U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approval Summary: Atezolizumab for Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Establish a novel immune-related gene prognostic risk index (IRGPRI) associated with CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Background

The aim of this study is to create an index called IRGPRI (immune-related gene prognostic risk index) that can be utilized for predicting the prognosis and assessing the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Distinguishing gene expression patterns (DEGs) were detected in CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) compared to other cellular types such as CD4 T cells, B cells, plasma cells, and CD8 Tex using the advanced technology of Single-cell RNA Sequencing (scRNA-seq). The construction of IRGPRI was accomplished by employing LASSO Cox regression analysis. We conducted a comparative analysis on clinical characteristics and molecular features, such as pathway enrichment and gene mutation, among the distinct subgroups of IRGPRI. Furthermore, we explored the correlation between immunological characteristics and IRGPRI subgroups to comprehensively assess the effectiveness of ICIs in NSCLC patients.

Results

A total of 109 genes were identified by intersecting immune-related genes with DEGs obtained from single-cell RNA sequencing data (GSE131907), specifically comparing CTLs to other cell types. From these, we selected 7 prognosis-related genes, namely TRBC1, HLA-DMA, CTSH, RAC1, CTSL, ANXA2, and CEBPB. These genes were used to construct the IRGPRI. The prognosis of patients diagnosed with NSCLC was found to be significantly better in the low-risk group compared to the high-risk group, as demonstrated by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis. This observation was further confirmed through the utilization of data from the GEO cohort. The low-risk group demonstrated an increase in pathways linked with immune response, whereas the high-risk group exhibited a higher prevalence of pathways related to cancer. Furthermore, it was noted in the TCGA cohort that there existed a significant rise in the mutation frequency of every gene within the high-risk group as opposed to the low-risk group. Missense variation emerged as the most prevalent form of mutation. According to the analysis of immune cell infiltration and function, the comprehensive findings suggest that the group with a low risk is characterized by an increased presence of plasma cells, CTLs, T cells follicular helper, Tregs, and Dendritic cell resting. Additionally, they exhibit a higher score in terms of immune function for B cells, CD8+ T cells, checkpoint activity, T cell inhibition and stimulation. Moreover, this low-risk group demonstrates greater efficacy when treated with ICIs therapy compared to the high-risk group.

Conclusions

Our research effectively developed and verified a unique IRGPRI, showcasing its association with immune-related characteristics. As a result, the potential of IRGPRI as a valuable biomarker for predicting prognosis and evaluating the effectiveness of ICIs treatment in cancer is evident.

Comprehensive assessment of TECENTRIQ® and OPDIVO®: analyzing immunotherapy indications withdrawn in triple-negative breast cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma

Atezolizumab (TECENTRIQ®) and nivolumab (OPDIVO®) are both immunotherapeutic indications targeting programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), respectively. These inhibitors hold promise as therapies for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and have demonstrated encouraging results in reducing the progression and spread of tumors. However, due to their adverse effects and low response rates, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has withdrawn the approval of atezolizumab in TNBC and nivolumab in HCC treatment. The withdrawals of atezolizumab and nivolumab have raised concerns regarding their effectiveness and the ability to predict treatment responses. Therefore, the current study aims to investigate the immunotherapy withdrawal of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, specifically atezolizumab for TNBC and nivolumab for HCC. This study will examine both the structural and clinical aspects. This review provides detailed insights into the structure of the PD-1 receptor and its ligands, the interactions between PD-1 and PD-L1, and their interactions with the withdrawn antibodies (atezolizumab and nivolumab) as well as PD-1 and PD-L1 modifications. In addition, this review further assesses these antibodies in the context of TNBC and HCC. It seeks to elucidate the factors that contribute to diverse responses to PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in different types of cancer and propose approaches for predicting responses, mitigating the potential risks linked to therapy withdrawals, and optimizing patient outcomes. By better understanding the mechanisms underlying responses to PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and developing strategies to predict these responses, it is possible to create more efficient treatments for TNBC and HCC.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of recombinant human endostatin plus PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for EGFR/ALK-negative, advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of recombinant human endostatin (Rh-endostatin) plus programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study on patients with EGFR/ALK-negative, advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients received Rh-endostatin plus PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy every three weeks for 4 to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients were included in this retrospective analysis. As of data cutoff (December 13, 2022), the median follow-up of 21.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 8.3-44.4 months). The median PFS and OS was 22.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.6-27.4) and 31.0 months (95% CI: 23.4-not evaluable [NE]), respectively. The ORR was 72.06% (95% CI: 59.85-82.27%), and DCR was 95.59% (95% CI: 87.64-99.08%). Patients with stage IIIB/IIIC NSCLC had significantly longer median PFS (23.4 vs. 13.2 months), longer median OS (not reached vs. 18.0 months), and higher ORR (89.2% vs. 51.6%) than those with stage IV NSCLC (all p ≤ 0.001). The ORR was higher in patients with high PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥ 50%) than in those with low PD-L1 expression or positive PD-L1 expression (75% vs. 50%, p = 0.025). All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and ≥ grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 16 (23.53%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Rh-endostatin combined with PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment yielded favorable effectiveness with a manageable profile in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, representing a promising treatment modality.

"Find Me" and "Eat Me" signals: tools to drive phagocytic processes for modulating antitumor immunity

Phagocytosis, a vital defense mechanism, involves the recognition and elimination of foreign substances by cells. Phagocytes, such as neutrophils and macrophages, rapidly respond to invaders; macrophages are especially important in later stages of the immune response. They detect "find me" signals to locate apoptotic cells and migrate toward them. Apoptotic cells then send "eat me" signals that are recognized by phagocytes via specific receptors. "Find me" and "eat me" signals can be strategically harnessed to modulate antitumor immunity in support of cancer therapy. These signals, such as calreticulin and phosphatidylserine, mediate potent pro-phagocytic effects, thereby promoting the engulfment of dying cells or their remnants by macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells and inducing tumor cell death. This review summarizes the phagocytic "find me" and "eat me" signals, including their concepts, signaling mechanisms, involved ligands, and functions. Furthermore, we delineate the relationships between "find me" and "eat me" signaling molecules and tumors, especially the roles of these molecules in tumor initiation, progression, diagnosis, and patient prognosis. The interplay of these signals with tumor biology is elucidated, and specific approaches to modulate "find me" and "eat me" signals and enhance antitumor immunity are explored. Additionally, novel therapeutic strategies that combine "find me" and "eat me" signals to better bridge innate and adaptive immunity in the treatment of cancer patients are discussed.

Specific Cell Targeting by Toxoplasma gondii Displaying Functional Single-Chain Variable Fragment as a Novel Strategy; A Proof of Principle

Toxoplasma gondii holds significant therapeutic potential; however, its nonspecific invasiveness results in off-target effects. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether T. gondii specificity can be improved by surface display of scFv directed against dendritic cells' endocytic receptor, DEC205, and immune checkpoint PD-L1. Anti-DEC205 scFv was anchored to the T. gondii surface either directly via glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) or by fusion with the SAG1 protein. Both constructs were successfully expressed, but the binding results suggested that the anti-DEC-SAG1 scFv had more reliable functionality towards recombinant DEC protein and DEC205-expressing MutuDC cells. Two anti-PD-L1 scFv constructs were developed that differed in the localization of the HA tag. Both constructs were adequately expressed, but the localization of the HA tag determined the functionality by binding to PD-L1 protein. Co-incubation of T. gondii displaying anti-PD-L1 scFv with tumor cells expressing/displaying different levels of PD-L1 showed strong binding depending on the level of available biomarker. Neutralization assays confirmed that binding was due to the specific interaction between anti-PD-L1 scFv and its ligand. A mixed-cell assay showed that T. gondii expressing anti-PD-L1 scFv predominately targets the PD-L1-positive cells, with negligible off-target binding. The recombinant RH-PD-L1-C strain showed increased killing ability on PD-L1+ tumor cell lines compared to the parental strain. Moreover, a co-culture assay of target tumor cells and effector CD8+ T cells showed that our model could inhibit PD1/PD-L1 interaction and potentiate T-cell immune response. These findings highlight surface display of antibody fragments as a promising strategy of targeting replicative T. gondii strains while minimizing nonspecific binding.

Iridium(III)-Based PD-L1 Agonist Regulates p62 and ATF3 for Enhanced Cancer Immunotherapy

Anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy, a new lung cancer treatment, is limited to a few patients due to low PD-L1 expression and tumor immunosuppression. To address these challenges, the upregulation of PD-L1 has the potential to elevate the response rate and efficiency of anti-PD-L1 and alleviate the immunosuppression of the tumor microenvironment. Herein, we developed a novel usnic acid-derived Iridium(III) complex, Ir-UA, that boosts PD-L1 expression and converts "cold tumors" to "hot". Subsequently, we administered Ir-UA combined with anti-PD-L1 in mice, which effectively inhibited tumor growth and promoted CD4+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration. To our knowledge, Ir-UA is the first iridium-based complex to stimulate the expression of PD-L1 by explicitly regulating its transcription factors, which not only provides a promising platform for immune checkpoint blockade but, more importantly, provides an effective treatment strategy for patients with low PD-L1 expression.

Immune checkpoint targeting antibodies hold promise for combinatorial cancer therapeutics

Through improving the immune system's ability to recognize and combat tumor cells as well as its receptivity to changes in the tumor microenvironment, immunotherapy has emerged as a highly successful addition to the treatment of cancer. However, tumor heterogeneity poses a significant challenge in cancer therapy as it can undermine the anti-tumor immune response through the manipulation of the extracellular matrix. To address these challenges and improve targeted therapies and combination treatments, the food and drug administration has approved several immunomodulatory antibodies to suppress immunological checkpoints. Combinatorial therapies necessitate the identification of multiple targets that regulate the intricate communication between immune cells, cytokines, chemokines, and cellular responses within the tumor microenvironment. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of the ongoing clinical trials involving immunomodulatory antibodies in various cancer types. It explores the potential of these antibodies to modulate the immune system and enhance anti-tumor responses. Additionally, it discusses the perspectives and prospects of immunomodulatory therapeutics in cancer treatment. Although immunotherapy shows great promise in cancer treatment, it is not exempt from side effects that can arise due to hyperactivity of the immune system. Therefore, understanding the intricate balance between immune activation and regulation is crucial for minimizing these adverse effects and optimizing treatment outcomes. This study aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge surrounding immunomodulatory antibodies and their potential as effective therapeutic options in cancer treatment, ultimately paving the way for improved patient outcomes and deepening our perception of the intricate interactivity between the immune system and tumors.

A comprehensive review on immune checkpoint inhibitors induced cardiotoxicity characteristics and associated factors

Newly approved cancer drugs called ICIs have shown remarkable success in improving patient survival rates, but they also have the potential for inflammatory and immune-related side effects, including those affecting the cardiovascular system. Research has been conducted to understand the development of these toxicities and identify risk factors. This review focuses on the characteristics of ICI-induced cardiotoxicity and discusses the reported risk factors. It is important for cardio-oncologists to understand the basic concepts of these drugs to better understand how cardiotoxicities occur. It might be hard to find reports, where all patients treated with ICIs had developed cardiac toxicity, because there could be other existing and variable factors that influence the likelihood or risk of developing cardiotoxicity during treatment. Various clinical parameters have been explored as potential risk factors, and further investigation is needed through large-scale studies.

Understanding the feasibility of chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic targets against non-small cell lung cancers: an update of resistant responses and recent combinatorial therapies

Despite consistent progress in prompt diagnosis and curative therapies in the last decade, lung cancer (LC) continues to threaten mankind, accounting for nearly twice the casualties compared to prostate, breast, and other cancers. Statistics associate ~25% of 2021 cancer-related deaths with LC, more than 80% of which are explicitly caused by tobacco smoking. Prevailing as small and non-small cell pathologies, with respective occurring frequency of nearly 15% and 80-85%, non-small cell LCs (NSCLCs) are prominently distinguished into lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), subtypes. Since the first use of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor gefitinib for NSCLC treatment in 2002, immense progress has been made for targeted therapies with the next generation of drugs spanning across the chronological generations of small molecule inhibitors. The last two years have overseen the clinical approval of more than 10 therapeutic agents as first-line NSCLC medications. However, uncertain mutational aberrations as well as systemic resistant responses, and abysmal overall survival curtail the combating efficacies. Of late, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) against various molecules including programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have been demonstrated as reliable LC treatment targets. Keeping these aspects in mind, this review article discusses the success of NSCLC chemo and immunotherapies with their characteristic effectiveness and future perspectives.

Targeting Potential of Innate Lymphoid Cells in Melanoma and Other Cancers

Reinvigorating the killing function of tumor-infiltrating immune cells through the targeting of regulatory molecules expressed on lymphocytes has markedly improved the prognosis of cancer patients, particularly in melanoma. While initially thought to solely strengthen adaptive T lymphocyte anti-tumor activity, recent investigations suggest that other immune cell subsets, particularly tissue-resident innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), may benefit from immunotherapy treatment. Here, we describe the recent findings showing immune checkpoint expression on tissue-resident and tumor-infiltrating ILCs and how their effector function is modulated by checkpoint blockade-based therapies in cancer. We discuss the therapeutic potential of ILCs beyond the classical PD-1 and CTLA-4 regulatory molecules, exploring other possibilities to manipulate ILC effector function to further impede tumor growth and quench disease progression.

Anti-PD-(L)1 therapy of non-small cell lung cancer-A summary of clinical trials and current progresses

Background

This review discusses the impact of mono or combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, comparing clinical outcomes and safety. Cancer subtype, tumor mutational burden (TMB), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression state and T cell infiltration (TIL) density are considered for interpretations. Besides, current progresses in the field of immunotherapy are discussed.

Results

Anti-PD-(L)1 is a safe and an effective strategy in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Clinical responses to nivolumab and pembrolizumab, in particular, are promising. The most desired clinical responses are for patients receiving combination of anti-PD-(L)1 or anti-PD-(L)1/anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) with chemotherapy (taxane and platinum). PD-L1 expression state (PD-L1 ≥ 50%), patient performance state (PS: 0-1 ECOG scale) and effector T cell (Teff) immune signature considerably affect ICI responses. Higher ICI responses are also expected in TMB ^high but EGFR^-/ALK^- cancer patients. In regard with safety profile, adverse events (AEs) related to anti-PD-(L)1 are lower compared with that for platinum-based and docetaxel therapy. Toripalimab is the safest among various immunotherapy drugs. Bispecific antibodies against anti-PD-(L)1 with dominant signaling or alternative checkpoints in tumor microenvironment (TME) is the current focus in immunotherapy of cancers like NSCLC. Besides, the contribution of extracellular vesicles (EVs) to immune escape and their implication in cancer diagnosis and therapy is on the eye of current investigations.

Conclusion

Appropriate biomarker selection will improve therapy outcomes in ICI treated NSCLC patients, particularly in cases under combinatory ICI therapy. Application of bispecific antibodies and EV-based targeted therapy are effective novel strategies to improve therapeutic outcomes in cancer patients.

IL4I1 enhances PD-L1 expression through JAK/STAT signaling pathway in lung adenocarcinoma

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the major type of lung cancer and is one of the deadliest cancers worldwide. IL4I1, as a gene associated with unsatisfactory prognosis, is involved in tumor immune escape, but its immune regulatory mechanism in LUAD is limited. Bioinformatics analysis was applied to analyze the differentially expressed mRNAs and enriched signaling pathways in LUAD tissue. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was manipulated to test IL4I1 expression. We carried out several methods to examine cell functions: CCK-8 to measure LUAD cell proliferation; flow cytometry to determine cell apoptosis; Western blot to assess the expression of JAK/STAT pathway-related proteins and PD-L1; T cell cytotoxicity assay to evaluate the effect of IL4I1 on the immune escape of LUAD cells. Through bioinformatics analysis, IL4I1 was verified to be highly expressed in LUAD tissue, participate in the modulation of JAK/STAT signaling pathway, and be positively associated with CD274 (PD-L1) expression. Cell function experiments indicated that silencing IL4I1 notably repressed LUAD cell proliferation and induced apoptosis. IL4I1 silence would block JAK/STAT signaling pathway, but this effect could be reversed by RO8191 activator treatment. Moreover, IL4I1 silence suppressed PD-L1 expression and facilitated T cell cytotoxicity, while its inhibitory impact on PD-L1 expression and immune escape of LUAD cells could be reversed by atezolizumab treatment. Overall, we confirmed that IL4I1 promoted the malignant cell behaviors and immune escape of LUAD through JAK/STAT signaling pathway. IL4I1 has the potential to be a diagnostic biomarker for LUAD.

Real-world ALK Testing Trends in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors harbor anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements can be treated with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We assessed real-world ALK biomarker testing and treatment patterns of patients with NSCLC in the United States.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were extracted from the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived deidentified database for patients aged ≥18 years with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and ≥2 clinic visits between January 2011 and December 2019.

RESULTS

Among 60,025 eligible patients, tumors from 36,691 (61.1%) patients were tested for ALK rearrangements, and 1042 (2.8%) tested positive (ALK+). From 2011 to 2019, ALK testing rates increased from 33.1% to 73.0%; testing via fluorescence in situ hybridization declined from 68.3% to 32.1% while next-generation sequencing increased from <1% to 52.2%. Although tissue samples were more commonly used than blood (85.1% vs. 13.5% of tests), blood sample testing increased from 0.1% in 2011 to 28.2% in 2019. Median (interquartile range) time from diagnosis of advanced NSCLC to first ALK+ test result was 23 (13-43) days, including laboratory processing time of 9 (6-14) days. For the 24.7% of patients with an ALK+ test result who began treatment before receiving the positive result, chemotherapy was initiated most often overall until 2018 when immuno-oncology agents became most common.

CONCLUSION

Although ALK testing in NSCLC increased over time, testing rates among eligible patients did not reach 100% during the study period. Treatment decisions for some patients with NSCLC may have been made without important, guideline-recommended biomarker data.

Rh‐endostatin plus camrelizumab and chemotherapy in first‐line treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Clinical evidence of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with antiangiogenic drugs in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was limited. Recombinant human endostatin (rh-endostatin), an antiangiogenic drug, and camrelizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, have been approved for the treatment of advanced NSCLC in China. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of rh-endostatin plus camrelizumab and chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Eligible patients were enrolled and received camrelizumab (200 mg, day 1) every 3 weeks and continuous intravenous infusion of rh-endostatin (70 mg/day, days 1-3) and cisplatin combined with pemetrexed (for adenocarcinoma) or paclitaxel (for NSCLC other than adenocarcinoma) every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles.

RESULTS

Overall, 27 patients were included, and 25 patients were eligible for efficacy evaluation. For these 25 patients, ORR was 48.15% (13/27) and DCR was 85.19% (23/27). With a median follow-up of 10.37 months, the median PFS was 8.9 (95% CI: 4.23-13.57) months. Median OS was not reached. Overall, 96.3% of patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event, and grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 9 (33.3%) patients. No unexpected AEs were observed.

CONCLUSION

Rh-endostatin plus camrelizumab and chemotherapy showed favorable efficacy and safety profile in patients with advanced NSCLC, representing a promising treatment regimen for these patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse cardiac events in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although people are more and more aware of the cardiotoxicity caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of lung cancer, its incidence rate has not been systematically analyzed. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of cardiotoxicity related to the ICI therapies for lung cancer, so as to enhance clinicians' attention to cardiotoxicity, implement proper prevention and intervention for high-risk patients, and minimize the risk of cardiac dysfunction during and after completion of therapy.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search for relevant publications in PubMed and Scopus from inception to 19 April 2022. Pooled incidence and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for cardiotoxicity events were calculated.

Results

A total of 37 studies covering 38 trials, including 14,342 patients, were identified. The pooled risk ratios of incidence of any cardiac AEs were 1.944 [95% CI 0.8–4.725] (Single ICI versus chemotherapy), 1.677 [95% CI 1.065–2.64] (Single ICI plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy), and 0.478 [95% CI 0.127–1.798] (Single ICI versus Dual ICI). The incidence of myocarditis and arrhythmia were 0.003[95%CI 0.002–0.006] and 0.014[95%CI 0–0.037], respectively.

Conclusion

Single ICI did not increase the risk of cardiotoxicity compared with chemotherapy, and single ICI plus chemotherapy increased the risk of cardiotoxicity by 67% compared with chemotherapy alone. Combination immunotherapy did not increase the risk of cardiotoxicity compared with single ICI.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02760-2.

Immunoregulatory signal networks and tumor immune evasion mechanisms: insights into therapeutic targets and agents in clinical development

Through activation of immune cells, the immune system is responsible for identifying and destroying infected or otherwise damaged cells including tumorigenic cells that can be recognized as foreign, thus maintaining homeostasis. However, tumor cells have evolved several mechanisms to avoid immune cell detection and killing, resulting in tumor growth and progression. In the tumor microenvironment, tumor infiltrating immune cells are inactivated by soluble factors or tumor promoting conditions and lose their effects on tumor cells. Analysis of signaling and crosstalk between immune cells and tumor cells have helped us to understand in more detail the mechanisms of tumor immune evasion and this forms basis for drug development strategies in the area of cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we will summarize the dominant signaling networks involved in immune escape and describe the status of development of therapeutic strategies to target tumor immune evasion mechanisms with focus on how the tumor microenvironment interacts with T cells.

[Atezolizumab therapy in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors: An open-label, phase Ⅰ study]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) in high interest cancers in China, including esophageal cancer (EC), gastric cancer (GC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC), and non-small cell lung can-cer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This phase I, open-label study was conducted at 6 Chinese sites from August 4, 2016 to April 15, 2019. The patients were ≥18 years old with a histologically documented incurable or metastatic solid tumor that was advanced or recurrent and had progressed since the last anti-tumor the-rapy. The PK phase characterized PK and safety of atezolizumab following multiple-dose administration when atezolizumab was administered as a single agent. The extension phase studied safety and efficacy of atezolizumab, as monotherapy (EC, GC, HCC, NPC) and with chemotherapy (NSCLC).

RESULTS

This study enrolled 120 patients (PK phase: n=20; extension phase: n=20/cohort). Fourty-two patients (42.0%) were PD-L1 positive in atezolizumab monotherapy group (100 patients), of the 9 patients (9.0%) with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. Atezolizumab clearance was 0.219 L/d, and steady state was reached after 6 to 9 weeks (2-3 cycles) of repeated dosing. Objective response rates (ORRs) in EC, GC, HCC, NPC, and NSCLC were 10.0%, 15.0%, 10.0%, 5.0%, and 40.0%, respectively. In the patients with PD-L1 positive tumors, ORR was 11.9% with atezolizumab and 46.2% with atezolizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin. Two GC patients achieved durable response after pseudo-progression. The most common treatment-related adverse events in the atezolizumab monotherapy group were fatigue, anemia, fever, and decreased white blood cell count. The most common treatment-related adverse events in the combination group were anemia, decreased white blood cell count, and decreased appetite. No new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSION

Atezolizumab's PK, efficacy, and safety were similar in Chinese patients vs. global patients in previous studies.

Clinical Significance of Serum Biomarkers in Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with PD-1 Inhibitors: LIPI Score, NLR, dNLR, LMR, and PAB

Background

To assess the prognostic value of pretreatment serum biomarkers in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1) inhibitors and their value as a predictor of benefit.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study including patients with stage IV NSCLC who were treated with anti-PD-1 drugs in first or advanced lines of therapy in the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University. Serum biomarkers such as NLR, dNLR, LMR, PAB, ALB, and LIPI scores were calculated and analyzed in detail.

Results

A total of 85 patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with PD-1 inhibitors in the first or advanced lines of therapy were included in this subject. According to the tumor response of PD-1-based treatment, ORR was 42.4% (36/85) and DCR was 68.2% (58/85). The median OS and PFS were 20.0 months and 7.0 months, respectively. The ROC curves showed that the serum biomarkers of NLR, dNLR, LDH, LMR, PAB, and ALB were significantly associated with overall survival and helped to determine the cut-off value. The multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses for stage IV NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors indicated that dNLR (P < 0.001) and ALB (P = 0.033) were independent prognostic indicators of PFS, while liver metastasis (P = 0.01), NLR (P = 0.01), dNLR (P = 0.001), and LMR (P = 0.006) were independent prognostic indicators of OS. Moreover, patients of the good LIPI group showed prolonged PFS and OS than those with intermediate/poor LIPI score (P < 0.001 and P = 0.006, respectively).

Conclusions

Pretreatment dNLR is an independent prognostic indicator of both PFS and OS in stage IV NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Pretreatment LIPI, combining dNLR > 3 and LDH>ULN, was correlated with worse outcome for stage IV NSCLC patients treated with ICI. High NLR, high dNLR, low LMR, and low ALB at baseline might be useful as an early predictive biomarker of benefit.

Combined treatment with anti-PSMA CAR NK-92 cell and anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody enhances the antitumour efficacy against castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The chimeric antigen receptor NK-92 (CAR NK-92) cell targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has shown antitumour effects in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, the expression changes of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and its mechanisms on CAR NK-92 and CRPC cells and the effect of the anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) on PD-L1 expressed on CAR NK-92 cells remain unknown.

METHODS

Human dendritic cells and CD8+ T cells were acquired from blood samples of healthy donors and cocultured with C4-2 cells. Changes in PD-L1 expression were detected by flow cytometry. Differential gene expressions were investigated by RNA sequence analysis, while the regulation of PD-L1 molecular signaling was explored using western blotting. In vitro cytotoxicity was evaluated using the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay and the bioluminescent intensity (BLI) of green fluorescent protein-labelled C4-2 cells. CRPC growth in vivo was monitored using callipers and BLI in male NOD/SCID mice subcutaneously injected with C4-2 cells and treated intravenously with anti-PD-L1/PD-1 mAb, CAR NK-92 or cocultured CD8+ T cells.

RESULTS

Significantly upregulated expression of PD-L1k was observed in cocultured C4-2 and CAR NK-92 cells. In addition, upregulation of PD-L1 expression was dependent on interferon-γ in C4-2 cells, while it was dependent on direct cell-to-cell interaction via the NK group 2 member D/ phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT pathway in CAR NK-92 cells. The anti-PD-L1 mAb directly acted on PD-L1 expressed on CAR NK-92 cells and augmented the cytotoxicity of CAR NK-92 cells against C4-2 and CRPC cells from one patient in vitro. Anti-PD-L1 mAb significantly enhanced the antitumour effect of CAR NK-92 cells against CRPC cells in vivo when compared to treatment with CAR NK-92 cells or combined with anti-PD-1 mAb in the absence or presence of cocultured CD8+ T cells.

CONCLUSION

Combined treatment with CAR NK-92 and anti-PD-L1 mAb improved the antitumour efficacy against CRPC, which is of extraordinary translational value in the clinical treatment of CRPC.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy

The discovery of immune checkpoint proteins such as PD-1/PDL-1 and CTLA-4 represents a significant breakthrough in the field of cancer immunotherapy. Therefore, humanized monoclonal antibodies, targeting these immune checkpoint proteins have been utilized successfully in patients with metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancers and non-small lung cancer. The US FDA has successfully approved three different categories of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as PD-1 inhibitors (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, and Cemiplimab), PDL-1 inhibitors (Atezolimumab, Durvalumab and Avelumab), and CTLA-4 inhibitor (Ipilimumab). Unfortunately, not all patients respond favourably to these drugs, highlighting the role of biomarkers such as Tumour mutation burden (TMB), PDL-1 expression, microbiome, hypoxia, interferon-γ, and ECM in predicting responses to ICIs-based immunotherapy. The current study aims to review the literature and updates on ICIs in cancer therapy.

Tim-3 and PD-1 blocking cannot restore the functional properties of natural killer cells in early clinical stages of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: An in vitro study

Background

Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and T-cell immunoglobulin- and mucin-domain-containing molecule-3 (Tim-3) are two major immune checkpoint receptors expressed on immune cells and their expression is related to the exhaustion phenotype. In the present in vitro study, blocking of PD-1 and Tim-3 molecules was performed on isolated natural killer (NK) cells from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) to restore their functional properties.

Materials and Methods

NK cells fraction was positively isolated from fresh peripheral blood of 18 CLL patients, treated with anti-PD-1 and anti-Tim-3 blocking monoclonal antibodies and co-cultured with K562 target cells to evaluate their apoptosis induction by Annexin V-PI method. Blocked NK cells were also incubated with anti-CD107a antibody to assess their degranulation properties by flow cytometry. The level of secreted tumor node factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) by NK cells was also measured by ELISA.

Results

Our results showed similar functional properties in terms of degranulation and apoptosis of K562 target cells by isolated NK cells from CLL patients in PD-1/Tim-3 blocked and control groups. It was also shown that blocking of PD-1 and Tim-3 could not improve the production of pro-inflammatory TNF-α and IFN-γ cytokines by isolated NK cells from CLL patients.

Conclusion

Altogether, our results indicated that pretreatment of NK cells with anti-PD-1 and anti-Tim-3 blocking antibodies in CLL patients at early clinical stages cannot improve their functional properties. Besides many other malignancies, the application of checkpoint inhibitors in CLL needs more investigations and complementary studies.

Long-term avelumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: summaries and post hoc analyses from JAVELIN Solid Tumor

Background:

This study examined patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who received long-term avelumab (anti-PD-L1) in a large phase Ib trial (JAVELIN Solid Tumor).

Methods:

Patients receiving >2 years of avelumab were reviewed and exploratory descriptive analyses were conducted.

Results:

Individuals with varying baseline characteristics who had received up to 6 years of avelumab were reviewed. Overall, 37/340 (10.9%) had received ≥2 years of treatment; in this subgroup, best response was complete response in 5.4%, partial response in 59.5% and stable disease in 29.7%; 51.4% had continued treatment beyond disease progression.

Conclusions:

In this study, 11% of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer received ≥2 years of avelumab treatment and experienced prolonged response or continued clinical benefit.

Clinical Trial Registration:NCT02395172 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Understanding the Critical Role of Glycolysis-Related lncRNAs in Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on Three Molecular Subtypes

Background

Glycolysis is closely associated with tumor progression, but the roles of lncRNAs in glycolysis have not been comprehensively investigated in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). This study is aimed at studying the possible mechanisms of glycolysis-related lncRNAs in tumor development and providing a guidance for targeted therapy.

Methods

Unsupervised consensus clustering was used to identify molecular subtypes. Gene enrichment analysis was applied to screen important pathways involved in tumor progression. A series of immune analysis was performed to assess immune infiltration. Critical transcription factors (TFs) interacting with lncRNAs were selected by Pearson correlation analysis. A first-order partial correlation analysis was implemented to identify critical lncRNAs with prognostic significance.

Results

Three molecular subtypes (C1, C2, and C3) were identified with distinct overall survival. Three subtypes showed differential immune infiltration, and C3 subtype was the optimal for immunotherapy treatment. Ten lncRNA-TF pairs among four glycolysis-related lncRNAs (FTX, LINC00472, PSMA3-AS1, and SNHG14) and six TFs (FOXP1, SP1, MYC, FOXM1, HIF1A, and FOS) were involved in tumor progression. We identified four critical glycolysis-related lncRNAs significantly associated with prognosis.

Conclusions

This study identified three molecular subtypes that could guide personalized therapy. The four-lncRNA prognostic model can serve as an indicator for predicting prognosis or early screening of lung adenocarcinoma patients. The current results improve the understanding of the relation between lncRNAs and glycolysis.

Severe immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

A complete toxicity profile, toxicity profile, and safety ranking of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will be provided in this network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched 14 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) including 9572 NSCLC patients by PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomized pairwise and network meta-analyses were used to compare the incidence of severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) across different ICIs-based treatments using risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

For severe dermatologic irAEs, the corresponding ranking of incidences of the nine groups from high to low was: nivolumab + ipilimumab + platinum (79.1%), pembrolizumab (75.2%), nivolumab + ipilimumab (72.9%), camrelizumab + platinum (64.9%), atezolizumab + platinum (47.4%), nivolumab (44.2%), durvalumab (40.5%), pembrolizumab + platinum (15.5%), platinum-based chemotherapy (10.3%). For severe colitis, the corresponding ranking of incidences of the seven groups from high to low was: nivolumab + ipilimumab + platinum (72.4%), nivolumab (63.1%), atezolizumab + platinum (56.9%), durvalumab (56.6%), pembrolizumab (54.9%), pembrolizumab + platinum (38.6%), platinum-based chemotherapy (7.4%). For severe endocrine irAEs, the corresponding ranking of incidences of the nine groups from high to low was: durvalumab (74.3%), atezolizumab + platinum (54.5%), nivolumab + ipilimumab (54.0%), camrelizumab + platinum (51.7%), nivolumab + ipilimumab + platinum (51.6%), pembrolizumab + platinum (49.8%), pembrolizumab (49.2%), nivolumab (46.3%), platinum-based chemotherapy (18.6%). For severe pneumonitis, the corresponding ranking of incidences of the nine groups from high to low was: nivolumab (84.3%), pembrolizumab (84.1%), durvalumab (66.1%), camrelizumab + platinum (61.4%), atezolizumab + platinum (50%), pembrolizumab + platinum (43.4%), platinum-based chemotherapy (16.2%), atezolizumab (6.2%). For severe hepatitis, the corresponding ranking of incidences of the eight groups from high to low was: pembrolizumab (68.8%), nivolumab + ipilimumab + platinum (65%), pembrolizumab + platinum (64.6%), durvalumab (57.9%), nivolumab (47.1%), atezolizumab + platinum (43.4%), camrelizumab + platinum (42%), platinum-based chemotherapy (11.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to platinum-based chemotherapy, pembrolizumab + platinum for severe dermatologic irAEs and colitis, nivolumab for severe endocrine irAEs, atezolizumab for severe pneumonitis, camrelizumab + platinum for severe hepatitis may be associated with lower rates of irAEs than other immune-based regimens.

Comparison of the tumor microenvironments of squamous cell carcinoma at different anatomical locations within the upper aerodigestive tract in relation to response to ICI therapy

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has improved treatment outcomes in many cancer types and has focused attention on cancer immunity and the role of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Studies into efficacy of immunotherapy and TME are generally restricted to tumors in one anatomical location, while the histological type may have substantial influence on the contexture of the TME, perhaps more so than anatomical location, and subsequently to the response to immunotherapy. This review aims to focus on the TME in ICI‐treated tumors of the same histological type, namely carcinogen‐induced squamous cell carcinoma developing within the aerodigestive tract, at three locations, i.e. head and neck (HNSCC), esophagus (ESCC) and lung (LUSC).

ctDNA Predicts Overall Survival in Patients With NSCLC Treated With PD-L1 Blockade or With Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Identification of predictors for overall survival (OS) allows timely detection of clinical efficacy signals and therefore facilitates treatment decisions. We assessed the association between circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) metrics and the primary end point of OS in a subset of previously treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, who underwent atezolizumab or docetaxel treatment in the open-label randomized phase III OAK trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma from 94 patients at baseline and at subsequent cycles of therapy every 3 weeks was analyzed retrospectively for ctDNA. ctDNA was measured by allele frequency and mutant molecules per milliliter (MMPM). Concordance between various per-sample metrics and clinical outcome were assessed using C index.

RESULTS

Of all the ctDNA metrics tested, the association of median MMPM at 6 weeks with OS in patients treated with atezolizumab or docetaxel had a C index > 0.7. The OS hazard ratios relative to high ctDNA above median MMPM within each arm were 0.28 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.75) for atezolizumab and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.48) for docetaxel. For patients who had ctDNA median MMPM levels of < 4.79, the median survival time was more than 17 months in docetaxel-treated patients and the median survival time was not reached in the atezolizumab-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

ctDNA MMPM levels measured at 6 weeks post-treatment are associated with OS in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Our results suggest that ctDNA has the potential for a noninvasive early liquid biopsy predictor for OS that warrants further studies to demonstrate its utility in clinical development.

Chemotherapy plus single/double immunotherapy in the treatment of non-oncogene addicted advanced non-small cell lung cancer: where do we stand and where are we going?

INTRODUCTION

: Chemo-immunotherapy combinations have revolutionized our treatment algorithm with respect to naïve advanced NSCLC, however, given the great number of developed and approved combinations, the question arises as to which combinations provide the best efficacy and safety.

AREAS COVERED

: This review assesses and discusses the available data concerning chemo-immunotherapy combinations in the treatment of naïve advanced NSCLC, as well as presenting the most promising data involving combinations currently under investigation.

EXPERT OPINION

: Pembrolizumab-containing chemo-immunotherapy combinations are associated with the most mature data available and presently represent the standard treatment in clinical practice in naïve advanced NSCLC-affected patients. The nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus short-course chemotherapy combination, more recently approved by regulatory agencies, is an appealing alternative thanks to the reduced rate of grade 3-5 TRAEs and the limited chemotherapy administration. The new chemo-immunotherapy combinations currently under investigation will help us to better identify both the best immune checkpoints to target and the most effective combinations to administer.

Novel Combinations of Human Immunomodulatory mAbs Lacking Cardiotoxic Effects for Therapy of TNBC

Simple Summary

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of cancer by improving outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Recently, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), was identified as a target for TNBC and several preclinical and clinical trials are currently focusing on combinatorial treatments of immunomodulatory mAbs with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or other mAbs. Here, we tested in in vitro models novel combinations of immunomodulatory mAbs on TNBC cell lines and on cardiomyocytes, in comparison with the mAbs approved by FDA for cancer therapy, in order to identify at early stages the more potent anti-cancer combinations endowed with low or no cardiotoxic side effects.

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive subtype of breast cancer characterized by a higher mortality rate among breast cancer subtypes. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are used in clinics to treat a subgroup of TNBC patients, but other targeted therapies are urgently needed. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), involved in tumor immune escape, was recently identified as a target for TNBC; accordingly, the anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (mAb), atezolizumab, has been approved by FDA in combination with Paclitaxel for the therapy of metastatic TNBC. Here, we tested novel combinations of fully human immunomodulatory mAbs, including anti-PD-L1 mAbs generated in our laboratory and atezolizumab, on TNBC and other tumor cell lines. We evaluated their anti-tumor efficacy when used as single agents or in combinatorial treatments with anti-CTLA-4 mAbs in in vitro co-cultures of hPBMCs with tumor cells, by measuring tumor cell lysis and IL-2 and IFNγ cytokines secretion by lymphocytes. In parallel, by using co-cultures of hPBMCs and cardiomyocytes, we analyzed the potential cardiotoxic adverse side effects of the same antibody treatments by measuring the cardiac cell lysis and the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. We identified novel combinations of immunomodulatory mAbs endowed with more potent anti-cancer activity on TNBC and lower cardiotoxic side effects than the combination of atezolizumab and ipilimumab.

Prognostic implications of the tumor immune microenvironment and immune checkpoint pathway in primary central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the North Indian population

Primary central nervous system-diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PCNS-DLBCL) is a rare, extranodal malignant lymphoma carrying poor prognosis. The prognostic impact of tumor microenvironment (TME) composition and the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint pathway are still undetermined in PCNS-DLBCL. We aimed to quantify the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and PD-L1 expression in the PCNSL and evaluated their prognostic significance. All patients with histopathologically diagnosed PCNS-DLBCL over a period of 7 years were recruited. Immunohistochemistry for CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, CD68, CD163, PD-1, and PD-L1 was performed on the tissue microarray. Forty-four cases of PCNS-DLBCL, who satisfied the selection criteria, were included with mean age of 55 ± 12.3 years and male-to-female ratio of 0.91:1. The mean overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 531.6 days and 409.8 days, respectively. Among TILs, an increased number of CD3+ T cells showed better OS and DFS, without achieving statistical significance. CD4 positive T-cells were significantly associated with the longer OS (p = 0.037) and DFS (p = 0.023). TAMs (68CD and CD163 positive) showed an inverse relationship with OS and DFS but did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). Increased PD-L1 expression in immune cells, but not in tumor cells, was associated with significantly better DFS (p = 0.037). The TME plays a significant role in the prognosis of PCNS-DLBCL. Increased number of CD4+ T cells and PD-L1-expressing immune cells is associated with better prognosis in PCNS-DLBCL. Further studies with larger sample size are required to evaluate the role of targeted therapy against the TME and immune check point inhibitors in this disease.

Health care resource utilization and costs associated with advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer in the United States

BACKGROUND: The treatment landscape for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved from 2015 onward, since the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Considering this shift, there have been limited prior analyses that assess the economic burden of NSCLC within the current treatment landscape. OBJECTIVE: To present an analysis of health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC in the United States between 2010 and 2019. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who initiated first-line (1L) systemic treatment between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2019, were included from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database using a previously developed claims-based predictive model algorithm. Mean total HCRU and costs and mean per-person-per-year (PPPY) HCRU and costs were estimated for 2 follow-up periods: the time during the entire follow-up period and the time during the 1L treatment period. Distribution of treatment classes (defined as chemotherapy, ICIs, targeted therapies, and others) were also analyzed by index year. RESULTS: 27,257 patients met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. The mean duration of follow-up for all patients was 16.6 months (median 10.6 months), and the median time to discontinuation of 1L treatment was 2.8 months. The number of outpatient visits accounted for the majority of HCRU across the entire study follow-up (mean 97.7 in total and 147.1 PPPY) and for the 1L treatment period (mean 46.3 in total and 167.5 PPPY). The total mean cost across the entire study follow-up was $158,908 ($250,942 PPPY). For the 1L treatment period, the total mean cost was $72,760 ($271,590 PPPY). Total mean outpatient costs for systemic anticancer treatment were $61,797 for the entire study follow-up ($85,609 PPPY) and $27,138 during the 1L treatment period ($92,412 PPPY). Total costs increased over the study duration, which were mainly due to increasing outpatient costs for systemic therapy. In both follow-up periods, inpatient costs, other outpatient costs (nonsystemic therapy-related costs), and pharmacy costs remained relatively stable but still accounted for more than 60% of the total costs. Analysis of treatment classes over time showed that chemotherapy was the most frequently used treatment, regardless of line of therapy. A trend was observed for increased ICI use from 2015 onward. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the improvement in treatment options, a high economic burden associated with the treatment of NSCLC still exists. The total costs have been increasing, mainly driven by outpatient costs for systemic therapy, which might reflect the greater use of ICIs for advanced NSCLC. Costs for inpatient services, other outpatient services, and pharmacy services remained stable but still accounted for the majority of the economic burden. Further studies are required to assess the impact of innovative treatments on the disease management costs of advanced NSCLC. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945) as part of an alliance between the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and Pfizer. Zhang, Liu, and Yang are employees of EMD Serono. Beachler, Dinh, and Jamal-Allial are employees of HealthCore Inc., which received funding from the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and Pfizer for the implementation of this study. Masters and Kolitsopoulos are employees of Pfizer. Lamy was an employee of the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, at the time this study was conducted.

Cardiotoxicity in cancer immune-checkpoint therapy: Mechanisms, clinical evidence, and management strategies

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a unique antibody-based therapeutic strategy, have revolutionized the treatment landscape of solid and hematological cancers. Despite the proven benefits of ICIs, the cardiotoxicity from unspecific immune activation (uncommon but potentially fatal) is a continuing concern. Accumulating preclinical research has demonstrated that ICIs initiate inflammation in the myocardium, while clinically significant cardiotoxicity were reported in few patients receiving ICI therapy, probably due to the low incidence and unspecific symptoms. The subtle signs and symptoms (e.g., chest pain, dizziness, and dyspnea) were likely attributed to cancer and/or non-cardiac events by previous studies, thus limiting the understanding of the incidence, outcomes, risk factors, and management of ICI-related cardiotoxicity. The heterogeneous clinical presentation and complex diagnostic procedure further make it challenging to accurately identify ICI-related cardiac events in clinical trials. Therefore, ICI-related cardiotoxicity, whose incidence is probably underestimated, has not been well recognized. In this article, we provide an overview of potential mechanisms underlying ICI-related cardiotoxicity and review accumulating clinical evidence of ICI-related cardiotoxicity, with a focus on myocarditis. Moreover, we discuss possible strategies to manage ICI-related cardiotoxicity and highlight the importance of developing cardio-oncology.

Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Objective: This network meta-analysis will provide a complete toxicity profile, toxicity profile, and safety ranking of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: We found 12 phase II or III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) including 8,453 patients with NSCLC by searching Pubmed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to compare the rate of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) for different ICIs-based treatments using pairwise and network meta-analysis with random effects.

Results: For dermatologic irAEs, the corresponding ranking of incidences of the seven groups from high to low was: nivolumab + ipilimumab (97.4%), pembrolizumab (80.1%), nivolumab (67.1%), pembrolizumab + platinum (43.3%), atezolizumab + platinum (39.9%), durvalumab (17.5%), platinum-based chemotherapy (4.7%). For colitis, the corresponding ranking of incidences of the six groups from high to low was: atezolizumab + platinum (77.1%), nivolumab (67.3%), pembrolizumab (60.5%), durvalumab (45.2%), pembrolizumab + platinum (41.4%), platinum-based chemotherapy (8.5%). For endocrine irAEs, the corresponding ranking of incidences of the seven groups from high to low was: nivolumab + ipilimumab (79.1%), durvalumab (69.1%), pembrolizumab (61.9%), atezolizumab + platinum (60.4%),nivolumab (45.7%), pembrolizumab + platinum (33.5%), platinum-based chemotherapy (0.3%). For pneumonitis, the corresponding ranking of incidences of the seven groups from high to low was: pembrolizumab (99.3%), pembrolizumab + platinum (65.1%), durvalumab (62.2%), atezolizumab + platinum (56%), nivolumab (35.9%), platinum-based chemotherapy (18.1%),atezolizumab (13.3%). For hepatitis, the corresponding ranking of incidences of the six groups from high to low was: pembrolizumab (71.2%), pembrolizumab + platinum (64.3%), durvalumab (56.4%), atezolizumab + platinum (53.8%), nivolumab (44.5%), platinum-based chemotherapy (9.8%).

Conlusion: In addition to platinum-based chemotherapy, durvalumab for dermatologic and liver irAEs, pembrolizumab for gastrointestinal irAEs, pembrolizumab + platinum for endocrine irAEs, and atezolizumab for pneumonitis may be associated with lower rates of irAEs than other immune-based regimens. Nivolumab + ipilimumab for dermatologic and endocrine irAEs, atezolizumab + platinum for colitis, and pembrolizumab for pneumonitis and hepatitis may be associated with higher rates of irAEs.

Mechanisms of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Mediated Colitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have provided tremendous clinical benefit in several cancer types. However, systemic activation of the immune system also leads to several immune-related adverse events. Of these, ICI-mediated colitis (IMC) occurs frequently and is the one with the highest absolute fatality. To improve current treatment strategies, it is important to understand the cellular mechanisms that induce this form of colitis. In this review, we discuss important pathways that are altered in IMC in mouse models and in human colon biopsy samples. This reveals a complex interplay between several types of immune cells and the gut microbiome. In addition to a mechanistic understanding, patients at risk should be identifiable before ICI therapy. Here we propose to focus on T-cell subsets that interact with bacteria after inducing epithelial damage. Especially, intestinal resident immune cells are of interest. This may lead to a better understanding of IMC and provides opportunities for prevention and management.

Immunotherapy for lung cancer: Focusing on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy

Besides traditional treatment strategies, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for lung cancer as the leading cause of cancer incidence and death, immunotherapy has also emerged as a new treatment strategy. The goal of immunotherapy is to stimulate the immune system responses against cancer, using various approaches such as therapeutic vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and T-cell therapy. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, one of the most popular cancer immunotherapy approaches in the last decade, are genetically engineered T-cells to redirect patients' immune responses to recognize and eliminate tumor-associated antigens (TAA)-expressing tumor cells. CAR-T cell therapy provides promising benefits in lung tumors. In this review, we summarize different immunotherapy approaches for lung cancer, the structure of CAR-T cells, currently undergoing CARs in clinical trials, and various TAAs are being investigated as potential targets in designing CAR-T cells for lung cancer.

Cancer immunotherapies revisited: state of the art of conventional treatments and next-generation nanomedicines

Nowadays, the landscape of cancer treatments has broadened thanks to the clinical application of immunotherapeutics. After decades of failures, cancer immunotherapy represents an exciting alternative for those patients suffering from a wide variety of cancers, especially for those skin cancers, such as the early stages of melanoma. However, those cancers affecting internal organs still face a long way to success, because of the poor biodistribution of immunotherapies. Here, nanomedicine appears as a hopeful strategy to modulate the biodistribution aiming at target organ accumulation. In this way, efficacy will be improved, while reducing the side effects at the same time. In this review, we aim to highlight the most promising cancer immunotherapeutic strategies. From monoclonal antibodies and their traditional use as targeted therapies to their current use as immune checkpoint inhibitors; as well as adoptive cell transfer therapies; oncolytic viruses, and therapeutic cancer vaccination. Then, we aim to discuss the important role of nanomedicine to improve the performance of these immunotherapeutic tools to finally review the already marketed nanomedicine-based cancer immunotherapies.

Haemodialysed patient with lung cancer in the COVID-19 era: a clinical challenge

A 66-year-old man was referred to the oncological pneumology consultation due to a mass in the right upper lobe observed in a routine X-ray of the chest. The CT scan confirmed a mass in the same location. The biopsy revealed a lung adenocarcinoma. It was decided to start chemotherapy adapted to kidney function. In April 2020, the patient contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection and developed bilateral pneumonia with partial respiratory failure. He was transferred to the intensive care unit, where he had a positive evolution. In the next 5 months, there was a clinical improvement; however, the CT scan of the chest showed disease progression. After a new multidisciplinary approach, it was decided to start a second line with atezolizumab. After four cycles of atezolizumab, there was a clear clinical improvement, and a reduction by more than 50% in the tumour size, without significant adverse effects.

The Pandora's box of novel technologies that may revolutionize lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common cancers globally and has a 5-year survival rate ~20%. Immunotherapies have demonstrated long-term and durable responses in NSCLC patients, although they appear to be effective in only a subset of patients. A more comprehensive understanding of the underlying tumour biology may contribute to identifying those patients likely to achieve optimal outcomes. Profiling the tumour microenvironment (TME) has shown to be beneficial in addressing fundamental tumour-immune cell interactions. Advances in multiplexing immunohistochemistry and molecular barcoding has led to recent advances in profiling genes and proteins in NSCLC. Here, we review the recent advancements in spatial profiling technologies for the analysis of NSCLC tissue samples to gain new insights and therapeutic options for NSCLC. The combination of spatial transcriptomics combined with advanced imaging is likely to lead to deep insights into NSCLC tissue biology, which can be a powerful tool to predict likelihood of response to therapy.

Pan-cancer analysis of SETD2 mutation and its association with the efficacy of immunotherapy

Histone methyltransferase SETD2 plays a critical role in maintaining genomic integrity and stability. Here, we investigated the characteristics of SETD2 somatic mutation in the cancer genome atlas pan-cancer cohort. Our data revealed that, compared with SETD2 nonmutant patients, SETD2 mutant patients had higher tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability. In addition, the transcriptions of most genes related to immune activities were upregulated in patients with SETD2 mutant tumors. Further examination of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors suggested SETD2 mutation was associated with favorable clinical outcomes. These results have implication for the personalization of cancer immunotherapy.

MGA Mutation as a Novel Biomarker for Immune Checkpoint Therapies in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed the treatment landscape for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, only a small proportion of patients experience clinical benefit from ICIs. Thus, the discovery of predictive biomarkers is urgently warranted. Evidence have shown that genetic aberrations in cancer cells can modulate the tumor immune milieu. We therefore explored the association between oncogenic mutations and efficacy to ICIs in non-squamous NSCLC. Methods: We curated genomic and clinical data of 314 non-squamous NSCLC patients receiving ICIs from four independent studies for the discovery cohort. For external validation, 305 patients from an ICI-treated cohort and 1,027 patients from two non-ICI-treated cohorts were used. Relations between oncogenic mutations and outcomes of immunotherapy were examined. Multivariate Cox regression models were applied to adjust confounding factors. Further investigation on tumor antigenicity and antitumor immunity was performed in The Cancer Genome Atlas lung adenocarcinoma cohort. Results: A total of 82 oncogenes/tumor suppressor genes according to the Oncology Knowledge base database with a frequency greater than 3% were identified and investigated in the discovery cohort. Within these genes, MGA mutations were enriched in patients with durable clinical benefit (p = 0.001, false discovery rate q < 0.05). The objective response rate was also significantly higher in patients with MGA mutation (2.63-fold, p < 0.001, FDR q < 0.05). Longer progression-free survival was found in MGA-mutated patients (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.73; p = 0.003), and the association remained significant after controlling for tumor mutational burden (TMB), programmed cell death ligand-1 expression, and treatment regimens. In the validation cohort, significant improvement in overall survival was found in patients harboring MGA mutation (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17-0.88; p = 0.02). Furthermore, the survival difference was not detected in non-ICI-treated cohorts. We also demonstrated that MGA mutation correlate with higher TMB, elevated neoantigen load and DNA damage repair deficiency. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed that gene sets regarding activated immune responses were enriched in MGA-mutated tumors. Conclusion: Our work provides evidence that MGA mutation can be used as a novel predictive biomarker for ICI response in non-squamous NSCLC and merits further clinical and preclinical validation.

Treatment of solid tumors using bispecific anti-PDL-1/ICOS antibody

PD-L1 and ICOS are immune control points in cancer and their presence in cancer tends to have a poor prognosis. WO2019122882 patent describes a bispecific antibody that targets PDL-1/ICOS with the potential application of cancer treatment. WO2019122882 patent describes a bispecific antibody with antitumor efficacy in CT26 model through of the depletion of T_Reg cells and improved ratio of CD8⁺ T cells: T_Reg in tumor microenvironment. The anti-PDL-1/ICOS antibody is new; however, only preclinical assays are shown using colon carcinoma model. So far, there are no reports of clinical trials to evaluate the safety, toxicity and efficacy, but it will be of great interest to analyze in the future if this antibody surpasses the action of the combinatorial therapy in cancer.

Efficacy of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Mayo Clinic Experience

OBJECTIVES

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) for low- and intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have been associated with limited efficacy; recent studies suggest CPIs may represent promising treatment for high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).

METHODS

We examined 57 patients with NENs who were treated with CPIs to determine if NETs and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) respond to immunotherapy.

RESULTS

Patients with poorly differentiated NECs on CPI monotherapy had an objective response rate (ORR) of 0% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-4.6). Patients with poorly differentiated NECs on dual CPI therapy had an ORR of 13% and PFS of 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.4-not reached [NR]). Patients with poorly differentiated NECs on CPI and cytotoxic therapy had an ORR of 36% with PFS of 4.2 months (95% CI, 1.6-NR). Well-differentiated grade 1 and 2 NETs on CPI monotherapy had an ORR of 25% with PFS NR. Well-differentiated grade 3 NETs had 0% ORR with a PFS of 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.4-4.2) on CPI monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Checkpoint inhibitor therapy shows limited activity in patients with NENs. Future studies should identify biomarkers that can help identify patients who are likely responders to immunotherapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors: review of the existing evidence and challenges in breast cancer

Cancer initiation and progression are associated with immune system responses. Tumor cells use various tricks to scape of immune system, such as activating immune checkpoint pathways that induce immunosuppressive functions. Among the different immune checkpoint receptors, CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 are prominent therapeutic targets in different cancers. Although the US FDA has approved some immune checkpoint inhibitors for several cancers, concerning breast cancer still different clinical trials are looking for optimizing efficacy and decreasing immune-related adverse events. This review will discuss the existing body of knowledge with regard to cross-talk between immune system and tumor cells and then explore immune checkpoint-related signaling pathways in the context of breast tumors. Finally, we highlight the application of different immune checkpoint blockers in breast cancer patients.

Precision Oncology, Signaling and Anticancer Agents in Cancer Therapeutics

BACKGROUND

The global alliance for genomics and healthcare facilities provides innovational solutions to expedite research and clinical practices for complex and incurable health conditions. Precision oncology is an emerging field explicitly tailored to facilitate cancer diagnosis, prevention and treatment based on patients' genetic profile. Advancements in "omics" techniques, next-generation sequencing, artificial intelligence and clinical trial designs provide a platform for assessing the efficacy and safety of combination therapies and diagnostic procedures.

METHOD

Data were collected from Pubmed and Google scholar using keywords: "Precision medicine", "precision medicine and cancer", "anticancer agents in precision medicine" and reviewed comprehensively.

RESULTS

Personalized therapeutics including immunotherapy, cancer vaccines, serve as a groundbreaking solution for cancer treatment. Herein, we take a measurable view of precision therapies and novel diagnostic approaches targeting cancer treatment. The contemporary applications of precision medicine have also been described along with various hurdles identified in the successful establishment of precision therapeutics.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the key breakthroughs related to immunotherapies, targeted anticancer agents, and target interventions related to cancer signaling mechanisms. The success story of this field in context to drug resistance, safety, patient survival and in improving quality of life is yet to be elucidated. We conclude that, in the near future, the field of individualized treatments may truly revolutionize the nature of cancer patient care.

Interpretation According to Clone-Specific PD-L1 Cutoffs Reveals Better Concordance in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma

Because immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for treating advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays have been widely used as companion or complementary diagnostic tests for predicting treatment outcomes. Because different clones, scoring algorithms, and cutoffs have been used for interpretation, this study investigated the variation, correlation, and concordance of four validated PD-L1 clones (SP142, SP263, 22C3, and 28-8) and proposed a practical solution for the harmonization of PD-L1 IHC. A tissue microarray, including 46 muscle-invasive UCs, was constructed for PD-L1 testing with the four clones. Tumor cell (TC) and immune cell (IC) expression was analyzed. SP142 had significantly low TC expression, whereas SP263, 22C3, and 28-8 exhibited a moderate correlation (rho ≥ 0.6), with almost perfect concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.8) in TC expression. Fair to moderate correlation and concordance were observed in IC expression in most pairwise comparisons of clones. Substantial concordance (kappa > 0.6) was noted when high PD-L1 expression was defined by applying clone-specific cutoffs to each clone. Our findings imply that a universal cutoff value is not feasible for UC; we propose that PD-L1 IHC assays for UC should be interpreted according to a clone-specific scoring algorithm and cutoff value.

Impact of subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment on overall survival with avelumab vs docetaxel in platinum-treated advanced NSCLC: Post hoc analyses from the phase 3 JAVELIN Lung 200 trial

OBJECTIVES

The JAVELIN Lung 200 phase 3 trial did not meet its primary endpoint of improving overall survival (OS) with avelumab vs docetaxel in patients with platinum-treated PD-L1+ NSCLC. We report post hoc analyses assessing the effects of subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment on OS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC progressed following platinum-doublet therapy were randomized to receive avelumab or docetaxel. OS was analyzed in the PD-L1+ population (≥1% of tumor cells) and full analysis set (PD-L1+ or PD-L1-). Effects of subsequent ICI (after permanent discontinuation of study treatment) on OS were analyzed using a preplanned naive sensitivity analysis and post hoc inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) analysis. Subgroups with or without subsequent ICI treatment were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

In the avelumab and docetaxel arms, a subsequent ICI was received by 16/396 (4.0 %) and 104/396 (26.3 %) after a median of 10.5 months (range, 3.9-20.4) and 5.7 months (range, 0.1-24.4), respectively. Some subgroups showed trends for higher subsequent ICI treatment, including patients with non-squamous NSCLC (avelumab arm, 4.3 % vs docetaxel arm, 32.1 %) or with a baseline ECOG performance status of 0 (6.3 % vs 31.3 %); those enrolled in the early recruitment wave (11.6 % vs 54.3 %), or enrolled in the US/Western Europe (2.8 % vs 45.5 %) or Asia (11.0 % vs 35.4 %); and non-white patients (10.1 % vs 35.0 %). The hazard ratio for OS with avelumab vs docetaxel was lower in the IPCW analysis than in the naive sensitivity analysis (PD-L1+ population: 0.80 [95 % CI, 0.62-1.04] vs 0.86 [95 % CI, 0.68-1.09], respectively).

CONCLUSION

In the JAVELIN Lung 200 trial, avelumab showed clinical activity as second-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC. Post hoc analyses suggest that the primary OS analysis may have been confounded by subsequent ICI use in the docetaxel arm. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02395172.

Low-dose carboplatin reprograms tumor immune microenvironment through STING signaling pathway and synergizes with PD-1 inhibitors in lung cancer

Although the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy is a hot topic in lung cancer, little is understood regarding the possible mechanisms behind their synergy. Moreover, safety is a major concern for clinicians while performing chemotherapy. Therefore, it is important to determine the appropriate dose and period of chemotherapy for combining it with immunotherapy, and investigate the underlying synergistic mechanism. Here, we showed that carboplatin can induce DNA damage and activate the canonical STING/TBK1/IRF3 pathway and non-canonical STING-NF-κB signaling complex. Further, low-dose carboplatin changed the "cold" tumor into a "hot" tumor via the signaling hub STING, augmenting CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration, increasing PD-L1 expression, and hence potentiating the anti-tumor effect of PD-1 inhibitors; importantly, there were no adverse effects. Furthermore, knocking down STING in tumor cells effectively reversed PD-L1 upregulation and STING pathway activation, and reduced the anti-tumor effect of low-dose carboplatin and carboplatin-PD-1 inhibitor combination. Our findings collectively reported a previously unexplored role of low-dose carboplatin targeting in the STING pathway and provided an economical, useful and safe option for improving the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in lung cancer.

Atezolizumab Versus Docetaxel in Pretreated Patients With NSCLC: Final Results From the Randomized Phase 2 POPLAR and Phase 3 OAK Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION

The phase 2 POPLAR and phase 3 OAK studies of the anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy atezolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC revealed significant improvements in survival versus docetaxel (p = 0.04 and 0.0003, respectively). Longer follow-up permits evaluation of continued benefit of atezolizumab. This study reports the final overall survival (OS) and safety findings from both trials.

METHODS

POPLAR randomized 287 patients (atezolizumab, 144; docetaxel, 143) and OAK randomized 1225 patients (atezolizumab, 613; docetaxel, 612). The patients received atezolizumab (1200 mg fixed dose) or docetaxel (75 mg/m²) every 3 weeks. Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A longer OS was observed in patients receiving atezolizumab versus docetaxel in POPLAR (median OS = 12.6 mo versus 9.7 mo; hazard ratio = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-1.00) and OAK (median OS = 13.3 versus 9.8 mo; hazard ratio = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.89). The 4-year OS rates in POPLAR were 14.8% (8.7-20.8) and 8.1% (3.2-13.0) and those in OAK were 15.5% (12.4-18.7) and 8.7% (6.2-11.3) for atezolizumab and docetaxel, respectively. Atezolizumab had improved OS benefit compared with docetaxel across all PD-L1 expression and histology groups. Most 4-year survivors in the docetaxel arms received subsequent immunotherapy (POPLAR, 50%; OAK, 65%). Of the 4-year survivors, most had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 and nonsquamous histological classification and approximately half were responders (POPLAR: atezolizumab, seven of 15; docetaxel, three of four; OAK: atezolizumab, 24 of 43; docetaxel, 11 of 26). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 27% and 16% of atezolizumab 4-year survivors in POPLAR and OAK, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow-up suggests a consistent survival benefit with atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated NSCLC regardless of PD-L1 expression, histology, or subsequent immunotherapy. Atezolizumab had no new safety signals, and the safety profile was similar to that in previous studies.

Evidences of CTLA-4 and PD-1 Blocking Agents-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Cellular and Preclinical Models

Background: Several strategies based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been developed for cancer therapy, opening to advantages in cancer outcomes. However, several ICI-induced side effects have emerged in these patients, especially a rare but clinically significant cardiotoxicity with high rate of mortality. We studied the cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory properties of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab, the underlying pathways and cytokine storm involved. Methods: Co-cultures of human cardiomyocytes and lymphocytes were exposed to Ipilimumab or Nivolumab; cell viability and expression of leukotrienes, NLRP3, MyD88, and p65/NF-kB were performed. C57 mice were treated with Ipilimumab (15 mg/kg); analysis of fractional shortening, ejection fraction, radial and longitudinal strain were made before and after treatments through 2D-echocardiography. Expression of NLRP3, MyD88, p65/NF-kB, and 12 cytokines were analyzed in murine myocardium. Results: Nivolumab and Ipilimumab exert effective anticancer, but also significant cardiotoxic effects in co-cultures of lymphocytes and tumor or cardiac cells. Both ICIs increased NLRP3, MyD88, and p65/NF-kB expression compared to untreated cells, however, the most pro-inflammatory and cardiotoxic effects were seen after exposure to Ipilimumab. Mice treated with Ipilimumab showed a significant decrease in fractional shortening and radial strain with respect to untreated mice, coupled with a significant increase in myocardial expression of NLRP3, MyD88, and several interleukins. Conclusions: Nivolumab and Ipilimumab exert cytotoxic effects mediated by the NLRP3/IL-1β and MyD88 pathways, leading to pro-inflammatory cytokine storm in heart tissue.