Sex Differences in Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis in a Broad Spectrum of Patients With Heart Failure

Sex-related similarities and differences in responses to heart failure therapies

Although sex-related differences in the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical characteristics and outcomes of heart failure are well known, investigations in the past decade have shed light on an often overlooked aspect of heart failure: the influence of sex on treatment response. Sex-related differences in anatomy, physiology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and psychosocial factors might influence the response to pharmacological agents, device therapy and cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure. In this Review, we discuss the similarities between men and women in their response to heart failure therapies, as well as the sex-related differences in treatment benefits, dose-response relationships, and tolerability and safety of guideline-directed medical therapy, device therapy and cardiac rehabilitation. We provide insights into the unique challenges faced by men and women with heart failure, highlight potential avenues for tailored therapeutic approaches and call for sex-specific evaluation of treatment efficacy and safety in future research.

Differential sex-related effect of left ventricular ejection fraction trajectory on the risk of mortality and heart failure readmission following hospitalization for acute heart failure: A longitudinal study

AIMS

There is limited information on the sex-specific longitudinal changes of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after an acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalization. We aimed to investigate whether LVEF trajectories over time and their impact on mortality and AHF readmission rates differ between men and women.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a retrospective sex-specific analysis of longitudinal LVEF measurements (n = 9581) in 3383 patients with an index hospitalization for AHF in a single tertiary-level hospital. Statistical techniques suited for longitudinal data analysis were used. The mean age of the sample was 73.8 ± 11.2 years, and 47.9% were women. The mean LVEF was 49.4 ± 15.3%. At a median follow-up of 2.58 years (interquartile range 0.77-5.62), we registered 2197 deaths (64.9%) and 2597 AHF readmissions in 1302 (38.5%) patients. The longitudinal analysis showed that women had consistently higher LVEF values throughout the follow-up with both trajectories characterized by an early peak-approximately at 1 year-followed by decreasing values in men but a plateau in women. Multivariate between-sex comparisons across LVEF categories revealed that women had lower rates of AHF readmissions when LVEF ≤40%. On the contrary, women displayed an excess risk of AHF readmissions when LVEF >60%. A trend in the same direction was found for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

Sex was a significant factor in determining the follow-up trajectory of LVEF and predicting differences in outcomes after an AHF admission. The findings suggest that women have a higher risk of AHF readmissions at higher LVEF values, while men have a higher risk at lower LVEF values. For all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, the same direction of the association was inferred but they were not significant.

Impact of Frailty on Heart Failure Prognosis: Is Sex Relevant?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heart failure (HF) is one of the most frequent causes of hospital admission in elderly patients, especially in women, who present a high prevalence of geriatric syndromes like frailty. Studies have suggested that frailty and its impact may also differ between males and females. Understanding how frailty may differently affect HF patients depending on sex is therefore imperative for providing personalized care. The aim of this review is to summarize the role of sex in the prognostic impact of frailty in HF patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Numerous studies have identified frailty as a significant predictor of all-cause mortality and hospital readmissions. A recent study of elderly HF out-patients demonstrated that while women had a higher prevalence of frailty, it was an independent predictor of mortality and readmission only in men. Moreover, another study revealed that physical frailty was associated with time to first clinical event among men but not among women. These results raise the question about why frailty affects differently HF prognosis in men and women. Women with HF present a higher prevalence of frailty, especially when it is considered as physical decline. Nevertheless, frailty affects differently HF prognosis in men and women. Women with HF present lower mortality than men and frailty is related with prognosis only in men. The different severity of HF between men and women and other hormonal, psychosocial, and clinical factors might be involved in this fact.

Characteristics, management, and outcomes in women and men with congestive heart failure in 40 countries at different economic levels: an analysis from the Global Congestive Heart Failure (G-CHF) registry

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data on the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of women compared with men with heart failure in low-income and middle-income countries compared with high-income countries. We examined sex differences in risk factors, clinical characteristics, and treatments, and prospectively assessed the risk of heart failure hospitalisation and mortality in patients with heart failure in 40 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries.

METHODS

Participants aged 18 years or older with heart failure were enrolled from Dec 20, 2016, to Sept 9, 2020 in the prospective Global Congestive Heart Failure (G-CHF) study from 257 centres in 40 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries. Participants were followed up until May 25, 2023. We recorded the demographic characteristics, medical history, and treatments of participants. We prospectively recorded data on heart failure hospitalisation and mortality by sex in the overall study, according to country economic status, and according to level of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

FINDINGS

23 341 participants (9119 [39·1%] women and 14 222 [60·1%] men) were recruited and followed up for a mean of 2·6 years (SD 1·4). The mean age of women in the study was 62 years (SD 17) compared with 64 years (14) in men. Fewer women than men had an LVEF of 40% or lower (51·7% women vs 66·2% men). By contrast, more women than men had an LVEF of 50% or higher (33·2% women vs 18·6% men). Hypertensive heart failure was the most common aetiology in women (25·5% women vs 16·8% men), whereas ischaemic heart failure was the most common aetiology in men (45·6% men vs 26·6% women). Signs and symptoms of congestion were more common in women than men: 42·6% of women had a New York Heart Association functional class of III or IV compared with 37·9% of men. The use of heart failure medications and cardiac tests did not differ systematically between the sexes, although implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation was lower among women than men (8·7% women vs 17·2% men). The adjusted risk of heart failure hospitalisation was similar in women and men (women-to-men adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·99 [95% CI 0·92-1·05]). This pattern was consistent within groups of countries categorised by economic status, geographical region, and by LVEF level. However, women had a lower adjusted risk of mortality (women-to-men adjusted HR 0·79 [95% CI 0·75-0·84]) despite adjustments for prognostic factors-a pattern which was consistently observed across groups of countries irrespective of economic status, geography, and LVEF levels of patients.

INTERPRETATION

The underlying cause of heart failure and ejection fraction phenotype differ between women and men, as do the severity of symptoms. Heart failure treatments (except ICD use) were not consistently in favour of one sex. Paradoxically, while the rates of hospitalisations were similar among women and men, the risk of death was lower among women. These patterns were consistent regardless of the economic status of the countries. The higher mortality among men is unexplained and warrants further study.

FUNDING

Bayer.

Effect of Mavacamten in Women Compared With Men With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Insights From EXPLORER-HCM

BACKGROUND

Compared with men, women with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have a higher incidence of heart failure and worse outcomes. We investigated baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics and response to mavacamten among women compared with men in the EXPLORER-HCM study (Clinical Study to Evaluate Mavacamten [MYK-461] in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy).

METHODS

A prespecified post hoc analysis of sex from the blinded, randomized EXPLORER-HCM trial of mavacamten versus placebo in symptomatic patients with obstructive HCM was performed. Baseline characteristics were compared with t tests for continuous variables (expressed as mean values) and χ2 tests for categorical variables. Prespecified primary, secondary, and exploratory end points and echocardiographic measurements from baseline to end of treatment (week 30) were analyzed with ANCOVA for continuous end points and a generalized linear model with binomial distribution for binary end points, with adjustment for each outcome's baseline value, New York Heart Association class, β-blocker use, and ergometer type.

RESULTS

At baseline, women (n=102) were older (62 years versus 56 years; P<0.0001), had lower peak oxygen consumption (16.7 mL·kg-1·min-1 versus 21.3 mL·kg-1·min-1; P<0.0001), were more likely to be assigned New York Heart Association class III (42% versus 17%; P<0.0001), had worse health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Score 64 versus 75; P<0.0001), and had higher baseline plasma NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels (1704 ng/L versus 990 ng/L; P=0.004) than men (n=149). After 30 weeks of mavacamten treatment, similar improvements were observed in women and men in the primary composite end point (percentage difference on mavacamten versus placebo, 22% versus 19%, respectively; P=0.759) and in the secondary end points of change in postexercise left ventricular outflow tract gradient (-42.4 mm Hg versus -33.6 mm Hg; P=0.348), change in peak oxygen consumption (1.2 mL·kg-1·min-1 versus 1.6 mL·kg-1·min-1; P=0.633), and percentage achieving ≥1 New York Heart Association class improvement (41% versus 28%; P=0.254). However, women had greater improvement in health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Score 14.8 versus 6.1; P=0.026) and in the exploratory end point of NT-proBNP levels (-1322 ng/L versus -649 ng/L; P=0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

Although at baseline women with symptomatic obstructive HCM enrolled in EXPLORER-HCM were older and had worse heart failure and health status than men, treatment with mavacamten resulted in similar improvements in the primary and most secondary EXPLORER-HCM end points and greater improvements in health status and NT-proBNP.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03470545.

Sex differences in mortality and hospitalization in heart failure with preserved and mid-range ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Introduction

The influence of sex on the prognosis of heart failure with preserved or intermediate ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFmrEF) remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate whether sex differences impact the prognosis of patients diagnosed with HFpEF and HFmrEF.

Methods

A comprehensive search across three databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase) was conducted to identify sex-related prognostic cohort studies focusing on HFpEF and HFmrEF. Risk estimates were synthesized using the random effects model. The analysis included 14 cohorts comprising 41,508 HFpEF patients (44.65% males) and 10,692 HFmrEF patients (61.79% males).

Results

Among HFpEF patients, men exhibited significantly higher rates of all-cause mortality (13 studies; hazard ratio (HR): 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15 to 1.33)) and cardiovascular disease mortality (5 studies; HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.31) compared to women. However, no significant difference was observed in HF admissions. For HFmrEF patients, men displayed notably higher all-cause mortality (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.31) but no significant differences in cardiovascular mortality or HF admissions.

Discussion

These findings suggest that male patients diagnosed with HFpEF and HFmrEF may face a more unfavorable prognosis in terms of all-cause mortality. Variations were noted in cardiovascular mortality and HF admissions, indicating potential complexities in sex-related prognostic factors within these heart failure categories. In summary, male patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF may have a more unfavorable prognosis.

Sex differences in clinical characteristics and long-term outcome in patients with heart failure: data from the KorAHF registry

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Sex differences in the prognosis of heart failure (HF) have yielded inconsistent results, and data from Asian populations are even rare. This study aimed to investigate sex differences in clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis among Korean patients with HF.

METHODS

A total of 5,625 Korean patients hospitalized for acute HF were analyzed using a prospective multi-center registry database. Baseline clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes including HF readmission and death were compared between sexes.

RESULTS

Women were older than men and had worse symptoms with higher N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Women had a significantly higher proportion of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality and rate of guideline-directed medical therapies in men and women. During median follow- up of 3.4 years, cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.78; p = 0.014), and composite outcomes of death and HF readmission (adjusted HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.27; p = 0.030) were significantly higher in men than women. When evaluating heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HFpEF separately, men were an independent risk factor of cardiovascular death in patients with HFrEF. Clinical outcome was not different between sexes in HFpEF.

CONCLUSION

In the Korean multi-center registry, despite having better clinical characteristics, men exhibited a higher risk of all-cause mortality and readmission for HF. The main cause of these disparities was the higher cardiovascular mortality rate observed in men compared to women with HFrEF.

Prevalence of, association with, severity of, and prognostic role of serum hemoglobin level in acutely decompensated heart failure patients

BACKGROUND

The role of hemoglobin (Hb) level in the short-term prognosis of patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains a matter of debate. We aimed to declare the prevalence of, association with, severity of, and prognostic role of SHL with ADHF.

METHODS

Using the data from the Persian Registry Of Cardiovascular Disease/ Heart Failure (PROVE-HF) study, we assessed the association between anemia and polycythemia (Hb < 13 g/dLit, > 16.5 g/dLit in males and < 12 g/dLit, and > 16 g/dLit in females, respectively) and short-term mortality using Cox proportional hazard modeling, with adjustment of clinically relevant variables.

RESULTS

Of 3652 ADHF patients, anemia was seen in 1673 patients (48.40%). The prevalence of mild, moderate, and severe anemia was 42.33% (n = 1546), 3.23% (n = 118), and 0.24% (n = 9), respectively. Also, 422 patients (11.55%) had polycythemia. Compared to non-anemic patients, anemic patients were mainly male, older, and were more likely to have diabetes mellitus (DM), renal dysfunction, hypertension (HTN), and thyroid disease. Significant predictors of short-term mortality were lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure, lower Hb level, and higher blood urea nitrogen (BUN). Anemic patients had higher all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.213, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.054-1.396]. Moderate anemia increased mortality by approximately 80% in males (aHR 1.793, 95% CI 1.308-2.458) and females (aHR 1.790, 95% CI 1.312-2.442), respectively. Polycythemia had no association with short-term mortality in both genders (P-value > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that anemia is an adverse prognostic factor for short-term mortality in ADHF patients, with higher mortality in moderately anemic patients.

Lagging behind the Western countries: the knowledge gaps of gender differences in heart failure in Asia

Gender differences in heart failure (HF), ranging from epidemiological and pathophysiological factors to therapeutic response and prognosis, have been well documented in Western countries, especially in Europe and North America. The above gender differences in HF found in Westerners are rarely investigated in Asians. In this review, we explore the worrying knowledge gap on the gender differences in HF that existed in Asia in contrast with Western populations based on the following four aspects: epidemiology, risk factors, therapy, and prognosis. Finally, we conclude that investigations of gender differences in HF in Asia lag behind those in Europe and North America. Future work is required to establish and better use the high-level, population-based cohorts and develop our own high-quality, convincing clinical trials to deliver robust gender-specific conclusions in Asia.

Sex differences in major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event risk among central retinal artery occlusion patients

To estimate the association between central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including their clinical characteristics, blood markers, and the contribution of CRAO to MACCE, as well as to assess any sex differences. This retrospective cohort study included continuous new-onset CRAO patients and 1:4 controls during the same period. Correlations of CRAO with the incidence of MACCE during follow-up and the sex-related differences were studied. One hundred and twenty-four CRAO patients and four hundred and ninety-six controls were enrolled. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR, P = 0.014) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP, P = 0.038) were tended to be higher in CRAO patients. After the follow-up period, 78 patients experienced MACCE. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that CRAO was a predictor of the occurrence of MACCE (HR 2.321, 95% CI 1.439-3.744, P = 0.001). Sex subgroups indicated that age, diabetes, current smoking, CRAO, NLR and hs-CRP increased the risk factor of MACCE in males (All P < 0.05) and CRAO, NLR, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and hs-CRP were independent influencing factors for females (All P < 0.05). New-onset CRAO significantly increases the probability of MACCE and is associated with a poor prognosis. The sex-related differences suggested that effective prevention of the occurrence of MACCE in high-risk patients requires that attention be given to individualized risk factors corresponding to sexes.

Sex differences in long-term outcomes following acute heart failure hospitalization: Findings from the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry

AIMS

Sex differences in long-term outcomes following hospitalization for heart failure (HF) across ejection fraction (EF) subtypes are not well described. In this study, we evaluated the risk of mortality and rehospitalization among males and females across the spectrum of EF over 5 years of follow-up following an index HF hospitalization event.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients hospitalized with HF between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2014 from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry with available 5-year follow-up using Medicare Part A claims data were included. The association between sex and risk of mortality and readmission over a 5-year follow-up period for each HF subtype (HF with reduced EF [HFrEF, EF ≤40%], HF with mildly reduced EF [HFmrEF, EF 41-49%], and HF with preserved EF [HFpEF, EF >50%]) was assessed using adjusted Cox models. The effect modification by the HF subtype for the association between sex and outcomes was assessed by including multiplicative interaction terms in the models. A total of 155 670 patients (median age: 81 years, 53.4% female) were included. Over 5-year follow-up, males and females had comparably poor survival post-discharge; however, females (vs. males) had greater years of survival lost to HF compared with the median age- and sex-matched US population (HFpEF: 17.0 vs. 14.6 years; HFrEF: 17.3 vs. 15.1 years; HFmrEF: 17.7 vs. 14.6 years for age group 65-69 years). In adjusted analysis, females (vs. males) had a lower risk of 5-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.90, p < 0.0001), and the risk difference was most pronounced among patients with HFrEF (aHR 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.89; pinteraction [sex*HF subtype] = 0.04). Females (vs. males) had a higher adjusted risk of HF readmission over 5-year follow-up (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08, p < 0.0001), with the risk difference most pronounced among patients with HFpEF (aHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.14; pinteraction [sex*HF subtype] = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

While females (vs. males) had lower adjusted mortality, females experienced a significantly greater loss in survival time than the median age- and sex-matched US population and had a greater risk of rehospitalization over 5 years following HF hospitalization.

Sex Differences in Prognosis of Heart Failure Due to Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Limited research has explored sex-specific differences in death predictors of HF patients with ischemic (iCMP) and nonischemic (niCMP) cardiomyopathy. This study assessed sex differences in niCMP and iCMP prognosis.

METHODS

We studied 7487 patients with HF between February 2017 and September 2020. Clinical features and echocardiographic findings were collected. We used Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazard models, and chi-square scores of Cox regression to determine death predictors in women and men.

RESULTS

The mean age was 64.3 ± 14.2 years, with 4417 (59%) males. Women with iCMP and niCMP exhibited a significantly higher mean age, higher mean left ventricular ejection fraction, and smaller left ventricular diastolic diameter than men. Over 2.26 years of follow-up, 325 (14.7%) women and 420 (15.7%) men, and 211 women (24.5%) and 519 men (29.8%) with niCMP (p = NS) and iCMP (p = 0.004), respectively, died. The cumulative incidence of death was higher in men with iCMP (log-rank p < 0.0001) but similar with niCMP. Cox regression showed chronic kidney disease, diabetes, stroke, atrial fibrillation, age, and myocardial infarction as the main predictors of death for iCMP in women and men.

CONCLUSIONS

Women exhibited a better prognosis than men with iCMP, but similar for niCMP. Nevertheless, sex was not an independent predictor of death for both CMP.

Sex-specific analysis of the rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies after a hospitalization for acute heart failure: Insights from the STRONG-HF trial

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) in men and women hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In STRONG-HF, AHF patients were randomized just prior to discharge to either usual care (UC) or a high-intensity care (HIC) strategy of GDMT up-titration. In these analyses, we compared the implementation, efficacy, and safety of the HIC strategy between men and women. In the randomized AHF population, 416/1078 (39%) were women. By day 90, a higher proportion of both sexes in the HIC group had been up-titrated to full doses of GDMT compared to UC. Overall, there were no differences in the primary endpoint between the sexes. The primary endpoint, 180-day heart failure readmission or death, occurred in 15.8% HIC women versus 23.5% women in the UC group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-1.13) and in 14.9% HIC men versus 23.5% UC men (adjusted HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.88) (adjusted interaction p = 0.65). There was no significant treatment-by-sex interaction in quality-of-life improvement or in adverse events, including serious or fatal adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The results of the current analyses suggest that a rapid up-titration of GDMT immediately after an AHF hospitalization can and should be implemented similarly in men and women, as it results in reduction of 180-day all-cause death or heart failure readmission, quality-of-life improvement in both men and women with a similar safety profile.

Improvement of exercise and functional capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure by iron therapy

Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common causes of death in industrialized countries and increases steadily with age. Patients with HF present many comorbidities that affect their clinical management, quality of life, and prognosis. Iron deficiency is a relevant comorbidity of all patients with heart failure. It remains the most prevalent nutritional deficiency worldwide, affecting an estimated 2 billion people and has a negative prognostic impact on hospitalization and mortality rate. To date, none of the previous studies, have provided evidence of reduced mortality or decrease in hospitalization with intravenous iron supplementation. This review describes the prevalence, clinical implications, and current trials on the treatment of iron deficiency in heart failure and discusses the Improvement of exercise and functional capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure by iron therapy. Despite compelling evidence of the significant prevalence of ID in HF patients and current guidelines, ID is often not properly managed in clinical practice. Therefore, ID should be given greater consideration in HF health care practice to improve patient quality of life and outcome.

Sex differences in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

Clinical studies on heart failure with mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFmrEF) have gradually increased. However, studies on the prognostic differences between men and women among patients with HFmrEF are few, and no evidence on sex differences in such patients exists. Therefore, we retrospectively assessed the data of patients with HFmrEF using propensity score-matched analysis (PSMA). A total of 1691 patients with HFmrEF were enrolled in the Outcome of Discharged HFmrEF Patients study (OUDI-HF study), which included 1095 men and 596 women. After propensity score matching, we compared the difference in cardiovascular (CV) events (cardiovascular death or heart failure readmission) and all-cause mortality at 90 days and 1 year after discharge between men and women using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. After PSMA, men with HFmrEF were 2.2 times more likely to die at 90 days than women with HFmrEF [hazard ratio (HR) 1.88; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.03-3.46; P = 0.041]. However, there was no difference in the 90-day CV events (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.75-1.22; P = 0.718). Similarly, there was no difference in all-cause mortality (HR 1.16; 95% CI 0.81-1.65; P = 0.417) and CV events (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.83-1.16; P = 0.817) between men and women after 1 year. Among the patients with HFmrEF, men had a higher 90-day risk of all-cause mortality than women after hospital discharge, and this risk disappeared after 1 year.Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT05240118 (ESC Heart Failure. (2022). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14044 ).

Sex and gender differences in myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy: An update

In the past decade there has been a growing interest in understanding sex and gender differences in myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and the purpose of this review is to provide an update on this topic including epidemiology, pathogenesis and clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. Recently, many clinical studies have been conducted examining sex differences in myocarditis. Studies consistently report that myocarditis occurs more often in men than women with a sex ratio ranging from 1:2-4 female to male. Studies reveal that DCM also has a sex ratio of around 1:3 women to men and this is also true for familial/genetic forms of DCM. Animal models have demonstrated that DCM develops after myocarditis in susceptible mouse strains and evidence exists for this progress clinically as well. A consistent finding is that myocarditis occurs primarily in men under 50 years of age, but in women after age 50 or post-menopause. In contrast, DCM typically occurs after age 50, although the age that post-myocarditis DCM occurs has not been investigated. In a small study, more men with myocarditis presented with symptoms of chest pain while women presented with dyspnea. Men with myocarditis have been found to have higher levels of heart failure biomarkers soluble ST2, creatine kinase, myoglobin and T helper 17-associated cytokines while women develop a better regulatory immune response. Studies of the pathogenesis of disease have found that Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 signaling pathways play a central role in increasing inflammation during myocarditis and in promoting remodeling and fibrosis that leads to DCM, and all of these pathways are elevated in males. Management of myocarditis follows heart failure guidelines and there are currently no disease-specific therapies. Research on standard heart failure medications reveal important sex differences. Overall, many advances in our understanding of the effect of biologic sex on myocarditis and DCM have occurred over the past decade, but many gaps in our understanding remain. A better understanding of sex and gender effects are needed to develop disease-targeted and individualized medicine approaches in the future.

Sex Differences in Characteristics, Outcomes, and Treatment Response With Dapagliflozin Across the Range of Ejection Fraction in Patients With Heart Failure: Insights From DAPA-HF and DELIVER

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors have emerged as a key pharmacotherapy in heart failure (HF) with both reduced and preserved ejection fraction. The benefit of other HF therapies may be modified by sex, but whether sex modifies the treatment effect and safety profile of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors remains unclear. Our analyses aim to assess the effect of sex on the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin.

METHODS

In a prespecified patient-level pooled analysis of DAPA-HF (Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure) and DELIVER (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure), clinical outcomes were compared by sex (including the composite of cardiovascular death or worsening HF events, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, total events [first and recurrent HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death], and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores) across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction.

RESULTS

Of a total of 11 007 randomized patients, 3856 (35%) were women. Women with HF were older and had higher body mass index but were less likely to have a history of diabetes and myocardial infarction or stroke and more likely to have hypertension and atrial fibrillation compared with men. At baseline, women had higher ejection fraction but worse Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores than men did. After adjustment for baseline differences, women were less likely than men to experience cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.60-0.79]), all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.62-0.78]), HF hospitalizations (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.72-0.94]), and total events (adjusted rate ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.71-0.84]). Dapagliflozin reduced the primary end point in both men and women similarly (P_interaction=0.77) with no sex-related differences in secondary outcomes (all P_interaction>0.35) or safety events. The benefit of dapagliflozin was observed across the entire ejection fraction spectrum and was not modified by sex (P_interaction>0.40). There were no sex-related differences in serious adverse events, adverse events, or drug discontinuation attributable to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In DAPA-HF and DELIVER, the response to dapagliflozin was similar between men and women. Sex did not modify the treatment effect of dapagliflozin across the range of ejection fraction.

Sex differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: From traditional risk factors to sex-specific risk factors

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction has a higher prevalence in women versus men. There are several proposed mechanisms to explain this sex discrepancy including differences in cardiovascular adaptation to comorbidities and potential underlying etiologic mechanisms. In this review, we summarize sex differences in traditional risk factors, such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and coronary artery disease, which contribute to the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in women. Furthermore, we explore female-specific risk factors, such as sex hormones, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and other reproductive factors, which may explain the predominance of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in women. Beyond sex differences in risk factors, there are also significant sex differences in outcomes with women reporting lower quality of life but overall better survival versus men. Finally, while treatment options for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction are still limited, sex differences have also been reported for the available therapies, with suggestion of preferential benefit of specific heart failure with preserved ejection fraction therapies in women. Further work is required to better understand sex differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, including deeper understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms, derivation of more accurate risk stratification models, and increased representation of women in clinical trials.

Cardiac Rehabilitation for Older Women with Heart Failure

Background: the role that sex plays in impacting cardiac rehabilitation (CR) outcomes remains an important gap in knowledge. Methods: we assessed sex differences in clinical and functional outcomes in 2345 older patients with heart failure (HF) admitted to inpatient CR. Three outcomes were considered: (1) the composite outcome of death during the index admission to CR or transfer to acute care; (2) three-year mortality; (3) change in six-minute walking distance (6MWD) from admission to discharge. Sex differences in outcomes were assessed using multivariable Cox or logistic regression models. Results: the hazard ratios of the composite outcome and of three-year mortality for females vs. males were 0.71 (95%CI:0.50−1.00; p = 0.049) and 0.68 (95%CI:0.59−0.79; p < 0.001), respectively. The standardized mean difference in 6MWD increase from admission to discharge between males and females was 0.10. The odds ratio of achieving an increase in 6MWD at discharge to values higher than the optimal sex-specific thresholds for predicting mortality for females vs. males was 2.21 (95%CI:1.53−3.20; p < 0.001). Conclusion: our findings suggest that older females with HF undergoing CR have better prognosis and garner similar improvement in 6MWD compared with their male counterparts. Nonetheless, females were more likely to achieve levels of functional capacity predictive of improved survival.

Sex related differences in the characteristics and outcomes of heart failure: A sub analysis of heart failure disease management study

Aims

This is a sub-analysis of a randomized controlled trial on heart failure (HF) disease management (DM) in which patients with HF (N = 1,360; 27.5% women) were assigned randomly to DM (N = 682) or usual care (UC) (N = 678). Study intervention did not significantly affect the rate of hospital admissions or mortality. This study evaluates sex-related differences in baseline characteristics, clinical manifestations, adherence to treatment and outcomes among the study cohort.

Methods

Association between sex and hospital admissions and mortality was tested in multivariable models adjusted for the patients’ baseline characteristics. The primary composite outcome of the study included time to first HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality. Secondary composite outcome included number of hospital admissions and days of hospitalization, for HF and all other causes.

Results

Compared to males, females recruited in the study were on average 3 years older [median age 72 (62, 78) vs. 75 (65, 82), p = 0.001], with higher prevalence of preserved left ventricular function (LVEF ≥50%) and lower frequency of ischemic heart disease (IHD) (p ≤ 0.001). Females had shorter 6-min walking distance and worse quality of life and depression scores at baseline (p &lt; 0.001). The proportion of patients receiving HF recommended medical treatment was similar among females and males. During a median follow-up of 2.7 years (range: 0–5), there were no significant differences between females and males with respect to the time elapsed until the study primary endpoint and its components in univariate analysis [557 (56.5%) males and 218 (58.3%) females were hospitalized for HF or died for any cause; p &gt; 0.05]. Multivariable analysis showed that females were significantly less likely than males to experience the primary outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.835, 95% CI: 0.699, 0.998] or to die from any cause [adjusted HR = 0.712; 95%CI: 0.560, 0.901]. The sex-related mortality differences were especially significant among patients with non-preserved EF, with IHD or with recent HF hospitalization. Females also had lower rates of all-cause hospital admissions [adjusted rate ratio = 0.798; 95%CI: 0.705, 0.904] and were more likely to adhere to HF medical therapy compared to males.

Conclusion

Females with HF fare better than men. Sex related differences were not explained by baseline and morbidity-related characteristics or adherence to medical treatment.

Effects of Empagliflozin in Women and Men With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Women and men with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction may differ in their clinical characteristics and their response to therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of sex on the effects of empagliflozin in patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction enrolled in the EMPEROR-Preserved trial (Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction).

METHODS

The effects of empagliflozin on the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF and on secondary outcomes (including total HF hospitalization, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores) were compared in women and men in the overall cohort and in subgroups defined by left ventricular ejection fraction (41%-49%, 50%-59%, and ≥60%). The effects of empagliflozin on physiological measures, including changes in systolic blood pressure, uric acid, hemoglobin, body weight, and natriuretic peptide levels, were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 5988 patients randomized, 2676 (44.7%) were women. In the placebo arm, women tended to have lower risk for adverse outcomes, including a lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.56, 0.84]). Compared with placebo, empagliflozin reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF to a similar degree in both sexes (hazard ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.69, 0.96] for men; and hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.61, 0.92] for women; P_interaction=0.54). Sex did not modify the relationship between empagliflozin and outcomes across ejection fraction groups. Similar results were seen for secondary outcomes and physiological measures. Compared with placebo, empagliflozin improved the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score to a similar extent in both sexes (1.38 for men versus 1.63 for women at 52 weeks; P_interaction=0.77); the results were similar for Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score and total summary score.

CONCLUSIONS

Empagliflozin produced similar benefits on outcomes and health status in women and men with HF and preserved ejection fraction.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT03057951.

Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure According to Sex: Extended Follow-Up Study of the DANISH Trial

BACKGROUND

Men and women may respond differently to certain therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, including implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). In an extended follow-up study of the DANISH trial (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients With Non-Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality), adding 4 years of additional follow-up, we examined the effect of ICD implantation according to sex.

METHODS

In the DANISH trial, 1116 patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure were randomized to receive an ICD (N=556) or usual clinical care (N=550). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 1116 patients randomized in the DANISH trial, 307 (27.5%) were women. During a median follow-up of 9.5 years, women had a lower associated rate of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60 [95% CI, 0.47-0.78]) cardiovascular death (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.46-0.84]), nonsudden cardiovascular death (HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.42-0.85]), and a numerically lower rate of sudden cardiovascular death (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.40-1.25]), compared with men. Compared with usual clinical care, ICD implantation did not reduce the rate of all-cause mortality, irrespective of sex (men, HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.69-1.06]; women, HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.64-1.50]; Pinteraction=0.51). In addition, sex did not modify the effect of ICD implantation on sudden cardiovascular death (men, HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.36-0.92]; women, HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.26-1.77]; Pinteraction=0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure, ICD implantation did not provide an overall survival benefit, but reduced sudden cardiovascular death, irrespective of sex.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT00542945.

Assessment of clinical and hemodynamic congestion as predictors of mortality in elderly outpatients with heart failure

INTRODUCTION

This work aims to evaluate whether a clinical examination and measurement of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide can predict poor prognosis in outpatients with heart failure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective study from 2010 to 2018 in 238 patients diagnosed with heart failure. At baseline, we evaluated the presence of pulmonary rales and bilateral leg edema (clinical congestion) together with N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide ≥ 1500 pg/mL (hemodynamic congestion). Patients were classified into 4 groups depending on their congestion pattern: no congestion (G1) (n = 50); clinical congestion (G2) (n = 43); hemodynamic congestion (G3) (n = 73); and clinical and hemodynamic congestion (G4) (n = 72). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at one year of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients were included. The mean age was 82 years, 61.8% were women, and 20.7% had reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Thirty patients died in the first year of follow-up (12.6%). After controlling for confounding variables (sex, recent discharge for heart failure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and left ventricular ejection fraction), the independent risk of death in each group compared to G1 as the reference group was: G2: HR 4.121 (95%CI 1.131-15.019); G3: HR 2.511 (95%CI 1.007-6.263); and G4: HR 7.418 (95%CI 1.630-33.763).

CONCLUSION

Congestion in outpatients with heart failure correlates with prognosis. Patients with both clinical and hemodynamic congestion had the highest risk of all-cause death at one year.

Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Death in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Matter of Sex or Scar?

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the association between sex and ventricular arrhythmias (VA) or sudden death (SD) in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, including analysis of potential confounders.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with DCM referred for cardiac magnetic resonance at 2 tertiary hospitals. The primary combined end point encompassed sustained VA, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and SD. We included 1165 patients with median follow-up of 36 months (interquartile range 20-58 months). The majority of patients (66%) were males. Males and females had similar left ventricular ejection fraction, but the prevalence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at cardiac magnetic resonance was significantly higher among males (48% vs 30%, P < .001). Males had higher cumulative incidence of the primary end point (8% vs 4%, P = .02), and male sex was a significant predictor of the primary end point at univariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.93, P = .02). However, LGE had a major confounding effect in the association between sex and the primary outcome: the hazard ratio of male sex adjusted for LGE was 1.29 (P = .37). LGE+ females had significantly higher cumulative incidence of the primary end point than LGE- males (13% vs 1.8%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with DCM, the prevalence of LGE is significantly higher among males, implying a major confounding effect in the association between male sex and VA or SD. LGE+ females have significantly higher risk than LGE- males. These data do not support the inclusion of sex into risk stratification algorithms for VA or SD in DCM.

Interaction of sex and diabetes in Asian patients with heart failure with mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

INTRODUCTION

The impact of sex and diabetes mellitus (DM) on patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is not well elucidated. This study aims to evaluate sex differences in the clinical profile and outcomes in Asian HFmrEF patients with and without DM.

METHODS

Patients admitted nationally for HFmrEF (ejection fraction 40-49%) between 2008 and 2014 were included and followed up until December 2016. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular (CV) death and/or heart failure (HF) rehospitalisations.

RESULTS

A total of 2,272 HFmrEF patients (56% male) were included. More women had DM than men (60% versus 55%, P=0.013). Regardless of DM status, HFmrEF females were older, less likely to smoke, had less coronary artery disease, narrower QRS and lower haemoglobin compared to men. The odds of having DM decreases in smokers who are women as opposed to men (P_interaction =0.017). In multivariate analysis, DM reached statistical analysis for all-cause mortality and combined CV mortality or HF rehospitalisation in both men and women. However, the results suggest that there may be sex differences in terms of outcomes. DM (vs non-DM) was less strongly associated with increased all-cause mortality (adjusted hazards ratio [adj HR] 1.234 vs adj HR 1.290, P_interaction <0.001] but more strongly associated with the combined CV death/HF rehospitalisation (adj HR 1.429 vs adj HR 1.317, P_interaction =0.027) in women (vs men).

CONCLUSION

Asian women with HFmrEF had a higher prevalence of DM, with differences in clinical characteristics, compared to men. While diabetes conferred poor outcomes regardless of sex, there were distinct sex differences. These highlight the need for sex-specific management strategies.

Sex differences in cardiac remodeling post myocardial infarction with acute cigarette smoking

Background

Whether cigarette smoking affects the heart post-myocardial infarction (MI) in a sex-dependent way remains controversial. Using a mouse model, we investigated cardiac remodeling under the influence of acute cigarette smoke (CS) exposure following ischemic injury in both sexes.

Methods

Ten cigarettes were smoked twice daily for 2 weeks followed by MI and then 1 additional week post permanent LAD ligation. Cardiac function, histology, and infarct size were assessed, and inflammatory markers quantified by RT–PCR. Statistical comparisons were performed using an unpaired t test or ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test.

Results

We observed that cigarette smoking exacerbated both left and right ventricular remodeling only in males at an early stage of post-MI. Females did not display a significant structural and/or functional alteration within 7 days of cardiac remodeling post-MI upon CS exposure. Worsened right ventricular remodeling in males was independent of pulmonary congestion. CS-exposed males exhibited enhanced increases in left ventricular end systolic and diastolic volumes, as well as reductions in ejection fraction and fractional area changes of left ventricular base. At day 7, infarct size was increased by cigarette smoking in males only, which was accompanied by enhanced collagen deposition in both the infarcted and peri-infarcted areas. Both IL-6 and TNF-α mRNA expression significantly increased in CS-exposed MI male group only at day 7 post-MI suggestive of prolonged inflammation.

Conclusions

These findings indicate that CS exposure worsens the progression of cardiac remodeling post-MI in male sex in a significant manner compared to female sex at least at early stages.

Gender Differences in the Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support

There is evidence for the lower use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) in women. We aimed to determine (1) whether gender differences exist regarding in-hospital mortality, hospital course, and procedures; (2) whether socio-demographic and treatment-related factors were associated with these differences. Using the National Inpatient Sample, we collected the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for cardiogenic shock (CS) because of acute myocardial infarction AMI or acutely decompensated advanced heart failure and included intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella or Tandem Heart percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Demographics, co-morbidities, in-hospital course and procedures were recorded, and the Charlson Co-morbidity Index was calculated. Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression analysis and additional sensitivity analyses were performed. We identified 376,116 cases of CS because of acute myocardial infarction or acutely decompensated advanced heart failure, of which 113,305 required pMCS. Women were more likely to be older, non-White, insured by Medicare, and have a higher burden of co-morbidities and higher Charlson Co-morbidity Index. pMCS devices were inserted in 35,516 women (24.9%) and 77,789 men (33.3%). Women were less likely to receive pVAD or pulmonary artery (PA) catheters. Blood transfusions and acute respiratory failure were more common in women than men. Women had 15% higher in-hospital mortality and in a multivariate analysis, women, older age, having no insurance, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, longer time to pMCS insertion, receiving PA catheter, pVAD or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and having cardiac arrest were associated with higher in-hospital mortality. In conclusion, women requiring pMCS support had a higher co-morbidity load, in-hospital mortality, acute respiratory failure, blood transfusions, and lower PA catheter use. Studies addressing early gender-specific interventions in CS are needed to reduce these differences.

Estrogen Protects Cardiac Function and Energy Metabolism in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Induced by Loss of Cardiac IRS1 and IRS2

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a high-risk factor for incident of cardiovascular diseases. Women at young ages show a reduced incidence of both T2D and cardiovascular diseases compared with men, but these disparities disappear in postmenopausal women versus age-matched men. Thus, ovaries and ovarian hormones, such as estrogen, are expected to protect from T2D and cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of ovaries and ovarian hormone estrogen in cardiac function and energy metabolism using the cardiac IRS (insulin receptor substrate) 1 and IRS2 double genes knockout mice that mimic cardiac insulin resistance.

METHODS

Control and heart-specific IRS1/2 double genes knockout mice were treated with placebo or 17β-estradiol (E2) pellets, respectively, through subcutaneous implantation. Female mice were subjected to a bilateral ovariectomy surgery to remove endogenous E2. The cardiac function and energy metabolism were determined using echocardiography and indirect calorimeter, respectively.

RESULTS

All male heart-specific IRS1/2 double genes knockout mice died of heart failure at 6 to 8 weeks as we previously described (Qi et al), but all female heart-specific IRS1/2 double genes knockout mice survived >1 year. Removal of ovaries in heart-specific IRS1/2 double genes knockout female mice resulted in cardiac dysfunction, and ultimately animal death. However, E2 supplementation prevented the dilated cardiomyopathy, improved cardiac function and energy metabolism, and enhanced lifespan in both male and ovariectomy female mice deficient for cardiac IRS1 and IRS2 genes, largely owing to the activation of Akt (protein kinase B)-Foxo1 (O1 class of forkhead/winged helix transcription factor) signaling cascades.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that estrogen protects mice from cardiac insulin resistance-induced diabetic cardiomyopathy. This may provide a fundamental mechanism for the gender difference for the incidence of both T2D and cardiovascular diseases. This study highlights that estrogen signaling could be a potential target for improving cardiac function and energy metabolism in humans with T2D.

Imaging in Women with Heart Failure: Sex-specific Characteristics and Current Challenges

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents a significant threat to women's health. Heart failure (HF) is one CVD that still has an increasing incidence and about half of all cases involve women. HF is characterised by strong sex-specific features in aetiology, clinical manifestation and outcomes. Women are more likely to have hypertensive heart disease and HF with preserved ejection fraction, they experience worse quality of life but have a better overall survival rate. Women's hearts also have unique morphological characteristics that should be considered during cardiovascular assessment. It is important to understand and highlight these sex-specific features to be able to provide a tailored diagnostic approach and therapeutic management. The aim of this article is to review these aspects together with the challenges and the unique characteristics of different imaging modalities used for the diagnosis and follow-up of women with HF.

Sex-Related Differences in Mortality Following Admission for Acute Heart Failure Across the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Spectrum

Background

Following a heart failure (HF)‐decompensation, there is scarce data about sex‐related prognostic differences across left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) status. We sought to evaluate sex‐related differences in 6‐month mortality risk across LVEF following admission for acute HF.

Methods and Results

We retrospectively evaluated 4812 patients consecutively admitted for acute HF in a multicenter registry from 3 hospitals. Study end points were all‐cause, cardiovascular, and HF‐related mortality at 6‐month follow‐up. Multivariable Cox regression models were fitted to investigate sex‐related differences across LVEF. A total of 2243 (46.6%) patients were women, 2569 (53.4%) were men, and 2608 (54.2%) showed LVEF≥50%. At 6‐month follow‐up, 645 patients died (13.4%), being 544 (11.3%) and 416 (8.6%) cardiovascular and HF‐related deaths, respectively. LVEF was not independently associated with mortality (HR, 1.02; 95% CI 0.99–1.05; P=0.135). After multivariable adjustment, we found no sex‐related differences in all‐cause mortality (P value for interaction=0.168). However, a significant interaction between sex and cardiovascular and HF mortality risks was found across LVEF (P value for interaction=0.030 and 0.007, respectively). Compared with men, women had a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular and HF‐mortality at LVEF<25% and <43%, respectively. On the contrary, women showed a higher risk of HF‐mortality at the upper extreme of LVEF (>80%).

Conclusions

Following an admission for acute HF, no sex‐related differences were found in all‐cause mortality risk. However, when compared with men, women showed a lower risk of cardiovascular and HF‐mortality at the lower extreme of LVEF. On the contrary, they showed a higher risk of HF death at the upper extreme.

Gender differences in characteristics and outcomes in heart failure patients referred for end-stage treatment

Aims

Despite signals from clinical trials and mechanistic studies implying different resilience to heart failure (HF) depending on gender, the impact of gender on presentation and outcomes in patients with HF remains unclear. This study assessed the impact of gender on clinical presentation and outcomes in patients with HF referred to a specialised tertiary HF service.

Methods and results

Consecutive patients with HF referred to a specialised tertiary HF service offering advanced therapy options including left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) and heart transplantation were prospectively enrolled from August 2015 until March 2018. We assessed clinical characteristics at baseline and performed survival analyses and age‐adjusted Cox regression analyses in men vs. women for all‐cause death and a combined disease‐related endpoint comprising death, heart transplantation, and LVAD implantation. Analyses were performed for the overall study population and for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Of 356 patients included, 283 (79.5%) were male. The median age was 58 years (interquartile range 50–67). Two hundred and fifty‐one (74.5%) patients had HFrEF. HF aetiology, ejection fraction, functional status measures, and most of the cardiac and non‐cardiac comorbidities did not differ between men and women. In a median follow‐up of 3.2 years, 50 patients died (45 men, 5 women), 15 patients underwent LVAD implantation, and 8 patients heart transplantation. While all‐cause death was not significantly different between both genders in the overall population [16.9 vs. 6.0%, P = 0.065, hazard ratio (HR) 2.29 (95% confidence interval 0.91–5.78), P = 0.078], in the HFrEF subgroup, a significant difference between men and women was observed [20.7% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.017, HR 3.67 (95% confidence interval 1.13–11.91), P = 0.031]. The combined endpoint was more often reached in men than in women in both the overall population [21.6% vs. 9.0%, P = 0.053, HR 2.51 (1.08–5.82), P = 0.032] and the HFrEF subgroup [27.1% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.015, HR 3.58 (1.29–9.94), P = 0.014].

Conclusions

Patients referred to a specialised tertiary HF service showed a similar clinical profile without relevant gender differences. In the mid‐term follow‐up, more male than female patients died or underwent heart transplantation and LVAD implantation. These findings call for independent validation and for further research into gender‐specific drivers of HF progression.

Sex-Specific Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral-Valve Repair and Medical Therapy for Mitral Regurgitation in Heart Failure

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the sex-specific outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with 3+ and 4+ secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) treated with transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) plus guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) versus GDMT alone in the COAPT trial.

BACKGROUND

The impact of sex in patients with HF and severe SMR treated with TMVr with the MitraClip compared with GDMT alone is unknown.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to TMVr versus GDMT alone. Two-year outcomes were examined according to sex.

RESULTS

Among 614 patients, 221 (36.0%) were women. Women were younger than men and had fewer comorbidities, but reduced quality of life and functional capacity at baseline. In a joint frailty model accounting for the competing risk of death, the 2-year cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint of all HF hospitalizations (HFH) was higher in men compared with women treated with GDMT alone. However, the relative reduction in HFHs with TMVr was greater in men (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.34-0.54) than women (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.57-1.05) (P_interaction = 0.002). A significant interaction between TMVr versus GDMT alone treatment and time was present for all HFHs in women (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.39-0.84, and HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.83-2.33 between 0-1 year and 1-2 years after randomization, respectively, P_interaction = 0.007) but not in men (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.36-0.64, and HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.21-0.51; P_interaction = 0.16). Female sex was independently associated with a lower adjusted risk of death at 2 years (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46-0.90; P = 0.011). TMVr consistently reduced 2-year mortality compared with GDMT alone, irrespective of sex (P_interaction = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

In the COAPT trial, TMVr with the MitraClip resulted in improved clinical outcomes compared with GDMT alone, irrespective of sex. However, the impact of TMVr in reducing HFH was less pronounced in women compared with men beyond the first year after treatment. (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation [The COAPT Tria] [COAPT]; NCT01626079).

The Impact of Preeclampsia on Women's Health: Cardiovascular Long-term Implications

Importance

Women with a history of preeclampsia have a 2- to 5-fold increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, which represent almost half of mortality in the female population worldwide.

Objective

To summarize the current evidence concerning women's future cardiovascular risk after pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia.

Evidence Acquisition

A PubMed and Web of Science search was conducted in English, supplemented by hand searching for additional references. Retrieved articles were reviewed, synthesized, and summarized. Relevant studies on cardiovascular risk after preeclampsia were included.

Results

Evidence suggests that the cardiovascular implications of preeclampsia do not cease with delivery, with a significant proportion of women demonstrating persistent asymptomatic myocardial impairment, aortic stiffening, and microcirculatory dysfunction. More severe and early-onset preeclampsia, as well as preeclampsia with concurrent neonatal morbidity, increases the risk of cardiovascular disease later in life.

Conclusions and Relevance

As former preeclamptics have been shown to be at increased cardiovascular risk, this identifies a subgroup of women who may benefit from early preventive measures.

Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Females with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This narrative review synthesizes sex differences in guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) use and response among female patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), discusses female representation in HFrEF clinical trials, and outlines future areas of investigation to reduce sex disparities in HFrEF care globally.

RECENT FINDINGS

Observational registries suggest sex-specific disparities persist in GDMT rates, and there may be key sex-specific differences in optimal dosing of GDMT in HFrEF patients. Underrepresentation of female patients in HF clinical trials is a key barrier, and sex disparities in HF clinical trial leadership may influence sex-specific knowledge generation of medical management of HFrEF patients. There are important sex-specific differences in GDMT use and response among female HFrEF patients that warrant further study. Increasing female representation in HFrEF clinical trials, diversifying HF trial leadership, and embedding sex-specific approaches in the lifecycle of research from conception to reporting are essential to decreasing sex disparities in clinical care of all HFrEF patients.

Comorbidities Associated with One-Year Mortality in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly coexist and patients with both diseases have a worse prognosis than those with HF or AF alone. The objective of our study was to identify the factors associated with one-year mortality in patients with HF and AF, depending on the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

METHODS

We included 727 patients with HF and AF consecutively admitted in a clinical emergency hospital between January 2018 and December 2019. The inclusion criteria were age of more than 18 years, diagnosis of chronic HF and AF (paroxysmal, persistent, permanent), and signed informed consent. The exclusion criteria were the absence of echocardiographic data, a suboptimal ultrasound view, and other cardiac rhythms than AF. The patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1 (337 patients with AF and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)), group 2 (112 patients with AF and HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF)), and group 3 (278 patients with AF and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)).

RESULTS

The one-year mortality rates were 36.49% in group 1, 27.67% in group 2, and 27.69% in group 3. The factors that increased one-year mortality were chronic kidney disease (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.45-3.83), coronary artery disease (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.06-2.62), and diabetes (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.05-2.67) in patients with HFrEF; and hypertension in patients with HFpEF (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.36-4.39).

CONCLUSIONS

One-year mortality in patients with HF and AF is influenced by different factors, depending on the LVEF.

Identification of sex-specific biomarkers predicting new-onset heart failure

Aims

Heart failure (HF) is common in both men and women, yet disease pathophysiology, presentation, and progression differ between sexes. Studies addressing whether biomarkers predict new onset HF sex‐specifically are scarce. This study therefore aims to test the sex‐specificity of 252 protein biomarkers for new‐onset HF.

Methods and results

A matched case–control design in patients selected from cohorts within the HOMAGE consortium was used. Cases (new‐onset HF, n = 562) and controls (n = 780) were matched for cohort (PREDICTOR, HEALTH‐ABC, & PROSPER), follow‐up time (defined as time from entry to incident HF), and age. Incident HF was defined as first hospitalization for HF. Targeted plasma proteins (n = 252) were measured using Proximity Extension Assay technology from O‐link. To look for sex differences for new onset HF, we adjusted for cohort, age, and baseline clinical parameters. At baseline, women had a biomarker profile reflecting activated metabolism and immune responses. However, none of the biomarkers had a significant interaction with sex in predicting new onset HF, but four biomarkers had a trend towards sex‐specificity (P < 0.013). E‐selectin and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist were more female‐specific, whereas IL17A and CHIT1 tended to be male sex‐specific for incident HF.

Conclusions

The majority of biomarkers associated with incident HF did not significantly differ between women and men, despite clear differences in biomarkers at baseline.

Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin in Men and Women With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Prespecified Analysis of the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure Trial

Importance

Women may respond differently to certain treatments for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) than men.

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin compared with placebo in men and women with HFrEF enrolled in the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure trial (DAPA-HF).

Design, Setting, and Participants

Prespecified subgroup analysis of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial conducted at 410 sites in 20 countries. Patients with New York Heart Association functional class II through IV with an ejection fraction of 40% or less and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide were eligible. Data were analyzed between June 2020 and January 2021.

Interventions

Addition of once-daily 10 mg of dapagliflozin or placebo to guideline-recommended therapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the composite of an episode of worsening HF (HF hospitalization or urgent HF visit requiring intravenous therapy) or cardiovascular death.

Results

A total of 4744 patients were randomized in DAPA-HF, of whom 1109 were women (23.4%). Compared with placebo, dapagliflozin reduced the risk of worsening HF events or cardiovascular death to a similar extent in both men and women (hazard ratios, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.63-0.85] and 0.79 [95% CI, 0.59-1.06], respectively; P for interaction = .67). Consistent benefits were observed for the components of the primary outcome and all-cause mortality. Compared with placebo, dapagliflozin increased the proportion of patients with a meaningful improvement in symptoms (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score of ≥5 points; men, 59% vs 50%; women, 57% vs 54%; P for interaction = .14) and decreased the proportion with worsening symptoms (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score decrease of ≥5 points; men, 25% vs 34%; women, 27% vs 31%; P for interaction = .15), irrespective of sex. Results were consistent for the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score and overall summary score. Study drug discontinuation and serious adverse events were not more frequent in the dapagliflozin group than in the placebo group in either men or women.

Conclusions and Relevance

Dapagliflozin reduced the risk of worsening HF, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death and improved symptoms, physical function, and health-related quality of life similarly in men and women with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. In addition, dapagliflozin was safe and well-tolerated irrespective of sex.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03036124.

Beta-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system for chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system improve survival and reduce morbidity in people with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); a review of the evidence is required to determine whether these treatments are beneficial for people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in people with HFpEF.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and one clinical trial register on 14 May 2020 to identify eligible studies, with no language or date restrictions. We checked references from trial reports and review articles for additional studies.  SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials with a parallel group design, enrolling adults with HFpEF, defined by LVEF greater than 40%.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 41 randomised controlled trials (231 reports), totalling 23,492 participants across all comparisons. The risk of bias was frequently unclear and only five studies had a low risk of bias in all domains. Beta-blockers (BBs) We included 10 studies (3087 participants) investigating BBs. Five studies used a placebo comparator and in five the comparator was usual care. The mean age of participants ranged from 30 years to 81 years. A possible reduction in cardiovascular mortality was observed (risk ratio (RR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.99; number needed to treat for an additional benefit (NNTB) 25; 1046 participants; three studies), however, the certainty of evidence was low. There may be little to no effect on all-cause mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.00; 1105 participants; four studies; low-certainty evidence). The effects on heart failure hospitalisation, hyperkalaemia, and quality of life remain uncertain. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) We included 13 studies (4459 participants) investigating MRA. Eight studies used a placebo comparator and in five the comparator was usual care. The mean age of participants ranged from 54.5 to 80 years. Pooled analysis indicated that MRA treatment probably reduces heart failure hospitalisation (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.98; NNTB = 41; 3714 participants; three studies; moderate-certainty evidence). However, MRA treatment probably has little or no effect on all-cause mortality (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.06; 4207 participants; five studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.11; 4070 participants; three studies; moderate-certainty evidence). MRA treatment may have little or no effect on quality of life measures (mean difference (MD) 0.84, 95% CI -2.30 to 3.98; 511 participants; three studies; low-certainty evidence). MRA treatment was associated with a higher risk of hyperkalaemia (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.77 to 2.51; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) = 11; 4291 participants; six studies; high-certainty evidence). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) We included eight studies (2061 participants) investigating ACEIs. Three studies used a placebo comparator and in five the comparator was usual care. The mean age of participants ranged from 70 to 82 years. Pooled analyses with moderate-certainty evidence suggest that ACEI treatment likely has little or no effect on cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.42; 945 participants; two studies), all-cause mortality (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.45; 1187 participants; five studies) and heart failure hospitalisation (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.15; 1019 participants; three studies), and may result in little or no effect on the quality of life (MD -0.09, 95% CI -3.66 to 3.48; 154 participants; two studies; low-certainty evidence). The effects on hyperkalaemia remain uncertain. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) Eight studies (8755 participants) investigating ARBs were included. Five studies used a placebo comparator and in three the comparator was usual care. The mean age of participants ranged from 61 to 75 years. Pooled analyses with high certainty of evidence suggest that ARB treatment has little or no effect on cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.02, 95% 0.90 to 1.14; 7254 participants; three studies), all-cause mortality (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.11; 7964 participants; four studies), heart failure hospitalisation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.02; 7254 participants; three studies), and quality of life (MD 0.41, 95% CI -0.86 to 1.67; 3117 participants; three studies). ARB was associated with a higher risk of hyperkalaemia (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.33; 7148 participants; two studies; high-certainty evidence). Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) Three studies (7702 participants) investigating ARNIs were included. Two studies used ARBs as the comparator and one used standardised medical therapy, based on participants' established treatments at enrolment. The mean age of participants ranged from 71 to 73 years. Results suggest that ARNIs may have little or no effect on cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.15; 4796 participants; one study; moderate-certainty evidence), all-cause mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.11; 7663 participants; three studies; high-certainty evidence), or quality of life (high-certainty evidence). However, ARNI treatment may result in a slight reduction in heart failure hospitalisation, compared to usual care (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.00; 7362 participants; two studies; moderate-certainty evidence). ARNI treatment was associated with a reduced risk of hyperkalaemia compared with valsartan (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.01; 5054 participants; two studies; moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that MRA and ARNI treatment in HFpEF probably reduces heart failure hospitalisation but probably has little or no effect on cardiovascular mortality and quality of life. BB treatment may reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality, however, further trials are needed. The current evidence for BBs, ACEIs, and ARBs is limited and does not support their use in HFpEF in the absence of an alternative indication. Although MRAs and ARNIs are probably effective at reducing the risk of heart failure hospitalisation, the treatment effect sizes are modest. There is a need for improved approaches to patient stratification to identify the subgroup of patients who are most likely to benefit from MRAs and ARNIs, as well as for an improved understanding of disease biology, and for new therapeutic approaches.

Sex-related differences in the pharmacological treatment of heart failure

Heart failure (HF) represents a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. However, HF trials highlighted many differences between men and women with HF. Thus, women represent approximately a quarter of people with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), while they account for over half of those with HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). There are also sex-related differences (SRDs) in the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety profile of some guideline-recommended drugs for the treatment of HF. As compared with men, women with HFrEF are less often treated with guideline-recommended HF drugs, experience more frequent and severe adverse reactions when these drugs are prescribed at the same doses in both sexes, and recent evidence suggests that women might need lower doses than men, bringing into question which are the optimal doses of HF drugs in women and men separately. However, information on SRDs in drug efficacy and safety in patients with HFrEF is very limited due to the underrepresentation of women and the lack of sex-specific evaluations of drug efficacy and safety in HF clinical trials. As a consequence, current clinical guidelines do not provide sex-specific recommendations, even when significant differences exist, at least, in drug safety. The aim of this article is to review the SRDs in the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of guideline-recommended HF drugs and to identify emerging areas of research to improve our understanding of the SRDs, because a better understanding of these differences is the first step to achieve a personalized treatment of HF in women and men.

Effect of Gonadectomy and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockade in a Mouse Model of Isoproterenol-induced Cardiac Diastolic Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Although heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is more common in postmenopausal women than in men, the effect of sex hormones on cardiac diastolic function remains unclear. We examined the effect of gonadectomy with or without the angiotensin receptor blocker olmesartan (Olm) in an isoproterenol (ISO) -induced mouse model of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and cardiac diastolic dysfunction.

METHODS

ISO or ISO with Olm were administered for 28 days in sham-operated male and female, castrated (CAS), and ovariectomized (OVX) mice. LV ejection fraction (EF) and E/A ratio were analyzed by echocardiography, and the LV and lung weight corrected by tibial length were used as indices of LVH and lung congestion, respectively.

RESULTS

On echocardiography, systolic function did not differ between the four groups. LV/tibial length (TL) and Lung/TL significantly increased in all groups. The LV/TL ratio was lower in castrated-ISO vs. Male-Sham-ISO but did not differ between Female-Sham-ISO and OVX-ISO. However, the Lung/TL ratio of OVX-ISO was greater than that of Female-Sham-ISO. Olm prevented LV hypertrophy in all groups. The decrease in E/A and increase in lung weight were improved by Olm in Male-Sham and OVX-ISO but not in the other groups.

CONCLUSION

These sex differences suggest that sex hormones play a pivotal role in modulating cardiac hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction induced by chronic β-adrenoceptor stimulation, and thus affect the therapeutic potential of angiotensin receptor blockade.

Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Outcomes in CKD: Findings From the CRIC Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Cardiovascular events are less common in women than men in general populations; however, studies in chronic kidney disease (CKD) are less conclusive. We evaluated sex-related differences in cardiovascular events and death in adults with CKD.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

1,778 women and 2,161 men enrolled in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC).

EXPOSURE

Sex (women vs men).

OUTCOME

Atherosclerotic composite outcome (myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral artery disease), incident heart failure, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up period of 9.6 years, we observed 698 atherosclerotic events (women, 264; men, 434), 762 heart failure events (women, 331; men, 431), 435 cardiovascular deaths (women, 163; men, 274), and 1,158 deaths from any cause (women, 449; men, 709). In analyses adjusted for sociodemographic, clinical, and metabolic parameters, women had a lower risk of atherosclerotic events (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.57-0.88]), heart failure (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.62-0.93]), cardiovascular death (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.42-0.72]), and death from any cause (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.49-0.69]) compared with men. These associations remained statistically significant after adjusting for cardiac and inflammation biomarkers.

LIMITATIONS

Assessment of sex hormones, which may play a role in cardiovascular risk, was not included.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large, diverse cohort of adults with CKD, compared with men, women had lower risks of cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and mortality from any cause. These differences were not explained by measured cardiovascular risk factors.

Gender-related clinical and management differences in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

AIM

Gender-related differences have been described in the clinical characteristics and management of patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, published data are conflictive in this regard.

METHODS

We investigated differences in clinical and management variables between male and female patients from the ATA study, a prospective, multicentre, observational study that included 1462 outpatients with chronic HFrEF between January and June 2019.

RESULTS

Study population was predominantly male (70.1%). In comparison to men, women with chronic HFrEF were older (66 ± 11 years vs 69 ± 12 years, P < .001), suffered more hospitalisations and presented more frequently with NYHA class III or IV symptoms. Ischaemic heart disease was more frequent in men, whereas anaemia, thyroid disease and depression were more frequent in women. No difference was seen between genders in the use rate of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, or ivabradine, or in the proportion of patients achieving target doses of these drugs. Regarding device therapies, men were more often treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and women received more cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

CONCLUSION

In summary, although management seemed to be equivalent between genders, women tended to present with more symptoms, require hospitalisation more frequently and have different comorbidities than men. These results highlight the importance of gender-related differences in HFrEF and call for further research to clarify the causes of these disparities. Gender-specific recommendations should be included in future guidelines in HFrEF.

Sex differences in heart failure medications targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system

Heart failure (HF) is a major healthcare problem. Sex-related differences in clinical manifestations, outcomes, risk factors and symptoms in HF have been described in the literature. Sex-related differences have also been described in the regulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), which is at the core of the pathophysiology of HF. Considering that drugs targeting RAAS are cornerstones in the treatment of HF, it is important to determine whether sex-related differences exist in the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and ARB/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs). In regards to the relative efficacy of RAAS drugs in men vs. women in HF, there are conflicting results, which may stem from the fact that a lot of clinical trials were not specifically designed to investigate sex differences, with many of them having an underrepresentation of women. With respect to optimal dosage of RAAS drugs, even though, current HF guidelines, recommend up-titration to the same target dose in both men and women, evidence suggests that lower doses could be used in women. Furthermore, several studies have reported underutilization of guideline-directed medical therapy in women, including ACEIs, ARBs and MRAs, which may be at least partially attributed to increased prevalence of HF with a preserved ejection fraction and increased propensity for adverse effects in women. Overall, these investigations have shed some light on sex-related differences but there is scope for conducting further studies to determine the optimal use of RAAS drugs in men and women with failing hearts.

Palliative Care for People Living With Heart Disease-Does Sex Make a Difference?

The distribution of individual heart disease differs among women and men and, parallel to this, among particular age groups. Women are usually affected by cardiovascular disease at an older age than men, and as the prevalence of comorbidities (like diabetes or chronic pain syndromes) grows with age, women suffer from a higher number of symptoms (such as pain and breathlessness) than men. Women live longer, and after a husband or partner's death, they suffer from a stronger sense of loneliness, are more dependent on institutionalized care and have more unaddressed needs than men. Heart failure (HF) is a common end-stage pathway of many cardiovascular diseases and causes substantial symptom burden and suffering despite optimal cardiologic treatment. Modern, personalized medicine makes every effort, including close cooperation between disciplines, to alleviate them as efficiently as possible. Palliative Care (PC) interventions include symptom management, psychosocial and spiritual support. In complex situations they are provided by a specialized multiprofessional team, but usually the application of PC principles by the healthcare team responsible for the person is sufficient. PC should be involved in usual care to improve the quality of life of patients and their relatives as soon as appropriate needs emerge. Even at less advanced stages of disease, PC is an additional layer of support added to disease modifying management, not only at the end-of-life. The relatively scarce data suggest sex-specific differences in symptom pathophysiology, distribution and the requisite management needed for their successful alleviation. This paper summarizes the sex-related differences in PC needs and in the wide range of interventions (from medical treatment to spiritual support) that can be considered to optimally address them.

Perceived Stress, Subjective, and Objective Symptoms of Disturbed Sleep in Men and Women with Stable Heart Failure

Objective/Background: Sleep disturbance is prevalent among patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Stress also affects health and quality of life among patients with cardiovascular disease and likely plays a prominent role in HF. However, little is known about the associations between stress and sleep among HF patients.Participants: One hundred fifty-three stable New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification I-IV HF patients with at least low symptoms of insomnia (M_age:63.0 ± 12.8, 42% Women).Methods: We examined baseline stress, sleep disturbance, and sleep-related characteristics from a randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, including the Perceived Stress Scale, Insomnia Severity Index, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Sleep Disturbance Questionnaire, Dysfunctional Beliefs about Sleep Scale, PROMIS Cognitive Ability, SF-36 Mental Health, and wrist actigraphy. We used Pearson correlations and general linear models to assess stress-sleep associations, including the potential moderating effects of sex and symptom severity (NYHA).Results: There were moderate-to-large correlations between stress and self-reported sleep disturbance, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, cognitive ability, and mental health (p's < 0.01). High stress was associated with more objectively-measured (i.e., actigraph-assessed) awakenings and sleep fragmentation among women than men (β = - 0.04, p < 0.01; β = - 0.71, p = 0.04). Relationships between stress and objectively-measured sleep did not vary by symptom severity.Conclusions: Perceived stress is related to sleep disturbance among HF patients, and effects may be sex-dependent. Subsequent research should determine the temporal links between sleep and stress, and optimal opportunities for intervention among HF patients.

Sex Influence on Heart Failure Prognosis

Heart failure (HF) affects 1-2% of the population in developed countries and ~50% of patients living with it are women. Compared to men, women are more likely to be older and suffer hypertension, valvular heart disease, and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Since the number of women included in prospective HF studies has been low, much information regarding HF in women has been inferred from clinical trials observations in men and data obtained from registries. Several relevant sex-related differences in HF patients have been described, including biological mechanisms, age, etiology, precipitating factors, comorbidities, left ventricular ejection fraction, treatment effects, and prognosis. Women have greater clinical severity of HF, with more symptoms and worse functional class. However, females with HF have better prognosis compared to males. This survival advantage is particularly impressive given that women are less likely to receive guideline-proven therapies for HF than men. The reasons for this better prognosis are unknown but prior pregnancies may play a role. In this review article we aim to describe sex-related differences in HF and how these differences might explain why women with HF can expect to survive longer than men.

Sex Differences in Clinical Characteristics and 2-Year Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Grouped by Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Status

After the new left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) classification criteria emerged, many studies have focused on the differences between heart failure (HF) with reduced EF (HFrEF), HF with midrange EF (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). However, the lack of consensus on sex-related differences in prognosis within the new standard remains. We aimed to explore sex differences in the clinical characteristics and prognoses of Chinese inpatients with HF defined according to the new standard.From March 2014 to February 2016, 2284 patients with symptomatic HF were consecutively recruited to this prospective research. Case data and 2-year follow-up observations were used to identify sex differences in clinical characteristics and prognoses.When comparing men and women with HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF, women were older, were more likely to be hospitalized for the first diagnosis of HF, and had lower mean LVEF. Women had a higher tendency of all-cause mortality than did men at 3, 12, and 24 months following HF. After multivariate adjustment, the hazard ratios (HRs) for 24-month all-cause mortality for HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF were 1.113 (0.728, 1.704), P = 0.620; 1.063 (0.730, 1.548), P = 0.750; and 0.619 (0.240, 1.593), P = 0.320, for men versus women, respectively.There were some sex differences in the clinical characteristics of patients with symptomatic HF in HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF, but women and men had comparable outcomes over the 2-year period following hospitalization.