1
|
Oermann MH, Bailey HE, Carter-Templeton H, Condy C, Wrigley J, Ledbetter LS. Bibliometric analysis of nursing education reviews. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY 2024; 139:106217. [PMID: 38676961 DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the number of reviews of nursing education research has increased over the years, bibliometric studies about these reviews are limited. OBJECTIVES The purposes were to: (1) examine the number of reviews of nursing education research published from 2018 through 2022, (2) identify journals publishing these reviews, (3) identify the types and topics of reviews in nursing education, and (4) analyze how these reviews are labeled (standard versus nonstandard). DESIGN This was a bibliometric study of reviews in nursing education. METHODS The search for reviews in nursing education was done using CINAHL Complete via the EBSCO host platform and was limited to articles published in peer reviewed journals. The results were imported into EndNote, and the title or abstract was used to identify the review type. The categorized reviews were then exported into Microsoft Excel. The titles and abstracts were searched to identify reviews in nursing education, resulting in 600 articles analyzed in this study. The topics of the reviews were identified via natural language processing techniques based on the Medical Subject Headings biomedical vocabulary in the manual tags with each article. RESULTS The number of reviews has steadily increased over the years. The top journal in which reviews were published was Nurse Education Today (n = 197). Nearly a quarter (n = 149, 24.8 %) of the reviews were integrative, followed by systematic (n = 117, 19.5 %), scoping (n = 117, 19.5 %), and literature (n = 85, 14.2 %). There were 12 main topics: most reviews were on simulation, followed by critical thinking methods and the academic achievement of nursing students. CONCLUSION This study documented an increase in the number of reviews of nursing education research over the last five years. The most common type was an integrative review, followed by systematic, scoping, and literature. Reviews on simulation were most common.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hannah E Bailey
- John Chambers College of Business and Economics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Leila S Ledbetter
- School of Nursing, Duke University Medical Center Library, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anderson M, van Kessel R, Wood E, Stokes A, Fistein J, Porter I, Mossialos E, Valderas JM. Understanding factors impacting patient-reported outcome measures integration in routine clinical practice: an umbrella review. Qual Life Res 2024:10.1007/s11136-024-03728-7. [PMID: 39023733 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03728-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-report outcome measures (PROMs) have gained widespread support as a mechanism to improve healthcare quality. We aimed to map out key enablers and barriers influencing PROMs implementation strategies in routine clinical practice. METHODS An umbrella review was conducted to identify reviews exploring enablers and barriers related to the integration of PROMs in routine clinical practice from January 2000 to June 2023. Information on key enablers and barriers was extracted and summarised thematically according to the Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS 34 reviews met our criteria for inclusion. Identified reviews highlighted barriers such as limited PROMs awareness among clinicians and patients, perceived low value by clinicians and patients, PROMs that were too complex or difficult for patients to complete, poor usability of PROMs systems, delayed feedback of PROMs data, clinician concerns related to use of PROMs as a performance management tool, patient concerns regarding privacy and security, and resource constraints. Enablers encompassed phased implementation, professional training, stakeholder engagement prior to implementation, clear strategies and goals, 'change champions' to support PROMs implementation, systems to respond to issues raised by PROMs, and integration into patient pathways. No consensus favoured paper or electronic PROMs, yet offering both options to mitigate digital literacy bias and integrating PROMs into electronic health records emerged as important facilitators. CONCLUSIONS The sustainable implementation of PROMs is a complex process that requires multicomponent organisational strategies covering training and guidance, necessary time and resources, roles and responsibilities, and consultation with patients and clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Anderson
- Health Organisation, Policy, Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care & Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
| | - Robin van Kessel
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
- Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Eleanor Wood
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Adam Stokes
- Centre for Global Health, St Georges, University of London, London, UK
| | - Jon Fistein
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ian Porter
- Health Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Elias Mossialos
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jose M Valderas
- Health Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Centre for Research On Health Systems Performance, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nagendrababu V, Gopinath VK, Narasimhan S, Acharya AB, Dummer PMH, Faggion CM. Methodological quality of umbrella reviews in endodontics: A cross-sectional study. Int Endod J 2024. [PMID: 39016048 DOI: 10.1111/iej.14114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In endodontics, the number of umbrella reviews has increased significantly over the last few years, but there is no evidence that they were methodologically sound. The aim of the current study was to appraise the methodological quality of umbrella reviews in endodontics, and to identify possible predictive factors associated with methodological quality. METHODS Umbrella reviews published in the discipline of endodontics until December 2023 were included. The methodological quality of the reviews was evaluated using a checklist consisting of 11 items. Each item in the checklist was evaluated by two independent assessors who assigned a score of '1' if it was fully addressed, '0.5' if it was partially ddressed, and '0' if it was not addressed. Bootstrapped multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine the association between the total scores awarded and five predictor variables (a priori protocol registration, year of publication, number of authors, journal impact factor (IF) and continent of the corresponding author). The statistical significance level was set as 5%. RESULTS A total of 27 reviews were included. Ninety-six per cent of the reviews adequately reported: eligibility criteria for selecting the reviews, details of the reviews, techniques for assessing the risk of bias or methodological quality of the individual systematic reviews they included. Only 30% of the reviews adequately managed overlapping primary studies within individual systematic reviews. Among the five predictors analysed, a priori protocol registration and journals with IFs were associated with significantly greater total methodological quality scores. DISCUSSION Several methodological shortcomings in the umbrella reviews published within the field of endodontics were revealed. Umbrella reviews published in journals with IFs and those with protocols registered a priori had significantly superior methodological quality scores. CONCLUSION In endodontics, authors intending to publish umbrella reviews should consider the limitations revealed in this study and follow the appropriate rules to ensure their reviews comply with the highest standards and provide accurate and dependable information and conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu
- Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Vellore Kannan Gopinath
- Department of Orthodontics, Pediatric and Community Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Anirudh B Acharya
- Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Paul M H Dummer
- School of Dentistry, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Clovis Mariano Faggion
- Department of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cheng C, Christensen M. Interventions Addressing Symptoms in Older Adults with Multimorbidity: An Umbrella Review. J Multidiscip Healthc 2024; 17:3181-3192. [PMID: 39006878 PMCID: PMC11246035 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s452426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
This umbrella review was to synthesize the summarized evidence-based research regarding interventions addressing symptoms in older populations with multimorbidity. Three databases including PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched systematically. The JBI Methodology for Umbrella Reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statements were used to report this review. Six reviews published between 2016 and 2010 were included for analysis. Interventions were mixed and included components on health-related behaviors, body systems or functions, activities and participation domains, and the environment. Outcomes concerning physiological/clinical functioning were most reported. The evidence regarding the symptoms-related interventions was mixed, but all showed promising outcomes compared with usual care or not. To sum up, this umbrella review reveals the lack of strong empirical evidence for the effectiveness of intervention addressing symptoms in older adults with multimorbidity. It highlights the need to evaluate the established approach of interventions further to support this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Cheng
- School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, People’s Republic of China
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, Xuhui, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Martin Christensen
- School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tang D, Tran Y, Lo C, Lee JN, Turner J, McAlpine D, McMahon C, Gopinath B. The Benefits of Cochlear Implantation for Adults: A Systematic Umbrella Review. Ear Hear 2024; 45:801-807. [PMID: 38233980 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The uptake of cochlear implants among adults who could benefit (based on pure-tone audiometry) in developed countries is estimated to be less than 10%. Concerns about potential surgical complications, fear of losing residual hearing, and limited awareness about the benefits of this intervention contribute to the low adoption rate. To enhance quality of life and improve the uptake of cochlear implants, it is essential to have a clear understanding of their benefits. DESIGN This umbrella review aims to summarize the major benefits of cochlear implant usage in adults, by synthesizing findings from published review articles. A comprehensive search of databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar, was conducted. The search was limited to English-language review articles published between 1990 and 2022, focusing on cochlear implant outcomes in at least 5 adults (aged ≥18 years). Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles, and conducted a quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses. RESULTS Forty-two articles were included in this review. There were 15 systematic reviews with meta-analysis, 25 systematic reviews without meta-analysis, and 2 systematic scoping reviews. All 42 articles underwent quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses, of which 40% (n = 17) satisfied 9 out of 11 quality criteria. This umbrella review shows that cochlear implants are associated with improvements in speech perception and recognition as well as improved quality of life and cognition. These benefits are observed in a significant proportion of adults undergoing the procedure, highlighting its effectiveness as a viable intervention for individuals with severe to profound hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS The potential benefits of cochlear implantation appear to outweigh the risks and complications associated with the procedure. It is recommended that adults with severe to profound hearing loss in particular, engage in informed discussions with healthcare professionals to consider cochlear implantation as a viable treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Tang
- Macquarie University Hearing Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yvonne Tran
- Macquarie University Hearing Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Charles Lo
- Department of Management, Australian College of Applied Professions, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jien Nien Lee
- Macquarie University Hearing Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jessica Turner
- Macquarie University Hearing Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David McAlpine
- Macquarie University Hearing Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Catherine McMahon
- Macquarie University Hearing Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bamini Gopinath
- Macquarie University Hearing Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Donato H, Donato M. [Review of Reviews (Umbrella Reviews): Step-by-Step Guide]. ACTA MEDICA PORT 2024; 37:547-555. [PMID: 38950608 DOI: 10.20344/amp.21796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
In recent years, as a result of the dramatic increase in the number of systematic reviews, a new type of systematic review, the 'systematic reviews of systematic reviews', also known as umbrella reviews, reviews of reviews, meta-reviews or synthesis of review, was developed. The aim of this article is to provide recommendations on how this type of systematic review should be conducted and reported to ensure its quality and usefulness. These reviews are designed to compile evidence from multiple systematic reviews of interventions into an accessible and usable document and are one of the highest levels of evidence synthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Donato
- Serviço de Documentação e Informação Científica. Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra. Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra. Coimbra; Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade de Coimbra. Coimbra. Portugal
| | - Mariana Donato
- Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia. Unidade Local de Saúde Lisboa Ocidental. Lisboa; NOVA Medical School. Lisboa. Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kang J, Lee H, Park J, Kim HJ, Kwon R, Kim S, Fond G, Boyer L, Rahmati M, Smith L, Nehs CJ, Son Y, Kim S, Lee H, Lee J, Kim MS, Kim T, Yon DK. Comorbid physical health outcomes in patients with bipolar disorder: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Asian J Psychiatr 2024; 99:104138. [PMID: 38991375 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although several meta-analyses have examined the association between bipolar disorder (BD) and its comorbid health outcomes, this evidence has not been comprehensively assembled. OBJECTIVE We aimed to systematically review existing meta-analyses based on multiple physical outcomes and validate the evidence level by examining the existing certainty of evidence. METHODS We systematically searched databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, and CINAHL, for articles published up to July 2023. We included meta-analyses of cohort, case-control, and/or cross-sectional studies investigating any comorbid health outcomes in patients with BD. We conducted quality assessments of the included meta-analysis using AMSTAR2. The credibility of findings was categorized into five levels of class and quality of evidence (CE), including convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or not significant. RESULTS We analyzed 12 meta-analyses, including 145 original articles, covering 14 unique health outcomes with over 60 million participants across 29 countries and five continents. Among 14 health outcomes, BD was significantly associated with eight comorbid health outcomes, including dementia (equivalent odds ratio [eOR], 2.96 [95 % confidence intervals {CI}, 1.69-5.17]; CE=suggestive), Parkinson's disease (3.35 [1.72-6.53]; CE=suggestive), asthma (1.86 [1.42-2.42]; CE=weak), toxoplasmosis (1.69 [1.21-2.37]; CE=weak), hypertension (1.28 [1.02-1.60]; CE=convincing), breast cancer (1.33 [1.15-1.55]; CE=weak), obesity (1.64 [1.30-1.99]; CE=suggestive), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (1.98 [1.55-2.52]; CE=weak). CONCLUSION Individuals with BD are predisposed to numerous comorbid physical conditions, though these links are supported by various evidence levels and necessitate further studies. It is imperative that physicians be aware of these potential comorbidities in patients with BD and take proactive measures to manage them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiseung Kang
- Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hyeri Lee
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Regulatory Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jaeyu Park
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Regulatory Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyeon Jin Kim
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Regulatory Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Rosie Kwon
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Regulatory Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sunyoung Kim
- Department of Family Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Guillaume Fond
- Research Centre on Health Services and Quality of Life, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Boyer
- Research Centre on Health Services and Quality of Life, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Masoud Rahmati
- Research Centre on Health Services and Quality of Life, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France; Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran; Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Vali-E-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran
| | - Lee Smith
- Centre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christa J Nehs
- Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yejun Son
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Precision Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Soeun Kim
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Precision Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hayeon Lee
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, South Korea
| | - Jinseok Lee
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, South Korea
| | - Min Seo Kim
- Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Tae Kim
- Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, South Korea.
| | - Dong Keon Yon
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Regulatory Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Precision Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Huneke NTM, Amin J, Baldwin DS, Bellato A, Brandt V, Chamberlain SR, Correll CU, Eudave L, Garner M, Gosling CJ, Hill CM, Hou R, Howes OD, Ioannidis K, Köhler-Forsberg O, Marzulli L, Reed C, Sinclair JMA, Singh S, Solmi M, Cortese S. Placebo effects in randomized trials of pharmacological and neurostimulation interventions for mental disorders: An umbrella review. Mol Psychiatry 2024:10.1038/s41380-024-02638-x. [PMID: 38914807 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02638-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
There is a growing literature exploring the placebo response within specific mental disorders, but no overarching quantitative synthesis of this research has analyzed evidence across mental disorders. We carried out an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of biological treatments (pharmacotherapy or neurostimulation) for mental disorders. We explored whether placebo effect size differs across distinct disorders, and the correlates of increased placebo effects. Based on a pre-registered protocol, we searched Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE, and Web of Knowledge up to 23.10.2022 for systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses reporting placebo effect sizes in psychopharmacological or neurostimulation RCTs. Twenty meta-analyses, summarising 1,691 RCTs involving 261,730 patients, were included. Placebo effect size varied, and was large in alcohol use disorder (g = 0.90, 95% CI [0.70, 1.09]), depression (g = 1.10, 95% CI [1.06, 1.15]), restless legs syndrome (g = 1.41, 95% CI [1.25, 1.56]), and generalized anxiety disorder (d = 1.85, 95% CI [1.61, 2.09]). Placebo effect size was small-to-medium in obsessive-compulsive disorder (d = 0.32, 95% CI [0.22, 0.41]), primary insomnia (g = 0.35, 95% CI [0.28, 0.42]), and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (standardized mean change = 0.33, 95% CI [0.22, 0.44]). Correlates of larger placebo response in multiple mental disorders included later publication year (opposite finding for ADHD), younger age, more trial sites, larger sample size, increased baseline severity, and larger active treatment effect size. Most (18 of 20) meta-analyses were judged 'low' quality as per AMSTAR-2. Placebo effect sizes varied substantially across mental disorders. Future research should explore the sources of this variation. We identified important gaps in the literature, with no eligible systematic reviews/meta-analyses of placebo response in stress-related disorders, eating disorders, behavioural addictions, or bipolar mania.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan T M Huneke
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
| | - Jay Amin
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - David S Baldwin
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- University Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Alessio Bellato
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih, Malaysia
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Valerie Brandt
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Clinic of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Samuel R Chamberlain
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Christoph U Correll
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
- Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Luis Eudave
- Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Matthew Garner
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Corentin J Gosling
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Université Paris Nanterre, DysCo Lab, F-92000, Nanterre, France
- Université de Paris, Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, F-92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Catherine M Hill
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Department of Sleep Medicine, Southampton Children's Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Ruihua Hou
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Oliver D Howes
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- H Lundbeck A/s, Iveco House, Watford, UK
- Institute of Clinical Sciences (ICS), Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Konstantinos Ioannidis
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Ole Köhler-Forsberg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Psychosis Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital-Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lucia Marzulli
- Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience (DIBRAIN), University of Studies of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Claire Reed
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Julia M A Sinclair
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Satneet Singh
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Marco Solmi
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Department of Mental Health, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI) Clinical Epidemiology Program, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Samuele Cortese
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- DiMePRe-J-Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine-Jonic Area, University "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
- Hassenfeld Children's Hospital at NYU Langone, New York University Child Study Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
He S, Zeng H. Comment on "An umbrella review of the diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing in infectious diseases": appealing results, but caution is still necessary. Int J Clin Pharm 2024:10.1007/s11096-024-01764-4. [PMID: 38896392 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01764-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sike He
- Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hao Zeng
- Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chua S, Todd A, Reeve E, Smith SM, Fox J, Elsisi Z, Hughes S, Husband A, Langford A, Merriman N, Harris JR, Devine B, Gray SL. Deprescribing interventions in older adults: An overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0305215. [PMID: 38885276 PMCID: PMC11182547 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The growing deprescribing field is challenged by a lack of consensus around evidence and knowledge gaps. The objective of this overview of systematic reviews was to summarize the review evidence for deprescribing interventions in older adults. METHODS 11 databases were searched from 1st January 2005 to 16th March 2023 to identify systematic reviews. We summarized and synthesized the results in two steps. Step 1 summarized results reported by the included reviews (including meta-analyses). Step 2 involved a narrative synthesis of review results by outcome. Outcomes included medication-related outcomes (e.g., medication reduction, medication appropriateness) or twelve other outcomes (e.g., mortality, adverse events). We summarized outcomes according to subgroups (patient characteristics, intervention type and setting) when direct comparisons were available within the reviews. The quality of included reviews was assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2). RESULTS We retrieved 3,228 unique citations and assessed 135 full-text articles for eligibility. Forty-eight reviews (encompassing 17 meta-analyses) were included. Thirty-one of the 48 reviews had a general deprescribing focus, 16 focused on specific medication classes or therapeutic categories and one included both. Twelve of 17 reviews meta-analyzed medication-related outcomes (33 outcomes: 25 favored the intervention, 7 found no difference, 1 favored the comparison). The narrative synthesis indicated that most interventions resulted in some evidence of medication reduction while for other outcomes we found primarily no evidence of an effect. Results were mixed for adverse events and few reviews reported adverse drug withdrawal events. Limited information was available for people with dementia, frailty and multimorbidity. All but one review scored low or critically low on quality assessment. CONCLUSION Deprescribing interventions likely resulted in medication reduction but evidence on other outcomes, in particular relating to adverse events, or in vulnerable subgroups or settings was limited. Future research should focus on designing studies powered to examine harms, patient-reported outcomes, and effects on vulnerable subgroups. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020178860.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiyun Chua
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Adam Todd
- Newcastle University, School of Pharmacy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
- NIHR Patient Safety Research Collaborative, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Reeve
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Susan M. Smith
- Discipline of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Julia Fox
- School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Zizi Elsisi
- School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Stephen Hughes
- School of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrew Husband
- Newcastle University, School of Pharmacy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
- NIHR Patient Safety Research Collaborative, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Aili Langford
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Niamh Merriman
- Discipline of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jeffrey R. Harris
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Beth Devine
- School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Shelly L. Gray
- School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Plein Center for Geriatric Pharmacy Research, Education and Outreach, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Heidar Alizadeh A, Nurchis MC, Garlasco J, Mara A, Pascucci D, Damiani G, Gianino MM. Pediatric post COVID-19 condition: an umbrella review of the most common symptoms and associated factors. Eur J Public Health 2024; 34:517-523. [PMID: 38411398 PMCID: PMC11161168 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the long-term consequences of the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are yet to be fully comprehended, a syndrome symptomatically akin to the COVID-19 disease has been defined, for children and adolescents, in February 2023 by the World Health Organization (WHO) as 'post COVID-19 condition' (PCC). Potential consequences of COVID-19 that affect developmental milestones in children and adolescents should be comprehended in their magnitude and duration. The aim is to investigate the most common symptoms and predictors or risk factors for pediatric PCC. METHODS In this umbrella review, the population of interest was defined as children and adolescents from 0 to 19 years old presenting PCC symptoms as defined by the WHO in the International Classification of Diseases. The intervention considered was general follow-up activity to monitor the patients' recovery status. No comparator was chosen, and the outcomes were symptoms of PCC and predictors or risk factors of developing PCC. Methodological quality, risk of bias and the level of overlap between studies were assessed. A random-effects meta-analytic synthesis of respective estimates with inverse variance study weighting was carried out, for the primary studies included by the reviews retrieved, regarding predictors or risk factors reported. RESULTS We identified six eligible systematic reviews, five with meta-analyses, from three databases. The most common symptoms reported were fatigue and respiratory difficulties; female sex and older age were the most reported factors associated with the development of pediatric PCC. CONCLUSIONS A deeper understanding of pediatric PCC requires well-designed and clearly defined prospective studies, symptom differentiation, and adequate follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurora Heidar Alizadeh
- Department of Health Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Mario Cesare Nurchis
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Jacopo Garlasco
- Department of Public Health and Paediatrics, Università di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Alessandro Mara
- Department of Public Health and Paediatrics, Università di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Domenico Pascucci
- Department of Health Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Damiani
- Department of Health Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shrestha S, Iqbal A, Teoh SL, Khanal S, Gan SH, Lee SWH, Paudyal V. Impact of pharmacist-delivered interventions on pain-related outcomes: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Res Social Adm Pharm 2024; 20:34-51. [PMID: 38514293 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pain is a significant healthcare challenge, impacting millions worldwide. Pharmacists have increasingly taken on expanded roles in managing pain, particularly in primary and ambulatory care contexts. This umbrella review aims to systematically evaluate evidence from published systematic reviews that explore the impact of pharmacist-delivered interventions on clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes related to pain. METHODS A systematic search was conducted across six electronic databases, including Ovid Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, CENTRAL, APA PsycINFO, and DARE, from inception until June 2023. Prior to inclusion, two independent reviewers assessed study titles and abstracts. Following inclusion, an assessment of the methodological quality of the included studies was conducted. AMSTAR 2 was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included SRs. RESULTS From 2055 retrieved titles, 11 systematic reviews were included, with 5 out of 11 being meta-analyses. These SRs encompassed diverse pharmacist-led interventions such as education, medication reviews, and multi-component strategies targeting various facets of pain management. These findings showed favorable clinical outcomes, including reduced pain intensity, improved medication management, enhanced overall physical and mental well-being, and reduced hospitalization durations. Significant pain intensity reductions were found due to pharmacists' interventions, with standardized mean differences (SMDs) ranging from -0.76 to -0.22 across different studies and subgroups. Physical functioning improvements were observed, with SMDs ranging from -0.38 to 1.03. Positive humanistic outcomes were also reported, such as increased healthcare provider confidence, patient satisfaction, and quality of life (QoL). QoL improvements were reported, with SMDs ranging from 0.29 to 1.03. Three systematic reviews examined pharmacist interventions' impact on pain-related economic outcomes, highlighting varying cost implications and the need for robust research methodologies to capture costs and benefits. CONCLUSION This umbrella review highlights the effectiveness of pharmacist-delivered interventions in improving clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes related to pain management. Existing evidence emphasises on the need to integrate pharamacists into multi-disciplinary pain management teams. Further research is needed to investigate innovative care models, such as pharmacist-independent prescribing initiatives within collaborative pain management clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil Shrestha
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
| | - Ayesha Iqbal
- Office of Lifelong Learning and the Physician Learning Program, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, AB, T6G1C9, Edmonton, Canada.
| | - Siew Li Teoh
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
| | - Saval Khanal
- Health Economics Consulting, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Bob Champion Research & Education Building, UEA Research Park Rosalind Franklin Rd, NR4 7UQ, Norwich, United Kingdom.
| | - Siew Hua Gan
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
| | - Shaun Wen Huey Lee
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia; School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia; Asian Centre for Evidence Synthesis in Population, Implementation and Clinical Outcomes (PICO), Health and Well Being Cluster, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia; Global Asia in the 21st Century (GA21) Platform, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
| | - Vibhu Paudyal
- School of Pharmacy, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Laitano R, Calzetta L, Matino M, Pistocchini E, Rogliani P. Asthma management with triple ICS/LABA/LAMA combination to reduce the risk of exacerbation: an umbrella review compliant with the PRIOR statement. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2024; 25:1071-1081. [PMID: 38864834 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2366991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION According to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) should be considered as add-on therapy in patients with asthma that remains uncontrolled, despite treatment with medium-dose (MD) or high-dose (HD) inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) combinations. In patients ≥ 18 years, LAMA may be added in triple combination with an ICS and a LABA. To date, the precise efficacy of triple ICS/LABA/LAMA combination remains uncertain concerning the impact on exacerbation risk in patients with uncontrolled asthma. Therefore, an umbrella review was performed to systematically summarize available data on the effect of triple ICS/LABA/LAMA combination on the risk of asthma exacerbation. METHODS An umbrella review has been performed according to the PRIOR statement. RESULTS The overall results obtained from 5 systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that triple ICS/LABA/LAMA combination reduces the risk of asthma exacerbation. HD-ICS showed a greater effect particularly in reducing severe asthma exacerbation, especially in patients with evidence of type 2 inflammation biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this umbrella review suggest an optimization of ICS dose in triple ICS/LABA/LAMA combination, based on the severity of exacerbation and type 2 biomarkers expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rossella Laitano
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Luigino Calzetta
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Respiratory Disease and Lung Function Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Matteo Matino
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Pistocchini
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Rogliani
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kang J, Lee H, Yu S, Lee M, Kim HJ, Kwon R, Kim S, Fond G, Boyer L, Rahmati M, Koyanagi A, Smith L, Nehs CJ, Kim MS, Sánchez GFL, Dragioti E, Kim T, Yon DK. Effects and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation on multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of randomized clinical trials. Mol Psychiatry 2024:10.1038/s41380-024-02624-3. [PMID: 38816583 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02624-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which delivers a direct current to the brain, emerged as a non-invasive potential therapeutic in treating a range of neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. However, a comprehensive quantitative evidence synthesis on the effects of tDCS on a broad range of mental illnesses is lacking. Here, we systematically assess the certainty of the effects and safety of tDCS on several health outcomes using an umbrella review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The methodological quality of each included original meta-analysis was assessed by the A Measurement Tool for Assessing Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2), and the certainty of the evidence for each effect was evaluated with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). We followed an a priori protocol (PROSPERO CRD42023458700). We identified 15 meta-analyses of RCTs (AMSTAR 2; high 3, moderate 3, and low 9) that included 282 original articles, covering 22 unique health endpoints across 22 countries and six continents. From meta-analyses of RCTs supported by very low to high certainty of evidence, it was found that tDCS improved symptoms related to post-stroke, including post-stroke depression scale score (equivalent standardized mean difference [eSMD], 1.61 [95% confidence level, 0.72-2.50]; GRADE=moderate), activities of daily living independence (7.04 [3.41-10.67]; GRADE=high), motor recovery of upper and lower extremity (upper extremity: 0.15 [0.06-0.24], GRADE=high; lower extremity: 0.10 [0.03-0.16], GRADE=high), swallowing performance (GRADE=low), and spasticity (GRADE=moderate). In addition, tDCS had treatment effects on symptoms of several neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder (0.81 [0.44-1.18]; GRADE=high), pain in fibromyalgia (GRADE=low), disease of consciousness (GRADE=low), insight score (GRADE=moderate) and working memory (0.34 [0.01-0.67]; GRADE=high) in schizophrenia, migraine-related pain (-1.52 [-2.91 to -0.13]; GRADE=high), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (reduction in overall symptom severity: 0.24 [0.04-0.45], GRADE=low; reduction in inattention: 0.56 [0.02-1.11], GRADE=low; reduction in impulsivity: 0.28 [0.04-0.51], GRADE=low), depression (GRADE=low), cerebellar ataxia (GRADE=low), and pain (GRADE=very low). Importantly, tDCS induced an increased number of reported cases of treatment-emergent mania or hypomania (0.88 [0.62-1.13]; GRADE=moderate). We found varied levels of evidence for the effects of tDCS with multiple neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions, from very low to high certainty of evidence. tDCS was effective for people with stroke, obsessive-compulsive disorder, fibromyalgia, disease of consciousness, schizophrenia, migraine, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depression, cerebellar ataxia, and pain. Therefore, these findings suggest the benefit of tDCS for several neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders; however, further studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanism and optimize its therapeutic potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiseung Kang
- Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, South Korea
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hyeri Lee
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Regulatory Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seungyeong Yu
- Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, South Korea
| | - Myeongcheol Lee
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Regulatory Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyeon Jin Kim
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Regulatory Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Rosie Kwon
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Regulatory Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sunyoung Kim
- Department of Family Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Guillaume Fond
- Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Marseille, Research Centre on Health Services and Quality of Life, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Boyer
- Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Marseille, Research Centre on Health Services and Quality of Life, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Masoud Rahmati
- Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Marseille, Research Centre on Health Services and Quality of Life, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran
- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Vali-E-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran
| | - Ai Koyanagi
- Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lee Smith
- Centre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christa J Nehs
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Min Seo Kim
- Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Guillermo F López Sánchez
- Division of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Elena Dragioti
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Research Laboratory Psychology of Patients, Families, and Health Professionals, Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Tae Kim
- Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, South Korea.
| | - Dong Keon Yon
- Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
- Department of Regulatory Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kisely S, Herrman H, Chamoli S, Hemachandra D, Lawn S, Bajurny L, Wright N, Mellsop G. Determining the future role of clinical practice guidelines: The experience of Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2024:48674241253475. [PMID: 38761089 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241253475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
There has been recent discussion in Australia and New Zealand concerning the utility of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and the role of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) in their development. The College Board therefore established a Steering Group (SG) to oversee an exploration of options and produce recommendations about contemporary approaches to the development of high-quality evidence-based clinical practice guidance for psychiatry. This paper outlines the SG's conclusions and recommendations, as well as the underlying methods and reasoning. In particular, we discuss best practice and recent developments in the synthesis of research evidence. Account has been taken of the opportunities offered by digital technologies, the proliferation of clinical evidence and awareness of the gains to be made by increased inclusion of lived-experience perspectives. It is recommended that the broader concept of best practice resources (BPRs) as now emphasised in so many fields of service is the most appropriate starting point for the College's role in this area especially as the expertise of the College and its fellows lends itself to the development of a range of BPRs. In conclusion, contemporary guidance needs to be tailored to the requirements of the practitioners seeking it, to articulate the real-world needs and experiences of patients, and to be delivered in a contemporary format that is responsive to rapidly emerging evidence. The experience in Australia and New Zealand may have implications elsewhere for the development of CPGs and BPRs more broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Kisely
- The Princess Alexandra Hospital Southside Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - H Herrman
- Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- The Centre for Youth Mental Health, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - S Chamoli
- Bi-national Faculty of Adult Psychiatry Committee, The Royal Australian & New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP), Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - D Hemachandra
- Department of Psychiatry, Canberra Health Services, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - S Lawn
- Lived Experience Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - L Bajurny
- Policy, Practice, and Research, The Royal Australian & New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP), Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - N Wright
- Policy, Practice, and Research, The Royal Australian & New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP), Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - G Mellsop
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, the University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Garabet R, Melley LE, Sataloff RT. Noninvasive Management of Voice Disorders: An Umbrella Review. J Voice 2024:S0892-1997(24)00099-7. [PMID: 38604901 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess published systematic reviews that discussed noninvasive management of voice disorders. An umbrella review was conducted to collect, organize, and summarize narratively all available pharmacologic and voice therapy interventions. STUDY DESIGN Umbrella review of systematic reviews. METHODS Pertinent systematic reviews were identified by searching Pubmed/Medline and Embase. A primary screen identified studies related to voice. The second round of screening focused on studies that involved noninvasive management of voice disorders such as pharmacologic or voice therapy interventions. Variables of interest included study design, number of studies included in the review, target population, method of intervention, and outcomes. RESULTS Forty-three systematic reviews were eligible and included in the umbrella review. Ten studies focused on pharmacologic interventions, and 33 studies focused on voice therapy. Individual studies included in the systematic reviews ranged from 2-47, with a total of 601 studies overall. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a detailed review of all available systematic reviews on noninvasive management of voice disorders. Explored medications included proton pump inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, antibiotics, corticosteroids, and hormone replacement. Explored voice therapy techniques included hydration, vocal function exercises, laryngeal manual therapy, respiratory exercise, biofeedback, phonation, coping strategies, and others. This may be utilized to guide therapeutic decision-making and identify current gaps in the literature that may warrant future investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Razmig Garabet
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lauren E Melley
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert T Sataloff
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van de Loo M, van Kaam A, Offringa M, Doyle LW, Cooper C, Onland W. Corticosteroids for the prevention and treatment of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 4:CD013271. [PMID: 38597338 PMCID: PMC11005325 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013271.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) remains an important complication of prematurity. Pulmonary inflammation plays a central role in the pathogenesis of BPD, explaining the rationale for investigating postnatal corticosteroids. Multiple systematic reviews (SRs) have summarised the evidence from numerous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating different aspects of administrating postnatal corticosteroids. Besides beneficial effects on the outcome of death or BPD, potential short- and long-term harms have been reported. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this overview was to summarise and appraise the evidence from SRs regarding the efficacy and safety of postnatal corticosteroids in preterm infants at risk of developing BPD. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Epistemonikos for SRs in April 2023. We included all SRs assessing any form of postnatal corticosteroid administration in preterm populations with the objective of ameliorating pulmonary disease. All regimens and comparisons were included. Two review authors independently checked the eligibility of the SRs comparing corticosteroids with placebo, and corticosteroids with different routes of administration and regimens. The included outcomes, considered key drivers in the decision to administer postnatal corticosteroids, were the composite outcome of death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA), its individual components, long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae, sepsis, and gastrointestinal tract perforation. We independently assessed the methodological quality of the included SRs by using AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) and ROBIS (Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews) tools. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We provided a narrative description of the characteristics, methodological quality, and results of the included SRs. MAIN RESULTS We included nine SRs (seven Cochrane, two non-Cochrane) containing 87 RCTs, 1 follow-up study, and 9419 preterm infants, investigating the effects of postnatal corticosteroids to prevent or treat BPD. The quality of the included SRs according to AMSTAR 2 varied from high to critically low. Risk of bias according to ROBIS was low. The certainty of the evidence according to GRADE ranged from very low to moderate. Early initiated systemic dexamethasone (< seven days after birth) likely has a beneficial effect on death or BPD at 36 weeks' PMA (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 0.95; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 16, 95% CI 10 to 41; I2 = 39%; 17 studies; 2791 infants; moderate-certainty evidence) and on BPD at 36 weeks' PMA (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.82; NNTB 13, 95% CI 9 to 21; I2 = 39%; 17 studies; 2791 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). Early initiated systemic hydrocortisone may also have a beneficial effect on death or BPD at 36 weeks' PMA (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99; NNTB 18, 95% CI 9 to 594; I2 = 43%; 9 studies; 1376 infants; low-certainty evidence). However, these benefits are likely accompanied by harmful effects like cerebral palsy or neurosensory disability (dexamethasone) or gastrointestinal perforation (both dexamethasone and hydrocortisone). Late initiated systemic dexamethasone (≥ seven days after birth) may have a beneficial effect on death or BPD at 36 weeks' PMA (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.84; NNTB 5, 95% CI 4 to 9; I2 = 61%; 12 studies; 553 infants; low-certainty evidence), mostly contributed to by a beneficial effect on BPD at 36 weeks' PMA (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.87; NNTB 6, 95% CI 4 to 13; I2 = 14%; 12 studies; 553 infants; low-certainty evidence). No harmful side effects were shown in the outcomes chosen as key drivers to the decision to start or withhold late systemic dexamethasone. No effects, either beneficial or harmful, were found in the subgroup meta-analyses of late hydrocortisone studies. Early initiated inhaled corticosteroids probably have a beneficial effect on death and BPD at 36 weeks' PMA (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.99; NNTB 19, 95% CI not applicable; I2 = 0%; 6 studies; 1285 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), with no apparent adverse effects shown in the SRs. In contrast, late initiated inhaled corticosteroids do not appear to have any benefits or harms. Endotracheal instillation of corticosteroids (budesonide) with surfactant as a carrier likely has a beneficial effect on death or BPD at 36 weeks' PMA (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.74; NNTB 4, 95% CI 3 to 6; I2 = 0%; 2 studies; 381 infants; moderate-certainty evidence) and on BPD at 36 weeks' PMA. No evidence of harmful effects was found. There was little evidence for effects of different starting doses or timing of systemic corticosteroids on death or BPD at 36 weeks' PMA, but potential adverse effects were observed for some comparisons. Lowering the dose might result in a more unfavourable balance of benefits and harms. Moderately early initiated systemic corticosteroids, compared with early systemic corticosteroids, may result in a higher incidence of BPD at 36 weeks' PMA. Pulse dosing instead of continuous dosing may have a negative effect on death and BPD at 36 weeks' PMA. We found no differences for the comparisons of inhaled versus systemic corticosteroids. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This overview summarises the evidence of nine SRs investigating the effect of postnatal corticosteroids in preterm infants at risk for BPD. Late initiated (≥ seven days after birth) systemic administration of dexamethasone is considered an effective intervention to reduce the risk of BPD in infants with a high risk profile for BPD, based on a favourable balance between benefits and harms. Endotracheal instillation of corticosteroids (budesonide) with surfactant as a carrier is a promising intervention, based on the beneficial effect on desirable outcomes without (so far) negative side effects. Pending results of ongoing large, multicentre RCTs investigating both short- and long-term effects, endotracheal instillation of corticosteroids (budesonide) with surfactant as a carrier is not appropriate for clinical practice at present. Early initiated (< seven days after birth) systemic dexamethasone and hydrocortisone and late initiated (≥ seven days after birth) hydrocortisone are considered ineffective interventions, because of an unfavourable balance between benefits and harms. No conclusions are possible regarding early and late inhaled corticosteroids, as more research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moniek van de Loo
- Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anton van Kaam
- Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Martin Offringa
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lex W Doyle
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Newborn Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Chris Cooper
- Cochrane Neonatal Group, Vermont Oxford Network, Burlington, USA
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Wes Onland
- Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Scheerman JFM, Qari AH, Varenne B, Bijwaard H, Swinckels L, Giraudeau N, van Meijel B, Mariño R. A Systematic Umbrella Review of the Effects of Teledentistry on Costs and Oral-Health Outcomes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:407. [PMID: 38673320 PMCID: PMC11050059 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21040407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Teledentistry offers possibilities for improving efficiency and quality of care and supporting cost-effective healthcare systems. This umbrella review aims to synthesize existing systematic reviews on teledentistry and provide a summary of evidence of its clinical- and cost-effectiveness. A comprehensive search strategy involving various teledentistry-related terms, across seven databases, was conducted. Articles published until 24 April 2023 were considered. Two researchers independently reviewed titles, abstracts and full-text articles. The quality of the included reviews was critically appraised with the AMSTAR-2 checklist. Out of 749 studies identified, 10 were included in this umbrella review. Two reviews focusing on oral-health outcomes revealed that, despite positive findings, there is not yet enough evidence for the long-term clinical effectiveness of teledentistry. Ten reviews reported on economic evaluations or costs, indicating that teledentistry is cost-saving. However, these conclusions were based on assumptions due to insufficient evidence on cost-effectiveness. The main limitation of our umbrella review was the critically low quality of the included reviews according to AMSTAR-2 criteria, with many of these reviews basing their conclusions on low-quality studies. This highlights the need for high-quality experimental studies (e.g., RCTs, factorial designs, stepped-wedge designs, SMARTs and MRTs) to assess teledentistry's clinical- and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janneke F. M. Scheerman
- Oral Hygiene, Cluster Health, Sport and Welfare, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Technology Research Group, Cluster Health, Sport and Welfare, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, 2015 CE Haarlem, The Netherlands
- Mental Health Nursing Research Group, Cluster Health, Sport and Welfare, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, 2015 CE Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - Alaa H. Qari
- College of Dental Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24381, Saudi Arabia
| | - Benoit Varenne
- Oral Health Programme, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, Rehabilitation and Disability (NCD), World Health Organization, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland;
| | - Harmen Bijwaard
- Medical Technology Research Group, Cluster Health, Sport and Welfare, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, 2015 CE Haarlem, The Netherlands
- Centre for Safety, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Laura Swinckels
- Oral Hygiene, Cluster Health, Sport and Welfare, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Technology Research Group, Cluster Health, Sport and Welfare, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, 2015 CE Haarlem, The Netherlands
- Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Berno van Meijel
- Mental Health Nursing Research Group, Cluster Health, Sport and Welfare, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, 2015 CE Haarlem, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC) and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, Parnassia Academy, 2552 DH The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Rodrigo Mariño
- Center for Research in Epidemiology, Economics and Oral Public Health (CIEESPO), Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 01145, Chile
- Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Singh MK, Gorelik AJ, Stave C, Gotlib IH. Genetics, epigenetics, and neurobiology of childhood-onset depression: an umbrella review. Mol Psychiatry 2024; 29:553-565. [PMID: 38102485 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-02347-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Depression is a serious and persistent psychiatric disorder that commonly first manifests during childhood. Depression that starts in childhood is increasing in frequency, likely due both to evolutionary trends and to increased recognition of the disorder. In this umbrella review, we systematically searched the extant literature for genetic, epigenetic, and neurobiological factors that contribute to a childhood onset of depression. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, OVID/PsychInfo, and Google Scholar with the following inclusion criteria: (1) systematic review or meta-analysis from a peer-reviewed journal; (2) inclusion of a measure assessing early age of onset of depression; and (3) assessment of neurobiological, genetic, environmental, and epigenetic predictors of early onset depression. Findings from 89 systematic reviews of moderate to high quality suggest that childhood-onset depressive disorders have neurobiological, genetic, environmental, and epigenetic roots consistent with a diathesis-stress theory of depression. This review identified key putative markers that may be targeted for personalized clinical decision-making and provide important insights concerning candidate mechanisms that might underpin the early onset of depression.
Collapse
|
20
|
Jahrami H, Saif Z, Trabelsi K, Ghazzawi H, Pandi-Perumal SR, Seeman MV. An Umbrella Review and a Meta-analysis of Meta-analyses of Disordered Eating Among Medical Students. ALPHA PSYCHIATRY 2024; 25:165-174. [PMID: 38798808 PMCID: PMC11117415 DOI: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Objective To prevent eating disorders in future physicians, this umbrella review and meta-analysis of previous meta-analyses estimates the prevalence of disordered eating (DE) among medical students worldwide and identifies key risk factors. Methods Four databases were searched electronically between their inception and February 1, 2023. The search was later updated to December 31, 2023. Results The search yielded prevalence rates for medical students who scored above established cutoffs on validated assessment measures for DE. These were computed to provide an overall pooled estimate. The data was taken from 2 previous reviews. Both these systematic reviews found a 15.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.7%-15.6%) prevalence rate of DE among medical students. The equivalent Hedges' G = 0.30 (95% CI: 0.29-0.31), the equivalent odds ratio = 1.74 (95% CI: 1.71-1.77), I2 = 97.6%, and the excess of statistical significance is P = .001. The trim and fill adjusted effect size was 16.0% (95% CI: 14.0%-20.0%). Conclusion Because eating disorders put students' safety and well-being at risk and because the health of early-stage physicians is vital to the welfare of a country, early signs of disordered eating must become a priority of medical schools and a signal for effective prevention and intervention. The recommendation is to ensure supportive environments, provide easy access to effective care, and hold clear expectations for student eating behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haitham Jahrami
- Department of Psychiatry, Governmental Hospitals, Manama, Bahrain
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain
| | - Zahra Saif
- Department of Psychiatry, Governmental Hospitals, Manama, Bahrain
| | - Khaled Trabelsi
- High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
- Research Laboratory: Education, Motricity, Sport and Health, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
| | - Hadeel Ghazzawi
- Department of Nutrition and Food Science, The University of Jordan, Agriculture School, Amman, Jordan
| | - Seithikurippu R. Pandi-Perumal
- Division of Research and Development, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
- Saveetha Medical College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Mary V. Seeman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Otero Torres S, Montero Pérez O, Rodríguez Mauriz R, Fort Casamartina E, Fontanals Martínez S, Clopés Estela A. DPYD genotyping and 5-fluoropyrimidine toxicity: An overview of systematic reviews protocol. FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA 2024; 48:T79-T82. [PMID: 38072762 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2023.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The increased risk of severe and life-threatening toxicity in patients with dihydropyridine dehydrogenase deficiency, under treatment with fluoropyrimidines, has been widely studied. An up-to-date overview of systematic reviews summarizing existing literature can add value by highlighting most relevant information and supports decision-making regarding treatment in dihydropyridine dehydrogenase deficient patients. The main objective of this overview is to identify published systematic reviews on the association between germline variations in the DPYD gene and fluoropyrimidine toxicity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This protocol was developed following the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist, and the overview of systematic reviews will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library will be searched from inception to 2023. Systematic reviews irrespective of study designs that analyze the association between germline variations in the DPYD and fluoropyrimidine toxicity will be considered. Methodological quality will be assessed using AMSTAR2 checklist (Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2). Two independent investigators will perform the study selection, quality assessment and data collection. Discrepancies will be solved by a third investigator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Otero Torres
- Departamento de Farmacia, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España.
| | | | - Rosa Rodríguez Mauriz
- Departamento de Farmacia, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España
| | - Eduard Fort Casamartina
- Departamento de Farmacia, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España
| | | | - Ana Clopés Estela
- Departamento de Farmacia, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Torres SO, Pérez OM, Mauriz RR, Casamartina EF, Martínez SF, Estela AC. DPYD genotyping and 5-fluoropyrimidine toxicity: An overview of systematic reviews protocol. FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA 2024; 48:79-82. [PMID: 37758638 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2023.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The increased risk of severe and life-threatening toxicity in patients with dihydropyridine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency, under treatment with fluoropyrimidines, has been widely studied. An up-to-date overview of systematic reviews summarizing existing literature can add value by highlighting most relevant information and supports decision-making regarding treatment in DPD deficient patients. The main objective of this overview of systematic reviews is to identify published systematic reviews on the association between germline variations in the DPYD gene and fluoropyrimidine toxicity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This protocol was developed following the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist, and the overview of systematic reviews will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library will be searched from inception to 2023. Systematic reviews irrespective of study designs that analyze the association between germline variations in the DPYD and fluoropyrimidine toxicity will be considered. Methodological quality will be assessed using AMSTAR2 checklist (Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2). Two independent investigators will perform the study selection, quality assessment, and data collection. Discrepancies will be solved by a third investigator. REGISTRATION DETAILS Registration number in PROSPERO: CRD42023401226.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Otero Torres
- Pharmacy Department, Catalan Institut of Oncology - L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Rosa Rodríguez Mauriz
- Pharmacy Department, Catalan Institut of Oncology - L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Fort Casamartina
- Pharmacy Department, Catalan Institut of Oncology - L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mazumder H, Rimu FH, Shimul MH, Das J, Gain EP, Liaw W, Hossain MM. Maternal health outcomes associated with ambient air pollution: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 914:169792. [PMID: 38199356 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
A growing body of literature demonstrated an association between exposure to ambient air pollution and maternal health outcomes with mixed findings. The objective of this umbrella review was to systematically summarize the global evidence on the effects of air pollutants on maternal health outcomes. We adopted the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting standards for this umbrella review. We conducted a comprehensive search across six major electronic databases and other sources to identify relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) published from the inception of these databases up to June 30, 2023. Out of 2399 records, 20 citations matched all pre-determined eligibility criteria that include SRMAs focusing on exposure to air pollution and its impact on maternal health, reported quantitative measures or summary effects, and published in peer-reviewed journals in the English language. The risk of bias of included SRMAs was evaluated based on the JBI critical appraisal checklist. All SRMAs reported significant positive associations between ambient air pollution and several maternal health outcomes. Specifically, particulate matter (PM), SO2, and NO demonstrated positive associations with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Moreover, PM and NO2 showed a consistent positive relationship with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP) and preeclampsia (PE). Although limited, available evidence highlighted a positive correlation between PM and gestational hypertension (GH) and spontaneous abortion (SAB). Only one meta-analysis reported the effects of air pollution on maternal postpartum depression (PPD) where only PM10 showed a significant positive relationship. Limited studies were identified from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), suggesting evidence gap from the global south. This review necessitates further research on underrepresented regions and communities to strengthen evidence on this critical issue. Lastly, interdisciplinary policymaking and multilevel interventions are needed to alleviate ambient air pollution and associated maternal health disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoimonty Mazumder
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, United States.
| | - Fariha Hoque Rimu
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Monir Hossain Shimul
- Department of Public Health, Daffodil International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Jyoti Das
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States
| | - Easter Protiva Gain
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, United States
| | - Winston Liaw
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health Sciences, Tilman J. Fertitta Family College of Medicine, University of Houston, TX 77204, United States
| | - M Mahbub Hossain
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health Sciences, Tilman J. Fertitta Family College of Medicine, University of Houston, TX 77204, United States; Department of Decision and Information Sciences, C.T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, TX 77204, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cooper RE, Saunders KRK, Greenburgh A, Shah P, Appleton R, Machin K, Jeynes T, Barnett P, Allan SM, Griffiths J, Stuart R, Mitchell L, Chipp B, Jeffreys S, Lloyd-Evans B, Simpson A, Johnson S. The effectiveness, implementation, and experiences of peer support approaches for mental health: a systematic umbrella review. BMC Med 2024; 22:72. [PMID: 38418998 PMCID: PMC10902990 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03260-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peer support for mental health is recommended across international policy guidance and provision. Our systematic umbrella review summarises evidence on the effectiveness, implementation, and experiences of paid peer support approaches for mental health. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, The Campbell Collaboration, and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2012-2022) for reviews of paid peer support interventions for mental health. The AMSTAR2 assessed quality. Results were synthesised narratively, with implementation reported using the CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research). The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022362099). RESULTS We included 35 reviews (426 primary studies, n = 95-40,927 participants): systematic reviews with (n = 13) or without (n = 13) meta-analysis, or with qualitative synthesis (n = 3), scoping reviews (n = 6). Most reviews were low or critically low (97%) quality, one review was high quality. Effectiveness was investigated in 23 reviews. Results were mixed; there was some evidence from meta-analyses that peer support may improve depression symptoms (particularly perinatal depression), self-efficacy, and recovery. Factors promoting successful implementation, investigated in 9 reviews, included adequate training and supervision, a recovery-oriented workplace, strong leadership, and a supportive and trusting workplace culture with effective collaboration. Barriers included lack of time, resources and funding, and lack of recognised peer support worker (PSW) certification. Experiences of peer support were explored in 11 reviews, with 3 overarching themes: (i) what the PSW role can bring, including recovery and improved wellbeing for service users and PSWs; (ii) confusion over the PSW role, including role ambiguity and unclear boundaries; and (iii) organisational challenges and impact, including low pay, negative non-peer staff attitudes, and lack of support and training. CONCLUSIONS Peer support may be effective at improving some clinical outcomes, self-efficacy, and recovery. Certain populations, e.g. perinatal populations, may especially benefit from peer support. Potential strategies to successfully implement PSWs include co-production, clearly defined PSW roles, a receptive hierarchical structure and staff, appropriate PSW and staff training with clinical and/or peer supervision alongside safeguarding. Services could benefit from clear, coproduced, setting specific implementation guidelines for PSW. PSW roles tend to be poorly defined and associations between PSW intervention content and impacts need further investigation. Future research should reflect the priorities of providers/service users involved in peer support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth E Cooper
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Katherine R K Saunders
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Anna Greenburgh
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Prisha Shah
- MHPRU Lived Experience Working Group, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Appleton
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Karen Machin
- MHPRU Lived Experience Working Group, London, UK
| | - Tamar Jeynes
- MHPRU Lived Experience Working Group, London, UK
| | - Phoebe Barnett
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
| | - Sophie M Allan
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Jessica Griffiths
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ruth Stuart
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alan Simpson
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, London, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Labrague LJ. Umbrella Review: Stress Levels, Sources of Stress, and Coping Mechanisms among Student Nurses. NURSING REPORTS 2024; 14:362-375. [PMID: 38391073 PMCID: PMC10885020 DOI: 10.3390/nursrep14010028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Prelicensure nursing students face significant stress from their education and clinical placements, highlighting the crucial need for the development of effective coping mechanisms with which to manage both academic and clinical responsibilities, ultimately enhancing the wellbeing and academic performance of these students. This umbrella review aims to evaluate and synthesize existing review articles that examine stress levels and coping mechanisms among student nurses during their education and training. Five databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched for review articles published from 2010 onwards. This review includes twelve articles, encompassing 189 studies. The review findings demonstrate that student nurses experience moderate-to-high levels of stress during their nurse education. Major sources of stress include academic demands, patient care responsibilities, and interactions with nursing staff and faculty. Commonly utilized coping skills involve problem-solving behaviors, transference, and maintaining an optimistic outlook. Given the adverse consequences of stress, nurse educators play a critical role in the development of strategies with which to reduce stress and enhance coping skills among student nurses. This study was not registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leodoro J Labrague
- Marcella Neihoff School of Nursing, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bargeri S, Castellini G, Vitale JA, Guida S, Banfi G, Gianola S, Pennestrì F. Effectiveness of Telemedicine for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Umbrella Review. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e50090. [PMID: 38306156 PMCID: PMC10873802 DOI: 10.2196/50090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several systematic reviews (SRs) assessing the use of telemedicine for musculoskeletal conditions have been published in recent years. However, the landscape of evidence on multiple clinical outcomes remains unclear. OBJECTIVE We aimed to summarize the available evidence from SRs on telemedicine for musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS We conducted an umbrella review of SRs with and without meta-analysis by searching PubMed and EMBASE up to July 25, 2022, for SRs of randomized controlled trials assessing telemedicine. We collected any kind of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), and objective measures, including direct and indirect costs. We assessed the methodological quality with the AMSTAR 2 tool (A Measurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2). Findings were reported qualitatively. RESULTS Overall, 35 SRs published between 2015 and 2022 were included. Most reviews (n=24, 69%) were rated as critically low quality by AMSTAR 2. The majority of reviews assessed "telerehabilitation" (n=29) in patients with osteoarthritis (n=13) using PROMs (n=142 outcomes mapped with n=60 meta-analyses). A substantive body of evidence from meta-analyses found telemedicine to be beneficial or equal in terms of PROMs compared to conventional care (n=57 meta-analyses). Meta-analyses showed no differences between groups in PREMs (n=4), while objectives measures (ie, "physical function") were mainly in favor of telemedicine or showed no difference (9/13). All SRs showed notably lower costs for telemedicine compared to in-person visits. CONCLUSIONS Telemedicine can provide more accessible health care with noninferior results for various clinical outcomes in comparison with conventional care. The assessment of telemedicine is largely represented by PROMs, with some gaps for PREMs, objective measures, and costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42022347366; https://osf.io/pxedm/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Bargeri
- Unità di Epidemiologia Clinica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| | - Greta Castellini
- Unità di Epidemiologia Clinica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Stefania Guida
- Unità di Epidemiologia Clinica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Banfi
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Gianola
- Unità di Epidemiologia Clinica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tahmasbi F, Mosaddeghi-Heris R, Soleimanzadeh F, Ghaderpanah R, Sadrian S, Hajebrahimi S, Salehi-Pourmehr H. Effects of Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation on Fecal Incontinence: An Umbrella Review. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:229-242. [PMID: 37452797 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to summarize relevant data from previous systematic reviews (SRs) and conduct comprehensive research on the clinical effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), via the transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TPTNS) or percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PPTNS) method on fecal incontinence (FI). MATERIALS AND METHODS In adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. We included English-language, full-text SRs reporting outcomes for FI following either PPTNS or TPTNS. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. In addition, reanalyzing the meta-analyses was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software version 3.0 to achieve effect sizes and the level of statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS From a total of 835 citations, 14 SRs met our inclusion criteria. Four of these also conducted a meta-analysis. Most SRs reported an overall improvement in different study parameters, including bowel habits and quality of life. However, there were major inconsistencies across the results. The most studied outcome was FI episodes, followed by incontinence score. The summary outcomes showed no statistically significant changes in comparing PTNS with sham or sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for FI (p > 0.05). However, the results of subgroup analysis based on the type of intervention in the control group revealed that FI episodes were significantly fewer than in the PTNS arm, whereas PTNS led to fewer episodes of FI than did the sham. In terms of incontinence score, the results showed that PTNS compared with sham did not change the incontinence score; however, SNS improved the score significantly in one eligible study for reanalysis when compared with PTNS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The findings of the current umbrella review suggest that PTNS can potentially benefit patients with FI. However, this is concluded from studies with a limited population, disregarding the etiology of FI and with limited follow-up duration. Therefore, caution must be taken in contemplating the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fateme Tahmasbi
- Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran; Research Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Iranian EBM Centre, A Joanna Briggs Institute Center of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | | | - Farzin Soleimanzadeh
- Research Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Iranian EBM Centre, A Joanna Briggs Institute Center of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Rezvan Ghaderpanah
- Students Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - SeyedHassan Sadrian
- Students Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Sakineh Hajebrahimi
- Research Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Iranian EBM Centre, A Joanna Briggs Institute Center of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Hanieh Salehi-Pourmehr
- Research Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Iranian EBM Centre, A Joanna Briggs Institute Center of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kisely SR. Can new approaches to synthesising evidence help achieve a consensus in psychotherapy research? Australas Psychiatry 2024; 32:23-25. [PMID: 38079408 PMCID: PMC10809726 DOI: 10.1177/10398562231219851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The recent debate around the College's Clinical Practice Guidelines on mood disorders have highlighted differences in opinion on interpreting evidence from randomised control trials (RCTs) for psychodynamic psychotherapy. This paper discusses new techniques of synthesising research evidence (e.g., umbrella reviews) that may help minimise disagreements in the interpretation of RCTs and foster greater consensus on treatment guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Findings from the latest umbrella review suggest that psychodynamic therapy is an evidence-based approach, among several, for common mental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R Kisely
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Metro South Health Service, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia; and Departments of Psychiatry, Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Nguyen F, Liao G, McIsaac DI, Lalu MM, Pysyk CL, Hamilton GM. Perioperative quality indicators specific to the practice of anesthesia in noncardiac surgery: an umbrella review. Can J Anaesth 2024; 71:274-291. [PMID: 38182828 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-023-02671-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Improvement in delivery of perioperative care depends on the ability to measure outcomes that can direct meaningful changes in practice. We sought to identify and provide an overview of perioperative quality indicators specific to the practice of anesthesia in noncardiac surgery. SOURCE We conducted an umbrella review (a systematic review of systematic reviews) according to Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. We included systematic reviews examining perioperative indicators in patients ≥ 18 yr of age undergoing noncardiac surgery. Our primary outcome was any quality indicator specific to anesthesia. Indicators were classified by the Donabedian system and perioperative phase of care. The quality of systematic reviews was assessed using AMSTAR 2 criteria. Level of evidence of quality indicators was stratified by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Classification. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Our search returned 1,475 studies. After removing duplicates and screening of abstracts and full texts, 23 systematic reviews encompassing 3,164 primary studies met our inclusion criteria. There were 330 unique quality indicators. Process indicators were most common (n = 169), followed by outcome (n = 114) and structure indicators (n = 47). Few identified indicators were supported by high-level evidence (45/330, 14%). Level 1 evidence supported indicators of antibiotic prophylaxis (1a), venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (1a), postoperative nausea/vomiting prophylaxis (1b), maintenance of normothermia (1a), and goal-directed fluid therapy (1b). CONCLUSION This umbrella review highlights the scarcity of perioperative quality indicators that are supported by high quality evidence. Future development of quality indicators and recommendations for outcome measurement should focus on metrics that are supported by level 1 evidence. Potential targets for evidence-based quality-improvement programs in anesthesia are identified herein. STUDY REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42020164691); first registered 28 April 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederic Nguyen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada.
| | - Gary Liao
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel I McIsaac
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Manoj M Lalu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Christopher L Pysyk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Gavin M Hamilton
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Panțiru I, Ronaldson A, Sima N, Dregan A, Sima R. The impact of gardening on well-being, mental health, and quality of life: an umbrella review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2024; 13:45. [PMID: 38287430 PMCID: PMC10823662 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02457-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gardening and horticultural therapy (HT) has been widely recognised as a multicomponent approach that has affected a broad range of health and well-being outcomes. The aim of this umbrella review and meta-analysis was to compare the findings of previous reviews on the impact of multiple gardening interventions and gardening attributes on different well-being constructs. METHODS Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to December 2022. Interventional and observational reviews were eligible for inclusion in this umbrella review. Outcome measures included mental well-being, health status and quality of life. The key exposure variables were gardening and horticultural therapy. Narrative synthesis was used to evaluate the overall impact of gardening and HT on study outcomes. For a subsample of studies with available quantitative data, a random effect meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS This umbrella review included 40 studies (10 interventional studies, 2 observational studies, and 28 mixed interventional and observational studies). The reviewed studies reported an overall positive impact of gardening activities on several measures of mental well-being, quality of life, and health status. Meta-analysis showed a significant and positive effect of gardening and HT activities on well-being (effect size (ES) 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23, 0.87, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Evidence from observational and interventional studies supports a positive role for gardening and HT activities on well-being and general health. Interventional studies with horticultural-based therapies were effective in improving well-being and quality of life both in the general population and vulnerable subgroups. The high degree of heterogeneity in the included studies cautions against any direct clinical implications of the study findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Panțiru
- Department of Horticulture and Landscape, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca-Napoca, Romania
| | - A Ronaldson
- Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK
| | - N Sima
- Department of Technological Sciences, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca-Napoca, Romania
| | - A Dregan
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK
| | - R Sima
- Department of Horticulture and Landscape, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca-Napoca, Romania.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hamadé L, El-Disoki S, Chrcanovic BR. Hypertension and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2024; 13:499. [PMID: 38256633 PMCID: PMC10816909 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the present systematic review was to investigate the influence of hypertension on the dental implant failure rate. METHODS An electronic search was undertaken in four databases, plus a manual search of journals. The I2 statistic was used to check heterogeneity and the inverse-variance method was used for the meta-analysis. The estimate of relative effect for dichotomous outcome was expressed as an odds ratio (OR). RESULTS The review included 24 publications. There were 4874 implants (257 failures) placed in hypertensive patients and 16,192 implants (809 failures) placed in normotensive patients. A pairwise meta-analysis showed that implants in hypertensive patients did not have a higher risk of failure than implants placed in normotensive patients (OR 1.100, p = 0.671). The log OR of implant failure between hypertensive and normotensive patients did not significantly change with the follow-up time (p = 0.824). CONCLUSIONS This review suggests that implants in hypertensive patients do not present higher odds of failure in comparison to normotensive patients. However, further research on this topic, with the use of more rigorous criteria to diagnose patients as being hypertensive, as well as clearer information about the pharmacological management of the condition in the patients, is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liljan Hamadé
- Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, 214 21 Malmö, Sweden; (L.H.); (S.E.-D.)
| | - Salma El-Disoki
- Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, 214 21 Malmö, Sweden; (L.H.); (S.E.-D.)
| | - Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, 214 21 Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zavalis EA, Rameau A, Saraswathula A, Vist J, Schuit E, Ioannidis JP. Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e076675. [PMID: 38195174 PMCID: PMC10810041 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to examine the prevalence of comparisons of surgery to drug regimens, the strength of evidence of such comparisons and whether surgery or the drug intervention was favoured. DESIGN Systematic review of systematic reviews (umbrella review). DATA SOURCES Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Systematic reviews attempt to compare surgical to drug interventions. DATA EXTRACTION We extracted whether the review found any randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for eligible comparisons. Individual trial results were extracted directly from the systematic review. SYNTHESIS The outcomes of each meta-analysis were resynthesised into random-effects meta-analyses. Egger's test and excess significance were assessed. RESULTS Overall, 188 systematic reviews intended to compare surgery versus drugs. Only 41 included data from at least one RCT (total, 165 RCTs) and covered a total of 103 different outcomes of various comparisons of surgery versus drugs. A GRADE assessment was performed by the Cochrane reviewers for 87 (83%) outcomes in the reviews, indicating the strength of evidence was high in 4 outcomes (4%), moderate in 22 (21%), low in 27 (26%) and very low in 33 (32%). Based on 95% CIs, the surgical intervention was favoured in 38/103 (37%), and the drugs were favoured in 13/103 (13%) outcomes. Of the outcomes with high GRADE rating, only one showed conclusive superiority in our reanalysis (sphincterotomy was better than medical therapy for anal fissure). Of the 22 outcomes with moderate GRADE rating, 6 (27%) were inconclusive, 14 (64%) were in favour of surgery and 2 (9%) were in favour of drugs. There was no evidence of excess significance. CONCLUSIONS Though the relative merits of surgical versus drug interventions are important to know for many diseases, high strength randomised evidence is rare. More randomised trials comparing surgery to drug interventions are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel A Zavalis
- Department of Learning Informatics Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Anaïs Rameau
- Sean Parker Institute for the Voice, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anirudh Saraswathula
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Joachim Vist
- Department of Learning Informatics Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ewoud Schuit
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Cochrane Denmark, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - John P Ioannidis
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
van Wely M. Finding a way through the review maze: systematic, scoping, or an overview. Hum Reprod Update 2024; 30:1-2. [PMID: 38167946 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmad032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
|
34
|
de Waure C, Alti E, Baldo V, Bonanni P, Conversano M, Fedele A, Gabutti G, Ieraci R, Landi F, Landolfi R, Orsi A, Rizzo C, Rossi A, Villani A, Vitale F, Domnich A. Mapping and ranking outcomes for the evaluation of seasonal influenza vaccine efficacy and effectiveness: a delphi study. Expert Rev Vaccines 2024; 23:636-644. [PMID: 38869028 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2024.2367457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Protection provided by seasonal influenza vaccination (SIV) may be measured against numerous outcomes, and their heterogeneity may hamper decision-making. The aim of this study was to explore outcomes used for estimation of SIV efficacy/effectiveness (VE) and obtain expert consensus on their importance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS An umbrella review was first conducted to collect and map outcomes considered in systematic reviews of SIV VE. A Delphi study was then performed to reach expert convergence on the importance of single outcomes, measured on a 9-point Likert scale, in principal target groups, namely children, working-age adults, older adults, subjects with co-morbidities and pregnant women. RESULTS The literature review identified 489 outcomes. Following data reduction, 20 outcomes were selected for the Delphi process. After two Delphi rounds and a final consensus meeting, convergence was reached. All 20 outcomes were judged to be important or critically important. More severe outcomes, such as influenza-related hospital encounters and mortality with or without laboratory confirmation, were generally top-ranked across all target groups (median scores ≥8 out of 9). CONCLUSIONS Rather than focusing on laboratory-confirmed infection per se, experimental and observational VE studies should include more severe influenza-related outcomes because they are expected to exercise a greater impact on decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara de Waure
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Alti
- Department of General Practice, Local Health Unit Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Baldo
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Conversano
- Prevention Department, Local Health Authority of Taranto, Taranto, Italy
| | - Alberto Fedele
- Prevention Department, Hygiene and Public Health Service, Local Health Unit, Lecce, Italy
| | - Giovanni Gabutti
- Coordinator Working Group "Vaccines and Immunization Policies", Italian Scientific Society of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health (SItI), Cogorno (Ge), Italy
| | | | - Francesco Landi
- Department of Geriatrics and Orthopedics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaele Landolfi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Orsi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Hygiene Unit, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy
| | - Caterina Rizzo
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandro Rossi
- Italian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care, Florence, Italy
| | - Alberto Villani
- Pediatric Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- System Medicine Department, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Vitale
- Department of Health Promotion, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Alexander Domnich
- Hygiene Unit, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lin CS, Chen TC, Verhoeff MC, Lobbezoo F, Trulsson M, Fuh JL. An umbrella review on the association between factors of oral health and cognitive dysfunction. Ageing Res Rev 2024; 93:102128. [PMID: 38007045 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
An increasing number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been published on the association between oral health and cognitive dysfunction, also known as oral-cognitive links. However, there is great diversity in the oral and cognitive factors included in these studies, with different opinions for clinical practice drawn from the evidence. To understand which oral and cognitive factors are involved in those associations, we conducted an umbrella review of 28 systematic reviews, including 12 meta-analyses, on oral-cognitive links. We found that (a) periodontal diseases, oral microbiome, and dementia were frequently studied, while other factors, such as mastication and mild cognitive impairment, were less commonly investigated, and (b) severe deterioration of oral health, such as severe periodontitis or extensive tooth loss, rather than the presence of oral diseases alone, was strongly associated with cognitive dysfunction. In conclusion, the diversity of oral and cognitive factors included in the review studies reflects the complexity of oral-cognitive links. Clarifying the factors helps to form evidence-based clinical advice for healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Shu Lin
- Department of Dentistry, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan; Institute of Brain Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan; Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan; Oral Medicine Innovation Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan.
| | - Ta-Chung Chen
- Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Stomatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Merel Charlotte Verhoeff
- Department of Orofacial Pain and Dysfunction, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Lobbezoo
- Department of Orofacial Pain and Dysfunction, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mats Trulsson
- Division of Oral Diagnostics and Rehabilitation, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden; Academic Center for Geriatric Dentistry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jong-Ling Fuh
- Institute of Brain Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan; Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bevilacqua L, Fox-Smith L, Lewins A, Jetha P, Sideri A, Barton G, Meiser-Stedman R, Beazley P. Response to: 'Impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of children and young people: perspectives on evidence synthesis' by Hossain et al. J Epidemiol Community Health 2023:jech-2023-221431. [PMID: 38053254 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2023-221431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Bevilacqua
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Amy Lewins
- Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Poonam Jetha
- Population, Policy and Practice Unit, UCL, Surrey, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Peter Beazley
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Therapies, UEA, Norwich, Norfolk, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Zhao Q, Liu S, Zhao H, Dong L, Zhu X, Liu J. Non-pharmacological interventions to prevent and treat delirium in older people: An overview of systematic reviews. Int J Nurs Stud 2023; 148:104584. [PMID: 37826889 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As advanced age is a major risk factor for confusion status, delirium has become prevalent in the older population, contributing to longer hospital stays, cognitive impairment, and higher risks of complications and mortality. Compared with pharmacological methods, non-pharmacological interventions are preferred and are recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for the prevention of delirium. Numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been carried out to investigate the effects of non-pharmacological interventions. However, the outcomes were diverse and the quality varied widely, making it challenging to draw firm conclusions from the evidence. OBJECTIVE To summarize the contents and evaluate the effects of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent and treat delirium among older people. DESIGN Overview of systematic reviews. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Medline, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, JBI EBP Database, China's SinoMed, CNKI, and Wangfang databases from inception to 2nd December 2022. Two reviewers performed the study selection, quality appraisal, and data extraction independently. The AMSTAR 2 tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of eligible reviews. The results were presented in narrative synthesis based on types of intervention, including multicomponent and single-component interventions. RESULTS Twenty-four systematic reviews were included in this overview, of which four reviews were of high quality. Multicomponent interventions were the most widely disseminated non-pharmacological strategy, which were effective in preventing delirium with 27 %-54 % reduction in delirium incidence. Additionally, the multicomponent strategy also reduced the incidence of falls and pressure ulcers, and showed trends toward shortening the length of stay and improving cognitive function. Among single-component interventions, physical training, geriatric risk assessment, and reorientation protocol revealed positive effects in delirium prevention. However, the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for treating delirium was limited, and while multicomponent methods had inconsistent impacts on the duration and severity of delirium, single-component methods showed no significant impact. CONCLUSION Non-pharmacological interventions are effective in reducing the incidence of delirium and improving other health outcomes among older patients. However, the effects on the duration and severity of delirium need more evidence to confirm. REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022376651 in PROSPERO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qin Zhao
- Nursing Department, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China; Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Shan Liu
- College of Nursing and Public Health, Adelphi University 1 South Ave., Garden City, NY, USA
| | - Hongyu Zhao
- Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Lei Dong
- Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiao Zhu
- Nursing Department, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China; Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, China; Research Center of Chinese Health Ministry on Transplantation Medicine Engineering and Technology, Changsha, China
| | - Jia Liu
- Nursing Department, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China; Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, China; Research Center of Chinese Health Ministry on Transplantation Medicine Engineering and Technology, Changsha, China.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Huneke NT, Amin J, Baldwin DS, Chamberlain SR, Correll CU, Garner M, Hill CM, Hou R, Howes OD, Sinclair JM, Solmi M, Cortese S. Placebo effects in mental health disorders: protocol for an umbrella review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073946. [PMID: 38035741 PMCID: PMC10689367 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Given the high prevalence of mental health disorders and their significant socioeconomic burden, there is a need to develop improved treatments, and to evaluate them through placebo-controlled trials. However, the magnitude of the placebo response in randomised controlled trials to test medications may be substantial, affecting their interpretation. Therefore, improved understanding of the patient, trial and mental disorder factors that influence placebo responses would inform clinical trial design to better detect active treatment effects. There is a growing literature exploring the placebo response within specific mental health disorders, but no overarching synthesis of this research has been produced to date. We present a protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses in which we aim to understand the effect size and potential predictors of placebo response within, and across, mental health disorders. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will systematically search databases (Medline, PsycINFO, EMBASE+EMBASE Classic, Web of Knowledge) for systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses that report placebo effect size in clinical trials in patients with mental health disorders (initial search date 23 October 2022). Screening of abstracts and full texts will be done in pairs. We will extract data to qualitatively examine how placebo effect size varies across mental health disorders. We also plan to qualitatively summarise predictors of increased placebo response identified either quantitatively (eg, through meta-regression) or qualitatively. Risk of bias will be assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool. We aim to not only summarise the current literature but also to identify gaps in knowledge and generate further hypotheses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION We do not believe there are any specific ethical considerations relevant to this study. We will publish the results in a peer-reviewed journal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Tm Huneke
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Jay Amin
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - David S Baldwin
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- University Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Samuel R Chamberlain
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Christoph U Correll
- Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York, USA
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
- Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Matthew Garner
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Catherine M Hill
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
- Department of Sleep Medicine, Southampton Children's Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Ruihua Hou
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
| | - Oliver D Howes
- Department of Psychosis Studies, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
- H Lundbeck A/s, Iveco House, Watford, UK
- Institute of Clinical Sciences (ICS), Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Julia Ma Sinclair
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
| | - Marco Solmi
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI) Clinical Epidemiology Program, University of Ottawa, Ottowa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samuele Cortese
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
- Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Hassenfeld Children's Hospital at NYU Langone, New York University Child Study Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hu Y, Yuan X, Ye P, Chang C, Hu YH, Zhang W, Li K. Virtual Reality in Clinical Nursing Practice Over the Past 10 Years: Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses. JMIR Serious Games 2023; 11:e52022. [PMID: 37997773 PMCID: PMC10690102 DOI: 10.2196/52022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Virtual reality (VR) has shown promising levels of effectiveness in nursing education, pain management, and rehabilitation. However, meta-analyses have discussed the effects of VR usage in nursing unilaterally and inconsistently, and the evidence base is diffuse and varied. Objective We aimed to synthesize the combined evidence from meta-analyses that assessed the effects of nurses using VR technology on nursing education or patient health outcomes. Methods We conducted an umbrella review by searching for meta-analyses about VR intervention in clinical nursing practice on Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed, and in reference lists. Eligible studies were published in English between December 1, 2012, and September 20, 2023. Meta-analyses of ≤2 intervention studies and meta-analyses without 95% CI or heterogeneity data were excluded. Characteristic indicators, population information, VR intervention information, and 95% CIs were extracted. A descriptive analysis of research results was conducted to discern relationships between VR interventions and outcomes. I2 and P values were used to evaluate publication bias. AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) 2 and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) checklist were used to appraise literature quality. Results In total, 768 records were identified; 74 meta-analyses were included for review. The most reported VR study conditions were neuronursing (25/74, 34%), pediatric nursing (13/74, 18%), surgical and wound care (11/74, 15%), oncological nursing (11/74, 15%), and older adult nursing (10/74, 14%). Further, 30% (22/74) of meta-analyses reported publication bias, and 15% (11/74) and 8% (6/74) were rated as "high" based on AMSTAR 2 and the GRADE checklist, respectively. The main outcome indicators among all included meta-analyses were pain (37/214, 17.3%), anxiety (36/214, 16.8%), cognitive function (17/214, 7.9%), balance (16/214, 7.5%), depression (16/214, 7.5%), motor function (12/214, 5.6%), and participation in life (12/214, 5.6%). VR treatment for cognition, pain, anxiety, and depression was effective (all P values were <.05), while the utility of VR for improving motor function, balance, memory, and attention was controversial. Adverse effects included nausea, vomiting, and dizziness (incidence: range 4.76%-50%). The most common VR platforms were Pico VR glasses, head-mounted displays, the Nintendo Wii, and the Xbox Kinect. VR intervention duration ranged from 2 weeks to 12 months (typically ≥4 wk). VR session length and frequency ranged from 5 to 100 minutes and from 1 to 10 times per week, respectively. Conclusions VR in nursing has positive effects-relieving patients' pain, anxiety, and depression and improving cognitive function-despite the included studies' limited quality. However, applying VR in nursing to improve patients' motor function, balance, memory, and attention remains controversial. Nursing researchers need to further explore the effects and standard operation protocols of VR in clinical practice, and more high-quality research on VR in nursing is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanjie Hu
- West China Hospital/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xingzhu Yuan
- West China Hospital/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Peiling Ye
- West China Hospital/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Chengting Chang
- West China Hospital/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yue Han Hu
- West China Hospital/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Weihua Zhang
- School of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ka Li
- West China Hospital/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Frisaldi E, Shaibani A, Benedetti F, Pagnini F. Placebo and nocebo effects and mechanisms associated with pharmacological interventions: an umbrella review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e077243. [PMID: 37848293 PMCID: PMC10582987 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This review aimed to summarise the existing knowledge about placebo and nocebo effects associated with pharmacological interventions and their mechanisms. DESIGN Umbrella review, adopting the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 tool for critical appraisal. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial were searched in September 2022, without any time restriction, for systematic reviews, narrative reviews, original articles. Results were summarised through narrative synthesis, tables, 95% CI. OUTCOME MEASURES Mechanisms underlying placebo/nocebo effects and/or their effect sizes. RESULTS The databases search identified 372 studies, for a total of 158 312 participants, comprising 41 systematic reviews, 312 narrative reviews and 19 original articles. Seventy-three per cent of the examined systematic reviews were of high quality.Our findings revealed that mechanisms underlying placebo and/or nocebo effects have been characterised, at least in part, for: pain, non-noxious somatic sensation, Parkinson's disease, migraine, sleep disorders, intellectual disability, depression, anxiety, dementia, addiction, gynaecological disorders, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, immune and endocrine systems, cardiovascular and respiratory systems, gastrointestinal disorders, skin diseases, influenza and related vaccines, oncology, obesity, physical and cognitive performance. Their magnitude ranged from 0.08 to 2.01 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.89) for placebo effects and from 0.32 to 0.90 (95% CI 0.24 to 1.00) for nocebo effects. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a valuable tool for clinicians and researchers, identifying both results ready for clinical practice and gaps to address in the near future. FUNDING Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy with the 'Finanziamento Ponte 2022' grant. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42023392281.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Frisaldi
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Aziz Shaibani
- Muscle and Nerve Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Fabrizio Benedetti
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Pagnini
- Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wu J, Adams C, He X, Qi F, Xia J. Diversity when interpreting evidence in network meta-analyses (NMAs) on similar topics: an example case of NMAs on diabetic macular oedema. Syst Rev 2023; 12:189. [PMID: 37805569 PMCID: PMC10559427 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02349-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different network meta-analyses (NMAs) on the same topic result in differences in findings. In this review, we investigated NMAs comparing aflibercept with ranibizumab for diabetic macular oedema (DME) in the hope of illuminating why the differences in findings occurred. METHODS Studies were searched for in English and Chinese electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP; see detailed search strategy in the main body). Two independent reviewers systematically screened to identify target NMAs that included a comparison of aflibercept and ranibizumab in patients with DME. The key outcome of interest in this review is the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), including various ways of reporting (such as the proportion of participants who gain ≥ 10 ETDRS letters at 12 months; average change in BCVA at 12 months). RESULTS For the binary outcome of BCVA, different NMAs all agreed that there is no clear difference between the two treatments, while continuous outcomes all favour aflibercept over ranibizumab. We discussed four points of particular concern that are illustrated by five similar NMAs, including network differences, PICO (participants, interventions, comparators, outcomes) differences, different data from the same measures of effect, and differences in what is truly significant. CONCLUSIONS A closer inspection of each of these trials shows how the methods, including the searches and analyses, all differ, but the findings, although presented differently and sometimes interpreted differently, were similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wu
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Nankai District, No. 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, CO, 300072, China.
- Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
| | - Clive Adams
- Mental Health Services Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Xiaoning He
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Nankai District, No. 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, CO, 300072, China
- Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Fang Qi
- Academic Department, Systematic Review Solutions Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Xia
- The Nottingham Ningbo GRADE Centre, The University of Nottingham Ningbo, Ningbo, China
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Michel S, Atmakuri A, von Ehrenstein OS. Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants and congenital heart defects: An umbrella review. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2023; 178:108076. [PMID: 37454629 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants has been linked to congenital heart defects (CHD), but findings of existing systematic reviews have been mixed. OBJECTIVE To assess the epidemiological evidence on associations between prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants and CHD subtypes, based on a systematic overview of reviews ("umbrella review"). METHODS We conducted a systematic search for reviews assessing associations between prenatal exposure to criteria air pollutants and CHD. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) tool. The certainty of the systematic review findings was graded using the Navigation Guide methodology. RESULTS We identified eleven systematic reviews, including eight with meta-analyses, assessing in total 35 primary studies of prenatal exposure to criteria air pollutants and various CHD subtypes. The certainty of the findings of four meta-analyses indicating an increased risk for coarctation of the aorta associated with nitrogen dioxide exposure was rated as moderate. The certainty of findings indicating positive, inverse, or null associations for other pollutant-subtype combinations was rated as very low to low, based on low precision and high statistical heterogeneity of summary odds ratios (SOR), substantial inconsistencies between review findings, and methodological limitations of the systematic reviews. DISCUSSION The inconsistent findings and high statistical heterogeneity of many SOR of the included systematic reviews may partly be traced to differences in methodological approaches, and the risk of bias across included reviews (e.g., inclusion criteria, systematic search strategies, synthesis methods) and primary studies (e.g., exposure assessment, diagnostic criteria). Adherence to appropriate systematic review guidelines for environmental health research, as well as rigorous evaluation of risk of bias in primary studies, are essential for future risk assessments and policy-making. Still, our findings suggest that prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants may increase risks for at least some CHD subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Michel
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
| | - Aishwarya Atmakuri
- Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ondine S von Ehrenstein
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Belbasis L, Brooker RD, Zavalis E, Pezzullo AM, Axfors C, Ioannidis JP. Mapping and systematic appraisal of umbrella reviews in epidemiological research: a protocol for a meta-epidemiological study. Syst Rev 2023; 12:123. [PMID: 37452309 PMCID: PMC10347720 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02265-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Umbrella review is one of the terms used to describe an overview of systematic reviews. During the last years, a rapid increase in the number of umbrella reviews on epidemiological studies has been observed, but there is no systematic assessment of their methodological and reporting characteristics. Our study aims to fill this gap by performing a systematic mapping of umbrella reviews in epidemiological research. METHODS We will perform a meta-epidemiological study including a systematic review in MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify all the umbrella reviews that focused on systematic reviews of epidemiological studies and were published from inception until December 31, 2022. We will consider eligible any research article which was designed as an umbrella review and summarized systematic reviews and meta-analyses of epidemiological studies. From each eligible article, we will extract information about the research topic, the methodological characteristics, and the reporting characteristics. We will examine whether the umbrella reviews assessed the strength of the available evidence and the rigor of the included systematic reviews. We will also examine whether these characteristics change across time. DISCUSSION Our study will systematically appraise the methodological and reporting characteristics of published umbrella reviews in epidemiological literature. The findings of our study can be used to improve the design and conduct of future umbrella reviews, to derive a standardized set of reporting and methodological guidelines for umbrella reviews, and to allow further meta-epidemiological work. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION osf.io/sxzc6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lazaros Belbasis
- Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin, QUEST Center, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Robin D Brooker
- Department of Sociology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
| | - Emmanuel Zavalis
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | - Angelo Maria Pezzullo
- Section of Hygiene, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Cathrine Axfors
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - John Pa Ioannidis
- Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin, QUEST Center, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Zavalis EA, Rameau A, Saraswathula A, Vist J, Schuit E, Ioannidis JPA. Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.01.30.23285207. [PMID: 36778340 PMCID: PMC9915830 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.30.23285207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To examine the prevalence of comparisons of surgery to drug regimens, the strength of evidence of such comparisons, and whether surgery or the drug intervention was favored. Design Systematic review of systematic reviews (umbrella review). Data sources Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). Eligibility criteria and synthesis of results Using the search term "surg*" in CDSR, we retrieved systematic reviews of surgical interventions. Abstracts were subsequently screened to find systematic reviews that aimed to compare surgical to drug interventions; and then, among them, those that included any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for such comparisons. Trial results data were extracted manually and synthesized into random-effects meta-analyses. Results Overall, 188 systematic reviews intended to compare surgery versus drugs. Only 41 included data from at least one RCT (total, 165 RCTs with data) and covered a total of 103 different outcomes of various comparisons of surgery versus drugs. A GRADE assessment was performed by the Cochrane reviewers for 87 (83%) outcomes in the reviews, indicating the strength of evidence was high in 4 outcomes (4%), moderate in 22 (21%), low in 27 (26%) and very low in 33 (32%). Based on 95% confidence intervals, the surgical intervention was favored in 38/103 (37%), and the drugs were favored in 13/103 (13%) outcomes. Of the outcomes with high GRADE rating, only one showed conclusive superiority (sphincterotomy was better than medical therapy for anal fissure). Of the 22 outcomes with moderate GRADE rating, 6 (27%) were inconclusive, 14 (64%) were in favor of surgery, and 2 (9%) were in favor of drugs. Conclusions Though the relative merits of surgical versus drug interventions are important to know for many diseases, high strength randomized evidence is rare. More randomized trials comparing surgery to drug interventions are needed. Protocol registration https://osf.io/p9x3j.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel A Zavalis
- Department of Learning Informatics Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Anaïs Rameau
- Sean Parker Institute for the Voice, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anirudh Saraswathula
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joachim Vist
- Department of Learning Informatics Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ewoud Schuit
- Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Cochrane Netherland, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - John P A Ioannidis
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|