1
|
Gyftopoulos S, Simon E, Swartz JL, Smith SW, Martinez LS, Babb JS, Horwitz LI, Makarov DV. Efficacy and Impact of a Multimodal Intervention on CT Pulmonary Angiography Ordering Behavior in the Emergency Department. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21:309-318. [PMID: 37247831 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of a multimodal intervention in reducing CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) overutilization in the evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department (ED). METHODS Previous mixed-methods analysis of barriers to guideline-concordant CTPA ordering results was used to develop a provider-focused behavioral intervention consisting of a clinical decision support tool and an audit and feedback system at a multisite, tertiary academic network. The primary outcome (guideline concordance) and secondary outcomes (yield and CTPA and D-dimer order rates) were compared using a pre- and postintervention design. ED encounters for adult patients from July 5, 2017, to January 3, 2019, were included. Fisher's exact tests and statistical process control charts were used to compare the pre- and postintervention groups for each outcome. RESULTS Of the 201,912 ED patient visits evaluated, 3,587 included CTPA. Guideline concordance increased significantly after the intervention, from 66.9% to 77.5% (P < .001). CTPA order rate and D-dimer order rate also increased significantly, from 17.1 to 18.4 per 1,000 patients (P = .035) and 30.6 to 37.3 per 1,000 patients (P < .001), respectively. Percent yield showed no significant change (12.3% pre- versus 10.8% postintervention; P = .173). Statistical process control analysis showed sustained special-cause variation in the postintervention period for guideline concordance and D-dimer order rates, temporary special-cause variation for CTPA order rates, and no special-cause variation for percent yield. CONCLUSION Our success in increasing guideline concordance demonstrates the efficacy of a mixed-methods, human-centered approach to behavior change. Given that neither of the secondary outcomes improved, our results may demonstrate potential limitations to the guidelines directing the ordering of CTPA studies and D-dimer ordering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soterios Gyftopoulos
- Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, and Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York; Chief of Radiology, NYU-Brooklyn.
| | - Emma Simon
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, and Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Jordan L Swartz
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Silas W Smith
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York; and Chief, Division of Quality, Safety, and Practice Innovation, Institute for Innovations in Medical Education, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Leticia Santos Martinez
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, and Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - James S Babb
- Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Leora I Horwitz
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York; Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York; and Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York. https://twitter.com/Leorahorwitzmd
| | - Danil V Makarov
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Urology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York; and Department of Urology, VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, New York. https://twitter.com/Dannymak76
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Evans BA, Akbari A, Bailey R, Bethell L, Bufton S, Carson-Stevens A, Dixon L, Edwards A, John A, Jolles S, Kingston MR, Lyons J, Lyons R, Porter A, Sewell B, Thornton CA, Watkins A, Whiffen T, Snooks H. Evaluation of the shielding initiative in Wales (EVITE Immunity): protocol for a quasiexperimental study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059813. [PMID: 36691218 PMCID: PMC9461087 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Shielding aimed to protect those predicted to be at highest risk from COVID-19 and was uniquely implemented in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinically extremely vulnerable people identified through algorithms and screening of routine National Health Service (NHS) data were individually and strongly advised to stay at home and strictly self-isolate even from others in their household. This study will generate a logic model of the intervention and evaluate the effects and costs of shielding to inform policy development and delivery during future pandemics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a quasiexperimental study undertaken in Wales where records for people who were identified for shielding were already anonymously linked into integrated data systems for public health decision-making. We will: interview policy-makers to understand rationale for shielding advice to inform analysis and interpretation of results; use anonymised individual-level data to select people identified for shielding advice in March 2020 and a matched cohort, from routine electronic health data sources, to compare outcomes; survey a stratified random sample of each group about activities and quality of life at 12 months; use routine and newly collected blood data to assess immunity; interview people who were identified for shielding and their carers and NHS staff who delivered healthcare during shielding, to explore compliance and experiences; collect healthcare resource use data to calculate implementation costs and cost-consequences. Our team includes people who were shielding, who used their experience to help design and deliver this study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has received approval from the Newcastle North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee (IRAS 295050). We will disseminate results directly to UK government policy-makers, publish in peer-reviewed journals, present at scientific and policy conferences and share accessible summaries of results online and through public and patient networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridie Angela Evans
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
- PRIME Centre Wales, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| | | | | | | | - Samantha Bufton
- Knowledge and Analytical Services, Welsh Government, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Lucy Dixon
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ann John
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| | | | - Mark Rhys Kingston
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
- PRIME Centre Wales, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| | - Jane Lyons
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| | - Ronan Lyons
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| | - Alison Porter
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
- PRIME Centre Wales, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| | - Bernadette Sewell
- Swansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, West Glamorgan, UK
| | | | | | - Tony Whiffen
- Knowledge and Analytical Services, Welsh Government, Cardiff, UK
| | - Helen Snooks
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
- PRIME Centre Wales, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kingston M, Jones J, Black S, Evans B, Ford S, Foster T, Goodacre S, Jones ML, Jones S, Keen L, Longo M, Lyons RA, Pallister I, Rees N, Siriwardena AN, Watkins A, Williams J, Wilson H, Snooks H. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of paramedic administered fascia iliaca compartment block for emergency hip fracture (RAPID 2)-protocol for an individually randomised parallel-group trial. Trials 2022; 23:677. [PMID: 35978361 PMCID: PMC9385096 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06522-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Approximately 75,000 people fracture a hip each year in the UK. This painful injury can be devastating—with a high associated mortality rate—and survivors likely to be more dependent and less mobile. Pain relief at the scene of injury is known to be inadequate. Intravenous morphine is usually given by paramedics, but opioids are less effective for dynamic pain and can cause serious side effects, including nausea, constipation, delirium and respiratory depression. These may delay surgery, require further treatment and worsen patient outcomes. We completed a feasibility study of paramedic-provided fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB), testing the intervention, trial methods and data collection. The study (RAPID) demonstrated that a full trial was feasible. In this subsequent study, we aim to test safety, clinical and cost-effectiveness of paramedic-provided FICB as pain relief to patients with suspected hip fracture in the prehospital environment. Methods We will conduct a pragmatic multi-centre individually randomised parallel-group trial, with a 1:1 allocation between usual care (control) and FICB (intervention). Hospital clinicians in five sites (paired ambulance services and receiving hospitals) in England and Wales will train 220 paramedics to administer FICB. The primary outcome is change in pain score from pre-randomisation to arrival at the emergency department. One thousand four hundred patients are required to find a clinically important difference between trial arms in the primary outcome (standardised statistical effect ~ 0.2; 90% power, 5% significance). We will use NHS Digital (England) and the SAIL (Secure Anonymised Information Linkage) databank (Wales) to follow up patient outcomes using routine anonymised linked data in an efficient study design, and questionnaires to capture patient-reported outcomes at 1 and 4 months. Secondary outcomes include mortality, length of hospital stay, job cycle time, prehospital medications including morphine, presence of hip fracture, satisfaction, mobility, and NHS costs. We will assess safety by monitoring serious adverse events (SAEs). Discussion The trial will help to determine whether paramedic administered FICB is a safe, clinically and cost-effective treatment for suspected hip fracture in the pre-hospital setting. Impact will be shown if and when clinical guidelines either recommend or reject the use of FICB in routine practice in this context. Trial registration ISRCTN15831813. Registered on 22 September 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sarah Black
- South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Simon Ford
- Swansea Bay University Health Board, Port Talbot, UK
| | - Theresa Foster
- East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Melbourn, UK
| | | | | | | | - Leigh Keen
- Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust, St Asaph, UK
| | | | | | - Ian Pallister
- Swansea Bay University Health Board, Port Talbot, UK
| | - Nigel Rees
- Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust, St Asaph, UK
| | | | | | - Julia Williams
- South East Coast Ambulance Services NHS Foundation Trust, Crawley, UK
| | - Helen Wilson
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
The impact of an integrated care intervention on mortality and unplanned hospital admissions in a disadvantaged community in England: A difference-in-differences study. Health Policy 2022; 126:549-557. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
5
|
Gatt ML, Cassar M, Buttigieg SC. A review of literature on risk prediction tools for hospital readmissions in older adults. J Health Organ Manag 2022; ahead-of-print. [PMID: 35032131 DOI: 10.1108/jhom-11-2020-0450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this paper is to identify and analyse the readmission risk prediction tools reported in the literature and their benefits when it comes to healthcare organisations and management. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH Readmission risk prediction is a growing topic of interest with the aim of identifying patients in particular those suffering from chronic diseases such as congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes, who are at risk of readmission. Several models have been developed with different levels of predictive ability. A structured and extensive literature search of several databases was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis strategy, and this yielded a total of 48,984 records. FINDINGS Forty-three articles were selected for full-text and extensive review after following the screening process and according to the eligibility criteria. About 34 unique readmission risk prediction models were identified, in which their predictive ability ranged from poor to good (c statistic 0.5-0.86). Readmission rates ranged between 3.1 and 74.1% depending on the risk category. This review shows that readmission risk prediction is a complex process and is still relatively new as a concept and poorly understood. It confirms that readmission prediction models hold significant accuracy at identifying patients at higher risk for such an event within specific context. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS Since most prediction models were developed for specific populations, conditions or hospital settings, the generalisability and transferability of the predictions across wider or other contexts may be difficult to achieve. Therefore, the value of prediction models remains limited to hospital management. Future research is indicated in this regard. ORIGINALITY/VALUE This review is the first to cover readmission risk prediction tools that have been published in the literature since 2011, thereby providing an assessment of the relevance of this crucial KPI to health organisations and managers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria Cassar
- Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Sandra C Buttigieg
- Health Systems Management and Leadership, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Girwar SM, Jabroer R, Fiocco M, Sutch SP, Numans ME, Bruijnzeels MA. A systematic review of risk stratification tools internationally used in primary care settings. Health Sci Rep 2021; 4:e329. [PMID: 34322601 PMCID: PMC8299990 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS In our current healthcare situation, burden on healthcare services is increasing, with higher costs and increased utilization. Structured population health management has been developed as an approach to balance quality with increasing costs. This approach identifies sub-populations with comparable health risks, to tailor interventions for those that will benefit the most. Worldwide, the use of routine healthcare data extracted from electronic health registries for risk stratification approaches is increasing. Different risk stratification tools are used on different levels of the healthcare continuum. In this systematic literature review, we aimed to explore which tools are used in primary healthcare settings and assess their performance. METHODS We performed a systematic literature review of studies applying risk stratification tools with health outcomes in primary care populations. Studies in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries published in English-language journals were included. Search engines were utilized with keywords, for example, "primary care," "risk stratification," and "model." Risk stratification tools were compared based on different measures: area under the curve (AUC) and C-statistics for dichotomous outcomes and R 2 for continuous outcomes. RESULTS The search provided 4718 articles. Specific election criteria such as primary care populations, generic health utilization outcomes, and routinely collected data sources identified 61 articles, reporting on 31 different models. The three most frequently applied models were the Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG, n = 23), the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI, n = 19), and the Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCC, n = 7). Most AUC and C-statistic values were above 0.7, with ACG showing slightly improved scores compared with the CCI and HCC (typically between 0.6 and 0.7). CONCLUSION Based on statistical performance, the validity of the ACG was the highest, followed by the CCI and the HCC. The ACG also appeared to be the most flexible, with the use of different international coding systems and measuring a wider variety of health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelley‐Ann M. Girwar
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, LUMC Campus the HagueLeiden University Medical CentreThe HagueThe Netherlands
- Jan van Es InstituutEdeThe Netherlands
| | - Robert Jabroer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, LUMC Campus the HagueLeiden University Medical CentreThe HagueThe Netherlands
| | - Marta Fiocco
- Mathematical InstituteLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
- Medical Statistics Department of Biomedical Data ScienceLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric OncologyUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Stephen P. Sutch
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, LUMC Campus the HagueLeiden University Medical CentreThe HagueThe Netherlands
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementBloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Mattijs E. Numans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, LUMC Campus the HagueLeiden University Medical CentreThe HagueThe Netherlands
| | - Marc A. Bruijnzeels
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, LUMC Campus the HagueLeiden University Medical CentreThe HagueThe Netherlands
- Jan van Es InstituutEdeThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liotta G, Madaro O, Scarcella P, Inzerilli MC, Frattini B, Riccardi F, Accarino N, Mancinelli S, Terracciano E, Orlando S, Marazzi MC. Assessing the Impact of A Community-Based Pro-Active Monitoring Program Addressing the need for Care of Community-Dwelling Citizens aged more than 80: Protocol for a Prospective Pragmatic Trial and Results of the Baseline Assessment. TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE AT UNISA 2021. [PMID: 34447708 PMCID: PMC8370536 DOI: 10.37825/2239-9747.1004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to describe the protocol of a study assessing the impact of a Community-based pro-Active Monitoring Program, by measuring the effect in counteracting the adverse outcomes related to frailty. Methods a prospective pragmatic trial will be carried out to describe the impact of an intervention on people aged>80, adjusted for relevant parameters: demographic variables, comorbidities, disability and bio-psycho-social frailty. They have been assessed with the Functional Geriatric Evaluation questionnaire that is a validated tool. Mortality, Acute Hospital Admission rates, Emergency Room Visit rates and Institutionalization rates are the main outcomes to be evaluated annually, over three years. Two groups of patients, made up by 578 cases (undergoing the intervention under study) and 607 controls have been enrolled and interviewed. Results at baseline the two groups are quite similar for age, living arrangement, comorbidity, disability and cognitive status. They differ in education, economic resources and physical status (that are better in the control group) and in social resources (that is better in the case group). The latter was expected since the intervention is focused on increasing social capital at individual and community level and aimed at improving survival among the cases as well as reducing the recourse to hospital and residential Long Term Care. Conclusion The proposed study addresses a crucial issue: assessing the impact of a bottom up care service consisting of social and health interventions aimed at reducing social isolation and improving access to health care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Liotta
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00173, Rome, Italy
| | - O Madaro
- Community of Sant'Egidio, "Long Live the Elderly!" program, Via San Gallicano 25, 00153, Rome, Italy
| | - P Scarcella
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00173, Rome, Italy
| | - M C Inzerilli
- Community of Sant'Egidio, "Long Live the Elderly!" program, Via San Gallicano 25, 00153, Rome, Italy
| | - B Frattini
- Community of Sant'Egidio, "Long Live the Elderly!" program, Via San Gallicano 25, 00153, Rome, Italy
| | - F Riccardi
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00173, Rome, Italy
| | - N Accarino
- Community of Sant'Egidio, "Long Live the Elderly!" program, Via San Gallicano 25, 00153, Rome, Italy
| | - S Mancinelli
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00173, Rome, Italy
| | - E Terracciano
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00173, Rome, Italy
| | - S Orlando
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00173, Rome, Italy
| | - M C Marazzi
- LUMSA University, Via della Traspontina 21, 00193, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Implementing emergency admission risk prediction in general practice: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2021; 72:e138-e147. [PMID: 34782316 PMCID: PMC8597766 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Using computer software in general practice to predict patient risk of emergency hospital admission has been widely advocated, despite limited evidence about effects. In a trial evaluating the introduction of a Predictive Risk Stratification Model (PRISM), statistically significant increases in emergency hospital admissions and use of other NHS services were reported without evidence of benefits to patients or the NHS. Aim To explore GPs’ and practice managers’ experiences of incorporating PRISM into routine practice. Design and setting Semi-structured interviews were carried out with GPs and practice managers in 18 practices in rural, urban, and suburban areas of south Wales. Method Interviews (30–90 min) were conducted at 3–6 months after gaining PRISM access, and ∼18 months later. Data were analysed thematically using Normalisation Process Theory. Results Responders (n = 22) reported that the decision to use PRISM was based mainly on fulfilling Quality and Outcomes Framework incentives. Most applied it to <0.5% practice patients over a few weeks. Using PRISM entailed undertaking technical tasks, sharing information in practice meetings, and making small-scale changes to patient care. Use was inhibited by the model not being integrated with practice systems. Most participants doubted any large-scale impact, but did cite examples of the impact on individual patient care and reported increased awareness of patients at high risk of emergency admission to hospital. Conclusion Qualitative results suggest mixed views of predictive risk stratification in general practice and raised awareness of highest-risk patients potentially affecting rates of unplanned hospital attendance and admissions. To inform future policy, decision makers need more information about implementation and effects of emergency admission risk stratification tools in primary and community settings.
Collapse
|
9
|
Marafino BJ, Escobar GJ, Baiocchi MT, Liu VX, Plimier CC, Schuler A. Evaluation of an intervention targeted with predictive analytics to prevent readmissions in an integrated health system: observational study. BMJ 2021; 374:n1747. [PMID: 34380667 PMCID: PMC8356037 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n1747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the associations between a care coordination intervention (the Transitions Program) targeted to patients after hospital discharge and 30 day readmission and mortality in a large, integrated healthcare system. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING 21 hospitals operated by Kaiser Permanente Northern California. PARTICIPANTS 1 539 285 eligible index hospital admissions corresponding to 739 040 unique patients from June 2010 to December 2018. 411 507 patients were discharged post-implementation of the Transitions Program; 80 424 (19.5%) of these patients were at medium or high predicted risk and were assigned to receive the intervention after discharge. INTERVENTION Patients admitted to hospital were automatically assigned to be followed by the Transitions Program in the 30 days post-discharge if their predicted risk of 30 day readmission or mortality was greater than 25% on the basis of electronic health record data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Non-elective hospital readmissions and all cause mortality in the 30 days after hospital discharge. RESULTS Difference-in-differences estimates indicated that the intervention was associated with significantly reduced odds of 30 day non-elective readmission (adjusted odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 0.93; absolute risk reduction 95% confidence interval -2.5%, -3.1% to -2.0%) but not with the odds of 30 day post-discharge mortality (1.00, 0.95 to 1.04). Based on the regression discontinuity estimate, the association with readmission was of similar magnitude (absolute risk reduction -2.7%, -3.2% to -2.2%) among patients at medium risk near the risk threshold used for enrollment. However, the regression discontinuity estimate of the association with post-discharge mortality (-0.7% -1.4% to -0.0%) was significant and suggested benefit in this subgroup of patients. CONCLUSIONS In an integrated health system, the implementation of a comprehensive readmissions prevention intervention was associated with a reduction in 30 day readmission rates. Moreover, there was no association with 30 day post-discharge mortality, except among medium risk patients, where some evidence for benefit was found. Altogether, the study provides evidence to suggest the effectiveness of readmission prevention interventions in community settings, but further research might be required to confirm the findings beyond this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben J Marafino
- Biomedical Informatics Training Program, Department of Biomedical Data Science, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Gabriel J Escobar
- Systems Research Initiative, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Michael T Baiocchi
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Vincent X Liu
- Systems Research Initiative, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
- Critical Care Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Santa Clara, CA, USA
| | - Colleen C Plimier
- Systems Research Initiative, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Alejandro Schuler
- Systems Research Initiative, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mann J, Thompson F, McDermott R, Esterman A, Strivens E. Impact of an integrated community-based model of care for older people with complex conditions on hospital emergency presentations and admissions: a step-wedged cluster randomized trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:701. [PMID: 34271945 PMCID: PMC8285878 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06668-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health systems must reorient towards preventative and co-ordinated care to reduce hospital demand and achieve positive and fiscally responsible outcomes for older persons with complex needs. Integrated care models can improve outcomes by aligning primary practice with the specialist health and social services required to manage complex needs. This paper describes the impact of a community-facing program that integrates care at the primary-secondary interface on the rate of Emergency Department (ED) presentation and hospital admissions among older people with complex needs. METHODS The Older Persons Enablement and Rehabilitation for Complex Health Conditions (OPEN ARCH) study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with a stepped wedge cluster design. General practitioners (GPs; n = 14) in primary practice within the Cairns region are considered 'clusters' each comprising a mixed number of participants. 80 community-dwelling persons over 70 years of age if non-Indigenous and over 50 years of age if Indigenous were included at baseline with no new participants added during the study. Clusters were randomly assigned to one of three steps that represent the time at which they would commence the OPEN ARCH intervention, and the subsequent intervention duration (3, 6, or 9 months). Each participant was its own control. GPs and participants were not blinded. The primary outcomes were ED presentations and hospital admissions. Data were collected from Queensland Health Casemix data and analysed with multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression modelling to estimate the effectiveness of the OPEN ARCH intervention. Data were analysed at the cluster and participant levels. RESULTS Five clusters were randomised to steps 1 and 2, and 4 clusters randomised to step 3. All clusters (n = 14) completed the trial accounting for 80 participants. An effect size of 9% in service use (95% CI) was expected. The OPEN ARCH intervention was found to not make a statistically significant difference to ED presentations or admissions. However, a stabilising of ED presentations and a trend toward lower hospitalisation rates over time was observed. CONCLUSIONS While this study detected no statistically significant change in ED presentations or hospital admissions, a plateauing of ED presentation and admission rates is a clinically significant finding for older persons with complex needs. Multi-sectoral integrated programs of care require an adequate preparation period and sufficient duration of intervention for effectiveness to be measured. TRIAL REGISTRATION The OPEN ARCH study received ethical approval from the Far North Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee, HREC/17/QCH/104-1174 and is registered on the Australian and New Zealand Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000198325p .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Mann
- Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service, PO Box 906, Cairns, Qld, 4870, Australia. .,College of Public Health, Medicine and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, 4811, Australia.
| | - Fintan Thompson
- College of Public Health, Medicine and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, 4811, Australia
| | - Robyn McDermott
- Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
| | - A Esterman
- Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
| | - Edward Strivens
- Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service, PO Box 906, Cairns, Qld, 4870, Australia.,College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, 4811, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stokes J, Guthrie B, Mercer SW, Rice N, Sutton M. Multimorbidity combinations, costs of hospital care and potentially preventable emergency admissions in England: A cohort study. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003514. [PMID: 33439870 PMCID: PMC7815339 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with multimorbidities have the greatest healthcare needs and generate the highest expenditure in the health system. There is an increasing focus on identifying specific disease combinations for addressing poor outcomes. Existing research has identified a small number of prevalent "clusters" in the general population, but the limited number examined might oversimplify the problem and these may not be the ones associated with important outcomes. Combinations with the highest (potentially preventable) secondary care costs may reveal priority targets for intervention or prevention. We aimed to examine the potential of defining multimorbidity clusters for impacting secondary care costs. METHODS AND FINDINGS We used national, Hospital Episode Statistics, data from all hospital admissions in England from 2017/2018 (cohort of over 8 million patients) and defined multimorbidity based on ICD-10 codes for 28 chronic conditions (we backfilled conditions from 2009/2010 to address potential undercoding). We identified the combinations of multimorbidity which contributed to the highest total current and previous 5-year costs of secondary care and costs of potentially preventable emergency hospital admissions in aggregate and per patient. We examined the distribution of costs across unique disease combinations to test the potential of the cluster approach for targeting interventions at high costs. We then estimated the overlap between the unique combinations to test potential of the cluster approach for targeting prevention of accumulated disease. We examined variability in the ranks and distributions across age (over/under 65) and deprivation (area level, deciles) subgroups and sensitivity to considering a smaller number of diseases. There were 8,440,133 unique patients in our sample, over 4 million (53.1%) were female, and over 3 million (37.7%) were aged over 65 years. No clear "high cost" combinations of multimorbidity emerged as possible targets for intervention. Over 2 million (31.6%) patients had 63,124 unique combinations of multimorbidity, each contributing a small fraction (maximum 3.2%) to current-year or 5-year secondary care costs. Highest total cost combinations tended to have fewer conditions (dyads/triads, most including hypertension) affecting a relatively large population. This contrasted with the combinations that generated the highest cost for individual patients, which were complex sets of many (6+) conditions affecting fewer persons. However, all combinations containing chronic kidney disease and hypertension, or diabetes and hypertension, made up a significant proportion of total secondary care costs, and all combinations containing chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension had the highest proportion of preventable emergency admission costs, which might offer priority targets for prevention of disease accumulation. The results varied little between age and deprivation subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Key limitations include availability of data only from hospitals and reliance on hospital coding of health conditions. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that there are no clear multimorbidity combinations for a cluster-targeted intervention approach to reduce secondary care costs. The role of risk-stratification and focus on individual high-cost patients with interventions is particularly questionable for this aim. However, if aetiology is favourable for preventing further disease, the cluster approach might be useful for targeting disease prevention efforts with potential for cost-savings in secondary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Stokes
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Bruce Guthrie
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Stewart W. Mercer
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel Rice
- Department of Economics and Related Studies and Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Matt Sutton
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lung T, Si L, Hooper R, Di Tanna GL. Health Economic Evaluation Alongside Stepped Wedge Trials: A Methodological Systematic Review. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2021; 39:63-80. [PMID: 33015754 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00963-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, there has been an increase in use of the stepped wedge trial (SWT) design in the context of health services research, due to its pragmatic and methodological advantages over the parallel group design. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to summarise the statistical methods used when conducting economic evaluations alongside SWTs. METHODS A systematic literature search extending to February 2020 was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS-EED) databases to find and evaluate studies where there was an intention to conduct an economic evaluation alongside an SWT. Studies were assessed for their eligibility, findings, reporting of statistical methods and quality of reporting. RESULTS Of the 586 studies retrieved from the literature search, 69 studies were identified and included in this systematic review. A total of 54 studies were published protocols, with eight economic evaluations and seven studies reporting full trial results. Included studies varied in terms of their reporting of statistical methods, in both detail and methodology. There were 34 studies that did not report any statistical methods for the economic evaluation, and only 16 studies reported appropriate methods, mainly using some form of mixed/multilevel model, and two used seemingly unrelated regression. Twelve studies reported the use of generic bootstrap methods and other modelling techniques, whilst the remaining studies failed to appropriately account for clustering, correlation or adjustment for time. CONCLUSIONS The use of appropriate statistical methods that account for time, clustering and correlation between costs and outcomes is an important part of SWT health economics analysis, one that will benefit from an effort to communicate the methods available and their performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Lung
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Edward Ford Building A27, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Lei Si
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia
- School of Health Policy & Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Richard Hooper
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Gian Luca Di Tanna
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bussu S, Marshall M. (Dis)Integrated Care? Lessons from East London. Int J Integr Care 2020; 20:2. [PMID: 33177965 PMCID: PMC7597578 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This paper examines one of the NHS England Pioneers programmes of Integrated Care, which was implemented in three localities in East London, covering the area served by one of the largest hospital groups in the UK and bringing together commissioners, providers and local authorities. The partners agreed to build a model of integrated care that focused on the whole person. This qualitative and participatory evaluation looked at how an ambitious vision translated into the delivery of integrated care on the ground. The study explored the micro-mechanisms of integrated care relationships based on the experience of health and social care professionals working in acute and community care settings. METHODS We employed a participatory approach, the Researcher in Residence model, whereby the researcher was embedded in the organisations she evaluated and worked alongside managers and clinicians to build collaboration across the full range of stakeholders, develop shared learning, and find common ground through competing interests, while trying to address power imbalances. A number of complementary qualitative methods of data generation were used, including documentary analysis, participant observations, semi-structured interviews, and coproduction workshops with frontline health and social care professionals to interpret the data and develop recommendations. RESULTS Our fieldwork exposed persistent organisational fragmentation, despite the dominant rhetoric of integration and efforts to build a shared vision at senior governance levels. The evaluation identified several important themes, including: a growing barrier between acute and community services; a persisting difficulty experienced by health and social care staff in working together because of professional and cultural differences, as well as conflicting organisational priorities and guidelines; and a lack of capacity and support to deliver a genuine multidisciplinary approach in practice, despite the ethos of multiagency being embraced widely. DISCUSSION By focusing on professionals' working routines, we detailed how and why action taken by organisational leaders failed to have tangible impact. The inability to align organisational priorities and guidelines on the ground, as well as a failure to acknowledge the impact of structural incentives for organisations to compete at the expense of cooperation, in a context of limited financial and human resources, acted as barriers to more coordinated working. Within an environment of continuous reconfigurations, staff were often confused about the functions of new services and did not feel they had influence on change processes. Investing in a genuine bottom-up approach could ensure that the range of activities needed to generate system-wide cultural transformation reflect the capacity of the organisations and systems and address genuine local needs. LIMITATIONS The authors acknowledge several limitations of this study, including the focus on one geographical area, East London, and the timing of the evaluation, with several new interventions and programmes introduced more or less simultaneously. Some of the intermediate care services under evaluation were still at pilot stage and some teams were undergoing new reconfigurations, reflecting the fast-pace of change of the past decade. This created confusion at times, for instance when discussing specific roles and activities with participants. We tried to address some of these challenges by organising several workshops with different teams to co-interpret and discuss the findings.
Collapse
|
14
|
Emergency admission risk stratification tools in UK primary care: a cross-sectional survey of availability and use. Br J Gen Pract 2020; 70:e740-e748. [PMID: 32958534 PMCID: PMC7510844 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20x712793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stratifying patient populations by risk of adverse events was believed to support preventive care for those identified, but recent evidence does not support this. Emergency admission risk stratification (EARS) tools have been widely promoted in UK policy and GP contracts. Aim To describe availability and use of EARS tools across the UK, and identify factors perceived to influence implementation. Design and setting Cross-sectional survey in UK. Method Online survey of 235 organisations responsible for UK primary care: 209 clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in England; 14 health boards in Scotland; seven health boards in Wales; and five local commissioning groups (LCGs) in Northern Ireland. Analysis results are presented using descriptive statistics for closed questions and by theme for open questions. Results Responses were analysed from 171 (72.8%) organisations, of which 148 (86.5%) reported that risk tools were available in their areas. Organisations identified 39 different EARS tools in use. Promotion by NHS commissioners, involvement of clinical leaders, and engagement of practice managers were identified as the most important factors in encouraging use of tools by general practices. High staff workloads and information governance were identified as important barriers. Tools were most frequently used to identify individual patients, but also for service planning. Nearly 40% of areas using EARS tools reported introducing or realigning services as a result, but relatively few reported use for service evaluation. Conclusion EARS tools are widely available across the UK, although there is variation by region. There remains a need to align policy and practice with research evidence.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hooper R, Eldridge SM. Cutting edge or blunt instrument: how to decide if a stepped wedge design is right for you. BMJ Qual Saf 2020; 30:245-250. [PMID: 32546592 PMCID: PMC7907557 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Hooper
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sandra M Eldridge
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vollmer S, Mateen BA, Bohner G, Király FJ, Ghani R, Jonsson P, Cumbers S, Jonas A, McAllister KSL, Myles P, Granger D, Birse M, Branson R, Moons KGM, Collins GS, Ioannidis JPA, Holmes C, Hemingway H. Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for patient benefit: 20 critical questions on transparency, replicability, ethics, and effectiveness. BMJ 2020; 368:l6927. [PMID: 32198138 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l6927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Vollmer
- Alan Turing Institute, Kings Cross, London, UK
- Departments of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Bilal A Mateen
- Alan Turing Institute, Kings Cross, London, UK
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Gergo Bohner
- Alan Turing Institute, Kings Cross, London, UK
- Departments of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Franz J Király
- Alan Turing Institute, Kings Cross, London, UK
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Pall Jonsson
- Science Policy and Research, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Cumbers
- Health and Social Care Directorate, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| | - Adrian Jonas
- Data and Analytics Group, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| | | | - Puja Myles
- Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK
| | - David Granger
- Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK
| | - Mark Birse
- Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK
| | - Richard Branson
- Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK
| | - Karel G M Moons
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Gary S Collins
- UK EQUATOR Centre, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John P A Ioannidis
- Meta-Research Innovation Centre at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chris Holmes
- Alan Turing Institute, Kings Cross, London, UK
- Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3LB, UK
| | - Harry Hemingway
- Health Data Research UK London, University College London, London, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research, University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gupta A, Meddings J, Houchens N. Quality & safety in the literature: May 2020. BMJ Qual Saf 2020; 29:436-440. [PMID: 32139399 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin Gupta
- Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA .,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jennifer Meddings
- Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Nathan Houchens
- Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
A new population-based risk stratification tool was developed and validated for predicting mortality, hospital admissions, and health care costs. J Clin Epidemiol 2019; 116:62-71. [PMID: 31472207 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to develop a new population-based risk stratification tool (Chronic Related Score [CReSc]) for predicting 5-year mortality and other outcomes. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING The score included 31 conditions selected from a list of 65 candidates whose weights were assigned according to the Cox model coefficients. The model was built from a sample of 5.4 million National Health Service (NHS) beneficiaries from the Italian Lombardy Region and applied to the remaining 2.7 million NHS beneficiaries. Predictive performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration. CReSc ability in predicting secondary endpoints (i.e., hospital admissions and health care costs) was investigated. Finally, the relationship between CReSc and income was considered. RESULTS Among individuals aged 50-85 years, CReSc performance showed (1) an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.730, (2) an improved reclassification from 44% to 52% with respect to other scores, and (3) a remarkable calibration. A trend toward increasing rates of all the considered endpoints as CReSc increases was observed. Compared with individuals on low-intermediate income, NHS beneficiaries on high income showed better CReSc profile. CONCLUSION We developed a risk stratification tool able to predict mortality, costs, and hospital admissions. The application of CReSc may generate clinically and operationally important effects.
Collapse
|
19
|
Shojania KG. Are increases in emergency use and hospitalisation always a bad thing? Reflections on unintended consequences and apparent backfires. BMJ Qual Saf 2019; 28:687-692. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
20
|
Evans BA, Porter A, Snooks H, Burholt V. A co-produced method to involve service users in research: the SUCCESS model. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019; 19:34. [PMID: 30770732 PMCID: PMC6377726 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0671-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 03/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Public and patient involvement is a routine element of health services research methods to produce better designed and reported studies. Although co-production is recommended when involving people in research, methods for involving people are usually designed and managed by researchers and there is little evidence about methods to co-produce models for effective public and patient involvement. We report the method used by a group of patient and carer service users to develop and implement a model for involving public members in research. Method We recruited people with experience of chronic conditions, as patients and carers, and supported them to develop and implement the involvement model. We collected written records to describe the processes of co-production. Results Sixteen service users were involved through a series of workshop, meeting and email discussions. They specified principles and operating characteristics of the model which concerned an inclusive culture, adequate resources, accessibility, good communication and clarity of purpose and roles. Components of the model included an on-line Panel of members (n = 20), Steering Group meetings, representation and communication system, facilitator, supportive research environment and access to research activities. Over 8 years, members were active in 218 research activities and held 22 Steering Group meetings. The model was named SUCCESS standing for Service Users with Chronic Conditions Encouraging Sensible Solutions. Conclusion We supported patients and carers to co-produce the SUCCESS model of involvement in research. The model’s components, addressing their needs and priorities, led to sustained involvement in research over 8 years. Further work is needed to apply the model in different settings and assess impact of this method of involving people in research. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0671-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alison Porter
- Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Helen Snooks
- Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Vanessa Burholt
- Centre for Innovative Ageing, College of Human and Health Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|