Outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy

Long-Term Freedom From Ventricular Arrhythmias in ARVC With Endocardial Only Ablation: Predictors of Success

BACKGROUND

Although the epicardial predominance of substrate abnormalities has been well demonstrated in early stages of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), endocardial (ENDO) ablation may suffice to eliminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) in some patients.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to report the long-term outcomes of ENDO-only ablation in ARVC patients and factors that predict VT-free survival.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients with Task Force Criteria diagnosis of ARVC undergoing a first ENDO-only VT ablation between 1998 and 2020. Ablation was predominantly guided by activation/entrainment mapping for mappable VTs and pace mapping/targeting abnormal electrograms for unmappable VTs. The primary endpoint was freedom from any recurrent sustained VT after the last ENDO-only ablation.

RESULTS

Seventy-four ARVC patients underwent ENDO-only VT ablation. VT noninducibility was achieved in 49 (66%) patients. During median follow-up of 6.6 years (Q1-Q3: 3.4-11.2 years), 40 (54.1%) patients remained free from any VT recurrence with rare VT ≤2 episodes in additional 12.2%. Among patients with noninducibility, VT-free survival was 75.5% during long-term follow-up. In multivariable analysis, >45 y of age at diagnosis (HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.17-0.98) and VT noninducibility (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.16-0.80) were predictors of VT-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term VT-free survival can be achieved in over half of ARVC patients following ENDO-only VT ablation, increasing to over 75% if VT noninducibility is achieved. Our results support consideration of a stepwise ENDO-only approach before proceeding to epicardial ablation if VT noninducibility can be achieved particularly in older patients.

Impact of artificial intelligence arrhythmia mapping on time to first ablation, procedure duration, and fluoroscopy use

INTRODUCTION

Artificial intelligence (AI) ECG arrhythmia mapping provides arrhythmia source localization using 12-lead ECG data; whether this information impacts procedural efficiency is unknown. We performed a retrospective, case-control study to evaluate the hypothesis that AI ECG mapping may reduce time to ablation, procedural duration, and fluoroscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases in which system output was used were retrospectively enrolled according to IRB-approved protocols at each site. Matched control cases were enrolled in reverse chronological order beginning on the last day for which the technology was unavailable. Controls were matched based upon physician, institution, arrhythmia, and a predetermined complexity rating. Procedural metrics, fluoroscopy data, and clinical outcomes were assessed from time-stamped medical records.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 28 patients (age 65 ± 11 years, 46% female, left atrial dimension 4.1 ± 0.9 cm, LVEF 50 ± 18%) and was similar to 28 controls. The most common arrhythmia types were atrial fibrillation (n = 10), premature ventricular complexes (n = 8), and ventricular tachycardia (n = 6). Use of the system was associated with a 19.0% reduction in time to ablation (133 ± 48 vs. 165 ± 49 min, p = 0.02), a 22.6% reduction in procedure duration (233 ± 51 vs. 301 ± 83 min, p < 0.001), and a 43.7% reduction in fluoroscopy (18.7 ± 13.3 vs. 33.2 ± 18.0 min, p < 0.001) versus controls. At 6 months follow-up, arrhythmia-free survival was 73.5% in the study group and 63.3% in the control group (p = 0.56).

CONCLUSION

Use of forward-solution AI ECG mapping is associated with reductions in time to first ablation, procedure duration, and fluoroscopy without an adverse impact on procedure outcomes or complications.

Innovations in ventricular tachycardia ablation

Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) has evolved significantly over the past decade and is currently a well-established therapeutic option. Technological advances and improved understanding of VA mechanisms have led to tremendous innovations in VA ablation. The purpose of this review article is to provide an overview of current innovations in VA ablation. Mapping techniques, such as ultra-high density mapping, isochronal late activation mapping, and ripple mapping, have provided improved arrhythmogenic substrate delineation and potential procedural success while limiting duration of ablation procedure and potential hemodynamic compromise. Besides, more advanced mapping and ablation techniques such as epicardial and intramyocardial ablation approaches have allowed operators to more precisely target arrhythmogenic substrate. Moreover, advances in alternate energy sources, such as electroporation, as well as stereotactic radiation therapy have been proposed to be effective and safe. New catheters, such as the lattice and the saline-enhanced radiofrequency catheters, have been designed to provide deeper and more durable tissue ablation lesions compared to conventional catheters. Contact force optimization and baseline impedance modulation are important tools to optimize VT radiofrequency ablation and improve procedural success. Furthermore, advances in cardiac imaging, specifically cardiac MRI, have great potential in identifying arrhythmogenic substrate and evaluating ablation success. Overall, VA ablation has undergone significant advances over the past years. Innovations in VA mapping techniques, alternate energy source, new catheters, and utilization of cardiac imaging have great potential to improve overall procedural safety, hemodynamic stability, and procedural success.

Endocardial-Epicardial Catheter Ablation Versus Endocardial Catheter Ablation Alone for Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients With Structural Heart Disease (Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data)

Endocardial-epicardial (Endo-epi) catheter ablation (CA) has been shown to reduce the rate of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). However, the effectiveness of this technique compared with endocardial (Endo) CA alone remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness of Endo-epi versus Endo alone in reducing the risk of VA recurrence in patients with SHD. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register with a comprehensive strategy. We used reconstructed time-to-event data to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for VA recurrence accompanied by at least one Kaplan-Meier curve for ventricular tachycardia recurrence. Our meta-analysis included 11 studies with a total of 977 patients. Endo-epi had a significantly lower risk of VA recurrence compared with those treated with Endo alone (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.57, p <0.001). Subgroup analysis based on the type of cardiomyopathy revealed that patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) benefited significantly from Endo-epi in reducing the risk of VA recurrence (HR 0.835, 0.55 to 0.87, p <0.021). However, there was no significant difference with non-ICM (HR 0.440, 0.55 to 0.87, p <0.33). The analysis of conditional survival showed that patients who remained free of VA recurrence for 5 years after the procedure had a very low probability of developing VA recurrence thereafter. In conclusion, Endo-epi CA is more effective than Endo CA alone in reducing the risk of VA recurrence in patients with SHD, especially those with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and ICM.

Correlations Between Endocardial Voltage Mapping, Diagnosis, and Genetics in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

The relations between endocardial voltage mapping and the genetic background of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) have not been investigated so far. A total of 97 patients with proved or suspected ARVC who underwent 3-dimensional endocardial mapping and genetic testing have been retrospectively included. Presence, localization, and size of scar areas were correlated to ARVC diagnosis and the presence of a pathogenic variant. A total of 78 patients (80%) presented with some bipolar or unipolar scar on endocardial voltage mapping, whereas 43 carried pathogenic variants (44%). Significant associations were observed between presence of endocardial scars on voltage mapping and previous or inducible ventricular tachycardia, right ventricular function and dimensions, or electrocardiogram features of ARVC. A total of 60 of the 78 patients (77%) with an endocardial scar fulfilled the criteria for a definitive arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia diagnosis versus 8 of 19 patients (42%) without scar (p = 0.003). Patients with a definitive diagnosis of ARVC had more scars from any location and the scars were larger in patients with ARVC. In the 68 patients with a definitive diagnosis of ARVC, the presence of any endocardial scar was similar whether an ARVC-causal mutation was present or not. Only scar extent was significantly greater in patients with pathogenic variants. There was no difference in the presence and characteristics of scars in PKP2 mutated versus other mutated patients. The 3-dimensional endocardial mapping could have an important role for refining ARVC diagnosis and may be able to detect minor forms with otherwise insufficient criteria for diagnosis. The trend for larger scar extent were observed in mutated patients, without any difference according to the mutated genes.

Varied Presentation of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C): A Case Series

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is a genetically predisposed form of cardiomyopathy that mainly affects young individuals resulting in fatal ventricular arrhythmias leading to sudden cardiac death. ARVD has 50% of cases that involve both the right ventricle (RV) and left ventricle (LV), but only a small number of cases involve an isolated left ventricle. In this case series, five patients (four males and one female) with a diagnosis of ARVD presented to our center with varied clinical presentations across a wide range of age groups. The MRI of all five cases showed dilated right atrium (RA)/RV with right ventricular free wall dyskinesia. Two-dimensional (2D) MRI showed aneurysmal outpouching with diffuse free wall enhancement. Automated implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) was implanted uneventfully in all five patients, and the patients were discharged with oral medications such as low-dose diuretics, beta-blockers, spironolactone, angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACE) inhibitors, amiodarone, and anxiolytics. Until now, the patients were doing well on follow-up visits. The therapeutic management of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) has evolved over the years and continues to be an important challenge. To further improve risk stratification and treatment of patients, more information is needed on natural history, long-term prognosis, and risk assessment. Special attention should be focused on the identification of patients who would benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in comparison to pharmacological and other nonpharmacological approaches.

Matching Ablation Endpoints to Long-Term Outcome: The Prospective Multicenter Italian Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Registry

BACKGROUND

Multicenter ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation studies have shown poorer outcomes compared with single-center experiences. This difference could be related to heterogeneous mapping and ablation strategies.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated a homogenous simplified catheter ablation strategy for different substrates and compared the results with those of a single referral center.

METHODS

This was a multicenter prospective VT ablation registry of patients with the following 4 causes of VT: previous myocardial infarction; previous myocarditis; arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia; or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. The procedural protocol included precise mapping and ablation steps with the combined endpoint of late potential (LP) abolition and noninducibility of VT. The long-term primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from VT.

RESULTS

A total of 309 patients were enrolled. LPs were present in 70% of patients and were abolished in 83%. At the end of the procedure 74% of LPs were noninducible. The primary combined endpoint of LP abolition and noninducibility was achieved in 64% of patients with LPs at baseline. Freedom from VT at 12 months was observed in 67% of patients. In the overall study group, VT inducibility was the only predictor of freedom from VT (P = 0.013). In patients with LPs, the VT recurrence rate was lower both for patients with complete LP abolition (P = 0.040) and for patients meeting the composite endpoint (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized VT mapping and ablation technique reproduced the procedural outcomes of a single referral center in a multicenter prospective study. LP abolition and noninducibility were effective in reducing VT recurrences in patients with 4 causes of cardiomyopathy. (Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Registry; NCT03649022).

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) encompasses a group of conditions characterized by right ventricular fibrofatty infiltration, with a predominant arrhythmic presentation. First described in the late 1970s and early 1980s, it is now frequently recognized to have biventricular involvement. The prevalence is ∼1:2,000 to 1:5,000, depending on geographic location, and it has a slight male predominance. The diagnosis of ARVC is determined on the basis of fulfillment of task force criteria incorporating electrophysiological parameters, cardiac imaging findings, genetic factors, and histopathologic features. Risk stratification of patients with ARVC aims to identify those who are at increased risk of sudden cardiac death or sustained ventricular tachycardia. Factors including age, sex, electrophysiological features, and cardiac imaging investigations all contribute to risk stratification. The current management of ARVC includes exercise restriction, β-blocker therapy, consideration for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion, and catheter ablation. This review summarizes our current understanding of ARVC and provides clinicians with a practical approach to diagnosis and management.

How exercise can deteriorate the clinical course of an ARVC patient: a case report

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC)/dysplasia is a genetic disease characterized by fibro-adipose degeneration of ventricular myocardium. Initial clinical presentation is variable and ranges from asymptomatic cases to chronic heart failure and sudden cardiac death due to malignant arrhythmias.

CASE SUMMARY

Here, a 67-year-old male patient who started extensive physical training upon retirement and presented with ventricular tachycardia and progressive heart failure as a first sign of his disease. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy diagnosis was established according to the 2010 modified Task Force Criteria and supported by HRS/EHRA consensus-based genotyping. After initial discharge on optimal medical therapy and prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation according to his individual ARVC risk score, the patient reported rapid decline in physical capacity on a regular follow-up 4 months later. To better understand the aetiology of his clinical deterioration, we performed stress echocardiography, coronary angiogram, and exercise right heart catheterization, which conclusively suggest impaired left ventricular filling secondary to right ventricular failure as a main cause of global circulatory failure.

DISCUSSION

The present case report focuses on relation of physical activity to disease onset and the concomitant advent of symptoms during exercise as well as a structured and guideline-aided diagnostic workup in ARVC and staged treatment options. Continuous ARVC centre-oriented re-assessment and treatment planning including lifestyle intervention, psychological support, medical, surgical, and interventional options are key elements of sustained long-term care for ARVC patients.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Electroanatomic voltage mapping for tissue characterization beyond arrhythmia definition: A systematic review

Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction by means of electroanatomic mapping (EAM) systems, allows for the understanding of the mechanism of focal or re-entrant arrhythmic circuits, which can be identified by means of dynamic (activation and propagation) and static (voltage) color-coded maps. However, besides this conventional use, EAM may offer helpful anatomical and functional information for tissue characterisation in several clinical settings. Today, data regarding electromechanical myocardial viability, scar detection in ischaemic and nonischaemic cardiomyopathy and arrhythmogenic right ventricle dysplasia (ARVC/D) definition are mostly consolidated, while emerging results are becoming available in contexts such as Brugada syndrome and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) implant procedures. As part of an invasive procedure, EAM has not yet been widely adopted as a stand-alone tool in the diagnostic path. We aim to review the data in the current literature regarding the use of 3D EAM systems beyond the definition of arrhythmia.

Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy-Current Treatment and Future Options

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an inheritable heart muscle disease characterised pathologically by fibrofatty myocardial replacement and clinically by ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although, in its original description, the disease was believed to predominantly involve the right ventricle, biventricular and left-dominant variants, in which the myocardial lesions affect in parallel or even mostly the left ventricle, are nowadays commonly observed. The clinical management of these patients has two main purposes: the prevention of SCD and the control of arrhythmic and heart failure (HF) events. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is the only proven lifesaving treatment, despite significant morbidity because of device-related complications and inappropriate shocks. Selection of patients who can benefit the most from ICD therapy is one of the most challenging issues in clinical practice. Risk stratification in ACM patients is mostly based on arrhythmic burden and ventricular dysfunction severity, although other clinical features resulting from electrocardiogram and imaging modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance may have a role. Medical therapy is crucial for treatment of VAs and the prevention of negative ventricular remodelling. In this regard, the efficacy of novel anti-HF molecules and drugs acting on the inflammatory pathway in patients with ACM is, to date, unknown. Catheter ablation represents an effective strategy to treat ventricular tachycardia relapses and recurrent ICD shocks. The present review will address the current strategies for prevention of SCD and treatment of VAs and HF in patients with ACM.

Clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: Insights from the Johns Hopkins ARVC Program

BACKGROUND

Previous studies of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), relying on limited numbers of procedures, have not reported VT-free survival in parallel for single and multiple procedures (ie, after the last procedure). Data regarding the impact of RFA on VT burden are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to provide new insights on clinical outcomes based on a large series of VT ablation procedures from the current era in ARVC patients.

METHODS

We evaluated consecutive patients with definite ARVC who underwent RFA procedures between 2009 and 2019 at our center. We assessed VT-free survival, for single and multiple procedures, and changes in VT burden and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) after RFA.

RESULTS

Among 116 patients, there were 166 RFA procedures, 106 (63.9%) of which involved epicardial ablation. Cumulative freedom from VT after a single procedure was 68.6% and 49.8% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Cumulative VT-free survival after multiple procedures was 81.8% and 69.6% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. VT burden per RFA was reduced after vs before ablation (mean 0.7 vs 10.0 events/year; P <.001). Furthermore, VT burden per patient was reduced after last ablation vs before first ablation (mean 0.5 vs 10.9 events/year; P <.001). Use of AADs decreased after ablation (22.2% vs 51.9%; P <.001).

CONCLUSION

In ARVC patients, RFA provided good VT-free survival after a single procedure, with multiple procedures required for more sustained freedom from VT recurrence. Marked reduction in VT burden permitted discontinuation of AADs.

Efficacy of catheter ablation for premature ventricular contractions in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) may be found in any stage of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and have been associated with the risk of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of PVC ablation in ARVC patients.

METHODS

We studied consecutive ARVC patients who underwent PVC ablation due to symptomatic high PVC burden. Mean daily PVC burden and antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use were assessed before and after the procedure. Complete long-term success was defined as more than 80% reduction in PVC burden off of membrane-active AADs.

RESULTS

Eight patients (37 ± 15 years; 4 males) underwent PVC ablation. The mean daily PVC burden before ablation ranged from 5.4% to 24.8%. A total of 7 (87.5%) patients underwent epicardial ablation. Complete acute elimination of PVCs was achieved in 4 (50%) patients (no complications). The mean daily PVC burden variation ranged from an 87% reduction to a 26% increase after the procedure. Over a median follow-up of 345 days (range: 182-3004 days), only one (12.5%) patient presented complete long-term success, and 6 (75%) patients either maintained or increased the need for Class I or Class III AADs. A total of 2 (25%) patients experienced sustained VT for the first time following the ablation procedure, requiring repeat ablation. No death or heart transplantation occurred.

CONCLUSION

PVC ablation was not associated with a consistent reduction of the PVC burden in ARVC patients with symptomatic, frequent PVCs. PVC ablation may be reserved for highly symptomatic patients who failed AADs. Additional investigation is required to improve the efficacy of PVC ablation in ARVC patients.

Electroanatomic voltage mapping and characterisation imaging for "right ventricle arrhythmic syndromes" beyond the arrhythmia definition: a comprehensive review

Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction by means of electroanatomic mapping (EAM) systems, allows for the understanding of the mechanism of focal or re-entrant arrhythmic circuits along with pacing techniques. However, besides this conventional use, EAM may offer helpful anatomical and functional information. Data regarding electromechanical scar detection in ischaemic (and nonischaemic) cardiomyopathy are mostly consolidated, while emerging results are becoming available in contexts such as arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVC/D) definition and Brugada syndrome. As part of an invasive procedure, EAM has not yet been widely adopted as a stand-alone tool in the diagnostic path. We aim to review the current literature regarding the use of 3D EAM systems for right ventricle (RV) functional characterisation beyond the definition of arrhythmia.

Spatial and transmural properties of the reentrant ventricular tachycardia circuit in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: Simultaneous epicardial and endocardial recordings

BACKGROUND

While advances in the characterization of the structural substrate in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) have been made, the ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuit remains incompletely described.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to delineate the reentrant VT circuit with simultaneous epicardial and endocardial mapping (SEEM) in ARVC.

METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive patients with ARVC and VT underwent SEEM at 4 centers between 2014 and 2020. Retrospective analysis was performed on combined isochronal activation maps.

RESULTS

Of the 30 VT circuits, 24 were delineated with SEEM (956 [341-1843] endocardial points and 1763 [882-3054] epicardial points). The apex and outflow tract rarely harbored VT circuits, with 50% distributed in the inferior wall and 43% in the free wall. The entire tachycardia cycle length was recorded from the epicardium in 71% of circuits. In all circuits, a large proportion of the tachycardia cycle length was recorded from the epicardium relative to the endocardium. Localized epicardial reentry was observed in 35% of patients (14 mm × 15 mm), which was associated with smaller endocardial low voltage area (39 cm² vs 104 cm²; P = .002) and preserved right ventricular ejection fraction (35% vs 25%; P = .046) compared with those with larger circuit dimensions. Seventy percent of termination sites were achieved from the epicardium.

CONCLUSION

High-resolution recordings from both myocardial surfaces confirm a consistent predominance of epicardial participation during reentry in ARVC. Only the perivalvular inflow region of the "triangle of dysplasia" had a strong propensity to harbor VT circuits, with the greatest proportion located in the inferior wall. Localized epicardial reentry may be a manifestation of earlier stage disease with a relative paucity of endocardial substrate.

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy in Pediatric Patients: An Important but Underrecognized Clinical Entity

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited cardiomyopathy characterized by fibrofatty infiltration of predominantly the right ventricular (RV) myocardium. Affected patients typically present as young adults with hemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia, although pediatric cases are increasingly recognized. These young subjects often have a more severe phenotype with a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and progression toward heart failure. Diagnosis of ARVC is made by combining multiple sources of information as prescribed by the consensus-based Task Force Criteria. The description of Naxos disease, a fully penetrant autosomal recessive disorder that is associated with ARVC and a cutaneous phenotype of palmoplantar keratoderma and wooly hair facilitated the identification of the genetic cause of ARVC. At present, approximately 60% of patients are found to carry a pathogenic variant in one of five genes associated with the cardiac desmosome. The incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity of these variants however implies an important role for environmental factors, of which participation in endurance exercise is a strong risk factor. Since there currently is no definite cure for ARVC, disease management is directed toward symptom reduction, delay of disease progression, and prevention of SCD. This clinically focused review describes the spectrum of ARVC among children and adolescents, the genetic architecture underlying this disease, the cardio-cutaneous syndromes that led to its identification, and current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in pediatric ARVC subjects.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Ablation strategies for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) has significantly evolved over the past decade. However, different ablation strategies showed inconsistency in acute and long-term outcomes.

Methods

We searched the databases of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library through October 17, 2019 for studies describing the clinical outcomes of VT ablation in ARVC. Data including VT recurrence, all-cause mortality, acute procedural efficacy and major procedural complications were extracted. A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis was further performed in comparative studies of endo-epicardial versus endocardial-only ablation.

Results

A total of 24 studies with 717 participants were enrolled. The literatures of epicardial ablation were mainly published after 2010 with total ICD implantation of 73.7%, acute efficacy of 89.8%, major complication of 5.2%, follow-up of 28.9 months, VT freedom of 75.3%, all-cause mortality of 1.1% and heart transplantation of 0.6%. Meta-analysis of 10 comparative studies revealed that compared with endocardial-only approach, epicardial ablation significantly decreased VT recurrence (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.30-0.85; P = 0.010), but somehow increased major procedural complications (OR: 4.64; 95% CI: 1.28-16.92; P= 0.02), with not evident improvement of acute efficacy (OR: 2.74; 95% CI: 0.98-7.65; P = 0.051) or all-cause mortality (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.09-8.31; P = 0.90).

Conclusion

Catheter ablation for VT in ARVC is feasible and effective. Epicardial ablation is associated with better long-term VT freedom, but with more major complications and unremarkable survival or acute efficacy benefit.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Epicardial Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited heart muscle disease characterized by progressive fibrofatty replacement of the myocardium, right ventricular enlargement, and malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) may be seen in all stages of the disease and is associated with sudden cardiac death. In patients who failed anti-arrhythmic medical therapy, catheter ablation has become an attractive therapeutic option to reduce VT burden and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions. In this article, the authors aim to address the overall concepts of epicardial catheter ablation in ARVC, focusing on substrate characterization and ablation strategies.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia: A Sequential Approach

Background

It has been suggested that endocardial and epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) improves outcome in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. We investigated our sequential approach for VT ablation in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia in a single center.

Methods and Results

We included 47 patients (44±16 years) with definite (81%) or borderline (19%) arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia between 1998 and 2016. Our ablation strategy was to target the endocardial substrate. Epicardial ablation was performed in case of acute ablation failure or lack of an endocardial substrate. Single and multiple procedural 1‐ and 5‐year outcome data for the first occurrence of the study end points (sustained VT/ventricular fibrillation, heart transplant, and death after the index procedure, and sustained VT/ventricular fibrillation for multiple procedures) are reported. Eighty‐one radiofrequency ablation procedures were performed (mean 1.7 per patient, range 1–4). Forty‐five (56%) ablation procedures were performed via an endocardial, 11 (13%) via an epicardial, and 25 (31%) via a combined endo‐ and epicardial approach. Complete acute success was achieved in 65 (80%) procedures, and partial success in 13 (16%). After a median follow‐up of 50.8 (interquartile range, [18.6; 99.2]) months after the index procedure, 17 (36%) patients were free from the primary end point. After multiple procedures, freedom from sustained VT/ventricular fibrillation was 63% (95% CI, 52–75) at 1 year, and 45% (95% CI, 34–61) at 5 years, with 36% of patients receiving only endocardial radiofrequency ablation. A trend (log rank P=0.058) towards an improved outcome using a combined endo‐/epicardial approach was observed after multiple procedures.

Conclusion

Endocardial ablation can be effective in a considerable number of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia patients with VT, potentially obviating the need for an epicardial approach.

Endo-epicardial ablation vs endocardial ablation for the management of ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The pathologic process of ARVC (arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy) typically originates in the epicardium or subepicardial layers with progression toward endocardium. However, in the most recent ARVC international task force consensus statement, epicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation is recommended as a Class I indication only in patients with at least one failed endocardial VT ablation attempt.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the outcomes of ARVC patients undergoing combined endo-epicardial VT ablation, as compared to endocardial ablation alone.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane was performed for studies reporting clinical outcomes of endo-epicardial VT ablation vs endocardial-only VT ablation in patients with ARVC. Fixed-Effect model was used if I₂ < 25 and the Random-Effects Model was used if I₂ ≥ 25%.

RESULTS

Nine studies consisting of 452 patients were included (mean age 42.3 ± 5.7 years; 70% male). After a mean follow-up of 48.1 ± 21.5 months, endo-epicardial ablation was associated with 42% relative risk reduction in VA recurrence as opposed to endocardial ablation alone (risk ratio [RR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.75; P < .0001). No significant differences were noted between endo-epicardial and endocardial VT ablation groups in terms of all-cause mortality (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.03-47.08; P = .93) and acute procedural complications (RR, 5.39; 95% CI, 0.60-48.74; P = .13).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that in patients with ARVC, endo-epicardial VT ablation is associated with a significant reduction in VA recurrence as opposed to endocardial ablation alone, without a significant difference in all-cause mortality or acute procedural complications.

Ventricular tachycardia in cardiolaminopathy: Characteristics and considerations for device programming

BACKGROUND

Mutations in LMNA cause an arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (cardiolaminopathy) with high risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT). The natural history of VT among patients with cardiolaminopathy is incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the longitudinal burden and progression of VT, including change in tachycardia cycle length (TCL), response to antitachycardia pacing (ATP), and prognostic significance of high-burden VT (>5 episodes of VT at any device interrogation) in cardiolaminopathy patients.

METHODS

Patients with cardiolaminopathy and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) were identified from a single-center database. Serial device interrogations and medical records were used to collect data on VT burden, TCL, and response to ATP.

RESULTS

Cardiolaminopathy patients with primary (n = 27) or secondary prevention (n = 16) ICDs were followed for 2 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1-5). VT burden was substantially higher in patients receiving secondary prevention ICDs (28 ± 40.9 vs 3.6 ± 7.3 episodes per 100 patient-years; P <.001). ATP was highly effective (94%) at terminating VT except for short TCL (<250 ms), for which ATP failed in 60%. Among patients with recurrent VT, TCL increased by 112 ± 93.6 ms during follow-up. Inappropriate shocks were rare (0.4% of all therapies). Median time to transplantation, ventricular assist device, or death was 18 months (IQR 0.7-27.1) in patients with high-burden VT.

CONCLUSION

In patients with cardiolaminopathy, VT is recurrent and highly responsive to ATP, which supports the use of transvenous ICDs iteratively programmed to manage VT of various TCLs. Onset of high-burden VT indicates poor prognosis and should warrant referral to a heart failure specialist.

Incidence, Predictors, and Success of Ventricular Tachycardia Catheter Ablation in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (from the Nordic ARVC Registry)

Catheter ablation may reduce ventricular tachycardia (VT) burden in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients. However, little is known about factors predicting need for ablation. Therefore, we sought to investigate predictors and use of VT ablation and to evaluate the postprocedural outcome in ARVC patients. We studied 435 patients from the Nordic ARVC registry including 220 probands with definite ARVC according to the 2010 task force criteria and 215 mutation-carrying relatives identified through cascade screening. Patients were followed until first-time VT ablation, death, heart transplantation, or January 1st 2018. Additionally, patients undergoing VT ablation were further followed from the time of ablation for recurrent ventricular arrhythmias. The cumulative use of VT ablation was 4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3% to 6%) and 11% (95% CI 8% to 15%) after 1 and 10 years. All procedures were performed in probands in whom cumulative use was 8% (95% CI 5% to 12%) and 20% (95% CI 15% to 26%). In adjusted analyses among probands, only young age predicted ablation. In patients undergoing ablation, risk of recurrent arrhythmias was 59% (95% CI 44% to 71%) and 74% (95% CI 59% to 84%) 1 and 5 years after the procedure. Despite high recurrence rates, the burden of ventricular arrhythmias was reduced after ablation (p = 0.0042). Young age, use of several antiarrhythmic drugs and inducibility to VT after ablation were associated with an unfavorable outcome. In conclusion, twenty percent of ARVC probands developed a clinical indication for VT ablation within 10 years whereas mutation-carrying relatives were without such need. Although the burden of ventricular arrhythmias decreased after ablation, risk of recurrence was substantial.

Application of noninvasive signal-averaged electrocardiogram analysis in predicting the requirement of epicardial ablation in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) provides not only diagnostic information but also the prognostic implication of ablation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to validate the role of SAECG in identifying arrhythmogenic substrates requiring an epicardial approach in ARVC.

METHODS

Ninety-one patients with a definite diagnosis of ARVC who underwent successful ablation for drug-refractory ventricular arrhythmia were enrolled and classified into 2 groups: group 1 who underwent successful ablation at the endocardium only and group 2 who underwent successful ablation requiring an additional epicardial approach. The baseline characteristics of patients and SAECG parameters were obtained for analysis.

RESULTS

Male predominance, worse right ventricular (RV) function, higher incidence of syncope, and depolarization abnormality were observed in group 2. Moreover, the number of abnormal SAECG criteria was higher in group 2 than in group 1. After a multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of the requirement of epicardial ablation included the number of abnormal SAECG criteria (odds ratio 2.8, 95% confidence interval 1.4-5.4; P = .003) and presence of syncope (odds ratio 11.7; 95% confidence interval 2.7-50.4; P = .001). In addition, ≥2 abnormal SAECG criteria were associated with larger RV endocardial unipolar low-voltage zone (P < .001), larger RV endocardial/epicardial bipolar low-voltage zone/scar (P < .05), and longer RV endocardial/epicardial total activation time (P < .001 and P = .004, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The number of abnormal SAECG criteria was correlated with the extent of diseased epicardial substrates and could be a potential surrogate marker for predicting the requirement of epicardial ablation in patients with ARVC.

Mapping and Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Cardiomyopathies

Mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies remain a major challenge. The electroanatomic abnormalities are frequently inaccessible to conventional endocardial ablations. Diagnostic diligence with a thorough understanding of the potential mechanisms/substrate, coupled with detailed electroanatomic mapping, is essential. Careful procedural planning, advanced imaging, and unipolar recordings help to formulate ablation strategy, facilitate work flow, and improve outcomes. Inaccessibility of arrhythmogenic substrate and disease progression are important causes of ablation failure. Early intervention may help to improve outcome and minimize complications. Several novel adjunctive ablation techniques are capable of serving as alternative options in refractory cases.

Clinical Differences in Japanese Patients Between Brugada Syndrome and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy With Long-Term Follow-Up

Some Brugada syndrome (BrS) patients have been suspected of being in the initial state of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). This study aimed to clarify the electrocardiographic (ECG) and clinical differences between BrS and ARVC in long-term follow-up (mean 11.9 ± 6.3 years). A total of 50 BrS and 65 ARVC patients with fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) were evaluated according to the revised Task Force Criteria for ARVC. Based on the current diagnostic criteria concerning electrocardiographic, repolarization abnormality was positive in 2.0% and 2.6% of BrS patients at baseline and follow-up, and depolarization abnormality was positive in 6.0% and 12.8% of BrS patients at baseline and follow-up, respectively. At baseline, none of the BrS patients were definitively diagnosed with ARVC. Considering patients' lives since birth, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that age at first VTA attack showed the same tendency between the groups (BrS: mean 42.2 ± 12.5 years old vs ARVC: mean 44.8 ± 13.7 years old, log-rank p = 0.123). Moreover, the incidence of VTA recurrence was similar between the groups during follow-up (log-rank p = 0.906). Incidence of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was significantly higher in ARVC than in BrS whereas the opposite was true for ventricular fibrillation (log-rank p <0.001 and p <0.001, respectively). None of the diagnoses of BrS patients were changed to ARVC during follow-up. During long-term follow-up, although age at first VTA attack and VTA recurrence were similar, BrS consistently exhibited features that differed from those of ARVC.

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia: An Updated Review of Diagnosis and Management

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) is a condition caused by the replacement of the normal right ventricular myocardium with fibrofatty tissue. ARVC/D can present with a variety of clinical conditions including right ventricular dysfunction, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, sudden cardiac arrest, and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Since the first report of ARVC/D in 1982, many advances have been made in the diagnosis, genetic findings for pathology, and treatment. The 2010 International Task Force diagnostic criteria distinguish between major and minor criteria and focus on gross structural changes, microscopic changes, repolarization defects, conduction defects, arrhythmias, and family history. Implantable cardiac defibrillators and catheter ablation of the endocardium and epicardium with electromagnetic mapping have emerged as successful tools in the treatment and prevention of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and SCD. This review discusses the pathophysiology, genetics, diagnosis, and treatment advances in ARVC/D.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS expert consensus statement on evaluation, risk stratification, and management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an arrhythmogenic disorder of the myocardium not secondary to ischemic, hypertensive, or valvular heart disease. ACM incorporates a broad spectrum of genetic, systemic, infectious, and inflammatory disorders. This designation includes, but is not limited to, arrhythmogenic right/left ventricular cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, Chagas disease, and left ventricular noncompaction. The ACM phenotype overlaps with other cardiomyopathies, particularly dilated cardiomyopathy with arrhythmia presentation that may be associated with ventricular dilatation and/or impaired systolic function. This expert consensus statement provides the clinician with guidance on evaluation and management of ACM and includes clinically relevant information on genetics and disease mechanisms. PICO questions were utilized to evaluate contemporary evidence and provide clinical guidance related to exercise in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Recommendations were developed and approved by an expert writing group, after a systematic literature search with evidence tables, and discussion of their own clinical experience, to present the current knowledge in the field. Each recommendation is presented using the Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence system formulated by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association and is accompanied by references and explanatory text to provide essential context. The ongoing recognition of the genetic basis of ACM provides the opportunity to examine the diverse triggers and potential common pathway for the development of disease and arrhythmia.

Characteristics of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmia after catheter ablation in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The reason for recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) after catheter ablation in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is not clear.

METHODS

In this study, 91 ARVC patients (age, 47 ± 13 years; 47 men) who underwent catheter ablation for drug-refractory ventricular arrhythmia (VA) were enrolled. The patients were categorized into single or multiple procedures (n = 28). The baseline characteristics and electrophysiological features of the patients were examined to elucidate the reason of the VA recurrences.

RESULTS

A total of 186 VAs were induced during the index procedure and 176 (94.6%) were eliminated. Successful, partially successful, and failed ablations were achieved in 89.0%, 8.8%, and 2.2% of the patients, respectively. During a mean follow-up period of 32 ± 26 months, 35 patients had VA recurrences. Forty-two repeat procedures were performed for 81 induced VAs in 28 patients. Of the 42 repeat procedures, successful, partially successful, and failed ablations were achieved in 37, 4, and 1 of the procedures, respectively. Most of the recurrent VAs (70 [72.9%]) originated from the newly-developed circuits owing to the scar progression. The patients with repeat procedure had worsening right ventricular remodeling. The multivariate analysis revealed that history as endurance athlete significantly predicted the need of a repeat procedure in spite of the initially successful endocardial/epicardial ablation and negative inducibility (hazard ratio: 3.014, 95% confidence interval: 1.493-6.084, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of the initial complete VA elimination, history as an athlete was associated with scar progression, RV remodeling, and VA recurrences from the newly developed arrhythmogenic substrates/circuit in ARVC.

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia (ARVC/D) - What We Have Learned after 40 Years of the Diagnosis of This Clinical Entity

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) was initially recognized as a clinical entity by Fontaine and Marcus, who evaluated a group of patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmia from a structurally impaired right ventricle (RV). Since then, there have been significant advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology, manifestation and clinical progression, and prognosis of the pathology. The identification of genetic mutations impairing cardiac desmosomes led to the inclusion of this entity in the classification of cardiomyopathies. Classically, ARVC/D is an inherited disease characterized by ventricular arrhythmias, right and / or left ventricular dysfunction; and fibro-fatty substitution of cardiomyocytes; its identification can often be challenging, due to heterogeneous clinical presentation, highly variable intra- and inter-family expressiveness, and incomplete penetrance.

In the absence of a gold standard that allows the diagnosis of ARVC/D, several diagnostic categories were combined and recently reviewed for a higher diagnostic sensitivity, without compromising the specificity. The finding that electrical abnormalities, particularly ventricular arrhythmias, usually precede structural abnormalities is extremely important for risk stratification in positive genetic members. Among the complementary exams, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) allows the early diagnosis of left ventricular impairment, even before morpho-functional abnormalities. Risk stratification remains a major clinical challenge, and antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation and implantable cardioverter defibrillator are the currently available therapeutic tools. The disqualification of the sport prevents cases of sudden death because the effort can trigger not only the electrical instability, but also the onset and progression of the disease.

Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy patient

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is a rare inherited heart muscle disease characterized by ventricular tachyarrhythmia, predominant right ventricular dysfunction, and sudden cardiac death. Its pathophysiology involves close interaction between genetic mutations and exposure to physical activity. Mutations in genes encoding desmosomal protein are the most common genetic basis. Genetic testing plays important roles in diagnosis and screening of family members. Syncope, palpitation, and lightheadedness are the most common symptoms. The 2010 Task Force Criteria is the standard for diagnosis today. Implantation of a defibrillator in high-risk patients is the only therapy that provides adequate protection against sudden death. Selection of patients who are best candidates for defibrillator implantation is challenging. Exercise restriction is critical in affected individuals and at-risk family members. Antiarrhythmic drugs and ventricular tachycardia ablation are valuable but palliative components of the management. This review focuses on the current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in ARVD/C and outlines the future area of development in this field.