Eliminating Explicit and Implicit Biases in Health Care: Evidence and Research Needs

Embracing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Access (IDEA): Cultivating understanding internally to foster external change

CONTEXT

Healthcare institutions acknowledge the value of diverse workforces for enhancing programs and meeting the varied needs of individuals with Spinal Cord Injury. This survey conducted at the 2023 Academy of Spinal Cord Injury Professions (ASCIP) conference assesses healthcare professionals' views on workplace Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) and their support for integrating related educational content in future events.

METHODS

: The survey was distributed digitally to ASCIP attendees, ensuring anonymity and voluntary participation. It aimed to collect data on demographic backgrounds, perceptions of DEI at work, and the relevance of educational topics regarding Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Access (IDEA) for upcoming conference agendas.

RESULTS

: Seventy percent of respondents felt able to achieve success and express their genuine feelings in the workplace, with their opinions valued. While economic disparities were often discussed (56%) in relation to patient care, other aspects like religion, cultural racism, racial inequalities, and LGBTQ + issues were less frequently addressed. Approximately 55% reported that their organizations had recently started or were initiating DEI efforts.

CONCLUSIONS

: There is a clear need for inclusive work environments and patient care that values the diverse intersectionality of the community served. Strong support exists for further educational initiatives on IDEA concepts, highlighting a significant opportunity to enhance early-stage DEI programs in healthcare settings.

Blind spots in medical education - International perspectives

BACKGROUND

All individuals and groups have blind spots that can create problems if unaddressed. The goal of this study was to examine blind spots in medical education from international perspectives.

METHODS

From December 2022 to March 2023, we distributed an electronic survey through international networks of medical students, postgraduate trainees, and medical educators. Respondents named blind spots affecting their medical education system and then rated nine blind spot domains from a study of U.S. medical education along five-point Likert-type scales (1 = much less attention needed; 5 = much more attention needed). We tested for differences between blind spot ratings by respondent groups. We also analyzed the blind spots that respondents identified to determine those not previously described and performed content analysis on open-ended responses about blind spot domains.

RESULTS

There were 356 respondents from 88 countries, including 127 (44%) educators, 80 (28%) medical students, and 33 (11%) postgraduate trainees. At least 80% of respondents rated each blind spot domain as needing 'more' or 'much more' attention; the highest was 88% for 'Patient perspectives and voices that are not heard, valued, or understood.' In analyses by gender, role in medical education, World Bank country income level, and region, a mean difference of 0.5 was seen in only five of the possible 279 statistical comparisons. Of 885 blind spots documented, new blind spot areas related to issues that crossed national boundaries (e.g. international standards) and the sufficiency of resources to support medical education. Comments about the nine blind spot domains illustrated that cultural, health system, and governmental elements influenced how blind spots are manifested across different settings.

DISCUSSION

There may be general agreement throughout the world about blind spots in medical education that deserve more attention. This could establish a basis for coordinated international effort to allocate resources and tailor interventions that advance medical education.

Navigating sensor-skin coupling challenges in magnetic-based blood pressure monitoring: Innovations and clinical implications for hypertension and aortovascular disease management

Non-invasive blood pressure monitoring has emerged as a critical frontier in cardiovascular healthcare, with magnetic sensors playing an increasingly pivotal role in wearable health technologies. This comprehensive review critically examines the complex challenges of sensor-skin coupling and its profound impact on the accuracy of blood pressure measurements in patients with hypertension and aortovascular disease. Despite the growing demand for precise, real-time health monitoring, significant limitations persist in current magnetic sensor technologies. Our analysis reveals how intricate interactions between sensor devices and skin characteristics including pigmentation, texture, and elasticity can substantially compromise measurement reliability. We systematically explore innovative approaches to mitigate these challenges, presenting cutting-edge strategies in advanced material development, adaptive calibration techniques, and sophisticated signal processing algorithms. The review synthesizes current research to demonstrate the multidisciplinary approaches necessary for enhancing magnetic sensor performance. By critically analyzing the nuanced interactions between sensor technologies and individual patient physiological profiles, we provide insights into developing more robust, personalized health monitoring systems. Our findings underscore the urgent need for continued innovation in non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, with direct implications for improved clinical assessment and patient outcomes in cardiovascular care.

Ethnicity, Skin Tones, and Cultural Considerations in Wound Care: Challenges and Solutions

Wound care patients often have a variety of chronic medical conditions that result in poor outcomes, such as delayed healing and nontraumatic limb loss. Many of these suboptimal patient outcomes result from healthcare disparities linked to social determinants of health (SDOH). Race and ethnicity influence SDOH by impacting patients' access to consistent quality healthcare. Understanding and addressing why and how ethnic and cultural factors influence SDOH is crucial for making substantial changes.

Enhancing student understanding of cardiovascular disease burden in marginalized communities in the physiology classroom

Physiology education is at the core of biomedical science and medicine. Physiology unites multiple disciplines to explain the mechanisms whereby a risk factor is associated with disease. Race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity are associated with risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Minority stress theory attempts to explain the association of identity variables in sex and gender minority (SGM) and Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) populations with CVD. However, instruction on how to effectively incorporate the ways that social determinants of health are linked to disease outcomes in marginalized populations, such as the SGM and BIPOC communities, is needed. We investigated the efficacy of teaching minority stress theory concepts in a single lecture in an upper-level cardiovascular pathophysiology course (N = 44 students). To test students' understanding of minority-related disease, we used both subjective and objective measures to evaluate student understanding before and after the lecture. Student self-assessment of understanding of health disparity physiological mechanisms and lifestyle and pharmacological interventions to reduce health disparities in SGM communities increased post intervention. We observed similar results of self-assessment of understanding of health disparity physiological mechanisms and appropriate lifestyle and pharmacological interventions to reduce health disparities regarding the BIPOC community. Our findings suggest that integrating social determinants of health into pathophysiology courses may result in a more inclusive-minded scientific and medical workforce.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Physiology education has historically lacked the inclusion of the social determinants of health and discussion of medically marginalized communities. Here, we show that discussion of cardiovascular disease and psychosocial stress in marginalized communities improves student understanding of the distribution of and causes of cardiovascular disease in marginalized groups. We conclude that more physiology instructors should include discussions on chronic diseases within multiple communities and programs should incorporate social determinants of health into their curricula.

Scoping review identifying interventions that have been tested to optimise the experience of people from ethnic minority groups receiving systemic anticancer therapy (SACT)

BACKGROUND

Disparities have been identified in many aspects of the cancer care pathway for people from minority ethnic groups (MEGs). Adherence to systemic anticancer therapies (SACTs) has been shown to impact morbidity and mortality, and therefore, inequitable experiences can have a detrimental effect on outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To identify interventions that focused on improving the experiences and clinical outcomes in people from MEG receiving SACT treatments.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted according to Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework to map the available literature. A comprehensive search was performed using three electronic databases (Medline, Embase and CINAHL). Standard scoping review methodology following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was used. Studies were included that assessed interventions to improve MEG patients' experience with SACT. Study types included in the review were evaluation studies, randomised/non-randomised controlled trials and all observational studies. Exclusion criteria were applied to studies including opinion pieces, literature and systematic reviews, non-English studies, conference abstracts and studies that were not describing an intervention. Independent duplicate screening, study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken. Results of the studies were synthesised using a published equity framework.

RESULTS

Searches yielded 1356 articles. Nine studies were included after exclusion criteria were applied. Studies described six digital, two in-person and one hybrid intervention employing different research methodologies, ranging from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), feasibility studies and mixed methods studies. The majority of interventions in this study were delivered remotely, using digital platforms such as websites, recorded educational training materials as well as social media. These interventions were conducted in the USA and primarily targeted patients with early breast cancer from African American backgrounds.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review showed that there has been a very small number of studies investigating interventions to optimise SACT treatment experiences in people from MEG. We found evidence of interventions incorporating the equity domains that reported improved patient engagement and experience. This new knowledge will help to implement future SACT interventions, addressing health inequities across the cancer continuum.

Disparities in Aortic Aneurysm Mortality Trends: Revealing Sex and Racial Inequalities

BACKGROUND

Abdominal aortic dissection or aneurysm (AAA) is a significant health concern in developed nations often underdiagnosed with poor outcomes. Despite a decline in aortic dissection and aneurysm mortality rates in the US from 1999 to 2020, reported by the CDC, this improvement disproportionately favors males and Caucasians. This study aims to elucidate these disparities.

METHODS

Data from the CDC Wonder database from 1999 to 2020 on aortic aneurysm, including abdominal, thoracic, and thoracoabdominal aneurysms and rupture related deaths in the US were analyzed. Mortality rates were compared across sex, race, and geographic location separated by state. Mortality was normalized based on population and analyzed with linear regression models with all plots showing goodness of fit.

RESULTS

Overall, the mortality gap between male and female cohorts with aortic aneurysm-related deaths widened by 0.57 per 100,000 deaths per year (P < 0.001). Mortality between Caucasians with African American and Asian American cohorts showed reductions of 0.41 per 100,000 per year (P < 0.001). Caucasian and male cohorts started at higher mortality rates when compared to their competitive cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a reduction in mortality rates among individuals with aortic aneurysm in the US from 1999 to 2020, this decline disproportionately benefits males and Caucasians over African American and Asian populations. Although Caucasians and males had higher mortality in 1999, their decline is significantly greater. Following current trends, Caucasian and male mortalities will be lower than minority groups by 2026. Targeted interventions are needed to address these disparities effectively.

Digital health equity frameworks and key concepts: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Digital health equity, the opportunity for all to engage with digital health tools to support good health outcomes, is an emerging priority across the world. The field of digital health equity would benefit from a comprehensive and systematic understanding of digital health, digital equity, and health equity, with a focus on real-world applications. We conducted a scoping review to identify and describe published frameworks and concepts relevant to digital health equity interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of published peer-reviewed literature guided by the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. We searched 5 databases for frameworks related to or applied to digital health or equity interventions. Using deductive and inductive approaches, we analyzed frameworks and concepts based on the socio-ecological model.

RESULTS

Of the 910 publications initially identified, we included 44 (4.8%) publications in our review that described 42 frameworks that sought to explain the ecosystem of digital and/or health equity, but none were comprehensive. From the frameworks we identified 243 concepts grouped into 43 categories including characteristics of individuals, communities, and organizations; societal context; perceived value of the intervention by and impacts on individuals, community members, and the organization; partnerships; and access to digital health services, in-person services, digital services, and data and information, among others.

DISCUSSION

We suggest a consolidated definition of digital health equity, highlight illustrative frameworks, and suggest concepts that may be needed to enhance digital health equity intervention development and evaluation.

CONCLUSION

The expanded understanding of frameworks and relevant concepts resulting from this study may inform communities and stakeholders who seek to achieve digital inclusion and digital health equity.

Implicit bias in referrals to relational psychological therapies: review and recommendations for mental health services

Introduction

Timely and appropriate psychological treatment is an essential element required to address the growing burden of mental health issues, which has significant implications for individuals, society, and healthcare systems. However, research indicates that implicit biases among mental health professionals may influence referral decisions, potentially leading to disparities in access to relational psychological therapies. This study investigates bias in referral practices within mental health services, identifying key themes in referral procedures and proposing recommendations to mitigate bias and promote equitable access.

Methods

A systematic review of literature published between 2002 and 2022 was conducted, focusing on biases, referral practices, and relational psychological therapies. The search strategy involved full-text screening of studies meeting inclusion criteria, specifically those examining professional and organizational implicit bias in mental health referrals. Thematic synthesis was employed to analyze and categorize bias within these domains, providing a structured framework for understanding its impact on referral decision making processes.

Results

The search yielded 2,964 relevant papers, of which 77 underwent full-text screening. Ultimately, eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the review. The analysis revealed that bias development mechanisms in referral decisions occurred across five key domains: resource allocation, organizational procedures, clinical roles, decision-making, and referral preferences. These domains highlight organizational and practitioner-level factors contributing to disparities in access to psychological therapies.

Discussion

Findings suggest that implicit biases within referral processes can limit equitable access to psychological therapies, particularly relational therapies that emphasize therapeutic alliance and patient-centered care. This study provides recommendations to address these biases, including standardized referral guidelines, enhanced professional training on implicit bias, and improved oversight mechanisms within mental health services.

Neighborhood deprivation is a risk factor for severe child physical abuse: A multicenter cohort investigation

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to investigate whether neighborhood deprivation is associated with outcomes in a multicenter population of children with suspected or confirmed child physical abuse. We hypothesized that community level social determinants of health are associated with worse outcomes following child physical abuse.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective review included children (18 years or younger) admitted with suspected or confirmed physical abuse at six pediatric trauma centers. A national Area Deprivation Index (ADI) score was assigned to each patient based on home address. Area Deprivation Index was divided into quartiles using the distribution of our dataset. Exclusion of a caregiver at discharge was used as a proxy for confirmed physical abuse. Descriptive statistics and stepwise logistic regression were used to identify covariates. Multiple logistic regression was used to test for associations between ADI and caregiver exclusion.

RESULTS

Of 1,105 included patients, 512 had confirmed abuse. These patients were younger (median [interquartile range], 0.50 [1.50] vs. 0.83 [1.67]; p = 0.002), more likely to be Black or African American (28.3% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.001), and had higher ADI scores (81.0 [35.0] vs. 66.0 [60.0], p < 0.001). A dose-dependent relationship between ADI and caregiver exclusion was identified. Compared with those from the least vulnerable neighborhoods (ADI first quartile), patients from the most vulnerable neighborhoods (ADI fourth quartile) had 2.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.73-4.08; p < 0.001) times higher odds of confirmed abuse. Despite no differences in Injury Severity Scores (8.0 [6.0] vs. 9.0 [10.0], p = 0.163), they also had longer lengths of hospital stay (1.0 [2.0] vs. 3.0 [2.8], p = 0.002) and higher mortality (1.5% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

This large multicenter experience demonstrates a dose-dependent relationship between socioeconomic disadvantage and child physical abuse. We further demonstrate that disadvantage is associated with worse outcomes, including increased mortality, in child physical abuse. These findings provide objective data and lead to suggestions for interdisciplinary and multiscale approaches to primary prevention of child physical abuse.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Integrating Social Determinants With the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide in a Study of Bipolar Outpatients

INTRODUCTION

Bipolar disorder, socioeconomic deprivation, and social isolation are major risk factors for suicide. The interpersonal theory of suicide (IPTS) posits perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness as proximal causes of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, while the social determinants of health (SDOH) framework highlights distal socioeconomic factors. Studies of suicidality in bipolar disorder have used the IPTS and the SDOH framework, but few have integrated them to explore connections between distal and proximal factors.

METHODS

This study examined perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness as mediators of the relationship between cumulative socioeconomic risk and suicide risk. Participants were 171 outpatients in a United States (U.S.) bipolar clinic (mean age = 39.0, 69.6% female, 73.7% Black/African American).

RESULTS

Cumulative socioeconomic risk, perceived burdensomeness, and thwarted belongingness were positively associated with suicide risk. Perceived burdensomeness mediated the relationship between cumulative socioeconomic risk and suicide risk, but thwarted belongingness did not.

CONCLUSION

Findings broadly suggest the IPTS and the SDOH framework can be fruitfully integrated to guide research and prevent suicide. The pathway from cumulative socioeconomic risk to suicide risk via perceived burdensomeness warrants further attention, particularly for individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Implications for future studies of the IPTS, SDOH, and suicidality are discussed.

Implicit Racial Bias in Evaluation of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To assess implicit bias by administrating the Modified Finnegan Score (MFS) for quantifying neonatal opioid withdrawal and to evaluate risk of decreased opioid treatment of Black versus White infants.

STUDY DESIGN

Study participants were nurses recruited from a large tertiary care center who received three clinical vignettes portraying withdrawing infants and were randomized to receive an accompanying photo of either a Black or White infant. MFS results were compared for identical vignettes based on race of infant photo.

RESULTS

Out of 275 nurses, 70 completed the survey. In vignette 2, nurses aged ≤35 years scored Black infants lower than White infants (MFS=8.3 ± 2 vs. 9.5 ± 1.2, p=0.012). Nurses with <5 years of experience and ≤10 years of experience also scored Black infants lower for the same vignette (8.2 ± 2.3 vs. 9.6 ± 1.2, p=0.032 and 8.3 ± 2 vs. 9.5 ± 1.2, p=0.0083).

CONCLUSION

Implicit bias may contribute to the difference in opioid treatment.

Theatre of the Oppressed to Teach Medical Students About Power, Lived Experience, and Health Equity

BACKGROUND

A difficult challenge in health equity training is conducting honest and safe discussions about differences in lived experience based on social identity, and how racism and other systems of oppression impact health care.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a Theatre of the Oppressed workshop for medical students that examines systems of oppression as related to lived health care experiences.

DESIGN

Mixed-methods cross-sectional survey and interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty randomly assigned early first-year medical students.

INTERVENTIONS

A 90-min virtual workshop with three clinical scenes created by students where a character is being discriminated against or oppressed. During performance, students can stop scene, replace oppressed character, and role play how they would address harm, marginalization, and power imbalance. Participants discuss what they have witnessed and experienced.

MAIN MEASURES/APPROACH

Likert-scale questions assessing workshop's impact. Open-ended survey questions and interviews about workshop.

KEY RESULTS

Thirty-one (78%) of 40 participants completed the survey. Fifty-three percent were female. Thirty-seven percent were White, 33% Asian American, 15% Black, 11% Latinx, and 4% multiracial. Ninety percent thought this training could help them take better care of patients with lived experiences different from their own. Most agreed or strongly agreed the workshop helped them develop listening (23, 77%) and observation (26, 84%) skills. Twelve (39%) students felt stressed, while 29 (94%) felt safe. Twenty-five (81%) students agreed or strongly agreed there were meaningful discussions about systemic inequities. Students reported the workshop helped them step into others' shoes, understand intersectional experiences of multiple identities, and discuss navigating and addressing bias, discrimination, social drivers of health, hierarchy, power structures, and systems of oppression. Some thought it was difficult to have open discussions because of fear of being poorly perceived by peers.

CONCLUSIONS

Theatre of the Oppressed enabled medical students to engage in meaningful discussions about racism and other systems of oppression.

Post-Traumatic Stress Across Color Lines: A History of Anti-Black Exclusion & PTSD

Black Americans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder have less access to mental healthcare compared to White Americans. Many factors contribute to this inequity, including broader disparities within the healthcare system driven by systemic racism, and an underutilization of mental health services by Black Americans due to provider bias and stigma around mental health care. These disparities are rooted in a racist historical context of exclusion and abuse of the Black community by the White psychiatric establishment, and a perpetration of further trauma on Black clients, a context that is largely missing from traditional mental health education and literature on Black mental health today. This article aims to provide a necessary historical context of how the U.S. mental health care system has excluded Black Americans from trauma treatment. We use a contemporary trauma lens to demonstrate the ways in which Black trauma has existed throughout U.S. history, but how White psychiatry has cast trauma symptoms as evidence of racial inferiority, has excluded Black individuals from treatment, and has abused Black patients, thereby increasing Black trauma. The purpose of this review is to inform and educate mental health providers about our collective history, to counter a narrative of amnesia which identifies Black underutilization of services but forgets the exclusion from and abuse of Black people within the mental health system. We conclude with recommendations that providers can utilize to engage in antiracist practice and create an affirmative space for Black Americans to utilize trauma treatment and mental health care freely.

Racial equity in and through medical interaction scholarship: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic scoping review to characterize the landscape of communication scholarship within racial health equity in and through the patient-provider interaction.

METHODS

We employed three waves of data collection to identify relevant articles (N = 454) about racial equity within provider-patient interactions. We iteratively developed a codebook concerning article characteristics, coding for journal names, data source, descriptive characteristics for the study samples, and presence of theory and equity in sections of the manuscripts.

RESULTS

This search identified studies (N = 206) that were published in 76 peer-reviewed scientific journals. The majority of studies reported primary data analyses and used survey and interview methodology. Many studies examined participants as patients generally rather than in reference to particular health conditions. Among those with a specific health condition, the largest proportion focused on cancer control. Very few studies included samples with Native American and Pacific Island heritage. Most studies included cisgender men and/or women, but none included transgender men or women. The vast majority of research focused on the patient experience; few centered on providers' and caregivers' experiences. The body of scholarship was largely atheoretical; the most frequently noted constructs were patient-provider communication (including patient-centered communication and patient-centered care), implicit/explicit racial bias, shared decision-making. There was wide variation in the extent to which equity was woven through the manuscripts. Equity is typically mentioned in the literature review, and racial identity in the sample may serve as a marker of racialized experiences.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the need for the development of theory that elevates the centrality of health equity to attend to the bi- or multi-directional flow of communication that shapes the quality of these interactions.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

These insights can serve as a strong foundation for the development of interventions to address equity in clinical interactions.

Evaluating for Evidence of Sociodemographic Bias in Conversational AI for Mental Health Support

The integration of large language models (LLMs) into healthcare highlights the need to ensure their efficacy while mitigating potential harms, such as the perpetuation of biases. Current evidence on the existence of bias within LLMs remains inconclusive. In this study, we present an approach to investigate the presence of bias within an LLM designed for mental health support. We simulated physician-patient conversations by using a communication loop between an LLM-based conversational agent and digital standardized patients (DSPs) that engaged the agent in dialogue while remaining agnostic to sociodemographic characteristics. In contrast, the conversational agent was made aware of each DSP's characteristics, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, and annual income. The agent's responses were analyzed to discern potential systematic biases using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count tool. Multivariate regression analysis, trend analysis, and group-based trajectory models were used to quantify potential biases. Among 449 conversations, there was no evidence of bias in both descriptive assessments and multivariable linear regression analyses. Moreover, when evaluating changes in mean tone scores throughout a dialogue, the conversational agent exhibited a capacity to show understanding of the DSPs' chief complaints and to elevate the tone scores of the DSPs throughout conversations. This finding did not vary by any sociodemographic characteristics of the DSP. Using an objective methodology, our study did not uncover significant evidence of bias within an LLM-enabled mental health conversational agent. These findings offer a complementary approach to examining bias in LLM-based conversational agents for mental health support.

Epidemiological methods in transition: Minimizing biases in classical and digital approaches

Epidemiology and Public Health have increasingly relied on structured and unstructured data, collected inside and outside of typical health systems, to study, identify, and mitigate diseases at the population level. Focusing on infectious diseases, we review the state of Digital Epidemiology at the beginning of 2020 and how it changed after the COVID-19 pandemic, in both nature and breadth. We argue that Epidemiology's progressive use of data generated outside of clinical and public health systems creates several technical challenges, particularly in carrying specific biases that are almost impossible to correct for a priori. Using a statistical perspective, we discuss how a definition of Digital Epidemiology that emphasizes "data-type" instead of "data-source," may be more operationally useful, by clarifying key methodological differences and gaps. Therefore, we briefly describe some of the possible biases arising from varied collection methods and sources, and offer some recommendations to better explore the potential of Digital Epidemiology, particularly on how to help reduce inequity.

Impact of Urinary Tract and Vaginal Infections on the Physical and Emotional Well-being of Women

Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) is a common bacterial infection that can affect various parts of the urinary system, with symptoms including frequent urination, painful urination, and lower back pain. UTIs are more common in women due to their shorter urethra, and they can lead to serious complications if left untreated. Vaginitis is an inflammation or infection of the vagina caused by factors like bacteria, fungi (Candida), or protozoa (Trichomonas). Symptoms include vaginal itching, abnormal discharge, and discomfort during urination or sexual activity. Treatment depends on the underlying cause and may involve antifungal or antimicrobial medications. Vaginal infections, such as bacterial vaginosis, yeast infections, trichomoniasis, cervicitis, and atrophic vaginitis, can have various physical, emotional, sexual, and social impacts on the lives of women. These impacts may include discomfort, embarrassment, reduced sexual satisfaction, social isolation, and emotional distress. Support and resources for managing these infections include healthcare providers who can diagnose and prescribe treatment, pharmacies that provide medications and guidance, telemedicine for remote consultations and prescriptions, support groups for emotional and informational support, and online resources for reliable information. They offer a sense of community, information sharing, and emotional support, making it easier for individuals to manage their vaginitis and related concerns. Utilizing these resources can contribute to a more informed and empowered approach to vaginal infection prevention and treatment.

Assessing Facility Readiness to Provide Equitable Birthing Care in New York State: A Baseline Survey

CONTEXT

Facility policies, practices, and culture contribute to inequities in maternal outcomes. In New York State (NYS), Black birthing people are 4 to 5 times more likely to experience maternal mortality than White birthing people.

OBJECTIVES

Understanding the racial, ethnic, linguistic, and gender equity policies at NYS birthing facilities can identify areas of improvement to impact care and outcomes.

DESIGN

The design was a cross-sectional study.

SETTING

The setting was NYS birthing facilities, which included hospitals and birthing centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Facility leadership completed self-reported surveys from December 2020 through June 2021.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Facility equity data were obtained across 4 domains: (1) organizational commitment to equity, (2) staff equity training and evaluation, (3) leadership and staff composition, and (4) patient data, voice, and influence.

RESULTS

Over half of NYS birthing facilities documented a public commitment to equity in their mission, but only 15% had a written equity plan with processes for monitoring progress. Less than one-third of facilities stated that staff from underrepresented racial, ethnic, and language, gender (REaLG) groups were proportionally represented in leadership and management positions. About half of the facilities reported their staff composition reflects their patient population, but only a quarter analyzed staff REaLG demographics to serve diverse patients. Twenty-eight percent of facilities assess diversity in their board of directors, facility leadership, medical leadership, medical staff, and administrative staff. One-third required staff implicit bias training; 17% collected and used data on patient satisfaction regarding racial equity; and 12% engaged affected communities.

CONCLUSIONS

Facilities differed in their implementation of policies and practices that support equitable care. Survey data provide facilities with specific areas of improvement to focus their efforts. Equity assessments are an important step for facilities to evaluate their policies and practices and for statewide institutions to develop programming.

Insights from North American radiology grand rounds: Determining patterns of gender bias in professional introductions

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the impact of moderator and speaker gender, as well as geographic location, on the use of professional titles during introductions in radiology grand rounds. Specifically, the study aimed to investigate potential gender disparities in how moderators introduce speakers, focusing on the use of formal titles such as "Doctor" compared to informal name-based introductions.

METHODS

The study utilized English-language radiology grand rounds video recordings from seven institutions in Canada and the United States of America (USA) that were chosen due to their publicly available videos. The gender of the moderator and speaker and the type of title introduction the speaker received from the moderator (introducing them as "Doctor" or their name followed by their degree credentials or their first name only). Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests were used to analyze the correlation between demographic variables (moderator and speaker gender, and country) and the chosen style of introduction (title usage).

RESULTS

The study analyzed 250 speaker introductions in radiology grand rounds presentations at institutions in Canada and the USA. The professional title "Doctor" was used to introduce speakers 160 out of 250 instances (64.0 %) and significant gender disparities were found in how male moderators introduced speakers. Male moderators used the professional title "Doctor" to introduce male speakers 71.9 % of the time but did so for female speakers only 29.6 % of the time (χ²(1, N = 168) = 27.0, p < 0.001). Additionally, male moderators were more likely to introduce female speakers by "Name only" (44.4 %) compared to male speakers (18.4 %), (χ²(1, N = 168) = 12.59, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although the title "Doctor" was used to introduce speakers the majority of the time, it was observed that male moderators are more likely to introduce male speakers with the title "Doctor" than female speakers, highlighting a potential gender bias in the recognition of professional status. However, female moderators were shown to introduce both male and female speakers as "Doctor" the majority of the time. Promoting equitable recognition across genders requires addressing these dynamics in professional environments.

Ethical and Bias Considerations in Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning

As artificial intelligence (AI) gains prominence in pathology and medicine, the ethical implications and potential biases within such integrated AI models will require careful scrutiny. Ethics and bias are important considerations in our practice settings, especially as an increased number of machine learning (ML) systems are being integrated within our various medical domains. Such ML-based systems have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in specified tasks such as, but not limited to, image recognition, natural language processing, and predictive analytics. However, the potential bias that may exist within such AI-ML models can also inadvertently lead to unfair and potentially detrimental outcomes. The source of bias within such ML models can be due to numerous factors but is typically categorized into 3 main buckets (data bias, development bias, and interaction bias). These could be due to the training data, algorithmic bias, feature engineering and selection issues, clinic and institutional bias (ie, practice variability), reporting bias, and temporal bias (ie, changes in technology, clinical practice, or disease patterns). Therefore, despite the potential of these AI-ML applications, their deployment in our day-to-day practice also raises noteworthy ethical concerns. To address ethics and bias in medicine, a comprehensive evaluation process is required, which will encompass all aspects of such systems, from model development through clinical deployment. Addressing these biases is crucial to ensure that AI-ML systems remain fair, transparent, and beneficial to all. This review will discuss the relevant ethical and bias considerations in AI-ML specifically within the pathology and medical domain.

First Nations women's experiences of out-of-hospital childbirth: Insights for enhancing paramedic practice - A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Birthing on Country principles in Australia have seen a revitalisation in midwifery care over the last decade with it being seen as a metaphor for the best start to life for First Nations peoples. This scoping review aimed to explore the extent of evidence of Australian First Nations women's experiences of out-of-hospital childbirth and the alignment with Birthing on Country principles to inform paramedic practice.

METHODS

Four databases were searched including MEDLINE, CINAHL, EBSCOhost Health and Scopus utilising the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for Scoping Reviews. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified. All articles were reviewed in a two stage process.

RESULTS

Fifty two papers were yielded with 6 meeting the inclusion criteria. Using reflective thematic analysis four key themes were generated; Birthing on Country and identity, inequitable access to healthcare, trusting relationships and medicalisation of birth.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a large gap in the literature surrounding delivery of care by paramedics to First Nations women birthing out-of-hospital in Australia. This review proposes supports and actions required to implement Birthing on Country principles into paramedicine. Further, standard maternity care has been found to be insufficient for First Nations women due to a lack of culturally safe care.

Same patient but different worlds: A state-of-the-art review translating best practice psychosocial care from musculoskeletal care to the orthopaedic context

BACKGROUND

Individuals with chronic musculoskeletal conditions experience persistent pain and disability that has deleterious impacts on physical function, psychological health, social engagement, relationships, and work participation. This impact is greater in people with psychosocial risk factors, and best practice musculoskeletal care recommends a biopsychosocial approach to management. Orthopaedic surgery is often an effective management approach for chronic musculoskeletal conditions, but research has only recently explored the links between differing patient outcomes after orthopaedic surgery and psychosocial risk factors. Implementing biopsychosocial approaches to musculoskeletal care has taken great strides in the primary care setting however, implementation of the biopsychosocial approach in orthopaedic surgery brings complexity as the context changes from primary care to hospital based secondary care. The aim of this review therefore is to explore implementation of psychosocial care in the elective orthopaedic surgery context, informed by evidence in musculoskeletal care.

ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS

Several composite screening tools for psychosocial factors or 'yellow flags' are recommended for use in primary care for musculoskeletal conditions alongside a comprehensive patient interview. However, in the orthopaedic surgery context, composite measures have focused on discharge destination, and there is not a universal approach to comprehensive patient interview incorporating a biopsychosocial approach. A range of biopsychosocial approaches to musculoskeletal conditions have been developed for the primary care setting, yet few have been explored in the context of orthopaedic surgery.

IMPLEMENTATION OF PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE

Implementing best practice psychosocial care into the orthopaedic context has enormous potential for all stakeholders, but several barriers exist at the level of the individual patient and practitioner, workforce, health service and society. We have discussed key considerations for implementation including workforce composition, patient-centred care and shared decision making, health literacy, continuity of care, and consideration of preferences for women and culturally diverse communities.

CONCLUSION

This review considers current literature exploring implementation of psychosocial care into the orthopaedic surgery context, informed by current research in musculoskeletal care. This presents a critical opportunity for orthopaedic surgery to provide optimised, equitable, high-value, patient-centred care.

Perceptions of homelessness: Is there variation across medical careers and specialties?

INTRODUCTION

Medical students, residents and faculty are all capable of holding biases towards stigmatised groups like people experiencing homelessness. This study sought to investigate how the level of training may influence perceptions of homelessness among medical students, residents and faculty. Additionally, we sought to understand how different specialities perceive people experiencing homelessness and whether this changes at various points in a career.

METHODS

The Health Professionals' Attitudes Towards the Homeless Inventory (HPATHI) was administered to medical students, residents and faculty at one institution in the United States. Basic demographics as well as length of time spent in practice were collected in addition to HPATHI responses.

RESULTS

A total of 1,141 individuals were invited to complete the survey, including 736 medical students, 214 residents and 191 faculty. Two hundred and ninety individuals participated in the survey and 238 recorded complete responses were analysed for a sample response rate of 238/1141 (20.9%.) Overall perceptions of homelessness across the entire sample were positive and not greatly influenced by the level of training during a medical career. Medical students across classes were largely in agreement and there was a noticeable increase in positive perceptions for students engaged in clinical rotations. However, clinical specialties demonstrated wide variation in perceptions, with the most prominent differences amongst individuals from surgical subspecialties of General Surgery and Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the largely favourable attitudes physicians, residents and students have towards people experiencing homelessness with implications for future work to support greater exposure to underserved populations during training. Specialty choice appears to play a larger role in the formation of attitudes towards underserved populations rather than the length of time spent in a particular specialty.

The relationship between race and emergency medical services resuscitation intensity for those in refractory-arrest

Background

Previous studies have reported race-based health disparities in North America. It is unknown if emergency medical service (EMS) treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) varies based on race. We sought to compare markers of resuscitation intensity among different racial groups.

Methods

Using data of adult EMS-treated OHCAs from the Trial of Continuous or Interrupted Chest Compressions During CPR, we analyzed data from participants for whom on-scene return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was not achieved. We fit multivariate regression models using a generalized estimating equation, to estimate the association between patient race (White vs. Black vs. "Other") and the following markers for resuscitation intensity: (1) resuscitation attempt duration; (2) intra-arrest transport; (3) number of epinephrine doses; (4) EMS arrival-to-CPR interval, and (5) 9-1-1 to first shock.

Results

From our study cohort of 5370 cases, the median age was 65 years old (IQR: 53-78), 2077 (39 %) were women, 2121 (39 %) were Black, 596 (11 %) were "Other race", 2653 (49 %) were White, and 4715 (88 %) occurred in a private location. With reference to White race, Black race was associated with a longer resuscitation attempt duration and a lower number of epinephrine doses; Black and "Other" race were both associated with a lower odds of intra-arrest transport.

Conclusion

We identified race-based differences in EMS resuscitation intensity for OHCA within a North American cohort, although 40% of race data was missing from this dataset. Future research investigating race-based differences in OHCA management may be warranted.

Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: Nursing Recommendations Supporting ASPMN's 2024 Position Statement

The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) upholds the principle that all persons with pain have equal rights to evidence-based, high quality pain assessment, management, and treatment. This practice recommendation's goals are to 1) summarize known pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices among commonly marginalized and at risk groups, 2) offer recommendations to ascertain that just and equitable pain care is provided to all people, and 3) outline a call to action for all nurses to embrace diversity, equity, inclusion, and a sense of belonging in order to mitigate pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices within clinical environments and the nursing profession. This paper provides background and rationale for the 2024 ASPMN position statement on disparities, inequities and injustices in people with pain.

Mitigating Cognitive Biases in Clinical Decision-Making Through Multi-Agent Conversations Using Large Language Models: Simulation Study

BACKGROUND

Cognitive biases in clinical decision-making significantly contribute to errors in diagnosis and suboptimal patient outcomes. Addressing these biases presents a formidable challenge in the medical field.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the role of large language models (LLMs) in mitigating these biases through the use of the multi-agent framework. We simulate the clinical decision-making processes through multi-agent conversation and evaluate its efficacy in improving diagnostic accuracy compared with humans.

METHODS

A total of 16 published and unpublished case reports where cognitive biases have resulted in misdiagnoses were identified from the literature. In the multi-agent framework, we leveraged GPT-4 (OpenAI) to facilitate interactions among different simulated agents to replicate clinical team dynamics. Each agent was assigned a distinct role: (1) making the final diagnosis after considering the discussions, (2) acting as a devil's advocate to correct confirmation and anchoring biases, (3) serving as a field expert in the required medical subspecialty, (4) facilitating discussions to mitigate premature closure bias, and (5) recording and summarizing findings. We tested varying combinations of these agents within the framework to determine which configuration yielded the highest rate of correct final diagnoses. Each scenario was repeated 5 times for consistency. The accuracy of the initial diagnoses and the final differential diagnoses were evaluated, and comparisons with human-generated answers were made using the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 240 responses were evaluated (3 different multi-agent frameworks). The initial diagnosis had an accuracy of 0% (0/80). However, following multi-agent discussions, the accuracy for the top 2 differential diagnoses increased to 76% (61/80) for the best-performing multi-agent framework (Framework 4-C). This was significantly higher compared with the accuracy achieved by human evaluators (odds ratio 3.49; P=.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The multi-agent framework demonstrated an ability to re-evaluate and correct misconceptions, even in scenarios with misleading initial investigations. In addition, the LLM-driven, multi-agent conversation framework shows promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy in diagnostically challenging medical scenarios.

Responsibilities of Medical Professionals Amidst Geopolitical Conflict

The ethical responsibilities of healthcare professionals amidst geopolitical conflict, particularly regarding their impact on patient care and healthcare delivery, present a significant challenge, especially during current strife. With the rise of national and international discord and debate, and the close relationship between war and healthcare, healthcare organizations are increasingly pressured to comment, which can reflect societal engagement, but also pose demands for maintaining professionalism. This article discusses the need for healthcare practitioners to navigate their roles in advocacy without compromising patient care, emphasizing the importance of self-reflection, adherence to ethical standards, and effective communication. We also address the implications of politicization within healthcare settings, offering strategies to uphold professional integrity and prioritize patient-centered care amidst the complexities of geopolitical tensions. While the premise of this paper was prompted by geopolitical conflict, the principles emphasized are broadly applicable to an array of controversial issues. By fostering a culture of inclusivity and respect, healthcare professionals can mitigate the risks associated with politicization and ensure a commitment to the fundamental principle of "do no harm."

Reporting Sex and Gender Differences in Cardiovascular Research

Incorporating sexual orientation, gender identity, and expression (SOGIE) data into cardiovascular research design is necessary to reduce cardiovascular healthcare disparities among sexual and gender minority (SGM) people. To achieve this, researchers should not only understand appropriate terminology, but also implement inclusive survey tools that respect privacy and cultural nuances, as the benefit of obtaining SOGIE information is critical to tailoring cardiovascular interventions and ensuring equitable healthcare outcomes. In order to address potential concerns related to disclosing SOGIE information, we must prioritize sensitivity training for healthcare professionals to foster an inclusive environment for data collection, ethical considerations, and confidentiality safeguards. This review aims to develop and inform critical thinking about sex and gender and to identify strategic mechanisms to include SOGIE data in cardiovascular research, thus improving cardiovascular health outcomes for SGM individuals. By embracing a more comprehensive and inclusive approach to data collection, cardiovascular research can contribute significantly to advancing personalized and inclusive healthcare practices and medical education, and ultimately promote better health outcomes for all SGM individuals.

Factors affecting U.S. adults' comfort level in sharing social needs information with healthcare providers

OBJECTIVE

This study examines various factors affecting U.S. adults' comfort level in sharing information about their social needs with healthcare providers.

METHODS

We used data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (cycle 6), a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults (n = 6252). The outcome variables were participants' comfort level in sharing information about three social needs (food insecurity, transportation difficulties, and housing instability). Data were analyzed using weighted bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Participants who faced discrimination when getting medical care based on race/ethnicity were more likely to be uncomfortable in sharing information about food insecurity, housing instability, and transportation difficulties. Those who trusted the healthcare system "a lot" were less likely to be uncomfortable in sharing information about food insecurity and transportation difficulties. Patient-Centered Communication (PCC) and social isolation scores significantly affected participants' comfort level in sharing information about social needs.

CONCLUSION

Various factors such as trust, discrimination, social isolation, and PCC were found to be significantly affecting US adults' comfort level in sharing information about social needs.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Healthcare systems and policymakers should focus on developing approaches and strategies to enhance trust, reduce discrimination, improve patient-provider communication, and create supportive social environments.

"I Think Many of Them Want to Appear to Have a Growth Mindset": Exploring Supervisors' Perceptions of Feedback-Seeking Behavior

PURPOSE

Feedback seeking is an expected learner competency. Motivations to seek feedback are well explored, but we know little about how supervisors perceive such requests for feedback. These perceptions matter because how supervisors judge requests can affect the feedback they give. This study explores how supervisors perceive and attribute motivations behind feedback requests to better understand the benefits and hazards of feedback seeking.

METHOD

Constructivist grounded theory was used to interview supervisors at the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, from February 2020 to September 2022. Supervisors were asked to describe instances when they perceived feedback requests as being sincere or insincere, what led to their opinions, and how they responded. Transcripts were analyzed and coded in parallel with data collection; data analysis was guided by constant comparison.

RESULTS

Seventeen faculty were interviewed. Participants perceived 4 motivations when learners sought feedback: affirmation or praise; a desire to improve; an administrative requirement, such as getting forms filled out; and hidden purposes, such as making a good impression. These perceptions were based on assumptions regarding the framing of the initial request; timing; preexisting relationship with the learner; learner characteristics, such as insecurity; and learner reactions to feedback, particularly defensiveness. Although being asked for feedback was generally well received, some participants reported irritation at requests that were repetitive, were poorly timed, or did not appear sincere.

CONCLUSIONS

Feedback seeking may prompt supervisors to consider learners' motivations, potentially resulting in a set of entangled attributions, assumptions, and reactions that shape the feedback conversation in invisible and potentially problematic ways. Learners should consider these implications as they frame their feedback requests and be explicit about what they want and why they want it. Supervisors should monitor their responses, ask questions to clarify requests, and err on the side of assuming feedback-seeking requests are sincere.

County-level racial bias is associated with worse care for white and especially black older US adults: a cross-sectional observational study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of county-level bias about black and white people with patient experience, influenza immunisation, and quality of clinical care for black and white older US adults (age 65+ years).

DESIGN

Linear multivariable regression measured the cross-sectional association of county-level estimates of implicit and explicit bias about black and white people with patient experiences, influenza immunisation, and clinical quality-of-care for black and white older US adults.

PARTICIPANTS

We used data from 1.9 million white adults who completed implicit and explicit bias measures during 2003-2018, patient experience and influenza immunisation data from respondents to the 2009-2017 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (MCAHPS) Surveys, and clinical quality-of-care data from patients whose records were included in 2009-2017 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) submissions (n=0.8-2.9 million per measure).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Three patient experience measures and patient-reported influenza immunisation from the MCAHPS Survey; five HEDIS measures.

RESULTS

In county-level models, higher pro-white implicit bias was associated with lower immunisation rates and worse scores for some patient experience measures for black and white adults as well as larger-magnitude black-white disparities. Higher pro-white implicit bias was associated with worse scores for some HEDIS measures for black and white adults but not with black-white disparities in clinical quality of care. Most significant associations were small in magnitude (effect sizes of 0.2-0.3 or less).

CONCLUSIONS

To the extent that county-level pro-white implicit bias is indicative of bias among healthcare providers, there may be a need for interventions designed to prevent such bias from adversely affecting the experiences and preventive care of black patients and the clinical quality of care for all patients.

Redefining professionalism to improve health equity in competency based medical education (CBME): A qualitative study

Purpose

There is a pressing need to address all forms of anti-oppression in medicine, given systemic harm and inequities in care and outcomes for patients and health care professionals from equity-deserving groups. Revising definitions of professionalism used in competency-based education can incorporate new professional competencies for physicians to identify and eliminate the root causes of these inequities. This study redefined the CanMEDS Professionalism definition to centre perspectives of equity-deserving groups.

Methods

In this qualitative study there were two phases. The authors conducted individual semi-structured interviews with participants representing equity-deserving population groups to understand their perspectives on and iteratively build a definition of medical professionalism. Then, the authors undertook a consensus-building process, a modified nominal group technique, using focus groups with community members from equity-deserving groups and healthcare providers to verify findings and arrive at an updated definition of medical professionalism.

Results

Four main themes were identified: 1) healthcare at the margins; 2) equity-oriented domains of professionalism; 3) structural professionalism; and 4) supporting improved professionalism. These themes were incorporated into a consensus-based definition of medical professionalism, with a focus on anti-oppression, anti-racism, accountability, safety, and equity.

Conclusions

The authors propose a new definition of medical professionalism that embeds anti-oppression, including anti-racism, as critical competencies in clinical practice and education.

"First, Trust Needs to Develop": Hematologists' Perspectives on Factors Influencing Black Persons' Participation in Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Cancer clinical trials are crucial for treatment standards and innovation but lack racial-ethnic diversity. Understanding physician perspectives on recruiting participants is critical due to their role in decision-making about trial candidacy and enrollment.

METHODS

From August 2021 to January 2022 we recruited 13 Academic hematologists experienced with treating blood cancers and enrolling clinical trial participants. Each hematologist participated in a 60-75-minute semistructured interview and completed a sociodemographic survey. Using the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities multilevel model as a framework, we characterized hematologists' perceived barriers to clinical trial participation among Black persons. ATLAS.ti v9 and later v 23.2.1 was used for project management and to facilitate data analysis using the Sort and Sift, Think and Shift approach (ResearchTalk Inc).

RESULTS

All hematologists were White, with 70% being male. Three factors influenced their perspectives on enrolling Black individuals in clinical trials: individual attitudes and beliefs, such as perceptions that Black or socioeconomically disadvantaged persons will be less willing or less compliant with the requirements for trial participation and follow-up. The need to build trusting relationships between themselves and patients prior to discussing clinical trials and the prevailing legacy of medical mistrust among the Black community. Trust was found to be the underlying factor in determining communication between hematologists and Black persons about clinical trials across all three levels.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights how hematologists' attitudes, beliefs, biases, and views on trust in patient relationships influence their communication with Black individuals about clinical trials. It emphasizes the need for further research to develop interventions that address the lack of racial and ethnic diversity in trials.

Latine Immigrant Perspectives on Trust of Clinical Research

Introduction: Medical mistrust impedes minority group participation in research, but there are few studies assessing determinants of Latine immigrants' trust in the clinical research enterprise. This qualitative study explored Latine immigrants' perspectives of clinical research. Methods: We conducted telephonic interviews with 20 Latine immigrants receiving care at a Federally Qualified Health Center in Los Angeles, California. Interviews were conducted between December 2021 and April 2022, and resultant data were coded using thematic analysis. Results: Six main themes emerged across two domains. First, trust was influenced by perceptions of the investigators' intentions. These perceptions were primarily based on (1) adequacy of information provided about the research, (2) perceived intent of investigators to respect their humanity, and (3) opportunities to share personal experiences. Second, trust was influenced by perceptions of the study's potential impact, including (4) risk of adverse outcomes, including health risks and risk of immigration status exposure, (5) perceived personal benefits, and (6) perceived community-level benefits. Conclusion: Researchers can build trust and promote participation among Latine immigrants by effectively communicating study objectives, risk mitigation efforts, and personal and community benefits. Enhancing the trustworthiness of clinical research can increase the relevance of scientific findings, representing one pathway to achieving health equity.

A Systematic Review of the Relationship Between Discrimination, Racism, and Type 2 Diabetes Healthcare Outcomes for Black Americans

BACKGROUND

Disparities in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) risk, care, and complications impact Black Americans more than that of their White counterparts. This study aims to examine the association between discrimination, racism, and T2DM care and outcomes in Black Americans.

METHOD

The systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of six original research articles met the inclusion criteria, comprising three quantitative and three qualitative studies. Overall, the systematic review findings revealed that among Black Americans, perceived interpersonal discrimination and racism by healthcare professionals are associated with patients' behaviors that impact T2DM outcomes. The findings also revealed that provider-level factors such as communication, provider assumptions and attitudes, information sharing, shared decision-making, and disease management behaviors might influence T2DM outcomes in this population.

DISCUSSION

Better T2DM-related outcomes depend on optimal disease control through adequate disease management. Building a therapeutic and culturally appropriate relationship free of discrimination and racism is vital for optimal disease management and decreasing health disparities in this patient population.

CONCLUSION

Perceived interpersonal racism and discrimination by healthcare providers, among other sociocultural factors, play a crucial role in influencing some patient behaviors that affect T2DM health outcomes in this population. Efforts to decrease health disparities in this specific community should also focus on interventions addressing provider-level factors and behaviors perceived as racist or discriminatory.

Effectiveness of the uChicago Health Inequity Classification System on surgical morbidity and mortality conference: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Across surgery, marginalized individuals experience worse postoperative outcomes. These disparities stem from the interplay between multiple factors.

METHODS

We introduced a novel framework to assess the role of barriers to access and bias in surgical complications (the uChicago Health Inequity Classification System, CHI-CS) in the setting of morbidity and mortality conference and assessed impact through pre and post implementation surveys.

RESULTS

Access and bias were related to surgical complications in 14 ​% of cases. 97 ​% reported enhanced M&M presentations with the grading system, and 47 ​% reported a change in decision-making or practice style. Although post-implementation response rate was low, there were improvements in self-reported confidence and comfort in recognizing and discussing these issues.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the CHI-CS framework to discuss bias and access to care positively impacted the way providers view, discuss, and process health inequities.

"It's just as remarkable as being left-handed, isn't it?": exploring normativity through Australian physiotherapists' perspectives of working with LGBTQIA+ patients

INTRODUCTION

Individuals identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual and other related identities (LGBTQIA+) experience challenges with healthcare, including physiotherapy. To understand potential contributions to poor experiences, this study explored physiotherapists' experiences and perspectives about working with members of LGBTQIA+ communities.

METHODS

This study employed a qualitative research design, suitable for exploring the experiences and perspectives of individuals within the physiotherapy context. The sample consisted of physiotherapists working in Australia who participated in a larger survey study. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was conducted using a relativistic and queer theoretical framework with a reflexive thematic approach.

RESULTS

Eighteen physiotherapists with diverse sexual orientations participated in the interviews. While all participants identified as women or men, not all used binary gender pronouns. Five key themes were developed: 1) "anti-discrimination" regarding choice of language and providing safe environments; 2) "current and historical discrimination" against LGBTQIA+ individuals; 3) "taking an equality approach" when working with LGBTQIA+ patients; 4) "knowledge of LGBTQIA+ health" in a broad sense and specifically with transgender and gender-diverse people; and 5) "managing own reactions" with respect to individual biases and discomfort.

CONCLUSION

Underpinning all themes was the overarching concept of cis/hetero/endonormativity. Assuming normativity when working with LGBTQIA+ patients, is likely to have negative effects on patients' mental health, the therapeutic relationship and quality of care. In order to improve diversity, safety, inclusion and equity of care for LGBTQIA+ individuals, it is vital that normativity within physiotherapy is challenged.

Ending Unequal Treatment and Achieving Optimal Health for All

This Viewpoint discusses the findings of a recent National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report suggesting that current health care delivery and accountability structures perpetuate, rather than reduce, health inequities and details several changes needed to address these structural problems.

Addressing Bias in the Occupational Therapy Admissions Process

This study investigated the impact of a workshop in reducing unconscious bias in admissions committee members of an occupational therapy program to determine if workshop participation increased the number of underrepresented students in the program. A convenience sample of 50 committee members was used. A Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test indicated a significant increase in the post-test survey question scores. A chi-square test of independence revealed a significant increase in the number of students in the program from underrepresented groups. These results suggest that an online workshop can reduce perceived bias and increase diversity in an occupational therapy program.

Challenging Misconceptions about Race in Undergraduate Genetics

Racial biases, which harm marginalized and excluded communities, may be combatted by clarifying misconceptions about race during biology lessons. We developed a human genetics laboratory activity that challenges the misconception that race is biological (biological essentialism). We assessed the relationship between this activity and student outcomes using a survey of students' attitudes about biological essentialism and color-evasive ideology and a concept inventory about phylogeny and human diversity. Students in the human genetics laboratory activity showed a significant decrease in their acceptance of biological essentialism compared with a control group, but did not show changes in color-evasive ideology. Students in both groups exhibited increased knowledge in both areas of the concept inventory, but the gains were larger in the human genetics laboratory. In the second iteration of this activity, we found that only white students' decreases in biological essentialist beliefs were significant and the activity failed to decrease color-evasive ideologies for all students. Concept inventory gains were similar and significant for both white and non-white students in this iteration. Our findings underscore the effectiveness of addressing misconceptions about the biological origins of race and encourage more research on ways to effectively change damaging student attitudes about race in undergraduate genetics education.

Bias, Prejudice, Discrimination, Racism, and Social Determinants: The Impact on the Health and Well-Being of Latino Children and Youth

This narrative review focuses on the impact of bias, prejudice, discrimination, racism (BPDR), social determinants of health, and structural racism on Latino children's health and well-being. The race/ethnicity, country of origin, immigrant/generational status, limited English proficiency (LEP), acculturation level, and social class of Latino children and their parents can heighten or modify the impact of BPDR. These differences have been shown to affect BPDR among Latino adults and presumably for their children. Surveys of Latino adolescents reveal that 60% have experienced discrimination, with first- and second-generation teens having a higher prevalence. These experiences are magnified by adverse social determinants/structural racism. BPDR can impact Latino children prenatally through adolescence. Bias involving neonatal, primary, and inpatient pediatric services has been reported. In 2021, Latino children were 19% less likely to complete preventive care, and 32% of LEP children had no medical home. School-age Latino children experience system inequities associated with chronic physical and mental health conditions. BPDR is also seen in educational performance but can be buffered by a strong racial/ethnic self-identity. To address BPDR/structural racism for Latino children, we suggest pediatricians: 1) increase the Latino child-health workforce to address BPDR internally and externally, 2) advocate for data collection on and monitoring of Latino children's disparities and racism metrics in pediatric services, to improve quality of care for Latino children and their families, and 3) advocate for child health equity. Together, these steps will help eliminate BPDR for Latino children and ensure they obtain their full potential.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Obstetrics and Gynecologist Hospitalists' Impact on Maternal Mortality

Obstetrics and gynecology hospitalists play a vital role in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality by providing immediate access to obstetric care, especially in emergencies. Their presence in hospitals ensures timely interventions and expert management, contributing to better outcomes for mothers and babies. This proactive approach can extend beyond hospital walls through education, advocacy, and community outreach initiatives aimed at improving maternal health across diverse settings.

Understanding Implicit Bias and Its Impact in Veterinary Medicine

Implicit biases are those we are unwilling to admit, yet they influence our behavior in ways that impact our experience in the workplace. Literature demonstrates that implicit bias influences career choice and limits success within a chosen career. Discrimination in the veterinary workplace is pervasive and has a negative impact that is responsible for financial loss. It can also influence client communication, patient-care, and be inadvertently perpetuated by well-meaning community clinics. Strategies can be employed to acknowledge implicit bias and to foster behavioral change, which results in a healthier workplace and improved client and patient-care.

The pervasive influence of systems of power on transition readiness for adult care in sickle cell disease: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Adolescence and young adulthood are vulnerable developmental periods for individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD), particularly given the impact of social inequities, challenges with transitioning to adult healthcare services, and increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Systems of power, such as institutionalized and interpersonal manifestations of bias, could impact SCD transfer and engagement in adult care through their influence on healthcare transition readiness; yet research in this area is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize how systems of power impact transition readiness factors described in the Social-ecological Model of AYA Readiness for Transition to Promote Health Equity (SMART-E) framework at the patient, caregiver, and practitioner levels.

METHODS

Pediatric adolescents and young adults (AYA), transferred AYA, caregivers, and practitioners participated in semi-structured focus groups and individual interviews examining health equity and systems of power during healthcare transition. Focus groups/interviews were transcribed and coded using a deductive approach via the updated SMART-E framework.

RESULTS

Ten pediatric AYA with SCD, nine transferred AYA with SCD, eight caregivers, and nine practitioners participated in a focus group or interview. Qualitative findings across reporters emphasize the impact of systems of power (e.g., racial bias and disease stigma) on knowledge, skills and self-efficacy, beliefs and expectations, goals and motivation, and emotions and psychosocial functioning at the patient, caregiver, and practitioner levels.

CONCLUSION

Systems of power are prevalent with respect to transition barriers for AYA with SCD and their supports. Structural, institutional, and individual factors with potential to reduce the influence of systems of power should be further identified and targeted for intervention.

LT4/LT3 Combination Therapy vs. Monotherapy with LT4 for Persistent Symptoms of Hypothyroidism: A Systematic Review

Regardless of the cause, hypothyroidism should be treated with levothyroxine. The objectives of management are the normalization of TSH levels and the relief of symptoms. In general, the vast majority of patients who achieve normalization of TSH levels show a resolution of symptoms; however, for a small number of individuals, symptoms persist (despite adequate control of TSH). This scenario generates a dilemma in the therapeutic approach to these patients, because even when excluding other causes or concomitant diseases that can explain the persistence of symptoms, pharmacological management strategies are scarce. Consequently, the efficacy of some less conventional approaches to therapy, such as the use of LT3 monotherapy, desiccated thyroid extracts, and LT4/LT3 combinations, in addressing persistent hypothyroid symptoms have been evaluated in multiple studies. The majority of these studies did not observe a significant benefit from these "nonconventional" therapies in comparison to results with LT4 monotherapy alone. Nevertheless, some studies report that a significant proportion of patients prefer an alternative to monotherapy with LT4. The most common approach has been to prescribe a combination of LT4 and LT3, and this review describes and analyzes the current evidence of the efficacy of LT4/LT3 combination therapy vs. LT4 monotherapy in addressing persistent hypothyroidism symptoms to provide suggested guidelines for clinicians in the management of these patients.