Significant frequencies of T cells with indirect anti-donor specificity in heart graft recipients with chronic rejection

Polyclonally Derived Alloantigen-Specific T Regulatory Cells Exhibit Target-Specific Suppression and Capture MHC Class II from Dendritic Cells

Foxp3+ T regulatory (Treg) cells prevent allograft rejection and graft-versus-host disease. Although polyclonal Tregs have been used both in animal models and in humans, the fine specificity of their suppressive function is poorly defined. We have generated mouse recipient-derived alloantigen-specific Tregs in vitro and explored the fine specificity of their suppressive function and their mechanism of action in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, when alloantigen and peptide Ag were both presented on the same dendritic cell, both responses were suppressed by iTregs specific either for the alloantigen or for the peptide Ag. In vivo, iTreg suppression was limited to the cognate Ag, and no bystander suppression was observed when both allo-antigen and peptide Ag were present on the same dendritic cell. In vitro, alloantigen-specific Tregs captured cognate MHC but failed to capture noncognate MHC. Our results demonstrate that a polyclonal population of iTregs generated from naive T cells can mediate highly specific function in vivo and support the view that Treg therapy, even with unselected polyclonal populations, is likely to be target antigen-specific and that bystander responses to self-antigens or to infectious agents are unlikely.

Intercellular transfer of MHC molecules in T cell alloimmunity and allotransplantation

After transplantation of allogeneic tissues and organs, recognition by recipient T cells of donor MHC molecules initiates the pro-inflammatory adaptive immune response leading to allograft rejection. T cell allorecognition has long been known to be mediated via two distinct pathways: the direct pathway in which T cells recognize intact allogeneic MHC molecules displayed on donor cells and the indirect pathway whereby T cells recognize donor MHC peptides processed and presented by recipient antigen-presenting cells (APCs). It is believed that direct allorecognition is the driving force behind early acute allograft rejection while indirect allorecognition is involved in chronic allograft rejection, a progressive condition characterized by graft vasculopathy and tissue fibrosis. Recently, we and others have reported that after transplantation of allogeneic skin and organs, donor MHC molecules are transferred from donor cells to the host's APCs via trogocytosis or extracellular vesicles. Recipient APCs having captured donor MHC molecules can either present them to T cells in the intact form on their surface (semi-direct pathway) or the form of peptides bound to self-MHC molecules (indirect pathway). The present article provides an overview of recent studies evaluating the role of intercellular exchange of MHC molecules in T cell alloimmunity and its contribution to allograft rejection and tolerance.

Analysis of T-cell alloantigen response via a direct pathway in kidney transplant recipients with donor-specific antibodies

Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are the main cause of graft loss over time. The direct pathway of alloantigen recognition is important in the pathogenesis of acute rejection. Recent studies have suggested that the direct pathway also contributes to the pathogenesis of chronic injury. Nevertheless, there are no reports on T-cell alloantigen response via the direct pathway in kidney recipients with DSAs. We analyzed the T-cell alloantigen response via the direct pathway in kidney recipients with DSAs (DSA+) or without DSAs (DSA-). A mixed lymphocyte reaction assay was implemented to assess the direct pathway response. DSA+ patients showed significantly higher CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cell responses to donor cells than DSA- patients. Furthermore, proliferating CD4⁺ T cells showed a marked increase in Th1 and Th17 responses in DSA+ patients than in DSA- patients. In a comparison between anti-donor and third-party responses, the anti-donor CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cell response was significantly lower than the anti-third-party response. In contrast, the donor-specific hyporesponsiveness was absent in DSA+ patients. Our study demonstrated that DSA+ recipients have a greater potential for developing immune responses against the donor tissues via the direct alloantigen recognition pathway. These data contribute to an understanding of DSAs pathogenicity during kidney transplantation.

Lymphocytic Airway Inflammation in Lung Allografts

Lung transplant remains a key therapeutic option for patients with end stage lung disease but short- and long-term survival lag other solid organ transplants. Early ischemia-reperfusion injury in the form of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and acute cellular rejection are risk factors for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), a syndrome of airway and parenchymal fibrosis that is the major barrier to long term survival. An increasing body of research suggests lymphocytic airway inflammation plays a significant role in these important clinical syndromes. Cytotoxic T cells are observed in airway rejection, and transcriptional analysis of airways reveal common cytotoxic gene patterns across solid organ transplant rejection. Natural killer (NK) cells have also been implicated in the early allograft damage response to PGD, acute rejection, cytomegalovirus, and CLAD. This review will examine the roles of lymphocytic airway inflammation across the lifespan of the allograft, including: 1) The contribution of innate lymphocytes to PGD and the impact of PGD on the adaptive immune response. 2) Acute cellular rejection pathologies and the limitations in identifying airway inflammation by transbronchial biopsy. 3) Potentiators of airway inflammation and heterologous immunity, such as respiratory infections, aspiration, and the airway microbiome. 4) Airway contributions to CLAD pathogenesis, including epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), club cell loss, and the evolution from constrictive bronchiolitis to parenchymal fibrosis. 5) Protective mechanisms of fibrosis involving regulatory T cells. In summary, this review will examine our current understanding of the complex interplay between the transplanted airway epithelium, lymphocytic airway infiltration, and rejection pathologies.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: current review and future research directions

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a pathologic immune-mediated remodelling of the vasculature in transplanted hearts and, by impairing perfusion, is the major cause of late graft loss. Although best understood following cardiac transplantation, similar forms of allograft vasculopathy occur in other vascularized organ grafts and some features of CAV may be shared with other immune-mediated vasculopathies. Here, we describe the incidence and diagnosis, the nature of the vascular remodelling, immune and non-immune contributions to pathogenesis, current therapies, and future areas of research in CAV.

Identification, selection, and expansion of non-gene modified alloantigen-reactive Tregs for clinical therapeutic use

Transplantation is limited by the need for life-long pharmacological immunosuppression, which carries significant morbidity and mortality. Regulatory T cell (Treg) therapy holds significant promise as a strategy to facilitate immunosuppression minimization. Polyclonal Treg therapy has been assessed in a number of Phase I/II clinical trials in both solid organ and hematopoietic transplantation. Attention is now shifting towards the production of alloantigen-reactive Tregs (arTregs) through co-culture with donor antigen. These allospecific cells harbour potent suppressive function and yet their specificity implies a theoretical reduction in off-target effects. This review will cover the progress in the development of arTregs including their potential application for clinical use in transplantation, the knowledge gained so far from clinical trials of Tregs in transplant patients, and future directions for Treg therapy.

Pre-existing Alloreactive T and B Cells and Their Possible Relevance for Pre-transplant Risk Estimation in Kidney Transplant Recipients

In allogeneic transplantation, genetic disparities between patient and donor may lead to cellular and humoral immune responses mediated by both naïve and memory alloreactive cells of the adaptive immune system. This review will focus on alloreactive T and B cells with emphasis on the memory compartment, their role in relation to kidney rejection, and in vitro assays to detect these alloreactive cells. Finally, the potential additional value of utilizing donor-specific memory T and B cell assays supplementary to current routine pre-transplant risk assessment of kidney transplant recipients will be discussed.

Pattern of organ remodeling in chronic non-communicable diseases is due to endogenous regulations and falls under the category of Kauffman's self-organization: A case of arterial neointimal pathology

Clinical diagnosis is based on analysis of pathologic findings that may result in perceived patterns. The same is true for diagnostic pathology: Pattern analysis is a foundation of the histopathology-based diagnostic system and, in conjunction with clinical and laboratory findings, forms a basis for the classification of diseases. Any histopathology diagnosis is based on the explicit assumption that the same diseased condition should result in formation of the same (or highly similar) morphologic patterns in different individuals; it is a standard approach in microscopic pathology, including that of non-communicable chronic diseases with organ remodeling. During fifty years of examining diseased tissues under microscopy, I keep asking the same question: Why is a similarity of patterns expected for chronic organ remodeling? For infection diseases, xenobiotic toxicity and deficiencies forming an identical pathologic pattern in different individuals is understandable and logical: The same infection, xenobiotic, or deficiency strikes the same target, which results in identical pathology. The same is true for Mendelian diseases: The same mutations lead to the same altered gene expressions and the same pathologic pattern. But why does this regularity hold true for chronic diseases with organ remodeling? Presumable causes (or risk factors) for a particular chronic disease differ in magnitude and duration between individuals, which should result in various series of transformations. Yet, mysteriously enough, pathological remodeling in a particular chronic disease always falls into a main dominating pattern, perpetuating and progressing in a similar fashion in different patients. Furthermore, some chronic diseases of different etiologies and dissimilar causes/risk factors manifest as identical or highly similar patterns of pathologic remodeling. HYPOTHESIS: I hypothesize that regulations governing a particular organ's chronic remodeling were selected in evolution as the safest response to various insults and physiologic stress conditions. This hypothesis implies that regulations directing diseased chronic remodeling always preexist but normally are controlled; this control can be disrupted by a diverse range of non-specific signals, liberating the pathway for identical pathologic remodeling. This hypothesis was tested in an analysis of arterial neointimal formation, the identical pathology occurring in different diseases and pathological conditions: graft vascular disease in organ transplantation, in-stent restenosis, peripheral arterial diseases, idiopathic intimal hyperplasia, Kawasaki disease, coronary atherosclerosis and as reaction to drugs. The hypothesis suggests that arterial intimal cells are poised between only two alternative pathways: the pathway with controlled intimal cell proliferation or the pathway where such control is disrupted, ultimately leading to the progressive neointimal pathology. By this property the arterial neointimal formation constitutes a special case of Kauffman's self-organization. This new hypothesis gives a parsimonious explanation for identical pathological patterns of arterial remodeling (neointimal formation), which occurs in diseases of different etiologies and due to dissimilar causes/risk factors, or without any etiology and causes/risk factors at all. This new hypothesis also suggests that regulation facilitating intimal cell proliferation cannot be overwritten or annulled because this feature is vital for arterial differentiation, cell renewal, and integrity. This hypothesis suggests that studying numerous, and likely interchangeable, non-specific signals that disrupt regulation controlling intimal cell proliferation is unproductive; instead, a study of the controlling regulation(s) itself should be a priority of our research.

Innate Functions of Dendritic Cell Subsets in Cardiac Allograft Tolerance

Survival rates after heart transplant have significantly improved over the last decade. Nevertheless, long-term allograft viability after 10 years remains poor and the sequelae of transplant-associated immunosuppression increases morbidity. Although several studies have implicated roles for lymphocyte-mediated rejection, less is understood with respect to non-major histocompatibility, and innate immune reactivity, which influence graft viability. As immature and mature dendritic cells (DCs) engage in both Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC)-dependent and MHC-independent immune responses, these cells are at the crossroads of therapeutic strategies that seek to achieve both allograft tolerance and suppression of innate immunity to the allograft. Here we review emerging roles of DC subsets and their molecular protagonists during allograft tolerance and allograft rejection, with a focus on cardiac transplant. New insight into emerging DC subsets in transplant will inform novel strategies for operational tolerance and amelioration of cardiac vasculopathy.

PIRCHE-II: an algorithm to predict indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes in solid organ transplantation

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches between donors and recipients may lead to alloreactivity after solid organ transplantation. Over the last few decades, our knowledge of the complexity of the HLA system has dramatically increased, as numerous new HLA alleles have been identified. As a result, the likelihood of alloreactive responses towards HLA mismatches after solid organ transplantation cannot easily be assessed. Algorithms are promising solutions to estimate the risk for alloreactivity after solid organ transplantation. In this review, we show that the recently developed PIRCHE-II (Predicted Indirectly ReCognizable HLA Epitopes) algorithm can be used to minimize alloreactivity towards HLA mismatches. Together with the use of other algorithms and simulation approaches, the PIRCHE-II algorithm aims for a better estimated alloreactive risk for individual patients and eventually an improved graft survival after solid organ transplantation.

State of the Art: Role of the Dendritic Cell in Induction of Allograft Tolerance

Despite decades of research, the induction and maintenance of long-term allograft tolerance without immunosuppression remains an elusive goal in the field of solid organ and cell transplantation. Immunosuppressive medications frequently prevent or minimize acute cellular rejection but have failed to halt antidonor antibody production and chronic organ rejection. Past efforts aimed at promoting lasting allograft tolerance have focused primarily on peripheral T-cell depletion, augmentation of regulatory T cells, or induction via simultaneous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and facilitation of donor chimerism. So far, none of these methods have led to consistently safe, feasible and long lasting donor organ acceptance. Over the course of the past 4 decades, the study of a unique population of antigen-presenting cells known as dendritic cells has shown promise for breaking new ground in achieving indefinite allograft survival without immunosuppression and its associated adverse effects. In this review, we discuss the discovery and early investigations of dendritic cells and chronicle some of the key studies demonstrating their role in transplantation, particularly in indirect allorecognition, the immunologic pathway thought to drive chronic rejection and perhaps tolerance induction.

T cell Allorecognition Pathways in Solid Organ Transplantation

Transplantation is unusual in that T cells can recognize alloantigen by at least two distinct pathways: as intact MHC alloantigen on the surface of donor cells via the direct pathway; and as self-restricted processed alloantigen via the indirect pathway. Direct pathway responses are viewed as strong but short-lived and hence responsible for acute rejection, whereas indirect pathway responses are typically thought to be much longer lasting and mediate the progression of chronic rejection. However, this is based on surprisingly scant experimental evidence, and the recent demonstration that MHC alloantigen can be re-presented intact on recipient dendritic cells-the semi-direct pathway-suggests that the conventional view may be an oversimplification. We review recent advances in our understanding of how the different T cell allorecognition pathways are triggered, consider how this generates effector alloantibody and cytotoxic CD8 T cell alloresponses and assess how these responses contribute to early and late allograft rejection. We further discuss how this knowledge may inform development of cellular and pharmacological therapies that aim to improve transplant outcomes, with focus on the use of induced regulatory T cells with indirect allospecificity and on the development of immunometabolic strategies. KEY POINTS Acute allograft rejection is likely mediated by indirect and direct pathway CD4 T cell alloresponses.Chronic allograft rejection is largely mediated by indirect pathway CD4 T cell responses. Direct pathway recognition of cross-dressed endothelial derived MHC class II alloantigen may also contribute to chronic rejection, but the extent of this contribution is unknown.Late indirect pathway CD4 T cell responses will be composed of heterogeneous populations of allopeptide specific T helper cell subsets that recognize different alloantigens and are at various stages of effector and memory differentiation.Knowledge of the precise indirect pathway CD4 T cell responses active at late time points in a particular individual will likely inform the development of alloantigen-specific cellular therapies and will guide immunometabolic modulation.

Matching donor and recipient based on predicted indirectly recognizable human leucocyte antigen epitopes

The predicted indirectly recognizable human leucocyte antigen (HLA) epitopes (PIRCHE) algorithm is a novel in silico algorithm to determine donor-recipient compatibility. The PIRCHE algorithm determines donor-recipient compatibility by counting the number of mismatched HLA-derived epitopes that are involved in indirect T-cell alloimmune responses; these epitopes are designated as PIRCHE. Over the last few years, the PIRCHE algorithm has been investigated in both hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and solid organ transplantation. This review describes the theory of the algorithm, its application in transplantation, and highlights the future perspectives on the clinical application of the PIRCHE algorithm.

Update on Dendritic Cell-Induced Immunological and Clinical Tolerance

Dendritic cells (DCs) as highly efficient antigen-presenting cells are at the interface of innate and adaptive immunity. As such, they are key mediators of immunity and antigen-specific immune tolerance. Due to their functional specialization, research efforts have focused on the characterization of DCs subsets involved in the initiation of immunogenic responses and in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis. Tolerogenic DCs (tolDCs)-based therapies have been designed as promising strategies to prevent and control autoimmune diseases as well as allograft rejection after solid organ transplantation (SOT). Despite successful experimental studies and ongoing phase I/II clinical trials using autologous tolDCs in patients with type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and in SOT recipients, additional basic research will be required to determine the optimal DC subset(s) and conditioning regimens for tolDCs-based treatments in vivo. In this review, we discuss the characteristics of human DCs and recent advances in their classification, as well as the role of DCs in immune regulation and their susceptibility to in vitro or in vivo manipulation for the development of tolerogenic therapies, with a focus on the potential of tolDCs for the treatment of autoimmune diseases and the prevention of allograft rejection after SOT.

A New Window into the Human Alloresponse

Alloreactive T lymphocytes are the primary mediators of allograft rejection. The size and diversity of the HLA-alloreactive T cell repertoire has thus far precluded the ability to follow these T cells and thereby to understand their fate in human transplant recipients. This review summarizes the history, challenges, and recent advances in the study of alloreactive T cells. We highlight the historical development of assays to measure alloreactivity and discuss how high-throughput T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing-based assays can provide a new window into the fate of alloreactive T cells in human transplant recipients. A specific approach combining a classical in vitro assay, the mixed lymphocyte reaction, with deep T cell receptor sequencing is described as a tool to track the donor-reactive T cell repertoire for any specific HLA-mismatched donor-recipient pair. This assay can provide mechanistic insights and has potential as a noninvasive, highly specific biomarker for rejection and tolerance.

Graft dysfunction in chronic antibody-mediated rejection correlates with B-cell-dependent indirect antidonor alloresponses and autocrine regulation of interferon-γ production by Th1 cells

Chronic antibody-mediated rejection, a common cause of renal transplant failure, has a variable clinical phenotype. Understanding why some with chronic antibody-mediated rejection progress slowly may help develop more effective therapies. B lymphocytes act as antigen-presenting cells for in vitro indirect antidonor interferon-γ production in chronic antibody-mediated rejection, but many patients retain the ability to regulate these responses. Here we test whether particular patterns of T and B cell antidonor response associate with the variability of graft dysfunction in chronic antibody-mediated rejection. Our results confirm that dynamic changes in indirect antidonor CD4⁺ T-cell responses correlate with changes in estimated glomerular filtration rates, independent of other factors. Graft dysfunction progressed rapidly in patients who developed unregulated B-cell–driven interferon-γ production. However, conversion to a regulated or nonreactive pattern, which could be achieved by optimization of immunosuppression, associated with stabilization of graft function. Functional regulation by B cells appeared to activate an interleukin-10 autocrine pathway in CD4⁺ T cells that, in turn, impacted on antigen-specific responses. Thus, our data significantly enhance the understanding of graft dysfunction associated with chronic antibody-mediated rejection and provide the foundation for strategies to prolong renal allograft survival, based on regulation of interferon-γ production.

Allorecognition by T Lymphocytes and Allograft Rejection

Recognition of donor antigens by recipient T cells in secondary lymphoid organs initiates the adaptive inflammatory immune response leading to the rejection of allogeneic transplants. Allospecific T cells become activated through interaction of their T cell receptors with intact allogeneic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules on donor cells (direct pathway) and/or donor peptides presented by self-MHC molecules on recipient antigen-presenting cells (APCs) (indirect pathway). In addition, recent studies show that alloreactive T cells can also be stimulated through recognition of allogeneic MHC molecules displayed on recipient APCs (MHC cross-dressing) after their transfer via cell-cell contact or through extracellular vesicles (semi-direct pathway). The specific allorecognition pathway used by T cells is dictated by intrinsic and extrinsic factors to the allograft and can influence the nature and magnitude of the alloresponse and rejection process. Consequently, various organs and tissues such as skin, cornea, and solid organ transplants are recognized differently by pro-inflammatory T cells through these distinct pathways, which may explain why these grafts are rejected in a different fashion. On the other hand, the mechanisms by which anti-inflammatory regulatory T cells (Tregs) recognize alloantigen and promote transplantation tolerance are still unclear. It is likely that thymic Tregs are activated through indirect allorecognition, while peripheral Tregs recognize alloantigens in a direct fashion. As we gain insights into the mechanisms underlying allorecognition by pro-inflammatory and Treg cells, novel strategies are being designed to prevent allograft rejection in the absence of ongoing immunosuppressive drug treatment in patients.

Involvement of indirectly allostimulated CD4+CD43highCD45RO+ T cell proliferation in the development of chronic allograft nephropathy

The goal of this study was to identify immunological markers for use in antigen-specific assays that predict long-term survival after renal allograft and distinguish stable-functioning (SP) patients from poorly functioning (PP) patients. For this prospective study, 20 patients were enrolled. Eight SP and six PP patients were enrolled in this study. Serum cytokine/chemokine levels were analyzed by the Luminex multiplex assay. To detect indirect alloreactive T cells, we performed indirect mixed lymphocyte reaction using donor-antigen-pulsed autologous dendritic cells as stimulators. Serum induced protein-10 levels were significantly higher in the serum of PP patients, whereas sCD40L levels were higher in SP patients. The PP patients had significantly higher numbers of donor-specific CD4(+)CD43(high)CD45RO(+) T cells after indirect allostimulation, whereas this cell population was unchanged in SP patients. The donor-specific CD4(+)CD43(high)CD45RO(+) T cells had the effector memory T cell phenotype. Prospectively, we studied whether these cells influence graft outcome and found that their strong proliferation in pre-transplant patients is related to a poorly functioning graft. Indirectly allostimulated CD4(+)CD43(high)CD45RO(+) T cells may not only contribute to chronic allograft nephropathy development but may also have a role in the progression of acute rejection. Thus, these cells may have potential use as immune-monitoring markers in a noninvasive in vitro assay that predicts graft outcome.

The Limits of Linked Suppression for Regulatory T Cells

BACKGROUND

We have previously found that CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) can adoptively transfer tolerance after its induction with costimulatory blockade in a mouse model of murine cardiac allograft transplantation. In these experiments, we tested an hypothesis with three components: (1) the Tregs that transfer tolerance have the capacity for linked suppression, (2) the determinants that stimulate the Tregs are expressed by the indirect pathway, and (3) the donor peptides contributing to these indirect determinants are derived from donor major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens (Ags).

METHODS

First heart transplants were performed from the indicated donor strain to B10.D2 recipients along with costimulatory blockade treatment (250 μg i.p. injection of MR1 on day 0 and 250 μg i.p. injection of CTLA-4 Ig on day 2). At least 8 weeks later, a second heart transplant was performed to a new B10.D2 recipient who had been irradiated with 450 cGy. This recipient was given 40 × 106 naive B10.D2 spleen cells + 40 × 106 B10.D2 spleen cells from the first (tolerant) recipient. We performed three different types of heart transplants using various donors.

RESULTS

(1) Tregs suppress the graft rejection in an Ag-specific manner. (2) Tregs generated in the face of MHC disparities suppress the rejection of grafts expressing third party MHC along with tolerant MHC.

CONCLUSION

The limits of linkage appear to be quantitative and not universally determined by either the indirect pathway or by peptides of donor MHC Ags.

Alloantibody Generation and Effector Function Following Sensitization to Human Leukocyte Antigen

Allorecognition is the activation of the adaptive immune system to foreign human leukocyte antigen (HLA) resulting in the generation of alloantibodies. Due to a high polymorphism, foreign HLA is recognized by the immune system following transplant, transfusion, or pregnancy resulting in the formation of the germinal center and the generation of long-lived alloantibody-producing memory B cells. Alloantibodies recognize antigenic epitopes displayed by the HLA molecule on the transplanted allograft and contribute to graft damage through multiple mechanisms, including (1) activation of the complement cascade resulting in the formation of the MAC complex and inflammatory anaphylatoxins, (2) transduction of intracellular signals leading to cytoskeletal rearrangement, growth, and proliferation of graft vasculature, and (3) immune cell infiltration into the allograft via FcγR interactions with the FC portion of the antibody. This review focuses on the generation of HLA alloantibody, routes of sensitization, alloantibody specificity, and mechanisms of antibody-mediated graft damage.

Diversity of the CD4 T Cell Alloresponse: The Short and the Long of It

MHC alloantigen is recognized by two pathways: "directly," intact on donor cells, or "indirectly," as self-restricted allopeptide. The duration of each pathway, and its relative contribution to allograft vasculopathy, remain unclear. Using a murine model of chronic allograft rejection, we report that direct-pathway CD4 T cell alloresponses, as well as indirect-pathway responses against MHC class II alloantigen, are curtailed by rapid elimination of donor hematopoietic antigen-presenting cells. In contrast, persistent presentation of epitope resulted in continual division and less-profound contraction of the class I allopeptide-specific CD4 T cell population, with approximately 10,000-fold more cells persisting than following acute allograft rejection. This expanded population nevertheless displayed sub-optimal anamnestic responses and was unable to provide co-stimulation-independent help for generating alloantibody. Indirect-pathway CD4 T cell responses are heterogeneous. Appreciation that responses against particular alloantigens dominate at late time points will likely inform development of strategies aimed at improving transplant outcomes.

Allospecific CD4(+) T cells retain effector function and are actively regulated by Treg cells in the context of transplantation tolerance

Although donor-specific transfusion (DST) plus CD154 blockade represents a robust protocol for inducing transplantation tolerance, the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. In a murine T-cell adoptive transfer model, we have visualized alloantigen-specific, TCR-transgenic for H2-A(b) /H2-K(d) 54-68 epitope (TCR75) CD4(+) T cells with indirect allospecificity during the course of tolerance induction. Three main observations were made. First, although the majority of TCR75 CD4(+) T cells were deleted following DST plus CD154 blockade, the surviving TCR75 CD4(+) T cells were capable of making IL-2, upregulating CD44, and undergoing cell division, suggesting that they were functionally active. Indeed, residual TCR75 CD4(+) T cells reisolated from the primary recipients given DST plus CD154 blockade were fully capable of rejecting allografts upon secondary transfer. Second, in tolerant mice, TCR75 CD4(+) T cells were not induced to express Foxp3 in the graft-draining lymph node. TCR75 CD4(+) T cells were also absent in accepted graft tissues in which endogenous Treg cells were enriched. Finally, DST plus CD154 blockade resulted in an abortive expansion of TCR75 CD4(+) T cells, a process that required the presence of endogenous Treg cells. Collectively, surviving TCR75 CD4(+) T cells are immunocompetent but kept in check by an endogenous immunosuppressive network induced by DST plus CD154 blockade.

Optimising long-term graft survival: establishing the benefit of targeting B lymphocytes

Kidney transplants do not last for the natural lifespan of most recipients. Of the reasons why transplants fail, damage by the immune system is the commonest cause. Understanding how the immune system recognises transplanted organs has increased significantly in recent years, but there is little insight into how organs are damaged, and no still no way of suppressing immune-mediated damage without exposing patients to the detrimental effects of long-term immunosuppression. In this article, we review the role of antibodies and B cells in immune-mediated damage of kidney transplants, and discuss the potential for manipulation of B cells to improve clinical outcomes.

Potential and limitations of regulatory T-cell therapy in solid organ transplantation

Over the past few years, the therapeutic potential of Treg has been highlighted in the field of autoimmune diseases and after allogeneic transplantation. The first hurdle for the therapeutic use of Treg is their insufficient numbers in non-manipulated individuals, in particular when facing strong immune activation and expanding effector cells, such as in response to an allograft. Here we review current approaches being explored for Treg expansion in the perspective of clinical therapeutic protocols. We describe different Treg subsets that could be suitable for clinical application, as well as discuss factors such as the required dose of Treg, their antigen-specificity and in vivo stability, that have to be considered for optimal Treg-based immunotherapy in transplantation. Since Treg may not be sufficient as stand-alone therapy for solid organ transplantation in humans, we draw attention to possible hurdles and combination therapy with immunomodulatory drugs that could possibly improve the in vivo efficacy of Treg.

HLA monomers as a tool to monitor indirect allorecognition

BACKGROUND

Recognition of donor antigens can occur through two separate pathways: the direct pathway (non-self HLA on donor cells) and the indirect pathway (self-restricted presentation of donor derived peptides on recipient cells). Indirect allorecognition is important in the development of humoral rejection; therefore, there is an increasing interest in the monitoring of indirect alloreactive T-cells. We have used an in vitro model to determine the optimal requirements for indirect presentation and assessed the risk for semidirect presentation in this system.

METHODS

HLA-typed monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) were incubated with cellular fragments or necrotic cells and incubated with either indirect or direct alloreactive T-cell clones. T-cell reactivity was measured through proliferation or cytokine secretion. HLA-typed moDC, monocytes, or PBMCs were incubated with HLA class I monomers, in combination with either direct/indirect T-cell clones.

RESULTS

Although both were efficiently taken up, alloreactivity was limited to the semi-direct pathway, as measured by allospecific CD4 (indirect) and CD8 T-cell clones (direct) when cells were used. In contrast, HLA-A2 monomers were not only efficiently taken up but also processed and presented by HLA-typed moDC, monocytes, and PBMCs. Activation was shown by a dose-dependent induction of IFN-γ production and proliferation by the CD4 T-cell clone. Antigen presentation was most efficient when the monomers were cultured for longer periods (24-48 hr) in the presence of the T-cells. Using this method, no reactivity was observed by the CD8 T-cell clone, confirming no semidirect alloreactivity.

CONCLUSION

We have developed a system that could be used to monitor indirect alloreactive T-cells.

Predicting alloreactivity in transplantation

Human leukocyte Antigen (HLA) mismatching leads to severe complications after solid-organ transplantation and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. The alloreactive responses underlying the posttransplantation complications include both direct recognition of allogeneic HLA by HLA-specific alloantibodies and T cells and indirect T-cell recognition. However, the immunogenicity of HLA mismatches is highly variable; some HLA mismatches lead to severe clinical B-cell- and T-cell-mediated alloreactivity, whereas others are well tolerated. Definition of the permissibility of HLA mismatches prior to transplantation allows selection of donor-recipient combinations that will have a reduced chance to develop deleterious host-versus-graft responses after solid-organ transplantation and graft-versus-host responses after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Therefore, several methods have been developed to predict permissible HLA-mismatch combinations. In this review we aim to give a comprehensive overview about the current knowledge regarding HLA-directed alloreactivity and several developed in vitro and in silico tools that aim to predict direct and indirect alloreactivity.

Allorecognition pathways in transplant rejection and tolerance

With the advent of cellular therapies, it has become clear that the success of future therapies in prolonging allograft survival will require an intimate understanding of the allorecognition pathways and effector mechanisms that are responsible for chronic rejection and late graft loss.Here, we consider current understanding of T-cell allorecognition pathways and discuss the most likely mechanisms by which these pathways collaborate with other effector mechanisms to cause allograft rejection. We also consider how this knowledge may inform development of future strategies to prevent allograft rejection.Although both direct and indirect pathway CD4 T cells appear active immediately after transplantation, it has emerged that indirect pathway CD4 T cells are likely to be the dominant alloreactive T-cell population late after transplantation. Their ability to provide help for generating long-lived alloantibody is likely one of the main mechanisms responsible for the progression of allograft vasculopathy and chronic rejection.Recent work has suggested that regulatory T cells may be an effective cellular therapy in transplantation. Given the above, adoptive therapy with CD4 regulatory T cells with indirect allospecificity is a rational first choice in attempting to attenuate the development and progression of chronic rejection; those with additional properties that enable inhibition of germinal center alloantibody responses hold particular appeal.

Transplantation immunology and the central nervous system

Controlled clinical trials of cell transplantation for Parkinson's disease yielded disappointing results. Significant long-term functional improvement was not observed and cell survival was low. Although the brain was traditionally considered as "immunologically privileged" recent findings demonstrated late increase in the number of microglia around the grafts, therefore implying an involvement of immune mechanisms. The immunology of organ and cell transplantation to other body locations is scrupulously investigated and significant stepping-stones have been achieved. Ample evidence regarding the role of antigen-presenting cells in graft rejection has been documented. However, this knowledge did not benefit the discipline of cell transplantation to the central nervous system, and the minimal consideration of potential immune responses remain empirical in nature. In this review we summarize current knowledge of the major histo-compatibility complex and its role in transplant immunology. Resident cells of the brain that take part in immune responses are also discussed. Based on this information we hypothesize that the immune mechanisms involved with the long-term graft failure of cell transplantation to the central nervous system are likely to be chronic, and not acute, rejection. This, in turn, should have significant importance in the choice of anti-rejection drugs to be used.

Relevance of regulatory T cell promotion of donor-specific tolerance in solid organ transplantation

Current clinical strategies to control the alloimmune response after transplantation do not fully prevent induction of the immunological processes which lead to acute and chronic immune-mediated graft rejection, and as such the survival of a solid organ allograft is limited. Experimental research on naturally occurring CD4⁺CD25^highFoxP3⁺ Regulatory T cells (Tregs) has indicated their potential to establish stable long-term graft acceptance, with the promise of providing a more effective therapy for transplant recipients. Current approaches for clinical use are based on the infusion of freshly isolated or ex vivo polyclonally expanded Tregs into graft recipients with an aim to redress the in vivo balance of T effector cells to Tregs. However mounting evidence suggests that regulation of donor-specific immunity may be central to achieving immunological tolerance. Therefore, the next stages in optimizing translation of Tregs to organ transplantation will be through the refinement and development of donor alloantigen-specific Treg therapy. The altering kinetics and intensity of alloantigen presentation pathways and alloimmune priming following transplantation may indeed influence the specificity of the Treg required and the timing or frequency at which it needs to be administered. Here we review and discuss the relevance of antigen-specific regulation of alloreactivity by Tregs in experimental and clinical studies of tolerance and explore the concept of delivering an optimal Treg for the induction and maintenance phases of achieving transplantation tolerance.

Pathways of major histocompatibility complex allorecognition

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Here, we review the pathways of allorecognition and their potential relevance to the balance between regulatory and effector responses following transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Transplantation between nonidentical members of the same species elicits an immune response that manifests as graft rejection or persistence. Presentation of foreign antigen to recipient T cells can occur via three nonmutually exclusive routes, the direct, indirect and semi-direct pathways. Allospecific T cells can have effector or regulatory functions, and the relative proportions of the two populations activated following alloantigen presentation are two of the factors that determine the clinical outcome. Regulatory T cells have been the subject of significant research, and there is now greater understanding of their recruitment and function in the context of allorecognition.

SUMMARY

A greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying allorecognition may be fundamental to appreciating how these different populations are recruited and could in turn inform novel strategies for immunomodulation.

Pathways of major histocompatibility complex allorecognition

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Here, we review the pathways of allorecognition and their potential relevance to the balance between regulatory and effector responses following transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Transplantation between nonidentical members of the same species elicits an immune response that manifests as graft rejection or persistence. Presentation of foreign antigen to recipient T cells can occur via three nonmutually exclusive routes, the direct, indirect and semi-direct pathways. Allospecific T cells can have effector or regulatory functions, and the relative proportions of the two populations activated following alloantigen presentation are two of the factors that determine the clinical outcome. Regulatory T cells have been the subject of significant research, and there is now greater understanding of their recruitment and function in the context of allorecognition.

SUMMARY

A greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying allorecognition may be fundamental to appreciating how these different populations are recruited and could in turn inform novel strategies for immunomodulation.

Differential activation of human T cells to allogeneic endothelial cells, epithelial cells and fibroblasts in vitro

BACKGROUND

In the direct pathway, T cells recognize intact donor major histocompatability complexes and allogeneic peptide on the surface of donor antigen presenting cells (APCs). Indirect allorecognition results from the recognition of processed alloantigen by self MHC complexes on self APCs. In this study, we wished to evaluate the relative contribution of different intragraft cells to the alloactivation of nave and memory T cells though the direct and the indirect pathway of allorecognition.

METHODS

The processing of membrane fragments from IFN-treated single donor endothelial cells (EC), fibroblasts or renal epithelial cells (RPTEC) was evaluated by DiOC labeling of each cell type and flow cytometry following interaction with PBMC. Direct pathway activation of nave CD45RA+ or memory CD45RO+ CD4+ T cells was evaluated following coculture with IFN-treated and MHC class II-expressing EC, fibroblasts or RPTEC. Indirect pathway activation was assessed using CD45RA+ or CD45RO+ CD4+ T cells cocultured with autologous irradiated APCs in the absence or presence of sonicates derived from IFN-treated allogeneic EC, fibroblasts or RPTEC. Activation of T cells was assessed by [3H]thymidine incorporation and by ELISpot assays.

RESULTS

We find that CD14+ APCs readily acquire membrane fragments from fibroblasts and RPTEC, but fail to acquire membrane fragments from intact EC. However, APCs process membranes from EC undergoing apoptosis.There was a notable direct pathway alloproliferative response of CD45RO+ CD4+ T cells to IFN-treated EC, but not to fibroblasts or RPTEC. Also, there was a minimal direct pathway response of CD45RA+ CD4+ T cells to all cell types. In contrast, we found that both CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ CD4+ T cells proliferated following coculture with autologous APCs in the presence of sonicates derived from IFN-treated EC, fibroblasts or RPTEC. By ELISpot, we found that these T cells stimulated via the indirect pathway also produced the cytokines IFN, IL-2, IL-4 and IL-5.

CONCLUSIONS

Recipient APCs may readily process membrane fragments from allogeneic intragraft cells, but not from EC unless they are undergoing apoptosis. This processing is sufficient for indirect pathway alloactivation of both CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ CD4+ T cells. Only graft vascular EC mediate direct pathway reactivation of CD4+ T cells.

Regulatory T cell therapy for the induction of clinical organ transplantation tolerance

The pursuit of transplantation tolerance is the holygrail in clinical organ transplantation. It has been established that regulatory T cells (Tregs) can confer donor-specific tolerance in mouse models of transplantation. However, this is crucially dependent on the strain combination, the organ transplanted and most importantly, the ratio of Tregs to alloreactive effector T cells. The ex vivo expansion of Tregs is one solution to increase the number of alloantigen specific cells capable of suppressing the alloresponse. Indeed, ex vivo expanded, alloantigen specific murine Tregs are shown to preferentially migrate to, and proliferate in, the graft and draining lymph node. In human transplantation it has been proposed that depletion of the majority of direct pathway alloreactive T cells will be required to tip the balance in favour of regulation. Ex vivo expansion of alloantigen specific, indirect pathway human Tregs, which can cross regulate the residual direct pathway has been established. Rapid expansion of these cells is possible, whilst they retain antigen specificity, suppressive properties and favourable homing markers. Furthermore, considerable progress has been made to define which immunosuppressive drugs favour the expansion and function of Tregs. Currently a series of clinical trials of adoptive Treg therapy in combination with depletion of alloreactive T cells and short term immunosuppression are underway for human transplantation with the aim of minimizing immunosuppressive drugs and completely withdrawal.

Cell therapy to promote transplantation tolerance: a winning strategy?

Organ transplantation is currently the only effective treatment for end-stage organ failure. However, success is limited by the immune response of the recipient to allogeneic tissues (recognized by the direct and indirect alloresponses) and by the morbidity and mortality associated with the immunosuppressive drugs that are used to control alloimmunity. One solution to these problems is the induction of immunological tolerance. In our laboratory, we have selected two strategies to achieve this goal. The first is to expand and/or generate Tregs directly in vivo using infusions of 'tolerogenic' DCs into patients; the second is to purify Tregs from the blood of patients on the waiting list for a transplant, enrich and expand these cells in vitro and then inject back in vivo after transplantation. Here, we have summarized our results both in the murine and human systems on the use of Treg-based strategies to induce tolerance to the transplanted organs.

Coexpression of donor peptide/recipient MHC complex and intact donor MHC: evidence for a link between the direct and indirect pathways

T lymphocytes recognize foreign antigens presented by donor or recipient cells through the direct and indirect pathways respectively. This raises the question of how directly and indirectly activated T cells interact. A 4-cell model involving the interaction of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells recognizing major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II on recipient antigen presenting cell (APC), and MHC class I on donor APC, has been proposed. However, this would require complex co-ordination between all the participating cell types. The semidirect pathway of alloantigen presentation suggests a simpler mechanism. Although exchange of MHC class II molecules between donor and recipient cells has been described, coexpression of recipient MHC molecules presenting donor derived allopeptides (indirect presentation) and donor MHC (direct presentation) on the same cell, a key requirement for the semidirect alloantigen presentation pathway, has not been demonstrated. We have used a mouse transplantation model to demonstrate the presence of cells expressing both donor MHC class I/II molecules, and a donor MHC class II peptide in the context of a recipient MHC class II molecule. This would allow indirectly activated CD4(+) T cells to regulate directly activated CD4(+) T cells, or to help directly activated CD8(+) T cells, thus providing physical evidence for the semidirect pathway.

T-cell alloimmunity and chronic allograft dysfunction

Solid organ transplantation is the standard treatment to improve both the quality of life and survival in patients with various end-stage organ diseases. The primary barrier against successful transplantation is recipient alloimmunity and the need to be maintained on immunosuppressive therapies with associated side effects. Despite such treatments in renal transplantation, after death with a functioning graft, chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) is the most common cause of late allograft loss. Recipient recognition of donor histocompatibility antigens, via direct, indirect, and semidirect pathways, is critically dependent on the antigen-presenting cell (APC) and elicits effector responses dominated by recipient T cells. In allograft rejection, the engagement of recipient and donor cells results in recruitment of T-helper (Th) cells of the Th1 and Th17 lineage to the graft. In cases in which the alloresponse is dominated by regulatory T cells (Tregs), rejection can be prevented and the allograft tolerated with minimum or no immunosuppression. Here, we review the pathways of allorecognition that underlie CAD and the T-cell effector phenotypes elicited as part of the alloresponse. Future therapies including depletion of donor-reactive lymphocytes, costimulation blockade, negative vaccination using dendritic cell subtypes, and Treg therapy are inferred from an understanding of these mechanisms of allograft rejection.

The indirect alloimmune response causes microvascular endothelial dysfunction-a possible role for alloantibody

BACKGROUND

The causes of endothelial dysfunction after cardiac transplantation are unknown. Here, we have investigated whether the indirect alloimmune response mediates endothelial dysfunction in a major histocompatibility complex class I mismatch model.

METHODS

PVG.RT1 rat hearts were transplanted into thymectomized CD8 T-cell-depleted allogeneic (PVG.R8) or syngeneic (PVG.RT1) recipients. Alloantibody was assessed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy, the nature of the inflammatory infiltrate, and origin of endothelial cells were examined at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Endothelial function was assessed by Langendorff preparations at 1, 2, and 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Recipients produced alloantibody and showed luminal occlusion at 1 (17.7%±8.0%), 2 (23.2%±4.9%), 4 (34.3%±5.0%), and 8 weeks (58.1%±1.8%) posttransplantation. The major inflammatory features of the allografts consisted of CD11b monocytes, CD4 T cells, and C4d deposition. At 1 week, the basal coronary flow and the vasodilator response to 5-hydroxytrytamine of syngeneic and allografted hearts were inhibited compared with normal hearts. At 4 weeks, the basal coronary flow of allografts was 54% lower than syngrafts (P<0.01), and 5- hydroxytrytamine and sodium nitroprusside did not evoke an increase in coronary flow in the allograft heart compared with syngeneic controls (P<0.01). Culture of aortic rings with antibody to major histocompatibility complex class I inhibited endothelium-dependent vasodilation to acetylcholine.

CONCLUSION

Transient microvascular endothelial dysfunction occurred in syngeneic and allogeneic cardiac grafts after transplantation. Syngeneic but not allogeneic grafts recovered, suggesting the indirect immune response, consisting of CD4 T cells, monocytes, and antibody, mediates endothelial dysfunction. A possible role for alloantibody in endothelial dysfunction is discussed.

Differential role of naïve and memory CD4 T-cell subsets in primary alloresponses

The T cell response to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) alloantigens occurs via two main pathways. The direct pathway involves the recognition of intact allogeneic MHC:peptide complexes on donor cells and provokes uniquely high frequencies of responsive T cells. The indirect response results from alloantigens being processed like any other protein antigen and presented as peptide by autologous antigen-presenting cells. The frequencies of T cells with indirect allospecificity are orders of magnitude lower and comparable to other peptide-specific responses. In this study, we explored the contributions of naïve and memory CD4(+) T cells to these two pathways. Using an adoptive transfer and skin transplantation model we found that naive and memory CD4(+) T cells, both naturally occurring and induced by sensitization with multiple third-party alloantigens, contributed equally to graft rejection when only the direct pathway was operative. In contrast, the indirect response was predominantly mediated by the naïve subset. Elimination of regulatory CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells enabled memory cells to reject grafts through the indirect pathway, but at a much slower tempo than for naïve cells. These findings have implications for better targeting of immunosuppression to inhibit immediate and later forms of alloimmunity.

Targeting MHC class I monomers to dendritic cells inhibits the indirect pathway of allorecognition and the production of IgG alloantibodies leading to long-term allograft survival

T cell depletion strategies are an efficient therapy for the treatment of acute rejections and are an essential part of tolerance induction protocols in various animal models; however, they are usually nonselective and cause wholesale T cell depletion leaving the individual in a severely immunocompromised state. So far it has been difficult to selectively delete alloreactive T cells because the majority of protocols either delete all T cells, subsets of T cells, or subpopulations of T cells expressing certain activation markers, ignoring the Ag specificity of the TCR. We have developed a model in which we were able to selectively deplete alloreactive T cells with an indirect specificity by targeting intact MHC molecules to quiescent dendritic cells using 33D1 as the targeting Ab. This strategy enabled us to inhibit the indirect alloresponse against MHC-mismatched skin grafts and hence the generation of IgG alloantibodies, which depends on indirectly activated T cells. In combination with the temporary abrogation of the direct alloresponse, we were able to induce indefinite skin graft survival. Importantly, the targeting strategy had no detrimental effect on CD4(+)CD25(+)FoxP3(+) T cells, which could potentially be used as an adjunctive cellular therapy. Transplantation tolerance depends on the right balance between depletion and regulation. For the former this approach may be a useful tool in the development of future tolerance induction protocols in non-sensitized patients.

In situ-targeting of dendritic cells with donor-derived apoptotic cells restrains indirect allorecognition and ameliorates allograft vasculopathy

Chronic allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is an atheromatous-like lesion that affects vessels of transplanted organs. It is a component of chronic rejection that conventional immuno-suppression fails to prevent, and is a major cause of graft loss. Indirect allo-recognition through T cells and allo-Abs are critical during CAV pathogenesis. We tested whether the indirect allo-response and its impact on CAV is down-regulated by in situ-delivery of donor Ags to recipient's dendritic cells (DCs) in lymphoid organs in a pro-tolerogenic fashion, through administration of donor splenocytes undergoing early apoptosis. Following systemic injection, donor apoptotic cells were internalized by splenic CD11c^hi CD8α⁺ and CD8⁻ DCs, but not by CD11c^int plasmacytoid DCs. Those DCs that phagocytosed apoptotic cells in vivo remained quiescent, resisted ex vivo-maturation, and presented allo-Ag for up to 3 days. Administration of donor apoptotic splenocytes, unlike cells alive, (i) promoted deletion, FoxP3 expression and IL-10 secretion, and decreased IFN-γ-release in indirect pathway CD4 T cells; and (ii) reduced cross-priming of anti-donor CD8 T cells in vivo. Targeting recipient's DCs with donor apoptotic cells reduced significantly CAV in a fully-mismatched aortic allograft model. The effect was donor specific, dependent on the physical characteristics of the apoptotic cells, and was associated to down-regulation of the indirect type-1 T cell allo-response and secretion of allo-Abs, when compared to recipients treated with donor cells alive or necrotic. Down-regulation of indirect allo-recognition through in situ-delivery of donor-Ag to recipient's quiescent DCs constitutes a promising strategy to prevent/ameliorate indirect allorecognition and CAV.

Regulatory T cells as therapeutic cells

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although a plethora of data indicate the importance of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in experimental and clinical transplantation, are we any closer to seeing these cells as therapeutic tools in the clinic? This review discusses the functional and practical aspects of using CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+ Tregs as cellular therapeutic products in clinical transplantation, focusing on the requirements in terms of phenotype, antigen specificity and preparation of Tregs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Following the emergence of new phenotypic markers of Tregs as well as improved isolation methods, a few milestone clinical trials employing the adoptive transfer of Tregs are now underway. Although mounting data suggest that alloantigen-specific Tregs may provide higher therapeutic benefits in solid organ transplantation compared with polyclonal Tregs, it seems that the specificty of Treg selected for use will need to be tailored to each clinical transplantation setting. In addition, recent findings imply that immunosuppressive regimes will also need to be reevaluated in order to complement this therapeutic strategy.

SUMMARY

Although many key questions about Tregs remain, we are undoubtedly entering an exciting era of Treg research in clinical transplantation. As renewed efforts focus on translational medical research, it seems as though, whether ready or not, Tregs are finally crossing from bench to bedside.

In vitro assays of allosensitization

Current approaches to the management of immunosuppression are largely empiric and reactive rather than proactive due to our inability to predict accurately how the recipient immune system will respond to a given organ allograft. The validation of simple, reliable, non-invasive assays exploring allogeneic anti donor responsiveness or donor specific non-responsiveness are of interest for several reasons: (i) it would allow for early and non-invasive detection of acute or chronic allograft rejection such that intervention could be initiated before effector mechanisms and organ destruction occur, (ii) it would allow for individual immunosuppressive drug therapy thereby avoiding the unwanted consequences of over immunosuppression, and (iii) the identification of the immunological phenotype related to operational tolerance could allow for the complete cessation of immunosuppressants. This review will summarize in vitro assays of T cell reactivity that reflect allo-antigen-specific responses.

Tolerance-inducing immunosuppressive strategies in clinical transplantation: an overview

The significant development of immunosuppressive drug therapies within the past 20 years has had a major impact on the outcome of clinical solid organ transplantation, mainly by decreasing the incidence of acute rejection episodes and improving short-term patient and graft survival. However, long-term results remain relatively disappointing because of chronic allograft dysfunction and patient morbidity or mortality, which is often related to the adverse effects of immunosuppressive treatment. Thus, the induction of specific immunological tolerance of the recipient towards the allograft remains an important objective in transplantation. In this article, we first briefly describe the mechanisms of allograft rejection and immune tolerance. We then review in detail current tolerogenic strategies that could promote central or peripheral tolerance, highlighting the promises as well as the remaining challenges in clinical transplantation. The induction of haematopoietic mixed chimerism could be an approach to induce robust central tolerance, and we describe recent encouraging reports of end-stage kidney disease patients, without concomitant malignancy, who have undergone combined bone marrow and kidney transplantation. We discuss current studies suggesting that, while promoting peripheral transplantation tolerance in preclinical models, induction protocols based on lymphocyte depletion (polyclonal antithymocyte globulins, alemtuzumab) or co-stimulatory blockade (belatacept) should, at the current stage, be considered more as drug-minimization rather than tolerance-inducing strategies. Thus, a better understanding of the mechanisms that promote peripheral tolerance has led to newer approaches and the investigation of individualized donor-specific cellular therapies based on manipulated recipient regulatory T cells.

The indirect alloresponse impairs the induction but not maintenance of tolerance to MHC class I-disparate allografts

We studied the effects of indirect allorecognition on the induction and maintenance phases of tolerance in miniature swine cotransplanted with heart and kidney allografts. MHC class I-mismatched heart and kidney grafts were cotransplanted in recipients receiving CyA for 12 days. Recipients were unimmunized or immunized with a set of donor-derived or control third-party MHC class I peptides either 21 days prior to transplantation or over 100 days after transplantation. T-cell proliferation, delayed type hypersensitivity reaction (DTH) and antibody production were assessed. All animals injected with donor MHC class I peptides developed potent indirect alloresponses specific to the immunizing peptides. While untreated recipients developed stable tolerance, all animals preimmunized with donor allopeptides rejected kidney-heart transplants acutely. In contrast, when peptide immunization was delayed until over 100 days after kidney-heart transplantation, no effects were observed on graft function or in vitro measures of alloimmunity. Donor peptide immunization prevented tolerance when administered to recipients pre transplantation but did not abrogate tolerance when administered to long-term survivors post transplantation. This suggests that the presence of T cells activated via indirect allorecognition represent a barrier to the induction but not the maintenance of tolerance.