Comparison of PD-L1 protein expression between primary tumors and metastatic lesions in triple negative breast cancers

Inflammation drives tumor growth in an immunocompetent implantable metastasis model

Nearly 90% of cancer deaths are due to metastasis. Conventional cancer therapeutics including chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy, are effective in treating primary tumors, but may aggravate disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) into regaining a proliferative state. Models isolating the post dissemination environment are needed to address the potential risks of these therapies, however modeling post dissemination environments is challenging. Often, host organisms become moribund due to primary tumor mass before native metastatic niches can evolve. Implantable tissue engineered niches have been used to attract circulating tumor cells independent of the primary tumor. Here, we serially transplant such tissue engineered niches with recruited DTCs in order to isolate the post dissemination environment. After transplantaion, 69% of scaffolds developed overt post-dissemination cancer growth, however 100% of scaffolds did not grow to a life-threatening critical size within twelve weeks. Adjuvant chemotherapy, while initially effective, did not prevent long-term DTC growth in scaffolds. Subjecting these transplanted niches to surgical resection via biopsy punch enhanced CD31, MMP9, Ly6G, and tumor burden compared to control scaffolds. Biopsy punching was able to rescue tumor incidence from prior chemotherapy. This model of serial transplantation of engineered DTC niches is a highly controllable and flexible method of establishing and systematically investigating the post-dissemination niche.

6th and 7th International consensus guidelines for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC guidelines 6 and 7)

This manuscript describes the Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) international consensus guidelines updated at the last two ABC international consensus conferences (ABC 6 in 2021, virtual, and ABC 7 in 2023, in Lisbon, Portugal), organized by the ABC Global Alliance. It provides the main recommendations on how to best manage patients with advanced breast cancer (inoperable locally advanced or metastatic), of all breast cancer subtypes, as well as palliative and supportive care. These guidelines are based on available evidence or on expert opinion when a higher level of evidence is lacking. Each guideline is accompanied by the level of evidence (LoE), grade of recommendation (GoR) and percentage of consensus reached at the consensus conferences. Updated diagnostic and treatment algorithms are also provided. The guidelines represent the best management options for patients living with ABC globally, assuming accessibility to all available therapies. Their adaptation (i.e. resource-stratified guidelines) is often needed in settings where access to care is limited.

Interrogating the roles of lymph node metastasis in systemic immune surveillance

Lymph nodes (LNs) are principal orchestrators of the adaptive immune response, yet in the context of malignancy, they are typically the first sites of metastasis. When tumors spread to LNs, they alter the immune repertoire, ultimately reconditioning it in a manner that suppresses anti-tumor immunity and promotes further metastatic dissemination. Conversely, activation of anti-tumor immunity within LNs is essential for immunotherapy, suggesting clinical approaches to radiotherapy in LNs and lymphadenectomy may need to be reconsidered in the context of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Herein, we discuss our understanding of the immune remodeling that coincides with LN metastasis as well as recent clinical studies exploring neoadjuvant immunotherapy and the roles of LNs in treatment of solid organ malignancies.

Heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression between primary and metastatic lymph nodes: a predictor of EGFR-TKI therapy response in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

There is inconclusive evidence to suggest that the expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a putative predictor of response to EGFR-TKI therapy in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression in the primary lung site and metastatic lymph nodes to analyze the association between PD-L1 expression and response for patients treated with EGFR-TKI.

METHODS

This study reviewed 184 advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations who received first-generation EGFR-TKI as first-line treatment from 2020 to 2021 at Shanghai Chest Hospital. The patients were divided into the primary lung site group (n = 100) and the metastatic lymph nodes group (n = 84) according to the biopsy site. The patients in each group were divided into TPS < 1%, TPS 1-49%, and TPS ≥ 50% groups according to PD-L1 expression.

RESULTS

The median PFS was 7 (95% CI: 5.7-8.3) months, and the median OS was 26 (95% CI: 23.5-28.5) months for all patients. No correlation existed between PFS or OS and PD-L1 expression. The median PFS in the primary lung site group was 11 months (95% CI: 9.6-12.4) in the TPS < 1% group, 8 months (95% CI: 6.6-9.4) in TPS 1-49% group, and 4 months (95% CI: 3.2-4.8) in TPS ≥ 50% group, with statistically significant differences (p = 0.000). The median OS of the TPS < 1% group and TPS ≥ 50% group showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.008) in the primary lung site group. In contrast, PD-L1 expression in the lymph nodes of EGFR-mutant patients was unrelated to PFS or OS after EGFR-TKI therapy.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression from the primary lung site might predict clinical benefit from EGFR-TKI, whereas PD-L1 from metastatic lymph nodes did not.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Chest Hospital (ID: IS23060) and performed following the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 (revised 2008).

Comparison of PD-L1 (22C3) Expression in Paired Primary and Metastatic Breast Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is being used as a predictive marker of the benefit derived from immunotherapy in several cancer types, including breast cancer. However, the insight gleaned of the prognostic and predictive value of PD-L1 status and its correlation with molecular characteristics during breast cancer progression remains limited.

METHODS

We performed an PD-L1 (22C3) assay in pre-treatment primary and metastatic tumor sections from 33 patients with breast carcinoma, matched for post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p-NACT). PD-L1 expression was evaluated using 3 scoring methods: immune cell (IC) and tumor cell (TC) with a 1% as the cutoff value, and combined positive scores (CPS) with a 1 as the cutoff value. Twenty-two samples from 11 patients had successful fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based molecular data available for analysis.

RESULTS

In the 33 pre-treatment primary tumors, PD-L1 IC, TC, and CPS showed positive correlation with stromal tumor infiltrate lymphocytes (sTIL), histological grade 3, and triple negative breast carcinoma (TNBC). In the matched metastatic tumors, only PD-L1 IC showed a positive correlation with sTIL. The primary tumors showed a higher PD-L1 expression than the matched metastatic tumors by IC and CPS. Negative to positive conversion by CPS was identified in the metastatic tumors from lung, pleura and liver. p-NACT tumors also showed a trend of lower PD-L1 expression compared to the pre-treatment tumors. Six patients had matched samples for molecular and PD-L1 comparison, and none of them showed consistent gene alterations or PD-L1 expression among the primary, p-NACT and metastatic tumors.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a decrease in PD-L1 expression and disconnected molecular features during breast cancer progression. Repeating PD-L1 IHC testing could be considered in some specific metastatic sites if primary tumors were negative. Further studies are needed to identify other predictive factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in patients with breast carcinoma.

The roles of PD-L1 in the various stages of tumor metastasis

The interaction between tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and T-cell programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) has long been acknowledged as a mechanism for evading immune surveillance. Recent studies, however, have unveiled a more nuanced role of tumor-intrinsic PD-L1 in reprograming tumoral phenotypes. Preclinical models emphasize the synchronized effects of both intracellular and extracellular PD-L1 in promoting metastasis, with intricate interactions with the immune system. This review aims to summarize recent findings to elucidate the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression and the pro-metastatic roles of PD-L1 in the entire process of tumor metastasis. For example, PD-L1 regulates the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process, facilitates the survival of circulating tumor cells, and induces the formation of immunosuppressive environments at pre-metastatic niches and metastatic sites. And the complexed and dynamic regulation process of PD-L1 for tumor metastasis is related to the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression and functions from tumor primary sites to various metastatic sites. This review extends the current understandings for the roles of PD-L1 in mediating tumor metastasis and provides new insights into therapeutic decisions in clinical practice.

Favorable impact of PD1/PD-L1 antagonists on bone remodeling: an exploratory prospective clinical study and ex vivo validation

BACKGROUND

Skeletal morbidity in patients with cancer has a major impact on the quality of life, and preserving bone health while improving outcomes is an important goal of modern antitumor treatment strategies. Despite their widespread use in early disease stages, the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on the skeleton are still poorly defined. Here, we initiated a comprehensive investigation of the impact of ICIs on bone health by longitudinal assessment of bone turnover markers in patients with cancer and by validation in a novel bioengineered 3D model of bone remodeling.

METHODS

An exploratory longitudinal study was conducted to assess serum markers of bone resorption (C-terminal telopeptide, CTX) and formation (procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide, PINP, and osteocalcin, OCN) before each ICI application (programmed cell death 1 (PD1) inhibitor or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor) for 6 months or until disease progression in patients with advanced cancer and no evidence of bone metastases. To validate the in vivo results, we evaluated osteoclast (OC) and osteoblast (OB) differentiation on treatment with ICIs. In addition, their effect on bone remodeling was assessed by immunohistochemistry, confocal microscopy, and proteomics analysis in a dynamic 3D bone model.

RESULTS

During the first month of treatment, CTX levels decreased sharply but transiently. In contrast, we observed a delayed increase of serum levels of PINP and OCN after 4 months of therapy. In vitro, ICIs impaired the maturation of preosteoclasts by inhibiting STAT3/NFATc1 signaling but not JNK, ERK, and AKT while lacking any direct effect on osteogenesis. However, using our bioengineered 3D bone model, which enables the simultaneous differentiation of OB and OC precursor cells, we confirmed the uncoupling of the OC/OB activity on exposure to ICIs by demonstrating impaired OC maturation along with increased OB differentiation.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that the inhibition of the PD1/PD-L1 signaling axis interferes with bone turnover and may exert a protective effect on bone by indirectly promoting osteogenesis.

Contribution of tumour and immune cells to PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: exploratory analysis from KEYNOTE-119

The efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy increased with increasing programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, as quantified by combined positive score (CPS; PD-L1 expression on both tumour cells and immune cells) in patients with previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-119 study. This exploratory analysis was conducted to determine whether the expression of PD-L1 on tumour cells contributes to the predictive value of PD-L1 CPS in mTNBC. PD-L1 expression in tumour samples was assessed using PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx and quantified using both CPS and tumour proportion score (TPS; PD-L1 expression on tumour cells alone). Calculated immune cell density (CID) was defined as CPS minus TPS. The ability of each scoring method (CPS, TPS, and CID) to predict clinical outcomes with pembrolizumab was evaluated. With pembrolizumab, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.69 (95% CI = 0.58-0.80) for CPS, 0.55 (95% CI = 0.46-0.64) for TPS, and 0.67 (95% CI = 0.56-0.77) for CID. After correction for cutoff prevalence, CPS performed as well as, if not better than, CID with respect to predicting objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Data from this exploratory analysis suggest that, although PD-L1 expression on immune cells alone is predictive of response to programmed death 1 blockade in mTNBC, adding tumour PD-L1 expression assessment (i.e. CPS, which combines immune cell and tumour cell PD-L1 expression) may improve prediction. PD-L1 CPS thus remains an effective and broadly applicable uniform scoring system for enriching response to programmed death 1 blockade with pembrolizumab in mTNBC as well as other tumour types.

Current usage of pembrolizumab in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)

INTRODUCTION

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway has changed the landscape in the treatment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The ICI pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy now forms a standard of care for the treatment of advanced PD-L1 positive TNBC and as part of neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk early-stage disease. Evidence in this space is rapidly advancing.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to highlight the evolving role of immunotherapy in TNBC management and to discuss current challenges. The studies in this review were searched from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov.

EXPERT OPINION

The KEYNOTE-522 trial demonstrated that the addition of peri-operative pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves patient outcomes in early-stage TNBC. However, critical questions remain including how to select which patients truly gain benefit from the addition of pembrolizumab; the optimal duration of therapy, and the optimal adjuvant therapy depending on pathologic response.

Expert consensus on the clinical application of immunotherapy in breast cancer: 2024

Background

Significant progress has been made in immunotherapy of breast cancer (BC) with the approval of multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly in early and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) settings. Most guidelines have recommended immune therapy as the important approach in BC, yet several critical aspects still require further clarification, including proper patient selection, treatment duration, optimized chemotherapy partner, predictive biomarkers, and specific considerations for Chinese patients.

Methods

(I) Establishment of expert group: the expert group consists of 32 experts from departments such as medical oncology, breast surgery, and pathology; (II) literature search: mainly conducted in English databases (such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) and Chinese databases (such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine disc, and Wanfang Database), with a search cutoff date of April 23, 2024; (III) assessment of evidence quality and recommendation strength: evidence quality and recommendation opinions are graded based on the evidence category and recommendation level of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) guidelines; (IV) consensus formulation: on the March 2, 2024, through online consensus meeting, the consensus content is thoroughly discussed, and opinions from all experts are solicited.

Results

The consensus meeting has resulted in 15 detailed recommendations, providing clearer guidance on the clinical application of immunotherapy in BC management. The core suggestions are as follows: for early-stage II-III TNBC and metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) in the first-line setting, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors can be considered. However, for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC (HR+/HER2- BC), HER2+ BC, and mTNBC in later lines of therapy, evidence is lacking to support the use of immunotherapy.

Conclusions

This consensus provides a comprehensive overview of BC immunotherapy, including immunotherapy for early-stage BC and late-stage BC, immune related adverse event (irAE) management, biomarkers of immunotherapy, and future directions. The consensus consolidates these deliberations into 15 evidence-based recommendations, serving as a practical guide for clinicians to more scientifically and systematically manage the clinical application of immunotherapy.

PD-L1 (SP142) Expression in Primary and Recurrent/Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancers and Its Clinicopathological Significance

PURPOSE

The programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) SP142 assay identifies patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who are most likely to respond to the anti-PD-L1 agent atezolizumab. We aimed to compare PD-L1 (SP142) expression between primary and recurrent/metastatic TNBCs and elucidate the clinicopathological features associated with its expression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Primary and recurrent/metastatic TNBCs tested with PD-L1 (SP142) were collected, and clinicopathological information of these cases was obtained through a review of slides and medical records.

RESULTS

PD-L1 (SP142) positivity was observed in 50.9% (144/283) of primary tumors and 37.8% (31/82) of recurrent/metastatic TNBCs with a significant difference. Recurrent or metastatic sites were associated with PD-L1 positivity, with high PD-L1 positivity in the lung, breast, and soft tissues, and low positivity in the bone, skin, liver, and brain. When comparing PD-L1 expression between primary and matched recurrent/metastatic TNBCs using 55 paired samples, 20 cases (36.4%) showed discordance; 10 cases revealed positive conversion, and another 10 cases revealed negative conversion during metastatic progression. In primary TNBCs, PD-L1 expression was associated with a higher histologic grade, lower T category, pushing border, and higher tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte infiltration. In survival analyses, PD-L1 positivity, especially high positivity, was found to be associated with favorable prognosis of patients.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 (SP142) expression was lower in recurrent/metastatic TNBCs, and substantial cases showed discordance in its expression between primary and recurrent/metastatic sites, suggesting that multiple sites may need to be tested for PD-L1 (SP142) when considering atezolizumab therapy. PD-L1 (SP142)-positive TNBCs seems to be associated with favorable clinical outcomes.

Comparison of assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status in triple-negative breast cancer biopsies and surgical specimens

AIMS

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is important for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies but may vary between different immunohistochemical assays, scorings and the type of specimen used for analysis.

METHODS

We compared the analytical concordance of three clinically relevant PD-L1 assays (VENTANA SP142, VENTANA SP263 and DAKO 22C3 pharmDx) assessing immune cell score (IC), tumour proportion score and combined positive score (CPS) in preoperative biopsies and resection specimens of primary TNBC. PD-L1 expression was scored on virtual whole slide images and compared with expression data from corresponding surgical specimens.

RESULTS

The mean PD-L1 positivity in TNBC biopsies defined as IC ≥1% and CPS ≥1 ranged between 11% and 61% with the lowest positivity for SP142 and highest for SP263. The corresponding surgical specimens showed overall higher positivity rates (53%-75%). When comparing biopsies with surgical specimens, the agreement for PD-L1 positivity with SP263 and 22C3 at IC score ≥1% and CPS ≥1 was fair (kappa 0.47-0.52) and poor for SP142 (kappa 0.15-0.19). Using CPS ≥10 cut-off, the agreement for SP263 was excellent (kappa 0.751) but poor for 22C3 (kappa 0.261). Spearman correlation coefficients ranged between 0.489 and 0.75 indicating a generally moderate to strong correlation between biopsies and surgical specimens for all assays and scores.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate high accordance between biopsies and surgical specimens for SP263 and 22C3 scoring but less for SP142. Generally, biopsies are suitable for PD-L1 testing in TNBC but the appropriate assay, scoring and cut-off must be considered.

PD-L1 testing in metastatic triple negative breast cancer: Results of an Italian survey

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the approach to metastatic triple-negative breast cancers. Atezolizumab was approved for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancers whose tumors express PD-L1, determined by SP 142 assay. To assess the availability and practice of SP142 test we administered a survey to all the 15 pathology departments of the Lazio Region during a six-month period.

METHODS

The survey comprised 12 questions regarding the availability of SP142 in the pathology departments, the percentage of positive tests, the difficulties of pathologists in cases close to cut-off value and the tested samples.

RESULTS

The SP142 assay was available in only eight centers. In case of positive result, most centers (5/8, 62.5%) reported values of PD-L1 expression ranging from > 1 to ⩽ 5%, with values close to the cut-off point (⩾ 1% or < 1%) being the greatest challenge.Most of the centers (6/8, 75%) tested material from both their own and other hospitals. In most centers, the evaluations were performed either on primary tumors or metastasis, in particular lymph nodes (5/8, 62.5%), followed by lung (3/8, 37.5%) and liver (1/8, 12.5%) metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Our results raise some important issues concerning the evaluation of PD-L1 in the "real-life" setting, providing strategies for its implementation.

Atezolizumab in Combination With Carboplatin and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: The TBCRC 043 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Agents targeting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) have demonstrated efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) when combined with chemotherapy and are now the standard of care in patients with PD-L1-positive metastatic disease. In contrast to microtubule-targeting agents, the effect of combining platinum compounds with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 immunotherapy has not been extensively determined.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of atezolizumab with carboplatin in patients with metastatic TNBC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted in 6 centers from August 2017 to June 2021.

Interventions

Patients with metastatic TNBC were randomized to receive carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 alone or with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects with a 3-year duration of follow-up.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and overall survival (OS). Other objectives included correlation of response with tumor PD-L1 levels, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumor DNA- and RNA-sequenced biomarkers, TNBC subtyping, and multiplex analyses of immune markers.

Results

All 106 patients with metastatic TNBC who were enrolled were female with a mean (range) age of 55 (27-79) years, of which 12 (19%) identified as African American/Black, 1 (1%) as Asian, 73 (69%) as White, and 11 (10%) as unknown. Patients were randomized and received either carboplatin (n = 50) or carboplatin and atezolizumab (n = 56). The combination improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-1.01; P = .05) from a median of 2.2 to 4.1 months, increased ORR from 8.0% (95% CI, 3.2%-18.8%) to 30.4% (95% CI, 19.9%-43.3%), increased CBR at 6 months from 18.0% (95% CI, 9.8%-30.1%) to 37.5% (95% CI, 26.0%-50.6%), and improved OS (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.96; P = .03) from a median of 8.6 to 12.6 months. Subgroup analysis showed PD-L1-positive tumors did not benefit more from adding atezolizumab (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.23-1.65; P = .35). Patients with high TILs (HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.30-0.50), high mutation burden (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.23-1.06), and prior chemotherapy (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.95) received greater benefit on the combination. Patients with obesity and patients with more than 125 mg/dL on-treatment blood glucose levels were associated with better PFS (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.10-1.80) on the combination. TNBC subtypes benefited from adding atezolizumab, except the luminal androgen receptor subtype.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, the addition of atezolizumab to carboplatin significantly improved survival of patients with metastatic TNBC regardless of PD-L1 status. Further, lower risk of disease progression was associated with increased TILs, higher mutation burden, obesity, and uncontrolled blood glucose levels.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03206203.

A Comprehensive Comparison between Primary Liver Cancer and Liver Metastases through scRNA-Seq Data Analysis

Metastasis is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. A comprehensive comparison of the differences between primary and metastatic cancers within the same organ can aid in understanding the growth mechanisms of cancer cells at metastatic sites, thereby helping to develop more effective targeted treatment strategies. Primary liver cancer is one of the most common types of cancer, and the liver is also one of the main metastatic sites. In this paper, we utilize single-cell RNA-Seq data to compare primary liver cancer and colorectal liver metastases from multiple perspectives, including cell types and proportions, activity of various cell types, cell-cell communication, mRNA expression differences within the same types of cells, key factors associated with cell proliferation, etc. Our analysis results show the following: (i) Compared to primary tissue, metastatic tissue contains more cytotoxic T cells and exhausted T cells, and it retains some specific characteristics of the primary site. (ii) Cells of the same type exhibit functional differences between primary and metastatic cancers, with metastatic cancer cells showing lower metabolism levels and immune cells exhibiting stronger immune activity. (iii) Interactions between monocytes and hepato-associated cells are strong in primary cancer, while depleted T cells frequently communicate with hepatocytes in metastatic cancer. (iv) Proliferation-related genes in primary and metastatic cancers are mainly involved in cell energy supply and basic metabolism activity, respectively.

Reconstruction of unreported subgroup survival data with PD-L1-low expression in advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer using innovative KMSubtraction workflow

BACKGROUND

Among patients with advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with high/positive programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, a superior survival outcome has been demonstrated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, it remains unclear whether ICIs are beneficial for patients with low PD-L1 levels. Here, we derived survival data for subgroups with low PD-L1-expressing and conducted a pooled analysis.

METHODS

After a systematic search of Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL from inception until May 18, 2023, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), or duration of response (DOR) for metastatic TNBC treated with ICI-based regimens were included. Kaplan-Meier curves were extracted for the intention-to-treat population and high PD-L1 subgroups. KMSubtraction was used when survival curves were not provided for subgroups with low PD-L1 expression. A pooled analysis of survival data was then conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 3022 patients were included in four RCTs: Impassion130, Impassion131, KEYNOTE-119, and KEYNOTE-355. Unreported low PD-L1-expressing subgroups were identified, including PD-L1 immune cell (IC)<1%, combined positive score (CPS)<1, and 1≤CPS<10. Compared with chemotherapy, ICI-chemotherapy combinations did not significantly differ in OS, PFS, or DOR in the Impassion PD-L1<1%, KEYNOTE-355 PD-L1 CPS<1, and KEYNOTE-355 1≤CPS<10 subgroups. In the KEYNOTE-119 CPS<1 subgroup, the risk of tumor progression was increased with pembrolizumab (HR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.62 to 3.08; p<0.001), as well as in the 1≤CPS<10 subgroup (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.20; p<0.001). A pooled analysis using a scoring system found no significant difference in OS and PFS among the subgroups with an IC of <1% between immunochemotherapy and chemotherapy. OS (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.26), PFS (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.10), and DOR were also not significantly different in pooled analysis of first-line trials for those with low PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSION

ICI-based regimens are not associated with a survival benefit versus chemotherapy in subgroups of advanced/metastatic TNBC that express low PD-L1 levels.

Refining PD-1/PD-L1 assessment for biomarker-guided immunotherapy: A review

Anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1)  immunotherapy is an increasingly crucial in cancer treatment. To date, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) has approved four PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining protocols, commercially available in the form of "kits", facilitating testing for PD-L1 expression. These kits comprise four PD-L1 antibodies on two separate IHC platforms, each utilizing distinct, non-interchangeable scoring systems. Several factors, including tumor heterogeneity and the size of the tissue specimens assessed, can lead to PD-L1 status misclassification, potentially hindering the initiation of therapy. Therefore, the development of more accurate predictive biomarkers to distinguish between responders and non-responders prior to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy warrants further research. Achieving this goal necessitates refining sampling criteria, enhancing current methods of PD-L1 detection, and deepening our understanding of the impact of additional biomarkers. In this article, we review potential solutions to improve the predictive accuracy of PD-L1 assessment in order to more precisely anticipate patients' responses to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, monitor disease progression and predict clinical outcomes.

Primary tumor-induced immunity suppresses bone metastases of breast cancer in syngeneic immunocompetent mouse models

The immune system plays a crucial role in cancer development and progression. More than a century ago, mouse models showed that primary tumors suppressed the growth of newly implanted secondary tumors. This phenomenon, in which tumor-primed T cells mediate the rejection of tumor growth at a distant site, is known as concomitant tumor immunity. Here, we investigated the role of concomitant immunity in the development of breast cancer bone metastases using newly developed syngeneic immunocompetent mouse models. The presence of primary breast tumors developed by tumor cell injection into the mammary fat pads (MFPs) significantly reduced bone metastases of mouse breast cancer 4T1 and EMT6 cells induced by cell injection through the caudal artery (CA). Similar results were obtained when primary tumors were surgically resected prior to CA injection of tumor cells. In contrast, no inhibition was found when MFP and CA injections were performed using different cell combinations. Immunohistochemical studies revealed that the number of CD8+ T cells in bone metastases of 4T1 and EMT6 cells was significantly increased in the presence of primary tumors. The primary tumor-induced inhibition of bone metastases was not reproduced in T cell-deficient athymic nude mice. Furthermore, depletion of CD8+ T cells using an anti-CD8α antibody also abolished the primary tumor-induced inhibition of bone metastases. Taken together, these results suggest that immune cell priming by orthotopic breast tumors inhibits the development of breast cancer bone metastases, which is predominantly mediated by CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Development of Tumor Markers for Breast Cancer Immunotherapy

Although breast cancer treatment has been developed remarkably in recent years, it remains the primary cause of death among women. Immune checkpoint blockade therapy has significantly altered the way breast cancer is treated, although not all patients benefit from the changes. At present, the most effective mechanism of immune checkpoint blockade application in malignant tumors is not clear and efficacy may be influenced by many factors, including host, tumor, and tumor microenvironment dynamics. Therefore, there is a pressing need for tumor immunomarkers that can be used to screen patients and help determine which of them would benefit from breast cancer immunotherapy. At present, no single tumor marker can predict treatment efficacy with sufficient accuracy. Multiple markers may be combined to more accurately pinpoint patients who will respond favorably to immune checkpoint blockade medication. In this review, we have examined the breast cancer treatments, developments in research on the role of tumor markers in maximizing the clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, prospects for the identification of novel therapeutic targets, and the creation of individualized treatment plans. We also discuss how tumor markers can provide guidance for clinical practice.

Facing the conundrum: which first-line therapy should be used for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer carrying germline BRCA mutation?

Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy has been established as the preferred first-line therapy for treating metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) with programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-positive disease since its approval for that indication. However, the optimal sequencing of therapy remains an unanswered question for a subset of mTNBC patients who harbor germline breast cancer gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2; gBRCA1/2) mutation. This article aims to offer insights into the optimal therapy sequencing for mTNBC patients with gBRCA1/2 mutations and its impact on clinical decision-making. The perspective offered is based on the best currently available data and propose a practical algorithm to guide the management of this subgroup in the frontline setting.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in bone metastasis: Clinical challenges, toxicities, and mechanisms

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the field of anti-cancer therapy over the last decade; they provide durable clinical responses against tumors by inhibiting immune checkpoint proteins that canonically regulate the T cell-mediated immune response. Despite their success in many primary tumors and soft tissue metastases, ICIs function poorly in patients with bone metastases, and these patients do not have the same survival benefit as patients with the same primary tumor type (e.g., non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC], urothelial, renal cell carcinoma [RCC], etc.) that has not metastasized to the bone. Additionally, immune-related adverse events including rheumatologic and musculoskeletal toxicities, bone loss, and increased fracture risk develop after treatment with ICIs. There are few preclinical studies that investigate the interplay of the immune system in bone metastases; however, the current literature suggests a role for CD8+ T cells and myeloid cell subsets in bone homeostasis. As such, this review focuses on findings from the clinical and pre-clinical studies that have investigated immune checkpoint blockade in the bone metastatic setting and highlights the need for more comprehensive investigations into the relationship between immune cell subsets, ICIs, and the bone-tumor microenvironment.

Pre-treatment inflamed tumor immune microenvironment is associated with FOLFIRINOX response in pancreatic cancer

Introduction

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive tumor with limited response to both chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Pre-treatment tumor features within the tumor immune microenvironment (TiME) may influence treatment response. We hypothesized that the pre-treatment TiME composition differs between metastatic and primary lesions and would be associated with response to modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) or gemcitabine-based (Gem-based) therapy.

Methods

Using RNAseq data from a cohort of treatment-naïve, advanced PDAC patients in the COMPASS trial, differential gene expression analysis of key immunomodulatory genes in were analyzed based on multiple parameters including tumor site, response to mFFX, and response to Gem-based treatment. The relative proportions of immune cell infiltration were defined using CIBERSORTx and Dirichlet regression.

Results

145 samples were included in the analysis; 83 received mFFX, 62 received Gem-based therapy. Metastatic liver samples had both increased macrophage (1.2 times more, p < 0.05) and increased eosinophil infiltration (1.4 times more, p < 0.05) compared to primary lesion samples. Further analysis of the specific macrophage phenotypes revealed an increased M2 macrophage fraction in the liver samples. The pre-treatment CD8 T-cell, dendritic cell, and neutrophil infiltration of metastatic samples were associated with therapy response to mFFX (p < 0.05), while mast cell infiltration was associated with response to Gem-based therapy (p < 0.05). Multiple immunoinhibitory genes such as ADORA2A, CSF1R, KDR/VEGFR2, LAG3, PDCD1LG2, and TGFB1 and immunostimulatory genes including C10orf54, CXCL12, and TNFSF14/LIGHT were significantly associated with worse survival in patients who received mFFX (p = 0.01). There were no immunomodulatory genes associated with survival in the Gem-based cohort.

Discussion

Our evidence implies that essential differences in the PDAC TiME exist between primary and metastatic tumors and an inflamed pretreatment TiME is associated with mFFX response. Defining components of the PDAC TiME that influence therapy response will provide opportunities for targeted therapeutic strategies that may need to be accounted for in designing personalized therapy to improve outcomes.

TROPION-Breast02: Datopotamab deruxtecan for locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Despite recent treatment advances, the prognosis for patients with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains poor. The antibody-drug conjugate datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is composed of a humanized anti-TROP2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody linked to a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload via a stable, cleavable linker. The phase III TROPION-Breast02 trial in patients previously untreated for locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic TNBC, who are not candidates for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is evaluating efficacy and safety of Dato-DXd versus investigator's choice of chemotherapy (ICC). Approximately 600 patients will be randomized 1:1 to Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg iv. every 3 weeks or ICC (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, carboplatin, capecitabine or eribulin mesylate). Dual primary end points are progression-free survival by blinded independent central review and overall survival.

Hydroxyproline metabolism enhances IFN-γ-induced PD-L1 expression and inhibits autophagic flux

The immune checkpoint protein PD-L1 plays critical roles in both immune system homeostasis and tumor progression. Impaired PD-1/PD-L1 function promotes autoimmunity and PD-L1 expression within tumors promotes immune evasion. If and how changes in metabolism or defined metabolites regulate PD-L1 expression is not fully understood. Here, using a metabolomics activity screening-based approach, we have determined that hydroxyproline (Hyp) significantly and directly enhances adaptive (i.e., IFN-γ-induced) PD-L1 expression in multiple relevant myeloid and cancer cell types. Mechanistic studies reveal that Hyp acts as an inhibitor of autophagic flux, which allows it to regulate this negative feedback mechanism, thereby contributing to its overall effect on PD-L1 expression. Due to its prevalence in fibrotic tumors, these findings suggest that hydroxyproline could contribute to the establishment of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and that Hyp metabolism could be targeted to pharmacologically control PD-L1 expression for the treatment of cancer or autoimmune diseases.

Development of a LAG-3 immunohistochemistry assay for melanoma

AIMS

A robust immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay was developed to detect lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) expression by immune cells (ICs) in tumour tissues. LAG-3 is an immuno-oncology target with demonstrable clinical benefit, and there is a need for a standardised, well-characterised assay to measure its expression. This study aims to describe LAG-3 scoring criteria and present the specificity, sensitivity, analytical precision and reproducibility of this assay.

METHODS

The specificity of the assay was investigated by antigen competition and with LAG3 knockout cell lines. A melanin pigment removal procedure was implemented to prevent melanin interference in IHC interpretation. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) human melanoma samples with a range of LAG-3 expression levels were used to assess the sensitivity and analytical precision of the assay with a ≥1% cut-off to determine LAG-3 positivity. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility were evaluated with 60 samples in intralaboratory studies and 70 samples in interlaboratory studies.

RESULTS

The LAG-3 IHC method demonstrated performance suitable for analysis of LAG-3 IC expression in clinical melanoma samples. The pretreatment step effectively removed melanin pigment that could interfere with interpretation. LAG-3 antigen competition and analysis of LAG3 knockout cell lines indicated that the 17B4 antibody clone binds specifically to LAG-3. The intrarun repeatability, interday, interinstrument, interoperator and inter-reagent lot reproducibility demonstrated a high scoring concordance (>95%). The interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility and overall interlaboratory and intralaboratory reproducibility also showed high scoring concordance (>90%).

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated that the assay reliably assesses LAG-3 expression in FFPE human melanoma samples by IHC.

Clinical and translational relevance of intratumor heterogeneity

Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) is a driver of tumor evolution and a main cause of therapeutic resistance. Despite its importance, measures of ITH are still not incorporated into clinical practice. Consequently, standard treatment is frequently ineffective for patients with heterogeneous tumors as changes to treatment regimens are made only after recurrence and disease progression. More effective combination therapies require a mechanistic understanding of ITH and ways to assess it in clinical samples. The growth of technologies enabling the spatially intact analysis of tumors at the single-cell level and the development of sophisticated preclinical models give us hope that ITH will not simply be used as a predictor of a poor outcome but will guide treatment decisions from diagnosis through treatment.

Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Current Treatments and Future Directions

Until recently, despite its heterogenous biology, metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) was treated as a single entity, with successive lines of palliative chemotherapy being the only systemic option. Significant gene expression studies have demonstrated the diversity of TNBC, but effective differential targeting of the four main (Basal-like 1 and 2, mesenchymal and luminal androgen receptor) molecular sub-types has largely eluded researchers. The introduction of immunotherapy, currently useful only for patients with PD-L1 positive cancers, led to the stratification of first-line therapy using this immunohistochemical biomarker. Germline BRCA gene mutations can also be targeted with PARP inhibitors in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings. In contrast, the benefit of the anti-Trop-2 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) does not appear confined to patients with tumours expressing high levels of Trop-2, leading to its potential utility for any patient with an estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). Most recently, low levels of HER2 expression, detected in up to 60% of TNBC, predicts benefit from the potent HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), defining an additional treatment option for this sub-group. Regrettably, despite recent advances, the median survival of TNBC continues to lag far behind the approximately 5 years now expected for patients with ER-positive or HER2-positive breast cancers. We review the data supporting immunotherapy, ADCs, and targeted agents in subgroups of patients with TNBC, and current clinical trials that may pave the way to further advances in this challenging disease.

Intratumor spatial heterogeneity in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression in early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is required for benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). In contrast, in the neoadjuvant setting patients benefited regardless of PD-L1 expression. We hypothesized that, in stages II-III breast cancers, low levels of PD-L1 expression may be sufficient to confer sensitivity to therapy and focal expression could be missed by a biopsy.

METHODS

In this study, we examined intratumor spatial heterogeneity of PD-L1 protein expression in multiple biopsies from different regions of breast cancers in 57 primary breast tumors (n = 33 TNBC, n = 19 estrogen receptor-positive [ER-positive], n = 5 human epidermal receptor 2-positive [HER2 +]). E1L3N antibody was used to assess PD-L1 status and staining was scored using the combined positivity score (CPS) with PD-L1 positive defined as CPS ≥ 10.

RESULTS

Overall, 19% (11/57) of tumors were PD-L1 positive based on positivity in at least 1 biopsy. Among TNBC, PD-L1 positivity was 27% (9/33). The discordance rate, defined as the same tumor yielding PD-L1 positive and negative samples in different regions, was 16% (n = 9) in the whole study population and 23% (n = 7) in TNBC. Cohen's kappa coefficient of agreement was 0.214 for the whole study and 0.239 for TNBC, both of which falling into a non-statistically significant fair agreement range. Among all PD-L1 positive cases, 82% (n = 9/11) had positivity in only one of the tissue assessments.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the overall 84% concordance is driven by concordant negative results. In PD-L1 positive cancers, within-tumor heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression exists.

Hope and Hype around Immunotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) holds a poor prognosis compared to other breast cancer subtypes, and the development of new effective treatment strategies is an unmet medical need. TNBC has traditionally been considered not amenable to treatment with targeted agents due to a lack of actionable targets. Therefore, chemotherapy has remained the mainstay of systemic treatment for many decades. The advent of immunotherapy raised very hopeful expectations in TNBC, possibly due to higher levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden compared to other breast cancer subtypes, that predict an effective anti-tumor immune-engagement. The results of clinical trials testing immunotherapy in TNBC led to the approval of the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy in both early and advanced settings. However, some open questions about the use of immunotherapy in TNBC still exist. These include a deeper understanding of the heterogeneity of the disease, identification of reliable predictive biomarkers of response, determination of the most appropriate chemotherapy backbone and appropriate management of potential long-term immune-related adverse events. In this review we aim to examine the available evidence on the use of immunotherapy strategies in both early and advanced TNBC, to critically discuss some of the limitations encountered in clinical research and to summarize data on novel promising immunotherapeutic strategies beyond PD-(L)1 blockade that have been investigated in the most recent trials.

Breast Cancer with Brain Metastasis: Molecular Insights and Clinical Management

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide and the leading cause of cancer-related death among women. Brain metastases are a primary contributor to mortality, as they often go undetected until late stages due to their dormant nature. Moreover, the clinical management of brain metastases is complicated by the relevant issue of blood-brain barrier penetration. The molecular pathways involved in the formation, progression, and colonization of primary breast tumors and subsequent brain metastases are diverse, posing significant hurdles due to the heterogeneous nature of breast cancer subtypes. Despite advancements in primary breast cancer treatments, the prognosis for patients with brain metastases remains poor. In this review, we aim to highlight the biological mechanisms of breast cancer brain metastases by evaluating multi-step genetic pathways and to discuss currently available and emerging treatment strategies to propose a prospective overview of the management of this complex disease.

Biomarkers and factors in small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize the available results of immunotherapy predictors for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and to provide evidence-based information for their potential predictive value of efficacy.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials (from January 1, 1975 to November 1, 2021). The hazard ratios (HR) and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and tumor response rate of the included studies were extracted.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were eventually included and the pooled results showed that programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive: objective response rate (ORR) (relative risk [RR] = 1.39, 95% CI [0.48, 4.03], p = 0.54), with high heterogeneity (p = 0.05, I²  = 56%); disease control rate [DCR] (RR = 1.31, 95% CI [0.04, 38.57], p = 0.88), with high heterogeneity (p = 0.04, I²  = 75%); overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.74, 1.07], p = 0.22); and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.59, 1.16], p = 0.27), with high heterogeneity (p = 0.005, I²  = 73.1%). TMB-High (TMB-H): OS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.74, 1.00], p = 0.05); PFS (HR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.6, 0.85], p < 0.001). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >upper limit of normal (ULN): OS (HR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.81, 1.11], p = 0.511). Asian patients: OS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.72, 1.04], p = 0.135); White/Non-Asian patients: OS (HR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.76, 0.90], p < 0.001). Liver metastasis patients: OS (HR = 0.93, 95% CI [0.83, 1.05], p = 0.229); PFS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI [0.67, 1.06], p = 0.141). Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis patients: OS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.71, 1.17], p = 0.474); PFS (HR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.66, 1.60], p = 0.903).

CONCLUSION

The available research results do not support the recommendation of PD-L1 positive and TMB-H as predictors for the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in SCLC patients. LDH, baseline liver metastasis and CNS metastasis may be used as markers/influencing factors for predicting the efficacy of ICIs in SCLC patients. Non-Asian SCLC patients had better efficacy with ICIs in our results.

Variable Landscape of PD-L1 Expression in Breast Carcinoma as Detected by the DAKO 22C3 Immunohistochemistry Assay

BACKGROUND

In 2020, pembrolizumab was approved as a therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with the companion diagnostic DAKO 22C3 programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry assay. The study aimed to determine the landscape of PD-L1 expression as detected by the DAKO 22C3 PD-L1 assay in breast cancer subtypes and compare the clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics of PD-L1 positive and negative TNBC.

METHODS

PD-L1 expression using the DAKO 22C3 antibody was scored using a combined positive score (CPS) and positive status was defined as CPS ≥10. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed using the FoundationOne CDx assay.

RESULTS

Of the 396 BC patients stained with DAKO 22C3, the majority were HR+/HER2- and TNBC (42% and 36%, respectively). Median PD-L1 expression and frequency of CPS ≥10 was highest in TNBC cases (median: 7.5, 50% CPS ≥10) and lowest in the HR+/HER2- group (median: 1.0, 15.5% CPS ≥10) (P < .0001). A comparison of PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative TNBC demonstrated no significant differences in clinicopathologic or genomic characteristics. TNBC tissue samples from the breast did have an observed enrichment for PD-L1 positivity compared to TNBC tissue samples from a metastatic site (57% vs. 44%), but this was not statistically significant (P = .1766). In the HR+/HER2- group, genomic alterations in TP53, CREBBP, and CCNE1 were more prevalent and genomic loss of heterozygosity was higher in the PD-L1(+) group compared to the PD-L1(-) group.

CONCLUSIONS

The subtypes of breast cancer have distinct patterns of PD-L1 expression, supporting that further research of immunotherapies may include specific evaluation of optimum cutoffs for non-TNBC patients. In TNBC, PD-L1 positivity is not associated with other clinicopathologic or genomic features and should be integrated into future studies of immunotherapy efficacy.

Association Between Biomarkers and Clinical Outcomes of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: KEYNOTE-086 Exploratory Analysis

PURPOSE

In the two-cohort phase II KEYNOTE-086 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02447003), first-line and second-line or later pembrolizumab monotherapy demonstrated antitumor activity in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC; N = 254). This exploratory analysis evaluates the association between prespecified molecular biomarkers and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Cohort A enrolled patients with disease progression after one or more systemic therapies for metastatic disease irrespective of PD-L1 status; Cohort B enrolled patients with previously untreated PD-L1-positive (combined positive score [CPS] ≥ 1) metastatic disease. The association between the following biomarkers as continuous variables and clinical outcomes (objective response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]) was evaluated: PD-L1 CPS (immunohistochemistry), cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8; immunohistochemistry), stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (sTIL; hematoxylin and eosin staining), tumor mutational burden (TMB; whole-exome sequencing [WES]), homologous recombination deficiency-loss of heterozygosity, mutational signature 3 (WES), mutational signature 2 (apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide-like; WES), T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile (Tcell_infGEP; RNA sequencing), and 10 non-Tcell_infGEP signatures (RNA sequencing); Wald test P values were calculated, and significance was prespecified at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

In the combined cohorts (A and B), PD-L1 (P = .040), CD8 (P < .001), sTILs (P = .012), TMB (P = .007), and Tcell_infGEP (P = .011) were significantly associated with ORR; CD8 (P < .001), TMB (P = .034), Signature 3 (P = .009), and Tcell_infGEP (P = .002) with PFS; and CD8 (P < .001), sTILs (P = .004), TMB (P = .025), and Tcell_infGEP (P = .001) with OS. None of the non-Tcell_infGEP signatures were associated with outcomes of pembrolizumab after adjusting for the Tcell_infGEP.

CONCLUSION

In this exploratory biomarker analysis from KEYNOTE-086, baseline tumor PD-L1, CD8, sTILs, TMB, and Tcell_infGEP were associated with improved clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab and may help identify patients with mTNBC who are most likely to respond to pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Discordance of PD-L1 expression in primary and metastatic ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma and its correlation with CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and patient prognosis

Differential expression of programmed death-1 ligand (PD-L1) and its clinical significance in primary and metastatic ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) have not been defined. Thus, we investigated the PD-L1 expression of paired ovarian primary and omental metastatic HGSC and its correlation with CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TILs) and patient survival. A total of 212 cases of ovarian HGSCs with matched primary ovarian and metastatic omental tumors accessioned between 2003 and 2018 were selected for further analysis. Using immunohistochemistry, we evaluated the density of CD8 + TILs and expression of PD-L1 on whole tissue sections. Applying tumor proportion score (TPS, cutoff 1%) and combined positive score (CPS, cutoff 1), the prevalence of PD-L1 expression was similar but with significant discordance in ovarian and omental tumor. Using TPS, patients with PD-L1-positive tumors demonstrated significantly worse recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than patients with PD-L1-negative tumors. Using CPS, patients with PD-L1-positive ovarian tumors demonstrated significantly worse OS while no significant difference in RFS was found. Patients with PD-L1-positive omental tumors demonstrated significantly worse RFS and OS. Patients with omental PD-L1-positive tumors (TPS) were associated with poorer RFS and OS, while patients with ovarian PD-L1-positive tumors (TPS) were associated with OS not RFS, in COX multivariant analysis. Nonetheless, ovarian and omental high CD8 TILs density was not associated with worse OS in univariant and COX multivariant analysis. PD-L1 expression in ovarian and omental tumor associated with an increased CD8 + TILs density. PD-L1 expression by TPS was better correlated with survival than by CPS, and PD-L1 expression in omental tumors was a stronger prognostic indicator than that in ovarian tumors.

Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Familial Breast Cancer

Large numbers of breast cancers arise within a familial context, either with known inherited germline mutations largely within DNA repair genes, or with a strong family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, with unknown genetic underlying mechanisms. These cancers appear to be different to sporadic cases, with earlier age of onset, increased multifocality and with association with specific breast cancer histological and phenotypic subtypes. Furthermore, tumours showing homologous recombination deficiency, due to loss of BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 and CHEK2 function, have been shown to be especially sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapeutics and PARP inhibition. While there is extensive research and data accrued on risk stratification and genetic predisposition, there are few data pertaining to relevant prognostic and predictive biomarkers within this breast cancer subgroup. The following is a review of such biomarkers in male and female familial breast cancer, although the data for the former are particularly sparse.

Role of Immunotherapy in Early- and Late-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

For women with triple-negative breast cancer, the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy has become a standard of care in the early-stage and first-line metastatic setting. However, many questions persist. Different chemotherapy backbones and sequencing strategies have been evaluated, but evidence supporting the superiority of one over the other is weak. Although many have been investigated, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL1) is the only approved biomarker. Since immunotherapy has been associated with potentially severe and permanent toxicities, the identification of better predictive biomarkers is essential. New strategies are needed to increase the proportion of patients who might benefit from immunotherapy.

Soluble PD-L1: a potential dynamic predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in patients with proficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Circulating soluble programmed death ligand 1 (sPD-L1) can negatively regulate T-cell function and serve as a prognostic or predictive marker in a variety of cancers. However, rare studies have evaluated the potential roles of sPD-L1, and no study has estimated its predictive value for the efficacy of immune treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Plasma samples from 192 CRC patients were used to estimate correlations between clinicopathological features and sPD-L1, secreted PD-L1 (secPD-L1) and exosomal PD-L1 (exoPD-L1). Baseline and posttreatment sPD-L1 levels were also investigated in 55 patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) treated with chemotherapy ± targeted therapy and 40 patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) mCRC treated with combination immunotherapy. Both sPD-L1 and secPD-L1 were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, while exoPD-L1 was analyzed using flow cytometry.

RESULTS

secPD-L1 was the major component and positively correlated with sPD-L1 in CRC, while exoPD-L1 was almost undetectable. Higher levels of sPD-L1 were detected in patients with distant metastasis, especially those with distant lymph node metastasis and tissue combined positive score (CPS) instead of tumor proportion score (TPS). Chemotherapy or targeted therapy did not significantly impact sPD-L1 concentration. Progressive disease on combination immunotherapy was associated with an increase in sPD-L1 level, whereas no significant change was observed in patients with durable clinical benefit.

CONCLUSION

sPD-L1 mainly consisted of secPD-L1, and its level was higher in patients with distant metastasis, especially distant lymph node metastasis and positive CPS. sPD-L1 is a potential dynamic marker to identify rapid progression on combination immunotherapy and avoid ineffective treatment for pMMR CRC.

Triple negative breast cancer: Immunogenicity, tumor microenvironment, and immunotherapy

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a biologically diverse subtype of breast cancer characterized by genomic and transcriptional heterogeneity and exhibiting aggressive clinical behaviour and poor prognosis. In recent years, emphasis has been placed on the identification of mechanisms underlying the complex genomic and biological profile of TNBC, aiming to tailor treatment strategies. High immunogenicity, specific immune activation signatures, higher expression of immunosuppressive genes and higher levels of stromal Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes, constitute some of the key elements of the immune driven landscape associated with TNBC. The unprecedented response of TNBC to immunotherapy has undoubtedly changed the standard of care in this disease both in the early and the metastatic setting. However, the extent of interplay between immune infiltration and mutational signatures in TNBC is yet to be fully unravelled. In the present review, we present clinical evidence on the immunogenicity and tumour microenvironment influence on TNBC progression and the current treatment paradigms in TNBC based on immunotherapy.

Breast cancer heterogeneity and its implication in personalized precision therapy

Breast cancer heterogeneity determines cancer progression, treatment effects, and prognosis. However, the precise mechanism for this heterogeneity remains unknown owing to its complexity. Here, we summarize the origins of breast cancer heterogeneity and its influence on disease progression, recurrence, and therapeutic resistance. We review the possible mechanisms of heterogeneity and the research methods used to analyze it. We also highlight the importance of cell interactions for the origins of breast cancer heterogeneity, which can be further categorized into cooperative and competitive interactions. Finally, we provide new insights into precise individual treatments based on heterogeneity.

Recent Advancement of PD-L1 Detection Technologies and Clinical Applications in the Era of Precision Cancer Therapy

Programmed death-1 is a protein found on the surface of immune cells that can interact with its ligand, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), which is expressed on the plasma membrane, the surface of secreted cellular exosomes, in cell nuclei, or as a circulating soluble protein. This interaction can lead to immune escape in cancer patients. In clinical settings, PD-L1 plays an important role in tumor disease diagnosis, determining therapeutic effectiveness, and predicting patient prognosis. PD-L1 inhibitors are also essential components of tumor immunotherapy. Thus, the detection of PD-L1 levels is crucial, especially in the era of precision cancer therapy. In recent years, innovations have been made in traditional immunoassay methods and the development of new immunoassays for PD-L1 detection. This review aims to summarize recent research progress in tumor PD-L1 detection technology and highlight the clinical applications of PD-L1.

Pathology of neoadjuvant therapy and immunotherapy testing for breast cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become the standard of care for high-risk breast cancer, including triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive disease. As a result, handling and reporting of breast specimens post-NACT is part of routine practice, and it is important for pathologists to recognise the changes in tumour cells, tumour-associated stroma and background breast tissue induced by NACT. Familiarity with characteristic stromal features enables identification of the pre-treatment tumour site and allows confident diagnosis of pathological complete response (pCR) which is important for decisions concerning adjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NAET) is used less frequently than NACT; however, the SARS-COVID-19 pandemic has changed practice, with increased use as bridging therapy if surgery is delayed. NAET also induces characteristic changes in the tumour and stroma. Changes in the tumour microenvironment following NACT and NAET are also described. Immunotherapy is approved for use in advanced TNBC, and there are several trials exploring its role in early TNBC in the neoadjuvant setting. The current biomarker to determine eligibility for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors is programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry; however, this is complicated by lack of standardisation with different drugs linked to tests using different antibodies with different scoring systems. The situation in the neoadjuvant setting is further complicated by improved pCR rates for PD-L1-positive tumours in both immune therapy and placebo arms. Alternative biomarkers are urgently needed to identify which patients will derive benefit from immunotherapy and key candidates are discussed.

PD-L1 expression as biomarker of efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic triple negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Inhibitors of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1) checkpoint have been approved for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in patients positive for PD-L1 expression. Negative results from the recent phase III trials (IMPassion131 and IMPassion132) have raises questions on the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors and the predictive value of PD-L1 expression. Here we attempt to systematically analyze the biomarker value of PD-L1 expression for predicting the response of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in mTNBC.

Materials and methods

PubMed database was searched until Dec 2021 for studies evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors plus/minus chemotherapy in mTNBC. Outcome of interest included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4. was used for data-analysis.

Results

In total, 20 clinical trials comprising 3962 mTNBC patients (ICT: 2665 (67%); CT: 1297 (33%) were included in this study. Overall ORR was 22% (95%CI, 14-30%) and significant improvement was observed for PD-L1+ patients (ORR 1.78 [95%CI, 1.45-2.19], p<0.00001) as compared to PD-L1- cohort. Pooled outcome also indicated a significant 1-year PFS and 2-year OS advantage for patients with PD-L1 expression (1-year PFS: ORR 1.39 [95%CI, 1.04-1.85], p=0.02; I^{2 =} 0%; 2-year OS: (ORR 2.47 [95%CI, 1.30-4.69], p=0.006; I^{2 =} 63%). Subgroup analysis indicated that PD-L1 expression can successfully predict tumor response and 2-year OS benefit in mTNBC patients regardless of the type of investigating agent, line of treatment administration, and to some extent the type of treatment. Biomarker ability of PD-L1 expression to predict 1-year PFS was slightly better with pembrolizumab (p=0.09) than atezolizumab (p=0.18), and significantly better when treatment was administered in the first-line setting (OR 1.38 [95%CI, 1.02-1.87], p=0.04) and chemotherapy was added (OR 1.38 [95%CI, 1.02-1.86], p=0.03). Immune-related toxicity of any grade and grade≥3 was 39% (95%CI, 26%-52%) and 10% (95%CI, 8%-13%), respectively.

Conclusions

PD-L1 expression can predict objective response rate and 2-year OS in mTNBC patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. One-year PFS is also predicted in selected patients. PD-L1 expression can be a useful biomarker of efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in mTNBC.

Biomarkers and translational research approaches in breast cancer—an update

Diagnosis and decision-making in the treatment of breast cancer patients is vastly dependent on the exploration of biomarkers. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 are long-standing biomarkers, which determine the breast cancer subtype. In current practice, gene expression analyses further define the molecular breast cancer subtype and give additional information on disease characteristics. Prognostic biomarkers provide information regarding recurrence risk and survival. Predictive biomarkers, such as programmed cell death ligand 1 expression, are tools for identifying patients who can benefit from specific therapy regimens in order to choose the best treatment option for the patient. While some biomarkers are affordable and readily available, others remain technically complex to access. Translational research builds the bridge from discovering novel biomarkers in preclinical studies to testing their application utility in the clinical setting. Integrating translational studies into clinical trials is therefore essential to find novel and reliable biomarkers for an optimal personalized treatment approach for patients with breast cancer.

Comparison of PD-L1 tumor cell expression with 22C3, 28-8, and SP142 IHC assays across multiple tumor types

BACKGROUND

Multiple PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays, including DAKO 22C3, DAKO 28-8, and Ventana SP142 PD-L1 IHC assays, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a companion diagnostic (CDx) for various antiprogrammed death-1 and antiprogrammed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) based cancer immunotherapies. Here we present 22C3, 28-8, and SP142 analysis of 418 tumor specimens encountered in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

All specimens were tested with 22C3, 28-8, and SP142 assays following the manufacturer's established staining protocols.

RESULTS

The same PD-L1 status (defined as tumor cell expression (TC) scores with all three assays ≥1% or all &lt;1%) was observed in 60.0% (251/418) tumor specimens (45.9% (192/418) were triple negative and 14.1% (59/418) were triple positive). A total of 54.1% (226/418) tumor cases were positive with at least one IHC assay (94.2% (213/226), 77.0% (174/226), and 28.8% (65/226) of these were positive for 22C3, 28-8 and SP142, respectively). Among the 40.0% (167/418) tumor cases that showed a different PD-L1 status, 62.3% (104/167) were 22C3+/28-8+/SP142-, and 28.7% (48/167) were 22C3+/28-8-/SP142-. The same PD-L1 status with all three antibody clones was observed in 48.7% (97/199) of NSCLC cases, and among these, 54.6% (53/97) were triple negative and 45.4% (44/97) triple positive. A total of 73.4% (146/199) NSCLC cases were positive with at least one IHC assay (95.2% (n=139/146), 82.2% (n=120/146), and 32.2% (n=47/146) were positive for 22C3, 28-8, and SP142, respectively). Among the 51.3% (102/199) NSCLC cases that showed a different status among the three IHC assays, 67.6% (69/102) were 22C3+/28-8+/SP142-, and 23.5% (24/102) were 22C3+/28-8-/SP142-. A total of 81.1% (43/53) lung squamous cell carcinoma, 72.1% (88/122) of lung adenocarcinoma, 69.6% (16/23) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) not otherwise specified (NOS), and 50.0% (4/8) of small cell lung carcinoma cases were positive with at least one IHC assay.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that 22C3 is the most sensitive PD-L1 IHC assay for tumor cell expression, followed by 28-8 and in turn by SP-142. These findings represent an additional factor for clinical teams to consider when deciding which PD-L1 IHC assay (and in turn which CDx-associated PD-L1 based immunotherapy) is most appropriate for each individual patient.

Concordance of PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancers in Chinese patients: A retrospective and pathologist-based study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in different paraffin blocks from the same triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) specimen and between matched primary tumors and lymph node metastases (LNMets). We also aim to determine the interobserver agreement between pathologists trained on PD-L1 (SP142) assay in assessing TNBC.

METHODS

426 histologically confirmed TNBC cases, in which 85 have LNMets, were included in this study. A PD-L1 (SP142) assay was used to identify PD-L1 expression on tumor infiltrating immune cells (IC) and also on tumor cells (TC) in primary tumors and LNMets of TNBC by two trained pathologists. PD-L1 scoring and assessment were based on criteria in IMpassion 130 trial criteria. Concordance of PD-L1 expression in TNBC were analyzed using Kappa-test and assessed by the Kappa value.

RESULTS

Prevalence of positive PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 +) on tumor-infiltrating immune cells (PD-L1 IC+) (IC≥1%) in LNMets (49.4%) was higher than in the matched primary tumors (38.9%). Concordance of PD-L1 expression on IC between the two paraffin blocks from the same primary tumor specimen was substantial (P < 0.000, Kappa = 0.627) and was identified in 83.1% (108/130) of the selected cases. For TNBC cases with matched primary and LNMets blocks, the concordance of PD-L1IC scoring between the two blocks was moderate (P < 0.000, Kappa = 0.434). Interobserver agreement of PD-L1 assessment was 78.2% (P < 0.000, Kappa = 0.567) in primary tumors and 61.4% (P < 0.000, Kappa = 0.253) in the matched LNets.

CONCLUSION

Substantial intratumor concordance of PD-L1 scoring of the primary tumors in TNBC patients was determined, implying that immunohistochemically detection using one representative block of the primary tumor should be enough to assign the expression status of PD-L1 in clinical practice. The prevalence of PD-L1 + in lymph node metastases (LNMets) was higher than in the matched primary tumors, implying that PD-L1 detection in LNMets may provide additional PD-L1 expression information, especially in TNBC cases with PD-L1- in the matched primary breast tumors. Interobserver agreement of PD-L1 scoring in primary tumors was moderate while only fair in LNMets, implying that the additional training for PD-L1 assessment of TNBC LNMets specimens is recommended to enhance interobserver agreement.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Leveraging the Dynamic Immune Environment Triad in Patients with Breast Cancer: Tumour, Lymph Node, and Peripheral Blood

During the anti-tumour response to breast cancer, the primary tumour, the peripheral blood, and the lymph nodes each play unique roles. Immunological features at each site reveal evidence of continuous immune cross-talk between them before, during and after treatment. As such, immune responses to breast cancer are found to be highly dynamic and truly systemic, integrating three distinct immune sites, complex cell-migration highways, as well as the temporal dimension of disease progression and treatment. In this review, we provide a connective summary of the dynamic immune environment triad of breast cancer. It is critical that future studies seek to establish dynamic immune profiles, constituting multiple sites, that capture the systemic immune response to breast cancer and define patient-selection parameters resulting in more significant overall responses and survival rates for breast cancer patients.

Tissue Selection for PD-L1 Testing in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

Atezolizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel has been introduced for the treatment of locally advanced or recurrent triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patient selection relies on the use of immunohistochemistry using a specific monoclonal PD-L1 antibody (clone SP142) in a tightly controlled companion diagnostic test (CDx) with a defined interpretative algorithm. Currently there are no standardized recommendations for selecting the optimal tissue to be tested and there is limited data to support decision making, raising the possibility that tissue selection may bias test results. We compared PD-L1 SP142 assessment in a collection of 73 TNBC cases with matched core biopsies and excision samples. There was good correlation between PD-L1-positive core biopsy and subsequent excision, but we found considerable discrepancy between PD-L1 negative core biopsy and matched excision, with a third of cases found negative on core biopsies converting to positive upon examination of the excision tissue. In view of these findings, we developed a workflow for the clinical testing of TNBC for PD-L1 and implemented it in a central referral laboratory. We present audit data from the clinical PD-L1 testing relating to 2 years of activities, indicating that implementation of this workflow results in positivity rates in our population of TNBC similar to those of IMpassion130 clinical trial. We also developed an online atlas with a precise numerical annotation to aid pathologists in the interpretation of PD-L1 scoring in TNBC.

PD-L1 protein expression in relation to recurrence score values in early-stage ER + breast cancer

PURPOSE

We assessed associations between PD-L1 protein expression, RS, tumor grade, and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) count in early-stage ER + cancers.

METHODS

FFPE tissue blocks of 213 patients with RS in 2012-2017 were identified. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry was performed with SP142 assay, cases with ≥ 1% tumor-infiltrating immune cell positivity in the tumor area were considered PD-L1 + . TIL scores were determined following the international TIL counting guidelines. PD-L1 expression positivity rates were compared across RS (< 11, 11-25, > 25) and TIL categories (< 10%, 10-29%, > 30%), and tumor grade using Wilcoxon and Chi-square tests. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

PD-L1 and TIL results were available for 201 and 203 patients. Overall, 53% of cases were PD-L1 +. PD-L1 expression was higher among cases with RS > 25, versus RS < 11 (p = 0.00019) and RS 11-25 (p = 0.0017). PD-L1 positivity also correlated with TIL score, tumor grade, and tumor size. Among cancers with TIL > 30%, 92% were PD-L1 + versus 44% PD-L1 + among TIL < 10% (p = 2.8 × 10^-6). Grade 3 cancers had higher PD-L1 positivity (79% PD-L1 +) versus grade 2 (49% PD-L1 +) or 1 tumors (48% PD-L1 +) (p = 0.00047). T2 and T3 tumors had more frequent PD-L1 positivity (67% and 83%, respectively) versus T1 cancers (46%) (p = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, only TIL and RS remained as independent predictors of PD-L1 positivity.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression is significantly more frequent and higher in larger tumors (T2, T3), grade 3 cancers, and in cancers with RS > 25. PD-L1 expression also correlates with TIL score.