1
|
Adegbulugbe AA, Farah E, Ruan Y, Yong JHE, Cheung WY, Brenner DR. The projected health and economic impact of increased colorectal cancer screening participation among Canadians by income quintile. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH = REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE 2024; 115:384-394. [PMID: 38502494 PMCID: PMC11133258 DOI: 10.17269/s41997-024-00868-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake by socioeconomic status have been observed in Canada. We used the OncoSim-Colorectal model to evaluate the health and economic outcomes associated with increasing the participation rates of CRC screening programs to 60% among Canadians in different income quintiles. METHODS Baseline CRC screening participation rates were obtained from the 2017 Canadian Community Health Survey. The survey participants were categorized into income quintiles using their reported household income and 2016 Canadian Census income quintile thresholds. Within each quintile, the participation rate was the proportion of respondents aged 50-74 who reported having had a fecal test in the past two years. Using the OncoSim-Colorectal model, we simulated an increase in CRC screening uptake to 60% across income quintiles to assess the effects on CRC incidence, mortality, and associated economic costs from 2024 to 2073. RESULTS Increasing CRC screening participation rates to 60% across all income quintiles would prevent 69,100 CRC cases and 36,600 CRC deaths over 50 years. The improvement of clinical outcomes would also translate to increased person-years and health-adjusted person-years. The largest impact was observed in the lowest income group, with 22,200 cases and 11,700 deaths prevented over 50 years. Increased participation could lead to higher screening costs ($121 million CAD more per year) and lower treatments costs ($95 million CAD less per year), averaged over the period 2024-2073. CONCLUSION Increased screening participation will improve clinical outcomes across all income groups while alleviating associated treatment costs. The benefits of increased participation will be strongest among the lowest income quintile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abisola A Adegbulugbe
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Eliya Farah
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Yibing Ruan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jean H E Yong
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Winson Y Cheung
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Darren R Brenner
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
- Forzani & MacPhail Colon Cancer Screening Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tavakoli B, Feizi A, Zamani-Alavijeh F, Shahnazi H. Factors influencing breast cancer screening practices among women worldwide: a systematic review of observational and qualitative studies. BMC Womens Health 2024; 24:268. [PMID: 38678224 PMCID: PMC11055241 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03096-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The variation in breast cancer incidence rates across different regions may reflect disparities in breast cancer screening (BCS) practices. Understanding the factors associated with these screening behaviors is crucial for identifying modifiable elements amenable to intervention. This systematic review aims to identify common factors influencing BCS behaviors among women globally. METHODS Relevant papers were sourced from PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar. The included studies were published in English in peer-reviewed journals from January 2000 to March 2023 and investigated factors associated with BCS behaviors. RESULTS From an initial pool of 625 articles, 34 studies (comprising 29 observational and 5 qualitative studies) with 36,043 participants were included. Factors influencing BCS behaviors were categorized into nine groups: socio-demographic factors, health status history, knowledge, perceptions, cultural factors, cues to action, motivation, self-efficacy, and social support. The quality appraisal scores of the studies ranged from average to high. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review highlights factors pivotal for policy-making at various levels of breast cancer prevention and assists health promotion professionals in designing more effective interventions to enhance BCS practices among women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Banafsheh Tavakoli
- Student Research Committee, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Awat Feizi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Fereshteh Zamani-Alavijeh
- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Hossein Shahnazi
- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shuldiner J, Sutradhar R, Lau C, Shah N, Lam E, Ivers N, Nathan PC. Longitudinal adherence to surveillance for late effects of cancer treatment: a population-based study of adult survivors of childhood cancer. CMAJ 2024; 196:E282-E294. [PMID: 38467416 PMCID: PMC10927290 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.231358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adult survivors of childhood cancer are at elevated risk of morbidity and mortality compared to the general population, but their adherence to lifelong periodic surveillance is suboptimal. We aimed to examine adherence to surveillance guidelines for high-yield tests and identify risk factors for nonadherence in adult survivors of childhood cancer. METHODS In this retrospective, population-based cohort study, we used health care administrative data from Ontario, Canada, to identify adult survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed between 1986 and 2014 who were at elevated risk of therapy-related colorectal cancer, breast cancer, or cardiomyopathy. Using a Poisson regression framework, we assessed longitudinal adherence and predictors of adherence to the Children's Oncology Group surveillance guideline. RESULTS Among 3241 survivors, 327 (10%), 234 (7%), and 3205 (99%) were at elevated risk for colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and cardiomyopathy, respectively. Within these cohorts, only 13%, 6%, and 53% were adherent to recommended surveillance as of February 2020. During a median follow-up of 7.8 years, the proportion of time spent adherent was 14% among survivors at elevated risk for colorectal cancer, 10% for breast cancer, and 43% for cardiomyopathy. Significant predictors of adherence varied across the risk groups, but higher comorbidity was associated with adherence to recommended surveillance. INTERPRETATION Survivors of childhood cancer in Ontario are rarely up to date for recommended surveillance tests. Tailored interventions beyond specialized clinics are needed to improve surveillance adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Shuldiner
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care (Shuldiner, Ivers), Women's College Hospital; ICES Central (Sutradhar, Lau); the Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute (Shah, Lam, Nathan); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Ivers, Nathan), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto; Division of Hematology/Oncology (Nathan), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care (Shuldiner, Ivers), Women's College Hospital; ICES Central (Sutradhar, Lau); the Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute (Shah, Lam, Nathan); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Ivers, Nathan), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto; Division of Hematology/Oncology (Nathan), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Cindy Lau
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care (Shuldiner, Ivers), Women's College Hospital; ICES Central (Sutradhar, Lau); the Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute (Shah, Lam, Nathan); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Ivers, Nathan), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto; Division of Hematology/Oncology (Nathan), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Nida Shah
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care (Shuldiner, Ivers), Women's College Hospital; ICES Central (Sutradhar, Lau); the Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute (Shah, Lam, Nathan); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Ivers, Nathan), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto; Division of Hematology/Oncology (Nathan), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Emily Lam
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care (Shuldiner, Ivers), Women's College Hospital; ICES Central (Sutradhar, Lau); the Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute (Shah, Lam, Nathan); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Ivers, Nathan), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto; Division of Hematology/Oncology (Nathan), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Noah Ivers
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care (Shuldiner, Ivers), Women's College Hospital; ICES Central (Sutradhar, Lau); the Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute (Shah, Lam, Nathan); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Ivers, Nathan), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto; Division of Hematology/Oncology (Nathan), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| | - Paul C Nathan
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care (Shuldiner, Ivers), Women's College Hospital; ICES Central (Sutradhar, Lau); the Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute (Shah, Lam, Nathan); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Ivers, Nathan), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto; Division of Hematology/Oncology (Nathan), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dagne GA. Spatial mapping of colorectal cancer screening uptake and associated factors. Eur J Cancer Prev 2024; 33:161-167. [PMID: 37702612 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Over the past decades, it has been understood that the availability of screening tests has contributed to a steady decline in incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, it is also seen that there is a geographic disparity in the use of such tests across small areas. The aim of this study is to examine small-area level barrier factors that may impact CRC screening uptake and to delineate coldspot (low uptake of screening) counties in Florida. METHODS Data on the percentages of county-level CRC screening uptakes in 2016 and county-level barrier factors for screening were obtained from the Florida Department of Health, Division of Public Health Statistics & Performance Management. Bayesian spatial beta models were used to produce posterior probability of deceedance to identify coldspots for CRC screening rates. RESULTS Unadjusted screening rates using sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy test ranged from 56.8 to 85%. Bayesian spatial beta models were fitted to the proportion data. At an ecological level, we found that an increasing rate of CRC screening uptake for either of the test types (colon/rectum exam, stool-based test) was strongly associated with a higher health insurance coverage, and lower percentage of population that speak English less than very well (immigration) at county level. Eleven coldspot counties out of 67 total were also identified. CONCLUSION This study suggests that health insurance disparities in the use of CRC screening tests are an important factor that may need more attention for resource allocation and health policy targeting small areas with low uptake of screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Getachew A Dagne
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Holtz AV, Fink A, Tamgüney G, Doblhammer G. Colonoscopy and Subsequent Risk of Parkinson's Disease. JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2024; 14:747-760. [PMID: 38669559 PMCID: PMC11191466 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-240017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Background Parkinson's disease (PD) is caused by the misfolding and aggregation of α-synuclein in neurons into toxic oligomers and fibrils that have prion-like properties allowing them to infect healthy neurons and to be transmitted to animal models of PD by injection or oral exposure. Given α-synuclein fibrils' potential transmission on the gut-brain axis, α-synuclein may be transmitted through colonoscopy procedures. Objective This study examines a possible association between colonoscopy and PD. Methods Longitudinal health insurance data of 250,000 individuals aged 50+ from 2004-2019 was analyzed. Cox proportional hazard and competing risk models with death as a competing event were estimated to calculate the risk of PD. Colonoscopy was categorized as never receiving colonoscopy, colorectal cancer (CRC) screening without or with biopsy, destruction or excision (BDE), and diagnostic colonoscopy without or with BDE. Results We identified 6,422 new cases of PD among 221,582 individuals. The Cox model revealed a significantly increased risk of PD for patients who ever had a diagnostic colonoscopy without or with BDE (HR = 1.31; 95% CI: [1.23-1.40]; HR = 1.32 [1.22-1.42]) after adjustment for age and sex. After controlling for covariates and death, persons who ever underwent CRC screening had a 40% reduced risk of PD (CRHR = 0.60 [0.54-0.67]), while persons who underwent diagnostic colonoscopy had a 20% reduced risk of PD (CRHR = 0.81 [0.75-0.88]). Conclusions Colonoscopy does not increase the risk of PD, after adjusting for death and covariates. Individuals who underwent only CRC screening had the lowest risk of PD, which may be a result of a more health-conscious lifestyle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Victoria Holtz
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases(DZNE), Demographic Studies, Bonn, Germany
- University of Rostock, Institute for Sociology and Demography, Rostock, Germany
| | - Anne Fink
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases(DZNE), Demographic Studies, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gültekin Tamgüney
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Biological Information Processing – Structural Biochemistry (IBI-7), Jülich, Germany
- Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Institut für Physikalische Biologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Gabriele Doblhammer
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases(DZNE), Demographic Studies, Bonn, Germany
- University of Rostock, Institute for Sociology and Demography, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jose S, Zalin-Miller A, Knott C, Paley L, Tataru D, Morement H, Toledano MB, Khan SA. Cohort study to assess geographical variation in cholangiocarcinoma treatment in England. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15:2077-2092. [PMID: 38173436 PMCID: PMC10758644 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i12.2077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcomes for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are extremely poor owing to the complexities in diagnosing and managing a rare disease with heterogenous sub-types. Beyond curative surgery, which is only an option for a minority of patients diagnosed at an early stage, few systemic therapy options are currently recommended to relieve symptoms and prolong life. Stent insertion to manage disease complications requires highly specialised expertise. Evidence is lacking as to how CCA patients are managed in a real-world setting and whether there is any variation in treatments received by CCA patients. AIM To assess geographic variation in treatments received amongst CCA patients in England. METHODS Data used in this cohort study were drawn from the National Cancer Registration Dataset (NCRD), Hospital Episode Statistics and the Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy Dataset. A cohort of 8853 CCA patients diagnosed between 2014-2017 in the National Health Service in England was identified from the NCRD. Potentially curative surgery for all patients and systemic therapy and stent insertion for 7751 individuals who did not receive surgery were identified as three end-points of interest. Linear probability models assessed variation in each of the three treatment modalities according to Cancer Alliance of residence at diagnosis, and for socio-demographic and clinical characteristics at diagnosis. RESULTS Of 8853 CCA patients, 1102 (12.4%) received potentially curative surgery. The mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] percentage-point difference from the population average ranged from -3.96 (-6.34 to -1.59)% to 3.77 (0.54 to 6.99)% across Cancer Alliances in England after adjustment for patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, showing statistically significant variation. Amongst 7751 who did not receive surgery, 1542 (19.9%) received systemic therapy, with mean [95%CI] percentage-point difference from the population average between -3.84 (-8.04 to 0.35)% to 9.28 (1.76 to 16.80)% across Cancer Alliances after adjustment, again showing the presence of statistically significant variation for some regions. Stent insertion was received by 2156 (27.8%), with mean [95%CI] percentage-point difference from the population average between -10.54 (-12.88 to -8.20)% to 13.64 (9.22 to 18.06)% across Cancer Alliances after adjustment, showing wide and statistically significant variation from the population average. Half of 8853 patients (n = 4468) received no treatment with either surgery, systemic therapy or stent insertion. CONCLUSION Substantial regional variation in treatments received by CCA patients was observed in England. Such variation could be due to differences in case-mix, clinical practice or access to specialist expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Jose
- Health Data Analysis, Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge CB21 5XE, United Kingdom
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London SE1 8UG, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Zalin-Miller
- Health Data Analysis, Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge CB21 5XE, United Kingdom
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London SE1 8UG, United Kingdom
| | - Craig Knott
- Health Data Analysis, Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge CB21 5XE, United Kingdom
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London SE1 8UG, United Kingdom
| | - Lizz Paley
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London SE1 8UG, United Kingdom
| | - Daniela Tataru
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London SE1 8UG, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Morement
- Department of Executive, AMMF-The Cholangiocarcinoma Charity, Essex CM24 1QW, United Kingdom
| | - Mireille B Toledano
- MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, United Kingdom
- Mohn Centre for Children's Health and Wellbeing, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, United Kingdom
| | - Shahid A Khan
- Liver Unit, Division of Digestive Diseases, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Luo Z, Dong X, Wang C, Cao W, Zheng Y, Wu Z, Xu Y, Zhao L, Wang F, Li J, Ren J, Shi J, Chen W, Li N. Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Adherence to Fecal Occult Blood Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023; 9:e48150. [PMID: 37906212 PMCID: PMC10646673 DOI: 10.2196/48150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening adherence is important in reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. Disparity in CRC screening adherence was observed in populations of different socioeconomic status (SES), but the direction and strength of the association remained unclear. OBJECTIVE We aimed to systematically review all the observational studies that have analyzed the association between SES and adherence to organized CRC screening based on fecal occult blood tests. METHODS We systematically reviewed the studies in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science and reference lists of relevant reviews from the inception of the database up until June 7, 2023. Individual SES, neighborhood SES, and small-area SES were included, while any SES aggregated by geographic areas larger than neighbors were excluded. Studies assessing SES with any index or score combining indicators of income, education, deprivation, poverty, occupation, employment, marital status, cohabitation, and others were included. A random effect model meta-analysis was carried out for pooled odds ratios (ORs) and relative risks for adherence related to SES. RESULTS Overall, 10 studies, with a total of 3,542,379 participants and an overall adherence rate of 64.9%, were included. Compared with low SES, high SES was associated with higher adherence (unadjusted OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.42-2.10; adjusted OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.28-1.82). In the subgroup of nonindividual-level SES, the adjusted association was significant (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.26-1.95). However, the adjusted association was insignificant in the subgroup of individual-level SES (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.98-2.17). As for subgroups of the year of print, not only was the unadjusted association significantly stronger in the subgroup of early studies (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.59-2.44) than in the subgroup of late studies (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.31-1.56), but also the adjusted one was significantly stronger in the early group (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.43-2.42) than in the late group (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14-1.39), which was consistent and robust. Despite being statistically insignificant, the strength of the association seemed lower in studies that did not adjust for race and ethnicity (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.21-1.43) than the overall estimate (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.28-1.82). CONCLUSIONS The higher-SES population had higher adherence to fecal occult blood test-based organized CRC screening. Neighborhood SES, or small-area SES, was more competent than individual SES to be used to assess the association between SES and adherence. The disparity in adherence between the high SES and the low SES narrowed along with the development of interventions and the improvement of organized programs. Race and ethnicity were probably important confounding factors for the association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zilin Luo
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuesi Dong
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chenran Wang
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Cao
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yadi Zheng
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng Wu
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yongjie Xu
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Liang Zhao
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Wang
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jibin Li
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiansong Ren
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jufang Shi
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wanqing Chen
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ni Li
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dunlop HM, Williams LJ, Hall PS, Barber M, Dodds C, Figueroa JD. Evaluation of the association of area-level socioeconomic deprivation and breast cancer recurrence by oestrogen receptor subtypes in Scotland. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:106. [PMID: 37784154 PMCID: PMC10546786 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01704-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women from socioeconomically deprived areas have lower breast cancer (BC) incidence rates for screen-detected oestrogen receptor (ER) + tumours and higher mortality for select tumour subtypes. We aimed to determine if ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (IBR) differs by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) quintile and tumour subtype in Scotland. METHODS Patient data for primary invasive BC diagnosed in 2007-2008 in Scotland was analysed. Manual case-note review for 3495 patients from 10 years post-diagnosis was used. To determine the probability of IBR while accounting for the competing risk of death from any cause, cumulative incidence functions stratified by ER subtype and surgery were plotted. Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to estimate the association of SIMD accounting for other predictors of IBR. RESULTS Among 2819 ER + tumours, 423 patients had a recurrence and 438 died. SIMD was related to death (p = 0.018) with the most deprived more likely to have died in the 10-year period (17.7% vs. 12.9%). We found no significant differences by SIMD in prognostic tumour characteristics (grade, TNM stage, treatment, screen-detection) or risk of IBR. Among 676 patients diagnosed with ER- tumours, 105 died and 185 had a recurrence. We found no significant differences in prognostic tumour characteristics by SIMD except screen detection with the most deprived more likely than the least to have their tumours detected from screening (46.9% vs. 28%, p = 0.03). Among patients with ER- tumours, 50% had mastectomy and the most deprived had increased 5-year IBR risk compared to the least deprived (HR 3.03 [1.41-6.53]). CONCLUSIONS IBR is not a major contributor to mortality differences by SIMD for the majority of BC patients in our study. The lack of inequities in IBR are likely due to standardised treatment protocols and access to healthcare. The association with socioeconomic deprivation and recurrence for ER- tumours requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley M Dunlop
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Linda J Williams
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, The Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Peter S Hall
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Matthew Barber
- Edinburgh Breast Unit, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Jonine D Figueroa
- Centre for Global Health, The Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Agunwamba AA, Zhu X, Sauver JS, Thompson G, Helmueller L, Finney Rutten LJ. Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening using the 5As framework: A systematic review of US studies. Prev Med Rep 2023; 35:102353. [PMID: 37576848 PMCID: PMC10415795 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite clear evidence that regular screening reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and the availability of multiple effective screening options, CRC screening continues to be underutilized in the US. A systematic literature search of four databases - Ovid, Medline, EBSCHOhost, and Web of Science - was conducted to identify US studies published after 2017 that reported on barriers and facilitators to CRC screening adherence. Articles were extracted to categorize relevant CRC screening barriers or facilitators that were assessed against CRC screening outcomes using the 5As dimensions: Access, Affordability, Acceptance, Awareness, Activation. Sixty-one studies were included. Fifty determinants of screening within the 5As framework and two additional dimensions including Sociodemographics and Health Status were identified. The Sociodemographics, Access, and Affordability dimensions had the greatest number of studies included. The most common factor in the Access dimension was contact with healthcare systems, within the Affordability dimension was insurance, within the Awareness dimension was knowledge CRC screening, within the Acceptance dimension was health beliefs, within the Activation dimension was prompts and reminders, within the Sociodemographics dimension was race/ethnicity, and among the Health Status dimension was chronic disease history. Among all studies, contact with healthcare systems, insurance, race/ethnicity, age, and education were the most common factors identified. CRC screening barriers and facilitators were identified across individual, clinical, and sociocontextual levels. Interventions that consider multilevel strategies will most effectively increase CRC screening adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amenah A. Agunwamba
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Xuan Zhu
- Division of Health Care Policy & Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jenny St. Sauver
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Lila J. Finney Rutten
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Korous KM, Ogbonnaya UC, De Vera MA, Brooks E, Moore JX, Rogers CR. Perceived economic pressure and colorectal cancer-related perceptions among U.S. males (aged 45-75). Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:737-747. [PMID: 37243849 PMCID: PMC10961139 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01713-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine whether a greater perception of economic pressure would be associated with more-negative attitudes, greater perceived barriers, and lower subjective norms regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) and CRC screening among males aged 45-75 years. METHODS We recruited 492 self-identified males aged 45-75 years living in the United States. We operationalized perceived economic pressure as a latent factor with three subscales: can't make ends meet, unmet material needs, and financial cutbacks. Our dependent variables were attitudes toward CRC and CRC screening, perceived barriers to completing a CRC screening exam, and subjective norms regarding CRC screening (e.g., how others value CRC screening). We tested a hypothesized model using structural equation modeling with maximum-likelihood estimation, adjusting for covariates, and made post-hoc modifications to improve model fit. RESULTS Greater perceived economic pressure was associated with more-negative attitudes toward CRC and CRC screening (β = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.37,0.57) and with greater perceived barriers to CRC screening (β = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.34), but was not significantly associated with subjective norms (β = 0.07, 95% CI: - 0.05, 0.19). Perceived economic pressure was an indirect pathway by which lower-income and younger age were associated with more-negative attitudes and greater perceived barriers. CONCLUSIONS Our study is one of the first to show that, among males, perceived economic pressure is associated with two social-cognitive mechanisms (i.e., negative attitudes, greater perceived barriers) that are known to influence CRC screening intent and, ultimately, CRC screening completion. Future research on this topic should employ longitudinal study designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M Korous
- Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| | - Uchenna C Ogbonnaya
- Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Mary A De Vera
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Ellen Brooks
- Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Justin X Moore
- Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention, Control & Population Health, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA
| | - Charles R Rogers
- Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moazzam Z, Woldesenbet S, Endo Y, Alaimo L, Lima HA, Cloyd J, Dillhoff M, Ejaz A, Pawlik TM. Association of Historical Redlining and Present-Day Social Vulnerability with Cancer Screening. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 237:454-464. [PMID: 37318132 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Healthy People 2030 initiative has set national cancer screening targets at 77.1%, 74.4%, and 84.3% for breast, colon, and cervical cancers, respectively. We sought to assess the association between historical redlining relative and present-day social vulnerability on screening targets for breast, colon, and cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN Data on national census-tract level cancer screening prevalence and social vulnerability index in 2020 was extracted from the CDC PLACES and CDC social vulnerability index databases, respectively. Census tracts were then assigned Home-Owners Loan Corporation grades (A: "Best", B: "Still Desirable", C: "Definitely Declining," and D: "Hazardous/Redlined"). Mixed-effects logistic regression and mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between Home-Owners Loan Corporation grades and achievement of cancer screening targets. RESULT Among 11,831 census tracts, 3,712 were classified as redlined (A: n = 842, 7.1% vs B: n = 2,314, 19.6% vs C: n = 4,963, 42.0% vs D: n = 3,712, 31.4%). Notably, 62.8% (n = 7,427), 21.2% (n = 2,511), and 27.3% (n = 3,235) of tracts met screening targets for breast, colon, and cervical cancer, respectively. After adjusting for present-day social vulnerability index and access to care metrics (population to primary care physician ratio and distance to nearest healthcare facility), redlined tracts were markedly less likely to meet breast (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.91), colon (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.41), and cervical (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.27) cancer screening targets compared with the "Best" tracts. Notably, poverty, lack of education, and limited English proficiency, among others, mediated the adverse effect of historical redlining on cancer screening. CONCLUSIONS Redlining as a surrogate for structural racism continues to adversely impact cancer screening. Policies that aim to make access to preventive cancer care more equitable for historically marginalized communities should be a public priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zorays Moazzam
- From the Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rollet Q, Exarchakou A, Launoy G, Merville O, Rubio FJ, Belot A. Functional forms of socio-territorial inequities in breast cancer screening - A French cross-sectional study using hierarchical generalised additive models. Prev Med 2023; 173:107587. [PMID: 37355102 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
To reduce the breast cancer burden, the French National Organised Breast Cancer Screening Programme (FNOBCSP) was implemented in 2004. The recommended participation rate has never been achieved and socio-territorial inequities in participation have been reported on several occasions. We investigated the functional forms and consistency of the relationships between neighbourhood deprivation, travel time to the nearest accredited radiology centre and screening uptake. We used two-level hierarchical generalised additive models in 8 types of territories classified by socio-demographic and economic factors. The first level was 368,201 women aged 50-72 invited to the 2013-2014 screening campaign in metropolitan France. They were nested in 41 départements, the level of organisation of the FNOBCSP. The effect of travel time showed two main patterns: it was either linear (with participation decreasing as travel time increased) or participation first increased with increasing travel time to a peak around 5-15 min and decreased afterward. In nearly all types and départements, the probability of participation decreased linearly with increasing deprivation. Territorial inequities in participation were more context-dependent and complex than social inequities. Inequities in participation represent a loss of opportunity for individuals who already have the worst cancer outcomes. Evidence-based public health policies are needed to increase the effectiveness and equity of breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quentin Rollet
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network (ICON), Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM, University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse, 3, Avenue du Général Harris, Caen 14000, France.
| | - Aimilia Exarchakou
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network (ICON), Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Guy Launoy
- U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM, University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse, 3, Avenue du Général Harris, Caen 14000, France
| | - Ophélie Merville
- U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM, University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse, 3, Avenue du Général Harris, Caen 14000, France
| | - Francisco J Rubio
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Aurélien Belot
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network (ICON), Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Davis LE, Mahar AL, Strumpf EC. Agreement between individual and neighborhood income measures in patients with colorectal cancer in Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:514-522. [PMID: 36708004 PMCID: PMC10165486 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With increasing interest in income-related differences in cancer outcomes, accurate measurement of income is imperative. Misclassification of income can result in wrong conclusions as to the presence of income inequalities. We determined misclassification between individual- and neighborhood-level income and their association with overall survival among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. METHODS The Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohorts were used to identify CRC patients diagnosed from 1992 to 2017. We used neighborhood income quintiles from Statistics Canada and created individual income quintiles from the same data sources to be as similar as possible. Agreement between individual and neighborhood income quintiles was measured using cross-tabulations and weighted kappa statistics. Cox proportional hazards and Lin semiparametric hazards models were used to determine the effects of individual and neighborhood income independently and jointly on survival. Analyses were also stratified by rural residence. RESULTS A total of 103 530 CRC patients were included in the cohort. There was poor agreement between individual and neighborhood income with only 17% of respondents assigned to the same quintile (weighted kappa = 0.18). Individual income had a greater effect on relative and additive survival than neighborhood income when modeled separately. The interaction between individual and neighborhood income demonstrated that the most at risk for poor survival were those in the lowest individual and neighborhood income quintiles. Misclassification was more likely to occur for patients residing in rural areas. CONCLUSION Cancer researchers should avoid using neighborhood income as a proxy for individual income, especially among patients with cancers with demonstrated inequalities by income.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Davis
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Alyson L Mahar
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Queens University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Erin C Strumpf
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Economics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Markey C, Bello O, Hanley M, Loehrer AP. The Use of Area-Level Socioeconomic Indices in Evaluating Cancer Care Delivery: A Scoping Review. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2620-2628. [PMID: 36695989 PMCID: PMC11163235 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13099-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple composite indices of small-area socioeconomic characteristics have been used to examine how neighborhood characteristics influence cancer care, but there is little consensus regarding how to use them. This scoping review aimed to summarize the use of these indices in cancer literature and their association with outcomes. METHODS A search was conducted to identify studies from 2015 to 2021 that investigated cancer incidence, disease stage at diagnosis, and mortality using area-based indices of deprivation as an independent variable. Studies were screened and assessed for eligibility. Data were extracted regarding the geospatial and statistical use of these indices. RESULTS All the inclusion criteria were met by 45 studies. The area level of analysis was at the census tract level in 19 studies (42.3%), the county level in 15 studies (33.3%), the block group level in 6 studies (13.3%), and the ZIP code level in 5 studies (11.1%). Altogether, 18 unique indices were used, with 4 indices used most frequently. Of the studies that used their indices ordinally, 3 defined high and low deprivation dichotomously, 10 used tertiles, 13 used quartiles, and 15 used quintiles. Of the 45 studies, 34 (76%) showed a significant association between area deprivation and cancer-related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Neighborhood deprivation indices are most commonly used at the census tract level and ordinally as quintiles. Despite variance in methods, there is a strong indication that deprived areas are at adverse odds with cancer-related outcomes. Further study investigating deprivation in the context of cancer can inform drivers of inequity and identify potential targets for care delivery and policy interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad Markey
- The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | | | - Meg Hanley
- The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Andrew P Loehrer
- The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Edmonds MC, Dahman B, Kim SJ, McGuire KP, Sheppard VB. Surveillance Mammography Behaviors in Black and White Breast Cancer Survivors: Behavioral Risk Factors and Surveillance System, 2016. BMC Womens Health 2023; 23:148. [PMID: 36997881 PMCID: PMC10061852 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02246-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surveillance mammography is recommended annually for early detection of disease relapse among breast cancer survivors; yet Black women have poorer national rates of surveillance mammography compared to White women. Factors that influence racial disparities in surveillance mammography rates are poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the contribution of health care access, socioeconomic status, and perceived health status on adherence to surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors. METHODS This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey among Black and White women ≥ 18 years, who reported a breast cancer diagnosis and completed breast surgery and adjuvant treatment from the 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System National Survey (BRFSS). Bivariate associations (chi-squared, t-test) for independent variables (e.g., health insurance, marital status) were analyzed with adherence to nationally recommended surveillance guidelines defined as two levels: adherent (received a mammogram in the last 12 months), vs. non- adherent ("received a mammogram in the last 2-5 years, 5 or more years or unsure). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between study variables with adherence, while adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS Of 963 breast cancer survivors, 91.7% were White women with an average age of 65. 71.7% reported a surveillance mammogram in the last 12 months, while 28.2% did not. Diagnosed > 5 years (p < 0.001); not having a routine checkup visit within 12 months (p = 0.045); and not seeing a doctor when needed due to cost (p = 0.026), were significantly related to survivor's non-adherence to surveillance mammography guidelines. A significant interaction was found between race and residential area (p < 0.001). Compared to White women, Black women living in metropolitan/suburban residential areas were more likely to receive surveillance guidelines (OR:3.77;95% CI: 1.32-10.81); however Black women living in non-metropolitan areas were less likely to receive a surveillance mammogram compared to White women living in non-metropolitan areas (OR: 0.04; 95% CI: 0.00-0.50). CONCLUSION Findings from our study further explain the impact of socioeconomic disparities on racial differences in the use of surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors. Black women living in non-metropolitan counties are an important subgroup for future research and screening and navigation interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan C Edmonds
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 17 E. 102 St, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Bassam Dahman
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Sunny Jung Kim
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- VCU Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Kandace P McGuire
- VCU Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA
- Department of Surgery, VCU Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- VCU Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Markus AR, Li Y, Wilder ME, Catalanotti J, McCarthy ML. The Influence of Social Determinants on Cancer Screening in a Medicaid Sample. Am J Prev Med 2023:S0749-3797(23)00063-6. [PMID: 36907747 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Little attention has been paid to the influence of individually measured social determinants of health on cancer screening tests in the Medicaid population. METHODS Analysis was conducted on 2015-2020 claims data from a subgroup of Medicaid enrollees from the District of Columbia Medicaid Cohort Study (N=8,943) who were eligible for colorectal (n=2,131), breast (n=1,156), and cervical cancer (n= 5,068) screening. Participants were grouped into 4 distinct social determinants of health groups on the basis of their responses to social determinants of health questionnaire. This study estimated the influence of the 4 social determinants of health groups on the receipt of each screening test using log-binomial regression adjusted for demographics, illness severity, and neighborhood-level deprivation. RESULTS The receipt of cancer screening tests was 42%, 58%, and 66% for colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer, respectively. Those in the most disadvantaged social determinants of health group were less likely to receive a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy than those in the least disadvantaged one (adjusted RR=0.70, 95% CI=0.54, 0.92). The pattern for mammograms and Pap smears was similar (adjusted RR=0.94, 95% CI=0.80, 1.11 and adjusted RR=0.90, 95% CI=0.81, 1.00, respectively). In contrast, participants in the most disadvantaged social determinants of health group were more likely to receive fecal occult blood test than those in the least disadvantaged one (adjusted RR=1.52, 95% CI=1.09, 2.12). CONCLUSIONS Severe social determinants of health measured at the individual level are associated with lower cancer preventive screening. A targeted approach that addresses the social and economic adversities that affect cancer screening could result in higher preventive screening rates in this Medicaid population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne R Markus
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia.
| | - Yixuan Li
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Marceé E Wilder
- The Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Jillian Catalanotti
- The Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Melissa L McCarthy
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Poiseuil M, Payet C, Molinié F, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Amadeo B, Coureau G. Survival after breast cancer according to participation in organised or opportunistic screening and deprivation. Cancer Epidemiol 2023; 82:102312. [PMID: 36508966 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many studies have investigated the survival of women by comparing those who participated in organised screening with those who did not. However, among those who do not participate in organised screening, some women undergo opportunistic screening, but these women remain difficult to identify, particularly in France. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify opportunistic screening, and then to study survival after breast cancer separately according to participation in organised, opportunistic or no screening, and taking into account sociodemographic inequalities. METHODS The study population was identified from 3 French cancer registries, whose data was crossed with the screening coordination centers and the National Health Data System to identify the different type of screening. The European Deprivation Index was used to define the level of deprivation. We estimated net survival using the Pohar-Perme method. RESULTS The 5-year net survival probabilities were higher for women who attended organised screening (97.0 %) than for women with opportunistic screening (94.1 %) or non-attenders (78.1 %). According to the level of deprivation, a significant difference was observed between the groups of women screened by organised and opportunistic screening, compared to the non-attenders. CONCLUSION The identification of opportunistic screening is an important element in identifying women who do not screening. It enables to us to see that women who do not attend any screening have a much higher loss-of-opportunity in terms of survival than those who participate in organised or opportunistic screening, and even more so in the most deprived areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Poiseuil
- Univ. Bordeaux, Gironde General Cancer Registry, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health, Research Center U1219, Team EPICENE, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
| | - Catherine Payet
- Centre Régional de Coordination du Dépistage des Cancers (CRCDC), Nouvelle Aquitaine, France.
| | - Florence Molinié
- Loire-Atlantique/Vendée Cancer Registry, Nantes, France; CERPOP, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, France.
| | - Tienhan Sandrine Dabakuyo-Yonli
- FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, France; Breast and Gynaecologic Cancer Registry of Côte d'Or, Georges Francois Leclerc Comprehensive Cancer Centre, INSERM U1231, 1 rue Professeur Marion, Dijon, France; Epidemiology and Quality of Life Research Unit, INSERM U1231, Dijon, France.
| | - Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier
- Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health, Research Center U1219, Team EPICENE, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Institut Bergonie, Inserm CIC 1401, Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, 351 cours de la Libération, 33405 Talence cedex, France.
| | - Brice Amadeo
- Univ. Bordeaux, Gironde General Cancer Registry, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health, Research Center U1219, Team EPICENE, 33000 Bordeaux, France; FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, France.
| | - Gaëlle Coureau
- Univ. Bordeaux, Gironde General Cancer Registry, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health, Research Center U1219, Team EPICENE, 33000 Bordeaux, France; FRANCIM Network of French Cancer Registries, France.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wakata S, Nishioka D, Takaki Y. Changes in health-related quality of life scores among low-income patients on social welfare programs in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic: a single-center repeated cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:2147. [PMID: 36419068 PMCID: PMC9682633 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14597-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-income is one of the well-established determinants of people's health and health-related behavior, including susceptibility to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Two social welfare services are available in Japan to support financial and medical care among low-income patients: Public Assistance (PA), which provide both minimum income and medical costs; and Free/Low-Cost Medical Care (FLCMC), wherein only medical costs were covered. In this study, changes in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) scores of low-income patients on PA and FLCMC, before and after COVID-19 pandemic, were described and compared against those that are not utilizing the said services (comparison group) to evaluate the contribution of social welfare services in protecting the HRQOL of the beneficiaries during the pandemic. METHODS We used repeated cross-sectional data of adult beneficiaries of FLCMC and PA, as well as those without social welfare services, who regularly visit the Kamigyo clinic in Kyoto, Japan. We collected the data from 2018 and 2021 using a questionnaire on patients' socioeconomic attributes and the Japanese version of Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). The Japanese version of SF-12 can calculate the three components scores: physical health component summary (PCS), the mental health component summary (MCS), and the role-social component summary (RCS), which can be transformed to a 0-100 range scale with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. RESULTS Data of 200 and 174 beneficiaries in 2018 and 2021, respectively, were analyzed. Low-income patients on social welfare services had lower PCS, and RCS than the comparison group in both years. Multiple linear regression analyses with cluster-adjusted standard error estimator showed that the decline in MCS was significantly higher among FLCMC beneficiaries than in those without welfare services (Beta: -4.71, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: -5.79 to -3.63, p < 0.01), and a decline in MCS among PA recipients was also observed (Beta: -4.27, 95% CI: -6.67 to -1.87 p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Low-income beneficiaries of social welfare may have experienced mental health deterioration during the COVID-19 pandemic. To maintain healthy lives during the pandemic, additional support on mental health for low-income recipients of social welfare services may be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Wakata
- Kamigyo Clinic, 482-2 Hanaguruma-Cho, Senbondori-Teranouchisagaru, Kamigyo-Ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Daisuke Nishioka
- Department of Medical Statistics, Research & Development Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-Machi, Takatsuki, Osaka Japan ,grid.258799.80000 0004 0372 2033Department of Social Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Kyoto Japan
| | - Yukio Takaki
- Kamigyo Clinic, 482-2 Hanaguruma-Cho, Senbondori-Teranouchisagaru, Kamigyo-Ku, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kim G, Qin J, Hall CB, In H. Association Between Socioeconomic and Insurance Status and Delayed Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Cancers. J Surg Res 2022; 279:170-186. [PMID: 35779447 PMCID: PMC10132254 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Association between socioeconomic status (SES) and stage at diagnosis in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers is poorly described. Relationship between low SES and stage at diagnosis as well as the mediating role of insurance status (IS) was examined. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for esophageal, gastric, liver, biliary, pancreatic, colon, and rectal cancers diagnosed in 2012-2016. Relationship between census-tract SES index quintiles and late diagnosis (distant disease at diagnosis) was examined. Uni and multivariable logistic regressions were performed. Mediation analyses were conducted to determine the degree to which IS (private/Medicare versus Medicaid/uninsured) mediates the relationship between SES and late diagnosis of cancer. RESULTS Analysis included 236,713 adult patients from 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results areas. In univariable analysis, lowest SES quintile was significantly associated with late diagnosis for all cancers except gastric and biliary cancers. In multivariable analysis controlling for age, gender, marital status and race, this association remained significant for liver (odds ratio (OR) 1.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-1.58]), pancreatic (OR 1.13 [95% CI 1.06-1.21]), and rectal (OR 1.31 [95% CI 1.20-1.42]) cancers. Further controlling for IS showed the largest effect size reduction for rectal cancer (OR 1.18 [95% CI 1.09-1.29]), with IS mediating 36.5% (P < 0.0001) of SES effect. CONCLUSIONS Low SES is an independent risk factor for late diagnosis in liver, pancreas, and rectal cancers. Insurance is not a critical mediator of difference by SES for most GI cancers, with the exception of rectal cancer. Further research is needed to understand factors beyond IS that can account for SES differences in late diagnosis for GI cancers. Insurance related differences for rectal cancer deserves further attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina Kim
- Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Jiyue Qin
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Charles B Hall
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Haejin In
- Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gregory J, Foster L, O'Shaughnessy P, Robson S. The socioeconomic gradient in mortality from ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancer in Australian women, 2001-2018: A population-based study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 62:714-719. [PMID: 35708170 PMCID: PMC9796872 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Socio-economic (SE) status is closely linked to health status and the mechanisms of this association are complex. One important adverse effect of SE disadvantage is vulnerability to cancer and cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Australia. AIMS We aimed to estimate the effect of SE status on mortality rates from ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS National mortality data were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) for the calendar years from 2001 to 2018, inclusive. Individual deaths were grouped by the ABS Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage. Population data were obtained to provided denominators allowing calculation of mortality rates (deaths per 100 000 women aged 30-79 years). Statistical analyses performed included tabulating point-estimates of mortality rates and their changes over time and modelling the trends of rates using maximum likelihood method. RESULTS Age-standardised mortality rates for ovarian and cervical cancer fell over the study period but increased for endometrial cancer. There was clear evidence of a SE gradient in the mortality rate for all three cancers. This SE gradient increased over the study period for ovarian and cervical cancer but remained unchanged for endometrial cancer. CONCLUSIONS Women at greater SE disadvantage have higher rates of death from the commonest gynaecological cancers and this gradient has not reduced over the last two decades. After the COVID-19 pandemic efforts must be redoubled to ensure that Australians already at risk of ill health do not face even greater risks because of their circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Gregory
- Junior Medical OfficerNepean HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Leon Foster
- Senior Subspecialty Trainee, Gynaecological OncologyRoyal Hospital for WomenSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Pauline O'Shaughnessy
- School of Mathematics and Applied StatisticsUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Stephen J. Robson
- School of Health and MedicineAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralian Capital TerritoryAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bauer C, Zhang K, Xiao Q, Lu J, Hong YR, Suk R. County-Level Social Vulnerability and Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the US, 2018. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2233429. [PMID: 36166230 PMCID: PMC9516325 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Area-level factors have been identified as important social determinants of health (SDoH) that impact many health-related outcomes. Less is known about how the social vulnerability index (SVI), as a scalable composite score, can multidimensionally explain the population-based cancer screening program uptake at a county level. OBJECTIVE To examine the geographic variation of US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)-recommended breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates and the association between county-level SVI and the 3 screening rates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This population-based cross-sectional study used county-level information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's PLACES and SVI data sets from 2018 for 3141 US counties. Analyses were conducted from October 2021 to February 2022. EXPOSURES Social vulnerability index score categorized in quintiles. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was county-level rates of USPSTF guideline-concordant, up-to-date breast, cervical, and colorectal screenings. Odds ratios were calculated for each cancer screening by SVI quintile as unadjusted (only accounting for eligible population per county) or adjusted for urban-rural status, percentage of uninsured adults, and primary care physician rate per 100 000 residents. RESULTS Across 3141 counties, county-level cancer screening rates showed regional disparities ranging from 54.0% to 81.8% for breast cancer screening, from 69.9% to 89.7% for cervical cancer screening, and from 39.8% to 74.4% for colorectal cancer screening. The multivariable regression model showed that a higher SVI was significantly associated with lower odds of cancer screening, with the lowest odds in the highest SVI quintile. When comparing the highest quintile of SVI (SVI-Q5) with the lowest quintile of SVI (SVI-Q1), the unadjusted odds ratio was 0.86 (95% posterior credible interval [CrI], 0.84-0.87) for breast cancer screening, 0.80 (95% CrI, 0.79-0.81) for cervical cancer screening, and 0.72 (95% CrI, 0.71-0.73) for colorectal cancer screening. When fully adjusted, the odds ratio was 0.92 (95% CrI, 0.90-0.93) for breast cancer screening, 0.87 (95% CrI, 0.86-0.88) for cervical cancer screening, and 0.86 (95% CrI, 0.85-0.88) for colorectal cancer screening, showing slightly attenuated associations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cross-sectional study, regional disparities were found in cancer screening rates at a county level. Quantifying how SVI associates with each cancer screening rate could provide insight into the design and focus of future interventions targeting cancer prevention disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cici Bauer
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston
| | - Kehe Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston
| | - Qian Xiao
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston
| | - Jiachen Lu
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston
| | - Young-Rock Hong
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville
- UFHealth Cancer Center, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ryan Suk
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Herb J, Dunham L, Stitzenberg K. A Comparison of Area-Level Socioeconomic Status Indices in Colorectal Cancer Care. J Surg Res 2022; 280:304-311. [PMID: 36030606 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are multiple measures of area socioeconomic status (SES) and there is little evidence on the comparative performance of these measures. We hypothesized adding area SES measures improves model ability to predict guideline concordant care and overall survival compared to models with standard clinical and demographic data alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included patients with colorectal cancer from 2006 to 2015 from the North Carolina Cancer Registry merged with insurance claims data. The primary area SES study variables were the Social Deprivation Index, Distressed Communities Index, Area Deprivation Index, and Social Vulnerability Index. We used multivariable logistic modeling and Cox proportional hazards modeling to assess the adjusted association of each indicator, with guideline concordant care and overall survival, respectively. Model performance of the SES measures was compared to a base model using likelihood ratio testing and area under the curve (AUC) assessments to compare SES indicator models with each other. RESULTS We found that the Area Deprivation Index, Social Vulnerability Index and Social Deprivation Index, but not Distressed Communities Index, were significantly associated with receiving guideline concordant care and significantly improved model fit over the base model on likelihood ratio testing. All models had similar AUCs. With respect to overall survival, we found that all indices were independently and significantly associated with survival and had significantly improved model fit over the base model on likelihood ratio testing. AUC analysis again showed all area SES measures had comparable performance for overall survival at 5 y. CONCLUSIONS This analysis demonstrates the importance of including these measures in risk adjustment models. However, of the commonly available measures, no one measure stood out as superior to others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Herb
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Lisette Dunham
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Karyn Stitzenberg
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Conti B, Bochaton A, Charreire H, Kitzis-Bonsang H, Desprès C, Baffert S, Ngô C. Influence of geographic access and socioeconomic characteristics on breast cancer outcomes: A systematic review. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0271319. [PMID: 35853035 PMCID: PMC9295987 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Socio-economic and geographical inequalities in breast cancer mortality have been widely described in European countries and the United States. To investigate the combined effects of geographic access and socio-economic characteristics on breast cancer outcomes, a systematic review was conducted exploring the relationships between: (i) geographic access to healthcare facilities (oncology services, mammography screening), defined as travel time and/or travel distance; (ii) breast cancer-related outcomes (mammography screening, stage of cancer at diagnosis, type of treatment and rate of mortality); (iii) socioeconomic status (SES) at individuals and residential context levels. In total, n = 25 studies (29 relationships tested) were included in our systematic review. The four main results are: The statistical significance of the relationship between geographic access and breast cancer-related outcomes is heterogeneous: 15 were identified as significant and 14 as non-significant. Women with better geographic access to healthcare facilities had a statistically significant fewer mastectomy (n = 4/6) than women with poorer geographic access. The relationship with the stage of the cancer is more balanced (n = 8/17) and the relationship with cancer screening rate is not observed (n = 1/4). The type of measures of geographic access (distance, time or geographical capacity) does not seem to have any influence on the results. For example, studies which compared two different measures (travel distance and travel time) of geographic access obtained similar results. The relationship between SES characteristics and breast cancer-related outcomes is significant for several variables: at individual level, age and health insurance status; at contextual level, poverty rate and deprivation index. Of the 25 papers included in the review, the large majority (n = 24) tested the independent effect of geographic access. Only one study explored the combined effect of geographic access to breast cancer facilities and SES characteristics by developing stratified models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit Conti
- LVMT, Université Gustave Eiffel, Ecole des Ponts, Champs-sur-Marne, France
- * E-mail:
| | - Audrey Bochaton
- Université Paris Nanterre, UMR 7533 LADYSS, Nanterre, France
| | - Hélène Charreire
- Université Paris-Est, Lab’Urba, France
- Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France
| | | | - Caroline Desprès
- Centre de recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, INSERM, Equipe Etres, France
| | | | - Charlotte Ngô
- Hôpital Privé des Peupliers, Ramsay Santé, Paris, France
- Centre de recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, INSERM, Equipe Etres, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ogunlayi F, Chauhan-Lall N, Hughes D, Myers P, Sitch A. A cross-sectional study examining the equitability of invitation, uptake and coverage for NHS Health Check. J Public Health (Oxf) 2022:6618070. [PMID: 35754318 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence for access to NHS Health Check (NHSHC) varies considerably across the country. This study examined the equity in invitation, uptake and coverage of NHSHC and impact of different invitation methods. METHODS This patient-level cross-sectional study from 52 general practices in Walsall used adjusted logistic regressions to examine the association between patient characteristics (age, sex, ethnicity and deprivation) and NHSHC access. RESULTS Over the 5-year study period, 61 464 people were eligible for NHSHC, 66% were invited, uptake was 74% and coverage was 55%. Males had lower odds of: invitation (AOR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.75-0.81), uptake (0.73, 95% CI: 0.70-0.77) and coverage (0.69, 95% CI: 0.66-0.71). Compared with White, the 'Other' ethnicity group (mixed backgrounds, other Asians that are not South Asians and other ethnic groups) had lower odds of: invitation (0.74, 95% CI: 0.67-0.81), uptake (0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.98) and coverage (0.74, 95% CI: 0.68-0.81). The most deprived areas had lower odds of invitation, uptake and coverage. Opportunistic invitation had a 25-fold increase in odds of uptake. CONCLUSIONS The study has highlighted areas of inequities in access to NHSHC. The group most negatively affected were men, people from particular minority ethnic groups and people from deprived communities. Further actions are needed to reduce these inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatai Ogunlayi
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick Coventry, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | | | - David Hughes
- Public Health, Walsall Council, Walsall, WS1 1TP, UK
| | | | - Alice Sitch
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Le Bonniec A, Sun S, Andrin A, Dima AL, Letrilliart L. Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Health Screening: an Umbrella Review Across Conditions. PREVENTION SCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH 2022; 23:1115-1142. [PMID: 35705780 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-022-01388-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Screening is an essential prevention practice for a number of health conditions. However, screening coverage remains generally low. Studies that investigate determinants of screening participation are becoming more common, but oftentimes investigate screening for health conditions in an individualized rather than integrated fashion. In routine clinical practice, however, healthcare professionals are often confronted with situations in which several screening procedures are recommended for the same patient. The consideration of their common determinants may support a more integrated screening approach. The objectives of this umbrella review were therefore to examine: 1) the determinants (barriers and facilitators) that have been identified in relation to recommended health screening procedures; and 2) the modifiable determinants (in primary care) common across health conditions or specific to individual procedures. Results were presented through a narrative synthesis. PubMed, PsycInfo and Cochrane were searched up to January 2022. Systematic reviews reporting determinants of participation in health screening procedures with grade A or B recommendation according to the US Preventive Services Task Force were included. A total of 85 systematic reviews were included, most which contained both qualitative and quantitative studies on determinants that describe individual factors (961 occurrences), social factors (113 occurrences, healthcare professional factors (149 occurrences), health system factors (105 occurrences) and screening procedure factors (99 occurrences). The most studied screening procedures concerned cervical cancer/human papillomavirus (n = 33), breast cancer (n = 28), colorectal cancer (n = 25) and the human immunodeficiency virus (n = 12). Other conditions have been under-studied (e.g. cardiovascular problems, lung cancer, syphilis). The individual domain, including determinants such as knowledge, beliefs and emotions, was the most covered across health conditions. Healthcare professional's recommendations and the quality of patient-provider communication were identified to have a strong influence on screening participation in most conditions. The other three domains included determinants which were more specific to a condition or a population. Various determinants modifiable in primary care were found in the individual domain and in the health system, healthcare professional and screening procedure domains. Quality was assessed as low for most systematic reviews included. The identification of various modifiable determinants common across conditions highlights the potential of an integrated screening participation approach. Interventions may address common determinants in a broader person-centred framework within which tailoring to specific procedures or populations can be considered. This approach needs to be explored in intervention studies. The systematic review registration is PROSPERO CRD42019126709.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Le Bonniec
- Research On Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
- Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale (GRePS) EA4163, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
| | - Sophie Sun
- Research On Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Collège Universitaire de Médecine Générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Amandine Andrin
- Research On Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale (GRePS) EA4163, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France
| | - Alexandra L Dima
- Research On Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Letrilliart
- Research On Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Collège Universitaire de Médecine Générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mesa-Eguiagaray I, Wild SH, Bird SM, Williams LJ, Brewster DH, Hall PS, Figueroa JD. Breast cancer incidence and survival in Scotland by socio-economic deprivation and tumour subtype. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 194:463-473. [PMID: 35648299 PMCID: PMC9239954 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06632-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background Women from socio-economically deprived areas are less likely to develop and then to survive breast cancer (BC). Whether associations between deprivation and BC incidence and survival differ by tumour molecular subtypes and mode of detection in Scotland are unknown. Methods Data consisted of 62,378 women diagnosed with invasive BC between 2000 and 2016 in Scotland. Incidence rates and time trends were calculated for oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) and negative (ER−) tumours and stratified by the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) quintiles and screening status. SIMD is an area-based measure derived across seven domains: income, employment, education, health, access to services, crime and housing. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHR [95% confidence intervals]) for BC death by immunohistochemical surrogates of molecular subtypes for the most versus the least deprived quintile. We adjusted for mode of detection and other confounders. Results In Scotland, screen-detected ER+tumour incidence increased over time, particularly in the least deprived quintile [Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC) = 2.9% with 95% CI from 1.2 to 4.7]. No marked differences were observed for non-screen-detected ER+tumours or ER− tumours by deprivation. BC mortality was higher in the most compared to the least deprived quintile irrespective of ER status (aHR = 1.29 [1.18, 1.41] for ER+ and 1.27 [1.09, 1.47] for ER− tumours). However, deprivation was associated with significantly higher mortality for luminal A and HER2−enriched tumours (aHR = 1.46 [1.13, 1.88] and 2.10 [1.23, 3.59] respectively) but weaker associations for luminal B and TNBC tumours that were not statistically significant. Conclusions Deprivation is associated with differential BC incidence trends for screen-detected ER+tumours and with higher mortality for select tumour subtypes. Future efforts should evaluate factors that might be associated with reduced survival in deprived populations and monitor progress stratified by tumour subtypes and mode of detection. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06632-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ines Mesa-Eguiagaray
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Sarah H Wild
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sheila M Bird
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Cambridge University's MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK
| | - Linda J Williams
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David H Brewster
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter S Hall
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jonine D Figueroa
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. .,Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ritchie D, Van Hal G, Van den Broucke S. Factors affecting intention to screen after being informed of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: a study in 5 European countries in 2021. Arch Public Health 2022; 80:143. [PMID: 35599312 PMCID: PMC9125943 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-022-00902-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Participation in mammography screening comes with harms alongside benefits. Information about screening provided to women should convey this information yet concerns persist about its effect on participation. This study addressed factors that may influence the intention to screen once a woman has been informed about benefits and harms of participation. METHODS A cross-sectional survey of women from five countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom) was performed in January 2021. The survey contained a statement regarding the benefits and harms of mammography screening along with items to measure cognitive variables from the theory of planned behaviour and health belief model and the 6-item version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q6). Logistic regression and mediation analysis were performed to investigate the effect of cognitive and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS A total of 1180 participants responded to the survey. 19.5% of participants (n = 230) were able to correctly identify that mammography screening carries both benefits and harms. 56.9% of participants (n = 672) responded that they would be more likely to participate in screening in the future after being informed about the benefits and harms of mammography screening. Perceived behavioural control and social norms demonstrated were significant in predicting intention, whereas, the effect of health literacy was limited. CONCLUSIONS Informing women about the presence of benefits and harms of in mammography screening participation did not negatively impact upon intention to be screened. Information should also address perception on implementation factors alongside messages on benefits and harms. Overall, screening programme managers should not be discouraged by the assumption of decreased participation through increasing efforts to address the lack of knowledge on benefits and harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Ritchie
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
| | - Guido Van Hal
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Khan JR, Carroll SJ, Coffee NT, Warner-Smith M, Roder D, Daniel M. Associations between breast cancer screening participation and residential area sociodemographic features, geographic accessibility, and features of screening venue location in Greater Sydney, Australia. Prev Med 2021; 153:106774. [PMID: 34450190 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer screening (BCS) participation rates are often suboptimal and vary geographically. Environmental features may influence BCS participation, but few studies have assessed this relationship. This study assessed the associations between BCS participation, residential area sociodemographic characteristics, distance to BCS venue, and venue location attributes. Data for 384,433 women residing in Greater Sydney, Australia, invited to BCS during 2011-2014 were spatially joined to their state suburb (SSC) (n = 800). SSC sociodemographic measures included women's median age, proportion women speaking English at home, full-time employed, and university educated; and proportion dwellings with motor-vehicles. Road network distance was calculated to each BCS venue. BCS venues were coded as co-located with bus-stop, train-station, hospital, general practitioner (GP), and shop. Hot spots were calculated to quantify spatial clustering of BCS participation. Multilevel logistic models were used to estimate the associations between environmental predictors and BCS participation, accounting for SSC-level clustering. BCS participation was 53.9% and spatially clustered. BCS was positively associated with SSC-level median age for women, proportions women speaking English and university educated, and dwellings with motor-vehicles. Distance to venue was inversely associated with BCS. Venue co-location with GP was positively associated and co-location with bus-stop, train-station, and shop, hospital were negatively associated with BCS. Residential sociodemographic features, geographic access, and venue location attributes are associated with BCS participation. These findings implicate the relevance of social and built environmental factors to programmatic aims to raise BCS participation. Additional research on venue location features is required to understand where best to site BCS venues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jahidur Rahman Khan
- Australian Geospatial Health Laboratory, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Suzanne J Carroll
- Australian Geospatial Health Laboratory, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Neil T Coffee
- Australian Geospatial Health Laboratory, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; Housing and Healthy Cities Research Group, School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - David Roder
- School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Cancer Institute NSW, St Leonards, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Daniel
- Australian Geospatial Health Laboratory, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jansen L, Erb C, Nennecke A, Finke I, Pritzkuleit R, Holleczek B, Brenner H. Socioeconomic deprivation and cancer survival in a metropolitan area: An analysis of cancer registry data from Hamburg, Germany. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-EUROPE 2021; 4:100063. [PMID: 34557810 PMCID: PMC8454769 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background Few studies have investigated socioeconomic inequalities within cities. Yet, such analyses are particularly important given the increasing international trend to urbanization. Here we investigated area-based socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in Hamburg, a port city in the North of Germany (population: 1.84 million people). Methods Patients with a diagnosis of colorectal, lung, female breast, and prostate cancer in 2004–2018 (follow-up until 31.12.2018) and registered in the Hamburg cancer registry were included. Area-based socioeconomic deprivation on urban district level was assigned to the patients and grouped in five quintiles. Relative survival in 2014–2018 was calculated using the period approach. Trend analyses between 2004 and 2018 were conducted. Relative excess risks adjusted for age and stage were computed with model-based period analyses. Findings For the 73,106 included patients, age-standardized 5-year relative survival in 2014–2018 decreased with increasing deprivation with significant differences between the most and least deprived group of 14·7 (prostate), 10·8 (colorectal), 8·0 (breast), and 2·5 (lung) percent units. Standardization by cancer stage decreased the difference for prostate cancer to 8·5 percent units and for breast cancer to 3·6 percent units but had only a minor effect for colorectal and lung cancer. Similar socioeconomic inequalities were already present in 2004–08. Interpretation Strong socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival were observed in Hamburg, which could be partly explained by differences in the stage distribution. Further research including information on screening participation as well as information on cancer care are important to further understand and finally overcome these inequalities. Funding 10.13039/501100005972German Cancer Aid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Jansen
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cynthia Erb
- Hamburg Cancer Registry, Billstraße 80, 20539 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alice Nennecke
- Hamburg Cancer Registry, Billstraße 80, 20539 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Isabelle Finke
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ron Pritzkuleit
- Institute for Cancer Epidemiology at the University of Lübeck, Cancer Registry Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus 50, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Bernd Holleczek
- Saarland Cancer Registry, Präsident-Baltz-Straße 5, 66119 Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Negi J, Nambiar D. Intersectional social-economic inequalities in breast cancer screening in India: analysis of the National Family Health Survey. BMC WOMENS HEALTH 2021; 21:324. [PMID: 34493267 PMCID: PMC8424809 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01464-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Breast cancer incidence rates are increasing in developing countries including India. With 1.3 million new cases of cancer been diagnosed annually, breast cancer is the most common women’s cancer in India. India’s National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) data 2015–2016 shows that only 9.8% of women between the ages of 15 and 49 had ever undergone breast examination (BE). Further, access to screening and treatment is unequally distributed, with inequalities by socio-economic status. It is unclear, however, if socio-economic inequalities in breast examination are similar across population subgroups. Methods We compared BE coverage in population sub-groups categorised by place of residence, religion, caste/tribal groups, education levels, age, marital status, and employment status in their intersection with economic status in India. We analysed data for 699,686 women aged 15–49 using the NFHS-4 data set conducted during 2015–2016. Descriptive (mean, standard errors, and confidence intervals) of women undergoing BE disaggregated by dimensions of inequality (education, caste/tribal groups, religion, place of residence) and their intersections with wealth were computed with national weights using STATA 12. Chi-square tests were performed to assess the association between socio-demographic factors and breast screening. Additionally, the World Health Organisation’s Health Equity Assessment Toolkit Plus was used to compute summary measures of inequality: Slope index for inequality (SII) and Relative Concentration Indices (RCI) for each intersecting dimension. Results BE coverage was concentrated among wealthier groups regardless of other intersecting population subgroups. Wealth-related inequalities in BE coverage were most pronounced among Christians (SII; 20.6, 95% CI: 18.5–22.7), married (SII; 14.1, 95% CI: 13.8–14.4), employed (SII: 14.6, 95%CI: 13.9, 15.3), and rural women (SII; 10.8, 95% CI: 10.5–11.1). Overall, relative summary measures (RCI) were consistent with our absolute summary measures (SII). Conclusions Breast examination coverage in India is concentrated among wealthier populations across population groups defined by place of residence, religion, age, employment, and marital status. Apart from this national analysis, subnational analyses may also help identify strategies for programme rollout and ensure equity in women’s cancer screening. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-021-01464-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jyotsna Negi
- Independent Consultant, 62 Stratford Rd, Kensington, California, 94707, USA.
| | - Devaki Nambiar
- The George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.,Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rollet Q, Tron L, De Mil R, Launoy G, Guillaume É. Contextual factors associated with cancer screening uptake: A systematic review of observational studies. Prev Med 2021; 150:106692. [PMID: 34166675 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review of a wide range of contextual factors related to cancer screening uptake that have been studied so far. Studies were identified through PubMed and Web of Science databases. An operational definition of context was proposed, considering as contextual factors: social relations directly aimed at cancer screening, health care provider and facility characteristics, geographical/accessibility measures and aggregated measures at supra-individual level. We included 70 publications on breast, cervical and/or colorectal cancer screening from 42 countries, covering a data period of 24 years. A wide diversity of factors has been investigated in the literature so far. While several of them, as well as many interactions, were robustly associated with screening uptake (family, friends or provider recommendation, provider sex and experience, area-based socio-economic status…), others showed less consistency (ethnicity, urbanicity, travel time, healthcare density …). Screening inequities were not fully explained through adjustment for individual and contextual factors. Context, in its diversity, influences individual screening uptake and lots of contextual inequities in screening are commonly shared worldwide. However, there is a lack of frameworks, standards and definitions that are needed to better understand what context is, how it could modify individual behaviour and the ways of measuring and modifying it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quentin Rollet
- U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM-University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse: 3, Avenue du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France.
| | - Laure Tron
- U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM-University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse: 3, Avenue du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Rémy De Mil
- U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM-University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse: 3, Avenue du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Guy Launoy
- U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM-University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse: 3, Avenue du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Élodie Guillaume
- U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM-University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse: 3, Avenue du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Staples JN, Nelamangala SL, Morris S, Wells K. Exploring socio-demographic and geospatial variation in human papillomavirus vaccination uptake in Virginia. Vaccine 2021; 39:5385-5390. [PMID: 34384637 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Significant variation in human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage exists across the United States. A closer look at state and region-specific coverage is necessary to identify potentially modifiable disparities. Using ArcGIS software, we identify geospatial variation in HPV vaccine coverage in the state of Virginia and examine the relationship between various socio-demographic indicators and HPV vaccination uptake. HPV vaccination rates among adolescents 11 to 17 years as of 07/01/2018 were retrieved at the zip-code level from the Virginia Immunization Information System and chloropleth maps produced. The ArcGIS Hot Spot Analysis tool identified spatial clusters of zip codes with high and low vaccination rates. Population characteristics and socioeconomic indicators were retrieved from the 2010 United States Census and compared between statistically significant clusters of higher or lower than expected vaccination rates. Regions with significantly lower initiation rates were less populated, less educated, and had a lower median household income (MHI) with higher rates of poverty and unemployment. Among male adolescents, these areas had a significantly lower density of primary care providers and smaller African American and Hispanic populations. In contrast, regions with significantly lower series completion were more populated and had a higher MHI, but there was no difference in provider density or minority population. Ultimately, regional socioeconomic indicators are significant predictors of HPV vaccination, but have contrasting implications for series initiation and completion. Targeted interventions and safety net programs have traditionally focused on the socioeconomically disadvantaged, however it is the more affluent communities that may be struggling with series completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanine N Staples
- Sibley Center for Gynecologic Oncology and Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
| | | | - Sean Morris
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Kristen Wells
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Castro S, Sosa E, Lozano V, Akhtar A, Love K, Duffels J, Raz DJ, Kim JY, Sun V, Erhunmwunsee L. The impact of income and education on lung cancer screening utilization, eligibility, and outcomes: a narrative review of socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:3745-3757. [PMID: 34277066 PMCID: PMC8264678 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-3281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the US and worldwide. In particular, vulnerable populations such as those of low socioeconomic status (SES) are at the highest risk for and suffer the highest mortality from NSCLC. Although lung cancer screening (LCS) has been demonstrated to be a powerful tool to lower NSCLC mortality, it is underutilized by eligible smokers, and disparities in screening are likely to contribute to inequities in NSCLC outcomes. It is imperative that we collect and analyze LCS data focused on individuals of low socioeconomic position to identify and address barriers to LCS utilization and help close the gaps in NSCLC mortality along socioeconomic lines. Toward this end, this review aims to examine published studies that have evaluated the impact of income and education on LCS utilization, eligibility, and outcomes. We searched the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and CINAHL Plus databases for all studies published from January 1, 2010, to October 21, 2020, that discussed socioeconomic-based LCS outcomes. The review reveals that income and education have impact on LCS utilization, eligibility, false positive rates and smoking cessation attempts; however, there is a lack of studies evaluating the impact of SES on LCS follow-up, stage at diagnosis, and treatment. We recommend the intentional inclusion of lower SES participants in LCS studies in order to clarify appropriate eligibility criteria, risk-based metrics and outcomes in this high-risk group. We also anticipate that low SES smokers and their providers will require increased support and education regarding smoking cessation and shared decision-making efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Castro
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ernesto Sosa
- Department of Populations Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Vanessa Lozano
- Department of Populations Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Aamna Akhtar
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Kyra Love
- Library Services, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jeanette Duffels
- Library Services, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Dan J Raz
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jae Y Kim
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Virginia Sun
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.,Department of Populations Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Loretta Erhunmwunsee
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.,Department of Populations Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Effect of Neighborhood and Individual-Level Socioeconomic Factors on Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18094398. [PMID: 33919106 PMCID: PMC8122519 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Despite the effectiveness of screenings in reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality, ~25% of US adults do not adhere to screening guidelines. Prior studies associate socioeconomic status (SES) with low screening adherence and suggest that neighborhood deprivation can influence CRC outcomes. We comprehensively investigated the effect of neighborhood SES circumstances (nSES), individual SES, and race/ethnicity on adherence to CRC screening in a multiethnic cross-sectional study. Participant surveys assessing 32 individual-level socioeconomic and healthcare access measures were administered from 2017 to 2018. Participant data were joined with nine nSES measures from the US Census at the census tract level. Univariate, LASSO, and multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression models were used for variable reduction and evaluation of associations. The total study population included 526 participants aged 50–85; 29% of participants were non-adherent. In the final multivariable model, age (p = 0.02) and Non-Hispanic Black race (p = 0.02) were associated with higher odds of adherence. Factors associated with lower adherence were home rental (vs. ownership) (p = 0.003), perception of low healthcare quality (p = 0.006), no routine checkup within two years (p = 0.002), perceived discrimination (p = 0.02), and nSES deprivation (p = 0.02). After comprehensive variable methods were applied, socioeconomic indicators at the neighborhood and individual level were found to contribute to low CRC screening adherence.
Collapse
|
35
|
Zhang M, Zhong Y, Bao H, Zhao Z, Huang Z, Zhang X, Li C, Zhou M, Wang L, Wu J, Zheng X, Wang L. Breast Cancer Screening Rates Among Women Aged 20 Years and Above - China, 2015. China CDC Wkly 2021; 3:267-273. [PMID: 34594864 PMCID: PMC8392981 DOI: 10.46234/ccdcw2021.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS TOPIC? Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in China and around the world. By 2019, 121 countries have instituted a national screening program as a secondary prevention measure for breast cancer. WHAT IS ADDED BY THIS REPORT? Breast cancer screening rates in China were 18.9% in women aged 20 years and above, and 25.7% in women aged 35-64 years in 2015. The screening rate for women aged 20 years and above was significantly higher in urban areas than in rural areas (24.6% vs. 15.0%), and in the eastern region than in the central and western regions (24.0% vs. 15.1% and 15.3%). WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE? Continued efforts should be made to strengthen national and local policy initiatives and financial support for population-based, organized screening programs for breast cancer. Health education and accessibility of screening services to women across the country should be strengthened, especially for women aged 50 years and above.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Zhang
- National Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Yijing Zhong
- Institute of Population Research, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Heling Bao
- National Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenping Zhao
- National Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Zhengjing Huang
- National Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Zhang
- National Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Chun Li
- National Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Maigeng Zhou
- National Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Limin Wang
- National Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Wu
- National Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoying Zheng
- Institute of Population Research, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Linhong Wang
- National Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Watt GP, John EM, Bandera EV, Malone KE, Lynch CF, Palmer JR, Knight JA, Troester MA, Bernstein JL. Race, ethnicity and risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer in the United States. Int J Cancer 2021; 148:2748-2758. [PMID: 33544892 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer survivors have a high risk of a second primary contralateral breast cancer (CBC), but there are few studies of CBC risk in racial/ethnic minority populations. We examined whether the incidence and risk factors for CBC differed by race/ethnicity in the United States. Women with a first invasive Stage I-IIB breast cancer diagnosis at ages 20-74 years between 2000 and 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) 18 registries were followed through 2016 for a diagnosis of invasive CBC ≥1 year after the first breast cancer diagnosis. We used cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models to test the association between race/ethnicity and CBC, adjusting for age, hormone receptor status, radiation therapy, chemotherapy and stage at first diagnosis, and evaluated the impact of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, socioeconomic status, and insurance status on the association. After a median follow-up of 5.9 years, 9247 women (2.0%) were diagnosed with CBC. Relative to non-Hispanic (NH) White women, CBC risk was increased in NH Black women (hazard ratio = 1.44, 95% CI 1.35-1.54) and Hispanic women (1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20), with the largest differences among women diagnosed at younger ages. Adjustment for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, socioeconomic status and health insurance did not explain the associations. Therefore, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women have an increased risk of CBC that is not explained by clinical or socioeconomic factors collected in SEER. Large studies of diverse breast cancer survivors with detailed data on treatment delivery and adherence are needed to inform interventions to reduce this disparity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon P Watt
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Kathleen E Malone
- Epidemiology Program, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Charles F Lynch
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Julie R Palmer
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Julia A Knight
- Prosserman Centre for Population Health Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melissa A Troester
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonine L Bernstein
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Namin S, Zhou Y, Neuner J, Beyer K. The role of residential history in cancer research: A scoping review. Soc Sci Med 2021; 270:113657. [PMID: 33388619 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The role of residential history in cancer prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship is garnering increasing attention in cancer research. To our knowledge, there is no comprehensive synthesis of the current state of knowledge in the field. We reviewed the extant literature on this topic and conducted a scoping analysis to examine two main research questions: (a) To what degree, and how, have researchers accounted for residential history/mobility in cancer research? and (b) What are the gaps in the literature based on a knowledge synthesis using scoping review and concept mapping? To answer these questions, this scoping analysis focuses on how researchers compile, analyze and discuss residential history/mobility in studies on cancer. The study is focused on peer-reviewed articles from 6 different datasets (PubMed, Cinahl, Scopus, Web of Science and JSTOR, ERIC) from 1990 to August 2020. The review captured 1951 results in total, which was scoped to 281 relevant peer-reviewed journal articles. First, we examined these articles based on cancer continuum, cancer type and the main theme. Second, we identified 21 main themes and an additional 16 sub-themes in the pool of the selected articles. We utilized concept mapping to provide a conceptual framework and to highlight the underlying socioecological assumptions and paradigms. Results show that cancer research incorporating residential histories is primarily focused on incidence and estimating cumulative exposure, with little consideration across the cancer continuum. Additionally, our review suggests that although the social environment plays an important role across the cancer continuum, a small number of articles were focused on such factors and this area remains relatively unexplored. Additionally, the expansion of interdisciplinary research on residential mobility before and after cancer diagnosis will enhance understanding of the role of environmental and socioeconomic characteristics and exposures on cancer continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Namin
- Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
| | - Y Zhou
- Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - J Neuner
- General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - K Beyer
- Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Brewster R, Deb S, Pendharkar AV, Ratliff J, Li G, Desai A. The effect of socioeconomic status on age at diagnosis and overall survival in patients with intracranial meningioma. Int J Neurosci 2020; 132:413-420. [PMID: 32878534 DOI: 10.1080/00207454.2020.1818742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intracranial meningiomas are the most common primary tumors of the central nervous system. How socioeconomic status (SES) impacts treatment access and outcomes for brain tumor subtypes is an emerging area of research. Few studies have examined the relationship between SES and meningioma survival and management with reference to relevant clinical factors, including age at diagnosis. We studied the independent effects of SES on receiving surgery and survival probability in patients with intracranial meningioma. METHODS 54,282 patients diagnosed with intracranial meningioma between 2003 and 2012 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program at the National Cancer Institute database were included. Patient SES was divided into tertiles. Patient age groups included 'older' (>65, the median patient age) and 'younger'. Multivariable linear regression and Cox proportional hazards model were used with SAS v9.4. Results were adjusted for race, sex, and tumor grade. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed according to SES tertiles and age groups. RESULTS Meningioma prevalence increased with higher SES tertile. Higher SES tertile was also associated with younger age at diagnosis (OR = 0.890, p < 0.05), an increased likelihood of undergoing gross total resection (GTR) (OR = 1.112, p < 0.05), and a trend toward greater 5-year survival probability (HR = 1.773, p = 0.0531). Survival probability correlated with younger age at diagnosis (HR = 2.597, p < 0.001), but not with GTR receipt. CONCLUSION The findings from this national longitudinal study on patients with meningioma suggest that SES affects age at diagnosis and treatment access for intracranial meningiomas patients. Further studies are required to understand and address the mechanisms underlying these disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Brewster
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sayantan Deb
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Arjun Vivek Pendharkar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - John Ratliff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Gordon Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Atman Desai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Understanding the participation of breast screening among women born in predominantly Muslim countries living in Victoria, Australia from record-linkage data. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0237341. [PMID: 32764828 PMCID: PMC7413407 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early detection of breast cancer can improve survival rates and decrease mortality rates. This study investigates whether there are significant differences in participation in breast screening among women born in Muslim countries compared to women born in Non-Muslim countries and Australia. METHODS Screening data from January 1st, 2000 to December 31st, 2013 from the Breast Screen Victoria Registry (BSV) was linked with hospital records from the Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset (VAED). Countries having more than 50% of their population as Muslim were categorised as Muslim countries. Age adjusted rates were calculated for women born in Muslim and Non-Muslim countries and compared with the Australian age adjusted rates. Logistic regression assessed the association between screening status and other factors which include country of birth, marital status, age and socio-economic status. RESULTS Women born in Muslim countries (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.68-0.72) and in other Non-Muslim countries (OR = 0.87, 95%CI = 0.86-0.88) had lower odds of participation in breast screening than Australian born women. Women aged 60-64 years (OR = 1.42, 95%CI = 1.40-1.44) had higher odds of participation in the BreastScreen program than 50-54 age group. CONCLUSION This study provides valuable insights to understanding breast screening participation among women born in Muslim countries residing in Victoria. This population level study contributes to the broader knowledge of screening participation of women born in Muslim countries, an understudied population group in Australia and across the world. This study has implications for breast screening programs as it highlights the need for culturally sensitive approaches to support breast screening participation among women born in Muslim countries.
Collapse
|
40
|
Davis LE, Coburn NG, Hallet J, Earle CC, Liu Y, Myrehaug S, Mahar AL. Material deprivation and access to cancer care in a universal health care system. Cancer 2020; 126:4545-4552. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E. Davis
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada
| | - Natalie G. Coburn
- Division of Surgical Oncology Odette Cancer CentreSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Ontario Canada
- ICES Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Julie Hallet
- Division of Surgical Oncology Odette Cancer CentreSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Ontario Canada
- ICES Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Craig C. Earle
- ICES Toronto Ontario Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology Odette Cancer CentreSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Ontario Canada
| | | | - Sten Myrehaug
- Division of Radiation Oncology Odette Cancer CentreSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Alyson L. Mahar
- ICES Toronto Ontario Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ayanore MA, Adjuik M, Ameko A, Kugbey N, Asampong R, Mensah D, Alhassan RK, Afaya A, Aviisah M, Manu E, Zotor F. Self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening practices among women in Ghana: predictive factors and reproductive health policy implications from the WHO study on global AGEing and adult health. BMC WOMENS HEALTH 2020; 20:158. [PMID: 32723342 PMCID: PMC7388217 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-020-01022-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast and cervical cancers constitute the two leading causes of cancer deaths among women in Ghana. This study examined breast and cervical screening practices among adult and older women in Ghana. METHODS Data from a population-based cross-sectional study with a sample of 2749 women were analyzed from the study on global AGEing and adult health conducted in Ghana between 2007 and 2008. Binary and multivariable ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between socio-demographic factors, breast and cervical screening practices. RESULTS We found that 12.0 and 3.4% of adult women had ever had pelvic screening and mammography respectively. Also, 12.0% of adult women had either one of the screenings while only 1.8% had both screening practices. Age, ever schooled, ethnicity, income quantile, father's education, mother's employment and chronic disease status were associated with the uptake of both screening practices. CONCLUSION Nationwide cancer awareness campaigns and education should target women to improve health seeking behaviours regarding cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment. Incorporating cancer screening as a benefit package under the National Health Insurance Scheme can reduce financial barriers for breast and cervical screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Amogre Ayanore
- School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
| | - Martin Adjuik
- School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Asiwome Ameko
- School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Nuworza Kugbey
- School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Robert Asampong
- School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Derrick Mensah
- School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Robert Kaba Alhassan
- Institute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Agani Afaya
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Mark Aviisah
- School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Emmanuel Manu
- School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Francis Zotor
- School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Withrow DR, Berrington de González A, Spillane S, Freedman ND, Best AF, Chen Y, Shiels MS. Trends in Mortality Due to Cancer in the United States by Age and County-Level Income, 1999-2015. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 111:863-866. [PMID: 31199459 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Disparities in cancer mortality by county-level income have increased. It is unclear whether these widening disparities have affected older and younger adults equally. National death certificate data were utilized to ascertain cancer deaths during 1999-2015. Average annual percent changes in mortality rates and mortality rate ratios (RRs) were estimated by county-level income quintile and age (25-64 vs ≥65 years). Among 25- to 64-year-olds, cancer mortality rates were 30% higher (RR = 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.29 to 1.31) in the lowest-vs the highest-income counties in 1999-2001 and 56% higher (RR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.55 to 1.57) in 2013-2015; the disparities among those 65 years and older were smaller but also widened over time (RR1999-2001 = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.05; RR2013-2015 = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.14). Widening disparities occurred across cancer sites. If all counties had the mortality rates of the highest-income counties, 21.5% of cancer deaths among 25- to 64-year-olds and 7.3% of cancer deaths in those 65 years and older would have been avoided in 2015. These results highlight an ongoing need for equity-focused interventions, particularly among younger adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana R Withrow
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | | | - Susan Spillane
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | - Neal D Freedman
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | - Ana F Best
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | - Yingxi Chen
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Veldhuis CB, Maki P, Molina K. Psychological and neighborhood factors associated with urban women's preventive care use. J Behav Med 2020; 43:346-364. [PMID: 31865485 PMCID: PMC7234927 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-019-00122-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Women are more likely than men to forego care-including preventive care. Understanding which factors influence women's preventive care use has the potential to improve health. This study focuses on the largely understudied areas of psychological barriers (depression) and neighborhood factors (support and stressors) that may be associated with women's preventive care use through secondary analysis of the Chicago Community Adult Health Study. Across models, 30-40% of the variance in preventive care adherence was explained by the neighborhood. Depressive symptoms were not associated with preventive care use when neighborhood factors were included. However, stratified models showed that associations varied by race/ethnicity. Previous research has tended to focus on individual determinants of care, but this study suggests that barriers to care are far more complex. Efforts aimed at improving care utilization need to be multipronged and interventions need to take an individual's demographics, mental health, and context into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy B Veldhuis
- School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
- Center for Research on Women and Gender, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Pauline Maki
- Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Center for Research on Women and Gender, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kristine Molina
- Department of Psychology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Uptake of Breast Cancer Screening among Saudi Women: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a National Survey. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17062056. [PMID: 32244881 PMCID: PMC7143184 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17062056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Timely and adequate screening for breast cancer could improve health outcomes and reduce health costs. However, the utilization of free breast cancer screening services among Saudi women is very low. This study aims to investigate socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer screening among Saudi women. The data of this study were extracted from the nationally representative Saudi Health Interview Survey, conducted in 2013; the study included 2786 Saudi women. Multivariate logistic regression, the concentration curve, and the concentration index were used to examine, illustrate, and quantify income- and education-related inequalities in three outcomes: Knowledge about self-breast examination (SBE), clinical breast examination (CBE) received in the last year, and mammography, that has ever been previously carried out. Results showed a marked socioeconomic gradient in breast cancer screening services. The concentration index by income was 0.229 (SBE), 0.171 (CBE), and 0.163 (mammography). The concentration index by education was 0.292 (SBE), 0.149 (CBE), and 0.138 (mammography). Therefore, knowledge about breast cancer screening, and the utilization of screening services, were more concentrated among richer and better-educated women. Poorer and less educated women had less knowledge about self-breast examination, and had considerably less adherence to clinical breast examination and mammography. The findings are helpful for policy makers to devise and implement strategies to promote equity in breast cancer screening among Saudi women.
Collapse
|
45
|
Kurani SS, McCoy RG, Lampman MA, Doubeni CA, Finney Rutten LJ, Inselman JW, Giblon RE, Bunkers KS, Stroebel RJ, Rushlow D, Chawla SS, Shah ND. Association of Neighborhood Measures of Social Determinants of Health With Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the US Midwest. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e200618. [PMID: 32150271 PMCID: PMC7063513 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Despite advances in cancer treatment and cancer-related outcomes, disparities in cancer mortality remain. Lower rates of cancer prevention screening and consequent delays in diagnosis may exacerbate these disparities. Better understanding of the association between area-level social determinants of health and cancer screening may be helpful to increase screening rates. Objective To examine the association between area deprivation, rurality, and screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer in patients from an integrated health care delivery system in 3 US Midwest states (Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin). Design, Setting, and Participants In this cross-sectional study of adults receiving primary care at 75 primary care practices in Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin, rates of recommended breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening completion were ascertained using electronic health records between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017. The area deprivation index (ADI) is a composite measure of social determinants of health composed of 17 US Census indicators and was calculated for all census block groups in Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin (11 230 census block groups). Rurality was defined at the zip code level. Using multivariable logistic regression, this study examined the association between the ADI, rurality, and completion of cancer screening after adjusting for age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, race, and sex (for colorectal cancer only). Main Outcomes and Measures Completion of recommended breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Results The study cohorts were composed of 78 302 patients eligible for breast cancer screening (mean [SD] age, 61.8 [7.1] years), 126 731 patients eligible for cervical cancer screening (mean [SD] age, 42.6 [13.2] years), and 145 550 patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening (mean [SD] age, 62.4 [7.0] years; 52.9% [77 048 of 145 550] female). The odds of completing recommended screening were decreased for individuals living in the most deprived (highest ADI) census block group quintile compared with the least deprived (lowest ADI) quintile: the odds ratios were 0.51 (95% CI, 0.46-0.57) for breast cancer, 0.58 (95% CI, 0.54-0.62) for cervical cancer, and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.53-0.61) for colorectal cancer. Individuals living in rural areas compared with urban areas also had lower rates of cancer screening: the odds ratios were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.79) for breast cancer, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79-0.83) for cervical cancer, and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.96) for colorectal cancer. Conclusions and Relevance Individuals living in areas of greater deprivation and rurality had lower rates of recommended cancer screening, signaling the need for effective intervention strategies that may include improved community partnerships and patient engagement to enhance access to screening in highest-risk populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaheen S. Kurani
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rozalina G. McCoy
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Michelle A. Lampman
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Chyke A. Doubeni
- Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Lila J. Finney Rutten
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jonathan W. Inselman
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rachel E. Giblon
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kari S. Bunkers
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Robert J. Stroebel
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - David Rushlow
- Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sagar S. Chawla
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Nilay D. Shah
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Neighborhood context and non-small cell lung cancer outcomes in Florida non-elderly patients by race/ethnicity. Lung Cancer 2020; 142:20-27. [PMID: 32062478 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 10/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between neighborhood environment and lung cancer outcomes among Florida residents younger than 65 years of age. METHODS AND MATERIALS This was a retrospective cohort study that included patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Florida from January 2005 to December 2014 (n = 22,750). Multi-level, mixed-effect logistic regression models were used for two outcomes: receipt of treatment and receipt of surgery. Survival analyses, using proportional subdistribution hazard models, were conducted to examine the impact of neighborhood characteristics on risk of death due to lung cancer with adjustment for individual-level variables. Neighborhood exposures of interest were census tract level black and Hispanic segregation combined with economic deprivation. RESULTS White patients who lived in low black segregation/high deprivation areas had 15 % lower odds of receiving surgery (95 % CI: 0.76-0.93). However, the likelihood of receiving surgery for black patients who lived in high black segregation/low deprivation and high black segregation/high deprivation was lower than for black patients who lived in low black segregation/low deprivation neighborhoods (level 3 AOR = 0.56 [0.38-0.85]; level 4 AOR = 0.69 [0.54-0.88]). Living in suburban and rural areas increased the risk of lung cancer death for white patients by 14 % (95 % CI: 1.05-1.24) and 26 % (95 % CI: 1.08-1.46), respectively. Living in rural areas increased the risk of death for black patients by 54 % r (SHR = 1.54 [1.19-2.0]). Black patients who live in high Hispanic segregation/high deprivation had 36 % increased risk of death compared to black patients who lived in low Hispanic segregation/low deprivation areas. CONCLUSION This study suggests that when investigating cancer disparities, merely adjusting for race/ethnicity does not provide sufficient explanation to understand survival and treatment variations. Lung cancer outcomes are impacted by neighborhood environments that are formed based on the distribution of race, ethnicity and class.
Collapse
|
47
|
Associations between area-level deprivation, rural residence, physician density, screening policy and late-stage colorectal cancer in Canada. Cancer Epidemiol 2019; 64:101654. [PMID: 31837534 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.101654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Revised: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Important social disparities in colorectal screening exist in Canada. Few studies have assessed disparities further along the cancer control continuum. Here we assess the associations between social and material deprivation, physician density, rural residence, and the absence of provincial mail-based screening programs and colorectal cancer (CRC) stage at diagnosis. METHODS Colorectal cancer cases and stage data ("local or regional" if stage 0, I, or II, "late" if stage III or IV) were obtained through the Canadian Cancer Registry (2011-2015, N = 54,745). Cases were linked to 2006 Canadian Census Dissemination Area-level data on rural/urban status, exposure to a provincial mail-based screening program, and social and material deprivation (Pampalon Index quintile groups); and to Scott's Medical Database 2011 physician density data (<7 vs. ≥ 7/10,000). Age, sex, and predictor-adjusted Generalized estimating equation (GEE) Poisson models were used to determine independent associations between predictors and late-stage at diagnosis. RESULTS Half of CRC cases are diagnosed at stage III or IV (51 %), with younger age groups experiencing higher late-stage prevalence (57 % among those aged 18-49). The covariate-adjusted late-stage prevalence was 2-percentage points higher in most materially- and socially-deprived areas (95 % CI: 1 %, 4 %, in both, respectively) and in provinces with no mail-based screening programs (95 % CI: 1 %, 2 %). No significant differences were observed according to rural residence or physician density. CONCLUSIONS Social disparities in late-stage CRC diagnosis are modest. Continued surveillance of these disparities may be warranted as provinces continue to promote early cancer detection through screening, and stage distributions may change overtime.
Collapse
|
48
|
Nuche-Berenguer B, Sakellariou D. Socioeconomic determinants of cancer screening utilisation in Latin America: A systematic review. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0225667. [PMID: 31765426 PMCID: PMC6876872 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer incidence and mortality in Latin America are rising. While effective cancer screening services, accessible to the whole population and enabling early cancer detection are needed, existing research shows the existence of disparities in screening uptake in the region. OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review to investigate the socioeconomic determinants for the disparities in the use of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening services in Latin America. METHODS We searched for studies reporting on socioeconomic determinants impacting on access to breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening, published from 2009 through 2018. The studies that qualified for inclusion contained original analyses on utilisation of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening across socioeconomic levels in Latin America. For each study, paired reviewers performed a quality analysis followed by detailed review and data extraction. RESULTS Twenty-four articles that met the eligibility criteria and were of sufficient quality were included in this review. Thirteen of the included articles were written in English, eight in Portuguese and three in Spanish, and they reported on the use of breast or cervical cancer screening. No studies were found on the socioeconomic determinants regarding the utilisation of colorectal cancer screening in Latin America. Low income, low education level, lack of health insurance and single marital status were all found to be determinants of underuse of breast and cervical cancer screening services. CONCLUSIONS Cancer screening programs in the region must prioritize reaching those populations that underuse cancer screening services to ensure equitable access to preventive services. It is important to develop national screening programmes that are accessible to all (including uninsured people) through, for example, the use of mobile units for mammography and self-screening methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dikaios Sakellariou
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Buehler JW, Castro JC, Cohen S, Zhao Y, Melly S, Moore K. Personal and Neighborhood Attributes Associated with Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Urban African American Population. Prev Chronic Dis 2019; 16:E118. [PMID: 31469069 PMCID: PMC6716424 DOI: 10.5888/pcd16.190030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Assessing individual social determinants of health in primary care might be complemented by consideration of population attributes in patients’ neighborhoods. We studied associations between cervical and colorectal cancer screening and neighborhood attributes among an African American population in Philadelphia. Methods We abstracted demographic and cancer screening information from records of patients seen during 2006 at 3 federally qualified health centers and characterized patients’ census tracts of residence by using census, survey, and other data to define population metrics for poverty, racial segregation, educational attainment, social capital, neighborhood safety, and violent crime. We used generalized estimating equations to obtain adjusted relative risks of screening associated with individual and census tract attributes. Results Among 1,708 patients for whom colorectal cancer screening was recommended, screening was up to date for 41%, and among 4,995 women for whom cervical cancer screening was recommended, screening was up to date for 75%. After controlling for age, sex (for colorectal cancer screening), insurance coverage, and clinic site, people living in the most racially segregated neighborhoods were nearly 10% more likely than others to be unscreened for colorectal cancer. Other census tract population attributes were not associated with differences in screening levels for either cancer. Conclusions The association between lower rates of colorectal cancer screening and neighborhood racial segregation is consistent with known barriers to colonoscopy among African Americans combined with effects of segregation on health-related behaviors. Recognition of the association between segregation and lower colorectal cancer screening rates might be useful in informing and targeting community outreach to improve screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W Buehler
- Urban Health Collaborative and Department of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Dornsife School of Public Health, 3215 Market St, 3rd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Juan C Castro
- Family Practice and Counseling Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Suzanne Cohen
- Health Federation of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Yuzhe Zhao
- Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven Melly
- Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kari Moore
- Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Perdamaian TK. Recent evidence on modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC): a systematic synopsis of meta-analyses from 2015 to 2017. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDONESIA 2019. [DOI: 10.13181/mji.v28i2.2679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cancer with a huge impact on international public health. This review discusses recent evidence on modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for CRC using a systematic review method. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. The literature search was performed on the Ovid MEDLINE database and included publications from 2015 to 2017, followed by a quality assessment and a narrative synthesis. Of the 90 identified articles, there were 13 meta-analyses with statistically significant results. Seven articles discussed modifiable risk factors and six articles discussed non-modifiable risk. The modifiable risk factors with the highest risk were radiotherapy of prostate cancer (pooled odds ratio 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33–2.12). The non-modifiable risk factors with the highest risk was Lynch syndrome (hazard ratio 135.49; 95% CI 111.55–164.57). This review discovered new and previously known risk factors for CRC. Recent evidence shows that research on CRC risk factors is continuing to grow indicating that more studies on risk factors are needed to optimize CRC prevention and early detection.
Collapse
|