1
|
García A, Vallejo-Aparicio LA, Begum N, Nikitas G, González-Inchausti C, de Gomensoro E. The quality-adjusted life-years loss due to serogroup B invasive meningococcal disease in Spain. Vaccine 2024; 42:126155. [PMID: 39146857 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite its impact on a patient's life, there is a paucity of evidence on the humanistic burden of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) due to serogroup B (MenB) in Spain. This study estimates the total quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) loss due to MenB-IMD in Spain from a societal perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS A previously published incidence-based Excel tool adapted to the Spanish setting was used to estimate total QALY losses over a patient's lifetime horizon, including direct and indirect impact on patients and families/caregivers, respectively. A 3% discount rate was applied, and a deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate uncertainty and assumptions used for the base case. RESULTS The total discounted QALY loss for a hypothetical cohort of 142 cases of MenB-IMD was 572.44 QALYs (4.03/case). Direct loss (attributable to patients) represented 81.2% of the total loss (464.54 QALYs; 3.27/case) and indirect loss (caused to relatives/ caregivers) represented 18.8% (108.90 QALYs; 0.76/case). Sequelae had the highest impact on QALY loss for both patients (60.5%) and relatives/caregivers (84.6%). Children <5 years of age (YOA) accounted for 47.8% of the total QALY loss. Mortality accounted for 17.62 QALY loss per death. The discount rate parameter showed the highest influence on results and the probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed a 98.0% probability of total QALY loss achieving the point estimate. CONCLUSIONS The results emphasize that the humanistic burden associated with a MenB case is mainly driven by its sequelae, impacting the patients and their relatives/caregivers.
Collapse
|
2
|
Ladhani SN, White PJ, Campbell H, Mandal S, Borrow R, Andrews N, Bhopal S, Saunders J, Mohammed H, Drisdale-Gordon L, Callan E, Sinka K, Folkard K, Fifer H, Ramsay ME. Use of a meningococcal group B vaccine (4CMenB) in populations at high risk of gonorrhoea in the UK. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2024; 24:e576-e583. [PMID: 38521080 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(24)00031-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
The meningococcal group B vaccine, 4CMenB, is a broad-spectrum, recombinant protein vaccine that is licensed for protection against meningococcal group B disease in children and adults. Over the past decade, several observational studies supported by laboratory studies have reported protection by 4CMenB against gonorrhoea, a sexually transmitted infection caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Gonorrhoea is a major global public health problem, with rising numbers of diagnoses and increasing resistance to multiple antibiotics. In England, more than 82 000 cases of gonorrhoea were diagnosed in 2022, with nearly half of the cases diagnosed among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. There are currently no licensed vaccines against gonorrhoea but 4CMenB is estimated to provide 33-47% protection against gonorrhoea. On Nov 10, 2023, the UK Joint Scientific Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation agreed that a targeted programme should be initiated using 4CMenB to prevent gonorrhoea among individuals at higher risk of infection attending sexual health services in the UK. This decision was made after reviewing evidence from retrospective and prospective observational studies, laboratory and clinical data, national surveillance reports, and health economic analyses. In this Review, we summarise the epidemiology of invasive meningococcal disease and gonorrhoea in England, the evidence supporting the use of 4CMenB for protection against gonorrhoea, and the data needed to inform long-term programme planning and extension to the wider population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamez N Ladhani
- Immunisation Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK; Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
| | - Peter J White
- Modelling and Economics Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK; MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College School of Public Health, London, UK
| | - Helen Campbell
- Immunisation Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Sema Mandal
- Immunisation Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Ray Borrow
- Meningococcal Reference Unit, UK Health Security Agency, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Nick Andrews
- Statistics, Modelling, and Economics Department, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Sunil Bhopal
- Immunisation Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - John Saunders
- Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI & HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Hamish Mohammed
- Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI & HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Lana Drisdale-Gordon
- Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI & HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Emma Callan
- Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI & HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Katy Sinka
- Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI & HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Kate Folkard
- Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI & HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Helen Fifer
- Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI & HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Mary E Ramsay
- Immunisation Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mendoza-Jiménez MJ, van Exel J, Brouwer W. On spillovers in economic evaluations: definition, mapping review and research agenda. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:1239-1260. [PMID: 38261132 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01658-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
An important issue in economic evaluations is determining whether all relevant impacts are considered, given the perspective chosen for the analysis. Acknowledging that patients are not isolated individuals has important implications in this context. Increasingly, the term "spillovers" is used to label consequences of health interventions on others. However, a clear definition of spillovers is lacking, and as a result, the scope of the concept remains unclear. In this study, we aim to clarify the concept of spillovers by proposing a definition applicable in health economic evaluations. To illustrate the implications of this definition, we highlight the diversity of potential spillovers through an expanded impact inventory and conduct a mapping review that outlines the evidence base for the different types of spillovers. In the context of economic evaluations of health interventions, we define spillovers as all impacts from an intervention on all parties or entities other than the users of the intervention under evaluation. This definition encompasses a broader range of potential costs and effects, beyond informal caregivers and family members. The expanded impact inventory enables a systematic approach to identifying broader impacts of health interventions. The mapping review shows that the relevance of different types of spillovers is context-specific. Some spillovers are regularly included in economic evaluations, although not always recognised as such, while others are not. A consistent use of the term "spillovers", improved measurement of these costs and effects, and increased transparency in reporting them are still necessary. To that end, we propose a research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María J Mendoza-Jiménez
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL), Guayaquil, Ecuador.
| | - Job van Exel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Pouvourville G, Breau-Brunel M, Loncle-Provot V, Beck E, Gaugain L, Nachbaur G, Pribil C. Public Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of 4-Component Meningococcal Serotype B Vaccination for Infants in France. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2024; 8:539-557. [PMID: 38780884 PMCID: PMC11252096 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-024-00488-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In France, meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) is the most common serogroup causing invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in infants and young children. Our objective was to illustrate the impact of model choices on health outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of infant vaccination with the multicomponent meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) versus no vaccine in France. METHODS A previously published dynamic transmission-based cost-effectiveness model was adapted for the French context using updated, French-specific demographic, epidemiological, and cost data. IMD incidence and long-term sequelae were derived through analysis of French healthcare and surveillance databases. A collective perspective over a 100-year time horizon was adopted, with a discount rate of 2.5%, reduced to 1.5% after the first 30 years. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed. RESULTS In the base case analysis, infant vaccination with 4CMenB avoided 3101 MenB IMD cases in infants aged < 1 year (- 54%) and 6845 cases in all age groups (- 21%). The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €316,272/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) but was highly sensitive to the types of sequelae included, MenB incidence, vaccine effectiveness parameters, and consideration of life-expectancy in IMD survivors (range: €65,272/QALY to €493,218/QALY). CONCLUSIONS Using economic models compliant with French methodology guidelines, 4CMenB does not seem cost-effective; however, results are sensitive to model choices and 4CMenB immunization is an effective strategy to prevent MenB IMD cases and to improve quality of life and economic burden associated with MenB IMD treatment, especially with regard to long-term sequelae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Céline Pribil
- GSK, 23, rue François Jacob, 92500, Rueil-Malmaison, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lamsal R, Yeh EA, Pullenayegum E, Ungar WJ. A Systematic Review of Methods Used by Pediatric Cost-Utility Analyses to Include Family Spillover Effects. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:199-217. [PMID: 37945777 PMCID: PMC10810985 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01331-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A child's health condition affects family members' health and well-being. However, pediatric cost-utility analysis (CUA) commonly ignores these family spillover effects leading to an incomplete understanding of the cost and benefits of a child's health intervention. Methodological challenges exist in assessing, valuing, and incorporating family spillover effects. OBJECTIVE This study systematically reviews and compare methods used to include family spillover effects in pediatric CUAs. METHODS A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, EconLit, Cochrane collection, CINAHL, INAHTA, and the Pediatric Economic Database Evaluation (PEDE) database from inception to 2020 to identify pediatric CUAs that included family spillover effects. The search was updated to 2021 using PEDE. The data describing in which family members spillover effects were measured, and how family spillover effects were measured, incorporated, and reported, were extracted. Common approaches were grouped conceptually. Further, this review identified theories or theoretical frameworks used to justify approaches for integrating family spillover effects into CUA. RESULTS Of 878 pediatric CUAs identified, 35 included family spillover effects. Most pediatric CUAs considered family spillover effects on one family member. Pediatric CUAs reported eight different approaches to measure the family spillover effects. The most common method was measuring the quality-adjusted life years (QALY) loss of the caregiver(s) or parent(s) due to a child's illness or disability using an isolated approach whereby family spillover effects were quantified in individual family members separately from other health effects. Studies used four approaches to integrate family spillover effects into CUA. The most common method was to sum children's and parents/caregivers' QALYs. Only two studies used a theoretical framework for incorporation of family spillover effects. CONCLUSIONS Few pediatric CUAs included family spillover effects and the observed variation indicated no consensus among researchers on how family spillover effects should be measured and incorporated. This heterogeneity is mirrored by a lack of practical guidelines by Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies or a theoretical foundation for including family spillover effects in pediatric CUA. The results from this review may encourage researchers to develop a theoretical framework and HTA agencies to develop guidelines for including family spillover effects. Such guidance may lead to more rigorous and standardized methods for including family spillover effects and better-quality evidence to inform decision-makers on the cost-effectiveness of pediatric health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh Lamsal
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, 686 Bay Street, 11th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E Ann Yeh
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Neurosciences and Mental Health, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eleanor Pullenayegum
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, 686 Bay Street, 11th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, 686 Bay Street, 11th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pennington B, Al-Janabi H. Modelling Informal Carers' Health-Related Quality of Life: Challenges for Economic Evaluation. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2024; 22:9-16. [PMID: 37948034 PMCID: PMC10761460 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00834-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
There has been increasing interest in including carers' health-related qualify of life (HRQoL) in decision models, but currently there is no best practice guidance as to how to do so. Models thus far have typically assumed that carers' HRQoL can be predicted from patient health states, as we illustrate with three examples of disease-modifying treatments. However, this approach limits the mechanisms that influence carers' HRQoL solely to patient health and may not accurately reflect carers' outcomes. In this article, we identify and discuss challenges associated with modelling intervention effects on carers' HRQoL: attaching carer utilities to patient disease states, the size of the caring network, aggregation of carer and patient HRQoL, patient death, and modelling longer-term carer HRQoL. We review and critique potential alternatives to modelling carers' HRQoL in decision models: trial-based analyses, qualitative consideration, cost-consequence analysis, and multicriteria decision analysis, noting that each of these also has its own challenges. We provide a framework of issues to consider when modelling carers' HRQoL and suggest how these can be addressed in current practice and future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Becky Pennington
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Hareth Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Borrow R, Findlow J. The important lessons lurking in the history of meningococcal epidemiology. Expert Rev Vaccines 2024; 23:445-462. [PMID: 38517733 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2024.2329618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The epidemiology of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), a rare but potentially fatal illness, is typically described as unpredictable and subject to sporadic outbreaks. AREAS COVERED Meningococcal epidemiology and vaccine use during the last ~ 200 years are examined within the context of meningococcal characterization and classification to guide future IMD prevention efforts. EXPERT OPINION Historical and contemporary data highlight the dynamic nature of meningococcal epidemiology, with continued emergence of hyperinvasive clones and affected regions. Recent shifts include global increases in serogroup W disease, meningococcal antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and meningococcal urethritis; additionally, unvaccinated populations have experienced disease resurgences following lifting of COVID-19 restrictions. Despite these changes, a close analysis of meningococcal epidemiology indicates consistent dominance of serogroups A, B, C, W, and Y and elevated IMD rates among infants and young children, adolescents/young adults, and older adults. Demonstrably effective vaccines against all 5 major disease-causing serogroups are available, and their prophylactic use represents a powerful weapon against IMD, including AMR. The World Health Organization's goal of defeating meningitis by the year 2030 demands broad protection against IMD, which in turn indicates an urgent need to expand meningococcal vaccination programs across major disease-causing serogroups and age-related risk groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ray Borrow
- Meningococcal Reference Unit, UKHSA, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Jamie Findlow
- Global Medical Affairs, Vaccines and Antivirals, Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Neri M, Brassel S, Akerjord S, Charos A, Schley K, Steuten L. Recognizing the Broader Value of Meningococcal Vaccination: A Matter of Evidence, Ability, or Willingness? VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:1535-1542. [PMID: 37406961 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES It is widely argued that the value of meningococcal vaccination extends beyond the narrow value elements traditionally considered in health technology assessment. Nevertheless, measuring broader value presents challenges, whereas assessment methods and outcomes vary widely. This article investigates the extent to which the broader value of meningococcal vaccination is recognized, considering the available evidence and decision maker's methodological ability and willingness. METHODS A targeted literature review informed the classification of broader value elements according to their relevance to meningococcal vaccination and the quality of existing evidence. Focusing on relevant value elements with good evidentiary standards, decision makers' perspectives and methodological ability to consider them were assessed through case studies of health technology assessment of meningococcal B vaccination in England and The Netherlands. RESULTS Value elements of high relevance to meningococcal vaccination with good quality evidence include caregivers' health gains, patients' lifetime productivity gains, and disease severity. The willingness and methodological ability to incorporate them into value assessments have been mixed. This is attributable to the scope of the value assessment perspective and the use of evaluation methods that do not fully capture broader value. For other broader value elements, evidence gaps are another potential barrier to value demonstration and recognition. CONCLUSIONS The current evidence base confirms that the value of meningococcal vaccination spans beyond healthcare sector effects to health-related externalities, allocative value, and societal economic benefits. To ensure that the most efficient resource allocation outcomes are achieved, countries should consider how to improve their perspective and methodological ability to assess broader value elements accurately.
Collapse
|
9
|
Gibson E, Ollendorf DA, Simoens S, Bloom DE, Martinón-Torres F, Salisbury D, Severens JL, Toumi M, Molnar D, Meszaros K, Sohn WY, Begum N. Rule of Prevention: a potential framework to evaluate preventive interventions for rare diseases. JOURNAL OF MARKET ACCESS & HEALTH POLICY 2023; 11:2239557. [PMID: 37583879 PMCID: PMC10424616 DOI: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2239557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
Background: The benefits of preventive interventions lack comprehensive evaluation in standard health technology assessments (HTA), particularly for rare and transmissible diseases. Objective: To identify possible considerations for future HTA using analogies between the treatment and prevention of rare diseases. Study design: An Expert panel meeting assessed whether one HTA assessment framework can be applied to assess both rare disease treatments and preventive interventions. Experts also evaluated the range of value elements currently included in HTAs and their applicability to rare, transmissible, and/or preventable diseases. Results: A broad range of value should be considered when assessing rare, transmissible disease prevention. Although standard HTA can be applied to transmissible diseases, the risk of local outbreaks and the need for large-scale prevention programs suggest a modified assessment framework, capable of incorporating prevention-specific value elements in HTAs. A 'Rule of Prevention' framework was proposed to allow broader value considerations anchored to severity, equity, and prevention benefits in decision-making for preventive interventions for rare transmissible diseases. Conclusion: The proposed prevention framework introduces an explicit initial approach to consistently assess rare transmissible diseases, and to incorporate the broader value of preventive interventions compared with treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel A. Ollendorf
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies (ICRHPS), Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven Simoens
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David E Bloom
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Federico Martinón-Torres
- Department of Pediatrics, Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Genetics, Vaccines and Infections Research Group (GENVIP), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, University of Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica En Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España
| | - David Salisbury
- Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dold C, Marsay L, Wang N, Silva-Reyes L, Clutterbuck E, Paterson GK, Sharkey K, Wyllie D, Beernink PT, Hill AV, Pollard AJ, Rollier CS. An adenoviral-vectored vaccine confers seroprotection against capsular group B meningococcal disease. Sci Transl Med 2023; 15:eade3901. [PMID: 37343082 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.ade3901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
Adenoviral-vectored vaccines are licensed for prevention of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Ebola virus, but, for bacterial proteins, expression in a eukaryotic cell may affect the antigen's localization and conformation or lead to unwanted glycosylation. Here, we investigated the potential use of an adenoviral-vectored vaccine platform for capsular group B meningococcus (MenB). Vector-based candidate vaccines expressing MenB antigen factor H binding protein (fHbp) were generated, and immunogenicity was assessed in mouse models, including the functional antibody response by serum bactericidal assay (SBA) using human complement. All adenovirus-based vaccine candidates induced high antigen-specific antibody and T cell responses. A single dose induced functional serum bactericidal responses with titers superior or equal to those induced by two doses of protein-based comparators, as well as longer persistence and a similar breadth. The fHbp transgene was further optimized for human use by incorporating a mutation abrogating binding to the human complement inhibitor factor H. The resulting vaccine candidate induced high and persistent SBA responses in transgenic mice expressing human factor H. The optimized transgene was inserted into the clinically relevant ChAdOx1 backbone, and this vaccine has now progressed to clinical development. The results of this preclinical vaccine development study underline the potential of vaccines based on genetic material to induce functional antibody responses against bacterial outer membrane proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Dold
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, CCVTM, Churchill Lane, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Leanne Marsay
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, CCVTM, Churchill Lane, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Nelson Wang
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, CCVTM, Churchill Lane, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Laura Silva-Reyes
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, CCVTM, Churchill Lane, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Elizabeth Clutterbuck
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, CCVTM, Churchill Lane, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Gavin K Paterson
- Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Kelsey Sharkey
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - David Wyllie
- Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Peter T Beernink
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Adrian V Hill
- Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Andrew J Pollard
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, CCVTM, Churchill Lane, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Christine S Rollier
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, CCVTM, Churchill Lane, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
- School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hadley L, Karachaliou Prasinou A, Christensen H, Ramsay M, Trotter C. Modelling the impact of COVID-19 and routine MenACWY vaccination on meningococcal carriage and disease in the UK. Epidemiol Infect 2023; 151:e98. [PMID: 37259803 PMCID: PMC10284610 DOI: 10.1017/s0950268823000870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Country-wide social distancing and suspension of non-emergency medical care due to the COVID-19 pandemic will undoubtedly have affected public health in multiple ways. While non-pharmaceutical interventions are expected to reduce the transmission of several infectious diseases, severe disruptions to healthcare systems have hampered diagnosis, treatment, and routine vaccination. We examined the effect of this disruption on meningococcal disease and vaccination in the UK. By adapting an existing mathematical model for meningococcal carriage, we addressed the following questions: What is the predicted impact of the existing MenACWY adolescent vaccination programme? What effect might social distancing and reduced vaccine uptake both have on future epidemiology? Will catch-up vaccination campaigns be necessary? Our model indicated that the MenACWY vaccine programme was generating substantial indirect protection and suppressing transmission by 2020. COVID-19 social distancing is expected to have accelerated this decline, causing significant long-lasting reductions in both carriage prevalence of meningococcal A/C/W/Y strains and incidence of invasive meningococcal disease. In all scenarios modelled, pandemic social mixing effects outweighed potential reductions in vaccine uptake, causing an overall decline in carriage prevalence from 2020 for at least 5 years. Model outputs show strong consistency with recently published case data for England.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza Hadley
- Disease Dynamics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Doggen K, van Hoek AJ, Luyten J. Accounting for Adverse Events Following Immunization in Economic Evaluation: Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Pediatric Vaccines Against Pneumococcus, Rotavirus, Human Papillomavirus, Meningococcus and Measles-Mumps-Rubella-Varicella. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:481-497. [PMID: 36809673 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01252-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Economic evaluations of vaccines should accurately represent all relevant economic and health consequences of vaccination, including losses due to adverse events following immunization (AEFI). We investigated to what extent economic evaluations of pediatric vaccines account for AEFI, which methods are used to do so and whether inclusion of AEFI is associated with study characteristics and the vaccine's safety profile. METHODS A systematic literature search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Systematic Reviews and Trials, Database of the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination of the University of York, EconPapers, Paediatric Economic Database Evaluation, Tufts New England Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, Tufts New England Global Health CEA, International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment Database) was performed for economic evaluations published between 2014 and 29 April 2021 (date of search) pertaining to the five groups of pediatric vaccines licensed in Europe and the United States since 1998: the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, the meningococcal vaccines (MCV), the measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) combination vaccines, the pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) and the rotavirus vaccines (RV). Rates of accounting for AEFI were calculated, stratified by study characteristics (e.g., region, publication year, journal impact factor, level of industry involvement) and triangulated with the vaccine's safety profile (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices [ACIP] recommendations and information on safety-related product label changes). The studies accounting for AEFI were analyzed in terms of the methods used to account for both cost and effect implications of AEFI. RESULTS We identified 112 economic evaluations, of which 28 (25%) accounted for AEFI. This proportion was significantly higher for MMRV (80%, four out of five evaluations), MCV (61%, 11 out of 18 evaluations) and RV (60%, nine out of 15 evaluations) compared to HPV (6%, three out of 53 evaluations) and PCV (5%, one out of 21 evaluations). No other study characteristics were associated with a study's likelihood of accounting for AEFI. Vaccines for which AEFI were more frequently accounted for also had a higher frequency of label changes and a higher level of attention to AEFI in ACIP recommendations. Nine studies accounted for both the cost and health implications of AEFI, 18 studies considered only costs and one only health outcomes. While the cost impact was usually estimated based on routine billing data, the adverse health impact of AEFI was usually estimated based on assumptions. DISCUSSION Although (mild) AEFI were demonstrated for all five studied vaccines, only a quarter of reviewed studies accounted for these, mostly in an incomplete and inaccurate manner. We provide guidance on which methods to use to better quantify the impact of AEFI on both costs and health outcomes. Policymakers should be aware that the impact of AEFI on cost-effectiveness is likely to be underestimated in the majority of economic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kris Doggen
- Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Belgian Intermutualistic Agency, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Albert Jan van Hoek
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Luyten
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rodrigues F, Marlow R, Gouveia C, Correia P, Brett A, Silva C, Gameiro I, Rua I, Dias J, Martins M, Diogo R, Lopes T, Hipólito E, Moreira D, Costa Alves M, Prata F, Labrusco M, Gomes S, Fernandes A, Andrade A, Granjo Morais C, João Virtuoso M, Manuel Zarcos M, Teresa Raposo A, Boon A, Finn A. Prospective study of loss of health-related quality adjusted life years in children and their families due to uncomplicated and hospitalised varicella. Vaccine 2023; 41:1182-1189. [PMID: 36522267 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS Although usually benign, varicella can lead to serious complications and sometimes long-term sequelae. Vaccines are safe and effective but not yet included in immunisation programmes in many countries. We aimed to quantify the impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALY) in children with varicella and their families, key to assessing cost-utility in countries with low mortality due to this infection. METHODS Children with varicella in the community and admitted to hospitals in Portugal were included over 18 months from January 2019. Children's and carers' HRQoL losses were assessed prospectively using standard multi-attribute utility instruments for measuring HRQoL (EQ-5D and CHU9D), from presentation to recovery, allowing the calculation of QALYs. RESULTS Among 109 families with children with varicella recruited from attendees at a pediatric emergency service (community arm), the mean HRQoL loss/child was 2.0 days (95 % CI 1.9-2.2, n = 101) (mean 5.4 QALYs/1000 children (95 % CI 5.3-6.1) and 1.3 days/primary carer (95 % CI 1.2-1.6, n = 103) (mean 3.6 QALYs /1000 carers (95 % CI 3.4-4.4). Among 114 families with children admitted to hospital because of severe varicella or a complication (hospital arm), the mean HRQoL loss/child was 9.8 days (95 % CI 9.4-10.6, n = 114) (mean 26.8 QALYs /1000 children (95 % CI 25.8-29.0) and 8.5 days/primary carer (95 % CI 7.4-9.6, n = 114) (mean 23.4 QALYs/1000 carers (95 % CI 20.3-26.2). Mean QALY losses/1000 patients were particularly high for bone and joint infections [67.5 (95 % CI 43.9-97.6)]. Estimates for children's QALYs lost using the CHU9D tool were well correlated with those obtained using EQ-5D, but substantially lower. CONCLUSIONS The impact of varicella on HRQoL is substantial. We report the first measurements of QALYs lost in hospitalised children and in the families of children both in the community and admitted to hospital, providing important information to guide vaccination policy recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda Rodrigues
- Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Av. Afonso Romão, 3000-602 Coimbra, Portugal; Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.
| | - Robin Marlow
- Bristol Vaccine Centre, Schools of Population Health Sciences and of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, BS2 8AE, UK
| | - Catarina Gouveia
- Hospital D. Estefânia, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Rua Jacinta Marto, 1150-191 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Paula Correia
- Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca, IC 19, 2720-276 Amadora, Portugal
| | - Ana Brett
- Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Av. Afonso Romão, 3000-602 Coimbra, Portugal; Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Catarina Silva
- Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Av. Afonso Romão, 3000-602 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Inês Gameiro
- Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Av. Afonso Romão, 3000-602 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Inês Rua
- Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Av. Afonso Romão, 3000-602 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - João Dias
- Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Av. Afonso Romão, 3000-602 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Marta Martins
- Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Av. Afonso Romão, 3000-602 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Rui Diogo
- Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Av. Afonso Romão, 3000-602 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Teresa Lopes
- Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Av. Afonso Romão, 3000-602 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Elsa Hipólito
- Hospital Infante D. Pedro, Av. Dr. Artur Ravara, 3810-164 Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Diana Moreira
- Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho (Unidade 2), Rua Dr. Francisco Sá Carneiro, 4400-129 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Manuela Costa Alves
- Hospital de Braga, Rua das Comunidades Lusíadas 133, 4710-243 Braga, Portugal
| | - Filipa Prata
- Hospital Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Miguel Labrusco
- Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Av. Carlos Teixeira, 2674-514 Loures, Portugal
| | - Susana Gomes
- Hospital do Espírito Santo, Largo Senhor da Pobreza, 7000-811 Évora, Portugal
| | - Alexandre Fernandes
- Centro Materno Infantil do Norte, Largo da Maternidade de Júlio Dinis, 4050-651 Porto, Portugal
| | - Alexandra Andrade
- Hospital Nélio Mendonça, Av. Luís de Camões 6180, 9000-177 Funchal, Portugal
| | - Catarina Granjo Morais
- Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de S. João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Maria João Virtuoso
- Hospital de Faro, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Algarve, Rua Leão Penedo, 8000-386 Faro, Portugal
| | - Maria Manuel Zarcos
- Hospital de Santo André, Centro Hospitalar Leiria Pombal, Rua de Santo André, 2410-197 Leiria, Portugal
| | - Ana Teresa Raposo
- Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo, Av. D. Manuel I, 9500-370 Ponta Delgada, Portugal
| | - Adam Boon
- Bristol Vaccine Centre, Schools of Population Health Sciences and of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, BS2 8AE, UK
| | - Adam Finn
- Bristol Vaccine Centre, Schools of Population Health Sciences and of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, BS2 8AE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mueller JE. Serogroup B meningococcal vaccines from the public health perspective. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2023; 23:13-14. [PMID: 36087587 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00444-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Judith E Mueller
- EHESP French School of Public Health, 93210 La Plaine Saint Denis, France; Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Presa J, Serra L, Weil-Olivier C, York L. Preventing invasive meningococcal disease in early infancy. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:1979846. [PMID: 35482946 PMCID: PMC9196819 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1979846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
This review considers the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and epidemiology of invasive meningococcal disease in infants, to examine and critique meningococcal disease prevention in this population through vaccination. High rates of meningococcal disease and poor outcomes, particularly for very young infants, highlight the importance of meningococcal vaccination in early infancy. Although effective and safe meningococcal vaccines are available for use from 6 weeks of age, they are not recommended globally. Emerging real-world data from the increased incorporation of these vaccines within immunization programs inform recommendations regarding effectiveness, appropriate vaccination schedule, possible long-term safety effects, and persistence of antibody responses. Importantly, to protect infants from IMD, national vaccination recommendations should be consistent with available data regarding vaccine safety, effectiveness, and disease risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Presa
- Vaccine Medical, Development, Scientific, and Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Lidia Serra
- Global Vaccines Medical Development and Scientific, and Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | | | - Laura York
- York Biologics Consulting LLC, Wayne, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Scope A, Bhadhuri A, Pennington B. Systematic Review of Cost-Utility Analyses That Have Included Carer and Family Member Health-Related Quality of Life. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1644-1653. [PMID: 35339379 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Health interventions for patients can also affect the health of their informal carers and family members. These changes in carer or family member health could be reflected in cost-utility analyses (CUAs) through the inclusion of their quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). We conducted a systematic review to identify and describe all CUAs that have included family member health-related QALYs. METHODS A total of 4 bibliographic databases were searched from inception to July 2021. A 2-stage sifting process for inclusion of studies was undertaken. We performed data extraction using a standardized data extraction form and performed a narrative synthesis of the evidence. RESULTS A total of 40 CUAs published between 1999 and 2021 were identified. CUAs were conducted in 15 different countries. CUAs examined 13 different conditions including 15 CUAs on vaccination, 5 on Alzheimer's disease, 2 on Parkinson's disease, 3 on dementia, and 2 on terminal illness. The EQ-5D was the most commonly used measure of family member health. Generally, including carer QALYs resulted in lower incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. CONCLUSIONS When considering the total number of economic evaluations published, few have included family member QALYs and the methods for doing so are often inconsistent and data sources often limited. Estimation of family member QALYs in patient CUAs was regularly uncertain and often substantial in magnitude. The findings highlight the variation among methods and call for greater consistency in methods for incorporating family member QALYs in patient CUAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Scope
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Arjun Bhadhuri
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Becky Pennington
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Capturing the value of vaccination within health technology assessment and health economics: Literature review and novel conceptual framework. Vaccine 2022; 40:4008-4016. [PMID: 35618559 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination provides significant health gains to individuals and society and can potentially improve health equity, healthcare systems and national economies. Policy decisions, however, are rarely informed by comprehensive economic evaluations (EE) including vaccination's wide-ranging value. The objective of this analysis was to focus on health technology assessment systems to identify relevant value concepts in order to improve current EE of non-pandemic vaccines. METHODS Following a literature review, a novel Value of Vaccination (VoV) framework was developed with experts in vaccine EE from developed countries with established health technology assessment systems. RESULTS Forty-four studies presenting value frameworks or concepts applicable to vaccination were included. Eighteen unique value concepts relevant to EE were identified and defined. These were categorised within the VoV framework using three dimensions, moving from a narrow payer perspective to a more expansive and societal perspective. The dimensions were: (I) conventional payer perspective concepts (e.g., health gains in vaccinees, direct medical costs); (II) conventional societal perspective concepts (e.g., indirect health/economic gains to caregivers/households, productivity in vaccinees); and (III) novel societal concepts (e.g., financial risk protection, peace of mind, societal health gains, healthcare systems security, political stability, social equity and macroeconomic gains). While good quality evidence and methods are available to support concepts in Dimensions I and II, further work is needed to generate the required evidence for vaccination impact on Dimension III concepts. CONCLUSIONS The devastating effect on nations of the COVID-19 pandemic has helped to highlight the potential far-reaching benefits that many vaccination programmes can offer. This VoV framework is particularly relevant to policy decisions considering EE, and the potential future expansion of non-pandemic vaccination value considerations. The framework helps to understand and compare current value considerations across countries and payer versus societal perspectives. It provides decision-makers with a transparent and logical path to broaden consideration of VoV in EE.
Collapse
|
18
|
Sheerin D, Dold C, Silva-Reyes L, Linder A, Pollard AJ, Rollier CS. Inclusion of a dual signal sequence enhances the immunogenicity of a novel viral vectored vaccine against the capsular group B meningococcus. Cell Biosci 2022; 12:86. [PMID: 35690803 PMCID: PMC9187930 DOI: 10.1186/s13578-022-00809-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disease caused by the capsular group B meningococcus (MenB) is the leading cause of infectious death in UK infants. A novel adenovirus-based vaccine encoding the MenB factor H binding protein (fHbp) with an N-terminal dual signal sequence induces high titres of protective antibody after a single dose in mice. A panel of N-terminal signal sequence variants were created to assess the contribution of components of this sequence to transgene expression kinetics of the encoded antigen from mammalian cells and the resultant effect on immunogenicity of fHbp. RESULTS The full-length signal sequence (FL SS) resulted in superior early antigen expression compared with the panel of variants, as measured by flow cytometry and confocal imaging, and supported higher bactericidal antibody levels against the expressed antigen in mouse sera < 6 weeks post-immunisation than the licensed four component MenB vaccine. The FL SS also significantly increased antigen-specific T cell responses against other adenovirus-encoded bacterial antigens in mice. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate that the FL SS enhances immunogenicity of the encoded antigen, supporting its inclusion in other viral vectored bacterial antigen transgenes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Sheerin
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK. .,Infectious Diseases and Immune Defence Division, Institute of Medical Research (WEHI), The Walter & Eliza Hall, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
| | - Christina Dold
- grid.415719.f0000 0004 0488 9484Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Laura Silva-Reyes
- grid.415719.f0000 0004 0488 9484Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Aline Linder
- grid.415719.f0000 0004 0488 9484Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew J. Pollard
- grid.415719.f0000 0004 0488 9484Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Christine S. Rollier
- grid.415719.f0000 0004 0488 9484Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK ,grid.5475.30000 0004 0407 4824Present Address: Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shen J, Begum N, Ruiz-Garcia Y, Martinon-Torres F, Bekkat-Berkani R, Meszaros K. Range of invasive meningococcal disease sequelae and health economic application - a systematic and clinical review. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1078. [PMID: 35641955 PMCID: PMC9153861 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13342-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is uncommon, life-threatening, with many diverse sequelae. The aims were to: 1) comprehensively characterise the sequelae; 2) have a systematic application for sequelae impact in economic evaluation (EE). Methods Sequelae categorised as physical/neurological or psychological/behavioural were identified from a systematic review of IMD observational studies (OS) and EEs in high-income countries (published 2001–2020). A comprehensive map and EE-relevant list, respectively, included physical/neurological sequelae reported in ≥2OS and ≥ 2OS + 2EE (≥1OS and ≥ 1OS + 1EE for psychological/behavioural). Sequelae proportions were selected from the highest quality studies reporting most sequelae. Three medical experts independently evaluated the clinical impact of findings. Results Sixty-Six OS and 34 EE reported IMD sequelae. The comprehensive map included 44 sequelae (30 physical/neurological, 14 psychological/behavioural), of which 18 (14 physical/neurological and 4 psychological/behavioural) were EE-relevant. Experts validated the study and identified gaps due to limited evidence, underreporting of psychological/behavioural sequelae in survivors/their families, and occurrence of multiple sequelae in the acute phase and long-term. Conclusions The considerable burden of IMD sequelae on survivors and their families is potentially underestimated in EE, due to underreporting and poorly-defined subtle sequelae. When assessing IMD burden and potential interventions e.g., vaccination, sequelae range and duration, underreporting, and indirect burden on dependents should be considered. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13342-2. Invasive meningococcal disease survivors frequently suffer from variable sequelae. A broad sequelae map plus those relevant to economic evaluation (EE) were defined. Forty-four sequelae were selected: 30 physical/neurological and 14 psychological/behavioural. Eighteen EE-relevant sequelae included 14 physical/neurological and 4 psychological/behavioural Underreporting, family impact and multiple sequelae cases were critical gaps. A video summary linked to this article can be found on Figshare: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19753840.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Shen
- GSK, Avenue Fleming, 20 1300, Wavre, Belgium.,Present address: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Federico Martinon-Torres
- Genetics, Vaccines and Infections Research Group (GENVIP), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, University of Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.,Department of Pediatrics, Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Postma M, Biundo E, Chicoye A, Devlin N, Mark Doherty T, Garcia-Ruiz AJ, Jaros P, Sheikh S, Toumi M, Wasem J, Beck E, Salisbury D, Nolan T. Capturing the value of vaccination within health technology assessment and health economics: Country analysis and priority value concepts. Vaccine 2022; 40:3999-4007. [PMID: 35597688 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A value of vaccination framework for economic evaluation (EE) identified unique value concepts for the broad benefits vaccination provides to individuals, society, healthcare systems and national economies. The objectives of this paper were to work with experts in developed countries to objectively identify three priority concepts to extend current EE. METHODS The previously developed classification of value concepts in vaccination distinguished 18 concepts, categorised as conventional payer and societal perspective concepts and novel broader societal concepts. Their inclusion in current EE guidelines was assessed. Experts identified eight criteria relevant to decision-making and measurement feasibility, which were weighted and used to score each concept. The relative ranking of concepts by importance and the gaps in guidelines were used to identify three priority concepts on which to focus immediate efforts to extend EE. RESULTS The EE guidelines review highlighted differences across countries and between guidelines and practice. Conventional payer perspective concepts (e.g., individual and societal health gains and medical costs) were generally included, while gaps were evident for conventional societal perspective concepts (e.g., family/caregiver health and economic gains). Few novel broader societal benefits were considered, and only in ad hoc cases. The top-three concepts for near-term consideration: macroeconomic gains (e.g., benefiting the economy, tourism), social equity and ethics (e.g., equal distribution of health outcomes, reduced health/financial equity gaps) and health systems strengthening, resilience and security (e.g., efficiency gains, reduced disruption, increased capacity). CONCLUSIONS Gaps, inconsistencies and limited assessment of vaccination value in EE can lead to differences in policy and vaccination access. The three priority concepts identified provide a feasible approach for capturing VoV more broadly in the near-term. Robust methods for measuring and valuing these concepts in future assessments will help strengthen the evidence used to inform decisions, improving access to vaccines that are demonstrably good value for money from society's point of view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Postma
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Economics, Econometrics & Finance, University of Groningen, Faculty of Economics & Business, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Pharmacology & Therapy, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia; Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David Salisbury
- Programme for Global Health, Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Terry Nolan
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Whittles LK, Didelot X, White PJ. Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of gonorrhoea vaccination: an integrated transmission-dynamic health-economic modelling analysis. THE LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2022; 22:1030-1041. [PMID: 35427491 PMCID: PMC9217755 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00744-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Gonorrhoea is a rapidly growing public health threat, with rising incidence and increasing drug resistance. Evidence that the MeNZB and four-component serogroup B meningococcal (4CMenB) vaccines, designed against Neisseria meningitidis, can also offer protection against gonorrhoea has created interest in using 4CMenB for this purpose and for developing gonorrhoea-specific vaccines. However, cost-effectiveness, and how the efficacy and duration of protection affect a gonorrhoea vaccine's value, have not been assessed. Methods We developed an integrated transmission-dynamic health-economic model, calibrated using Bayesian methods to surveillance data (from the Genitourinary Medicine Clinic Activity Dataset and the Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobials Surveillance Programme) on men who have sex with men (MSM) in England. We considered vaccination of MSM from the perspective of sexual health clinics, with and without vaccination offered to all adolescents in schools (vaccination before entry [VbE]), comparing three realistic approaches to targeting: vaccination on attendance (VoA) for testing; vaccination on diagnosis (VoD) with gonorrhoea; or vaccination according to risk (VaR), offered to patients diagnosed with gonorrhoea plus individuals who test negative but report having more than five sexual partners per year. For the primary analysis, vaccine impact was assessed relative to no vaccination in a conservative baseline scenario wherein time-varying behavioural parameters (sexual risk behaviour and screening rates) stabilise. To calculate the value of vaccination per dose administered, the value of vaccination was calculated by summing the averted costs of testing and treatment, and the monetary value of quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gains with a QALY valued at £20 000. Costs were in 2018–19 GB£, and both costs and QALYs were discounted at 3·5% per year. We analysed the effects of varying vaccine uptake (0·5, 1, or 2 times HPV vaccine uptake by MSM in sexual health clinics in England), vaccine efficacy (1–100%) and duration of protection (1–20 years), and the time-horizon considered (10 years and 20 years). In addition, we calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the use of 4CMenB using assumed vaccine prices. Findings VbE has little impact on gonorrhoea diagnoses, with only 1·7% of MSM vaccinated per year. VoA has the largest impact but requires more vaccine doses than any other strategy, whereas VoD has a moderate impact but requires many fewer doses than VoA. VaR has almost the same impact as VoA but with fewer doses administered than VoA. VaR is the most cost-effective strategy for vaccines of moderate efficacy or duration of protection (or both), although VoD is more cost-effective for very protective and long-lasting vaccines. Even under conservative assumptions (efficacy equivalent to that of MeNZB and protection lasting for 18 months after two-dose primary vaccination and 36 months after single-dose booster vaccination), 4CMenB administered under VaR would likely be cost-saving at its current National Health Service price, averting an estimated mean 110 200 cases (95% credible interval 36 500–223 600), gaining a mean 100·3 QALYs (31·0–215·8), and saving a mean £7·9 million (0·0–20·5) over 10 years. A hypothetical gonorrhoea vaccine's value is increased more by improving its efficacy than its duration of protection—eg, 30% protection lasting 2 years has a median value of £48 (22–85) per dose over 10 years; doubling efficacy increases the value to £102 (53–144) whereas doubling the duration of protection increases it to £72 (34–120). Interpretation We recommend that vaccination of MSM against gonorrhoea according to risk in sexual health clinics in England with the 4CMenB vaccine be considered. Development of gonorrhoea-specific vaccines should prioritise maximising efficacy over duration of protection. Funding Medical Research Council (UK), National Institute for Health Research (UK).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilith K Whittles
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling and Health Economics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Xavier Didelot
- School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Genomics and Enabling Data, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Peter J White
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling and Health Economics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; Modelling and Economics Unit, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Taha MK, Martinon-Torres F, Köllges R, Bonanni P, Safadi MAP, Booy R, Smith V, Garcia S, Bekkat-Berkani R, Abitbol V. Equity in vaccination policies to overcome social deprivation as a risk factor for invasive meningococcal disease. Expert Rev Vaccines 2022; 21:659-674. [PMID: 35271781 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2052048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Social deprivation is associated with poorer healthcare access. Vaccination is among the most effective public health interventions and achieving equity in vaccination access is vitally important. However, vaccines are often reimbursed by public funds only when recommended in national immunization programs (NIPs), which can increase inequity between high and low socioeconomic groups. Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a serious vaccination-preventable disease. This review focuses on vaccination strategies against IMD designed to reduce inequity. AREAS COVERED We reviewed meningococcal epidemiology and current vaccination recommendations worldwide. We also reviewed studies demonstrating an association between social deprivation and risk of meningococcal disease, as well as studies demonstrating an impact of social deprivation on uptake of meningococcal vaccines. We discuss factors influencing inclusion of meningococcal vaccines in NIPs. EXPERT OPINION Incorporating meningococcal vaccines in NIPs is necessary to reduce inequity, but insufficient alone. Inclusion provides clear guidance to healthcare professionals and helps to ensure that vaccines are offered universally to all target groups. Beyond NIPs, cost of vaccination should be reimbursed especially for disadvantaged individuals. These approaches should help to achieve optimal protection against IMD, by increasing access and immunization rates, eventually reducing social inequities, and helping to protect those at greatest risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhamed-Kheir Taha
- Institut Pasteur, Invasive Bacterial Infections Unit, National Reference Centre for Meningococci and Haemophilus Influenza, Paris, France
| | - Federico Martinon-Torres
- Genetics, Vaccines, Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics Research Group (GENVIP), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago and Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.,Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.,Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBER-ES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ralph Köllges
- Praxis für Kinder und Jugendliche, Ralph Köllges und Partner, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Robert Booy
- Department of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Institute of Infectious Diseases, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Timing of meningococcal vaccination with 4CMenB (Bexsero®) in children with invasive meningococcal group B (MenB) disease in England. Vaccine 2022; 40:1493-1498. [PMID: 35148913 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely vaccination is critical for providing early protection against meningococcal B (MenB) disease because of the high incidence in early childhood. We assessed the timeliness of vaccination in children with confirmed MenB disease after 4CMenB (a recombinant protein-based vaccine) implementation into the national infant immunisation programme in England. METHODS Public Health England (PHE) conducts surveillance of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in England. Children born since 01 July 2015 who developed MenB disease between 01 September 2015 and 31 August 2019 (four surveillance years) were included in the analysis. RESULTS There were 276 children with laboratory-confirmed MenB disease, including 36 infants who were too young for vaccination, 59 who were eligible for one 4CMenB dose, 104 for two doses and 77 for 3 doses before they developed MenB disease. Prior to developing MenB disease, there were 59 opportunities for vaccination with two 4CMenB doses in 48/104 (46.5%) eligible infants and 41 opportunities in 28/77 (36.6%) children aged ≥ 1 year who were under-immunised. A schedule with a shorter interval at 8 and 12 weeks of age, compared to the current schedule at 8 and 16 weeks, had the potential to offer an additional 4CMenB dose to 35/58 infants (58.6%) who developed MenB disease between 10 and 18 weeks of age. CONCLUSIONS A high proportion of infants and toddlers with laboratory-confirmed MenB disease had not received their scheduled 4CMenB vaccine prior to developing MenB disease. An infant priming schedule with a shorter interval of 4 weeks has the potential to provide earlier protection against MenB disease.
Collapse
|
24
|
Sohn WY, Tahrat H, Novy P, Bekkat-Berkani R. Real-world implementation of 4-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB): implications for clinical practices. Expert Rev Vaccines 2022; 21:325-335. [DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2021881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
25
|
Argante L, Abbing-Karahagopian V, Vadivelu K, Rappuoli R, Medini D. A re-assessment of 4CMenB vaccine effectiveness against serogroup B invasive meningococcal disease in England based on an incidence model. BMC Infect Dis 2021; 21:1244. [PMID: 34895161 PMCID: PMC8666080 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06906-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The four-component serogroup B meningococcal 4CMenB vaccine (Bexsero, GSK) has been routinely given to all infants in the United Kingdom at 2, 4 and 12 months of age since September 2015. After 3 years, Public Health England (PHE) reported a 75% [95% confidence interval 64%; 81%] reduction in the incidence of serogroup B invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in age groups eligible to be fully vaccinated. In contrast, vaccine effectiveness (VE) evaluated in the same immunization program applying the screening method was not statistically significant. We re-analyzed the data using an incidence model. METHODS Aggregate data-stratified by age, year and doses received-were provided by PHE: serogroup B IMD case counts for the entire population of England (years 2011-2018) and 4CMenB vaccine uptake in infants. We combined uptake with national population estimates to obtain counts of vaccinated and unvaccinated person-time by age and time. We re-estimated VE comparing incidence rates in vaccinated and non-vaccinated subjects using a Bayesian Poisson model for case counts with person-time data as an offset. The model was adjusted for age, time and number of doses received. RESULTS The incidence model showed that cases decreased until 2013-2014, followed by an increasing trend that continued in the non-vaccinated population during the immunization program. VE in fully vaccinated subjects (three doses) was 80.1% [95% Bayesian credible interval (BCI): 70.3%; 86.7%]. After a single dose, VE was 33.5% [12.4%; 49.7%]95%BCI and after two doses, 78.7% [71.5%; 84.5%]95%BCI. We estimated that vaccination averted 312 cases [252; 368]95%BCI between 2015 and 2018. VE was in line with the previously reported incidence reduction. CONCLUSIONS Our estimates of VE had higher precision than previous estimates based on the screening method, which were statistically not significant, and in line with the 75% incidence reduction previously reported by PHE. When disease incidence is low and vaccine uptake is high, the screening method applied to cases exclusively from the population eligible for vaccination may not be precise enough and may produce misleading point-estimates. Precise and accurate VE estimates are fundamental to inform public health decision making. VE assessment can be enhanced using models that leverage data on subjects not eligible for vaccination.
Collapse
|
26
|
Public Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Routine Infant 4CMenB Vaccination in Germany to Prevent Serogroup B Invasive Meningococcal Disease. Infect Dis Ther 2021; 11:367-387. [PMID: 34877641 PMCID: PMC8847463 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-021-00573-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is an uncommon, severe, life-threatening disease primarily affecting infants, with potential lifelong sequelae. Neisseria meningitidis (Nm) serogroup B (MenB) causes most IMD cases in Germany, many of which can be prevented with four-component MenB (4CMenB) vaccination. The potential public health and economic impact of introducing routine 4CMenB infant vaccination in Germany was assessed. Methods A dynamic transmission-based cost-effectiveness model adapted for Germany assessed the impact of infant 4CMenB universal mass vaccination (UMV) versus no vaccination. The model included the latest real-world evidence on vaccine effectiveness, the comprehensive burden of disease on patients (sequelae) and their family (quality of life impact), comprehensive German IMD costs, and vaccination uptake assumptions. Results The largest public health impact was predicted in children: a rapid decline, 5 years after UMV implementation, of 39.9% (34.7%) for MenB (all IMD) cases aged 0–4 years and 42.4% (36.8%) in infants. Over lifetime (100-year time horizon), 4CMenB could prevent 3154 MenB (3303 all IMD) cases, 291 MenB (304 all IMD) deaths and 1370 MenB (1435 all IMD) long-term sequelae. 4CMenB saved 25,878 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), at a cost of €188,762 per QALY gained in the base case (societal perspective including lost productivity). Scenarios including potential Nm carriage protection (enabling herd protection) or societal preferences for the prevention of severe diseases led to more cost-effective results, while a scenario excluding IMD impact beyond the patient with increased discounting of vaccination health benefits produced less cost-effective results. Conclusions MenB IMD is a vaccine-preventable disease. This analysis for Germany can inform decision-makers on the potential impact of introducing infant 4CMenB UMV. The program is predicted to rapidly produce health benefits (reduction in child cases, deaths and sequelae) at a cost per QALY to society of around €190,000 (base case), decreasing to around €78,000 when considering societal preferences and IMD underreporting. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-021-00573-w. Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is an uncommon but severe infection, usually presenting as meningitis and/or sepsis, caused by the bacteria Neisseria meningitidis. Most cases occur in infants, young children and adolescents. Patients who survive the disease can develop lifelong sequelae, such as physical, neurological and psychological/behavioural problems that impact their quality of life and that of their family/caregivers. This disease can be prevented by vaccination. The use of the four-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) in countries like Germany can prevent the most common form of this disease, IMD caused by serogroup B. This study assessed the public health and economic impact of infant vaccination in Germany with 4CMenB. For this, the authors used an economic model that measured the lifetime impact of the disease on patients but also on their families. The model predicted that after 5 years of vaccination, the number of cases and deaths in infants and young children aged 0–4 years would rapidly decrease by almost 40%. Over a long-term horizon of 100 years, this number was predicted to remain stable. Due to the reduced number of cases, vaccination would also result in fewer deaths and patients with sequelae, as well as cost savings for the healthcare system and society due to the reduced loss of productivity. In conclusion, in Germany, IMD caused by serogroup B is preventable through vaccination, and the 4CMenB vaccine in German infants is predicted to rapidly reduce the disease burden, save lives and prevent healthcare costs.
Collapse
|
27
|
Staniszewska S, Hill EM, Grant R, Grove P, Porter J, Shiri T, Tulip S, Whitehurst J, Wright C, Datta S, Petrou S, Keeling M. Developing a Framework for Public Involvement in Mathematical and Economic Modelling: Bringing New Dynamism to Vaccination Policy Recommendations. THE PATIENT 2021; 14:435-445. [PMID: 33462773 PMCID: PMC8205902 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00476-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Mathematical and Economic Modelling for Vaccination and Immunisation Evaluation (MEMVIE) programme aimed to explore, capture and support the potential contribution of the public to mathematical and economic modelling, in order to identify the values that underpin public involvement (PI) in modelling and co-produce a framework that identifies the nature and type of PI in modelling and supports its implementation. METHODS We established a PI Reference Group, who worked collaboratively with the academic contributors to create a deliberative knowledge space, which valued different forms of knowledge, expertise and evidence. Together, we explored the key steps of mathematical and economic methods in 21 meetings during 2015-2020. These deliberations generated rich discussion, through which we identified potential points of public contribution and the values that underpin PI in modelling. We iteratively developed a framework to guide future practice of PI in modelling. RESULTS We present the MEMVIE Public Involvement Framework in two forms: a short form to summarise key elements, and a long form framework to provide a detailed description of each potential type of public contribution at each stage of the modelling process. At a macro level, the public can contribute to reviewing context, reviewing relevance, assessing data and justifying model choice, troubleshooting, and interpreting and reviewing outcomes and decision making. The underpinning values that drive involvement include the public contributing to the validity of the model, potentially enhancing its relevance, utility and transparency through diverse inputs, and enhancing the credibility, consistency and continuous development through scrutiny, in addition to contextualising the model within a wider societal view. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION PI in modelling is in its infancy. The MEMVIE Framework is the first attempt to identify potential points of collaborative public contribution to modelling, but it requires further evaluation and refinement that we are undertaking in a subsequent study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Staniszewska
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
| | - Edward M Hill
- The Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Richard Grant
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | | | - Jarina Porter
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Tinevimbo Shiri
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
| | - Sue Tulip
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Jane Whitehurst
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Claire Wright
- Meningitis Research Foundation, Bristol, BS1 1LT, UK
| | - Samik Datta
- Population Modelling, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd (NIWA), Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Matt Keeling
- The Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
van der Flier M. Neonatal meningitis: small babies, big problem. THE LANCET CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH 2021; 5:386-387. [PMID: 33894158 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(21)00092-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel van der Flier
- Division of Pediatrics, Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584EA Utrecht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Nwogu IB, Jones M, Langley T. Economic evaluation of meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccines: A systematic review. Vaccine 2021; 39:2201-2213. [PMID: 33744052 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) has emerged as the leading cause of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in several countries following the release of effective vaccines against serogroups A, C, W, and Y. In 2013, however, the first multicomponent MenB vaccine (Bexsero®) was licensed in Europe. AIM To review the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of vaccination against MenB. METHODS Searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, NHS EED, Econlit, Tufts CEA registry, and HTA. Three reviewers independently screened and selected studies. Using a narrative synthesis, studies were categorized by vaccination strategies. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Comparative Health Economics Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. RESULTS 13 studies were included. Ten studies were conducted in the European region and three in the Americas. None of the vaccination strategies were considered cost-effective. Including herd effects improved value for money for MenB vaccines. Routine infant vaccination was the most effective short-term strategy, however, adolescent strategies offered the best value for money. Without herd immunity, routine infant vaccination had the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio estimates. CONCLUSION Routine MenB vaccination does not offer substantial value for money, mainly due to high vaccine costs and low disease incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ifechukwu B Nwogu
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK.
| | - Matthew Jones
- Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Tessa Langley
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rivero-Calle I, Gómez-Rial J, Bont L, Gessner BD, Kohn M, Dagan R, Payne DC, Bruni L, Pollard AJ, García-Sastre A, Faustman DL, Osterhaus A, Butler R, Giménez Sánchez F, Álvarez F, Kaforou M, Bello X, Martinón-Torres F. TIPICO X: report of the 10th interactive infectious disease workshop on infectious diseases and vaccines. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:759-772. [PMID: 32755474 PMCID: PMC7996078 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1788301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
TIPICO is an expert meeting and workshop that aims to provide the most recent evidence in the field of infectious diseases and vaccination. The 10th Interactive Infectious Disease TIPICO workshop took place in Santiago de Compostela, Spain, on November 21-22, 2019. Cutting-edge advances in vaccination against respiratory syncytial virus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, rotavirus, human papillomavirus, Neisseria meningitidis, influenza virus, and Salmonella Typhi were discussed. Furthermore, heterologous vaccine effects were updated, including the use of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine as potential treatment for type 1 diabetes. Finally, the workshop also included presentations and discussion on emergent virus and zoonoses, vaccine resilience, building and sustaining confidence in vaccination, approaches to vaccine decision-making, pros and cons of compulsory vaccination, the latest advances in decoding infectious diseases by RNA gene signatures, and the application of big data approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Rivero-Calle
- Translational Paediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital Clínico Universitario De Santiago De Compostela, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
- Genetics, Vaccines and Infections Research Group (GENVIP), Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Santiago, Universidad De Santiago De Compostela, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
| | - Jose Gómez-Rial
- Genetics, Vaccines and Infections Research Group (GENVIP), Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Santiago, Universidad De Santiago De Compostela, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
| | - Louis Bont
- Wilhelmina’s Children’s Hospital University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Melvin Kohn
- Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Medical Affairs, Global Medical and Scientific Affairs, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Ron Dagan
- The Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Daniel C. Payne
- Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Laia Bruni
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO) - IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrew J. Pollard
- Oxford Vaccines Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Adolfo García-Sastre
- Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Global Health and Emerging Pathogens Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Denise L. Faustman
- The Immunobiology Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Albert Osterhaus
- Artemis One Health, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Research Center Emerging Infections and Zoonoses, Hannover, Germany
| | - Robb Butler
- WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Myrsini Kaforou
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Xabier Bello
- Genetics, Vaccines and Infections Research Group (GENVIP), Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Santiago, Universidad De Santiago De Compostela, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
| | - Federico Martinón-Torres
- Translational Paediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital Clínico Universitario De Santiago De Compostela, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
- Genetics, Vaccines and Infections Research Group (GENVIP), Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Santiago, Universidad De Santiago De Compostela, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Huang L, Snedecor SJ, Balmer P, Srivastava A. Potential public health impact of a Neisseria meningitidis A, B, C, W, and Y pentavalent vaccine in the United States. Postgrad Med 2021; 134:341-348. [PMID: 33615973 DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2021.1876478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Globally, 5 serogroups (A, B, C, W, and Y) cause the majority of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). Vaccines targeting these serogroups are currently part of the US adolescent immunization platform, which includes 1 + 1 dosing of a MenACWY vaccine routinely at ages 11 and 16 years and 2 doses of a MenB vaccine at age 16-23 years under shared clinical decision-making between the patient and healthcare provider. In 2018, MenACWY vaccination coverage was 86.6% for ≥1 dose and 50.8% for ≥2 doses, whereas MenB vaccination coverage was 17.2% for ≥1 dose and <50% for completion of the multidose series. A pentavalent MenABCWY vaccine could simplify immunization schedules and improve vaccination coverage. We estimated the public health impact of a pentavalent MenABCWY vaccine using a model that considers meningococcal carriage and vaccination coverage.Methods: A population-based dynamic model estimated the 10-year reduction in IMD from implementing a MenABCWY vaccine within the existing US meningococcal immunization platform. Five vaccination schedules (4 new, 1 existing) were examined to estimate the impact of different recommendations on the overall reduction in the number of IMD cases. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying vaccination coverage at age 16 years.Results: The existing schedule and coverage of MenACWY and MenB vaccines (total 4 doses) could potentially avert 165 IMD cases over 10 years versus no vaccination. Assuming similar MenABCWY and MenACWY vaccination coverage rates at age 16 years, replacing 1 or more MenACWY and/or MenB doses with MenABCWY could avert more cases, ranging from 189 to 256. The most beneficial MenABCWY vaccine schedule was 2 doses at age 11 years and 1 dose at age 16 years.Conclusions: Replacing one or more MenACWY/MenB vaccine doses with MenABCWY could reduce IMD caused by all 5 meningococcal serogroups among the US adolescent population, while also reducing the number of injections required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liping Huang
- Patient Health and Impact, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Sonya J Snedecor
- Health Economics, Pharmerit - an OPEN Health Company, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paul Balmer
- Vaccines Medical Development, Scientific & Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Amit Srivastava
- Vaccines Medical Development, Scientific & Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Huang L, Mauskopf J, Farkouh R, Masaquel C. Use of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses for Decisions About Vaccination Programs for Meningococcal Disease in the United States, United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Canada. Expert Rev Vaccines 2021; 20:59-72. [PMID: 33455487 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1878030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Meningococcal vaccines to protect against invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) vary in terms of vaccine technology and serogroup coverage (Polysaccharide MnACWY, conjugated C and ACWY, outer membrane vesicle-based or protein-based B vaccines), and the national recommendations for each of them vary in terms of target population and number of doses. We sought to understand factors associated with the evolution of meningococcal vaccination program recommendations in four countries with formal evaluation processes: the UK, US, the Netherlands, and Canada. AREAS COVERED A targeted review of published literature and internet sources for the four countries relating to meningococcal vaccination decision-making was conducted. The review focused on the impact of cost-effectiveness analyses on vaccine policy decisions and the extent to which variation in incidence of IMD and its potential catastrophic consequences influenced policy decisions.The evolution of meningococcal vaccine recommendations in the four countries was mainly driven by changes in vaccine availability and changes in serogroup incidence. Public pressure due to the catastrophic nature of IMD influenced recommendations. The role of cost-effectiveness analyses varied across the 4 countries. EXPERT OPINION The value of implementing meningococcal vaccination programs should be assessed using factors beyond those included in traditional cost-effectiveness analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liping Huang
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Collegeville, PA
| | - Josephine Mauskopf
- Health Economics Department, RTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ray Farkouh
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Collegeville, PA
| | - Catherine Masaquel
- Market Access and Outcomes Strategy Departments, RTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, Research Triangle Park, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mauskopf J, Masaquel C, Huang L. Evaluating Vaccination Programs That Prevent Diseases With Potentially Catastrophic Health Outcomes: How Can We Capture the Value of Risk Reduction? VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:86-90. [PMID: 33431158 PMCID: PMC7550269 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
In the last 5 years, guidelines have been developed for performing cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) for the economic evaluation of vaccination programs against infectious diseases. However, these cost-effectiveness guidelines do not provide specific guidance for including the value of reducing the risk of rare but potentially catastrophic health outcomes, such as mortality or long-term sequelae. Alternative economic evaluation methods, including extended CEA, the impact inventory, cost-benefit analyses, willingness to pay or the value of a statistical life, to capture the value of this risk reduction could provide more complete estimates of the value of vaccination programs for diseases with potentially catastrophic health and nonhealth outcomes. In this commentary, using invasive meningococcal disease as an example, we describe these alternative approaches along with examples to illustrate how the benefits of vaccination in reducing risk of catastrophic health outcomes can be valued. These benefits are not usually captured in CEAs that only include population benefits estimated as the quality-adjusted life-years gained and reduced costs from avoided cases.
Collapse
|
34
|
Herd Protection against Meningococcal Disease through Vaccination. Microorganisms 2020; 8:microorganisms8111675. [PMID: 33126756 PMCID: PMC7693901 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8111675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Reduction in the transmission of Neisseria meningitidis within a population results in fewer invasive disease cases. Vaccination with meningococcal vaccines composed of high weight capsular polysaccharide without carrier proteins has minimal effect against carriage or the acquisition of carriage. Conjugate vaccines, however, elicit an enhanced immune response which serves to reduce carriage acquisition and hinder onwards transmission. Since the 1990s, several meningococcal conjugate vaccines have been developed and, when used in age groups associated with higher carriage, they have been shown to provide indirect protection to unvaccinated cohorts. This herd protective effect is important in enhancing the efficiency and impact of vaccination. Studies are ongoing to assess the effect of protein-based group B vaccines on carriage; however, current data cast doubt on their ability to reduce transmission.
Collapse
|
35
|
Carr J, Plested E, Aley P, Camara S, Davis K, MacLennan JM, Gray S, Faust SN, Borrow R, Christensen H, Trotter C, Maiden MCJ, Finn A, Snape MD. 'Be on the TEAM' Study (Teenagers Against Meningitis): protocol for a controlled clinical trial evaluating the impact of 4CMenB or MenB-fHbp vaccination on the pharyngeal carriage of meningococci in adolescents. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e037358. [PMID: 33093030 PMCID: PMC7583083 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Capsular group B Neisseria meningitidis (MenB) is the most common cause of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in many parts of the world. A MenB vaccine directed against the polysaccharide capsule remains elusive due to poor immunogenicity and safety concerns. The vaccines licensed for the prevention of MenB disease, 4CMenB (Bexsero) and MenB-fHbp (Trumenba), are serogroup B 'substitute' vaccines, comprised of subcapsular proteins and are designed to provide protection against most MenB disease-causing strains. In many high-income countries, such as the UK, adolescents are at increased risk of IMD and have the highest rates of meningococcal carriage. Beginning in the late 1990s, immunisation of this age group with the meningococcal group C conjugate vaccine reduced asymptomatic carriage and disrupted transmission of this organism, resulting in lower group C IMD incidence across all age groups. Whether vaccinating teenagers with the novel 'MenB' protein-based vaccines will prevent acquisition or reduce duration of carriage and generate herd protection was unknown at the time of vaccine introduction and could not be inferred from the effects of the conjugate vaccines. 4CMenB and MenB-fHbp may also impact on non-MenB disease-causing capsular groups as well as commensal Neisseria spp. This study will evaluate the impact of vaccination with 4CMenB or MenB-fHbp on oropharyngeal carriage of pathogenic meningococci in teenagers, and consequently the potential for these vaccines to provide broad community protection against MenB disease. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The 'Be on the TEAM' (Teenagers Against Meningitis) Study is a pragmatic, partially randomised controlled trial of 24 000 students aged 16-19 years in their penultimate year of secondary school across the UK with regional allocation to a 0+6 month schedule of 4CMenB or MenB-fHbp or to a control group. Culture-confirmed oropharyngeal carriage will be assessed at baseline and at 12 months, following which the control group will be eligible for 4CMenB vaccination. The primary outcome is the carriage prevalence of potentially pathogenic meningococci (defined as those with genogroups B, C, W, Y or X), in each vaccine group compared separately to the control group at 12 months post-enrolment, that is, 12 months after the first vaccine dose and 6 months after the second vaccine dose. Secondary outcomes include impact on carriage of: genogroup B meningococci; hyperinvasive meningococci; all meningococci; those meningococci expressing vaccine antigens and; other Neisseria spp. A sample size of 8000 in each arm will provide 80% power to detect a 30% reduction in meningococcal carriage, assuming genogroup B, C, W, Y or X meningococci carriage of 3.43%, a design effect of 1.5, a retention rate of 80% and a significance level of 0.05. Study results will be available in 2021 and will inform the UK and international immunisation policy and future vaccine development. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study is approved by the National Health Service South Central Research Ethics Committee (18/SC/0055); the UK Health Research Authority (IRAS ID 239091) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Publications arising from this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals. Study results will be disseminated in public forums, online, presented at local and international conferences and made available to the participating schools. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS ISRCTN75858406; Pre-results, EudraCT 2017-004609-42.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Carr
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Emma Plested
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Parvinder Aley
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Susana Camara
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Kimberly Davis
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Steve Gray
- Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Saul N Faust
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Faculty of Medicine and Institute of Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ray Borrow
- Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Hannah Christensen
- School of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Caroline Trotter
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Adam Finn
- School of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Matthew D Snape
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chung GS, Hutton DW. Epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness of universal meningitis b vaccination among college students prior to college entry. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0239926. [PMID: 33035260 PMCID: PMC7546456 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES University students are at significantly higher risk of serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) infection, which can result in debilitating sequelae and excessive healthcare usage. This study aimed to elucidate the impact of universal pre-enrollment vaccination on MenB outbreak probability and the cost-effectiveness in outbreak-only scenarios. METHODS We developed an infectious disease transmission model to determine the number of outbreaks averted under universal vaccination and a Markov model to simulate the costs accrued and QALYs lost associated with infection. The analysis was done on a hypothetical population of 40,000 college students over a four-year time frame. We used the outputs of these two models to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of universal MenB vaccination from a societal perspective. RESULTS We find that the vaccination strategy was estimated to reduce MenB incidence by 63% and outbreak frequency rate by 90%. Under base case assumptions, the ICER of universal vaccination was $748,129 per QALY and in outbreak-only scenarios, it was cost-saving. CONCLUSIONS Universal vaccination is not cost-effective at the current low MenB incidence levels and vaccine price in the U.S., but it is cost-saving if outbreak is imminent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace S. Chung
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - David W. Hutton
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pennington BM. Inclusion of Carer Health-Related Quality of Life in National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Appraisals. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:1349-1357. [PMID: 33032779 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Health interventions for patients can have effects on their carers too. For consistency, decision makers may wish to specify whether carer outcomes should be included. One example is the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), whose reference case specifies that economic evaluations should include direct health effects for patients and carers where relevant. We aimed to review the methods used in including carer health-related quality of life (HRQL) in NICE appraisals. METHODS We reviewed all published technology appraisals (TAs) and highly specialized technologies (HSTs) to identify those that included carer HRQL and discussed the methods and data sources. RESULTS Twelve of 414 TAs (3%) and 4 of 8 HSTs (50%) included carer HRQL in cost-utility analyses. Eight were for multiple sclerosis, the remainder were each in a unique disease area. Twelve of the 16 appraisals modeled carer HRQL as a function of the patient's health state, 3 modeled carer HRQL as a function of the patient's treatment, and 1 included family quality-adjusted life year (QALY) loss. They used 5 source studies: 2 compared carer EQ-5D scores with controls, 2 measured carer utility only (1 health utilities index and 1 EQ-5D), and 1 estimated family QALY loss from a child's death. Two used disutility estimates not from the literature. Including carer HRQL increased the incremental QALYs and decreased incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in all cases. CONCLUSIONS The inclusion of carer HRQL in NICE appraisals is relatively uncommon and has been limited by data availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Becky M Pennington
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Stawasz A, Huang L, Kirby P, Bloom D. Health Technology Assessment for Vaccines Against Rare, Severe Infections: Properly Accounting for Serogroup B Meningococcal Vaccination's Full Social and Economic Benefits. Front Public Health 2020; 8:261. [PMID: 32754566 PMCID: PMC7366491 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The high price of new generations of vaccines relative to their predecessors has become an important consideration in debates over whether the benefits of the new vaccines justify their costs. An increasingly central line of inquiry in the literature on valuing vaccination surrounds accounting for the full social and economic benefits of vaccination. This paper applies this emerging perspective to the particular case of vaccination against serogroup B meningococcal disease (MenB). We explore key issues involved in health technology assessments of MenB vaccination, which have led to pronounced heterogeneity in evaluation methods and recommendation outcomes across countries such as France, Germany, the US, and the UK. Accounting for typically neglected sources of socioeconomic benefit could potentially impact recommendation and reimbursement decisions. We propose a taxonomy of such benefits built around four dimensions: (i) internalized health benefits, (ii) internalized non-health benefits, (iii) externalized health benefits, and (iv) externalized non-health benefits. This approach offers a systematic, comprehensive evaluation framework that can be used in future assessment of MenB vaccines as well as other health technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Stawasz
- Data for Decisions, LLC, Waltham, MA, United States.,Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | | | - Paige Kirby
- Data for Decisions, LLC, Waltham, MA, United States
| | - David Bloom
- Data for Decisions, LLC, Waltham, MA, United States.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Christensen H, Al-Janabi H, Levy P, Postma MJ, Bloom DE, Landa P, Damm O, Salisbury DM, Diez-Domingo J, Towse AK, Lorgelly PK, Shah KK, Hernandez-Villafuerte K, Smith V, Glennie L, Wright C, York L, Farkouh R. Economic evaluation of meningococcal vaccines: considerations for the future. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2020; 21:297-309. [PMID: 31754924 PMCID: PMC7072054 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-019-01129-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
In 2018, a panel of health economics and meningococcal disease experts convened to review methodologies, frameworks, and decision-making processes for economic evaluations of vaccines, with a focus on evaluation of vaccines targeting invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). The panel discussed vaccine evaluation methods across countries; IMD prevention benefits that are well quantified using current methods, not well quantified, or missing in current cost-effectiveness methodologies; and development of recommendations for future evaluation methods. Consensus was reached on a number of points and further consideration was deemed necessary for some topics. Experts agreed that the unpredictability of IMD complicates an accurate evaluation of meningococcal vaccine benefits and that vaccine cost-effectiveness evaluations should encompass indirect benefits, both for meningococcal vaccines and vaccines in general. In addition, the panel agreed that transparency in the vaccine decision-making process is beneficial and should be implemented when possible. Further discussion is required to ascertain: how enhancing consistency of frameworks for evaluating outcomes of vaccine introduction can be improved; reviews of existing tools used to capture quality of life; how indirect costs are considered within models; and whether and how the weighting of quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), application of QALY adjustment factors, or use of altered cost-effectiveness thresholds should be used in the economic evaluation of vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Christensen
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
| | - Hareth Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Pierre Levy
- Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University, LEDa [LEGOS], 75775, Paris, France
| | - Maarten J Postma
- Department of Pharmacy, University Medical Center/University of Groningen, 9712 CP, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center/University of Groningen, 9712 CP, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, University Medical Center/University of Groningen, 9712 CP, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David E Bloom
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Paolo Landa
- Institute of Health Research, Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Oliver Damm
- School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - David M Salisbury
- Centre on Global Health Security, Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, SW1Y 4LE, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Vinny Smith
- Meningitis Research Foundation, Newminster House, 27-29 Baldwin Street, Bristol, BS1 1LT, UK.
| | - Linda Glennie
- Meningitis Research Foundation, Newminster House, 27-29 Baldwin Street, Bristol, BS1 1LT, UK
| | - Claire Wright
- Meningitis Research Foundation, Newminster House, 27-29 Baldwin Street, Bristol, BS1 1LT, UK
| | - Laura York
- Vaccine Medical Development, Scientific and Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Marshall HS, McMillan M, Koehler AP, Lawrence A, Sullivan TR, MacLennan JM, Maiden MCJ, Ladhani SN, Ramsay ME, Trotter C, Borrow R, Finn A, Kahler CM, Whelan J, Vadivelu K, Richmond P. Meningococcal B Vaccine and Meningococcal Carriage in Adolescents in Australia. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:318-327. [PMID: 31971677 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1900236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The meningococcal group B vaccine 4CMenB is a new, recombinant protein-based vaccine that is licensed to protect against invasive group B meningococcal disease. However, its role in preventing transmission and, therefore, inducing population (herd) protection is uncertain. METHODS We used cluster randomization to assign, according to school, students in years 10 to 12 (age, 15 to 18 years) in South Australia to receive 4CMenB vaccination either at baseline (intervention) or at 12 months (control). The primary outcome was oropharyngeal carriage of disease-causing Neisseria meningitidis (group A, B, C, W, X, or Y) in students in years 10 and 11, as identified by polymerase-chain-reaction assays for PorA (encoding porin protein A) and N. meningitidis genogroups. Secondary outcomes included carriage prevalence and acquisition of all N. meningitidis and individual disease-causing genogroups. Risk factors for carriage were assessed at baseline. RESULTS A total of 237 schools participated. During April through June 2017, a total of 24,269 students in years 10 and 11 and 10,220 students in year 12 were enrolled. At 12 months, there was no difference in the prevalence of carriage of disease-causing N. meningitidis between the vaccination group (2.55%; 326 of 12,746) and the control group (2.52%; 291 of 11,523) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.31; P = 0.85). There were no significant differences in the secondary carriage outcomes. At baseline, the risk factors for carriage of disease-causing N. meningitidis included later year of schooling (adjusted odds ratio for year 12 vs. year 10, 2.75; 95% CI, 2.03 to 3.73), current upper respiratory tract infection (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.63), cigarette smoking (adjusted odds ratio, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.83), water-pipe smoking (adjusted odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.54), attending pubs or clubs (adjusted odds ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.86), and intimate kissing (adjusted odds ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.05). No vaccine safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS Among Australian adolescents, the 4CMenB vaccine had no discernible effect on the carriage of disease-causing meningococci, including group B. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03089086.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen S Marshall
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Mark McMillan
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Ann P Koehler
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Andrew Lawrence
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Thomas R Sullivan
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Jenny M MacLennan
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Martin C J Maiden
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Shamez N Ladhani
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Mary E Ramsay
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Caroline Trotter
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Ray Borrow
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Adam Finn
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Charlene M Kahler
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Jane Whelan
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Kumaran Vadivelu
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| | - Peter Richmond
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network (H.S.M.), the Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School (H.S.M., M.M.), and the School of Public Health (T.R.S.), University of Adelaide, the Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health (A.P.K.), and SA Pathology (A.L.), Adelaide, and the Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training, School of Biomedical Science (C.M.K.), and the School of Medicine (P.R.), University of Western Australia, the Departments of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital (P.R.), and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute (P.R.), Perth - all in Australia; the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford (J.M.M., M.C.J.M.), the Immunization Department, Public Health England, London (S.N.L., M.E.R., C.T.), the Departments of Pathology and Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (C.T.), the Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester (R.B.), and Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre, Schools of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol (A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Amsterdam (J.W.); and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rockville, MD (K.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Boccalini S, Bechini A, Sartor G, Paolini D, Innocenti M, Bonanni P, Panatto D, Lai PL, Zangrillo F, Marchini F, Lecini E, Iovine M, Amicizia D, Landa P. [Health Technology Assessment of meningococcal B vaccine (Trumenba ®) in adolescent in Italy]. JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE AND HYGIENE 2019; 60:E1-E94. [PMID: 32047867 PMCID: PMC7007189 DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.3s2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S Boccalini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze
| | - A Bechini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze
| | - G Sartor
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze
| | - D Paolini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze
| | - M Innocenti
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze
| | - P Bonanni
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze
| | - D Panatto
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova
| | - P L Lai
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova
| | - F Zangrillo
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova
| | - F Marchini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova
| | - E Lecini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova
| | - M Iovine
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova
| | - D Amicizia
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova
| | - P Landa
- Dipartimento di Economia, Università degli Studi di Genova
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ruiz-Montero R, Epstein D, Guzmán Herrador B, Espín Balbino J. [Economic evaluation of the introduction of 4CMenB (Bexsero®) in the national vaccine schedule in Spain]. GACETA SANITARIA 2019; 34:318-325. [PMID: 31776044 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bexsero® (4CMenB), meningococcal B vaccine, was licensed in Europe in 2013. In Spain, despite MenB being the most frequent cause of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), Bexsero® is recommended and financed for patients at increased risk of IMD but is not financed by the NHS in the routine vaccination schedule. OBJECTIVE to evaluate the cost-utility, epidemiological impact, and total costs of the introduction of 4CMenB into the vaccination schedule to help inform vaccine policy in Spain. METHOD We adapted a cost-utility analysis, a probabilistic decision-tree, to Spain. A cohort of new-born infants in 2015 was modelled with two dosages, using two different strategies: routine vaccination schedule with 4CMenB and non-vaccination. Costs were measured from a payer perspective and benefits were calculated in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). A Monte Carlo analysis and 32 scenarios were performed to assess the robustness and the uncertainty of our results. RESULTS With the 3+1 dosage, routine vaccination prevented 54% of cases and deaths and an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of 351.389 €/QALY (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 265,193-538,428) was estimated. The 2+1 dosage prevented 50% of cases and deaths, with an ICUR of 278.556 €/QALY (95%CI: 210,285-430,122). CONCLUSIONS Given the current incidence of invasive meningococcal disease in Spain and the information available from 4CMenB, our model shows that routine vaccination is not cost-effective at the current price. Only with a vaccine price of 1.45 € for the 3+1 schedule or 3.37 € for the 2+1 schedule could it be recommended based on efficiency criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Ruiz-Montero
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica Interniveles de Prevención, Promoción y Vigilancia de la Salud, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, España; Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (Imibic), Córdoba, España; Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, España.
| | - David Epstein
- Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España
| | - Bernardo Guzmán Herrador
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica Interniveles de Prevención, Promoción y Vigilancia de la Salud, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, España; Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (Imibic), Córdoba, España; Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, España
| | - Jaime Espín Balbino
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, Granada, España; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (ibs Granada), Granada, España; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), España
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
O'Mahony JF, Paulden M. The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation's Advice on Extending Human Papillomavirus Vaccination to Boys: Were Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Guidelines Bent to Achieve a Politically Acceptable Decision? VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 22:1227-1230. [PMID: 31708058 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
In July 2018, the UK Minister of Public Health announced that human papillomavirus vaccination would be extended to 12-year-old boys. This decision was informed by updated evidence from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) published earlier that month. Vaccination of boys had been found not to be cost-effective in a series of analyses conducted for the JCVI, including the most recent assessment prior to the minister's announcement. These analyses were conducted under the standard methods for cost-effectiveness analysis recommended by the JCVI, which are primarily based on guidelines from the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. Although the JCVI concluded they were unable to advise extending vaccination on the basis of standard appraisal methods, their most recent round of assessment also considered analyses using nonstandard appraisal methods. In particular, the JCVI noted that vaccination of boys was likely to be cost-effective when a lower discount rate of 1.5% is applied to costs and health effects, as opposed to the 3.5% rate usually employed. The JCVI stated that they were supportive of applying such alternative methods, and on this basis, they would advise extending vaccination to boys. This commentary explains the JCVI's application of nonstandard appraisal methods and considers whether it was justified. We conclude that the JCVI was not justified in applying the lower discount rate. We voice concerns that a willingness to endorse a politically popular intervention may have driven the JCVI to depart from a fair and consistent application of healthcare rationing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James F O'Mahony
- Centre for Health Policy & Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Mike Paulden
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Outbreak strain characterisation and pharyngeal carriage detection following a protracted group B meningococcal outbreak in adolescents in South-West England. Sci Rep 2019; 9:9990. [PMID: 31292501 PMCID: PMC6620271 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46483-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Between April 2016 and September 2017, four cases of group B meningococcal disease were reported among sixth-form college students in Bristol, UK. Culture and non-culture whole genome sequencing was utilised and demonstrated that the four genomes of the responsible ST-41 strains clustered closely on a sub-lineage of ST-41/44 clonal complex. The outbreak resulted in two fatalities. A distinct social group associated with one of the cases was selected for vaccination with 4CMenB and pharyngeal swabbing. In vitro culturing, multiple real-time PCR assays (sodC, ctrA and siaDB) and a PorA PCR-sequencing assay were used to detect meningococcal colonisation and a carriage rate of 32.6% was observed. Furthermore, a high proportion of the pharyngeal swabs (78.3%) yielded a Factor H-Binding Protein (fHbp) nucleotide allele suggesting that the antigenic gene is prevalent among non-meningococcal flora, most likely Neisseria commensals. This may have implications for fHbp as a vaccine antigen should it be shown to influence bacterial colonisation.
Collapse
|
45
|
De Wals P, Espinoza-Moya ME, Béland D. Kingdon's Multiple Streams Framework and the Analysis of Decision-Making Processes Regarding Publicly-Funded Immunization Programs. Expert Rev Vaccines 2019; 18:575-585. [PMID: 31216187 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2019.1627208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: The implementation of a publicly-funded immunization program results from a complex decision-making process. John Kingdon's 'Multiple Streams Framework' has been extensively used to analyze how and why governmental policies were adopted. Area covered: Ideas that will ultimately end up in a proposal for a new immunization program develop gradually along three main streams: (i) the problem stream, which focuses on a particular vaccine-preventable disease and its perception by stakeholders; (ii) the policy stream, which is centered on experts' views on the optimal use of available vaccines; and (iii) the politics stream, which consists of socio-political factors, including budgetary constraints. Ideas are progressively shaped by policy entrepreneurs into a proposal with concrete implementation strategies. The three streams then converge within a policy window, during which adoption is especially likely to occur. To survive, the proposed program should be operationally feasible, consistent with mainstream social values, and financially affordable. The timing of the policy window is usually unpredictable and of short duration. Expert opinion: Analytical frameworks traditionally used to assess immunization programs focus on the technical aspects of the disease, the vaccine, and the program. The 'Multiple Streams Framework' brings added analytical value by enlarging the scope of the analysis into the political arena.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe De Wals
- a Department of Social and Preventive Medicine , Laval University , Québec City , Canada
| | - Maria-Eugenia Espinoza-Moya
- b Health Services Research, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| | - Daniel Béland
- c Department of Political Science , McGill University , Montréal , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Incorporating Household Spillovers in Cost Utility Analysis: A Case Study Using Behavior Change in COPD. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2019; 35:212-220. [PMID: 31064563 DOI: 10.1017/s026646231900028x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES It is important to capture all health effects of interventions in cost-utility analyses conducted under a societal or healthcare perspective. However, this is rarely done. Household spillovers (health effects on patients' other household members) may be particularly likely in the context of technologies and interventions to change behaviors that are interdependent in the household. Our objective was to prospectively collect outcome data from household members and illustrate how these can be included in a cost-utility analysis of a behavior change intervention in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS Data were collected from patients' household members (n = 153) alongside a randomized controlled trial of a COPD self-management intervention. The impact of the intervention on household members' EQ-5D-5L scores (primary outcome), was evaluated. Analyses were then carried out to estimate household members' quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and assess the impact of including these QALYs on cost-effectiveness. RESULTS The intervention had a negligible spillover on household members' EQ-5D-5L scores (-0.007; p = .75). There were also no statistically significant spillovers at the 5 percent level in household member secondary outcomes. In the base-case model, the inclusion of household member QALYs in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) denominator marginally increased the ICER from GBP 10,271 (EUR 13,146) to GBP 10,991 (EUR 14,068) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates it is feasible to prospectively collect and include household members' outcome data in cost utility analysis, although the study highlighted several methodological issues. In this case, the intervention did not impact significantly on household members' health or health behaviors, but inclusion of household spillovers may make a difference in other contexts.
Collapse
|
47
|
O'Mahony JF, Paulden M. Appraising the cost-effectiveness of vaccines in the UK: Insights from the Department of Health Consultation on the revision of methods guidelines. Vaccine 2019; 37:2831-2837. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Revised: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
48
|
Dixon P, Round J. Caring for Carers: Positive and Normative Challenges for Future Research on Carer Spillover Effects in Economic Evaluation. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 22:549-554. [PMID: 31104733 PMCID: PMC6524130 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Revised: 10/04/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many individuals rely on family and friends to provide care outside of the formal healthcare sector. The need for caring is driven by many factors, including government policies toward health and social care, and increased prevalence of chronic and comorbid conditions. Informal care may give rise to "spillover" effects from the health of a cared-for individual to the health of carers. Spillover effects are rarely reflected in economic evaluations, in spite of growing research interest in this area, and recommendations from bodies such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness that effects of this type be included in cost-effectiveness analysis. OBJECTIVE We explore the positive and normative issues to which the inclusion of carer spillover effects in economic evaluation may give rise and how future research might begin to address these challenges. RESULTS Positive challenges include the identification of causal rather than coincidental impacts on carers, selection into caring, and the measurement and treatment of spillover effects. The normative issues are related to these challenges, and particularly include impacts on equity, and spillovers that improve rather than reduce the health of carers. CONCLUSIONS We argue that challenges including spillover effects in economic evaluation are considerable. Avenues for future research and possible solutions to these challenges include a re-orientation of analytic perspectives so that the impacts of caring on carers are accounted for where appropriate, and the design of studies to collect robust evidence to inform debate and guidance development in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Padraig Dixon
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK.
| | - Jeff Round
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ginsberg GM, Somekh E, Schlesinger Y. Should we use Palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for infants against respiratory syncytial virus? - a cost-utility analysis. Isr J Health Policy Res 2018; 7:63. [PMID: 30554570 PMCID: PMC6296113 DOI: 10.1186/s13584-018-0258-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Passive immunization against RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) is given in most western countries (including Israel) to infants of high risk groups such as premature babies, and infants with Congenital Heart Disease or Congenital Lung Disease. However, immunoprophylaxis costs are extremely high ($2800-$4200 per infant). Using cost-utility analysis criteria, we evaluate whether it is justified to expand, continue or restrict nationwide immunoprophylaxis using palivizumab of high risk infants against RSV. METHODS Epidemiological, demographic, health service utilisation and economic data were integrated from primary (National Hospitalization Data, etc.) and secondary data sources (ie: from published articles) into a spread-sheet to calculate the cost per averted disability-adjusted life year (DALY) of vaccinating various infant risk groups. Costs of intervention included antibody plus administration costs. Treatment savings and DALYs averted were estimated from applying vaccine efficacy data to relative risks of being hospitalised and treated for RSV, including possible long-term sequelae like asthma and wheezing. RESULTS For all the groups RSV immunoprophylaxis is clearly not cost effective as its cost per averted DALY exceeds the $105,986 guideline representing thrice the per capita Gross Domestic Product. Vaccine price would have to fall by 48.1% in order to justify vaccinating Congenital Heart Disease or Congenital Lung Disease risk groups respectively on pure cost-effectiveness grounds. For premature babies of < 29 weeks, 29-32 and 33-36 weeks gestation, decreases of 36.8%, 54.5% and 83.3% respectively in vaccine price are required. CONCLUSIONS Based solely on cost-utility analysis, at current price levels it is difficult to justify the current indications for passive vaccination with Palivizumab against RSV. However, if the manufacturers would reduce the price by 54.5% then it would be cost-effective to vaccinate the Congenital Heart Disease or Congenital Lung Disease risk groups as well as premature babies born before the 33rd week of gestation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary M. Ginsberg
- Department of Technology Assessment, Public Health Service, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Eli Somekh
- Department of Pediatrics, Wolfson Hospital, Holon, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
- European Paediatric Association/Union of National European Paediatric Societies and Associations, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yechiel Schlesinger
- Department of Pediatrics, Shaarae Zedek Medical Center, Affiliated to the Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Rappuoli R, Pizza M, Masignani V, Vadivelu K. Meningococcal B vaccine (4CMenB): the journey from research to real world experience. Expert Rev Vaccines 2018; 17:1111-1121. [DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2018.1547637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rino Rappuoli
- Chief Scientist & Head of External Research and Development, GSK, Siena, Italy
| | - Mariagrazia Pizza
- Senior Scientific Director, Bacterial Vaccines, Chief Scientist & Head of External Research and Development, Siena, Italy
| | - Vega Masignani
- Discovery Project Leader, Research and Development Centre, Siena, Italy
| | - Kumaran Vadivelu
- Vaccine Development Leader, Research and Development Centre, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|