1
|
Heppell C, Malka S, Moosajee M. Incidental finding of a BRCA2 variant following whole genome sequencing to molecularly diagnose bilateral congenital cataracts. BMJ Case Rep 2024; 17:e260755. [PMID: 39395831 PMCID: PMC11474931 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2024-260755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/14/2024] Open
Abstract
A male patient in his 20s with a history of bilateral congenital cataracts and nystagmus presented to the genetic eye disease clinic at Moorfields Eye Hospital to enquire about genetic testing for family decision-making and access to preimplantation genetic testing. He had a history of lensectomy with best-corrected visual acuities of logMAR 0.60 and 1.00 in the right and left eye. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was conducted, which included targeted analysis of a panel of 115 lens-related genes and incidental findings, for which patients are unable to opt-out. Genetic testing identified the causative variant c.134T>C (p.Leu45Pro) in the CRYGC gene. A pathogenic variant in BRCA2 was also identified as a secondary finding. This was unexpected given the absence of a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer. This case illustrates the importance of genetic counselling and informing patients about the implications of incidental findings that arise from WGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara Heppell
- Genetics Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Samantha Malka
- Genetics Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mariya Moosajee
- Genetics Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Development, Ageing and Disease, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morgan RD, Burghel GJ, Flaum N, Schlecht H, Clamp AR, Hasan J, Mitchell C, Salih Z, Moon S, Hogg M, Lord R, Forde C, Lalloo F, Woodward ER, Crosbie EJ, Taylor SS, Jayson GC, Evans DGR. Extended panel testing in ovarian cancer reveals BRIP1 as the third most important predisposition gene. Genet Med 2024; 26:101230. [PMID: 39096152 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in homologous recombination repair (HRR) and Lynch syndrome (LS) genes in ovarian cancer (OC) is uncertain. METHODS An observational study reporting the detection rate of germline PVs in HRR and LS genes in all OC cases tested in the North West Genomic Laboratory Hub between September 1996 and May 2024. Effect sizes are reported using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for unselected cases tested between April 2021 and May 2024 versus 50,703 controls from the Breast Cancer Risk after Diagnostic Gene Sequencing study. RESULTS 2934 women were tested for BRCA1/2 and 433 (14.8%) had a PV. In up to 1572 women tested for PVs in non-BRCA1/2 HRR genes, detection rates were PALB2 = 0.8%, BRIP1 = 1.1%, RAD51C = 0.4% and RAD51D = 0.4%. In 940 unselected cases, BRIP1 (OR = 8.7, 95% CI 4.6-15.8) was the third most common OC predisposition gene followed by RAD51C (OR = 8.3, 95% CI 3.1-23.1), RAD51D (OR = 6.5, 95% CI 2.1-19.7), and PALB2 (OR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.5-10.3). No PVs in LS genes were detected in unselected cases. CONCLUSION Panel testing in OC resulted in a detection rate of 2% to 3% for germline PVs in non-BRCA1/2 HRR genes, with the largest contributor being BRIP1. Screening for LS in unselected cases of OC is unnecessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D Morgan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Flaum
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Helene Schlecht
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew R Clamp
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jurjees Hasan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Mitchell
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Zena Salih
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Moon
- University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Trust, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Hogg
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Rosemary Lord
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Forde
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Emma R Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen S Taylor
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Gordon C Jayson
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - D Gareth R Evans
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Evans DG, Howell SJ, Burghel GJ, Forde C, Lalloo F, Smith MJ, Howell A, Gandhi A, Woodward ER. Germline testing for breast cancer patients in England: illogical to prioritise grade 1 breast cancer aged 30-39 over grade 3 aged 40-49 years? J Med Genet 2024; 61:935-936. [PMID: 39054051 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2024-110183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- D Gareth Evans
- Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester - The Victoria University of Manchester Campus, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Sacha J Howell
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - George J Burghel
- Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Claire Forde
- Clinical Genetics Service, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Miriam J Smith
- Genetic Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Ashu Gandhi
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma Roisin Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tsoulaki O, Tischkowitz M, Antoniou AC, Musgrave H, Rea G, Gandhi A, Cox K, Irvine T, Holcombe S, Eccles D, Turnbull C, Cutress R, Archer S, Hanson H. Joint ABS-UKCGG-CanGene-CanVar consensus regarding the use of CanRisk in clinical practice. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:2027-2036. [PMID: 38834743 PMCID: PMC11183136 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02733-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The CanRisk tool, which operationalises the Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) is used by Clinical Geneticists, Genetic Counsellors, Breast Oncologists, Surgeons and Family History Nurses for breast cancer risk assessments both nationally and internationally. There are currently no guidelines with respect to the day-to-day clinical application of CanRisk and differing inputs to the model can result in different recommendations for practice. METHODS To address this gap, the UK Cancer Genetics Group in collaboration with the Association of Breast Surgery and the CanGene-CanVar programme held a workshop on 16th of May 2023, with the aim of establishing best practice guidelines. RESULTS Using a pre-workshop survey followed by structured discussion and in-meeting polling, we achieved consensus for UK best practice in use of CanRisk in making recommendations for breast cancer surveillance, eligibility for genetic testing and the input of available information to undertake an individualised risk assessment. CONCLUSIONS Whilst consensus recommendations were achieved, the meeting highlighted some of the barriers limiting the use of CanRisk in clinical practice and identified areas that require further work and collaboration with relevant national bodies and policy makers to incorporate wider use of CanRisk into routine breast cancer risk assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Tsoulaki
- St George's University of London, London, UK
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hannah Musgrave
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Gillian Rea
- Northern Ireland Regional Genetics Service, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - Ashu Gandhi
- Manchester University Hospitals; Manchester Breast Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Karina Cox
- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, UK
| | | | | | - Diana Eccles
- Department of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Translational Genetics Team, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Ramsey Cutress
- University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, Somers Research Building, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Stephanie Archer
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen Hanson
- Translational Genetics Team, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McDevitt T, Durkie M, Arnold N, Burghel GJ, Butler S, Claes KBM, Logan P, Robinson R, Sheils K, Wolstenholme N, Hanson H, Turnbull C, Hume S. EMQN best practice guidelines for genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:479-488. [PMID: 38443545 PMCID: PMC11061103 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01507-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) is a genetic condition associated with increased risk of cancers. The past decade has brought about significant changes to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) diagnostic testing with new treatments, testing methods and strategies, and evolving information on genetic associations. These best practice guidelines have been produced to assist clinical laboratories in effectively addressing the complexities of HBOC testing, while taking into account advancements since the last guidelines were published in 2007. These guidelines summarise cancer risk data from recent studies for the most commonly tested high and moderate risk HBOC genes for laboratories to refer to as a guide. Furthermore, recommendations are provided for somatic and germline testing services with regards to clinical referral, laboratory analyses, variant interpretation, and reporting. The guidelines present recommendations where 'must' is assigned to advocate that the recommendation is essential; and 'should' is assigned to advocate that the recommendation is highly advised but may not be universally applicable. Recommendations are presented in the form of shaded italicised statements throughout the document, and in the form of a table in supplementary materials (Table S4). Finally, for the purposes of encouraging standardisation and aiding implementation of recommendations, example report wording covering the essential points to be included is provided for the most common HBOC referral and reporting scenarios. These guidelines are aimed primarily at genomic scientists working in diagnostic testing laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trudi McDevitt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Miranda Durkie
- Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, North East and Yorkshire Genomic Laboratory Hub, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust Western Bank, Sheffield, UK
| | - Norbert Arnold
- UKSH Campus Kiel, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Institut of Clinical Chemistry, Institut of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel, Germany
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester, UK
| | - Samantha Butler
- Central and South Genomic Laboratory Hub, West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Peter Logan
- HSCNI / Belfast Trust Laboratories, Regional Molecular Diagnostics Service, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Rachel Robinson
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Genetics Department, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Helen Hanson
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Genetics, London, UK
| | | | - Stacey Hume
- University of British Columbia, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Evans DGR, Howell A, Howell Sacha J. Metaplastic breast cancer and BRCA1: first strong evidence of a link. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:1207-1208. [PMID: 37592173 PMCID: PMC10620387 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01441-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- D Gareth R Evans
- Manchester for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK.
- Manchester Breast Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, UK.
| | - Anthony Howell
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - J Howell Sacha
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McCarthy RL, Copson E, Tapper W, Bolton H, Mirnezami AH, O'Neill JR, Patel NN, Tischkowitz M, Cutress RI. Risk-reducing surgery for individuals with cancer-predisposing germline pathogenic variants and no personal cancer history: a review of current UK guidelines. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:383-392. [PMID: 37258796 PMCID: PMC10403612 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02296-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Identifying healthy carriers of germline pathogenic variants in high penetrance cancer susceptibility genes offers the potential for risk-reducing surgery. The NHS England National Genomic Test Directory offers germline and somatic testing to patients with certain cancers or rare and inherited diseases, or, in some cases, to their relatives. This review summarises current UK guidelines for risk-reducing surgical interventions available for individuals with no personal history of cancer, who are determined to carry germline pathogenic variants. An electronic literature search of NICE guidelines and PubMed citable articles was performed. NICE guidelines are available for bilateral mastectomy and are currently in development for risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Guidelines developed with affiliation to, or through relevant British Surgical Societies or international consensus, are available for risk-reducing hysterectomy, polypectomy, gastrectomy, and thyroidectomy. There is a disparity in the development and distribution of national guidelines for interventions amongst tumour types. Whilst we are focusing on UK guidelines, we anticipate they will be relevant much more generally and so of interest to a wider audience including where there are no national guidelines to refer to. We suggest that, as genetic testing becomes rapidly more accessible, guideline development for interventions should be more closely aligned to those for testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L McCarthy
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - Ellen Copson
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - William Tapper
- University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Health and Life Sciences, Southampton, UK
| | - Helen Bolton
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Alex H Mirnezami
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - J Robert O'Neill
- Cambridge Oesophagogastric Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Nimesh N Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ramsey I Cutress
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Jong VMT, Pruntel R, Steenbruggen TG, Bleeker FE, Nederlof P, Hogervorst FBL, Linn SC. Identifying the BRCA1 c.-107A > T variant in Dutch patients with a tumor BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation. Fam Cancer 2023; 22:151-154. [PMID: 36112334 PMCID: PMC10020283 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-022-00314-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
An inherited single nucleotide variant (SNV) in the 5'UTR of the BRCA1 gene c.-107A > T was identified to be related to BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation and a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer phenotype in two UK families. We investigated whether this BRCA1 variant was also present in a Dutch cohort of breast and ovarian cancer patients with tumor BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation. We selected all breast and ovarian cancer cases that tested positive for tumor BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation at the Netherlands Cancer Institute and Sanger sequenced the specific mutation in the tumor DNA. In total, we identified 193 tumors with BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation in 178 unique patients. The wild-type allele was identified in 100% (193/193) of sequenced tumor samples. In a large cohort of 178 patients, none had tumors harboring the previously identified c.-107A > T SNV in BRCA1. We therefore can conclude that the germline SNV is not pervasive in patients with tumor BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent M T de Jong
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Roelof Pruntel
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Tessa G Steenbruggen
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fonnet E Bleeker
- Department of Clinical Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Petra Nederlof
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frans B L Hogervorst
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lang N, Ayme A, Ming C, Combes JD, Chappuis VN, Friedlaender A, Vuilleumier A, Sandoval JL, Viassolo V, Chappuis PO, Labidi-Galy SI. Chemotherapy-related agranulocytosis as a predictive factor for germline BRCA1 pathogenic variants in breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study. Swiss Med Wkly 2023; 153:40055. [PMID: 37011610 DOI: 10.57187/smw.2023.40055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carriers of germline pathogenic variants of the BRCA1 gene (gBRCA1) tend to have a higher incidence of haematological toxicity upon exposure to chemotherapy. We hypothesised that the occurrence of agranulocytosis during the first cycle of (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy (C1) in breast cancer (BC) patients could predict gBRCA1 pathogenic variants. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study population included non-metastatic BC patients selected for genetic counselling at Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève (Jan. 1998 to Dec. 2017) with available mid-cycle blood counts performed during C1. The BOADICEA and Manchester scoring system risk-prediction models were applied. The primary outcome was the predicted likelihood of harbouring gBRCA1 pathogenic variants among patients presenting agranulocytosis during C1. RESULTS Three hundred seven BC patients were included: 32 (10.4%) gBRCA1, 27 (8.8%) gBRCA2, and 248 (81.1%) non-heterozygotes. Mean age at diagnosis was 40 years. Compared with non-heterozygotes, gBRCA1 heterozygotes more frequently had grade 3 BC (78.1%; p = 0.014), triple-negative subtype (68.8%; p <0.001), bilateral BC (25%; p = 0.004), and agranulocytosis following the first cycle of (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy (45.8%; p = 0.002). Agranulocytosis and febrile neutropenia that developed following the first cycle of chemotherapy were independently predictive for gBRCA1 pathogenic variants (odds ratio: 6.1; p = 0.002). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for agranulocytosis predicting gBRCA1 were 45.8% (25.6-67.2%), 82.8% (77.5-87.3%), 22.9% (6.1-37.3%), and 93.4% (88.9-96.4%), respectively. Agranulocytosis substantially improved the positive predictive value of the risk-prediction models used for gBRCA1 evaluation. CONCLUSION Agranulocytosis following the first cycle of (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy is an independent predictive factor for gBRCA1 detection in non-metastatic BC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noémie Lang
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aurélie Ayme
- Department of Diagnostics, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Chang Ming
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Damien Combes
- Infections and Cancer Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Victor N Chappuis
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alex Friedlaender
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aurélie Vuilleumier
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - José L Sandoval
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Valeria Viassolo
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Pierre O Chappuis
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Diagnostics, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - S Intidhar Labidi-Galy
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Diagnostics, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Flaum N, Crosbie EJ, Edmondson R, Woodward ER, Lalloo F, Smith MJ, Schlecht H, Evans DG. High detection rate from genetic testing in BRCA-negative women with familial epithelial ovarian cancer. Genet Med 2022; 24:2578-2586. [PMID: 36169650 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is associated with pathogenic variants (PVs) in homologous recombination and/or mismatch repair genes. We aimed to review the testing of women with familial EOC at our center. METHODS Women with familial EOC (≥2 EOC in family, including index case) referred to our center between 1993 and 2021 were included. Genetic testing (BRCA/Lynch syndrome screening, exome sequencing, panel testing, 100,000 Genome Project, and NIHR BioResource genome sequencing) and clinical demographic, diagnosis, and survival data were reviewed. RESULTS Of 277, 128 (46.2%) women were BRCA heterozygotes (BRCA1: 89, BRCA2: 39). The detection rate in BRCA-negative women was 21.8%; the most commonly affected gene was BRIP1 (5.9%). The non-BRCA detection rate was significantly higher in families with 2 affected members with EOC only (22.4%) than the families with ≥3 (11.1%) affected members (odds ratio = 9.9, 95% CI = 1.6-105.2, P = .0075). Overall, 112 different PVs in 12 homologous recombination/mismatch repair genes were detected in 150 of 277 (54.2%) unrelated women. CONCLUSION This is the largest report of women with familial EOC undergoing wider testing to date. One-fifth of BRCA-negative women were heterozygous for a PV in a potentially actionable gene. Wider genetic testing of women with familial EOC is essential to optimize their treatment and prevention of disease in family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Flaum
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, United Kingdom; North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, United Kingdom.
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Uunited Kingdom; Division of Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Uunited Kingdom; Division of Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Emma R Woodward
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Miriam J Smith
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, United Kingdom; North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, United Kingdom
| | - Helene Schlecht
- North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, United Kingdom
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, United Kingdom; North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, United Kingdom; Prevention Breast Cancer Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kulkarni A, Wafik M. Genomics makes prostate cancer personal. TRENDS IN UROLOGY & MEN'S HEALTH 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/tre.883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
12
|
Evans DGR, van Veen EM, Harkness EF, Brentnall AR, Astley SM, Byers H, Woodward ER, Sampson S, Southworth J, Howell SJ, Maxwell AJ, Newman WG, Cuzick J, Howell A. Breast cancer risk stratification in women of screening age: Incremental effects of adding mammographic density, polygenic risk, and a gene panel. Genet Med 2022; 24:1485-1494. [PMID: 35426792 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is great promise in breast cancer risk stratification to target screening and prevention. It is unclear whether adding gene panels to other risk tools improves breast cancer risk stratification and adds discriminatory benefit on a population basis. METHODS In total, 10,025 of 57,902 women aged 46 to 73 years in the Predicting Risk of Cancer at Screening study provided DNA samples. A case-control study was used to evaluate breast cancer risk assessment using polygenic risk scores (PRSs), cancer gene panel (n = 33), mammographic density (density residual [DR]), and risk factors collected using a self-completed 2-page questionnaire (Tyrer-Cuzick [TC] model version 8). In total, 525 cases and 1410 controls underwent gene panel testing and PRS calculation (18, 143, and/or 313 single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]). RESULTS Actionable pathogenic variants (PGVs) in BRCA1/2 were found in 1.7% of cases and 0.55% of controls, and overall PGVs were found in 6.1% of cases and 1.3% of controls. A combined assessment of TC8-DR-SNP313 and gene panel provided the best risk stratification with 26.1% of controls and 9.7% of cases identified at <1.4% 10-year risk and 9.01% of controls and 23.3% of cases at ≥8% 10-year risk. Because actionable PGVs were uncommon, discrimination was identical with/without gene panel (with/without: area under the curve = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.64-0.70). Only 7 of 17 PGVs in cases resulted in actionable risk category change. Extended case (n = 644)-control (n = 1779) series with TC8-DR-SNP143 identified 18.9% of controls and only 6.4% of stage 2+ cases at <1.4% 10-year risk and 20.7% of controls and 47.9% of stage 2+ cases at ≥5% 10-year risk. CONCLUSION Further studies and economic analysis will determine whether adding panels to PRS is a cost-effective strategy for risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Gareth R Evans
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Prevention Breast Cancer Unit and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (South), Manchester, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (Central), Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Cancer Prevention Early Detection Theme, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Elke M van Veen
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Elaine F Harkness
- Prevention Breast Cancer Unit and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (South), Manchester, United Kingdom; Cancer Prevention Early Detection Theme, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Adam R Brentnall
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Charterhouse Square, Barts and The London, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Susan M Astley
- Prevention Breast Cancer Unit and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (South), Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Cancer Prevention Early Detection Theme, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Byers
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Cancer Prevention Early Detection Theme, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Emma R Woodward
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Cancer Prevention Early Detection Theme, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Sampson
- Prevention Breast Cancer Unit and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (South), Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jake Southworth
- Prevention Breast Cancer Unit and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (South), Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sacha J Howell
- Prevention Breast Cancer Unit and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (South), Manchester, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Cancer Prevention Early Detection Theme, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony J Maxwell
- Prevention Breast Cancer Unit and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (South), Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Cancer Prevention Early Detection Theme, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - William G Newman
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (Central), Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Charterhouse Square, Barts and The London, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony Howell
- Prevention Breast Cancer Unit and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (South), Manchester, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Cancer Prevention Early Detection Theme, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alenezi WM, Fierheller CT, Revil T, Serruya C, Mes-Masson AM, Foulkes WD, Provencher D, El Haffaf Z, Ragoussis J, Tonin PN. Case Review: Whole-Exome Sequencing Analyses Identify Carriers of a Known Likely Pathogenic Intronic BRCA1 Variant in Ovarian Cancer Cases Clinically Negative for Pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13040697. [PMID: 35456503 PMCID: PMC9032308 DOI: 10.3390/genes13040697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Detecting pathogenic intronic variants resulting in aberrant splicing remains a challenge in routine genetic testing. We describe germline whole-exome sequencing (WES) analyses and apply in silico predictive tools of familial ovarian cancer (OC) cases reported clinically negative for pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Methods: WES data from 27 familial OC cases reported clinically negative for pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants and 53 sporadic early-onset OC cases were analyzed for pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2. WES data from carriers of pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants were analyzed for pathogenic variants in 10 other OC predisposing genes. Loss of heterozygosity analysis was performed on tumor DNA from variant carriers. Results: BRCA1 c.5407-25T>A intronic variant, identified in two affected sisters and one sporadic OC case, is predicted to create a new splice effecting transcription of BRCA1. WES data from BRCA1 c.5407-25T>A carriers showed no evidence of pathogenic variants in other OC predisposing genes. Sequencing the tumor DNA from the variant carrier showed complete loss of the wild-type allele. Conclusions: The findings support BRCA1 c.5407-25T>A as a likely pathogenic variant and highlight the importance of investigating intronic sequences as causal variants in OC families where the involvement of BRCA1 is highly suggestive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wejdan M. Alenezi
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada; (W.M.A.); (C.T.F.); (T.R.); (W.D.F.); (J.R.)
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada;
- Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Taibah University, Medina 42353, Saudi Arabia
| | - Caitlin T. Fierheller
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada; (W.M.A.); (C.T.F.); (T.R.); (W.D.F.); (J.R.)
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada;
| | - Timothée Revil
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada; (W.M.A.); (C.T.F.); (T.R.); (W.D.F.); (J.R.)
- McGill Genome Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Corinne Serruya
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada;
| | - Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
- Département de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada;
- Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada; (D.P.); (Z.E.H.)
| | - William D. Foulkes
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada; (W.M.A.); (C.T.F.); (T.R.); (W.D.F.); (J.R.)
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada;
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3H 1P3, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1G5, Canada
| | - Diane Provencher
- Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada; (D.P.); (Z.E.H.)
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Zaki El Haffaf
- Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada; (D.P.); (Z.E.H.)
- Service de Médecine Génique, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Jiannis Ragoussis
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada; (W.M.A.); (C.T.F.); (T.R.); (W.D.F.); (J.R.)
- McGill Genome Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Patricia N. Tonin
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada; (W.M.A.); (C.T.F.); (T.R.); (W.D.F.); (J.R.)
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada;
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(514)-934-1934 (ext. 44069)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Woodward ER, Green K, Burghel GJ, Bulman M, Clancy T, Lalloo F, Schlecht H, Wallace AJ, Evans DG. 30 year experience of index case identification and outcomes of cascade testing in high-risk breast and colorectal cancer predisposition genes. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:413-419. [PMID: 34866136 PMCID: PMC8645350 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-01011-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
It is 30 years since the first diagnostic cancer predisposition gene (CPG) test in the Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine (MCGM), providing opportunities for cancer prevention, early detection and targeted treatments in index cases and at-risk family members. Here, we present time trends (1990-2020) of identification of index cases with a germline CPG variant and numbers of subsequent cascade tests, for 15 high-risk breast and gastro-intestinal tract cancer-associated CPGs: BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, PTEN, TP53, APC, BMPR1a, CDH1, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, SMAD4, STK11 and MUTYH. We recorded 2082 positive index case diagnostic screening tests, generating 3216 positive and 3140 negative family cascade (non-index) tests. This is equivalent to an average of 3.05 subsequent cascade tests per positive diagnostic index test, with 1.54 positive and 1.51 negative non-index tests per family. The CPGs with the highest numbers of non-index positive cases identified on cascade testing were BRCA1/2 (n = 1999) and the mismatch repair CPGs associated with Lynch Syndrome (n = 731). These data are important for service provision and health economic assessment of CPG diagnostic testing, in terms of cancer prevention and early detection strategies, and identifying those likely to benefit from targeted treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma R Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Kate Green
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Michael Bulman
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Tara Clancy
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Helene Schlecht
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Andrew J Wallace
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Spectrum and frequency of CHEK2 variants in breast cancer affected and general population in the Baltic states region, initial results and literature review. Eur J Med Genet 2022; 65:104477. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2022.104477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
16
|
Ip E, Young AL, Scheinberg T, Harrison M, Beale P, Goodwin A. Evaluation of a mainstream genetic testing program for women with ovarian or breast cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2022; 18:e414-e419. [PMID: 35098668 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mainstream genetic testing refers to genetic testing arranged by a patient's treating specialist. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review a Sydney-based ovarian cancer mainstream genetic testing program. METHODS A Cancer Genetics Service (CGS)-supported mainstream genetic testing program was commenced in 2015. The CGS provided training, paperwork and ongoing and adaptable advice regarding appropriate genes for testing and interpretation of results. Written and electronic medical records were reviewed until August 2019 to assess patient and family history characteristics, genetic testing eligibility, results and posttest management for women who had testing coordinated via mainstreaming or by the CGS. RESULTS Genetic testing was arranged for 289 women with ovarian cancer. Prior to 2017, 44% of genetic tests were mainstreamed, compared with 76% of tests from 2017 onwards. CGS was more likely to arrange testing for women with a strong family history of cancer and nonserous pathology. Germline pathogenic variants were detected in 13.7% (19/138) of women who had mainstream testing and 20.3% (14/69) of women tested by the CGS. Referral for posttest counseling occurred for pathogenic variant carriers identified through mainstreaming. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated successful uptake of a mainstream ovarian cancer genetic testing program by medical oncologists, as evidenced by higher proportion and absolute numbers of eligible ovarian cancer patients accessing genetic testing through this pathway over time. The genetic testing criteria were appropriately assessed by oncologists and posttest referral occurred where required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Ip
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Cancer Genetics, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alison Luk Young
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Catalyst Translational Research Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tahlia Scheinberg
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Advanced Prostate Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Harrison
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Philip Beale
- Sydney Catalyst Translational Research Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Medical Oncology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Annabel Goodwin
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Medical Oncology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fierheller CT, Guitton-Sert L, Alenezi WM, Revil T, Oros KK, Gao Y, Bedard K, Arcand SL, Serruya C, Behl S, Meunier L, Fleury H, Fewings E, Subramanian DN, Nadaf J, Bruce JP, Bell R, Provencher D, Foulkes WD, El Haffaf Z, Mes-Masson AM, Majewski J, Pugh TJ, Tischkowitz M, James PA, Campbell IG, Greenwood CMT, Ragoussis J, Masson JY, Tonin PN. A functionally impaired missense variant identified in French Canadian families implicates FANCI as a candidate ovarian cancer-predisposing gene. Genome Med 2021; 13:186. [PMID: 34861889 PMCID: PMC8642877 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-021-00998-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Familial ovarian cancer (OC) cases not harbouring pathogenic variants in either of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 OC-predisposing genes, which function in homologous recombination (HR) of DNA, could involve pathogenic variants in other DNA repair pathway genes. Methods Whole exome sequencing was used to identify rare variants in HR genes in a BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant negative OC family of French Canadian (FC) ancestry, a population exhibiting genetic drift. OC cases and cancer-free individuals from FC and non-FC populations were investigated for carrier frequency of FANCI c.1813C>T; p.L605F, the top-ranking candidate. Gene and protein expression were investigated in cancer cell lines and tissue microarrays, respectively. Results In FC subjects, c.1813C>T was more common in familial (7.1%, 3/42) than sporadic (1.6%, 7/439) OC cases (P = 0.048). Carriers were detected in 2.5% (74/2950) of cancer-free females though female/male carriers were more likely to have a first-degree relative with OC (121/5249, 2.3%; Spearman correlation = 0.037; P = 0.011), suggesting a role in risk. Many of the cancer-free females had host factors known to reduce risk to OC which could influence cancer risk in this population. There was an increased carrier frequency of FANCI c.1813C>T in BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant negative OC families, when including the discovery family, compared to cancer-free females (3/23, 13%; OR = 5.8; 95%CI = 1.7–19; P = 0.005). In non-FC subjects, 10 candidate FANCI variants were identified in 4.1% (21/516) of Australian OC cases negative for pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, including 10 carriers of FANCI c.1813C>T. Candidate variants were significantly more common in familial OC than in sporadic OC (P = 0.04). Localization of FANCD2, part of the FANCI-FANCD2 (ID2) binding complex in the Fanconi anaemia (FA) pathway, to sites of induced DNA damage was severely impeded in cells expressing the p.L605F isoform. This isoform was expressed at a reduced level, destabilized by DNA damaging agent treatment in both HeLa and OC cell lines, and exhibited sensitivity to cisplatin but not to a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. By tissue microarray analyses, FANCI protein was consistently expressed in fallopian tube epithelial cells and only expressed at low-to-moderate levels in 88% (83/94) of OC samples. Conclusions This is the first study to describe candidate OC variants in FANCI, a member of the ID2 complex of the FA DNA repair pathway. Our data suggest that pathogenic FANCI variants may modify OC risk in cancer families. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-021-00998-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin T Fierheller
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3 J1, Canada
| | - Laure Guitton-Sert
- Genome Stability Laboratory, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Laval University Cancer Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Wejdan M Alenezi
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3 J1, Canada.,Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia
| | - Timothée Revil
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,McGill Genome Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kathleen K Oros
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yuandi Gao
- Genome Stability Laboratory, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Laval University Cancer Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Karine Bedard
- Laboratoire de Diagnostic Moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Département de pathologie et biologie cellulaire, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Suzanna L Arcand
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3 J1, Canada
| | - Corinne Serruya
- Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3 J1, Canada
| | - Supriya Behl
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Liliane Meunier
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hubert Fleury
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Eleanor Fewings
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Deepak N Subramanian
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Javad Nadaf
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,McGill Genome Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jeffrey P Bruce
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Bell
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Diane Provencher
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3 J1, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Zaki El Haffaf
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jacek Majewski
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Trevor J Pugh
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul A James
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,The Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian G Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Celia M T Greenwood
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jiannis Ragoussis
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,McGill Genome Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-Yves Masson
- Genome Stability Laboratory, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Laval University Cancer Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Patricia N Tonin
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. .,Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3 J1, Canada. .,Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Reisel D, Baran C, Manchanda R. Preventive population genomics: The model of BRCA related cancers. ADVANCES IN GENETICS 2021; 108:1-33. [PMID: 34844711 DOI: 10.1016/bs.adgen.2021.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Preventive population genomics offers the prospect of population stratification for targeting screening and prevention and tailoring care to those at greatest risk. Within cancer, this approach is now within reach, given our expanding knowledge of its heritable components, improved ability to predict risk, and increasing availability of effective preventive strategies. Advances in technology and bioinformatics has made population-testing technically feasible. The BRCA model provides 30 years of insight and experience of how to conceive of and construct care and serves as an initial model for preventive population genomics. Population-based BRCA-testing in the Jewish population is feasible, acceptable, reduces anxiety, does not detrimentally affect psychological well-being or quality of life, is cost-effective and is now beginning to be implemented. Population-based BRCA-testing and multigene panel testing in the wider general population is cost-effective for numerous health systems and can save thousands more lives than the current clinical strategy. There is huge potential for using both genetic and non-genetic information in complex risk prediction algorithms to stratify populations for risk adapted screening and prevention. While numerous strides have been made in the last decade several issues need resolving for population genomics to fulfil its promise and potential for maximizing precision prevention. Healthcare systems need to overcome significant challenges associated with developing delivery pathways, infrastructure expansion including laboratory services, clinical workforce training, scaling of management pathways for screening and prevention. Large-scale real world population studies are needed to evaluate context specific population-testing implementation models for cancer risk prediction, screening and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Reisel
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chawan Baran
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Health Services Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shen L, Zhang S, Wang K, Wang X. Familial Breast Cancer: Disease Related Gene Mutations and Screening Strategies for Chinese Population. Front Oncol 2021; 11:740227. [PMID: 34926254 PMCID: PMC8671637 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.740227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND About 5%-10% of the breast cancer cases have a hereditary background, and this subset is referred to as familial breast cancer (FBC). In this review, we summarize the susceptibility genes and genetic syndromes associated with FBC and discuss the FBC screening and high-risk patient consulting strategies for the Chinese population. METHODS We searched the PubMed database for articles published between January 2000 and August 2021. Finally, 380 pieces of literature addressing the genes and genetic syndromes related to FBC were included and reviewed. RESULTS We identified 16 FBC-related genes and divided them into three types (high-, medium-, and low-penetrance) of genes according to their relative risk ratios. In addition, six genetic syndromes were found to be associated with FBC. We then summarized the currently available screening strategies for FBC and discussed those available for high-risk Chinese populations. CONCLUSION Multiple gene mutations and genetic disorders are closely related to FBC. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend corresponding screening strategies for these genetic diseases. However, such guidelines for the Chinese population are still lacking. For screening high-risk groups in the Chinese population, genetic testing is recommended after genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Xiaochen Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Ministry of Education, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mampunye L, van der Merwe NC, Grant KA, Peeters AV, Torrorey-Sawe R, French DJ, Moremi KE, Kidd M, van Eeden PC, Pienaar FM, Kotze MJ. Pioneering BRCA1/2 Point-Of-Care Testing for Integration of Germline and Tumor Genetics in Breast Cancer Risk Management: A Vision for the Future of Translational Pharmacogenomics. Front Oncol 2021; 11:619817. [PMID: 34660253 PMCID: PMC8513538 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.619817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Research performed in South African (SA) breast, ovarian and prostate cancer patients resulted in the development of a rapid BRCA point-of-care (POC) assay designed as a time- and cost-effective alternative to laboratory-based technologies currently used for first-tier germline DNA testing. In this study the performance of the new assay was evaluated for use on a portable screening device (ParaDNA), with the long-term goal to enable rollout at POC as an inventive step to meet the World Health Organization’s sustainable development goals for Africa. DNA samples for germline testing were obtained retrospectively from 50 patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer referred for genomic tumor profiling (MammaPrint). Currently, SA patients with the luminal-type breast cancer are not routinely selected for BRCA1/2 testing as is the case for triple-negative disease. An initial evaluation involved the use of multiple control samples representing each of the pathogenic founder/recurrent variants included in the BRCA 1.0 POC Research Assay. Comparison with a validated laboratory-based first-tier real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay demonstrated 100% concordance. Clinical utility was evident in five patients with the founder BRCA2 c.7934delG variant, identified at the 10% (5/50) threshold considered cost-effective for BRCA1/2 testing. BRCA2 c.7934delG carrier status was associated with a significantly younger age (p=0.03) at diagnosis of breast cancer compared to non-carriers. In three of the BRCA2 c.7934delG carriers a high-risk MammaPrint 70-gene profile was noted, indicating a significantly increased risk for both secondary cancers and breast cancer recurrence. Initiating germline DNA testing at the POC for clinical interpretation early in the treatment planning process, will increase access to the most common pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants identified in SA and reduce loss to follow-up for timely gene-targeted risk reduction intervention. The ease of using cheek swabs/saliva in future for result generation within approximately one hour assay time, coupled with low cost and a high BRCA1/2 founder variant detection rate, will improve access to genomic medicine in Africa. Application of translational pharmacogenomics across ethnic groups, irrespective of age, family history, tumor subtype or recurrence risk profile, is imperative to sustainably implement preventative healthcare and improve clinical outcome in resource-constrained clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lwando Mampunye
- Division of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Wellness, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Nerina C van der Merwe
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa.,Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Kathleen A Grant
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Wellness, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Armand V Peeters
- Division of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Rispah Torrorey-Sawe
- Division of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.,Immunology Department, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya
| | - David J French
- Division of Health Science and Innovation, LGC Limited, Teddington, United Kingdom
| | - Kelebogile E Moremi
- Division of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Martin Kidd
- Centre for Statistical Consultation, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | | | | | - Maritha J Kotze
- Division of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.,Division of Chemical Pathology, National Health Laboratory Service, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bancroft EK, Raghallaigh HN, Page EC, Eeles RA. Updates in Prostate Cancer Research and Screening in Men at Genetically Higher Risk. CURRENT GENETIC MEDICINE REPORTS 2021; 9:47-58. [PMID: 34790437 PMCID: PMC8585808 DOI: 10.1007/s40142-021-00202-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Prostate cancer (PrCa) is the most common cancer in men in the western world and is a major source of morbidity and mortality. Currently, general population PrCa screening is not recommended due to the limitations of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. As such, there is increasing interest in identifying and screening higher-risk groups. The only established risk factors for PrCa are age, ethnicity, and having a family history of PrCa. A significant proportion of PrCa cases are caused by genetic factors. RECENT FINDINGS Several rare germline variants have been identified that moderately increase risk of PrCa, and targeting screening to these men is proving useful at detecting clinically significant disease. The use of a "polygenic risk score" (PRS) that can calculate a man's personalized risk based on a number of lower-risk, but common genetic variants is the subject of ongoing research. Research efforts are currently focusing on the utility of screening in specific at-risk populations based on ethnicity, such as men of Black Afro-Caribbean descent. Whilst most screening studies have focused on use of PSA testing, the incorporation of additional molecular and genomic biomarkers alongside increasingly sophisticated imaging modalities is being designed to further refine and individualise both the screening and diagnostic pathway. Approximately 10% of men with advanced PrCa have a germline genetic predisposition leading to the opportunity for novel, targeted precision treatments. SUMMARY The mainstreaming of genomics into the PrCa screening, diagnostic and treatment pathway will soon become standard practice and this review summarises current knowledge on genetic predisposition to PrCa and screening studies that are using genomics within their algorithms to target screening to higher-risk groups of men. Finally, we evaluate the importance of germline genetics beyond screening and diagnostics, and its role in the identification of lethal PrCa and in the selection of targeted treatments for advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth K. Bancroft
- Urology Genetics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Holly Ni Raghallaigh
- Urology Genetics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Elizabeth C. Page
- Urology Genetics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Rosalind A. Eeles
- Urology Genetics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, SM2 5NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gene Panel Testing for Breast Cancer Reveals Differential Effect of Prior BRCA1/2 Probability. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13164154. [PMID: 34439310 PMCID: PMC8394249 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Whilst panel testing of an extended group of genes including BRCA1/2 is commonplace, these studies have not been subdivided by histiotype or by a priori BRCA1/2 probability. Patients with a breast cancer diagnosis undergoing extended panel testing were assessed for frequency of actionable variants in breast cancer genes other than BRCA1/2 by histiotype and Manchester score (MS) to reflect a priori BRCA1/2 likelihood. Rates were adjusted by prior testing for BRCA1/2 in an extended series. 95/1398 (6.3%) who underwent panel testing were found to be positive for actionable non-BRCA1/2 breast/ovarian cancer genes (ATM, BARD1, CDH1, CHEK2, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, TP53). As expected, PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM were predominant with 80-(5.3%). The highest rate occurred in Grade-3 ER+/HER2- breast cancers-(9.6%). Rates of non-BRCA actionable genes was fairly constant over all likelihoods of BRCA1/2 but adjusted rates were three times higher with MS < 9 (BRCA1/2 = 1.5%, other = 4.7%), but was only 1.6% compared to 79.3% with MS ≥ 40. Although rates of detection of non-BRCA actionable genes are relatively constant across BRCA1/2 likelihoods this disguises an overall adjusted low frequency in high-likelihood families which have been heavily pre-tested for BRCA1/2. Any loss of detection sensitivity for BRCA1/2 actionable variants in breast cancer panels should lead to bespoke BRCA1/2 testing being conducted first.
Collapse
|
23
|
Meiser B, Woodward P, Gleeson M, Kentwell M, Fan HM, Antill Y, Butow PN, Boyle F, Best M, Taylor N, Bell K, Tucker K. Pilot study of an online training program to increase genetic literacy and communication skills in oncology healthcare professionals discussing BRCA1/2 genetic testing with breast and ovarian cancer patients. Fam Cancer 2021; 21:157-166. [PMID: 33970363 PMCID: PMC8107020 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00261-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The increasing use of genetic testing for BRCA1/2 and other pathogenic variants in the management of women with breast and ovarian cancer necessitates increased genetic literacy in oncology healthcare professionals. This pilot study aimed to evaluate an online training program to increase
genetic literacy and communication skills in Australian oncology healthcare professionals tasked with discussing and coordinating mainstream genetic testing with breast and ovarian cancer patients. A training website with embedded videos was developed. This study assesses the website’s acceptability and user-friendliness; suggestions for improvement were also elicited. Oncology healthcare professionals were recruited through relevant professional organisations, invited to the study by email, asked to work through the website and then complete an online questionnaire. Thirty-two oncology healthcare professionals completed the questionnaire after viewing the website. Nearly all participants were satisfied with the information contained in the program (very satisfied: n = 14/32, 44%, satisfied: n = 17/32, 53%, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied: n = 1/32, 3%) and reported that they had gained new skills (n = 29/32, 91%) and had increased confidence (n = 29/31, 94%) in communicating with breast and ovarian cancer patients about genetic testing. More than 93% (28/30) of participants endorsed the online program as clearly presented, informative, relevant and useful. This pilot study demonstrated high feasibility and acceptability of the training program to increase genetic literacy and communication skills in oncology healthcare professionals discussing genetic testing with breast and ovarian cancer patients. Further evidence from a randomised trial is needed to evaluate effects on changing clinical practice, improving patient outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Level 4, C25 Lowy Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| | | | | | - Maira Kentwell
- Parkville Familial Cancer Clinic, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helen Mar Fan
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Yoland Antill
- Parkville Familial Cancer Clinic, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Family Cancer Clinic, Monash Health, Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Phyllis N Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Frances Boyle
- School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Pam McLean Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Megan Best
- Institute for Ethics and Society, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Katy Bell
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kathy Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bennett S, Alexander E, Fraser H, Bowers N, Wallace A, Woodward ER, Lalloo F, Quinn AM, Huang S, Schlecht H, Evans DG. Germline FFPE inherited cancer panel testing in deceased family members: implications for clinical management of unaffected relatives. Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 29:861-871. [PMID: 33654310 PMCID: PMC8110779 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00817-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Where previously, germline genetic testing in deceased affected relatives was not possible due to the absence of lymphocytic DNA, the North-West-Genomic-Laboratory Hub (NWGLH) has developed and validated next-generation sequencing based gene panels utilising formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue DNA from deceased individuals. This technology has been utilised in the clinical setting for the management of unaffected relatives seen in the Clinical Genetics Service (CGS). Here we assess the clinical impact. At the time of data collection, the NWGLH had analysed 180 FFPE tissue samples from deceased affected individuals: 134 from breast and/or ovarian cancer cases for germline variants in the BRCA1/BRCA2 genes and 46 from colorectal, gastric, ovarian and endometrial cancer cases for germline variants in a panel of 13 genes implicated in inherited colorectal cancer and gastric cancer conditions. Successful analysis was achieved in 140/180 cases (78%). In total, 29 germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified in autosomal dominant cancer predisposition genes where the gene was pertinent to the cancer family history (including BRCA1/BRCA2, the mismatch-repair genes and APC). Of the 180 cases, the impact of the result on clinical management of unaffected relatives was known in 143 cases. Of these, the results in 54 cases (38%) directly impacted the clinical management of relatives seen by the CGS. This included changes to risk assessments, screening recommendations and the availability of predictive genetic testing to unaffected relatives. Our data demonstrate how FFPE testing in deceased relatives is an accurate and informative tool in the clinical management of patients referred to the CGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bennett
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Elizabeth Alexander
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Harry Fraser
- Northern Regional Genetic Service, Genetics Health Service New Zealand, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Naomi Bowers
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Health Innovation Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew Wallace
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Health Innovation Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma R. Woodward
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK ,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Health innovation Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Anne Marie Quinn
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Shuwen Huang
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Health Innovation Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Helene Schlecht
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Health Innovation Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK ,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Health innovation Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Woodward ER, van Veen EM, Evans DG. From BRCA1 to Polygenic Risk Scores: Mutation-Associated Risks in Breast Cancer-Related Genes. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16:202-213. [PMID: 34248461 DOI: 10.1159/000515319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There has been huge progress over the last 30 years in identifying the familial component of breast cancer. Summary Currently around 20% is explained by the high-risk genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, a further 2% by other high-penetrance genes, and around 5% by the moderate risk genes ATM and CHEK2. In contrast, the more than 300 low-penetrance single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) now account for around 28% and they are predicted to account for most of the remaining 45% yet to be found. Even for high-risk genes which confer a 40-90% risk of breast cancer, these SNP can substantially affect the level of breast cancer risk. Indeed, the strength of family history and hormonal and reproductive factors is very important in assessing risk even for a BRCA carrier. The risks of contralateral breast cancer are also affected by SNP as well as by the presence of high or moderate risk genes. Genetic testing using gene panels is now commonplace. Key-Messages There is a need for a more parsimonious approach to panels only testing those genes with a definite 2-fold increased risk and only testing those genes with challenging management implications, such as CDH1 and TP53, when there is strong clinical indication to do so. Testing of SNP alongside genes is likely to provide a more accurate risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma R Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Elke M van Veen
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.,PREVENT Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, Nightingale Centre, Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, The Christie, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Purpose: Lobular breast cancer (LBC) accounts for ~ 15% of breast cancer. Here, we studied the frequency of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in an extended panel of genes in women affected with LBC. Methods: 302 women with LBC and 1567 without breast cancer were tested for BRCA1/2 PGVs. A subset of 134 LBC affected women who tested negative for BRCA1/2 PGVs underwent extended screening, including: ATM, CDH1, CHEK2, NBN, PALB2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51D, and TP53.Results: 35 PGVs were identified in the group with LBC, of which 22 were in BRCA1/2. Ten actionable PGVs were identified in additional genes (ATM(4), CDH1(1), CHEK2(1), PALB2(2) and TP53(2)). Overall, PGVs in three genes conferred a significant increased risk for LBC. Odds ratios (ORs) were: BRCA1: OR = 13.17 (95%CI 2.83–66.38; P = 0.0017), BRCA2: OR = 10.33 (95%CI 4.58–23.95; P < 0.0001); and ATM: OR = 8.01 (95%CI 2.52–29.92; P = 0.0053). We did not detect an increased risk of LBC for PALB2, CDH1 or CHEK2. Conclusion: The overall PGV detection rate was 11.59%, with similar rates of BRCA1/2 (7.28%) PGVs as for other actionable PGVs (7.46%), indicating a benefit for extended panel genetic testing in LBC. We also report a previously unrecognised association of pathogenic variants in ATM with LBC.
Collapse
|
27
|
Evans DG, van Veen EM, Byers HJ, Evans SJ, Burghel GJ, Woodward ER, Harkness EF, Eccles DM, Greville-Haygate SL, Ellingford JM, Bowers NL, Pereira M, Wallace AJ, Howell SJ, Howell A, Lalloo F, Newman WG, Smith MJ. High likelihood of actionable pathogenic variant detection in breast cancer genes in women with very early onset breast cancer. J Med Genet 2021; 59:115-121. [PMID: 33758026 PMCID: PMC8788257 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background While the likelihood of identifying constitutional breast cancer-associated BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 pathogenic variants (PVs) increases with earlier diagnosis age, little is known about the correlation with age at diagnosis in other predisposition genes. Here, we assessed the contribution of known breast cancer-associated genes to very early onset disease. Methods Sequencing of BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53 and CHEK2 c.1100delC was undertaken in women with breast cancer diagnosed ≤30 years. Those testing negative were screened for PVs in a minimum of eight additional breast cancer-associated genes. Rates of PVs were compared with cases ≤30 years from the Prospective study of Outcomes in Sporadic vs Hereditary breast cancer (POSH) study. Results Testing 379 women with breast cancer aged ≤30 years identified 75 PVs (19.7%) in BRCA1, 35 (9.2%) in BRCA2, 22 (5.8%) in TP53 and 2 (0.5%) CHEK2 c.1100delC. Extended screening of 184 PV negative women only identified eight additional actionable PVs. BRCA1/2 PVs were more common in women aged 26–30 years than in younger women (p=0.0083) although the younger age group had rates more similar to those in the POSH cohort. Out of 26 women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) alone, most were high-grade and 11/26 (42.3%) had a PV (TP53=6, BRCA2=2, BRCA1=2, PALB2=1). This PV yield is similar to the 61 (48.8%) BRCA1/2 PVs identified in 125 women with triple-negative breast cancer. The POSH cohort specifically excluded pure DCIS which may explain lower TP53 PV rates in this group (1.7%). Conclusion The rates of BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 PVs are high in very early onset breast cancer, with limited benefit from testing of additional breast cancer-associated genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK .,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester, University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Elke Maria van Veen
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen J Byers
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah J Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Histopathology, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma Roisin Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Elaine F Harkness
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester, University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Diana M Eccles
- University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Jamie M Ellingford
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Naomi L Bowers
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Marta Pereira
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew J Wallace
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Sasha J Howell
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester, University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester, University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - William G Newman
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Miriam Jane Smith
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Loza P, Irmejs A, Daneberga Z, Miklasevics E, Berga-Svitina E, Subatniece S, Maksimenko J, Trofimovics G, Tauvena E, Ukleikins S, Gardovskis J. A novel frequent BRCA1 recurrent variant c.5117G > A (p.Gly1206Glu) identified after 20 years of BRCA1/2 research in the Baltic region: cohort study and literature review. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2021; 19:11. [PMID: 33468216 PMCID: PMC7814703 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-021-00168-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Several recent studies in the Baltic region have found extended spectrum of pathogenic variants (PV) of the BRCA1/2 genes. The aim of current study is to analyze the spectrum of the BRCA1/2 PV in population of Latvia and to compare common PV between populations of the Baltic region. Methods We present a cohort of 9543 unrelated individuals including ones with cancer and unaffected individuals from population of Latvia, who were tested for three most common BRCA1 founder PV. In second line testing, 164 founder negative high-risk individuals were tested for PV of the BRCA1/2 using next generation sequencing (NGS). Local spectrum of the BRCA1/2 PV was compared with the Baltic region by performing a literature review. Results Founder PV c.5266dupC, c.4035delA or c.181 T > G was detected in 369/9543 (3.9%) cases. Other BRCA1/2 PV were found in 44/164 (26.8%) of NGS cases. Four recurrent BRCA1 variants c.5117G > A (p.Gly1706Glu), c.4675G > A (p.Glu1559Lys), c.5503C > T (p.Arg1835*) and c.1961delA (p.Lys654fs) were detected in 18/44 (41.0%), 5/44 (11.4%), 2/44 (4.5%) and 2/44 (4.5%) cases respectively. Additionally, 11 BRCA1 PV and six BRCA2 PV were each found in single family. Conclusions By combining three studies by our group of the same cohort in Latvia, frequency of the BRCA1/2 PV for unselected breast and ovarian cancer cases is 241/5060 (4.8%) and 162/1067 (15.2%) respectively. The frequency of three “historical” founder PV is up to 87.0% (369/424). Other non-founder PV contribute to at least 13.0% (55/424) and this proportion probably will rise by increasing numbers of the BRCA1/2 sequencing. In relative numbers, c.5117G > A is currently the third most frequent PV of the BRCA1 in population of Latvia, overcoming previously known third most common founder variant c.181 T > G. In addition to three BRCA1 founder PV, a total of five recurrent BRCA1 and two recurrent BRCA2 PV have been reported in population of Latvia so far. Many of the BRCA1/2 PV reported in Latvia are shared among other populations of the Baltic region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Loza
- Riga Stradins University, Institute of Oncology, Riga, Latvia. .,Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
| | - A Irmejs
- Riga Stradins University, Institute of Oncology, Riga, Latvia
| | - Z Daneberga
- Riga Stradins University, Institute of Oncology, Riga, Latvia
| | - E Miklasevics
- Riga Stradins University, Institute of Oncology, Riga, Latvia
| | - E Berga-Svitina
- Riga Stradins University, Institute of Oncology, Riga, Latvia
| | - S Subatniece
- Riga Stradins University, Institute of Oncology, Riga, Latvia
| | - J Maksimenko
- Riga Stradins University, Institute of Oncology, Riga, Latvia
| | - G Trofimovics
- Department of Surgery, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - E Tauvena
- Department of Surgery, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - S Ukleikins
- Department of Surgery, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - J Gardovskis
- Department of Surgery, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Long-Term Evaluation of Women Referred to a Breast Cancer Family History Clinic (Manchester UK 1987-2020). Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123697. [PMID: 33317064 PMCID: PMC7763143 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This study reports the management of women at high risk for breast cancer over a 33 years period. The aim was to summarize the numbers seen and to report the results of our studies on gene testing, the outcomes of screening and the success of preventive methods including lifestyle change, chemoprevention and risk-reducing mastectomy. We also discuss how the clinical Family History Service may be improved in the future. Abstract Clinics for women concerned about their family history of breast cancer are widely established. A Family History Clinic was set-up in Manchester, UK, in 1987 in a Breast Unit serving a population of 1.8 million. In this review, we report the outcome of risk assessment, screening and prevention strategies in the clinic and propose future approaches. Between 1987–2020, 14,311 women were referred, of whom 6.4% were from known gene families, 38.2% were at high risk (≥30% lifetime risk), 37.7% at moderate risk (17–29%), and 17.7% at an average/population risk who were discharged. A total of 4168 (29.1%) women were eligible for genetic testing and 736 carried pathogenic variants, predominantly in BRCA1 and BRCA2 but also other genes (5.1% of direct referrals). All women at high or moderate risk were offered annual mammographic screening between ages 30 and 40 years old: 646 cancers were detected in women at high and moderate risk (5.5%) with a detection rate of 5 per 1000 screens. Incident breast cancers were largely of good prognosis and resulted in a predicted survival advantage. All high/moderate-risk women were offered lifestyle prevention advice and 14–27% entered various lifestyle studies. From 1992–2003, women were offered entry into IBIS-I (tamoxifen) and IBIS-II (anastrozole) trials (12.5% of invitees joined). The NICE guidelines ratified the use of tamoxifen and raloxifene (2013) and subsequently anastrozole (2017) for prevention; 10.8% women took up the offer of such treatment between 2013–2020. Since 1994, 7164 eligible women at ≥25% lifetime risk of breast cancer were offered a discussion of risk-reducing breast surgery and 451 (6.2%) had surgery. New approaches in all aspects of the service are needed to build on these results.
Collapse
|
30
|
Benusiglio PR, Korenbaum C, Vibert R, Ezenfis J, Geoffron S, Paul C, Richard S, Byrde V, Lejeune M, Guillerm E, Basset N, Lotz JP, Chabbert-Buffet N, Gligorov J, Coulet F. Utility of a mainstreamed genetic testing pathway in breast and ovarian cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Med Genet 2020; 63:104098. [PMID: 33186762 PMCID: PMC7654320 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2020.104098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mainstreamed genetic testing (MGT) obviates the need for a cancer genetics consultation, since trained oncologists (O) and gynaecologists (G) provide counseling, prescribe testing and deliver results. We report results from our MGT program and emphasize its utility during the COVID-19 lockdown, when cancer genetics clinics had suspended their activity. METHODS An MGT pathway for breast and ovarian cancer (BC/OC) patients was established in Jan-2018 between the Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.Sorbonne Université Cancer Genetics team and the Oncology/Gynecology departments at one teaching and two regional hospitals. Trained O + G evaluated patients with the Manchester Scoring System. A 12-point threshold was recommended for testing. Next-generation sequencing of BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C and RAD51D was performed. Results were delivered to the patient by O/G. Pathogenic variants (PV) carriers were referred to the genetics clinic. Results are reported for the 2nd-Jan-2018 to 1st-June-2020 period. That includes the eight-week COVID-19 lockdown and three-week de-confinement phase 1. RESULTS Results were available for 231/234 patients. Twenty-eight (12.1%) carried a PV. Of the 27 patients tested during the COVID-19 period, three carried a PV, two in BRCA1 and one in RAD51C. The clinical impact was immediate for the two BRCA1 BC cases undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, since double mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy will now be performed using two-step strategies. CONCLUSIONS MGT guaranteed care continuity in BC/OC patients during the critical phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, with immediate implications for PV carriers. More broadly, we report for the first time the successful implementation of MGT in France.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick R Benusiglio
- UF d'Oncogénétique, Département de Génétique et Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, F-75013 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938 et SIRIC CURAMUS, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Equipe Instabilité des Microsatellites et Cancer, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, F-75012 Paris, France; Réseau Sein à Risque AP-HP, Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et de Médecine de la Reproduction, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, F-75020 Paris, France.
| | - Clément Korenbaum
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, F-75020 Paris, France
| | - Roseline Vibert
- UF d'Oncogénétique, Département de Génétique et Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Joël Ezenfis
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien, avenue Serge Dassault, F-91106 Corbeil-Essonnes, France
| | - Sophie Geoffron
- Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Groupe Hospitalier de l'Est Francilien, Site Marne-la-Vallée, 2-4 Cours de la Gondoire, F-77600 Jossigny, France
| | - Charlotte Paul
- Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Groupe Hospitalier de l'Est Francilien, Site Marne-la-Vallée, 2-4 Cours de la Gondoire, F-77600 Jossigny, France
| | - Sandrine Richard
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, F-75020 Paris, France
| | - Veronique Byrde
- Réseau Sein à Risque AP-HP, Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et de Médecine de la Reproduction, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, F-75020 Paris, France
| | - Manon Lejeune
- UF d'Oncogénétique, Département de Génétique et Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Erell Guillerm
- UF d'Oncogénétique, Département de Génétique et Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Noemie Basset
- UF d'Oncogénétique, Département de Génétique et Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Lotz
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, F-75020 Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet
- Réseau Sein à Risque AP-HP, Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et de Médecine de la Reproduction, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, F-75020 Paris, France
| | - Joseph Gligorov
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, F-75020 Paris, France
| | - Florence Coulet
- UF d'Oncogénétique, Département de Génétique et Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, F-75013 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938 et SIRIC CURAMUS, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Equipe Instabilité des Microsatellites et Cancer, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, F-75012 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Flaum N, Morgan RD, Burghel GJ, Bulman M, Clamp AR, Hasan J, Mitchell CL, Badea D, Moon S, Hogg M, Hadjiyiannakis D, Clancy T, Schlecht H, Woodward ER, Crosbie EJ, Edmondson RJ, Wallace AJ, Jayson GC, Lalloo FI, Harkness EF, Evans DGR. Mainstreaming germline BRCA1/2 testing in non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer in the North West of England. Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 28:1541-1547. [PMID: 32651552 PMCID: PMC7575602 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0692-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 06/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors improve survival in BRCA-mutant high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. As a result, germline and somatic BRCA1/2 testing has become standard practice in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. We outline changes in testing and detection rates of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) in cases of non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed during three eras, spanning 12 years, within the North West of England, and compare the uptake of cascade testing in families identified by oncology-led mainstreaming versus regional genetics clinics. Eras included: Period 1 (20% risk threshold for testing): between January 2007 and May 2013; Period 2 (10% risk threshold for testing): between June 2013 and October 2017 and; Period 3 (mainstream testing): between November 2017 and November 2019. A total of 1081 women underwent germline BRCA1/2 testing between January 2007 and November 2019 and 222 (20.5%) were found to have a PV. The monthly testing rate increased by 3.3-fold and 2.5-fold between Periods 1-2 and Periods 2-3, respectively. A similar incidence of germline BRCA1/2 PVs were detected in Period 2 (17.2%) and Period 3 (18.5%). Uptake of cascade testing from first-degree relatives was significantly lower in those women undergoing mainstream testing compared with those tested in regional genetics clinics (31.6% versus 47.3%, P = 0.038). Mainstream testing allows timely detection of germline BRCA1/2 status to select patients for PARP inhibitors, but shortfalls in the uptake of cascade testing in first-degree relatives requires optimisation to broaden benefits within families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Flaum
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Robert D Morgan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - George J Burghel
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael Bulman
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | - Doina Badea
- Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, UK
| | - Sarah Moon
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Martin Hogg
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Dennis Hadjiyiannakis
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Tara Clancy
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Helene Schlecht
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma R Woodward
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard J Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew J Wallace
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Gordon C Jayson
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona I Lalloo
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Elaine F Harkness
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - D Gareth R Evans
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Uzan C, Ndiaye-Guèye D, Nikpayam M, Oueld Es Cheikh E, Lebègue G, Canlorbe G, Azais H, Gonthier C, Belghiti J, Benusiglio PR, Séroussi B, Gligorov J, Uzan S. [First results of a breast cancer risk assessment and management consultation]. Bull Cancer 2020; 107:972-981. [PMID: 32977936 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In France, participation in the organized breast cancer screening program remains insufficient. A personalized approach adapted to the risk factors for breast cancer (RBC) should make screening more efficient. A RBC evaluation consultation would therefore make it possible to personalize this screening. Here we report our initial experience. MATERIAL AND METHOD This is a prospective study on women who were seen at the RBC evaluation consultation and analyzing: their profile, their risk assessed according to Tyrer Cuzick model (TC)±Mammorisk© (MMR), the existence of an indication of oncogenetic consultation (Eisinger and Manchester score), their satisfaction and the recommended monitoring. RESULTS Among the women who had had a TCS and/or MMR evaluation of SCR (n=153), 76 (50%) had a high risk (n=67) or a very high risk (n=9). Almost half (47%) had a possible (15%) or certain (32%) indication to an oncogenetic consultation. Regarding this consultation, 98% of women were satisfied or very satisfied. In total, 60% of women had a change in screening methods. CONCLUSION This RBC evaluation consultation satisfies women and for a majority of them, modifies their methods of breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Uzan
- AP-HP, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, service de chirurgie et cancérologie gynécologique et mammaire, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; Inserm UMR S938 « Biologie et thérapeutique des cancers », Paris, France; AP-HP, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne Université (IUC AP-HP.SU), Paris, France.
| | - Diaretou Ndiaye-Guèye
- AP-HP, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne Université (IUC AP-HP.SU), Paris, France
| | - Marianne Nikpayam
- AP-HP, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, service de chirurgie et cancérologie gynécologique et mammaire, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; AP-HP, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne Université (IUC AP-HP.SU), Paris, France
| | - Eva Oueld Es Cheikh
- AP-HP, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, service de chirurgie et cancérologie gynécologique et mammaire, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; AP-HP, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne Université (IUC AP-HP.SU), Paris, France
| | - Geraldine Lebègue
- AP-HP, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, service de chirurgie et cancérologie gynécologique et mammaire, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; AP-HP, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne Université (IUC AP-HP.SU), Paris, France
| | - Geoffroy Canlorbe
- AP-HP, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, service de chirurgie et cancérologie gynécologique et mammaire, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; Inserm UMR S938 « Biologie et thérapeutique des cancers », Paris, France; AP-HP, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne Université (IUC AP-HP.SU), Paris, France
| | - Henri Azais
- AP-HP, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, service de chirurgie et cancérologie gynécologique et mammaire, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Clementine Gonthier
- AP-HP, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, service de chirurgie et cancérologie gynécologique et mammaire, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Jeremie Belghiti
- AP-HP, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, service de chirurgie et cancérologie gynécologique et mammaire, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; AP-HP, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne Université (IUC AP-HP.SU), Paris, France
| | - Patrick R Benusiglio
- AP-HP, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne Université (IUC AP-HP.SU), Paris, France; AP-HP, groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, département de génétique, UF d'oncogénétique, Paris, France
| | - Brigitte Séroussi
- AP-HP, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne Université (IUC AP-HP.SU), Paris, France; Département de santé publique, Tenon, France; Sorbonne Université, université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, UMR S_1142, LIMICS, Paris, France
| | - Joseph Gligorov
- Inserm UMR S938 « Biologie et thérapeutique des cancers », Paris, France; AP-HP, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne Université (IUC AP-HP.SU), Paris, France; AP-HP Tenon, Sorbonne Université, oncologie médicale, Paris, France
| | - Serge Uzan
- AP-HP, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne Université (IUC AP-HP.SU), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Peixoto A, Pinto P, Guerra J, Pinheiro M, Santos C, Pinto C, Santos R, Escudeiro C, Bartosch C, Canário R, Barbosa A, Gouveia A, Petiz A, Abreu MH, Sousa S, Pereira D, Silva J, Teixeira MR. Tumor Testing for Somatic and Germline BRCA1/ BRCA2 Variants in Ovarian Cancer Patients in the Context of Strong Founder Effects. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1318. [PMID: 32850417 PMCID: PMC7412538 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Deleterious variants in the BRCA1/BRCA2 genes and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status are considered strong predictors of response to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi). The introduction of PARPi in clinical practice for the treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer imposed changes in the molecular diagnosis of BRCA1/BRCA2 variants. BRCA1/BRCA2 tumor testing by next-generation sequencing (NGS) can detect simultaneously both somatic and germline variants, allowing the identification of more patients with higher likelihood of benefiting from PARPi. Our main goal was to determine the frequency of somatic and germline BRCA1/BRCA2 variants in a series of non-mucinous OC, and to define the best strategy to be implemented in a routine diagnostic setting for the screening of germline/somatic variants in these genes, including the BRCA2 c.156_157insAlu Portuguese founder variant. We observed a frequency of 19.3% of deleterious variants, 13.3% germline, and 5.9% somatic. A higher prevalence of pathogenic variants was observed in patients diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (23.2%). Considering the frequencies of the c.3331_3334del and the c.2037delinsCC BRCA1 variants observed in this study (73% of all BRCA1 pathogenic germline variants identified) and the limitations of NGS to detect the BRCA2 c.156_157insAlu variant, it might be cost-effective to test for these founder variants with a specific test prior to tumor screening of the entire coding regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 by NGS in patients of Portuguese ancestry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Peixoto
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Pinto
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Joana Guerra
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Manuela Pinheiro
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Catarina Santos
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Carla Pinto
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Rui Santos
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Carla Escudeiro
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Carla Bartosch
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, CI-IPOP, IPO Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rita Canário
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, CI-IPOP, IPO Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Epithelial Interactions in Cancer Lab, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (I3S)/Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade Do Porto (IPATIMUP), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Graduate Program in Areas of Basic and Applied Biology, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Barbosa
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Alfredo Gouveia
- Department of Gynecology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Almerinda Petiz
- Department of Gynecology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Miguel Henriques Abreu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Susana Sousa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Deolinda Pereira
- Department of Medical Oncology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - João Silva
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Yuen J, Cousens N, Barlow-Stewart K, O'Shea R, Andrews L. Online BRCA1/2 screening in the Australian Jewish community: a qualitative study. J Community Genet 2020; 11:291-302. [PMID: 31879826 PMCID: PMC7295878 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-019-00450-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Screening programmes for BRCA1/2 Jewish Founder mutations (JFM) in the Jewish community have been advocated internationally. Implementation of these programmes could decrease morbidity and mortality of BRCA1/2 JFM carriers through the uptake of cancer screening strategies and risk-reducing surgery. An online programme offered to the Sydney Jewish community that delivers pre-test information and collects consent for BRCA1/2 JFM testing via a website is currently being evaluated (JeneScreen). Forty-three participants from JeneScreen were invited to participate in a sub-study, of semi-structured pre- and post-result telephone interviews. Eleven participants consented to the sub-study. The interviews explored their experiences regarding the online model of obtaining pre-test genetic information, giving consent and receiving results. Inductive thematic analysis was carried out on the interviews. Overarching themes identified include (1) embracing online testing, (2) the online pre-test experience, (3) the result notification experience, (4) concerns associated with online testing and (5) testing as a responsibility. Overall, participants were highly satisfied with online BRCA1/2 JFM testing, an indication that the a website for pre-test information provision is an acceptable alternative to in-person genetic counselling for BRCA1/2 JFM screening and represents a feasible model for future community screening efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette Yuen
- Discipline Genetic Medicine, Sydney Medical School, Northern, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Third Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
| | - Nicole Cousens
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Rosie O'Shea
- Discipline Genetic Medicine, Sydney Medical School, Northern, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Discipline of Genetic Counselling, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lesley Andrews
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Scott N, O'Sullivan J, Asgeirsson K, Macmillan D, Wilson E. Changing practice: moving to a specialist nurse-led service for BRCA gene testing. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 29:S6-S13. [DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.10.s6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Some 5–10% of all breast cancers are associated with a pathogenic variant in a breast cancer-associated gene (BRCA1/BRCA2). Historically, with referral to the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust's clinical genetics department for genetic testing, waiting times were on average 12–14 weeks for an initial appointment and 4–6 months to obtain results from the date of testing. A specialist, nurse-led mainstreaming cancer genetics (MCG) service was set up in the trust's Nottingham Breast Institute (NBI) to: reduce waiting times for the initial consultation, counselling, consent and obtaining results for BRCA1/BRCA2 gene testing; and to ensure appropriate patients with breast cancer were offered genetic testing. Two breast clinical nurse specialists were trained so they could counsel, consent and give results for the BRCA1/BRCA2 gene testing directly to patients. Average waiting times for results from the time of testing were reduced to 35.8 days under the nurse-led service, which enabled oncologists and patients to consider individual treatment options at an earlier time. The MCG service reduced waiting times, resulting in an improved, more streamlined service for patients undergoing genetic testing. The MCG service extended the scope of practice of the breast nurse clinical specialists, embedded an expert advanced nursing role in the breast multidisciplinary team and developed nurse mentoring opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Scott
- Breast Clinical Nurse Specialist and Specialist in Breast Family History, Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Jackie O'Sullivan
- Breast Clinical Nurse Specialist and Specialist in Breast Family History, Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Kristjan Asgeirsson
- Consultant Oncoplastic Breast Surgeon, Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Douglas Macmillan
- Consultant Oncoplastic Breast Surgeon, Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Emma Wilson
- Associate Professor in Public Health, University of Nottingham
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Genetic Testing for Cancer Predisposition Syndromes in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs). CURRENT GENETIC MEDICINE REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40142-020-00187-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
37
|
Høberg-Vetti H, Ognedal E, Buisson A, Vamre TBA, Ariansen S, Hoover JM, Eide GE, Houge G, Fiskerstrand T, Haukanes BI, Bjorvatn C, Knappskog PM. The intronic BRCA1 c.5407-25T>A variant causing partly skipping of exon 23-a likely pathogenic variant with reduced penetrance? Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 28:1078-1086. [PMID: 32203205 PMCID: PMC7382492 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0612-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Rare sequence variants in the non-coding part of the BRCA genes are often reported as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), which leave patients and doctors in a challenging position. The aim of this study was to determine the pathogenicity of the BRCA1 c.5407-25T>A variant found in 20 families from Norway, France and United States with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. This was done by combining clinical and family information with allele frequency data, and assessment of the variant’s effect on mRNA splicing. Mean age at breast (n = 12) and ovarian (n = 11) cancer diagnosis in female carriers was 49.9 and 60.4 years, respectively. The mean Manchester score in the 20 families was 16.4. The allele frequency of BRCA1 c.5407-25T>A was 1/64,566 in non-Finnish Europeans (gnomAD database v2.1.1). We found the variant in 1/400 anonymous Norwegian blood donors and 0/784 in-house exomes. Sequencing of patient-derived cDNA from blood, normal breast and ovarian tissue showed that BRCA1 c.5407-25T>A leads to skipping of exon 23, resulting in frameshift and protein truncation: p.(Gly1803GlnfsTer11). Western blot analysis of transiently expressed BRCA1 proteins in HeLa cells showed a reduced amount of the truncated protein compared with wild type. Noteworthily, we found that a small amount of full-length transcript was also generated from the c.5407-25T>A allele, potentially explaining the intermediate cancer burden in families carrying this variant. In summary, our results show that BRCA1 c.5407-25T>A leads to partial skipping of exon 23, and could represent a likely pathogenic variant with reduced penetrance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hildegunn Høberg-Vetti
- Western Norway Familial Cancer Center, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. .,Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. .,Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Elisabet Ognedal
- Western Norway Familial Cancer Center, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | - Sarah Ariansen
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Geir Egil Eide
- Centre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Gunnar Houge
- Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Torunn Fiskerstrand
- Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bjørn Ivar Haukanes
- Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Cathrine Bjorvatn
- Western Norway Familial Cancer Center, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Research and Development, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Per Morten Knappskog
- Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Evans O, Gaba F, Manchanda R. Population-based genetic testing for Women's cancer prevention. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 65:139-153. [PMID: 32245629 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Germline mutations in cancer-susceptibility-genes (CSG) can dramatically increase womens' lifetime risk of ovarian, endometrial, breast and bowel cancers. Identification of unaffected carriers is important to enable proactive engagement with highly effective screening and preventive options to minimise cancer risk. Currently, a family-history model is used to identify individuals with CSGs. Complex regional referral guidelines specify the family-history criteria required before an individual is eligible for genetic-testing. This model is ineffective, resource intense, misses >50% CSG carriers, is associated with underutilisation of genetic-testing services and delays detection of mutation carriers. Although awareness and detection of CSG-carriers has improved, over 97% carriers remain unidentified. This reflects significant missed opportunities for precision-prevention. Population-based genetic-testing (PBGT) represents a novel healthcare strategy with the potential to dramatically improve detection of unaffected CSG-carriers along with enabling population risk-stratification for cancer precision-prevention. Several research studies have assessed the impact, feasibility, acceptability, long-term psychological outcomes and cost-effectiveness of population-based BRCA-testing in the Ashkenazi-Jewish population. Initial data on PBGT in the general-population is beginning to emerge and large implementation studies investigating PBGT in the general-population are needed. This review will summarise the current research into the clinical, psycho-social, health-economic, societal and ethical consequences of a PBGT model for women's cancer precision-prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Evans
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, EC1A 7BE, London, UK
| | - Faiza Gaba
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, EC1A 7BE, London, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, EC1A 7BE, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
[Clinical Cancer Genetics: A guide for the pathologist]. Ann Pathol 2020; 40:63-69. [PMID: 32046877 DOI: 10.1016/j.annpat.2020.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
It is paramount to identify patients whose cancer is associated with genetic susceptibility to the disease, since their long-term management depends on it. Anatomical and molecular pathologists play a key role in the process. Indeed, their diagnosis supports or even sometimes warrants germline genetic testing. For example, a colorectal cancer with mismatch repair protein expression loss suggests Lynch syndrome, while a rare type of renal cell carcinoma with fumarate hydrate expression loss is highly evocative of hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma syndrome. Similarly, the presence of the T790M EGFR variant before treatment in a non-small-cell lung carcinoma warrants further testing as the variant is likely of germline origin. Patients with suspected genetic susceptibility to cancer are referred to the nearest clinical cancer genetics clinic. The cancer geneticist, assisted by a genetic counsellor, then collects detailed personal and familial information, sometimes feeds them into bioinformatics tools or clinico-pathological scores, decides whether germline genetic analysis is justified, determines which genes should be analysed and prescribes testing. Germline testing is carried out on a blood sample by expert laboratories using next generation sequencing on panels of cancer susceptibility genes. The cancer geneticists then return the result to the patient. When a pathogenic variant is identified, the patient's management is modified, with recommendations ranging from intensified surveillance to risk-reducing surgery. Treatment is sometimes adapted to the pathogenic variant. In addition, relatives can undergo genetic testing, should they wish to know whether they carry the familial variant. In the near future, we expect clinical cancer genetics to move towards strengthened partnerships with molecular pathologists and medical oncologists. Somatic genetic analyses are now routine, at least in metastatic cancer, and a proportion of the tumoral variants identified are actually of germline origin. As for the oncologists, the development of mainstreaming programs where they are allowed to prescribe germline testing under the supervision of a cancer genetics team is unavoidable.
Collapse
|
40
|
McVeigh ÚM, McVeigh TP, Curran C, Miller N, Morris DW, Kerin MJ. Diagnostic yield of a custom-designed multi-gene cancer panel in Irish patients with breast cancer. Ir J Med Sci 2020; 189:849-864. [PMID: 32008151 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-020-02174-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is genetically heterogeneous, and parellel multi-gene sequencing is the most cost- and time-efficient manner to investigate breast cancer predisposition. Numerous multi-gene panels (MGPs) are commercially available, but many include genes with weak/unproven associaton with breast cancer, or with predisposition to cancer of other types. This study investigates the utility of a custom-designed multi-gene panel in an Irish cohort with breast cancer. METHODS A custom panel comprising 83 genes offered by 19 clinical "breast cancer predisposition" MGPs was designed and applied to germline DNA from 91 patients with breast cancer and 77 unaffected ethnicially matched controls. Variants were identified and classified using a custom pipeline. RESULTS Nineteen loss-of-function (LOF) and 334 missense variants were identified. After removing common and/or benign variants, 15 LOF and 30 missense variants were analysed. Variants in known breast cancer susceptibility genes were identified, including in BRCA1 and ATM in cases, and in NF1 and CHEK2 in controls. Most variants identified were in genes associated with predisposition to cancers other than breast cancer (BRIP1, RAD50, MUTYH, and mismatch repair genes), or in genes with unknown or unproven association with cancer. CONCLUSION Using multi-gene panels enables rapid, cost-effective identification of individuals with high-risk cancer predisposition syndromes. However, this approach also leads to an increased amount of uncertain results. Clinical management of individuals with particular genetic variants in the absence of a matching phenotype/family history is challenging. Further population and functional evidence is required to fully elucidate the clinical relevance of variants in genes of uncertain significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Úna M McVeigh
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Terri P McVeigh
- Cancer Genetics Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Catherine Curran
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Nicola Miller
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Derek W Morris
- Discipline of Biochemistry, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Micheal J Kerin
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Challenging the believed proportion of ovarian cancer attributable to BRCA2 versus BRCA1 pathogenic variants. Eur J Cancer 2019; 124:88-90. [PMID: 31760313 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
42
|
Abstract
Hereditary breast cancers, mainly due to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, account for only 5-10% of this disease. The threshold for genetic testing is a 10% likelihood of detecting a mutation, as determined by validated models such as BOADICEA and Manchester Scoring System. A 90-95% reduction in breast cancer risk can be achieved with bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy in unaffected BRCA mutation carriers. In patients with BRCA-associated breast cancer, there is a 40% risk of contralateral breast cancer and hence risk-reducing contralateral mastectomy is recommended, which can be performed simultaneously with surgery for unilateral breast cancer. Other options for risk management include surveillance by mammogram and breast magnetic resonance imaging, and chemoprevention with hormonal agents. With the advent of next-generation sequencing and development of multigene panel testing, the cost and time taken for genetic testing have reduced, making it possible for treatment-focused genetic testing. There are also drugs such as the PARP inhibitors that specifically target the BRCA mutation. Risk management multidisciplinary clinics are designed to quantify risk, and offer advice on preventative strategies. However, such services are only possible in high-income settings. In low-resource settings, the prohibitive cost of testing and the lack of genetic counsellors are major barriers to setting up a breast cancer genetics service. Family history is often not well documented because of the stigma associated with cancer. Breast cancer genetics services remain an unmet need in low- and middle-income countries, where the priority is to optimise access to quality treatment.
Collapse
|
43
|
Morgan RD, Burghel GJ, Flaum N, Bulman M, Clamp AR, Hasan J, Mitchell CL, Schlecht H, Woodward ER, Lallo FI, Crosbie EJ, Edmondson RJ, Wallace AJ, Jayson GC, Evans DGR. Prevalence of germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants in sequential epithelial ovarian cancer cases. J Med Genet 2019; 56:301-307. [DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Revised: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
IntroductionPoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors significantly improve progression-free survival in platinum-sensitive high-grade serous and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma, with greatest benefits observed in women with a pathogenic BRCA1/2 variant. Consequently, the demand for germline BRCA1/2 testing in ovarian cancer has increased substantially, leading to the screening of unselected populations of patients. We aimed to determine the prevalence of pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 variants in women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer, categorised according to the established risk factors for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and the Manchester BRCA Score, to inform risk stratification.MethodsA cohort of sequential epithelial ovarian cancer cases recruited between June 2013 and September 2018 underwent germline BRCA1/2 testing by next-generation sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.ResultsFive hundred and fifty-seven patients were screened. Of these, 18% had inherited a pathogenic BRCA1/2 variant. The prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants was >10% in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer earlier than 60 years of age (21%) and those diagnosed later than 60 years of age with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (17%) or a medical history of breast cancer (34%). The prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants was also >10% in women with a Manchester BRCA Score of ≥15 points (14%).DiscussionOur study suggests that age at diagnosis, family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, medical history of breast cancer or a Manchester BRCA Score of ≥15 points are associated with a >10% prevalence of germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
44
|
Kirk J, Barlow‐Stewart KK, Poplawski NK, Gleeson M, Tucker K, Friedlander M. Medicare‐funded cancer genetic tests: a note of caution. Med J Aust 2018; 209:193-196. [DOI: 10.5694/mja17.01124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 03/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Judy Kirk
- Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
| | | | | | | | - Kathy Tucker
- Prince of Wales Hospital and Community Health Services, Sydney, NSW
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Evans DGR, van Veen EM, Byers HJ, Wallace AJ, Ellingford JM, Beaman G, Santoyo-Lopez J, Aitman TJ, Eccles DM, Lalloo FI, Smith MJ, Newman WG. A Dominantly Inherited 5' UTR Variant Causing Methylation-Associated Silencing of BRCA1 as a Cause of Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Am J Hum Genet 2018; 103:213-220. [PMID: 30075112 PMCID: PMC6080768 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 06/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are identified in ∼20% of families with multiple individuals affected by early-onset breast and/or ovarian cancer. Extensive searches for additional highly penetrant genes or alternative mutational mechanisms altering BRCA1 or BRCA2 have not explained the missing heritability. Here, we report a dominantly inherited 5' UTR variant associated with epigenetic BRCA1 silencing due to promoter hypermethylation in two families affected by breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA1 promoter methylation of ten CpG dinucleotides in families who are affected by breast and/or ovarian cancer but do not have germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants was assessed by pyrosequencing and clonal bisulfite sequencing. RNA and DNA sequencing of BRCA1 from lymphocytes was undertaken to establish allelic expression and the presence of germline variants. BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation was identified in 2 of 49 families in which multiple women are affected by grade 3 breast cancer or high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Soma-wide BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation was confirmed in blood, buccal mucosa, and hair follicles. Pyrosequencing showed that DNA was ∼50% methylated, consistent with the silencing of one allele, which was confirmed by clonal bisulfite sequencing. RNA sequencing revealed the allelic loss of BRCA1 expression in both families and that this loss of expression segregated with the heterozygous variant c.-107A>T in the BRCA1 5' UTR. Our results establish a mechanism whereby familial breast and ovarian cancer is caused by an in cis 5' UTR variant associated with epigenetic silencing of the BRCA1 promoter in two independent families. We propose that methylation analyses be undertaken to establish the frequency of this mechanism in families affected by early-onset breast and/or ovarian cancer without a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Gareth R Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Prevention Breast Cancer Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK; Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
| | - Elke M van Veen
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Helen J Byers
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Andrew J Wallace
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Jamie M Ellingford
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Glenda Beaman
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Javier Santoyo-Lopez
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine and Edinburgh Genomics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Timothy J Aitman
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine and Edinburgh Genomics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton S016 6YD, UK
| | - Fiona I Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Miriam J Smith
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - William G Newman
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, UK; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Maksimenko J, Irmejs A, Trofimovičs G, Bērziņa D, Skuja E, Purkalne G, Miklaševičs E, Gardovskis J. High frequency of pathogenic non-founder germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in families with breast and ovarian cancer in a founder population. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2018; 16:12. [PMID: 29928469 PMCID: PMC5989401 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-018-0094-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pathogenic BRCA1 founder mutations (c.4035delA, c.5266dupC) contribute to 3.77% of all consecutive primary breast cancers and 9.9% of all consecutive primary ovarian cancers. Identifying germline pathogenic gene variants in patients with primary breast and ovarian cancer could significantly impact the medical management of patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the rate of pathogenic mutations in the 26 breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in patients who meet the criteria for BRCA1/2 testing and to compare the accuracy of different selection criteria for second-line testing in a founder population. Methods Fifteen female probands and 1 male proband that met National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for BRCA1/2 testing were included in the study and underwent 26-gene panel testing. Fourteen probands had breast cancer, one proband had ovarian cancer, and one proband had both breast and ovarian cancer. In a 26-gene panel, the following breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes were included: ATM, BARD1, BLM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, EPCAM, FAM175A, MEN1, MLH1, MRE11A, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D, STK11, TP53, and XRCC2. All patients previously tested negative for BRCA1 founder mutations. Results In 44% (7 out of 16) of tested probands, pathogenic mutations were identified. Six probands carried pathogenic mutations in BRCA1, and one proband carried pathogenic mutations in BRCA2. In patients, a variant of uncertain significance was found in BRCA2, RAD50, MRE11A and CDH1. The Manchester scoring system showed a high accuracy (87.5%), high sensitivity (85.7%) and high specificity (88.9%) for the prediction of pathogenic non-founder BRCA1/2 mutations. Conclusion A relatively high incidence of pathogenic non-founder BRCA1/2 mutations was observed in a founder population. The Manchester scoring system predicted the probability of non-founder pathogenic mutations with high accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Maksimenko
- Institute of Oncology, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema iela 16, Riga, LV1007 Latvia
| | - A Irmejs
- Institute of Oncology, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema iela 16, Riga, LV1007 Latvia
| | - G Trofimovičs
- Institute of Oncology, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema iela 16, Riga, LV1007 Latvia
| | - D Bērziņa
- Institute of Oncology, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema iela 16, Riga, LV1007 Latvia
| | - E Skuja
- Institute of Oncology, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema iela 16, Riga, LV1007 Latvia
| | - G Purkalne
- Institute of Oncology, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema iela 16, Riga, LV1007 Latvia
| | - E Miklaševičs
- Institute of Oncology, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema iela 16, Riga, LV1007 Latvia
| | - J Gardovskis
- Institute of Oncology, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema iela 16, Riga, LV1007 Latvia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Potjer TP, Helgadottir H, Leenheer M, van der Stoep N, Gruis NA, Höiom V, Olsson H, van Doorn R, Vasen HFA, van Asperen CJ, Dekkers OM, Hes FJ. CM-Score: a validated scoring system to predict CDKN2A germline mutations in melanoma families from Northern Europe. J Med Genet 2018; 55:661-668. [PMID: 29661971 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-105205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Revised: 03/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several factors have been reported that influence the probability of a germline CDKN2A mutation in a melanoma family. Our goal was to create a scoring system to estimate this probability, based on a set of clinical features present in the patient and his or her family. METHODS Five clinical features and their association with CDKN2A mutations were investigated in a training cohort of 1227 Dutch melanoma families (13.7% with CDKN2A mutation) using multivariate logistic regression. Predefined features included number of family members with melanoma and with multiple primary melanomas, median age at diagnosis and presence of pancreatic cancer or upper airway cancer in a family member. Based on these five features, a scoring system (CDKN2A Mutation(CM)-Score) was developed and subsequently validated in a combined Swedish and Dutch familial melanoma cohort (n=421 families; 9.0% with CDKN2A mutation). RESULTS All five features were significantly associated (p<0.05) with a CDKN2A mutation. At a CM-Score of 16 out of 49 possible points, the threshold of 10% mutation probability is approximated (9.9%; 95% CI 9.8 to 10.1). This probability further increased to >90% for families with ≥36 points. A CM-Score under 16 points was associated with a low mutation probability (≤4%). CM-Score performed well in both the training cohort (area under the curve (AUC) 0.89; 95% CI 0.86 to 0.92) and the external validation cohort (AUC 0.94; 95% CI 0.90 to 0.98). CONCLUSION We developed a practical scoring system to predict CDKN2A mutation status among melanoma-prone families. We suggest that CDKN2A analysis should be recommended to families with a CM-Score of ≥16 points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas P Potjer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hildur Helgadottir
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mirjam Leenheer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke van der Stoep
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nelleke A Gruis
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Veronica Höiom
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Håkan Olsson
- Department of Oncology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Remco van Doorn
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hans F A Vasen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Olaf M Dekkers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik J Hes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Chew W, Moorakonda RB, Courtney E, Soh H, Li ST, Chen Y, Shaw T, Allen JC, Evans DGR, Ngeow J. Evaluation of the relative effectiveness of the 2017 updated Manchester scoring system for predicting BRCA1/2 mutations in a Southeast Asian country. J Med Genet 2017; 55:344-350. [PMID: 29275357 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-105073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Revised: 11/23/2017] [Accepted: 12/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have significant clinical implications for both risk-reducing and early surveillance management. The third and most recent revision of the Manchester scoring system (MSS3) used to distinguish patients indicated for germline BRCA1/2 testing included further adjustments for triple negative breast cancer, high-grade serous ovarian cancer and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) receptor status. This study aims to evaluate the relative effectiveness of MSS3 in a Southeast Asian population. METHODS All patients in our centre were tested using next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels that included full gene sequencing as well as coverage for large deletions/duplications in BRCA1/2. We calculated MSS1-3 scores for index patients between 2014 and 2017 who had undergone BRCA1/2 genetic testing and recorded their genetic test results. MSS1-3 outcomes were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis, while associations with predictors were investigated using Fisher's exact test and logistics regression. Calculations were performed using Medcalc17. RESULTS Of the 330 included patients, 47 (14.2%) were found to have a germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. A positive HER2 receptor was associated with a lower likelihood of a BRCA1/2mutation (OR=0.125, 95% CI 0.016 to 0.955; P=0.007), while high-grade serous ovarian cancer was conversely associated with an increased likelihood of a BRCA1/2 mutation (OR=5.128, 95% CI 1.431 to 18.370; P=0.012). At the 10% threshold, 43.0% (142/330) of patients were indicated for testing under MSS3, compared with 35.8% (118/330) for MSS1% and 36.4% (120/330) for MSS2. At the 10% threshold, MSS3 sensitivity was 91.5% and specificity 65.0%, significantly better than the previous MSS1 (P=0.037) and MSS2 (P=0.032) models. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that the updated MSS3 outperforms previous iterations and relative to the Manchester population, is just as effective in identifying patients with BRCA1/2 mutations in a Southeast Asian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winston Chew
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Cancer Genetics Service, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rajesh Babu Moorakonda
- Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eliza Courtney
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Cancer Genetics Service, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hazel Soh
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Cancer Genetics Service, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shao Tzu Li
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Cancer Genetics Service, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yanni Chen
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Cancer Genetics Service, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tarryn Shaw
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Cancer Genetics Service, Singapore, Singapore
| | - John Carson Allen
- Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Dafydd Gareth R Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Cancer Genetics Service, Singapore, Singapore.,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.,Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*Star), Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|