1
|
Toyoda T, Mankia K. Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis in At-Risk Individuals: Current Status and Future Prospects. Drugs 2024:10.1007/s40265-024-02061-0. [PMID: 38954266 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02061-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
Early intervention has been the cornerstone of improving outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Over the past decade, the boundaries have been pushed in an attempt to achieve effective prevention strategies in those who are at high risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis. Core risk factors including the presence of serum anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, arthralgia and subclinical inflammation on imaging are highly predictive of arthritis development. The influence of air pollution, diet and the role of microbiome on disease progression are less clear. In turn, therapeutic focus has shifted to an earlier pre-arthritis phase of the disease continuum where the clinically apparent arthritis may potentially be intercepted. Seven proof-of-concept interventional trials in at-risk individuals have been conducted so far. Whether true prevention of rheumatoid arthritis is possible remains elusive. Promising signals towards permanent disease modulation and improvement in symptom burden were seen with some immunomodulatory therapies, whilst others were unsuccessful. Long-term follow-up is required to ascertain a true effect. Looking forward, a better understanding of the natural history and underlying biological mechanisms of arthritis development and more accurate, validated risk stratification is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Task Toyoda
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Kulveer Mankia
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
El-Gabalawy H. The Impact of Rheumatoid Arthritis on First Nations and How We Can Work With Communities to Prevent It. J Rheumatol 2024; 51:3-9. [PMID: 38950968 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0369_dunlop-dottridge] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is prevalent in many Indigenous North American First Nations (FN) and tends to be seropositive, familial, and disabling, as well as associated with highly unfavorable outcomes such as early mortality. The risk of developing RA is based on a perfect storm of gene-environment interactions underpinning this risk. The gene-environment interactions include a high frequency of shared epitope encoding HLA alleles, particularly HLA-DRB1*1402, in the background population, and prevalent predisposing environmental factors such as smoking and periodontal disease. Together, these provide a compelling rationale for an RA prevention agenda in FN communities. Our research team has worked in partnership with several FN communities to prospectively follow the first-degree relatives of FN patients with RA, with the aim of better understanding the preclinical stages of RA in this population. We have focused on specific features of the anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and other proteomic biomarkers as predictors of future development of RA. These studies have now led us to consider interventions having a favorable risk-benefit ratio if applied at a stage prior to a hypothetical "point of no return," when the autoimmunity potentially becomes irreversible. Based on a supportive mouse model and available human studies of curcumin, omega-3, and vitamin D supplements, we are undertaking studies where we screen communities using dried blood spot technology adapted for the detection of ACPA, and then enrolling ACPA-positive individuals in studies that use a combination of these supplements. These studies are guided by shared decision-making principles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hani El-Gabalawy
- H. El-Gabalawy, MD, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Torlinska B, Raza K, Filer A, Jutley G, Sahbudin I, Singh R, de Pablo P, Rankin E, Rhodes B, Amft N, Justice E, McGrath C, Baskar S, Trickey J, Calvert M, Falahee M. Predictors of quality of life, functional status, depression and fatigue in early arthritis: comparison between clinically suspect arthralgia, unclassified arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:307. [PMID: 38643104 PMCID: PMC11031996 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07446-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is often preceded by symptomatic phases during which classification criteria are not fulfilled. The health burden of these "at-risk" stages is not well described. This study assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL), function, fatigue and depression in newly presenting patients with clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA), unclassified arthritis (UA) or RA. METHODS Cross-sectional analysis of baseline Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) was conducted in patients from the Birmingham Early Arthritis Cohort. HRQoL, function, depression and fatigue at presentation were assessed using EQ-5D, HAQ-DI, PHQ-9 and FACIT-F. PROMs were compared across CSA, UA and RA and with population averages from the HSE with descriptive statistics. Multivariate linear regression assessed associations between PROMs and clinical and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS Of 838 patients included in the analysis, 484 had RA, 200 had CSA and 154 had UA. Patients with RA reported worse outcomes for all PROMs than those with CSA or UA. However, "mean EQ-5D utilities were 0.65 (95%CI: 0.61 to 0.69) in CSA, 0.61 (0.56 to 0.66) in UA and 0.47 (0.44 to 0.50) in RA, which was lower than in general and older (≥ 65 years) background populations." In patients with CSA or UA, HRQoL was comparable to chronic conditions such as heart failure, severe COPD or mild angina. Higher BMI and older age (≥ 60 years) predicted worse depression (PHQ-9: -2.47 (-3.85 to -1.09), P < 0.001) and fatigue (FACIT-F: 5.05 (2.37 to 7.73), P < 0.001). Women were more likely to report worse function (HAQ-DI: 0.13 (0.03 to 0.21), P = 0.01) and fatigue (FACIT-F: -3.64 (-5.59 to -1.70), P < 0.001), and residents of more deprived areas experienced decreased function (HAQ-DI: 0.23 (0.10 to 0.36), P = 0.001), greater depression (PHQ-9: 1.89 (0.59 to 3.18), P = 0.004) and fatigue (FACIT-F: -2.60 (-5.11 to 0.09), P = 0.04). After adjustments for confounding factors, diagnostic category was not associated with PROMs, but disease activity and polypharmacy were associated with poorer performance across all PROMs. CONCLUSIONS Patient-reported outcomes were associated with disease activity and sociodemographic characteristics. Patients presenting with RA reported a higher health burden than those with CSA or UA, however HRQoL in the pre-RA groups was significantly lower than population averages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Torlinska
- Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Karim Raza
- Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research and the Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Andrew Filer
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research and the Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gurpreet Jutley
- Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | - Ilfita Sahbudin
- Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ruchir Singh
- Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | - Paola de Pablo
- Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | - Elizabeth Rankin
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Benjamin Rhodes
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicole Amft
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elizabeth Justice
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Catherine McGrath
- Department of Rheumatology, Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley, UK
| | - Sangeetha Baskar
- Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jeanette Trickey
- Department of Rheumatology, The County Hospital, Wye Valley NHS Trust, Hereford, UK
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Centre West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
| | - Marie Falahee
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Steiner G, Verschueren P, Van Hoovels L, Studenic P, Bossuyt X. Classification of rheumatoid arthritis: is it time to revise the criteria? RMD Open 2024; 10:e003851. [PMID: 38642926 PMCID: PMC11033656 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Classification criteria have been developed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other rheumatic diseases in order to gather a homogeneous patient population for clinical studies and facilitate the timely implementation of therapeutic measures. Although classification criteria are not intended to be used for diagnosis, they are frequently used to support the diagnostic process in clinical practice, including clinical decision-making. The 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) classification criteria for RA are capable of identifying the majority of symptomatic patients with RA already in the earliest stages of the disease who are not yet showing radiographic changes. These patients will also profit from the early implementation of therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). However, the risk of misclassification is higher as compared with the former 1987 ACR criteria, which were considerably less sensitive to the recognition of patients with early RA. Of note, the presence of rheumatoid factors (RFs) and anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) has been attributed equal weight in the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria and may contribute up to 50% of the score needed for being classified as RA. However, while ACPAs have been proven to be the most specific serological markers of RA, the specificity of RF is moderate, especially at lower titres. This may lead to the misclassification of RF-positive patients and, consequently, the unjustified implementation of DMARD therapy. Therefore, issues arise on how comprehensive the criteria should be and whether they should be updated and adapted to findings from the past two decades that might increase both their specificity and sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guenter Steiner
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Wien, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Wien, Wien, Austria
| | - Patrick Verschueren
- Rheumatology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven Biomedical Sciences Group, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lieve Van Hoovels
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, OLV Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Paul Studenic
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Wien, Austria
- Department of Medicine (Solna), Division of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Xavier Bossuyt
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kay J, Nikolov NP, Weisman MH. American College of Rheumatology and Food and Drug Administration Summit: Summary of the Meeting May 17-18, 2022. Arthritis Rheumatol 2024. [PMID: 38622107 DOI: 10.1002/art.42864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
The American College of Rheumatology and the US Food and Drug Administration co-sponsored a public meeting in May 2022 about challenges in the clinical development of drugs for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), focusing on innovative clinical trial designs, outcome measures, and data collection methods. Recommendations include early dose-ranging studies and use of active comparators. Challenges and opportunities in assessing long-term safety by leveraging real-world data from electronic health records (EHRs) and claims data are discussed, along with insights from European registries and the evolving role of real-world evidence and artificial intelligence in regulatory evaluations. Endpoints for assessing disease activity and outcome measures used in RA and PsA trials are explored, emphasizing challenges in defining remission, assessing clinical response, and evaluating structural progression. The need for outcome measures that better reflect treatment targets and the potential of advanced imaging in future trials are highlighted. Challenges with placebo-controlled trials in RA are discussed and use of non-inferiority clinical trial design, in which new drugs are evaluated with active comparators, is proposed. Pragmatic trials in RA and PsA, employing decentralized approaches, are highlighted for their real-world relevance and administrative efficiencies. Strategies for identifying at-risk populations for RA and the challenges of using EHRs and insurance claims data in drug development are discussed. Registry data and digital health technologies show promise in bridging the gap between clinical trials and real-world effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Kay
- UMass Chan Medical School and UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Nikolay P Nikolov
- Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Di Matteo A, Mankia K, Garcia-Montoya L, Sharrack S, Duquenne L, Nam JL, Mahler M, Emery P. Utility of testing for third-generation anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP3) antibodies in individuals who present with new musculoskeletal symptoms but have a negative second-generation anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP2) antibody test. RMD Open 2024; 10:e003927. [PMID: 38599655 PMCID: PMC11015229 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the role of third-generation anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP3) antibodies in predicting progression to inflammatory arthritis (IA) in individuals with new musculoskeletal (MSK) symptoms and a negative second-generation anti-CCP antibody test (anti-CCP2-). METHODS 469 anti-CCP2- individuals underwent baseline anti-CCP3 testing (QUANTA Lite CCP3; Inova Diagnostics) and received a post enrolment 12-month questionnaire. A rheumatologist confirmed or excluded diagnosis of IA. Univariable/multivariable analyses were performed to assess the value of anti-CCP3 in predicting IA development in these anti-CCP2- individuals. RESULTS Only 16/469 (3.4%) anti-CCP2- individuals had a positive anti-CCP3 test. Of these 16 individuals, 4 developed IA. In addition, 61/469 (13.0%) anti-CCP2- individuals self-reported, to have developed, IA. Progression was confirmed in 43/61 of them (70.5%); of whom 30/43 (69.8%) and 13/43 (30.2%) were given a diagnosis of IA and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), respectively. In qualitative univariable analysis, anti-CCP3 positivity was associated with self-reported progression (p<0.01) and IA (p=0.03), but not with RA. Anti-CCP3 levels differed significantly between progressors and non-progressors (p<0.01) for all three categories. At the manufacturer's cut-off, OR for progression ranged from 2.4 (95% CI 0.5 to 18.6; RA) to 7.5 (95% CI 2.3 to 24.0; self-reported progression). Interestingly, when cut-offs for anti-CCP3 were optimised, lower values (≥5 units) significantly increased the OR for progression in all three categories. In multivariable analysis, anti-CCP3 positivity at the manufacturer's cut-off did not remain associated with IA progression, while this lower cut-off value (≥5 units) was associated with diagnosis of RA (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Anti-CCP3 testing could improve the prediction of IA development in anti-CCP2- individuals with new MSK symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Di Matteo
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Kulveer Mankia
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Leticia Garcia-Montoya
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Sana Sharrack
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Laurence Duquenne
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Michael Mahler
- Werfen Autoimmunity Technology Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
O'Neil LJ, Alpízar-Rodríguez D, Deane KD. Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Continuum of Disease and Strategies for Prediction, Early Intervention, and Prevention. J Rheumatol 2024; 51:337-349. [PMID: 38224993 PMCID: PMC10984790 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is known to include a pre-RA stage that can be defined as the presence of familial or genetic risk factors, biomarker abnormalities (eg, anticitrullinated protein antibodies [ACPA]), symptoms, and even abnormal imaging findings prior to the development of the onset of clinical RA with inflammatory arthritis that is apparent on physical examination. Indeed, there are multiple completed or ongoing retrospective case-control as well as prospective observational studies to identify the key biologic drivers of disease. Further, building on the predictive ability of combinations of biomarkers, symptoms, and imaging for future RA, there are multiple clinical trials completed, underway, or in development to identify approaches that may prevent, delay, or ameliorate future clinical RA in at-risk individuals. Importantly, however, although an effective preventive intervention has not yet been identified, at-risk individuals are being increasingly identified in clinical care; this presents a challenge of how to manage these individuals in clinical practice. This review will discuss the current understanding of the biology and natural history of RA development, nomenclature, and current models for prediction of future RA, as well as evaluate the current and ongoing clinical prevention trials with the overall goal to provide insights into the challenges and opportunities in the field of RA prevention. Moreover, this review will provide up-to-date options for clinical management of individuals at risk for RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam J O'Neil
- L.J. O'Neil, MD, MHSc, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Kevin D Deane
- K.D. Deane, MD, PhD, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chapman LS, Siddle HJ, Serban S, Mankia K, Rooney CM, Mustufvi Z, Pini S, Vinall-Collier K. 'What is my risk really?': a qualitative exploration of preventive interventions among individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2024; 8:rkae023. [PMID: 38495430 PMCID: PMC10939459 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkae023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Intervention in the pre-arthritis phase of RA could prevent or delay the onset of disease. The primary aim of this study was to explore perspectives of being at risk and potential preventive interventions among individuals at risk of developing RA and to identify factors influencing their engagement with prevention. A secondary aim, established during the analytical process, was to understand and compare different approaches to health-related behaviours related to prevention of RA. Methods Anti-CCP-positive (CCP+) at-risk individuals with musculoskeletal symptoms but no synovitis participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, followed by a secondary ideal-type analysis. Results Nineteen CCP+ at-risk individuals (10 women; age range 35-70 years) participated. Three overarching themes were identified: being CCP+ at risk; aiming to prevent RA; and influencers of engagement. Participants described distress related to symptoms and uncertainty about disease progression. Many participants had concerns about medication side effects. In contrast, most participants expressed willingness to make lifestyle changes with the aim of preventing RA. Engagement with preventive measures was influenced by symptom severity, personal risk level, co-morbidities, experiences of taking other medications/supplements, knowledge of RA, risk factors and medications, and perceived effort. Three types of participants were identified from the data: proactive preventers, change considerers and fearful avoiders. Overall orientation to health behaviours also impacted the attitude towards preventing RA. Conclusion Findings could inform recruitment and retention in RA prevention research and promote uptake of preventive interventions in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara S Chapman
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Heidi J Siddle
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Stefan Serban
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kulveer Mankia
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Simon Pini
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brown P, Pratt AG, Hyrich KL. Therapeutic advances in rheumatoid arthritis. BMJ 2024; 384:e070856. [PMID: 38233032 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most common immune mediated inflammatory diseases. People with rheumatoid arthritis present with pain, swelling, and stiffness that typically affects symmetrically distributed small and large joints. Without effective treatment, significant joint damage, disability, and work loss develop, owing to chronic inflammation of the joint lining (synovium). Over the past 25 years, the management of this condition has been revolutionized, resulting in substantially higher levels of disease remission and better long term outcomes. This improvement reflects a paradigm shift towards early and aggressive pharmacological intervention coupled with a proliferation in treatment choice, in turn related to enhanced pathobiological understanding and the advent of new drugs for rheumatoid arthritis. Following an overview of these developments from a historical perspective, and with a general audience in mind, this review focuses on newer, targeted treatments in an ever evolving landscape. The review highlights ongoing areas of debate and unmet need, including the proportion of patients with persistent, difficult-to-treat disease, despite recent advances. Also discussed are personalized, strategic approaches to individual patients, the role for imaging in clinical decision making, and the goal of sustained, drug free remission and disease prevention in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Brown
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals and Cumbria, Northumberland; and Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trusts, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Arthur G Pratt
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals and Cumbria, Northumberland; and Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trusts, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Steenbergen HW, Cope AP, van der Helm-van Mil AHM. Rheumatoid arthritis prevention in arthralgia: fantasy or reality? Nat Rev Rheumatol 2023; 19:767-777. [PMID: 37814057 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-023-01035-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
The concept of a 'window of opportunity' in treating a disease assumes the existence of a time frame during which the trajectory of the disease can be effectively and permanently modified. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), optimal timing of this period is presumed to be during the phase before arthritis is clinically apparent and disease is diagnosed. Several proof-of-concept trials of treatment during the 'arthralgia' phase of RA have been completed in the past 4 years, with the underlying notion that temporary treatment at this stage could prevent the development of RA or induce a sustained reduction in the burden of disease. This Review summarizes the results of these trials and reflects on the outcomes in relation to the patients' perspectives. Overall, the majority of symptomatic at-risk individuals could benefit from a fixed period treatment, even if RA does not develop. Various factors must be taken into consideration when translating these findings into clinical practice. More evidence is needed to target the individuals at highest risk, and additional tools are needed to monitor treatment and guide decisions about whether treatment can be discontinued. Without these tools, there is a paradoxical risk of seemingly increasing the incidence of the disease and prolonging disease duration, which is the opposite of what the concept of intervening in the window of opportunity entails.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew P Cope
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hitchon CA, ONeil L, Peschken CA, Robinson DB, Fowler-Woods A, El-Gabalawy HS. Disparities in rheumatoid arthritis outcomes for North American Indigenous populations. Int J Circumpolar Health 2023; 82:2166447. [PMID: 36642913 PMCID: PMC9848324 DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2023.2166447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management have significantly improved clinical outcomes of this disease; however, some Indigenous North Americans (INA) with RA have not achieved the high rates of treatment success observed in other populations. We review factors contributing to poor long-term outcomes for INA with RA. We conducted a narrative review of studies evaluating RA in INA supplemented with regional administrative health and clinical cohort data on clinical outcomes and health care utilisation. We discuss factors related to conducting research in INA populations including studies of RA prevention. NA with RA have a high burden of genetic and environmental predisposing risk factors that may impact disease phenotype, delayed or limited access to rheumatology care and advanced therapy. These factors may contribute to the observed increased rates of persistent synovitis, premature end-stage joint damage and mortality. Novel models of care delivery that are culturally sensitive and address challenges associated with providing speciality care to patients residing in remote communities with limited accessibility are needed. Progress in establishing respectful research partnerships with INA communities has created a foundation for ongoing initiatives to address care gaps including those aimed at RA prevention. This review highlights some of the challenges of diagnosing, treating, and ultimately perhaps preventing, RA in INA populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol A Hitchon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada,CONTACT Carol A Hitchon Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, CAN, RR149 800 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, ManitobaR3A 1M4Canada
| | - Liam ONeil
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Christine A Peschken
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada,Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - David B Robinson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Amanda Fowler-Woods
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Hani S El-Gabalawy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Di Matteo A, Bathon JM, Emery P. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2023; 402:2019-2033. [PMID: 38240831 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01525-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic, systemic, autoimmune inflammatory disease that mainly affects the joints and periarticular soft tissues. In this Seminar, we provide an overview of the main aspects of rheumatoid arthritis. Epidemiology and advances in the understanding of rheumatoid arthritis pathogenesis will be reviewed. We will discuss the clinical manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis, classification criteria, and the value of imaging in the diagnosis of the disease. The advent of new medications and the accumulated scientific evidence demand continuous updating regarding the diagnosis and management, including therapy, of rheumatoid arthritis. An increasing number of patients are now able to reach disease remission. This major improvement in the outcome of patients with rheumatoid arthritis has been determined by a combination of different factors (eg, early diagnosis, window of opportunity, treat-to-target strategy, advent of targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and combination therapy). We will discuss the updated recommendations of the two most influential societies for rheumatology worldwide (ie, the American College of Rheumatology and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Furthermore, controversies (ie, the role of glucocorticoids in the management of rheumatoid arthritis and safety profile of Janus kinase inhibitors) and outstanding research questions, including precision medicine approach, prevention, and cure of rheumatoid arthritis will be highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Di Matteo
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Joan M Bathon
- Division of Rheumatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul Emery
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang D, Zheng Z, Yu H, Dou D, Gao Y, Xu S, Li Z, Sun L, Qiu X, Zhong X. Impact of humid climate on rheumatoid arthritis faecal microbiome and metabolites. Sci Rep 2023; 13:16846. [PMID: 37803075 PMCID: PMC10558475 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43964-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Studies have shown that high humidity is a condition that aggravates the pain of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the relevant mechanism is controversial. Currently, there is a lack of experimental animal studies on high humidity as an adverse factor related to the pathogenesis of RA. We used healthy SD rats and collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rats to investigate the effects of high humidity on arthritis. Integrated metabolomics analyses of faeces and 16S rRNA sequencing of the faecal microbiota were performed to comprehensively assess the diversity of the faecal microbiota and metabolites in healthy and CIA rats. In this study, high humidity aggravated arthritis in CIA rats, which manifested as articular cartilage lesions, increased arthritis scores, and an increase in proinflammatory cytokines. High humidity had a certain effect on the articular cartilage extent, arthritis score and proinflammatory cytokines of healthy rats as well. Furthermore, high humidity caused significant changes in faecal microbes and metabolites in both healthy and CIA rats. 16S rRNA sequencing of faecal samples showed that high humidity increased the amount of inflammation-related bacteria in healthy and CIA rats. Faecal metabolomics results showed that high humidity significantly altered the level of faecal metabolites in healthy rats and CIA rats, and the changes in biological functions were mainly related to the inflammatory response and oxidative stress. Combined analysis showed that there was a strong correlation between the faecal microbiota and faecal metabolites. High humidity is an adverse factor for the onset and development of RA, and its mechanism is related to the inflammatory response and oxidative stress. However, the question of how high humidity impacts RA pathogenesis needs to be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dingnan Wang
- Institute of Synopsis of Golden Chamber Department, School of Chinese Medicine College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhili Zheng
- Institute of Synopsis of Golden Chamber Department, School of Chinese Medicine College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Han Yu
- Formulas of Chinese Medicine, Basic Medical College of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611137, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Dou Dou
- Institute of Synopsis of Golden Chamber Department, School of Chinese Medicine College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Yining Gao
- Institute of Synopsis of Golden Chamber Department, School of Chinese Medicine College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuang Xu
- Institute of Synopsis of Golden Chamber Department, School of Chinese Medicine College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiming Li
- Institute of Synopsis of Golden Chamber Department, School of Chinese Medicine College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Lili Sun
- Institute of Synopsis of Golden Chamber Department, School of Chinese Medicine College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Xudong Qiu
- Institute of Synopsis of Golden Chamber Department, School of Chinese Medicine College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Xianggen Zhong
- Institute of Synopsis of Golden Chamber Department, School of Chinese Medicine College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zabotti A, De Marco G, Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Aletaha D, Iagnocco A, Gisondi P, Balint PV, Bertheussen H, Boehncke WH, Damjanov NS, de Wit M, Errichetti E, Marzo-Ortega H, Protopopov M, Puig L, Queiro R, Ruscitti P, Savage L, Schett G, Siebert S, Stamm TA, Studenic P, Tinazzi I, Van den Bosch FE, van der Helm-van Mil A, Watad A, Smolen JS, McGonagle DG. EULAR points to consider for the definition of clinical and imaging features suspicious for progression from psoriasis to psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82:1162-1170. [PMID: 37295926 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-224148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The transition from psoriasis (PsO) to psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and the early diagnosis of PsA is of considerable scientific and clinical interest for the prevention and interception of PsA. OBJECTIVE To formulate EULAR points to consider (PtC) for the development of data-driven guidance and consensus for clinical trials and clinical practice in the field of prevention or interception of PsA and for clinical management of people with PsO at risk for PsA development. METHODS A multidisciplinary EULAR task force of 30 members from 13 European countries was established, and the EULAR standardised operating procedures for development for PtC were followed. Two systematic literature reviews were conducted to support the task force in formulating the PtC. Furthermore, the task force proposed nomenclature for the stages before PsA, through a nominal group process to be used in clinical trials. RESULTS Nomenclature for the stages preceding PsA onset, 5 overarching principles and 10 PtC were formulated. Nomenclature was proposed for three stages towards PsA development, namely people with PsO at higher risk of PsA, subclinical PsA and clinical PsA. The latter stage was defined as PsO and associated synovitis and it could be used as an outcome measure for clinical trials evaluating the transition from PsO to PsA. The overarching principles address the nature of PsA at its onset and underline the importance of collaboration of rheumatologists and dermatologists for strategies for prevention/interception of PsA. The 10 PtC highlight arthralgia and imaging abnormalities as key elements of subclinical PsA that can be used as potential short-term predictors of PsA development and useful items to design clinical trials for PsA interception. Traditional risk factors for PsA development (ie, PsO severity, obesity and nail involvement) may represent more long-term disease predictors and be less robust for short-term trials concerning the transition from PsO to PsA. CONCLUSION These PtC are helpful to define the clinical and imaging features of people with PsO suspicious to progress to PsA. This information will be helpful for identification of those who could benefit from a therapeutic intervention to attenuate, delay or prevent PsA development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alen Zabotti
- Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, Azienda sanitaria universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Gabriele De Marco
- Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Laure Gossec
- INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
- APHP, Rheumatology Department, Hopital Universitaire Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, France
| | | | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Annamaria Iagnocco
- Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Gisondi
- Department of Medicine, Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Peter V Balint
- 3rd Department of Rheumatology, National Institute for Rheumatology and Physiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - Nemanja S Damjanov
- Rheumatology, University of Belgrade Faculty of Medicine, Beograd, Serbia
| | - Maarten de Wit
- Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Enzo Errichetti
- Department of Medical and Biological Sciences University Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Azienda sanitaria universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Helena Marzo-Ortega
- Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Mikhail Protopopov
- Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lluis Puig
- Dermatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rubén Queiro
- Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Piero Ruscitti
- University of L'Aquila Department of Clinical Sciences and Applied Biotechnology, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Laura Savage
- Chapel Allerton Hospital Department of Dermatology, Leeds, UK
| | - Georg Schett
- Rheumatology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stefan Siebert
- Institute of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Paul Studenic
- Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Ilaria Tinazzi
- Unit of Rheumatology, Don Calabria Sacred Heart Hospital, Negrar, Italy
| | | | - Annette van der Helm-van Mil
- Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Abdulla Watad
- Internal Medicine, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Dennis G McGonagle
- Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Izumiyama T, Miyazawa M. Importance of tenosynovitis in preventing the progression through rheumatoid arthritis continuum. Mod Rheumatol 2023; 33:868-874. [PMID: 36124933 DOI: 10.1093/mr/roac109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has long been characterized by synovitis and bone erosions typically developing symmetrically in small joints. However, recent advances in imaging modalities have indicated frequent association of tenosynovitis with RA, and some consider tenosynovitis to be not just a complication but a major trait of RA. Furthermore, as there are cases with tenosynovitis preceding the clinical detection of inflammatory arthritis in predisposed individuals, tenosynovitis may constitute an important biomarker in defining the pre-RA phase of disease development. Tenosynovitis itself must be treated as it causes functional impairment and physical as well as socioeconomic burden, and its treatment may result in effective prevention of RA development at a pre-arthritic stage. Thus, further efforts need to be taken in detecting and treating tenosynovitis in the pre-RA stage, which can be facilitated by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Masaaki Miyazawa
- Department of Immunology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Awuah WA, Huang H, Kalmanovich J, Mehta A, Mikhailova T, Ng JC, Abdul-Rahman T, Adebusoye FT, Tan JK, Kamanousa K, Ferreira T, Roy S, Kundu M, Yarlagadda R, Mukerjee N, Alexiou A, Papadakis M. Circadian rhythm in systemic autoimmune conditions: Potential of chrono-immunology in clinical practice: A narrative review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e34614. [PMID: 37565922 PMCID: PMC10419593 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The circadian rhythm (CR) is a fundamental biological process regulated by the Earth's rotation and solar cycles. It plays a critical role in various bodily functions, and its dysregulation can have systemic effects. These effects impact metabolism, redox homeostasis, cell cycle regulation, gut microbiota, cognition, and immune response. Immune mediators, cycle proteins, and hormones exhibit circadian oscillations, supporting optimal immune function and defence against pathogens. Sleep deprivation and disruptions challenge the regulatory mechanisms, making immune responses vulnerable. Altered CR pathways have been implicated in diseases such as diabetes, neurological conditions, and systemic autoimmune diseases (SADs). SADs involve abnormal immune responses to self-antigens, with genetic and environmental factors disrupting self-tolerance and contributing to conditions like Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Inflammatory Myositis. Dysregulated CR may lead to increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, contributing to the systemic responses observed in SADs. Sleep disturbances significantly impact the quality of life of patients with SADs; however, they are often overlooked. The relationship between sleep and autoimmune conditions, whether causal or consequential to CR dysregulation, remains unclear. Chrono-immunology investigates the role of CR in immunity, offering potential for targeted therapies in autoimmune conditions. This paper provides an overview of the connections between sleep and autoimmune conditions, highlighting the importance of recognizing sleep disturbances in SADs and the need for further research into the complex relationship between the CR and autoimmune diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helen Huang
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Aashna Mehta
- University of Debrecen-Faculty of Medicine, Debrecen, Hungary
| | | | - Jyi Cheng Ng
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| | | | | | | | | | - Tomas Ferreira
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sakshi Roy
- School of Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Mrinmoy Kundu
- Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India
| | | | - Nobendu Mukerjee
- Department of Microbiology, West Bengal State University, Barasat, India
- Department of Health Sciences, Novel Global Community Educational Foundation, Hebersham, NSW
| | - Athanasios Alexiou
- Department of Science and Engineering, Novel Global Community Educational Foundation, Hebersham, NSW
| | - Marios Papadakis
- Department of Surgery II, University Hospital Witten-Herdecke, Heusnerstrasse 40, University of Witten-Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Duquenne L, Hensor EM, Wilson M, Garcia-Montoya L, Nam JL, Wu J, Harnden K, Anioke IC, Di Matteo A, Chowdhury R, Sidhu N, Ponchel F, Mankia K, Emery P. Predicting Inflammatory Arthritis in At-Risk Persons: Development of Scores for Risk Stratification. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:1027-1036. [PMID: 37523695 DOI: 10.7326/m23-0272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory arthritis (IA) is an immune-related condition defined by the presence of clinical synovitis. Its most common form is rheumatoid arthritis. OBJECTIVE To develop scores for predicting IA in at-risk persons using multidimensional biomarkers. DESIGN Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING Single-center, Leeds, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS Persons with new musculoskeletal symptoms, a positive test result for anticitrullinated protein antibodies, and no clinical synovitis and followed for 48 weeks or more or until IA occurred. MEASUREMENTS A simple score was developed using logistic regression, and a comprehensive score was developed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox proportional hazards regression. Internal validation with bootstrapping was estimated, and a decision curve analysis was done. RESULTS Of 455 participants, 32.5% (148 of 455) developed IA, and 15.4% (70 of 455) developed it within 1 year. The simple score identified 249 low-risk participants with a false negative rate of 5% (and 206 high-risk participants with a false-positive rate of 72%). The comprehensive score identified 119 high-risk participants with a false-positive rate of 29% (and 336 low-risk participants with a false-negative rate of 19%); 40% of high-risk participants developed IA within 1 year and 71% within 5 years. LIMITATIONS External validation is required. Recruitment occurred over 13 years, with lower rates of IA in later years. There was geographic variation in laboratory testing and recruitment availability. CONCLUSION The simple score identified persons at low risk for IA who were less likely to need secondary care. The comprehensive score identified high-risk persons who could benefit from risk stratification and preventive measures. Both scores may be useful in clinical care and should also be useful in clinical trials. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Institute for Health and Care Research Leeds Biomedical Research Centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence Duquenne
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom (L.D., E.M.H., M.W., L.G., J.L.N., K.H., A.D.M., R.C., N.S., K.M., P.E.)
| | - Elizabeth M Hensor
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom (L.D., E.M.H., M.W., L.G., J.L.N., K.H., A.D.M., R.C., N.S., K.M., P.E.)
| | - Michelle Wilson
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom (L.D., E.M.H., M.W., L.G., J.L.N., K.H., A.D.M., R.C., N.S., K.M., P.E.)
| | - Leticia Garcia-Montoya
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom (L.D., E.M.H., M.W., L.G., J.L.N., K.H., A.D.M., R.C., N.S., K.M., P.E.)
| | - Jacqueline L Nam
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom (L.D., E.M.H., M.W., L.G., J.L.N., K.H., A.D.M., R.C., N.S., K.M., P.E.)
| | - Jianhua Wu
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, and Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (J.W.)
| | - Kate Harnden
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom (L.D., E.M.H., M.W., L.G., J.L.N., K.H., A.D.M., R.C., N.S., K.M., P.E.)
| | - Innocent Chidi Anioke
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, and Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nigeria (I.C.A.)
| | - Andrea Di Matteo
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom (L.D., E.M.H., M.W., L.G., J.L.N., K.H., A.D.M., R.C., N.S., K.M., P.E.)
| | - Rahaymin Chowdhury
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom (L.D., E.M.H., M.W., L.G., J.L.N., K.H., A.D.M., R.C., N.S., K.M., P.E.)
| | - Navkiran Sidhu
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom (L.D., E.M.H., M.W., L.G., J.L.N., K.H., A.D.M., R.C., N.S., K.M., P.E.)
| | - Frederique Ponchel
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom (F.P.)
| | - Kulveer Mankia
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom (L.D., E.M.H., M.W., L.G., J.L.N., K.H., A.D.M., R.C., N.S., K.M., P.E.)
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom (L.D., E.M.H., M.W., L.G., J.L.N., K.H., A.D.M., R.C., N.S., K.M., P.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chapman LS, Vinall-Collier K, Siddle HJ, Mustufvi Z, Mankia K, Serban S. 'It surprised me a lot that there is a link': a qualitative study of the acceptability of periodontal treatment for individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open 2023; 9:rmdopen-2023-003099. [PMID: 37156573 PMCID: PMC10174022 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Current evidence suggests that periodontal disease could be a causal risk factor for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) onset and progression. Earlier periodontal intervention in individuals at risk of RA could provide a unique opportunity to prevent or delay the onset of RA. This study aimed to explore the acceptability of periodontal treatment as a measure to potentially prevent RA among at-risk individuals and healthcare professionals. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with anti-CCP positive at-risk individuals (CCP+ at risk) and a range of healthcare professionals. At-risk participant data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis; subsequent coding of healthcare professional data was deductive, based on a preidentified set of constructs. RESULTS Nineteen CCP+ at-risk and 11 healthcare professionals participated. Three themes (six subthemes) were identified: (1) understanding risk (knowledge of shared at-risk factors; information and communication); (2) oral health perceptions and experiences (personal challenges and opportunities for dental intervention and oral health maintenance; external barriers) and (3) oral health treatment and maintenance (making oral health changes with the aim of preventing RA; acceptability of participation in periodontal research). CONCLUSIONS Periodontal disease is common in individuals at risk of RA, but the impact of poor oral health may not be well understood. Oral health information should be tailored to the individual. CCP+ at-risk participants and healthcare professionals identified seeking dental treatment can be hindered by dental phobia, treatment costs or inability to access dentists. While CCP+ at-risk individuals may be reluctant to take preventive medications, a clinical trial involving preventive periodontal treatment is potentially acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara S Chapman
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Karen Vinall-Collier
- Department of Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Heidi J Siddle
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Zhain Mustufvi
- Department of Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - K Mankia
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK
| | - Stefan Serban
- Department of Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Public Health Directorate, NHS England North West Region, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yen TH, Wu YD, Chen HH, Tseng CW, Chen YH, Chen YM, Lai KL. The role of ultrasound synovitis scores for patients who are at risk of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis 2023; 26:922-929. [PMID: 36944587 DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.14675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been classified into 6 phases A-F according to the present risk factors in sequence of genes, environments, autoimmunity, arthralgia and joint swelling. To clarify the ultrasound synovitis scores in at-risk patients (phases C-E) and RA (phase F). METHODS Patients who had been experiencing hand joint symptoms for at least 6 weeks and asymptomatic patients with positive rheumatoid factor and/or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies were enrolled. A 40-joint ultrasonography with semiquantitative synovitis scoring for gray scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) images was performed. RESULTS A total of 139 patients were enrolled and classified into non-RA, phase C, phase D, phase E and phase F. Total GS scores in phases C (17.4 ± 7.0), D (16.0 ± 5.4), E (18.5 ± 7.7) and F (21.8 ± 9.1) were higher than those in non-RA (9.8 ± 4.0, P < 0.001). The total PD score in phase F (3.1 ± 4.6) was higher than that in phases C (0.2 ± 0.5), D (0.1 ± 0.4), and E (0.1 ± 0.3), as well as in non-RA (0.0 ± 0.0, P < 0.01). A total GS score ≥14 differentiated patients at risk for RA from patients with non-RA (area under curve [AUC] 0.82), while a total PD score ≥2 differentiated patients with RA from patients at risk for RA (AUC 0.71). CONCLUSION Total GS score may differentiate patients at risk for RA from non-RA patients, while total PD score may differentiate patients with RA from those who are at risk for RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsai-Hung Yen
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Da Wu
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Hua Chen
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Wei Tseng
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Hsin Chen
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Ming Chen
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Lung Lai
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Simons G, Veldwijk J, DiSantostefano RL, Englbrecht M, Radawski C, Bywall KS, Valor Méndez L, Hauber B, Raza K, Falahee M. Preferences for preventive treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: discrete choice survey in the UK, Germany and Romania. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023; 62:596-605. [PMID: 36068022 PMCID: PMC9891433 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To quantify preferences for preventive therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) across three countries. METHODS A web-based survey including a discrete choice experiment was administered to adults recruited via survey panels in the UK, Germany and Romania. Participants were asked to assume they were experiencing arthralgia and had a 60% chance of developing RA in the next 2 years and completed 15 choices between no treatment and two hypothetical preventive treatments. Treatments were defined by six attributes (effectiveness, risks and frequency/route of administration) with varying levels. Participants also completed a choice task with fixed profiles reflecting subjective estimates of candidate preventive treatments. Latent class models (LCMs) were conducted and the relative importance of attributes, benefit-risk trade-offs and predicted treatment uptake was subsequently calculated. RESULTS Completed surveys from 2959 participants were included in the analysis. Most participants preferred treatment over no treatment and valued treatment effectiveness to reduce risk more than other attributes. A five-class LCM best fitted the data. Country, perceived risk of RA, health literacy and numeracy predicted class membership probability. Overall, the maximum acceptable risk for a 40% reduction in the chance of getting RA (60% to 20%) was 21.7%, 19.1% and 2.2% for mild side effects, serious infection and serious side effects, respectively. Predicted uptake of profiles reflecting candidate prevention therapies differed across classes. CONCLUSION Effective preventive pharmacological treatments for RA were acceptable to most participants. The relative importance of treatment attributes and likely uptake of fixed treatment profiles were predicted by participant characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwenda Simons
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jorien Veldwijk
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management and Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam.,Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Larissa Valor Méndez
- Department of Internal Medicine 3-Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nurnberg and Universitatsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Brett Hauber
- Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY.,Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics Institute, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Karim Raza
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis and MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, University of Birmingham.,Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marie Falahee
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ponchel F, Duquenne L, Xie X, Corscadden D, Shuweihdi F, Mankia K, Trouw LA, Emery P. Added value of multiple autoantibody testing for predicting progression to inflammatory arthritis in at-risk individuals. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002512. [PMID: 36535711 PMCID: PMC9764647 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predicting progression to clinical arthritis in individuals at-risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis is a prerequisite to developing stratification groups for prevention strategies. Selecting accurate predictive criteria is the critical step to define the population at-risk. While positivity for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) remains the main recruitment biomarker, positivity for other autoantibodies (AutoAbs) identified before the onset of symptoms, may provide additional predictive accuracy for stratification. OBJECTIVE To perform a multiple AutoAbs analysis for both the prediction and the time of progression to inflammatory arthritis (IA). METHODS 392 individuals were recruited based on a new musculoskeletal complaint and positivity for ACPA or rheumatoid factor (RF). ELISAs were performed for ACPA, RF, anti-nuclear Ab, anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) and anti-collagen AutoAbs. Logistic and COX regression were used for analysis. RESULTS Progression to IA was observed in 125/392 (32%) of cases, of which 78 progressed within 12 months. The AutoAbs ACPA, RF, anti-CarP were individually associated with progression (p<0.0001) and improved prediction when combined with demographic/clinical data (Accuracy >77%; area under the curve (AUC) >0.789), compared with prediction using only demographic/clinical data (72.9%, AUC=0.760). Multiple AutoAbs testing provided added value, with +6.4% accuracy for number of positive AutoAbs (AUC=0.852); +5.4% accuracy for AutoAbs levels (ACPA/anti-CarP, AUC=0.832); and +6.2% accuracy for risk-groups based on high/low levels (ACPA/RF/anti-CarP, AUC=0.837). Time to imminent progression was best predicted using ACPA/anti-CarP levels (AUC=0.779), while the number of positive AutoAbs was/status/risk were as good (AUC=0.778). CONCLUSION We confirm added value of multiple AutoAbs testing for identifying progressors to clinical disease, allowing more specific stratification for intervention studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederique Ponchel
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Laurence Duquenne
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Xuanxiao Xie
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Diane Corscadden
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Farag Shuweihdi
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - K Mankia
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - L A Trouw
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK,Leeds NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Simons G, Janssen EM, Veldwijk J, DiSantostefano RL, Englbrecht M, Radawski C, Valor-Méndez L, Humphreys JH, Bruce IN, Hauber B, Raza K, Falahee M. Acceptable risks of treatments to prevent rheumatoid arthritis among first-degree relatives: demographic and psychological predictors of risk tolerance. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002593. [PMID: 36598004 PMCID: PMC9748990 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To quantify tolerance to risks of preventive treatments among first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Preventive treatments for RA are under investigation. In a preference survey, adult FDRs assumed a 60% chance of developing RA within 2 years and made choices between no treatment and hypothetical preventive treatment options with a fixed level of benefit (reduction in chance of developing RA from 60% to 20%) and varying levels of risks. Using a probabilistic threshold technique, each risk was increased or decreased until participants switched their choice. Perceived risk of RA, health literacy, numeracy, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire and Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire-General were also assessed. Maximum acceptable risk (MAR) was summarised using descriptive statistics. Associations between MARs and participants' characteristics were assessed using interval regression with effects coding. RESULTS 289 FDRs (80 male) responded. The mean MAR for a 40% reduction in chance of developing RA was 29.08% risk of mild side effects, 9.09% risk of serious infection and 0.85% risk of a serious side effect. Participants aged over 60 years were less tolerant of serious infection risk (mean MAR ±2.06%) than younger participants. Risk of mild side effects was less acceptable to participants who perceived higher likelihood of developing RA (mean MAR ±3.34%) and more acceptable to those believing that if they developed RA it would last for a long time (mean MAR ±4.44%). CONCLUSIONS Age, perceived chance of developing RA and perceived duration of RA were associated with tolerance to some risks of preventive RA therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwenda Simons
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ellen M Janssen
- Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jorien Veldwijk
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management and Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Larissa Valor-Méndez
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute for Clinical Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jennifer H Humphreys
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Kellgren Centre for Rheumatology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Ian N Bruce
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Kellgren Centre for Rheumatology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Karim Raza
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis and MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marie Falahee
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Takeuchi T. Cytokines and cytokine receptors as targets of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases-RA as a role model. Inflamm Regen 2022; 42:35. [PMID: 36451227 PMCID: PMC9713106 DOI: 10.1186/s41232-022-00221-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in our understanding in the immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) are explored and promoted by the targeted treatment. Among these targets, cytokines and cytokine receptors have become the good candidates for the drug development. In this review, the cytokine and cytokine receptors, which are approved in IMID, are overviewed, and modalities of the treatment, the role of cytokines and cytokine receptors in each disease, and the updated molecular information by modern technologies in rheumatoid arthritis as a role model are shown and discussed for the future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsutomu Takeuchi
- grid.410802.f0000 0001 2216 2631Saitama Medical University, 38 Morohongo, Moroyama, Iruma, Saitama, 350-0495 Japan ,grid.26091.3c0000 0004 1936 9959Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-8582 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bunnewell S, Wells I, Zemedikun D, Simons G, Mallen CD, Raza K, Falahee M. Predictors of perceived risk in first-degree relatives of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open 2022; 8:e002606. [PMID: 36597990 PMCID: PMC9723950 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To define variables associated with perceived risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with RA. METHODS Patients with RA and their FDRs were invited to complete cross-sectional surveys. FDR and index patient responses were linked. FDRs' perceived absolute risk, comparative risk, experiential risk and worry about risk were assessed using 5-point Likert scales. FDR predictor variables included demographics, illness perceptions and psychosocial variables. Patient predictors of FDR perceived risk were assessed. Binary logistic regression examined the relationship between FDR characteristics and perceived risk of RA. Generalised estimating equations assessed whether patient variables predicted FDR's perceived risk. RESULTS 396 FDRs returned a survey. 395 FDRs provided sufficient data and were included in analysis. Paired data from 213 patients were available for 291 of these FDRs. All measures of perceived risk were inter-correlated. 65.2% of FDRs perceived themselves to be 'likely' or 'very likely' to develop RA in their lifetime. Relationship with index patient, high health anxiety, female gender, long perceived RA duration, high perceived concern about RA, negative perceived emotional impact of RA and low perceptions of how well treatment would control RA were all associated with increased FDRs' perceived risk. Patient characteristics did not associate with FDRs' risk perceptions. CONCLUSIONS FDRs' perceived risk of RA was high. Key predictors included being a child of a patient with RA, higher health anxiety and lower perceptions of RA treatment control. An understanding of these predictors will inform the development of tailored risk communication resources and preventive clinical strategies for RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bunnewell
- Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Imogen Wells
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Dawit Zemedikun
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gwenda Simons
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Christian D Mallen
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Karim Raza
- Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research and the Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marie Falahee
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rogier C, Frazzei G, Kortekaas MC, Verstappen M, Ohrndorf S, van Mulligen E, van Vollenhoven RF, van Schaardenburg D, de Jong PHP, van der Helm-van Mil AHM. An ultrasound negative for subclinical synovitis in arthralgia patients: is it helpful in identifying those not developing arthritis? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 61:4892-4897. [PMID: 35416958 PMCID: PMC9707035 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the negative predictive value (NPV) of musculoskeletal US (MSUS) in arthralgia patients at risk for developing inflammatory arthritis. METHODS An MSUS examination of hands and feet was performed in arthralgia patients at risk for inflammatory arthritis in four independent cohorts. Patients were followed for one-year on the development of inflammatory arthritis. Subclinical synovitis was defined as greyscale ≥2 and/or power Doppler ≥1. NPVs were determined and compared with the prior risks of not developing inflammatory arthritis. Outcomes were pooled using meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses. In sensitivity analyses, MSUS imaging of tender joints only (rather than the full US protocol) was analysed and ACPA stratification applied. RESULTS After 1 year 78, 82, 77 and 72% of patients in the four cohorts did not develop inflammatory arthritis. The NPV of a negative US was 86, 85, 82 and 90%, respectively. The meta-analysis showed a pooled non-inflammatory arthritis prevalence of 79% (95% CI 75%, 83%) and a pooled NPV of 86% (95% CI 81, 89%). Imaging tender joints only (as generally done in clinical practice) and ACPA stratification showed similar results. CONCLUSION A negative US result in arthralgia has a high NPV for not developing inflammatory arthritis, which is mainly due to the high a priori risk of not developing inflammatory arthritis. The added value of a negative US (<10% increase) was limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cleo Rogier
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
| | - Giulia Frazzei
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam
| | - Marion C Kortekaas
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes Verstappen
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah Ohrndorf
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elise van Mulligen
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Harnden K, Di Matteo A, Mankia K. When and how should we use imaging in individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis? Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1058510. [PMID: 36507546 PMCID: PMC9726914 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1058510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years rheumatologists have begun to shift focus from early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to studying individuals at risk of developing the disease. It is now possible to use blood, clinical and imaging biomarkers to identify those at risk of progression before the onset of clinical synovitis. The use of imaging, in particular ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has become much more widespread in individuals at-risk of RA. Numerous studies have demonstrated that imaging can help us understand RA pathogenesis as well as identifying individuals at high risk of progression. In addition, imaging techniques are becoming more sophisticated with newer imaging modalities such as high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQRCT), nuclear imaging and whole body-MRI (WB-MRI) starting to emerge. Imaging studies in at risk individuals are heterogeneous in nature due to the different at-risk populations, imaging modalities and protocols used. This review will explore the available imaging modalities and the rationale for their use in the main populations at risk of RA.
Collapse
|
27
|
O’Neil LJ, Meng X, Mcfadyen C, Fritzler MJ, El-Gabalawy HS. Serum proteomic networks associate with pre-clinical rheumatoid arthritis autoantibodies and longitudinal outcomes. Front Immunol 2022; 13:958145. [PMID: 36159862 PMCID: PMC9492875 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.958145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The development of autoantibody directed towards citrullinated proteins (ACPA) are predictive of RA in at-risk individuals. The biological events that underpin loss of immune tolerance and progression into inflammatory arthritis are not known. We sought to identify serum proteomic alterations that drive autoantibody formation, persistence and progression into inflammatory arthritis in a cohort of first-degree relatives (FDR) of RA patients. Methods We studied baseline serum samples from a cohort of Indigenous FDR (n = 147) and quantified serum proteins using a 48-plex platform. Longitudinal outcomes were defined on the basis of ACPA status and progression into inflammatory arthritis (IA). K-means clustering, differential expression, and principal components analyze group differences. A co-expression module analysis was used to identify enriched networks. Random forest was used to classify ACPA positive samples, while network analysis was used to understand underlying biological processes based on protein expression. Results We defined 6 proteomic clusters, with enrichment of ACPA positive samples in one of the clusters. 23 of 24 differentially expressed proteins in ACPA positive samples were upregulated. A co-expression network was enriched in ACPA positive sera and individuals who progressed into IA. Random Forest achieved an area under the curve of 0.767 to classify ACPA positive sera in a test dataset. Network analysis revealed upregulation of JAK-STAT signalling as being activated in those at highest risk to develop future IA. Conclusions The serum proteome provides a rich dataset to understand biological processes in ACPA seropositive individuals. A combination of serum biomarkers, including ACPA, may predict future arthritis onset in at-risk individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam J. O’Neil
- Department of Internal Medicine, Manitoba Centre for Proteomics and Systems Biology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- *Correspondence: Liam J. O’Neil,
| | - Xiaobo Meng
- Department of Internal Medicine, Manitoba Centre for Proteomics and Systems Biology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Caitlin Mcfadyen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Manitoba Centre for Proteomics and Systems Biology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | | | - Hani S. El-Gabalawy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Manitoba Centre for Proteomics and Systems Biology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Romão VC, Fonseca JE. Disease mechanisms in preclinical rheumatoid arthritis: A narrative review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:689711. [PMID: 36059838 PMCID: PMC9437632 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.689711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last decades, the concept of preclinical rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has become established. In fact, the discovery that disease mechanisms start years before the onset of clinical RA has been one of the major recent insights in the understanding of RA pathogenesis. In accordance with the complex nature of the disease, preclinical events extend over several sequential phases. In a genetically predisposed host, environmental factors will further increase susceptibility for incident RA. In the initial steps of preclinical disease, immune disturbance mechanisms take place outside the joint compartment, namely in mucosal surfaces, such as the lung, gums or gut. Herein, the persistent immunologic response to altered antigens will lead to breach of tolerance and trigger autoimmunity. In a second phase, the immune response matures and is amplified at a systemic level, with epitope spreading and widening of the autoantibody repertoire. Finally, the synovial and bone compartment are targeted by specific autoantibodies against modified antigens, initiating a local inflammatory response that will eventually culminate in clinically evident synovitis. In this review, we discuss the elaborate disease mechanisms in place during preclinical RA, providing a broad perspective in the light of current evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasco C. Romão
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre and European Reference Network on Rare Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases Network (ERN-ReCONNET), Lisbon, Portugal
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - João Eurico Fonseca
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rech J, Schett G. Towards preventive treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2022; 400:253-255. [PMID: 35871801 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01327-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen Rech
- Department of Internal Medicine 3-Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen 91054, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen 91054, Germany
| | - Georg Schett
- Department of Internal Medicine 3-Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen 91054, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen 91054, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kowalski EN, Qian G, Vanni KMM, Sparks JA. A Roadmap for Investigating Preclinical Autoimmunity Using Patient-Oriented and Epidemiologic Study Designs: Example of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Front Immunol 2022; 13:890996. [PMID: 35693829 PMCID: PMC9175569 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.890996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a prototypic autoimmune disease causing inflammatory polyarthritis that affects nearly 1% of the population. RA can lead to joint destruction and disability along with increased morbidity and mortality. Similar to other autoimmune diseases, RA has distinct preclinical phases corresponding to genetic risk, lifestyle risk factors, autoantibody development, and non-specific symptoms prior to clinical diagnosis. This narrative review will detail observational studies for RA risk and clinical trials for RA prevention as a roadmap to investigating preclinical autoimmunity that could be applied to other diseases. Methods In this narrative review, we summarized previous and ongoing research studies investigating RA risk and prevention, categorizing them related to their design and preclinical phases. Results We detailed the following types of studies investigating RA risk and prevention: retrospective population-based and administrative datasets; prospective studies (case-control and cohort; some enrolling based on genetics, first-degree relative status, elevated biomarkers, or early symptoms/arthritis); and randomized clinical trials. These correspond to all preclinical RA phases (genetic, lifestyle, autoimmunity, early signs/symptoms). Previous and ongoing randomized controlled trials have enrolled individuals at very elevated risk for RA based on biomarkers, symptoms, imaging abnormalities, or early signs/symptoms. Conclusion We detailed the rich variety of study designs that is necessary to investigate distinct preclinical phases of an autoimmune disease such as RA. However, further progress is needed to fully elucidate the pathogenesis of RA that may ultimately lead to prevention or delay of disease onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily N Kowalski
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Grace Qian
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kathleen M M Vanni
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jeffrey A Sparks
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Studenic P, Hensvold A, Kleyer A, van der Helm-van Mil A, Pratt AG, Sieghart D, Krönke G, Williams R, de Souza S, Karlfeldt S, Johannesson M, Krogh NS, Klareskog L, Catrina AI. Prospective Studies on the Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis: The European Risk RA Registry. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:824501. [PMID: 35273981 PMCID: PMC8901993 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.824501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The accumulation of risk for the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is regarded as a continuum that may start with interacting environmental and genetic factors, proceed with the initiation of autoimmunity, and result in the formation of autoantibodies such as anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA). In parallel, at-risk individuals may be asymptomatic or experience joint pain (arthralgia) that is itself non-specific or clinically suspicious for evolving RA, even in the absence of overt arthritis. Optimal strategies for the management of people at-risk of RA, both for symptom control and to delay or prevent progression to classifiable disease, remain poorly understood. Methods To help address this, groups of stakeholders from academia, clinical rheumatology, industry and patient research partners have collaborated to advance understanding, define and study different phases of the at-risk state. In this current report we describe different European initiatives in the field and the successful effort to build a European Registry of at-risk people to facilitate observational and interventional research. Results We outline similarities and differences between cohorts of at-risk individuals at institutions spanning several countries, and how to best combine them within the new database. Over the past 2 years, besides building the technical infrastructure, we have agreed on a core set of variables that all partners should strive to collect for harmonization purposes. Conclusion We emphasize to address this process from different angles and touch on the biologic, epidemiologic, analytic, and regulatory aspects of collaborative studies within a meta-database of people at-risk of RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Studenic
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Internal Medicine 3, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aase Hensvold
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Academic Specialist Centre-Stockholm Health Care Services, Centre for Rheumatology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Arnd Kleyer
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Annette van der Helm-van Mil
- Department of Rheumatology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Arthur G Pratt
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.,Musculoskeletal Services Directorate, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Daniela Sieghart
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerhard Krönke
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ruth Williams
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Savia de Souza
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Susanne Karlfeldt
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Academic Specialist Centre-Stockholm Health Care Services, Centre for Rheumatology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martina Johannesson
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Lars Klareskog
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Rheumatology Section, Theme Inflammation and Infection, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anca I Catrina
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
The undifferentiated arthritis dilemma: the story continues. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2022; 18:189-190. [DOI: 10.1038/s41584-022-00762-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
33
|
Simons G, Caplan J, DiSantostefano RL, Veldwijk J, Englbrecht M, Bywall KS, Kihlbom U, Raza K, Falahee M. Systematic review of quantitative preference studies of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis among patients and at-risk populations. Arthritis Res Ther 2022; 24:55. [PMID: 35193653 PMCID: PMC8862509 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-021-02707-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Treatments used for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are under investigation for their efficacy to prevent RA in at risk groups. It is therefore important to understand treatment preferences of those at risk. We systematically reviewed quantitative preference studies of drugs to treat, or prevent RA, to inform the design of further studies and trials of RA prevention. Stated preference studies for RA treatment or prevention were identified through a search of five databases. Study characteristics and results were extracted, and the relative importance of different types of treatment attributes was compared across populations. Twenty three studies were included 20 of RA treatments (18 of patients; 2 of the general public) and 3 prevention studies with first-degree relatives (FDRs). Benefits, risks, administration method and cost (when included) were important determinants of treatment choice. A benefit was more important than a risk attribute in half of the studies of RA treatment that included a benefit attribute and 2/3 studies of RA prevention. There was variability in the relative importance of attributes across the few prevention studies. In studies with non-patient participants, attributes describing confidence in treatment effectiveness/safety were more important determinants of choice than in studies with patients. Most preference studies relating to RA are of treatments for established RA. Few studies examine preferences for treatments to prevent RA. Given intense research focus on RA prevention, additional preference studies in this context are needed. Variation in treatment preferences across different populations is not well understood and direct comparisons are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwenda Simons
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham Research Laboratories, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK.
| | - Joshua Caplan
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham Research Laboratories, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | | | - Jorien Veldwijk
- School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Julius Center for Health and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Karin Schölin Bywall
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ulrik Kihlbom
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Karim Raza
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham Research Laboratories, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK.,Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis and MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marie Falahee
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham Research Laboratories, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fiechter RH, Bolt JW, van de Sande MGH, Aalbers CJ, Landewé RBM, Maas M, Tas SW, van Baarsen LGM. Ultrasound-guided lymph node biopsy sampling to study the immunopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis: a well-tolerated valuable research tool. Arthritis Res Ther 2022; 24:36. [PMID: 35115042 PMCID: PMC8812012 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-022-02728-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Analyses of lymphoid organs are required to further elucidate the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Yet, invasive tissue collection methods are scarcely applied, because they are often considered burdensome, although patients do not always consider invasive methods as a high burden. We aimed to investigate the perspectives of study participants undergoing ultrasound-guided inguinal lymph node (LN) needle biopsy sampling and determine the molecular and cellular quantity and quality of LN biopsies. Methods Together with patient research partners, questionnaires were developed to evaluate the motives, expectations, and experiences of participants undergoing a LN biopsy. Healthy controls and RA(-risk) patients were asked to complete these questionnaires before and after the procedure. RNA and lymphocyte yields from obtained LN biopsies were also calculated. Results We included 50 individuals, of which 43 (86%) reported their pre- and post-procedure experiences. The median reported pain on a 5-point Likert scale (1 not to 5 very painful) was 1. Interestingly, almost all (n = 32; 74%) study participants would undergo a second procedure and more than half (n = 23; 54%) would encourage others to take part in the LN biopsy study. Motives for current and future participation were mostly altruistic. Inguinal hematoma occurred frequently, but no other significant or unexpected complications ensued. The LN biopsies yielded sufficient and high-quality RNA and lymphocyte numbers. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided inguinal LN biopsy sampling is well-tolerated, safe, and provides sufficient material for further molecular and cellular analyses. Our participants’ positive experiences endorse the application of this research tool to further elucidate the pathogenesis of RA and other inflammatory diseases. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-022-02728-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée H Fiechter
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center (ARC), EULAR & FOCIS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janne W Bolt
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center (ARC), EULAR & FOCIS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marleen G H van de Sande
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center (ARC), EULAR & FOCIS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline J Aalbers
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center (ARC), EULAR & FOCIS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert B M Landewé
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center (ARC), EULAR & FOCIS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mario Maas
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander W Tas
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center (ARC), EULAR & FOCIS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Lisa G M van Baarsen
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center (ARC), EULAR & FOCIS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
|
36
|
Falahee M, Raza K. Perspectives of at-Risk Individuals on Preventive Intervention for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Mini Review. Front Immunol 2022; 13:883287. [PMID: 35572603 PMCID: PMC9098966 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.883287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
There has been intense research focus on the biological mechanisms underlying the transition from health to disease for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over recent years, and it is now well established that a state of autoimmunity precedes the development of symptoms for a large proportion of patients. This has led to an increased interest in the identification of at-risk groups and the potential for preventive intervention. The ability of several immunomodulatory agents to delay or prevent RA is under investigation and novel cellular therapies are in development. Preventive approaches are also being assessed in other chronic autoimmune diseases. For example, an anti-CD3 antibody has recently been shown to delay progression to type 1 diabetes in non-diabetic relatives of patients identified as being at high risk. The identification and treatment of individuals as being at risk of a disease where there is a degree of uncertainty around the potential for benefit is socially and ethically challenging. Recently reported difficulties in recruitment to RA prevention trials have underlined the importance of understanding the perspectives of at-risk individuals to identify barriers and facilitators that need to be addressed in order for preventive strategies to be acceptable. Understanding of their preferences for benefits and risks of preventive interventions can inform efficient intervention prioritization, prevention trial design and the development of informational resources for those at risk. In this review we summarize current knowledge of preferences for RA prevention and make recommendations for further research needed to ensure efficient development of preventive therapies and clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Falahee
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Medical Research Council (MRC) Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research and the Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Karim Raza
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Medical Research Council (MRC) Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research and the Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Rheumatology Department, Sandwell and West Birmingham National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Siddle HJ, Chapman LS, Mankia K, Zăbălan C, Kouloumas M, Raza K, Falahee M, Kerry J, Kerschbaumer A, Aletaha D, Emery P, Richards SH. Perceptions and experiences of individuals at-risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) knowing about their risk of developing RA and being offered preventive treatment: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 81:159-168. [PMID: 34750103 PMCID: PMC8762008 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Objectives There is increasing interest in identifying individuals at-risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and initiating early treatment to prevent or delay the onset of arthritis. We aimed to describe the perceptions and experiences of at-risk individuals and to inform the conduct of clinical trials and studies, and clinical practice. Methods A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies was conducted. Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion, appraised their methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and assessed confidence in the findings using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation–Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research approach. Results Seven studies involving 115 individuals at-risk of developing RA were included. Three major themes (seven subthemes) were identified: understanding the risk of developing RA (knowledge of RA and identification of potential risk factors); preventive interventions to reduce the risk of developing RA (understanding the value and role of preventive interventions, and engagement with preventive interventions); and perceptions of predictive testing for RA (benefits of predictive testing, decision to undertake predictive testing and concerns about predictive testing). Moderate confidence in most review findings was evident. Conclusion While there are clear benefits in informing individuals at-risk of RA about their risk following predictive testing and offering preventive treatment, there are potential barriers to engagement, intensified by the burden of uncertainty. Identification of the optimum approaches for presenting risk information, including the risks and benefits of engaging with preventive interventions, is urgently needed to support individuals at-risk of RA in their decision making. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021236034.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi J Siddle
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Lara S Chapman
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Kulveer Mankia
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Karim Raza
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marie Falahee
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Joel Kerry
- Library and Information Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|