1
|
Miller NE, Lally P, Conway R, Steptoe A, Frank P, Beeken RJ, Fisher A. Psychological distress and health behaviours in people living with and beyond cancer: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:15367. [PMID: 38965364 PMCID: PMC11224398 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66269-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to examine whether psychological distress was cross-sectionally associated with meeting World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) recommendations in people living with and beyond cancer. Participants were adults living with and beyond breast, prostate and colorectal cancer, participating in the baseline wave of the Advancing Survivorship after Cancer Outcomes Trial (ASCOT). Anxiety/depression was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L and dichotomised into any/no problems. WCRF recommendations were assessed via pedometers, 24-h dietary recalls, self-reported alcohol intake (AUDIT-C), and self-reported smoking status. Participants were categorised as meeting WCRF recommendations using the following cut-offs: average daily steps (≥ 10,000/day), average weekly aerobic steps (≥ 15,000/day), fruit and vegetables (≥ 400 g/day), fibre (≥ 30 g/day), red meat (< 500 g/week), processed meat (0 g/day), high calorie food (fat ≤ 33% of total daily energy intake and free sugar ≤ 5% of total daily energy intake), alcohol (≤ 14 units/week) and smoking (non-smoking). A composite health behaviour risk index (CHBRI) was calculated by summing the number of WCRF recommendations met (range: 0-9). Among 1348 participants (mean age = 64 years (SD = 11.4)), 41.5% reported anxiety/depression problems. The mean CHBRI score was 4.4 (SD = 1.4). Anxiety/depression problems were associated with lower odds of meeting WCRF recommendations for average daily steps (odds ratio (OR) = 0.73; 95% CI 0.55, 0.97), but not for any other health behaviour. Psychological distress is associated with lower adherence to WCRF recommendations for physical activity in people living with and beyond cancer. Physical activity may be a mechanism linking psychological distress and poorer outcomes among people living with and beyond cancer, and this should be explored in longitudinal studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Ella Miller
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK.
| | - Phillippa Lally
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK
| | - Rana Conway
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Andrew Steptoe
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Philipp Frank
- UCL Brain Sciences, University College London, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, London, W1T 7BN, UK
| | - Rebecca J Beeken
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Abi Fisher
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heuchan GN, Lally PJ, Beeken RJ, Fisher A, Conway RE. Perception of a need to change weight in individuals living with and beyond breast, prostate and colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional survey. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:844-853. [PMID: 36701100 PMCID: PMC11081928 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01333-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE People living with and beyond cancer (LWBC) are advised to achieve a body mass index (BMI) within the healthy range (≥ 18.5 and < 25). Not perceiving a need for weight change may be a barrier to achieving a healthy weight. This study aimed to explore factors associated with perceived need for weight change among people LWBC. METHODS Adults diagnosed with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer were recruited through National Health Service sites in Essex and London. Participants (N = 5835) completed the 'Health and Lifestyle After Cancer' survey, which included a question on perceived need to change weight. Associations between perceived need for weight change and BMI, and perceived need for weight change and health and demographic variables, were analyzed using chi-square tests and logistic regression, respectively. RESULTS The proportion of participants perceiving a need to lose weight differed according to BMI category: healthy weight (23%), overweight (64%), obese (85%) (P < 0.001). Having overweight or obesity but not perceiving a need to lose weight was associated with being older, male, non-white, not married or cohabiting, and having cancer that had spread, no formal qualifications, no comorbidities, and having received chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Perceived need to lose weight is prevalent among people LWBC with obesity and overweight. This group may be interested in weight management support. Demographic and health factors were associated with having obesity or overweight but not perceiving a need to lose weight. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Weight loss interventions for people LWBC are needed. A subset of people LWBC with overweight and obesity may need additional information or motivators to engage with weight management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella N Heuchan
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Phillippa J Lally
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7HX, UK
| | - Rebecca J Beeken
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Abigail Fisher
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Rana E Conway
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smith S, Lally P, Steptoe A, Chavez-Ugalde Y, Beeken RJ, Fisher A. Prevalence of loneliness and associations with health behaviours and body mass index in 5835 people living with and beyond cancer: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:635. [PMID: 38419011 PMCID: PMC10903019 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17797-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A cancer diagnosis and its treatment may be an especially isolating experience. Despite evidence that positive health behaviours can improve outcomes for people living with and beyond cancer (LWBC), no studies have examined associations between loneliness and different health behaviours in this population. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of loneliness in a large sample of UK adults LWBC and to explore whether loneliness was associated with multiple health behaviours. METHODS Participants were adults (aged ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with breast, prostate or colorectal cancer who completed the Health and Lifestyle After Cancer Survey. Loneliness was reported using the UCLA loneliness score, dichotomised into higher (≥ 6) versus lower (< 6) loneliness. Engagement in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, dietary intake, smoking status, alcohol use, and self-reported height and weight were recorded. Behaviours were coded to reflect meeting or not meeting the World Cancer Research Fund recommendations for people LWBC. Logistic regression analyses explored associations between loneliness and health behaviours. Covariates were age, sex, ethnicity, education, marital status, living situation, cancer type, spread and treatment, time since treatment, time since diagnosis and number of comorbid conditions. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. RESULTS 5835 participants, mean age 67.4 (standard deviation = 11.8) years, completed the survey. 56% were female (n = 3266) and 44% (n = 2553) male, and 48% (n = 2786) were living with or beyond breast cancer, 32% (n = 1839) prostate, and 21% (n = 1210) colorectal. Of 5485 who completed the loneliness scale, 81% (n = 4423) of participants reported lower and 19% (n = 1035) higher loneliness. After adjustment for confounders, those reporting higher levels of loneliness had lower odds of meeting the WCRF recommendations for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% Confidence Internal [CI], 0.67, 0.97, p =.028), fruit and vegetable intake (OR 0.81, CI 0.67, 1.00, p =.046), and smoking (OR 0.62, 0.46, 0.84, p =.003). No association was observed between loneliness and the other dietary behaviours, alcohol, or body mass index. CONCLUSIONS Loneliness is relatively common in people LWBC and may represent an unmet need. People LWBC who experience higher levels of loneliness may need additional support to improve their health behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Smith
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK
| | - Phillippa Lally
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Surrey, GU2 7XH, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Andrew Steptoe
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK
| | - Yanaina Chavez-Ugalde
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, Box 285, UK
| | - Rebecca J Beeken
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, Leeds, UK
| | - Abi Fisher
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith S, Fisher A, Lally PJ, Croker HA, Roberts A, Conway RE, Beeken RJ. Perceiving a need for dietary change in adults living with and beyond cancer: A cross-sectional study. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7073. [PMID: 38457197 PMCID: PMC10922024 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many people living with and beyond cancer (LWBC) do not meet dietary recommendations. To implement a healthier diet, people LWBC must perceive a need to improve their diet. METHODS Participants included people diagnosed with breast, prostate or colorectal cancer in the UK. Two binary logistic regression models were conducted with perceived need for dietary change as the outcome (need to improve vs. no need). Predictor variables included demographic and clinical characteristics, receipt of dietary advice, and either body mass index (BMI) or adherence to seven relevant World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) dietary recommendations. RESULTS The sample included 5835 responses. Only 31% perceived a need to improve their diet. Being younger (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 94-0.95), female (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.15-1.53), not of white ethnicity (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.48-2.27), not married/cohabiting (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.16-1.52) and having received dietary advice (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.43-1.86) was associated with an increased odds of perceiving a need to improve diet. This association was also seen for participants with two or more comorbidities (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.09-1.57), those not meeting the recommendations for fruit and vegetables (OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.41-0.55), fat (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.58-0.77), and sugar (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.98) in the dietary components model and those who had a higher BMI (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.32-1.77) in the BMI model. CONCLUSIONS Most of this sample of people LWBC did not perceive a need to improve their diet. More research is needed to understand the reasons for this and to target these reasons in dietary interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Smith
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Abi Fisher
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Phillippa J Lally
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK
| | - Helen A Croker
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anna Roberts
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rana E Conway
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca J Beeken
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pini S, Buck C, Lally P, Beeken R, Fisher A. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and quality of life in people living with and beyond breast, prostate and colorectal cancer - a qualitative study. BMC Psychol 2024; 12:25. [PMID: 38229188 PMCID: PMC10790421 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01471-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals living with and beyond cancer are at heightened risk of adverse psychological and social outcomes and experiences. In March 2020, the COVID-19 global pandemic presented a unique set of social circumstances with the potential to exacerbate the challenges faced by this population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the experiences of people living with and beyond cancer during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and assess the impact on psychological and social aspects of their lives. METHODS From a pool of participants from a larger health behaviours study thirty participants were purposively sampled for characteristics including: diagnostic group (breast, prostate and colorectal cancers), gender, time since diagnosis and age. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone to discuss their experience of living through the pandemic. A thematic analysis was conducted using a needs-based approach to detail the fundamental needs expressed by this population in relation to their mental health and quality of life during the pandemic. RESULTS Three fundamental needs underpinned the experiences expressed by participants: the need to feel safe; particularly in relation to risk of contracting COVID-19 and their ongoing cancer monitoring; the need to feel connected; to the people, places, activities and practices of everyday life; and the need to make the most out of life; specifically in context of having already endured cancer and cancer treatment. Participant experiences are described in relation to how they impacted each of these three needs. CONCLUSIONS People living with and beyond cancer have past and ongoing experiences that make them vulnerable to adverse psychosocial reactions and outcomes. Support for this population needs to provide greater clarity of risk, clearer guidelines specific to their personal circumstances, and regular updates on scheduling of important follow up care and monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Pini
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Caroline Buck
- UCL Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Phillippa Lally
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK
| | - Rebecca Beeken
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Abigail Fisher
- UCL Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lally P, Miller NE, Lawrence C, Beeken RJ, Fisher A. Associations of self-reported and device-assessed physical activity with fatigue, quality of life, and sleep quality in adults living with and beyond cancer. JOURNAL OF SPORT AND HEALTH SCIENCE 2023; 12:664-673. [PMID: 37172763 PMCID: PMC10658319 DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Greater physical activity is associated with improved outcomes in people living with and beyond cancer. However, most studies in exercise oncology use self-reported measures of physical activity. Few have explored agreement between self-reported and device-based measures of physical activity in people living with and beyond cancer. This study aimed to describe physical activity in adults affected by cancer across self-reported and device-assessed activity, to explore levels of agreement between these measures in terms of their utility for categorizing participants as meeting/not meeting physical activity guidelines, and to explore whether meeting guidelines is associated with fatigue, quality of life, and sleep quality. METHODS A total of 1348 adults living with and beyond cancer from the Advancing Survivorship Cancer Outcomes Trial completed a survey assessing fatigue, quality of life, sleep quality, and physical activity. The Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to calculate a Leisure Score Index (LSI) and an estimate of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Average daily steps and weekly aerobic steps were derived from pedometers worn by participants. RESULTS The percentage of individuals meeting physical activity guidelines was 44.3% using LSI, 49.5% using MVPA, 10.8% using average daily steps, and 28.5% using weekly aerobic steps. Agreement (Cohen's κ) between self-reported and pedometer measures ranged from 0.13 (LSI vs. average daily steps) to 0.60 (LSI vs. MVPA). After adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related covariates, meeting activity guidelines using all measures was associated with not experiencing severe fatigue (odds ratios (ORs): 1.43-1.97). Meeting guidelines using MVPA was associated with no quality-of-life issues (OR = 1.53). Meeting guidelines using both self-reported measures were associated with good sleep quality (ORs: 1.33-1.40). CONCLUSION Less than half of all adults affected by cancer are meeting physical activity guidelines, regardless of measure. Meeting guidelines is associated with lower fatigue across all measures. Associations with quality of life and sleep differ depending on measure. Future research should consider the impact of physical activity measure on findings, and where possible, use multiple measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillippa Lally
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
| | - Natalie Ella Miller
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Claire Lawrence
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Rebecca J Beeken
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Abigail Fisher
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Buck C, Pini S, Lally P, Beeken RJ, Fisher A. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health behaviours of people living with and beyond breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer-a qualitative study. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:1488-1498. [PMID: 35854193 PMCID: PMC9296113 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01234-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Positive health behaviours (sufficient exercise, healthy diet, limiting alcohol, and not smoking) can improve multiple outcomes after a cancer diagnosis. Observational studies suggest that health behaviours were negatively impacted for some but not all individuals living with and beyond cancer. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore the impact of the pandemic on health behaviours of people in this population. METHODS Thirty participants were purposively sampled for characteristics including diagnostic group (breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers), gender, time since diagnosis, and age. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to discuss the impact of the pandemic on health behaviours. Thematic analysis and a secondary Ideal Types analysis were conducted. RESULTS Five themes covered changes in food, weight management, relationship to alcohol, and exercise. Five "types" were identified, representing orientations to health behaviours. The "gift of time" provided by the pandemic had an impact on health behaviours, with trends towards increases in drinking, eating unhealthy food, and exercising less. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic impacted engagement in positive health behaviours among participants in this study. Strict restrictions and changes in routines resulted in individuals adjusting how they managed their diet, alcohol intake, and exercise behaviours. The typology identified within this study helps to define how different orientation to health behaviours could underpin the responses of individual people LWBC. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Alongside providing an understanding of the experiences of people LWBC during the COVID-19 pandemic, the proposed typology suggests how, with further development, future health behaviour interventions in this group could be targeted based on individual orientations to health, rather than demographic or clinical variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Buck
- UCL Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB UK
| | - Simon Pini
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Phillippa Lally
- UCL Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB UK
| | - Rebecca J. Beeken
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Abigail Fisher
- UCL Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Taylor KS, Beeken RJ, Fisher A, Lally P. Did the COVID-19 pandemic impact the dietary intake of individuals living with and beyond breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer and who were most likely to experience change? Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:585. [PMID: 37728860 PMCID: PMC10511549 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08032-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present work investigated dietary changes amongst individuals living with and beyond cancer (LWBC) from before to during the pandemic. To identify those at greatest risk of unhealthy changes, it was further examined whether patterns varied by sociodemographic, health-related, and COVID-19-related characteristics. METHODS This longitudinal cohort study analysed data from 716 individuals LWBC participating in the Advancing Survivorship Cancer Outcomes Trial (ASCOT). Using data provided before and during the pandemic, changes in fruit and vegetable, snack, and alcohol intake were tested using mixed-effect regression models. RESULTS Fruit and vegetable (95%CI: - 0.30; - 0.04) and alcohol consumption (95%CI: - 1.25; - 0.31) decreased, whilst snacking increased (95%CI: 0.19; 0.53). Women and individuals with limited social contact were more likely to reduce fruit and vegetable intake during the pandemic. Women and individuals with poorer sleep quality, limited social contact, and shielding requirements and without higher education were more likely to increase snacking during the pandemic. Individuals with poorer sleep quality, poorer mental health, and regular social contact were more likely to decrease alcohol consumption during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest decreased intake for fruit, vegetable, and alcohol consumption and increased snack intake in response to the pandemic amongst individuals LWBC. These changes appear to differ across various characteristics, suggesting the pandemic has not equally impacted everyone in this population. Findings highlight the need for targeted post-COVID strategies to support individuals LWBC most adversely affected by the pandemic, including women and socially isolated individuals. This encourages resources to be prioritised amongst these groups to prevent further negative impact of the pandemic. Whilst the findings are statistically significant, practically they appear less important. This is necessary to acknowledge when considering interventions and next steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie S Taylor
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Rebecca J Beeken
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Abi Fisher
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Phillippa Lally
- Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kennedy F, Lally P, Miller NE, Conway RE, Roberts A, Croker H, Fisher A, Beeken RJ. Fatigue, quality of life and associations with adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund guidelines for health behaviours in 5835 adults living with and beyond breast, prostate and colorectal cancer in England: A cross-sectional study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:12705-12716. [PMID: 37021752 PMCID: PMC10278485 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many individuals living with and beyond cancer (LWBC) have ongoing quality of life (QoL) issues, including fatigue. The World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) provides health behaviour recommendations for people LWBC, and there is some evidence linking adherence to these with improved QoL. METHODS Adults LWBC (specifically breast, colorectal or prostate cancer) completed a survey covering health behaviours (diet, physical activity, alcohol consumption and smoking), fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue Scale, version 4) and a broad measure of QoL (EQ-5D-5L descriptive scale). Participants were categorised as meeting/not meeting WCRF recommendations, using the following cut-offs classified as meeting the guidelines: ≥150 min physical activity/week, fruit and vegetables (≥5 portions/day), fibre (≥30 g fibre per day), free sugar (<5% of total calories from free sugar), fat (<33% total energy), red meat (<500 g/week), processed meat (none), alcohol consumption (<14 units/week) and not a current smoker. Logistic regression analyses explored associations between WCRF adherence and fatigue and QoL issues, controlling for demographic and clinical variables. RESULTS Among 5835 individuals LWBC (mean age: 67 years, 56% female, 90% white, breast 48%, prostate 32% and colorectal 21%), 22% had severe fatigue and 72% had 1+ issue/s on the EQ-5D-5L. Adhering to physical activity recommendations (odds ratio [OR] = 0.88, confidence interval [CI] = 0.77-0.99), meeting various dietary recommendations (fruit and vegetables OR = 0.79; CI = 0.68-0.91, free sugar OR = 0.85; CI = 0.76-0.96, fat OR = 0.71; CI = 0.62-0.82, red meat OR = 0.65; CI = 0.50-0.85) and not smoking (OR = 0.53, CI = 0.41-0.67) were associated with decreased odds of experiencing severe fatigue. Adhering to physical activity guidelines (OR = 0.71, CI = 0.62-0.82) was also associated with decreased odds of having 1+ QoL issue/s. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to various WCRF recommendations, particularly the recommendation for physical activity, was associated with less fatigue and better QoL in a large UK cohort of people living with and beyond breast, colorectal or prostate cancer. Multi-component interventions designed to support people LWBC to improve health behaviours, in line with the levels recommended by the WCRF, may also improve QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Kennedy
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of LeedsClarendon WayLeedsLS2 9NLUK
| | - Phillippa Lally
- Department of PsychologyUniversity of SurreyGuildfordSurreyGU2 7XHUK
| | - Natalie Ella Miller
- Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonGower StreetLondonWC1E 6BTUK
| | - Rana E. Conway
- Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonGower StreetLondonWC1E 6BTUK
| | - Anna Roberts
- Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonGower StreetLondonWC1E 6BTUK
| | - Helen Croker
- World Cancer Research Fund International140 Pentonville RoadLondonN1 9FWUK
| | - Abigail Fisher
- Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonGower StreetLondonWC1E 6BTUK
| | - Rebecca J. Beeken
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of LeedsClarendon WayLeedsLS2 9NLUK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Conway R, Heuchan G, Croker H, Esser S, Ireland V, Lally P, Beeken R, Fisher A. Comparison between Self-Completed and Interviewer-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recalls in Cancer Survivors: Sampling Bias and Differential Reporting. Nutrients 2022; 14:5236. [PMID: 36558396 PMCID: PMC9781276 DOI: 10.3390/nu14245236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Self-completed 24 h dietary recalls (24-HRs) are increasingly used for research and national dietary surveillance. It is unclear how difficulties with self-completion affect response rates and sample characteristics. This study identified factors associated with being unable to self-complete an online 24-HR but willing to do so with an interviewer. Baseline 24-HRs from the ASCOT Trial were analysed (n = 1224). Adults who had been diagnosed with cancer in the past seven years and completed treatment, were invited to self-complete 24-HRs online using myfood24®. Non-completers were offered an interviewer-administered 24-HR. One third of participants willing to provide dietary data, were unable to self-complete a 24-HR. This was associated with being older, non-white and not educated to degree level. Compared to interviewer-administered 24-HRs, self-completed 24-HRs included 25% fewer items and reported lower intakes of energy, fat, saturated fat and sugar. This study highlights how collection of dietary data via online self-completed 24-HRs, without the provision of an alternative method, contributes to sampling bias. As dietary surveys are used for service and policy planning it is essential to widen inclusion. Optimisation of 24-HR tools might increase usability but interviewer-administered 24-HRs may be the only suitable option for some individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rana Conway
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Gabriella Heuchan
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Helen Croker
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Sara Esser
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Victoria Ireland
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Phillippa Lally
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | | | - Abigail Fisher
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aronsen S, Conway R, Lally P, Roberts A, Croker H, Beeken RJ, Fisher A. Determinants of sleep quality in 5835 individuals living with and beyond breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional survey. J Cancer Surviv 2022; 16:1489-1501. [PMID: 34750779 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01127-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study aimed to quantify the level of sleep problems in 5835 breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors, and explore a number of potential determinants of poor sleep quality in the present sample. BMI, diet, and physical activity were of particular interest as potential determinants. METHODS Participants who completed the 'Health and Lifestyle after Cancer' survey were adults who had been diagnosed with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer (mean time since cancer diagnosis was 35.5 months, SD=13.56). Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. BMI was calculated from self-reported height and weight. Participants were categorised as meeting/not meeting the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) recommendations for fibre, fruit and vegetables, added sugar, red meat, processed meat, fat, alcohol, and physical activity. Analyses accounted for demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS Fifty-seven percent of those with sleep data were classified as poor sleepers (response rate 79%). Being female, having a higher number of cancer treatments, more comorbid conditions, and being more anxious/depressed increased the odds of being a poor sleeper. After adjustment for these factors, there were no associations between diet/alcohol/physical activity and sleep. However, BMI was associated with sleep. Individuals in the overweight and obese categories had 22% and 79% higher odds of being poor sleepers than individuals in the underweight/healthy weight category, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that there may be a need to develop sleep quality interventions for cancer survivors with obesity. Even after adjustment for multiple clinical and demographic factors, BMI (particularly obesity) was associated with poor sleep. Thus, researchers and health professionals should find ways to support individuals with overweight and obesity to improve their sleep quality. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The present findings highlight that poor sleep is a common issue in cancer survivors. Interventions seeking to improve outcomes for cancer survivors over the longer term should consider sleep quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silje Aronsen
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
| | - Rana Conway
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Phillippa Lally
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Anna Roberts
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Helen Croker
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Rebecca J Beeken
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Abigail Fisher
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Miller N, Conway R, Pini S, Buck C, Gil N, Lally P, Beeken RJ, Fisher A. Exploring the perceived impact of social support on the health behaviours of people living with and beyond cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:8357-8366. [PMID: 35879472 PMCID: PMC9311339 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07291-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Social support facilitated healthy behaviours in people living with and beyond cancer (LWBC) before the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about how social support impacted their health behaviours during the pandemic when social restrictions were imposed. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore how social support was perceived to impact the health behaviours of people LWBC during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone with 24 adults living with and beyond breast, prostate and colorectal cancer. Inductive and deductive framework analysis was used to analyse the data. RESULTS Five themes developed. These were (1) Companionship and accountability as motivators for physical activity, (2) Social influences on alcohol consumption, (3) Instrumental support in food practices, (4) Informational support as important for behaviour change and (5) Validation of health behaviours from immediate social networks. CONCLUSION This study described how companionship, social influence, instrumental support, informational support and validation were perceived to impact the health behaviours of people LWBC during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interventions for people LWBC could recommend co-participation in exercise with friends and family; promote the formation of collaborative implementation intentions with family to reduce alcohol consumption; and encourage supportive communication between partners about health behaviours. These interventions would be useful during pandemics and at other times. Government policies to help support clinically extremely vulnerable groups of people LWBC during pandemics should focus on providing access to healthier foods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Miller
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK.
| | - Rana Conway
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Simon Pini
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Caroline Buck
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Natalie Gil
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Phillippa Lally
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Rebecca J Beeken
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Abigail Fisher
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Conway RE, Rigler FV, Croker HA, Lally PJ, Beeken RJ, Fisher A. Dietary supplement use by individuals living with and beyond breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer: A cross-sectional survey. Cancer 2022; 128:1331-1338. [PMID: 34927236 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dietary supplements (DSs) are not recommended for the prevention of cancer recurrence. Although DS use is common in individuals living with and beyond cancer, its associations with beliefs about reduced cancer recurrence risk and demographic and health behaviors are unclear. METHODS Adults (18 years old or older) who had been diagnosed with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer were recruited through National Health Service sites in Essex and London. Participants completed a mailed survey and telephone or online 24-hour dietary recalls (MyFood24). Supplement use was collected during the dietary recalls. Associations between DS use and demographics, health behaviors, and beliefs about DSs and cancer were explored. RESULTS Nineteen percent of 1049 individuals believed that DSs were important for the reduction of cancer recurrence risk, and 40% of individuals reported DS use. DS use was positively associated with being female (odds ratio [OR], 2.48; confidence interval [CI], 1.72-3.56), meeting 5-a-day fruit and vegetable recommendations (OR, 1.36; CI, 1.02-1.82), and believing that DSs were important for reducing cancer recurrence risk (OR, 3.13; CI, 2.35-4.18). DS use was negatively associated with having obesity (OR, 0.58; CI, 0.38-0.87). The most commonly taken DSs overall were fish oils (taken by 13%). Calcium with or without vitamin D was the most common DS taken by individuals with breast cancer (15%). CONCLUSIONS DS use by individuals living with and beyond cancer is associated with demographic factors and health behaviors. A belief that DSs reduce the risk of cancer recurrence is common and positively associated with DS use. There is a need for health care professionals to provide advice about DS use and cancer recurrence risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rana E Conway
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Freyja V Rigler
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen A Croker
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Phillippa J Lally
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Abi Fisher
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kang E, Kim S, Rhee YE, Yun YH. Development and validation of the Highly Effective Health Behavior Pattern Inventory - Short Form. Chronic Illn 2021; 17:81-94. [PMID: 30987434 DOI: 10.1177/1742395319843166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a short form (SF) of the highly effective health behavior pattern inventory (HEBPI) for chronic disease patients for comfort to use. METHODS HEBPI-SF is a self-reported questionnaire based on highly effective health behaviors associated with building healthy habits. HEBPI-SF was validated by calculating adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for the 12 HEBPI-SF health behavior subscales and the maintenance of the 12 corresponding health habits. RESULTS HEBPI-SF developed in this study comprised 12 subscales and 53 items, utilizing patient data (N = 724) derived from the original HEBPI (12 subscales and 131items). HEBPI-SF demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's α of 0.703-0.859) and showed that the 12 health behaviors included in the HEBPI are associated with the maintenance of the corresponding health habits (aOR: 2.29-8.42). The scores of the HEBPI-SF showed a positive correlation with physical, mental, social, spiritual and general health status, quality of life, and self-management strategies. DISCUSSION HEBPI-SF is a reliable tool for the assessment of health behaviors of chronically ill patients. Considering previous findings of simple health behaviors significantly affecting health status, this survey tool for the assessment of health behaviors is useful for promotion and maintenance of healthy habits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunkyo Kang
- Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soojeong Kim
- Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ye E Rhee
- Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young H Yun
- Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Koutoukidis DA, Jones NR, Taylor CJ, Casadei B, Aveyard P. Obesity, self-reported symptom severity, and quality of life in people with atrial fibrillation: A community-based cross-sectional survey. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2020; 30:2221-2229. [PMID: 32917499 DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Intentional weight loss may reduce symptom severity of atrial fibrillation (AF) in relatively young AF patients with overweight. We examined whether symptom severity and quality of life (QoL) are associated with weight status in the general population with AF. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with electrocardiogram-confirmed AF completed validated questionnaires: the EuroQol 5 Dimensions QoL questionnaire and the Toronto Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale (AFSS). The AFSS assessed the AF burden scoring on AF-related symptoms and the total AF burden measured as a combination of duration, frequency, and severity of an irregular heartbeat. Generalized liner models examined the association of body mass index (BMI) with AF severity and QoL adjusting for confounders. Between 2018 and 2019, 882 of 1901 (46%) mailed questionnaires were returned completed. Participants had a mean (SD) age of 74 (10) years old and a BMI of 27.4 (5.6) kg/m2. Sixteen percent reported having never experienced an irregular heartbeat. A 5 kg/m2 higher BMI was associated with a 0.65 (95%CI: 0.25 to 1.06) higher symptom score, where 3 points represent a clinically relevant change in state. A 5 kg/m2 higher BMI was associated with a -1.61 (95%CI: -2.72 to -0.50) lower QoL score. The coefficient of the total AF burden for a 5 kg/m2 higher BMI was 0.17 (95% CI: -0.01 to 0.68). CONCLUSION BMI was positively associated with symptoms and negatively associated with one of the two measures of QoL, but not with the total AF burden. However, the strength of association was small and not clinically meaningful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios A Koutoukidis
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
| | - Nicholas R Jones
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Clare J Taylor
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Barbara Casadei
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Paul Aveyard
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sremanakova J, Sowerbutts AM, Todd C, Cooke R, Burden S. Healthy Eating and Active Lifestyle After Bowel Cancer (HEAL ABC): feasibility randomised controlled trial protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2020; 6:176. [PMID: 33292854 PMCID: PMC7661321 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00721-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Targeting modifiable lifestyle factors including diet and physical activity represents a potentially cost-effective strategy that could support a growing population of colorectal cancer survivors and improve their health outcomes. Currently, effective, evidence-based interventions and resources helping people after bowel cancer to adopt new lifestyle habits are lacking. The aim of this trial is to test the Healthy Eating and Active Lifestyle After Bowel Cancer (HEAL-ABC) intervention to inform a future definitive randomised controlled trial. Methods/design This is a feasibility randomised controlled trial. A total of 72 survivors who have completed surgery and all anticancer treatments will be recruited. The intervention group will receive HEAL-ABC resources based on behaviour change theory combined with supportive telephone calls informed by motivational interviewing every 2 weeks during the 3-month intervention, and once a month for 6 months to follow-up. Participants in the control group will follow usual care and have access to resources available in the public domain. The study is testing feasibility of the intervention including adherence and ability to collect data on anthropometry, body composition, diet, physical activity, behaviour change, quality of life, blood markers, contact with healthcare services, morbidities and overall survival. Discussion The proposed study will add to the evidence base by addressing an area where there is a paucity of data. This study on lifestyle interventions for people after colorectal cancer follows the Medical Research Council guidance on evaluating complex interventions in clinical practice. It focuses on people living after treatment for colorectal cancer and targets an important research area identified by cancer survivors as a research priority reported by the National Cancer Institute and James Lind Alliance UK. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04227353 approved on the 13th of January 2020 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-020-00721-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Sremanakova
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. .,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
| | - Anne Marie Sowerbutts
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Chris Todd
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Cooke
- Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sorrel Burden
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Grimmett C, Foster C, Bradbury K, Lally P, May CR, Myall M, Pinto B, Corbett T. Exploring maintenance of physical activity behaviour change among people living with and beyond gastrointestinal cancer: a cross-sectional qualitative study and typology. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e037136. [PMID: 33122311 PMCID: PMC7597473 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In the last decade, there has been a rapid expansion of physical activity (PA) promotion programmes and interventions targeting people living with and beyond cancer (LWBC). The impact that these initiatives have on long-term maintenance of PA remains under-researched. This study sought to explore the experiences of participants in order to characterise those who have and have not successfully sustained increases in PA following participation in a PA intervention after a diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, and identify barriers and facilitators of this behaviour. DESIGN Cross-sectional qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews with participants who had previously taken part in a PA programme in the UK, explored current and past PA behaviour and factors that promoted or inhibited regular PA participation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Themes and subthemes were identified. Differences between individuals were recognised and a typology of PA engagement was developed. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-seven individuals (n=15 male, mean age=66.3 years) with a diagnosis of GI cancer who had participated in one of four interventions designed to encourage PA participation. SETTING UK. RESULTS Seven themes were identified: disease processes, the role of ageing, emotion and psychological well-being, incorporating PA into everyday life, social interaction, support and self-monitoring and competing demands. A typology with three types describing long-term PA engagement was generated: (1) maintained PA, (2) intermittent PA, (3) low activity. Findings indicate that identifying an enjoyable activity that is appropriate to an individual's level of physical functioning and is highly valued is key to supporting long-term PA engagement. CONCLUSION The typology described here can be used to guide stratified and personalised intervention development and support sustained PA engagement by people LWBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Grimmett
- Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Claire Foster
- Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Katherine Bradbury
- Centre for Clinical and Community Health Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Phillippa Lally
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Carl R May
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Michelle Myall
- NIHR ARC Wessex, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Bernardine Pinto
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Teresa Corbett
- NIHR ARC Wessex, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
McGettigan M, Cardwell CR, Cantwell MM, Tully MA. Physical activity interventions for disease-related physical and mental health during and following treatment in people with non-advanced colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 5:CD012864. [PMID: 32361988 PMCID: PMC7196359 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012864.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. A diagnosis of colorectal cancer and subsequent treatment can adversely affect an individuals physical and mental health. Benefits of physical activity interventions in alleviating treatment side effects have been demonstrated in other cancer populations. Given that regular physical activity can decrease the risk of colorectal cancer, and cardiovascular fitness is a strong predictor of all-cause and cancer mortality risk, physical activity interventions may have a role to play in the colorectal cancer control continuum. Evidence of the efficacy of physical activity interventions in this population remains unclear. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of physical activity interventions on the disease-related physical and mental health of individuals diagnosed with non-advanced colorectal cancer, staged as T1-4 N0-2 M0, treated surgically or with neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy (i.e. chemotherapy, radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy), or both. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 6), along with OVID MEDLINE, six other databases and four trial registries with no language or date restrictions. We screened reference lists of relevant publications and handsearched meeting abstracts and conference proceedings of relevant organisations for additional relevant studies. All searches were completed between 6 June and 14 June 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised control trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs comparing physical activity interventions, to usual care or no physical activity intervention in adults with non-advanced colorectal cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected studies, performed the data extraction, assessed the risk of bias and rated the quality of the studies using GRADE criteria. We pooled data for meta-analyses by length of follow-up, reported as mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) using random-effects wherever possible, or the fixed-effect model, where appropriate. If a meta-analysis was not possible, we synthesised studies narratively. MAIN RESULTS We identified 16 RCTs, involving 992 participants; 524 were allocated to a physical activity intervention group and 468 to a usual care control group. The mean age of participants ranged between 51 and 69 years. Ten studies included participants who had finished active treatment, two studies included participants who were receiving active treatment, two studies included both those receiving and finished active treatment. It was unclear whether participants were receiving or finished treatment in two studies. Type, setting and duration of physical activity intervention varied between trials. Three studies opted for supervised interventions, five for home-based self-directed interventions and seven studies opted for a combination of supervised and self-directed programmes. One study did not report the intervention setting. The most common intervention duration was 12 weeks (7 studies). Type of physical activity included walking, cycling, resistance exercise, yoga and core stabilisation exercise. Most of the uncertainty in judging study bias came from a lack of clarity around allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessors. Blinding of participants and personnel was not possible. The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to moderate overall. We did not pool physical function results at immediate-term follow-up due to considerable variation in results and inconsistency of direction of effect. We are uncertain whether physical activity interventions improve physical function compared with usual care. We found no evidence of effect of physical activity interventions compared to usual care on disease-related mental health (anxiety: SMD -0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.40 to 0.18; 4 studies, 198 participants; I2 = 0%; and depression: SMD -0.21, 95% CI -0.50 to 0.08; 4 studies, 198 participants; I2 = 0%; moderate-quality evidence) at short- or medium-term follow-up. Seven studies reported on adverse events. We did not pool adverse events due to inconsistency in reporting and measurement. We found no evidence of serious adverse events in the intervention or usual care groups. Minor adverse events, such as neck, back and muscle pain were most commonly reported. No studies reported on overall survival or recurrence-free survival and no studies assessed outcomes at long-term follow-up We found evidence of positive effects of physical activity interventions on the aerobic fitness component of physical fitness (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.29; 7 studies, 295; I2 = 68%; low-quality evidence), cancer-related fatigue (MD 2.16, 95% CI 0.18 to 4.15; 6 studies, 230 participants; I2 = 18%; low-quality evidence) and health-related quality of life (SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.62; 6 studies, 230 participants; I2 = 0%; moderate-quality evidence) at immediate-term follow-up. These positive effects were also observed at short-term follow-up but not medium-term follow-up. Only three studies reported medium-term follow-up for cancer-related fatigue and health-related quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The findings of this review should be interpreted with caution due to the low number of studies included and the quality of the evidence. We are uncertain whether physical activity interventions improve physical function. Physical activity interventions may have no effect on disease-related mental health. Physical activity interventions may be beneficial for aerobic fitness, cancer-related fatigue and health-related quality of life up to six months follow-up. Where reported, adverse events were generally minor. Adequately powered RCTs of high methodological quality with longer-term follow-up are required to assess the effect of physical activity interventions on the disease-related physical and mental health and on survival of people with non-advanced colorectal cancer. Adverse events should be adequately reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chris R Cardwell
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Marie M Cantwell
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Mark A Tully
- Institute of Mental Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pugh G, Hough R, Gravestock H, Fisher A. The health behaviour status of teenage and young adult cancer patients and survivors in the United Kingdom. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:767-777. [PMID: 31144171 PMCID: PMC6954124 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04719-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary aim of this study was to investigate the health behaviour status of teenage and young adult (TYA) cancer patients and survivors; the secondary aim was to determine if TYA cancer patients and survivors health behaviour differs to general population controls. METHODS Two hundred sixty-seven young people with cancer (n =83 cancer patients receiving active treatment: n =174 cancer survivors, 57.1% >1 year since treatment completion) and 321 controls completed a health and lifestyle questionnaire which included validated measures of physical activity (PA) (Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire), diet (Dietary Instrument for Nutrition Education, DINE), smoking status, and alcohol consumption (AUDIT-C). RESULTS General population controls and cancer survivors were more likely to meet current (PA) recommendations (p <0.001) than TYA cancer patients undergoing treatment (54.8% vs 52.3% vs 30.1%, respectively). Less than 40% of young people with cancer and controls met fat intake, sugar intake, fibre intake or current fruit and vegetable recommendations. TYA cancer survivors were more likely to report binge drinking than controls (OR=3.26, 95% CI 2.12-5.02, p <0.001). Very few young people with in the study were current smokers. The majority of TYA cancer patients and survivors reported a desire to make positive changes to their health behaviour. CONCLUSION Consideration should be given to whether existing health behaviour change interventions which have demonstrated positive effects among the general TYA population could be adapted for young people with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. Pugh
- Centre for Sports & Exercise Medicine, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, Bancroft Road, London, E1 4DG UK
- Department of Behavioural Science & Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | - R. Hough
- Department of Haematology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - H. Gravestock
- CLIC Sargent, No.1 Farriers Yard, L77-85 Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8JA UK
| | - A. Fisher
- Department of Behavioural Science & Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sremanakova J, Jones D, Cooke R, Burden S. Exploring Views of Healthcare Professionals, Researchers, and People Living with and beyond Colorectal Cancer on a Healthy-Eating and Active Lifestyle Resource. Nutrients 2019; 11:E2482. [PMID: 31623177 PMCID: PMC6835229 DOI: 10.3390/nu11102482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People after bowel cancer are at high risk of cancer recurrences and co-morbidities, and therefore strategies are needed to reduce these risks. One promising strategy targets modifiable lifestyle factors including diet and physical activity. However, effective, evidence-based resources in adopting new lifestyle habits are currently lacking. METHODS The Healthy-Eating and Active Lifestyle After Bowel Cancer (HEAL ABC) resource was developed incorporating behavior change theory and World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute of Cancer Research guidelines. Focus groups and telephone interviews were conducted with professionals and survivors (age ≥18 years) to obtain feedback on the resource layout, structure, and content. Recorded data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using framework analysis. RESULTS Thirty participants evaluated the resource-19 cancer survivors and 11 professionals. Survivors' mean age was 62 years (SD 11.5), 11 (58%) were females and 8 (42%) were male. Professionals were all females and mean age was 40 years (SD 6.06). Both survivors and professionals evaluated the resource as useful and provided suggestions for improvements. CONCLUSIONS HEAL ABC is an evidence-based resource designed to aid cancer survivors in translating their motivation into action. It was valued positively by both survivors and healthcare professionals and viewed as filling a gap in post-treatment advice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Sremanakova
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Debra Jones
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Richard Cooke
- Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK.
| | - Sorrel Burden
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Current opportunities to catalyze research in nutrition and cancer prevention - an interdisciplinary perspective. BMC Med 2019; 17:148. [PMID: 31357989 PMCID: PMC6664739 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1383-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer Research UK and Ludwig Cancer Research convened an inaugural international Cancer Prevention and Nutrition Conference in London on December 3-4, 2018. Much of the discussion focused on the need for systematic, interdisciplinary approaches to better understand the relationships of nutrition, exercise, obesity and metabolic dysfunction with cancer development. Scientists at the meeting underscored the importance of studying the temporal natural history of exposures that may cumulatively impact cancer risk later in life.A robust dialogue identified obesity as a major risk for cancer, and the food environment, especially high energy and low nutrient processed foods, as strong and prevalent risk factors for obesity. Further engagement highlighted challenges in the post-diagnostic setting, where similar opportunities to understand the complex interplay of nutrition, physical activity, and weight will inform better health outcomes.Going forward, holistic research approaches, encompassing insights from multiple disciplines and perspectives, will catalyze progress urgently needed to prevent cancer and improve public health.
Collapse
|
22
|
Walker AK, Chang A, Ziegler AI, Dhillon HM, Vardy JL, Sloan EK. Low dose aspirin blocks breast cancer-induced cognitive impairment in mice. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0208593. [PMID: 30532184 PMCID: PMC6287899 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer patients with non-central nervous system tumors often suffer from cognitive impairment. While chemotherapy has long been attributed as the cause of these memory, learning and concentration difficulties, we recently observed cognitive impairment in cancer patients prior to treatment. This suggests the cancer alone may be sufficient to induce cognitive impairment, however the mechanisms are unknown. Here, we show that we can experimentally replicate the clinical phenomenon of cancer-associated cognitive impairment and we identify inflammation as a causal mechanism. We demonstrate that a peripheral tumor is sufficient to induce memory loss. Using an othotopic mouse model of breast cancer, we found that mice with 4T1.2 or EO771 mammary tumors had significantly poorer memory than mice without tumors. Memory impairment was independent of cancer-induced sickness behavior, which was only observed during the later stage of cancer progression in mice with high metastatic burden. Tumor-secreted factors were sufficient to induce memory impairment and pro-inflammatory cytokines were elevated in the plasma of tumor-bearing mice. Oral treatment with low-dose aspirin completely blocked tumor-induced memory impairment without affecting tumor-induced sickness or tumor growth, demonstrating a causal role for inflammation in cognitive impairment. These findings suggest that anti-inflammatories may be a safe and readily translatable strategy that could be used to prevent cancer-associated cognitive impairment in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam K. Walker
- Drug Discovery Biology Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Aeson Chang
- Drug Discovery Biology Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexandra I. Ziegler
- Drug Discovery Biology Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Haryana M. Dhillon
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Janette L. Vardy
- Concord Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Erica K. Sloan
- Drug Discovery Biology Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Cousins Center for PNI, UCLA Semel Institute, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, and UCLA AIDS Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United states of America
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Webb J, Fife-Schaw C, Ogden J, Foster J. The Effect of the Move More Pack on the Physical Activity of Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a Randomized Waiting List Control Trial with Process Evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc 2017; 6:e220. [PMID: 29122737 PMCID: PMC5701086 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.7755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2017] [Revised: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Physical activity can improve many common side effects of cancer treatment as well as improve physical function and quality of life (QOL). In addition, physical activity can improve survival rate and reduce cancer recurrence. Despite these benefits, only 23% of cancer survivors in England are active to recommended levels. Cancer survivors are interested in lifestyle behavior change. Home-based interventions offer a promising means for changing physical activity behavior. Prediagnosis levels of physical activity and self-efficacy have been reported to be predictors of physical activity behavior change. The Move More Pack, which has undergone revision, is a printed resource with supporting Internet-based tools that aims to increase the physical activity of cancer survivors in the United Kingdom. The revised Move More Pack is underpinned by the theory of planned behavior and the social cognitive theory. Objective The aim of this proposed study was to investigate the effect of the revised Move More Pack, supported by Internet-based tools, on physical activity, self-efficacy, and health-related QOL (HRQOL) of cancer survivors in the United Kingdom. Methods This study is a two-arm waiting list randomized control trial with embedded process evaluation. A sample of 99 participants per arm will be recruited by invitation through an email database of cancer survivors held by UK charity Macmillan Cancer Support and an advert placed on the Macmillan Cancer Support Facebook page. Each participant is randomized to receive brief physical activity information and the UK guidelines for physical activity, or brief physical activity information and the revised Move More Pack with supporting Internet-based tools. The intervention and control arm will be followed up at 12 weeks to identify changes in self-reported physical activity, self-efficacy, and HRQOL based on Web-based questionnaires. The control arm will receive the revised Move More Pack at 12 weeks with follow-up at 24 weeks. The intervention arm is followed up at 24 weeks to determine maintenance of reported changes. Subgroup analyses will be completed based on participants’ prediagnosis level of physical activity and baseline self-efficacy as possible predictors of positive changes. Use of each component of the revised Move More Pack will be assessed using a 4-point Likert scale. Semistructured phone interviews will evaluate the use and perceived usefulness of the revised Move More Pack. Results Participant recruitment started in March 2017. Projected completion of this study is October 2018. Conclusions This study’s findings will identify if the proposed low-cost broad reach intervention improves physical activity, self-efficacy, and the HRQOL of cancer survivors. The process evaluation is designed to contextualize the use and perceived usefulness of the revised Move More Pack, help augment its efficient distribution, and identify potential improvements to its design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Webb
- Centre for Primary Health and Social Care, School of Social Professions, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Fife-Schaw
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Ogden
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Jo Foster
- Support and Wellbeing Team, Macmillan Cancer Support, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Croker H, Beeken RJ. Applied Interventions in the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity Through the Research of Professor Jane Wardle. Curr Obes Rep 2017; 6:57-62. [PMID: 28265868 PMCID: PMC5359372 DOI: 10.1007/s13679-017-0249-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Obesity presents a challenge for practitioners, policy makers, researchers and for those with obesity themselves. This review focuses on psychological approaches to its management and prevention in children and adults. RECENT FINDINGS Through exploring the work of the late Professor Jane Wardle, we look at the earliest behavioural treatment approaches and how psychological theory has been used to develop more contemporary approaches, for example incorporating genetic feedback and habit formation theory into interventions. We also explore how Jane has challenged thinking about the causal pathways of obesity in relation to eating behaviour. Beyond academic work, Jane was an advocate of developing interventions which had real-world applications. Therefore, we discuss how she not only developed new interventions but also made these widely available and the charity that she established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Croker
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | - Rebecca J. Beeken
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| |
Collapse
|