1
|
Gezels E, Van Roy K, Arbyn M, Coursier P, Devroey D, Martens P, Simoens C, Vaes B, Van Herck K, Vankrunkelsven P, Verhoeven V, Willems S. The ESSAG-trial protocol: A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of offering a self-sampling kit by the GP to reach women underscreened in the routine cervical cancer screening program. Contemp Clin Trials 2024; 144:107617. [PMID: 38977179 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Flanders (Belgium), women not screened for cervical cancer (CC) within the last three years receive an invitation letter from the regional screening organization, the Centre for Cancer Detection (CCD), encouraging them to have a cervical specimen taken by their general practitioner (GP) or gynecologist. However, the coverage for CC screening remains suboptimal (63%). The offer of a self-sampling kit (SSK, for HPV testing) by a GP may trigger participation among women who do not attend regular screening. METHODS The ESSAG-trial is a cluster-randomized controlled trial with three arms, each including 1125 women aged 31-64 years, who were not screened for CC in the last 6 years. In arm A, GPs offer a SSK when eligible women consult for any reason. In arm B, women receive a personal GP signed invitation letter including an SSK at their home address. In the control arm, women receive the standard invitation letter from the CCD. The primary outcome is the response rate at three months after inclusion. Secondary outcomes are: screen test positivity; compliance with foreseen follow-up among screen-positives; costs per invited and per screened women; as well as contrasts between trial arms and between socio-demographic categories. CONCLUSION The ESSAG-trial will assess the effect of GP-based interventions using SSKs on CC screening participation among hard-to-reach populations. Findings will inform policymakers about feasible strategies on increasing CC screening that may be rolled-out throughout the whole region. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05656976.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Gezels
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, C Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Kaatje Van Roy
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, C Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Marc Arbyn
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Center, Sciensano, Juliette Wytsmanstraat 14, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patrick Coursier
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Devroey
- Department of Family Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Jette, Belgium
| | - Patrick Martens
- Center for Cancer Detection, Ruddershove 4, 8000 Bruges, Belgium
| | - Cindy Simoens
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Center, Sciensano, Juliette Wytsmanstraat 14, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bert Vaes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Herck
- Belgian Cancer Registry, Koningsstraat 215/7, 1210 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patrick Vankrunkelsven
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Veronique Verhoeven
- Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat 331, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Sara Willems
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, C Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fujita M, Nagashima K, Shimazu M, Suzuki M, Tauchi I, Sakuma M, Yamamoto S, Hanaoka H, Shozu M, Tsuruoka N, Kasai T, Hata A. Effectiveness of self-sampling human papillomavirus test on precancer detection and screening uptake in Japan: The ACCESS randomized controlled trial. Int J Cancer 2024; 155:905-915. [PMID: 38648390 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Japan is lagging in cervical cancer prevention. The effectiveness of a self-sampling human papillomavirus (HPV) test, a possible measure to overcome this situation, has not yet been evaluated. A randomized controlled trial was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of a self-sampling HPV test on detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and screening uptake. Women between 30 and 58 years old who did not participate in the cervical cancer screening program for ≥3 years were eligible and assigned to the intervention group (cytology or self-sampling HPV test) or control group (cytology). Participants assigned to the intervention group were sent a self-sampling kit according to their ordering (opt-in strategy). A total of 7337 and 7772 women were assigned to the intervention and control groups, respectively. Screening uptake in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (20.0% vs. 6.4%; risk ratio: 3.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.82, 3.42). The compliance rate with cytology triage for HPV-positive women was 46.8% (95% CI: 35.5%, 58.4%). CIN2+ was detected in five and four participants in the intervention and control groups, respectively; there was no difference for intention-to-screen analysis (risk ratio: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.36, 4.93). Self-sampling of HPV test increased screening uptake; however, no difference was observed in the detection of CIN2+, probably due to the low compliance rate for cytology triage in HPV-positive women. Efforts to increase cytology triage are essential to maximize precancer detections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misuzu Fujita
- Department of Health Research, Chiba Foundation for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Public Health, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kengo Nagashima
- Biostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, Shinjuku-ku, Japan
- Research Center for Medical and Health Data Science, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tachikawa, Japan
| | - Minobu Shimazu
- Clinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | - Hideki Hanaoka
- Clinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Makio Shozu
- Evolution and Reproduction Biology, Medical Mycology Research Center, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Tokuzo Kasai
- Department of Health Research, Chiba Foundation for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Chiba, Japan
| | - Akira Hata
- Department of Health Research, Chiba Foundation for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Chiba, Japan
- Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mackay O, Lifford KJ, Kalra A, Williams D. Identifying optimum implementation for human papillomavirus self-sampling in underserved communities: A systematic review. J Med Screen 2024:9691413241274312. [PMID: 39212004 DOI: 10.1177/09691413241274312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the existing evidence to identify the optimum methods for implementing human papillomavirus self-sampling to increase screening uptake for underserved groups. SETTING Specific groups are less likely to participate in cervical screening. These include individuals from low socioeconomic status groups, ethnic minority groups, younger age groups (25-29), older age groups (≥50), with a physical disability, with a learning disability and with an LGBTQ+ identity. The advent of human papillomavirus self-sampling for cervical screening presents an opportunity to promote equitable access to screening. Implementation for human papillomavirus self-sampling can vary, for example, opt-out or opt-in approaches. However, it is unclear which of these is the best method of offering human papillomavirus self-sampling to underserved groups. METHODS Six databases were searched through May 2023. Studies comparing cervico-vaginal human papillomavirus self-sampling provision using different implementation strategies with the standard screening pathway in underserved groups were identified. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS In total, 4574 studies were identified; 25 studies were included, of which 22 were from high-income countries. Greater uptake was found for offering human papillomavirus self-sampling compared to standard clinician-based sampling. Directly mailing human papillomavirus self-sampling kits to participants resulted in higher uptake of screening than using an 'opt-in' approach or standard recall in low socioeconomic status and ethnic minority groups, and older women. Strategies that used community health workers or educational materials increased uptake in ethnic minority and low socioeconomic status groups. CONCLUSIONS Directly mailing human papillomavirus self-sampling kits to low socioeconomic status groups, ethnic minority groups and older women has the potential to increase uptake of human papillomavirus self-sampling. Using community health workers to offer human papillomavirus self-sampling should be considered for ethnic minority and low socioeconomic status groups. Further research exploring the preferences of younger women is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anahat Kalra
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Denitza Williams
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu D, Kpokiri EE, Azizatunnisa' L, Rotenberg S, Kuper H, Tucker JD. Equitable cervical cancer screening for women with disabilities. Maturitas 2024:108094. [PMID: 39214727 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Wu
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, China.
| | - Eneyi E Kpokiri
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropic Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
| | - Luthfi Azizatunnisa'
- International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Rotenberg
- International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Department of Health Behavior, Environment, and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Hannah Kuper
- International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph D Tucker
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropic Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom; Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hariprasad R, Bagepally BS, Kumar S, Pradhan S, Gurung D, Tamang H, Sharma A, Bhatnagar T. Cost-utility analysis of primary HPV testing through home-based self-sampling in comparison to visual inspection using acetic acid for cervical cancer screening in East district, Sikkim, India, 2023. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0300556. [PMID: 39137206 PMCID: PMC11321578 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Primary Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) testing offers higher sensitivity and specificity over Visual Inspection using Acetic acid (VIA) in cervical cancer screening. Self-sampling is a promising strategy to boost participation and reduce disparities. However, concerns about the initial costs hinder HPV testing adoption in low and middle-income countries. This study assesses the cost-utility of home-based HPV self-sampling versus VIA for cervical cancer screening in India. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted in East district, Sikkim, India, comparing the costs and utility outcomes of population-based cervical cancer screening through VIA and primary HPV screening through self-sampling. Cost-related data were collected from April 2021 to March 2022 using the bottom-up micro-costing method, while utility measures were collected prospectively using the EuroQoL-5D-5L questionnaire. The utility values were converted into quality-adjusted life days (QALDs) for an 8-day period. The willingness to pay threshold (WTP) was based on per capita GDP for 2022. If the calculated Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) value is lower than the WTP threshold, it signifies that the intervention is cost-effective. RESULTS The study included 95 women in each group of cervical cancer screening with VIA & HPV self-sampling. For eight days, the QALD was found to be 7.977 for the VIA group and 8.0 for the HPV group. The unit cost per woman screened by VIA and HPV self-testing was ₹1,597 (US$ 19.2) and ₹1,271(US$ 15.3), respectively. The ICER was ₹-14,459 (US$ -173.6), which was much below the WTP threshold for eight QALDs, i.e. ₹ 4,193 (US$ 50.4). CONCLUSION The findings support HPV self-sampling as a cost-effective alternative to VIA. This informs policymakers and healthcare providers for better resource allocation in cervical cancer screening in Sikkim.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roopa Hariprasad
- School of Public Health, Indian Council Medical Research-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Bhavani Shankara Bagepally
- Health Technology Assessment Resource Centre, Indian Council Medical Research-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Sajith Kumar
- Health Technology Assessment Resource Centre, Indian Council Medical Research-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Sangeeta Pradhan
- Department of Health and Welfare, Government of Sikkim, Gangtok, Sikkim, India
| | - Deepsikka Gurung
- Department of Health and Welfare, Government of Sikkim, Gangtok, Sikkim, India
| | - Harki Tamang
- Department of Health and Welfare, Government of Sikkim, Gangtok, Sikkim, India
| | - Arpana Sharma
- Jhpiego - an affiliate of Johns Hopkins University, Gangtok, Sikkim, India
| | - Tarun Bhatnagar
- School of Public Health, Indian Council Medical Research-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Garcia PJ, Santos C, Chiappe M, Valderrama M, Carcamo CP. Academic accountability to local communities and society through Programme Science: a case study from the HPV self-sampling programme HOPE in Peru. J Int AIDS Soc 2024; 27 Suppl 2:e26297. [PMID: 38988049 PMCID: PMC11236900 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.26297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health challenges in the 21st century underscore the need for adaptable and innovative approaches in public health. Academic institutions can and should contribute much more effectively to generate and translate scientific knowledge that will result in better programmes to improve societal health. Academic accountability to local communities and society requires universities to actively engage with local communities, understanding the context, their needs, and leveraging their knowledge and local experience. The Programme Science initiative provides a framework to optimize the scale, quality and impact of public health programmes, by integrating diverse approaches during the iterative cycle of research and practice within the strategic planning, programme implementation and programme management and evaluation. We illustrate how the Programme Science framework could be a useful tool for academic institutions to accomplish accountability to local communities and society through the experience of Project HOPE in Peru. DISCUSSION Project HOPE applied the Programme Science framework to introduce HPV self-sampling into a women's health programme in Peru. Collaboration with local authorities and community members was pivotal in all phases of the project, ensuring interventions aligned with community needs and addressing social determinants of health. The HOPE Ladies-community women trained and empowered to promote and provide the HPV kits-crafted the messages used through the study and developed strategies to reach individuals and provided support to women's journey through health centres. By engaging communities in co-creating knowledge and addressing health inequities, academic institutions can generate contextually relevant and socially just scientific knowledge. The active participation of community women in Project HOPE was instrumental in improving service utilization and addressing barriers to self-sampling. CONCLUSIONS The Programme Science approach offers a pathway for academic institutions to enhance their accountability to communities and society at large. By embedding researchers within public health programmes and prioritizing community engagement, academic institutions can ensure that research findings directly inform policy improvements and programmatic decisions. However, achieving this requires a realignment of research agendas and recognition of the value of community engagement. Establishing Programme Science networks involving academia, government and funding entities can further reinforce academic accountability and enhance the impact of public health programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlos Santos
- Directorate of Cancer Prevention and ControlMinistry of HealthLimaPeru
| | - Marina Chiappe
- School of Public HealthCayetano Heredia UniversityLimaPeru
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Farajimakin O. Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e65555. [PMID: 39192892 PMCID: PMC11347962 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer remains a significant global health concern, particularly in underserved populations. Despite the availability of effective screening methods, uptake remains suboptimal in many regions. This systematic review aims to synthesize the current evidence on barriers to cervical cancer screening across diverse populations and healthcare settings. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published till June 2024. Studies examining barriers to cervical cancer screening in various populations were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. A narrative synthesis approach was used to analyze and present the findings. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a wide range of study designs and populations. Common barriers identified across studies included lack of knowledge and awareness, economic constraints, access issues, cultural and religious factors, fear and embarrassment, and distrust in healthcare systems. Population-specific barriers were observed among immigrant and ethnic minority women, individuals in low- and middle-income countries, indigenous women, and LGBQ women. Healthcare system factors, socioeconomic influences, psychological and individual factors, and interpersonal and community dynamics also played significant roles in screening participation. This review highlights the complex and multifaceted nature of barriers to cervical cancer screening. Findings suggest that interventions to improve screening rates should be comprehensive, culturally sensitive, and tailored to specific population needs. Addressing both individual-level and systemic barriers is crucial for enhancing cervical cancer screening uptake globally.
Collapse
|
8
|
Song J, Ni YH, Fang J, Qu SX, Chen XY, Wu WL, Zhang WC, Qin JF. The levels of women's awareness, experience, acceptability and preference for Vaginal Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling in three provinces of China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health 2024; 24:343. [PMID: 38877469 PMCID: PMC11179292 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03186-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary screening technique for precancerous lesions and cervical cancer is human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, and HPV self-sampling has been shown to be consistent with clinician sampling in terms of the accuracy of the results and may improve cervical cancer screening rates. The aim of this study was to understand the level of awareness, experience, acceptability, and preference for vaginal HPV self-sampling among women in Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shanghai, China, and to analyze the possible influencing factors to determine the feasibility of implementing self-sampling. METHODS Overall, 1793 women were included in the data analysis. A self-administered questionnaire was utilized. In addition to descriptive analysis, univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the associations between sociodemographic features, history of cervical cancer screening, and the level of awareness, experience, acceptability, and preference for HPV self-samples. RESULTS The participants' level of awareness of and experience with HPV self-sampling were moderate. A total of 88.8% of participants rated the acceptability as "high", and self-sampling was preferred by 64.2% of them for cervical cancer screening. People aged 45 to 54 years showed a preference for both clinician sampling(OR = 1.762 (1.116-2.163)) and self-sampling (OR = 1.823 (1.233-2.697)). Those who had graduated from high school or above (OR = 2.305 (1.517-3.503), OR = 2.432 (1.570-3.768), OR = 3.258 (2.024-5.244)) preferred clinician-sampling, and those with a bachelor's degree or above (OR = 1.664 (1.042-2.657)) preferred self-sampling. Middle- and high-income individuals showed no preference for either sampling method (OR < 1). CONCLUSIONS HPV self-sampling is widely accepted, but awareness, experience and preferences need to be improved. These results may help to adjust public health strategies for the early inclusion of HPV self-sampling as a screening method in national initiatives to prevent cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Song
- Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310020, China
| | - Yi-Hua Ni
- Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310020, China
| | - Jing Fang
- Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310020, China
| | - Shui-Xiang Qu
- Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310020, China
| | - Xiao-Yan Chen
- Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310020, China
| | - Wei-Li Wu
- Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310020, China
| | - Wei-Chu Zhang
- Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310020, China
| | - Jian-Fen Qin
- Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310020, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zammit CM, Brooks A, Brotherton JML, Nightingale CE. What young women (aged 24-29 years) in Australia think about self-collection for cervical screening: a brief report. Sex Health 2024; 21:SH24033. [PMID: 38833543 DOI: 10.1071/sh24033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
Background In mid-2022 Australia's National Cervical Screening Program made self-collection of a vaginal sample an option for screening for young women or people with a cervix aged 25 to 29 years for the first time. This study explored what young women thought about, and wanted to know about, self-collection, and what their future screening preferences are. Methods Young women (n =21), aged 24-29years, were recruited through social media. Semi-structured interviews explored screening history, screening preferences and thoughts about self-collection. Data were analysed using an a priori coding framework informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Results Young women valued the addition of self-collection to the national cervical screening program, believing it to be less invasive and more convenient. However, they also valued the choice to opt for a clinician-collected specimen if preferred. Conclusions Self-collection is a valuable addition to the National Cervical Screening Program. This study suggests that continued efforts are needed to raise awareness of its availability, and improve understanding about its accuracy, the ease of collection, that you still need to engage with a primary healthcare service to access it and that you can still opt for a clinician-collected test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire M Zammit
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Australian National University, National Centre for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Wellbeing Research, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Alexandra Brooks
- Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Julia M L Brotherton
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Claire E Nightingale
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Garcia K, Iacob E, Dean-Smith M, Royce E, Alvarez G, Kepka D. Low Levels of Lifetime Pap Test Receipt Among Vulnerable Guatemalans. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2024; 39:264-270. [PMID: 38376746 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02405-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
Low and middle-income countries, such as Guatemala, shoulder a disproportionate share of cervical cancer, a preventable disease in high income countries. Tangible obstacles, such as lack of access to health care, cultural differences, and insufficient infrastructure, and facilitators, such as being Ladino, married, and educated, have been identified in the literature related to cervical cancer prevention. The aim of this survey was to explore barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer prevention, comparing rural Indigenous and urban Ladino populations. We surveyed 139 women in two health clinics. Participants answered questions about demographic information, cervical cancer knowledge, and health care behaviors. We analyzed survey data with four bivariate models. Our results suggest vulnerable populations, such as rural Indigenous women who are single, illiterate, and lack education, face higher cervical cancer risk. Partnerships should be formed with health promotors and lay midwives to educate and encourage vulnerable populations to prevent cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Garcia
- University of Utah College of Nursing, 10 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
| | - Eli Iacob
- University of Utah College of Nursing, 10 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Mari Dean-Smith
- University of Utah College of Nursing, 10 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Emily Royce
- University of Utah College of Nursing, 10 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | | | - Deanna Kepka
- University of Utah College of Nursing, 10 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Biasioli L, Rossotti R, Tavelli A, De Bona A, Tincati C, Calzavara D, Vinti P, Baiguera C, D'Amico F, Nava A, Repossi R, Bossolasco S, Muccini C, Mulè G, Tesoro D, d'Arminio Monforte A, Cernuschi M. Performance evaluation of a self-administered point-of-care test for anal HPV screening in PrEP users: data from a community-based PrEP service. Sex Transm Infect 2024; 100:252-255. [PMID: 38641362 DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2023-055939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In this study, we compared the performance of a self-administered point-of-care test (POCT) for anal human papillomavirus (HPV) screening with laboratory gold-standard test in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users and evaluated its feasibility. METHODS We enrolled PrEP users from a local community-based PrEP service. Each participant self-collected an anal swab to test anal HPV with a PCR POCT capable of detecting 14 high-risk HPV genotypes. Anonymous questionnaires on self-sampling feasibility were completed. Participants were then referred to local clinics to undergo standard viral genotyping. Concordance between POCT and gold-standard test was measured with absolute agreement and Cohen's kappa. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to calculate POCT sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS 179 subjects got a valid POCT result, most of them men (98.3%) and men who have sex with men (90.4%). 68.2% tested positive for at least one high-risk HPV genotype on POCT. 150 feasibility questionnaires were collected: 92.7% of compilers found the self-swab easy to perform. For 178 subjects, a gold-standard test valid result was also available: 77% tested positive for at least one high-risk HPV genotype. The median time elapsed between the two tests was 9.8 months, due to COVID-19-related service interruptions. Agreement between POCT and gold-standard test was 79.3% (Cohen's kappa=0.49). POCT showed a sensitivity of 81.0%, a specificity of 73.8%, a PPV of 91.0% and an NPV of 54.4%. CONCLUSIONS POCT showed a moderate agreement with gold-standard test and a discrete sensitivity and specificity, suggesting that it could be a useful and feasible additional tool for HPV screening, especially in low-resource and community-based settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Biasioli
- University of Milan, Department of Infectious Diseases, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
- Milano Check Point, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Rossotti
- Milano Check Point, Milan, Italy
- Department of Infectious Diseases, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tavelli
- University of Milan, Department of Infectious Diseases, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
- Milano Check Point, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna De Bona
- University of Milan, Department of Infectious Diseases, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
- Milano Check Point, Milan, Italy
| | - Camilla Tincati
- University of Milan, Department of Infectious Diseases, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Chiara Baiguera
- Milano Check Point, Milan, Italy
- Department of Infectious Diseases, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico D'Amico
- Department of Infectious Diseases, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Nava
- Department of Infectious Diseases, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Simona Bossolasco
- Milano Check Point, Milan, Italy
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Camilla Muccini
- Milano Check Point, Milan, Italy
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mulè
- University of Milan, Department of Infectious Diseases, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
- Milano Check Point, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Tesoro
- University of Milan, Department of Infectious Diseases, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
- Milano Check Point, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonella d'Arminio Monforte
- University of Milan, Department of Infectious Diseases, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
- Milano Check Point, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vega-Crespo B, Neira VA, Maldonado - Rengel R, López D, Delgado-López D, Guerra Astudillo G, Verhoeven V. "Barriers and Advantages of Self-Sampling Tests, for HPV Diagnosis: A Qualitative Field Experience Before Implementation in a Rural Community in Ecuador". Int J Womens Health 2024; 16:947-960. [PMID: 38827925 PMCID: PMC11143988 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s455118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Cervical cancer screening has demonstrated high efficacy in reducing cervical cancer mortality worldwide. However, clinician sampling is often perceived as an uncomfortable procedure that could reduce screening uptake. Self-sampling methods for HPV diagnosis have shown high sensitivity, which could increase acceptance and screening rates among women. Purpose This study aims to identify the perceived barriers and advantages of self-sampling methods versus clinician sampling for cervical cancer screening in a rural setting in Ecuador. Patients and Methods A qualitative study was conducted. Seven focus group discussions took place in the rural Parish of El Valle in Azuay Province, Cuenca, Ecuador. Women native to this rural area were included in the study. FGDs were recorded and transcribed, and content analysis was performed to categorize and analyze the data. Results A total of 45 women participated in the study. Clinician sampling was perceived as a painful and intrusive method. However, participants believed that it is more reliable compared to self-sampling methods, attributing this to the direct visualization of the cervix, which facilitates the detection of cervical pathologies. The perceived advantages of self-sampling included increased comfort, pain reduction, time savings, the ability to perform the test at home, and the potential for widespread availability through pharmacies or local traditional healers. Nevertheless, doubts about the test's reliability as well as the user's proficiency in self-testing posed barriers to the adoption of this technique. Conclusion Self-sampling methods offer several advantages over clinician sampling, such as enhanced privacy, comfort, and accessibility to cancer screening. Barriers primarily revolved around users' proficiency in performing the test and the reliability of the results. Providing training for using self-sampling tests could address these barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vivian Alejandra Neira
- Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador
| | | | - Diana López
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ring KL, Duska LR. How far is too far? Cancer prevention and clinical trial enrollment in geographically underserved patient populations. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 184:8-15. [PMID: 38271774 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Despite dedicated efforts to improve equitable access to cancer care in the United States, disparities in cancer outcomes persist, and geographically underserved patients remain at an increased risk of cancer with lower rates of survival. The critical evaluation of cancer prevention inequities and clinical trial access presents the opportunity to outline novel strategies to incrementally improve bookended access to gynecologic cancer care for geographically underserved patients. Cancer prevention strategies that can be addressed in the rural patient population mirror priorities in the Healthy People 2030 objectives and include increased identification of high risk individuals who may benefit from increased cancer screening and risk reduction, increasing the proportion of people who discuss interventions to prevent cancer, such as HPV vaccination, with their provider, and increasing the proportion of adults who complete evidence based cancer screening. Barriers to accrual to clinical trials for rural patients overlap significantly with the same barriers to obtaining health care in general. These barriers include: lack of facilities and specialized providers; lack of robust health infrastructure; inability to travel; and financial barriers. In this review, we will discuss current knowledge and opportunities to improve cancer prevention initiatives and clinical trial enrollment in geographically underserved populations with a focus on rurality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari L Ring
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States of America.
| | - Linda R Duska
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ngo O, Chloupková R, Cibula D, Sláma J, Mandelová L, Hejduk K, Hajdúch M, Minka P, Koudeláková V, Jaworek H, Trnková M, Vaněk P, Dvořák V, Dušek L, Májek O. Direct mailing of HPV self-sampling kits to women aged 50-65 non-participating in cervical screening in the Czech Republic. Eur J Public Health 2024; 34:361-367. [PMID: 38224266 PMCID: PMC10990530 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A population-based cervical cancer screening programme is implemented in the Czech Republic. However, participation is insufficient among women over 50 years. This study aimed to estimate the potential improvement in participation through directly mailed HPV self-sampling kits (HPVssk) compared with standard invitation letters in women aged 50-65 non-participating in screening. METHODS The study recruited 1564 eligible women (no cervical cancer screening in the last 3 years or more, no previous treatment associated with cervical lesions or cervical cancer). Eight hundred women were mailed with an HPVssk (HPVssk group), and 764 women were sent a standard invitation letter (control group) inviting them to a routine screening (Pap test). The primary outcome was a comparison of the overall participation rate between study groups using a binominal regression model. RESULTS The participation rate in the HPVssk group was 13.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.2-15.9%; 7.4% of women returned the HPVssk and 6.0% attended gynaecological examination] and 5.0% (95% CI 3.6-6.8%) in the control group. Using the binominal regression model, the difference between the groups was estimated as 7.6% (95% CI 5.0-10.2%; P < 0.001). In the HPVssk group, 22% of women who returned HPVssk had a positive result and 70% of them underwent a follow-up examination. CONCLUSIONS Compared with traditional invitation letters, the direct mailing of the HPVssk achieved a significantly higher participation rate, along with a notable HPV positivity rate among HPVssk responders. This approach offers a potentially viable method for engaging women who have not yet attended a cervical screening programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ondřej Ngo
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Renata Chloupková
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jiří Sláma
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lucie Mandelová
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Karel Hejduk
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marián Hajdúch
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Minka
- RBP, Health Insurance Company, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Vladimíra Koudeláková
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Hana Jaworek
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | | | - Peter Vaněk
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Vladimír Dvořák
- Centre of Outpatient Gynaecology and Primary Care, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ladislav Dušek
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ondřej Májek
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nitkowski J, Ridolfi TJ, Lundeen SJ, Giuliano AR, Chiao EY, Fernandez ME, Schick V, Smith JS, Brzezinski B, Nyitray AG. The influence of home versus clinic anal human papillomavirus sampling on high-resolution anoscopy uptake in the Prevent Anal Cancer Self-Swab Study. Sex Health 2024; 21:SH23210. [PMID: 38683939 DOI: 10.1071/sh23210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
Background Anal cancer disproportionately affects sexual and gender minority individuals living with HIV. High-resolution anoscopy (HRA) is an in-clinic procedure to detect precancerous anal lesions and cancer, yet prospective data on factors associated with HRA attendance are lacking. We examined whether anal HPV sampling at home versus in a clinic impacts HRA uptake and assessed HRA acceptability. Methods Sexual and gender minority individuals were randomised to home-based self-sampling or clinical sampling. All were asked to attend in-clinic HRA 1year later. We regressed HRA attendance on study arm using multivariable Poisson regression and assessed HRA acceptability using χ 2 tests. Results A total of 62.8% of 196 participants who engaged in screening attended HRA. Although not significant (P =0.13), a higher proportion of participants who engaged in clinic-based screening attended HRA (68.5%) compared to home-based participants (57.9%). Overall, HRA uptake was higher among participants with anal cytology history (aRR 1.40, 95% CI 1.07-1.82), and lower among participants preferring a versatile anal sex position versus insertive (aRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.91), but did not differ by race or HIV serostatus. In the clinic arm, persons living with HIV had lower HRA attendance (42.9%) versus HIV-negative participants (73.3%) (P =0.02) and Black non-Hispanic participants had lower HRA attendance (41.7%) than White non-Hispanic participants (73.1%), (P =0.04). No differences in attendance by race or HIV status were observed in the home arm. Conclusions HRA uptake differed significantly by race and HIV status in the clinic arm but not the home arm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Nitkowski
- Center for AIDS Intervention Research (CAIR), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Timothy J Ridolfi
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Sarah J Lundeen
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Anna R Giuliano
- Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Elizabeth Y Chiao
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria E Fernandez
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vanessa Schick
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer S Smith
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Bridgett Brzezinski
- Center for AIDS Intervention Research (CAIR), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Alan G Nyitray
- Center for AIDS Intervention Research (CAIR), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; and Clinical Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
McCartney DJ, Bassichetto KC, Leal AF, Knauth D, Dourado I, Magno L, Carvalho da Silva RJ, Mayaud P, Veras MA. Acceptability and Usability of Self-Sampling for the Detection of Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Transgender Women: The TransOdara Multicentric Study in Brazil. Sex Transm Dis 2024; 51:276-282. [PMID: 38534084 DOI: 10.1097/olq.0000000000001924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effective testing of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) requires sampling from potential infection sites. This study aimed to assess the choice, satisfaction, and performance of self-collected samples (SCS) from potential infection sites for STI testing among transgender women in Brazil. METHODS TransOdara was a multicentric, cross-sectional STI prevalence study conducted in 5 Brazilian cities. Using respondent-driven sampling, 1317 transgender women 18 years or older were recruited. Participants completed interviewer-led questionnaires and provided swab samples from multiple sites (anorectal, oropharyngeal, genital) for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. Participants were given a choice of SCS or provider-collected samples (PCS) at each site. RESULTS Most participants selected SCS for anorectal (74.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 72.4-77.3) and genital (72.7%; 95% CI, 70.2-75.1) sites, whereas fewer chose for oropharyngeal samples (49.8%; 95% CI, 47.0-52.6). For future testing, most participants expressed a preference for SCS for genital (72.2%; 95% CI, 69.5-74.7) and anorectal (70.2%; 95% CI, 67.6-72.7) sites. There was no significant difference in the positive test results for CT and NG between SCS and PCS at anorectal and oropharyngeal sites, or for HPV at anorectal and genital (penile or neovaginal) sites. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated a high level of acceptability and usability of self-sampling for STI testing among transgender women. A preference for SCS was evident at the anorectal and genital sites, and the results of SCS were comparable to those of PCS. The findings suggest that multisite STI testing utilizing self-collection methods as a provided option can be effectively integrated into sexual health services for transgender women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Jason McCartney
- From the Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Daniela Knauth
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Inês Dourado
- Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia
| | - Laio Magno
- Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade do Estado da Bahia, Salvador
| | | | - Philippe Mayaud
- From the Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ghouneimy A, Ali Z, Aman R, Jiang W, Aouida M, Mahfouz M. CRISPR-Based Multiplex Detection of Human Papillomaviruses for One-Pot Point-of-Care Diagnostics. ACS Synth Biol 2024; 13:837-850. [PMID: 38349963 PMCID: PMC10949237 DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
The World Health Organization's global initiative toward eliminating high-risk Human Papillomavirus (hrHPV)-related cancers recommends DNA testing over visual inspection in all settings for primary cancer screening and HPV eradication by 2100. However, multiple hrHPV types cause different types of cancers, and there is a pressing need for an easy-to-use, multiplex point-of-care diagnostic platform for detecting different hrHPV types. Recently, CRISPR-Cas systems have been repurposed for point-of-care detection. Here, we established a CRISPR-Cas multiplexed diagnostic assay (CRISPRD) to detect cervical cancer-causing hrHPVs in one reaction (one-pot assay). We harnessed the compatibility of thermostable AapCas12b, TccCas13a, and HheCas13a nucleases with isothermal amplification and successfully detected HPV16 and HPV18, along with an internal control in a single-pot assay with a limit of detection of 10 copies and 100% specificity. This platform offers a rapid and practical solution for the multiplex detection of hrHPVs, which may facilitate large-scale hrHPV point-of-care screening. Furthermore, the CRISPRD platform programmability enables it to be adapted for the multiplex detection of any two nucleic acid biomarkers as well as internal control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Ghouneimy
- Laboratory
for Genome Engineering and Synthetic Biology, Division of Biological
Sciences, 4700 King Abdullah University
of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
| | - Zahir Ali
- Laboratory
for Genome Engineering and Synthetic Biology, Division of Biological
Sciences, 4700 King Abdullah University
of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rashid Aman
- Laboratory
for Genome Engineering and Synthetic Biology, Division of Biological
Sciences, 4700 King Abdullah University
of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
| | - Wenjun Jiang
- Laboratory
for Genome Engineering and Synthetic Biology, Division of Biological
Sciences, 4700 King Abdullah University
of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mustapha Aouida
- Division
of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, College of Health and Life
Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Education City, Qatar Foundation, P.O. Box: 34110 Doha, Qatar
| | - Magdy Mahfouz
- Laboratory
for Genome Engineering and Synthetic Biology, Division of Biological
Sciences, 4700 King Abdullah University
of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Choi HC, Leung K, Wu JT. Cervical screening among Chinese females in the era of HPV vaccination: a population-based survey on screening uptake and regular screening following an 18-year organized screening program. J Gynecol Oncol 2024; 35:e20. [PMID: 37921604 PMCID: PMC10948984 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE China has a substantial disease burden of cervical cancer. To further understand preventive measures for reducing cervical cancer in China, this study aimed to correlate screening attendance and regular screening with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among Chinese females. METHODS This prospective questionnaire-based survey recruited Chinese females aged 25 or above in Hong Kong by random digit dialing telephone interviews in 2022. The survey studied women's practice of cervical screening and adherence to regular screening. Variables including HPV vaccination status and attendance of physical check-ups were involved in the questionnaire. Screening uptake and screening adherence were the main outcomes, which were measured as the proportion of women who reported having attended a cervical screening and screened regularly, respectively. RESULTS Out of 906 valid respondents, the reported cervical screening uptake was over 70% among females aged 30 or above and particularly over 80% among women aged 35-59; however, the uptake was only 46% among those aged 25-29. Adherence to regular screening was 50%-60% across ages 25-59 years and dropped to approximately 40% for women older than 60 years. Both screening uptake and adherence were associated with HPV vaccination, with adjusted odds ratios of 2.37 and 2.23, respectively. A large proportion of regularly screened women may be overscreened for screening more frequently than recommended. CONCLUSION Responded Chinese females showed good cervical screening uptake but were moderately adherent to regular screening. Policymakers should emphasize the importance of regular screening and the recommended screening frequency by HPV vaccination status for better healthcare resource use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Horace Cw Choi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), Hong Kong, China.
| | - Kathy Leung
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), Hong Kong, China
| | - Joseph T Wu
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Narasimhan M, Hargreaves JR, Logie CH, Abdool-Karim Q, Aujla M, Hopkins J, Cover J, Sentumbwe-Mugisa O, Maleche A, Gilmore K. Self-care interventions for women's health and well-being. Nat Med 2024; 30:660-669. [PMID: 38454127 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02844-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
The human right to health is universal and non-exclusionary, supporting health in full, and for all. Despite advances in health systems globally, 3.6 billion people lack access to essential health services. Women and girls are disadvantaged when it comes to benefiting from quality health services, owing to social norms, unequal power in relationships, lack of consideration beyond their reproductive roles and poverty. Self-care interventions, including medicines and diagnostics, which offer an additional option to facility-based care, can improve the autonomy and agency of women in managing their own health. However, tackling challenges such as stigma is essential to avoid scenarios in which self-care interventions provide more choice for those who already benefit from access to quality healthcare, and leave behind those with the greatest need. This Perspective explores the opportunities that self-care interventions offer to advance the health and well-being of women with an approach grounded in human rights, gender equality and equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manjulaa Narasimhan
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, including the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - James R Hargreaves
- Center for Evaluation, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Carmen H Logie
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Mandip Aujla
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Jane Cover
- Sexual and Reproductive Health Program, PATH, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Allan Maleche
- Kenya Legal & Ethical Issues Network on HIV and AIDS (KELIN), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Kate Gilmore
- Department of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Verbunt EJ, Newman G, Creagh NS, Milley KM, Emery JD, Kelaher MA, Rankin NM, Nightingale CE. Primary care practice-based interventions and their effect on participation in population-based cancer screening programs: a systematic narrative review. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2024; 25:e12. [PMID: 38345096 PMCID: PMC10894721 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423623000713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM To provide a systematic synthesis of primary care practice-based interventions and their effect on participation in population-based cancer screening programs. BACKGROUND Globally, population-based cancer screening programs (bowel, breast, and cervical) have sub-optimal participation rates. Primary healthcare workers (PHCWs) have an important role in facilitating a patient's decision to screen; however, barriers exist to their engagement. It remains unclear how to best optimize the role of PHCWs to increase screening participation. METHODS A comprehensive search was conducted from January 2010 until November 2023 in the following databases: Medline (OVID), EMBASE, and CINAHL. Data extraction, quality assessment, and synthesis were conducted. Studies were separated by whether they assessed the effect of a single-component or multi-component intervention and study type. FINDINGS Forty-nine studies were identified, of which 36 originated from the USA. Fifteen studies were investigations of single-component interventions, and 34 studies were of multi-component interventions. Interventions with a positive effect on screening participation were predominantly multi-component, and most included combinations of audit and feedback, provider reminders, practice-facilitated assessment and improvement, and patient education across all screening programs. Regarding bowel screening, provision of screening kits at point-of-care was an effective strategy to increase participation. Taking a 'whole-of-practice approach' and identifying a 'practice champion' were found to be contextual factors of effective interventions.The findings suggest that complex interventions comprised of practitioner-focused and patient-focused components are required to increase cancer screening participation in primary care settings. This study provides novel understanding as to what components and contextual factors should be included in primary care practice-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebony J. Verbunt
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Grace Newman
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicola S. Creagh
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kristi M. Milley
- Centre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jon D. Emery
- Centre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Margaret A. Kelaher
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicole M. Rankin
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Claire E. Nightingale
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Aimagambetova G, Atageldiyeva K, Marat A, Suleimenova A, Issa T, Raman S, Huang T, Ashimkhanova A, Aron S, Dongo A, Iztleuov Y, Shamkeeva S, Azizan A. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and acceptability of self-sampling devices for human Papillomavirus detection: A systematic review. Prev Med Rep 2024; 38:102590. [PMID: 38283967 PMCID: PMC10821625 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Cervical cancer screening coverage remains low in many countries worldwide. Self-sampling approach for cervical cancer screening has a good potential to improve the screening coverage. This study aims to compare different types of HPV self-sampling devices for cervical cancer screening to identify the most accurate and acceptable device(s). Methods A systematic review was performed on data extracted from all studies specific to HPV self-sampling devices by searching relevant articles in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO published from 2013 to October 2023. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022375682). Results Overall, 70 papers met the eligibility criteria for this systematic review and were included in the analysis: 22 studies reported self-sampling devices diagnostic accuracy, 32 studies reported self-sampling devices acceptability and 16 studies reported both (accuracy and acceptability). The most popular self-sampling devices were Evalyn Brush, FLOQ Swab, Cervex-Brush, and Delphi Screener. Out of overall 38 studies analyzing self-sampling devices' diagnostic accuracy, 94.7% of studies reported that self-collected specimens provided sensitivity and specificity comparable with clinician-collected samples; acceptability of Evalyn Brush, FLOQ Swab, Delphi Screener, and Colli-Pee, varied between 84.2% and 100%. Conclusion The self-sampling approach has a good potential to increase cervical cancer screening coverage. Evalyn Brush, Cervex-Brush, FLOQ Swab, and Delphi Screener self-sampling devices for HPV detection were the most commonly utilized and found to be the most accurate, and patient-acceptable. HPV detection accuracy using these self-sampling devices had no significant difference compared to the sampling performed by healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gulzhanat Aimagambetova
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Kuralay Atageldiyeva
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan
- Clinical Academic Department of Internal Medicine, CF “University Medical Center”, 10000 Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Aizada Marat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology #1, NJSC “Astana Medical University”, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Assem Suleimenova
- Kazakh National Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Torgyn Issa
- School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Sarina Raman
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, Nevada, USA
| | - Timothy Huang
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, Nevada, USA
| | - Ayimkul Ashimkhanova
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan
- Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Al Farabi University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Saida Aron
- School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Andrew Dongo
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, Nevada, USA
| | - Yerbolat Iztleuov
- Medical Center, Marat Ospanov West-Kazakhstan Medical University, 030000, Aktobe, Kazakhstan
| | - Saykal Shamkeeva
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, Leipzig University Hospital, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Azliyati Azizan
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, Nevada, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Machado Colling A, Creagh NS, Gogia N, Wyatt K, Zammit C, Brotherton JML, Nightingale CE. The acceptability of, and informational needs related to, self-collection cervical screening among women of Indian descent living in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study. Health Expect 2024; 27:e13961. [PMID: 39102732 PMCID: PMC10771801 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In July 2022, self-collection became universally available as part of Australia's National Cervical Screening Program. This change aims to address screening inequities experienced among underscreened populations, including women of Indian descent. This study explored experiences of cervical screening, alongside the acceptability of self-collection, among women of Indian descent living in Victoria, Australia. We also aimed to articulate the informational needs to promote self-collection among this population. METHODS Five focus group discussions with 39 women living in Victoria were conducted in English (n = 3) and Punjabi (n = 2). Transcripts were thematically analysed, as informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. RESULTS Women were motivated by the choice to self-collect, perceiving the ability to maintain modesty and greater autonomy as key enablers. Healthcare practitioners were seen as central in supporting patient-centred models of care. Perceived barriers to self-collection included concerns around its accuracy and women's confidence in collecting their own sample. Widespread dissemination of culturally tailored promotion strategies communicating concepts such as 'privacy' and 'accuracy' were suggested by women to promote self-collection. CONCLUSION Self-collection was highly acceptable among women of Indian descent, particularly when assured of its accuracy, and sociocultural norms and previous screening experiences are considered. This study highlights the huge potential that self-collection can play in increasing equity in Australia's cervical screening programme. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Members of the public were involved in focus group discussions. Findings were summarised and disseminated via a poster. A bicultural worker was involved in all stages of the research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Machado Colling
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Nicola S. Creagh
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Neha Gogia
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Kerryann Wyatt
- Cancer CouncilCentre for Behavioural Research in CancerMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Claire Zammit
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Julia M. L. Brotherton
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Claire E. Nightingale
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Panta S, Rajaram S, Heda A, Bhadoria AS, Kalita D, Chawla L, Chaturvedi J. Community Screening for High-Risk Human Papilloma Virus Infection using Self-Sampling and 'Point-Of-Care' Test. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2024; 25:653-659. [PMID: 38415553 PMCID: PMC11077117 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2024.25.2.653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE HR-HPV types 16 and 18 are responsible for pre-invasive and invasive lesions of the cervix, accounting for 70-80% of the total subtypes. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of high-risk HPV subtypes 16 and 18 in self-collected vaginal samples using real-time micro-PCR and to study the acceptability of self-sampling. METHODS Eligible women (30-65 years) were screened from a semi-urban area of Uttarakhand (India) using self-sampling. High-risk HPV genotypes (16/31 and 18/45) were tested using real-time micro-PCR technique with results available in one hour. The positive results were validated by standard RT-PCR for high-risk HPV 16, 18, separately and for 12 other high-risk genotypes, combined. Ease of the procedure, level of comfort, and recommendation to other women were studied and the acceptability of self-sampling was analyzed using the Likert scale. RESULT Of 975 eligible women screened, 45 participants tested positive for HR-HPV (16/31,18/45) using real-time micro-PCR with a prevalence of 4.6%. Positive samples were further tested through routine RT-PCR and 60% were found to be HR-HPV 16 and 18 positive. For self-sampling, 96.72% (n=943) participants were 'very satisfied' and 94.15% (n=918) found self-sampling to be 'very comfortable' and 88.51% (n=863) stated that they will strongly recommend this test to other eligible women in the community. CONCLUSION We conclude that HR-HPV testing with limited genotyping showed a prevalence of 4.6%, 60% of these were HPV 16/18 positive. Point of care testing was feasible in the community and self-sampling was acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilpa Panta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
| | - Shalini Rajaram
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Gynaecologic Oncology), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
| | - Ayush Heda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Gynaecologic Oncology), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
| | - Ajeet Singh Bhadoria
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
| | - Deepjyoti Kalita
- Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, India.
| | - Latika Chawla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
| | - Jaya Chaturvedi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fitch K, Bohn JA, Emerson JB, Boniface ER, Bruegl A. Acceptability of human papillomavirus self-collection and the role of telehealth: a prospective, randomized study stratified by menopausal status. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:19-27. [PMID: 38101813 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We investigated the utility of telehealth instruction versus mail-based written instruction in facilitating high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) self-collection among post-menopausal patients compared with pre-menopausal patients, as well as the impact on acceptability and feasibility. METHODS We conducted a prospective, randomized study of people eligible for cervical cancer screening, stratified by menopausal status, to undergo standard written or telehealth-based instructions for hrHPV self-collection. English speaking individuals residing in Oregon, with a cervix, eligible for primary hrHPV testing, and with access to a video-capable device were included. Patients with prior hysterectomy, trachelectomy, diagnosis of cervical cancer, or pelvic radiation for gynecologic cancer were excluded. We compared preference for and opinions about self-collection and hrHPV test results, by randomization group and stratified by menopausal status using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Among 123 patients enrolled, 61 identified as post-menopausal with a median age of 57 years. While the majority of post-menopausal participants who received telehealth instructions found it helpful, only 6.1% considered telehealth instructions necessary to complete self-testing. There was no difference in opinion of telehealth by menopausal status. Overall, 88.5% of post-menopausal participants preferred self-collection to provider-collection. There were no significant differences between pre- and post-menopausal participants in terms of test preference, discomfort, ease of use, or perceptions of self-collection. CONCLUSION Telehealth instruction did not add significant value to patients participating in hrHPV self-collection, nor did it alter the acceptability of hrHPV-self collection among an English-speaking cohort. Compared with prior experiences with provider-collected screening, hrHPV self-collection was preferred by both pre- and post-menopausal participants. There were no significant differences in preference for provider- versus self-collection when stratified by menopausal status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Fitch
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, OHSU, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jacqueline A Bohn
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Jenna B Emerson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, OHSU, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Emily R Boniface
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, OHSU, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Amanda Bruegl
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, OHSU, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hang S, Haruyama R, Uy K, Fujita N, Kimura T, Koum K, Kawana K. Feasibility, accuracy and acceptability of self-sampled human papillomavirus testing using careHPV in Cambodia: a cross-sectional study. J Gynecol Oncol 2024; 35:e6. [PMID: 37743059 PMCID: PMC10792213 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Self-sampled human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is a potential option for cervical cancer screening, but research is scarce in Cambodia. We evaluated the feasibility, accuracy, and acceptability of self-sampled HPV testing using careHPV. METHODS A cross-sectional study including women aged 20-49 years attending 2 national hospitals in the capital city was conducted. Women underwent both self-sampling and clinician-sampling of specimens, and were then asked to complete an acceptability questionnaire. The paired samples were analyzed for high-risk HPV by careHPV and genotyped by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS A total of 375 women were eligible for inclusion. Based on PCR, 78.9% were negative for HPV in both self and clinician-samples, 9.9% had a complete HPV type match, and 6.1% had all HPV types in clinician-samples also detected in self-samples. In 5.1%, one or more HPV types identified in the clinician-samples were missed in self-samples. When using careHPV, the overall agreement between the 2 sampling methods was 95.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]=95.8-95.6) with good concordance (κ=0.66, 95% CI=0.56-0.76). Nearly 90% of the women preferred clinician-sampling over self-sampling, citing greater comfort, ease, and speed. CONCLUSION Self-sampled HPV testing using careHPV could be an option for cervical cancer screening in Cambodia; however, it requires periodic quality control of handling procedures. In addition, women's health education regarding the accuracy of self-sampled HPV testing and the importance of follow-up in cases of positive results is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sovanara Hang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Maternal and Child Health Center, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Rei Haruyama
- Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kyna Uy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Khmer-Soviet Friendship Hospital, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Noriko Fujita
- Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kanal Koum
- Cambodian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Kei Kawana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fritzell K, Hedberg B, Woudstra A, Forsberg A, Sventelius M, Kottorp A, Jervaeus A. Making the BEST decision-the BESTa project development, implementation and evaluation of a digital Decision Aid in Swedish cancer screening programmes- a description of a research project. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0294332. [PMID: 38085710 PMCID: PMC10715660 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sweden has a long tradition of organized national population-based screening programmes. Participation rates differ between programmes and regions, being relatively high in some groups, but lower in others. To ensure an equity perspective on screening, it is desirable that individuals make an informed decision based on knowledge rather than ignorance, misconceptions, or fear. Decision Aids (DAs) are set to deliver information about different healthcare options and help individuals to visualize the values associated with each available option. DAs are not intended to guide individuals to choose one option over another. The advantage of an individual Decision Aid (iDA) is that individuals gain knowledge about cancer and screening by accessing one webpage with the possibility to communicate with health professionals and thereafter make their decision regarding participation. The objective is therefore to develop, implement and evaluate a digital iDA for individuals invited to cancer screening in Sweden. METHODS This study encompasses a process-, implementation-, and outcome evaluation. Multiple methods will be applied including focus group discussions, individual interviews and the usage of the think aloud technique and self-reported questionnaire data. The project is based on The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) framework and the proposed model development process for DAs. Individuals aged 23-74, including women (the cervical-, breast- and CRC screening module) and men (the CRC screening module), will be included in the developmental process. Efforts will be made to recruit participants with self-reported physical and mental limitations, individuals without a permanent residence and ethnic minorities. DISCUSSION To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first attempt aimed at developing an iDA for use in the Swedish context. The iDA is intended to facilitate shared decision making about participation in screening. Furthermore, the iDA is expected to increase knowledge and raise awareness about cancer and cancer screening. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Lay people are involved throughout the whole development and implementation process of the digital DA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05512260.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaisa Fritzell
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Berith Hedberg
- School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Anke Woudstra
- Team Advies en Onderzoek, Municipal Health Service (GGD) Kennemerland, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Anna Forsberg
- Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Anders Kottorp
- Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anna Jervaeus
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Persaud N, Sabir A, Woods H, Sayani A, Agarwal A, Chowdhury M, de Leon-Demare K, Ibezi S, Jan SH, Katz A, LaFortune FD, Lewis M, McFarlane T, Oberai A, Oladele Y, Onyekwelu O, Peters L, Wong P, Lofters A. Recommandations pour des soins préventifs pour promouvoir l’équité en matière de santé. CMAJ 2023; 195:E1674-E1701. [PMID: 38081626 PMCID: PMC10718275 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.230237-f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Contexte: Malgré des investissements importants dans un système de soins de santé public qui comprend des services préventifs, on continue d’observer des disparités évitables en matière de santé au Canada. L’équipe avait pour objectif de formuler des recommandations pour des soins de santé préventifs qui puissent améliorer l’équité en matière de santé par la priorisation des interventions efficaces à l’intention des groupes défavorisés. Méthodes: La ligne directrice a été élaborée par un comité composé de spécialistes en soins primaires et de membres de la patientèle, avec la contribution d’un groupe de patientes-et patientspartenaires ayant vécu diverses expériences. Après avoir sélectionné les sujets à prioriser, nous avons recensé les revues systématiques, les essais randomisés et contrôlés récents sur les méthodes de dépistage et d’autres études pertinentes sur l’efficacité du dépistage et de la prise en charge. Nous avons utilisé l’approche GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) pour formuler les recommandations et avons suivi le guide AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) pour rédiger le rapport. Il en a été de même avec les principes du Guidelines International Network pour la gestion des intérêts concurrents. Les recommandations ont été passées en revue par un comité externe d’experts en contenu avant d’être distribuées à des intervenants à l’échelle nationale pour approbation. Recommandations: Nous avons formulé 15 recommandations concernant le dépistage et d’autres soins préventifs et 1 recommandation de nature politique visant à améliorer l’accès aux soins primaires. Ainsi, nous recommandons de prioriser une stratégie de communication pour le dépistage du cancer colorectal à partir de l’âge de 45 ans et pour l’évaluation du risque de maladie cardiovasculaire pour lutter contre les iniquités en matière de santé et promouvoir la santé. Les interventions particulières qui devraient être déployées pour lutter contre les iniquités comprennent l’autodépistage du virus du papillome humain (VPH) et du VIH, et le test de libération de l’interféron γ pour l’infection tuberculeuse. Le dépistage de la dépression, de la toxicomanie, de la violence conjugale et de la pauvreté devrait également permettre aux personnes touchées d’accéder plus facilement à des interventions éprouvées. Nous recommandons une prise de contact systématique avec des professionnels de la santé en soins primaires pour les personnes défavorisées. Interprétation: Les interventions préventives éprouvées peuvent aider à combattre les iniquités en matière de santé si la priorité est accordée aux personnes défavorisées. Les médecins, les organisations de santé et les gouvernements devraient adopter des mesures fondées sur des données probantes et en faire le suivi s’ils veulent promouvoir l’équité en matière de santé partout au Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nav Persaud
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont.
| | - Areesha Sabir
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Hannah Woods
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Ambreen Sayani
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Arnav Agarwal
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Muna Chowdhury
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Kathleen de Leon-Demare
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Somtochukwu Ibezi
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Saadia Hameed Jan
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Alan Katz
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Frantz-Daniel LaFortune
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Melanie Lewis
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Trudy McFarlane
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Anjali Oberai
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Yinka Oladele
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Onyema Onyekwelu
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Lisa Peters
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Patrick Wong
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Aisha Lofters
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kasper T, Yamey G, Dwyer S, McDade KK, Lidén J, Lüdemann C, Diab MM, Ogbuoji O, Poodla P, Schrade C, Thoumi A, Zimmerman A, Assefa Y, Allen LN, Basinga P, Garcia PJ, Jackson D, Mwanyika H, Nugent R, Ofosu A, Rawaf S, Reddy KS, Settle D, Tritter B, Benn C. Rethinking how development assistance for health can catalyse progress on primary health care. Lancet 2023; 402:2253-2264. [PMID: 37967568 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01813-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
Global campaigns to control HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, and vaccine-preventable illnesses showed that large-scale impact can be achieved by using additional international financing to support selected, evidence-based, high-impact investment areas and to catalyse domestic resource mobilisation. Building on this paradigm, we make the case for targeting additional international funding for selected high-impact investments in primary health care. We have identified and costed a set of concrete, evidence-based investments that donors could support, which would be expected to have major impacts at an affordable cost. These investments are in: (1) individuals and communities empowered to engage in health decision making, (2) a new model of people-centred primary care, and (3) next generation community health workers. These three areas would be supported by strengthening two cross-cutting elements of national systems. The first is the digital tools and data that support facility, district, and national managers to improve processes, quality of care, and accountability across primary health care. The second is the educational, training, and supervisory systems needed to improve the quality of care. We estimate that with an additional international investment of between US$1·87 billion in a low-investment scenario and $3·85 billion in a high-investment scenario annually over the next 3 years, the international community could support the scale-up of this evidence-based package of investments in the 59 low-income and middle-income countries that are eligible for external financing from the World Bank Group's International Development Association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gavin Yamey
- Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | | | - Kaci Kennedy McDade
- Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Mohamed Mustafa Diab
- Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Osondu Ogbuoji
- Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Andrea Thoumi
- Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Armand Zimmerman
- Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yibeltal Assefa
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Luke N Allen
- Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Paulin Basinga
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Patricia J Garcia
- School of Public Health, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Debra Jackson
- Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH) Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Rachel Nugent
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Salman Rawaf
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ramesan CK, Calvin JD, Thomas A, Fletcher J, Kannangai R, Abraham P, Peedicayil A. Diagnostic study of human papillomavirus DNA detection in cervical and vaginal samples using the filter paper card. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023; 163:660-666. [PMID: 37269047 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the accuracy of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA samples on filter paper in comparison to specimen transport medium (STM). METHODS This was a cross-sectional diagnostic study of 42 consecutive women who were prospectively recruited. Each had self-collected vaginal samples on filter paper, physician-collected cervical samples on filter paper, and physician-collected cervical samples in STM. HPV DNA testing was performed with a Hybrid Capture 2 system (Qiagen). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and agreement of filter paper methods with the standard procedure were calculated. RESULTS The overall prevalence of HPV in STM was 67.5%. Detection of HPV DNA in the physician-collected cervical samples on filter paper had a sensitivity of 77.8%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100%, and an NPV of 68.4%. The patient's self-sampling on filter paper had a sensitivity of 66.7%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100%, and an NPV of 59.1%. The agreement between STM method and physician-collected sample on filter paper was substantial, (κ = 0.695, P < 0.001), while the agreement between STM and self-collected samples on filter paper was moderate (κ = 0.565, P < 0.001). Most patients reported that self-collection was acceptable (100%), painless (95%), and not embarrassing (95%). CONCLUSION Filter paper, with dried self-collected vaginal samples, can be used to detect high-risk HPV with acceptable accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anitha Thomas
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - John Fletcher
- Department of Clinical Virology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Rajesh Kannangai
- Department of Clinical Virology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Priya Abraham
- Department of Clinical Virology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Abraham Peedicayil
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
- Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care & Research Centre, Muscat, Oman
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sokale IO, Thrift AP, Montealegre J, Adekanmbi V, Chido-Amajuoyi OG, Amuta A, Reitzel LR, Oluyomi AO. Geographic Variation in Late-Stage Cervical Cancer Diagnosis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2343152. [PMID: 37955896 PMCID: PMC10644213 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance There are stark disparities in cervical cancer burden in the United States, notably by race and ethnicity and geography. Late-stage diagnosis is an indicator of inadequate access to and utilization of screening. Objective To identify geospatial clusters of late-stage cervical cancer at time of diagnosis in Texas. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based cross-sectional study used incident cervical cancer data from the Texas Cancer Registry from 2014 to 2018 of female patients aged 18 years or older. Late-stage cervical cancer cases were geocoded at the census tract level (n = 5265) using their residential coordinates (latitude and longitude) at the time of diagnosis. Statistical analysis was performed from April to September 2023. Exposures Census tract of residence at diagnosis. Main Outcome and Measures Late-stage cervical cancer diagnosis (ie, cases classified by the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results summary stages 2 to 4 [regional spread] or 7 [distant metastasis]). A Poisson probability-based model of the SaTScan purely spatial scan statistics was applied at the census tract-level to identify geographic clusters of higher (hot spots) or lower (cold spots) proportions than expected of late-stage cervical cancer diagnosis and adjusted for age. Results Among a total of 6484 female patients with incident cervical cancer cases (mean [SD] age, 48.7 [14.7] years), 2300 (35.5%) were Hispanic, 798 (12.3%) were non-Hispanic Black, 3090 (47.6%) were non-Hispanic White, and 296 (4.6%) were other race or ethnicity. Of the 6484 patients, 2892 with late-stage diagnosis (mean [SD] age, 51.8 [14.4] years were analyzed. Among patients with late-stage diagnosis, 1069 (37.0%) were Hispanic, 417 (14.4%) were non-Hispanic Black, 1307 (45.2%) were non-Hispanic White, and 99 (3.4%) were other race or ethnicity. SaTScan spatial analysis identified 7 statistically significant clusters of late-stage cervical cancer diagnosis in Texas, of which 4 were hot spots and 3 were cold spots. Hot spots included 1128 census tracts, predominantly in the South Texas Plains, Gulf Coast, and Prairies and Lakes (North Texas) regions. Of the 2892 patients with late-stage cervical cancer, 880 (30.4%) were observed within hot spots. Census tract-level comparison of characteristics of clusters suggested that hot spots differed significantly from cold spots and the rest of Texas by proportions of racial and ethnic groups, non-US born persons, and socioeconomic status. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study examining geospatial clusters of late-stage cervical cancer diagnosis, place-based disparities were found in late-stage cervical cancer diagnosis in Texas. These findings suggest that these communities may benefit from aggressive cervical cancer interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Itunu O. Sokale
- Department of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Aaron P. Thrift
- Department of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jane Montealegre
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Victor Adekanmbi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
| | | | - Ann Amuta
- School of Health Promotion and Kinesiology, Texas Woman’s University, Denton
| | - Lorraine R. Reitzel
- Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Abiodun O. Oluyomi
- Department of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Asare M, Lanning BA, Montealegre JR, Akowuah E, Adunlin G, Rose T. Determinants of Low-Income Women's Participation in Self-Collected Samples for Cervical Cancer Detection: Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. COMMUNITY HEALTH EQUITY RESEARCH & POLICY 2023; 44:65-76. [PMID: 37724032 DOI: 10.1177/0272684x221090060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-income women (LIW) are underrepresented in physician-provided cervical cancer screening. Providing women with an option for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling would increase cervical cancer screening. However, little is known about LIW's attitude towards self-sampling for cervical cancer. We determined the associations between the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) constructs and LIW intention for participation in the HPV self-sampling. METHODS A 44-item survey was administered among women receiving food from a food pantry in central Texas. Independent variables included TPB constructs (i.e., attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived control). The outcome variables were intentions and preference for self-sampling. Both variables were measured on a 5-point scale. Hierarchical linear regression models were used to analyze the data. RESULTS A sample of 241 participants (age 50.13 ± 9.60 years) comprising non-Hispanic White (40%), Black/African American (27%), and Hispanic (30%) participated in the study. The participants were current with a pap test (54.8%) and preferred self-sampling (42%). The participant's attitudes and subjective norms were significantly associated with their intention for self-sampling, accounting for 38.7% of the variance (p < .001). Women who were overdue for pap testing versus current with pap testing had increased odds of preferring self-sampling (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.27, 6.04). CONCLUSIONS The key predictors for LIW's intention for self-sampling included attitudes and subjective norms. Future research should use the TPB as a framework to examine whether intention predicts self-sampling behavior among LIW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Asare
- Department of Public Health, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
| | - Beth A Lanning
- Department of Public Health, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
| | - Jane R Montealegre
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
| | | | - Georges Adunlin
- Department of Pharmaceutical, Social and Administrative Sciences, Samford University, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Tiffany Rose
- Department of Public Health, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vimpere L, Sami J, Jeannot E. Cervical cancer screening programs for female sex workers: a scoping review. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1226779. [PMID: 37841741 PMCID: PMC10570451 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1226779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common neoplasia affecting women worldwide. Female sex workers (FSWs) are among those at highest risk of developing and succumbing to CC. Yet, they are often overlooked in CC screening programs and have limited access to CC healthcare globally. The development of CC screening programs for this high-risk target population is necessary to reduce the global burden of this disease and to reach the World Health Organization's objective of accelerating the elimination of CC. Objective This review summarizes findings on CC screening programs for FSWs that have been implemented worldwide, and assesses their effectiveness and sustainability. Methods A scoping review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A literature search was performed on PubMed, Swisscovery, and Google Scholar for studies describing and assessing CC screening programs for FSWs. In addition, targeted searching online Non-Governmental and International Organizations websites identified grey literature. A single reviewer screened titles and abstracts, and extracted data from the research findings. Results The search identified 13 articles published from 1989 to 2021. All implemented programs successfully reached FSWs and provided them with CC screening during the study period. The most effective and sustainable strategies were the Screen and Treat approach, introducing CC screening into existing STI services in drop-in or outreach clinics, HPV-DNA self-sampling, and integrating sex-workers-specific services in public health facilities. Follow-up was deemed the main challenge in providing and enhancing CC healthcare to FSWs with rates of loss to follow-up ranging from 35 to 60%. Conclusion FSWs are often omitted in national CC screening programs. The further development and improvement of CC healthcare, including follow-up systems, for this high-priority target population are imperative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Léa Vimpere
- Global Studies Institute, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
- Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jana Sami
- Gynecology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Emilien Jeannot
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health, Geneva, Switzerland
- Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Persaud N, Sabir A, Woods H, Sayani A, Agarwal A, Chowdhury M, de Leon-Demare K, Ibezi S, Jan SH, Katz A, LaFortune FD, Lewis M, McFarlane T, Oberai A, Oladele Y, Onyekwelu O, Peters L, Wong P, Lofters A. Preventive care recommendations to promote health equity. CMAJ 2023; 195:E1250-E1273. [PMID: 37748784 PMCID: PMC10519166 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.230237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Avoidable disparities in health outcomes persist in Canada despite substantial investments in a publicly funded health care system that includes preventive services. Our objective was to provide preventive care recommendations that promote health equity by prioritizing effective interventions for people experiencing disadvantages. METHODS The guideline was developed by a primary care provider-patient panel, with input from a patient-partner panel with diverse lived experiences. After selecting priority topics, we searched for systematic reviews and recent randomized controlled trials of screening and other relevant studies of screening accuracy and management efficacy. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to develop recommendations and followed the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) reporting guidance. We managed competing interests using the Guideline International Network principles. The recommendations were externally reviewed by content experts and circulated for endorsement by national stakeholders. RECOMMENDATIONS We developed 15 screening and other preventive care recommendations and 1 policy recommendation on improving access to primary care. We recommend prioritized outreach for colorectal cancer screening starting at age 45 years and for cardiovascular disease risk assessment, to help address inequities and promote health. Specific interventions that should be rolled out in ways that address inequities include human papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing, HIV self-testing and interferon-γ release assays for tuberculosis infection. Screening for depression, substance use, intimate partner violence and poverty should help connect people experiencing specific disadvantages with proven interventions. We recommend automatic connection to primary care for people experiencing disadvantages. INTERPRETATION Proven preventive care interventions can address health inequities if people experiencing disadvantages are prioritized. Clinicians, health care organizations and governments should take evidence-based actions and track progress in promoting health equity across Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nav Persaud
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont.
| | - Areesha Sabir
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Hannah Woods
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Ambreen Sayani
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Arnav Agarwal
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Muna Chowdhury
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Kathleen de Leon-Demare
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Somtochukwu Ibezi
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Saadia Hameed Jan
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Alan Katz
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Frantz-Daniel LaFortune
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Melanie Lewis
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Trudy McFarlane
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Anjali Oberai
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Yinka Oladele
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Onyema Onyekwelu
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Lisa Peters
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Patrick Wong
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Aisha Lofters
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Taghavi K, Zhao F, Downham L, Baena A, Basu P. Molecular triaging options for women testing HPV positive with self-collected samples. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1243888. [PMID: 37810963 PMCID: PMC10560038 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1243888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
We review developments in molecular triaging options for women who test positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) on self-collected samples in the context of cervical cancer elimination. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends hrHPV screening as the primary test for cervical screening due to its high sensitivity compared to other screening tests. However, when hrHPV testing is used alone for treatment decisions, a proportion of women of childbearing age receive unnecessary treatments. This provides the incentive to optimize screening regimes to minimize the risk of overtreatment in women of reproductive age. Molecular biomarkers can potentially enhance the accuracy and efficiency of screening and triage. HrHPV testing is currently the only screening test that allows triage with molecular methods using the same sample. Additionally, offering self-collected hrHPV tests to women has been reported to increase screening coverage. This creates an opportunity to focus health resources on linking screen-positive women to diagnosis and treatment. Adding an additional test to the screening algorithm (a triage test) may improve the test's positive predictive value (PPV) and offer a better balance of benefits and risks for women. Conventional triage methods like cytology and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) cannot be performed on self-collected samples and require additional clinic visits and subjective interpretations. Molecular triaging using methods like partial and extended genotyping, methylation tests, detection of E6/E7 proteins, and hrHPV viral load in the same sample as the hrHPV test may improve the prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and invasive cancer, offering more precise, efficient, and cost-effective screening regimes. More research is needed to determine if self-collected samples are effective and cost-efficient for diverse populations and in comparison to other triage methods. The implementation of molecular triaging could improve screening accuracy and reduce the need for multiple clinical visits. These important factors play a crucial role in achieving the global goal of eliminating cervical cancer as a public health problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katayoun Taghavi
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency For Research On Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - Fanghui Zhao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Laura Downham
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency For Research On Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - Armando Baena
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency For Research On Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - Partha Basu
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency For Research On Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Effah K, Tekpor E, Amuah JE, Essel NOM, Kemawor S, Catherine Morkli EA, Lamptey–Mills E, Wormenor CM, Manu LS, Klutsey GB, Danyo S, Akakpo PK. Self-sampling and HPV DNA testing for cervical precancer screening in a cohort of nuns in Ghana: a cross-sectional cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 63:102183. [PMID: 37692077 PMCID: PMC10484965 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The need for cervical cancer screening has been emphasised in at-risk cohorts of women to reduce their risk of cervical cancer. Some women with decreased risk of acquiring human papillomavirus (HPV) infections, such as Catholic nuns, receive less attention and on occasion are missed in cervical cancer screening programmes. This study aimed to determine the high-risk HPV (hr-HPV) prevalence in such a cohort to emphasise the need for cervical precancer screening among all women. To improve compliance, we employed self-sampling. Methods This descriptive cross-sectional cohort study involved the data of 105 Catholic nuns subjected to cervical screening using self-samples in the Greater Accra, Volta, and Central regions of Ghana between June 4, 2022 and June 30, 2022. hr-HPV testing was performed on self-samples using the MA-6000 HPV DNA platform. Screen-positive nuns underwent follow-up pap smears and EVA colposcopy. In addition to descriptive analysis, univariate and multivariable nominal logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between hr-HPV positivity and selected continuous and categorical factors. Findings 105 nuns from three convents were screened with hr-HPV DNA testing (MA-6000). Twenty-five tested positive for hr-HPV (prevalence of 23.8% (95% CI, 15.7-32.0) [HPV 18 only (n = 2, 1.9%), non-HPV 16/18 genotypes (others) (n = 22, 21.0%), and mixed infection with HPV 16 and other genotype(s) (n = 1, 1.0%)]. Pap smears for all 25 hr-HPV-positives came in as negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy, whereas EVA mobile colposcopy showed minor abnormal findings in two (8.0%; 95% CI, 1.0-26.0), both of whom were managed conservatively. Interpretation Our findings suggest that the hr-HPV prevalence in this cohort of nuns is similar to that of the general population. To meet the World Health Organization's target for cervical cancer elimination, it is important that all women are given access to cervical cancer screening and preventative services. Further, increasing 'anonymity' and privacy among nuns through self-sampling may be crucial to expanding choice, coverage, and uptake of screening in support of their health rights. Funding None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kofi Effah
- Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Centre, Catholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana
| | - Ethel Tekpor
- Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Centre, Catholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana
| | - Joseph Emmanuel Amuah
- Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Centre, Catholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nana Owusu M. Essel
- Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Centre, Catholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Seyram Kemawor
- Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Centre, Catholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana
| | | | - Esther Lamptey–Mills
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Cape Coast, Ghana
| | | | - Lawrencia Serwaa Manu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
| | | | - Stephen Danyo
- Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Centre, Catholic Hospital, Battor, Ghana
| | - Patrick Kafui Akakpo
- Department of Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Welsh EF, Andrus EC, Sandler CB, Moravek MB, Stroumsa D, Kattari SK, Walline HM, Goudsmit CM, Brouwer AF. Cervicovaginal and anal self-sampling for HPV testing in a transgender and gender diverse population assigned female at birth: comfort, difficulty, and willingness to use. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.08.15.23294132. [PMID: 37645965 PMCID: PMC10462238 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.15.23294132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Background Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people assigned female at birth (AFAB) face numerous barriers to preventive care, including for HPV and cervical cancer screening. Self-sampling options may expand access to HPV testing for TGD people AFAB. Methods We recruited TGD individuals AFAB to collect cervicovaginal and anal specimens at-home using self-sampling for HPV testing, and individuals reported their perceptions of self-sampling. Associations between demographic and health characteristics and each of comfort of use, ease of use, and willingness to use self-sampling were estimated using robust Poisson regression. Results The majority of the 101 participants who completed the study reported that the cervicovaginal self-swab was not uncomfortable (68.3%) and not difficult to use (86.1%), and nearly all (96.0%) were willing to use the swab in the future. Fewer participants found the anal swab to not be uncomfortable (47.5%), but most participants still found the anal swab to not be difficult to use (70.2%) and were willing to use the swab in the future (89.1%). Participants were more willing to use either swab if they had not seen a medical professional in the past year. About 70% of participants who reported negative experiences with either self-swab were still willing to use that swab in the future. Conclusions TGD AFAB individuals were willing to use and preferred self-sampling methods for cervicovaginal and anal HPV testing. Developing clinically approved self-sampling options for cancer screening could expand access to HPV screening for TGD AFAB populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin F Welsh
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Emily C. Andrus
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Claire B. Sandler
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Molly B. Moravek
- Reproductive Endocrinology Clinic, Center for Reproductive Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Daphna Stroumsa
- Reproductive Endocrinology Clinic, Center for Reproductive Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Shanna K. Kattari
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Women’s and Gender Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Heather M. Walline
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | | | - Andrew F. Brouwer
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Xiong S, Ghebre R, Kulasingam S, Mason SM, Pratt RJ, Lazovich D. Exploring factors associated with preferences for human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among racially- and ethnically-diverse women in Minnesota: A cross-sectional study. Prev Med Rep 2023; 34:102243. [PMID: 37234567 PMCID: PMC10206196 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Pap tests are still underutilized by minority women due to limited awareness of cervical cancer screening (CCS), inadequate health care access, and cultural or religious beliefs. Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling, a new CCS tool, has demonstrated potential to overcome some of these barriers. In 2021, women aged 30-65 years old were recruited across Minnesota to complete an online survey. The survey assessed five outcome measures related to HPV self-sampling: (1) awareness of test; (2) self-efficacy to conduct test; (3) location preference of test (clinic vs. home); 4) collector preference (self vs. clinician); and (5) preference of CCS strategy (HPV self-sampling vs. Pap test). Modified Poisson regressions tested associations between sociodemographic variables and outcomes. A total of 420 women completed the survey, of which 32.4% identified as Non-Hispanic white, 22.2% as Hispanic, 12.6% as Black/African-American, 28.3% as Asian, 1.9% as American Indian/Alaskan Native, and 1.4% as more than two races. Few women had heard of HPV self-sampling (6.5%), but a majority reported high self-efficacy to perform self-sampling (75.3%). Women also reported higher preferences for completing an HPV test in the clinic (52.2%) and for performing a self-collected HPV test themselves (58.7%), yet would choose a traditional Pap test over HPV self-sampling (56.0%). The low level of HPV self-sampling awareness, across all racial/ethnic groups, suggests a strong opportunity to promote widespread educational efforts around this new tool. Future HPV self-sampling research efforts should examine educational interventions targeted at healthcare providers to educate and encourage women on the importance of self-collection options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Xiong
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 600 S Taylor Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States
| | - Rahel Ghebre
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, 425 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
| | - Shalini Kulasingam
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, 425 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 1300 S 2nd Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454, United States
| | - Susan M. Mason
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 1300 S 2nd Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454, United States
| | - Rebekah J. Pratt
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, 425 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
- Program in Health Disparities Research, University of Minnesota Medical School, 717 Delaware Street SE, Suite 166, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| | - DeAnn Lazovich
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, 425 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 1300 S 2nd Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454, United States
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bakkum-Gamez JN, Sherman ME, Slettedahl SW, Mahoney DW, Lemens MA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Hopkins MR, VanOosten A, Shridhar V, Staub JK, Cao X, Foote PH, Clarke MA, Burger KN, Berger CK, O'Connell MC, Doering KA, Podratz KC, DeStephano CC, Schoolmeester JK, Kerr SE, Wentzensen N, Taylor WR, Kisiel JB. Detection of endometrial cancer using tampon-based collection and methylated DNA markers. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:11-20. [PMID: 37141817 PMCID: PMC10330802 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Alterations in DNA methylation are early events in endometrial cancer (EC) development and may have utility in EC detection via tampon-collected vaginal fluid. METHODS For discovery, DNA from frozen EC, benign endometrium (BE), and benign cervicovaginal (BCV) tissues underwent reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) to identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs). Candidate DMRs were selected based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) discrimination, methylation level fold-change between cancers and controls, and absence of background CpG methylation. Methylated DNA marker (MDM) validation was performed using qMSP on DNA from independent EC and BE FFPE tissue sets. Women ≥45 years of age with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) or postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) or any age with biopsy-proven EC self-collected vaginal fluid using a tampon prior to clinically indicated endometrial sampling or hysterectomy. Vaginal fluid DNA was assayed by qMSP for EC-associated MDMs. Random forest modeling analysis was performed to generate predictive probability of underlying disease; results were 500-fold in-silico cross-validated. RESULTS Thirty-three candidate MDMs met performance criteria in tissue. For the tampon pilot, 100 EC cases were frequency matched by menopausal status and tampon collection date to 92 BE controls. A 28-MDM panel highly discriminated between EC and BE (96% (95%CI 89-99%) specificity; 76% (66-84%) sensitivity (AUC 0.88). In PBS/EDTA tampon buffer, the panel yielded 96% (95% CI 87-99%) specificity and 82% (70-91%) sensitivity (AUC 0.91). CONCLUSION Next generation methylome sequencing, stringent filtering criteria, and independent validation yielded excellent candidate MDMs for EC. EC-associated MDMs performed with promisingly high sensitivity and specificity in tampon-collected vaginal fluid; PBS-based tampon buffer with added EDTA improved sensitivity. Larger tampon-based EC MDM testing studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
| | - Mark E Sherman
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | - Seth W Slettedahl
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Douglas W Mahoney
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Maureen A Lemens
- Surgery Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Matthew R Hopkins
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Ann VanOosten
- Surgery Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Viji Shridhar
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Julie K Staub
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Xiaoming Cao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Patrick H Foote
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Megan A Clarke
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Kelli N Burger
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Calise K Berger
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Maria C O'Connell
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Karen A Doering
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Karl C Podratz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Christopher C DeStephano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | - J Kenneth Schoolmeester
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Sarah E Kerr
- Hospital Pathology Associates, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - William R Taylor
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - John B Kisiel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Richardson-Parry A, Silva M, Valderas JM, Donde S, Woodruff S, van Vugt J. Interactive or tailored digital interventions to increase uptake in cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening to reduce health inequity: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Prev 2023; 32:396-409. [PMID: 37144585 PMCID: PMC10249608 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Significant health inequities exist in screening uptake for certain types of cancer. The review question was to identify and describe interactive, tailored digital, computer, and web-based interventions to reduce health inequity in cancer screening and review the effectiveness of such interventions in increasing screening rates versus usual care. METHODS We searched four medical literature databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) published until 12 January 2023 that evaluated interventions aimed at increasing the percentage of breast, prostate, cervical, or colorectal cancer screening uptake. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity among studies. RESULTS After screening 4200 titles and abstracts, 17 studies were included. Studies focused on colorectal ( n = 10), breast ( n = 4), cervical ( n = 2), and prostate ( n = 1) cancer screening. All were based in the USA except two. Most studies focused on ethnicity/race, while some included low-income populations. Intervention types were heterogeneous and used computer programs, apps, or web-based methods to provide tailored or interactive information to participants about screening risks and options. Some studies found positive effects for increasing cancer screening uptake in the intervention groups compared to usual care, but results were heterogeneous. CONCLUSION Interventions that use individual and cultural tailoring of cancer screening educational material should be further developed and investigated outside of the USA. Designing effective digital intervention strategies, with components that can be adapted to remote delivery may be an important strategy for reducing health inequities in cancer screening during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jose M. Valderas
- Department of Family Medicine, National University Health System and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Centre for Research in Health Systems Performance, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shaantanu Donde
- European Developed Markets Medical Affairs Viatris, Hatfield, UK
| | - Seth Woodruff
- North America Medical Affairs, Viatris, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rebolj M, Sargent A, Njor SH, Cuschieri K. Widening the offer of human papillomavirus self-sampling to all women eligible for cervical screening: Make haste slowly. Int J Cancer 2023; 153:8-19. [PMID: 36385698 PMCID: PMC10952475 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Self-collection of samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has the potential to increase the uptake of cervical screening among underscreened women and will likely form a crucial part of the WHO's strategy to eliminate cervical cancer by 2030. In high-income countries with long-standing, organised cervical screening programmes, self-collection is increasingly becoming available as a routine offer for women regardless of their screening histories, including under- and well-screened women. For these contexts, a validated microsimulation model determined that adding self-collection to clinician collection is likely to be cost-effective on the condition that it meets specific thresholds relating to (1) uptake and (2) sensitivity for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+). We used these thresholds to review the 'early-adopter' programme-level evidence with a mind to determine how well and how consistently they were being met. The available evidence suggested some risk to overall programme performance in the situation where low uptake among underscreened women was accompanied by a high rate of substituting clinician sampling with self-collection among well-screened women. Risk was further compounded in a situation where the slightly reduced sensitivity of self-sampling vs clinician sampling for the detection of CIN2+ was accompanied with lack of adherence to a follow-up triage test that required a clinician sample. To support real-world programmes on their pathways toward implementation and to avoid HPV self-collection being introduced as a screening measure in good faith but with counterproductive consequences, we conclude by identifying a range of mitigations and areas worthy of research prioritisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matejka Rebolj
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Alexandra Sargent
- Cytology Department, Manchester Royal InfirmaryManchester University NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
| | - Sisse Helle Njor
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health ProgrammesRanders Regional HospitalRandersDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
| | - Kate Cuschieri
- Scottish HPV Reference Laboratory, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian ScotlandEdinburghUK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mekuria SF, Timmermans S, Borgfeldt C, Jerkeman M, Johansson P, Linde DS. HPV self-sampling versus healthcare provider collection on the effect of cervical cancer screening uptake and costs in LMIC: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2023; 12:103. [PMID: 37349822 PMCID: PMC10286394 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02252-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer is a major global health issue, with 89% of cases occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling tests have been suggested as an innovative way to improve cervical cancer screening uptake and reduce the burden of disease. The objective of this review was to examine the effect of HPV self-sampling on screening uptake compared to any healthcare provider sampling in LMICs. The secondary objective was to estimate the associated costs of the various screening methods. METHOD Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL (by Cochrane), Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov up until April 14, 2022, and a total of six trials were included in the review. Meta-analyses were performed mainly using the inverse variance method, by pooling effect estimates of the proportion of women who accepted the screening method offered. Subgroup analyses were done comparing low- and middle-income countries, as well as low- and high-risk bias studies. Heterogeneity of the data was assessed using I2. Cost data was collected for analysis from articles and correspondence with authors. RESULTS We found a small but significant difference in screening uptake in our primary analysis: RR 1.11 (95% CI: 1.10-1.11; I2 = 97%; 6 trials; 29,018 participants). Our sensitivity analysis, which excluded one trial that measured screening uptake differently than the other trials, resulted in a clearer effect in screening uptake: RR: 1.82 (95% CI: 1.67-1.99; I2 = 42%; 5 trials; 9590 participants). Two trials reported costs; thus, it was not possible to make a direct comparison of costs. One found self-sampling more cost-effective than the provider-required visual inspection with acetic acid method, despite the test and running costs being higher for HPV self-sampling. CONCLUSION Our review indicates that self-sampling improves screening uptake, particularly in low-income countries; however, to this date, there remain few trials and associated cost data. We recommend further studies with proper cost data be conducted to guide the incorporation of HPV self-sampling into national cervical cancer screening guidelines in low- and middle-income countries. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020218504.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sydney Timmermans
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Mats Jerkeman
- Division of Oncology, Lund University, 22185 Lund, Sweden
| | - Pia Johansson
- School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Ditte Søndergaard Linde
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Zigras T, Mayrand MH, Bouchard C, Salvador S, Eiriksson L, Almadin C, Kean S, Dean E, Malhotra U, Todd N, Fontaine D, Bentley J. Canadian Guideline on the Management of a Positive Human Papillomavirus Test and Guidance for Specific Populations. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:5652-5679. [PMID: 37366908 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30060425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence-based guidance on the management of a positive human papilloma virus (HPV) test and to provide guidance around screening and HPV testing for specific patient populations. The guideline was developed by a working group in collaboration with the Gynecologic Oncology Society of Canada (GOC), Society of Colposcopists of Canada (SCC), and the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. The literature informing these guidelines was obtained through a systematic review of relevant literature by a multi-step search process led by an information specialist. The literature was reviewed up to July 2021 with manual searches of relevant national guidelines and more recent publications. The quality of the evidence and strength of recommendations were developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The intended users of this guideline include primary care providers, gynecologists, colposcopists, screening programs, and healthcare facilities. The implementation of the recommendations will ensure an optimum implementation of HPV testing with a focus on the management of positive results. Recommendations for appropriate care for underserved and marginalized groups are made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Zigras
- Trillium Health Partners, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2, Canada
| | - Marie-Hélène Mayrand
- Département d'obstétrique-gynécologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Celine Bouchard
- Clinique de Researche en Sante des femmes, Quebec City, QC G1V 3M7, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada
| | - Lua Eiriksson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Chelsea Almadin
- Health Innovation and Evaluation Hub, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, QC H3Z 2H5, Canada
| | - Sarah Kean
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Winnipeg, MB R3J 3T7, Canada
| | - Erin Dean
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Winnipeg, MB R3J 3T7, Canada
| | - Unjali Malhotra
- Office of the Chief Medical Officer, First Nations Health Authority, West Vancouver, BC V7T 1A2, Canada
| | - Nicole Todd
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology UBC, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E1, Canada
| | - Daniel Fontaine
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Valley Regional Hospital, Kentville, NS B4N 5E3, Canada
| | - James Bentley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Fujita M, Nagashima K, Shimazu M, Suzuki M, Tauchi I, Sakuma M, Yamamoto S, Hanaoka H, Shozu M, Tsuruoka N, Kasai T, Hata A. Acceptability of self-sampling human papillomavirus test for cervical cancer screening in Japan: A questionnaire survey in the ACCESS trial. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286909. [PMID: 37289798 PMCID: PMC10249862 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In terms of medical policy for cervical cancer prevention, Japan lags far behind other industrialized countries. We initiated a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the self-sampling human papillomavirus (HPV) test as a tool to raise screening uptake and detection of pre-cancer. This study was conducted to explore the acceptability and preference of self-sampling using a subset of the data from this trial. METHODS A pre-invitation letter was sent to eligible women, aged 30-59 years who had not undergone cervical cancer screening for three or more years. After excluding those who declined to participate in this trial, the remaining women were assigned to the self-sampling and control groups. A second invitation letter was sent to the former group, and those wanting to undergo the self-sampling test ordered the kit. A self-sampling HPV kit, consent form, and a self-administered questionnaire were sent to participants who ordered the test. RESULTS Of the 7,340 participants in the self-sampling group, 1,196 (16.3%) administered the test, and 1,192 (99.7%) answered the questionnaire. Acceptability of the test was favorable; 75.3-81.3% of participants agreed with positive impressions (easy, convenient, and clarity of instruction), and 65.1-77.8% disagreed with negative impressions (painful, uncomfortable, and embarrassing). However, only 21.2% were confident in their sampling procedure. Willingness to undergo screening with a self-collected sample was significantly higher than that with a doctor-collected sample (89.3% vs. 49.1%; p<0.001). Willingness to undergo screening with a doctor-collected sample was inversely associated with age and duration without screening (both p<0.001), but that with a self-collected sample was not associated. CONCLUSIONS Among women who used the self-sampling HPV test, high acceptability was confirmed, while concerns about self-sampling procedures remained. Screening with a self-collected sample was preferred over a doctor-collected sample and the former might alleviate disparities in screening rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misuzu Fujita
- Department of Health Research, Chiba Foundation for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Public Health, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kengo Nagashima
- Biostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Research Center for Medical and Health Data Science, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tachikawa, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minobu Shimazu
- Clinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Misae Suzuki
- Municipal Health Center, Department of Health and Welfare, Ichihara City, Ichihara, Chiba, Japan
| | - Ichiro Tauchi
- Municipal Health Center, Department of Health and Welfare, Ichihara City, Ichihara, Chiba, Japan
| | - Miwa Sakuma
- Municipal Health Center, Department of Health and Welfare, Ichihara City, Ichihara, Chiba, Japan
| | - Setsuko Yamamoto
- Municipal Health Center, Department of Health and Welfare, Ichihara City, Ichihara, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideki Hanaoka
- Clinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Makio Shozu
- Departments of Reproductive Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Tokuzo Kasai
- Department of Health Research, Chiba Foundation for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Chiba, Japan
| | - Akira Hata
- Department of Health Research, Chiba Foundation for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Chiba, Japan
- Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Deffieux X, Rousset-Jablonski C, Gantois A, Brillac T, Maruani J, Maitrot-Mantelet L, Mignot S, Gaucher L, Athiel Y, Baffet H, Bailleul A, Bernard V, Bourdon M, Cardaillac C, Carneiro Y, Chariot P, Corroenne R, Dabi Y, Dahlem L, Frank S, Freyens A, Grouthier V, Hernandez I, Iraola E, Lambert M, Lauchet N, Legendre G, Le Lous M, Louis-Vahdat C, Martinat Sainte-Beuve A, Masson M, Matteo C, Pinton A, Sabbagh E, Sallee C, Thubert T, Heron I, Pizzoferrato AC, Artzner F, Tavenet A, Le Ray C, Fauconnier A. [Pelvic exam in gynecology and obstetrics: Guidelines for clinical practice]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2023; 51:297-330. [PMID: 37258002 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide guidelines for the pelvic clinical exam in gynecology and obstetrics. MATERIAL AND METHODS A multidisciplinary experts consensus committee of 45 experts was formed, including representatives of patients' associations and users of the health system. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any funding. The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized. METHODS The committee studied 40 questions within 4 fields for symptomatic or asymptomatic women (emergency conditions, gynecological consultation, gynecological diseases, obstetrics, and pregnancy). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology. RESULTS The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 27 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 17 present a strong agreement, 7 a weak agreement and 3 an expert consensus agreement. Thirteen questions resulted in an absence of recommendation due to lack of evidence in the literature. CONCLUSIONS The need to perform clinical examination in gynecological and obstetrics patients was specified in 27 pre-defined situations based on scientific evidence. More research is required to investigate the benefit in other cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Deffieux
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, 92140 Clamart, France.
| | - Christine Rousset-Jablonski
- Département de chirurgie, Centre Léon Bérard, 28, rue Laënnec, 69008 Lyon, France; Inserm U1290, Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France; Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Adrien Gantois
- Collège national des sages-femmes de France hébergé au Réseau de santé périnatal parisien (RSPP), 75010 Paris, France
| | | | - Julia Maruani
- Cabinet médical, 6, rue Docteur-Albert-Schweitzer, 13006 Marseille, France
| | - Lorraine Maitrot-Mantelet
- Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), hôpital universitaire Paris centre (HUPC), 75014 Paris, France
| | | | - Laurent Gaucher
- Collège national des sages-femmes de France, CNSF, 75010 Paris, France; Public Health Unit, hospices civils de Lyon, 69500 Bron, France; Inserm U1290, Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France; Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, 1206 Genève, Suisse
| | - Yoann Athiel
- Maternité Port-Royal, groupe hospitalier Paris Centre, AP-HP, université Paris cité, FHU Prema, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Hortense Baffet
- Service de gynécologie médicale, orthogénie et sexologie, CHU de Lille, université de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Alexandre Bailleul
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier de Poissy Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 78300 Poissy, France; Équipe RISCQ « Risques cliniques et sécurité en santé des femmes et en santé périnatale », université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Valérie Bernard
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, gynécologie médicale et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, centre hospitalo-universitaire Pellegrin, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Unité Inserm 1312, université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux Institute of Oncology, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Mathilde Bourdon
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique II et médecine de la reproduction, université Paris cité, AP-HP, centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) Cochin Port-Royal, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Claire Cardaillac
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France
| | | | - Patrick Chariot
- Département de médecine légale et sociale, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 93140 Bondy, France; Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire sur les enjeux sociaux, UMR 8156-997, UFR SMBH, université Sorbonne Paris Nord, 93000 Bobigny, France
| | - Romain Corroenne
- Service de gynécologue-obstétrique, CHU d'Angers, 49000 Angers, France
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Sorbonne université-AP-HP-hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Laurence Dahlem
- Département universitaire de médecine générale, faculté de médecine, université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Sophie Frank
- Service d'oncogénétique, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Anne Freyens
- Département universitaire de médecine générale (DUMG), université Paul-Sabatier, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Virginie Grouthier
- Service d'endocrinologie, diabétologie, nutrition et d'endocrinologie des gonades, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, Centre Hospitalo-universitaire régional de Bordeaux, 31000 Bordeaux, France; Université de Bordeaux, Inserm U1034, Biology of Cardiovascular Diseases, Pessac, France
| | - Isabelle Hernandez
- Collège national des sages-femmes de France hébergé au Réseau de santé périnatal parisien (RSPP), 75010 Paris, France
| | - Elisabeth Iraola
- Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire sur les enjeux sociaux (IRIS), UMR 8156-997, CNRS U997 Inserm EHESS UP13 UFR SMBH, université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Paris, France; Direction de la protection maternelle et infantile et promotion de la santé, conseil départemental du Val-de-Marne, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Marie Lambert
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, gynécologie médicale et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, centre hospitalo-universitaire Pellegrin, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Nadege Lauchet
- Groupe médical François-Perrin, 9, rue François-Perrin, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Guillaume Legendre
- Service de gynécologue-obstétrique, CHU Angers, 49000 Angers, France; UMR_S1085, université d'Angers, CHU d'Angers, université de Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), Angers, France
| | - Maela Le Lous
- Université de Rennes 1, Inserm, LTSI - UMR 1099, 35000 Rennes, France; Département de gynécologie et obstétrique, CHU de Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Christine Louis-Vahdat
- Cabinet de gynécologie et obstétrique, 126, boulevard Saint-Germain, 75006 Paris, France
| | | | - Marine Masson
- Département de médecine générale, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Caroline Matteo
- Ecole de maïeutique, Aix Marseille Université, 13015 Marseille, France
| | - Anne Pinton
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Trousseau, AP-HP, 26, avenue du Dr-Arnold-Netter, 75012 Paris, France; Sorbonne université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Emmanuelle Sabbagh
- Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), hôpital universitaire Paris centre (HUPC), 75014 Paris, France
| | - Camille Sallee
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Mère-Enfant, CHU de Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Thibault Thubert
- Service de gynecologie-obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France; EA 4334, laboratoire mouvement, interactions, performance (MIP), Nantes université, 44322 Nantes, France
| | - Isabelle Heron
- Service d'endocrinologie, université de Rouen, hôpital Charles-Nicolle, 76000 Rouen, France; Cabinet médical, Clinique Mathilde, 76100 Rouen, France
| | - Anne-Cécile Pizzoferrato
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital universitaire de La Miletrie, 86000 Poitiers, France; Inserm CIC 1402, université de Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - France Artzner
- Ciane, Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance, c/o Anne Evrard, 101, rue Pierre-Corneille, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - Arounie Tavenet
- Endofrance, Association de lutte contre l'endométriose, 3, rue de la Gare, 70190 Tresilley, France
| | - Camille Le Ray
- Maternité Port-Royal, groupe hospitalier Paris Centre, AP-HP, université Paris cité, FHU Prema, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Fauconnier
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier de Poissy Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 78300 Poissy, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lee SHF, Abdul Rahim N, Ong SK, Abdul Rahman H, Naing L. Survival of cervical cancer patients in Brunei Darussalam: 2002-2017. Heliyon 2023; 9:e16080. [PMID: 37215873 PMCID: PMC10192735 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Cervical cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths among Bruneian women. This study aims to investigate the survival rate of cervical cancer patients in Brunei Darussalam between 2002 and 2017, to compare survival of cervical cancer patients between two periods: 2002-2009 and 2010-2017 and to identify prognostic factors of cervical cancer. Methods A retrospective cohort study on cervical cancer patients registered in Brunei Darussalam Cancer Registry between 2002 and 2017. De-identified data from the registry was extracted and survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test and multiple Cox regression analysis. Results The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of cervical cancer patients in Brunei Darussalam were 87.3%, 77.4% and 72.5% respectively from 2002 to 2017. The 5-year survival rate for 2002-2009 and 2010-2017 were 77.3% and 69.1% respectively. The risk of mortality was significantly higher in 2010-2017 compared to 2002-2009 after adjusting for variables (Adjusted HR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.40; p = 0.019). Patients with distant cancer (Adjusted HR = 11.21; 95% CI: 6.18, 20.30; p < 0.001) had the highest risk of mortality. Conclusion The 5-year survival rate of cervical cancer patients in Brunei Darussalam was 72.5%, which ranks relatively high globally. However, increased mortality among elderly patients, and patients diagnosed with cervical cancers at the later stages, calls for public health efforts to raise awareness, early detection, and disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley HF. Lee
- PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Tungku Link Road, BE1410, Brunei Darussalam
| | - Nurlaylasahira Abdul Rahim
- PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Tungku Link Road, BE1410, Brunei Darussalam
- School of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
| | - Sok King Ong
- NCD Prevention Unit, Ministry of Health, Commonwealth Drive, BB3910, Brunei Darussalam
| | - Hanif Abdul Rahman
- PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Tungku Link Road, BE1410, Brunei Darussalam
- School of Nursing and Statistics Online Computational Resource, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
| | - Lin Naing
- PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Tungku Link Road, BE1410, Brunei Darussalam
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Zammit C, Creagh N, Nightingale C, McDermott T, Saville M, Brotherton J, Kelaher M. 'I'm a bit of a champion for it actually': qualitative insights into practitioner-supported self-collection cervical screening among early adopting Victorian practitioners in Australia. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2023; 24:e31. [PMID: 37185205 PMCID: PMC10156465 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423623000191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-collection for cervical screening has been available in the Australian National Cervical Screening Program since 2017 and is now available to all people as an option for cervical screening through a practitioner-supported model. Documenting early adopting practitioner experiences with self-collection as a mechanism to engage people in cervical screening is crucial to informing its continuing roll-out and implementation in other health systems. AIM This study aimed to describe the experiences of practitioners in Victoria, Australia, who used human papillomavirus (HPV)-based self-collection cervical screening during the first 17 months of its availability. METHODS Interviews (n = 18) with practitioners from Victoria, who offered self-collection to their patients between December 2017 and April 2019, analysed using template analysis. FINDINGS Practitioners were overwhelmingly supportive of self-collection cervical screening because it was acceptable to their patients and addressed patients' barriers to screening. Practitioners perceived that knowledge and awareness of self-collection were variable among the primary care workforce, with some viewing self-collection to be inferior to clinician-collected screening. Practitioners championed self-collection at an individual level, with the extent of practice-level implementation depending on resourcing. Concerns regarding supporting the follow-up of self-collected HPV positive patients were noted. Other practical barriers included gaining timely, accurate screening histories from the National Cancer Screening Register to assess eligibility. Practitioners' role surrounded facilitating the choice between screening tests through a patient-centred approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Zammit
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Level 4 207 Bouverie Street Carlton, Melbourne, VIC3053, Australia
| | - Nicola Creagh
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Level 4 207 Bouverie Street Carlton, Melbourne, VIC3053, Australia
| | - Claire Nightingale
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Level 4 207 Bouverie Street Carlton, Melbourne, VIC3053, Australia
| | - Tracey McDermott
- Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, 265 Faraday Street Carlton, Melbourne, VIC3053, Australia (formally known as VCS Foundation)
| | - Marion Saville
- Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, 265 Faraday Street Carlton, Melbourne, VIC3053, Australia (formally known as VCS Foundation)
| | - Julia Brotherton
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Level 4 207 Bouverie Street Carlton, Melbourne, VIC3053, Australia
| | - Margaret Kelaher
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Level 4 207 Bouverie Street Carlton, Melbourne, VIC3053, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Dzobo M, Dzinamarira T, Maluleke K, Jaya ZN, Kgarosi K, Mashamba-Thompson TP. Mapping evidence on the acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e062090. [PMID: 37085299 PMCID: PMC10124230 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this scoping review was to map evidence on the acceptability of self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing (HPVSS) for cervical cancer screening among women in the sub-Saharan Africa region. DESIGN Scoping review. METHODS Using Arksey and O'Malley's framework, we searched Scopus, PubMed, Medline Ovid, Cochrane and Web of Science databases for evidence on the acceptability of HPVSS among women aged 25 years and older published between January 2011 and July 2021. We included studies that reported evidence on the acceptability of HPVSS for cervical cancer screening. Review articles and protocols were excluded. We also searched for evidence from grey literature sources such as dissertations/theses, conference proceedings, websites of international organisations such as WHO and relevant government reports. Two reviewers independently performed the extraction using a pre-designed Excel spreadsheet and emerging themes were narratively summarised. RESULTS The initial search retrieved 1018 articles. Of these, 19 articles were eligible and included in the review. The following themes emerged from the included articles: acceptability of HPVSS; lack of self-efficacy to perform HPVSS, complications when performing HPVSS, preferences for provider sampling or assistance; setting of HPVSS; HPVSS by vulnerable populations. CONCLUSION Evidence shows that HPVSS is highly acceptable for cervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa. Further research exploring the acceptability of HPVSS among women residing in rural areas is required, as well as studies to determine women's preferences for HPVSS intervention including the preferred type of sampling devices. Knowledge on the acceptability and preferences for HPVSS is important in designing women-centred interventions that have the potential to increase screening coverage and participation in cervical cancer screening programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Dzobo
- School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria Faculty of Health Sciences, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Tafadzwa Dzinamarira
- School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria Faculty of Health Sciences, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Kuhlula Maluleke
- School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria Faculty of Health Sciences, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Ziningi Nobuhle Jaya
- School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria Faculty of Health Sciences, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Kabelo Kgarosi
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zhao XL, Zhao S, Xia CF, Hu SY, Duan XZ, Liu ZH, Wang YY, You TT, Gao M, Qiao YL, Basu P, Zhao FH. Cost-effectiveness of the screen-and-treat strategies using HPV test linked to thermal ablation for cervical cancer prevention in China: a modeling study. BMC Med 2023; 21:149. [PMID: 37069602 PMCID: PMC10111823 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-02840-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-sampling HPV test and thermal ablation are effective tools to increase screening coverage and treatment compliance for accelerating cervical cancer elimination. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of their combined strategies to inform accessible, affordable, and acceptable cervical cancer prevention strategies. METHODS We developed a hybrid model to evaluate costs, health outcomes, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of six screen-and-treat strategies combining HPV testing (self-sampling or physician-sampling), triage modalities (HPV genotyping, colposcopy or none) and thermal ablation, from a societal perspective. A designated initial cohort of 100,000 females born in 2015 was considered. Strategies with an ICER less than the Chinese gross domestic product (GDP) per capita ($10,350) were considered highly cost-effective. RESULTS Compared with current strategies in China (physician-HPV with genotype or cytology triage), all screen-and-treat strategies are cost-effective and self-HPV without triage is optimal with the most incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained (220 to 440) in rural and urban China. Each screen-and-treat strategy based on self-collected samples is cost-saving compared with current strategies (-$818,430 to -$3540) whereas more costs are incurred using physician-collected samples compared with current physician-HPV with genotype triage (+$20,840 to +$182,840). For screen-and-treat strategies without triage, more costs (+$9404 to +$380,217) would be invested in the screening and treatment of precancerous lesions rather than the cancer treatment compared with the current screening strategies. Notably, however, more than 81.6% of HPV-positive women would be overtreated. If triaged with HPV 7 types or HPV16/18 genotypes, 79.1% or 67.2% (respectively) of HPV-positive women would be overtreated with fewer cancer cases avoided (19 cases or 69 cases). CONCLUSIONS Screen-and-treat strategy using self-sampling HPV test linked to thermal ablation could be the most cost-effective for cervical cancer prevention in China. Additional triage with quality-assured performance could reduce overtreatment and remains highly cost-effective compared with current strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue-Lian Zhao
- Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shuang Zhao
- Department of Clinical Trial Research Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Chang-Fa Xia
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shang-Ying Hu
- Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xian-Zhi Duan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi-Hua Liu
- Affiliated Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yue-Yun Wang
- Affiliated Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Ting-Ting You
- Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Meng Gao
- Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - You-Lin Qiao
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Partha Basu
- Early Detection, Prevention & Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Fang-Hui Zhao
- Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gottschlich A, Payne BA, Trawin J, Albert A, Jeronimo J, Mitchell-Foster S, Mithani N, Namugosa R, Naguti P, Pedersen H, Rawat A, Simelela PN, Singer J, Smith LW, van Niekerk D, Orem J, Nakisige C, Ogilvie G. Community-integrated self-collected HPV-based cervix screening in a low-resource rural setting: a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial. Nat Med 2023; 29:927-935. [PMID: 37037880 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02288-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
Effective approaches to improve coverage of self-collected human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervix screening (SCS) as well as attendance at treatment for HPV-positive participants are needed to inform policy on optimal integration of cervical cancer screening programs within existing infrastructure in low-resource settings. ASPIRE Mayuge was a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in rural Mayuge district, Uganda, comparing the superiority of two recruitment implementation strategies for SCS: Door-to-Door versus Community Health Day. Villages were randomized (unblinded) to a strategy, and participants aged 25-49 years with no previous history of hysterectomy or treatment for cervical cancer or pre-cancer were eligible. Participants completed a survey and participated in SCS. The primary outcome was rate of attendance at treatment after a positive SCS. The trial randomized 31 villages and 2,019 participants included in these analyses (Door-to-Door: 16 clusters, 1,055 participants; Community Health Day: 15 clusters, 964 participants). Among HPV-positive participants, attendance at treatment rates were 75% (Door-to-Door) and 67% (Community Health Day) (P = 0.049). Participants in the Community Health Day intervention were less likely to attend treatment compared to Door-to-Door (risk ratio = 0.78, 95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.96). No adverse events were reported. Policymakers in low-resource settings can use these results to guide implementation of SCS programs. ISRCTN registration: 12767014 . ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04000503 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gottschlich
- BC Women's Hospital and Health Center, Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
- University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Beth A Payne
- BC Women's Hospital and Health Center, Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jessica Trawin
- BC Women's Hospital and Health Center, Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Arianne Albert
- BC Women's Hospital and Health Center, Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Sheona Mitchell-Foster
- BC Women's Hospital and Health Center, Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Northern Medical Program, University of British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nadia Mithani
- BC Women's Hospital and Health Center, Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Heather Pedersen
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Angeli Rawat
- University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Joel Singer
- University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Laurie W Smith
- BC Women's Hospital and Health Center, Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dirk van Niekerk
- University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Gina Ogilvie
- BC Women's Hospital and Health Center, Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Blomberg K, Hälleberg-Nyman M. Experiences of human papillomavirus self-sampling by women >60 years old: A qualitative study. Health Expect 2023; 26:818-826. [PMID: 36633121 PMCID: PMC10010077 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling has shown to be acceptable and feasible across cultures and effective in reaching women who do not participate in regular cervical cancer screening. However, most of these studies have included younger women. There is a lack of knowledge of how older women reason about HPV self-sampling. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe how women (>60 years old) experience the offering of self-sampling of HPV, compared to having a sample collected by a healthcare professional. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS The study had a qualitative explorative design. Four focus group discussions were conducted with women 60-69 years old (n = 22). Data were analysed using principles of interpretive description. RESULTS Five themes were identified: self-sampling-convenient and without pain, lack of knowledge, worries related to HPV self-sampling, need for information and taking a societal perspective. CONCLUSION Women aged >60 years found that HPV self-sampling was convenient and easy to perform. Further, they stressed the importance of being able to remain in the screening programme in advanced age and that self-sampling could be a possible solution. This study also revealed a lack of knowledge among women in this age group regarding HPV infection, how the disease is transmitted and its relation to cervical cancer. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Women who had performed HPV self-sampling participated in the focus group discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Blomberg
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Maria Hälleberg-Nyman
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|