Functional antagonism: tolerance produced by inhaled beta 2 agonists

The Role of ICS-Containing Rescue Therapy Versus SABA Alone in Asthma Management Today

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommends that short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) monotherapy should no longer be prescribed, and that as-needed combination inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)-formoterol is the preferred reliever therapy in adults and adolescents with mild asthma. These recommendations are based on the risks of SABA monotherapy, the evidence that ICS-formoterol reliever therapy markedly decreases the occurrence of severe asthma exacerbations compared with SABA reliever therapy alone, and because ICS-formoterol reliever therapy has a favorable risk/benefit profile compared with maintenance ICS plus SABA reliever therapy. Data supporting the use of combination ICS-albuterol reliever therapy in mild asthma are more limited, but there are studies that inform its use in this population. In this review, we compare, using a pros and cons format, the (1) long-term safety and efficacy of ICS-formoterol reliever therapy versus SABA reliever therapy alone, (2) long-term safety and efficacy of ICS-albuterol reliever therapy versus SABA reliever therapy alone, (3) immediate bronchodilator effects of ICS-formoterol versus SABA alone, and (4) clinical and regulatory factors that may inform reliever therapy prescription decisions. By presenting the evidence of these reliever inhaler options, we hope to inform the reader while also calling for necessary future effectiveness and implementation research.

Long-acting bronchodilators with or without inhaled corticosteroids and 30-day readmission in patients hospitalized for COPD

BACKGROUND

The ability of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting beta 2 agonists (LABAs; long-acting bronchodilators, LABDs) with or without inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) to reduce early readmission in hospitalized patients with COPD is unknown.

METHODS

We studied a 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare parts A, B and D and hospitalized for COPD in 2011. We examined prescriptions filled for LABDs with or without ICSs (LABDs±ICSs) within 90 days prior to and 30 days after hospitalization. Primary outcome was the 30-day readmission rate between "users" and "nonusers" of LABDs±ICSs. Propensity score matching and sensitivity analysis were performed by limiting analysis to patients hospitalized for acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD). Among 6,066 patients hospitalized for COPD, 3,747 (61.8%) used LABDs±ICSs during the specified period. The "user" and "nonuser" groups had similar rates of all-cause emergency room (ER) visits and readmissions within 30 days of discharge date (22.4% vs 20.7%, P-value 0.11; 18.0% vs 17.8%, P-value 0.85, respectively). However, the "users" had higher rates of COPD-related ER visits (5.3% vs 3.4%, P-value 0.0006), higher adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.47 (95% CI, 1.11-1.93) and readmission (7.8% vs 5.0%, P-value <0.0001 and aOR 1.48 [95% CI, 1.18-1.86]) than "nonusers". After propensity score matching, the aOR of COPD-related ER visits was 1.45 (95% CI, 1.07-1.96) and that of readmission was 1.34 (95% CI, 1.04-1.73). The results were similar when restricted to patients hospitalized for AECOPD.

CONCLUSION

Use of LABDs±ICSs did not reduce 30-day readmissions in patients hospitalized for COPD.

Are inhaled longacting β2 agonists detrimental to asthma?

Possible adverse effects of adrenergic bronchodilators in asthma have been the subject of discussion for more than half a century, with recent intense debate about the safety of longacting β agonists (LABAs). In this Debate, we consider the issues of bronchodilator and bronchoprotective tolerance resulting from the frequent use of bronchodilators, which is noted particularly with shortacting drugs, but has also been shown to occur quicker and to a greater extent with LABAs. Increased allergen responsiveness and masking allowing inflammation to increase, while symptoms and lung function remain apparently controlled, have also been observed. Studies in which LABAs were used as monotherapy were associated with increased mortality. However, several studies have shown the benefits of adding LABAs to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Meta-analyses of asthma clinical trials involving LABAs showed that, when given with mandatory ICS, LABAs were not associated with an increased risk of death, intubations, or hospital admission for exacerbations when compared with use of the same dose of ICS only. Withdrawal of LABA therapy once symptom control is achieved is often associated with subsequent loss of symptom control. When used for appropriate indications, LABAs should be combined with ICS in one inhaler so that monotherapy is not possible.

Third-generation long-acting β₂-adrenoceptor agonists: medicinal chemistry strategies employed in the identification of once-daily inhaled β₂-adrenoceptor agonists

Inhaled long-acting β(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) are highly effective bronchodilators in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There is significant interest in the development of third-generation compounds that improve upon the marketed twice-daily LABAs salmeterol and formoterol. A principal advantage sought from the next generation is duration of action that supports once-daily dosing, although improved efficacy, faster onset, and increased therapeutic index are also frequently cited as objectives. Recent publications detailing medicinal chemistry programs directed at the discovery of third-generation LABAs illustrate a wide variety of strategies that have been successfully employed towards these goals. Some recent scientific advances in the understanding of inhaled bronchodilators are discussed and the reported medicinal chemistry strategies are reviewed in the context of these advances.

β(2) -adrenoceptor agonists: current and future direction

Despite the passionate debate over the use of β(2) -adrenoceptor agonists in the treatment of airway disorders, these agents are still central in the symptomatic management of asthma and COPD. A variety of β(2) -adrenoceptor agonists with long half-lives, also called ultra long-acting β(2) -adrenoceptor agonists (ultra-LABAs; indacaterol, olodaterol, vilanterol, carmoterol, LAS100977 and PF-610355) are currently under development with the hopes of achieving once-daily dosing. It is likely that the once-daily dosing of a bronchodilator would be a significant convenience and probably a compliance-enhancing advantage, leading to improved overall clinical outcomes. As combination therapy with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a LABA is important for treating patients suffering from asthma, and a combination with an inhaled long-acting antimuscarinic agent (LAMA) is important for treating COPD patients whose conditions are not sufficiently controlled by monotherapy with a β(2) -adrenoceptor agonist, some novel once-daily combinations of LABAs and ICSs or LAMAs are under development.

Is combination therapy with inhaled anticholinergics and beta2-adrenoceptor agonists justified for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a debilitating condition characterised by progressive, irreversible airflow limitation. The economic and social burden of the disease is enormous. The treatment of COPD is guided by the stage of the disease and is aimed primarily at control of symptoms. Bronchodilators are the cornerstone of pharmacological management of COPD. Short-acting bronchodilators (beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists and anticholinergics) have been available for many years and have been extensively studied as individual agents and in combination. When administered in combination, short-acting bronchodilators provide superior bronchodilation compared with individual agents given alone. However, the improvement in bronchodilation does not translate into an improvement in quality-of-life (QOL) indices. More recently, long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) and anticholinergics have been introduced, and current guidelines recommend regular use of these agents in COPD of Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage II or more. Combining short-acting anticholinergics with LABAs for daily use has been evaluated, but this combination does not confer any advantage in terms of subjective improvement or prevention of exacerbations. Combining the long-acting anticholinergic tiotropium bromide with formoterol given once or twice daily improves airway obstruction and hyperinflation. However, the effects of combinations of long-acting bronchodilators on patients' symptom scores, QOL and exacerbations remain to be studied. Ultra-LABAs, which are in development, may enable use of a combination of long-acting bronchodilators in a single inhaler for once-daily use, thus simplifying the regimen. This article discusses the results of various clinical trials comparing the efficacy of bronchodilators given alone or in combination to patients with COPD, with emphasis on the effects of these agents on bronchodilation, symptomatic and objective improvements in QOL and prevention of exacerbations.

Oral beta2-agonist use by preschool children with asthma in East and Central Harlem, New York

Although studies have documented underuse of controller medications and overuse of short-acting inhaled ss(2)-agonist among children with persistent asthma in disadvantaged communities, the persistence of oral ss(2)-agonist use in pediatric practice has not been studied since inhaled short-acting ss(2)-agonists became widespread. We describe medications used to treat asthma among children 3 to 5 years of age at 10 Head Start and other subsidized preschool centers in East and Central Harlem, New York City. We interviewed 149 parents/guardians of children who were identified as having probable asthma based on physician's diagnosis, persistent symptoms, hospitalization, and medication use. We classified 86 of the 149 children (58%) as having current persistent asthma. Only 15 of them (17%) were reported to have used controller medications at least 5 days/week in the last 4 weeks-only 2 of whom used inhaled corticosteroids. By contrast, 53 children (62%) used oral ss(2)-agonist in the last 4 weeks, often (72%) in conjunction with nebulized or inhaled short-acting ss(2)-agonist. Use of oral ss(2)-agonist was associated with more severe symptoms. This study documents the continued widespread use of oral ss(2)-agonist for treatment of children in a low-income community with high prevalence of asthma.

Influence of epithelium on beta-adrenoceptor desensitization of guinea pig tracheal smooth muscle

The effect of tissue incubation with a beta2-agonist of denuded and intact epithelium trachea on the responsiveness to isoprenaline and beta-receptor blocked by propranolol (CR-1) was examined in this study. We examined the effect of epithelium removal on the beta-adrenoceptor desensitization resulting from incubation of guinea pig trachea in the beta-adrenergic agonist isoprenaline (10 microM). Desensitization was measured as the change in EC50, the concentration of beta-agonist that produced 50% relaxation of tracheal rings contracted with methacholine. As a second measure of desensitization, we measured the shift in EC50 resulting from incubation of tracheal rings with the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol (20 nM), expressed as CR-1 ([post-propranolol EC50/baseline EC50]-1). Initially, we measured desensitization immediately after incubation in isoprenaline; subsequently, we repeated the protocol and allowed a 30 min rest between the end of incubation and the measurement. The sensitivity of denuded epithelium trachea to isoprenaline and (CR-1) was significantly higher than that of intact epithelium only in non-incubated preparations (p<0.05 to p<0.001). Incubation to isoprenaline caused a significant reduction in the tracheal response to isoprenaline in both the denuded groups (p<0.005 for both cases) and intact epithelium groups (p<0.05 for both cases). Incubation to isoprenaline also caused a significant reduction in (CR-1) value in both the denuded groups (p<0.005 for group 2 and p<0.001 for group 4) and intact epithelium only in group 1 (p<0.05). However, the changes in EC50 due to tissue incubation with isoprenaline were significantly greater in denuded than intact epithelium trachea (p<0.05 for all cases) and for CR-1 value only in groups 1 and 2 (p<0.05). These results indicate decrease in both tracheal response to beta-agonist (tolerance) and CR-1 (due to incubation of tissues with isoprenaline), which were greater in denuded epithelium groups.

Clinical concerns with inhaled beta2-agonists: adult asthma

Inhaled beta2-agonists, when used regularly, cause subtle but significant worsening of asthma control. Overuse of inhaled beta2-agonists is associated with increased risk of death from asthma in a dose-response fashion. beta2-Agonists enhance airway responses to allergens, including induced airway hyperresponsiveness and induced airway inflammation. This is a plausible explanation for beta2-agonist-worsened asthma control. These direct effects of inhaled beta2-agonists, including increased airway response to allergen, tolerance, etc., may partially explain the association of overuse with asthma death. However, it is probable that the major reason for the association of beta2-agonists overuse and asthma mortality is an indirect effect. Inhaled beta2-agonists are effective relievers and preventers of bronchoconstriction and asthma symptoms but fail to treat the underlying pathogenesis, namely the airway inflammation. Thus, overuse may mask the true asthma severity and result in both an underappreciation and undertreatment of the disease. This would provide a rational explanation for the relationship of inhaled beta2-agonist use and mortality and also would fit the dose-response pattern. Inhaled beta2-agonists should be used exclusively as needed for relief of symptoms and their requirement should be infrequent: the need for excessive doses of beta2-agonists provides a useful marker of asthma (lack of) control.

Recovery from bronchoconstriction and bronchodilator tolerance

Until recently, researchers believed that tolerance or tachyphylaxis to the bronchodilator effects of beta-agonists did not occur. However, recent studies examining the recovery from bronchoconstriction have clearly shown that an impaired response to beta-agonists occurs in patients who have been using regular beta-agonist treatment. This tolerance develops with both long- and short-acting beta-agonists and is not affected by treatment with inhaled steroids. It develops rapidly, reaching a maximum within 1 wk of starting beta-agonists, and has been demonstrated after methacholine, hypertonic saline, mannitol, and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The observed reduction in the bronchodilator response is proportional to the severity of bronchoconstriction. Therefore, although individuals with stable asthma show little evidence of tolerance, those with severe bronchospasm have a markedly reduced bronchodilator response to beta-agonists. Almost all asthmatics show evidence of tolerance when tested in the setting of bronchoconstriction, although the extent of this tolerance varies. The reasons for this interindividual variation are not understood. Bronchodilator tolerance is difficult to study in the clinical setting because nearly every patient has used multiple doses of beta-agonist before seeking medical attention. However, there is compelling evidence that the response to rescue beta-agonist treatment is reduced in those who use regular long- or short-acting beta-agonists. The extent to which this phenomenon contributes to asthma morbidity and mortality remains to be determined.

Long-acting beta2-agonists for chronic asthma in adults and children where background therapy contains varied or no inhaled corticosteroid

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common respiratory disease among both adults and children and short acting inhaled beta-2 agonists are used widely for 'reliever' bronchodilator therapy. Long acting beta-2 agonists (LABA) were introduced as prospective 'symptom controllers' in addition to inhaled corticosteroid 'preventer' therapy (ICS). In this updated review we have included studies in which patients were either not on ICS as a group, or in which some patients, but not all, were on ICS to complement previous systematic reviews of studies where LABA was given in patients uniformly receiving ICS. We have focussed particularly on serious adverse events, given previous concerns about potential risks, especially of death, from regular beta-2 agonist use.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to determine the benefit or detriment on the primary outcome of asthma control with the regular use of LABA compared with placebo, in mixed populations in which only some were taking ICS and in populations not using ICS therapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We carried out searches using the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, most recently in October 2005. We searched bibliographies of identified RCTs for additional relevant RCTs and contacted authors of identified RCTs for other published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised studies of at least four weeks duration, comparing a LABA given twice daily with a placebo, in chronic asthma. Selection criteria to this updated review have been altered to accommodate recently published Cochrane reviews on combination and addition of LABA to ICS therapy. Studies in which all individuals were uniformly taking ICS were excluded from this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers performed data extraction and study quality assessment independently. We contacted authors of studies for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-seven studies (representing 68 experimental comparisons) randomising 42,333 participants met the inclusion criteria. Salmeterol was used as long-acting agent in 50 studies and formoterol fumarate in 17. The treatment period was four to nine weeks in 29 studies, and 12 to 52 weeks in 38 studies. Twenty-four studies did not permit the use of ICS, and forty permitted either inhaled corticosteroid or cromones (in three studies this was unclear). In these studies between 22% and 92% were taking ICS, with a median of 62%. There were significant advantages to LABA treatment compared to placebo for a variety of measurements of airway calibre including morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), evening PEF and FEV1. They were associated with significantly fewer symptoms, less use of rescue medication and higher quality of life scores. This was true whether patients were taking LABA in combination with ICS or not. Findings from SMART (a recently published surveillance study) indicated significant increases in asthma related deaths, respiratory related deaths and combined asthma related deaths and life threatening experiences. The absolute increase in asthma-related mortality was consistent with an increase of around one per 1250 patients treated with LABA for six months, but the confidence intervals are wide (from 700 to 10,000). Post-hoc exploratory subgroups suggested that African-Americans and those not on inhaled corticosteroids were at particular risk for the primary end-point of death or life-threatening asthma event. There was also a suggestion of an increase in exacerbation rate in children. Pharmacologically predicted side effects such as headache, throat irritation, tremor and nervousness were more frequent with LABA treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

LABA are effective in the control of chronic asthma in the "real-life" subject groups included. However there are potential safety issues which call into question the safety of LABA, particularly in those asthmatics who are not taking ICS, and it is not clear why African-Americans were found to have significant differences in comparison to Caucasians for combined respiratory-related death and life threatening experiences, but not for asthma-related death.

Ultra long-acting beta 2-agonists in development for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

After the discovery of formoterol and salmeterol, new candidates for long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) have emerged from various companies. In particular, once-daily beta2-adrenoceptor agonists such as arformoterol, carmoterol, indacaterol, GSK-159797, GSK-597901, 159802, 642444 and 678007 are under development for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The majority of these compounds are (R,R)-isomers in order to control desensitisation and accumulation. Several options for combination products are currently being evaluated in parallel with the development of these ultra LABAs. Once-daily dosing of an ultra LABA would be a significant convenience and probably a compliance-enhancing advantage leading to improved overall clinical outcomes in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The only limits set for the development of a LABA with a new product profile are medical needs and marketing opportunities.

As-needed inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonists in moderate-to-severe asthma: current recommendations

Intermediate-acting inhaled beta2-agonists (e.g. albuterol [salbutamol]), once recommended for round-the-clock bronchodilation, are now recommended to be used exclusively as-needed. Guidelines advise that asthma should be controlled with anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies so that the as-needed requirement for inhaled beta2-agonists should be infrequent; ideally less than several times per week, up to once a day for exercise, and none at night. These recommendations are based upon the recognition that asthma is primarily an inflammatory condition and that the major thrust of therapy should be anti-inflammatory, including environmental control and administration of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), leukotriene-receptor antagonists, and possibly oral theophylline and inhaled cromones; the cromones include cromolyn sodium (sodium cromogylcate) and nedocromil. While this is the primary rationale behind the as-needed infrequent prescription of the inhaled beta2-agonist paradigm, there are a number of detrimental effects that can be seen with regularly scheduled (or frequent as-needed) use of inhaled beta2-agonists. These include tolerance to the bronchodilator and particularly the bronchoprotective effects, increased airway responsiveness to allergen, worsened asthma control, and, probably most importantly, over-reliance on an excellent symptom reliever leading to undertreatment. Any or all of these could be responsible for the demonstrated dose-response relationship between inhaled beta2-agonist overuse and death from asthma. Several controlled clinical trials, which have included many patients with at least moderately severe asthma, have failed to demonstrate any obvious advantage to the regular scheduled use of inhaled beta2-agonists compared with as-needed inhaled beta2-agonists. On the other hand, despite no obvious advantage, regular use of albuterol 1000-1200 microg/day appears to be well tolerated and reasonably safe. When asthma is treated using an as-needed, infrequent inhaled beta2-agonist, the requirements for beta2-agonists become a useful marker of whether or not the asthma is adequately controlled. When inhaled beta2-agonists are required inordinately frequently (i.e. when asthma is not adequately controlled), after ensuring compliance with ICS, the most common strategy is to add one of the long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists twice daily. On the basis of the available evidence, the as-needed intermediate-acting inhaled beta2-agonist therapeutic strategy appears appropriate for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

Tolerance to bronchodilation during treatment with long-acting beta-agonists, a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Regular use of beta-agonists leads to tolerance to their bronchodilator effects. This can be demonstrated by measuring the response to beta-agonist following bronchoconstriction using methacholine. However most studies have demonstrated tolerance after a period of beta-agonist withdrawal, which is not typical of their use in clinical practice. This study assessed tolerance to the bronchodilator action of salbutamol during ongoing treatment with long-acting beta-agonist.

METHODS

Random-order, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. After 1 week without beta-agonists, 13 asthmatic subjects inhaled formoterol 12 microg twice daily or matching placebo for 1 week. Eight hours after the first and last doses subjects inhaled methacholine to produce a 20% fall in FEV1. Salbutamol 100, 200 and 400 microg (cumulative dose) was then given at 5-minute intervals and FEV1 was measured 5 minutes after each dose. After a 1 week washout subjects crossed over to the other treatment. Unscheduled use of beta-agonists was not allowed during the study. The main outcome variable was the area under the salbutamol response curve.

RESULTS

The analysis showed a significant time by treatment interaction indicating that the response to salbutamol fell during formoterol therapy compared to placebo. After 1 week of formoterol the area under the salbutamol response curve was 48% (95% confidence interval 28 to 68%) lower than placebo. This reduction in response remained significant when the analyses were adjusted for changes in the pre-challenge FEV1 and dose of methacholine given (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The bronchodilator response to salbutamol is significantly reduced in patients taking formoterol. Clinically relevant tolerance to rescue beta-agonist treatment is likely to occur in patients treated with long-acting beta-agonists.

Differential desensitization of homozygous haplotypes of the beta2-adrenergic receptor in lymphocytes

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor gene and its 5' promoter have been associated with differences in receptor function and desensitization. Linkage disequilibrium may account for inconsistencies in reported effects of isolated polymorphisms. Therefore, we have investigated the three most common homozygous haplotypes of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (position 19 [Cys/Arg] of the 5' leader cistron and positions 16 [Arg/Gly] and 27 [Gln/Glu] of the receptor) for putative differences in agonist-induced desensitization. Lymphocytes of well defined nonasthmatic, nonallergic subjects homozygous for the haplotype CysGlyGln, ArgGlyGlu, or CysArgGln were isolated. Desensitization of (-)-isoproterenol-induced cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation and beta(2)-adrenergic receptor sequestration and downregulation were measured in relation to beta(2)-adrenergic receptor-mediated inhibition of IFN-gamma and interleukin-5 production. We observed that lymphocytes of individuals bearing the CysGlyGln haplotype were more susceptible to desensitization of the beta-agonist-induced cAMP response than those of individuals with the ArgGlyGlu or CysArgGln haplotype. The haplotype-dependent desensitization of beta-agonist-induced cAMP response was not associated with haplotype-dependent beta(2)-adrenergic receptor sequestration or downregulation. In addition, our data suggest reduced inhibition, in lymphocytes of subjects with the CysGlyGln haplotype, of interleukin-5 production induced by treatment with antibodies to the T-cell receptor-CD3 complex and to costimulatory molecule CD28 (alphaCD3/alphaCD28). This is the first study demonstrating haplotype-related differences in agonist-induced beta(2)-adrenergic receptor desensitization in primary human cells. This haplotype-related desensitization of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor in lymphocytes might have consequences regarding the regulation of helper T-cell type 2 inflammatory responses.

The pursuit of precision pharmaceuticals: divergent effects of beta2 agonist isomers

Beta2 agonists are the most commonly used treatment for acute bronchoconstriction. However, during regular use there is a progressive decline of protective efficacy of bronchodilators. This progressive decline has long been considered anomalous because with short-acting beta agonists, there is no corresponding change in bronchodilator efficacy. Airway hyper-responsiveness is itself a feature of asthma and there maybe however, there may be an increase in airway hyper-responsiveness following regular use of beta2 agonist. Airway hyperresponsiveness could diminish the capacity of beta agonists to protect from or result in paradoxical bronchospasm and there effects of racemic salbutamol. There have been reports of increased morbidity and mortality associated with excessive use of beta(2) agonists. As all beta agonists used clinically are racemates composed of 1:1 mixtures of R and S isomers, conducted on the possible involvement of the isomers in hyper-responsiveness. Hyper-responsiveness cannot be attributed to the R isomer, whose capacity to activate beta adrenoceptors will nullify this effect. In contrast, extensive evidence indicated that the S isomer might cause hyper-responsiveness and potential airway inflammation. Further, the S isomer shows a propensity to activate human eosinophils and alter muscarinic M(2) receptor functions. The S isomer, which makes no contribution to therapeutic efficacy and may exacerbate asthma, might therefore be excluded from asthma therapy.

Levalbuterol hydrochloride

Racemic salbutamol (racemic albuterol) ameliorates symptoms of asthma by activating beta-adrenoceptors on nerve, smooth muscle and inflammatory cells within the airways. Racemic salbutamol comprises equal proportions of 2 isomers: (S)-salbutamol and (R)-salbutamol, with the latter being exclusively responsible for activation of beta-adrenoceptors. Accordingly, within racemic salbutamol it is (R)-salbutamol that efficiently relieves obstruction of asthmatic airways and affords highly effective protection from bronchoconstrictor stimuli, including allergens. During regular use of racemic salbutamol, there is a progressive decline of protective efficacy and a corresponding intensification of airway responsiveness. This decline is largely absent during regular use of (R)-salbutamol. Consequently, bronchodilator responses to sub-maximal doses of (R)-salbutamol exceed responses to the equivalent dose of (R)-salbutamol given as the racemate. For example, in asthmatics with baseline FEVs <or= 60%, 1.25 mg of nebulised (R)-salbutamol achieved a maximal 52% change in FEV while 2.5 mg of racemic salbutamol only achieved a 38% change in FEV. Since extrapulmonary effects (e.g., tremor, heart rate) of beta agonists are related to dose and limit the use of beta agonist therapy, (R)-salbutamol at 0.63 mg provides uncompromised efficacy with marked reduction of side-effects. In addition to quantitative differences, the constituent isomers of salbutamol also exhibit qualitative differences. Thus, (R)-salbutamol inhibits activation of human eosinophils in vitro whereas, under the same conditions and concentrations, (S)-salbutamol augments activation of these cells. This property of (S)-salbutamol may explain why eosinophilia in induced sputum from subjects with allergic asthma is increased by regular use of racemic salbutamol. Similarly, the capacity of (R)-salbutamol to suppress hyperresponsiveness of the airways can be contrasted with the capacity of (S)-salbutamol to intensify hyperresponsiveness. This action of (S)-salbutamol would explain why regular use of racemic salbutamol intensifies the bronchoconstrictor response to antigen in subjects with allergic asthma. Taken together, these findings imply that replacement of racemic salbutamol by (R)-salbutamol will diminish, or even eliminate, the anomalous actions that have curtailed the efficacy of racemic salbutamol. Pharmacokinetically, (R)-salbutamol exhibits near absolute conformational stability (i.e., no conversion to (S)-salbutamol). If in vitro anti-inflammatory actions of (R)-salbutamol are also manifest in asthmatic airways, (R)-salbutamol could provide a novel approach to asthma therapy which combines bronchodilation and bronchoprotection with anti-inflammatory efficacy.

Effect of reproterol either alone or combined with disodium cromoglycate on airway responsiveness to methacholine

Regular use of inhaled beta2-agonists might lead to tolerance as reflected in a loss of bronchoprotection. In vitro-data suggest that this might be prevented by disodium cromoglycate (DSCG). Therefore, we studied the effect of the beta2-agonist reproterol in combination with DSCG. In a cross-over design, 19 subjects with airway hyperresponsiveness inhaled either placebo, 1mg reproterol, 2 mg DSCG, or 1mg reproterol plus 2 mg DSCG 4x daily over 2 weeks. Treatment periods were separated by > or = 7 days. Before and at the end of periods, lung function and methacholine responsiveness were determined in the morning, and 6h later the bronchodilator effect and the protection against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. Reproterol or DSCG or their combination did not exert detrimental effects on lung function, airway responsiveness, or bronchodilator capacity. However, bronchoprotection was significantly reduced (p < 0.05) after treatment with placebo, reproterol or reproterol plus DSCG, the respective changes being 0.59, 0.96 and 1.37 doubling concentrations. All changes were small as compared to intraindividual variability. In this model all treatments except with DSCG caused a significant but small loss of protection against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. Thus, tolerance was not prevented by 2 weeks of additional treatment with DSCG, in contrast to in vitro findings.

One week treatment with salmeterol does not prevent early and late asthmatic responses and sputum eosinophilia induced by allergen challenge in asthmatics

Salmeterol is an effective long-acting beta(2)-agonist bronchodilator, able to inhibit, as a single dose, asthmatic responses induced by several stimuli including allergen, and the subsequent increase in sputum eosinophilia. Aim of the present study was to investigate whether these effects of salmeterol persisted after 1 week of continuous treatment, or whether a loss of the bronchoprotective effects of salmeterol can occur over time. We investigated in a cross-over double blind placebo-controlled study, the protective effect of 1 week treatment with salmeterol on allergen-induced early and late responses and the associated airway inflammation in 15 atopic asthmatic subjects. Eosinophil percentage and Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP) concentration in peripheral blood and in hypertonic saline induced sputum were measured at baseline and 24 h after allergen inhalation. Salmeterol partially inhibited early asthmatic response, but it did not inhibit late asthmatic response in comparison with placebo. Salmeterol did not inhibit also the increase in sputum eosinophils percentage 24 h after allergen inhalation (E%, median: 22.7 and 15%, after placebo and after salmeterol respectively, p=n.s. between two post-allergen sputum samples). Also, the increase in blood eosinophils and both sputum and serum ECP at 24 h after allergen challenge was not affected by salmeterol pre-treatment. In conclusion, 1 week treatment with salmeterol causes a loss of its protective effect on allergen-induced airway bronchoconstriction, and does not prevent the subsequent increase in sputum and serum eosinophilic markers.

(S)-Albuterol activates pro-constrictory and pro-inflammatory pathways in human bronchial smooth muscle cells

BACKGROUND

Pro-constrictory and proinflammatory properties of (S)-albuterol have been widely reported both under in vivo and in vitro conditions. However, underlying mechanisms are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We examined and compared the cellular effects of albuterol enantiomers on key intracellular molecules involved in constrictory and inflammatory pathways in human bronchial smooth muscle cells (hBSMCs).

METHODS

Primary hBSMCs were grown in culture and treated with various concentrations of albuterol enantiomers for various periods. Methacholine was used to stimulate cells. The expression and activity of Gs and Gi proteins, the intracellular free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i), the activity of phosphatidylinositol 3'-OH-kinase (PI3) kinase, and the transcriptional nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) level were examined.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in the expression and activity of Gialpha-1 protein and a decrease in the expression of Gs protein in hBSMCs after 8 hours of treatment with (S)-albuterol. These effects of (S)-albuterol were observed in a dose-dependent manner. Nonreceptor-mediated activation of adenylate cyclase by forskolin was attenuated with (S)-albuterol. Treatment of the cells for 24 hours with (S)-albuterol significantly increased [Ca2+]i on stimulation with methacholine. Interestingly, the effect of (R)-albuterol was opposite to that of (S)-albuterol. The effect of the racemic albuterol in some cases was similar to that of (S)-albuterol. (S)-Albuterol significantly activated both PI3 kinase and NF-kappaB in hBSMCs.

CONCLUSION

These studies demonstrated an (S)-albuterol-induced increase in the expression and activity of pro-constrictory pathways involving Gialpha-1 protein and [Ca2+]i and a decrease in the activity of the bronchodilatory pathway involving Gs proteins in hBSNMCs. Additionally, (S)-albuterol activated proinflammatory pathways involving PI3 kinase and NF-kappaB. Because (S)-albuterol metabolizes at least 10-fold slower than (R)-albuterol and has a longer elimination half-life, these cellular effects of (S)-albuterol might explain the detrimental effect seen with chronic administration of racemic albuterol in the treatment of airway diseases, such as bronchial asthma.

Nebulised salbutamol administered during sputum induction improves bronchoprotection in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhalation of hypertonic or even isotonic saline during sputum induction may cause bronchospasm in susceptible patients with asthma, despite premedication with 400 microg inhaled salbutamol delivered by pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI). The bronchoprotection afforded by additional inhaled salbutamol administered through the ultrasonic nebuliser during sputum induction was investigated.

METHODS

Twenty patients with moderate to severe asthma underwent sputum induction by inhaling saline 4.5% (or 0.9% if post-bronchodilation forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) <65% predicted) for 10 minutes according to two protocols given 1 week apart in random order. At visit A the patients received 400 microg salbutamol administered through a pMDI+spacer 20 minutes before induction while at visit B the premedication was supplemented by 1500 microg nebulised salbutamol inhaled throughout the induction procedure. Both the investigator and the patients were blind to the nebulised solution used. FEV1 was recorded during sputum induction at 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes. Sputum cell counts and histamine, tryptase and albumin levels in the supernatants were determined.

RESULTS

The mean (SE) maximal reduction in FEV1 over the 10 minute period of sputum induction was 11.7 (2.8)% at visit A, which was significantly greater than at visit B (2.6 (1.2)%; mean difference 9% (95% CI 2.7 to 15.4), p<0.01). Total and differential sputum cell counts as well as albumin, tryptase, and histamine levels did not differ between the two visits.

CONCLUSION

The addition of inhaled salbutamol through an ultrasonic nebuliser markedly improves bronchoprotection against saline induced bronchoconstriction in patients with moderate to severe asthma undergoing sputum induction without affecting cell counts and inflammatory markers.

Adverse effects of beta-agonists: are they clinically relevant?

Inhaled beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists) are the most commonly used asthma medications in many Western countries. Minor adverse effects such as palpitations, tremor, headache and metabolic effects are predictable and dose related. Time series studies suggested an association between the relatively nonselective beta-agonist fenoterol and asthma deaths. Three case-control studies confirmed that among patients prescribed fenoterol, the risk of death was significantly elevated even after controlling for the severity of asthma. The Saskatchewan study not only found an increased risk of death among patients dispensed fenoterol, but also suggested this might be a class effect of beta(2)-agonists. However, in subsequent studies, the long-acting beta(2)-agonist salmeterol was not associated with increased asthma mortality. In a case-control study blood albuterol (salbutamol) concentrations were found to be 2.5 times higher among patients who died of asthma compared with controls. It is speculated that such toxic concentrations could cause tachyarrhythmias under conditions of hypoxia and hypokalemia. The risk of asthma exacerbations and near-fatal attacks may also be increased among patients dispensed fenoterol, but this association may be largely due to confounding by severity. Although salmeterol does not appear to increase the risk of near-fatal attacks, there is a consistent association with the use of nebulized beta(2)-agonists. Nebulized and oral beta(2)-agonists are also associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death, ischemic heart disease and cardiac failure. Caution should be exercised when first prescribing a beta-agonist for patients with cardiovascular disease. A potential mechanism for adverse effects with regular use of beta(2)-agonists is tachyphylaxis. Tachyphylaxis to the bronchodilator effects of long-acting beta(2)-agonists can occur, but has been consistently demonstrated only for formoterol (eformoterol) a full agonist, rather than salmeterol, a partial agonist. Tachyphylaxis to protection against induced bronchospasm occurs with both full and partial beta(2)-agonists, and probably within a matter of days at most. Underlying airway responsiveness to directly acting bronchoconstricting agents is not increased when the bronchodilator effect of the regular beta(2)-agonist has been allowed to wear off, although there may be an increase in responsiveness to indirectly acting agents. While there has been speculation that underlying airway inflammation in asthma may be made worse by regular use of short-acting beta(2)-agonists, in contradistinction, a number of studies have shown that long-acting beta(2)-agonists have positive anti-inflammatory effects. An Australian Cochrane Airways Group systematic review of the randomized, controlled trials of short-acting beta-agonists found only minimal and clinically unimportant differences between regular use and use as needed. Regular short-acting treatment was better than placebo. However, a subsequent systematic review has found that regular use of long-acting beta-agonists had significant advantages over regular use of short-acting beta-agonists. More studies and data are needed on the regular use of beta(2)-agonists in patients not taking inhaled corticosteroids, and in potentially vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and those with particular genotypes for the beta-receptor, who might be more prone to adverse effects.

Redefining Treatment in COPD

COPD is a growing international health concern and it is estimated that by the year 2020 it will rank fifth as a cause of disability worldwide. In response to this problem, the World Health Organization and the US National Institutes of Health convened a panel of experts to draft a consensus strategy to treat patients with COPD. Called the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines, they are designed to define and stage the severity of COPD, make recommendations for treatment, and to expand global awareness of the disease. The GOLD guidelines describe a multimodality approach to provide optimal care for the COPD patient population. This includes respiratory and rehabilitative therapy, nutrition services, psychosocial counseling, and surgical care. Bronchodilators form the cornerstone of pharmacologic treatment for COPD. These medications can significantly lessen dyspnea, enhance quality of life, increase airflow, and improve exercise performance. While bronchodilators decrease airway resistance and lessen hyperinflation in patients with COPD, they have not been shown to influence the decline in FEV1 over time or improve survival in this patient population. Recently, long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (beta2-agonists) such as formoterol and salmeterol and anticholinergic medications including tiotropium bromide have been developed which may further improve symptom management in COPD patients. This article discusses bronchodilator pharmacologic therapy for patients with COPD focusing on beta2-agonists, anticholinergics, and methylxanthines in the light of the recent GOLD consensus statements.

Inhaled long acting beta agonists for stable chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common respiratory disease among both adults and children and short acting inhaled beta-2 agonists are used widely for 'reliever' bronchodilator therapy. Long acting beta-2 agonists were introduced as prospective 'symptom controllers' in addition to inhaled corticosteroid 'preventer' therapy (ICS).

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to determine the benefit or detriment on the primary outcome of asthma control with the regular use of long acting inhaled beta-2 agonists compared with placebo.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We carried out searches using the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, most recently in October 2002. We searched bibliographies of identified RCTs for additional relevant RCTs and contacted authors of identified RCTs for other published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised studies of at least two weeks duration, comparing a long acting inhaled beta-agonist given twice daily with a placebo, in chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers performed data extraction and study quality assessment independently. We contacted authors of studies for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty five studies met the inclusion criteria, 56 parallel group and 29 cross over design. Salmeterol xinafoate was used as long acting agent in 60 studies and formoterol fumarate in 25. The treatment period was two to four weeks in 32 studies, and 12 to 52 weeks in 53 studies. 34 study groups used concurrent inhaled corticosteroid treatment, 21 studies did not permit their use and 35 permitted either inhaled corticosteroid or cromones. There were significant advantages to long acting beta-2 agonist treatment compared to placebo for a variety of measurements of airway calibre including morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (weighted mean difference (WMD) 26.78 L/min 95%CI 20.36 to 33.20), evening PEF (WMD 19.17 L/min 95%CI 11.63 to 26.73). They were associated with significantly fewer symptoms, less use of rescue medication and higher quality of life scores. The risk of exacerbation was lower in adults using regular inhaled corticosteroids.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Long acting beta-2 agonists are effective in the control of chronic asthma, and the evidence supports their use in addition to inhaled corticosteroids, as emphasised in current guidelines. Further research is needed on their use in children under 12 and in mild asthmatics not taking ICS.

SR 142801, a tachykinin NK(3) receptor antagonist, prevents beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist-induced hyperresponsiveness to neurokinin A in guinea-pig isolated trachea

We investigated whether fenoterol was able to enhance contractile responsiveness to neurokinin A (NKA) on the guinea-pig isolated trachea. We then studied the effects of two inhibitors of nuclear factor kappa B (NFkappaB), gliotoxin and pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate, and of the tachykinin NK(1), NK(2) and NK(3) receptor antagonists, SR 140333, SR 48968 and SR 142801 and determined whether tachykinin receptor gene expression was up-regulated in the trachea after exposure to fenoterol. Fenoterol (0.1 microM, 15 h, 21 degrees C) induced an increased contractile response to NKA (mean of difference in maximal tension between control and fenoterol +/- S.E.M; +0.47 +/- 0.14 g, n = 26, P < 0.01). This hyperresponsiveness was strongly reduced by co-incubation with gliotoxin (0.1 microg/ml) or pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (0.1 mM) and abolished by SR 140333 (0.1 microM) and SR 142801 (0.1 microM). SR 48968 (0.1 microM) diminished the tracheal contractility to NKA but failed to reduce the hyperreactivity induced by fenoterol. Tachykinin NK(1) receptor (NK(1)R), NK(2) receptor (NK(2)R) and NK(3) receptor (NK(3)R) gene expression was analyzed by semiquantitative RT-PCR. Compared to control tissues, NK(1)R and NK(2)R mRNA expression was increased by about 1.6-fold and 1.4-fold, respectively, in tissues treated with fenoterol. We were unable to detect the presence of NK(3)R mRNA in the guinea-pig trachea. In conclusion, fenoterol induces tracheal hyperresponsiveness to NKA and an up-regulation of NK(1)R and NK(2)R gene expression. The hyperresponsiveness implicates the NFkappaB pathway and is abolished by tachykinin NK(1) (SR 140333) and NK(3) (SR 142801) receptor antagonists.

Management of acute pediatric asthma

Pediatric asthma prevalence, morbidity, and severity are increasing. Direct costs associated with providing emergency department and inpatient care account for more than 40% of overall dollars spent for this disease in the United States. Physicians in many health care settings may be required to treat a child in severe respiratory distress caused by acute asthma. This article reviews the pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment of severe asthma exacerbations, or status asthmaticus.

Genetic variation of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor: its functional and clinical importance in bronchial asthma

Asthma is a polygenic disease for which no clear genotype-phenotype relationships have emerged. In contrast, although not associated with the diagnosis of asthma per se, variant forms of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor (beta2-AR) gene (ADRB2) display functional effects that may be clinically relevant. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of ADBR2 are common and result in amino acid substitutions at positions 16, 27, and 164 of the receptor as well as position 19 of its 5' upstream peptide. These SNPs influence receptor function in vitro, although evidence regarding exact relationships is conflicting. This has raised the possibility that phenotypes such as bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) and responses to (beta2)-agonist drugs may be genetically determined. To date, no unequivocal relationships between SNPs and phenotype have been identified. In some studies the Gly(16) allele has been associated with increased BHR and asthma severity. In others, the Arg(16) allele has been shown to determine acute bronchodilator response and adverse events during long term beta(2)-agonist therapy. The latter may provide the basis for clinical application of this new knowledge. More recently, a small number of frequently occurring, functionally relevant ADRB2 haplotype pairs have been confirmed. These combinations of alleles may be more important in determining genotype/phenotype relationships than individual SNPs, and may explain why earlier investigations have yielded contrasting results. Future studies will be required to clarify the pharmacodynamic effects of ADRB2haplotypes both in vitro and in vivo.

Formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg (delivered dose) has a rapid onset and 12-h duration of bronchodilation

Clinical trials show that formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler 4.5 microg delivered dose (6 microg metered dose) has a rapid onset of bronchodilation similar to that of salbutamol and a 12-h duration of action. Maximum increase in FEV(1) and duration of bronchodilation are dose-dependent, the 4.5 microg dose being the lowest dose tested giving both effects. Clinical studies investigating onset of bronchodilation show a significant increase in specific airway conductance occurring within 1 min after inhalation of formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg. When measured from 3-20 min after inhalation, formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg showed similar increases in FEV(1) to salbutamol administered via pMDI. No difference in onset of bronchodilation was observed between the formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 and 9 microg doses.Single-dose studies and studies of 1-12 weeks' duration show that formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg produces a significant and clinically important mean bronchodilating effect for > or =12 h after inhalation. In the cited studies no significant differences in duration of bronchodilation were observed between the formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 and 9 microg doses.

CONCLUSION

clinical data show that formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg is an effective dose in patients with asthma, with a rapid onset of bronchodilation and a duration of at least 12 h.

Beta2-agonist tolerance and exercise-induced bronchospasm

The effect of regular inhaled beta-agonist on the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction was studied. Eight subjects with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction took 1 week each of salbutamol 200 microg qid or placebo in a random-order, double-blind, crossover study. They then withheld this treatment for 8 hours before performing a dry-air, sub-maximal exercise challenge at a work-rate previously shown to induce a 15% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Five minutes after exercise, they inhaled salbutamol 100, 100, and 200 microg at 5-minute intervals. The mean pre-exercise FEV1 was similar on both study days. However, pretreatment for 1 week with salbutamol led to a significantly greater fall in FEV1 after exercise. The FEV1 remained lower than during the placebo arm despite the administration of salbutamol after exercise. This difference persisted 25 minutes after exercise. It is concluded that regular beta-agonist treatment leads to increased exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and a suboptimal bronchodilator response to beta-agonist. The data suggest that previous regular beta-agonist treatment may lead to a failure to respond to emergency bronchodilator treatment during an acute asthma attack and support current opinion that regular short-acting beta-agonist therapy should not be used to treat asthma.

Beta-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and drug responses in asthma

Genetic variation in the beta 2-adrenoceptor and its associated proteins is common and therefore potentially relevant to the clinician. Several functional SNPs have been described but in vitro studies have yielded inconsistent results. Confounding due to the variable presence of other polymorphic alleles may be the explanation and the recent definition of ADRB2 haplotypes offers the opportunity for clarification. In vitro studies have concentrated on downregulation and desensitization as functional end points. However, the relevance of these phenomena is unclear and extrapolating in vitro data to the clinical setting may not be appropriate. To date, only the Arg(16) polymorphism appears to be important in determining beta 2-agonist drug responses but the data as well as their application are limited. The results of prospective studies based on selection by ADRB2 haplotype will be necessary before a more general application of this knowledge can be encouraged.

Changing approaches to asthma management in Australia: effects on asthma morbidity

Asthma is an important public health issue in Australia and is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in the community. Recognition of the impact of asthma on the health of Australians, and the apparent failure of new medications to reduce mortality and hospital admission rates resulted in a major review by the stakeholders in asthma care. This led to new approaches to asthma management based on strategic use of asthma medications and the development of the Asthma Management Plan (AMP). The AMP drew together current understanding of asthma to develop a simple stepwise approach to management that could be readily applied in patient management. The National Asthma Campaign (NAC), a coalition of the major stakeholders in asthma care, was launched in 1990 to lead the dissemination of the AMP. In association with other organisations interested in asthma care in Australia, the NAC has developed the AMP, and co-ordinated a decade of education and advocacy about asthma that targeted doctors, health professionals and the general public. These activities have been successful in raising awareness about asthma in the community. However, recent research, while demonstrating the continued uptake of written asthma action plans for asthma and decrease in use of inhaled bronchodilator medications, reported a decrease in use of preventive therapy by people with asthma. These activities have had a sustained impact on asthma-related health outcomes with mortality at the lowest level since 1960 and a decline in hospital readmission rates. This is useful information because there is sound evidence that the prevalence and possibly severity of asthma in children has increased. However, review of management in primary care and among people who present to emergency services with acute asthma suggest that many people continue to manage their asthma poorly. Continued education is needed to build on the progress that has been made. There are opportunities to do this through efforts to integrate general practitioners into the wider health system through the formation of Divisions of General Practice. Recognition of asthma as a health priority area at a national level will help to enhance and maintain awareness of the public health importance of asthma and facilitate the further development of the initiatives begun during the last decade or more.

Regular treatment with long acting beta agonists versus daily regular treatment with short acting beta agonists in adults and children with stable asthma

BACKGROUND

Selective beta-adrenergic agonists for use in asthma are: short acting (2-6 hours) and long acting (>12 hours). There has been little controversy about using short acting beta-agonists intermittently, but long acting beta-agonists are used regularly, and their regular use has been controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefit or detriment of treatment with regular short- or long acting inhaled beta-agonists in chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search was carried out using the Cochrane Airways Group register. Bibliographies of identified RCTs were searched for additional relevant RCTs. Authors of identified RCTs were contacted for other published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised studies of at least two weeks duration, comparing a long acting inhaled beta-agonist given twice daily with any short acting inhaled beta-agonist of equivalent bronchodilator effectiveness given regularly in chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers performed data extraction and study quality assessment independently. Authors of studies were contacted for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

31 studies met the inclusion criteria, 24 of parallel group and 7 cross over design. Salmeterol xinafoate was used as long acting agent in 22 studies and formoterol fumarate in 9. Salbutamol was the short acting agent used in 27 studies and terbutaline in 5. The treatment period was over 2 weeks in 29 studies, and at least 12 weeks in 20. 25 studies permitted a variety of co-intervention treatments, usually inhaled corticosteroid or cromones. One study did not permit inhaled corticosteroid. Long acting beta-agonists were significantly better than short acting for a variety of lung function measurements including morning PEF (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 33 l/min 95% CI 25, 42) or evening PEF (WMD 26 l/min 95% CI 18, 33); and had significantly lower scores for day and night time asthma symptom scores and percentage of days and nights without symptoms. They were also associated with a significantly lower use of rescue medication both during the day and night. Risk of exacerbations was not different between the two types of agent, but most studies were of short duration which limits the power to test for such differences.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Long acting inhaled beta-agonists have advantages across a wide range of physiological and clinical outcomes for regular treatment.

Long-acting beta-agonist treatment in patients with persistent asthma already receiving inhaled corticosteroids

International guidelines recommend that long-acting beta-agonists should be considered in patients who are symptomatic despite moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids. When combined with inhaled corticosteroids they improve asthma symptoms and lung function and reduce exacerbations. The evidence suggests that they are well tolerated. However, they are less effective than inhaled corticosteroids as monotherapy and should not be used alone, although the addition of a long-acting beta-agonist may permit a small reduction in the corticosteroid dose. Both salmeterol and formoterol appear equally effective in improving asthma control. Formoterol, however, has a rapid onset of action and is now being promoted for the relief of acute asthma symptoms. Both drugs provide prolonged protection against exercise-induced bronchospasm. However, this effect rapidly diminishes with continuous therapy and if this is the main aim of treatment, intermittent use may be preferable. When compared with alternative treatments, inhaled long-acting beta-agonists are more effective in controlling asthma symptoms than either theophylline or antileukotriene agents. Bambuterol, an oral prodrug of terbutaline, appears to be as effective as the inhaled long-acting beta-agonists and has the advantage of once daily oral administration. However, the inhaled long-acting beta-agonists are less likely to have systemic adverse effects. There are theoretical concerns that regular beta-agonist treatment may lead to tolerance and a failure to respond to emergency asthma treatment. While there is no doubt that tolerance occurs, there is currently little evidence that this is a clinical problem. Insights into pharmacological as well as therapeutic interactions between inhaled corticosteroids and beta-agonists are providing justification for their use in combination. Guidelines for the management of patients with chronic persistent asthma are likely to require modification to reflect these developments.

A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND

Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists.

METHODS

Asthmatic patients (n = 145) allergic to house dust mite (HDM) were randomly allocated to monotherapy with a short-acting beta(2)-agonist (SA; n = 48), a long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LA; n = 50), or placebo (n = 47), double blind, double dummy. The study covered three periods: (1) a 4-week run-in period, in which no changes took place; followed by (2) cessation of treatment with asthma medication including inhaled corticosteroids, introduction of allergen avoidance measures (active/placebo treatment) to lower HDM exposure in the active group, and an 8-week washout period to adjust patients to these changes; followed by (3) a 12-week study medication period. At the start of the 12-week medication period, and every 4 weeks thereafter, spirometric measurements (FEV(1) and provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) [PC(20)]) were performed. Peak flow and asthma symptoms were recorded daily. Additionally, at the start and every 6 weeks thereafter, dust samples were collected from mattresses and living room and bedroom floors to assess HDM (der p 1) concentrations. Effects on FEV(1), PC(20), peak flow, and asthma symptoms were analyzed with repeated-measurement analysis and corrected for the exposure to HDM allergens.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among the three medication groups after 12 weeks for FEV(1). However, a significant decrease in mean FEV(1) percent predicted (95% confidence interval [CI]) was observed within the SA group: - 6.6 (- 10.4 to - 2.8) (p = 0.0002). A decrease in geometric mean PC(20) (95% CI) of - 1.2 (- 1.96 to - 0.44) doubling concentration was observed within the SA group (p = 0.05). No significant changes in FEV(1) and PC(20) were observed > 12 weeks within the LA group or the placebo group. There were neither changes in peak flow and asthma symptom scores among the three medication groups nor within the groups. Moreover, none of the parameters showed interactive effects with allergen exposure.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences among the three medication groups for FEV(1) and PC(20). The within-treatment group comparison showed a significant small decline in FEV(1) for the SA group (but not for the LA group), which could indicate that monotherapy with SAs might have negative effects on FEV(1). This was not seen during regular use of LAS: No clear pathophysiologic mechanism can explain these findings at the moment. Relatively high or low exposure to allergens did not alter these findings.

Decreased bronchodilating effect of salbutamol in relieving methacholine induced moderate to severe bronchoconstriction during high dose treatment with long acting β2 agonists

BACKGROUND

In vitro the long acting β2 agonist salmeterol can, in contrast to formoterol, behave as a partial agonist and become a partial antagonist to other β2 agonists. To study this in vivo, the bronchodilating effect of salbutamol was measured during methacholine induced moderate to severe bronchoconstriction in patients receiving maintenance treatment with high dose long acting β2agonists.

METHODS

A randomised double blind crossover study was performed in 19 asthmatic patients with mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 88.4% predicted and median concentration of methacholine provoking a fall in FEV1 of 20% or more (PC20) of 0.62 mg/ml at entry. One hour after the last dose of 2 weeks of treatment with formoterol (24 μg twice daily by Turbuhaler), salmeterol (100 μg twice daily by Diskhaler), or placebo a methacholine provocation test was performed and continued until there was at least a 30% decrease in FEV1. Salbutamol (50 μg) was administered immediately thereafter, followed by ipratropium bromide (40 μg) after a further 30 minutes. Lung function was monitored for 1 hour after provocation.

RESULTS

There was a significant bronchodilating and bronchoprotective effect after 2 weeks of active treatment. The dose of methacholine needed to provoke a fall in FEV1 of ⩾30% was higher after pretreatment with formoterol (2.48 mg) than with salmeterol (1.58 mg) or placebo (0.74 mg). The difference between formoterol and salmeterol was statistically significant: 0.7 doubling dose steps (95% CI 0.1 to 1.2, p=0.016). The immediate bronchodilating effect of subsequently administered salbutamol was significantly impaired after pretreatment with both drugs (p<0.0003 for both). Three minutes after inhaling salbutamol the increase in FEV1 relative to the pre-methacholine baseline was 15.8%, 7.3%, and 5.5% for placebo, formoterol and salmeterol, respectively (equivalent to increases of 26%, 14%, and 12%, respectively, from the lowest FEV1after methacholine). At 30 minutes significant differences remained, but 1 hour after completing the methacholine challenge FEV1had returned to baseline values in all three treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Formoterol has a greater intrinsic activity than salmeterol as a bronchoprotective agent, indicating that salmeterol is a partial agonist compared with formoterol in contracted human airways in vivo. Irrespective of this, prior long term treatment with both long acting β2agonists reduced the bronchodilating effect of an additional single dose of salbutamol equally, indicating that the development of tolerance or high receptor occupancy overshadowed any possible partial antagonistic activity of salmeterol. Patients on regular treatment with long acting β2 agonists should be made aware that an additional single dose of a short acting β2 agonist may become less effective.

Decreased bronchodilating effect of salbutamol in relieving methacholine induced moderate to severe bronchoconstriction during high dose treatment with long acting beta2 agonists

BACKGROUND

In vitro the long acting beta2 agonist salmeterol can, in contrast to formoterol, behave as a partial agonist and become a partial antagonist to other beta2 agonists. To study this in vivo, the bronchodilating effect of salbutamol was measured during methacholine induced moderate to severe bronchoconstriction in patients receiving maintenance treatment with high dose long acting beta2 agonists.

METHODS

A randomised double blind crossover study was performed in 19 asthmatic patients with mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 88.4% predicted and median concentration of methacholine provoking a fall in FEV1 of 20% or more (PC(20)) of 0.62 mg/ml at entry. One hour after the last dose of 2 weeks of treatment with formoterol (24 microg twice daily by Turbuhaler), salmeterol (100 microg twice daily by Diskhaler), or placebo a methacholine provocation test was performed and continued until there was at least a 30% decrease in FEV1. Salbutamol (50 microg) was administered immediately thereafter, followed by ipratropium bromide (40 microg) after a further 30 minutes. Lung function was monitored for 1 hour after provocation.

RESULTS

There was a significant bronchodilating and bronchoprotective effect after 2 weeks of active treatment. The dose of methacholine needed to provoke a fall in FEV1 of > or = 30% was higher after pretreatment with formoterol (2.48 mg) than with salmeterol (1.58 mg) or placebo (0.74 mg). The difference between formoterol and salmeterol was statistically significant: 0.7 doubling dose steps (95% CI 0.1 to 1.2, p=0.016). The immediate bronchodilating effect of subsequently administered salbutamol was significantly impaired after pretreatment with both drugs (p<0.0003 for both). Three minutes after inhaling salbutamol the increase in FEV1 relative to the pre-methacholine baseline was 15.8%, 7.3%, and 5.5% for placebo, formoterol and salmeterol, respectively (equivalent to increases of 26%, 14%, and 12%, respectively, from the lowest FEV1 after methacholine). At 30 minutes significant differences remained, but 1 hour after completing the methacholine challenge FEV1 had returned to baseline values in all three treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Formoterol has a greater intrinsic activity than salmeterol as a bronchoprotective agent, indicating that salmeterol is a partial agonist compared with formoterol in contracted human airways in vivo. Irrespective of this, prior long term treatment with both long acting beta2 agonists reduced the bronchodilating effect of an additional single dose of salbutamol equally, indicating that the development of tolerance or high receptor occupancy overshadowed any possible partial antagonistic activity of salmeterol. Patients on regular treatment with long acting beta2 agonists should be made aware that an additional single dose of a short acting beta2 agonist may become less effective.

Regular inhaled salbutamol : effect on airway responsiveness to methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate and tolerance to bronchoprotection

OBJECTIVE

Regular treatment with inhaled beta(2)-agonists increases airway responsiveness consistently to indirect bronchoconstrictors (allergen, exercise, hypertonic saline solution, etc) and inconsistently to direct bronchoconstrictors (histamine, methacholine). Studies demonstrating tolerance to beta(2)-agonist bronchoprotection against the indirect bronchoconstrictor adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) have not examined changes in baseline AMP responsiveness. This study assessed the effect of regular salbutamol on AMP and methacholine responsiveness and on tolerance to bronchoprotection.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, crossover study.

SETTING

University hospital bronchoprovocation laboratory.

PATIENTS

Fourteen atopic asthmatic subjects with FEV(1) > 65% predicted, and methacholine provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)) < 8 mg/mL.

INTERVENTIONS

Salbutamol, 100 microg, and placebo inhalers, two puffs qid, each for 10 days.

MEASUREMENTS

Methacholine PC(20) and AMP PC(20) measured 12 h after blinded inhaler after each treatment period. Methacholine PC(20) and AMP PC(20) repeated 10 min after salbutamol, 200 microg (eight subjects).

RESULTS

There was no difference between placebo and salbutamol treatment in geometric mean methacholine PC(20) (0.85 mg/mL vs 0.82 mg/mL, p = 0.86) or AMP PC(20) (22 mg/mL vs 17.4 mg/mL, p = 0.21; n = 14). The acute bronchoprotective effect of salbutamol was greater vs. AMP than vs methacholine (5.1 doubling concentrations vs. 3.5 doubling concentrations, p = 0.06) and loss of protective effect of salbutamol (mean +/- SD) was greater vs AMP than vs. methacholine (2.4 +/- 0.33 doubling concentration loss vs 0.8 +/- 0.21 doubling concentration loss, p = 0.008; n = 8).

CONCLUSION

Regular salbutamol (mean +/- SD) treatment did not enhance airway responsiveness to either the indirect bronchoconstrictor AMP or the direct bronchoconstrictor methacholine. Compared to its effect on methacholine, salbutamol had a greater acute protective effect vs AMP and produced greater loss of protection vs AMP when used regularly.

Enhancement of goblet cell hyperplasia and airway hyperresponsiveness by salbutamol in a rat model of atopic asthma

BACKGROUND

Goblet cell hyperplasia (GCH) is a prominent feature in animal models of atopic asthma produced by immunisation and following multiple challenges with antigens. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a beta(2) agonist on the development of GCH induced by the immune response.

METHODS

Brown Norway rats were immunised and challenged with an aerosol of ovalbumin for four weeks. Salbutamol (0.5 mg/kg/day) or vehicle was continuously delivered for the four weeks using a subcutaneously implanted osmotic minipump. The density of goblet cells, other morphological changes, and airway responsiveness to methacholine were evaluated 24 hours after the final challenge.

RESULTS

Treatment with salbutamol induced a more than twofold increase in the mean (SE) number of goblet cells (53.7 (7.3) vs 114.5 (11.8) cells/10(3) epithelial cells, p<0.01) while it did not significantly influence airway wall thickening and eosinophilic infiltration. Airway responsiveness to methacholine expressed as the logarithmic value of the concentration of methacholine required to generate a 50% increase in airway pressure (logPC(150)Mch) was also enhanced by the beta(2) agonist (-0.56 (0. 21) vs -0.95 (0.05), p<0.05). Additional experiments revealed that the same dose of the beta(2) agonist alone did not cause GCH in non-immunised rats and that the enhancement of GCH by salbutamol was completely abolished by simultaneous treatment with methylprednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that salbutamol enhances goblet cell hyperplasia and airway hyperresponsiveness in this rat model of atopic asthma.

The influence of polymorphism at position 16 of the beta2-adrenoceptor on the development of tolerance to beta-agonist

Polymorphism at position 16 of the beta2-adrenoceptor alters receptor down-regulation in vitro. Our aim was to compare the development of tolerance to beta-agonist in homozygous Gly-16 patients with patients harboring the "wild" genotype (homozygous Arg-16) during regular treatment with salmeterol. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, 20 subjects with mild to moderate asthma (10 Gly-16, 10 Arg-16) received 2 weeks of treatment with inhaled salmeterol 100 microg b.i.d. Thereafter, dose responses to inhaled salbutamol were constructed for forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), heart rate, QTc interval, serum potassium and glucose, and finger tremor. The protective effect of salbutamol against adenosine monophosphate (AMP) challenge was also measured. Salmeterol resulted in a significant reduction in the area under curve (AUC) for FEV1 (p = 0.01), heart rate (p = 0.01), QTc interval (p = 0.01), and tremor (p = 0.05), and in the maximum responses for FEV1 (p = 0.05), heart rate (p = 0.02), and glucose (p = 0.02). The protective effect of salbutamol against AMP was reduced by 3.61 doubling doses (p < 0.001). However, differences between Gly-16 and Arg-16 patients were small and nonsignificant. Thus, although tolerance is influenced in vitro by polymorphism of the beta2-adrenoceptor, the magnitude of between-genotype differences in vivo is unlikely to be significant.

Asthma exacerbations during long term beta agonist use: influence of beta(2) adrenoceptor polymorphism

BACKGROUND

Polymorphisms of the beta(2) adrenoceptor influence receptor function in vitro and asthma phenotypes in vivo. However, their importance in determining responses to inhaled beta agonist treatment has not been clearly defined.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of previously published data we have examined relationships between polymorphisms at codons 16 and 27 of the beta(2) adrenoceptor and clinical outcomes in a randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of regularly scheduled salbutamol and salmeterol in 115 patients with mild to moderate asthma. Genotyping was obtained for positions 16 and 27 in 108 and 107 patients, respectively. For position 16, 17 patients (16%) were homozygous Arg-Arg, 40 (37%) were heterozygous Arg-Gly, and 51 (47%) were homozygous Gly-Gly.

RESULTS

Within the homozygous Arg-16 group major exacerbations were more frequent during salbutamol treatment than with placebo (1.91 (95% CI 1.07 to 3.12) per year versus 0.81 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.66) per year; p = 0.005). No significant treatment related differences occurred for heterozygous Arg-Gly patients (salbutamol 0.11 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.40), placebo 0.54 (95% CI 0.26 to 1.00) exacerbations per year) or homozygous Gly-16 patients (salbutamol 0.38 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.73), placebo 0.30 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.61) exacerbations per year). No adverse changes occurred for any position 16 subgroup with salmeterol. There was no significant relationship between position 27 genotypes and treatment related outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Homozygous Arg-16 patients are susceptible to clinically important increases in asthma exacerbations during chronic dosing with the short acting beta(2) agonist salbutamol.

Bronchodilator tolerance and rebound bronchoconstriction during regular inhaled beta-agonist treatment

There is uncertainty about the development of airway tolerance to beta-agonists and the phenomenon of rebound bronchoconstriction on beta-agonist withdrawal. We have recently completed a study of the regular terbutaline and budesonide treatment in asthma. We report our observations on the effect of starting and stopping terbutaline treatment on morning and evening peak flows. The study was a randomized four-way, double-dummy, cross-over comparison of regular inhaled terbutaline (500-1000 microg four times daily), budesonide, combined treatment and matching placebo. Each treatment was given for 6 weeks following a 4 week single-blind placebo washout. Ipratropium was used for symptom relief. No other asthma medication was permitted during either the treatment or wash-out periods. Evaluable data were obtained from 52 subjects for both placebo and terbutaline treatment. Changes in mean morning and evening peak flows during terbutaline treatment were compared to the baseline peak flows during the last 2 weeks of the preceding washout. The peak flow changes on stopping terbutaline were also analysed. Mean morning peak flow was not significantly different during terbutaline treatment when compared to either baseline or placebo treatment. Evening peak flows were significantly higher during terbutaline treatment [mean increase 23.1 l min(-1) (95% CI = 18.8, 27.4)]. Analysis of the peak flow changes on a day-by-day basis revealed an initial increase in morning peak flows for the first 2 days of treatment of 19.2 and 13.41 min(-1) [increases of 25.0 and 17.31 min(-1) in comparison with the corresponding values during placebo (P<0.01)] followed by a return to baseline. The increase in evening peak flows was also greater for the first 2 days of treatment than for the remainder of the treatment period (P<0.01). On ceasing terbutaline treatment there was a fall in mean morning peak flow below the baseline on the following morning of 21.6 l min(-1) (P<0.05 compared to placebo). The temporary increase in morning peak flows and greater than expected rise in evening peak flows for the first 2 days of treatment suggest the development of tolerance to the bronchodilator effect of terbutaline. Similarly, the fall in morning peak flows on treatment withdrawal suggests rebound bronchoconstriction. These effects are likely to be mediated by downregulation of the beta-receptor during treatment. The clinical significance of these changes is uncertain in view of the stability of overall asthma control during terbutaline treatment, but sudden withdrawal of beta-agonist treatment could conceivably lead to a deterioration in asthma control.

Effects of terbutaline and budesonide on sputum cells and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthma

Previous studies have shown that the regular administration of short acting beta-agonists can be associated with adverse effects on airway caliber and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and that this may occur through a proinflammatory mechanism. The aim was to explore possible adverse effects of high-dose beta-agonist therapy and to assess any adverse interaction with corticosteroids. We undertook a randomized, crossover study to investigate the effects of 6 wk of treatment with regular terbutaline (1 mg four times a day), regular budesonide (400 microg twice a day), combined treatment, and placebo in subjects with mild to moderate asthma. Major endpoints were PD(15) saline, PD(20) methacholine, and induced sputum differential cell counts. Thirty-four subjects were randomized and 28 completed the study. PD(15) saline decreased on terbutaline alone compared with placebo treatment and on combined treatment compared with budesonide alone (mean fold decrease of 0.57 [95% CI = 0.36, 0.90] and 0.65 [95% CI = 0.43, 0.97], respectively). PD(20) methacholine was not affected by the use of terbutaline either alone or in combination with budesonide. The percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum increased during terbutaline treatment alone compared with placebo (median 8.3% versus 4.4%, p = 0.049). The addition of terbutaline to budesonide did not affect the percentage of eosinophils compared with budesonide treatment alone. These findings support the hypothesis that short-acting beta-agonists have a permissive effect on airway inflammation and that when used in high dose there may be an unfavorable interaction with inhaled corticosteroids.

Asthma--the changing face of drug therapy

Until the recent introduction of long acting beta 2-agonists and the leukotriene antagonists, the drug treatment of asthma had remained largely unchanged for a quarter century. Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of the long acting beta 2-agonists in the management of asthma in children and highlighted their value as an adjunct to inhaled corticosteroids. The leukotriene antagonists are an important new class of drug therapy which target a specific area of asthma pathogenesis. Whilst they have been shown to be effective for asthma, their exact role in the clinical situation remains to be established. Recent guidelines have emphasised the important role of inflammation in persistent asthma and recommended the early institution of anti-inflammatory treatment. Many patients remain uncontrolled despite high doses of anti-inflammatory agents including oral corticosteroids. Recent experience with other immunomodulatory agents such as cyclosporin, methotrexate and intravenous immunoglobulin has highlighed their potential as steroid sparing agents. With improved understanding of asthma pathogenesis the potential for specific targeted therapies has become evident. Monoclonal antibodies to IgE and certain cytokines are being investigated as possible treatments for asthma. Similarly, preliminary studies of selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors in asthmatic individuals have been encouraging. Other potential therapies include platelet-activating factor receptor antagonists, tryptase inhibitors and prostaglandin E analogs. The continued development of such targeted treatments should ensure a greater diversity of therapeutic options for the management of asthma in the new millennium.

Bronchodilator response to albuterol after regular formoterol and effects of acute corticosteroid administration

BACKGROUND

There is controversy about the development of bronchodilator subsensitivity after regular administration of long-acting beta(2)-agonists.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether regular treatment with formoterol affects the bronchodilator response to repeated puffs of albuterol, and also to assess the effects of acute administration of a bolus dose of IV or inhaled corticosteroid.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve patients (mean [SD] age, 43 [15] years; FEV(1), 57 [17] % predicted) with stable, moderate to severe persistent asthma who were all taking inhaled corticosteroids were evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study. Patients received treatments each for 2 weeks followed by a bolus (IV/inhaled) of corticosteroid or placebo: (1) placebo inhaler bid + bolus placebo; (2) formoterol Turbuhaler 24 microg metered dosage bid (delivered dosage 18 microg bid) + placebo; (3) formoterol 24 microg bid + bolus IV hydrocortisone, 200 mg; or (4) formoterol 24 microg bid + bolus inhaled budesonide, 1,600 microg. Bronchodilator response to repeated puffs of albuterol (200 to 1,600 microg) for > 80 min was measured at 2 h after bolus administration of placebo or corticosteroid. The study was powered at the 80% level to detect a 20% difference in area under curve between 20 and 80 min (AUC) for FEV(1) response to albuterol as change from baseline (primary end point).

RESULTS

There was significant subsensitivity (p = 0.01) of the mean albuterol FEV(1) response (as AUC, L x s) after formoterol alone (737) as compared to placebo (1,453) along with partial reversal by steroid administration: formoterol + hydrocortisone (1, 050), and formoterol + budesonide (942). There was a similar pattern of subsensitivity (p = 0.03) for the mean albuterol forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity response (as AUC, L): placebo (2,149), formoterol alone (1,002), formoterol + hydrocortisone (1,402), and formoterol + budesonide (1,271).

CONCLUSION

Regular treatment with formoterol produced significant bronchodilator subsensitivity to repeated puffs of albuterol, which was partially reversed by a bolus dose of systemic or inhaled corticosteroid.