EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: a report from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR)

Efficacy of methylprednisolone in very early systemic sclerosis: results of the 'Hit Hard and Early' randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that glucocorticoids would induce remission in very early systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients by inhibition of inflammation driving the disease. We examined the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone in very early SSc.

METHODS

In this trial adults with puffy fingers for less than 3 years, specific auto-antibodies and meeting the Very Early Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis criteria were randomly assigned (2:1) to methylprednisolone 1000 mg i.v. or placebo for three consecutive days three times with monthly intervals. The primary end point was nailfold capillary density at week 12. Capillary density at 52 weeks, number of megacapillaries and patient-reported outcomes were secondary outcomes. In addition, we assessed disease progression and lung function decline over 52 weeks. We used linear regression analyses adjusted for baseline values and stratification variables to estimate differences between groups.

RESULTS

Between February 2017 and February 2021, 87 patients were screened, of whom 30 (70% female, median [interquartile range, IQR] age 52.9 [40.8-60.8] years, median [IQR] disease duration 11.4 [4.6-18.6] months) were randomly assigned to methylprednisolone (n = 21) or placebo (n = 9). We found no difference in nailfold capillary density at 12 weeks (-0.5 [95% CI: -1.1, 0.2]) nor in any of the secondary outcomes. Eleven (37%) patients showed disease progression during 1 year follow-up, and seven (23%) patients had a relevant pulmonary function decline. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

No clinically relevant effect of short-term methylprednisolone in patients with very early SSc was observed. A substantial proportion of patients showed disease progression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03059979.

EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: 2023 update

OBJECTIVES

To update the 2017 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations for treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc), incorporating new evidence and therapies.

METHODS

An international task force was convened in line with EULAR standard operating procedures. A nominal group technique exercise was performed in two rounds to define questions underpinning a subsequent systematic literature review. The evidence derived was discussed and overarching principles, recommendations and future research agenda were iteratively developed with voting rounds.

RESULTS

The task force agreed on 22 recommendations covering 8 clinical/organ domains including Raynaud's phenomenon, digital ulcers, pulmonary arterial hypertension, scleroderma renal crisis, skin fibrosis, interstitial lung disease (ILD), gastrointestinal manifestations and arthritis. Most new recommendations are related to skin fibrosis and ILD. These included novel recommendations for the use of mycophenolate mofetil, nintedanib, rituximab and tocilizumab for the treatment of these crucial disease manifestations. The recommendations also included first-line and second-line interventions, providing increased utility for rheumatology practitioners. Important additions to the future research agenda included consideration of novel interventions for the management of vascular, musculoskeletal and gastrointestinal manifestations and calcinosis, as well as for the local management of digital ulcers.

CONCLUSION

These updated recommendations include the first set of synthetic and biological targeted therapies recommended for key fibrotic manifestations of SSc as well as first-line combination treatment for newly diagnosed pulmonary artery hypertension and prioritise a new research agenda for the coming years.

Results from the international collaborative systematic literature review informing the 2023 EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc) were updated in 2017, informed by a systematic literature review (SLR) completed in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this new SLR was to provide the most up-to-date literature to underpin contemporary EULAR recommendations for the management of SSc.

METHODS

30 searches for 30 interventions (including several outcomes/clinical questions), and 1 dedicated search (with several interventions) for calcinosis were prioritised by the task force. Three types of questions were defined: type I questions, unchanged as compared with the previous recommendations; type II questions exploring interventions already mentioned in the previous recommendations but with new outcomes; type III questions for new interventions.

RESULTS

14 490 abstracts were retrieved from the databases on 31 March 2022 and 2021 abstracts were retrieved on 11 October 2022. 483 new full texts were evaluated and 172 new articles were included for the first search and 9 for the second search. The majority of the questions covered by this SLR explored new interventions (40% of type III questions) or new outcomes (26% of type II questions). New interventions included targeted therapies such as abatacept, Janus kinase inhibitors or nintedanib, and updated questions incorporated the results from key game- changing randomised controlled trials including trials on tocilizumab, mycophenolate or rituximab in SSc- interstitial lung disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This SLR provides and summarises the highest level of evidence for the new EULAR recommendations for the treatment of SSc, providing an unprecedented comprehensive overview of recent knowledge on SSc treatments and participating in defining the future research agenda.

Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in systemic sclerosis: role and therapeutic directions

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex autoimmune disease with clinical symptoms of vascular damage, immune disorders, and fibrosis, presenting significant treatment challenges and limited therapeutic options. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) have been demonstrated in numerous studies as more effective than MSCs in treating autoimmune diseases. Recent studies demonstrate that MSC-EVs can significantly ameliorate the symptoms of SSc and mitigate pathological changes such as vascular injury, immune dysregulation, and fibrosis. These findings underscore the promising therapeutic potential of MSC-EVs in the treatment of SSc. MSC-EVs promote angiogenesis, modulate immune dysfunction, and combat fibrosis. This article summarizes the therapeutic applications and possible mechanisms of MSC-EVs for SSc, thereby offering a novel therapeutic direction for the treatment of SSc.

Antioxidant, Antiinflammation, and Antifibrotic Activity of Ciplukan (Physalis angulata L). Extract

Purpose

Physalis angulata Linn. (Ciplukan) is a plant widely used in traditional medicine in subtropical and tropical regions. Most studies focus on its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity. Many studies also reported its therapeutic potential for treating cancer, malaria, hepatitis, rheumatism, liver problems, and tumors, but few studies have reported its anti-fibrosis activity. Here, we aimed to investigate the potential of P. angulata as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory that may be correlated with its anti-fibrosis action.

Methods

In our study, we treated 3T3-L1 and TGF-β-induced 3T3-L1 cells with an ethanol extract of P. angulata. We then monitored the cell's response, evaluated the antioxidant activity using an MTT assay, and observed the cells' migration using the cell scratch assay. We used RT-PCR to determine the expression of HIF-1α and IL-6 on TGF-β-induced 3T3-L1 cells.

Results

The ethanol extract of P. angulata showed antioxidant activity and promoted cell proliferation on 3T3-L1 cells. Interestingly, the extract inhibited the migration of TGF-β-induced 3T3-L1 cells. Further analysis revealed that the extract could inhibit HIF-1α expression and suppress IL-6 expression on TGF-β-induced 3T3-L1 cells.

Conclusion

The ethanol extract of P. angulata showed antioxidant and anti-inflammation activities in 3T3-L1 cells. Both activities are associated with the antifibrotic activity of P. angulata's ethanol extract.

Intermittent versus continuous intravenous epoprostenol for the treatment of digital ischemia

Digital ischemia can be a painful complication of Raynaud's phenomenon or systemic sclerosis, which is caused by narrowing of blood vessels in the toes and hands. Epoprostenol is a potent vasodilator that may be used to treat digital ischemia in this patient population. Our institution provides epoprostenol infusion using two different administration techniques: a 30-h continuous infusion option and a 5-day intermittent 6-h infusion. In this retrospective chart review, we compared two administration techniques of intravenous epoprostenol administered to patients with digital ischemia. The primary outcome was to compare the efficacy of intravenous epoprostenol 30-h continuous infusion versus 5-day intermittent infusion, as defined by the presence of treatment failure. Between June 2019 and June 2020, 72 adult patient encounters met the inclusion criteria (intermittent: n = 20; continuous: n = 52). The primary outcome did not achieve a statistically significant difference between the two groups: intermittent 20% versus continuous 33.3% p = 0.390, odds ratio = 0.57 (95% confidence interval = 0.17-1.90). Adverse reactions were documented in 28% of patients across both treatment groups, and there was no difference detected when treatment groups were compared (25% vs 28.8%). Patients who received the 5-day infusion experienced a significantly longer average length of stay, with a mean of 8.9 days versus 3 days for those treated with the continuous 30-h infusion (p < 0.05; 95% confidence interval = 2.15-9.47). This study determined that the efficacy and safety profiles of the two administration techniques may not be comparable. Each protocol offers advantages over the other, and selection should be guided by patient history and risk factors to optimize management.

Does stress response axis activation differ between patients with autoimmune disease and healthy people?

Many studies have shown that patients with autoimmune disease present a hypoactive hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, but the results are controversial. Our objective was to study differences in stress response axis activity between patients with autoimmune disease and healthy people. The study sample consisted of 97 women divided into four groups: 37 healthy women (HW), 21 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 21 with Sjögren's syndrome (SS), and 18 with systemic sclerosis (SSc). After being exposed to a stress task, participants' skin conductance and salivary cortisol levels were measured in order to assess their response to psychological stress. Diurnal cortisol concentrations were assessed by measuring salivary cortisol in samples collected five times over one day. In addition, self-administered questionnaires were used to assess psychological variables. A time × group interaction effect was found (p = 0.003) in salivary cortisol secretion in response to stressful challenge. The healthy group presented normal activation, the SS and SLE groups showed no activation, and the SSc group presented a similar activation pattern to the HW group, except at the time of recovery. Total cortisol production (AUCg) was higher in the SSc group than in the HW group (p = 0.001). Differences were also observed in the cortisol AUCg collected over one day between healthy women and patients with SLE (p = 0.004) as well as with SSc (p = 0.001): women with SLE and SSc presented higher total hormone production than healthy women. Patients with autoimmune disease present a different HPA axis response, which may contribute to the harmful effects of stress in these diseases.

Consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of sclerosing diseases of the skin, Part 1: Localized scleroderma, systemic sclerosis and overlap syndromes

The term 'sclerosing diseases of the skin' comprises specific dermatological entities, which have fibrotic changes of the skin in common. These diseases mostly manifest in different clinical subtypes according to cutaneous and extracutaneous involvement and can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from each other. The present consensus provides an update to the 2017 European Dermatology Forum Guidelines, focusing on characteristic clinical and histopathological features, diagnostic scores and the serum autoantibodies most useful for differential diagnosis. In addition, updated strategies for the first- and advanced-line therapy of sclerosing skin diseases are addressed in detail. Part 1 of this consensus provides clinicians with an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of localized scleroderma (morphea), and systemic sclerosis including overlap syndromes.

Real-World Clinical Profile and Safety of Nintedanib in Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Subgroup Analysis of Interstitial Lung Disease Data From an Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Specialty Clinic in India

INTRODUCTION

 Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multisystem autoimmune disorder characterized by dysregulated innate and adaptive immunity. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common and serious complication of SSc, often leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Consistent demographic characteristics that aid in the early diagnosis of ILD in SSc are lacking. This study aims to identify clinical and demographic parameters associated with ILD in SSc patients and assess the safety and tolerability of nintedanib with other immunosuppressants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a subgroup analysis of data from the ILD clinic at All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur, collected between January 2022 and January 2024. We assessed the clinical and demographic profiles, high-resolution computed tomography thorax patterns, autoantibody profiles, lung function, and treatments used in the patients.

RESULTS

We enrolled 57 patients with SSc-associated ILD. The mean age of the participants was 39.0 ± 11.1 years, with 53 (92.9%) being women. The mean body mass index was 20.4 ± 4.32 kg/m². Dyspnea was the most common symptom, followed by skin tightening and cough. Antinuclear antibody tests were positive in 92.9% of patients, and anti-Scl-70 antibodies were positive in 57.9%. Rheumatoid arthritis-SSc overlap was observed in 15.8% of patients. The mean predicted forced vital capacity was 46.5 ± 19.9%, the mean predicted total lung capacity was 64.5 ± 20.4%, and the mean predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide was 46.2 ± 15.7%. The mean six-minute walk distance was 360.3 ± 81.2 meters, and the mean King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease score was 63.9 ± 10.7. Common radiological abnormalities included ground-glass opacities in 57.8%, traction bronchiectasis in 43.8%, and honeycombing in 28.07%. The predominant ILD pattern was nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. Patients received a combination of prednisolone (5 mg/day) with mycophenolate mofetil (63.2%), hydroxychloroquine (17.5%), cyclophosphamide (12.3%), and methotrexate (7.02%). Nintedanib, the only antifibrotic used, was administered to 17 (29.8%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ILD is relatively common in SSc, particularly in patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc and those with anti-topoisomerase antibodies. Female patients comprised the predominant population in this study. Patients tolerated mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide well. Nintedanib was the only antifibrotic used, and all patients tolerated the combination of antifibrotics and immunosuppressants well. Early diagnosis is crucial to slow disease progression and preserve lung function. Our results highlight the need for vigilant screening in high-risk groups and suggest that MMF, cyclophosphamide, and nintedanib can be safely incorporated into treatment regimens, offering a potential strategy to improve patient outcomes.

Best clinical practice in the treatment of juvenile systemic sclerosis: expert panel guidance - the result of the International Hamburg Consensus Meeting December 2022

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile systemic sclerosis (jSSc) is an orphan disease with a prevalence of 3 in 1,000,000 children. Currently there is only one consensus treatment guideline concerning skin, pulmonary and vascular involvement for jSSc, the jSSc SHARE (Single Hub and Access point for pediatric Rheumatology in Europe) initiative, which was based on data procured up to 2014. Therefore, an update of these guidelines, with a more recent literature and expert experience, and extension of the guidance to more aspects of the disease is needed.

AREAS COVERED

Treatment options were reviewed, and opinions were provided for most facets of jSSc including general management, some of which differs from adult systemic sclerosis, such as the use of corticosteroids, and specific organ involvement, such as skin, musculoskeletal, pulmonary, and gastroenterology.

EXPERT OPINION

We are suggesting the treat to target strategy to treat early to prevent cumulative disease damage in jSSc. Conclusions are derived from both expert opinion and available literature, which is mostly based on adult systemic sclerosis (aSSc), given shared pathophysiology, extrapolation of results from aSSc studies was judged reasonable.

[Systemic sclerosis]

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a very heterogeneous, chronic, rare, but socioeconomically important disease with a severe disease course and severe impairment of the quality of life of affected patients.

OBJECTIVES

Overview of the current state of research on the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of SSc.

METHODS

A literature search was performed.

RESULTS

The pathogenesis of SSc is not fully understood. ACR/EULAR criteria allow the diagnosis of early forms of SSc. Classification into limited cutaneous SSc and diffuse cutaneous SSc is of prognostic and therapeutic relevance. New organ-specific treatment options for SSc have led to improved quality of life and prognosis.

Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells transplantation in patients with systemic sclerosis: a 5-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells transplantation (UMSCT) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

Forty-one patients with moderate to severe SSc underwent UMSCT at the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School from 2009 to 2017. In this study, we conducted a longitudinal and retrospective analysis and compared the clinical and laboratory manifestations before and after UMSCT. The main outcome of the study was overall survival. We evaluated changes in the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS), as well as the changes in the pulmonary examination by using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and ultrasound cardiogram (UCG). Additionally, we assessed the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and the severity of peripheral vascular involvement during the first year after treatment.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival rate was 92.7% (38 out of 41 patients). Following UMSCT, the mean mRSS significantly decreased from 18.68 (SD = 7.26, n = 41) at baseline to 13.95 (SD = 8.49, n = 41), 13.29 (SD = 7.67, n = 38), and 12.39 (SD = 8.49, n = 38) at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Improvement or stability in HRCT images was observed in 72.0% of interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remained stable in 5 out of 8 patients at the 5-year follow-up. No adverse events related to UMSCT were observed in any of the patients during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

UMSCT may provide a safe and feasible treatment option for patients with moderate to severe SSc based on long-term follow-up data. The randomized controlled study will further confirm the clinical efficacy of UMSCT in SSc.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00962923. Key Point • UMSCT is safe and effective for SSc patients.

Therapeutic management of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis patients - an analysis from the Swiss EUSTAR cohort

OBJECTIVES

Systemic sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune connective tissue disease leading to microvascular and fibrotic manifestations in multiple organs. Several treatment options and recommendations from different European countries are available. In this study, for which the ambit is Switzerland specifically, we aim to describe the treatment patterns of systemic sclerosis patients with fibrotic manifestations.

METHODS

Systemic sclerosis patients were selected from six Swiss tertiary centres recorded in the multicentre, prospective European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) registry. Patients fulfilling the 2013 ACR/EULAR systemic sclerosis classification criteria at baseline were included. To determine the differences in treatment of varying degrees of fibrosis, four groups were identified: (1) patients with a modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) >0; (2) those with mRSS ≥7; (3) those with interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), diagnosed by either chest X-Ray or high-resolution computed tomography; and (4) patients fulfilling one of the additional criteria for extensive interstitial lung disease, defined as interstitial lung disease involvement of >20% in high-resolution computed tomography, dyspnea NYHA-stage 3/4, or a predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) of <70%.

RESULTS

A total of 590 patients with systemic sclerosis fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In this cohort, 421 (71.4%) had mRSS >0, of whom 195 (33.1%) had mRSS ≥7; interstitial lung disease was diagnosed in 198 of 456 (43.4%), of whom 106 (18.0 %) showed extensive interstitial lung disease. Regarding non-biologic disease-modifying medications (DMARDs), the most frequently prescribed was methotrexate, followed by hydroxychloroquine and mycophenolate mofetil. Rituximab and tocilizumab were most frequently used among the biologic DMARDs. Specifically, 148/372 (39.8%) of treated patients with skin fibrosis received methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab, and 80/177 (45.2%) with interstitial lung disease received cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, tocilizumab or rituximab. Most patients received a proton-pump inhibitor, and few patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Overall, in Switzerland, a wide range of medications is prescribed for systemic sclerosis patients. This includes modern, targeted treatments for which randomised controlled clinical trial have been recently reported.

Effects of a telerehabilitation-based exercise program in patients with systemic sclerosis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of telerehabilitation-based exercise programs in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients.

METHODS

Forty-six SSc patients were randomly separated into two groups as telerehabilitation and control. Videos comprising clinical Pilates-based exercises were designed and uploaded to YouTube™ for the telerehabilitation group by physiotherapists. A video interview was conducted with the SSc patients once a week and an exercise program was performed twice daily for 8 weeks in the telerehabilitation group. The same exercise programs were printed on paper brochures and patients were instructed on their application in the form of a home exercise program to be continued for 8 weeks in the control group. Pain, fatigue, quality of life, sleep, physical activity, anxiety, and depression were assessed in all patients at the beginning and end of the study.

RESULTS

The clinical and demographic characteristics were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Fatigue, pain, anxiety, and depression decreased in both groups, while quality of life and sleep quality increased after the exercise program (p < 0.05). However, the improvements in the telerehabilitation group were statistically more significant than in the control group for all studied parameters (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study demonstrate the superior efficacy of telerehabilitation-based treatment programs over home exercise programs, hence, we suggest widespread use of this innovative treatment program in SSc patients.

Is cyclophosphamide still the gold standard in early severe rapidly progressive systemic sclerosis?

Cyclophosphamide (CYC) has been a gold standard of treatment for severe progressive Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), especially in patients with concomitant interstitial lung disease (ILD). This approach was based on results of several interventional studies, including randomized control trials, which mainly addressed SSc-ILD as a primary end point and skin involvement as a second one. The use of CYC is time-limited due to significant adverse events. More recently, other immunosuppressive and biological agents showed efficacy but better safety profile in patients with SSc and SSc-ILD. With regards to other end-points, post-hoc analyses, systematic reviews and metalysis showed that CYC had limited influence on patients' quality of life, event-free survival and mortality. Comprehensive patient's stratification according to a molecular, cellular and phenotypic pattern may help in choosing of personalized medicine with more ambitious treatment effect and should be the future direction. According to the above available data and even if scientific evidence may be missing, experts' opinion has changed the attitude to CYC as an anchor drug in the management of severe SSc. Indeed, CYC has been pushed to the second and even third treatment option after mycophenolate mofetil, tocilizumab or rituximab. This position became obvious during debate on this topic at CORA meeting 2023.

Mechanisms and management of cough in interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

Many patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), especially fibrotic ILDs, experience chronic cough. It negatively impacts both physical and psychological well-being. Effective treatment options are limited.

AREAS COVERED

The pathophysiology of chronic cough in IPF is complex and involves multiple mechanisms, including mechanical distortion of airways, parenchyma, and nerve fibers. The pathophysiology of cough in other fibrosing ILDs is poorly understood and involves various pathways. The purpose of this review is to highlight mechanisms of chronic cough and to present therapeutic evidence for its management in the most commonly occurring diffuse fibrosing lung diseases including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), sarcoidosis-related ILD (Sc-ILD), chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis-related ILD (CHP-ILD), and post-COVID-19-related interstitial lung disease (PC-ILD).

EXPERT OPINION

This review guides the management of chronic cough in fibrosing ILDs. In this era of precision medicine, chronic cough management should be individualized in each interstitial lung disease.

Immunoglobulins in systemic sclerosis management. A large multicenter experience

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effectiveness and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) given in routine care to patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter observational study was conducted in SSc patients treated with IVIG. We collected data on epidemiological parameters and clinical outcomes. Firstly, we assessed changes in organ manifestations during IVIG treatment. Secondly, we analyzed the frequency of adverse effects. The following parameters were collected from baseline to the last follow-up: the patient's weight, modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS), modified manual muscle strength scale (MRC), laboratory test(creatine kinase(CK), hemoglobin and protein levels), The University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium gastrointestinal tract 2.0 (UCLA GIT 2.0) questionnaire, pulmonary function tests, and echocardiography.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 78 patients (82% females; 59% with diffuse SSc). Inflammatory idiopathic myopathy was the most frequent concomitant overlap disease (41%). The time since Raynaud's phenomenon and SSc onset were 8.8 ± 18 and 6.2 ± 6.7 years respectively. The most frequent IVIG indication was myositis (38/78), followed by gastrointestinal (27/78) and cutaneous (17/78) involvement. The median number of cycles given were 5. 54, 53 and 9 patients have been treated previously with glucocorticoids, synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic therapies respectively. After IVIG use we found significant improvements in muscular involvement (MRC ≥ 3/5 92% IVIG, p = 0.001 and CK levels from 1149 ± 2026 UI to 217 ± 224 UI, p = 0.02), mRSS (15 ± 12.4 to 13 ± 12.5, p = 0.015) and improvement in total score of UCLA GIT 2.0 (p = 0.05). None Anti-RNA polymerase III patients showed an adequate response in gastrointestinal involvement (0/7) in comparison with other antibodies (0 vs. 25, p = 0,039). Cardiorespiratory involvement remained stable. A total of 12 adverse events were reported with only one withdrawn due to serious adverse effect.

CONCLUSIONS

this study suggest that IVIG may improve myositis, gastrointestinal and skin involvement in SSc patients treated in routine care and seems to have a good safety profile.

Assessment of the skin with 2D-shear wave elastography in the systemic scleroderma and its correlation with pulmonary involvement

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the skin involvement in systemic scleroderma patients (SSc) with 2D-Shear Wave Elastography (2D-SWE) and to review the corelation between skin elasticity and pulmonary involvement.

METHODS

Thirty SSc patients and 30 controls were examined using 2D-SWE. The demographics matched both groups. B-mode ultrasound (US) and 2D-SWE assessed skin thickness and elastography from the ventral side of the right forearm in each subjective. ROC analysis determined optimal group separation cut-off values. A rheumatologist applied mRSS for SSc patients. US, mRSS, and pulmonary involvement correlations were reviewed.

RESULTS

US parameter values (skin thickness, median kPa, median m/s) were higher in the SSc patient group (1.78 ± 0.36 mm, 22.15 ± 16.26, 2.60 ± 0.82, respectively) compared to the control group (1.55 ± 0.2 mm, 7.45 ± 1.84, 1.56 ± 0.2, respectively, p < 0.05). When the optimal cut-off SWE values for separating groups was determined as 10.5 kPa and 1.87 m/s, the sensitivity was 93% and the specificity was 97%. Pearson's correlation analysis showed a strong positive correlation between mRSS and median SWE values (kPa, r = 0.626, p = 0.001; m/s, r = 0.638, p < 0.001). There was no correlation between pulmonary involvement of SSc patients with mRSS and US parameters.

CONCLUSION

2D-SWE is a promising non-invasive method to evaluate skin involvement in SSc patient group. For pulmonary involvement we need more data with bigger patient groups.

Immunologic and nonimmunologic sclerodermal skin conditions - review

Scleroderma-like cutaneous lesions have been found in many pathological conditions and they have the clinical appearance of sclerotic or scleroatrophic lesions. Affected skin biopsies described histopathological changes similar to those of scleroderma located strictly on the skin or those of systemic sclerosis. These skin lesions can be found in inflammatory diseases with autoimmune substrate (generalized morphea, chronic graft versus host disease, eosinophilic fasciitis), tissue storage diseases (scleredema, scleromyxedema, nephrogenyc systemic fibrosis, systemic amyloidosis), metabolic diseases (porphyrya cutanea tarda, phenylketonuria, hypothyroidism, scleredema diabeticorum), progeroid syndromes. Given the multiple etiologies of sclerodermal lesions, a correct differential diagnosis is necessary to establish the appropriate treatment.

Understanding and managing cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac involvement is common in systemic sclerosis occurring in up to 80% of patients. Primary myocardial dysfunction results from impairment of coronary microvascular circulation, myocardial inflammation and fibrosis with the prevalence of atherosclerosis remaining contradictory.

AREAS COVERED

This review presents the various aspects of cardiac involvement in SSc from a pathophysiological, clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic standpoint. Imaging modalities with emerging role in the understanding of mechanisms and prompt diagnosis of myocardial fibrosis namely cardiac magnetic resonance are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Cardiac involvement in SSc - and particularly primary myocardial disease - remains a challenge as clinical symptoms manifest in advanced stages of heart failure and convey poor prognosis. Over the last years the introduction of sophisticated imaging methods of myocardial function has resulted in a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiological processes of myocardial damage such as microvasculopathy, inflammation, diffuse or focal fibrosis. Such developments could contribute to the identification of patients at higher risk for subclinical heart involvement for whom diligent surveillance and prompt initiation of therapy with cardioprotective and/or immunosuppressive drugs coupled with invasive interventions namely radiofrequency ablation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator when indicated, may improve long-term outcomes.

Juvenile and adult-onset scleroderma: different clinical phenotypes

OBJECTIVES

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) represents extremely rare disease with majority of data coming from adults. Studies comparing juvenile- (jSSc) and adult-onset (aSSc) patients are limited. We aimed to compare clinical features, treatment modalities and survival rates of jSSc and aSSc patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study among pediatric and adult Scl patients has been performed. Demographic characteristics, clinical features, autoantibody profiles, and treatment data were retrieved from the databases. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier plot and factors associated with mortality were identified with multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 158 adults and 58 juvenile Scl patients were identified. The mean age at the disease onset was 37±14.7 vs. 8.8 ± 4.1 years, mean age at diagnosis 42±15.2 vs. 10.4 ± 3.8 years and mean follow-up duration was 6.3 ± 4.9 years vs. 6.6 ± 4.9 years for aSSc and jSSc patients, respectively. The frequency of interstitial lung disease (ILD) (50.9% vs 30%, p<0.001) and systemic hypertension (17.9% vs 0, p = 0.009) was significantly higher among aSSc. While aSSc patients had presented mostly with limited cutaneous subset (74.1%), diffuse cutaneous subset was the dominant subset among jSSc (76.7%), (p<0.001). The mortality rate was significantly higher among adults (p = 0.005). The ILD (p = 0.03) and cardiac insufficiency (p = 0.05) were independent risk factors of mortality in both aSSc and jSSc patients.

CONCLUSION

Juvenile and adult-onset Scl represent rarely seen conditions with different clinical phenotypes. Pediatric patients with LS are more commonly seen by pediatric rheumatologists, in contrary to adults. Diffuse disease subset is the dominant form among juvenile patients, whereas limited form is the main disease subset among adults. On the other hand, juvenile-onset patients have a better survival than those with adult-onset.

Expert consensus on the management of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, complex, connective tissue disorder. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is common in SSc, occurring in 35-52% of patients and accounting for 20-40% of mortality. Evolution of therapeutic options has resulted in a lack of consensus on how to manage this condition. This Delphi study was initiated to develop consensus recommendations based on expert physician insights regarding screening, progression, treatment criteria, monitoring of response, and the role of recent therapeutic advances with antifibrotics and immunosuppressants in patients with SSc-ILD.

METHODS

A modified Delphi process was completed by pulmonologists (n = 13) and rheumatologists (n = 12) with expertise in the management of patients with SSc-ILD. Panelists rated their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale from - 5 (complete disagreement) to + 5 (complete agreement). Consensus was predefined as a mean Likert scale score of ≤  - 2.5 or ≥  + 2.5 with a standard deviation not crossing zero.

RESULTS

Panelists recommended that all patients with SSc be screened for ILD by chest auscultation, spirometry with diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and/or autoantibody testing. Treatment decisions were influenced by baseline and changes in pulmonary function tests, extent of ILD on HRCT, duration and degree of dyspnea, presence of pulmonary hypertension, and potential contribution of reflux. Treatment success was defined as stabilization or improvement of signs or symptoms of ILD and functional status. Mycophenolate mofetil was identified as the initial treatment of choice. Experts considered nintedanib a therapeutic option in patients with progressive fibrotic ILD despite immunosuppressive therapy or patients contraindicated/unable to tolerate immunotherapy. Concomitant use of nintedanib with MMF/cyclophosphamide can be considered in patients with advanced disease at initial presentation, aggressive ILD, or significant disease progression. Although limited consensus was achieved on the use of tocilizumab, the experts considered it a therapeutic option for patients with early SSc and ILD with elevated acute-phase reactants.

CONCLUSIONS

This modified Delphi study generated consensus recommendations for management of patients with SSc-ILD in a real-world setting. Findings from this study provide a management algorithm that will be helpful for treating patients with SSc-ILD and addresses a significant unmet need.

Early Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis: The Role of General Practitioner

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic, rare, and idiopathic disease characterized by the presence of microcirculatory and immune alterations followed by fibrosis. It is clinically heterogeneous and may present a rapid and progressive involvement that leads to disability and death. Over the years, the approach has changed with an increasing focus on early diagnosis. Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) and puffy fingers are "red flags" to refer the patients to rheumatology to detect and start the appropriate treatment of such a rare and complex disease. We present a case of a 75-year-old woman with edema and bright erythema on the back and palm of the hands, telangiectasias of the face, and RP with three years of evolution. The aim of this case is to recall the importance of primary care physicians in recognizing the main clinical manifestations of SSc that are sometimes undervalued.

The enigma of mixed connective tissue disease-challenges in routine care

OBJECTIVES

As a rare and heterogeneous disease, mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) represents a challenge. Herein, we aimed to unravel potential pitfalls including correct referral diagnosis, distinction from other connective tissue diseases (CTD) and treatment modalities.

METHODS

We characterised the MCTD cohort at our tertiary referral centre. All patients were evaluated for fulfilment of classification criteria of various CTDs. SLEDAI-2 K and EUSTAR-AI were used in accordance with previous research to evaluate disease activity and treatment response.

RESULTS

Out of 85 patients initially referred as MCTD, only one-third (33/85, 39%) fulfilled the diagnostic MCTD criteria and the other patients had undifferentiated CTD (16/85, 19%), non-MCTD overlap syndromes (11/85, 13%) and other rheumatic diseases. In our final cohort of 33 MCTD patients, 16 (48%) also met the diagnostic criteria of systemic sclerosis, 13 (39%) these of systemic lupus erythematosus, 6 (18%) these of rheumatoid arthritis and 3 (9%) these of primary myositis. Management of MCTD required immunomodulating combination therapy in most cases (15/28, 54%), whereas monotherapy was less frequent (10/28, 36%), and only a few (3/28, 11%) remained without immune modulators until the end of the follow-up period. Treatment led to a significant decline in disease activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed a high risk for misdiagnosis for patients with MCTD. As a multi-organ disease, MCTD required prolonged immunomodulating therapy to achieve remission. The establishment of an international registry with longitudinal data from observational multi-centre cohorts might represent a first step to address the many unmet needs of MCTD.

Rituximab for the treatment of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common pulmonary disease often associated with significant morbidity and mortality in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD). Currently, no gold-standard therapies are available for CTD-ILD. Recently, several studies have proposed that rituximab (RTX) may be effective for the treatment of CTD-ILD. Objectives: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of RTX for the treatment of CTD-ILD. Methods: Studies were selected from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, up to 20 July 2022. Improvement and stable rates were extracted as the main outcomes and pooled using the weighted mean proportion with fixed or random-effects models, in case of significant heterogeneity (I 2 > 50%). Safety analysis was performed based on the adverse events reported in all of the studies. Results: Thirteen studies (312 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The follow-up durations ranged from 6 to 36 months. The pooled improvement rate was 35.0% (95% CI: 0.277-0.442), while the pooled stable rate was 59.2% (95% CI: 0.534-0.656). Anti-synthetase syndrome associated with ILD [ASS-ILD, 48.1% (95% CI, 0.373-0.620)] and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies associated with ILD [IIM-ILD, non-ASS, 47.4% (95% CI, 0.266-0.846)] had higher improvement rates than the other types. A total of 106 adverse events associated with RTX or progressive ILD were reported among the 318 patients, 55.7% of which were mild. Among 19 deaths, 17 were due to ILD progression, one to severe pulmonary arterial hypertension, and one to Pneumocystis jirovecii infection. Conclusion: RTX, which exhibits a satisfactory safety profile, is an effective treatment option for CTD-ILD, even in patients who fail to respond to other therapies. Further randomized trials are needed to assess the efficacy of rituximab compared to other treatments for CTD-ILD. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, identifier (CRD42022363403).

Randomized feasibility trial of the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network hand exercise program (SPIN-HAND)

Purpose

The Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) online hand exercise program (SPIN-HAND), is an online self-help program of hand exercises designed to improve hand function for people with scleroderma. The objective of this feasibility trial was to evaluate aspects of feasibility for conducting a full-scale randomized controlled trial of the SPIN-HAND program.

Materials and Methods

The feasibility trial was embedded in the SPIN cohort and utilized the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial (cmRCT) design. In the cmRCT design, at the time of cohort enrollment, cohort participants consent to be assessed for trial eligibility and randomized prior to being informed about trials conducted using the cohort. When trials were conducted in the cohort, participants randomized to the intervention were informed and consented to access the intervention. Participants randomized to control were not informed that they have not received an intervention. All participants eligible and randomized to participate in the trial were included in analyses on an intent-to-treat basis. Cohort participants with a Cochin Hand Function Scale score ≥ 3/90 and an interest in using an online hand-exercise intervention were randomized (1:1 ratio) to be offered as usual care plus the SPIN-HAND Program or usual care for 3 months. User satisfaction was assessed with semi-structured interviews.

Results

Of the 40 randomized participants, 24 were allocated to SPIN-HAND and 16 to usual care. Of 24 participants randomized to be offered SPIN-HAND, 15 (63%) consented to use the program. Usage of SPIN-HAND content among the 15 participants who consented to use the program was low; only five (33%) logged in more than twice. Participants found the content relevant and easy to understand (satisfaction rating 8.5/10, N = 6). Automated eligibility and randomization procedures via the SPIN Cohort platform functioned properly. The required technical support was minimal.

Conclusions

Trial methodology functioned as designed, and the SPIN-HAND Program was feasibly delivered; however, the acceptance of the offer and use of program content among accepters were low. Adjustments to information provided to potential participants will be implemented in the full-scale SPIN-HAND trial to attempt to increase offer acceptance.

Stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by systemic inflammation, fibrosis, vascular injury, reduced quality of life, and limited treatment options. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has emerged as a potential intervention for severe SSc refractory to conventional treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (specifically, non-selective myeloablative HSCT versus cyclophosphamide; selective myeloablative HSCT versus cyclophosphamide; non-selective non-myeloablative HSCT versus cyclophosphamide).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and trial registries from database insertion to 4 February 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs that compared HSCT to immunomodulators in the treatment of SSc.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted study data, and performed risk of bias and GRADE assessments to assess the certainty of evidence using standard Cochrane methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three RCTs evaluating: non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT (10 participants), non-myeloablative selective HSCT (79 participants), and myeloablative selective HSCT (36 participants). The comparator in all studies was cyclophosphamide (123 participants). The study examining non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT had a high risk of bias given the differences in baseline characteristics between the two arms. The other studies had a high risk of detection bias for participant-reported outcomes. The studies had follow-up periods of one to 4.5 years. Most participants had severe disease, mean age 40 years, and the duration of disease was less than three years. Efficacy No study demonstrated an overall mortality benefit of HSCT when compared to cyclophosphamide. However, non-myeloablative selective HSCT showed overall survival benefits using Kaplan-Meier curves at 10 years and myeloablative selective HSCT at six years. We graded our certainty of evidence as moderate for non-myeloablative selective HSCT and myeloablative selective HSCT. Certainty of evidence was low for non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT. Event-free survival was improved compared to cyclophosphamide with non-myeloablative selective HSCT at 48 months (hazard ratio (HR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.74; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no improvement with myeloablative selective HSCT at 54 months (HR 0.54 95% CI 0.23 to 1.27; moderate-certainty evidence). The non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT trial did not report event-free survival. There was improvement in functional ability measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI, scale from 0 to 3 with 3 being very severe functional impairment) with non-myeloablative selective HSCT after two years with a mean difference (MD) of -0.39 (95% CI -0.72 to -0.06; absolute treatment benefit (ATB) -13%, 95% CI -24% to -2%; relative percent change (RPC) -27%, 95% CI -50% to -4%; low-certainty evidence). Myeloablative selective HSCT demonstrated a risk ratio (RR) for improvement of 3.4 at 54 months (95% CI 1.5 to 7.6; ATB -37%, 95% CI -18% to -57%; RPC -243%, 95% CI -54% to -662%; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 3, 95% CI 2 to 9; low-certainty evidence). The non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT trial did not report HAQ-DI results. All transplant modalities showed improvement of modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) (scale from 0 to 51 with the higher number being more severe skin thickness) favoring HSCT over cyclophosphamide. At two years, non-myeloablative selective HSCT showed an MD in mRSS of -11.1 (95% CI -14.9 to -7.3; ATB -22%, 95% CI -29% to -14%; RPC -43%, 95% CI -58% to -28%; moderate-certainty evidence). At 54 months, myeloablative selective HSCT at showed a greater improvement in skin scores than the cyclophosphamide group (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.13; ATB -27%, 95% CI -6% to -47%; RPC -51%, 95% CI -6% to -113%; moderate-certainty evidence). The NNTB was 4 (95% CI 3 to 18). At one year, for non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT the MD was -16.00 (95% CI -26.5 to -5.5; ATB -31%, 95% CI -52% to -11%; RPC -84%, 95% CI -139% to -29%; low-certainty evidence). No studies reported data on pulmonary arterial hypertension. Adverse events In the non-myeloablative selective HSCT study, there were 51/79 serious adverse events with HSCT and 30/77 with cyclophosphamide (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.3), with an absolute risk increase of 26% (95% CI 10% to 41%), and a relative percent increase of 66% (95% CI 20% to 129%). The number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome was 4 (95% CI 3 to 11) (moderate-certainty evidence). In the myeloablative selective HSCT study, there were similar rates of serious adverse events between groups (25/34 with HSCT and 19/37 with cyclophosphamide; RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.08; moderate-certainty evidence). The non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT trial did not clearly report serious adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Non-myeloablative selective and myeloablative selective HSCT had moderate-certainty evidence for improvement in event-free survival, and skin thicknesscompared to cyclophosphamide. There is also low-certainty evidence that these modalities of HSCT improve physical function. However, non-myeloablative selective HSCT and myeloablative selective HSCT resulted in more serious adverse events than cyclophosphamide; highlighting the need for careful risk-benefit considerations for people considering these HSCTs. Evidence for the efficacy and adverse effects of non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT is limited at this time. Due to evidence provided from one study with high risk of bias, we have low-certainty evidence that non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT improves outcomes in skin scores, forced vital capacity, and safety. Two modalities of HSCT appeared to be a promising treatment option for SSc though there is a high risk of early treatment-related mortality and other adverse events. Additional research is needed to determine the effectiveness and adverse effects of non-myeloablative non-selective HSCT in the treatment of SSc. Also, more studies will be needed to determine how HSCT compares to other treatment options such as mycophenolate mofetil, as cyclophosphamide is no longer the first-line treatment for SSc. Finally, there is a need for a greater understanding of the role of HSCT for people with SSc with significant comorbidities or complications from SSc that were excluded from the trial criteria.

Photobiomodulation Therapy: A New Light in the Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis Skin Ulcers

INTRODUCTION

Skin ulcers (SU) represent one of the most frequent manifestations of systemic sclerosis (SSc), occurring in almost 50% of scleroderma patients. SSc-SU are often particularly difficult to treat with conventional systemic and local therapies. In this study, a preliminary evaluation of the role and effectiveness of blue light photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy with EmoLED^® in the treatment of scleroderma skin ulcers (SSc-SU) was performed.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 12 consecutive SSc patients with a total of 15 SU on finger hands. All patients were treated with adequate systemic therapy and local treatment for SU; after a standard skin ulcer bed preparation with debridement of all lesions, EmoLED^® was performed. All patients were locally treated every week during 2 months of follow-up; SU data were collected after 4 weeks (T4) and 8 weeks (T8). Eight SSc patients with comparable SU were also evaluated as controls.

RESULTS

The application of EmoLED^® in addition to debridement apparently produced faster healing of SU. Complete healing of SU was recorded in 41.6% cases during EmoLED^® treatment. Significant improvements in SU area, length, and width, wound bed, and related pain were observed in EmoLED^® patients from T0 to T8. Control subjects treated with standard systemic/local therapies merely showed an amelioration of SU area and width at the end of the follow-up. No procedural or post-procedural adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The positive clinical results and the absence of side effects suggest that EmoLED^® could be a promising tool in the management of SSc-SU, with an interesting role to play in the healing process in addition to conventional systemic and local treatments.

Autologous Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Systemic Sclerosis: Focus on Interstitial Lung Disease

Autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (AHSCT) has been employed as treatment for severe systemic sclerosis (SSc) with high risk of organ failure. In the last 25 years overall survival and treatment-related mortality have improved, in accordance with a better patient selection and mobilization and conditioning protocols. This review analyzes the evidence from the last 5 years for AHSCT-treated SSc patients, considering in particular the outcomes related to interstitial lung disease. There are increasing data supporting the use of AHSCT in selected patients with rapidly progressive SSc. However, some unmet needs remain, such as an accurate patient selection, pre-transplantation analysis to identify subclinical conditions precluding the transplantation, and the alternatives for post-transplant ILD recurrence.

Emerging Therapeutics in the Management of Connective Tissue Disease. Part II. Dermatomyositis and Scleroderma

The management of connective tissue diseases is dramatically evolving with the advent of biologics and novel oral systemic therapeutics. Despite involvement in the care of these complex patients, there is a knowledge gap in the field of dermatology regarding these emerging agents. The second article in this continuing medical education series discusses new and emerging therapeutics for dermatomyositis and scleroderma that target cells, intracellular signaling pathways, and cytokines.

Immunosuppression use in early systemic sclerosis may be increasing over time

Background

Immunosuppression remains the main treatment for progressing skin involvement, interstitial lung disease and inflammatory joint or muscle disease in systemic sclerosis. This study investigated the pattern and trends in immunosuppressive agents used in early systemic sclerosis (diagnosed before and after 2007) to determine whether the changes in the preferred type, timing and combination of immunosuppression took place over the past decade.

Methods

In total, 397 Canadian Scleroderma Research Group database patients (183 diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and 214 limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis) who had baseline and follow-up visits within 3 years (mean: 1.8 ± 0.8) after disease onset were included: 82% females, age at diagnosis 53 ± 13 years. Bivariate, chi-square, analysis of variance and adjusted regression analyses were used.

Results

In total, 115 diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients (63%) and 62 limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (29%) received immunosuppressive drugs, most commonly methotrexate, followed by mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide. In diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, immunosuppressants were prescribed after 2007 more often (74% vs 50%, p = 0.001), especially methotrexate (p = 0.02) and mycophenolate mofetil (p = 0.04), and earlier (peak at 2 years after onset). Immunosuppressive therapy was associated with male gender, interstitial lung disease, anti-Scl70 positivity, ACA negativity and inflammatory joint disease in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and with ACA negativity and a higher modified Rodnan skin score in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the use of immunosuppressants after 2007 was predicted only by ACA negativity in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and by younger age in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

Conclusion

Over the past decade, there has been a trend to prescribe immunosuppressants more often and earlier in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients, regardless of modified Rodnan skin score. Methotrexate is being more frequently used, and mycophenolate mofetil has gained favour over cyclophosphamide. Autoantibody status was the most consistent predictor of immunosuppressive therapy.

Old and new therapeutic strategies in systemic sclerosis (Review)

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic inflammatory disease with autoimmune determinism having an incompletely known pathogenesis. Although not all links in the pathogenic chain are known, studies have shown that vasculopathy is the initial event and is followed by extensive fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. New therapeutic strategies have been developed in recent years, thanks to innovative research which has increased understanding of the disease mechanisms. No curative treatment for SSc is currently known. Therefore, the therapeutic target in SSc is its symptomatology. Peripheral vasculopathy can be improved by administering vasodilators. Endothelin receptor antagonists and 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitors have a double benefit, both on peripheral and on pulmonary vasculopathy. Several molecules with antifibrotic effects are currently available; however, further studies are needed to confirm their beneficial effects. Immunosuppressants manage to control the cutaneous and visceral fibrotic process, thereby remaining as first-line drugs in the treatment of SSc. Although biological therapy using rituximab and tocilizumab has shown promising results in pulmonary fibrosis, ongoing studies are needed to determine their exact impact. The authors have differing views on the triggering role of glucocorticoids and the benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in renal scleroderma. Some aspects of this disease such as calcinosis and pruritus, asthenia, or joint and muscle damage, remain difficult to manage.

Efficacy of Local Oxygen-Ozone Therapy for the Treatment of Digital Ulcers Refractory to Medical Therapy in Systemic Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of local oxygen-ozone therapy in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients with digital ulcers (DUs) who were resistant to medical therapy and had impairment in activities of daily living.

METHODS

Participants' demographic data, medical treatment, and clinical parameters (duration and number of Reynaud's Phenomenon (RP) attacks, ulcer pain, grade, and diameter) were recorded. Twenty-five SSc patients with DUs were randomized to the ozone group (I) (n = 13) to receive medical treatment plus local oxygen-ozone therapy and the control group (II) (n = 12) to receive medical treatment only. Hand functions were assessed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Modified Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMISm) test. Ulcer grade, clinical parameters, HAQ, mHAMIS scores were re-evaluated in all participants 4 weeks after the initiation of treatment.

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups showed no significant differences. At 4 weeks after the initial treatment, the efficacy rate was significantly higher in the ozone group than in the control group (92% versus 42%, p = 0.010). Clinical parameters, HAQ, and HAMISm scores were significantly improved in the treatment group compared to the control group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Local oxygen-ozone therapy was effective in the treatment of SSc patients with resistant DUs and improved clinical parameters and functional disability.

Scleroderma and the Esophagus

The gastrointestinal tract is the second largest organ system in the body and is often affected by connective tissue disorders. Scleroderma is the classic rheumatologic disease affecting the esophagus; more than 90% of patients with scleroderma have esophageal involvement. This article highlights esophageal manifestations of scleroderma, focusing on pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic considerations, and treatment options. In addition, this article briefly reviews the esophageal manifestations of other key connective tissue disorders, including mixed connective tissue disease, myositis, Sjogren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, fibromyalgia, and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

Updates in Systemic Sclerosis Treatment and Applicability to Pediatric Scleroderma

Juvenile-onset systemic sclerosis (jSSc) is a complex multisystem inflammatory-driven disease of fibrosis, requiring multifaceted treatment including pharmacologic therapy, supportive care, and lifestyle modification. Most regimens are adapted from adult SSc treatment given the rarity of the disease. Landmark trials over the past decade in adult SSc have led to 2 Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for SSc-associated interstitial lung disease, and several ongoing trials of other biological agents are underway. Resetting the immune system with autologous stem cell transplant to halt this disease earlier in its course, especially in pediatric onset where disease burden can accumulate, is on the horizon.

Autoantibody profiles in systemic sclerosis; a comparison of diagnostic tests

OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune antibody profiling plays a prominent role in both classification and prognosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc). In the last years novel autoantibodies have been discovered and have become available in diagnostic assays. However, standardization in autoimmune serology is lacking, which may have a negative impact on the added value of autoantibodies in diagnosis and prognosis of SSc. In this paper we describe the comparison of commercially available diagnostic assays for the detection of SSc-associated autoantibodies and explored the coexistence of multiple SSc-associated autoantibodies within patients.

METHODS

Serum samples of 347 patients from the Nijmegen Systemic Sclerosis Cohort were included in this study. All patients fulfilled the ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria for SSc and were classified as DcSSc or LcSSc according to the Leroy and Medsger criteria. All samples were evaluated on standard laboratory diagnostic tests for detection of SSc-specific autoantibodies CENPA and CENPB (ACA), Scl-70 (ATA), RNA Polymerase III (rp11/155) (ARA), and SSc-associated autoantibodies Fibrillarin, Th-To, PM-scl75, PM-Scl100, RNP68/A/C, Ku, NOR90, and PDGFR from suppliers EUROIMMUN, D-tek and Thermo Fisher Scientific.

RESULTS

We found that 79% of the patients was positive for one or more of the SSc autoantibodies. Overall, a high agreement was observed between the diagnostic methods for the SSC-specific autoantibodies listed in the ACR/EULAR criteria (ATA, ACA, and ARA) (Cohen's kappa 0.53-0.97). However, a lower agreement was found for SSc-associated autoantibodies PM-Scl, and Ku, as well as for the SSc-specific autoantibodies fibrillarin and Th-To. Furthermore, the data revealed that the presence of ATA, ARA and ACA is predominantly mutually exclusive, with only a fraction of the patients testing positive for both ATA and ARA.

CONCLUSION

Our data showed high concordance of prevalent SSc-specific autoantibodies between different diagnostic assays. Further standardisation for low prevalent SSc-specific and SSc-associated autoantibodies is needed.

Autologous fat grafting in the treatment of a scleroderma stump-skin ulcer: a case report

Here we describe the case of a 60‐year‐old-woman with systemic sclerosis sent to our Scleroderma Unit to treat digital stumps. The stumps were successfully treated with autologous fat grafting (crown-shape infiltration). Our technique of autologous lipotransfer improved wound healing in a scleroderma patient with stump-digital ulcers where all other options failed.

Systemic sclerosis: Update for oral health care providers

Systemic sclerosis (SSc), also known as scleroderma, is an autoimmune disease of unknown origin characterized by an uncontrolled inflammatory process resulting in fibrosis of the skin, internal organs and vasculopathy. Manifestations of SSc are heterogenous and can include pulmonary, cardiac, neural, renal, muscular, cutaneous and orofacial complications. Recent scientific advances have led to a better understanding of disease etiopathogenesis and the development of a new classification system. Therapeutic management is often multidisciplinary and targeted toward the affected organs. Oral health care providers (OHCPs) should be familiar with SSc, particularly as it relates to its impact on the orofacial region and modifications to delivery of oral health care for patients with this condition.

Clinical Treatment Options in Scleroderma: Recommendations and Comprehensive Review

There are two major clinical subsets of scleroderma: (i) systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by inflammation, vasculopathy, and excessive fibrosis of the skin and multiple internal organs and (ii) localized scleroderma (LoS), also known as morphea, is confined to the skin and/or subcutaneous tissues resulting in collagen deposition and subsequent fibrosis. SSc is rare but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality compared with other rheumatic diseases. Fatal outcomes in SSc often originate from organ complications of the disease, such as lung fibrosis, pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH), and scleroderma renal crisis (SRC). Current treatment modalities in SSc have focused on targeting vascular damage, fibrosis, and regulation of inflammation as well as autoimmune responses. Some drugs previously used in an attempt to suppress fibrosis, like D-penicillamine (D-Pen) or colchicine, have been disappointing in clinical practice despite anecdotal evidence of their advantages. Some canonical medications, including glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and vasodilators, have had some success in treating various manifestations in SSc patients. Increasing evidence suggests that some biologic agents targeting collagen, cytokines, and cell surface molecules might have promising therapeutic effects in SSc. In recent years, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), mostly autologous, has made great progress as a promising treatment option in severe and refractory SSc. Due to the complexity and heterogeneity of SSc, there are currently no optimal treatments for all aspects of the disease. As for LoS, local skin-targeted therapy is generally used, including topical application of glucocorticoids or other immunomodulatory ointments and ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. In addition, systemic immunosuppressants are also utilized in several forms of LoS. Here, we comprehensively discuss current treatment options for scleroderma, encompassing old, new, and future potential treatment options. In addition, we summarize data from new clinical trials that have the potential to modify the disease process and improve long-term outcomes in SSc.

Consensus-based recommendations for the management of juvenile systemic sclerosis

Juvenile systemic sclerosis (JSSc) is a rare disease of childhood and currently no international consensus exists with regard to its assessment and treatment. This SHARE (Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe) initiative, based on expert opinion informed by the best available evidence, provides recommendations for the assessment and treatment of patients with JSSc with a view to improving their outcome. Experts focused attention not only on the skin assessment but also on the early signs of internal organ involvement whose proper treatment can significantly affect the long-term outcome. A score for disease severity is proposed in order to perform a structured assessment of outcome over time but a validation in a wider patient population is recommended. Finally, a stepwise treatment approach is proposed in order to unify the standard of care throughout Europe with the aim to reduce morbidity and mortality in this disease.

Treatment with cyclophosphamide i.v. pulse therapy is an option for effective treatment of skin fibrosis in patients with early systemic sclerosis

Objectives

SSc is a autoimmune disease characterized by fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. There is a lack of evidence for the efficacy of i.v. CYC pulse therapy on skin thickening. We aimed to examine the response of i.v. CYC pulse therapy on skin thickening in our cohort of SSc patients and analysed factors that predict this response.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the data for 143 patients with SSc from baseline to 12, 24 and 36 months. All patients were treated with at least 6 i.v. CYC pulses (750 mg/m²/month). We applied the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) to assess skin thickening. A clinically relevant response was defined as a decrease in mRSS of 5 points and 25% from baseline. Different baseline variables for predicting response on month 12 were tested in logistic regression analyses.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the patients with dcSSc and lcSSc were collected. Forty-three percent (n = 42) of dcSSc patients had a clinically relevant response on month 12. Non-responding on month 6 predicts non-response on month 12 (odds ratio 37.1; 95% CI 4.5, 306.4).

Conclusion

We concluded that i.v. CYC pulse therapy should be considered as an effective treatment option for skin thickening in dcSSc patients, because 43% of this group of patients were found to have a clinically relevant response. Of the dcSSC patients who did not respond by month 6, only 29% had a response by month 12. This finding can help the physician and patient in shared decision making about whether or not to continue therapy.

Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Patients in England with Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Retrospective Database Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) places a substantial burden on patients and healthcare systems. The objectives of this study were to describe clinical characteristics and assess healthcare resource utilization and costs of patients with SSc-ILD in England, compared with patients with non-pulmonary organ involvement related to SSc (SSc-OOI).

METHODS

This population-based retrospective study used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics. Data were extracted from medical records dated January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2016. Patients with SSc were identified and placed in subgroups based on organ involvement: SSc-ILD, SSc-OOI, and both (SSc-ILD-OOI). Patients with SSc-ILD-OOI were included in both the SSc-ILD and SSc-OOI subgroups. All-cause healthcare costs, excluding medication costs, were calculated to 2016 British pounds sterling (£).

RESULTS

This study included 675 patients with SSc: 174 (26%) had neither ILD nor other organ involvement (OOI); 127 (19%) had SSc-ILD; 477 (71%) had SSc-OOI; 103 (15%) had SSc-ILD-OOI. Age-weighted median [interquartile range (IQR)] annual healthcare costs per patient were: £1496 (£664-£2817) in SSc only; £6375 (£3451-£15,041) in SSc-ILD; £4084 (£1454-£10,105) in SSc-OOI; £6632 (£4023-£17,009) in SSc-ILD-OOI. In multivariate analysis, older age at diagnosis, diagnosis of anemia, and number of comorbid diseases were associated with higher yearly healthcare costs.

CONCLUSION

The annual healthcare cost for patients with SSc-ILD is substantial, and higher than that of patients with SSc-OOI or SSc only. These results quantify the economic burden of SSc-ILD in a real-world setting, and highlight the need for treatment of this disease.

The Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Self-Management Program: Protocol for a Randomized Feasibility Trial

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc), or scleroderma, is a rare disease that often results in significant disruptions to activities of daily living and can negatively affect physical and psychological well-being. Because there is no known cure, SSc treatment focuses on reducing symptoms and disability and improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Self-management programs are known to increase self-efficacy for disease management in many chronic diseases. The Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) developed a Web-based self-management program (SPIN self-management; SPIN-SELF) to increase self-efficacy for disease management and to improve HRQoL for patients with SSc.

OBJECTIVE

The proposed study aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the SPIN-SELF program by evaluating the trial implementation processes, required resources and management, scientific aspects, and participant acceptability and usage of the SPIN-SELF program.

METHODS

The SPIN-SELF feasibility trial will be conducted via the SPIN Cohort. The SPIN Cohort was developed as a framework for embedded pragmatic trials using the cohort multiple RCT design. In total, 40 English-speaking SPIN Cohort participants with low disease management self-efficacy (Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease Scale score ≤7), who have indicated interest in using a Web-based self-management program, will be randomized with a 3:2 ratio into the SPIN-SELF program or usual care for 3 months. Feasibility outcomes include trial implementation processes, required resources and management, scientific aspects, and patient acceptability and usage of the SPIN-SELF program.

RESULTS

Enrollment of the 40 participants occurred between July 5, 2019, and July 27, 2019. By November 25, 2019, data collection of trial outcomes was completed. Data analysis is underway, and results are expected to be published in 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

The SPIN-SELF program is a self-help tool that may improve disease-management self-efficacy and improve HRQoL in patients with SSc. The SPIN-SELF feasibility trial will ensure that trial methodology is robust, feasible, and consistent with trial participant expectations. The results will guide adjustments that need to be implemented before undertaking a full-scale RCT of the SPIN-SELF program.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/16799.

Characterizing Disease Manifestations and Treatment Patterns Among Adults with Systemic Sclerosis: A Retrospective Analysis of a US Healthcare Claims Population

INTRODUCTION

Real-world use of immunomodulating therapy (IMT) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) was investigated for the first time in a descriptive, retrospective cohort analysis of claims made in a healthcare insurance database to characterize treatment patterns and their alignment with SSc disease manifestations.

METHODS

Treatment patterns and disease manifestations, symptoms, complications, and comorbidities were assessed in patients with SSc enrolled in a US healthcare claims database who received treatment between January 2006 and December 2013 and for whom data were available 6 months before and 12 months after SSc diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among 7812 eligible patients, 6852 received treatments of interest for SSc and 2404 (30.8%) received IMT during the first year after SSc diagnosis. In the first year after diagnosis, the most common claims were for antibiotics (61.7%), opioids (50.6%), glucocorticoids (46.5%), and proton pump inhibitors (35.4%); the most common organs involved with complications among patients with SSc were lung (30.5%), heart (17.4%), and gastrointestinal tract (22.4%); the most common signs or symptoms were musculoskeletal (16.1%) and fatigue (10.5%); 1035 patients (15.1%) had infections and 14 (0.2%) had malignancies. Among patients who received IMT, 43.8% received at least hydroxychloroquine and 21.1% received at least methotrexate; 460 patients switched to a second IMT, 23.0% to at least methotrexate and 22.8% to at least mycophenolate mofetil. The most common comorbidities reported with first IMT were in lung (11.8%), overlap syndrome (8.4%), heart (5.3%), and gastrointestinal (6.8%) categories.

CONCLUSION

One-third of patients with SSc in the healthcare claims population received IMTs during the first year after diagnosis. However, patients who received IMTs had disease manifestations similar to those of the overall SSc healthcare claims population.

Improving access to digital ulcer care through nurse-led clinic: a service evaluation

OBJECTIVE

Digital ulcers (DU) remain one of the most burdensome co-morbidities in systemic sclerosis. The objectives of the study were to describe patient-level stratification and to evaluate a nurse-led DU clinic service development.

METHODS

A nurse-led digital ulcer clinic was established to identify patients with DU and manage them. Patients were recruited through scleroderma clinics, GP referrals, and self-referrals. The clinic involved patients being treated with appropriate treatment. Patients were stratified according to their DU risk level based on number and severity of ulcers. Among these, 22 patients were asked to complete a patient satisfaction survey. Data were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were seen in the clinic, 46 (61%) were 56 years of age and above. Patients were identified as high (23%), medium (51%) or low risk (26%) for development of DU. The duration of DU history was from 7 months to 40 years. Prior to attending the nurse-led DU clinic, 90% of patients had received up to six courses of antibiotics for their DU, 76% had attended A&amp;E, and 90% had unscheduled appointments. 90% had been seen by the GP due to DU and subsequently required hospital admissions. During the nurse-led clinic follow-up, only two patients had emergency admission. All patients reported that their needs in personal care of DU were met.

CONCLUSION

There are a significant number of people with SSc who have DUs affecting their quality of life as well as needing more healthcare services. A dedicated specialist nurse-led DU clinic may improve overall care of patients.

Management of End-stage Renal Disease Associated with Systemic Rheumatic Diseases

The outcomes of rheumatic diseases (RDs) have improved over the past decades. However, a significant proportion of the patients still suffer from end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and have to bear the burden of hemodialysis. It is crucial to prevent patients with RDs from developing ESRD from viewpoints of medicine and medical economics. For those who already have ESRD, it is important to improve vial prognosis and quality of life through appropriate management of disease activity and comorbidities related to ESRD. Thus, rheumatologists and nephrologists need to recognize risk factors associated with progression to ESRD along with their appropriate management. Although the activity of most RDs tends to decrease after initiation of hemodialysis, disease activity may still increase, and recognizing how to appropriately use immunosuppressive agents even after the development of ESRD is crucial. The treatment of RDs needs extra attention as hydroxychloroquine requires more frequent monitoring for adverse drug reactions; therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary for mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine A, and tacrolimus; cyclophosphamide and azathioprine need dose adjustments; methotrexate and bucillamine are contraindicated in patients with ESRD; leflunomide and sulfasalazine do not require significant dose reduction and iguratimod should be carefully administered. The pharmacokinetics of biological agents such as rituximab or belimumab are not affected by ESRD, and dose adjustments are not necessary. Collaboration between rheumatologists and nephrologists is needed more than ever and is expected to produce a complementary effect and achieve better outcomes in clinical settings, although this cooperation has not always been conducted appropriately.