1
|
Ćwiertnia A, Borzyszkowska D, Golara A, Tuczyńska N, Kozłowski M, Poncyljusz W, Sompolska-Rzechuła A, Kotrych K, Cymbaluk-Płoska A. Ovarian Cancer Staging-How CT Scan Descriptions Differ from Surgical Findings. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4560. [PMID: 39124826 PMCID: PMC11312800 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2024] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer death in women worldwide. Most often, it is detected in an advanced stage due to its insidious onset and lack of symptoms in stages I and II. That is why imaging diagnostics is so important. Therefore, we assessed the consistency of the image seen on CT with the actual image assessed during surgery. Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare preoperative evaluation based on CT reports with those obtained during ovarian cancer surgery to determine whether CT is helpful in assessing the possibility of optimal or complete cytoreduction. Methods: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy with cytoreduction. We compared ovarian cancer lesions described by radiologists on CT scans to those described during laparoscopy or laparotomy; the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired observations was used to compare the variables. Results: We observed that the morphology of the tumor, mesenteric infiltration, and the assessment of the involvement of the abdominal, para-aortic, and iliac lymph nodes may differ in CT examination and during surgery. Conclusions: The site of the tumor exit on a CT scan does not always reflect the original site seen during surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrianna Ćwiertnia
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.C.-P.)
| | - Dominika Borzyszkowska
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.C.-P.)
| | - Anna Golara
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.C.-P.)
| | - Natalia Tuczyńska
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.C.-P.)
| | - Mateusz Kozłowski
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.C.-P.)
| | - Wojciech Poncyljusz
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, University Clinical Hospital No. 1, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Agnieszka Sompolska-Rzechuła
- Department of Applied Mathematics in Economics, Faculty of Economics, West Pomerania University of Technology Szczecin, Janickiego 31, 71-270 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Katarzyna Kotrych
- Institute of X-ray Diagnostic and CT, USG and MRI Scanning Workroom, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.C.-P.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mathur P, Ramamoorthy T, Lakshminarayana SK, Nath A, Mathew S, Rajput GK. Utilization of clinical practice guidelines for cancer care in routine practice and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in India. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2024; 20:507-514. [PMID: 38667342 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
AIM The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected cancer service delivery and the feasibility of following the standard treatment guidelines. The present paper describes the use of clinical care guidelines for cancer management in routine practice and the approach adopted towards cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic in India. METHODS A web-based survey was done in 107 hospitals (including public and private health facilities) that hosted Hospital-Based Cancer Registries under the National Cancer Registry Programme. The participants comprised Principal Investigators of these registries, who were also medical, surgical, and radiation oncology clinicians. The survey was done between May 1, 2021, and July 31, 2021. Participants were provided with a web link for the survey questionnaire, confidential login, and password. RESULTS The study found high utilization of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) during practice, with eight out of ten physicians constantly to referring them. The study reported lack of knowledge, skills, and training to administer the treatment based on the guidelines followed by organizational infrastructure and affordability of treatment by the patients as the factors hampering utilization. International clinical guidelines were preferred when compared to national guidelines. The COVID-19 pandemic decreased the use of CPGs, wherein six out of ten clinicians reported their use. CONCLUSION Stakeholders who formulate clinical guidelines must consider the practical aspects and feasibility of implementing such guidelines during a pandemic and similar situations. This should be coupled with adequate changes in care practice to ensure optimal care delivery and a continuum of cancer care in routine and pandemic-imposed situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prashant Mathur
- Indian Council of Medical Research-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Bengaluru, India
| | - Thilagavathi Ramamoorthy
- Indian Council of Medical Research-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Bengaluru, India
| | | | - Anita Nath
- Indian Council of Medical Research-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Bengaluru, India
| | - Stany Mathew
- Indian Council of Medical Research-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Bengaluru, India
| | - Gurpreet Kaur Rajput
- Indian Council of Medical Research-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Bengaluru, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yasin N, Yu M, Jones K, Woolfield A, Hughes I, Nascimento M, Green H. The impact of the COVID-19 public health response on service demand and patient perceptions in a tertiary Australian gynaecology oncology unit. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2024. [PMID: 39073108 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The public health response (PHR) to the COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted healthcare services worldwide. Our hospital, a major tertiary centre, is a unique two-state service across Queensland and New South Wales (NSW). OBJECTIVE The primary objective is to describe changes in service demand and delivery in our hospital resulting from the COVID-19 PHR. The secondary objective is to investigate patient perceptions of this impact. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective interrupted time series analysis and a population-based survey to examine patient perceptions of the impact of the COVID-19 PHR. The study periods were demarcated by the initiation of the COVID-19 PHR on 1 March 2020 with the 'pre' and 'during' COVID-19 periods defined as the 12 months before and after this date respectively. RESULTS More patients were seen during the COVID-19 PHR period. The number or stage of cancer diagnoses was not different (P > 0.05). There was evidence (P = 0.03) of an increase in overall occasions of service and fewer failed attendances (P = 0.005). Fewer surgeries were performed on NSW patients (P = 0.005). The survey response rate was 19.3% (n = 185) with 48% stating that COVID-19 had negatively affected their emotional wellbeing. More participants from NSW than Queensland identified border closures as the most significant impact of the COVID-19 PHR. DISCUSSION The COVID-19 PHR resulted in an unexpected increase in unit service demand and delivery. The necessary implementation of telephone appointments, while less preferred by patients, sustained service requirements. Cross-border tertiary healthcare services should consider the significant impact of border restrictions on patient wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nooraishah Yasin
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Yu
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kristen Jones
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anne Woolfield
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ian Hughes
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marcelo Nascimento
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Helen Green
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wickenheisser NE, Dillon M, Broadwater G, Zacherl K, Bixel K, Levine M, Newton M, Thel H, Tucker K, Gehrig P, Khetan VU, Brunette-Masi LL, Matsuo K, Khouri OR, Duhon A, Gowthaman D, Cowan M, Mojdehbakhsh R, Rose S, Olawaiye A, Davidson BA, Moss HA, Havrilesky LJ. Radical hysterectomy case volume and cervical cancer treatment in the era of COVID-19: A multi-site analysis of National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 179:70-78. [PMID: 37944328 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare radical hysterectomy case volume, cancer stage, and biopsy-to-treatment time of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed before and after onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS In a multi-institution retrospective cohort study conducted at 6 large, geographically diverse National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers, patients treated for newly diagnosed invasive cervical cancer were classified into 2 temporal cohorts based on date of first gynecologic oncology encounter: (1) Pre-Pandemic: 3/1/2018-2/28/2020; (2) Pandemic & Recovery: 4/1/2020-12/31/2021. The primary outcome was total monthly radical hysterectomy case volume. Secondary outcomes were stage at diagnosis and diagnosis-to-treatment time. Statistical analyses used chi-squared and two sample t-tests. RESULTS Between 3/1/2018-12/31/2021, 561 patients were diagnosed with cervical cancer. The Pre-Pandemic and Pandemic & Recovery cohorts had similar age, race, ethnicity, smoking status, and Body Mass Index (BMI). During Pandemic & Recovery, the mean monthly radical hysterectomy case volume decreased from 7[SD 2.8] to 5[SD 2.0] (p = 0.001), the proportion of patients diagnosed with Stage I disease dropped from 278/561 (49.5%) to 155/381 (40.7%), and diagnosis of stage II-IV disease increased from 281/561 (50.1%) to 224/381 (58.8%). Primary surgical management was less frequent (38.3% Pandemic & Recovery versus 46.7% Pre-Pandemic, p = 0.013) and fewer surgically-treated patients received surgery within 6 weeks of diagnosis (27.4% versus 38.9%; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS Lower radical hysterectomy case volume, a shift to higher cervical cancer stage, and delay in surgical therapy were observed across the United States following the COVID-19 outbreak. Decreased surgical volume may result from lower detection of early-stage disease or other factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie E Wickenheisser
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Mairead Dillon
- Biostatistics Shared Resources, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Gloria Broadwater
- Biostatistics Shared Resources, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Kathleen Zacherl
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Kristin Bixel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Monica Levine
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Meredith Newton
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Hannah Thel
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Katherine Tucker
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Paola Gehrig
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America
| | - Varun U Khetan
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Laurie L Brunette-Masi
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Koji Matsuo
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Olivia R Khouri
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Ashley Duhon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Divya Gowthaman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Matthew Cowan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Rachel Mojdehbakhsh
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - Stephen Rose
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - Alexander Olawaiye
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Brittany A Davidson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Haley A Moss
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Laura J Havrilesky
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Plotti F, Silvagni A, Montera R, De Cicco Nardone C, Luvero D, Ficarola F, Cundari GB, Branda F, Angioli R, Terranova C. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Endometrial Cancer: A Monocentric Retrospective Comparative Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7016. [PMID: 38002630 PMCID: PMC10671930 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer represents an ideal target to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 being the most frequent gynecological malignancy in Italy, generally detected at early stages and correlated with favorable oncological outcomes. The present comparative retrospective study carried out at Campus Bio-medico University Foundation in Rome aims to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation, diagnosis and treatment of EC. All women with a histological diagnosis of non-endometrioid and endometrioid endometrial cancer between 1 March 2018 and 31 October 2022 were included. The number of cases was higher in period 2 (95 vs. 64 cases). Time to diagnosis did not show statistically significant differences but in period 2, 92.06% of the diagnoses were made following abnormal uterine bleeding, while in period 1, only 67.02% were. The waiting time for the intervention was significantly shorter in period 2. Definitive histology, FIGO staging, surgical technique and adjuvant therapy did not show significant differences between the two periods. The study demonstrates that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic did not have a direct effect on the diagnostic delay, tumor staging and type of therapy but rather on the presentation pattern of endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Plotti
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Adele Silvagni
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Montera
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo De Cicco Nardone
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Luvero
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Fernando Ficarola
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Gianna Barbara Cundari
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Branda
- Unit of Medical Statistics and Molecular Epidemiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Angioli
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Corrado Terranova
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gracia M, Rodríguez E, Diestro MD, Spagnolo E, García V, Siegrist J, Pérez Y, Zapardiel I, Hernández A. Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the management of gynecologic cancer: a Spanish survey. Observational, multicenter study. BMC Womens Health 2023; 23:488. [PMID: 37710231 PMCID: PMC10500789 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02633-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2) pandemic changed the distribution of healthcare resources, leading in many cases to the suspension of all non-essential treatments and procedures and representing a challenge for medical professionals. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether clinical protocols in gynecologic oncology care were modified as a result of the pandemic and to assess surgeons' perceptions regarding the management of gynecologic cancers". METHODS Data were collected through an anonymous and voluntary survey sent via email to healthcare professionals in the field of gynecologic oncology in Spain. RESULTS A total of 75 gynecologic oncologists completed the online survey. Of these, 93.2% (69) reported working in public hospitals and 62.5% (45) in tertiary care hospitals. 97.3% (71) were affiliated with hospitals treating patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. 85.1% (63) of the respondents expressed concern about the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and 52.1% (38) indicated that the pandemic impacted the diagnostic and therapeutic quality of care for oncology patients. SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) testing was always performed before surgical interventions by 97.3% (71), being considered a best practice in triage by 94.4% (68). 87.5% (63) reported no change in the type of surgical approach during the pandemic. 62.5% (45) experienced limitations in accessing special personal protective equipment for SARS-CoV-2. An impact on the follow-up of patients with gynecologic cancers due to the pandemic was reported by 70.4% (50). CONCLUSIONS Most of the Spanish gynecologic oncologists who responded to our survey reported that the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had affected their clinical practice. The primary measures implemented were an increase in telemedicine, restricting outpatient visits to high-risk or symptomatic patients and the use of SARS-CoV-2 screening prior to surgery. No major changes in the surgical approach or management of the treatment of ovarian, endometrial or cervical cancer during the pandemic were reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myriam Gracia
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Rodríguez
- Department of Gynecology, La Paz University Hospital Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain, 28046, Paseo de la Castellana, 261
| | | | - Emanuela Spagnolo
- Department of Gynecology, La Paz University Hospital Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain, 28046, Paseo de la Castellana, 261.
| | - Virginia García
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaime Siegrist
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Yolanda Pérez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alicia Hernández
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miralpeix E, Fabregó B, Rodriguez-Cosmen C, Solé-Sedeño JM, Gayete S, Jara-Bogunya D, Corcoy M, Mancebo G. Prehabilitation in an ERAS program for endometrial cancer patients: impact on post-operative recovery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:528-533. [PMID: 36898697 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and prehabilitation programs are multidisciplinary care pathways that aim to reduce stress response and improve perioperative outcomes. However, literature is limited regarding the impact of ERAS and prehabilitation in gynecologic oncology surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of implementing an ERAS and prehabilitation program on post-operative outcomes of endometrial cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. METHODS We evaluated consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopy for endometrial cancer that followed ERAS and the prehabilitation program at a single center. A pre-intervention cohort that followed the ERAS program alone was identified. The primary outcome was length of stay, and secondary outcomes were normal oral diet restart, post-operative complications and readmissions. RESULTS A total of 128 patients were included: 60 patients in the ERAS group and 68 patients in the prehabilitation group. The prehabilitation group had a shorter length of hospital stay of 1 day (p<0.001) and earlier normal oral diet restart of 3.6 hours (p=0.005) in comparison with the ERAS group. The rate of post-operative complications (5% in the ERAS group and 7.4% in the prehabilitation group, p=0.58) and readmissions (1.7% in the ERAS group and 2.9% in the prehabilitation group, p=0.63) were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS The integration of ERAS and a prehabilitation program in endometrial cancer patients undergoing laparoscopy significantly reduced hospital stay and time to first oral diet as compared with ERAS alone, without increasing overall complications or the readmissions rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester Miralpeix
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Berta Fabregó
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | | | | | - Sonia Gayete
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - David Jara-Bogunya
- Family and Community Medicine, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Marta Corcoy
- Department of Anesthesia, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Gemma Mancebo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cruz-Valdez A, Palacio-Mejía LS, Quezada-Sánchez AD, Hernández-Ávila JE, Galicia-Carmona T, Cetina-Pérez LDC, Arango-Bravo EA, Isla-Ortiz D, Aranda-Flores CE, Uscanga-Sánchez SR, Madrid-Marina V, Torres-Poveda K. Cervical cancer prevention program in Mexico disrupted due to COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and opportunities. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1008560. [PMID: 36969022 PMCID: PMC10034019 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1008560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the preventive services for cervical cancer (CC) control programs in Mexico, which will result in increased mortality. This study aims to assess the impact of the pandemic on the interruption of three preventive actions in the CC prevention program in Mexico. Methods This study is a retrospective time series analysis based on administrative records for the uninsured population served by the Mexican Ministry of Health. Patient data were retrieved from the outpatient service information system and the hospital discharge database for the period 2017-2021. Data were aggregated by month, distinguishing a pre-pandemic and a pandemic period, considering April 2020 as the start date of the pandemic. A Poisson time series analysis was used to model seasonal and secular trends. Five process indicators were selected to assess the disruption of the CC program, these were analyzed as monthly data (N=39 pre-pandemic, N=21 during the pandemic). HPV vaccination indicators (number of doses and coverage) and diagnostic characteristics of CC cases were analyzed descriptively. The time elapsed between diagnosis and treatment initiation in CC cases was modeled using restricted cubic splines from robust regression. Results Annual HPV vaccination coverage declined dramatically after 2019 and was almost null in 2021. The number of positive Papanicolaou smears decreased by 67.8% (90%CI: -72.3, -61.7) in April-December 2020, compared to their expected values without the pandemic. The immediate pandemic shock (April 2020) in the number of first-time and recurrent colposcopies was -80.5% (95%CI:-83.5, -77.0) and -77.9% (95%CI: -81.0, -74.4), respectively. An increasing trend was observed in the proportion of advanced stage and metastatic CC cases. The fraction of CC cases that did not receive medical treatment or surgery increased, as well as CC cases that received late treatment after diagnosis. Conclusions Our analyses show significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic with declines at all levels of CC prevention and increasing inequalities. The restarting of the preventive programs against CC in Mexico offers an opportunity to put in place actions to reduce the disparities in the burden of disease between socioeconomic levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurelio Cruz-Valdez
- Center for Population Health Research, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Lina Sofia Palacio-Mejía
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT)—Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Amado D. Quezada-Sánchez
- Center for Evaluation and Surveys Research, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | | | - Tatiana Galicia-Carmona
- Department of Clinical Research and Medical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCAN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Eder A. Arango-Bravo
- Department of Clinical Research and Medical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCAN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - David Isla-Ortiz
- Department of Oncology Gynecology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCAN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Vicente Madrid-Marina
- Chronic Infections and Cancer Division, Center for Research on Infectious Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Kirvis Torres-Poveda
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT)—Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico
- Chronic Infections and Cancer Division, Center for Research on Infectious Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Caretto M, Giannini A, Simoncini T. The impact of the pandemic on gynecological oncology practice: Three years later. Maturitas 2023; 172:69-70. [PMID: 36739221 PMCID: PMC9889112 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
10
|
Della Corte L, Cafasso V, Boccia D, Morra I, De Angelis C, De Placido S, Giampaolino P, Di Carlo C, Bifulco G. How SARS-CoV-2 Infection Impacts the Management of Patients with Vulvar Cancer: Experience in a Third-Level Hospital of Southern Italy. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13020240. [PMID: 36836474 PMCID: PMC9967907 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Since February 2020, the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Italy has induced the government to call for lockdown of any activity apart from primary needs, and changing the lives of each of us. All that has dramatically impacted the management of patients affected by cancer. Patients with vulvar cancer (VC) represent a particularly frail population because they are elderly and affected by multiple comorbidities. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on VC patients in terms of delay or impossibility of carrying out the scheduled treatment. Methods: The medical records of patients affected by vulvar tumors, referred to "DAI Materno-Infantile" of AOU Federico II of Naples between February 2020 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The presence of a positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in nasopharyngeal swab defined the positivity to SARS-CoV-2. Results: Twenty-four patients with VC were analyzed and scheduled for treatment. The median age was 70.7 years (range: 59-80). Seven (29.2%) patients were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection: In three (42.8%) patients, the treatment was delayed with no apparent consequences, in four (57.2%), the treatment was delayed or changed due to cancer progression and, of these four, one died due to respiratory complications of COVID-19, and one died due to oncologic disease progression. Conclusion: COVID-19 caused, in most cases, significant delays in oncologic treatments and high mortality in our series of patients affected by VC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Della Corte
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Valeria Cafasso
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Napoli, Italy
| | - Dominga Boccia
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Napoli, Italy
| | - Ilaria Morra
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Naples, Italy
| | - Carmine De Angelis
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Naples, Italy
| | - Sabino De Placido
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Naples, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Giampaolino
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Napoli, Italy
| | - Costantino Di Carlo
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Napoli, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Bifulco
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fotopoulou C, Khan T, Bracinik J, Glasbey J, Abu-Rustum N, Chiva L, Fagotti A, Fujiwara K, Ghebre R, Gutelkin M, Konney TO, Ng J, Pareja R, Kottayasamy Seenivasagam R, Sehouli J, Surappa ST, Bhangu A, Leung E, Sundar S. Outcomes of gynecologic cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international, multicenter, prospective CovidSurg-Gynecologic Oncology Cancer study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 227:735.e1-735.e25. [PMID: 35779589 PMCID: PMC9242690 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The CovidSurg-Cancer Consortium aimed to explore the impact of COVID-19 in surgical patients and services for solid cancers at the start of the pandemic. The CovidSurg-Gynecologic Oncology Cancer subgroup was particularly concerned about the magnitude of adverse outcomes caused by the disrupted surgical gynecologic cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic, which are currently unclear. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the changes in care and short-term outcomes of surgical patients with gynecologic cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that the COVID-19 pandemic had led to a delay in surgical cancer care, especially in patients who required more extensive surgery, and such delay had an impact on cancer outcomes. STUDY DESIGN This was a multicenter, international, prospective cohort study. Consecutive patients with gynecologic cancers who were initially planned for nonpalliative surgery, were recruited from the date of first COVID-19-related admission in each participating center for 3 months. The follow-up period was 3 months from the time of the multidisciplinary tumor board decision to operate. The primary outcome of this analysis is the incidence of pandemic-related changes in care. The secondary outcomes included 30-day perioperative mortality and morbidity and a composite outcome of unresectable disease or disease progression, emergency surgery, and death. RESULTS We included 3973 patients (3784 operated and 189 nonoperated) from 227 centers in 52 countries and 7 world regions who were initially planned to have cancer surgery. In 20.7% (823/3973) of the patients, the standard of care was adjusted. A significant delay (>8 weeks) was observed in 11.2% (424/3784) of patients, particularly in those with ovarian cancer (213/1355; 15.7%; P<.0001). This delay was associated with a composite of adverse outcomes, including disease progression and death (95/424; 22.4% vs 601/3360; 17.9%; P=.024) compared with those who had operations within 8 weeks of tumor board decisions. One in 13 (189/2430; 7.9%) did not receive their planned operations, in whom 1 in 20 (5/189; 2.7%) died and 1 in 5 (34/189; 18%) experienced disease progression or death within 3 months of multidisciplinary team board decision for surgery. Only 22 of the 3778 surgical patients (0.6%) acquired perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infections; they had a longer postoperative stay (median 8.5 vs 4 days; P<.0001), higher predefined surgical morbidity (14/22; 63.6% vs 717/3762; 19.1%; P<.0001) and mortality (4/22; 18.2% vs 26/3762; 0.7%; P<.0001) rates than the uninfected cohort. CONCLUSION One in 5 surgical patients with gynecologic cancer worldwide experienced management modifications during the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant adverse outcomes were observed in those with delayed or cancelled operations, and coordinated mitigating strategies are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Gynecologic Oncology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tabassum Khan
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Juraj Bracinik
- Particle Physics Group, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - James Glasbey
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Luis Chiva
- University Clinic of Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Keiichi Fujiwara
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center and on behalf of GOTIC and APGOT, Saitama, Japan
| | - Rahel Ghebre
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Murat Gutelkin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Thomas O. Konney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Joseph Ng
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rene Pareja
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute, Bogotá and Astorga Oncology Clinic, Medellín, Colombia
| | | | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center of Surgical Oncology, Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Aneel Bhangu
- NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Elaine Leung
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom,Corresponding author: Sudha Sundar, MD, PhD
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Janke MJ, Santiago S, Straubhar AM, Uppal S. The utility of physical examination in ovarian cancer recurrence detection: a retrospective analysis informing virtual surveillance care. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:913-917. [PMID: 35675968 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Given the recent rapid increase in telemedicine in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, we sought to investigate the utility of symptom review, CA125, and physical examination in the detection of ovarian cancer recurrence to determine the role of virtual surveillance care in the COVID-19 era. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2013 and 2020 who achieved remission after primary treatment and then had recurrence while in a routine surveillance program. Modalities that detected recurrence including symptoms, CA125, physical examination, or 'other,' which was denoted if imaging was obtained for reasons other than suspected recurrence and recurrence was incidentally identified, were recorded. Descriptive statistics were performed to summarize the cohort. RESULTS One hundred and nine patients met inclusion criteria. At time of recurrence, elevated CA125 was present in 97 (89.0%) patients, symptoms in 41 (37.6%), and abnormal physical exam findings in 27 (24.8%). Recurrence was incidentally found with imaging obtained for reasons other than suspicion of recurrence in six (5.5%) patients. Recurrence was suspected based on multiple modalities in 46 (42.2%) patients. Elevated CA125, symptoms, or both were present in 102 (93.6%) patients. Of patients with abnormal physical exam findings, 26 (96.3%) also had elevated CA125 or symptoms present. Recurrence was suspected based on physical exam findings alone in one (0.9%) patient. CONCLUSIONS Over 90% of ovarian cancer recurrences were detected by rising CA125, symptoms, or both. Only one patient had recurrence detected by physical examination alone. Given that review of symptoms and CA125 can be conducted virtually, virtual visits may offer a reasonable alternative to in-person visits for ovarian cancer surveillance for patients who have pre-treatment elevated CA125.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica J Janke
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Sarah Santiago
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Alli M Straubhar
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Shitanshu Uppal
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ozturk UK, Akis S, Keles E, Alınca CM, Api M. Single centre experience of 800 gynaecologic oncology cases in 2020: influence of pandemy on cancer surgeries. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2022; 42:2302-2306. [PMID: 35476608 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2049716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the gynaecological oncology surgeries in the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 800 operations performed between January and December 2020 were retrieved. Since the COVID-19 pandemic affected operations as of April 1 2020, we compared the cases of the last nine months of the year with the first three months. Of the operations, 265 (33.1%) were performed between January and March and 535 (66.9%) between April and December. Of 168 malignant operations; 78 (46%) were uterine cancer, 58 (35%) ovarian cancer, 28 (17%) cervical cancer and four (2%) vulvar cancer. If we compared the last nine months of the year with the first three months, a significant increase was observed in the rates of malignant and premalignant, while a significant decrease was detected in benign operations (p<.001). Gynaecological oncology surgeries performed with open or laparoscopic approaches during the COVID-19 pandemic should continue by taking preventive measures. Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? During the COVID-19 pandemic, many international associations and organisations recommended the suspension of elective surgeries. It is still controversial whether the gynaecologic oncology surgical procedures to be performed in this unprecedented time should be laparoscopic or laparotomic.What do the results of this study add? The malignant and premalignant gynaecological oncology surgeries should be safely performed laparoscopically or by laparotomy in the COVID-19 pandemic.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Gynaecologic oncology surgeries can be safely performed by attaching appropriate personal protective equipment procedures with pre-operative COVID-19 PCR testing in the COVID-19 era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugur Kemal Ozturk
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Zeynep Kamil Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Serkan Akis
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Zeynep Kamil Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Esra Keles
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Zeynep Kamil Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cihat Murat Alınca
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Zeynep Kamil Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murat Api
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Zeynep Kamil Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hack AP, Zweemer RP, Jonges TN, van der Leij F, Gerestein CG, Peters M, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, van Rossum PSN. Prognostic impact of waiting time between diagnosis and treatment in patients with cervical cancer: A nationwide population-based study. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 165:339-346. [PMID: 35300853 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prior research underlined the importance of timely oncological care as longer waiting times from diagnosis to treatment may result in poorer survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of waiting time from diagnosis to treatment on overall survival (OS) in patients with cervical cancer treated with curative intent. METHODS Patients from a nationwide population-based cohort with newly diagnosed cervical cancer between 2010 and 2019 were studied. Patients who underwent surgery or (chemo)radiotherapy with curative intent were selected. Waiting time (i.e. interval between first pathologic confirmation and treatment) was modelled as continuous (i.e. linear per week), dichotomized (i.e. ≤8 versus >8 weeks), and polynomial (i.e. restricted cubic splines). The association with OS was examined using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Among 6895 patients with cervical cancer, 2755 treated with primary surgery and 1898 who received primary (chemo)radiotherapy were included. Mean waiting time was 8.5 (±4.2) weeks to surgery and 7.7 (±2.9) weeks to (chemo)radiotherapy. Adjusted for confounders, waiting time to surgery was not significantly associated with OS (continuous HR 0.97 [95%CI: 0.93-1.01], dichotomized HR 0.93 [95%CI: 0.68-1.27], polynomial HR not significant). Similarly, a longer waiting time to (chemo)radiotherapy was not significantly associated with poorer OS (continuous HR 0.97 [95%CI: 0.93-1.00], dichotomized HR 0.91 [95%CI: 0.75-1.09], polynomial HR not significant). CONCLUSIONS This large population-based study demonstrates that a longer waiting time (of up to 12 weeks) from diagnosis to treatment in patients with cervical cancer treated with curatively intended surgery or (chemo)radiotherapy does not negatively impact survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy P Hack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Trudy N Jonges
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Femke van der Leij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis G Gerestein
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Max Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bhatia RK, Lichter KE, Gurram L, MacDuffie E, Lombe D, Sarria GR, Grover S. Gynecologic radiation therapy in low and middle income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:446-450. [PMID: 35256435 PMCID: PMC9997715 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has forever affected healthcare and posed an incredible challenge to our society to care for our sick. Patients with cancer were found early on to have higher rates of complications with COVID-19. Radiation therapy is an integral part of treatment for many types of gynecologic cancer and adaptation on its utilization during the pandemic varied across the globe. In this review, we detail certain guidelines for the use of radiation in gynecologic cancers during the pandemic as well as real world accounts of how different countries adapted to these guidelines or created their own based on individualized resources, staffing, government restrictions, and societal norms. Critically, this review demonstrates the breadth of fractionation schemes and technologies used when resources were limited but highlights the importance of long term follow-up for many of our patients during this time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini K Bhatia
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Katie E Lichter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lavanya Gurram
- Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Emily MacDuffie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Surbhi Grover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Botswana-University of Pennsylvania Partnership, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA .,University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Aydın R, Bostan FS, Kabukcuoğlu K. Two wars on one front: Experiences of gynaecological cancer patients in the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13562. [PMID: 35170125 PMCID: PMC9111480 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of gynaecological cancer patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic from their own perspectives. Methods The study is a descriptive study with a qualitative design based on thematic analysis. We conducted the study with 17 women with gynaecological cancer and receiving chemotherapy in the Medical Oncology and Chemotherapy Unit of Kütahya Training and Research Hospital. The data were collected between April 2021 and May 2021 via an in‐depth individual interview form. The COREQ checklist was followed in the study. Results As a result of the interviews, we identified four main themes: the impacts of COVID‐19 on life, the impact of COVID‐19 on cancer treatment, the biggest fear during the COVID‐19 pandemic and the metaphors of struggling with cancer during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Conclusion The disruption of treatment services during the COVID‐19 pandemic and women's fear of infection by the virus led to delays in cancer diagnosis and treatment. This situation caused the women's state of health to deteriorate, and the resultant regret and sadness that they experienced had an adverse effect on their mental health. Furthermore, women's self‐isolation due to the fear of infection by the virus had a negative effect on their psychosocial health. Telehealth services should be provided for cancer patients to obtain accurate information and to easily access information about treatment processes during the pandemic, and telepsychological hotlines and peer support groups should be established to improve the psychosocial health of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruveyde Aydın
- Health Sciences Faculty, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Recker F, Dohmen S, Egger EK, Stope MB, Dimitrova D, Könsgen D, Ritter M, Sehouli J, Bondio MG, Mustea A. Impact of COVID-19 on gynaecological patient care: results of patient's survey with 327 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022; 305:389-395. [PMID: 34705116 PMCID: PMC8549413 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06280-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The pandemic SARS-CoV-2 poses new and unprecedented challenges for health care systems on a national and global level. Although the current situation has been going on for more than 1 year, there is limited data on the impact of the pandemic on general hospital and medical practice care. This survey captures the perspective of patients with gynaecological diseases of this impact. METHODS Using a paper-based questionnaire, 327 patients were asked about medical care and their experiences during the pandemic at the University Hospital Bonn and the University Hospital Charité Berlin. The study was performed from the 1st June to 30th September 2020. RESULTS A total of 327 patients participated in the study: 156 stated to have been tested for coronavirus, and 1 patient reported a positive test. 41.3% of the patients felt insecure about the current situation, 30.4% were concerned about the risk of infection during the hospital stay. The pandemic-specific measures in hospitals and medical practices unsettled 6.8% of patients. 18.1% of patients feared that their gynaecological disease would not be treated adequately due to the pandemic. 55.7% of patients reported that their confidence in their physicians has increased during the pandemic. CONCLUSION The results show that patients' confidence in the healthcare system and the physicians acting significantly increased during the COVID-19 crisis. Transparent and comprehensive information policy regarding actions and restrictions within the COVID-19 crisis eases patients concerns and improves patients' confidence in their physicians, which is crucial for a successful treatment's outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Recker
- Department for Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
| | - S Dohmen
- Department for Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - E K Egger
- Department for Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - M B Stope
- Department for Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - D Dimitrova
- Department for Gynecology with Centre for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - D Könsgen
- Department for Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - M Ritter
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - J Sehouli
- Department for Gynecology with Centre for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Gadebusch Bondio
- Institute of Medical Humanities, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - A Mustea
- Department for Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chargari C, Arbyn M, Leary A, Abu-Rustum NR, Basu P, Bray F, Chopra S, Nout R, Tanderup K, Viswanathan AN, Zacharopoulou C, Soria JC, Deutsch E, Gouy S, Morice P. Increasing global accessibility to high-level treatments for cervical cancers. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 164:231-241. [PMID: 34716024 PMCID: PMC9496636 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Human papillomaviruses (HPV)-related gynecological cancers are a major health care issue, and a leading cause of cancer death in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). In 2020, the World Health Organization launched a program aimed at cervical cancer elimination, by screening and vaccination strategies. Offering the best possible care to women diagnosed with invasive cancer is a complementary objective. Treatment of cervical cancer as per modern standards is complex and multimodal, mainly relying on surgery, external-beam radiotherapy (+/-chemotherapy) and brachytherapy. In parallel with the pivotal role of multidisciplinary discussion, international societies provide guidance to define the most effective and least toxic anti-cancer strategy, homogenize treatment protocols and provide benchmark quality indicators as a basis for accreditation processes. The challenge is to offer the appropriate diagnostic workup and treatment upfront and to avoid non- evidence-based treatment that consumes resources, impairs quality of life (QoL), and compromises oncological outcome. Various strategies may be applied for improving treatment quality: development of surgical mentorship, companion-training programs and international cooperation. The lack of radiotherapy/brachytherapy facilities is a major concern in LMIC. Reinforcing international support in terms of education, training, research and development and technical cooperation with national projects is required to increase access to minimum requirements but also introduce modern techniques, upgrade radiotherapy/brachytherapy services, and expand access to modern systemic treatments. In countries with robust economies, compliance to standards should also be increased. Integrative cancer care and multidisciplinary approaches are needed to tackle the dual challenge of increasing cure rates while minimizing QoL impairment. Appropriate dimensioning of the resources to avoid harmful treatment delays and access to expert referral centers is also a priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Chargari
- Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Inserm U-1030, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
| | - M Arbyn
- Unit Cancer Epidemiology - Belgian Cancer Centre, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Leary
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - N R Abu-Rustum
- Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States; European Society of Gynecological Oncology, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - P Basu
- Early Detection, Prevention & Infection Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - F Bray
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, UK
| | - S Chopra
- Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Maharashtra, India
| | - R Nout
- Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K Tanderup
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - A N Viswanathan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - C Zacharopoulou
- European Parliament, Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, France
| | - J C Soria
- Governance, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - E Deutsch
- Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Inserm U-1030, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - S Gouy
- Inserm U-1030, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - P Morice
- Inserm U-1030, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; European Society of Gynecological Oncology, Geneva, Switzerland; Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Singh N, Mishra N, Jayraj AS, Ghatage P. Management of Gynecologic Cancer During COVID-19 Pandemic: South Asian Perspective. Cancer Control 2022; 29:10732748221119349. [PMID: 36036360 PMCID: PMC9420651 DOI: 10.1177/10732748221119349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Management of gynecological cancers has suffered during the pandemic, partly due to lockdown and partly due to directing resources to manage COVID-19 patients. Modification of gynecological cancer management during this pandemic is recommended. Cervical cancer patients who present with stage IA1 disease can have a delay of up to 8 weeks for surgical treatment, considering the slow tumor growth rate. Women with stages IA2, IB1, IB2, IIA1 must undergo radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy within 6 to 8 weeks. In areas where surgical treatment is not available, patients should be referred for radiation therapy/areas with adequate surgical expertise. The surgical option is attractive for early cancers during the COVID era, as it involves a single visit compared to the multiple visits required for chemoradiation. The value of lymph node staging needs to be reconsidered. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be given preference over primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancers. Surgeries, which demand extended surgical time such as Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and pelvic exenterations, should be avoided during this pandemic. For patients scheduled for interval surgery after two or three neoadjuvant cycles, six cycles of chemotherapy should be considered before surgery is performed. For early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer, consideration should be given to medical management until surgery is possible. The above recommendations have been made keeping in mind the geography, patient load, and availability of resources available to health care providers from southeast Asia. They might not be applicable globally and every practitioner should take call regarding patient's management as per availability of resources and loco-regional circumstances. The implementation of recommended international guidelines for the management of gynecologic cancers should take precedence. Each modification to the standard approach should be approved by a multidisciplinary team depending on the condition of the patients and the locoregional circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilanchali Singh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 28730AIIMS, New Delhi, India.,Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 2125University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Neha Mishra
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 28730AIIMS, New Delhi, India.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 517234GIMS, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 2125University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bizzarri N, Nero C, Sillano F, Ciccarone F, D’Oria M, Cesario A, Fragomeni SM, Testa AC, Fanfani F, Ferrandina G, Lorusso D, Fagotti A, Scambia G. Building a Personalized Medicine Infrastructure for Gynecological Oncology Patients in a High-Volume Hospital. J Pers Med 2021; 12:jpm12010003. [PMID: 35055317 PMCID: PMC8778422 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12010003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gynecological cancers require complex intervention since patients have specific needs to be addressed. Centralization to high-volume centers improves the oncological outcomes of patients with gynecological cancers. Research in gynecological oncology is increasing thanks to modern technologies, from the comprehensive molecular characterization of tumors and individual pathophenotypes. Ongoing studies are focusing on personalizing therapies by integrating information across genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics with the genetic makeup and immune system of the patient. Hence, several challenges must be faced to provide holistic benefit to the patient. Personalized approaches should also recognize the unmet needs of each patient to successfully deliver the promise of personalized care, in a multidisciplinary effort. This may provide the greatest opportunity to improve patients' outcomes. Starting from a narrative review on gynecological oncology patients' needs, this article focuses on the experience of building a research and care infrastructure for personalized patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Bizzarri
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (N.B.); (F.S.); (F.C.); (S.M.F.); (A.C.T.); (F.F.); (G.F.); (D.L.); (A.F.); (G.S.)
| | - Camilla Nero
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (N.B.); (F.S.); (F.C.); (S.M.F.); (A.C.T.); (F.F.); (G.F.); (D.L.); (A.F.); (G.S.)
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.D.); (A.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Francesca Sillano
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (N.B.); (F.S.); (F.C.); (S.M.F.); (A.C.T.); (F.F.); (G.F.); (D.L.); (A.F.); (G.S.)
| | - Francesca Ciccarone
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (N.B.); (F.S.); (F.C.); (S.M.F.); (A.C.T.); (F.F.); (G.F.); (D.L.); (A.F.); (G.S.)
- Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.D.); (A.C.)
| | - Marika D’Oria
- Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.D.); (A.C.)
| | - Alfredo Cesario
- Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.D.); (A.C.)
| | - Simona Maria Fragomeni
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (N.B.); (F.S.); (F.C.); (S.M.F.); (A.C.T.); (F.F.); (G.F.); (D.L.); (A.F.); (G.S.)
| | - Antonia Carla Testa
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (N.B.); (F.S.); (F.C.); (S.M.F.); (A.C.T.); (F.F.); (G.F.); (D.L.); (A.F.); (G.S.)
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (N.B.); (F.S.); (F.C.); (S.M.F.); (A.C.T.); (F.F.); (G.F.); (D.L.); (A.F.); (G.S.)
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (N.B.); (F.S.); (F.C.); (S.M.F.); (A.C.T.); (F.F.); (G.F.); (D.L.); (A.F.); (G.S.)
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (N.B.); (F.S.); (F.C.); (S.M.F.); (A.C.T.); (F.F.); (G.F.); (D.L.); (A.F.); (G.S.)
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.D.); (A.C.)
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (N.B.); (F.S.); (F.C.); (S.M.F.); (A.C.T.); (F.F.); (G.F.); (D.L.); (A.F.); (G.S.)
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (N.B.); (F.S.); (F.C.); (S.M.F.); (A.C.T.); (F.F.); (G.F.); (D.L.); (A.F.); (G.S.)
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.D.); (A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bogani G, Scambia G, Cimmino C, Fanfani F, Costantini B, Loverro M, Ferrandina G, Landoni F, Bazzurini L, Grassi T, Vitobello D, Siesto G, Perrone AM, Zanagnolo V, De Iaco P, Multinu F, Ghezzi F, Casarin J, Berretta R, Capozzi VA, Zupi E, Centini G, Pellegrino A, Corso S, Stevenazzi G, Montoli S, Boschi AC, Comerci G, Greco P, Martinello R, Sopracordevole F, Giorda G, Simoncini T, Caretto M, Sartori E, Ferrari F, Cianci A, Sarpietro G, Matarazzo MG, Zullo F, Bifulco G, Morelli M, Ferrero A, Biglia N, Barra F, Ferrero S, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Cianci S, Chiantera V, Ercoli A, Sozzi G, Martoccia A, Schettini S, Orlando T, Cannone FG, Ettore G, Puppo A, Borghese M, Martinelli C, Muzii L, Di Donato V, Driul L, Restaino S, Bergamini A, Candotti G, Bocciolone L, Plotti F, Angioli R, Mantovani G, Ceccaroni M, Cassani C, Dominoni M, Giambanco L, Amodeo S, Leo L, Thomasset R, Raimondo D, Seracchioli R, Malzoni M, Gorlero F, Di Luca M, Busato E, Kilzie S, Dell'Acqua A, Scarfone G, Vercellini P, Petrillo M, Dessole S, Capobianco G, Ciavattini A, Delli Carpini G, Giannella L, Mereu L, Tateo S, Sorbi F, Fambrini M, Cicogna S, Romano F, Ricci G, Trojano G, Consonni R, Cantaluppi S, Lippolis A, Tinelli R, D'Ippolito G, Aguzzoli L, Mandato VD, Palomba S, Calandra D, Rosati M, Gallo C, Surico D, Remorgida V, Ruscitto F, Beretta P, Benedetti Panici P, Raspagliesi F. Characteristics and patterns of care of endometrial cancer before and during COVID-19 pandemic. J Gynecol Oncol 2021; 33:e10. [PMID: 34910391 PMCID: PMC8728669 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has correlated with the disruption of screening activities and diagnostic assessments. Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecological malignancies and it is often detected at an early stage, because it frequently produces symptoms. Here, we aim to investigate the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on patterns of presentation and treatment of EC patients. Methods This is a retrospective study involving 54 centers in Italy. We evaluated patterns of presentation and treatment of EC patients before (period 1: March 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020) and during (period 2: April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021) the COVID-19 outbreak. Results Medical records of 5,164 EC patients have been retrieved: 2,718 and 2,446 women treated in period 1 and period 2, respectively. Surgery was the mainstay of treatment in both periods (p=0.356). Nodal assessment was omitted in 689 (27.3%) and 484 (21.2%) patients treated in period 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.001). While, the prevalence of patients undergoing sentinel node mapping (with or without backup lymphadenectomy) has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (46.7% in period 1 vs. 52.8% in period 2; p<0.001). Overall, 1,280 (50.4%) and 1,021 (44.7%) patients had no adjuvant therapy in period 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.001). Adjuvant therapy use has increased during COVID-19 pandemic (p<0.001). Conclusion Our data suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the characteristics and patterns of care of EC patients. These findings highlight the need to implement healthcare services during the pandemic. The prevalence of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) has been lower during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic than before its onset. Further evidence is needed to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on survival outcomes of EC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Cimmino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Insubria, F. Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy.
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Costantini
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Loverro
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Luca Bazzurini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Tommaso Grassi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Domenico Vitobello
- Unit of Gynecology, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Siesto
- Unit of Gynecology, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Vanna Zanagnolo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Multinu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Insubria, F. Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Insubria, F. Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Roberto Berretta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Vito A Capozzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Errico Zupi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Gabriele Centini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Antonio Pellegrino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASST Lecco - Ospedale Alessandro Manzoni, Lecco, Italy
| | - Silvia Corso
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASST Lecco - Ospedale Alessandro Manzoni, Lecco, Italy
| | - Guido Stevenazzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASST OVEST MI, Legnano (Milan) Hospital, Legnano, Italy
| | - Serena Montoli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASST OVEST MI, Legnano (Milan) Hospital, Legnano, Italy
| | - Anna Chiara Boschi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AUSL Romagna, Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci", Ravenna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Comerci
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AUSL Romagna, Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci", Ravenna, Italy
| | - Pantaleo Greco
- Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica - Dipartimento Scienze Mediche - Università di Ferrara, Ferarra, Italy
| | - Ruby Martinello
- Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica - Dipartimento Scienze Mediche - Università di Ferrara, Ferarra, Italy
| | - Francesco Sopracordevole
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Italy
| | - Giorgio Giorda
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Italy
| | - Tommaso Simoncini
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marta Caretto
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Enrico Sartori
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Federico Ferrari
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonio Cianci
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Gynecological Clinic, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sarpietro
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Gynecological Clinic, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Matarazzo
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Gynecological Clinic, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Fulvio Zullo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria - Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Bifulco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria - Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Morelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AO "S.S. Annunziata", Cosenza, Italy
| | - Annamaria Ferrero
- Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Biglia
- Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Fabio Barra
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Cianci
- Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood "G. Barresi", University Hospital G. Martino, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Alfredo Ercoli
- Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood "G. Barresi", University Hospital G. Martino, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giulio Sozzi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Angela Martoccia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AOR San Carlo, Potenza, Italy
| | - Sergio Schettini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AOR San Carlo, Potenza, Italy
| | - Teresa Orlando
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AOR San Carlo, Potenza, Italy
| | - Francesco G Cannone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ARNAS Garibaldi Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ettore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ARNAS Garibaldi Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Andrea Puppo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASO Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Martina Borghese
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASO Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Canio Martinelli
- Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood "G. Barresi", University Hospital G. Martino, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenza Driul
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, University-Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Stefano Restaino
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, University-Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Alice Bergamini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Candotti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Bocciolone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Plotti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Angioli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Mantovani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, Sacred Heart Hospital Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceccaroni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, Sacred Heart Hospital Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Chiara Cassani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Mattia Dominoni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Laura Giambanco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Antonio Abate Hospital, Trapani, Italy and Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Silvia Amodeo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Antonio Abate Hospital, Trapani, Italy and Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Livio Leo
- Departments of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Hopital Beauregard, AUSL Valleè d'Aoste, Aosta, Italy
| | - Raphael Thomasset
- Departments of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Hopital Beauregard, AUSL Valleè d'Aoste, Aosta, Italy
| | - Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna. S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna. S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mario Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | - Franco Gorlero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy
| | - Martina Di Luca
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy
| | - Enrico Busato
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ospedale di Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | - Sami Kilzie
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ospedale di Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | - Andrea Dell'Acqua
- Gynaecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanna Scarfone
- Gynaecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Vercellini
- Gynaecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Petrillo
- Gynecologic and Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Salvatore Dessole
- Gynecologic and Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Giampiero Capobianco
- Gynecologic and Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Andrea Ciavattini
- Gynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatologic and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Delli Carpini
- Gynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatologic and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Luca Giannella
- Gynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatologic and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Liliana Mereu
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Saverio Tateo
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Flavia Sorbi
- Gynecology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Fambrini
- Gynecology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefania Cicogna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy
| | - Federico Romano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ricci
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy.,Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Trojano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Madonna delle Grazie Hospital ASM, Matera, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonio Lippolis
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Valle D'Itra Hospital, Martina Franca, Taranto, Italy
| | - Raffaele Tinelli
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Valle D'Itra Hospital, Martina Franca, Taranto, Italy
| | - Giovanni D'Ippolito
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Aguzzoli
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Vincenzo D Mandato
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Stefano Palomba
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GOM of Reggio Calabria & Magna Grcia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Davide Calandra
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti, Pescara, Italy
| | - Maurizio Rosati
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti, Pescara, Italy.,Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santo Spirito Hospital, Pescara, Italy
| | - Cinzia Gallo
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università "Magna Graecia" di Catanzaro - AO "Pugliese - Ciaccio" Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Daniela Surico
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Valentino Remorgida
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Francesco Ruscitto
- Gynecology Unit, Ospedale Valduce, Como - ASST Lariana, S. Anna, Como, Italy
| | - Paolo Beretta
- Gynecology Unit, Ospedale Valduce, Como - ASST Lariana, S. Anna, Como, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Federico A, Fragomeni SM, Tagliaferri L, Guajardo Rios LS, Lancellotta V, Gentileschi S, Corrado G, Gui B, Colloca G, Rufini V, Fagotti A, Scambia G, Garganese G. Clinical impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with vulvar cancer: the Gemelli Vul.Can multidisciplinary team. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 32:127-132. [PMID: 34903559 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 'Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2' (SARS-CoV-2) infection has dramatically affected the management of patients with cancer, who are most vulnerable to the consequences of the infection. Patients with vulvar cancer are frequently elderly and affected by multiple co-morbidities, thus representing a particularly frail population. OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients scheduled for treatment for active vulvar cancer. METHODS Data on patients with vulvar tumors referred to Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS between February 2020 and July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in nasopharyngeal swab were considered as positive for SARS-Cov-2. RESULTS One hundred and ninety-one patients with vulvar cancer were evaluated and scheduled for treatment. The median age was 72 years (range 35-94). Seven (3.7%) patients were diagnosed with SARS-Cov-2 infection: three (42.9%) had their treatment delayed, with no apparent consequences, two (28.6%) had their treatment delayed and later abandoned because of clinical worsening due to oncologic disease progression, and two (28.6%) contracted the infection in the post-operative period and died due to respiratory complications. CONCLUSIONS In most cases the infection had major clinical implications, being associated with significant delays in oncologic treatments and extremely high mortality when contracted in the post-operative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Federico
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Simona Maria Fragomeni
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Linda Stella Guajardo Rios
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefano Gentileschi
- UOC Chirurgia Plastica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Giacomo Corrado
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Benedetta Gui
- UOC Radiologia Generale ed Interventistica generale, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Colloca
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Vittoria Rufini
- UOC di Medicina Nucleare, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Istituto di Medicina Nucleare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Giorgia Garganese
- Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.,Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ling Y, Mingxia Y, Xiaoyan Z, Yifan F, Peipei L, Yue Z, Yuanguang M, Lian L. During the COVID-19 Epidemic: Recommendations for the Admission and Treatment of Patients With Ovarian Cancer. Front Surg 2021; 8:740198. [PMID: 34869552 PMCID: PMC8636676 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.740198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had become a health care event endangering humans globally. It takes up a large number of healthcare resources. We studied the impact of COVID-19 on patients with ovarian cancer by comprehensively analyzing their admissions before and after the epidemic, and made reasonable suggestions to improve their current situation. Methods: We randomly divided the enrolled patients into three groups, PreCOVID-19 Group (PCG) (2019.8.20–2020.1.20), COVID-19 Group (CG) (2020.1.21–2020.6.14), and Secondary Outbreak COVID-19 Group (SOCG) (2020.6.15–2020.10.10). One-way ANOVA and chi-square test were used for analysis. Results: The number of patients from other provinces decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The total hospital stay during the epidemic was substantially more extended (p < 0.05). Before the epidemic, our department performed more open surgery while during the epidemic outbreak, we tended to choose laparoscopy (p < 0.01). We took a longer surgery time (P < 0.05). Patients had significantly less post-operative fever during the epidemic (p < 0.001). Conclusion: During the COVID-19 epidemic, no patient was infected with COVID-19, and no patient experienced severe post-operative complications. We recommend maintaining the admissions of patients with ovarian cancer during the epidemic following the rules: 1. The outpatients must complete a nucleic acid test and chest CT in the outpatient clinic; 2. Maintain full daily disinfection of the ward and insist that health care workers disinfect their hands after contact with patients; 3. Increase the use of minimally invasive procedures, including laparoscopy and robotics; 4. Disinfect the ward twice a day with UV light and sodium hypochlorite disinfectant; 5. Patients need to undergo at least three nucleic acid tests before entering the operating room.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Ling
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Seventh Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ye Mingxia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Seventh Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhang Xiaoyan
- Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China
| | - Fan Yifan
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Liu Peipei
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Seventh Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhang Yue
- The Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Hospital of the Ninth Eighth, Kaifeng, China
| | - Meng Yuanguang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Seventh Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Li Lian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Seventh Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
COVID-19 has transformed the care we provide to gynecologic oncology patients. In addition to directly impacting the diagnosis and treatment of women with gynecologic cancer, it has affected our patient’s ability to undergo recommended surveillance and has made an impact on every caregiver providing care during this time. Herein we review the current literature on the impact of COVID-19 on gynecologic oncology and highlight new approaches and innovations that have resulted in gynecologic cancer care as a result of the pandemic. The impact of COVID-19 on the field of gynecologic oncology has been profound. In addition to directly impacting the diagnosis and treatment of women with cancer, it has also challenged the very ethics with which we practice medicine. The equitable distribution of resources is paramount to upholding the Hippocratic Oath which we all invoke. The COVID-19 pandemic has stripped this oath down to its very core, forcing all medical practitioners to scrutinize who gets what resources and when. As the pandemic continues to unfold, the question remains — in the setting of a strained and overburdened healthcare system, how do we maximize beneficence to one group of patients, while maintaining non-maleficence to others? As gynecologic oncologists, we are responsible for advocating for our patients to ensure that the quality of their cancer care is not compromised, while also not overutilizing resources that are sorely needed for the care of COVID-19 victims, and not making them more likely to succumb to COVID-19 by the very nature of the treatment we provide. The effects of the pandemic are far-reaching and broad, and many of these are yet to be determined. Future studies are needed to analyze how the above-utilized strategies in GYN cancer care during the pandemic will impact the long-term outcomes of our patients.
Collapse
|
25
|
Taylor A, Sundar SS, Bowen R, Clayton R, Coleridge S, Fotopoulou C, Ghaem-Maghami S, Ledermann J, Manchanda R, Maxwell H, Michael A, Miles T, Nicum S, Nordin A, Ramsay B, Rundle S, Williams S, Wood NJ, Yiannakis D, Morrison J. British Gynaecological Cancer Society recommendations for women with gynecological cancer who received non-standard care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 32:9-14. [PMID: 34795019 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, pressures on clinical services required adaptation to how care was prioritised and delivered for women with gynecological cancer. This document discusses potential 'salvage' measures when treatment has deviated from the usual standard of care. The British Gynaecological Cancer Society convened a multidisciplinary working group to develop recommendations for the onward management and follow-up of women with gynecological cancer who have been impacted by a change in treatment during the pandemic. These recommendations are presented for each tumor type and for healthcare systems, and the impact on gynecological services are discussed. It will be important that patient concerns about the impact of COVID-19 on their cancer pathway are acknowledged and addressed for their ongoing care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Taylor
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sudha S Sundar
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rebecca Bowen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | - Rick Clayton
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Coleridge
- Department of Gynaecology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Hilary Maxwell
- Department of Women's Health, Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorchester, Dorset, UK
| | - Agnieszka Michael
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Tracie Miles
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Bath, UK
| | - Shibani Nicum
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Nordin
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, Kent, UK
| | - Bruce Ramsay
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Stuart Rundle
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK
| | - Sarah Williams
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicholas J Wood
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Dennis Yiannakis
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Jo Morrison
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, Somerset, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Christiansen MG, Pappot H, Pedersen C, Jarden M, Mirza MR, Piil K. Patient perspectives and experiences of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19 - a qualitative study among women with gynecological cancer. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:2545-2554. [PMID: 34796401 PMCID: PMC8601371 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06651-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Due to the first COVID-19 outbreak and subsequent restrictions, standard practice for gynecological cancer quickly evolved to include additional digital consultations. Women with gynecological cancer have a high need for information and experience a high symptom burden. We aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19. Methods We conducted individual telephone interviews with patients with gynecological cancer 1–4 days after a telephone or video consultation during the COVID-19 outbreak in April and May 2020. We applied Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis to analyze the qualitative data. Results Thirty-two patients with ovarian (50%), cervical (35%), vulvar (12%), and vaginal cancer (3%) participated in the study. The patients experienced that, combined, cancer and COVID-19 restrictions made their situation twice as challenging. In general, the patients valued face-to-face consultations, recommending that they were ideal for the initial appointment to build trust. Overall, there was a willingness to participate in digital consultations because of the restrictions, but the results also showed varying degrees of openness and that individual solutions were favored. Conclusion The findings of this study show that digital consultations were an accepted alternative during COVID-19. Even though this temporary solution was deemed to be beneficial for practical reasons, patients also experienced digital consultations to be impersonal. A key message is that face–to–face encounters create the foundation to establish a trusting relationship from where a valuable dialogue arises. Digital consultations should therefore be implemented with caution since no one-size-fits-all model is recommended. Among patients with gynecological cancer, however, digital technologies represent a promising and flexible method depending on the purpose of consultations, patient preferences, and needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Pedersen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mary Jarden
- Department of Haematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karin Piil
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
McCarthy A, Balfour K, El Sayed I, Edmondson R, Wan YLL. Neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery in advanced endometrial cancer: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e054004. [PMID: 34764178 PMCID: PMC8587507 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is no consensus on the optimal treatment strategy for people with advanced endometrial cancer. Neoadjuvant therapies such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been employed to try to reduce the morbidity of surgery, improve its feasibility and/or improve functional performance in people considered unfit for primary surgery. The objective of this review is to assess whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy improves health outcomes in people with advanced endometrial cancer when compared with upfront surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This review will consider both randomised and non-randomised studies that compare health outcomes associated with the neoadjuvant therapy and upfront surgery in advanced endometrial cancer. Potential studies for inclusion will be collated from electronic searches of OVID Medline, Embase, international trial registries and conference abstract lists. Data collection and extraction will be performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The methodological quality of the studies will be assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 and Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tools. If appropriate, we will perform a meta-analysis and provide summary statistics for each outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was not required for this study. Once complete, we will publish our findings in peer-reviewed publications, via conference presentations and to update relevant practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy McCarthy
- Gynaecological Oncology, University of Manchester Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| | - Katharine Balfour
- Gynaecological Oncology, University of Manchester Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| | - Iman El Sayed
- Biomedical Informatics and Medical Statistics Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Richard Edmondson
- Gynaecological Oncology, University of Manchester Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| | - Yee-Loi Louise Wan
- Gynaecological Oncology, University of Manchester Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nikolopoulos M, Maheshwari MK, Doumouchtsis SK. Impact of COVID-19 in gynaecological oncology care: a systematic rapid review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 305:555-565. [PMID: 34729631 PMCID: PMC8563355 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06295-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Synthesis of available evidence on clinical practice in gynaecological oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic is highly warranted, as women with cancer are at increased risk due to their systemic immunosuppressed state and changes in their care are inevitable. Rapid review of available data is a quick way of providing useful information and insight into the way medical practice has been affected by the COVID pandemic. Methods We conducted a systematic rapid review, based on a literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL. We considered all studies on gynaecological oncology care during the COVID-19 pandemic using relevant keywords and MeSH terms. Selection criteria were English language, studies with more than five cases and publication in peer-review journal. Results Nine retrospective studies, one systematic review and five questionnaire surveys were included. Quality of the studies has been assessed. Development of higher quality evidence is warranted. Mortality of COVID-19 infection is higher in patients with gynaecological cancer than in non-cancer patients. Reported delays in diagnosis and management of cancer and changes in treatments, may affect the natural history of cancer and increase patients’ anxiety and fear of disease progression while causing concerns to healthcare professionals affecting their clinical practice. The number of new diagnoses has declined. Prioritization is important, face-to-face interactions should be limited, and appropriate protective measures are essential. Cancer surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy should continue as high priority practices. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has affected clinical practice significantly. Adaptations in clinical practice may improve mortality and complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manolis Nikolopoulos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Epsom, UK.
| | - Manish K Maheshwari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Epsom, UK
| | - Stergios K Doumouchtsis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Epsom, UK
- St George's University of London, London, UK
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N S Christeas, University of Athens, Medical school, Athens, Greece
- School of Medicine, American University of the Caribbean, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
- School of Medicine, Ross University, Miramar, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Oz M, Meydanli MM, Altintas MI, Akilli H, Gultekin M, Ozgul N, Salman MC, Taskin S, Yaprak E, Taskiran C, Vatansever D, Giray B, Yetkinel S, Celik H, Onan MA, Ayhan A. The safety of major gynaecologic cancer surgery without routine preoperative COVID-19 testing in the COVID-19 era: a multicentre, retrospective, case-control study. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2021; 42:1286-1292. [PMID: 34704523 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1959535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Our goal was to address the safety of major gynaecologic cancer surgery without routine preoperative COVID-19 testing in the COVID-19 era. The databases of seven gynaecologic cancer centres were searched in order to identify all consecutive gynaecologic cancer patients undergoing major surgery between March 11, 2020 and May 15, 2020 for this retrospective, case-control study. The case group consisted of patients with histopathologically confirmed gynaecologic cancers, and each case was matched with two counterparts who had undergone primary surgery before the COVID-19 pandemic. The case and the control groups were compared in terms of length of hospital stay, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), intraoperative and postoperative complications.During the study period, 154 women with gynaecologic cancer undergoing major surgery were identified. Although the case group had more co-morbidities compared to the control group (103/154 vs. 178/308, respectively; p = .04), the median length of hospital stays, the rate of ICU admission, intraoperative complication rates and postoperative complication rates were similar in the two groups. Gynaecologic cancer surgery may be performed safely in the COVID-19 era with similar rates of ICU admission, intraoperative and postoperative complications compared to the patients operated before the COVID-19 pandemic.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Many societies have announced their guidelines about the surgical management of gynaecologic cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, most of them are not evidence-based and mostly on expert opinions.What do the results of this study add? The main findings of this retrospective, case-control study indicate that the short-term (30 day) outcomes of gynaecologic cancer patients undergoing major surgery in the COVID-19 era are similar to those who had been operated before the COVID-19 pandemic. The length of hospital stays, the rates of admission to the ICU, intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable between women undergoing major gynaecologic cancer surgery in the COVID-19 era and the women who had been operated before the pandemic.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? We can suggest that definitive surgery may be performed for gynaecologic cancer patients in the COVID-19 era if the resources permit and appropriate precautions such as social distancing, isolation and the use of personal protective equipment are taken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murat Oz
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mufide Iclal Altintas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara City Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Akilli
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Murat Gultekin
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nejat Ozgul
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Coskun Salman
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Salih Taskin
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Esra Yaprak
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Dogan Vatansever
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Burak Giray
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selcuk Yetkinel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Husnu Celik
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Anil Onan
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ali Ayhan
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Manchanda R, Oxley S, Ghaem-Maghami S, Sundar S. COVID-19 and the impact on gynecologic cancer care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 155 Suppl 1:94-101. [PMID: 34669200 PMCID: PMC9087539 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The COVID‐19 pandemic resulted in significant reconfiguration of gynecologic cancer services and care pathways across the globe, with a transformation of working practices. Services had to adapt to protect their vulnerable patients from infection, whilst providing care despite reduced resources/capacity and staffing. The international gynecologic cancer community introduced modified clinical care guidelines. Remote working, reduced hospital visiting, routine COVID‐testing, and use of COVID‐free surgical areas/hubs enabled the ongoing and safe delivery of complex cancer care, with priority levels for cancer treatments established to guide decision‐making by multidisciplinary tumor boards. Some 2.3 million cancer surgeries were delayed or cancelled during the first peak, with many patients reporting significant anxiety/concern for cancer progression and COVID infection. Although COVID trials were prioritized, recruitment to other cancer trials/research activity was significantly reduced. The impact of resultant protocol deviations on outcomes remains to be established. During the recovery healthcare services must maintain capacity and flexibility to manage future surges of infection, address the large backlog of patients with altered or delayed treatments, along with salvaging screening and prevention services. Training needs/mental well‐being of trainees need addressing and staff burnout prevented. Future research needs to fully evaluate the impact of COVID‐19 on long‐term patient outcomes. This article reviews the global changes introduced to gynecologic cancer care due to COVID‐19, and their impact on services and patients. Key lessons are considered for the recovery and future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Department of Gynecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.,Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Department of Health Services Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Samuel Oxley
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cioffi R, Sabetta G, Rabaiotti E, Bergamini A, Bocciolone L, Candotti G, Candiani M, Valabrega G, Mangili G, Pignata S. Impact of COVID-19 on medical treatment patterns in gynecologic oncology: a MITO group survey. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1363-1368. [PMID: 34426526 PMCID: PMC8384495 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE COVID-19 is a global public health emergency. The increasing spread of COVID-19 presents challenges for the clinical care of patients with gynecological tumors. The Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies (MITO) performed a survey to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical treatment of gynecological cancer, with a focus on chemotherapy and oral treatment with poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARP-i). METHODS The survey consisted of a self-administered online questionnaire, sent via email between November 2020 and January 2021 to all members of MITO group. RESULTS Forty-nine centers completed the questionnaire. The majority of respondents (83%) use screening tests to determine COVID-19 status in patients who were to undergo chemotherapy or oral medications. All respondents to our survey continued cancer therapy in patients who tested negative for COVID-19 during the pandemic. Seventy-three percent of respondents declared they stopped treatment with chemotherapy or PARP-i only after a positive swab and resumed therapy when negative tests were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 positivity impacted patterns of treatment in patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer within the MITO group. Further investigations are needed to evaluate whether these modifications influence oncological clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaella Cioffi
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Sabetta
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Rabaiotti
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Bergamini
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Bocciolone
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Candotti
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Candiani
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giorgia Mangili
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Uro-Gynecological Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G Pascale" IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Uccella S, Garzon S, Lanzo G, Cromi A, Zorzato PC, Casarin J, Bosco M, Porcari I, Ciccarone F, Malzoni M, Ghezzi F, Scambia G, Franchi M. Practice changes in Italian Gynaecologic Units during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2021; 42:1268-1275. [PMID: 34581251 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1954149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The impact of Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on Italian Gynaecological Units practice and the compliance and satisfaction with available guidelines/recommendations is unknown. Therefore, a survey was conducted among all Italian Gynaecological Units Directors in April 2020. The response rate was 90% (135/150). 77.8% of centres performed surgery only for oncologic or not deferrable pathologies, and 9.6% was closed. 68.7% of directors were at least moderately satisfied by published guidelines/recommendations, but 94.8% of respondents identified limitations, mainly (83%) the absent definition of benign non-deferrable pathology. Responders considered as non-deferrable severe endometriosis (69.6%), endometriosis with organ failure/dysfunction (74.1%), and unresponsive symptomatic fibroids (89.6%). Despite guidelines/recommendations, respondents treated ovarian (77%) and endometrial (71.6%) cancer as usual. Only a minority of respondents reduced the laparoscopic approach (11.2%) and adopted all recommended surgical precautions (9.6%). Compliance with available guidelines/recommendations appears incomplete. Reconsidering guidelines/recommendations regarding oncological cases and specify non-deferrable benign pathologies would improve guidelines/recommendations compliance.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has profoundly influenced medical routine practice worldwide. Surgery units have been forced to reduce or even completely restrict their activity to re-allocate human resources. Many major international gynaecological societies have released statements and guidelines, providing various recommendations to guide practice changes. However, the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on Italian Gynaecological Units practice and the compliance and satisfaction with available guidelines/recommendations is unknown.What do the results of this study add? Study results provide evidence showing how the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has changed surgical activity in the Italian Gynaecological Units. Most centres reduced surgical activity, limiting surgery only for oncologic or not deferrable pathologies. Moreover, our research shows the level of compliance and satisfaction with available guidelines/recommendations and where they need to be improved. Most directors were at least moderately satisfied but identified different limitations. Guidelines/recommendations do not provide enough details, such as the absent definition of benign non-deferrable pathologies.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The limited compliance with available guidelines/recommendations and identified limitations suggest reconsidering guidelines/recommendations focussing on identified gaps. Provide more details, such as specifying non-deferrable benign pathologies, would improve guidelines/recommendations compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Uccella
- Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASL Biella, Biella, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Simone Garzon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Gabriele Lanzo
- Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASL Biella, Biella, Italy
| | - Antonella Cromi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Pier Carlo Zorzato
- Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASL Biella, Biella, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Mariachiara Bosco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Irene Porcari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Ciccarone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni-Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynaecological Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Franchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Vu E, Schröder C, Dülk J, Stelmes JJ, Vu J, Schilling J, Förster FG, Förster R. Nationwide Survey of German Outpatient Gynecologic Oncology Practices during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Reactions to the First Wave and Future Perspectives. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 382:1-7. [PMID: 34580581 PMCID: PMC8450854 DOI: 10.1159/000518858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction In the spring of 2020, coronavirus disease 2019 posed a substantial challenge for countries and their healthcare systems. In Germany, over 70% of all cancer patients are treated in an outpatient setting, so gynecologic oncology practices are the guarantors of optimal patient care. We developed a survey to evaluate the management of gynecologic oncology patients. Methods The survey consisted of 38 questions and was sent to the members of the Berufsverband Niedergelassener Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V. (BNGO), a professional association of gynecologic oncologists in the outpatient sector in Germany. Results The survey was completed by 54 out of 133 (41%) gynecologic oncologists from 14 out of 15 (93%) federal states where the BNGO is represented. Facing the pandemic, popular measures were mask requirements (100%), restriction of access to practices (94%), increased number of disinfectant dispensers (85%), installment of panes of acrylic glass (76%), or spatial alterations (67%). For most patients the pandemic had no influence on prioritization of therapies (82%) or prescribed systemic treatments (87%). Despite an increase in perceived psychological burden among the staff (72%), 85% (45/54) of the practices were not offered any additional psychological support. Discussion and Conclusion As most cancer patients in Germany are treated in an outpatient setting, a suitable reaction of oncology centers to the new circumstances was crucial to secure optimal treatment and patient care. Nevertheless, the low prioritization of mental health or distress of healthcare workers poses a serious threat to the maintenance of optimal medical care in further waves of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erwin Vu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Christina Schröder
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Jonas Dülk
- Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jean-Jacques Stelmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncological Institute of Southern Switzerland, Cantonal Hospitals, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer Vu
- Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jörg Schilling
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Dres. med. Schilling, Till and Kohn, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Gerhard Förster
- MVZ Flemmingstraße, Poliklinik GmbH, Chemnitz, Germany.,Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Applied Sciences Zwickau, Zwickau, Germany
| | - Robert Förster
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Changes in gynecologic and breast cancer diagnoses during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis from a tertiary academic gyneco-oncological center in Germany. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 305:713-718. [PMID: 34491417 PMCID: PMC8422832 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06211-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose With the beginning of 2021, the world has been suffering from the COVID-19 pandemic for more than 1 year. More and more, we are able to evaluate side effects of the pandemic in the healthcare sector. A negative impact on cancer diagnoses is one of them. Careful observation of trends in an academic gyneco-oncological context appears important to identify potential negative developments. Methods We analyzed the case number of gynecologic and breast cancer diagnoses in the period from January to June 2020 compared to 2019 and during the period of the first general German lockdown (March 22nd until May 5th 2020). Patients were characterized by age, tumor type, FIGO or TNM stage and presence of symptoms at initial hospital presentation. Results The frequency of newly diagnosed gynecologic and breast cancer cases from beginning of January until end of June changed by − 10% and by − 12% during the lockdown in 2020 compared to 2019. In both periods, reduction of breast cancer cases was relatively larger than decrease of gynecologic cancers. Moreover, median patient age decreased. For the first half of 2020, we found a shift towards higher tumor stages (N+/M1 or FIGO III–IV). During the lockdown period, the appearance of tumor-associated symptoms at diagnosis increased by about 12%. Conclusion This analysis illustrates the anticipated general decrease in diagnoses of primary cancers during the lockdown periods in 2020 due to COVID-19 pandemic for gynecologic and breast cancer cases.
Collapse
|
35
|
Garganese G, Romito A, Scambia G, Fagotti A. New developments in rare vulvar and vaginal cancers. Curr Opin Oncol 2021; 33:485-492. [PMID: 34319290 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide the latest insight on the rare vulvar and vaginal malignancies, able to impact on clinical practice, and to outline new potential research developments. RECENT FINDINGS Many efforts are being made to produce technical and scientific advances in the fields of vulvar and vaginal carcinoma, including imaging work-up, interventional procedures and minimally invasive surgical approach, as well as molecular profiling and identification of new target treatments. SUMMARY In the evaluation of lymph node status, ultrasound has demonstrated promising results because of high predictive value, low risk and low cost. Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography is confirmed to be reliable and should be prospectively investigated for its potential applications in radiomics, whilst Fusion-US could allow a precision guidance in diagnostics and interventional procedures. Regarding interventional procedure, surgery is becoming less invasive with the aim to increase quality of life; in carefully selected patients it would be possible to overcome the current strict criteria in the use of sentinel node biopsy. Future research should focus on potential target therapy, on the basis of tumor-specific biological features.Rare cancers should be referred to experienced centers with a high case flow, able to offer a full range of diagnostic and therapeutical options and a multidisciplinary approach. Networking should be encouraged to promote research opportunities and enable data sharing and multicenter trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgia Garganese
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
| | - Alessia Romito
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gaba F, Blyuss O, Rodriguez I, Dilley J, Wan YLL, Saiz A, Razumova Z, Zalewski K, Nikolova T, Selcuk I, Bizzarri N, Theofanakis C, Lanner M, Pletnev A, Gurumurthy M, Manchanda R. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 on training and mental well-being of surgical gynecological oncology trainees. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1268-1277. [PMID: 34326158 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic has caused a crisis disrupting health systems worldwide. While efforts are being made to determine the extent of the disruption, the impact on gynecological oncology trainees/training has not been explored. We conducted an international survey of the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on clinical practice, medical education, and mental well-being of surgical gynecological oncology trainees. METHODS In our cross-sectional study, a customized web-based survey was circulated to surgical gynecological oncology trainees from national/international organizations from May to November 2020. Validated questionnaires assessed mental well-being. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher's exact test were used to analyse differences in means and proportions. Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate the effect of variables on psychological/mental well-being outcomes. Outcomes included clinical practice, medical education, anxiety and depression, distress, and mental well-being. RESULTS A total of 127 trainees from 34 countries responded. Of these, 52% (66/127) were from countries with national training programs (UK/USA/Netherlands/Canada/Australia) and 48% (61/127) from countries with no national training programs. Altogether, 28% (35/125) had suspected/confirmed COVID-19, 28% (35/125) experienced a fall in household income, 20% (18/90) were self-isolated from households, 45% (57/126) had to re-use personal protective equipment, and 22% (28/126) purchased their own. In total, 32.3% (41/127) of trainees (16.6% (11/66) from countries with a national training program vs 49.1% (30/61) from countries with no national training program, p=0.02) perceived they would require additional time to complete their training fellowship. The additional training time anticipated did not differ between trainees from countries with or without national training programs (p=0.11) or trainees at the beginning or end of their fellowship (p=0.12). Surgical exposure was reduced for 50% of trainees. Departmental teaching continued throughout the pandemic for 69% (87/126) of trainees, although at reduced frequency for 16.1% (14/87), and virtually for 88.5% (77/87). Trainees reporting adequate pastoral support (defined as allocation of a dedicated mentor/access to occupational health support services) had better mental well-being with lower levels of anxiety/depression (p=0.02) and distress (p<0.001). Trainees from countries with a national training program experienced higher levels of distress (p=0.01). Mean (SD) pre-pandemic mental well-being scores were significantly higher than post-pandemic scores (8.3 (1.6) vs 7 (1.8); p<0.01). CONCLUSION SARS-CoV-2 has negatively impacted the surgical training, household income, and psychological/mental well-being of surgical gynecological oncology trainees. The overall clinical impact was worse for trainees in countries with no national training program than for those in countries with a national training program, although national training program trainees reported greater distress. COVID-19 sickness increased anxiety/depression. The recovery phase must focus on improving mental well-being and addressing lost training opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faiza Gaba
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK .,Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Oleg Blyuss
- Department of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.,Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child's Health, Sechenov University, Moskva, Russian Federation
| | - Isabel Rodriguez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - James Dilley
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Yee-Loi Louise Wan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Allison Saiz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Northwestern University in Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Zoia Razumova
- Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kamil Zalewski
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Świętokrzyskie Cancer Centre, Kielce, Poland
| | - Tanja Nikolova
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Academic Teaching Hospital of Heidelberg University, Baden-Baden, Germany
| | - Ilker Selcuk
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Charalampos Theofanakis
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, General Hospital of Athens Alexandra, Athens, Attica, Greece
| | - Maximilian Lanner
- Department of Obstetrics/Gynaecology, Kardinal Schwarzenberg'sches Krankenhaus, Schwarzach, Steiermark, Austria
| | - Andrei Pletnev
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | | | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London, UK .,Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Dong W, Gao R, Cai J, Yang S, Guo J, Zhao J, Wang Z, Cai L. Resumption of the treatment of non-COVID-19 gynecologic patients after lifting lockdown: Triage and infection prevention experiences from Wuhan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021; 47:3297-3302. [PMID: 34322966 PMCID: PMC8457066 DOI: 10.1111/jog.14917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Aim To share our experiences of resuming the treatments for gynecologic patients after lifting the lockdown in a hotspot area for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Methods The triage process used to resume medical activities for gynecologic patients at the Wuhan Union Hospital after a 76‐day lockdown of the city is described, and its effectiveness in preventing COVID‐19 nosocomial transmission is shown. Results Nonemergency patients were pretriaged based on their contact history and body temperature at an outpatient clinic, and negative COVID‐19 screening test results were required for admission to the buffering rooms at the gynecologic department. The buffering lasted at least 3 days for symptom monitoring, and a second round of COVID‐19 testing was required before patients could be transferred to the regular gynecologic wards. For patients who needed emergency surgery, the first screening was completed at the isolation wards after surgery, followed by buffering at the gynecologic department. We received 19 298 outpatient visits, admitted 326 patients, and performed 223 operations in the first 2 months after the lockdown was lifted. No COVID‐19 cases occurred in the hospitalized patients, while the proportion of potentially high‐risk patients with cancer and severe anemia was increased in comparison to that observed during the same period in 2019 and the first 2 months of 2020 before the lockdown. Conclusions We provide an effective triage system with buffering at two levels to guarantee safe and timely treatment for non‐COVID‐19 gynecologic patients in the postlockdown phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weihong Dong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Rui Gao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jing Cai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Shouhua Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jianfeng Guo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jing Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zehua Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Liqiong Cai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Association between hysterectomy wait-time and all-cause mortality for micro-invasive cervical cancer: treatment implications during the coronavirus pandemic. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 306:283-287. [PMID: 34302197 PMCID: PMC8301734 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06151-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
39
|
Complex and Challenging Surgery like CRS with HIPEC is Easible Midst the COVID 19 Pandemic: Experience from Tertiary Care Center in India. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY 2021; 19:66. [PMID: 34307832 PMCID: PMC8286034 DOI: 10.1007/s40944-021-00558-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Amidst the COVID pandemic, most guidelines have recommended delaying surgery and giving chemotherapy for with peritoneal surface malignancies. However, when all options are exhausted, complex surgery like CRS with HIPEC can be performed in select patients. Method To facilitate these complex surgeries with maximum safety, RT-PCR test for COVID-19 was performed for each patient. Personal protective equipment including N95 masks and face shields was used. A number of OT personals were limited. Taking these steps minimized the risk of COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers and patients. Conclusion After implementing these steps, we were able to perform complex CRS and HIPEC procedure during the pandemic and thus improve oncological outcomes.
Collapse
|
40
|
Goswami J, Sarkar A, Mukherjee S, Ghosh PS, Pal AR, Barman SM, Banerjee SS, Nandi R, Bhattacharyya S. COVID-19 pandemic and preparedness of anesthesia team in a stand-alone cancer centre in Eastern India. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2021; 37:284-289. [PMID: 34349381 PMCID: PMC8289642 DOI: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_454_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
India came under the grip of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and is now seeing rising graph. Cancer patients are specially in the high-risk group because of their immunocompromised status on one hand and progressive disease on the other hand. Hence, cancer care facility needs to prepare a clear strategy to manage their space, staff and supplies so that optimum patient care can be continued in the face of COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, infection prevention measures need to be robust to reduce in-hospital transmission. The working area of anesthesia and Critical Care is spread over the whole hospital such as operating room, ICU, isolation area, out-patient dept (OPD) area, various diagnostic areas and in-patient dept (IPD) to attend code blue calls. In this article, we describe the preparedness and initial response measures of the anesthesia and Critical Care department of a stand-alone tertiary level cancer care centre in eastern part of India. These include engineering controls such as identification and preparation of an isolation operating room, administrative measures such as modification of workflow, introduction and adequate supply of personal protective equipment for staff and formulation of clinical guidelines for anesthetic management. These containment measures are necessary to continue care of cancer patients, optimize the quality of care provided to COVID-19 positive cancer patients and to reduce the risk of viral transmission to other patients or healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jyotsna Goswami
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Anshuman Sarkar
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Sudipta Mukherjee
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Pralay S Ghosh
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Angshuman R Pal
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Suparna M Barman
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Sumantra S Banerjee
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Rudranil Nandi
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Sanjay Bhattacharyya
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sekhon R, Naithani A, R P, Makkar P. Experience in Gynecologic Cancers During Corona Virus Disease-2019 Pandemic: A Study from Tertiary Cancer Center in India. J Gynecol Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1089/gyn.2020.0134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rupinder Sekhon
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi, India
| | - Amita Naithani
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi, India
| | - Pratima R
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi, India
| | - Priyanka Makkar
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ayhan A, Yilmaz Baran S, Vatansever D, Dogan Durdag G, Akilli H, Celik H, Taskiran C. Feasibility of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in ovarian cancer during COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:883-887. [PMID: 33858953 PMCID: PMC8054827 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions on patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for ovarian cancer. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated ovarian cancer patients who underwent HIPEC following complete cytoreductive surgery performed during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in three different centers specializing in gynecological oncology. All patients who underwent cytoreduction plus HIPEC for a primary, interval, and recurrent surgery were evaluated. Primary outcomes was postoperative 30-day morbidity and mortality. The secondary outcome was infection of patient and/or related staff with COVID-19 during the perioperative or early postoperative period. RESULTS We performed a total of 35 HIPEC procedures during the pandemic: 15 (42.9%) patients underwent primary/interval surgery, while 20 (57.1%) patients had recurrent disease. Grade 3-4 complications occurred in one patient (2.9%) (chronic renal failure), while mortality did not occur in any patient. Neither the patients nor related staff were infected with the coronavirus during the perioperative or early postoperative period. One patient, who was diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia on postoperative day 80 died from the infection. Another patient died on postoperative day 85 due to progressive ovarian cancer, a disorder in vital functions, and organ failure. CONCLUSION HIPEC during the COVID-19 pandemic seems a safe and feasible procedure, with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Careful selection of patients is important and precautions should be taken before the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Ayhan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Safak Yilmaz Baran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Application and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - Dogan Vatansever
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gulsen Dogan Durdag
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Application and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Akilli
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Husnu Celik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Application and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Khazaeipour Z, Razavi E, Pahlevan-Fallahy MT. Indirect effects of COVID-19 in referring women to gynecologic oncology, perinatology and gynecology clinics in Iran. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 304:679-686. [PMID: 34059957 PMCID: PMC8166368 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06097-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose COVID-19 has captured the world. We hypothesized that this pandemic reduced referral of other non-COVID-19 patients to the hospitals or clinics, including gynecological and perinatological referrals. Women can be at risk in limited use of health services. Methods In this retrospective study, referrals from gynecologic oncology, perinatology, and gynecology clinics in a large teaching hospital of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) were compared from February 20 to May 20, 2020, with the same period in 2019. Finally, referral trends in 2020 were compared with the COVID-19 admission pattern. Results Total admissions to all three clinics declined 63% in 2020 compared to 2019. There was a significant relationship between the number of visits to three clinics during these2 years (p < 0.001). The reduction in referrals to the gynecology clinic was more than gynecologic oncology and perinatology. The COVID-19 referral pattern was conversely linked to gynecology-related admissions. Conclusion As the pandemic situation makes patients hesitant to go to the hospitals or not, health policymakers should consider other non-COVID issues, including maternal and fetal concerns. Providing safe places for other patients to visit is a goal that can be achieved through developing guidelines for nosocomial hygiene and training informed healthcare staff. Moreover, non-urgent visits should be avoided or postponed. This issue calls for new strategies, including telemedicine in situations similar to the current pandemic to both identify and manage such conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Khazaeipour
- Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Erfan Razavi
- Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad-Taha Pahlevan-Fallahy
- Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Non-anesthetist-administered moderate sedation with midazolam and fentanyl for outpatient MRI-aided hybrid intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy in cervix cancer: a single-institution experience. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 13:286-293. [PMID: 34122568 PMCID: PMC8170517 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.105946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility of interstitial brachytherapy under non-anesthetist-administered moderate sedation, to identify factors influencing the insertion, and the total procedural time. Material and methods A total of 47 insertions with hybrid intracavitary and interstitial applicators were performed in 23 patients from March 2017 to March 2020. Moderate sedation was achieved with intravenous midazolam and fentanyl administered by non-anesthetist. Insertion time and procedural time was recorded. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate the impact of different factors on insertion and procedural time. Results A total of 238 needles (range, 2-8 per insertion) were implanted, with an average insertion depth of 30 mm (range, 20-40 mm). The mean doses for midazolam and fentanyl were 3 mg (standard deviation [SD] = 1) and 53.3 mcg (SD = 23.9) per insertion, respectively. The median insertion time was 30 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] = 22-40), and the median total procedural time was 4.3 hours (IQR = 3.6-5.2). First time insertion, insertions performed before 2019, and higher midazolam dose were associated with significantly longer insertion time, whereas longer insertion time, MRI-based planning, and insertions performed before 2019 were associated with significantly longer total procedural time. Conclusions Outpatient interstitial brachytherapy with non-anesthetist-administered sedation is achievable and well-tolerated. This method may significantly lessen the burden on hospital resources and has the potential to be cost-effective.
Collapse
|
45
|
Razumova Z, Bizzarri N, Kacperczyk-Bartnik J, Pletnev A, Gonzalez Martin A, Persson J. Report from the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) 2020 State-of-the-Art Virtual Meeting. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:658-669. [PMID: 33811109 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
This is a report from the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology State-of-the-Art Virtual Meeting held December 14-16, 2020. The unique 3-day conference offered comprehensive state-of-the-art summaries on the major advances in the treatment of different types of gynecological cancers. Sessions opened with a case presentation followed by a keynote lecture and interactive debates with opinion leaders in the field. The speakers also presented scientific reviews on the clinical trial landscape in collaboration with the European Network of Gynecological Oncological Trial (ENGOT) groups. In addition, the new ESGO-ESRTO-ESP endometrial cancer guidelines were officially presented in public. This paper describes the key information and latest studies that were presented for the first time at the conference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoia Razumova
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nicolò Bizzarri
- Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Andrei Pletnev
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus
| | | | - Jan Persson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine at Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Matsuo K, Huang Y, Matsuzaki S, Ragab OM, Roman LD, Wright JD. Association between definitive chemoradiotherapy wait-time and survival in locally-advanced cervical cancer: Implications during the coronavirus pandemic. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 161:414-421. [PMID: 33771396 PMCID: PMC9751801 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The current coronavirus pandemic caused a significant decrease in cancer-related encounters resulting in a delay in treatment of cancer patients. The objective of this study was to examine the survival effect of delay in starting concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) in women with locally-advanced cervical cancer. METHODS This is a retrospective observational study querying the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. Women with stage IB2-IVA squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix who received definitive CCRT with known wait-time for CCRT initiation after cancer diagnosis were eligible (N=13,617). Cox proportional hazard regression model with restricted cubic spline transformation was fitted to assess the association between CCRT wait-time and all-cause mortality in multivariable analysis. RESULTS The median wait-time to start CCRT was 6 (IQR 4-8) weeks. In a multivariable analysis, older age, non-Hispanic black and Hispanic ethnicity, recent year of diagnosis, Medicaid and uninsured status, medical comorbidities, and absence of nodal metastasis were associated with longer CCRT wait-time (P<.05). Women with aggressive tumor factors (poorer differentiation, large tumor size, nodal metastasis, and higher cancer stage) were more likely to have a short CCRT wait-time (P<.05). After controlling for the measured covariates, CCRT wait-time of 6.1-9.8 weeks was not associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to a wait-time of 6 weeks. Similar association was observed when the cohort was stratified by histology, cancer stage, tumor size, or brachytherapy use. CONCLUSION An implication of this study for the current coronavirus pandemic is that in the absence of aggressive tumor factors, a short period of wait-time to start definitive CCRT may not be associated with increased risk of mortality in women with locally-advanced cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yongmei Huang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shinya Matsuzaki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Omar M Ragab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jason D Wright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Blache G, El Hajj H, Jauffret C, Houvenaeghel G, Sabiani L, Barrou J, Masquin I, Le Saout J, Mokart D, Faucher M, Lambaudie E. Care as Usual: An Acceptable Strategy to Apply During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a French Tertiary Gynecologic Oncology Department. Front Oncol 2021; 11:653009. [PMID: 33968755 PMCID: PMC8097084 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.653009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
We describe and analyze a “care as usual” strategy of a French Comprehensive Cancer Center during the COVID-19 pandemic to manage surgical patients with gynecological cancer. We conducted a retrospective analysis evaluating the surgical activity in our gynecologic oncology department between January 21 and May 12, 2020. We compared the surgical activity and surgical and oncologic outcomes during the pre-lockdown period and the pandemic period. The main objective was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical activity. The secondary objectives were to analyze the surgical and the oncologic outcomes. We compared the surgical activity during the 8 weeks after the national lockdown (85 procedures) to the surgical activity in the 8 weeks preceding the lockdown (127 procedures). We observed a 33% decrease in activity between the two periods. The clinical and epidemiologic characteristics were similar between the two periods. There were no differences between the surgical approaches (p = 0.592), the surgical complexity (p = 0.323), the length of stay (p = 0.85), and even for the complex procedure (p = 0.96) and the perioperative (p = 0.791) and postoperative complication rates (p = 0.102). We observed a significant decrease in the time of return to intended oncological treatment (RIOT) during the lockdown period with an average of 31.9 days compared to 46.9 days in the pre-lockdown period (p = 0.003). During the COVID-19 pandemic, “care as usual” represents an acceptable strategy without impairing the oncologic outcome in a Comprehensive Cancer Center with a patient-centered clinical pathway for gynecologic oncologic surgical patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Blache
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Houssein El Hajj
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Camille Jauffret
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Department of surgical oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes and CRCM, CNRS, INSERM, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Laura Sabiani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Julien Barrou
- Department of surgical oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes and CRCM, CNRS, INSERM, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Isabelle Masquin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Jérémy Le Saout
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Djamel Mokart
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Marion Faucher
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Eric Lambaudie
- Department of surgical oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes and CRCM, CNRS, INSERM, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Palluzzi E, Corrado G, Marchetti C, Bolomini G, Vertechy L, Bottoni C, Distefano M, Scambia G, Ferrandina G. Medical treatment of patients with gynecologic cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1154-1158. [PMID: 33883231 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, cancer care had to be reorganized; national and international recommendations were published to manage anticancer treatments safely and to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection for patients and health workers. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the adoption of recommendations for the management of patients with gynaecologic cancer receiving treatment during the pandemic resulted in containment of infections and continuing oncologic care. METHODS Based on the published recommendations, and according to the local Health Direction guidelines, we developed and drafted a security protocol to modify access of patients with gynaecologic cancer to the "Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome" between February 1 and April 30, 2020 and compared results with the corresponding 3 months of 2019. RESULTS Between February and April 2019, we registered 3254 admissions, including 2253 patients receiving intravenous chemotherapies, 298 receiving oral therapies, and 703 having hospital visits. Between February and April 2020, we registered 3213 admissions, including 2221 patients receiving intravenous chemotherapies, 401 receiving oral therapies, and 591 having hospital visits. Oral treatments and general visits were different in the two time periods (p<0.001). Despite the elevated patient flow, only one patient (0.1%) tested positive for COVID-19 and there were no cases among healthcare staff. CONCLUSIONS Based on the adopted security protocol we provided continuity of care for all patients and limited the spread of the COVID-19 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Palluzzi
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Corrado
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Marchetti
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Bolomini
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Vertechy
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Carolina Bottoni
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariagrazia Distefano
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Perrone AM, Dondi G, Giunchi S, De Crescenzo E, Boussedra S, Tesei M, D'Andrea R, De Leo A, Zamagni C, Morganti AG, De Palma A, De Iaco P. COVID-19 free oncologic surgical hub: The experience of reallocation of a gynecologic oncology unit during pandemic outbreak. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 161:89-96. [PMID: 33223219 PMCID: PMC7832928 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the majority of healthcare resources of the affected Italian regions were allocated to COVID-19 patients. Due to lack of resources and high risk of death, most cancer patients have been shifted to non-surgical treatments. The following reports our experience of a Gynaecologic Oncology Unit's reallocation of resources in a COVID-19 free surgical oncologic hub in order to guarantee standard quality of surgical activities. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a prospective observational study performed in the Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, on the outcomes of the reallocation of surgical activities outside the University Hospital of Bologna, Italy, during the Italian lockdown period. Here, we described our COVID-19 free surgical oncologic pathway, in terms of lifestyle restrictions, COVID-19 screening measures, and patient clinical, surgical and follow up outcomes. RESULTS During the lockdown period (March 9th - May 4th, 2020), 83 patients were scheduled for oncological surgery, 51 patients underwent surgery. Compared to pre-COVID period, we performed the same activities: number of cases scheduled for surgery, type of surgery and surgical and oncological results. No cases of COVID-19 infection were recorded in operated patients and in medical staff. Patients were compliant and well accepted the lifestyle restrictions and reorganization of the care. CONCLUSIONSONCLUSIONS Our experience showed that the prioritization of oncological surgical care and the allocation of resources during a pandemic in COVID-19 free surgical hubs is an appropriate choice to guarantee oncological protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M Perrone
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italy; Centro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Giulia Dondi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italy; Centro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Susanna Giunchi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenia De Crescenzo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italy
| | - Safia Boussedra
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Tesei
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italy; Centro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rocco D'Andrea
- Anestesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio De Leo
- Centro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Azienda USL, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Claudio Zamagni
- Centro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Oncologia Medica Addarii, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Centro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandra De Palma
- Forensic Medicine and Integrated Risk Management Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pierandrea De Iaco
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italy; Centro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
O'Neill D, El-Ghobashy A. Impact of COVID-19 on Gynaecological oncology; a global perspective. Heliyon 2021; 7:e06658. [PMID: 33829116 PMCID: PMC8015395 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus pandemic caused global devastation with over 2 million deaths and put unprecedented pressure on health care facilities world-wide. The response to the pandemic differed globally as countries faced different challenges. Within Gynaecological oncology, a multitude of guidance was published by various countries and organisations which demonstrated major themes. These consisted of implementations aimed at reducing transmission, managing limited resources, treatment prioritisation whilst continuing urgent oncological surgery where possible and the use of alternative therapies in the management of oncology patients to reduce hospital admission. Due to the novelty of this virus and its global effects, published guidance is currently limited to best practice and small-scale trials. This review aims to summarise the global response to coronavirus with respect to Gynaecological oncology and suggests potential interventions to limit the spread of the virus during resurgence or in the event of a future global pandemic. It also discusses the current trials recruiting relevant to the field of Gynaecological oncology to better inform the specialty on the management of cancer patients during COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle O'Neill
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, The Royal Wolverhampton Hospital NHS Trust, West Midlands, WV10 0QP, United Kingdom
| | - Alaa El-Ghobashy
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, The Royal Wolverhampton Hospital NHS Trust, West Midlands, WV10 0QP, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|