1
|
Chido-Amajuoyi OG, Osaghae I, Agaku IT, Chen B, Mantey DS. Exposure to school-based tobacco prevention interventions in low-income and middle-income countries and its association with psychosocial predictors of smoking among adolescents: a pooled cross-sectional analysis of Global Youth Tobacco Survey data from 38 countries. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e070749. [PMID: 38413149 PMCID: PMC10900417 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the prevalence of school-based tobacco prevention programme exposure among adolescents in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and its association with psychosocial predictors of smoking. DESIGN Analysis of pooled cross-sectional data. SETTING Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS), conducted in 38 LMICs. PARTICIPANTS This was a pooled analysis of data involving a total of 132 755 adolescent respondents to GYTS in 38 LMICs across Africa, Europe and Central/South America between 2014 and 2017. EXPOSURE AND OUTCOME MEASURES The primary independent variable for this study was self-reported exposure to school-based tobacco prevention programmes in the past year. Five psychosocial determinants of smoking were explored as outcomes: perceived addictiveness of nicotine, perceived harm of secondhand smoke exposure, support for restricting cigarette smoking at public indoor locations, support for restricting cigarette smoking at public outdoor areas and self-reported prediction of enjoying cigarette smoking. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between exposure to school-based tobacco prevention programmes and study outcomes, controlling for sociodemographic and smoking-related characteristics of respondents. RESULTS Overall, 59.1% of adolescents in LMICs self-reported exposure to school-based tobacco prevention programmes. The country-specific prevalence of adolescent exposure to school-based tobacco interventions ranged from 24.9% in the Comoros to 99.3% in Turkmenistan. Exposure to school-based tobacco interventions was significantly associated with greater secondhand smoke harm perceptions (adjusted OR (AOR): 1.69; 95% CI: 1.69 to 1.70), perceptions of addictiveness (AOR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.36 to 1.37) and supporting tobacco use restrictions indoors (AOR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.69 to 1.70) and outdoors (AOR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.59 to 1.60). Exposure to school-based tobacco interventions was associated with lower odds of anticipating enjoying cigarette smoking (AOR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.76). CONCLUSION Exposure to tobacco prevention programmes in schools is suboptimal in LMICs. Given the protective associations described in this study from school-based tobacco prevention programme exposure, it is imperative that national governments implement school-based programmes into ongoing tobacco control measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ikponmwosa Osaghae
- Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Israel Terungwa Agaku
- Oral Health Policy & Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Baojiang Chen
- Biostatistics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Dale S Mantey
- Health Promotion/Behavioral Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Austin, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alebshehy R, Asif Z, Boeckmann M. Policies regulating retail environment to reduce tobacco availability: A scoping review. Front Public Health 2023; 11:975065. [PMID: 36866095 PMCID: PMC9971920 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.975065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In 2005, the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) entered into force. This treaty was developed in response to the global tobacco epidemic, and it includes measures to reduce both demand for and supply of tobacco. The measures related to demand reduction include raising tax, providing cessation services, promoting smoke free public places, banning advertising, and raising awareness. However, there are a limited number of measures for supply reduction, and these mainly include fighting illicit trade, banning sales to minors and providing alternatives to tobacco workers and growers. Unlike regulation of many other goods and services that have been subjected to retail restrictions, there is a lack of resources about restricting tobacco availability through regulation of tobacco retail environment. Considering the potential of retail environment regulations in reducing tobacco supply and consequently reducing tobacco use, this scoping review aims to identify relevant measures. Methods This review examines interventions, policies, and legislations to regulate tobacco retail environment to reduce tobacco availability. This was done by searching the WHO FCTC and its Conference of Parties decisions, a gray literature search including tobacco control databases, a scoping communication with the Focal Points of the 182 WHO FCTC Parties, and a databases search in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Global Health, and Web of Science. Results Themes of policies were identified to reduce tobacco availability by regulating retail environment: four WHO FCTC and twelve non-WHO FCTC policies. The WHO FCTC policies included requiring a license to sell tobacco, banning tobacco sale via vending machines, promoting economically alternative activities to individual sellers, and banning ways of sale that constitute a way of advertising, promotion, and sponsorships. The Non-WHO FCTC policies included banning tobacco home delivery, tray sale, tobacco retail outlets in or within a minimum distance from specific facilities, sale in specific retail outlets, and sale of tobacco or one or more of its products, in addition to restricting tobacco retail outlets per density of population and per geographic area, capping the tobacco amount allowed per purchase, limiting the number of hours or days in which tobacco can be sold, requiring a minimum distance between tobacco retailers, reducing tobacco products availability and proximity within a retail outlet, and restricting sale to government controlled outlets. Discussion and conclusion Studies show the effects of regulation of the retail environment in influencing overall tobacco purchases, and there is evidence that having fewer retails reduces the level of impulse purchasing of cigarettes and tobacco goods. The measures covered by WHO FCTC are much more implemented than ones not covered by it. Although not all widely implemented, many themes of limiting tobacco availability by regulating tobacco retail environment are available. Further studies to explore such measures and the adoption of the effective ones under the WHO FCTC decisions, could possibly increase their implementation globally to reduce tobacco availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raouf Alebshehy
- School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany,Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom,*Correspondence: Raouf Alebshehy ✉
| | - Zara Asif
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Melanie Boeckmann
- Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Karriker-Jaffe KJ, Henriksen L, Smith EA, McDaniel PA, Malone RE, Kerr WC. Relapse to problem drinking or trading up to spirits? Using U.S. national cross-sectional survey data to highlight possible negative impacts of potential tobacco retail changes. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:72. [PMID: 36320048 PMCID: PMC9623940 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-022-00498-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association, twelve states in the United States (U.S.) have government retail monopolies on spirits/liquor sales. With a new federal minimum legal sales age for tobacco (raised from 18 to 21, the minimum legal sales age for alcohol), we examine possible unintended consequences of a hypothetical policy change restricting retail tobacco sales to state-run spirits/liquor stores in alcohol control states, which has been proposed as a tobacco endgame strategy. METHODS We used cross-sectional survey data from 14,821 randomly-selected adults ages 21 and older who responded to the 2015 or 2020 U.S. National Alcohol Survey (51.8% female; 65.8% identified as non-Hispanic White, 12.4% as Black or African American, 14.2% as Hispanic or Latinx; 34.0% had a low level of education), including 2,274 respondents (18.9%) residing in one of the alcohol control states (representing 42.2 million (M) adults ages 21+). We estimated associations between tobacco measures (lifetime smoking status, lifetime daily smoking, past-year daily smoking) and alcohol measures (drinking status, beverage choices, lifetime alcohol use disorder (AUD) status, recovery status) overall and for specific subgroups. RESULTS In control states, 55.1% of people who smoked daily in the past year also reported lifetime AUD, including an estimated 3.56 M adults ages 21 + who reported prior (but not current) AUD. The association of daily smoking with lifetime AUD was stronger among those with low education compared to those with higher education. Further, 58.8% of people in recovery from an alcohol and/or drug problem (1.49 M adults ages 21+) smoked daily, and this was more marked among women than men in control states. CONCLUSION There could be negative consequences of an endgame strategy to restructure tobacco retail sales, including increased risk for relapse to drinking among people who smoke daily, especially among women and people with low levels of education. Strategies to mitigate unintended harms would be needed if such a policy were implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe
- Center on Behavioral Health Epidemiology, Implementation & Evaluation Research, RTI International, 2150 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 800, 94704, Berkeley, CA, USA.
| | - Lisa Henriksen
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Smith
- Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, 94143, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Patricia A McDaniel
- Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, 94143, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ruth E Malone
- Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, 94143, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - William C Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 94608, Emeryville, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang LX, Wilson NJ. U.S. State approaches to cannabis licensing. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2022; 106:103755. [PMID: 35691088 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
U.S. states have taken varied approaches to licensing cannabis businesses under federal prohibition, but up to now there is limited research on cross-state licensing approaches. This paper provides a systematic analysis of the current licensing strategies taken by all states that have passed medical cannabis laws (MCLs)/recreational cannabis laws (RCLs). We construct comprehensive data on cannabis business licenses offered in each state, as well as metrics for license categories, cost, and issuance volume. We then analyze patterns between these metrics, also considering how long ago states implemented MCLs/RCLs, qualitative licensing aspects, state ideology and voting preference, and state cannabis taxation data. We observe that states tend to license medical cannabis more restrictively than adult-use cannabis: i.e., by offering licenses in fewer categories, at higher cost, in lower issuance volume, and more often mandating vertical integration. Additionally, states that implemented MCLs/RCLs earlier tend to offer licenses in more categories, at lower cost, and in greater volumes. Further, though states that implemented MCLs recently lean conservative and Republican, we do not observe clear relationships between ideology or voting preference and licensing policy. In our supporting results, we observe that a greater share of states with complex licensing structures impose non-retail price cannabis taxes than states overall, and we discuss how states have changed their licensing policies over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Xiaolu Wang
- Department of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst MA 01002, United States; Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Marstallplatz 1, Munich 80539, Germany; Canadian Centre for Health Economics, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada.
| | - Nicholas J Wilson
- Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Marstallplatz 1, Munich 80539, Germany; Department of Economics, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Ludwigstraße 28, Munich 80539, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Purushothaman V, Cuomo RE, Li J, Nali M, Mackey TK. Association of tobacco retailer count with smoking population versus vaping population in California (2019). Arch Public Health 2022; 80:42. [PMID: 35086563 PMCID: PMC8793220 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-022-00799-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Access to tobacco products, including vape products, from local brick-and-mortar stores influences the exposure, uptake, and use of these products in local communities. METHODS Licensed tobacco retailers in California were classified as specialized tobacco/vape stores or non-specialized stores by obtaining categories published on Yelp. California smoking and vaping prevalence data were obtained from the 500 cities project and ESRI community analyst tool respectively. A series of simple linear regression tests were performed, at the zip code level, between the retailer count in each store category and smoking/vaping population. The Getis-Ord Gi* and Anselin Local Moran's I statistics were used for characterization of tobacco retail density hotspots and cold spots. RESULTS The association between CA smoking/vaping population and number of tobacco retailers was statistically significant for all store categories. Variability in smoking population was best explained by variability in non-specialized storefronts(R2=0.84). Spatial variability in tobacco-only storefronts explained the least proportion of variability in the overall smoking population. Similar results were obtained specific to vaping population, although the proportion of population explained by variability in the number of non-specialized storefronts was comparatively lower(R2=0.80). CONCLUSIONS Localities with greater numbers of non-specialized tobacco retailers had higher rates of smoking/vaping populations, and this association was much stronger for localities with greater numbers of specialized retailers. Non-specialized storefronts may represent convenient access points for nicotine products, while specialized storefronts may represent critical access points for initiation. Hence, regulations that address the entirety of the tobacco/vaping retail environment by limiting widespread access from non-specialized stores and reducing appeal generated by specialized retailers should be incorporated in future tobacco regulatory science and policymaking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vidya Purushothaman
- Department of Anesthesiology, San Diego School of Medicine, University of California, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Global Health Policy and Data Institute, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Raphael E Cuomo
- Department of Anesthesiology, San Diego School of Medicine, University of California, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Global Health Policy and Data Institute, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Jiawei Li
- Global Health Policy and Data Institute, San Diego, CA, USA
- S-3 Research LLC, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Nali
- Department of Anesthesiology, San Diego School of Medicine, University of California, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Global Health Policy and Data Institute, San Diego, CA, USA
- S-3 Research LLC, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Tim K Mackey
- Global Health Policy and Data Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.
- S-3 Research LLC, San Diego, CA, USA.
- Global Health Program, Department of Anthropology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Obinwa U, Pasch KE, Jetelina KK, Ranjit N, Perez A, Perry C, Harrell M. A Simulation of the potential impact of restricting tobacco retail outlets around middle and high schools on tobacco advertisements. Tob Control 2022; 31:81-87. [PMID: 33310775 PMCID: PMC8672537 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine (1) if tobacco retail outlets (TROs) closer to middle and high schools have more tobacco advertisements than TROs farther away and (2) the potential impact of two place-based tobacco control strategies on tobacco advertisements: a simulated ban of TROs (1) within 1000ft of schools and (2) within 500 ft of other TROs. METHODS TROs within half-mile of 53 middle and high schools in the four largest Metropolitan areas in Texas were audited for all tobacco marketing. ArcGIS was used for mapping and grouping TROs by distance from the schools and simulating the ban. Mean differences in the number of tobacco advertisements were examined with t-tests. Percentage reductions in tobacco advertisements were calculated after simulation of both bans, reported by school type and by location, product and flavour. RESULTS TROs within 1000 ft of schools had significantly more tobacco advertisements as compared with TROs located within 1000-2000 ft (p=0.03) for all schools combined and middle schools. Simulation of the 1000 ft ban of TROs led to a slightly greater reduction in advertisements (19.4%) as compared with the 500 ft ban of TROs from other TROs (17.9%). The reduction in all advertisement types was greater around middle schools and greatest for e-cigarettes (23.6%). CONCLUSION Students can be exposed to a great deal of tobacco advertising in TROs around their schools. The implementation of a 1000 ft ban of TROs, or at minimum a ban on tobacco advertising outside and within these outlets, is one way to prevent or reduce the use of tobacco among adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udoka Obinwa
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), School of Public Health in Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Keryn E Pasch
- Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Katelyn K Jetelina
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), School of Public Health in Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Nalini Ranjit
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), School of Public Health in Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Adriana Perez
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), School of Public Health in Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Cheryl Perry
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), School of Public Health in Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Melissa Harrell
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), School of Public Health in Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hossain S, Anjum A, Uddin ME, Rahman F, Mahmud HM, Ahmed MK, Islam MS. Regulating tobacco retail outlets in Bangladesh: retailers' views and implications for tobacco control advocacy. Tob Control 2021; 30:687-691. [PMID: 32900919 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2019] [Revised: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco products are ubiquitously available in Bangladesh. There are currently no restrictions on who can sell tobacco products and where they are allowed to be sold. The objective of this study was to explore tobacco retailers' views regarding tobacco retail licensing (TRL) in Bangladesh. METHODS A two-stage cluster sampling procedure was used to collect data from a representative sample of 472 tobacco retailers (97% response rate) in Dhaka city in 2018 through face-to-face interviews using a semistructured questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, X2 tests and logistic regression. RESULTS The majority (79%) of the retailers reported that they would support TRL, and 68% were interested in applying for TRL if adopted. Support for TRL was higher among those with a university degree (OR 2.1, 95% CI 0.8 to 5.3) and among those with knowledge about existing tobacco control regulations (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.8). Furthermore, support for TRL was significantly higher among those who believed that it would restrict tobacco retailing locations (AOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.0) and prevent tobacco sales to minors (AOR 3.5, 95% CI 2.2 to 5.5). CONCLUSION This sample of tobacco retailers in Bangladesh supported TRL. TRL advocacy efforts could draw on this support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahadat Hossain
- Department of Public Health and Informatics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Bangladesh
| | - Afifa Anjum
- Department of Public Health and Informatics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Bangladesh
| | - Md Elias Uddin
- Department of English, Dhaka University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Farzana Rahman
- Tobacco Control Program, Bangladesh Center for Communication Programs, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Hm Miraz Mahmud
- Tobacco Control Program, Bangladesh Center for Communication Programs, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Md Kapil Ahmed
- Tobacco Control Program, Bangladesh Center for Communication Programs, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - M Shamimul Islam
- Tobacco Control Program, Bangladesh Center for Communication Programs, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Colditz JB, Tulikangas MC, Sidani JE, Dodson ZM, Woods MS, James AE, Primack BA. Vape Shop Proliferation and Noncompliance in Pennsylvania: A Pre- and Post-tax Analysis. Tob Use Insights 2021; 14:1179173X20927389. [PMID: 33746518 PMCID: PMC7905483 DOI: 10.1177/1179173x20927389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The growing use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among
adolescents is a public health concern. Taxation of these products is a
viable approach to reduce ENDS use, particularly among adolescents.
Opponents of taxation posit that it puts specialty retailers (ie, vape
shops) out of business, thereby reducing availability of ENDS for adult
smokers seeking harm reduction. Pennsylvania enacted substantial ENDS taxes
in October 2016. This study sought to examine (1) the prevalence of
Pennsylvania vape shops before and after ENDS taxes were enacted and (2)
ENDS retail licensing compliance among vape shops. Methods: We employed standardized searches for vape shops in Pennsylvania on the Yelp
business-listing platform a month prior to and for 18 consecutive months
following the imposition of ENDS taxes. We then compared listings to a
public database of ENDS-related retail licenses to determine compliance
status. Results: The number of listed vape shops increased in a linear fashion by a magnitude
of 23%. In addition, when we compared a final listing of retailers to data
from the state tax authority, we found roughly a quarter (22%-29%) of vape
shops to be noncompliant with maintaining a valid ENDS retail license. Conclusions: Overall, ENDS taxation in Pennsylvania has not appeared to reduce prevalence
of vape shops as anticipated. However, stricter enforcement of the tax law
is necessary to ensure compliance among retailers. These findings have
implications for implementation and enforcement of ENDS tax policy
nationwide, including states that currently lack such policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason B Colditz
- Center for Research on Media, Technology, and Health, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Megan C Tulikangas
- Bureau of Public Policy and Community Relations, Allegheny County Health Department, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jaime E Sidani
- Center for Research on Media, Technology, and Health, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Zan M Dodson
- American Association of Geographers, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Michelle S Woods
- Center for Research on Media, Technology, and Health, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - A Everette James
- Health Policy Institute, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Brian A Primack
- College of Education and Health Professions, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Marsh L, Vaneckova P, Robertson L, Johnson TO, Doscher C, Raskind IG, Schleicher NC, Henriksen L. Association between density and proximity of tobacco retail outlets with smoking: A systematic review of youth studies. Health Place 2021; 67:102275. [PMID: 33526204 PMCID: PMC8171582 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 12/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing the retail availability of tobacco has been proposed as a component of tobacco endgame, yet it is not known whether retail availability has a direct impact on smoking behaviours. A narrative review and a meta-analysis have been undertaken to examine the density and proximity of tobacco retail outlets, but were limited in scope, exposure and outcome variables. The aim of this current study was to undertake a systematic review of the international literature on the density and proximity of tobacco retail outlets to homes, schools and communities and their association with smoking behaviours among youth. METHODS We reviewed and critically appraised the evidence documenting the association between density or proximity of tobacco retail outlets and smoking behaviours among school-age youth (18 and under), between 1 January 1990 and 21 October 2019. We reviewed original quantitative research that examined the associations of tobacco retail outlet density and proximity with individual smoking status or population-level smoking prevalence; initiation of smoking; frequency of tobacco use; sales to minors; purchasing by minors; susceptibility to smoking among non-smokers; perceived prevalence of smoking, and quitting behaviours. FINDINGS Thirty-five peer-reviewed papers met the inclusion criteria. This review provided evidence of a relationship between density of tobacco retail outlets and smoking behaviours, particularly for the density near youths' home. A study using activity spaces also found a significant positive association between exposure to tobacco retail outlets and daily tobacco use. The review did not provide evidence of an association between the proximity of tobacco retail outlets to homes or schools and smoking behaviours among youth. CONCLUSIONS The existing evidence supports a positive association between tobacco retail outlet density and smoking behaviours among youth, particularly for the density near youths' home. This review provides evidence for the development and implementation of policies to reduce the density of tobacco retail outlets to reduce smoking prevalence among youth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Marsh
- Cancer Society Social & Behavioural Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
| | - Pavla Vaneckova
- Cancer Council New South Wales, 153 Dowling Street, Woolloomooloo, NSW, 2011, Australia
| | - Lindsay Robertson
- Cancer Society Social & Behavioural Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand; Tobacco Control Research Group, Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
| | - Trent O Johnson
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3300 Hillview Ave, Mail Code 5537, Palo Alto, CA, 94304-1334, USA
| | - Crile Doscher
- Faculty of Environment, Society and Design, Lincoln University, PO Box 84, Lincoln, 7647, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - Ilana G Raskind
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3300 Hillview Ave, Mail Code 5537, Palo Alto, CA, 94304-1334, USA
| | - Nina C Schleicher
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3300 Hillview Ave, Mail Code 5537, Palo Alto, CA, 94304-1334, USA
| | - Lisa Henriksen
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3300 Hillview Ave, Mail Code 5537, Palo Alto, CA, 94304-1334, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Glasser AM, Roberts ME. Retailer density reduction approaches to tobacco control: A review. Health Place 2021; 67:102342. [PMID: 33526207 PMCID: PMC7856310 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Tobacco retailer density is consistently associated with poor tobacco-use outcomes. The aim of this review was to synthesize the international evidence on density reduction policies. Searches in multiple databases resulted in 31 studies covering various policy approaches evaluated for their impact on retailer density. Findings indicate that bans on tobacco sales in pharmacies reduced retailer density, but perhaps not equitably. Prohibiting sale of tobacco near schools produced greater density reductions in higher-risk neighborhoods. Policies in combination were most effective. Future studies should measure the impact of these policies on tobacco use. Density-reduction policies offer a promising approach to tobacco control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison M Glasser
- The Ohio State University, College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Megan E Roberts
- The Ohio State University, College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Patel M, Donovan EM, Perks SN, Huang D, Czaplicki L, Akbar M, Gagosian S, Schillo BA. E-cigarette Tobacco Retail Licensing Laws: Variance Across US States as of January 1, 2020. Am J Public Health 2020; 110:1380-1385. [PMID: 32673117 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2020.305771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Objectives. To describe how US states and the District of Columbia regulate e-cigarette sales by examining e-cigarette-specific tobacco retail licensing (TRL) laws.Methods. We coded 25 state-level e-cigarette TRL laws (effective as of January 1, 2020) for provisions we labeled as either "core" (e.g., presence of license terms, fees, and penalties) or "descriptive" (e.g., license fee amount and term length).Results. Overall, 23 laws clearly defined a license term, 23 laws required a license fee, and 19 laws identified penalties for violations that included both license suspension and revocation. Fees widely ranged ($5-$1000 annually), and 8 laws did not explicitly direct fees toward TRL administration or enforcement. No law required that retailers comply with all local, state, and federal tobacco or e-cigarette laws.Conclusions. Most laws contained core TRL provisions. Several laws, however, had minimal license fees and did not direct fees toward administration or enforcement. As youth e-cigarette use increases, more states should consider establishing e-cigarette TRL laws or incorporating provisions into existing TRL laws.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minal Patel
- Minal Patel, Emily M. Donovan, Siobhan N. Perks, Lauren Czaplicki, and Barbara A. Schillo are with the Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. Maham Akbar and Stacey Gagosian are with Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. At the time of this research, Darlene Huang was with the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC
| | - Emily M Donovan
- Minal Patel, Emily M. Donovan, Siobhan N. Perks, Lauren Czaplicki, and Barbara A. Schillo are with the Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. Maham Akbar and Stacey Gagosian are with Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. At the time of this research, Darlene Huang was with the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC
| | - Siobhan N Perks
- Minal Patel, Emily M. Donovan, Siobhan N. Perks, Lauren Czaplicki, and Barbara A. Schillo are with the Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. Maham Akbar and Stacey Gagosian are with Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. At the time of this research, Darlene Huang was with the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC
| | - Darlene Huang
- Minal Patel, Emily M. Donovan, Siobhan N. Perks, Lauren Czaplicki, and Barbara A. Schillo are with the Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. Maham Akbar and Stacey Gagosian are with Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. At the time of this research, Darlene Huang was with the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC
| | - Lauren Czaplicki
- Minal Patel, Emily M. Donovan, Siobhan N. Perks, Lauren Czaplicki, and Barbara A. Schillo are with the Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. Maham Akbar and Stacey Gagosian are with Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. At the time of this research, Darlene Huang was with the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC
| | - Maham Akbar
- Minal Patel, Emily M. Donovan, Siobhan N. Perks, Lauren Czaplicki, and Barbara A. Schillo are with the Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. Maham Akbar and Stacey Gagosian are with Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. At the time of this research, Darlene Huang was with the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC
| | - Stacey Gagosian
- Minal Patel, Emily M. Donovan, Siobhan N. Perks, Lauren Czaplicki, and Barbara A. Schillo are with the Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. Maham Akbar and Stacey Gagosian are with Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. At the time of this research, Darlene Huang was with the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC
| | - Barbara A Schillo
- Minal Patel, Emily M. Donovan, Siobhan N. Perks, Lauren Czaplicki, and Barbara A. Schillo are with the Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. Maham Akbar and Stacey Gagosian are with Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. At the time of this research, Darlene Huang was with the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Agent-based Modeling in Tobacco Regulatory Science: Exploring 'What if' in Waterpipe Smoking. TOB REGUL SCI 2020; 6:171-178. [PMID: 32582820 DOI: 10.18001/trs.6.3.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) is an emerging public health crisis, particularly among youth and young adults. Different from the use of other tobacco products and e-cigarettes, WTS tends to be a social activity occurring among friends or persons associated with social networks. In this paper, we review a potential strategy for WTS-related research. Methods As a bottom-up computational model, agent-based modeling (ABM) can simulate the actions and interactions of agents, as well as the dynamic interactions between agents and their environments, to gain an understanding of the functioning of a system. ABM is particularly useful for incorporating the influence of social networks in WTS, and capturing people's space-time activity and the spatial distribution of WTS venues. Results Comprehensive knowledge of WTS-related behaviors at the individual level is needed to take advantage of ABM and use it to examine policies such as the interaction between WTS and cigarette smoking and the effect of flavors used in waterpipe tobacco. Longitudinal and WTS-specific surveys and laboratory experiments are particularly helpful to understand WTS basic mechanisms and elicit individual preferences, respectively. Conclusions We argue that the uniqueness of WTS makes ABM a promising tool to be used in WTS-related research, as well as understanding use of other tobacco products.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hammond RA, Combs TB, Mack-Crane A, Kasman M, Sorg A, Snider D, Luke DA. Development of a computational modeling laboratory for examining tobacco control policies: Tobacco Town. Health Place 2020; 61:102256. [PMID: 32329725 PMCID: PMC11410381 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
A key focus of recent policy efforts to curb tobacco product usage has been the role of place-specifically the density of retail and advertising and the resulting spatial pattern of access and exposure for consumers. Policies can alter the environment by reducing density or shifting distribution of tobacco retail and thus limiting access and exposure. Since little empirical evidence exists for the potential impact of these policies across potentially heterogeneous places, we develop and apply an original spatial computational model to simulate place-based retail tobacco control policies. The model is well-grounded in theory and available empirical evidence. We apply the model in four representative settings to demonstrate the utility of this approach as a policy laboratory, to develop general insights on the relationship between retailer density, retail interventions, and tobacco costs incurred by consumers, and to provide a framework to guide future modeling and empirical studies. Our results suggest that the potential impact on costs of reducing tobacco retailer density are highly dependent on context. Projected impacts are also influenced by assumptions made about agent (smoker) purchasing decision-making processes. In the absence of evidence in this area, we tested and compared three alternative decision rules; these interact with environmental properties to produce different results. Agent properties, namely income and cigarettes per day, also shape purchasing patterns before and after policy interventions. We conclude that agent-based modeling in general, and Tobacco Town specifically, hold much potential as a platform for testing and comparing the impact of various retail-based tobacco policies across different communities. Initial modeling efforts uncover important gaps in both data and theory and can provide guidance for new empirical studies in tobacco control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross A Hammond
- Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, Center for Social Dynamics & Policy, The Brookings Institution, USA.
| | - Todd B Combs
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School at Washington University in St, Louis, USA
| | | | - Matt Kasman
- Center for Social Dynamics & Policy, The Brookings Institution, USA
| | - Amy Sorg
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School at Washington University in St, Louis, USA
| | - Doneisha Snider
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School at Washington University in St, Louis, USA
| | - Douglas A Luke
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School at Washington University in St, Louis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Odani S, Armour BS, King BA, Agaku IT. E-Cigarette Use and Subsequent Cigarette Initiation and Sustained Use Among Youth, U.S., 2015-2017. J Adolesc Health 2020; 66:34-38. [PMID: 31685373 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Using cross-sectional data, we measured the association between electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use and subsequent initiation and sustained use of cigarettes among U.S. youth. METHODS Data were pooled from the 2015-2017 National Youth Tobacco Survey, a school-based survey of U.S. students in grades 6-12. Questions on current age and age of first use of different tobacco products (cigarettes, e-cigarettes, cigars, and smokeless tobacco) were used to ascertain the temporal sequence of tobacco product use. The pooled study population was 52,579 youth who 5 years before the survey had never smoked cigarettes. E-cigarette users were defined as those who used e-cigarettes before or without ever smoking cigarettes. Cigarette smoking was assessed with the following measures: ever smoking a cigarette at any time within the past 5 years and sustained smoking (smoked ≥1 year ago and within past 30 days). Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were calculated, controlling for other tobacco product use and sociodemographics. RESULTS Among never cigarette smokers as of 5 years before the survey, 17.4% used e-cigarettes, and 15.6% first smoked within the past 5 years. Compared with those who did not use e-cigarettes, those who used e-cigarettes had higher odds of ever smoking cigarettes within the past 5 years (AOR = 2.73) and had higher odds of sustained smoking (AOR = 1.55; all p < .05). CONCLUSIONS E-cigarette use is associated with subsequent initiation and sustained use of cigarettes among youth. Efforts are warranted to reduce youth use of all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satomi Odani
- Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Brian S Armour
- Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Brian A King
- Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Israel T Agaku
- Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Capewell S, Capewell A. An effectiveness hierarchy of preventive interventions: neglected paradigm or self-evident truth? J Public Health (Oxf) 2019; 40:350-358. [PMID: 28525612 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-communicable disease prevention strategies usually target the four major risk factors of poor diet, tobacco, alcohol and physical inactivity. Yet, the most effective approaches remain disputed. However, increasing evidence supports the concept of an effectiveness hierarchy. Thus, 'downstream' preventive activities targeting individuals (such as 1:1 personal advice, health education, 'nudge' or primary prevention medications) consistently achieve a smaller population health impact than interventions aimed further 'upstream' (for instance, smoke-free legislation, alcohol minimum pricing or regulations eliminating dietary transfats). These comprehensive, policy-based interventions reach all parts of the population and do not depend on a sustained 'agentic' individual response. They thus tend to be more effective, more rapid, more equitable and also cost-saving. This effectiveness hierarchy is self-evident to many professionals working in public health. Previously neglected in the wider world, this effectiveness hierarchy now needs to be acknowledged by policy makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Capewell
- Department of Public Health & Policy, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ann Capewell
- Department of Public Health & Policy, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Prochaska JJ, Benowitz NL. Current advances in research in treatment and recovery: Nicotine addiction. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2019; 5:eaay9763. [PMID: 31663029 PMCID: PMC6795520 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aay9763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
The health harms of combusted tobacco use are undeniable. With market and regulatory pressures to reduce the harms of nicotine delivery by combustion, the tobacco product landscape has diversified to include smokeless, heated, and electronic nicotine vaping products. Products of tobacco combustion are the main cause of smoking-induced disease, and nicotine addiction sustains tobacco use. An understanding of the biology and clinical features of nicotine addiction and the conditioning of behavior that occurs via stimuli paired with frequent nicotine dosing, as with a smoked cigarette, is important for informing pharmacologic and behavioral treatment targets. We review current advances in research on nicotine addiction treatment and recovery, with a focus on conventional combustible cigarette use. Our review covers evidence-based methods to treat smoking in adults and policy approaches to prevent nicotine product initiation in youth. In closing, we discuss emerging areas of evidence and consider new directions for advancing the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith J. Prochaska
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Neal L. Benowitz
- Program in Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Cardiology, and the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Combs TB, McKay VR, Ornstein J, Mahoney M, Cork K, Brosi D, Kasman M, Heuberger B, Hammond RA, Luke D. Modelling the impact of menthol sales restrictions and retailer density reduction policies: insights from tobacco town Minnesota. Tob Control 2019; 29:502-509. [PMID: 31462580 PMCID: PMC7476266 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-054986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Tobacco control policies focused on the retail environment have the potential to reduce tobacco use and tobacco-related health disparities through increasing direct and indirect costs. Recently, national and subnational governments have begun to restrict the sale of menthol products and reduce tobacco retailer density. Methods We developed an agent-based model to project the impact of menthol cigarette sales restrictions and retailer density reduction policies for six types of communities and three priority populations. During each simulated day, agents smoke cigarettes, travel in the community and make purchase decisions—whether, where and which product type to purchase—based on a combination of their own properties and the current retail environment. Results Of the policies tested, restricting all cigarette sales or menthol cigarette sales to tobacco specialty shops may have the largest effect on the total (direct and indirect) costs of purchasing cigarettes. Coupling one of these policies with one that establishes a minimum distance between tobacco retailers may enhance the impact. Combining these policies could also make the costs of acquiring cigarettes more equal across communities and populations. Discussion Our simulations revealed the importance of context, for example, lower income communities in urban areas begin with higher retailer density and may need stronger policies to show impact, as well as the need to focus on differential effects for priority populations, for example, combinations of policies may equalise the average distance travelled to purchase. Adapting and combining policies could enhance the sustainability of policy effects and reduce tobacco use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd B Combs
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Virginia R McKay
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Joseph Ornstein
- Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Kerry Cork
- Public Health Law Center, Mitchell Hamline School of Law, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - Deena Brosi
- Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado at Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Matt Kasman
- Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Benjamin Heuberger
- Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ross A Hammond
- Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.,Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Douglas Luke
- Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Myers AE, Knocke K, Leeman J. Tapping Into Multiple Data "Springs" to Strengthen Policy Streams: A Guide to the Types of Data Needed to Formulate Local Retail Tobacco Control Policy. Prev Chronic Dis 2019; 16:E43. [PMID: 30950786 PMCID: PMC6466950 DOI: 10.5888/pcd16.180282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2015, the tobacco industry spent $8.24 billion to market tobacco products in convenience stores, supermarkets, pharmacies, and other retail or point-of-sale settings. Community tobacco control partnerships have numerous evidence-based policies (eg, tobacco retailer licensing and compliance, tobacco-free–school buffer zones, eliminating price discounts) to counter point-of-sale tobacco marketing. However, deciding which point-of-sale policies to implement — and when and in what order to implement them — is challenging. The objective of this article was to describe tools and other resources that local-level tobacco use prevention and control leaders can use to assemble the data they need to formulate point-of-sale tobacco policies that fit the needs of their communities, have potential for public health impact, and are feasible in the local policy environment. We were guided by Kingdon’s theory of policy change, which contends that windows of policy opportunity open when 3 streams align: a clear problem, a solution to the problem, and the political will to work for change. Community partnerships can draw on 7 data “springs” to activate Kingdon’s streams: 1) epidemiologic and surveillance data, 2) macro retail environment data, 3) micro retail environment data, 4) the current policy context, 5) local legal feasibility of policy options, 6) the potential for public health impact, and 7) political will.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison E Myers
- Counter Tools, Inc, Carrboro, North Carolina.,Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kathleen Knocke
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,1101 McGavran-Greenberg, Campus Box 7411, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
| | - Jennifer Leeman
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fakunle DO, Eck R, Milam AJ, Thorpe RJ, Furr-Holden DM. E-Cigarettes in Baltimore Alcohol Outlets: Geographic and Demographic Correlates of Availability. FAMILY & COMMUNITY HEALTH 2019; 41:205-213. [PMID: 30134335 PMCID: PMC6107309 DOI: 10.1097/fch.0000000000000200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
There is limited research on e-cigarette availability despite increased use. E-cigarette availability within Baltimore alcohol outlets was analyzed for disparities among residential neighborhoods. Data were obtained via field surveys of alcohol outlets, and then spatially merged with sociodemographic data; 18.8% of alcohol outlets had any e-cigarette availability. Regression models showed greater odds ratios for e-cigarette availability when cigarettes, cigars, or hookah paraphernalia were sold, and lower odds ratios when alcohol outlets had an on-site consumption license. Outlets with e-cigarette availability were in predominantly lower-income, nonwhite neighborhoods. It is important to assess exposure of another potentially damaging substance among perpetually disadvantaged populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David O Fakunle
- School of Community Health & Policy, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Fakunle); Departments of Health, Behavior & Society (Drs Eck and Thorpe) and Mental Health (Drs Fakunle and Milam), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Prevention Science and Public Health, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Flint (Dr Furr-Holden)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Combs TB, Brosi D, Chaitan V, He E, Luke DA, Henriksen LA. Local Retail Tobacco Environment Regulation: Early Adoption in the United States. TOB REGUL SCI 2019; 5:76-86. [PMID: 38222289 PMCID: PMC10786621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
Objectives To identify sociodemographic and policy environment characteristics of early adopters of retail tobacco control policies in U.S. localities. Methods We interviewed a sample of local tobacco control programs on policy progress for 33 specific policies, along with other program characteristics. We combine these results with secondary data in logistic regression analysis. Results Eighty (82% of 97) county tobacco control programs from 24 states were interviewed. Localities with lower smoking rates (OR: 0.7; 95%: 0.6-0.9) or higher excise taxes (OR: 6.0; 95%: 1.4-26.0) were more likely to have adopted a retail policy by late 2015. Early adopters were less likely to have voted majority Republican in the 2012 election (OR: 0.03; 95%: 0.00-0.34) or to have higher percentages of African American population (OR: 0.9; 95%: 0.8-0.99). Conclusions While localities with more resources, eg, program capacity, political will or policy options, were more likely to adopt policies by 2015, those with higher smoking rates and proportions of priority populations were less likely to do so. As local retail policy work becomes more commonplace, only time will tell if this "rich-get-richer" trend continues, or if the contexts in which retail policies are adopted diversify.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd B Combs
- Washington University in St. Louis, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Center for Public Health Systems Science, St. Louis, MO
| | - Deena Brosi
- Washington University in St. Louis, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Center for Public Health Systems Science, St. Louis, MO
| | - Veronica Chaitan
- Washington University in St. Louis, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Center for Public Health Systems Science, St. Louis, MO
| | - Eda He
- Washington University in St. Louis, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Center for Public Health Systems Science, St. Louis, MO
| | - Douglas A Luke
- Washington University in St. Louis, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Center for Public Health Systems Science, St. Louis, MO
| | - Lisa A Henriksen
- Stanford University, Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Myers AE, Southwell BG, Ribisl KM, Moreland-Russell S, Bowling JM, Lytle LA. State-Level Point-of-Sale Tobacco News Coverage and Policy Progression Over a 2-Year Period. Health Promot Pract 2019; 20:135-145. [PMID: 29338430 DOI: 10.1177/1524839917752108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mass media content may play an important role in policy change. However, the empirical relationship between media advocacy efforts and tobacco control policy success has rarely been studied. We examined the extent to which newspaper content characteristics (volume, slant, frame, source, use of evidence, and degree of localization) that have been identified as important in past descriptive studies were associated with policy progression over a 2-year period in the context of point-of-sale (POS) tobacco control. METHOD We used regression analyses to test the relationships between newspaper content and policy progression from 2012 to 2014. The dependent variable was the level of implementation of state-level POS tobacco control policies at Time 2. Independent variables were newspaper article characteristics (volume, slant, frame, source, use of evidence, and degree of localization) and were collected via content analysis of the articles. State-level policy environment contextual variables were examined as confounders. RESULTS Positive, significant bivariate relationships exist between characteristics of news content (e.g., high overall volume, public health source present, local quote and local angle present, and pro-tobacco control slant present) and Time 2 POS score. However, in a multivariate model controlling for other factors, significant relationships did not hold. DISCUSSION Newspaper coverage can be a marker of POS policy progression. Whether media can influence policy implementation remains an important question. Future work should continue to tease out and confirm the unique characteristics of media content that are most associated with subsequent policy progression, in order to inform media advocacy efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison E Myers
- 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- 2 Counter Tools, Inc., Carrboro, NC, USA
| | - Brian G Southwell
- 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- 3 RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Kurt M Ribisl
- 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Leslie A Lytle
- 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Schleicher NC, Johnson TO, D'Angelo H, Luke DA, Ribisl KM, Henriksen L. Concordance of Advertised Cigarette Prices with Purchase Receipts in the United States. TOB REGUL SCI 2018; 4:3-9. [PMID: 30746427 PMCID: PMC6368404 DOI: 10.18001/trs.4.3.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Researchers and regulators study the advertised price of tobacco products to evaluate compliance with minimum price policies, tax increases, and geodemographic marketing. However, few studies report reliability of advertised price and none address its concordance with receipt price. METHODS In a sample of US tobacco retailers (N=1972), data collectors purchased the leading brand of non-menthol or menthol cigarettes, recorded advertised prices, whether sales tax was included and price was discounted. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed for the same measures by different observers (reliability), and for receipt and advertised pack price (validity). Discrepancy between receipt and advertised price was modeled as a function of store type and presence of a discount. RESULTS Advertised price was assessed reliably (ICCs = 0.74 to 0.87) and concordance with receipt price was near perfect (ICCs = 0.96 to 1.00). Prices were identical in 77.7% of stores for Marlboro and 78.1% for Newport. Differences between receipt and advertised price were related to store type and presence of a discount for Marlboro, but not for Newport. CONCLUSIONS Findings validate a common measure of cigarette price in research on minimum price compliance, effects of tax increase and industry marketing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina C Schleicher
- Research Statistician, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Trent O Johnson
- Manager, Tobacco Control Policy Studies, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Heather D'Angelo
- Doctoral Student, Gillings Global School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Douglas A Luke
- Professor and Director, Center for Public Health Systems Science, Washington University in St. Louis
| | - Kurt M Ribisl
- Professor, Gillings Global School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Lisa Henriksen
- Senior Research Scientist, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Palo Alto, CA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Macdonald L, Olsen JR, Shortt NK, Ellaway A. Do 'environmental bads' such as alcohol, fast food, tobacco, and gambling outlets cluster and co-locate in more deprived areas in Glasgow City, Scotland? Health Place 2018; 51:224-231. [PMID: 29747132 PMCID: PMC5989655 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Revised: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
This study utilised an innovative application of spatial cluster analysis to examine the socio-spatial patterning of outlets selling potentially health-damaging goods/services, such as alcohol, fast food, tobacco and gambling, within Glasgow City, Scotland. For all categories of outlets combined, numbers of clusters increased linearly from the least to the most income deprived areas (i.e. one cluster within the least deprived quintile to ten within the most deprived quintile). Co-location of individual types of outlets (alcohol, fast food, tobacco and gambling) within similar geographical areas was also evident. This type of research could influence interventions to tackle the co-occurrence of unhealthy behaviours and contribute to policies tackling higher numbers of 'environmental bads' within deprived areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Macdonald
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences, University of Glasgow, Top floor, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow G2 3QB, United Kingdom.
| | - Jonathan R Olsen
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences, University of Glasgow, Top floor, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow G2 3QB, United Kingdom
| | - Niamh K Shortt
- Centre for Research on Environment, Society and Health, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, United Kingdom
| | - Anne Ellaway
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences, University of Glasgow, Top floor, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow G2 3QB, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Henriksen L, Ribisl KM, Rogers T, Moreland-Russell S, Barker DM, Sarris Esquivel N, Loomis B, Crew E, Combs T. Standardized Tobacco Assessment for Retail Settings (STARS): dissemination and implementation research. Tob Control 2018; 25:i67-i74. [PMID: 27697950 PMCID: PMC5099212 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2016] [Accepted: 06/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective The Standardized Tobacco Assessment for Retail Settings (STARS) was designed to characterise the availability, placement, promotion and price of tobacco products, with items chosen for relevance to regulating the retail tobacco environment. This study describes the process to develop the STARS instrument and protocol employed by a collaboration of US government agencies, US state tobacco control programmes (TCPs), advocacy organisations, public health attorneys and researchers from the National Cancer Institute's State and Community Tobacco Control (SCTC) Research Initiative. Methods To evaluate dissemination and early implementation experiences, we conducted telephone surveys with state TCP leaders (n=50, response rate=100%), and with individuals recruited via a STARS download registry on the SCTC website. Website registrants were surveyed within 6 months of the STARS release (n=105, response rate=66%) and again after ∼5 months (retention rate=62%). Results Among the state TCPs, 42 reported conducting any retail marketing surveillance, with actual or planned STARS use in 34 of these states and in 12 of the 17 states where marketing surveillance was not previously reported. Within 6 months of the STARS release, 21% of surveyed registrants reported using STARS and 35% were likely/very likely to use it in the next 6 months. To investigate implementation fidelity, we compared data collected by self-trained volunteers and by trained professionals, the latter method being more typically in retail marketing surveillance studies. Results suggest high or moderate reliability for most STARS measures. Conclusion The study concludes with examples of states that used STARS to inform policy change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Henriksen
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Kurt M Ribisl
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd Rogers
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sarah Moreland-Russell
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St., Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Dianne M Barker
- Barker Bi-Coastal Health Consultants, Calabasas, California, USA
| | | | - Brett Loomis
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Erin Crew
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Todd Combs
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St., Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Luke DA, Hammond RA, Combs T, Sorg A, Kasman M, Mack-Crane A, Ribisl KM, Henriksen L. Tobacco Town: Computational Modeling of Policy Options to Reduce Tobacco Retailer Density. Am J Public Health 2017; 107:740-746. [PMID: 28398792 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2017.303685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the behavioral mechanisms and effects of tobacco control policies designed to reduce tobacco retailer density. METHODS We developed the Tobacco Town agent-based simulation model to examine 4 types of retailer reduction policies: (1) random retailer reduction, (2) restriction by type of retailer, (3) limiting proximity of retailers to schools, and (4) limiting proximity of retailers to each other. The model examined the effects of these policies alone and in combination across 4 different types of towns, defined by 2 levels of population density (urban vs suburban) and 2 levels of income (higher vs lower). RESULTS Model results indicated that reduction of retailer density has the potential to decrease accessibility of tobacco products by driving up search and purchase costs. Policy effects varied by town type: proximity policies worked better in dense, urban towns whereas retailer type and random retailer reduction worked better in less-dense, suburban settings. CONCLUSIONS Comprehensive retailer density reduction policies have excellent potential to reduce the public health burden of tobacco use in communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas A Luke
- Douglas A. Luke, Todd Combs, and Amy Sorg are with the Center for Public Health System Science, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO. Ross A. Hammond, Matt Kasman, and Austen Mack-Crane are with Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC. Kurt M. Ribisl is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Lisa Henriksen is with Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Ross A Hammond
- Douglas A. Luke, Todd Combs, and Amy Sorg are with the Center for Public Health System Science, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO. Ross A. Hammond, Matt Kasman, and Austen Mack-Crane are with Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC. Kurt M. Ribisl is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Lisa Henriksen is with Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Todd Combs
- Douglas A. Luke, Todd Combs, and Amy Sorg are with the Center for Public Health System Science, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO. Ross A. Hammond, Matt Kasman, and Austen Mack-Crane are with Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC. Kurt M. Ribisl is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Lisa Henriksen is with Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Amy Sorg
- Douglas A. Luke, Todd Combs, and Amy Sorg are with the Center for Public Health System Science, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO. Ross A. Hammond, Matt Kasman, and Austen Mack-Crane are with Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC. Kurt M. Ribisl is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Lisa Henriksen is with Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Matt Kasman
- Douglas A. Luke, Todd Combs, and Amy Sorg are with the Center for Public Health System Science, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO. Ross A. Hammond, Matt Kasman, and Austen Mack-Crane are with Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC. Kurt M. Ribisl is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Lisa Henriksen is with Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Austen Mack-Crane
- Douglas A. Luke, Todd Combs, and Amy Sorg are with the Center for Public Health System Science, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO. Ross A. Hammond, Matt Kasman, and Austen Mack-Crane are with Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC. Kurt M. Ribisl is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Lisa Henriksen is with Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Kurt M Ribisl
- Douglas A. Luke, Todd Combs, and Amy Sorg are with the Center for Public Health System Science, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO. Ross A. Hammond, Matt Kasman, and Austen Mack-Crane are with Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC. Kurt M. Ribisl is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Lisa Henriksen is with Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Lisa Henriksen
- Douglas A. Luke, Todd Combs, and Amy Sorg are with the Center for Public Health System Science, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO. Ross A. Hammond, Matt Kasman, and Austen Mack-Crane are with Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC. Kurt M. Ribisl is with the Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Lisa Henriksen is with Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Leeman J, Myers A, Grant JC, Wangen M, Queen TL. Implementation strategies to promote community-engaged efforts to counter tobacco marketing at the point of sale. Transl Behav Med 2017; 7:405-414. [PMID: 28405905 DOI: 10.1007/s13142-017-0489-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The US tobacco industry spends $8.2 billion annually on marketing at the point of sale (POS), a practice known to increase tobacco use. Evidence-based policy interventions (EBPIs) are available to reduce exposure to POS marketing, and nationwide, states are funding community-based tobacco control partnerships to promote local enactment of these EBPIs. Little is known, however, about what implementation strategies best support community partnerships' success enacting EBPI. Guided by Kingdon's theory of policy change, Counter Tools provides tools, training, and other implementation strategies to support community partnerships' performance of five core policy change processes: document local problem, formulate policy solutions, engage partners, raise awareness of problems and solutions, and persuade decision makers to enact new policy. We assessed Counter Tools' impact at 1 year on (1) partnership coordinators' self-efficacy, (2) partnerships' performance of core policy change processes, (3) community progress toward EBPI enactment, and (4) salient contextual factors. Counter Tools provided implementation strategies to 30 partnerships. Data on self-efficacy were collected using a pre-post survey. Structured interviews assessed performance of core policy change processes. Data also were collected on progress toward EBPI enactment and contextual factors. Analysis included descriptive and bivariate statistics and content analysis. Following 1-year exposure to implementation strategies, coordinators' self-efficacy increased significantly. Partnerships completed the greatest proportion of activities within the "engage partners" and "document local problem" core processes. Communities made only limited progress toward policy enactment. Findings can inform delivery of implementation strategies and tests of their effects on community-level efforts to enact EBPIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Leeman
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7460, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7460, USA.
| | | | | | - Mary Wangen
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Tara L Queen
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Henriksen L, Mahoney M. Tobacco industry's T.O.T.A.L. interference. Tob Control 2017; 27:234-236. [PMID: 28274990 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2016] [Revised: 01/27/2017] [Accepted: 02/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Henriksen
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Maggie Mahoney
- Public Health Law Center, Tobacco Control Legal Consortium, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|