Wide variability in the sensitivity of APTT reagents for monitoring of heparin dosage

Antithrombin during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with heparin anticoagulation: A single-center cohort study

IntroductionAntithrombin (AT) is a natural anticoagulant essential to enhancing the unfractionated heparin (UFH) anticoagulant effect. Its supplementation in the management of UFH-based anticoagulation during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) has a strong pathophysiological rationale.MethodsThis is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult VV ECMO patients with anticoagulation maintained by UFH targeting an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) of 40-50 s and AT activity >80%. We compare anticoagulation management and survival outcomes between AT subpopulations, defined by a threshold AT activity ≥80%. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the variation in AT activity and its association with ICU survival.ResultsIn 244 patients enrolled from 2009 to 2022, anticoagulation was maintained by a median heparin dose of 11.4 IU/kg/h [IQR: 8.2-14.7] with a mean aPTT of 46.1 s (±7.3) and AT activity of 88.9% (±17.0). A lower mean aPTT, higher dose of UFH and shorter fraction of time without UFH were associated with higher AT activity (p < .01). Higher AT activity showed a consistent association with ICU survival (for 10% increase of AT, odds ratio for ICU mortality: 0.95; 95% CI 0.93-0.97; p value <.01).ConclusionsThere is a positive association between AT activity and UFH requirements but no significant difference in the rate of bleeding events. A higher mean AT during VV ECMO was associated with ICU survival. Future studies are needed to differentiate between exogenously supplemented versus endogenous AT effect.

Difference in activated partial thromboplastin time values with two different reagents according to C-reactive protein values

BACKGROUND

Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) is susceptible to reagent composition. This study aimed to investigate a large number of specimens and determine the cause of discrepancies.

METHOD

This study included 18,994 subjects who underwent coagulation tests at our hospital from May 2020 to December 2020. Measuring reagents included HemosIL SynthASil APTT (APTT-SS, Instrumentation Laboratory) and Coagpia APTT-N (APTT-N, Sekisui Medical).

RESULTS

A total of 451 patients demonstrated APTT-N of >39 seconds and an APTT-N/SS ratio of >1.3. A C-reactive protein (CRP) level of ≥1.4 mg/L demonstrated a significant positive correlation, with a higher APTT-N/SS indicating higher CRP levels. All 28 subjects receiving no anticoagulants and who had remaining specimens underwent a cross-mixing test (CMT). Of them, 17 were suspected for lupus anticoagulant (LA) by both the waveform shape and the index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA) value, 6 by the ICA value, and 5 were difficult to determine.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that the APTT-N prolongation correlated with CRP degree and the transient involvement of LA in CMT results due to CRP. This study indicated various reactivities depending on the assay reagents used. Further testing is warranted if LA is suspected, considering the patient's background.

Pleiotropic Effects of Heparin and its Monitoring in the Clinical Practice

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) was uncovered in 1916, has been used as an anticoagulant since 1935, and has been listed in the World Health Organization's Model List of Essential Medicines. Despite the availability of many other anticoagulants, the use of heparin (either low molecular weight heparin [LMWH] or UFH) is still substantial. Heparin has pleotropic effects including anticoagulant and several nonanticoagulant properties such as antiproliferative, anti-inflammatory activity, and anticomplement effects. Although UFH has been widely replaced by LMWH, UFH is still the preferred anticoagulant of choice for patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and patients with high-risk mechanical cardiac valves requiring temporary bridging with a parenteral anticoagulant. UFH is a highly negatively charged molecule and binds many positively charged molecules, hence has unpredictable pharmacokinetics, and variable anticoagulant effect on an individual patient basis. Therefore, anticoagulant effects of UFH may not be proportional to the dose of UFH given to any individual patient. In this review, we discuss the anticoagulant and nonanticoagulant activities of UFH, differences between UFH and LMWH, when to use UFH, different methods of monitoring the anticoagulant effects of UFH (including activated partial thromboplastin time, heparin anti-Xa activity level, and activated clotting time), while discussing pros and cons related to each method and comparison of clinical outcomes in patients treated with UFH monitored with different methods based on available evidence.

Outcomes of heparinized adult veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients managed with low and high activated partial thromboplastin time targets: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There are no randomized controlled trials comparing low and high activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) targets in heparinized adult veno-arterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients. Our systematic review and meta-analysis summarized complication rates in adult VA ECMO patients treated with low and high aPTT targets.

METHODS

Studies published from January 2000 to May 2022 were identified using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature). Studies were included if aPTT was primarily used to guide heparin anticoagulation. For the low aPTT group, we included studies where aPTT goal was ≤60 seconds and for the high aPTT group, we included studies where aPTT goal was ≥60 seconds. Proportional meta-analysis with a random effects model was used to calculate pooled complication rates for patients in the two aPTT groups.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met inclusion criteria (5 in the low aPTT group and 7 in the high aPTT group). The pooled bleeding complication incidence for low aPTT studies was 53.6% (95% CI = 37.4%-69.4%, I2 = 60.8%) and for high aPTT studies was 43.8% (95% CI = 21.7%-67.1%, I2 = 91.8%). No studies in the low aPTT group reported overall thrombosis incidence, while three studies in the high aPTT group reported overall thrombosis incidence. The pooled thrombosis incidence for high aPTT studies was 16.1% (95% CI = 9.0%-24.5%, I2 = 13.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adult ECMO patients managed with low and high aPTT goals appeared to have similar bleeding and other complication rates further highlighting the need for a randomized controlled trial.

Anticoagulation and Bleeding during Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Insights from the PROTECMO Study

Rationale: Definitive guidelines for anticoagulation management during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) are lacking, whereas bleeding complications continue to pose major challenges. Objectives: To describe anticoagulation modalities and bleeding events in adults receiving VV ECMO. Methods: This was an international prospective observational study in 41 centers, from December 2018 to February 2021. Anticoagulation was recorded daily in terms of type, dosage, and monitoring strategy. Bleeding events were reported according to site, severity, and impact on mortality. Measurements and Main Results: The study cohort included 652 patients, and 8,471 days on ECMO were analyzed. Unfractionated heparin was the initial anticoagulant in 77% of patients, and the most frequently used anticoagulant during the ECMO course (6,221 d; 73%). Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was the most common test for monitoring coagulation (86% of days): the median value was 52 seconds (interquartile range, 39 to 61 s) but dropped by 5.3 seconds after the first bleeding event (95% confidence interval, -7.4 to -3.2; P < 0.01). Bleeding occurred on 1,202 days (16.5%). Overall, 342 patients (52.5%) experienced at least one bleeding event (one episode every 215 h on ECMO), of which 10 (1.6%) were fatal. In a multiple penalized Cox proportional hazard model, higher aPTT was a potentially modifiable risk factor for the first episode of bleeding (for 20-s increase; hazard ratio, 1.07). Conclusions: Anticoagulation during VV ECMO was a dynamic process, with frequent stopping in cases of bleeding and restart according to the clinical picture. Future studies might explore lower aPTT targets to reduce the risk of bleeding.

An Overview of Heparin Monitoring with the Anti-Xa Assay

Heparin remains a critical therapy in hospitalized patients requiring anticoagulation. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) mediates its therapeutic effect by binding to antithrombin (AT) and inhibiting thrombin and FXa, as well as other serine proteases. Because of its complex pharmacokinetics, monitoring UFH therapy is required, which is usually achieved with either the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) or the anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) assay. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is fast replacing UFH, as it has a more predictable response, negating the need for routine monitoring in most cases. When required, the anti-Xa assay is used for monitoring of LMWH. The APTT has many notable limitations when used for heparin therapeutic monitoring, including biologic, preanalytical, and analytical issues. With its increasing availability, the anti-Xa assay is appealing as it is less affected by patient factors (e.g., acute-phase reactants, lupus anticoagulants, consumptive coagulopathies), known to interfere with the APTT. The anti-Xa assay has shown additional benefits, such as faster time to achieve therapeutic levels, more consistent therapeutic levels, less dose adjustments, and, overall, less tests performed during therapy. However, poor interlaboratory agreement has been observed among anti-Xa reagents, highlighting that further work needs to be done to standardize this assay for use in patient heparin monitoring.

Monitoring of Unfractionated Heparin Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit Using a Point-of-Care aPTT: A Comparative, Longitudinal Observational Study with Laboratory-Based aPTT and Anti-Xa Activity Measurement

Continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) is administered routinely in the intensive care unit (ICU) for the anticoagulation of patients, and monitoring is performed by the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) or anti-Xa activity. However, these strategies are associated with potentially large time intervals before dose adjustments, which could be detrimental to the patient. The aim of the study was to compare a point-of-care (POCT) version of the APTT to (i) laboratory-based APTT and (ii) measurements of anti-Xa activity in terms of correlation, agreement and turnaround time (TAT). Thirty-five ICU patients requiring UFH therapy were prospectively included and followed longitudinally for a maximum duration of 15 days. UFH was administered according to a local adaptation of Raschke and Amanzadeh’s aPTT nomograms. Simultaneous measurements of POCT-APTT (CoaguCheck® aPTT Test, Roche Diagnostics) on a drop of fresh whole blood, laboratory-based APTT (C.K. Prest®, Stago) and anti-Xa activity (STA®Liquid anti-Xa, Stago) were systematically performed two to six times a day. Antithrombin, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, factor VIII and lupus anticoagulant were measured. The time tracking of sampling and analysis was recorded. The overall correlation between POCT-APTT and laboratory APTT (n = 795 pairs) was strongly positive (rs = 0.77, p < 0.0001), and between POCT-APTT and anti-Xa activity (n = 729 pairs) was weakly positive (rs = 0.46, p < 0.0001). Inter-method agreement (Cohen’s kappa (k)) between POCT and laboratory APTT was 0.27, and between POCT and anti-Xa activity was 0.30. The median TATs from sample collection to the lab delivery of results for lab-APTT and anti-Xa were 50.9 min (interquartile range (IQR), 38.4−69.1) and 66.3 min (IQR, 49.0−91.8), respectively, while the POCT delivered results in less than 5 min (p < 0.0001). Although the use of the POCT-APTT device significantly reduced the time to results, the results obtained were poorly consistent with those obtained by lab-APTT or anti-Xa activity, and therefore it should not be used with the nomograms developed for lab-APTT.

APTT therapeutic range for monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy. Significant impact of the anti-Xa reagent used for correlation

INTRODUCTION

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy is monitored by using the anti-activated factor X (anti-Xa) activity, or the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), which remains the most widely used assay. One of the main advantages of anti-Xa relies on its hypothesized standardization, with a unique therapeutic range (0.30-0.70 IU/ml) for all reagents, whereas APTT is influenced by numerous preanalytical and analytical parameters not related to the anticoagulant activity of UFH.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to compare the anti-Xa-correlated APTT therapeutic ranges calculated using different combinations of APTT (n = 4) and anti-Xa reagents (n = 4) in frozen citrated plasmas from 87 inpatients on UFH.

RESULTS

The median APTT ratio ranged from 2.19 for the less sensitive to 3.23 for the most sensitive reagent, whereas the median anti-Xa activity was between 0.37 IU/ml and 0.57 IU/ml. The APTT therapeutic ranges calculated to correlate with anti-Xa activities between 0.30 and 0.70 IU/ml were found to be highly different from one combination of APTT reagent and analyzer to another. The same applied to the therapeutic range of a single APTT reagent calculated using different anti-Xa assays performed on the same analyzer, leading to a lack of agreement as to whether a sample was classified as subtherapeutic, therapeutic or supratherapeutic in 8.0% to 23.0% of the patients, with kappa coefficients between 0.908 and 0.753.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the APTT therapeutic range calculated to correlate with anti-Xa activities between 0.30 and 0.70 IU/ml is influenced not only by the APTT reagent, but also by the anti-Xa reagent used for calculation.

Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin in Adult Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): ACT, APTT, or ANTI-XA?

Background

During ECMO, anticoagulants, in particular, unfractionated heparin (UFH), are commonly used and monitored by laboratory tests, including ACT, APTT, and anti-Xa level.

Method

A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted on adult patients undergoing ECMO between January 2019 and January 2020 at a tertiary hospital. The correlations between ACT, APTT, anti-Xa, antithrombin, and UFH dose were assessed.

Results

129 sets of measurements from 37 patients were obtained including ACT, APTT, anti-Xa, antithrombin, and UFH dose measured simultaneously. 102 out of 129 sets of values were interpreted as antithrombin deficiencies. The correlation coefficient between APTT and anti-Xa; ACT and anti-Xa are 0.72 and 0.33, respectively, p < 0.001. The patients with normal antithrombin levels exhibited a significant correlation between APTT and anti-Xa (r = 0.80, p < 0.001). ACT, on the other hand, was poorly correlated with UFH dose, whether there is AT deficiency or not. Anti-Xa and APTT are only moderately correlated with UFH dose in the group without antithrombin deficiency, with correlation coefficients of 0.62 and 0.57, respectively, p < 0.05.

Conclusion

APTT value is strongly correlated with anti-Xa value, particularly in patients with normal antithrombin levels. However, the ACT value was poorly correlated with anti-Xa and not with the UFH dose. In groups without antithrombin deficiency, APTT and anti-Xa values only moderately correlated with UFH dose.

Heparin dosage, level, and resistance in SARS-CoV2 infected patients in intensive care unit

Introduction

Patients with COVID‐19 frequently exhibit a hypercoagulable state with high thrombotic risk, particularly those admitted to intensive care units (ICU). Thromboprophylaxis is mandatory in these patients; nevertheless, thrombosis still occurs in many cases. Thus, the problem of assessing an adequate level of anticoagulation in ICU patients becomes evident during the COVID‐19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the heparin resistance and the efficacy of heparin monitoring using an anti‐Xa activity assay.

Methods

Thirty‐seven heparin‐treated patients admitted to ICU for SARS‐CoV‐2 pneumonia were retrospectively studied for antifactor Xa activity (anti‐Xa), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), Antithrombin, Fibrinogen, D‐Dimer, Factor VIII, von Willebrand Factor, and the total daily amount of heparin administered. The correlation between APTT and anti‐Xa was evaluated for unfractionated heparins (UFH). The correlations between the daily dose of UFH or the dosage expressed as IU/kg b.w. for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and anti‐Xa were also evaluated.

Results

Twenty‐one patients received calcium heparin, 8 sodium heparin, and 8 LMWH. A moderate correlation was found between APTT and anti‐Xa for UFH. APTT did not correlate with coagulation parameters. 62% of UFH and 75% of LMWH treated patients were under the therapeutic range. About 75% of patients could be considered resistant to heparin.

Conclusions

SARS‐COV2 pneumonia patients in ICU have frequently heparin resistance. Anti‐Xa seems a more reliable method to monitor heparin treatment than APTT in acute patients, also because the assay is insensitive to the increased levels of fibrinogen, FVIII, and LAC that are common during the COVID‐19 inflammatory state.

International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) laboratory guidance for the evaluation of haemostasis analyser-reagent test systems. Part 1: Instrument-specific issues and commonly used coagulation screening tests

Before a new method is used for clinical testing, it is essential that it is evaluated for suitability for its intended purpose. This document gives guidance for the performance of verification, validation and implementation processes required by regulatory and accreditation bodies. It covers the planning and execution of an evaluation of the commonly performed screening tests (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time and fibrinogen assay), and instrument-specific issues. Advice on selecting an appropriate haemostasis analyser, planning the evaluation, and assessing the reference, interval, precision, accuracy, and comparability of a haemostasis test system are also given. A second companion document will cover specialist haemostasis testing.

Monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy: Lack of standardization of anti-Xa activity reagents

INTRODUCTION

One of the main advantages of using anti-Xa instead of activated partial thromboplastin time in monitoring of unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy relies on its hypothesized standardization, with a unique therapeutic range defined to be 0.30 to 0.70 IU/mL. The aim of the present study was to compare the inter-reagent agreement of anti-Xa activity.

METHODS

Citrate tubes were obtained from 104 inpatients on UFH. Plasma samples were stored frozen in aliquots at -70°C before being shipped to three accredited coagulation laboratories to be evaluated for anti-Xa activity using their routine assay(s). Pooled normal plasmas spiked with dilutions of the 6th International Standard of UFH to achieve anti-Xa activities up to 1.0 IU/mL were evaluated using the same techniques.

RESULTS

In the plasmas from patients on UFH, the median anti-Xa activity ranged from 0.37 IU/mL with one reagent to 0.57 IU/mL with another; results were in between (0.45 IU/mL) using two other reagents. Comparisons of results obtained using the different reagents demonstrated unacceptable bias up to 0.24 IU/mL between some reagents (41% difference). The concordance as whether anti-Xa activities measured using different reagents were within or outside the therapeutic range was between 0.411 and 0.939 (kappa). Similar discrepancy was demonstrated for anti-Xa activities when evaluating normal plasma spiked with the International Standard. A discrepancy of the same order of magnitude was demonstrated in the 2017 External Quality Assessment Program provided by the External Quality Control in Assays and Tests exercises.

CONCLUSIONS

The reported discrepancy between test results obtained using different anti-Xa assays clearly suggests a lack of standardization of that assay with potentially significant impact on the patients' anticoagulation.

A narrative review of antithrombin use during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults: rationale, current use, effects on anticoagulation, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

During extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, the large contact surface between the blood and the extracorporeal circuit causes a continuous activation of coagulation and inflammation. Unfractionated heparin, a glycosaminoglycan that must bind to antithrombin as a cofactor, is currently the standard anticoagulant adopted during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Antithrombin, beyond being a potent natural anticoagulant, acts in the cross-talk between coagulation and inflammatory system through anticoagulation and coagulation-independent effects.

OBJECTIVES

In this review, we describe, in the adult setting of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, the pathophysiological rationale for antithrombin use, the current practice of administration, and the effects of antithrombin on anticoagulation, bleeding, and outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

Studies on adults (18 years or older) on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation published from 1995 to 2018 in order to evaluate the use of antithrombin.

RESULTS

In adults on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, antithrombin supplementation has a highly pathophysiological rationale since coagulation factor consumption, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and endothelial activation are triggered by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Eleven articles are focused on the topic but among the authors there is no consensus on the threshold for supplementation (ranging from 70% to 80%) as well as on the dose (rarely standardized) and time of administration (bolus vs continuous infusion). Consistently, antithrombin is considered able to achieve better anticoagulation targets in or not in the presence of heparin resistance. The impact of antithrombin administration on bleeding still shows contrasting results.

CONCLUSION

Antithrombin use in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should be investigated on the threshold for supplementation, dose, and time of administration.

The spatial distribution of the normal reference values of the activated partial thromboplastin time based on ArcGIS and GeoDA

We explored the variation and spatial distribution of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reference values of healthy people at different altitudes in China in order to develop a scientific basis for a unified standard. The APTT reference values of 49,020 healthy males (41-75 years old) and 32,447 healthy females (41-75 years old) were collected from 601 work units and 546 work units in China, respectively. The relationship between the APTT reference values and altitude was tested by correlation analysis. Linear regression analysis and curve analysis were employed to predict the APTT reference values in the whole country. Trend surface analysis, the variation function, kriging interpolation, and Getis-Ord Gi* statistic were utilized to reveal the spatial characteristics of the values. The result showed a significant positive correlation between the APTT reference values and altitude. The APTT values for females were prolonged for a greater amount of time than the males in several same areas in China. The spatial contact forms of the APTT reference values of healthy Chinese were mainly "high-high" and "low-low," which was in accord with the first law of geography. The APTT reference values still showed spatial autocorrelation and regional variation. The values were higher in the western and northern areas than in the eastern and southern areas of China. The APTT reference values of people aged 41-75 in China showed regional differences. The APTT reference values in one area can be estimated by using the best prediction model or can be obtained by the geographical distribution.

Anti-Factor Xa-Based Monitoring of Unfractionated Heparin: Clinical Outcomes in a Pediatric Cohort

OBJECTIVES

To assess clinical outcomes in children treated with unfractionated heparin and monitored using an anti-factor Xa (Anti-FXa)-based nomogram. We also sought to assess the correlation between activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and Anti-FXa.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-center, observational cohort study conducted over a 20-month period that included all pediatric patients (<21 years) who received therapeutic unfractionated heparin and were monitored using an anti-FXa-based nomogram.

RESULTS

In total, 95 patients met prespecified inclusion criteria, and 1098 pairs of APTT and Anti-FXa measurements were performed. The median unfractionated heparin dose required to reach therapeutic Anti-FXa goal was significantly greater in infants compared with older children (P <.0001). The median time to achieve therapeutic Anti-FXa was 10 hours (range 2-96 hours) and was significantly shorter in patients who received a bolus compared with those who did not (P = .03). Five (5.3%) major bleeding events were noted. Age, peak Anti-FXa, peak APTT, lowest platelet count, and fibrinogen were not predictive of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeds. Moderate correlation between the APTT and Anti-FXa (r = 0.75; 95% CI 0.72-0.77) assays was appreciated.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an anti-FXa-based nomogram to monitor unfractionated heparin in children is feasible. Although moderate correlation was observed between the APTT and Anti-FXa assays, the APTT frequently overestimated heparin activity. Safety and efficacy of an Anti-FXa nomogram needs further validation.

Advances in monitoring anticoagulant therapy

Anticoagulant drugs directly or indirectly influence coagulation factors preventing fibrin formation, thus preventing blood clotting. They are classified into two groups according to the mode of application, namely parenteral and oral drugs. Among the latter, vitamin K antagonists (most often warfarin) were most widely used for almost a century. In recent years new oral anticoagulant drugs have become available that directly target either factor IIa or Xa (direct oral anticoagulants, DOACs). The proportion of patients to whom DOACs are prescribed is increasing because clinical studies have proved they are at least as effective and safe as vitamin K antagonists. Some of the anticoagulant drugs require regular laboratory monitoring, while others only need assessment of blood drug levels in specific clinical situations. This chapter provides an overview of appropriate laboratory tests used for either regular laboratory monitoring of therapy or occasional assessment of the anticoagulant effect of both parenteral and oral anticoagulant drugs used in clinical practice.

Agreement between activated partial thromboplastin time and anti-Xa activity in critically ill patients receiving therapeutic unfractionated heparin

BACKGROUND

No study supports the use of either aPTT or anti-Xa activity for heparin monitoring in critical care patients. There are no strong data on the agreement between aPTT and anti-Xa. The aims of this study were to: 1. Analyse the agreement between aPTT and anti-Xa in a large population of critically ill patients under unfractionated heparin therapy (UFH), 2. Identify clinical and biological factors associated to agreement or disagreement, and 3. Analyse the impact of anti-Xa availability on the use of aPTT and UFH therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective study in a 35 beds mixed-ICU population between 2006 and 2016 in a University teaching hospital.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

delivery of a UFH dose >15,000 U/24 h during at least one day with one anti-Xa determination.

DATA

demographic variables, aPTT, anti-Xa, laboratory variables, presence of extracorporeal devices (ECD). Pairs of simultaneously dosed aPTT and anti-Xa [aPTT:anti-Xa] were analysed on the basis of their agreement within the sub-therapeutic, therapeutic (aPTT 50-80″, anti-Xa 0.3-0.7 U/ml) or supra-therapeutic ranges.

RESULTS

2283 patient admissions (2085 patients) were analysed. 35,595 [aPTT:anti-Xa] pairs were found. The overall [aPTT:anti-Xa] agreement was 59.6% and lowest (54.3%) in presence of ECD compared to non-ECD patients (61.6%; p < 0.001). Sixteen demographic and biological variables were analysed and were not predictive of [aPTT:anti-Xa] agreement. No significant difference in administered UFH dose was observed after anti-Xa introduction.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort, the [aPTT:anti-Xa] agreement is <60% and significantly lower in patients with ECD. None of the variables identified as potentially affecting the agreement were predictive. Availability of anti-Xa had neither effect on aPTT use nor on UFH-dose. These results call for a prospective study to determine the optimal UFH-therapy monitoring tool.

The importance of commutability in material used for quality control purposes

External Quality Assessment (EQA) is an important part of laboratory quality assurance. Spiking of normal plasma is sometimes employed to mimic clinical samples. It is important that spiked material gives similar results to clinical samples (ie, is commutable) to ensure appropriate conclusions can be drawn from EQA exercises. We describe here data from UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Blood Coagulation (NEQAS BC) exercises where spiked samples were tested alongside samples from patients to explore commutability of artificial material. Normal plasma was spiked with unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban. Factor VIII (FVIII) deficient plasma was spiked with FVIII concentrate. Spiked samples and ex vivo patient material were sent to laboratories for testing. For LMWH, good agreement was seen between results for samples from patient plasma and plasma spiked with heparin. For UFH, APTT ratios differed between spiked and patient samples for the same drug concentration, with no correlation in ranking of reagents. Precision for patient and spiked material for Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran assays was comparable. However, the pattern of results for some Dabigatran assay kits differed between spiked and patient samples. For FVIII assays, results obtained with spiked and postinfusion samples gave comparable results. Spiked material is suitable for EQA if commutability is demonstrated. Our data show commutability for plasma spiked with Rivaroxaban, LWMH and some FVIII concentrates. For some tests, notably APTT for UFH, marked differences between patient and spiked samples indicate not all tests can be evaluated using artificial samples.

Measurement of rivaroxaban concentrations demonstrates lack of clinical utility of a PT, dPT and APTT test in estimating levels

INTRODUCTION

Rivaroxaban concentrations were measured in 127 inpatient samples using an HPLC-MS/MS assay.

METHODS

We compared this measurement with a calibrated anti-Xa assay and performed PT, aPTT and dilute PT tests to assess the value of clot-based assays in clinical decision-making.

RESULTS

The correlation between the anti-Xa assay and the HPLC-MS/MS at therapeutic concentrations was strong (R²  = 0.98). The PT, RecombiPlasTin 2G, and aPTT, Actin FS, showed a linear dose-response but poor correlation (R²  = 0.32 and 0.44, respectively) and at dilutions of 1 in 150 to 1 in 750 the dilute PT assay also showed poor correlation with rivaroxaban concentrations measured by specific assays. A normal PT or aPTT alone did not identify a likely safe rivaroxaban concentration to allow surgery or invasive procedures, but the combination of normal PT and aPTT identified a group of patients with rivaroxaban levels less than 90 ng/mL. Combined normal PT and aPTT had specificity and sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI 0.92-0.99) and 0.37 (95% CI 0.1-0.74) for a rivaroxaban concentration < 32 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

The PT and aPTT show poor correlation with rivaroxaban levels measured by calibrated anti-Xa and HPLC-MS/MS assays. A normal combined PT and APTT identified low rivaroxaban levels with high specificity but lacked sensitivity. The dPT assay at several dilutions could not be used to quantify rivaroxaban in clinical samples. The utility of these PT, aPTT and dilute PT assays in a clinical setting is very limited, and results generated must be interpreted with caution.

Comparison of the ecarin chromogenic assay and diluted thrombin time for quantification of dabigatran concentrations

Essentials Routine monitoring is unnecessary but measuring dabigatran levels is helpful in certain situations. We compared ecarin chromogenic assay (STA-ECA-II) and dilute thrombin time (dTT) in patient samples. Both tests provided accurate measurements over a wide range of dabigatran concentrations. Adoption of STA-ECA-II and dTT into routine clinical practice will improve patient care.

SUMMARY

Background Although routine coagulation monitoring is unnecessary, measuring plasma dabigatran concentrations can be useful for detecting drug accumulation in renal failure or overdose, assessing the contribution of dabigatran to serious bleeding, planning the timing of urgent surgery or intervention, or determining the suitability for thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Dabigatran concentrations can be quantified using chromogenic or clot-based tests, such as the ecarin chromogenic assay (ECA) and the diluted thrombin time (dTT), respectively. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the results of these assays with dabigatran concentrations measured by the reference standard of mass spectrometry in samples from 50 dabigatran-treated patients collected at peak and trough after at least 4 months of drug intake. Methods Drug levels measured with either the STA Ecarin Chromogenic Assay-II (STA-ECA-II) or dTT were linearly correlated with those determined by mass spectrometry over a wide range of concentrations. Results and Conclusions For detection of levels below 50 ng mL-1 both tests have specificities of at least 96%, suggesting that they accurately detect even low levels of drug. Therefore, regardless of whether a chromogenic or clot-based platform is preferred, the STA-ECA-II and dTT are useful tests for measuring dabigatran concentrations. Unfortunately, neither test is licensed by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Although approved in other jurisdictions, the dTT and STA-ECA-II are not widely or rapidly available in most hospitals. Therefore, cooperation between regulators and hospitals is urgently needed to render these tests readily available to inform patient care.

Therapeutic monitoring of unfractionated heparin - trials and tribulations

INTRODUCTION

Heparin is one of the oldest biological medicines with an established role in prevention and treatment of arterial and venous thromboembolism. Published therapeutic ranges for unfractionated heparin (UFH) mostly precede the large increase in the number of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagent/instrument combinations that now show wide variability. Areas covered: This paper explores the use of UFH, the development of heparin therapeutic ranges (HTRs), and the strengths and limitations of the methods used to monitor heparin's anticoagulant effect. Expert commentary: Despite longstanding use of UFH for management of thromboembolic conditions, the optimal test for monitoring UFH remains undetermined. Although used extensively for monitoring UFH, routine APTT-derived HTRs are based on limited science that may have little relevance to current laboratory practice. Anti-FXa levels may provide better and more reliable HTRs; however, even these levels show considerable inter-laboratory variation, and there are insufficient clinical studies proving improved clinical efficacy. Alternative tests for monitoring UFH reported over time have not been proven effective nor feasible, secondary to technical or cost issues, or lack of general adoption. Thus, despite limited evidence of clinical utility, an uncomfortable marriage of convenience represented by heparin laboratory monitoring is unlikely to be terminated in the immediate future.

Protocolled Redefinition of the Therapeutic Range for Unfractionated Heparin: Lost in Translation?

BACKGROUND

Protocolled treatment with unfractionated heparin (UFH) is a subject of ongoing debate. Even though international guidelines prescribe calibration of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) to 0.3 to 0.7 U/mL anti-Xa activity to establish an UFH therapeutic range, evidence for this approach remains scarce. In this study, we evaluated different strategies to delineate the UFH therapeutic range and analyzed the effects on patient therapeutic classification.

METHODS

In 109 patient samples, the aPTT was measured with 2 different reagents, both of which used mechanical clot detection. The UFH therapeutic range was determined using 3 previously described methods: calibration of the aPTT to 0.3 to 0.7 U/mL anti-Xa activity, application of 1.5 to 2.5 times the control aPTT, or using 0.3 to 0.7 U/mL anti-Xa activity directly. We also applied the UFH therapeutic range of a second hospital to our patient population.

RESULTS

Application of the guideline-prescribed anti-Xa calibration method would result in patients receiving increased UFH dosage in comparison to our previous UFH nomogram. Between-method and between-laboratory variations in aPTT and anti-Xa activity assays are a likely cause of these discrepancies. Additionally, we show that individual patient characteristics, such as weight and UFH treatment duration, likely contribute to the discordance between different strategies to establish an UFH therapeutic range.

CONCLUSION

No consensus is reached between different strategies to define the UFH therapeutic range, which could result in relevant differences in UFH doses applied in patients. Clinicians and laboratory specialists should critically evaluate UFH monitoring protocols and be aware of their shortcomings.

Monitoring low molecular weight heparins at therapeutic levels: dose-responses of, and correlations and differences between aPTT, anti-factor Xa and thrombin generation assays

Background

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH’s) are used to prevent and treat thrombosis. Tests for monitoring LMWH’s include anti-factor Xa (anti-FXa), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and thrombin generation. Anti-FXa is the current gold standard despite LMWH’s varying affinities for FXa and thrombin.

Aim

To examine the effects of two different LMWH’s on the results of 4 different aPTT-tests, anti-FXa activity and thrombin generation and to assess the tests’ concordance.

Method

Enoxaparin and tinzaparin were added ex-vivo in concentrations of 0.0, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 anti-FXa international units (IU)/mL, to blood from 10 volunteers. aPTT was measured using two whole blood methods (Free oscillation rheometry (FOR) and Hemochron Jr (HCJ)) and an optical plasma method using two different reagents (ActinFSL and PTT-Automat). Anti-FXa activity was quantified using a chromogenic assay. Thrombin generation (Endogenous Thrombin Potential, ETP) was measured on a Ceveron Alpha instrument using the TGA RB and more tissue-factor rich TGA RC reagents.

Results

Methods’ mean aPTT at 1.0 IU/mL LMWH varied between 54s (SD 11) and 69s (SD 14) for enoxaparin and between 101s (SD 21) and 140s (SD 28) for tinzaparin. ActinFSL gave significantly shorter aPTT results. aPTT and anti-FXa generally correlated well. ETP as measured with the TGA RC reagent but not the TGA RB reagent showed an inverse exponential relationship to the concentration of LMWH. The HCJ-aPTT results had the weakest correlation to anti-FXa and thrombin generation (R_s0.62–0.87), whereas the other aPTT methods had similar correlation coefficients (R_s0.80–0.92).

Conclusions

aPTT displays a linear dose-respone to LMWH. There is variation between aPTT assays. Tinzaparin increases aPTT and decreases thrombin generation more than enoxaparin at any given level of anti-FXa activity, casting doubt on anti-FXa’s present gold standard status. Thrombin generation with tissue factor-rich activator is a promising method for monitoring LMWH’s.

Comparison of the aPTT with alternative tests for monitoring direct thrombin inhibitors in patient samples

OBJECTIVES

The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) test has been used for years to monitor parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) and unfractionated heparin. Because the aPTT correlates poorly with unfractionated heparin levels, we hypothesized that the aPTT may not be the best test for monitoring parenteral DTIs.

METHODS

Using 235 excess plasma specimens from 82 adult patients receiving treatment with DTIs (argatroban, bivalirudin, or dabigatran), we compared the aPTT with the ecarin chromogenic assay (ECA), the dilute thrombin time (dTT) test, and the prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT) test.

RESULTS

The aPTT correlated poorly with each of the other tests in both bivalirudin- and argatroban-containing samples (r(2) = 0.04-0.23). The ECA and dTT exhibited the best correlations (r(2) = 0.66-0.93). Intermediate correlations were seen when the results of the PiCT were plotted against the dTT or ECA (r(2) = 0.46-0.58). Nineteen specimens obtained from six patients receiving dabigatran showed a good correlation between the dTT and the ECA (r(2) = 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

The aPTT does not correlate well with other tests that might be used to monitor parental DTI administration. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of alternative tests and their correlation with clinical outcomes.

Anti-factor Xa assay is a superior correlate of heparin dose than activated partial thromboplastin time or activated clotting time in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation*

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of activated clotting time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and anti-Factor Xa assay for the monitoring and dosing of heparin in pediatric patients requiring support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

PICU in a single, tertiary care, academic children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Seventeen patients (age 1 d to 13.9 yr, median 0.83 yr) managed on pulmonary and cardiac extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between March 2010 and August 2012 by a single surgeon.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Twice daily measurements of anti-Factor Xa assay, activated clotting time, and activated partial thromboplastin time were determined from the same blood specimen. Data were analyzed using SAS system v9.2. Fourteen patients (82.4%) were successfully weaned from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and 12 (70.6%) were discharged from the hospital. Pearson correlations were used to compare heparin dose and activated clotting time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and anti-Factor Xa assay. Analysis showed negative Pearson correlations in 11 of 17 patients between the activated clotting time and heparin, as compared with seven of 17 for activated partial thromboplastin time and only one for heparin and anti-Factor Xa assay. Only four patients had moderate to strong positive correlations between activated clotting time and heparin as compared with a moderate to strong positive correlation in 10 patients for anti-Factor Xa assay and heparin.

CONCLUSIONS

The anti-Factor Xa assay correlated better with heparin dosing than activated clotting time or activated partial thromboplastin time. Activated clotting time has a poor correlation to heparin doses commonly associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, anti-Factor Xa assay may be a more valuable monitor of heparin administration.

Parenteral anticoagulants: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

This article describes the pharmacology of approved parenteral anticoagulants. These include the indirect anticoagulants, unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), fondaparinux, and danaparoid, as well as the direct thrombin inhibitors hirudin, bivalirudin, and argatroban. UFH is a heterogeneous mixture of glycosaminoglycans that bind to antithrombin via a unique pentasaccharide sequence and catalyze the inactivation of thrombin, factor Xa, and other clotting enzymes. Heparin also binds to cells and plasma proteins other than antithrombin causing unpredictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and triggering nonhemorrhagic side effects, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and osteoporosis. LMWHs have greater inhibitory activity against factor Xa than thrombin and exhibit less binding to cells and plasma proteins than heparin. Consequently, LMWH preparations have more predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, have a longer half-life than heparin, and are associated with a lower risk of nonhemorrhagic side effects. LMWHs can be administered once daily or bid by subcutaneous injection, without coagulation monitoring. Based on their greater convenience, LMWHs have replaced UFH for many clinical indications. Fondaparinux, a synthetic pentasaccharide, catalyzes the inhibition of factor Xa, but not thrombin, in an antithrombin-dependent fashion. Fondaparinux binds only to antithrombin. Therefore, fondaparinux-associated HIT or osteoporosis is unlikely to occur. Fondaparinux exhibits complete bioavailability when administered subcutaneously, has a longer half-life than LMWHs, and is given once daily by subcutaneous injection in fixed doses, without coagulation monitoring. Three additional parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors and danaparoid are approved as alternatives to heparin in patients with HIT.

The effect of prion reduction in solvent/detergent-treated plasma on haemostatic variables

BACKGROUND

Octapharma PPGmbH has recently modified its manufacturing process for solvent/detergent-treated plasma to incorporate a prion reduction step, in which a 3 log reduction has been demonstrated. The current study was undertaken to assess the impact of this procedure on haemostatic variables in the new product OctaplasLG in comparison with standard Octaplas.

METHODS

Production batches of standard Octaplas (n=4) and OctaplasLG (n=16) were assessed for levels of coagulation factors, physiological protease inhibitors, markers of activation and procoagulant microparticles. Global haemostasis was assessed by a thrombin generation test (TGT) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM).

RESULTS

Mean levels of factors: II, V, VII, IX, X, XI, XII and XIII, VWF:Ag, antithrombin, protein C and free protein S were all >75 u/dl. ADAMTS-13 activity levels were normal. Factor VIII and VWF:RCo were >55 u/dl. TGT and ROTEM were similar in both preparations, and microparticles were present at negligible levels. Two units of OctaplasLG had slightly elevated levels of Prothrombin Fragments 1+2, but D-Dimer and thrombin-antithrombin complexes were normal in all batches.

CONCLUSION

These studies indicate that the affinity chromatography procedure used in OctaplasLG does not appear to adversely affect the proven haemostatic quality of Octaplas, while offering a selective reduction in the concentration of pathological prion proteins.

Evaluation of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents for application in biomedical diagnostic device development

INTRODUCTION

The most commonly used test for monitoring heparin therapy is the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). The response of available aPTT reagents to heparin varies significantly. The aim of this study was to highlight the differences between aPTT reagents stored in a dried format to select the most suitable formulations to be used for the development of point-of-care diagnostic devices used for monitoring of unfractionated heparin dose response.

METHODS

Ten reagents were analysed in terms of their performance in liquid and in dried form after storage for 24 h and 14 days. Performance was assessed by measurement of the clotting time (CT) as evidenced by the onset of thrombin formation using a chromogenic thrombin substrate in plasma samples activated with these formulations.

RESULTS

Reagents in all of the three forms tested (liquid, 24 h and 14 days) resulted in significant shortening of CTs in comparison with the nonactivated plasma CT. Liquids returned more rapid CTs in comparison with dried reagents. Most of the reagents were more sensitive to heparin in dried, rather than in liquid form. Dried reagents based on kaolin as a surface activator were notably more effective in achieving short CT than others, while dried reagents composed of silica and synthetic phospholipids were the most sensitive to heparin.

CONCLUSION

Two reagents, namely aPTT-SP and SynthASIL both of which are based on synthetic phospholipids and silica, were identified as promising candidates for incorporation into point-of-care diagnostic device platforms as dried reagents.

Fluorescence-based blood coagulation assay device for measuring activated partial thromboplastin time

The measurement of blood clotting time is important in a range of clinical applications such as assessing coagulation disorders and controlling the effect of various anticoagulant drug therapies. Clotting time tests essentially measure the onset of clot formation which results from the formation of fibrin fibers in the blood sample. However, such assays are inherently imprecise due to the highly variable nature of the clot formation process and the sample matrix. This work describes a clotting time measurement assay which uses a fluorescent probe to very precisely detect the onset of fibrin clot formation. It uses a microstructured surface which enhances the formation of multiple localized clot loci and which results in the abrupt redistribution of the fluorescent label at the onset of clot formation in both whole blood and plasma. This methodology was applied to the development of an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) test in a lateral flow microfluidic platform and used to monitor the effect of heparin dosage where it showed linearity from 0 to 2 U/mL in spiked plasma samples (R(2)=0.996, n = 3), correlation against gold standard coagulometry of 0.9986, and correlation against standard hospital aPTT in 32 patient samples of 0.78.

Prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time assay considerations

Prothrombin times and activated partial thromboplastin times have long been used as tests of overall ("global") clotting function. Laboratory coagulation testing issues should be at the forefront of the reader's consciousness whenever critically evaluating and extrapolating published study conclusions reliant on the results of these tests. Thus, this article reviews laboratory issues and known variables influencing prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time results and international normalized ratio determinations.

Interlaboratory agreement in the monitoring of unfractionated heparin using the anti-factor Xa-correlated activated partial thromboplastin time

BACKGROUND

In an effort to improve interlaboratory agreement in the monitoring of unfractionated heparin (UFH), the College of American Pathologists (CAP) recommends that the therapeutic range of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) be defined in each laboratory through correlation with a direct measure of heparin activity such as the factor Xa inhibition assay. Whether and to what extent this approach enhances the interlaboratory agreement of UFH monitoring has not been reported.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a cross-validation study among four CAP-accredited coagulation laboratories to compare the interlaboratory agreement of the anti-FXa-correlated APTT with that of the traditional 1.5-2.5 times the midpoint of normal (1.5-2.5:control) method for defining the therapeutic APTT range.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

APTT and FXa inhibition assays were performed in each laboratory on plasma samples from 44 inpatients receiving UFH.

RESULTS

Using the anti-FXa-correlation method, there was agreement among all four laboratories as to whether a sample was subtherapeutic, therapeutic or supratherapeutic in seven (16%) patient samples. In contrast, consensus was achieved in 23 (52%) samples when the 1.5-2.5:control method was employed.

CONCLUSIONS

The anti-FXa-correlation method does not appear to enhance interlaboratory agreement in UFH monitoring as compared with the traditional 1.5-2.5:control method. Adoption of the anti-FXa-correlation method produces considerable disparity in UFH dosing decisions among different centers, although the clinical impact of this disparity is not known.

Results of a Survey of Hospital Coagulation Laboratories in the United States, 2001

Context.—Coagulation and bleeding problems are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, and inappropriate testing practices may lead to bleeding or thrombotic complications.

Objective.—To evaluate practices reported by hospital coagulation laboratories in the United States and to determine if the number of beds in a hospital was associated with different practices.

Design.—From a sampling frame of institutions listed in the 1999 directory of the American Hospital Association, stratified into hospitals with 200 or more beds (“large hospitals”) and those with fewer than 200 beds (“small hospitals”), we randomly selected 425 large hospitals (sampling rate, 25.6%) and 375 small hospitals (sampling rate, 8.8%) and sent a survey to them between June and October 2001. Of these, 321 large hospitals (75.5%) and 311 small hospitals (82.9%) responded.

Results.—An estimated 97.1% of respondents reported performing some coagulation laboratory tests. Of these, 71.6% reported using 3.2% sodium citrate as the specimen anticoagulant to determine prothrombin time (81.3% of large vs 67.7% of small hospitals, P &lt; .001). Of the same respondents, 45.3% reported selecting thromboplastins insensitive to heparin in the therapeutic range when measuring prothrombin time (59.4% of large vs 39.8% of small hospitals, P &lt; .001), and 58.8% reported having a therapeutic range for heparin (72.9% of large vs 53.2% of small hospitals, P &lt; .001). An estimated 96.3% of respondents assayed specimens for activated partial thromboplastin time within 4 hours after phlebotomy, and 89.4% of respondents centrifuged specimens within 1 hour of collection. An estimated 12.1% reported monitoring low-molecular-weight heparin therapy, and to do so, 79% used an assay for activated partial thromboplastin time (58% of large vs 96% of small hospitals, P = .001), whereas 38% used an antifactor Xa assay (65% of large vs 18% of small hospitals, P = .001).

Conclusions.—Substantial variability in certain laboratory practices was evident. Where significant differences existed between the hospital groups, usually large hospitals adhered to accepted practice guidelines to a greater extent. Some reported practices are not consistent with current recommendations, showing a need to understand the reasons for noncompliance so that better adherence to accepted standards of laboratory practice can be promoted.

Heparin and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin

This article about unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is part of the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines. UFH is a heterogeneous mixture of glycosaminoglycans that bind to antithrombin via a pentasaccharide, catalyzing the inactivation of thrombin and other clotting factors. UFH also binds endothelial cells, platelet factor 4, and platelets, leading to rather unpredictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Variability in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents necessitates site-specific validation of the aPTT therapeutic range in order to properly monitor UFH therapy. Lack of validation has been an oversight in many clinical trials comparing UFH to LMWH. In patients with apparent heparin resistance, anti-factor Xa monitoring may be superior to measurement of aPTT. LMWHs lack the nonspecific binding affinities of UFH, and, as a result, LMWH preparations have more predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. LMWHs have replaced UFH for most clinical indications for the following reasons: (1) these properties allow LMWHs to be administered subcutaneously, once daily without laboratory monitoring; and (2) the evidence from clinical trials that LMWH is as least as effective as and is safer than UFH. Several clinical issues regarding the use of LMWHs remain unanswered. These relate to the need for monitoring with an anti-factor Xa assay in patients with severe obesity or renal insufficiency. The therapeutic range for anti-factor Xa activity depends on the dosing interval. Anti-factor Xa monitoring is prudent when administering weight-based doses of LMWH to patients who weigh > 150 kg. It has been determined that UFH infusion is preferable to LMWH injection in patients with creatinine clearance of < 25 mL/min, until further data on therapeutic dosing of LMWHs in renal failure have been published. However, when administered in low doses prophylactically, LMWH is safe for therapy in patients with renal failure. Protamine may help to reverse bleeding related to LWMH, although anti-factor Xa activity is not fully normalized by protamine. The synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux is a promising new antithrombotic agent for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Thrombin generation for the control of heparin treatment, comparison with the activated partial thromboplastin time

Heparin can be quantified with antifactor Xa and IIa tests (aXa, aIIa) but the anticoagulant power of heparin depends upon plasma properties as well as upon heparin concentrations and thus differs between subjects. Measuring the effect, as with the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) therefore is clinically more relevant. Here we investigate the use of the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) for this purpose. In 12 volunteers 9000 IU of four heparins of different mol. wt distributions were injected. Samples were taken at 11 time points between 0 and 24 h. With the exception of the 0 and 24-h time points, heparin could be demonstrated by its aIIa and aXa activity in virtually all samples. The APTT showed the effect of this heparin in 34% of the samples; the ETP in 80%. This is partly due to the wide margins of the normal values, caused by large interindividual variation [coefficient of variation (CV) approximately 12% for the APTT, approximately 17% for the ETP]. The intraindividual variation is much smaller (CV approximately 4% for the APTT, approximately 5% for the ETP). Relative to the baseline value of the individual, the heparin effect was recognized by the APTT in 55% of the cases and by the ETP in 98%. There were no large differences between the different types of heparin.

The inhibition of blood coagulation by heparins of different molecular weight is caused by a common functional motif--the C-domain

BACKGROUND

Heparins in clinical use differ considerably as to mode of preparation, molecular weight distribution and pharmacodynamic properties.

OBJECTIVES

Find a common basis for their anticoagulant action.

METHODS

In 50 fractions of virtually single molecular weight (Mr), prepared from unfractionated heparin (UFH) and four low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), we determined: (i) the molar concentration of material (HAM) containing the antithrombin binding pentasaccharide (A-domain); (ii) the specific catalytic activity in thrombin and factor Xa inactivation; (iii) the capacity to inhibit thrombin generation (TG) and prolong the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). We also calculated the molar concentration of A-domain with 12 sugar units at its non-reducing end, i.e. the structure that carries antithrombin activity (C-domain).

RESULTS

The antithrombin activity and the effects on TG and APTT are primarily determined by the concentration of C-domain and independent of the source material (UFH or LMWH) or Mr. High Mr fractions (>15 000) are less active, probably through interaction with non-antithrombin plasma proteins. Anti-factor Xa activity is proportional to the concentration of A-domain, it is Ca2+- and Mr-dependent and does not determine the effect on TG and APTT.

CONCLUSION

For any type of heparin, the capacity to inhibit the coagulation process in plasma is primarily determined by the concentration of C-domain, i.e. the AT-binding pentasaccharide with 12 or more sugar units at its non-reducing end.

An institution-specific heparin titration nomogram: development, validation, and assessment of compliance

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To develop, validate, and assess compliance with a heparin titration nomogram.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label trial.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

SUBJECTS

Patients admitted with heart failure who required therapy with intravenous unfractionated heparin. Intervention. An in vitro concentration-response was determined by measuring activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) on normal pooled plasma containing known concentrations of heparin. The therapeutic aPTT range was determined from the concentration-response by using the therapeutic heparin concentration range of 0.2-0.4 U/ml (protamine neutralization). Patients were consecutively enrolled, and therapy was managed by using the heparin titration nomogram. Paired aPTT-heparin concentrations were obtained, and nomogram validation was performed by comparing the in vitro and the ex vivo concentration-responses with use of linear regression. Nomogram compliance also was assessed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The therapeutic aPTT ranges based on in vitro and ex vivo data were determined to be 45-72 seconds and 47-61 seconds, respectively. The ranges were significantly different (p<0.001). Overall compliance with the nomogram was 88%.

CONCLUSION

These results confirm that, even in a relatively homogeneous disease-state patient population, in vitro data do not accurately predict ex vivo data. If in vitro data are used to develop an institution-specific nomogram, a validation procedure should be used to ensure accuracy. Although 100% compliance to a nomogram may not be attainable, it should be expected. Therefore, a compliance rate of 88% is concerning and suggests a need for increased nursing and physician education.

Bedside coagulometry during intravenous heparin therapy after coronary angioplasty

In order to assess the applicability of a bedside coagulometer for measurement of b-APTT, serial blood samples were obtained from 20 patients receiving intravenous heparin treatment following PTCA, and from 5 healthy volunteers. B-APTT was analysed bedside on the Hemochron coagulometer; p-APTT and p-heparin, measured as factor anti-Xa activity, were analysed ex-vivo in the laboratory. B-APTT values, determined by the Hemochron coagulometer, were closely correlated to p-heparin (r=0.83, p<0.001, SD=52 seconds (sec), n=89), and duplicate determinations of b-APTT on the Hemochron coagulometer showed an acceptable repeatability. However, an APTT ratio of 1.5-2.5 was not related to a therapeutic p-heparin level, neither as measured by the Hemochron device nor in the laboratory.

BACKGROUND

When administering intravenous heparin during angioplasty procedures, a quick and reliable method for safe and effective monitoring of anticoagulation is necessary.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the applicability of a bedside coagulometer, measuring the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in patients receiving intravenous heparin treatment after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA).

METHODS

In patients with stable angina pectoris, receiving intravenous heparin treatment following PTCA, serial blood samples were obtained by venipuncture and from the arterial sheath for analysis of whole blood APTT (b-APTT), and plasma heparin concentration (p-heparin). Additionally, in healthy volunteers blood samples were obtained after a single bolus injection of heparin. B-APTT was analysed bedside on the Hemochron coagulometer; p-APTT and p-heparin, measured as factor anti-Xa activity, were analysed ex-vivo in the laboratory using conventional analytical methods.

RESULTS

In 20 patients a total of 94 venous and 69 arterial blood samples were analysed, and in five healthy volunteers analyses were performed in 20 venous blood samples. B-APTT values, determined by the Hemochron coagulometer, were closely correlated to p-heparin (r=0.83, p<0.001, SD=52 seconds (sec), n=89). An APTT ratio of 1.5-2.5 was not related to a therapeutic p-heparin level, however, neither when using APTT assessed by the Hemochron device nor APTT measured in the laboratory. Duplicate determinations of b-APTT on the Hemochron coagulometer showed an acceptable repeatability; the mean difference between duplicate measurements was 4 sec (coefficient of variation (c.v.)=6%, p<0.05, n=163).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients receiving intravenous heparin after PTCA treatment, b-APTT values measured by the Hemochron method showed an acceptable repeatability and were significantly correlated to p-heparin.