Multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial of camrelizumab and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Tislelizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin as the more effective chemoimmunotherapy strategy in the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective, two-cohort, phase 2 trial

This prospective, two-cohort phase 2 trial with random allocation was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant tislelizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel/paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel cohorts at a 1:1 ratio, and received intravenous tislelizumab (200 mg, day 1) combined with cisplatin (25 mg/m2, days 1-3) and either nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2, days 1 and 8) or paclitaxel (150 mg/m2, day 1) in a 21-day cycle for two cycles before surgery. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR) rate. From March 01, 2022 to April 10, 2023, 46 patients were enrolled (n = 23 in each cohort), with 42 patients receiving the full two-cycle treatments and undergoing surgery (n = 22 in the nab-paclitaxel cohort, n = 20 in the paclitaxel cohort). The MPR rate and the pCR rate in the total cohort were 44.2% (19/42) and 19.0% (8/42), respectively, with 59.1% (13/22) and 31.8% (7/22) in the nab-paclitaxel cohort and 30.0% (6/20) and 5.0% (1/20) in paclitaxel cohorts. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were anemia (89.1%) and alopecia (71.7%), and no significant difference in TRAEs was observed between the two cohorts. Up until March 28, 2024, the median follow-up time was 15.5 months (range of 6.0-24.3 months), and the survival analysis revealed that the patients in the nab-paclitaxel cohort had a higher event-free survival (p = .002). In conclusion, neoadjuvant tislelizumab combined with cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel, rather than cisplatin and paclitaxel, is a more effective neoadjuvant strategy for locally advanced thoracic ESCC.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for stage II-IVa esophageal cancer: a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced, resectable esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Literature published before November 2023 on the clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was searched in CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and the Web of Science. A meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 17.0.

RESULTS

The cumulative ranked probability results indicated that Camrelizumab + TN had the highest probability of achieving pCR, Camrelizumab + TP of achieving MPR, and Sintilimab + TP of achieving DCR and ORR. Camrelizumab + TP also had the highest probability of achieving an R0 resection rate. In terms of adverse events and postoperative complications, Pembrolizumab + TN had the highest likelihood of inducing myelosuppression and rash. Toripalimab + TP had the highest probability of inducing vomiting, while traditional chemotherapy alone had the highest likelihood of inducing postoperative cardiac adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has demonstrated superior clinical efficacy and safety compared to chemotherapy alone. The regimen of Camrelizumab + TP showed significant advantages in pCR, MPR, DCR, and R0 resection rates, particularly excelling in MPR and R0 resection rates. However, it was associated with a higher incidence of rash compared to chemotherapy alone and the Toripalimab + TP regimen. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, when combined with chemotherapy, has been shown to reduce the occurrence of postoperative cardiac adverse events. Among the various treatment options, Sintilimab + TP exhibited the most favorable outcomes.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Protocol Number: CRD42024623160.

Present and future of cancer nano-immunotherapy: opportunities, obstacles and challenges

Clinically, multimodal therapies are adopted worldwide for the management of cancer, which continues to be a leading cause of death. In recent years, immunotherapy has firmly established itself as a new paradigm in cancer care that activates the body's immune defense to cope with cancer. Immunotherapy has resulted in significant breakthroughs in the treatment of stubborn tumors, dramatically improving the clinical outcome of cancer patients. Multiple forms of cancer immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), adoptive cell therapy and cancer vaccines, have become widely available. However, the effectiveness of these immunotherapies is not much satisfying. Many cancer patients do not respond to immunotherapy, and disease recurrence appears to be unavoidable because of the rapidly evolving resistance. Moreover, immunotherapies can give rise to severe off-target immune-related adverse events. Strategies to remove these hindrances mainly focus on the development of combinatorial therapies or the exploitation of novel immunotherapeutic mediations. Nanomaterials carrying anticancer agents to the target site are considered as practical approaches for cancer treatment. Nanomedicine combined with immunotherapies offers the possibility to potentiate systemic antitumor immunity and to facilitate selective cytotoxicity against cancer cells in an effective and safe manner. A myriad of nano-enabled cancer immunotherapies are currently under clinical investigation. Owing to gaps between preclinical and clinical studies, nano-immunotherapy faces multiple challenges, including the biosafety of nanomaterials and clinical trial design. In this review, we provide an overview of cancer immunotherapy and summarize the evidence indicating how nanomedicine-based approaches increase the efficacy of immunotherapies. We also discuss the key challenges that have emerged in the era of nanotechnology-based cancer immunotherapy. Taken together, combination nano-immunotherapy is drawing increasing attention, and it is anticipated that the combined treatment will achieve the desired success in clinical cancer therapy.

[18F]FDG PET/CT for predicting neoadjuvant PD-L1 blockade monotherapy treatment response in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary study

PURPOSE

To investigate the predictive value of 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) PET/CT for evaluating primary tumor (PT) and lymph node (LN) responses after neoadjuvant programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade monotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC).

METHODS

In the single-arm phase 1b NATION-1907 trial (NCT04215471), 23 patients with LA-ESCC received two cycles of neoadjuvant PD-L1 blockade Adebrelimab followed by surgery. Among these, 18 patients underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT scans both before immunotherapy and prior to surgery. Standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SUL)-derived parameters, including SULmax and SULpeak, were documented for PTs and LNs. Lesions > 1cm3 were segmented using thresholds of 41% and 50% of SULmax, respectively, following European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines, with metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) calculated. Percentage changes of all metabolic parameters were also recorded. Residual viable tumor ≤ 33% were classified as well-responders, whereas residual viable tumor > 33% were classified as poor-responders based on histological evaluation.

RESULTS

In the PT analysis, 10 patients were classified as PT well-responders and 8 as PT poor-responders. All post-treatment metabolic parameters, except MTV, were significantly lower in well-responders compared to poor-responders. The %ΔMTV, %ΔTLG were significantly higher in the poor-responder group (all P < 0.05). ROC curves indicated %ΔMTV41 exhibited optimum performance in predicting well-responders, with an AUC of 0.875 (cut-off: -31.01). Furthermore, %ΔMTV41 significantly predicted patients' recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P < 0.1). In the LN analysis, 7 LNs were classified as well-responders and 10 as poor-responders. Pre-treatment SULmax, SULpeak were significantly lower in poor-responders compared to well-responders. Post-treatment MTV50 and all percentage changes in parameters were significantly higher in the poor-responder group (all P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis indicated %ΔTLG50 had excellent predictive performance for well-responders, with an AUC of 1.000 (cut-off: -7.5). However, there was no significant correlation between the metabolic response evaluations for PTs and LNs.

CONCLUSION

The metabolic parameters of [18F]FDG PET/CT, particularly %ΔMTV and %ΔTLG, could effectively predict well-responders among both PTs and LNs to neoadjuvant PD-L1 blockade monotherapy in LA-ESCC, which may facilitate personalized immunotherapy and serve as a stratification tool in future larger-scale studies.

Efficacy, safety, and prognostic modeling in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and construct a prognostic model.

METHODS

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients with locally advanced ESCC who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were major pathologic remission rate and disease-free survival, and secondary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events and perioperative complications. Correlates affecting pathological response were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, survival-related variables were screened by Boruta and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression analysis. A nomogram was constructed and utilized to test the predictive efficacy of the treatment with receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients were enrolled, of whom 119 (66 %) patients received 3-4 cycles of treatment. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 65.2 % of the patients, with 13.3 % experiencing severe complications. Major pathological remission rate was achieved in 68 (37.6 %) patients, with no significant difference between the treatment cycle groups (P=0.925). The nomogram included pathologic TNM stage, lymphovascular invasion, post-treatment and post-surgery albumin levels, and post-treatment systemic immune-inflammation index. One-year disease-free survival area under the curve was 0.86 (95 %CI, 0.75-0.97) in the derivation cohort and 0.75 (95 %CI, 0.50-0.99) in the validation cohort, with good calibration performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological staging combined with albumin level and systemic immune-inflammation index could be a superior predictor of survival prognosis in ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. The findings of this study yield new evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in ESCC and provide a tool for identifying patients at risk of recurrence.

From tumor microenvironment to emerging biomarkers: the reshaping of the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma tumor microenvironment by neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is a cancer with high morbidity and mortality. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has significantly increased complete response rates and postoperative R0 resection rates after neoadjuvant therapy. These drugs can largely reverse the suppression of the immune system caused by the tumor microenvironment, allowing the reactivation of anti-tumor immune infiltrating cells, significantly improving the patient's tumor microenvironment, and thus preventing tumor development. However, there are still some patients who respond poorly to neoadjuvant combined immunotherapy and cannot achieve the expected results. It is now found that exploring changes in the tumor microenvironment not only elucidates patient responsiveness to immunotherapy and identifies more reliable biomarkers, but also addresses the limitations of prediction with imaging examination such as CT and the instability of existing biomarkers. In light of these considerations, this review aims to delve into the alterations within the tumor microenvironment and identify potential predictive biomarkers ensuing from neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the context of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Mid-term follow-up results of neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

The study was conducted in order to investigate whether neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can bring survival benefits to patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the real world.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed patients with locally advanced resectable ESCC who underwent surgery at the Jining First People's Hospital from April 2020 to April 2022. Based on their medical history, the enrolled patients were divided into a neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy plus surgery group (nICT group) and a surgery-only group (S group). Primary endpoints were the two-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. Secondary endpoints were the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, and compared the surgery and postoperative outcomes between the two groups.

Results

A total of 47 patients in the nICT group and 73 patients in the S group were included for further analysis, the stage of the nICT group was more advanced than that of the S group. In the group nICT, 8 patients (17%) achieved the complete pathological response (pCR), 29 patients (61.7%) achieved major pathological response (MPR), including 6 patients (12.8%) with a primary tumor achieving pCR but had residual tumor cells in the lymph nodes (pT0N+), and the treatment-related AES was manageable. The surgery and postoperative outcomes were comparable in both groups. The two-year OS and DFS rates for the nICT group were 91.5% and 85.5% respectively, while those for the S group were 71.2% and 68.5%, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test revealed significant differences in DFS and OS between the two groups. Patients who achieved MPR in the nICT group showed better DFS and OS, while the Three-cycle subgroup did not exhibit any survival benefit compared to the Two-cycle subgroup.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with chemotherapy has promising efficacy and safety in the treatment of locally advanced resectable ESCC. The treatment modality has the potential to become a standard therapy for locally advanced resectable ESCC.

Perioperative tislelizumab with four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase 2 study

Background

The application of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer needs further exploration. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC).

Methods

In this phase II study, patients with clinical stages of II-IVA (T3-T4 and/or node positive) potentially resectable LA-ESCC were enrolled. Patients received neoadjuvant tislelizumab and chemotherapy every 3 weeks for 4 cycles before surgery and adjuvant tislelizumab for 9 months. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included R0 resection, disease free survival (DFS), adverse events (AE), and biomarkers for predicting efficacy.

Results

The study included 30 patients. 25 patients completed neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and underwent surgery, 96% with R0 resection. The pCR and MPR rate was 44% and 52%. The 6-month and 1-year DFS rate was 100% and 75.3%. 43.3% patients experienced severe (grade 3-4) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and 5 patients developed severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Further exploration found that a group of peripheral lymphocyte subsets increased significantly after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy in patients who achieved pCR, suggesting the importance of dynamic monitoring of circulating lymphocyte.

Conclusions

The combination of perioperative tislelizumab and neoadjuvant chemotherapy has achieved an encouraging pCR rate and demonstrated a manageable safety profile in patients with potentially resectable ESCC.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2100043772.

Combined Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Induction for Screening of Patients with Cervical Esophageal Carcinoma for Subsequent Local Treatment: A New Treatment Paradigm

BACKGROUND

Definitive chemoradiotherapy is recommended as the primary treatment for cervical esophageal carcinoma (CEC). However, local control rates remain unsatisfactory for some patients. Therefore, in this study, we introduced a new treatment paradigm for individuals with CEC, customizing the choice between subsequent local treatments based on their response to induction chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Induction treatment comprised two to four cycles of chemotherapy combined with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors. Patients achieving complete response (CR) or near CR after induction treatment underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT), while those not achieving CR or near CR underwent surgical resection.

RESULTS

Among the 40 eligible patients, 14 (35.0%) achieved a CR or near CR after induction treatment. Of the ten patients achieving a CR or near CR, one developed an esophageal fistula after dCRT (10.0%). Among the eight non-CR or non-near CR patients receiving chemoradiotherapy, six developed esophageal fistula (75.0%). Among the 26 patients who did not achieve CR or near CR after induction treatment, the 1-year cancer specific survival (CSS) rates were 93.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.815-1%] for the 18 patients in the surgery group, and 71.4% (95% CI 0.447-1%) for the 8 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group (p = 0.027). The overall laryngeal preservation rate was 85.0% (34/40), with a functional laryngeal preservation rate of 77.5% (31/40).

CONCLUSION

The approach consisting of combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy successfully identified patients who were responding well to induction treatment and who were sensitive to radiotherapy, for chemoradiotherapy; thus, improving laryngeal preservation rates. In addition, it also identified patients with poor responses to induction treatment and radiotherapy, for timely surgery; hence, reducing radiotherapy complications and enhancing survival.

Conversion chemoradiotherapy combined with nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin in patients with locally advanced borderline-resectable or unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase i/ii prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin as the regimen of conversional chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in locally advanced borderline resectable or unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced ESCC (cT3‑4, Nany, M0‑1, M1 was limited to lymph node metastasis in the supraclavicular area) were enrolled. All the patients received the cCRT of nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin. After the cCRT, those resectable patients received esophagectomy; those unresectable patients continued to receive the definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). The locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), pathological complete response (pCR), R0 resection rate, adverse events (AEs) and postoperative complications were calculated.

RESULTS

45 patients with ESCC treated from October 2019 to May 2021 were finally included. The median follow-up time was 30.3 months. The LRC, OS, EFS, DMFS at 1 and 2 years were 81.5%, 86.6%, 64.3%, 73.2 and 72.4%, 68.8%, 44.8%, 52.7% respectively. 21 patients (46.7%) received conversional chemoradiotherapy plus surgery (cCRT+S). The pCR rate and R0 resection rate were 47.6 and 84.0%. The LRC rate at 1 and 2 years were 95.0%, 87.1% in cCRT+S patitents and 69.3%, 58.7% in dCRT patients respectively (HR, 5.14; 95%CI, 1.10-23.94; P = 0.021). The toxicities during chemoradiotherapy were tolerated, and the most common grade 3-4 toxicitiy was radiation esophagitis (15.6%). The most common postoperative complication was pleural effusion (38.1%) and no grade ≥ IIIb complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin are safe as the regimen of conversional chemoradiotherapy of ESCC.

Chemoradiotherapy and Subsequent Immunochemotherapy as Conversion Therapy in Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase II NEXUS-1 Trial

PURPOSE

This phase II trial investigated the safety and efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by immunochemotherapy (iCT) and surgery in unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC received radiotherapy (50 Gy/25f, 5 days/week) and nab-paclitaxel (100 mg on day 1/week) plus cisplatin (25 mg/m2 on day 1/week) for 5 weeks, followed by tislelizumab (200 mg on day 1/cycle) plus chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 2/cycle) for two 21-day cycles. Patients who converted to resectable underwent surgery 2 to 4 weeks afterward. The primary endpoint was a 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled and underwent CRT (median follow-up: 21 months), of whom 24 received iCT. Twenty (66.7%) patients achieved resectability (R0: 95.2%; pathologic complete response: 65.0%; major pathologic response: 90.0%). One-year PFS and overall survival (OS) rates were 79.4% and 89.6%, respectively. The R0 resection group exhibited longer PFS (median, not reached vs. 8.4 months; HR = 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.84; P = 0.02) and OS (median, not reached vs. 19.2 months; HR = 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.73; P < 0.01) than the nonsurgery group. Grade 3 to 4 adverse events were observed in 11 (11/30, 36.7%) patients, and immune-related pneumonitis was observed in 5 (5/24, 20.8%) patients. Post-CRT minimal residual disease before surgery was associated with unfavorable PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study met the primary endpoint. Conversion CRT and subsequent iCT followed by surgery was a promising treatment strategy for unresectable locally advanced ESCC.

Unveiling the Power of Gut Microbiome in Predicting Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy Responses in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The role of the gut microbiome in enhancing the efficacy of anticancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiotherapy is well acknowledged. However, there is limited empirical evidence on its predictive capabilities for neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) responses in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Our study fills this gap by comprehensively analyzing the gut microbiome's influence on NICT outcomes. We analyzed 16S rRNA gene sequences from 136 fecal samples from 68 ESCC patients before and after NICT, along with 19 samples from healthy controls. After NICT, marked microbiome composition changes were noted, including a decrease in ESCC-associated pathogens and an increase in beneficial microbes such as Limosilactobacillus, Lacticaseibacillus, and Staphylococcus. Baseline microbiota profiles effectively differentiated responders from nonresponders, with responders showing higher levels of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria such as Faecalibacterium, Eubacterium_eligens_group, Anaerostipes, and Odoribacter, and nonresponders showing increases in Veillonella, Campylobacter, Atopobium, and Trichococcus. We then divided our patient cohort into training and test sets at a 4:1 ratio and utilized the XGBoost-RFE algorithm to identify 7 key microbial biomarkers-Faecalibacterium, Subdoligranulum, Veillonella, Hungatella, Odoribacter, Butyricicoccus, and HT002. A predictive model was developed using LightGBM, which achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 86.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 73.8% to 99.4%] in the training set, 76.8% (95% CI, 41.2% to 99.7%) in the validation set, and 76.5% (95% CI, 50.4% to 100%) in the testing set. Our findings underscore the gut microbiome as a novel source of biomarkers for predicting NICT responses in ESCC, highlighting its potential to enhance personalized treatment strategies and advance the integration of microbiome profiling into clinical practice for modulating cancer treatment responses.

Optimization of radiation target volume for locally advanced esophageal cancer in the immunotherapy era

INTRODUCTION

Locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) has poor prognosis. Preliminary clinical studies have demonstrated the synergistic efficacy of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in EC. Adjusting the radiotherapy target volume to protect immune function favors immunotherapy. However, there is no clear consensus on the exact definition of the EC target volume.

AREAS COVERED

Preclinical studies have provided a wealth of information on immunotherapy combined with different radiotherapy modalities, and several clinical studies have evaluated the impact of immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy on locally advanced EC. Here, we illustrate the rational target volume delineation for radiotherapy in terms of patient prognosis, pattern of radiotherapy failure, treatment-related toxicities, tumor-draining lymph nodes, and systemic immunity and summarize the clinical trials of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in EC.

EXPERT OPINION

We recommend applying involved-field irradiation (IFI) instead of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) for irradiated fields when immunotherapy is combined with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced EC. We expect that this target design will be evaluated in clinical trials to further explore more precise diagnostic modalities, long-term toxic responses, and quality of survival, and stratification factors for personalized treatment, and to provide more treatment benefits for patients.

Radiomics nomogram combined with clinical factors for predicting pathological complete response in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Introduction

Predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESSC) prior to surgery can minimize unnecessary surgical interventions and facilitate personalized treatment strategies. Our goal is to develop and validate an image-based radiomic model using preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans and clinical data to predict pathological complete response (pCR) in resectable ESSC following neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data from patients diagnosed with ESCC at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 2018 and May 2023, who received preoperative neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. Eligible patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets. Radiomic features extracted from preprocessed CT images were used to develop a radiomic model, incorporating Radiomic score (Rad-score) and clinical factors through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The model's performance was assessed for calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility in an independent validation cohort.

Results

We enrolled a total of 105 eligible participants who were randomly divided into two groups: a training set (N=74) and a validation set (N=31). After data dimension reduction and feature selection, we identified 11 radiomic features, which collectively formed the Rad-score. Rad-score had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.93) in the training set and 0.78 (95% CI 0.60-0.95) in the validation set. Multivariate analysis revealed that radiological response and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) were independent predictors of pCR, with p-values of 0.0026 and 0.0414, respectively. We developed and validated a nomogram combining Rad-score and clinical features, achieving AUCs of 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.98) in the training set and 0.85 (95% CI 0.70-0.99) in the validation set. The Delong test confirmed the nomogram's superiority over pure radiomic and clinical models. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) assessment supported the clinical value and superiority of the combined model.

Conclusion

The nomogram, which integrates Rad-score and clinical features, offers a precise and reliable method for predicting pCR status in ESCC patients who have undergone neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. This tool aids in tailoring treatment strategies to individual patients.

Two versus three to four cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in real-world practice

Background

There is currently no consensus on whether intensive cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy provide greater benefit than do less intensive cycles (two cycles) in esophageal cancer (EC). Therefore, in this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of three to four cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy compared to two cycles for treating patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

This is a retrospective study of patients enrolled on previous clinical studies involving locally/regionally advanced ESCC (St. II-IVA) who received preoperative immunochemotherapy at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from 2019 to 2021. In this study, patients were planned to receive 2-4 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy. In this secondary analysis, patients who received three to four cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were compared to those receiving two cycles in terms of safety and oncologic outcomes. The follow-up duration required for inclusion was at least one year following surgery, or until the patient died or independently elected to cease treatment if less than one year.

Results

Our study identified a total of 142 participants, who were categorized into two groups based on the number of neoadjuvant treatment cycles: the two cycles group (2 cycles) (n=65) and the three to four cycles group (3-4 cycles) (n=77). Regarding the rate of major pathologic response (MPR), the rates for the 3-4 cycles and 2 cycles groups were 22.1% and 20.0%, respectively, although this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.25). Similarly, the rate of pathologic complete remission (pCR) was higher in the 3-4 cycles group at 14.3% compared to 7.7% in the 2 cycles group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.07). However, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) classified as grade 3 or 4 was significantly higher in the 3-4 cycles group than in the 2 cycles group (36.4% vs. 18.5%; P=0.02). The median disease-free survival (DFS) for the 3-4 cycles group was 30.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI): not reached to not reached] and was not reached in the 2 cycles group (hazard ratio 2.35, 95% CI: 1.134-4.86; P=0.02). The 2 cycles group did not reach the median overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio 2.47, 95% CI: 1.08-5.53; P=0.045), with that in the 3-4 cycles group 34.9 months (95% CI: 24.5 to not reached). Interestingly, the survival outcomes were more favorable in the 2 cycles group for certain subgroups of patients: those who were male, those with a history of smoking, those with a history of drinking, and those who did not achieve MPR.

Conclusions

Two cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy can be considered in locally advanced ESCC at high risk of developing toxicity with 3-4 cycles with similar oncologic outcomes.

Comparison of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study with 3-year survival analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nCIT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) has shown short-term benefits, but long-term survival outcomes are unclear. This study compares nCIT and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) in resectable ESCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on ESCC patients who underwent nCT or nCIT followed by esophagectomy. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper of 0.02 was employed to minimize bias. The primary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 131 comparable pairs of ESCC patients receiving nCT and nCIT were selected for the final analysis. The nCIT had higher rates of pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (mPR) compared to nCT. Additionally, nCIT led to significant tumor down-staging, higher rates of R0 resection, and increased lymph node clearance during surgery. Patients who received nCIT exhibited improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at the 3-year follow-up. The incidence of distant and mixed relapses was lower in the nCIT group compared to the nCT group. However, the risk of locoregional relapse was comparable between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed that the benefits of nCIT were generally observed across most patient subgroups. Interestingly, in patients without pCR or mPR, nCIT still demonstrated better survival benefits than nCT.

CONCLUSION

nCIT demonstrated superior pathological response rates and improved 3-year DFS and OS compared to nCT alone in locally advanced ESCC, but long-term survival validation is needed.

Integrative analyses of bulk and single-cell RNA-seq reveals the correlation between SPP1+ macrophages and resistance to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NACI) has significant implications for the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, its clinical efficacy varies considerably among patients, necessitating further investigation into the underlying mechanisms. The rapid advancement of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology facilitates the analysis of patient heterogeneity at the cellular level, particularly regarding treatment outcomes. In this study, we first analyzed scRNA-seq data of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) following NACI, obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. After performing dimensionality reduction, clustering, and annotation on the scRNA-seq data, we employed CellChat to investigate differences in cell-cell communication among samples from distinct efficacy groups. The results indicated that macrophages in the non-responder exhibited stronger cell communication intensity compared to those in responders, with SPP1 and GALECTIN signals showing the most significant differences between the two groups. This finding underscores the crucial role of macrophages in the efficacy of NACI. Subsequently, reclustering of macrophages revealed that Mac-SPP1 may be primarily responsible for treatment resistance, while Mac-C1QC appears to promote T cell activation. Finally, we conducted transcriptome sequencing on ESCC tissues obtained from 32 patients who underwent surgery following NACI. Utilizing CIBERSORT, CIBERSORTx, and WGCNA, we analyzed the heterogeneity of tumor microenvironment among different efficacy groups and validated the correlation between SPP1+ macrophages and resistance to NACI in ESCC using publicly available transcriptome sequencing datasets. These findings suggest that SPP1+ macrophages may represent a key factor contributing to resistance against NACI in ESCC.

Comparison of pathologic response and survival outcomes between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

In locally advanced, operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) has shown results that are somewhat comparable to those of standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). The impact of these neoadjuvant treatments on survival outcomes, however, has yet to be elucidated.

METHODS

This study included 489 patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent surgery at Sichuan Cancer Hospital after receiving neoadjuvant treatment between June 2017 and September 2023. Patients were categorized into nCRT and nICT groups based on whether they received neoadjuvant treatment. To mitigate potential biases and balance covariates between the two cohorts, 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted using a caliper width of 0.05.

RESULTS

After PSM, the baseline characteristics of the 360 patients remained balanced between the two groups. The findings indicated a superior pathological response in the nCRT group, as evidenced by significantly greater rates of complete response (32.87% vs 14.58%, P < 0.001) and favorable tumor regression grade (TRG), as well as reduced ypT stages and less perineural and angioinvasion, despite comparable ypN stages. Despite the improvement in complete pathological response (pCR) in the nCRT group, the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates did not significantly differ between the groups (DFS: 58.32% vs 56.16%, P = 0.67; OS: 69.96% vs 71.99%, P = 0.99). Crucially, The nICT group showed a lower incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events in Leukopenia (2.8% vs 29%; P < 0.001) and Neutropenia (2.8% vs 24%; P < 0.001) during neoadjuvant treatment, comparing with nCRT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary findings suggest that nICT followed by surgery offers comparable survival rates to nCRT, despite being less effective in pathologic outcomes. Nonetheless, nICT is a safe and feasible strategy for locally advanced ESCC, warranting further exploration to understand its impact on long-term survival.

Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis should not be defined as regional lymph node metastasis in cervical and upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The importance of supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) metastasis in cervical and upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been determined. The aim of the present study was to provide a detailed definition of the range of SCLN regions and to explore whether SCLNs should be considered as a regional lymph nodes for patients with cervical and upper thoracic ESCC. A retrospective analysis was performed on 230 patients with locally advanced cervical or upper thoracic ESCC who underwent radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The range of SCLN regions was defined in detail on contrast enhanced computed tomography images of the neck. According to whether the patient had lymph node metastasis in the supraclavicular region, the included patients were divided into two groups, and the survival differences and reasons for treatment failure between the two groups were analyzed. Of the 230 patients with ESCC, 71 (30.87%) exhibited lymph node metastases in the supraclavicular region. The median overall survival time of ESCC patients with and without SCLN metastasis was 17 and 30 months, respectively (P<0.001). After propensity score matching (PSM), the median overall survival time of ESCC patients with and without SCLN metastasis was 17 and 28 months, respectively (P<0.001). During the follow-up period, there were a total of 101 cases of failure of treatment in the irradiation field, 6 cases had esophageal metastasis in the non-irradiated field and 27 cases had regional lymph node metastasis in the non-irradiated field. In addition, there were 33 cases of metastasis to the distant lymph nodes or organs. There was no significant difference in the local treatment failure rate between the groups with or without SCLN metastasis in both the irradiation field and the non-irradiation field, but the probability of distant metastasis in the SCLN metastasis group was significantly higher than that in the group without SCLN metastasis (P=0.025). In conclusion, patients with cervical and upper thoracic ESCC with SCLN metastasis have a poor prognosis and the median overall survival time is closer to that of metastatic ESCC than ESCC with regional lymph node metastasis; therefore, SCLNs should not be defined as regional lymph nodes in patients with cervical and upper thoracic ESCC.

Perioperative toripalimab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy might improve outcomes in resectable esophageal cancer: an interim analysis of a phase III randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

In the era of immunotherapy, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NAIC) for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is used clinically but lacks of high-level clinical evidence. This study aimed to compare the safety and long-term efficacy of NAIC followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with those of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by MIE.

METHODS

A prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized phase III clinical trial was conducted at Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either neoadjuvant toripalimab (240 mg) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) + cisplatin (75 mg/m2) (toripalimab group) or paclitaxel + cisplatin alone (chemotherapy group) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles. After surgery, the toripalimab group received toripalimab (240 mg every 3 weeks for up to 6 months). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). The pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) were key secondary endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) and quality of life were also assessed.

RESULTS

Between May 15, 2020 and August 13, 2021, 252 ESCC patients ranging from T1N1-3M0 to T2-3N0-3M0 were enrolled for interim analysis, with 127 in the toripalimab group and 125 in the chemotherapy group. The 1-year EFS rate was 77.9% in the toripalimab group compared to 64.3% in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39 to 1.00; P = 0.05). The 1-year OS rates were 94.1% and 83.0% in the toripalimab and chemotherapy groups, respectively (HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.97; P = 0.037). The patients in the toripalimab group had a higher pCR rate (18.6% vs. 4.6%; P = 0.001). The rates of postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb or higher morbidity were 9.8% in the toripalimab group and 6.8% in the chemotherapy group, with no significant difference observed (P = 0.460). The rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs did not differ between the two groups (12.5% versus 12.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The interim results of this ongoing trial showed that in resectable ESCC, the addition of perioperative toripalimab to NAC is safe, may improve OS and might change the standard treatment in the future.

Survival benefit and spatial properties of tertiary lymphoid structures in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with neoadjuvant therapies

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) were associated with survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing surgery alone (SA). However, their clinical relevance in neoadjuvant therapies remains less known. Here, we firstly investigated the presence, maturation and spatial distribution of TLSs in 359 ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NCI), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) or SA. We found mature TLS (MTLS) was an independent prognostic factor in ESCC. NCI group had the lowest immature TLS cases. NCRT group had the lowest MTLSs. MTLSs mostly located in stromal and normal compartments; these MTLSs were positively correlated with neoadjuvant therapy outcomes. NCI group displayed the highest T cells within 150 μm proximity of TLSs among the four groups. Most T cells were dispersed up to more than 150 μm from TLSs, while B cells remained concentrated within TLSs. Innate lymphoid cells and follicular dendritic cells infiltrated and connected with survival differently in NCRT and NCI groups compared with SA group. The novel PD-L1 combined positive score, NCPS, was positively connected with MTLSs and neoadjuvant therapy efficacy. ScRNA-seq analysis revealed TLS+ tumors had increased plasma cells, B cells, Th17, Tfh and Th1, and elevated exhausted CD8+ T cells that highly expressed checkpoint molecules and granzymes. Conclusively, MTLSs favored treatment outcome in ESCC patients receiving multiple neoadjuvant therapies. The spatial distribution of MTLSs was associated with multiregional immune status modified by the neoadjuvant therapies.

Efficacy, safety, and survival of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A real-world retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade plus chemotherapy in real-world applications. Additionally, we report survival outcomes with a median follow-up of 40.1 months.

METHODS

From January 2018 to October 2022, we retrospectively recruited patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent surgery after receiving PD-1 blockade (immunotherapy) plus chemotherapy at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 132 eligible ESCC patients were included, and R0 resection was achieved in 131 cases (99.2 %). A complete pathological response rate (ypT0N0) was observed in 32 patients (24.2 %), and the objective response rate was 59.1 %. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were leukopenia (18.2 %) and neutropenia (15.9 %). Three cases (2.3 %) of grade 3 immune-related AEs were observed, including increased ALT (0.8 %), rash (0.8 %), and encephalitis (0.8 %). The 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 68.2 % and 89.4 %, respectively, and the 2-year DFS and OS rates were 55.1 % and 78.6 %, respectively. The pathological responses of 103 cases (94.5 % of 109) of the index lymph node (ILN) were categorized as the worst regression subgroup. In these cases, using the pathological response of the ILN to indicate the status of other lymph nodes would not result to a missed therapeutic lymph node dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy is safe and effective for ESCC, with observable survival benefits. The pathological response of the ILN after neoadjuvant therapy may have important value in guiding therapeutic lymph node dissection.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without camrelizumab in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the randomized phase 3 ESCORT-NEO/NCCES01 trial

Recent single-arm studies involving neoadjuvant camrelizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, plus chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC) have shown promising results. This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 trial aimed to further assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant camrelizumab, compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. A total of 391 patients with resectable thoracic LA-ESCC (T1b-3N1-3M0 or T3N0M0) were stratified by clinical stage (I/II, III or IVA) and randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. Treatments included camrelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin (Cam+nab-TP group; n = 132); camrelizumab, paclitaxel and cisplatin (Cam+TP group; n = 130); and paclitaxel with cisplatin (TP group; n = 129), followed by surgical resection. Both the Cam+nab-TP and Cam+TP groups also received adjuvant camrelizumab. The dual primary endpoints were the rate of pathological complete response (pCR), as evaluated by a blind independent review committee, and event-free survival (EFS), as assessed by investigators. This study reports the final analysis of pCR rates. In the intention-to-treat population, the Cam+nab-TP and Cam+TP groups exhibited significantly higher pCR rates of 28.0% and 15.4%, respectively, compared to 4.7% in the TP group (Cam+nab-TP versus TP: difference 23.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 15.1-32.0, P < 0.0001; Cam+TP versus TP: difference 10.9%, 95% CI 3.7-18.1, P = 0.0034). The study met its primary endpoint of pCR; however, EFS is not yet mature. The incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events during neoadjuvant treatment was 34.1% for the Cam+nab-TP group, 29.2% for the Cam+TP group and 28.8% for the TP group; the postoperative complication rates were 34.2%, 38.8% and 32.0%, respectively. Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated superior pCR rates compared to chemotherapy alone for LA-ESCC, with a tolerable safety profile. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR2000040034 .

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab followed by concurrent camrelizumab plus chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-arm, phase II study

Background

Neoadjuvant therapy combining camrelizumab with chemotherapy has emerged as a promising approach for treating locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the optimal strategy for integrating immunotherapy with chemotherapy remains to be fully defined. This single-arm phase II study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy with camrelizumab induction followed by camrelizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced ESCC.

Methods

Patients with clinical stage cT2-4N0M0 or cTxN1-3M0 ESCC were enrolled in the study. Patients received one dose of camrelizumab (200 mg) followed by docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and nedaplatin (75 mg/m2) plus camrelizumab (200 mg) every 3 weeks for two cycles, and then underwent surgery within 3-4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR) rate. The secondary endpoints included the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, R0 resection rate, downstaging rate, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

In total, 55 patients were enrolled in the study between 16 April 2020 and 30 October 2021. Of these 55 patients, 53 (96.4%) completed neoadjuvant therapy, and 48 (87.3%) underwent surgery. The MPR rate was 77.1% [37/48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 62.7-88.0%]. The pCR (ypT0N0) rate was 39.6% (19/48, 95% CI: 25.8-54.7%). All the patients had R0 resections. Primary tumor downstaging occurred in 44 (91.7%) patients, and nodal downstaging occurred in 19 (39.6%) patients. The 2-year DFS rate was 68.9% (95% CI: 53.0-80.4%), and the 2-year OS rate was 74.7% (95% CI: 60.2-84.6%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 7 (12.7%) patients.

Conclusions

In conclusion, neoadjuvant camrelizumab followed by camrelizumab plus chemotherapy showed promising efficacy in treating locally advanced ESCC and had a manageable safety profile.

Tumor microenvironment biomarkers predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: post-hoc analysis of a single center, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has a promising effect on locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, reliable biomarkers robustly predicting therapeutic response are still lacking.

METHODS

Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded pre-neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy biopsy samples from locally advanced ESCC patients were collected. Cohort 1 composed of 66 locally advanced ESCC patients from a prospective clinical trial (NCT04506138) received two cycles of camrelizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin every 3 weeks. Cohort 2 included 48 patients receiving various types of immune checkpoint inhibitors with (nab-)paclitaxel and platinum-based chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy. Cohort 3 consisted of 27 ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment of toripalimab with chemotherapy and was used as the external validation dataset. Targeted RNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) imaging were performed.

RESULTS

Integration of targeted RNA sequencing, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, and mIF revealed a significant immune-suppressive microenvironment with higher neutrophil infiltration, enriched TGF-β, and cell cycle pathways in non-pathological complete response (non-pCR) patients. NK, activated CD4+ T cell infiltration, interferon-gamma, antigen processing and presentation, and other immune response signatures were significantly associated with pCR. Based on discovered tumor microenvironmental characteristics and their closely related genes were screened. Consequently, a seven-gene neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy risk prediction signature (NCIRPs) model, was constructed. In addition to cohort 1, this model alone or with PD-L1-combined positive score (CPS) demonstrated a higher prediction accuracy of pathological response than PD-L1 CPS or other routinely used immune signatures, such as IFN-γ, in cohorts 2 and 3. Neither prognostic association nor correlation with response to chemoradiotherapy was observed in The Cancer Genome Atlas Program ESCC dataset or in ESCC patients in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy cohort (cohort 4).

CONCLUSION

The NCIRPs model that was developed and validated using treatment-naïve endoscopic samples from the largest ESCC neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy dataset represents a robust and clinically meaningful approach to select a putative responder for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in locally advanced ESCC patients.

Exploring potential roles of long non-coding RNAs in cancer immunotherapy: a comprehensive review

Cancer treatment has long been fraught with challenges, including drug resistance, metastasis, and recurrence, making it one of the most difficult diseases to treat effectively. Traditional therapeutic approaches often fall short due to their inability to target cancer stem cells and the complex genetic and epigenetic landscape of tumors. In recent years, cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized the field, offering new hope and viable alternatives to conventional treatments. A particularly promising area of research focuses on non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), especially long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and their role in cancer resistance and the modulation of signaling pathways. To address these challenges, we performed a comprehensive review of recent studies on lncRNAs and their impact on cancer immunotherapy. Our review highlights the crucial roles that lncRNAs play in affecting both innate and adaptive immunity, thereby influencing the outcomes of cancer treatments. Key observations from our review indicate that lncRNAs can modify the tumor immune microenvironment, enhance immune cell infiltration, and regulate cytokine production, all of which contribute to tumor growth and resistance to therapies. These insights suggest that lncRNAs could serve as potential targets for precision medicine, opening up new avenues for developing more effective cancer immunotherapies. By compiling recent research on lncRNAs across various cancers, this review aims to shed light on their mechanisms within the tumor immune microenvironment.

Recent developments in immunotherapy for gastrointestinal tract cancers

The past few decades have witnessed the rise of immunotherapy for Gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and PD ligand-1 antibodies, has become increasingly pivotal in the treatment of advanced and perioperative GI tract cancers. Currently, anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy is considered as first-line regimen for unselected advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEJC), mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC), and advanced esophageal cancer (EC). In addition, the encouraging performance of claudin18.2-redirected chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in later-line GI tract cancers brings new hope for cell therapy in solid tumour treatment. Nevertheless, immunotherapy for GI tumour remains yet precise, and researchers are dedicated to further maximising and optimising the efficacy. This review summarises the important research, latest progress, and future directions of immunotherapy for GI tract cancers including EC, G/GEJC, and CRC.

Impact of the interval between neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery on prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): a real-world study

BACKGROUND

The time interval between neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery is 6 weeks for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but whether delayed surgery affects prognosis remains unclear.

METHODS

Clinical data of locally advanced ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022 were collected. The surgery outcomes and prognosis were compared between short-interval (time to surgery ≤ 6 weeks) and long-interval groups (time to surgery > 6 weeks).

RESULTS

152 patients were enrolled totally, with a ratio of 91:61 between short-interval and long-interval groups. The rate of pathological complete response in the short-interval and long-interval groups were 34.1% and 24.6% (P = 0.257). Delayed surgery did not have a significantly impact on the number of lymph node dissections (P = 0.133), operative duration (P = 0.689), blood loss (P = 0.837), hospitalization duration (P = 0.293), chest drainage duration (P = 0.886) and postoperative complications (P > 0.050). The 3-year Overall survival (OS) rates were 85.10% in the short-interval group, and 82.07% in the long-interval group (P = 0.435). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 83.41% and 70.86% in the two groups (P = 0.037). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with a favorable response to immunotherapy (tumor regression grade 0) exhibited inferior 3-year OS (long-interval vs. short-interval: 51.85% vs. 91.08%, P = 0.035) and DFS (long-interval vs. short-interval: 47.40% vs. 91.08%, P = 0.014) in the long-interval group.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy does not further improve pathological response; instead, it resulted in a poorer DFS. Especially for patients with a favorable response to immunotherapy, delayed surgery increases the risk of mortality and recurrence.

Reduction in chemotherapy relative dose intensity decreases overall survival of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Many patients undergo dose reduction or early termination of chemotherapy to reduce chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity, which may increase their risk of survival. However, this strategy may result in underdosing patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the relative dose intensity (RDI) and survival outcomes in patients with LA-ESCC.

METHODS

This retrospective study assessed patients with LA-ESCC (cT2N + M0, cT3-4NanyM0) receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) with curative-intent esophagectomy. The patients received 2 courses of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) combination radiotherapy prior to undergoing surgery. During NCRT, RDI was computed, defined as the received dose as a percentage of the standard dose, and the incidence of dose delays was estimated (≥ 7 days in any course cycle). The best RDI cutoff value (0.7) was obtained using ROC curve. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test, the treatment effect was measured using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

We included 132 patients in this study, divided into RDI < 0.7 and RDI ≥ 0.7 groups using cut-off value of 0.7. RDI grade was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced between the groups. There was no evidence that patients with RDI < 0.7 experienced less toxicity or those with RDI ≥ 0.7 resulted in more toxicity. However, patients with RDI < 0.7 who were given reduced doses had a worse overall survival [HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.88, P = 0.015]. The risk of a lower RDI increased with a longer dose delay time (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The RDI below 0.7 for avoiding chemoradiotherapy toxicity administration led to a reduction in the dose intensity of treatment and decreased overall survival.

Changes in the recent three decades and survey on the current status of surgical treatment for esophageal cancer in China

BACKGROUND

To review the changes and survey on status quo of the surgical treatment for esophageal cancer in China. The differences in diagnosis and treatment for esophageal cancer among hospitals in different regions across China were also investigated.

METHODS

We sent questionnaires to 46 hospitals across China, investigating the volume of esophageal cancer surgeries, surgical procedures, and perioperative management under the guidance of esophageal surgery chiefs.

RESULTS

A total of 46 questionnaires were sent out and collected. The survey results showed that in the past 5 years, the volume of surgeries for esophageal cancer remained stable by 23.9% of those hospitals, increased by 30.4%, and decreased by 45.7%. Of those patients treated by surgery, 19.1% were in the early stages, and 80.9% were in locally advanced stages. In terms of surgical procedures, 73.4% of the patients were treated by minimally invasive surgery and 85.7% of esophageal substitutes were a gastric conduit, 93.1% of the substitutes were pulled to the neck through the esophageal bed. For the lymph node dissection, 78.5% of the patients had a complete two-field lymph node dissection including the para-recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes. Of the patients with neoadjuvant therapy, 53.5% received chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (47.0%), and 43.5% had chemoradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, in China, minimally invasive surgery-oriented multimodality treatment, including complete two-field lymph node dissection, has become the standard approach for esophageal cancer management. Over the past decade, this standardized approach has significantly improved prognosis compared to previous decades.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was associated with better short-term survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

The chemotherapy and immunotherapy combination is currently the primary strategy to treat metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIT) is being intensively investigated for treating locally advanced ESCC.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the efficacy and safety of NCIT and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) to treat locally advanced ESCC.

METHODS

We included 214 locally advanced ESCC patients who were administered neoadjuvant therapy from May 2014 to April 2022. The patients were grouped according to two neoadjuvant protocols (NCIT and NCRT) routinely used at our institution. Perioperative findings, pathological results, and survival data were compared between the two groups by conducting unmatched and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analyses.

RESULTS

Following 1:1 PSM analysis of the confounders, 66 patients were allocated to each of the two groups. Time span between neoadjuvant therapy completion and esophagectomy was significantly longer after NCRT than that after NCIT (47.1 ± 13.2 days vs. 34.7 ± 8.8 days; p < 0.001). The NCIT group exhibited significantly greater number of harvested lymph nodes than the NCRT group (33.6 ± 12.7 vs. 21.7 ± 10.2; p < 0.001). The pathological complete response and major pathological response rates were similar between the two groups [NCIT group: 25.8% (17/66) and 62.1% (41/66), respectively; NCRT group: 27.3% (18/66) and 56.1% (37/66), respectively (p > 0.05)]. The overall incidence of pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, or postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. The 2-year cumulative overall survival rates and the 2-year disease-free survival rates of the NCIT and NCRT groups were 80.2% and 62.2%, respectively (p = 0.029) and 70.0% and 50.8%, respectively (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

In locally advanced ESCC patients, short-term survival after NCIT is superior to that after NCRT, with similar perioperative and pathological outcomes.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To date, few studies have compared effectiveness and survival rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (NACI) and conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The present study was conducted to compare therapeutic response and survival between NACI and NCRT.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised patients with locally advanced ESCC treated with either NACI or NCRT followed by surgery between June 2018 and March 2021. The 2 groups were compared for treatment response, 3-year overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method, differences were compared using the log-rank test, and potential imbalances were corrected for using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method.

RESULTS

Among 202 patients with locally advanced ESCC, 81 received NACI and 121 received conventional NCRT. After IPTW adjustment, the R0 resection rate (85.2% vs 92.3%; P = .227) and the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (27.5% vs 36.4%; P = .239) were comparable between the 2 groups. Nevertheless, patients who received NACI exhibited both a better 3-year OS rate (91.7% vs 79.8%; P = .032) and a better 3-year DFS rate (87.4% vs 72.8%; P = .039) compared with NCRT recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

NACI has R0 resection and pCR rates comparable to those of NCRT and seems to be correlated with better prognosis than NCRT. NACI followed by surgery may be an effective treatment strategy for locally advanced ESCC.

Real-world retrospective study of anti-PD-1 antibody in combination with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment strategy for locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Neoadjuvant therapy has become a mainstay of treatment for locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer. The objective of this research was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in treating surgically removable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

From January 1, 2016 to April 1, 2023, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with resectable esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. The primary endpoints of this study were pathologic complete response (pCR), major pathologic response (MPR) and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints of this study were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety.

Results

A total of 122 patients with ESCC receiving neoadjuvant immune-chemotherapy (nICT) were included. Fifty-four patients achieved partial response (PR) and two patients achieved complete response (CR), with an ORR of 45.9%. Of the 106 patients who underwent surgery, a total of 28 patients achieved pCR (26.4%) and a total of 37 patients achieved MPR (34.9%). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 26 patients (21.3%). The most common postoperative complication was pneumonitis (25.5%).

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy demonstrates satisfactory efficacy in the treatment of locally advanced ESCC, with manageable treatment-related adverse events and postoperative complications.

Radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy

With the success of immunotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) is being increasingly used for local staged esophageal cancer, especially in the context of clinical trials, which brings similar pCR with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and shows promising results. However, there is still a part of potentially operable patients can't undergo surgery after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. The follow-up treatment and prognosis of this population remain unclear. Patients pathologically diagnosed with ESCC, clinical stage T1-3N+M0 or T3-4aNanyM0 (AJCC 8th), PS 0-1 were retrospectively enrolled from 1/2020 to 6/2021 in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. All patients firstly received PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (albumin paclitaxel, 260 mg/m2 on day 1 plus carboplatin AUC = 5 on day 1) every 3 weeks for 2-4 cycles. For those patients who did not receive surgery, definitive radiotherapy with 50.4 Gy/28F or 50 Gy/25F was adopted using VMAT, concurrent with chemotherapy or alone. The concurrent chemotherapy regimens included weekly TC (paclitaxel 50 mg/m2, d1, carboplatin AUC = 2, d1) or S1 (60 mg bid d1-14, 29-42). The survival outcomes and treatment toxicity were recorded and analyzed. A total of 56 eligible patients were finally identified from 558 patients who were treated in department of thoracic surgery, among all the patients, 25 (44.6%) received radiotherapy alone, and 31 (55.4%) received chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant CIT. The median follow-up was 20.4 months (interquartile range [IQR] 8.7-27 months). The median PFS and OS were 17.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.0-21.9 months) and 20.5 months (95% CI 11.8-27.9 months), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, the median OS was 26.3 months (95% CI 15.33-NA) for patients exhibiting partial response (PR) to CIT, compared to 17 months (95% CI 8.77-26.4) for those with stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD), yielding a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.54 (95% CI 0.27-1.06, P = 0.07). No significant difference was observed for patients received radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy with HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.72-2.6, P = 0.33). The most common Adverse events (AEs) observed during this study were anemia (98.2%), leukopenia (83.9%), thrombocytopenia (53.6%). AEs of grade ≥ 3 radiation-induced pneumonitis and esophagitis were 12.5% and 32.1%, especially, 6 patients (10.7%) died from esophageal fistula and 2 patients (3.6%) died from grade 5 pneumonitis. For local advanced ESCC patients after neoadjuvant CIT who did not receive surgery, definitive radiotherapy was an optional treatment strategy. However, those patients with no response to CIT also showed poor response to radiotherapy, and particular attention should be paid to treatment related toxicity, especially esophageal fistula.

Case report: A case study of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma

In locally advanced esophageal cancer, the controversy over the two traditional treatment modalities, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, has been unending and also challenged by the addition of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has led to an increasing diversity of neoadjuvant combination treatment modalities, among which neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has emerged, with current clinical studies initially demonstrating its efficacy and safety. We report a case of a patient with locally advanced esophageal cancer who underwent two cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and successful surgery and achieved a pathological complete response (pCR). A 73-year-old elderly female patient presented with progressive dysphagia for more than 1 month with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 1. After completing gastroscopy + pathological biopsy, chest enhanced CT, barium esophageal meal, PET-CT, and other related examinations, the clinical diagnosis was thoracic segmental esophageal poorly differentiated squamous carcinoma cT2N2M0 stage III. After a multidisciplinary discussion of the comprehensive treatment plan, two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy were given on February 16, 2023, and March 9, 2023, and the treatment plan was as follows: cisplatin 30 mg d1-3 + albumin paclitaxel 200 mg d1 and 100 mg d8 + sintilimab 200 mg d4, q3w. After the neoadjuvant therapy, the patient underwent an imaging examination. The chest enhanced CT suggested that the lesion range was significantly reduced compared with the previous scan, and mediastinal lymph nodes were partially reduced. Then, thoracoscopic radical esophageal cancer surgery was performed on April 23, 2023. pCR was achieved by pathological evaluation, and the postoperative diagnosis was thoracic segmental esophageal hypofractionated squamous carcinoma ypT0N0M0. Two cycles of adjuvant immunochemotherapy were performed after surgery on May 30, 2023, and June 21, 2023, and the regimen was as follows: cisplatin 30 mg d1-3 + albumin paclitaxel 200 mg d1 and 100 mg d8 + sindilizumab 200 mg d4, q3w. As of the latest review on March 20, 2024, the patient was not seen to have any significant postoperative complications and remains in a state of complete response (CR). Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has positive significance for the treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Whether neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy can replace neoadjuvant synchronous radiotherapy is a future direction of research, which needs to be further verified by more reliable clinical trials.

The single cell immunogenomic landscape after neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy represents promising strategy in the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the mechanisms underlying its impact on treatment sensitivity or resistance remain a subject of controversy. In this study, we conducted single-cell RNA and T/B cell receptor (scTCR/scBCR) sequencing of CD45+ immune cells on samples from 10 patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. We also validated our findings using multiplexed immunofluorescence and analyzed bulk RNA-seq from other cohorts in public database. By integrating analysis of 87357 CD45+ cells, we found GZMK + effector memory T cells (Tem) were relatively enriched and CXCL13+ exhausted T cells (Tex) and regulator T cells (Treg) decreased among responders, indicating a persistent anti-tumor memory process. Additionally, the enhanced presence of BCR expansion and somatic hypermutation process within TNFRSF13B + memory B cells (Bmem) suggested their roles in antigen presentation. This was further corroborated by the evidence of the T-B co-stimulation pattern and CXCL13-CXCR5 axis. The complexity of myeloid cell heterogeneity was also particularly pronounced. The elevated expression of S100A7 in ESCC, as detected by bulk RNA-seq, was associated with an exhausted and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In summary, this study has unveiled a potential regulatory network among immune cells and the clonal dynamics of their functions, and the mechanisms of exhaustion and memory conversion between GZMK + Tem and TNFRSF13B + Bmem from antigen presentation and co-stimulation perspectives during neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade treatment in ESCC.

A prospective single-center, single-arm, open-label, phase II study of sintilimab and anlotinib combined with chemotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of resectable esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Antiangiogenic treatment and immunochemotherapy effectively treat patients with advanced esophageal cancer. However, there remains a dearth of studies concerning neoadjuvant therapy for resectable esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The study focused on patients with T2-4NxM0 resectable esophageal carcinoma. Neoadjuvant treatment involved administering anlotinib (10 mg orally, once a day, 2 weeks on and 1 week off) for antiangiogenesis and sintilimab (200 mg) and chemotherapy for three cycles. Surgical treatment was performed 4-6 weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle was completed. The primary endpoints assessed were pathological complete response (pCR) and safety.

RESULTS

Out of the 34 screened patients, 17 were successfully enrolled in the study, and 14 completed the entire treatment process. The pCR was 35.3% (6/17). However, two patients experienced mortality. The occurring rate of grade 3 or higher complications after the surgery was 78.6% (11/14) according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Specifically, anastomotic leakage was observed in 57.1% (8/14) of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the current regimen demonstrated improved pCR. However, it did not show significant improvement compared to immunochemotherapy. It is essential to exercise caution when using this treatment approach in patients with esophageal cancer as it might increase postoperative complications, especially anastomotic leakage.

Enhancer demethylation-regulated gene score identified molecular subtypes, inspiring immunotherapy or CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The 5-year survival rate of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is approximately 20%. The prognosis and drug response exhibit substantial heterogeneity in ESCC, impeding progress in survival outcomes. Our goal is to identify a signature for tumour subtype classification, enabling precise clinical treatments.

METHODS

Utilising pre-treatment multi-omics data from an ESCC dataset (n = 310), an enhancer methylation-eRNA-target gene regulation network was constructed and validated by in vitro experiments. Four machine learning methods collectively identified core target genes, establishing an Enhancer Demethylation-Regulated Gene Score (EDRGS) model for classification. The molecular function of EDRGS subtyping was explored in scRNA-seq (n = 60) and bulk-seq (n = 310), and the EDRGS's potential to predict treatment response was assessed in datasets of various cancer types.

FINDINGS

EDRGS stratified ESCCs into EDRGS-high/low subtypes, with EDRGS-high signifying a less favourable prognosis in ESCC and nine additional cancer types. EDRGS-high exhibited an immune-hot but immune-suppressive phenotype with elevated immune checkpoint expression, increased T cell infiltration, and IFNγ signalling in ESCC, suggesting a better response to immunotherapy. Notably, EDRGS outperformed PD-L1 in predicting anti-PD-1/L1 therapy effectiveness in ESCC (n = 42), kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC, n = 181), and bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA, n = 348) cohorts. EDRGS-low showed a cell cycle-activated phenotype with higher CDK4 and/or CDK6 expression, demonstrating a superior response to the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, validated in ESCC (n = 26), melanoma (n = 18), prostate cancer (n = 15) cells, and PDX models derived from patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 30).

INTERPRETATION

Identification of EDRGS subtypes enlightens ESCC categorisation, offering clinical insights for patient management in immunotherapy (anti-PD-1/L1) and CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy across cancer types.

FUNDING

This study was supported by funding from the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFC2501000, 2020YFA0803300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82030089, 82188102), the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2021-I2M-1-018, 2022-I2M-2-001, 2021-I2M-1-067), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3332021091).

Tumor immune microenvironment remodeling and prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with and without immunotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Immunochemotherapy was an emerging neoadjuvant treatment mode that can potentially benefit patients with esophageal carcinoma, but its synergistic mechanism and impact on the tumor immune microenvironment were still unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) in tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling among patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and to evaluate the prognostic value of immune-related biomarkers and clinicopathological characteristics.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between December 2019 and March 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. We examined TME features and immune antigen-related biomarkers before and after neoadjuvant therapy. Logistic and Cox regression model were used to evaluate the correlation between these factors and other clinical features and outcomes.

Results

A total of 50 eligible participants were analyzed, including 31 males (62%), 25 patients of ≥65 years old, 4/28/18 of upper/middle/lower thoracic cancer, 25/17/8 of poor/moderate/high tumor differentiation, 8/42 of cT1+2/T3+4 stages and 30/20 of cN0/N+ stages. In the entire cohort, the rates of pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) were 18% and 30%, respectively. pCR rates were 7.1% and 22.2% (χ2=0.699; P=0.40) MPR rates were 7.1% and 38.9% (χ2=4.837; P=0.03) in the nCT and nICT groups, respectively. Compared with the non-pCR patients, the pCR patients had a higher baseline programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) positive expression rate (16.7% vs. 77.8%, χ2=13.089; P<0.001). Following neoadjuvant therapy, the expression rates of PD-L1, CD3+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells in the tumor tissue was higher in the nICT group compared to the nCT group (P<0.05). Deficient expression of mismatch repair (MMR) genes was only observed in one patient (2%). Among patient-related biomarkers, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts decreased after treatment, with no significant changes in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio or platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Cox regression analysis showed that pretreatment, well-differentiated tumors and positive PD-L1 status were positive predictors of MPR (P<0.05). MPR was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.03).

Conclusions

Compared to nCT, nICT could more significantly upregulates PD-L1 TPS, PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), CD3+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells. Pretreatment tumor differentiation and PD-L1 TPS level could be predictive of MPR. Our findings suggested that the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy may be more beneficial for activating anti-tumor immunity in the TME.

Prognostic Nutritional Index as a Prognostic Indicator for the Occurrence of Postoperative Complications in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Following Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy

Background & Aims

The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) as a predictor of short-term postoperative complications in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Methods

Clinical data were collected from 77 patients undergoing radical esophageal cancer surgery after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy at Tongji Hospital from January 2022 to January 2023. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was utilized to establish the optimal cut-off point for the PNI. Subsequently, patients were stratified into low and high PNI groups according to this cut-off point, and comparisons were made between the two groups in terms of clinical data and postoperative complications.

Results

Out of the 77 patients included in the study, 31 were categorized in the low PNI group and 46 in the high PNI group, with a defined cutoff point of 47.38. Significant statistical variances were noted in the occurrence rates of general complications (P < 0.001), pulmonary infections (P < 0.001), and anastomotic fistula (P = 0.034) between the two groups. The low PNI group displayed elevated rates of these complications in comparison to the high PNI group.

Conclusion

The research findings indicate that preoperative nutritional assessment using the PNI can effectively predict short-term postoperative complications in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy. Furthermore, the results suggest that implementing nutritional interventions for patients with moderate-to-severe malnutrition, as indicated by preoperative PNI evaluation, may help reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy based on PD-1/L1 inhibitors for gastrointestinal tumors: a review of the rationale and clinical advances

The landscape of current tumor treatment has been revolutionized by the advent of immunotherapy based on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Leveraging its capacity to mobilize systemic antitumor immunity, which is primarily mediated by T cells, there is growing exploration and expansion of its potential value in various stages of clinical tumor treatment. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy induces a robust immune response against tumors prior to surgery, effectively facilitating tumor volume reduction, early eradication or suppression of tumor cell activity, and control of potential metastatic spread, to improve curative surgical resection rates, and prevent tumor recurrence. This review delineates the theoretical basis of neoadjuvant immunotherapy from preclinical research evidence, discusses specific challenges in clinical application, and provides a comprehensive overview of clinical research progress in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for gastrointestinal tumors. These findings suggest that neoadjuvant immunotherapy has the potential to ameliorate immunosuppressive states and enhance cytotoxic T cell function while preserving lymphatic drainage in the preoperative period. However, further investigations are needed on specific treatment regimens, suitable patient populations, and measurable endpoints. Despite numerous studies demonstrating the promising efficacy and manageable adverse events of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in gastrointestinal tumors, the availability of high-quality randomized controlled trials is limited, which highlights the necessity for further research.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by robot esophagectomy has no effect on short-term results compared with surgery alone

BACKGROUND

To determine the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCI).

METHODS

Data from patients who underwent RAMIE between January 2020 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The oncological and operative outcomes of the NCI and surgery-only (S) groups were compared by both unmatched and 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients with ESCC who underwent three-incision RAMIE were included in this study (143 patients in the S group and 58 patients in the NCI group). Of the 58 patients who underwent NCI, a pathologically complete response (pCR) (ypT0N0) was identified in 14 (24.1%) patients. The patients in the NCI group were younger than those in the S group (p = 0.017), and had more advanced cT (p < 0.001) and cN stage diseases (p = 0.002). After 1:1 PSM of the confounders, 55 patients were allocated to each of the NCI and S groups. No significant differences were found in oncological and operative results, including surgical blood loss, operative time, and lymph node harvest (all p > 0.05). However, the NCI group exhibited a lower rate of pulmonary complications than the S group (3.6% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.047). No significant difference between the groups was found for other complications (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that NCI could result in a high pCR rate without increased complications in locally advanced ESCC. RAMIE is safe and feasible in patients with ESCC after NCI.

Development of new techniques and clinical applications of liquid biopsy in lung cancer management

Lung cancer is an exceedingly malignant tumor reported as having the highest morbidity and mortality of any cancer worldwide, thus posing a great threat to global health. Despite the growing demand for precision medicine, current methods for early clinical detection, treatment and prognosis monitoring in lung cancer are hampered by certain bottlenecks. Studies have found that during the formation and development of a tumor, molecular substances carrying tumor-related genetic information can be released into body fluids. Liquid biopsy (LB), a method for detecting these tumor-related markers in body fluids, maybe a way to make progress in these bottlenecks. In recent years, LB technology has undergone rapid advancements. Therefore, this review will provide information on technical updates to LB and its potential clinical applications, evaluate its effectiveness for specific applications, discuss the existing limitations of LB, and present a look forward to possible future clinical applications. Specifically, this paper will introduce technical updates from the prospectives of engineering breakthroughs in the detection of membrane-based LB biomarkers and other improvements in sequencing technology. Additionally, it will summarize the latest applications of liquid biopsy for the early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of lung cancer. We will present the interconnectedness of clinical and laboratory issues and the interplay of technology and application in LB today.

Immunotherapy for esophageal cancer: Where are we now and where can we go

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has dramatically improved patient prognosis, and thereby transformed the treatment in various cancer types including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the past decade. Monoclonal antibodies that selectively inhibit programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) activity has now become standard of care in the treatment of ESCC in metastatic settings, and has a high expectation to provide clinical benefit during perioperative period. Further, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody has also been approved in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic ESCC in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody. Well understanding of the existing evidence of immune-based treatments for ESCC, as well as recent clinical trials on various combinations with chemotherapy for different clinical settings including neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic diseases, may provide future prospects of ESCC treatment for better patient outcomes.

Dynamic radiological features predict pathological response after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) plus esophagectomy has emerged as a promising treatment option for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). Pathologic complete response (pCR) is a key indicator associated with great efficacy and overall survival (OS). However, there are insufficient indicators for the reliable assessment of pCR.

METHODS

192 patients with LA-ESCC treated with NICT from December 2019 to October 2023 were recruited. According to pCR status, patients were categorized into pCR group (22.92%) and non-pCR group (77.08%). Radiological features of pretreatment and preoperative CT images were extracted. Logistic and COX regressions were trained to predict pathological response and prognosis, respectively.

RESULTS

Four of the selected radiological features were combined to construct an ESCC preoperative imaging score (ECPI-Score). Logistic models revealed independent associations of ECPI-Score and vascular sign with pCR, with AUC of 0.918 in the training set and 0.862 in the validation set, respectively. After grouping by ECPI-Score, a higher proportion of pCR was observed among the high-ECPI group and negative vascular sign. Kaplan Meier analysis demonstrated that recurrence-free survival (RFS) with negative vascular sign was significantly better than those with positive (P = 0.038), but not for OS (P = 0.310).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates dynamic radiological features are independent predictors of pCR for LA-ESCC treated with NICT. It will guide clinicians to make accurate treatment plans.

Development of perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The standard preoperative treatment for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is chemoradiotherapy in western countries (based on the CROSS trial) and triplet chemotherapy in Japan (based on the JCOG1109 trial). Postoperative nivolumab has recently been shown to improve disease-free survival in resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients who had residual pathological disease, based on the CheckMate 577 trial. Furthermore, preoperative immune checkpoint inhibitor-containing treatments have also been developed. The JCOG1804E trial is presently evaluating the safety and efficacy of preoperative nivolumab-containing chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced ESCC. This review discusses the treatment of resectable locally advanced ESCC and future perspectives on perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor-containing treatments.

Survival outcomes of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy versus chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is the standard preoperative treatment for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Some studies reported neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) could improve pathological response with manageable safety. However, few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of NICT and NCT, especially survival outcomes. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of NICT and NCT after a median follow-up of 36.0 months.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study with a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Locally advanced ESCC patients treated with neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy were reviewed. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were identified in each group by PSM. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate in NICT and NCT group were 28.9% and 8.9% (P = 0.02). The hazard ratio (HR) was 0.396 (95% CI 0.171-0.919, p = 0.025) for RFS and 0.377 (95% CI 0.145-0.981, p = 0.038) for overall survival (OS), 3-year RFS was 80.6% and 62.1%, 3-year OS was 86.2% and 68.1%. Patients with pCR, MPR or downstaging had better 3-year RFS and 3-year OS. The incidences of postoperative complications and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were similar.

CONCLUSION

This trial preliminarily shows that NICT improves pathological and survival outcomes over NCT for resectable locally advanced ESCC, with acceptable and manageable safety.

Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCT + ICIs) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCRT + ICIs) both induced favorable pathological response and tolerant toxicities for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, few studies compared safety and efficacy between the two treatment strategies.

Methods

This retrospective study collected clinical data of locally resectable ESCC patients who underwent nCT + ICIs or nCRT + ICIs followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022. The incidence of adverse events, surgical outcomes, short and long-term efficacy, and treatment costs were compared.

Results

A total of 206 patients were included, with a ratio of 158:48 between nCT + ICIs group and nCRT + ICIs group. The two groups exhibited well-balanced baseline characteristics. Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in both groups. The nCT + ICIs group had a longer operative time (334.00 ± 170.2 min vs 279.60 ± 88.31 min, P=0.020) than nCRT + ICIs group, but there were no differences in surgical complications. Although nCT + ICIs group had a lower pCR rate (32.3% vs 52.1%, P=0.004), the 2-year overall survival (84.42% vs 81.70%, P=0.860), 2-year disease-free survival (83.21% vs 80.47%, P=0.839), and recurrence patterns were similar to nCRT + ICIs group. In addition, nCT + ICIs group had significantly lower expenses (188796.00 ± 107704.00 RMB vs 231808.00 ± 48067.00 RMB, P=0.045).

Conclusion

Overall, nCT + ICIs have comparable safety and efficacy compared to nCRT + ICIs for locally resectable ESCC, but with lower hospitalization costs.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Data from literature review and a real-world analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is supported by increasing data, but the sample size is limited, and the findings are not completely consistent. We conducted a real-world study and a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NCIT in locally advanced ESCC.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the outcomes of patients with locally advanced ESCC who completed NICT and subsequent esophagectomy at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2022, including pathological complete response (pCR) rate, major pathological response (MPR) rate, 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates, disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), 1-year recurrence rate, R0 resection rate and adverse events. Moreover, a meta-analysis of 27 published literatures was also conducted for comparison.

RESULTS

In the analysis, 128 patients were studied, with 25% achieving pCR, 46.1% MPR, and 99.2% R0 resection. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 91.41% (95% CI: 85.15%-95.63%), 75.00% (95% CI: 66.58%-82.23%) and 64.84% (95% CI: 55.91%-73.07%).ORR and DCR were 31.2% (95% CI: 23.31-39.99) and 64.1% (95% CI: 55.15%-72.38%), and the 1-year recurrence rate was 26.7% (95% CI: 22.5%-38.1%). Treatment-related events occurred in 96.1% but were acceptable. In a meta-analysis of 27 studies with 1734 patients, pooled rates for pCR, MPR, ORR, DCR, and R0 resection were 29%, 52%, 71%, 97%, and 98%, respectively, with a 1-year recurrence rate of 12%.

CONCLUSION

NCIT is safe and provides potential survival benefits for patients with locally advanced ESCC. However, randomized phase 3 trial data is still needed.