Anticardiolipin antibodies are not an independent risk factor for stroke: an incident case-referent study nested within the MONICA and Västerbotten cohort project

Risk factors for cerebral infarction and cerebrovascular stenosis in antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients: A retrospective single-center study with propensity score matching analysis

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLA), such as anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI), or lupus anticoagulant (LA). Although cerebrovascular events are commonly associated with APS, comprehensive studies on risk factors for cerebral infarction in aPLA-positive patients remain sparse. In this retrospective single-center study, data from 9844 patients tested for aPLA between January 2017 and March 2023 were analyzed. A total of 647 aPLA-positive patients were included, with assessments of various factors including age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking history, and cardiac disease. Propensity score matching was employed to create 2 matched groups of 202 patients each, comparing those with and without cerebral infarction. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for cerebral infarction and progression of cerebrovascular stenosis. The mean age of the study cohort was 65.8 years, with 60% being male. LA was positive in 95.2% of the cases, aCL in 8.8%, and aβ2GPI in 5.3%. High-risk aPLA profiles were identified in 7.1% of the cases. In the cerebral infarction group, both smoking history and aCL positivity were significantly associated with an increased risk (OR = 1.543; 95% CI: 1.020-2.334; P = .040 and OR = 3.043; 95% CI: 1.426-6.491; P = .040, respectively). Male gender and posterior circulation involvement were significant risk factors for exacerbation of cerebrovascular stenosis (OR = 3.73; 95% CI: 1.16-16.69; P = .046 and OR = 5.41; 95% CI: 1.80-16.05; P = .002, respectively). Smoking history and aCL positivity are prominent risk factors for cerebral infarction in aPLA-positive patients, while male gender and involvement of the posterior circulation emerge as significant risk factors for the progression of cerebrovascular stenosis. Further comprehensive prospective studies are necessary to deepen understanding of aPLA-related cerebrovascular diseases.

Lupus, antiphospholipid syndrome, and stroke: An attempt to crossmatch

Cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) or strokes are part of the common thrombotic manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLEs) and Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Such neurological thrombotic events tend to occur in patients with SLE at a higher frequency when Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) are present, and tend to involve the large cerebral vessels. The mechanism of stroke in SLE can be driven by complement deposition and neuroinflammation involving the blood-brain barrier although the traditional cardiovascular risk factors remain major contributing factors. Primary prevention with antiplatelet therapy and disease activity controlling agent is the basis of the management. Anticoagulation via warfarin had been a tool for secondary prevention, especially in stroke recurrence, although the debate continues regarding the target international normalized ratio (INR). The presence of either of the three criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and certain non-criteria aPL can be an independent risk factor for stroke. The exact mechanism for the involvement of the large cerebral arteries, especially in lupus anticoagulant (LAC) positive cases, is still to be deciphered. The data on the role of non-criteria aPL remain very limited and heterogenous, but IgA antibodies against β2GPI and the D4/5 subunit as well as aPS/PT IgG might have a contribution. Anticoagulation with warfarin has been recommended although the optimal dosing or the utility of combination with antiplatelet agents is still unknown. Minimal data is available for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

IgA Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective: To define the role of IgA antibodies to cardiolipin (aCL) and IgA antibodies to beta-2 glycoprotein 1 (anti-β2-GP1) in the development of vascular complications in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Material and methods: A total of 187 patients with one of the following diagnoses: primary APS (PAPS), probable APS, SLE with APS, and SLE without APS. The comparison group consisted of 49 patients with other rheumatic diseases (RD), the control group included 100 relatively healthy individuals (without RD, oncological pathology, and infectious diseases). All patients underwent standard clinical, laboratory, and instrumental examinations before being included in the study and during follow-up. The aPL study included the determination of IgG/IgM aCL, IgG/IgM anti-β2-GP1 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), IgG/IgM/IgA aCL, IgG/IgM/IgA anti-β2-GP1 by chemiluminescence analysis (CLA), and lupus anticoagulant (LA). Results: IgA aCL were detected in 75 (40%) of the 187 patients with APS and SLE, in none of the comparison group, and in 2 (2%) of the control one. IgA anti-β2-GP1 were detected in 63 (34%) of the 187 patients with APS and SLE, in none of the patients in the comparison group, and in one (1%) of the control group. The prevalence of IgA aCL and IgA anti-β2-GP1 and their levels were statistically significantly higher in patients with APS (PAPS and SLE + APS) than the levels in patients with SLE and those of the comparison and control groups (p < 0.05). IgA aCL and IgA anti-β2-GP1 were significantly associated with thrombosis in APS (χ2 = 4.96; p = 0.02 and χ2 = 4.37; p = 0.04, respectively). The risk of thrombosis was 2.04 times higher in patients with positive IgA aCL than in patients without these antibodies, as well as in patients with positive IgA anti-β2-GP1; it was twice as high as in patients without antibodies. There was a high specificity of IgA aCL and IgA anti-β2-GP1 for both the diagnosis of APS and its clinical manifestations, despite a low sensitivity. Conclusions: The study revealed a relationship of thrombosis and APS with IgA aCL and IgA anti-β2-GP1. There was a high specificity of IgA aCL and IgA anti-β2-GP1 (95% and 93%, respectively) for the diagnosis of APS with a low sensitivity (54% and 44%, respectively). There were no patients with isolated positivity of IgA aCL and IgA anti-β2-GP1.

Immunoglobulin A Isotype of Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does Not Provide Added Value for the Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome in a Chinese Population

Objective

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by the presence of anti-phospholipid (aPL) antibodies. However, the relationship between the immunoglobulin (Ig) A isotype of aPL positivity and its clinical utility in APS diagnosis is controversial. Presently, we determine the clinical utility of IgA-aPL from consecutive patients in a large cohort from the Chinese population and patients with APS whose aPL profiles were obtained.

Methods

The detection of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β₂ glycoprotein-Ⅰ (aβ₂GPⅠ) antibodies of the IgA/IgG/IgM isotype by paramagnetic particle chemiluminescent immunoassay was carried out in sera from 7293 subjects. 153 primary APS (PAPS) patients and 59 patients with secondary APS (SAPS) were included in this study.

Results

In total, 1,082 out of 7,293 (2.55%) subjects had a positive IgA-aPL test, and the prevalence of isolated IgA-aPL was 0.29% (21/7,293) in the general population. The prevalence of IgA-aPL in the PAPS patients was 12.42% (19/153); however, only one patient (0.65%) presented with isolated IgA-aPL. Fifty (25.9%) of the SAPS had IgA-aPL, none of whom lacked IgG/IgM-aPL. The combination of the IgA isotype and the IgG/IgM isotype did not increase the diagnostic performance when compared with the IgG/IgM isotype of aCL or aβ₂GPⅠ, respectively. IgA-aPL was not associated with clinical manifestation in patients with APS.

Conclusion

Isolated IgA-aPL is rare in the general population as well as in patients with APS. Whether in the laboratory or in clinical practice, the presence of IgA-aPL does not provide added value for the diagnosis of APS in the Chinese population.

The antiphospholipid syndrome - often overlooked cause of vascular occlusions?

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was fully recognized as a clinical entity in the early 1980s. Still, more than 30 years later, the epidemiology of APS is not well described, and furthermore, APS remains a challenge in terms of both diagnostic issues and clinical praxis involving a wide range of specialties. To date, there are no diagnostic criteria for APS. The present classification criteria rely on a combination of clinical manifestations and persistently positive tests for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Clinical symptoms comprise vascular thrombosis, which can affect any vascular bed, including venous, microvascular and arterial vessels, and a set of pregnancy morbidities including early and late miscarriages, foetal death and preeclampsia. APS is more frequent among patients with other autoimmune diseases, and it is especially common in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Importantly, APS symptoms can present in almost any medical specialty, but general knowledge and most previous clinical studies have essentially been confined to haematology, rheumatology and obstetrics/gynaecology. However, recent data demonstrate a relatively high prevalence of aPL also in patients from the general population who suffer from vascular occlusions or pregnancy complications. It is important that these patients are recognized by the general health care since APS is a treatable condition. This review aims to summarize the present knowledge on the history, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and treatment of APS in order to urge a wide range of clinicians to consider comprehensive assessment of all patients where the diagnosis APS may be conceivable.

The Increase of Blood Anticardiolipin Antibody Depends on the Underlying Etiology in Cerebral Ischemia

Although anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) has been suggested to be a potent risk factor for thrombosis and atherosclerosis in multiple arterial beds, conflicting results exist between aCL and cerebral ischemia in the general stroke population. To elucidate if this discrepancy relates to the heterogeneity of underlying etiologies, the blood beta2-glycoprotein I dependent-aCL in 432 Taiwanese adults was examined. The associated cerebral ischemia in these patients was classified into five subtypes according to the cause of cerebral ischemia. The results were compared with those in 100 healthy controls. A definite increase of aCL-IgG isotype was found in 41 patients (9.35%) and four controls (4.0%). The relative risk was 2.52. The frequency of increased aCL-IgG was 12.2%, 12.8%, 8.8%, 3.9%, and 3.5% in patients with large-artery atherosclerotic disease, stroke of unknown etiology, small-artery occlusive disease, cardioembolism, and stroke of other known etiology, respectively. Only patients with large-artery atherosclerotic disease (p<0.025) and stroke of unknown etiology (p<0.05) had higher frequencies of increased aCL than those in control subjects. The frequencies of abnormal results of activated partial thromboplastin time, antinuclear factor, Coombs’ test, and venereal disease research laboratory were 2.84%, 1.22%, 1.02%, and 1.34% in these 41 patients, respectively. Accordingly, aCL-IgG selectively increases in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis and stroke of unknown etiology, reflecting selective activation of humoral immunity for aCL in the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemia.

The Increase of Blood Anticardiolipin Antibody Depends on the Underlying Etiology in Cerebral Ischemia

Although anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) has been suggested to be a potent risk factor for thrombosis and atherosclerosis in multiple arterial beds, conflicting results still exist between aCL and cerebral ischemia in the general stroke population. To elucidate if this discrepancy relates to the heterogeneity of underlying etiologies, blood beta2-glycoprotein I dependent-aCL was evaluated in 432 Taiwanese adults associated with cerebral ischemia who were classified into five subtypes according to their causes of cerebral ischemia. The results were compared with those in 100 healthy controls. A definite increase of aCL-IgG isotype was found in 41 patients (9.35%) and four controls (4.0%). The relative risk was 2.52. The frequency of increased aCL-IgG was 12.2%, 12.8%, 8.8%, 3.9%, and 3.5% in patients with large-artery atherosclerotic disease, stroke of unknown etiology, small-artery occlusive disease, cardioembolism, and stroke of other known etiology, respectively. Only patient with large-artery atherosclerotic disease (p<0.025) and stroke of unknown etiology (p<0.05) had a higher frequency of increased aCL than control. The frequencies of abnormal result of activated partial thromboplastin time, antinuclear factor, Coombs’ test, and venereal disease research laboratory were 2.84%, 1.22%, 1.02%, and 1.34% in these 41 patients, respectively. Accordingly, aCL-IgG selectively increases in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis and stroke of unknown etiology, reflecting selective activation of humoral immunity for aCL in the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemia.

Pregnancy and thrombophilia

The physiological changes that occur during pregnancy create a hypercoagulable milieu. This hypercoagulable state is thought to be protective, especially at the time of labor, preventing excessive hemorrhage. The presence of hereditary or acquired causes of thrombophilia during pregnancy tilts the balance in favor of unwanted venous thromboembolism and adverse pregnancy outcomes due to vascular uteroplacental insufficiency. These adverse pregnancy outcomes include recurrent pregnancy losses, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth retardation, preeclampsia and placental abruption. Much of the current data with regards to the association of the different thrombophilias and pregnancy-related complications are based on retrospectively designed studies. This lack of randomization, in-homogeneity of patient populations, varying case definitions, selection biases and inadequately matched control populations, have given rise to conflicting data with regard to screening for, and treatment of, pregnant women with suspected thrombophilias. The limited data that we have support the use of anticoagulant drugs for the prevention of pregnancy-related complications in the setting of thrombophilia. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins are the anticoagulant drugs of choice as they do not cross the placental barrier and, hence, do not cause fetal anticoagulation or teratogenicity. Warfarin can be used from the 12th week of gestation onwards but is preferably reserved for the postpartum period.

Antiphospholipid antibodies: evaluation of the thrombotic risk

The laboratory diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) via antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) tests, including lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anti-cardiolipin (aCL), or anti-beta2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) antibodies remains a challenge. Coagulation tests for LAC as well as solid phase assays for aCL and aβ2GPI have methodological shortcomings, although for LAC large progress have been made in standardization. All assays are associated with clinical APS-criteria (thrombotic and/or pregnancy complications) but with limited specificity. Besides, clinical studies demonstrating the association between the presence of aPL and thrombosis are not always well designed and result in wide ranges of odds ratio with large variation between studies. The best association between thrombotic complications and aPL is found for LAC. The association between thrombosis and aCL or aβ2GPI is at least inconsistent. The inclusion of more specific assays, such as the domain-I-β2GPI.antibodies is too premature and depends on further investigation in large clinical studies and the commercial availability. The search for new assays should proceed to identify patients with aPL with increased risk for thrombosis, preferable in large prospective studies. Meanwhile, with the current available LAC, aCL and aβ2GPI assays it is strongly recommended to make antibody profiles. Multiple positivity of tests seems clinically more relevant. The strengths and weaknesses of the current laboratory criteria for APS are discussed in view of their role in risk stratification of patients with thrombotic events.

The clinical relevance of IgA anticardiolipin and IgA anti-β2 glycoprotein I antiphospholipid antibodies: a systematic review

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed in patients with thromboembolic events and/or pregnancy loss in the presence of persistent laboratory evidence for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Diagnostic tests for the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies include laboratory assays that detect anticardiolipin antibodies, lupus anticoagulants, and anti-β(2)-glycoprotein I antibodies. Most studies on aPL have mainly focused on the estimation of the IgG and IgM isotypes, with only a few studies reporting on the pathogenic significance of IgA aPL. In this review we aimed to summarize and analyze the evidence published in the literature on the prevalence and the clinical significance of IgA aPL.

The management of stroke in antiphospholipid syndrome

Ischemic stroke is one of the most common complications of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Because of the relative lack of definitive prospective studies, there is still some debate as to whether the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) increases the risk of recurrent stroke. There is more evidence for aPLs as a risk factor for first stroke. The mechanisms of ischemic stroke are considered to be thrombotic and embolic. APS patients with thrombotic stroke frequently have other, often conventional vascular risk factors. Transesophageal echocardiogram is strongly recommended in APS patients with ischemic stroke because of the high yield of valvular abnormalities. The appropriate management of thrombosis in patients with APS is still controversial because of limited randomized clinical trial data. This review discusses the current evidence for antithrombotic therapy in patients who are aPL positive but do not fulfill criteria for APS, and in APS patients. Alternative and emerging therapies including low molecular weight heparin, new oral anticoagulants (including direct thrombin inhibitors), hydroxychloroquine, statins, and rituximab, are also addressed.

Epidemiology and etiology of young stroke

Introduction. Stroke in people under 45 years of age is less frequent than in older populations but has a major impact on the individual and society. In this article we provide an overview of the epidemiology and etiology of young stroke. Methods. This paper is based on a review of population-based studies on stroke incidence that have included subgroup analyses for patients under 45 years of age, as well as smaller community-based studies and case-series specifically examining the incidence of stroke in the young. Trends are discussed along with the relative frequencies of various etiologies. Discussion. Stroke in the young requires a different approach to investigation and management than stroke in the elderly given differences in the relative frequencies of possible underlying causes. It remains the case, however, that atherosclerosis contributes to a large proportion of stroke in young patients, thus, conventional risk factors must be targeted aggressively.

Treatment of risk factors to prevent stroke

Much of the decline in stroke incidence and mortality for the past several decades in Western countries has been attributed to better treatment of risk factors. Many epidemiological studies and clinical trials confirmed the importance of managing hypertension. Comparative trials of anti-hypertensive drugs or drug classes have not yielded clear results, but blood pressure variability may play an important role beyond the absolute value of blood pressure. Diabetes therapy remains a conundrum. Although diabetes is clearly a risk factor for ischemic stroke, treatment trials targeting different glycemic goals have not indicated that glucose lowering results in stroke prevention. Trials focused on insulin resistance are ongoing and they may be able to help establish the management of diabetes/impaired glucose tolerance. Evidence for treatment of dyslipidemia has contrasted science to diabetes mellitus. Dyslipidemia has not been strongly or consistently linked to ischemic stroke but the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial showed the impact of statin treatment in stroke prevention. The results of clinical trials investigating dabigatran and rivaroxaban clearly indicate alternative strategies to vitamin K antagonists in stroke prevention for persons with atrial fibrillation. Evidence for stroke prevention by life style modification, treating metabolic syndrome, sleep disordered breathing, lipoprotein (a), hyperhomocysteinemia, and coagulation disorders are also discussed.

'Non-criteria' aPL tests: report of a task force and preconference workshop at the 13th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies, Galveston, TX, USA, April 2010

Abstract: Current classification criteria for definite APS recommend the use of one or more of three positive standardized laboratory assays, including anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), lupus anticoagulant (LA), and antibodies directed to β(2)glycoprotein I (anti-β(2)GPI) to detect antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in the presence of at least one of the two major clinical manifestations (i.e., thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity) of the syndrome. Several other autoantibodies shown to be directed to phospholipids and/or their complexes with phospholipids and/or to proteins of the coagulation cascade, as well as a mechanistic test for resistance to annexin A5 anticoagulant activity, have been proposed to be relevant to APS. A task force of worldwide scientists in the field discussed and analyzed critical questions related to 'non-criteria' aPL tests in an evidence-based manner during the 13th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies (APLA 2010, 13-16 April 2010, Galveston, Texas, USA). This report summarizes the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of this task force.

Antiphospholipid antibodies--we are not quite there yet

The diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome is predominantly made in the laboratory and depends on the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in individuals with thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity. Correct diagnosis of the syndrome is imperative to prevent unnecessary long secondary thromboprophylaxis. Three antiphospholipid antibody subtypes are included in the classification criteria of the antiphospholipid syndrome: lupus anticoagulants, anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies. Only lupus anticoagulants are undisputedly associated with thrombosis, which is why the serological criteria of the antiphospholipid syndrome are under debate. All of the assays used to detect antiphospholipid antibodies are in need of better standardization, although progress has been made in the detection of lupus anticoagulants. The inconsistent association between both anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies and thrombosis is a cause for alarm. We are in need of better assays to detect those individuals at risk for thrombosis and population-based prospective studies to provide us with accurate risk assessments.

A review of hereditary and acquired coagulation disorders in the aetiology of ischaemic stroke

The diagnostic workup in patients with ischaemic stroke often includes testing for prothrombotic conditions. However, the clinical relevance of coagulation abnormalities in ischaemic stroke is uncertain. Therefore, we reviewed what is presently known about the association between inherited and acquired coagulation disorders and ischaemic stroke, with a special emphasis on the methodological aspects. Good-quality data in this field are scarce, and most studies fall short on epidemiological criteria for causal inference. While inherited coagulation disorders are recognised risk factors for venous thrombosis, there is no substantial evidence for an association with arterial ischaemic stroke. Possible exceptions are the prothrombin G20210A mutation in adults and protein C deficiency in children. There is proof of an association between the antiphospholipid syndrome and ischaemic stroke, but the clinical significance of isolated mildly elevated antiphospholipid antibody titres is unclear. Evidence also suggests significant associations of increased homocysteine and fibrinogen concentrations with ischaemic stroke, but whether these associations are causal is still debated. Data on other acquired coagulation abnormalities are insufficient to allow conclusions regarding causality. For most coagulation disorders, a causal relation with ischaemic stroke has not been definitely established. Hence, at present, there is no valid indication for testing all patients with ischaemic stroke for these conditions. Large prospective population-based studies allowing the evaluation of interactive and subgroup effects are required to appreciate the role of coagulation disorders in the pathophysiology of arterial ischaemic stroke and to guide the management of individual patients.

Risk factors for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack in patients under age 50

To analyze risk factors for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) in young adults under the age of 50. To make recommendations for additional research and practical consequences. From 97 patients with ischemic stroke or TIA under the age of 50, classical cardiovascular risk factors, coagulation disorders, history of migraine, use of oral contraceptives, cardiac abnormalities on ECG and echocardiography, and the results of duplex ultrasound were retrospectively analyzed. Literature was reviewed and compared to the results. 56.4% of the patients had hypertension, 12.1% increased total cholesterol, 20% hypertriglyceridemia, 31.5% an increased LDL-level, 32.6% a decreased HDL-level and 7.2% a disturbed glucose tolerance. Thrombophilia investigation was abnormal in 21 patients and auto-immune serology was abnormal in 15 patients. Ten of these patients were already known with a systemic disease associated with an increased risk for ischemic stroke (i.e. systemic lupus erythematosus). The ECG was abnormal in 16.7% of the cases, the echocardiography in 12.1% and duplex ultrasound of the carotid arteries was in 31.8% of the cases abnormal. Conventional cardiovascular risk factors are not only important in patients over the age of 50 with ischemic stroke or TIA, but also in this younger population under the age of 50. Thrombophilia investigation and/ or autoimmune serology should be restricted to patients without conventional cardiovascular risk factors and a history or other clinical symptoms associated with hypercoagulability and/ or autoimmune diseases.

Screening for coagulation disorders in patients with ischemic stroke

The role of coagulation disorders in the pathogenesis of (recurrent) ischemic stroke is uncertain. Therefore, the clinical utility of screening patients with ischemic stroke for these conditions and the therapeutic implications of a detected coagulation disorder in a patient who experienced ischemic stroke are uncertain. We reviewed the currently available data on the relationship between various inherited and acquired coagulation abnormalities (factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations, deficiencies of protein C, protein S and anti-thrombin, hyperhomocysteinemia, the antiphospholipid syndrome and increased levels of fibrinogen) and ischemic stroke. Based on the existing evidence we discuss the usefulness of screening stroke patients for prothrombotic conditions and current recommendations regarding the optimal management of ischemic stroke patients in whom a coagulation disorder is found.

Summary of the epidemiological evidence relating snus to health

Interest in snus (Swedish-type moist snuff) as a smoking alternative has increased. This wide-ranging review summarizes evidence relating snus to health and to initiation and cessation of smoking. Meta-analyses are included. After smoking adjustment, snus is unassociated with cancer of the oropharynx (meta-analysis RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.68-1.37), oesophagus (1.10, 0.92-1.33), stomach (0.98, 0.82-1.17), pancreas (1.20, 0.66-2.20), lung (0.71, 0.66-0.76) or other sites, or with heart disease (1.01, 0.91-1.12) or stroke (1.05, 0.95-1.15). No clear associations are evident in never smokers, any possible risk from snus being much less than from smoking. "Snuff-dipper's lesion" does not predict oral cancer. Snus users have increased weight, but diabetes and chronic hypertension seem unaffected. Notwithstanding unconfirmed reports of associations with reduced birthweight, and some other conditions, the evidence provides scant support for any major adverse health effect of snus. Although some claims that snus reduces initiation or encourages quitting are unsoundly based, snus seems not to increase initiation, as indicated by few smokers using snus before starting and current snus use being unassociated with smoking in adults (the association in children probably being due to uncontrolled confounding), and there are no reports that snus discourages quitting.

Lupus anticoagulants and anti-phospholipid antibodies as risk factors for a first episode of ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLA) and lupus anticoagulant (LAC) were shown to precipitate thromboembolic events. Their association with ischemic stroke remains to be seen.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the contribution of LAC, and antibodies directed against the phospholipids cardiolipin (aCL), phosphatidylserine (aPS), and the phospholipid-dependent cofactors beta2-glycoprotein I and annexin V, to the risk for ischemic stroke.

PATIENTS/METHODS

LAC and antibody levels were measured in 208 stroke patients and 203 age- and gender-matched control subjects.

RESULTS

Positive LAC resulted in an increased risk for stroke [OR (95% CI) = 8.1 (2.4-27.5)]. Significant elevation in aPS IgG, aCL IgM and aCL IgG titers, and increased prevalence of elevated aPS IgG, aCL IgM and aCL IgG (based on P95 cutoff values of healthy individuals) were seen in patients. aPS IgG was associated with cardioembolic, whereas aCL IgG and IgM were elevated in lacunar, atherosclerotic and cardioembolic, and LAC positivity was documented only in lacunar stroke subtypes. The co-presence of LAC with a positive aCL IgM/IgG or aPS IgG did not affect the overall risk for stroke. Multivariate analysis confirmed the association of positive LAC with stroke [aOR (95% CI) = 9.7 (1.8-52.5)], and demonstrated a clear gradation of increasing risk of stroke associated with the four categories of aCL IgG and aPS IgG, and identified aCL IgM P95 as independent predictors of stroke after adjusting for potentially confounding covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the presence of LAC, and elevated aCL IgG and aPS IgG antibodies are risk factors for stroke.

Antiphospholipid antibiodies: a critical review of the literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome is defined by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with recurrent venous or arterial thromboembolism or pregnancy morbidity. Antithrombotic therapies are the mainstay of treatment to reduce the risk of recurrent thromboembolism that characterizes this condition.

RECENT FINDINGS

Limitations in the laboratory testing for antiphospholipid antibodies and changes in the diagnostic criteria for antiphospholipid antibody syndrome are important to recognize as they will affect the type of patients enrolled in the clinical trials evaluating antiphospholipid antibody syndrome therapies. In this review, we discuss the laboratory testing and diagnostic criteria for antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and examine the evidence supporting the optimal antithrombotic management of patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. Studies addressing the management of patients with antiphospholipid antibodies and venous thromboembolism, and antiphospholipid antibodies and ischemic stroke, will be critically reviewed.

SUMMARY

Clinical trials and observational studies have evaluated the optimal type, intensity and duration of anticoagulant therapy in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. Critical evaluation of these studies is required to assess the generalizability of the results and how these results may be applicable to individual patients.

The Role of Anti-Phospholipid Auto Antibodies Syndrome in Cerebrovascular Diseases

Objectives: The aims of the study are to determine the role of anti-phospholipid autoantibodies (APLAs) among patients with stroke and/or transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs), to identify the types and effective isotype of some important APLAs which are lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL), anti∼fi2 glycoprotein I dependent (afi2-GPI), and anti-phosphatidyl serine (aPS). Also, to find out any concomitant effect of non-APLAparameters not specific to antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

Subjects and Methods: This study was carried out on 50 patients attending mainly the Teaching and General Hospitals in Mosul, Duhok, and Erbil Cities, Iraq during the period between 1st March 2004 and 1st March 2005. The studied cases were under 50 years of age, and had no recognizable risk factors. The activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was used for LA estimation and ELISA assay was used to test for IgG& IgM isotypes ofaCL, aJ32-GPI, and aPS. The ANA, RF, VDRL, CRP, and C4 complement were tested by different immuoserological methods. The thrombocytopenic (TP) status was diagnosed by estimation of platelets counts.

Results: The strokes and!or TIAs related to APS were diagnosed in 22/50 (44%) of patients and a significant correlation was reported among patients with IgG plus IgM aCL (p <  0.05), IgG afi2-GPI (p <  0.05), and IgG aPS (p <  0.05). In APLAs positive patients, raised CRP concentrations were reported in 36.4%, TP status in 22.7%, ANA in 22.7%, RF positive in 13.6%, and low C4 levels in l3.6%. Finally,the FP-VDRL test was found in 50 % of APLAs positive cases.

Conclusions: The aCL, afi2- GPI, and aPS antibodies were shown to play a significant role in the development of stroke and!or TIAs among the studied cases.

Circulatory disease and smokeless tobacco in Western populations: a review of the evidence

BACKGROUND

Use of oral snuff or 'snus' has risen in Sweden. Sales of snuff in the US have also risen, overtaking sales of chewing tobacco. There is some evidence that nicotine contributes to circulatory disease (CID) from smoking. We therefore reviewed the evidence relating smokeless tobacco (ST) to CID and related risk factors.

METHODS

Publications that described relevant cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies were identified from in-house files, a Medline search in December 2005 and reference lists. Relative risks (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs) for ischaemic heart disease, stroke and all CID for ST use, stratified by smoking habit, were estimated and combined by meta-analysis to provide an overall RR estimate. For diabetes, increased blood pressure, and other risk factors, evidence was qualitatively reviewed, with results from clinical studies also considered.

RESULTS

ST use in non-smokers was associated with an increased risk of heart disease (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.99-1.27, n = 8), stroke (1.42, 1.29-1.57, n = 5) and CID (1.25, 1.14-1.37, n = 3). The increases mainly derived from two large US studies. The Swedish studies provided little evidence of an increase for heart disease (1.06, 0.83-1.37, n = 5) or stroke (1.17, 0.80-1.70, n = 2), although the estimates by country are not notably heterogeneous, even for stroke (P = 0.29). No dose-response was evident. No increase was seen in former users of ST, or in ST users who also smoked. No clear relationship to diabetes was seen. In the US, an acute blood pressure rise following ST use was consistently reported, and isolated reports linked specific risk factors to ST. In Sweden, though one study reported that snuff acutely increased blood pressure, and two linked snuff to Raynaud-type symptoms, the overall evidence for an effect was inconclusive. Swedish studies generally showed no chronic effect of snuff on blood pressure or various risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Any CID risk from ST appears to be substantially less than from smoking, and no clear risk from Swedish snuff is seen. However, the overall evidence is limited.

Hypercoagulation Testing in Ischemic Stroke

Context.—The utility of laboratory testing for hypercoagulability in the setting of stroke is uncertain.

Objective.—To review the current literature and to make recommendations with regard to laboratory testing for various hypercoagulability risk factors for ischemic stroke.

Data Sources.—Published articles studying the utility of various hypercoagulation tests in predicting initial and/or recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack as well as cerebral vein thrombosis were collected and reviewed, with an emphasis on prospective studies.

Conclusions.—Certain tests, such as C-reactive protein, homocysteine, antiphospholipid antibodies, and lipoprotein(a), may be useful in patients with a history of stroke or at high risk for stroke, as evidenced by prospective data. Factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, protein C, protein S, and antithrombin are not recommended for routine testing but may be useful in certain populations, such as in pediatric patients or in patients with cerebral vein thrombosis.

Cerebral Manifestations in the Antiphospholipid (Hughes) Syndrome

The importance of cerebral disease in patients with the Hughes syndrome is now becoming more widely recognized. The range of neuropsychiatric manifestations of APS is comprehensive, and includes focal symptoms attributable to lesions in a specific area of the brain as well as diffuse or global dysfunction. Patients with APS frequently present with strokes and TIA, but a wide spectrum of other neurologic features-also including non thrombotic neurologic syndromes-has been described in association with the presence of aPL. The recognition of APS has had a profound impact on the understanding and management of the treatment of CNS manifestations associated with connective tissue diseases, in particular, SLE. Many patients with focal neurologic manifestations and aPL, who a few years ago would have received high-dose corticosteroids or immunosuppression, are often successfully treated with anticoagulation. In our opinion, testing for aPL may have a major diagnostic and therapeutic impact not only in patients with autoimmune diseases and neuropsychiatric manifestations, but also in young individuals who develop cerebral ischemia, in those with atypical multiple sclerosis, transverse myelitis, and atypical seizures. We would also recommend testing for aPL for young individuals found with multiple hyperintensity lesions on brain MRI in the absence of other possible causes,especially when under the age of 40 years. It is our practice to anticoagulate patients with aPL suffering from cerebral ischemia with a target INR of 3.0 to prevent recurrences. Low-dose aspirin alone (with occasional exceptions)does not seem helpful to prevent recurrent thrombosis in these patients. Our recommendation, once the patient has had a proven thrombosis associated with aPL, is long-term (possibly life-long) warfarin therapy. Oral anti coagulation carries a risk of hemorrhage, but in our experience the risk of serious bleeding in patients with APS and previous thrombosis treated with oral anticoagulation to a target INR of 3.5 was similar to that in groups of patients treated with lower target ratios. Although a double-blind crossover trial comparing low molecular weight heparin with placebo in patients with aPL and chronic headaches did not show a significant difference in the beneficial effect of low molecular weight heparin versus placebo, in our experience selected patients with aPL and neuropsychiatric manifestations such as seizures, severe cognitive dys-function, and intractable headaches unresponsive to conventional treatment may respond to anticoagulant treatment. The neurologic ramifications of Hughes syndrome are extensive, and it behoves clinicians in all specialties to be aware of this syndrome because treatment with anticoagulation may profoundly change the outlook for these patients.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: An evolving story

Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is a form of immune mediated thrombophilia, presenting as recurrent thrombotic events and pregnancy morbidity, in association with positive laboratory tests for antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) in the form of Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) or anticardiolipin antibodies(ACA). Insights into the pathophysiology of the condition suggest that some antibodies are prothrombotic in vivo, and that the mechanism of thrombosis is likely to be multifactorial. APS has a broad spectrum of clinical presentations, and the laboratory diagnosis can be difficult due to heterogeneity of APAs and poor standardisation of laboratory tests. Anticoagulation is the mainstay of the management of the thrombotic and obstetric complications of APS. The risk of recurrent thrombosis appears to be high, and the duration and intensity of therapy remains controversial. Randomised controlled trials have shown that standard intensity anticoagulation is adequate in most cases of venous thrombosis. Further trials are required to establish whether high intensity coagulation is of benefit in recurrent or arterial thrombosis. The optimal management of recurrent fetal loss is debated and large studies are required to establish a clear benefit of heparin and aspirin over aspirin alone or supportive care.

Hughes syndrome, the antiphospholipid syndrome: a new chapter in neurology

The importance of cerebral disease in patients with the antiphospholipid (Hughes) syndrome (APS) is now becoming more widely recognized. The range of neuropsychiatric manifestations of APS is comprehensive and includes focal symptoms attributable to lesions in a specific area of the brain as well as diffuse or global dysfunction. Patients with APS frequently present with strokes and transient ischemic attacks, but a wide spectrum of other neurologic features, also including nonthrombotic neurological syndromes, has been described in association with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. In this review, we attempt to highlight the large variety of the neurological features of APS.

High titer of anticardiolipin antibody is associated with first-ever ischemic stroke in Taiwan

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The association between anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) and ischemic stroke is controversial, and there are few case-control studies of Asian populations. The aim of this study, therefore, was to determine whether aCL is an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke in Taiwanese patients over the age of 40 years.

METHODS

Both the IgG and IgM isotypes of aCL were measured in 273 patients (> 40 years of age) hospitalized for first-ever ischemic stroke and in 181 non-stroke controls. Results were defined as: negative (< 10 IgG phospholipid units [GPL] or < 7.5 IgM phospholipid units [MPL]); low positive (10-20 GPL or 7.5-15 MPL); or, high positive (> 20 GPL or > 15 MPL). Odds ratios (OR) were estimated by logistic regression with adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS

A high positive IgG aCL was present in 4.4% of the stroke patients and 1.2% of the controls. Age- and sex-adjusted analysis showed a borderline association between a high positive level for aCL IgG titer and stroke, with an OR of 4.01 (95% CI 0.87-18.37; p = 0.0739). Final analysis, with adjustments for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, tobacco smoking, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy and hyperlipidemia, revealed an OR of 5.25 (95% CI 1.06-25.89; p = 0.0419).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that elevated titer of aCL IgG (> 20 GPL) is associated with first-ever ischemic stroke in Taiwanese patients aged over 40 years. High positive aCL titer is related to ischemic stroke after adjustment for conventional cerebrovascular risk factors, indicating that it is probably an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in young adults with stroke

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid antibodies have been associated with a clinical syndrome consisting thrombosis and recurrent, unexplained fetal loss.

METHODS

The literature pertaining to stroke associated with antiphospholipid antibodies, with emphasis on stroke in young adults, was reviewed.

RESULTS

Antiphospholipid antibodies are an independent risk factor for stroke in young adults in five of six studies. Multiple antiphospholipid specificities or the Lupus Anticoagulant were tested in addition to anticardiolipin antibody in these studies. In the single study that found no increased risk for stroke, only anticardiolipin antibody was tested. Only one of these studies evaluated for risk of recurrent stroke in young adults with antiphospholipid antibodies and found it to be increased. No treatment trials have been conducted in young adults with antiphospholipid antibodies and stroke. In the single treatment trial comparing aspirin and low-INR producing doses of warfarin to prevent recurrent stroke, both were found to be equally effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly Lupus Anticoagulant, is an independent risk factor for first and possibly recurrent ischemic stroke in young adults. The best therapeutic strategy for preventing antiphospholipid antibody-associated recurrent stroke is not clear.

Prevalence of antibodies against oxidised LDL in a cohort of 163 patients with positive anti-phospholipid antibodies and recent thrombosis

We evaluated the prevalence of anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (a-beta2-GPI), anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (a-PP), anti-prothrombin (a-PT), and anti-oxidised low-density lipoprotein (a-oxLDL) antibodies in a cohort of patients with a recent thrombotic event. Among consecutive sera sent to an autoimmune laboratory for routine testing for anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL) 473 were found positive for IgG and/or IgM aCL. The referring physicians were requested for clinical information about thrombo-embolic events occurring within 6 months prior to testing. One hundred and sixty-three individuals of which 82 had suffered from cerebro-vascular infarction and 49 from deep venous thromboses or pulmonary emboli were included in the study. Ninety-four sera were positive for IgG aCL and 69 were negative. There was a strong correlation between the presence of IgG aCL and the three other phospholipid-related antibodies: a-beta2-GPI, a-PP, and a-PT. However, IgG a-oxLDL antibodies were almost equally distributed among sera positive and negative for IgG aCL. The presence of antibodies of all subgroups was most pronounced among patients with venous thrombo-embolic disease. In this cohort antibodies to beta2-GPI, PP, PT seem to coexist with aCL. However, a-oxLDL antibodies appear to define a subset of patients, who were older, had more arterial vascular disease, and with no apparent association to the presence of IgG aCL.

IgG and IgM isotypes of anti-cardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein i antibodies reflect different forms of recent thrombo-embolic events

We correlated the distribution and levels of serum anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein-1 antibodies (anti-beta(2)-GPI) of the IgG and IgM isotypes to the clinical spectrum of recent (<6 months) thrombo-embolic events in a cohort of 162 patients. Clinical information was obtained by questionnaires from the referring physicians. Cerebro-vascular infarction (CVI) had taken place in 82 patients, deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in 34, pulmonary embolism (PE) in 14, myocardial infarction (MI) in four, and other thromboses in 28 patients. SLE was the most commonly associated rheumatic disease and accounted for 20 (12%) patients. In 124 (77%) patients no underlying rheumatic disease was identified. Isolated IgG aCL was found in 31 of 48 patients with DVT/PE (65%), but in only 21 of 82 patients with CVI (26%); p<0.0001. IgG anti-beta(2)-GPI were detected in 23 (48%) DVT/PE patients, but in only 13 (16%) CVI patients; p<0.001. The IgG class anti-beta(2)-GPI positive patients had significantly higher levels of IgG aCL (mean 65 units) compared to IgG anti-beta(2)-GPI negative patients (mean 29 units); p<0.0001. In contrast, isolated IgM aCL was found in nine (19%) patients with DVT/PE, but in 46 (56%) CVI patients; p<0.0001. Only ten patients had IgM anti-beta(2)-GPI. The present study shows that the IgG and IgM aCL isotypes seem to define different clinical subsets of patients with thrombo-embolic events with IgG aCL being most prevalent in the group having DVT/PE, IgM aCL being found primarily among CVI patients.

Phosphatidylserine IgG and beta-2-glycoprotein I IgA antibodies may be a risk factor for ischaemic stroke

OBJECTIVE

Antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) are established risk factors for venous thrombosis but their role in the pathogenesis of cerebral ischaemia is unclear. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relevance of various APLA in patients with cryptogenic stroke (group A, n = 21) and determined causes of stroke (group B, n = 104) according to the TOAST classification in comparison with healthy volunteers without any thrombotic or ischaemic event in their history (group C, n = 84).

METHODS

Median ages were 52 yr (A), 60 yr (B) and 51 yr (C). Blood samples were tested for lupus anticoagulant (LA) using phospholipid-dependent coagulation tests (activated partial thromboplastin time, diluted Russell viper venom time). Confirmatory tests were performed if necessary. Furthermore, we assessed the presence of specific APLA and their antibody subclasses against cardiolipin (AclA), phosphatidylserine (ApsA), phosphatidylinositol (ApiA) and beta-2-glycoprotein I (Abeta2A) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

For ApsA IgG we found a significantly higher prevalence in stroke patients (57.7%) compared with normal subjects (4.8%; P < 0.001). Similarly, Abeta2A IgA was significantly more prevalent in stroke patients (20.8%) in comparison with normals (3.6%; P < 0.001). For all other APLAs tested, no significant differences emerged after adjustment for multiple comparisons. We did not find significant differences between stroke subtypes for any APLA.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest a relevant role for antiphosphatidylserine IgG and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I IgA in stroke aetiology.

Thrombophilic risk factors in patients with severe carotid atherosclerosis

Carotid stenosis and atrial fibrillation are the strongest risk factors for ischemic stroke. Ongoing prevention efforts include the identification of novel factors that increase the risk for carotid atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to determine the thrombophilic risk profile of patients with severe carotid stenosis by evaluating a number of genetic and metabolic risk factors [factor (F)II G20210A, factor V Leiden, MTHFR C677T polymorphisms, anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), and homocysteine (Hcy)]. The study population consisted of 615 patients [(410 M/205 F; median age 73 (26-94) years] with severe (> 70%) carotid stenosis, and 615 apparently healthy subjects [(410 M/205 F; age 73 (31-92) years]. On multivariate analysis, independent risk factors were elevated Hcy [odds ratio (OR) 7.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.8, 11.8] and Lp(a) levels (OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.1, 3.9), the presence of aCL (OR 5.7, 95% CI 3.1, 10.4) and heterozygosity for FII G20210A polymorphism (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3, 5.9). In the subgroup of women, independent risk factors for severe carotid atherosclerosis were: high levels of Hcy and Lp(a) and the presence of aCL, whereas hyperhomocysteinemia, elevated Lp(a) levels, aCL, FII G20210A and MTHFR 677TT polymorphisms remained independent risk factors in the subgroup of men. The results of the present study demonstrate that the prevalence of the thrombophilic risk factors is increased in patients with severe carotid atherosclerosis.

Do antiphospholipid antibodies increase the long-term risk of thrombotic complications in young patients with a recent TIA or ischemic stroke?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of our study was to determine the relative risk of thrombotic events in young patients with a recent TIA or ischemic stroke and positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL).

METHODS

We included 128 consecutive patients aged 18-45 years with a recent TIA or ischemic stroke. All patients underwent computed tomography scanning and were screened for cardiovascular risk factors, cardiac disorders and large vessel disease. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) was screened for by an APTT-based assay and a diluted PT-assay. Anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, using cardiolipin and anti-human IgG and IgM. Thrombotic events could be TIA, stroke, myocardial infarction, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Product limit estimates of the time free of TIA or stroke and of the time free of any thrombotic event were made. The relative risk was estimated by means of a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Of the 128 patients, 22 (17.2%) had aPL. The mean follow-up was 3 years and 3 months (range 41 days to 6 yrs). The incidence of any thrombotic event per 100 patient years of follow-up was 9.0, and the incidence of recurrent stroke or TIA was 7.9. The relative risk of any thrombotic event in patients with aPL was 0.9 (95% CI: 0.3-2.4) and for recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA 0.7 (95% CI: 0.3-2.2).

CONCLUSION

In young patients with a recent TIA or ischemic stroke, aPL do not seem to be a strong risk factor for recurrent stroke or TIA, nor for other thrombotic complications.

Cardiovascular disease and diabetes in the Northern Sweden Health and Disease Study Cohort - evaluation of risk factors and their interactions

The purpose of this paper is, first, to describe the organization, sampling procedures, availability of samples/database, ethical considerations, and quality control program of the Northern Sweden Health and Disease Study Cohort. Secondly, some examples are given of studies on cardiovascular disease and diabetes with a focus on the biomarker programme. The cohort has been positioned as a national and international resource for scientific research.

Ein zerebraler Grenzzoneninfarkt nach Allgemeinan�sthesie bei einem Patienten mit erh�hten Antikardiolipinantik�rpern

During the first generalised epileptic attack, a patient suffered a humerus fracture which necessitated an operation. This patient also had a history of spontaneous lung emboli and an elevated anti-cardiolipin plasma level for which coumarin was prescribed but was stopped preoperatively. After induction of general anaesthesia for a total shoulder arthroplasty, the patient became hypotensive and the bispectral index recorded perioperatively dropped to 0. Postoperatively, the patient developed signs of a unilateral borderzone cerebral infarct in the area of the medial cerebral artery. The possible pathomechanisms involved are discussed. In cases of known cerebral pathology intraoperative hypotension should be avoided by at all costs. Patients with increased anti-cardiolipin antibody levels and who suffer from epileptic attacks have an increased risk of thromboembolic events.

APS and the brain

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) may present with neurological syndromes. Cerebrovascular disease, chorea/ballismus, epileptic seizures, headache, cognitive impairment, transverse myelopathy, Devic's syndrome and multiple sclerosis-like presentations feature among others. Cerebrovascular disease is one of the most common presenting symptoms of APS, second only to deep vein thrombosis, and accounts for half of neurological manifestations in patients with APS; accelerated atherogenesis and cardioembolism are the most likely mechanisms implicated. Though infrequent, chorea is consistently associated with APS; the pathogenetic role of antiphospholipid antibodies (APLab) in this case might be routed through cerebrovascular disease in some cases and through purely immunological pathways in others. Both ischemic and immunological mechanisms have been demonstrated in the pathogenesis of epileptic seizures, which may account for 7% of neurological manifestations in APS. Although frequent in APS, a causative link between APLab and most common types of headache (migraine and tension-type headache) is more than dubious. Cognitive impairment may derive from a well-defined clinical tableau of multi-infarct dementia. Nevertheless, (highly frequent) less severe cognitive impairment has also been associated with the presence of APLab in the absence of magnetic resonance findings. A relationship between APS and transverse myelopathy seems likely but small numbers in the studies published to date preclude definite statements; routinely testing for APLab patients with neurological manifestations suggestive of multiple sclerosis seems to be unrecommended at the present time.

Peripheral vascular disease in antiphospholipid syndrome

Atherosclerosis has been considered an inflammatory disease based on the finding that atherosclerotic lesion contains activated T lymphocytes reacting with oxidized low-density lipoproteins (oxLDL) and heat shock proteins (HSP); it also contains autoantigens like beta2GPI, a target of antibodies occurring in an immune-mediated thrombophilia called antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Further support to this hypothesis comes from the cross-reactivity, which occurs between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and antibodies to oxLDL. Animal experiments have shown that aPL are associated with atheroma. In addition, accelerated atherosclerosis has been detected in patients with a prototype systemic autoimmune disease, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the association of APS or aPL with atherosclerosis is a matter of debate due to the small numbers of patients studied, and the fact that traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis coexist. The prevalence of APS ranges from 1.7% to 6%, and that of aPL reaches to 14% among patients with peripheral vascular disease defined on the basis of clinical outcomes. On the other hand, the prevalence of asymptomatic atherosclerosis, defined in terms of plaques in ultrasonography, reaches to 15% of patients with APS compared to 9% of SLE patients and 3% of normal controls. Among SLE patients with aPL, the prevalence of plaques ranges from 6% in premenopausal women to 31% in unselected patients. Less than 10% of APS patients express premature atherosclerosis in the absence of other risk factors. Which APS patient will develop atherosclerosis is unpredictable.

Management of the neurological manifestations of APS—what do the trials tell us?

PURPOSE

To systematically review evidence from clinical trials about the management of neurological manifestations of Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS).

METHODS

Articles reporting case-control, cohort and prospective studies and treatment trials of primary or secondary stroke prevention in patients with aPL were identified in an OVID literature search from 1966 to 2004, using the keywords: APS, aPL and cerebrovascular disease. Articles were evaluated according to the standard system for assessing medical evidence to answer the following questions: (1) What is the role of aPL and recurrent stroke risk in both primary and secondary APS populations? (2) What is the evidence to support specific treatment strategies for secondary prevention of aPL-associated stroke? (3) What is the evidence to support specific treatment strategies for primary prevention of aPL-associated stroke?

CONCLUSIONS

(1) aPL are a risk factor for incident stroke (Grade A, established as useful for the given condition in the specified population). (2) The evidence to support the role of aPL in recurrent stroke is conflicting and, therefore, inconclusive. (3) Warfarin at moderate-intensity doses is equally effective in preventing a recurrent thrombotic event as warfarin at high-intensity doses in patients with APS (Grade A evidence, established as useful for the given condition in the specified population). (4) Warfarin, at moderate-intensity doses is as effective as aspirin (at a dose of 325 mg/day) in preventing recurrent thrombotic events in patients who are aPL-positive at the time of an initial stroke (Grade B evidence, probably useful for the given condition in the given population). (5) Currently there are no data to support the use of any prophylactic therapy in patients with aPL and no clinical manifestations for the purposes of preventing an incident stroke.

Controversies in the antiphospholipid syndrome and stroke

Many clinicians providing care and advice to patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), where the principal clinical manifestation is stroke, do so in the setting of an evidence base of mixed quality. Indeed, systematic studies have not particularly helped the practising clinician as they have been characterised by variable criteria used to select subjects, making it impossible to extrapolate to typical clinic patients. This has left us with a number of key questions, each of which attracts controversy in terms of patient management. In this review, these are posed as a series of questions with the answer, or lack of one, considered after each question. The review draws attention to the important questions that require answers for current primary and secondary prevention, as well as treatment of APS and stroke, and suggests a series of studies that are needed to clarify these issues.