the four genotypes using a linear regression models. RESULTS We found that tDCS responsiveness was significantly associated with COMT polymorphism; i.e., COMT val carriers (compared to met/met) showed higher tDCS responsiveness. No other significant associations emerged. CONCLUSION Using data from five brain stimulation studies conducted in our group, we showed that only individual variation of COMT genotypes modulated behavioral response to tDCS. These findings contribute to the understanding of inherent factors that explain inter-individual variability in functional tDCS effects in older adults, and might help to better stratify participants for future clinical trials.
Collapse
|
31
|
Yuan TF, Li WG, Zhang C, Wei H, Sun S, Xu NJ, Liu J, Xu TL. Targeting neuroplasticity in patients with neurodegenerative diseases using brain stimulation techniques. Transl Neurodegener 2020; 9:44. [PMID: 33280613 PMCID: PMC7720463 DOI: 10.1186/s40035-020-00224-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Deficits in synaptic transmission and plasticity are thought to contribute to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). Several brain stimulation techniques are currently available to assess or modulate human neuroplasticity, which could offer clinically useful interventions as well as quantitative diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. In this review, we discuss several brain stimulation techniques, with a special emphasis on transcranial magnetic stimulation and deep brain stimulation (DBS), and review the results of clinical studies that applied these techniques to examine or modulate impaired neuroplasticity at the local and network levels in patients with AD or PD. The impaired neuroplasticity can be detected in patients at the earlier and later stages of both neurodegenerative diseases. However, current brain stimulation techniques, with a notable exception of DBS for PD treatment, cannot serve as adequate clinical tools to assist in the diagnosis, treatment, or prognosis of individual patients with AD or PD. Targeting the impaired neuroplasticity with improved brain stimulation techniques could offer a powerful novel approach for the treatment of AD and PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ti-Fei Yuan
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, China.,Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China
| | - Wei-Guang Li
- Center for Brain Science, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, and Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Chencheng Zhang
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Hongjiang Wei
- Institute for Medical Imaging Technology, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Suya Sun
- Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Nan-Jie Xu
- Center for Brain Science, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, and Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
| | - Tian-Le Xu
- Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Yuan TF, Etkin A. Probing drug-evoked cortical plasticity with brain stimulation: A call for translation from animal to human medical research. Pharmacol Res 2020; 163:105338. [PMID: 33276104 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Drug evoked synaptic plasticity represents "memory traces" in the brain following abuse experiences. Preclinical studies have detailed the myriad changes in mesolimbic and cortical functioning, including alterations in synaptic transmission and plasticity. In humans, recent research advances utilizing a combination of non-invasive brain stimulation and neurophysiological readouts have opened a new avenue for the study cortical plasticity in clinical substance dependence states. These insights, along with findings in psychopathology more generally, uniquely positions brain stimulation as a key tool for understanding cortical function and plasticity in substance dependence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ti-Fei Yuan
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
| | - Amit Etkin
- Alto Neuroscience, Los Altos, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ehrhardt SE, Filmer HL, Wards Y, Mattingley JB, Dux PE. The influence of tDCS intensity on decision-making training and transfer outcomes. J Neurophysiol 2020; 125:385-397. [PMID: 33174483 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00423.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to improve single- and dual-task performance in healthy participants and enhance transferable training gains following multiple sessions of combined stimulation and task practice. However, it has yet to be determined what the optimal stimulation dose is for facilitating such outcomes. We aimed to test the effects of different tDCS intensities, with a commonly used electrode montage, on performance outcomes in a multisession single/dual-task training and transfer protocol. In a preregistered study, 123 participants, who were pseudorandomized across four groups, each completed six sessions (pre- and posttraining sessions and four combined tDCS and training sessions) and received 20 min of prefrontal anodal tDCS at 0.7, 1.0, or 2.0 mA or 15-s sham stimulation. Response time and accuracy were assessed in trained and untrained tasks. The 1.0-mA group showed substantial improvements in single-task reaction time and dual-task accuracy, with additional evidence for improvements in dual-task reaction times, relative to sham performance. This group also showed near transfer to the single-task component of an untrained multitasking paradigm. The 0.7- and 2.0-mA intensities varied in which performance measures they improved on the trained task, but in sum, the effects were less robust than for the 1.0-mA group, and there was no evidence for the transfer of performance. Our study highlights that training performance gains are augmented by tDCS, but their magnitude and nature are not uniform across stimulation intensity.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Using techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate cognitive performance is an alluring endeavor. However, the optimal parameters to augment performance are unknown. Here, in a preregistered study with a large sample (123 subjects), three different stimulation dosages (0.7, 1.0, and 2.0 mA) were applied during multitasking training. Different cognitive training performance outcomes occurred across the dosage conditions, with only one of the doses (1.0 mA) leading to training transfer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane E Ehrhardt
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia
| | - Hannah L Filmer
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia
| | - Yohan Wards
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia
| | - Jason B Mattingley
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.,Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.,Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul E Dux
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Primary motor cortex in Parkinson's disease: Functional changes and opportunities for neurostimulation. Neurobiol Dis 2020; 147:105159. [PMID: 33152506 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Movement abnormalities of Parkinson's disease (PD) arise from disordered neural activity in multiple interconnected brain structures. The planning and execution of movement requires recruitment of a heterogeneous collection of pyramidal projection neurons in the primary motor cortex (M1). The neural representations of movement in M1 single-cell and field potential recordings are directly and indirectly influenced by the midbrain dopaminergic neurons that degenerate in PD. This review examines M1 functional alterations in PD as uncovered by electrophysiological recordings and neurostimulation studies in patients and experimental animal models. Dysfunction of the parkinsonian M1 depends on the severity and/or duration of dopamine-depletion and the species examined, and is expressed as alterations in movement-related firing dynamics; functional reorganisation of local circuits; and changes in field potential beta oscillations. Neurostimulation methods that modulate M1 activity directly (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation) or indirectly (subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation) improve motor function in PD patients, showing that targeted neuromodulation of M1 is a realistic therapy. We argue that the therapeutic profile of M1 neurostimulation is likely to be greatly enhanced with alternative technologies that permit cell-type specific control and incorporate feedback from electrophysiological biomarkers measured locally.
Collapse
|
35
|
Madrid J, Benninger DH. Non-invasive brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: Clinical evidence, latest concepts and future goals: A systematic review. J Neurosci Methods 2020; 347:108957. [PMID: 33017643 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is becoming a major public-health issue in an aging population. Available approaches to treat advanced PD still have limitations; new therapies are needed. The non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) may offer a complementary approach to treat advanced PD by personalized stimulation. Although NIBS is not as effective as the gold-standard levodopa, recent randomized controlled trials show promising outcomes in the treatment of PD symptoms. Nevertheless, only a few NIBS-stimulation paradigms have shown to improve PD's symptoms. Current clinical recommendations based on the level of evidence are reported in Table 1 through Table 3. Furthermore, novel technological advances hold promise and may soon enable the non-invasive stimulation of deeper brain structures for longer periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Madrid
- Service of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - David H Benninger
- Service of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cisler JM, Privratsky AA, Sartin-Tarm A, Sellnow K, Ross M, Weaver S, Hahn E, Herringa RJ, James GA, Kilts CD. L-DOPA and consolidation of fear extinction learning among women with posttraumatic stress disorder. Transl Psychiatry 2020; 10:287. [PMID: 32801342 PMCID: PMC7429959 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-020-00975-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
This study tested whether L-DOPA delivered during the consolidation window following fear extinction learning reduces subsequent fear responding among women with PTSD. Adult women diagnosed with PTSD completed a contextual fear acquisition and extinction task during fMRI and then immediately received either placebo (n = 34), 100/25 mg L-DOPA/carbidopa (n = 28), or 200/50 mg L-DOPA/carbidopa (n = 29). Participants completed a resting-state scan before the task and again 45 min following drug ingestion to characterize effects of L-DOPA on extinction memory neural reactivation patterns during consolidation. Twenty-four hours later, participants returned for tests of context renewal, extinction recall, and reinstatement during fMRI with concurrent skin conductance responding (SCR) assessment. Both active drug groups demonstrated increased reactivation of extinction encoding in the amygdala during the post-task resting-state scan. For SCR data, both drug groups exhibited decreased Day 2 reinstatement across all stimuli compared to placebo, and there was some evidence for decreased context renewal to the fear stimulus in the 100 mg group compared to placebo. For imaging data, both drug groups demonstrated decreased Day 2 reinstatement across stimuli in a bilateral insula network compared to placebo. There was no evidence in SCR or neural activity that L-DOPA improved extinction recall. Reactivation of extinction encodings in the amygdala during consolidation on Day 1 predicted Day 2 activation of the insula network. These results support a role for dopamine during the consolidation window in boosting reactivation of amygdala extinction encodings and reducing reinstatement, but not improving extinction recall, in women with PTSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh M. Cisler
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI USA
| | - Anthony A. Privratsky
- grid.241054.60000 0004 4687 1637University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Brain Imaging Research Center, Little Rock, AR USA
| | - Anneliis Sartin-Tarm
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI USA
| | - Kyrie Sellnow
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI USA
| | - Marisa Ross
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI USA
| | - Shelby Weaver
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI USA
| | - Emily Hahn
- Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Ryan J. Herringa
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI USA
| | - George Andrew James
- grid.241054.60000 0004 4687 1637University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Brain Imaging Research Center, Little Rock, AR USA
| | - Clinton D. Kilts
- grid.241054.60000 0004 4687 1637University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Brain Imaging Research Center, Little Rock, AR USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cotelli M, Manenti R, Gobbi E, Enrici I, Rusich D, Ferrari C, Adenzato M. Theory of Mind Performance Predicts tDCS-Mediated Effects on the Medial Prefrontal Cortex: A Pilot Study to Investigate the Role of Sex and Age. Brain Sci 2020; 10:brainsci10050257. [PMID: 32353992 PMCID: PMC7288024 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10050257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has become an increasingly promising tool for understanding the relationship between brain and behavior. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the magnitude of sex- and age-related tDCS effects previously found in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) during a Theory of Mind (ToM) task correlates with social cognition performance; in particular, we explored whether different patterns of activity would be detected in high- and low-performing participants. For this, young and elderly, male and female participants were categorized as a low- or high-performer according to their score on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes task. Furthermore, we explored whether sex- and age-related effects associated with active tDCS on the mPFC were related to cognitive functioning. We observed the following results: (i) elderly participants experience a significant decline in ToM performance compared to young participants; (ii) low-performing elderly females report slowing of reaction time when anodal tDCS is applied over the mPFC during a ToM task; and (iii) low-performing elderly females are characterized by lower scores in executive control functions, verbal fluency and verbal short-term memory. The relationship between tDCS results and cognitive functioning is discussed in light of the neuroscientific literature on sex- and age-related differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cotelli
- Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Via Pilastroni, 4, 25125 Brescia, BS, Italy
| | - Rosa Manenti
- Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Via Pilastroni, 4, 25125 Brescia, BS, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-030-3501457; Fax: +39-030-3533513
| | - Elena Gobbi
- Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Via Pilastroni, 4, 25125 Brescia, BS, Italy
| | - Ivan Enrici
- Department of Philosophy and Educational Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Danila Rusich
- Department of Human Science, LUMSA University (Libera Università Maria Santissima Assunta), 00193 Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Clarissa Ferrari
- Statistics Service, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125 Brescia, BS, Italy
| | - Mauro Adenzato
- Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, TO, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bologna M, Paparella G, Fasano A, Hallett M, Berardelli A. Evolving concepts on bradykinesia. Brain 2020; 143:727-750. [PMID: 31834375 PMCID: PMC8205506 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Revised: 09/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Bradykinesia is one of the cardinal motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease and other parkinsonisms. The various clinical aspects related to bradykinesia and the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying bradykinesia are, however, still unclear. In this article, we review clinical and experimental studies on bradykinesia performed in patients with Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonism. We also review studies on animal experiments dealing with pathophysiological aspects of the parkinsonian state. In Parkinson's disease, bradykinesia is characterized by slowness, the reduced amplitude of movement, and sequence effect. These features are also present in atypical parkinsonisms, but the sequence effect is not common. Levodopa therapy improves bradykinesia, but treatment variably affects the bradykinesia features and does not significantly modify the sequence effect. Findings from animal and patients demonstrate the role of the basal ganglia and other interconnected structures, such as the primary motor cortex and cerebellum, as well as the contribution of abnormal sensorimotor processing. Bradykinesia should be interpreted as arising from network dysfunction. A better understanding of bradykinesia pathophysiology will serve as the new starting point for clinical and experimental purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Bologna
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy
| | | | - Alfonso Fasano
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Hallett
- Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alfredo Berardelli
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Morya E, Monte-Silva K, Bikson M, Esmaeilpour Z, Biazoli CE, Fonseca A, Bocci T, Farzan F, Chatterjee R, Hausdorff JM, da Silva Machado DG, Brunoni AR, Mezger E, Moscaleski LA, Pegado R, Sato JR, Caetano MS, Sá KN, Tanaka C, Li LM, Baptista AF, Okano AH. Beyond the target area: an integrative view of tDCS-induced motor cortex modulation in patients and athletes. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2019; 16:141. [PMID: 31730494 PMCID: PMC6858746 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-019-0581-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique used to modulate neural tissue. Neuromodulation apparently improves cognitive functions in several neurologic diseases treatment and sports performance. In this study, we present a comprehensive, integrative review of tDCS for motor rehabilitation and motor learning in healthy individuals, athletes and multiple neurologic and neuropsychiatric conditions. We also report on neuromodulation mechanisms, main applications, current knowledge including areas such as language, embodied cognition, functional and social aspects, and future directions. We present the use and perspectives of new developments in tDCS technology, namely high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) which promises to overcome one of the main tDCS limitation (i.e., low focality) and its application for neurological disease, pain relief, and motor learning/rehabilitation. Finally, we provided information regarding the Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in clinical applications, Cerebellar tDCS (ctDCS) and its influence on motor learning, and TMS combined with electroencephalography (EEG) as a tool to evaluate tDCS effects on brain function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgard Morya
- Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute of Neuroscience, Santos Dumont Institute, Macaíba, Rio Grande do Norte Brazil
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Kátia Monte-Silva
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco Brazil
- Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação (NAPeN), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)/Universidade de São Paulo (USP)/Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID)/Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Santo André, Brazil
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY USA
| | - Zeinab Esmaeilpour
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY USA
| | - Claudinei Eduardo Biazoli
- Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Alameda da Universidade, 3 - Anchieta, Bloco Delta – Sala 257, São Bernardo do Campo, SP CEP 09606-070 Brazil
| | - Andre Fonseca
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
- Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Alameda da Universidade, 3 - Anchieta, Bloco Delta – Sala 257, São Bernardo do Campo, SP CEP 09606-070 Brazil
| | - Tommaso Bocci
- Aldo Ravelli Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, International Medical School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Faranak Farzan
- School of Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Simon Fraser University, Surrey, British Columbia Canada
| | - Raaj Chatterjee
- School of Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Simon Fraser University, Surrey, British Columbia Canada
| | - Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
- Department of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | - Eva Mezger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Luciane Aparecida Moscaleski
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
- Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Alameda da Universidade, 3 - Anchieta, Bloco Delta – Sala 257, São Bernardo do Campo, SP CEP 09606-070 Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Pegado
- Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Santa Cruz, Rio Grande do Norte Brazil
| | - João Ricardo Sato
- Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Alameda da Universidade, 3 - Anchieta, Bloco Delta – Sala 257, São Bernardo do Campo, SP CEP 09606-070 Brazil
| | - Marcelo Salvador Caetano
- Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Alameda da Universidade, 3 - Anchieta, Bloco Delta – Sala 257, São Bernardo do Campo, SP CEP 09606-070 Brazil
| | - Kátia Nunes Sá
- Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação (NAPeN), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)/Universidade de São Paulo (USP)/Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID)/Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Santo André, Brazil
- Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, Bahia Brazil
| | - Clarice Tanaka
- Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação (NAPeN), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)/Universidade de São Paulo (USP)/Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID)/Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Santo André, Brazil
- Laboratório de Investigações Médicas-54, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo Brazil
| | - Li Min Li
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Abrahão Fontes Baptista
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
- Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação (NAPeN), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)/Universidade de São Paulo (USP)/Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID)/Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Santo André, Brazil
- Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Alameda da Universidade, 3 - Anchieta, Bloco Delta – Sala 257, São Bernardo do Campo, SP CEP 09606-070 Brazil
- Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, Bahia Brazil
- Laboratório de Investigações Médicas-54, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo Brazil
| | - Alexandre Hideki Okano
- Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
- Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação (NAPeN), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)/Universidade de São Paulo (USP)/Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID)/Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Santo André, Brazil
- Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Alameda da Universidade, 3 - Anchieta, Bloco Delta – Sala 257, São Bernardo do Campo, SP CEP 09606-070 Brazil
- Graduate Program in Physical Education. State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Brunoni AR, Carracedo A, Amigo OM, Pellicer AL, Talib L, Carvalho AF, Lotufo PA, Benseñor IM, Gattaz W, Cappi C. Association of BDNF, HTR2A, TPH1, SLC6A4, and COMT polymorphisms with tDCS and escitalopram efficacy: ancillary analysis of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 42:128-135. [PMID: 31721892 PMCID: PMC7115450 DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We investigated whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with neuroplasticity and activity of monoamine neurotransmitters, such as the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF, rs6265), the serotonin transporter (SLC6A4, rs25531), the tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1, rs1800532), the 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2A (HTR2A, rs6311, rs6313, rs7997012), and the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT, rs4680) genes, are associated with efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in major depression. METHODS Data from the Escitalopram vs. Electrical Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study (ELECT-TDCS) were used. Participants were antidepressant-free at baseline and presented with an acute, moderate-to-severe unipolar depressive episode. They were randomized to receive escitalopram/tDCS-sham (n=75), tDCS/placebo-pill (n=75), or placebo-pill/sham-tDCS (n=45). General linear models assessed the interaction between treatment group and allele-wise carriers. Additional analyses were performed for each group and each genotype separately. RESULTS Pairwise group comparisons (tDCS vs. placebo, tDCS vs. escitalopram, and escitalopram vs. placebo) did not identify alleles associated with depression improvement. In addition, exploratory analyses also did not identify any SNP unequivocally associated with improvement of depression in any treatment group. CONCLUSION Larger, combined datasets are necessary to identify candidate genes for tDCS response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre R Brunoni
- Departamento de Medicina Interna, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Angel Carracedo
- Grupo de Medicina Xenómica/Pharmacogenetics Research, Laboratorio SSL1, Centro Singular de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas (CiMUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Olalla M Amigo
- Grupo de Medicina Xenómica/Pharmacogenetics Research, Laboratorio SSL1, Centro Singular de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas (CiMUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Ana L Pellicer
- Grupo de Medicina Xenómica/Pharmacogenetics Research, Laboratorio SSL1, Centro Singular de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas (CiMUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Leda Talib
- Laboratório de Neurociências (LIM-27) and Instituto Nacional de Biomarcadores em Psiquiatria (INBION), Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Andre F Carvalho
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto & Centre for Addiction & Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada
| | - Paulo A Lotufo
- Departamento de Medicina Interna, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Isabela M Benseñor
- Departamento de Medicina Interna, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Wagner Gattaz
- Laboratório de Neurociências (LIM-27) and Instituto Nacional de Biomarcadores em Psiquiatria (INBION), Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Carolina Cappi
- Programa Transtornos do Espectro Obsessivo-Compulsivo, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fonteneau C, Redoute J, Haesebaert F, Le Bars D, Costes N, Suaud-Chagny MF, Brunelin J. Frontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Induces Dopamine Release in the Ventral Striatum in Human. Cereb Cortex 2019; 28:2636-2646. [PMID: 29688276 PMCID: PMC5998959 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhy093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
A single transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) session applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLFPC) can be associated with procognitive effects. Furthermore, repeated DLPFC tDCS sessions are under investigation as a new therapeutic tool for a range of neuropsychiatric conditions. A possible mechanism explaining such beneficial effects is a modulation of meso-cortico-limbic dopamine transmission. We explored the spatial and temporal neurobiological effects of bifrontal tDCS on subcortical dopamine transmission during and immediately after the stimulation. In a double blind sham-controlled study, 32 healthy subjects randomly received a single session of either active (20 min, 2 mA; n = 14) or sham (n = 18) tDCS during a dynamic positron emission tomography scan using [11C]raclopride binding. During the stimulation period, no significant effect of tDCS was observed. After the stimulation period, compared with sham tDCS, active tDCS induced a significant decrease in [11C]raclopride binding potential ratio in the striatum, suggesting an increase in extracellular dopamine in a part of the striatum involved in the reward-motivation network. The present study provides the first evidence that bifrontal tDCS induces neurotransmitter release in polysynaptic connected subcortical areas. Therefore, levels of dopamine activity and reactivity should be a new element to consider for a general hypothesis of brain modulation by bifrontal tDCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Fonteneau
- INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Psychiatric Disorders: from Resistance to Response Team, Lyon, France.,University Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, Lyon, France.,Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Jérome Redoute
- Centre d'Etude et de Recherche Multimodal et Pluridisciplinaire en Imagerie du Vivant (CERMEP-Imagerie du vivant), Lyon, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
| | - Frédéric Haesebaert
- INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Psychiatric Disorders: from Resistance to Response Team, Lyon, France.,University Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, Lyon, France.,Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Didier Le Bars
- Centre d'Etude et de Recherche Multimodal et Pluridisciplinaire en Imagerie du Vivant (CERMEP-Imagerie du vivant), Lyon, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.,ICBMS, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Nicolas Costes
- Centre d'Etude et de Recherche Multimodal et Pluridisciplinaire en Imagerie du Vivant (CERMEP-Imagerie du vivant), Lyon, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
| | - Marie-Françoise Suaud-Chagny
- INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Psychiatric Disorders: from Resistance to Response Team, Lyon, France.,University Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, Lyon, France
| | - Jérome Brunelin
- INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Psychiatric Disorders: from Resistance to Response Team, Lyon, France.,University Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, Lyon, France.,Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tanaka N, Tsutsumi R, Shirota Y, Shimizu T, Ohminami S, Terao Y, Ugawa Y, Tsuji S, Hanajima R. Effects of L-DOPA on quadripulse magnetic stimulation-induced long-term potentiation in older adults. Neurobiol Aging 2019; 84:217-224. [PMID: 31570179 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2018] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Reduced cortical plasticity has been previously reported in older adult as compared with young adults. However, the effects of dopamine on this plasticity reduction remain unknown. Here, we assessed the effects of high-dose (200 mg) and medium-dose (100 mg) L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) intake on the long-term potentiation (LTP)-like effect induced by quadripulse magnetic stimulation (QPS) in older adults (aged ∼65 years). The subjects were 32 (200 mg) and 20 (100 mg) healthy older adult volunteers. This study was designed as a double-blind, crossover and placebo-controlled trial on one dose of L-dopa. Two hours after taking L-DOPA or placebo-drug, QPS was applied over the motor cortex. Motor evoked potentials were recorded to evaluate the motor cortical excitability changes. We found that both doses of L-DOPA enhanced LTP after QPS in older adults as one group. We classified subjects into QPS responders and QPS nonresponders. Both L-DOPA doses produced significant LTP enhancement in QPS nonresponders, whereas either of doses did not produce significant LTP enhancement in QPS responders. Collectively, our findings suggest that the neural plasticity reductions observed in older adults could be partly improved by dopamine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuyuki Tanaka
- Department of Neurology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Tsutsumi
- Department of Neurology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Shirota
- Department of Neurology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Shimizu
- Department of Neurology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinya Ohminami
- Department of Neurology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuo Terao
- Department of Neurology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Ugawa
- Department of Neurology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoji Tsuji
- Department of Neurology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ritsuko Hanajima
- Department of Neurology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Dopamine depletion effects on cognitive flexibility as modulated by tDCS of the dlPFC. Brain Stimul 2019; 13:105-108. [PMID: 31494070 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent evidence suggests that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may interact with the dopaminergic system to affect cognitive flexibility. Objective/hypotheses: We examined whether putative reduction of dopamine levels through the acute phenylalanine/tyrosine depletion (APTD) procedure and excitatory anodal tDCS of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) are causally related to cognitive flexibility as measured by task switching and reversal learning. METHOD A double-blind, sham-controlled, randomised trial was conducted to test the effects of combining anodal tDCS and depletion of catecholaminergic precursor tyrosine on cognitive flexibility. RESULTS Anodal tDCS and tyrosine depletion had a significant effect on task switching, but not reversal learning. Whilst perseverative errors were significantly improved by anodal tDCS, the APTD impaired reaction times. Importantly, the combination of APTD and anodal tDCS resulted in cognitive performance which did not statistically differ to that of the control condition. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the effects of tDCS on cognitive flexibility are modulated by dopaminergic tone.
Collapse
|
44
|
Elder GJ, Colloby SJ, Firbank MJ, McKeith IG, Taylor JP. Consecutive sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation do not remediate visual hallucinations in Lewy body dementia: a randomised controlled trial. Alzheimers Res Ther 2019; 11:9. [PMID: 30658705 PMCID: PMC6339360 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-018-0465-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complex visual hallucinations are common in Lewy body dementia (LBD) and can cause significant patient and caregiver distress. Current treatments are primarily pharmacological in nature and have limited efficacy and associated side effects. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of consecutive sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on visual hallucination frequency and severity in LBD, at short-term and long-term follow-up stages. METHODS The study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 40 participants with LBD (Mage = 75.52 years, SDage = 8.69 years) which was conducted at a single site between November 2013 and December 2017. Participants received two consecutive 20-min sessions of active (0.048 mA/cm2) or placebo tDCS, separated by a 30-min break, over 5 consecutive days. The anodal electrode was applied to the right parietal cortex (P4) and the cathodal electrode was applied to the occipital cortex (Oz). The primary outcome measure was the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) hallucinations subscale, as completed by a caregiver/informant at baseline and day 5 (short-term) follow-up, and month 1 and month 3 (long-term) follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included visual cortical excitability, as measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation, computerised attentional and visuoperceptual tasks, and measures of global cognition and cognitive fluctuations. RESULTS Complete study data were obtained from 36 participants. There was an overall improvement in visual hallucinations (NPI) for both groups at day 5 relative to baseline, with a medium-to-large effect size; however, compared to placebo, active tDCS did not result in any improvements in visual hallucinations (NPI) at day 5 relative to baseline, or at month 1 or month 3 follow-up time points. Additionally, comparisons of secondary outcome measures showed that active tDCS did not result in any improvements on any measure (visual cortical excitability, attentional and visuoperceptual tasks or cognitive measures) at any time point. CONCLUSIONS Repeated consecutive sessions of parietal anodal tDCS, and occipital cathodal tDCS, do not improve visual hallucinations or visuoperceptual function, or alter visual cortical excitability in LBD. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN40214749 . Registered on 25 October 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg J. Elder
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL UK
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST UK
| | - Sean J. Colloby
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL UK
| | - Michael J. Firbank
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL UK
| | - Ian G. McKeith
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL UK
| | - John-Paul Taylor
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Adenzato M, Manenti R, Enrici I, Gobbi E, Brambilla M, Alberici A, Cotelli MS, Padovani A, Borroni B, Cotelli M. Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances theory of mind in Parkinson's disease patients with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Transl Neurodegener 2019; 8:1. [PMID: 30627430 PMCID: PMC6322239 DOI: 10.1186/s40035-018-0141-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Parkinson’s Disease (PD) with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (PD-MCI) represents one of the most dreaded complications for patients with PD and is associated with a higher risk of developing dementia. Although transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been demonstrated to improve motor and non-motor symptoms in PD, to date, no study has investigated the effects of tDCS on Theory of Mind (ToM), i.e., the ability to understand and predict other people’s behaviours, in PD-MCI. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study, we applied active tDCS over the medial frontal cortex (MFC) to modulate ToM performance in twenty patients with PD-MCI. Twenty matched healthy controls (HC) were also enrolled and were asked to perform the ToM task without receiving tDCS. Results In the patients with PD-MCI, i) ToM performance was worse than that in the HC, ii) ToM abilities were poorer in those with fronto-executive difficulties, and iii) tDCS over the MFC led to significant shortening of latency for ToM tasks. Conclusions We show for the first time that active tDCS over the MFC enhances ToM in patients with PD-MCI, and suggest that non-invasive brain stimulation could be used to ameliorate ToM deficits observed in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Adenzato
- 1Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Neuroscience Institute of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Rosa Manenti
- 3Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Ivan Enrici
- 4Department of Philosophy and Educational Sciences, University of Turin, via Gaudenzio Ferrari 9, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Gobbi
- 3Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michela Brambilla
- 3Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonella Alberici
- 5Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Maria Sofia Cotelli
- 5Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Padovani
- 5Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Barbara Borroni
- 5Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Maria Cotelli
- 3Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Jongkees BJ, Loseva AA, Yavari FB, Nitsche MA, Colzato LS. The COMT Val 158 Met polymorphism does not modulate the after-effect of tDCS on working memory. Eur J Neurosci 2019; 49:263-274. [PMID: 30402947 PMCID: PMC6590637 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Revised: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can alter cortical excitability, neural plasticity, and cognitive-behavioral performance; however, its effects are known to vary across studies. A partial account of this variability relates to individual differences in dopamine function. Indeed, dopaminergic manipulations alter the physiological and cognitive-behavioral effects of tDCS, and gene polymorphisms related to dopamine have predicted individual response to online tDCS (i.e., stimulation overlapping with the critical task). Notably, the role of individual differences in dopamine has not yet been properly assessed in the effect of offline tDCS (i.e., stimulation prior to the critical task). We investigated if and how the COMT Val158 Met polymorphism (rs4680) modulates the after-effect of prefrontal tDCS on verbal working memory (WM). One hundred and thirty-nine participants were genotyped for the COMT Val158 Met polymorphism and received anodal-over-left, cathodal-over-right (AL-CR), cathodal-over-left, anodal-over-right (CL-AR), or sham stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in a between-subjects, pretest-posttest study design. WM was assessed using the N-back task. The results provide no evidence that the COMT polymorphism impacts the after-effect of prefrontal tDCS on WM. Taken together with previous findings on dopamine and tDCS interactions, the results of the present study suggest that (a) indirect markers of dopamine (such as COMT) are differently related to online and offline effects of tDCS, and (b) findings from studies involving pharmacological manipulation should be generalized with caution to findings of inter-individual differences. In sum, we argue that state (i.e., a manipulation of) and trait (i.e., baseline) differences in dopamine may exert different effects on online and offline tDCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryant J. Jongkees
- Cognitive Psychology Unit & Leiden Institute for Brain and CognitionLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Alexandra A. Loseva
- Cognitive Psychology Unit & Leiden Institute for Brain and CognitionLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Fatemeh B. Yavari
- Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human FactorsDortmundGermany
| | - Michael A. Nitsche
- Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human FactorsDortmundGermany
- Department of Clinical NeurophysiologyGeorg‐August University GöttingenGöttingenGermany
- Department of NeurologyUniversity Medical Hospital BergmannsheilBochumGermany
| | - Lorenza S. Colzato
- Cognitive Psychology Unit & Leiden Institute for Brain and CognitionLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive PsychologyFaculty of PsychologyInstitute of Cognitive NeuroscienceRuhr University BochumBochumGermany
- Institute for Sports and Sport ScienceUniversity of KasselKasselGermany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Effect of caffeine on long-term potentiation-like effects induced by quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2018; 237:647-651. [DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5450-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
48
|
Dennison O, Gao J, Lim LW, Stagg CJ, Aquili L. Catecholaminergic modulation of indices of cognitive flexibility: A pharmaco-tDCS study. Brain Stimul 2018; 12:290-295. [PMID: 30552060 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Revised: 11/24/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dopaminergic activity within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) has been implicated in the control of cognitive flexibility. Much of the evidence for a causative relationship between cognitive flexibility and dopamine has come from animal studies, whilst human data have largely been correlational. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS The current study examines whether changes in dopamine levels through tyrosine administration and suppression of dlPFC activity via cathodal tDCS could be causally related to cognitive flexibility as measured by task switching and reversal learning. METHODS Using a crossover, double-blind, sham controlled, counterbalanced, randomized trial, we tested the effects of combining cathodal tDCS with tyrosine, a catecholaminergic precursor, with appropriate drug and tDCS placebo controls, on two measures of cognitive flexibility: probabilistic reversal learning, and task switching. RESULTS While none of the manipulations had an effect on task switching, there was a significant main effect of cathodal tDCS and tyrosine on reversal learning. Reversal learning performance was significantly worsened by cathodal tDCS compared with sham tDCS, whilst tyrosine significantly improved performance compared with placebo. However, there was no significant tDCS × drugs interaction. Interestingly, and as predicted by our model, the combined administration of tyrosine with cathodal tDCS resulted in performance that was equivalent to the control condition (i.e. tDCS sham + placebo). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest a causative role for dopamine signalling and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activity in regulating indices of cognitive flexibility in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Dennison
- Department of Psychology, Sociology and Politics, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jie Gao
- Department of Psychology, Sociology and Politics, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Lee Wei Lim
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Charlotte J Stagg
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Luca Aquili
- Department of Psychology, Sociology and Politics, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
The Contribution of Endogenous Modulatory Systems to TMS- and tDCS-Induced Analgesia: Evidence from PET Studies. Pain Res Manag 2018; 2018:2368386. [PMID: 30538794 PMCID: PMC6257907 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2368386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Chronic pain is an important public health issue. Moreover, its adequate management is still considered a major clinical problem, mainly due to its incredible complexity and still poorly understood pathophysiology. Recent scientific evidence coming from neuroimaging research, particularly functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) studies, indicates that chronic pain is associated with structural and functional changes in several brain structures that integrate antinociceptive pathways and endogenous modulatory systems. Furthermore, the last two decades have witnessed a huge increase in the number of studies evaluating the clinical effects of noninvasive neuromodulatory methods, especially transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which have been proved to effectively modulate the cortical excitability, resulting in satisfactory analgesic effects with minimal adverse events. Nevertheless, the precise neuromechanisms whereby such methods provide pain control are still largely unexplored. Recent studies have brought valuable information regarding the recruitment of different modulatory systems and related neurotransmitters, including glutamate, dopamine, and endogenous opioids. However, the specific neurocircuits involved in the analgesia produced by those therapies have not been fully elucidated. This review focuses on the current literature correlating the clinical effects of noninvasive methods of brain stimulation to the changes in the activity of endogenous modulatory systems.
Collapse
|
50
|
Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with cognitive training for the treatment of Parkinson Disease: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Brain Stimul 2018; 11:1251-1262. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.07.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Revised: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
|